Omadacycline is a novel aminomethylcycline antibiotic that shows non-inferior efficacy to moxifloxacin in adults with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), but lacking clinical evidence in elderly patients with CAP. This randomized, controlled study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of omadacycline in elderly patients with CAP. Eligible elderly patients with CAP were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to the omadacycline group (n = 48) and moxifloxacin group (n = 49) to receive the corresponding agent. The primary endpoint was clinical response. The most common pathogens in the omadacycline and moxifloxacin groups were viridans streptococci (16.7%, 16.3%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (14.6%, 14.3%), and Neisseria sicca (14.6%, 14.3%). Clinical response rate was greater in the omadacycline group compared to the moxifloxacin group (54.2% vs 26.5%, P = .032). The omadacycline group showed higher significant improvement rate (41.7% vs 16.3%, P = .02), but similar complete recovery (12.5% vs 10.2%, P = .737), effective improvement (37.5% vs 59.2%, P = .125), and ineffectiveness (8.3% vs 14.3%, P = .384) rates compared to the moxifloxacin group. Results of C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and interleukin-6 at baseline and after treatment, as well as their changes did not vary between the omadacycline and moxifloxacin groups (all P > .05). No difference was observed in liver, kidney, and coagulation function parameters between the two groups (all P > .05). Omadacycline indicates greater treatment efficacy and comparable safety profiles versus moxifloxacin in elderly patients with CAP.
奥马达环素是一种新型氨甲基环素类抗生素,在成人社区获得性肺炎(CAP)中显示出不逊于莫西沙星的疗效,但在老年CAP患者中缺乏临床证据。本研究旨在探讨奥马达环素治疗老年CAP患者的疗效和安全性。符合条件的老年CAP患者按1:1的比例随机分为奥马达环素组(n = 48)和莫西沙星组(n = 49)接受相应的药物治疗。主要终点是临床反应。奥马达环素组和莫西沙星组最常见的致病菌为翠绿链球菌(16.7%、16.3%)、肺炎克雷伯菌(14.6%、14.3%)和镰刀奈瑟菌(14.6%、14.3%)。与莫西沙星组相比,奥马达环素组的临床缓解率更高(54.2% vs 26.5%, P = 0.032)。与莫西沙星组相比,奥马达环素组的显着改善率更高(41.7% vs 16.3%, P = 0.02),但完全恢复率(12.5% vs 10.2%, P = 0.737)、有效改善率(37.5% vs 59.2%, P = 0.125)、无效率(8.3% vs 14.3%, P = 0.384)相似。c反应蛋白、降钙素原和白细胞介素-6在治疗前和治疗后的变化,以及它们在奥马达环素组和莫西沙星组之间的变化没有差异(均P < 0.05)。两组患者肝、肾、凝血功能指标比较差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。与莫西沙星相比,奥马达环素在老年CAP患者中显示出更高的治疗效果和相当的安全性。
{"title":"Comparison of Efficacy and Safety Profiles Between Omadacycline and Moxifloxacin in Elderly Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.","authors":"Muming Yu, Xiaorong Wang, Sitong Wu, Zikang Zhou, Yancun Liu, Yanfen Chai","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1627","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.1627","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Omadacycline is a novel aminomethylcycline antibiotic that shows non-inferior efficacy to moxifloxacin in adults with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), but lacking clinical evidence in elderly patients with CAP. This randomized, controlled study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of omadacycline in elderly patients with CAP. Eligible elderly patients with CAP were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to the omadacycline group (n = 48) and moxifloxacin group (n = 49) to receive the corresponding agent. The primary endpoint was clinical response. The most common pathogens in the omadacycline and moxifloxacin groups were viridans streptococci (16.7%, 16.3%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (14.6%, 14.3%), and Neisseria sicca (14.6%, 14.3%). Clinical response rate was greater in the omadacycline group compared to the moxifloxacin group (54.2% vs 26.5%, P = .032). The omadacycline group showed higher significant improvement rate (41.7% vs 16.3%, P = .02), but similar complete recovery (12.5% vs 10.2%, P = .737), effective improvement (37.5% vs 59.2%, P = .125), and ineffectiveness (8.3% vs 14.3%, P = .384) rates compared to the moxifloxacin group. Results of C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and interleukin-6 at baseline and after treatment, as well as their changes did not vary between the omadacycline and moxifloxacin groups (all P > .05). No difference was observed in liver, kidney, and coagulation function parameters between the two groups (all P > .05). Omadacycline indicates greater treatment efficacy and comparable safety profiles versus moxifloxacin in elderly patients with CAP.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145562620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Yang Song, Krischan Hudson, Zhan Ye, Lisa Hawley, Brajesh Pandey, Jennifer Zarzoso, John Rogowski, Yajing Sun, William A Rees, Yan Xin
Fipaxalparant, a small molecule and negative allosteric modulator of lysophosphatidic acid receptor 1, is being evaluated in phase 2 clinical trials of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis. This phase 1, open-label, crossover, 3-cohort study in healthy adults evaluated mutual drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between fipaxalparant and the IPF medications pirfenidone and nintedanib, as well as the effects of itraconazole (P-glycoprotein inhibitor) and rifampin (potent organic anion transporting polypeptide [OATP] inhibitor) on fipaxalparant. Participants received a single oral dose of fipaxalparant 300 mg. Overall, 16, 20, and 15 participants completed the study in cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The study demonstrated no relevant mutual DDIs between fipaxalparant and pirfenidone/nintedanib at clinical doses. There was no effect of itraconazole 400 mg on fipaxalparant exposure. A single rifampin 600 mg dose caused 1.48-fold and 1.86-fold increases in fipaxalparant Cmax and AUC0-∞, respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events were mild/moderate with fipaxalparant alone or with the other study drugs. Overall, fipaxalparant absorption in vivo occurs independently of the P-glycoprotein-mediated gut efflux pathway, and fipaxalparant is a clinically relevant OATP substrate. Results of this DDI study will inform the management of concomitant medications of ongoing/future trials of fipaxalparant.
{"title":"A pharmacokinetics study to evaluate drug-drug interactions between fipaxalparant and concomitant medications in healthy participants.","authors":"Yang Song, Krischan Hudson, Zhan Ye, Lisa Hawley, Brajesh Pandey, Jennifer Zarzoso, John Rogowski, Yajing Sun, William A Rees, Yan Xin","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1621","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.1621","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fipaxalparant, a small molecule and negative allosteric modulator of lysophosphatidic acid receptor 1, is being evaluated in phase 2 clinical trials of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis. This phase 1, open-label, crossover, 3-cohort study in healthy adults evaluated mutual drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between fipaxalparant and the IPF medications pirfenidone and nintedanib, as well as the effects of itraconazole (P-glycoprotein inhibitor) and rifampin (potent organic anion transporting polypeptide [OATP] inhibitor) on fipaxalparant. Participants received a single oral dose of fipaxalparant 300 mg. Overall, 16, 20, and 15 participants completed the study in cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The study demonstrated no relevant mutual DDIs between fipaxalparant and pirfenidone/nintedanib at clinical doses. There was no effect of itraconazole 400 mg on fipaxalparant exposure. A single rifampin 600 mg dose caused 1.48-fold and 1.86-fold increases in fipaxalparant C<sub>max</sub> and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub>, respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events were mild/moderate with fipaxalparant alone or with the other study drugs. Overall, fipaxalparant absorption in vivo occurs independently of the P-glycoprotein-mediated gut efflux pathway, and fipaxalparant is a clinically relevant OATP substrate. Results of this DDI study will inform the management of concomitant medications of ongoing/future trials of fipaxalparant.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145548571","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Olopatadine hydrochloride, a second-generation selective histamine H1 receptor antagonist, is an effective anti-allergic agent. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of two olopatadine hydrochloride tablet formulations in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting (n = 24) and fed (n = 24) conditions. A single-center, randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-way crossover study was conducted, in which 48 subjects were randomized to receive 5 mg of the test or reference formulation, followed by a 7-day washout period. Blood samples were collected at predefined intervals up to 24 h post-dose, and olopatadine plasma concentrations were measured using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. The results demonstrated no significant differences in the pharmacokinetic profiles between the test and reference formulations under fasting or fed conditions. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratio of geometric means of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ of olopatadine hydrochloride under both conditions were within the bioequivalence range of 0.80-1.25. A high-fat diet delayed olopatadine hydrochloride absorption, leading to a reduction in Cmax to approximately 60% of the fasting value and a decrease in AUC to 85%-90%. No serious adverse events occurred, and safety profiles were comparable between formulations. This research confirmed the bioequivalence and similar safety of the generic olopatadine hydrochloride tablets to the reference formulation.
{"title":"Bioequivalence Study of Two Olopatadine Hydrochloride Tablets in Chinese Healthy Subjects Under Fasting and Fed Conditions.","authors":"Yuyan Lei, Fang Pei, Qingqi Wu, Guiling Xiong, Fengzhi Liu, Xintong Wang, Lulu Chen, Chao Li, Ling Zhou, Qing Fang, Weiming Chen, Dongsheng Ouyang, Xiaohui Li","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1629","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.1629","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Olopatadine hydrochloride, a second-generation selective histamine H1 receptor antagonist, is an effective anti-allergic agent. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of two olopatadine hydrochloride tablet formulations in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting (n = 24) and fed (n = 24) conditions. A single-center, randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-way crossover study was conducted, in which 48 subjects were randomized to receive 5 mg of the test or reference formulation, followed by a 7-day washout period. Blood samples were collected at predefined intervals up to 24 h post-dose, and olopatadine plasma concentrations were measured using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. The results demonstrated no significant differences in the pharmacokinetic profiles between the test and reference formulations under fasting or fed conditions. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratio of geometric means of C<sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0-t</sub>, and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> of olopatadine hydrochloride under both conditions were within the bioequivalence range of 0.80-1.25. A high-fat diet delayed olopatadine hydrochloride absorption, leading to a reduction in C<sub>max</sub> to approximately 60% of the fasting value and a decrease in AUC to 85%-90%. No serious adverse events occurred, and safety profiles were comparable between formulations. This research confirmed the bioequivalence and similar safety of the generic olopatadine hydrochloride tablets to the reference formulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145548577","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Navodi Sandamini Jayathilaka, Arunodya Vishwanthi Weththasinghe, Nila Ganamurali, Sarvesh Sabarathinam
Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists have become frontline agents in obesity treatment due to their efficacy. However, there is considerable inter-individual variability in treatment response. Although these agents are primarily degraded by proteolytic enzymes rather than cytochrome P450 (CYP) pathways, pharmacogenomic factors may indirectly influence therapeutic outcomes. This review investigates the role of CYP2D6 polymorphisms in optimizing GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy in obesity. It explores genetic influences on treatment variability and highlights the importance of personalized dosing strategies. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science (1990-2025) was conducted using terms such as "CYP2D6 polymorphisms," "GLP-1 receptor agonists," "pharmacogenomics," and "personalized medicine." Emphasis was placed on primary experimental studies. While GLP-1RAs are not CYP2D6 substrates, pharmacogenomic factors play a key role through indirect mechanisms. ARRB1 (rs140226575 and Thr370Met) and GLP1R (rs6923761 and Gly168Ser) variants affect glycemic response. CYP2D6 polymorphisms significantly influence metabolism of concomitant medications (e.g., antidepressants and beta-blockers), affecting efficacy and safety. Ethnic variability in CYP2D6 allele frequencies further underscores the need for tailored approaches. Integrating pharmacogenomic data, including CYP2D6 status, can support personalized obesity management and improve clinical outcomes. The primary metabolizers of GLP-1 receptor agonists are proteolytic enzymes; nevertheless, pharmacogenomic heterogeneity influences treatment results via both direct and indirect mechanisms. Variants in CYP2D6 polymorphisms have an indirect impact on treatment outcomes through changed metabolism of concurrent drugs including beta-blockers and antidepressants, while variations in GLP1R and ARRB1 directly affect receptor signaling and weight loss effectiveness.
胰高血糖素样肽-1 (GLP-1)受体激动剂因其疗效已成为肥胖症治疗的一线药物。然而,治疗反应存在相当大的个体差异。尽管这些药物主要通过蛋白水解酶而不是细胞色素P450 (CYP)途径降解,但药物基因组学因素可能间接影响治疗结果。本文综述了CYP2D6多态性在优化GLP-1受体激动剂治疗肥胖中的作用。它探讨了基因对治疗变异性的影响,并强调了个性化给药策略的重要性。使用“CYP2D6多态性”、“GLP-1受体激动剂”、“药物基因组学”和“个性化医疗”等术语对PubMed、Embase和Web of Science(1990-2025)进行了系统搜索。重点放在初步实验研究上。虽然GLP-1RAs不是CYP2D6底物,但药物基因组学因子通过间接机制发挥关键作用。ARRB1 (rs140226575和Thr370Met)和GLP1R (rs6923761和Gly168Ser)变异影响血糖反应。CYP2D6多态性显著影响伴随用药(如抗抑郁药和β受体阻滞剂)的代谢,影响疗效和安全性。CYP2D6等位基因频率的种族差异进一步强调了定制方法的必要性。整合药物基因组学数据,包括CYP2D6状态,可以支持个性化肥胖管理并改善临床结果。GLP-1受体激动剂的主要代谢物是蛋白水解酶;然而,药物基因组异质性通过直接和间接的机制影响治疗结果。CYP2D6多态性的变异通过改变同期药物(包括β受体阻滞剂和抗抑郁药)的代谢间接影响治疗结果,而GLP1R和ARRB1的变异直接影响受体信号传导和减肥效果。
{"title":"Integrating Pharmacogenomic Insights in GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Therapy: Direct GLP1R and ARRB1 Variants and Indirect CYP2D6 Influences in Personalized Obesity Management.","authors":"Navodi Sandamini Jayathilaka, Arunodya Vishwanthi Weththasinghe, Nila Ganamurali, Sarvesh Sabarathinam","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1624","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.1624","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists have become frontline agents in obesity treatment due to their efficacy. However, there is considerable inter-individual variability in treatment response. Although these agents are primarily degraded by proteolytic enzymes rather than cytochrome P450 (CYP) pathways, pharmacogenomic factors may indirectly influence therapeutic outcomes. This review investigates the role of CYP2D6 polymorphisms in optimizing GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy in obesity. It explores genetic influences on treatment variability and highlights the importance of personalized dosing strategies. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science (1990-2025) was conducted using terms such as \"CYP2D6 polymorphisms,\" \"GLP-1 receptor agonists,\" \"pharmacogenomics,\" and \"personalized medicine.\" Emphasis was placed on primary experimental studies. While GLP-1RAs are not CYP2D6 substrates, pharmacogenomic factors play a key role through indirect mechanisms. ARRB1 (rs140226575 and Thr370Met) and GLP1R (rs6923761 and Gly168Ser) variants affect glycemic response. CYP2D6 polymorphisms significantly influence metabolism of concomitant medications (e.g., antidepressants and beta-blockers), affecting efficacy and safety. Ethnic variability in CYP2D6 allele frequencies further underscores the need for tailored approaches. Integrating pharmacogenomic data, including CYP2D6 status, can support personalized obesity management and improve clinical outcomes. The primary metabolizers of GLP-1 receptor agonists are proteolytic enzymes; nevertheless, pharmacogenomic heterogeneity influences treatment results via both direct and indirect mechanisms. Variants in CYP2D6 polymorphisms have an indirect impact on treatment outcomes through changed metabolism of concurrent drugs including beta-blockers and antidepressants, while variations in GLP1R and ARRB1 directly affect receptor signaling and weight loss effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145522661","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Menghan Ye, Rui Zhang, Jing Wan, Jinping Zhou, Pengpeng Guo, Dianwen Yu, Peixia Li, Yani Liu, Shaojun Shi
This single-center, randomized, open-label bioequivalence program compared two fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablets containing ibuprofen (200 mg) and phenylephrine hydrochloride (10 mg) from different manufacturers in healthy Chinese adults under fasting and fed conditions. A three-period, partially replicated crossover design was used for the fasting study and a four-period, fully replicated crossover design for the fed study. Serial plasma samples were collected up to 16 h post-dose, and pharmacokinetic parameters included Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ for both analytes. Bioequivalence was assessed using average bioequivalence (ABE) when the within-subject standard deviation of the reference was <0.294 and reference-scaled ABE (RSABE) otherwise. The geometric mean ratios (90% CIs) for Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ of both ibuprofen and phenylephrine fell within 80%-125% in both nutritional states, with RSABE applied to phenylephrine Cmax where variability was high. Both products were well tolerated; adverse events were mild, comparable between test and reference, and no subject discontinued due to adverse events. These findings demonstrate bioequivalence of the two ibuprofen/phenylephrine FDC and support their similar safety profiles in healthy Chinese volunteers.
{"title":"Comparative Bioequivalence and Safety Evaluation of Ibuprofen/Phenylephrine Hydrochloride Fixed-Dose Combination Tablets in Healthy Chinese Volunteers.","authors":"Menghan Ye, Rui Zhang, Jing Wan, Jinping Zhou, Pengpeng Guo, Dianwen Yu, Peixia Li, Yani Liu, Shaojun Shi","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1625","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.1625","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This single-center, randomized, open-label bioequivalence program compared two fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablets containing ibuprofen (200 mg) and phenylephrine hydrochloride (10 mg) from different manufacturers in healthy Chinese adults under fasting and fed conditions. A three-period, partially replicated crossover design was used for the fasting study and a four-period, fully replicated crossover design for the fed study. Serial plasma samples were collected up to 16 h post-dose, and pharmacokinetic parameters included C<sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0-t</sub>, and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> for both analytes. Bioequivalence was assessed using average bioequivalence (ABE) when the within-subject standard deviation of the reference was <0.294 and reference-scaled ABE (RSABE) otherwise. The geometric mean ratios (90% CIs) for C<sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0-t</sub>, and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> of both ibuprofen and phenylephrine fell within 80%-125% in both nutritional states, with RSABE applied to phenylephrine C<sub>max</sub> where variability was high. Both products were well tolerated; adverse events were mild, comparable between test and reference, and no subject discontinued due to adverse events. These findings demonstrate bioequivalence of the two ibuprofen/phenylephrine FDC and support their similar safety profiles in healthy Chinese volunteers.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145522702","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>At this year's American College of Clinical Pharmacology (ACCP)’s Annual Meeting, one of us found themselves cornered by two early-career professionals: “So,” one asked with genuine curiosity, “what exactly does an editor do? I mean, beyond deciding yes or no on papers?” Her colleague added with a grin, “And how do you decide? Coin flip? Dartboard?” What followed was a lively half-hour conversation that ranged from peer review logistics to research integrity to the latest AI controversies. Reflecting later, we realized that many in our clinical pharmacology community might benefit from a peek behind the editorial curtain, so to speak, especially now, in 2025, when scientific publishing faces unprecedented challenges and opportunities.</p><p>Editorial decisions are often perceived as binary: accept or reject. In reality, most decisions are far more nuanced. Every manuscript sits at the intersection of scientific rigor, novelty, relevance, and clarity. Although the “yes or no” question, is where many authors think editorial work starts, the real work lies in everything that precedes any decision: study design, assessing whether the methodology can answer the research question posed, synthesizing often contradictory reviewer comments, and determining whether the findings meaningfully advance clinical pharmacology practice or drug development science.</p><p>Our task as editors is to weigh these dimensions in the context of the journal's mission and its readership.</p><p>At CPDD, we focus on early-phase clinical trials and translational pharmacology. This means asking: Does the study meaningfully advance our understanding of drug development? Is the design appropriate for the stage of investigation? Are the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and safety data robust enough to inform future trials?</p><p>Consider a typical population pharmacokinetics manuscript. The model might be technically sound, but does it provide clinically actionable dosing guidance? Are the covariates biologically plausible or just statistical artifacts? Has the external validation been adequate? These questions require deep content expertise, which is why our editorial board (all of whom serve as reviewers) includes clinical pharmacologists from academia, industry, and regulatory agencies.</p><p>The scientific publishing environment has changed rapidly in recent years. The rise of open science and data sharing, integration of artificial intelligence, and increasing demands for transparency in conflict-of-interest disclosures are reshaping how journals function and how editorial decisions are made.<span><sup>1, 2</sup></span> Making this even more difficult is the rise of so-called “predatory” journals, which provide little or no editorial oversight over what they publish. These “journals” exist solely to make money, and their existence is eroding the public's confidence in science.<span><sup>3</sup></span> Their presence makes the editor's job even more difficult, since articl
在今年的美国临床药理学学院(American College of Clinical Pharmacology, ACCP)年会上,我们中的一位发现自己被两位初入职场的专业人士逼到墙角:“那么,”其中一位好奇地问道,“编辑到底是做什么的?”我的意思是,除了在论文上决定是或否之外?”她的同事笑着补充道:“你是怎么决定的?抛硬币吗?圆靶?”接下来是半个小时的生动对话,内容从同行评议后勤到研究诚信,再到最新的人工智能争议。后来回想起来,我们意识到临床药理学界的许多人可能会从编辑幕后的窥视中受益,可以这么说,特别是现在,在2025年,当科学出版面临前所未有的挑战和机遇时。编辑的决定通常被认为是二元的:接受或拒绝。在现实中,大多数决定都要微妙得多。每一份手稿都是科学严谨性、新颖性、相关性和清晰度的交叉点。虽然“是或否”的问题是许多作者认为编辑工作开始的地方,但真正的工作在于任何决定之前的一切:研究设计,评估方法是否可以回答所提出的研究问题,综合经常相互矛盾的审稿人意见,以及确定研究结果是否有意义地推进临床药理学实践或药物开发科学。作为编辑,我们的任务是在期刊使命和读者的背景下权衡这些方面。在CPDD,我们专注于早期临床试验和转化药理学。这意味着要问:这项研究是否有意义地推进了我们对药物开发的理解?设计是否适合调查阶段?药代动力学、药效学和安全性数据是否足够可靠,可以为未来的试验提供信息?考虑一个典型的群体药代动力学手稿。该模型在技术上可能是合理的,但它是否提供了临床可操作的剂量指导?这些协变量在生物学上是合理的还是仅仅是统计上的人为因素?外部验证是否足够?这些问题需要深厚的内容专业知识,这就是为什么我们的编辑委员会(所有人都担任审稿人)包括来自学术界,工业界和监管机构的临床药理学家。近年来,科学出版环境发生了迅速变化。开放科学和数据共享的兴起,人工智能的整合,以及对利益冲突披露透明度的日益增长的要求,正在重塑期刊的运作方式和编辑决策的制定方式。所谓的“掠夺性”期刊的兴起使这一过程变得更加困难,这些期刊很少或根本没有对其发表的内容进行编辑监督。这些“期刊”的存在仅仅是为了赚钱,它们的存在正在侵蚀公众对科学的信心他们的存在使编辑的工作更加困难,因为这些期刊上的文章可能与标准的科学实践不一致,但可能被用作引用。这给编辑和同行审稿人带来了更多的工作,因为他们试图将可靠的工作与糟糕的工作区分开来。对于像CPDD这样专注于早期临床试验和转化药物开发的期刊来说,这些趋势尤为突出。我们必须平衡方法的严谨性与创新性,在鼓励新方法的同时促进可重复性,并促进试验设计和作者的公平性和包容性。同行评议仍然是科学出版的基石,但它是一个承受着相当大压力的系统随着投稿率的急剧上升(这一趋势由于学术生产力的压力和电子投稿的便利性等原因而加速),找到合格的、愿意的审稿人变得越来越具有挑战性。5,6在CPDD,我们通常会邀请4-6个审稿人来确保每个手稿2-3个质量审查,这个比例反映了审稿人可用性的更广泛危机。但挑战不仅限于可用性。研究表明,审稿人的建议存在很大的可变性,这引发了对同行评议本身的可靠性和可重复性的质疑作为编辑,我们必须综合有时相互矛盾的评论,评估审稿人评论的技术价值,并做出决定,平衡科学严谨性与我们领域中合法方法多样性的认可。这就是编辑专业知识变得至关重要的地方。我们必须区分审稿人的个人方法偏好和真正的科学缺陷。我们必须认识到,当一个苛刻的审查反映了一个合理的担忧,而不是对临床药理学新兴方法的不熟悉。至关重要的是,我们必须确保同行评议过程达到其预期目的:改善稿件和推进科学,而不仅仅是为发表制造障碍。编辑工作经常被忽视的一个方面是它在指导和专业发展中的作用。 编辑最有价值的方面之一是有机会塑造我们领域的话语。通过选择解决早期药物开发中紧迫问题的手稿,无论是药物组微生物学,适应性试验设计还是模型信息药物开发,我们共同定义了我们学科中最重要的内容。导师的角色同样重要。每一封决定信都是一个教育作者科学严谨性、清晰沟通和道德研究实践的机会。例如,建设性的拒绝信解释了为什么一篇论文不符合标准,以及如何改进,这对早期的研究人员来说具有重要的教育作用。在CPDD,我们认真对待这一责任。我们努力提供具体的,可操作的反馈,即使拒绝手稿。我们为适当的研究设计、统计分析和药代动力学数据的呈现提供指导。我们认识到,许多作者,特别是那些来自资源有限的环境或新进入该领域的作者,可能是第一次导航出版。我们的编辑委员会也有社区建设的功能。通过汇集来自学术界、工业界和监管机构的临床药理学专家,我们促进了跨部门和观点的对话。科学诚信是我们职业的基石。可重复性危机、掠夺性出版和数据操纵等挑战提醒我们保持警惕是必要的。期刊和编辑是科学记录的管家。这包括提高数据可用性的透明度,要求进行严格的统计分析,并确保在临床试验行为中遵守道德标准。作为编辑,我们必须保持警惕,不要过度惊慌。我们使用抄袭检测软件,仔细检查投稿中的异常模式,调查涉嫌违反诚信的行为,并在出现问题时与出版道德委员会(COPE)等机构和组织合作。但我们也认识到,我们的绝大多数作者都是致力于推动科学发展的诚实研究人员。我们的系统必须在不给合法研究人员制造不可逾越的障碍的情况下发现不当行为。在临床药理学方面,我们的编辑责任尤其重要。我们处理的手稿通常是基础科学和临床应用之间的桥梁,对药物开发、监管决策以及最终的患者护理有直接的影响。今天发表的一项设计不良的药代动力学研究可能会影响未来几年的给药策略。报告不充分的药物-药物相互作用评估可能会错过关键的安全信号。利害攸关,我们的编辑警惕必须与之相称。当我们思考“编辑做什么”这个问题时,我们认识到,在2025年,编辑既是一种特权,也是一种责任。我们同时是科学家、教育家、倡导者和管理者。我们的工作基于为全球患者提供安全、有效和创新的治疗方法的共同使命。那些初出茅庐的专业人士问:“编辑是做什么的?”-我们希望这篇社论能提供一个更完整的答案。我们所做的远不止接受或拒绝论文。我们培养科学的严谨性,捍卫研究的完整性,促进同行评审,指导新兴科学家,并每天工作,以确保临床药理学在药物开发发表的研究成果,推动我们的领域,并最终改善患者的治疗效果。谢谢你问这个看似简单但很重要的问题。你提醒了我们这些有幸担任编辑的人,编辑不仅仅是管理稿件。编辑是为科学和使之成为可能的人服务。对我们所有的读者、评论家和作者:感谢你们在这一努力中的合作。高质量的科学出版是一项合作事业,CPDD的成功取决于整个临床药理学社区对卓越、诚信和透明的承诺。如果您被邀请为我们审阅稿件,我们鼓励您接受,我们期待着与您合作,感谢您的时间和精力。“编辑是做什么的?”这个问题没有一个简单的答案。但也许这种复杂性正是问题的关键。在一个快速变化和科学诚信面临越来越多挑战的时代,编辑的多方面作用从未像现在这样重要或要求更高。我们接受这一挑战,认识到临床药理学研究的可信度取决于我们对最高标准的集体承诺。作者声明无利益冲突。
{"title":"What Does an Editor Do in 2025?","authors":"Amalia M. Issa, Michael Fossler, Vijay V. Upreti","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1623","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.1623","url":null,"abstract":"<p>At this year's American College of Clinical Pharmacology (ACCP)’s Annual Meeting, one of us found themselves cornered by two early-career professionals: “So,” one asked with genuine curiosity, “what exactly does an editor do? I mean, beyond deciding yes or no on papers?” Her colleague added with a grin, “And how do you decide? Coin flip? Dartboard?” What followed was a lively half-hour conversation that ranged from peer review logistics to research integrity to the latest AI controversies. Reflecting later, we realized that many in our clinical pharmacology community might benefit from a peek behind the editorial curtain, so to speak, especially now, in 2025, when scientific publishing faces unprecedented challenges and opportunities.</p><p>Editorial decisions are often perceived as binary: accept or reject. In reality, most decisions are far more nuanced. Every manuscript sits at the intersection of scientific rigor, novelty, relevance, and clarity. Although the “yes or no” question, is where many authors think editorial work starts, the real work lies in everything that precedes any decision: study design, assessing whether the methodology can answer the research question posed, synthesizing often contradictory reviewer comments, and determining whether the findings meaningfully advance clinical pharmacology practice or drug development science.</p><p>Our task as editors is to weigh these dimensions in the context of the journal's mission and its readership.</p><p>At CPDD, we focus on early-phase clinical trials and translational pharmacology. This means asking: Does the study meaningfully advance our understanding of drug development? Is the design appropriate for the stage of investigation? Are the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and safety data robust enough to inform future trials?</p><p>Consider a typical population pharmacokinetics manuscript. The model might be technically sound, but does it provide clinically actionable dosing guidance? Are the covariates biologically plausible or just statistical artifacts? Has the external validation been adequate? These questions require deep content expertise, which is why our editorial board (all of whom serve as reviewers) includes clinical pharmacologists from academia, industry, and regulatory agencies.</p><p>The scientific publishing environment has changed rapidly in recent years. The rise of open science and data sharing, integration of artificial intelligence, and increasing demands for transparency in conflict-of-interest disclosures are reshaping how journals function and how editorial decisions are made.<span><sup>1, 2</sup></span> Making this even more difficult is the rise of so-called “predatory” journals, which provide little or no editorial oversight over what they publish. These “journals” exist solely to make money, and their existence is eroding the public's confidence in science.<span><sup>3</sup></span> Their presence makes the editor's job even more difficult, since articl","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"14 11","pages":"812-814"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://accp1.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpdd.1623","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145429454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Dymphy R Huntjens, Stephan Oehen, Elisabeth Kueenburg
Mocravimod, a novel immunomodulator targeting sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR), is being developed as a maintenance treatment for patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Preclinical data suggested that cytochrome (CYP) 3A4 is the primary enzyme involved in mocravimod metabolism. In vitro data showed that both mocravimod and its active metabolite mocravimod-phosphate are substrates for breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) but not for organic-anion-transporting polypeptides (OATP1B1 and OATP1B3). As mocravimod is co-administered with CYP3A4 inhibitors such as azoles or cyclosporin, the potential for drug-drug interactions (DDIs) was evaluated. In addition, the effect of BCRP, P-gp, and OATP via cyclosporin co-administration was assessed. Two open-label, two-period, fixed-sequence studies were conducted in healthy subjects to evaluate the DDI potential of mocravimod and 1) itraconazole, a dual CYP3A4/P-gP inhibitor, or 2) cyclosporin, a moderate inhibitor of CYP3A4 and P-gp, BCRP, OATP1B1, and OATP1B3. Safety and tolerability were also monitored. The PK of mocravimod and mocravimod-phosphate were bioequivalent with or without co-administration of multiple doses of itraconazole and a moderate interaction is observed when co-administered with cyclosporin. The most commonly-reported treatment-emergent adverse events were bradycardia and decreased lymphocyte count, which are expected side effects for S1PR modulators.
{"title":"Clinical assessment of mocravimod as a victim of drug-drug interactions via CYP3A4 metabolism and transporters.","authors":"Dymphy R Huntjens, Stephan Oehen, Elisabeth Kueenburg","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1622","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.1622","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mocravimod, a novel immunomodulator targeting sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR), is being developed as a maintenance treatment for patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Preclinical data suggested that cytochrome (CYP) 3A4 is the primary enzyme involved in mocravimod metabolism. In vitro data showed that both mocravimod and its active metabolite mocravimod-phosphate are substrates for breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) but not for organic-anion-transporting polypeptides (OATP1B1 and OATP1B3). As mocravimod is co-administered with CYP3A4 inhibitors such as azoles or cyclosporin, the potential for drug-drug interactions (DDIs) was evaluated. In addition, the effect of BCRP, P-gp, and OATP via cyclosporin co-administration was assessed. Two open-label, two-period, fixed-sequence studies were conducted in healthy subjects to evaluate the DDI potential of mocravimod and 1) itraconazole, a dual CYP3A4/P-gP inhibitor, or 2) cyclosporin, a moderate inhibitor of CYP3A4 and P-gp, BCRP, OATP1B1, and OATP1B3. Safety and tolerability were also monitored. The PK of mocravimod and mocravimod-phosphate were bioequivalent with or without co-administration of multiple doses of itraconazole and a moderate interaction is observed when co-administered with cyclosporin. The most commonly-reported treatment-emergent adverse events were bradycardia and decreased lymphocyte count, which are expected side effects for S1PR modulators.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145387575","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Correction to \"Preclinical and Phase 1 Assessment of Antisense Oligonucleotide Bepirovirsenin Hepatitis B Virus-Transgenic Mice and Healthy Human Volunteers: Support for Clinical Dose Selection and Evaluation of Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Single and Multiple Doses\".","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1620","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.1620","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145376362","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Xianmiao Yin, Rui Xia, Huan Song, Yi Zhang, Dongsheng Guo, Fangliang Gan
N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is a derivative of cysteine with potent mucolytic and antioxidant properties. However, the pharmacokinetics of NAC tablets remain unclear in healthy Chinese subjects. This study aimed to assess the pharmacokinetics, bioequivalence, and safety of a domestically manufactured NAC tablet (600 mg) compared with the reference formulation in healthy Chinese volunteers under both fasting and fed conditions. A single-dose, randomized, open-label, two-formulation, crossover bioequivalence study was conducted, using a two-period, two-sequence design under fasting conditions and a four-period, fully replicated crossover design under fed conditions. Blood samples were collected at predetermined time points and analyzed using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. The 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratios (test/reference) of the maximum plasma concentration, the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration, and from time zero to infinity were all within the accepted bioequivalence range of 80%–125%. Furthermore, both the test and reference formulations were well tolerated, and no serious adverse events were reported. These results demonstrate that the test and reference NAC tablets are bioequivalent and exhibit similar pharmacokinetic profiles and safety in healthy Chinese subjects under both fasting and fed conditions.
n -乙酰半胱氨酸(NAC)是半胱氨酸的衍生物,具有有效的解粘和抗氧化性能。然而,NAC片在中国健康人体内的药代动力学尚不清楚。本研究旨在评价国产NAC片(600 mg)与对照制剂在空腹和空腹条件下的药代动力学、生物等效性和安全性。进行了一项单剂量、随机、开放标签、双配方、交叉生物等效性研究,在禁食条件下采用两期、两序列设计,在喂养条件下采用四期、完全重复的交叉设计。在预定的时间点采集血样,并使用有效的液相色谱-串联质谱法进行分析。最大血浆浓度几何平均比(试验/参比)的90%置信区间、浓度-时间曲线下面积从时间0到最后可测浓度、从时间0到无穷都在公认的80%-125%的生物等效性范围内。此外,试验制剂和参考制剂均具有良好的耐受性,未报告严重不良事件。这些结果表明,在空腹和进食条件下,试验用NAC片和参比NAC片具有生物等效性,在中国健康受试者中具有相似的药代动力学特征和安全性。
{"title":"Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of two N-acetylcysteine tablets in healthy Chinese volunteers under fasting and fed conditions","authors":"Xianmiao Yin, Rui Xia, Huan Song, Yi Zhang, Dongsheng Guo, Fangliang Gan","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1619","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.1619","url":null,"abstract":"<p>N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is a derivative of cysteine with potent mucolytic and antioxidant properties. However, the pharmacokinetics of NAC tablets remain unclear in healthy Chinese subjects. This study aimed to assess the pharmacokinetics, bioequivalence, and safety of a domestically manufactured NAC tablet (600 mg) compared with the reference formulation in healthy Chinese volunteers under both fasting and fed conditions. A single-dose, randomized, open-label, two-formulation, crossover bioequivalence study was conducted, using a two-period, two-sequence design under fasting conditions and a four-period, fully replicated crossover design under fed conditions. Blood samples were collected at predetermined time points and analyzed using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. The 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratios (test/reference) of the maximum plasma concentration, the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration, and from time zero to infinity were all within the accepted bioequivalence range of 80%–125%. Furthermore, both the test and reference formulations were well tolerated, and no serious adverse events were reported. These results demonstrate that the test and reference NAC tablets are bioequivalent and exhibit similar pharmacokinetic profiles and safety in healthy Chinese subjects under both fasting and fed conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145367643","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Yan-ou Yang, Hong Yang, Xing Liu, Xiaohua Gong, Jay Getsy, Kevin Rockich
The oral, small molecule inhibitor of activin receptor-like kinase-2, zilurgisertib (INCB000928), is under evaluation in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Cardiac safety was assessed using electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters and a plasma concentration-heart rate-corrected QT (C-QTc) interval analysis of pooled data from single ascending dose (SAD) and multiple ascending dose (MAD) studies of zilurgisertib in healthy adult participants (SAD: 10-500 mg; INCB00928-102: 50-400 mg QD, 300 mg BID). Overall, 91 (SAD) and 79 (MAD) participants provided at least one pair of PK/ECG data. As both studies indicated a dose-dependent effect of zilurgisertib on heart rate, individualized QT correction (QTcI) was used as the primary endpoint for QTc analysis. Estimated population slope of the individualized C-ΔQTc (C-ΔQTcI) relationship was shallow (0.02 ms per µm [90% CI, −0.60, 0.65]) and not statistically significantly different from 0; treatment effect–specific intercept was small and not significant (−0.83 ms [90% CI, −2.26, 0.61]). No significant relationship between zilurgisertib plasma concentration and change in QTcI was identified; zilurgisertib did not have a clinically relevant effect on QTc prolongation. QT effect >10 ms could therefore be excluded within the dose range studied (up to 300 mg BID). No clinically meaningful effects on cardiac conduction (PR and QRS intervals) or any categorical PR or QRS outliers were observed. These data support further clinical development of zilurgisertib.
{"title":"Evaluation of clinical cardiac safety of zilurgisertib, an activin receptor-like kinase-2 (ALK2) inhibitor, in healthy participants","authors":"Yan-ou Yang, Hong Yang, Xing Liu, Xiaohua Gong, Jay Getsy, Kevin Rockich","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1618","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.1618","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The oral, small molecule inhibitor of activin receptor-like kinase-2, zilurgisertib (INCB000928), is under evaluation in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Cardiac safety was assessed using electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters and a plasma concentration-heart rate-corrected QT (C-QTc) interval analysis of pooled data from single ascending dose (SAD) and multiple ascending dose (MAD) studies of zilurgisertib in healthy adult participants (SAD: 10-500 mg; INCB00928-102: 50-400 mg QD, 300 mg BID). Overall, 91 (SAD) and 79 (MAD) participants provided at least one pair of PK/ECG data. As both studies indicated a dose-dependent effect of zilurgisertib on heart rate, individualized QT correction (QTcI) was used as the primary endpoint for QTc analysis. Estimated population slope of the individualized C-ΔQTc (C-ΔQTcI) relationship was shallow (0.02 ms per µ<span>m</span> [90% CI, −0.60, 0.65]) and not statistically significantly different from 0; treatment effect–specific intercept was small and not significant (−0.83 ms [90% CI, −2.26, 0.61]). No significant relationship between zilurgisertib plasma concentration and change in QTcI was identified; zilurgisertib did not have a clinically relevant effect on QTc prolongation. QT effect <i>></i>10 ms could therefore be excluded within the dose range studied (up to 300 mg BID). No clinically meaningful effects on cardiac conduction (PR and QRS intervals) or any categorical PR or QRS outliers were observed. These data support further clinical development of zilurgisertib.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12856974/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145343810","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}