CNS drugs最新文献

Background and Objectives

Cenobamate (CNB) is a new antiseizure medication (ASM) to treat drug-resistant, focal-onset seizures. Data on its use in early therapy lines are not yet available, and clinicians frequently consider CNB to be a later ASM drug choice. We investigated the efficacy and safety of CNB as an early adjunctive treatment in drug-resistant, focal-onset seizures.

Methods

The study population were patients with drug-resistant, focal-onset seizures who were initiated with CNB after they did not respond to two or three lifetime ASMs, including all prior and concomitant ASMs. These patients were matched (1:2) by sex, age, and seizure frequency to controls who were initiated with any ASM other than CNB. All participants participated in the Mainz Epilepsy Registry. We evaluated the retention rate after 12 months of CNB and after each new adjunctive ASM in the control group. In addition, seizure freedom and the response rate (reduction of seizure frequency by ≥ 50% from baseline) after 12 months were estimated.

Results

We included 231 patients aged 44.4 ± 15.8 years. Of these, 33.3% (n = 77) were on CNB, 19.0% (n = 44) on valproate (VPA), 17.3% (n = 40) on lacosamide (LCS), 16.4% (n = 38) on levetiracetam (LEV), and 13.9% (n = 32) on topiramate (TPM). The highest retention rate after 12 months since the beginning of the early adjunctive therapy was observed on CNB (92.0%), compared with LCS (80.0%), LEV (73.3%), VPA (68.2%), or TPM (62.5%) (p < 0.05). Seizure freedom and response rate were also the best on CNB (19.5% and 71.4%, respectively) compared with other ASMs (8.3% and 52.5%, respectively; p < 0.05). No significant differences in adverse events between CNB and other ASMs were observed.

Conclusions

Our study provides evidence that CNB is an effective ASM with a good safety profile in the early therapy lines of drug-resistant, focal-onset seizures. This data should support medical decision making in the management of patients with refractory epilepsy.

Clinical Trial ID

NCT05267405.

Binge eating disorder (BED) is the most common specific eating disorder (ED). It is frequently associated with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), depression, bipolar disorder (BD), anxiety disorders, alcohol and nicotine use disorder, and obesity. The aim of this narrative review was to summarize the evidence for the pharmacological treatment of BED and its comorbid disorders. We recommend the ADHD medication lisdexamfetamine (LDX) and the antiepileptic and antimigraine drug topiramate for the pharmacological treatment of BED. However, only LDX is approved for the treatment of BED in some countries. Medications to treat diseases frequently comorbid with BED include atomoxetine and LDX for ADHD; citalopram, fluoxetine, sertraline, duloxetine, and venlafaxine for anxiety disorders and depression; aripiprazole for manic episodes of BD; lamotrigine, lirasidone and lumateperone for depressive episodes of BD; naltrexone for alcohol use disorder; bupropion for nicotine use disorder; and liraglutide, semaglutide, and the combination of bupropion and naltrexone for obesity. As obesity is a frequent health consequence of BED, weight gain-inducing medications, such as the atypical antipsychotics olanzapine or clozapine, the novel antidepressant mirtazapine and tricyclic antidepressants, and the mood stabilizer valproate should be avoided where possible. It is currently unclear whether the novel and promising glucagon, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists like tirzepatide and retatrutide help with BED and its comorbidities. However, these compounds have been reported to reduce binge eating in individuals with obesity or overweight.

Synthetic cannabinoids are compounds made in the laboratory to structurally and functionally mimic phytocannabinoids from the Cannabis sativa L. plant, including delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). Synthetic cannabinoids (SCs) can signal via the classical endogenous cannabinoid system (ECS) and the greater endocannabidiome network, highlighting their signalling complexity and far-reaching effects. Dronabinol and nabilone, which mimic THC signalling, have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating nausea associated with cancer chemotherapy and/or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). However, there is ongoing interest in these two drugs as potential analgesics for a variety of other clinical conditions, including neuropathic pain, spasticity-related pain, and nociplastic pain syndromes including fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis, and postoperative pain, among others. In this review, we highlight the signalling mechanisms of FDA-approved synthetic cannabinoids, discuss key clinical trials that investigate their analgesic potential, and illustrate challenges faced when bringing synthetic cannabinoids to the clinic.

Background: Migraine and dizziness often coexist, with vestibular migraine (VM) presenting with vestibular symptoms and headaches. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) may be involved in motion-induced symptoms; however, studies on the use of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for the treatment of VM have yielded conflicting results. This study aimed to clarify the effectiveness of anti-CGRP mAbs in VM treatment.

Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study, conducted between 1 January 2021 and 31 March 2023, assessed 12 Japanese patients with VM who were treated with anti-CGRP mAbs (CGRP group) for 6 months and 11 Japanese patients who received standard of care for VM and served as controls. Clinical questionnaires and equilibrium tests were administered, with primary outcomes including changes in Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) scores compared with baseline values. Objective variables included the DHI score and explanatory variables included demographic data, balance test results, head-up tilt (HUT) test results, vestibular test results and questionnaire survey results. Analysis of variance was used to assess the treatment effects of anti-CGRP mAbs, and multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify mAb responders.

Results: After 6 months, the CGRP group showed significant improvements in DHI scores [0 versus 6 months, odds ratio (95% confidence interval): 22.01 (0.13-43.88)] and number of vertigo/dizziness attacks per month [0 versus 6 months: 10.28 (2.80-17.76)]. No significant difference was observed in the control group [DHI scores, 0 versus 6 months: 0.65 (-26.84 to 28.14); number of vertigo/dizziness attacks per month, 0 versus 6 months: - 8.07 (- 23.77 to 7.62)]. Multivariate regression analysis showed that autonomic function at baseline was associated with mAb response in patients [β estimates (95% confidence interval): 3.63 (0.21-7.06)].

Conclusions: Treatment with anti-CGRP mAbs was more effective than conventional treatment in preventing migraine in patients with VM. While the identified factors associated with treatment responsiveness offer valuable insights into personalised treatment approaches, further prospective studies are warranted to validate the findings due to our study's retrospective design and limited sample size.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a complex multifaceted disease. Recently approved anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies slow disease progression by approximately 30%, and combination therapy appears necessary to prevent the onset of AD or produce greater slowing of cognitive and functional decline. Combination therapies may address core features, non-specific co-pathology commonly occurring in patients with AD (e.g., inflammation), or non-AD pathologies that may co-occur with AD (e.g., α-synuclein). Combination therapies may be advanced through co-development of more than one new molecular entity or through add-on strategies including an approved agent plus a new molecular entity. Addressing add-on combination therapy is currently urgent since patients on anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies may be included in clinical trials for experimental agents. Phase 1 information must be generated for each agent in combination drug development. Phase 2 and Phase 3 of add-on therapies may contrast the new molecular entity, the approved agent as standard of care, and the combination. More complex development programs including standard or modified combinatorial designs are required for co-development of two or more new molecular entities. Biomarkers are markedly affected by anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies, and these effects must be anticipated in add-on trials. Examining target engagement biomarkers and comparing the magnitude and sequence of biomarker changes in those receiving more than one therapy, compared with those on monotherapy, may be informative. Using network-based medicine approaches, computational strategies may identify rational combinations using disease and drug effect network mapping.

Background and purpose: Sex is associated with clinical outcome in stroke. The present study aimed to determine the effect of sex on efficacy of dual antiplatelet (DAPT) versus alteplase in ischemic stroke based on Antiplatelet versus recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (R-tPA) for Acute Mild Ischemic Stroke (ARAMIS) trial.

Methods: In this secondary analysis of the ARAMIS study, eligible patients aged 18 years or older with minor nondisabling stroke who received dual antiplatelet therapy or intravenous alteplase within 4.5 h of stroke onset were divided into two groups: men and women. The primary endpoint was an excellent functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-1 at 90 days. Binary logistic regression analyses and generalized linear models were used.

Results: Of the 719 patients who completed the study, 31% (223) were women, and 69% (496) were men. There were no significant sex differences in excellent functional outcome (unadjusted p = 0.304 for men and p = 0.993 for women; adjusted p = 0.376 for men and p = 0.918 for women) and favorable functional outcome (mRS score of 0-2; unadjusted p = 0.968 for men and p = 0.881 for women; adjusted p = 0.824 for men and p = 0.881 for women). But for the secondary outcomes, compared with alteplase, DAPT was associated with a significantly decreased proportion of early neurological deterioration within 24 h in men {unadjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.440 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.221-0.878]; p = 0.020; adjusted OR = 0.436 [95% CI, 0.216-0.877]; p = 0.020}, but not in women [unadjusted OR = 0.636 (95% CI, 0.175-2.319), p = 0.490; adjusted OR = 0.687 (95% CI, 0.181-2.609), p = 0.581]. For the safety outcomes, compared with the DAPT group, alteplase was associated with a significantly increased proportion of any bleeding events in men [unadjusted OR = 3.110 (95% CI, 1.103-8.770); p = 0.032], but not in women [unadjusted OR = 5.333 (95% CI, 0.613-46.407), p = 0.129; adjusted OR = 5.394 (95% CI, 0.592-49.112), p = 0.135].

Conclusion: Sex did not influence the effect of dual antiplatelet therapy versus intravenous alteplase in minor nondisabling stroke, but more early neurological deterioration and bleeding events occurred in men who received alteplase.

Anhedonia, a complex symptom rooted in deficits across reward processes, is primarily linked to depression and schizophrenia but transcends diagnostic boundaries across various mental disorders. Its presence correlates with poorer clinical outcomes, including an increased risk of suicide and diminished response to treatment. The neurobiological underpinnings of anhedonia remain incompletely understood despite advancements in biomarkers and imaging that contribute to deeper insights. Ketamine, known for its rapid-acting antidepressant properties, appears to possess antianhedonic effects through a mechanism of action not fully elucidated. This effect appears to be independent of its antidepressant properties. Explorations into alternative antianhedonic treatments have been underway, yet lingering questions persist, underscoring the imperative need for ongoing research to advance the field.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of lecanemab for early-stage Alzheimer's disease (AD) represents an exciting new chapter in the management of neurodegenerative disease, but likewise presents numerous clinical, technical, and financial logistical challenges for both academic and non-academic medical institutions hoping to administer this drug. Minimal resources exist that provide guidance for establishing and maintaining a lecanemab treatment program at the institutional level. The current report aims to provide healthcare institutions a framework for the planning, onboarding, and longitudinal treatment of AD with anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody treatments. We present an implementation study involving three stages: (1) feasibility assessment, (2) operations and going live, and (3) monitoring assessment. We found that implementation of lecanemab in clinical practice was feasible due to the assignment of an enterprise-wide project manager to facilitate the planning phase, a cost analysis showing that lecanemab was financially sustainable, and the development of electronic medical record tools to support operational efficiency.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Clozapine is the medication of choice for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. However, it has a complex metabolism and unexplained interindividual variability. The current work aims to develop a pharmacokinetic model of clozapine and norclozapine in non-smokers and assess the impact of demographic and genetic predictors.

Methods: Healthy volunteers were recruited in a population pharmacokinetic study. Blood samples were collected at 30 min and 1, 2, 3, 5 and 8 h following a single flat dose of clozapine (12.5 mg). The clozapine and norclozapine concentrations were measured via high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet method. A semi-physiological pharmacokinetic model of clozapine and norclozapine was developed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Clinical and genetic predictors were evaluated, including CYP1A2 (rs762551) and ABCB1 (rs2032582), using restriction fragment length polymorphism.

Results: A total of 270 samples were collected from 33 participants. The data were best described using a two-compartment model for clozapine and a two-compartment model for norclozapine with first-order absorption and elimination and pre-systemic metabolism. The estimated (relative standard error) clearance of clozapine and norclozapine were 27 L h^-1 (31.5 %) and 19.6 L h^-1 (30%), respectively. Clozapine clearance was lower in sub-Saharan Africans (n = 4) and higher in Caucasians (n = 9) than Asians (n = 20). Participants with CYP1A2 (rs762551) (n = 18) and ABCB1 (rs2032582) (n = 12) mutant alleles had lower clozapine clearance in the univariate analysis.

Conclusions: This is the first study to develop a semi-physiological pharmacokinetic model of clozapine and norclozapine accounting for the pre-systemic metabolism. Asians required lower doses of clozapine as compared with Caucasians, while clozapine pharmacokinetics in sub-Saharan Africans should be further investigated in larger trials.