首页 > 最新文献

CNS drugs最新文献

英文 中文
Trends and Differences in Status Epilepticus Treatment of Children and Adults Over 10 Years: A Comparative Study of Medical Records (2012-2021) from a University Hospital in Germany. 10年以上儿童和成人癫痫持续状态治疗的趋势和差异:德国某大学医院病历(2012-2021)的比较研究
IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-18 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-023-01049-w
Leonore Purwien, Susanne Schubert-Bast, Matthias Kieslich, Michael W Ronellenfitsch, Michael Merker, Marcus Czabanka, Laurent M Willems, Felix Rosenow, Adam Strzelczyk

Background and objectives: Over the last decade, significant advancements have been made in status epilepticus (SE) management, influenced by landmark trials such as ESETT and RAMPART. The objectives of this study were to explore the evolution of drug treatments for patients with SE, to investigate its association with outcomes and mortality, and to evaluate differences in treatment patterns between adults and children for a potential shift in medication trends due to the above mentioned trials.

Methods: The medical records of patients with SE treated at University Hospital Frankfurt between 2012 and 2021 were evaluated for medication trends and outcomes. Children and adults were analyzed separately and jointly.

Results: This study included 1151 SE episodes in 1021 patients (mean age = 53.3 ± 28.3 years; 52.5 % female [n = 533]). The overall percentage of patients with SE treated prehospital was stable over the last decade. More than half (53.6 %) of children were treated prehospital, compared with less than one-third (26.7 %) of adults. Prehospital midazolam use increased over time, while diazepam use decreased. Lorazepam was the most commonly used benzodiazepine in hospitals in 2012-2013, used in 40.8 % of all episodes. However, its use declined to 27.2 % in 2020-2021, while midazolam use increased to 44.0 %. While the use of older antiseizure medications (ASMs) such as phenobarbital (p = 0.02), phenytoin (p < 0.001), and valproate (p < 0.001) decreased, the use of newer ASMs such as levetiracetam and lacosamide significantly increased (p < 0.001). Propofol and continuous midazolam infusion remained the most used third-line therapy drugs. Overall mortality was 16.5 % at discharge and 18.9 % at 30 days. Mortality rates did not change between 2012 and 2021.

Conclusion: Midazolam has become the preferred benzodiazepine in pre- and in-hospital settings, both in children and adults. The same applies to the increased use of levetiracetam and lacosamide over time in children and adults, while phenobarbital, phenytoin, and valproate use decreased. Continuous midazolam infusion and propofol remain the most frequently used anesthetic drugs. Mortality and outcome remain stable despite changes in medication patterns.

背景和目的:在过去十年中,受ESETT和RAMPART等具有里程碑意义的试验的影响,癫痫持续状态(SE)管理取得了重大进展。本研究的目的是探讨SE患者药物治疗的演变,调查其与预后和死亡率的关系,并评估成人和儿童之间治疗模式的差异,以了解上述试验可能导致的用药趋势的转变。方法:对2012年至2021年在法兰克福大学医院治疗的SE患者的病历进行用药趋势和结局评估。儿童和成人分别分析和联合分析。结果:本研究纳入1021例患者的1151次SE发作(平均年龄= 53.3±28.3岁;52.5%为女性[n = 533])。院前治疗SE患者的总体百分比在过去十年中保持稳定。超过一半(53.6%)的儿童院前接受过治疗,而成人院前接受治疗的比例不到三分之一(26.7%)。院前咪达安定的使用随着时间的推移而增加,而地西泮的使用则减少。劳拉西泮是2012-2013年医院最常用的苯二氮卓类药物,占所有发作的40.8%。然而,在2020-2021年,其使用率下降到27.2%,而咪达唑仑的使用率上升到44.0%。虽然旧的抗癫痫药物如苯巴比妥(p = 0.02)、苯妥英(p < 0.001)和丙戊酸盐(p < 0.001)的使用减少,但新抗癫痫药物如左乙拉西坦和拉科沙胺的使用显著增加(p < 0.001)。丙泊酚和咪达唑仑持续输注仍然是最常用的三线治疗药物。出院时的总死亡率为16.5%,30天时为18.9%。2012年至2021年期间,死亡率没有变化。结论:无论是儿童还是成人,咪达唑仑已成为院前和院内首选的苯二氮卓类药物。在儿童和成人中,随着时间的推移,左乙拉西坦和拉科沙胺的使用增加,而苯巴比妥、苯妥英和丙戊酸的使用减少,情况也是如此。持续输注咪达唑仑和异丙酚仍然是最常用的麻醉药物。尽管药物模式发生了变化,但死亡率和预后仍保持稳定。
{"title":"Trends and Differences in Status Epilepticus Treatment of Children and Adults Over 10 Years: A Comparative Study of Medical Records (2012-2021) from a University Hospital in Germany.","authors":"Leonore Purwien, Susanne Schubert-Bast, Matthias Kieslich, Michael W Ronellenfitsch, Michael Merker, Marcus Czabanka, Laurent M Willems, Felix Rosenow, Adam Strzelczyk","doi":"10.1007/s40263-023-01049-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40263-023-01049-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Over the last decade, significant advancements have been made in status epilepticus (SE) management, influenced by landmark trials such as ESETT and RAMPART. The objectives of this study were to explore the evolution of drug treatments for patients with SE, to investigate its association with outcomes and mortality, and to evaluate differences in treatment patterns between adults and children for a potential shift in medication trends due to the above mentioned trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The medical records of patients with SE treated at University Hospital Frankfurt between 2012 and 2021 were evaluated for medication trends and outcomes. Children and adults were analyzed separately and jointly.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 1151 SE episodes in 1021 patients (mean age = 53.3 ± 28.3 years; 52.5 % female [n = 533]). The overall percentage of patients with SE treated prehospital was stable over the last decade. More than half (53.6 %) of children were treated prehospital, compared with less than one-third (26.7 %) of adults. Prehospital midazolam use increased over time, while diazepam use decreased. Lorazepam was the most commonly used benzodiazepine in hospitals in 2012-2013, used in 40.8 % of all episodes. However, its use declined to 27.2 % in 2020-2021, while midazolam use increased to 44.0 %. While the use of older antiseizure medications (ASMs) such as phenobarbital (p = 0.02), phenytoin (p < 0.001), and valproate (p < 0.001) decreased, the use of newer ASMs such as levetiracetam and lacosamide significantly increased (p < 0.001). Propofol and continuous midazolam infusion remained the most used third-line therapy drugs. Overall mortality was 16.5 % at discharge and 18.9 % at 30 days. Mortality rates did not change between 2012 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Midazolam has become the preferred benzodiazepine in pre- and in-hospital settings, both in children and adults. The same applies to the increased use of levetiracetam and lacosamide over time in children and adults, while phenobarbital, phenytoin, and valproate use decreased. Continuous midazolam infusion and propofol remain the most frequently used anesthetic drugs. Mortality and outcome remain stable despite changes in medication patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":10508,"journal":{"name":"CNS drugs","volume":" ","pages":"993-1008"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10667152/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136396674","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy and Safety of MAO-B Inhibitors Safinamide and Zonisamide in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-16 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-023-01048-x
Laila Aboulatta, Lara Haidar, Ahmed Abou-Setta, Nicole Askin, Rasheda Rabbani, Alekhya Lavu, Payam Peymani, Ryan Zarychanski, Sherif Eltonsy
<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>In Parkinson's disease, safinamide and zonisamide are novel monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors with a dual mechanism of action involving the inhibition of sodium and calcium channels and the subsequent release of glutamate. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the efficacy and safety of both drugs compared with placebo on motor symptoms, cognitive function, and quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, Scopus, PsycINFO, and trials registries up to March 2023 for randomized controlled trials of adults with Parkinson's disease administered either safinamide or zonisamide and published in English. We excluded single-arm trials or if neither the efficacy nor safety outcomes of interest were reported. Primary outcomes were the change from baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale section III (UPDRS-III) and serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes included a change from baseline in OFF-time, Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire 39 to evaluate quality of life, and Mini-Mental State Examination for cognitive function assessment. The meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.4.1. Random-effect models were used to calculate the pooled mean differences (MDs) and risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses by medication, doses, Parkinson's disease stage, and risk of bias were conducted. We assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane's risk of bias tool. Sensitivity analysis was conducted, and publication bias were evaluated. This meta-analysis was not externally funded, and the protocol is available on the Open Science Framework Registration ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/AMNP5 ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 3570 screened citations, 16 trials met inclusion criteria (4314 patients with Parkinson's disease). Ten safinamide trials were conducted in several countries. Six zonisamide trials were included, five of which were conducted in Japan and one in India. UPDRS Part III scores were significantly lower with both monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors than with placebo (MD = -  2.18; 95% CI -  2.88 to -  1.49; I <sup>2</sup> =63%; n = 14 studies). A subgroup analysis showed a significant improvement in UPDRS-III in safinamide (MD = -  2.10; 95% CI -  3.09 to -  1.11; I<sup>2</sup> = 71%; n = 8 studies) and zonisamide (MD = -  2.31; 95% CI -  3.35 to -  1.27; I<sup>2</sup> = 52%; n = 6 studies) compared with placebo. Monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors significantly decreased OFF-time compared with placebo. No significant differences in cognitive function (Mini-Mental State Examination), whereas an improvement in quality of life (Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire 39 scores) was observed. There was no significant difference in incidence rates of serious adverse events among all examined doses of zonisamide and safinamide compared with placebo. Two trials were re
背景与目的:在帕金森病中,沙非胺和唑尼沙胺是新型单胺氧化酶- b抑制剂,具有双重作用机制,包括抑制钠和钙通道以及随后的谷氨酸释放。本系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是检查两种药物与安慰剂相比对帕金森病患者运动症状、认知功能和生活质量的疗效和安全性。方法:我们检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane Central、Scopus、PsycINFO和截至2023年3月的试验注册库,检索了使用沙非胺或唑尼沙胺的成年帕金森病患者的随机对照试验,并以英文发表。我们排除了单臂试验,或者没有相关疗效和安全性结果的报道。主要结局是统一帕金森病评定量表第III部分(UPDRS-III)的基线变化和严重不良事件。次要结果包括OFF-time的基线变化,帕金森病问卷39(用于评估生活质量)和认知功能评估的迷你精神状态检查(Mini-Mental State Examination)。meta分析使用Review Manager 5.4.1进行。采用随机效应模型计算合并平均差异(MDs)和95%置信区间(ci)的风险比。按用药、剂量、帕金森病分期和偏倚风险进行亚组分析。我们使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。进行敏感性分析,评价发表偏倚。这项荟萃分析没有外部资助,该方案可在开放科学框架注册(https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/AMNP5)上获得。结果:在筛选的3570篇引文中,16项试验符合纳入标准(4314例帕金森病患者)。在几个国家进行了10项沙芬胺试验。其中包括6项佐尼沙胺试验,其中5项在日本进行,1项在印度进行。单胺氧化酶- b抑制剂组UPDRS第三部分评分显著低于安慰剂组(MD = - 2.18;95% CI - 2.88 ~ - 1.49;I 2 =63%;N = 14项研究)。亚组分析显示沙芬胺组UPDRS-III显著改善(MD = - 2.10;95% CI - 3.09 ~ - 1.11;I2 = 71%;n = 8项研究)和唑尼沙胺(MD = - 2.31;95% CI - 3.35 ~ - 1.27;I2 = 52%;N = 6项研究)与安慰剂相比。与安慰剂相比,单胺氧化酶- b抑制剂显著减少了off时间。认知功能(迷你精神状态检查)无显著差异,而生活质量(帕金森病问卷39分)有改善。与安慰剂相比,所有检查剂量的唑尼沙胺和沙非胺的严重不良事件发生率没有显著差异。两项试验报告为高偏倚风险,敏感性分析证实了主要分析结果。结论:有证据表明,新型单胺氧化酶- b抑制剂不仅能改善运动症状,还能提高患者的生活质量。荟萃分析显示,两种药物在严重不良事件方面与安慰剂具有相似的安全性。总的研究结果强调沙非胺和唑尼沙胺作为辅助疗法治疗帕金森病的有效性。进一步的长期研究检查这些药物对运动和非运动症状的影响是必要的。
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of MAO-B Inhibitors Safinamide and Zonisamide in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Laila Aboulatta, Lara Haidar, Ahmed Abou-Setta, Nicole Askin, Rasheda Rabbani, Alekhya Lavu, Payam Peymani, Ryan Zarychanski, Sherif Eltonsy","doi":"10.1007/s40263-023-01048-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40263-023-01048-x","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background and objective: &lt;/strong&gt;In Parkinson's disease, safinamide and zonisamide are novel monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors with a dual mechanism of action involving the inhibition of sodium and calcium channels and the subsequent release of glutamate. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the efficacy and safety of both drugs compared with placebo on motor symptoms, cognitive function, and quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, Scopus, PsycINFO, and trials registries up to March 2023 for randomized controlled trials of adults with Parkinson's disease administered either safinamide or zonisamide and published in English. We excluded single-arm trials or if neither the efficacy nor safety outcomes of interest were reported. Primary outcomes were the change from baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale section III (UPDRS-III) and serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes included a change from baseline in OFF-time, Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire 39 to evaluate quality of life, and Mini-Mental State Examination for cognitive function assessment. The meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.4.1. Random-effect models were used to calculate the pooled mean differences (MDs) and risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses by medication, doses, Parkinson's disease stage, and risk of bias were conducted. We assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane's risk of bias tool. Sensitivity analysis was conducted, and publication bias were evaluated. This meta-analysis was not externally funded, and the protocol is available on the Open Science Framework Registration ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/AMNP5 ).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Of 3570 screened citations, 16 trials met inclusion criteria (4314 patients with Parkinson's disease). Ten safinamide trials were conducted in several countries. Six zonisamide trials were included, five of which were conducted in Japan and one in India. UPDRS Part III scores were significantly lower with both monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors than with placebo (MD = -  2.18; 95% CI -  2.88 to -  1.49; I &lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; =63%; n = 14 studies). A subgroup analysis showed a significant improvement in UPDRS-III in safinamide (MD = -  2.10; 95% CI -  3.09 to -  1.11; I&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 71%; n = 8 studies) and zonisamide (MD = -  2.31; 95% CI -  3.35 to -  1.27; I&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 52%; n = 6 studies) compared with placebo. Monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors significantly decreased OFF-time compared with placebo. No significant differences in cognitive function (Mini-Mental State Examination), whereas an improvement in quality of life (Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire 39 scores) was observed. There was no significant difference in incidence rates of serious adverse events among all examined doses of zonisamide and safinamide compared with placebo. Two trials were re","PeriodicalId":10508,"journal":{"name":"CNS drugs","volume":" ","pages":"941-956"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136396673","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Solriamfetol: A Review in Excessive Daytime Sleepiness Associated with Narcolepsy and Obstructive Sleep Apnoea. Solriamfetol:与嗜睡症和阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停相关的日间过度嗜睡综述。
IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-17 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-023-01040-5
Sheridan M Hoy

Solriamfetol (SUNOSI®) is an oral selective dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor approved in the EU and the USA for improving wakefulness in adults with excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) associated with narcolepsy or obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). In phase III studies, 12 weeks' therapy with solriamfetol within the recommended dosage range for narcolepsy (75 mg or 150 mg once daily) or OSA (37.5 mg, 75 mg or 150 mg once daily) provided early and sustained reductions in excessive sleepiness and improvements in wakefulness relative to placebo. These effects were generally sustained through 52 weeks. The drug's effectiveness in adults with EDS associated with narcolepsy is supported by results from real-world studies. Solriamfetol demonstrated a consistent safety and tolerability profile across clinical studies, with commonly reported adverse reactions generally occurring within 2 weeks of treatment initiation and mostly resolving within 2 weeks. Thus, solriamfetol represents a useful treatment option for adults with EDS associated with narcolepsy or OSA.

Solriamfetol(SUNOSI®)是一种口服选择性多巴胺和去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂,在欧盟和美国获得批准,用于改善与发作性睡病或阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)相关的日间过度嗜睡(EDS)成年人的清醒度。在III期研究中,与安慰剂相比,在发作性睡病(75 mg或150 mg每日一次)或OSA(37.5 mg、75 mg或150mg每日一次。这些影响通常持续52周。该药物对患有与嗜睡症相关的EDS的成年人的有效性得到了现实世界研究结果的支持。Solriamfetol在临床研究中表现出一致的安全性和耐受性,常见的不良反应通常在治疗开始后2周内发生,大多数在2周内解决。因此,对于患有与发作性睡病或OSA相关的EDS的成年人来说,舒利安酚是一种有用的治疗选择。
{"title":"Solriamfetol: A Review in Excessive Daytime Sleepiness Associated with Narcolepsy and Obstructive Sleep Apnoea.","authors":"Sheridan M Hoy","doi":"10.1007/s40263-023-01040-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40263-023-01040-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Solriamfetol (SUNOSI<sup>®</sup>) is an oral selective dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor approved in the EU and the USA for improving wakefulness in adults with excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) associated with narcolepsy or obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). In phase III studies, 12 weeks' therapy with solriamfetol within the recommended dosage range for narcolepsy (75 mg or 150 mg once daily) or OSA (37.5 mg, 75 mg or 150 mg once daily) provided early and sustained reductions in excessive sleepiness and improvements in wakefulness relative to placebo. These effects were generally sustained through 52 weeks. The drug's effectiveness in adults with EDS associated with narcolepsy is supported by results from real-world studies. Solriamfetol demonstrated a consistent safety and tolerability profile across clinical studies, with commonly reported adverse reactions generally occurring within 2 weeks of treatment initiation and mostly resolving within 2 weeks. Thus, solriamfetol represents a useful treatment option for adults with EDS associated with narcolepsy or OSA.</p>","PeriodicalId":10508,"journal":{"name":"CNS drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1009-1020"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41232907","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Semi-Naturalistic, Open-Label Trial Examining the Effect of Prescribed Medical Cannabis on Neurocognitive Performance. 一项半自然、开放标签的试验,研究处方医用大麻对神经认知性能的影响。
IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-09 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-023-01046-z
Thomas R Arkell, Brooke Manning, Luke A Downey, Amie C Hayley

Background and objectives: Medical cannabis use is increasing in Australia and other jurisdictions, yet little is known about the effects of medical cannabis on cognitive function. Findings from studies of non-medical ('recreational') cannabis may not be applicable to patients using prescribed medical cannabis to manage a health condition.

Methods: In this semi-naturalistic, open-label trial, patients with various health conditions attended a single laboratory session in which they self-administered a standard dose of prescribed medical cannabis as per instructions on the pharmacy label. We assessed cognitive performance using the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) and Druid application (app) prior to and following (CANTAB: + 3 h; Druid: + 3 and 5.5 h) medical cannabis self-administration. We also assessed subjective drug effects prior to and following (1, 2 and 4 h) medical cannabis self-administration using a range of 0-10 cm visual analogue scales ('stoned', 'sedated', 'relaxed', 'comfortable', 'anxious' and 'confident'). Data were analyzed using linear fixed-effect models.

Results: Participants (N = 40; 22 females) were prescribed a range of products including orally administered oils (n = 23) and flower for vaporization (n = 17). Participants had a mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of 41.38 (12.66) years and had been using medical cannabis for a mean (SD) of 10.18 (8.73) months. Chronic non-cancer pain was the most common indication for medical cannabis use (n = 20), followed by sleep disorder (n = 18) and anxiety (n = 11). The mean (SD) delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)/cannabidiol (CBD) dose administered by participants was 9.61 (8.52) mg/9.15 (10.11) mg among those using an oil, and 37.00 (24.53) mg/0.38 (1.58) mg among those who vaporized flower, respectively. Participants' performance improved over time on the CANTAB Multitasking Test and Rapid Visual Information Processing test (both p-values <0.001). All other changes in cognitive performance measures over time were non-significant (p > 0.05). Vaporization of flower was associated with significantly stronger subjective feelings of 'stoned' and 'sedated' relative to oils (both p < 0.001).

Conclusions: These findings suggest that prescribed medical cannabis may have minimal acute impact on cognitive function among patients with chronic health conditions, although larger and controlled trials are needed.

背景和目标:医用大麻在澳大利亚和其他司法管辖区的使用正在增加,但人们对医用大麻对认知功能的影响知之甚少。非医用(“创造性”)大麻研究的结果可能不适用于使用处方医用大麻来控制健康状况的患者。方法:在这项半自然、开放标签的试验中,患有各种健康状况的患者参加了一次单独的实验室会议,他们根据药房标签上的说明自行服用标准剂量的处方医用大麻。我们使用剑桥神经心理测试自动电池(CANTAB)和Druid应用程序(app)评估了医用大麻自我给药前后(CANTAB:+3小时;Druid:+3和5.5小时)的认知表现。我们还使用0-10厘米的视觉模拟量表(“稳定”、“镇静”、“放松”、“舒适”、“焦虑”和“自信”)评估了医用大麻自我给药前后(1、2和4小时)的主观药物效果。使用线性固定效应模型对数据进行分析。结果:参与者(N=40;22名女性)被开了一系列产品,包括口服油(N=23)和汽化花(N=17)。参与者的平均(标准差[SD])年龄为41.38(12.66)岁,使用医用大麻的平均(SD)为10.18(8.73)个月。慢性非癌症疼痛是医用大麻使用最常见的指征(n=20),其次是睡眠障碍(n=18)和焦虑(n=11)。参与者使用油的参与者服用的delta-9-四氢大麻酚(THC)/大麻二酚(CBD)的平均(SD)剂量分别为9.61(8.52)mg/9.15(10.11)mg和37.00(24.53)mg/0.38(1.58)mg。随着时间的推移,参与者在CANTAB多任务测试和快速视觉信息处理测试中的表现有所改善(均为0.05)。相对于油,花的蒸发与明显更强的主观感觉“石头味”和“镇静”有关(两个p结论:这些发现表明,处方医用大麻可能对慢性健康状况患者的认知功能产生最小的急性影响,尽管还需要更大规模的对照试验。
{"title":"A Semi-Naturalistic, Open-Label Trial Examining the Effect of Prescribed Medical Cannabis on Neurocognitive Performance.","authors":"Thomas R Arkell, Brooke Manning, Luke A Downey, Amie C Hayley","doi":"10.1007/s40263-023-01046-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40263-023-01046-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Medical cannabis use is increasing in Australia and other jurisdictions, yet little is known about the effects of medical cannabis on cognitive function. Findings from studies of non-medical ('recreational') cannabis may not be applicable to patients using prescribed medical cannabis to manage a health condition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this semi-naturalistic, open-label trial, patients with various health conditions attended a single laboratory session in which they self-administered a standard dose of prescribed medical cannabis as per instructions on the pharmacy label. We assessed cognitive performance using the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) and Druid application (app) prior to and following (CANTAB: + 3 h; Druid: + 3 and 5.5 h) medical cannabis self-administration. We also assessed subjective drug effects prior to and following (1, 2 and 4 h) medical cannabis self-administration using a range of 0-10 cm visual analogue scales ('stoned', 'sedated', 'relaxed', 'comfortable', 'anxious' and 'confident'). Data were analyzed using linear fixed-effect models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (N = 40; 22 females) were prescribed a range of products including orally administered oils (n = 23) and flower for vaporization (n = 17). Participants had a mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of 41.38 (12.66) years and had been using medical cannabis for a mean (SD) of 10.18 (8.73) months. Chronic non-cancer pain was the most common indication for medical cannabis use (n = 20), followed by sleep disorder (n = 18) and anxiety (n = 11). The mean (SD) delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)/cannabidiol (CBD) dose administered by participants was 9.61 (8.52) mg/9.15 (10.11) mg among those using an oil, and 37.00 (24.53) mg/0.38 (1.58) mg among those who vaporized flower, respectively. Participants' performance improved over time on the CANTAB Multitasking Test and Rapid Visual Information Processing test (both p-values <0.001). All other changes in cognitive performance measures over time were non-significant (p > 0.05). Vaporization of flower was associated with significantly stronger subjective feelings of 'stoned' and 'sedated' relative to oils (both p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that prescribed medical cannabis may have minimal acute impact on cognitive function among patients with chronic health conditions, although larger and controlled trials are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":10508,"journal":{"name":"CNS drugs","volume":" ","pages":"981-992"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10667416/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72013774","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Acknowledgement to Referees 致推荐人的确认函
2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2023-10-30 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-023-01043-2
{"title":"Acknowledgement to Referees","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s40263-023-01043-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-023-01043-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10508,"journal":{"name":"CNS drugs","volume":"63 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136023236","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Authors' Reply to Pande et al. Comment on "Extended-Release Viloxazine Compared to Atomoxetine for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder". 作者对Pande等人的回复。评论“与阿托莫西汀相比,维洛嗪缓释治疗注意力缺陷多动障碍”。
IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-023-01035-2
Maxwell Z Price, Richard L Price
{"title":"Authors' Reply to Pande et al. Comment on \"Extended-Release Viloxazine Compared to Atomoxetine for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder\".","authors":"Maxwell Z Price,&nbsp;Richard L Price","doi":"10.1007/s40263-023-01035-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40263-023-01035-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10508,"journal":{"name":"CNS drugs","volume":" ","pages":"939-940"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/33/30/40263_2023_Article_1035.PMC10570209.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10129656","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Dextromethorphan-Bupropion for the Treatment of Depression: A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Trials. 右美沙芬治疗抑郁症:临床试验有效性和安全性的系统评价。
IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-04 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-023-01032-5
Dania Akbar, Taeho Greg Rhee, Felicia Ceban, Roger Ho, Kayla M Teopiz, Bing Cao, Mehala Subramaniapillai, Angela T H Kwan, Joshua D Rosenblat, Roger S McIntyre

Background: A significant proportion of adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) do not respond to treatments which are currently used in clinical practice such as first-generation monoamine-based antidepressants.

Objectives: The objective of this systematic review was to assess the efficacy, safety, and mechanisms of action of AXS-05, a combination of the NMDA-receptor antagonist dextromethorphan with bupropion, in adults with MDD.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov for current studies reporting on efficacy and/or safety of AXS-05 in patients with MDD. The search terms included: "AXS-05" OR "dextromethorphan and bupropion" AND "depression". Studies from database inception to January 2023 were evaluated. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.

Results: The search yielded 54 studies of which 5 were included. All studies had low risk of bias. Depression severity, measured with the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) significantly decreased as early as 1-week post-treatment from baseline when compared to a placebo-controlled group (LS mean difference 2.2; 95% CI 0.6-3.9; p = 0.007) and at 2 weeks compared to an active control group (LS mean difference 4.7; 95% CI 0.6-8.8; p = 0.024). Treatment efficacy could be maintained for up to 12 months with mean MADRS score reduction of 23 points from baseline. Clinical remission and response rates also improved at week 1 and were maintained for 12 months. The treatment was well-tolerated, with some transient adverse events reported.

Conclusion: Current evidence suggests that the combination of dextromethorphan and bupropion is a well-tolerated, rapid-acting treatment option for adults with MDD. Initial success with AXS-05 supports the mechanistic role of glutamatergeric and sigma 1 signaling in the pathophysiology of MDD.

背景:相当一部分患有严重抑郁障碍(MDD)的成年人对目前临床实践中使用的治疗方法(如第一代单胺类抗抑郁药)没有反应。目的:本系统综述的目的是评估NMDA受体拮抗剂右美沙芬和安非他酮联合应用AXS-05治疗成人MDD的疗效、安全性和作用机制。方法:我们在PubMed、Embase、Google Scholar和ClinicalTrials.gov上搜索关于AXS-05对MDD患者疗效和/或安全性的最新研究。搜索词包括:“AXS-05”或“右美沙芬和安非他酮”和“抑郁症”。对从数据库建立到2023年1月的研究进行了评估。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。结果:检索得到54项研究,其中包括5项。所有研究的偏倚风险都很低。抑郁症严重程度,与安慰剂对照组相比,Montgomery-Åsberg抑郁评定量表(MADRS)在治疗后1周显著降低(LS平均差异2.2;95%CI 0.6-3.9;p=0.007),在治疗后2周与活动对照组相比显著降低(LS-平均差异4.7;95%CI 0.6-8.8;p=0.024)月,平均MADRS评分较基线降低23分。临床缓解率和缓解率在第1周也有所改善,并维持了12个月。该治疗耐受性良好,报告了一些短暂的不良事件。结论:目前的证据表明,右美沙芬和安非他酮联合治疗成人MDD是一种耐受性良好、快速有效的治疗选择。AXS-05的初步成功支持谷氨酸和西格玛1信号在MDD病理生理学中的机制作用。
{"title":"Dextromethorphan-Bupropion for the Treatment of Depression: A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Trials.","authors":"Dania Akbar, Taeho Greg Rhee, Felicia Ceban, Roger Ho, Kayla M Teopiz, Bing Cao, Mehala Subramaniapillai, Angela T H Kwan, Joshua D Rosenblat, Roger S McIntyre","doi":"10.1007/s40263-023-01032-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40263-023-01032-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A significant proportion of adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) do not respond to treatments which are currently used in clinical practice such as first-generation monoamine-based antidepressants.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this systematic review was to assess the efficacy, safety, and mechanisms of action of AXS-05, a combination of the NMDA-receptor antagonist dextromethorphan with bupropion, in adults with MDD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov for current studies reporting on efficacy and/or safety of AXS-05 in patients with MDD. The search terms included: \"AXS-05\" OR \"dextromethorphan and bupropion\" AND \"depression\". Studies from database inception to January 2023 were evaluated. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 54 studies of which 5 were included. All studies had low risk of bias. Depression severity, measured with the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) significantly decreased as early as 1-week post-treatment from baseline when compared to a placebo-controlled group (LS mean difference 2.2; 95% CI 0.6-3.9; p = 0.007) and at 2 weeks compared to an active control group (LS mean difference 4.7; 95% CI 0.6-8.8; p = 0.024). Treatment efficacy could be maintained for up to 12 months with mean MADRS score reduction of 23 points from baseline. Clinical remission and response rates also improved at week 1 and were maintained for 12 months. The treatment was well-tolerated, with some transient adverse events reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current evidence suggests that the combination of dextromethorphan and bupropion is a well-tolerated, rapid-acting treatment option for adults with MDD. Initial success with AXS-05 supports the mechanistic role of glutamatergeric and sigma 1 signaling in the pathophysiology of MDD.</p>","PeriodicalId":10508,"journal":{"name":"CNS drugs","volume":" ","pages":"867-881"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41103357","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comment on: "Extended‑Release Viloxazine Compared with Atomoxetine for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder". 评论:“与阿托莫西汀相比,维洛嗪缓释治疗注意力缺陷多动障碍”。
IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-023-01034-3
Uday Pande, Nitin R Gaikwad, Alok Singh
{"title":"Comment on: \"Extended‑Release Viloxazine Compared with Atomoxetine for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder\".","authors":"Uday Pande,&nbsp;Nitin R Gaikwad,&nbsp;Alok Singh","doi":"10.1007/s40263-023-01034-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40263-023-01034-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10508,"journal":{"name":"CNS drugs","volume":" ","pages":"937-938"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10128103","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Third-Generation Antiseizure Medication in the Treatment of Benzodiazepine-Refractory Status Epilepticus in Poststroke Epilepsy: A Retrospective Observational Register-Based Study. 第三代抗惊厥药物治疗脑卒中后癫痫中苯二氮卓类难治性癫痫:一项基于观察的回顾性研究。
IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-02 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-023-01039-y
Yaroslav Winter, Katharina Sandner, Thomas Vieth, Gabriel Gonzalez-Escamilla, Sebastian V Stuckrad-Barre, Sergiu Groppa

Background and objective: Status epilepticus in poststroke epilepsy is a challenging condition because of multiple vascular comorbidities and the advanced age of patients. Data on third-generation antiseizure medication (ASM) in this condition are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of third-generation ASMs in the second- or third-line therapy of benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus in poststroke epilepsy following acute ischemic stroke.

Methods: Data on the effectiveness of third-generation ASMs in patients with status epilepticus in poststroke epilepsy were gathered from two German Stroke Registries and the Mainz Epilepsy Registry. We included only cases with epilepsy remote to the ischemic event. No patients with acute symptomatic seizures were included. The following third-generation ASMs were included: brivaracetam, lacosamide, eslicarbazepine, perampanel, topiramate, and zonisamide. The assessment of effectiveness was based on seizure freedom within 48 h since the start of therapy with the respective ASM. Seizure freedom was evaluated both clinically (clinical evaluation at least three times per day) and by daily electroencephalogram records.

Results: Of the 138 patients aged 70.8 ± 8.1 years with benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus in ischemic poststroke epilepsy, 33 (23.9%) were treated with lacosamide, 24 (17.4%) with brivaracetam, 23 (16.7%) with eslicarbazepine, 21 (15.2%) with perampanel, 20 (14.5%) with topiramate, and 17 (12.3%) with zonisamide. Seizure freedom within 48 h was achieved in 66.7% of patients with lacosamide, 65.2% with eslicarbazepine, 38.1% with perampanel, 37.5% with brivaracetam, 35.0% with topiramate, and 35.3% with zonisamide (p < 0.05 for comparison of lacosamide or eslicarbazepine to other ASMs).

Conclusions: Based on these data, lacosamide and eslicarbazepine might be more favorable in the treatment of refractory status epilepticus in poststroke epilepsy, when administered as second- or third-line ASMs before anesthesia. Because of the fact that these ASMs share the same mechanism of action (slow inactivation of sodium channels), our findings could motivate further research on the role that this pharmaceutical mechanism of action has in the treatment of poststroke epilepsy.

Clinical trial registration: This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05267405).

背景和目的:脑卒中后癫痫的癫痫持续状态是一种具有挑战性的情况,因为患者患有多种血管合并症和高龄。关于这种情况下的第三代抗癫痫药物(ASM)的数据有限。本研究的目的是评估第三代ASM在急性缺血性卒中后卒中后癫痫的苯二氮卓类难治性癫痫持续状态的二线或三线治疗中的疗效。方法:从两个德国卒中登记处和美因茨癫痫登记处收集第三代ASM对卒中后癫痫持续状态患者的有效性数据。我们只纳入了缺血性事件以外的癫痫病例。没有包括急性症状性癫痫发作的患者。包括以下第三代ASM:溴拉西坦、拉沙酰胺、依斯卡巴zepine、perampanel、托吡酯和唑尼酰胺。有效性评估基于自开始使用相应ASM治疗后48小时内的癫痫发作自由度。对癫痫发作自由度进行临床评估(每天至少三次临床评估)和每日脑电图记录。结果:在138例年龄为70.8±8.1岁的缺血性脑卒中后癫痫患者中,33例(23.9%)接受了拉沙酰胺治疗,24例(17.4%)接受了布拉西坦治疗,23例(16.7%)接受埃斯利卡巴zepine治疗,21例(15.2%)接受帕帕奈治疗,20例(14.5%)接受托吡酯治疗,17例(12.3%)接受唑尼酰胺治疗。66.7%的患者在48小时内无癫痫发作,65.2%的患者在服用拉沙酰胺时无癫痫发作;38.1%的患者在使用帕帕奈时无癫痫发生;37.5%的患者使用溴拉西坦时无癫痫发病;35.0%的患者使用托吡酯时无癫痫发生;35.3%的患者使用唑硝胺时无癫痫(与其他ASM相比,p<0.05)。结论:根据这些数据,当在麻醉前作为二线或三线ASM给药时,lacosamide和eslicarbazepine可能更有利于治疗卒中后癫痫的难治性癫痫持续状态。由于这些ASM具有相同的作用机制(钠通道的缓慢失活),我们的发现可以推动对这种药物作用机制在治疗中风后癫痫中的作用的进一步研究。临床试验注册:本研究注册于ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT05267405)。
{"title":"Third-Generation Antiseizure Medication in the Treatment of Benzodiazepine-Refractory Status Epilepticus in Poststroke Epilepsy: A Retrospective Observational Register-Based Study.","authors":"Yaroslav Winter,&nbsp;Katharina Sandner,&nbsp;Thomas Vieth,&nbsp;Gabriel Gonzalez-Escamilla,&nbsp;Sebastian V Stuckrad-Barre,&nbsp;Sergiu Groppa","doi":"10.1007/s40263-023-01039-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40263-023-01039-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Status epilepticus in poststroke epilepsy is a challenging condition because of multiple vascular comorbidities and the advanced age of patients. Data on third-generation antiseizure medication (ASM) in this condition are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of third-generation ASMs in the second- or third-line therapy of benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus in poststroke epilepsy following acute ischemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on the effectiveness of third-generation ASMs in patients with status epilepticus in poststroke epilepsy were gathered from two German Stroke Registries and the Mainz Epilepsy Registry. We included only cases with epilepsy remote to the ischemic event. No patients with acute symptomatic seizures were included. The following third-generation ASMs were included: brivaracetam, lacosamide, eslicarbazepine, perampanel, topiramate, and zonisamide. The assessment of effectiveness was based on seizure freedom within 48 h since the start of therapy with the respective ASM. Seizure freedom was evaluated both clinically (clinical evaluation at least three times per day) and by daily electroencephalogram records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 138 patients aged 70.8 ± 8.1 years with benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus in ischemic poststroke epilepsy, 33 (23.9%) were treated with lacosamide, 24 (17.4%) with brivaracetam, 23 (16.7%) with eslicarbazepine, 21 (15.2%) with perampanel, 20 (14.5%) with topiramate, and 17 (12.3%) with zonisamide. Seizure freedom within 48 h was achieved in 66.7% of patients with lacosamide, 65.2% with eslicarbazepine, 38.1% with perampanel, 37.5% with brivaracetam, 35.0% with topiramate, and 35.3% with zonisamide (p < 0.05 for comparison of lacosamide or eslicarbazepine to other ASMs).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on these data, lacosamide and eslicarbazepine might be more favorable in the treatment of refractory status epilepticus in poststroke epilepsy, when administered as second- or third-line ASMs before anesthesia. Because of the fact that these ASMs share the same mechanism of action (slow inactivation of sodium channels), our findings could motivate further research on the role that this pharmaceutical mechanism of action has in the treatment of poststroke epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05267405).</p>","PeriodicalId":10508,"journal":{"name":"CNS drugs","volume":" ","pages":"929-936"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9d/e2/40263_2023_Article_1039.PMC10570217.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41110872","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Stopping Disease-Modifying Treatments in Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Real-World Studies. 停止多发性硬化症的疾病改良治疗:现实世界研究的系统综述和荟萃分析。
IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-23 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-023-01038-z
Luca Prosperini, Shalom Haggiag, Serena Ruggieri, Carla Tortorella, Claudio Gasperini

Background: The question of whether multiple sclerosis requires life-long disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) remains unanswered. Some studies suggest that older patients with stable disease may safely discontinue their DMTs, yet comprehensive evidence-based data are scarce and real-world studies have provided mixed results.

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the rate of disease reactivation and associated risk factors after discontinuation of DMTs in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Methods: We searched scientific databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and Google Scholar) to identify real-world studies published until 31 July, 2023 that reported the number of patients who experienced relapses and/or disability accrual (outcomes of interest) following a therapy discontinuation longer than 12 months. Magnetic resonance activity and treatment re-start after DMT discontinuation were also considered as additional outcomes. We excluded studies where therapy discontinuation was explicitly related to an unintended or planned pregnancy or preceded a treatment switch. We ran random-effects meta-analyses, subgroup analyses and meta-regression models to provide pooled estimates of post-discontinuation relapse and disability events, and to identify their potential moderators (predictors).

Results: After an independent screening, 22 articles met the eligibility criteria, yielding a pooled sample size of 2942 patients followed for 1-7 years after discontinuation (11,689 patient-years). The pooled rates for relapse and disability events were 6.7 and 5.8 per 100 patient-years, respectively. However, available data did not allow us to disentangle isolated disability accrual from relapse-associated worsening. Studies including older patients (β = -0.65, p = 0.006), patients with a longer exposure to DMTs (β = -2.22, p = 0.001) and patients with a longer period of disease stability (β = -2.74, p = 0.002) showed a lower risk of relapse events. According to meta-regression equations, the risk of relapse events after DMT discontinuation became negligible (arbitrarily set at < 1% per year) at approximately 60 years of age, and after either 10 years of DMT exposure, or 8 years of disease stability. Additional analyses showed pooled rates for magnetic resonance imaging activity and re-start events of 16.7 and 17.5 per 100 patient-years, respectively.

Conclusions: Based on our quantitative synthesis of real-world data, in the absence of definitive answers from clinical trials, DMT discontinuation appears feasible with a high degree of certainty in selected patients. While our findings are robust regarding relapse events, future efforts are warranted to determine if DMT discontinuation is associated with isolated disability accrual.

背景:多发性硬化症是否需要终身疾病改良治疗(DMTs)的问题仍未得到解答。一些研究表明,患有稳定疾病的老年患者可以安全地停止DMT,但全面的循证数据很少,现实世界的研究提供了喜忧参半的结果。目的:本研究的目的是评估多发性硬化症患者停用DMTs后疾病再激活率和相关风险因素。方法:我们搜索科学数据库(PubMed/MEDLINE、Scopus和Google Scholar),以确定截至2023年7月31日发表的真实世界研究,这些研究报告了在中断治疗超过12个月后出现复发和/或残疾增加(感兴趣的结果)的患者人数。磁共振活性和DMT停药后重新开始治疗也被认为是额外的结果。我们排除了那些停药与意外或计划怀孕或在治疗转换之前明确相关的研究。我们进行了随机效应荟萃分析、亚组分析和元回归模型,以提供停药后复发和残疾事件的汇总估计,并确定其潜在的调节因素(预测因素)。结果:经过独立筛选,22篇文章符合资格标准,产生2942名患者的合并样本量,在停药后随访1-7年(11689名患者年)。复发和残疾事件的合并率分别为每100名患者年6.7和5.8。然而,现有数据无法使我们将孤立的残疾累积与复发相关的恶化区分开来。包括老年患者(β=-0.65,p=0.006)、DMTs暴露时间较长的患者(β=2.22,p=0.001)和疾病稳定期较长(β=2.74,p=0.002)的研究显示,复发事件的风险较低。根据元回归方程,DMT停药后复发事件的风险变得可以忽略不计(任意设定为结论:根据我们对真实世界数据的定量综合,在临床试验没有明确答案的情况下,DMT停药在选定的患者中似乎是可行的,具有高度的确定性。虽然我们的研究结果对复发事件是可靠的,但有必要在未来努力确定DMT停用药是否与孤立的残疾有关权责发生制。
{"title":"Stopping Disease-Modifying Treatments in Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Real-World Studies.","authors":"Luca Prosperini,&nbsp;Shalom Haggiag,&nbsp;Serena Ruggieri,&nbsp;Carla Tortorella,&nbsp;Claudio Gasperini","doi":"10.1007/s40263-023-01038-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40263-023-01038-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The question of whether multiple sclerosis requires life-long disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) remains unanswered. Some studies suggest that older patients with stable disease may safely discontinue their DMTs, yet comprehensive evidence-based data are scarce and real-world studies have provided mixed results.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the rate of disease reactivation and associated risk factors after discontinuation of DMTs in patients with multiple sclerosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched scientific databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and Google Scholar) to identify real-world studies published until 31 July, 2023 that reported the number of patients who experienced relapses and/or disability accrual (outcomes of interest) following a therapy discontinuation longer than 12 months. Magnetic resonance activity and treatment re-start after DMT discontinuation were also considered as additional outcomes. We excluded studies where therapy discontinuation was explicitly related to an unintended or planned pregnancy or preceded a treatment switch. We ran random-effects meta-analyses, subgroup analyses and meta-regression models to provide pooled estimates of post-discontinuation relapse and disability events, and to identify their potential moderators (predictors).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After an independent screening, 22 articles met the eligibility criteria, yielding a pooled sample size of 2942 patients followed for 1-7 years after discontinuation (11,689 patient-years). The pooled rates for relapse and disability events were 6.7 and 5.8 per 100 patient-years, respectively. However, available data did not allow us to disentangle isolated disability accrual from relapse-associated worsening. Studies including older patients (β = -0.65, p = 0.006), patients with a longer exposure to DMTs (β = -2.22, p = 0.001) and patients with a longer period of disease stability (β = -2.74, p = 0.002) showed a lower risk of relapse events. According to meta-regression equations, the risk of relapse events after DMT discontinuation became negligible (arbitrarily set at < 1% per year) at approximately 60 years of age, and after either 10 years of DMT exposure, or 8 years of disease stability. Additional analyses showed pooled rates for magnetic resonance imaging activity and re-start events of 16.7 and 17.5 per 100 patient-years, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on our quantitative synthesis of real-world data, in the absence of definitive answers from clinical trials, DMT discontinuation appears feasible with a high degree of certainty in selected patients. While our findings are robust regarding relapse events, future efforts are warranted to determine if DMT discontinuation is associated with isolated disability accrual.</p>","PeriodicalId":10508,"journal":{"name":"CNS drugs","volume":" ","pages":"915-927"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41093711","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
CNS drugs
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1