Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-07-10DOI: 10.1007/s40263-025-01204-5
Aisling McGuigan, Hannah A Blair
Tofersen (QALSODY®) is the first drug approved for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) associated with superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) mutations. Tofersen is an antisense oligonucleotide that induces SOD1 mRNA degradation. In the 28-week, placebo-controlled, multinational, phase III VALOR trial, intrathecally administered tofersen reduced plasma concentrations of neurofilament proteins (biomarker for neuro-axonal injury) and total SOD1 protein in cerebrospinal fluid in patients with SOD1 mutation-associated ALS. These reductions were sustained in a long-term, open-label extension study. The decline in functional outcomes was not significantly reduced with tofersen treatment compared with placebo in the 28-week phase III trial, although in the longer-term open-label study, early tofersen initiation was associated with slowed functional decline versus delayed tofersen initiation. Tofersen had an acceptable tolerability profile in clinical trials with a favourable benefit-to-risk balance. In summary, tofersen is a new disease-modifying therapy for patients with ALS attributed to an SOD1 mutation, offering reductions in levels of a biomarker associated with neurodegeneration and disease progression, with an acceptable tolerability profile.
{"title":"Tofersen: A Review in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Associated with SOD1 Mutations.","authors":"Aisling McGuigan, Hannah A Blair","doi":"10.1007/s40263-025-01204-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40263-025-01204-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tofersen (QALSODY<sup>®</sup>) is the first drug approved for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) associated with superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) mutations. Tofersen is an antisense oligonucleotide that induces SOD1 mRNA degradation. In the 28-week, placebo-controlled, multinational, phase III VALOR trial, intrathecally administered tofersen reduced plasma concentrations of neurofilament proteins (biomarker for neuro-axonal injury) and total SOD1 protein in cerebrospinal fluid in patients with SOD1 mutation-associated ALS. These reductions were sustained in a long-term, open-label extension study. The decline in functional outcomes was not significantly reduced with tofersen treatment compared with placebo in the 28-week phase III trial, although in the longer-term open-label study, early tofersen initiation was associated with slowed functional decline versus delayed tofersen initiation. Tofersen had an acceptable tolerability profile in clinical trials with a favourable benefit-to-risk balance. In summary, tofersen is a new disease-modifying therapy for patients with ALS attributed to an SOD1 mutation, offering reductions in levels of a biomarker associated with neurodegeneration and disease progression, with an acceptable tolerability profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":10508,"journal":{"name":"CNS drugs","volume":" ","pages":"903-912"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144607674","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-06-12DOI: 10.1007/s40263-025-01196-2
Juri-Alexander Witt, Mostafa Badr, Rainer Surges, Randi von Wrede, Christoph Helmstaedter
Background: Previous studies on cenobamate (CNB) have generally reported neutral to positive effects on objective cognitive performance in patients with epilepsy, but are limited to dosages up to 250 mg/day. However, a case report (Witt et al. in Neurocase 30:91-96, 2024) noted severe memory deterioration at 400 mg/day.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine dose-dependent effects of CNB on cognition.
Methods: In this retrospective longitudinal real-world study, executive functions and episodic memory were assessed in adult patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy during CNB therapy and compared with baseline. Subgroups were stratified by daily CNB doses of ≥ 300 mg versus < 300 mg. Executive functions were assessed using the EpiTrack®, verbal memory via the VLMT or an abbreviated version, and figural memory with the DCS-R.
Results: The study included 84 patients, 24 (28.6%) of them with a CNB dose of ≥ 300 mg. With a mean CNB dose of 200.6 ± 114.3 mg (range 12.5-400.0 mg), seizure freedom was achieved in 11.9% with no significant difference between the lower and the higher dose group. Repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) revealed a significant decline in executive functions at ≥ 300 mg (n = 84; F = 6.35, p = 0.014) compared to baseline. Changes were correlated with CNB dose (r = - 0.31, p = 0.004). Individual level analyses indicated that 50.0% of patients on higher versus 16.7% on lower CNB doses deteriorated according to reliable change indices (RCI). In a subgroup undergoing extensive memory testing, verbal retention showed a significant negative, dose-independent effect at the group level (n = 22; F = 7.95, p = 0.011), with intraindividual declines in 28.6% (≥ 300 mg) versus 13.3% (< 300 mg). Other memory parameters were unaffected.
Conclusions: The results of this real-world study investigating objective cognitive performance under CNB suggest possible, partially dose-dependent negative effects of CNB on cognition. Daily CNB doses of ≥ 300 mg were associated with a significant decline in executive functions. Furthermore, a dose-independent negative effect on verbal retention was observed in a subgroup of patients undergoing extensive memory assessment. Given the limitations of retrospective audits, our findings prompt further, larger scope studies to confirm the results. However, a careful balance between seizure control at the lowest CNB dose possible and potential cognitive side effects appears advisable, which requires the implementation of cognitive monitoring in standard care where possible.
{"title":"The Effects of Cenobamate and Its Dosage on Cognition: A Retrospective Longitudinal Study in 84 Individuals with Epilepsy.","authors":"Juri-Alexander Witt, Mostafa Badr, Rainer Surges, Randi von Wrede, Christoph Helmstaedter","doi":"10.1007/s40263-025-01196-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40263-025-01196-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies on cenobamate (CNB) have generally reported neutral to positive effects on objective cognitive performance in patients with epilepsy, but are limited to dosages up to 250 mg/day. However, a case report (Witt et al. in Neurocase 30:91-96, 2024) noted severe memory deterioration at 400 mg/day.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to examine dose-dependent effects of CNB on cognition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective longitudinal real-world study, executive functions and episodic memory were assessed in adult patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy during CNB therapy and compared with baseline. Subgroups were stratified by daily CNB doses of ≥ 300 mg versus < 300 mg. Executive functions were assessed using the EpiTrack<sup>®</sup>, verbal memory via the VLMT or an abbreviated version, and figural memory with the DCS-R.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 84 patients, 24 (28.6%) of them with a CNB dose of ≥ 300 mg. With a mean CNB dose of 200.6 ± 114.3 mg (range 12.5-400.0 mg), seizure freedom was achieved in 11.9% with no significant difference between the lower and the higher dose group. Repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) revealed a significant decline in executive functions at ≥ 300 mg (n = 84; F = 6.35, p = 0.014) compared to baseline. Changes were correlated with CNB dose (r = - 0.31, p = 0.004). Individual level analyses indicated that 50.0% of patients on higher versus 16.7% on lower CNB doses deteriorated according to reliable change indices (RCI). In a subgroup undergoing extensive memory testing, verbal retention showed a significant negative, dose-independent effect at the group level (n = 22; F = 7.95, p = 0.011), with intraindividual declines in 28.6% (≥ 300 mg) versus 13.3% (< 300 mg). Other memory parameters were unaffected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this real-world study investigating objective cognitive performance under CNB suggest possible, partially dose-dependent negative effects of CNB on cognition. Daily CNB doses of ≥ 300 mg were associated with a significant decline in executive functions. Furthermore, a dose-independent negative effect on verbal retention was observed in a subgroup of patients undergoing extensive memory assessment. Given the limitations of retrospective audits, our findings prompt further, larger scope studies to confirm the results. However, a careful balance between seizure control at the lowest CNB dose possible and potential cognitive side effects appears advisable, which requires the implementation of cognitive monitoring in standard care where possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":10508,"journal":{"name":"CNS drugs","volume":" ","pages":"893-902"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12354123/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144274340","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-05-25DOI: 10.1007/s40263-025-01193-5
Aymeric Lanore, Edouard Januel, Nathalie Bertille, Margherita Fabbri, Louise-Laure Mariani, Graziella Mangone, Sara Sambin, Poornima Jayadev Menon, Melissa Tir, Matthieu Bereau, Wassilios G Meissner, Claire Thiriez, Ana Marques, Philippe Remy, Gwendoline Dupont, Elena Moro, Luc Defebvre, Jean Luc Houeto, Stéphane Thobois, Jean-Philippe Azulay, Christian Geny, Solène Frismand, Philippe Damier, Caroline Giordana, Giovanni Castelnovo, Solène Ansquer, Anne Doe De Maindreville, Sophie Drapier, David Maltête, Christine Tranchant, Olivier Rascol, Florence Tubach, Yann De Rycke, Jean-Christophe Corvol
Background: Levodopa, dopamine agonists (DA) and monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOI) are all approved first-line therapies for Parkinson's disease (PD), as monotherapy or in combination. Data on their use in the early management of patients with PD in real-life are lacking. Our objective was to assess the impact of early therapeutic strategies on the development of motor and neuropsychiatric complications using a nationwide PD cohort.
Methods: NS-PARK is a cohort of patients with PD recruited between 2011 and 2021 from 26 expert centres for PD in France. We analysed the patients with less than 5-years disease duration and no motor complications at inclusion. We used interval censoring survival models to assess the associations between therapeutic strategies (levodopa monotherapy, levodopa alternative therapies or levodopa combinations) and motor fluctuations, dyskinesia, impulse control and related behaviours (ICRBs), apathy, psychosis/hallucination and daytime sleepiness. Analyses were adjusted for sex, age, disease duration, dopaminergic dose and disease severity.
Results: We included 1722 patients (38.4% female, median age 67.7 years). At inclusion, 41% received levodopa monotherapy, 31% received levodopa alternative therapies and 28% received levodopa combinations. Compared with levodopa monotherapy, levodopa alternative therapies were associated with a lower dyskinesia risk (hazard ratio (HR) 0.48, 95% confidence interval (CI)[0.28-0.84]), but there was no significant difference in motor fluctuations. Both levodopa alternative and combinations therapies increased ICRBs risk (HR 4.06, 95% CI [2.48-6.67]; HR 5.16, 95% CI [3.00-8.86]) and decreased apathy risk (HR 0.36, 95% CI [0.26-0.49]; HR 0.52, 95% CI [0.39-0.69]). No association was found with psychosis/hallucination or daytime sleepiness.
Conclusions: In this real-life cohort, our data supported an association between levodopa alternative therapies and a lower risk of dyskinesia and apathy, but a higher risk of ICRBs compared with levodopa monotherapy.
Clinicaltrials:
Gov identifier: NCT04888364. Registered June 2021.
背景:左旋多巴、多巴胺激动剂(DA)和单胺氧化酶抑制剂(MAOI)均被批准为帕金森病(PD)的一线治疗药物,无论是单药还是联合用药。在现实生活中,它们在PD患者早期管理中的使用数据缺乏。我们的目的是通过一个全国性的PD队列来评估早期治疗策略对运动和神经精神并发症发展的影响。方法:NS-PARK是2011年至2021年间从法国26个PD专家中心招募的PD患者队列。我们分析了病程少于5年且纳入时无运动并发症的患者。我们使用间隔筛选生存模型来评估治疗策略(左旋多巴单一疗法、左旋多巴替代疗法或左旋多巴联合疗法)与运动波动、运动障碍、冲动控制及相关行为(ICRBs)、冷漠、精神病/幻觉和白天嗜睡之间的关系。分析根据性别、年龄、疾病持续时间、多巴胺能剂量和疾病严重程度进行调整。结果:纳入1722例患者(38.4%为女性,中位年龄67.7岁)。纳入时,41%接受左旋多巴单一疗法,31%接受左旋多巴替代疗法,28%接受左旋多巴联合疗法。与左旋多巴单药治疗相比,左旋多巴替代疗法与较低的运动障碍风险相关(危险比(HR) 0.48, 95%可信区间(CI)[0.28-0.84]),但在运动波动方面无显著差异。左旋多巴替代疗法和联合疗法均增加ICRBs风险(HR 4.06, 95% CI [2.48-6.67];HR 5.16, 95% CI[3.00-8.86])和冷漠风险降低(HR 0.36, 95% CI [0.26-0.49];Hr 0.52, 95% ci[0.39-0.69])。没有发现与精神病/幻觉或白天嗜睡有关。结论:在这个现实生活中的队列中,我们的数据支持左旋多巴替代疗法与运动障碍和冷漠的低风险之间的关联,但与左旋多巴单药治疗相比,ICRBs的风险更高。临床试验:政府标识符:NCT04888364。2021年6月注册。
{"title":"Motor and Non-motor Complications Following Different Early Therapies in Parkinson's Disease: Longitudinal Analysis of Real-Life Clinical and Therapeutic Data from the French NS-PARK Cohort.","authors":"Aymeric Lanore, Edouard Januel, Nathalie Bertille, Margherita Fabbri, Louise-Laure Mariani, Graziella Mangone, Sara Sambin, Poornima Jayadev Menon, Melissa Tir, Matthieu Bereau, Wassilios G Meissner, Claire Thiriez, Ana Marques, Philippe Remy, Gwendoline Dupont, Elena Moro, Luc Defebvre, Jean Luc Houeto, Stéphane Thobois, Jean-Philippe Azulay, Christian Geny, Solène Frismand, Philippe Damier, Caroline Giordana, Giovanni Castelnovo, Solène Ansquer, Anne Doe De Maindreville, Sophie Drapier, David Maltête, Christine Tranchant, Olivier Rascol, Florence Tubach, Yann De Rycke, Jean-Christophe Corvol","doi":"10.1007/s40263-025-01193-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40263-025-01193-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Levodopa, dopamine agonists (DA) and monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOI) are all approved first-line therapies for Parkinson's disease (PD), as monotherapy or in combination. Data on their use in the early management of patients with PD in real-life are lacking. Our objective was to assess the impact of early therapeutic strategies on the development of motor and neuropsychiatric complications using a nationwide PD cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>NS-PARK is a cohort of patients with PD recruited between 2011 and 2021 from 26 expert centres for PD in France. We analysed the patients with less than 5-years disease duration and no motor complications at inclusion. We used interval censoring survival models to assess the associations between therapeutic strategies (levodopa monotherapy, levodopa alternative therapies or levodopa combinations) and motor fluctuations, dyskinesia, impulse control and related behaviours (ICRBs), apathy, psychosis/hallucination and daytime sleepiness. Analyses were adjusted for sex, age, disease duration, dopaminergic dose and disease severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 1722 patients (38.4% female, median age 67.7 years). At inclusion, 41% received levodopa monotherapy, 31% received levodopa alternative therapies and 28% received levodopa combinations. Compared with levodopa monotherapy, levodopa alternative therapies were associated with a lower dyskinesia risk (hazard ratio (HR) 0.48, 95% confidence interval (CI)[0.28-0.84]), but there was no significant difference in motor fluctuations. Both levodopa alternative and combinations therapies increased ICRBs risk (HR 4.06, 95% CI [2.48-6.67]; HR 5.16, 95% CI [3.00-8.86]) and decreased apathy risk (HR 0.36, 95% CI [0.26-0.49]; HR 0.52, 95% CI [0.39-0.69]). No association was found with psychosis/hallucination or daytime sleepiness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this real-life cohort, our data supported an association between levodopa alternative therapies and a lower risk of dyskinesia and apathy, but a higher risk of ICRBs compared with levodopa monotherapy.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong></p><p><strong>Gov identifier: </strong>NCT04888364. Registered June 2021.</p>","PeriodicalId":10508,"journal":{"name":"CNS drugs","volume":" ","pages":"879-891"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144141590","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-07-19DOI: 10.1007/s40263-025-01208-1
Bryan Shapiro, Daniel Cohrs
{"title":"Barriers to Safely Discontinuing Duloxetine: An Urgent Call to Action.","authors":"Bryan Shapiro, Daniel Cohrs","doi":"10.1007/s40263-025-01208-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40263-025-01208-1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10508,"journal":{"name":"CNS drugs","volume":" ","pages":"819-822"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144667346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-07-10DOI: 10.1007/s40263-025-01199-z
Eric A Miller, Christy Capone, Erica Eaton, Robert M Swift, Carolina L Haass-Koffler
Psychedelics have been studied since the 1950s as a potential treatment for alcohol use disorder (AUD), with over a dozen clinical trials of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), and several contemporary trials of psilocybin and ayahuasca for this indication. Herein, we characterize foundational studies from the 1950s to the present, with emphasis on key design factors that varied considerably between published studies. Critically, those design factors include pharmacological factors, such as presence or absence of a placebo control and the nature of the placebo (e.g., ephedrine, dextroamphetamine, diphenhydramine, or low-dose LSD), and non-pharmacological factors, such as the treatment setting and the presence or absence of psychotherapy. We found that observational studies nearly uniformly show promising results, but trials in which psychedelics were tested against placebo or standard of care control groups have been more inconsistent in both outcomes and methodologies. Given the inconsistency in published results, we review candidate mechanisms of action for psychedelics in the context of AUD. We take a biopsychosocial approach, reviewing mechanisms spanning several different hierarchical levels of analysis, including cellular neuroplasticity, cognitive neuroscience, subjective experience, and social connection. Taken together, this review highlights key findings on both the efficacy and potential mechanisms of psychedelics for the treatment of AUD, which could motivate future studies in this rapidly developing field.
{"title":"Psychedelics for Alcohol Use Disorder: A Narrative Review with Candidate Mechanisms of Action.","authors":"Eric A Miller, Christy Capone, Erica Eaton, Robert M Swift, Carolina L Haass-Koffler","doi":"10.1007/s40263-025-01199-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40263-025-01199-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Psychedelics have been studied since the 1950s as a potential treatment for alcohol use disorder (AUD), with over a dozen clinical trials of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), and several contemporary trials of psilocybin and ayahuasca for this indication. Herein, we characterize foundational studies from the 1950s to the present, with emphasis on key design factors that varied considerably between published studies. Critically, those design factors include pharmacological factors, such as presence or absence of a placebo control and the nature of the placebo (e.g., ephedrine, dextroamphetamine, diphenhydramine, or low-dose LSD), and non-pharmacological factors, such as the treatment setting and the presence or absence of psychotherapy. We found that observational studies nearly uniformly show promising results, but trials in which psychedelics were tested against placebo or standard of care control groups have been more inconsistent in both outcomes and methodologies. Given the inconsistency in published results, we review candidate mechanisms of action for psychedelics in the context of AUD. We take a biopsychosocial approach, reviewing mechanisms spanning several different hierarchical levels of analysis, including cellular neuroplasticity, cognitive neuroscience, subjective experience, and social connection. Taken together, this review highlights key findings on both the efficacy and potential mechanisms of psychedelics for the treatment of AUD, which could motivate future studies in this rapidly developing field.</p>","PeriodicalId":10508,"journal":{"name":"CNS drugs","volume":" ","pages":"843-864"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144607673","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-07-08DOI: 10.1007/s40263-025-01198-0
Stuart Madden, Issam Awad, Miguel A Lopez-Toledano, Leslie Morrison, Juan Gutierrez, Leock Y Ngo, Enrique Carrazana, Adrian L Rabinowicz
Background and objectives: Cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) are vascular lesions of the brain that can lead to hemorrhage, focal neurologic deficits, and seizures. Rho-associated kinase (ROCK) overactivation plays a critical role in the development of CCMs, and a novel, selective ROCK2 inhibitor, NRL-1049, mitigated lesion burden and bleeding in mouse models of CCM. This study examined the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of NRL-1049 in healthy volunteers.
Methods: In this first-in-human, randomized, double-blind, single-ascending dose study, participants received a single, oral dose of NRL-1049 (25, 75, 150, or 250 mg) or placebo in a fasted state (period 1). In period 2, participants received 150 mg NRL-1049 or placebo 30 min after a standardized high-fat, high-calorie meal. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected pre-dose and at post-dose time points from 5 min to 48 h. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were recorded and pharmacokinetic parameters determined, including maximum drug concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax (tmax), and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t) and extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞).
Results: Of the 24 participants in period 1 who received NRL-1049 (fasted), 9 (37.5%) experienced ≥ 1 TEAE, with 8 (33.3%) reporting ≥ 1 treatment-related TEAE. TEAEs appeared to correlate with dose, and 150 mg was the maximum tolerated dose following single-dose administration in this study. The most common TEAEs (> 5%) were dizziness (16.7%), headache (8.3%), and syncope (8.3%). In period 2 (n = 10), four (40.0%) participants who received 150 mg NRL-1049 (fed) reported ≥ 1 TEAE, and three (30.0%) reported a treatment-related TEAE. There were no reports of serious TEAEs or discontinuations due to a TEAE. NRL-1049 was rapidly absorbed in the fasted state, with median tmax ranging from 0.50 to 0.75 h. Mean Cmax increased over the dose range of 25-250 mg (3.66-58.0 ng/mL). As NRL-1049 dose increased in a ratio of 1:3:6:10, mean Cmax similarly increased (1:5:10:16), while AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ increased in a greater-than-dose proportional manner (1:5:11:25 and 1:4:10:21, respectively; P < 0.001). In the fed state (150 mg NRL-1049), mean Cmax (18.5 ng/mL) was lower compared with the fasted state (34.9 ng/mL). For the active metabolite, NRL-2017, in the fasted state, median tmax was 0.88-1.63 h, and mean Cmax increased over the dose range (54.2-1520 ng/mL). Mean Cmax (1:6:14:28), AUC0-t (1:4:7:14), and AUC0-∞ (1:3:6:13) of NRL-2017 increased in a greater-than-dose proportional manner (P < 0.001). In the fed state, mean Cmax was lower compared with the fasted state.
{"title":"Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of NRL-1049, a Rho-Associated Kinase Inhibitor, in Healthy Volunteers: A Phase 1, First-in-Human, Single-Ascending Dose, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.","authors":"Stuart Madden, Issam Awad, Miguel A Lopez-Toledano, Leslie Morrison, Juan Gutierrez, Leock Y Ngo, Enrique Carrazana, Adrian L Rabinowicz","doi":"10.1007/s40263-025-01198-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40263-025-01198-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) are vascular lesions of the brain that can lead to hemorrhage, focal neurologic deficits, and seizures. Rho-associated kinase (ROCK) overactivation plays a critical role in the development of CCMs, and a novel, selective ROCK2 inhibitor, NRL-1049, mitigated lesion burden and bleeding in mouse models of CCM. This study examined the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of NRL-1049 in healthy volunteers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this first-in-human, randomized, double-blind, single-ascending dose study, participants received a single, oral dose of NRL-1049 (25, 75, 150, or 250 mg) or placebo in a fasted state (period 1). In period 2, participants received 150 mg NRL-1049 or placebo 30 min after a standardized high-fat, high-calorie meal. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected pre-dose and at post-dose time points from 5 min to 48 h. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were recorded and pharmacokinetic parameters determined, including maximum drug concentration (C<sub>max</sub>), time to C<sub>max</sub> (t<sub>max</sub>), and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to last quantifiable concentration (AUC<sub>0-t</sub>) and extrapolated to infinity (AUC<sub>0-∞</sub>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 24 participants in period 1 who received NRL-1049 (fasted), 9 (37.5%) experienced ≥ 1 TEAE, with 8 (33.3%) reporting ≥ 1 treatment-related TEAE. TEAEs appeared to correlate with dose, and 150 mg was the maximum tolerated dose following single-dose administration in this study. The most common TEAEs (> 5%) were dizziness (16.7%), headache (8.3%), and syncope (8.3%). In period 2 (n = 10), four (40.0%) participants who received 150 mg NRL-1049 (fed) reported ≥ 1 TEAE, and three (30.0%) reported a treatment-related TEAE. There were no reports of serious TEAEs or discontinuations due to a TEAE. NRL-1049 was rapidly absorbed in the fasted state, with median t<sub>max</sub> ranging from 0.50 to 0.75 h. Mean C<sub>max</sub> increased over the dose range of 25-250 mg (3.66-58.0 ng/mL). As NRL-1049 dose increased in a ratio of 1:3:6:10, mean C<sub>max</sub> similarly increased (1:5:10:16), while AUC<sub>0-t</sub> and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> increased in a greater-than-dose proportional manner (1:5:11:25 and 1:4:10:21, respectively; P < 0.001). In the fed state (150 mg NRL-1049), mean C<sub>max</sub> (18.5 ng/mL) was lower compared with the fasted state (34.9 ng/mL). For the active metabolite, NRL-2017, in the fasted state, median t<sub>max</sub> was 0.88-1.63 h, and mean C<sub>max</sub> increased over the dose range (54.2-1520 ng/mL). Mean C<sub>max</sub> (1:6:14:28), AUC<sub>0-t</sub> (1:4:7:14), and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> (1:3:6:13) of NRL-2017 increased in a greater-than-dose proportional manner (P < 0.001). In the fed state, mean C<sub>max</sub> was lower compared with the fasted state.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong","PeriodicalId":10508,"journal":{"name":"CNS drugs","volume":" ","pages":"865-877"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12354486/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144583276","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-07-18DOI: 10.1007/s40263-025-01205-4
Julia Li, Nandita Vas, Lilyana Amezcua, Dalia L Rotstein
Multiple sclerosis (MS) affects people of all racial and ethnic backgrounds, with greatest prevalence noted in Black and white individuals living in Europe and North America. Age of MS onset seems to be earlier in Black, Latino/Hispanic, and South Asian people living with MS in North America and the United Kingdom. Additionally, Black and Latino/Hispanic people with MS in the USA are more likely to have severe initial presentations and earlier accumulation of disability compared with white people with MS. Evidence is sparse concerning how efficacy and safety of disease-modifying therapies for MS may vary with race and ethnicity, largely due to underrepresentation of racial and ethnic diversity in clinical trials. Social determinants of health such as sex, income, education, and the built environment interact with race and ethnicity to affect delays in MS diagnosis, use of therapy, and disease outcomes. In general, considering earlier disability progression, barriers to treatment access and adherence, and existing drug efficacy data, there may be even greater reason to consider early high efficacy therapy in underrepresented populations. More research and targeted interventions are needed to improve outcomes for people of diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds living with MS.
{"title":"Multiple Sclerosis in People of Diverse Racial and Ethnic Backgrounds: Presentation, Disease Course, and Interactions with Disease-Modifying Therapy.","authors":"Julia Li, Nandita Vas, Lilyana Amezcua, Dalia L Rotstein","doi":"10.1007/s40263-025-01205-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40263-025-01205-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multiple sclerosis (MS) affects people of all racial and ethnic backgrounds, with greatest prevalence noted in Black and white individuals living in Europe and North America. Age of MS onset seems to be earlier in Black, Latino/Hispanic, and South Asian people living with MS in North America and the United Kingdom. Additionally, Black and Latino/Hispanic people with MS in the USA are more likely to have severe initial presentations and earlier accumulation of disability compared with white people with MS. Evidence is sparse concerning how efficacy and safety of disease-modifying therapies for MS may vary with race and ethnicity, largely due to underrepresentation of racial and ethnic diversity in clinical trials. Social determinants of health such as sex, income, education, and the built environment interact with race and ethnicity to affect delays in MS diagnosis, use of therapy, and disease outcomes. In general, considering earlier disability progression, barriers to treatment access and adherence, and existing drug efficacy data, there may be even greater reason to consider early high efficacy therapy in underrepresented populations. More research and targeted interventions are needed to improve outcomes for people of diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds living with MS.</p>","PeriodicalId":10508,"journal":{"name":"CNS drugs","volume":" ","pages":"823-842"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144658550","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-06-13DOI: 10.1007/s40263-025-01195-3
Abbas F Almulla, Michael Maes
Major depressive disorder (MDD), bipolar disorder (BD), and schizophrenia (SCZ) are major mental disorders linked to substantial morbidity. Traditional monoamine-based pharmacotherapies frequently produce inadequate outcomes for many patients. The elevated levels of treatment resistance require the exploration of new pharmacological targets. Evidence indicates that peripheral immune-inflammatory dysregulation, characterized by an imbalance between immunological responses and compensatory immune-regulatory systems (IRS/CIRS), together with increased oxidative and nitrosative stress (O&NS), significantly contributes to the pathogenesis of these disorders. This review examines IRS/CIRS/O&NS pathways as new drug targets and highlights novel pharmacological trials. Antiinflammatory drugs have been repurposed as augmentation strategies for the treatment of MDD/BD and SCZ, including nonsteroidal antiinflammatory medications, such as cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors; cytokine-targeting biologics, such as tumor necrosis factor-α monoclonal antibodies; and minocycline, an antibiotic that attenuates neuroinflammation. N-acetylcysteine, curcumin, and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids demonstrate some efficacy as augmentation therapies in MDD, likely by diminishing IRS activation and O&NS. Strategies aimed at the gut-brain axis and gut dysbiosis, including fecal microbiota transplantation, are under investigation for their capacity to restore immunological homeostasis by improving gut barrier integrity and microbiome composition. This review examines new potential therapeutic targets arising from recent discoveries in neuro-immune interactions and oxidative stress, including particular lymphocyte surface markers, the CIRS, and intracellular network molecules in both affective and psychotic disorders. The evidence underscores the clinical importance of immune-targeted augmentation treatments in psychiatric disorders and supports the ongoing development of these novel pharmacotherapies within a precision medicine paradigm.
{"title":"Peripheral Immune-Inflammatory Pathways in Major Depressive Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, and Schizophrenia: Exploring Their Potential as Treatment Targets.","authors":"Abbas F Almulla, Michael Maes","doi":"10.1007/s40263-025-01195-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40263-025-01195-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Major depressive disorder (MDD), bipolar disorder (BD), and schizophrenia (SCZ) are major mental disorders linked to substantial morbidity. Traditional monoamine-based pharmacotherapies frequently produce inadequate outcomes for many patients. The elevated levels of treatment resistance require the exploration of new pharmacological targets. Evidence indicates that peripheral immune-inflammatory dysregulation, characterized by an imbalance between immunological responses and compensatory immune-regulatory systems (IRS/CIRS), together with increased oxidative and nitrosative stress (O&NS), significantly contributes to the pathogenesis of these disorders. This review examines IRS/CIRS/O&NS pathways as new drug targets and highlights novel pharmacological trials. Antiinflammatory drugs have been repurposed as augmentation strategies for the treatment of MDD/BD and SCZ, including nonsteroidal antiinflammatory medications, such as cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors; cytokine-targeting biologics, such as tumor necrosis factor-α monoclonal antibodies; and minocycline, an antibiotic that attenuates neuroinflammation. N-acetylcysteine, curcumin, and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids demonstrate some efficacy as augmentation therapies in MDD, likely by diminishing IRS activation and O&NS. Strategies aimed at the gut-brain axis and gut dysbiosis, including fecal microbiota transplantation, are under investigation for their capacity to restore immunological homeostasis by improving gut barrier integrity and microbiome composition. This review examines new potential therapeutic targets arising from recent discoveries in neuro-immune interactions and oxidative stress, including particular lymphocyte surface markers, the CIRS, and intracellular network molecules in both affective and psychotic disorders. The evidence underscores the clinical importance of immune-targeted augmentation treatments in psychiatric disorders and supports the ongoing development of these novel pharmacotherapies within a precision medicine paradigm.</p>","PeriodicalId":10508,"journal":{"name":"CNS drugs","volume":" ","pages":"739-762"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144293420","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-06-07DOI: 10.1007/s40263-025-01189-1
Adrian Guessoum, Severin B Vogt, Maximilian Meyer, Jean Nicolas Westenberg, Benjamin Klemperer, Kenneth M Dürsteler, Matthias E Liechti, Jan Thomann, Dino Luethi, Urs Duthaler, Marc Vogel
Background: Intranasal diacetylmorphine (IN DAM) represents a promising new route of administration, which is currently under investigation as a novel treatment approach for opioid use disorder in Switzerland. This study characterized the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of therapeutically relevant intranasal doses of DAM and its metabolites in patients with severe opioid use disorder.
Methods: In this prospective observational study, patients on intranasal heroin-assisted treatment (HAT) in Basel, Switzerland, self-administered their usual dose of IN DAM before receiving their daily maintenance dose. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years and current participation in IN HAT. Plasma concentrations of diacetylmorphine, 6-monoacetylmorphine (6-MAM), morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide, and morphine-3-glucuronide were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry at baseline and at 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 120, and 180 min. Acute subjective effects and cravings were assessed repeatedly using visual analog scales, withdrawal symptoms were measured using the Short Opiate Withdrawal Scale, and autonomic responses were recorded over the 3 h after IN DAM administration.
Results: In total, 14 patients were included in the study. The mean self-administered IN DAM dose was 346 mg (range 190-700 mg) delivered over a mean time of 3.8 min (range 1-9 min). IN DAM elicited moderate-to-strong peak drug effects, with marked reductions in heroin craving and withdrawal symptoms. No clinically relevant respiratory depression or decrease in oxygenation saturation was observed. Subjective effects occurred rapidly within the first 2 min after the start of administration. These effects gradually increased and peaked at 30-35 min, which paralleled the rising plasma concentrations of DAM and 6-MAM, while the sustained heroin-like effects best correlated with morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide plasma concentrations. Plasma half-lives of diacetylmorphine and 6-monoacetylmorphine were longer, and time to maximal plasma concentration was later than previously reported, suggesting saturated absorption at high intranasal doses and volumes.
Conclusions: IN DAM has a good safety profile and should be considered as an effective alternative for patients in HAT, offering rapid onset of effects without significant side effects. Optimization of intranasal delivery may further improve absorption and clinical utility.
{"title":"Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Intranasal Diacetylmorphine in Heroin-Assisted Treatment for Severe Opioid Use Disorder.","authors":"Adrian Guessoum, Severin B Vogt, Maximilian Meyer, Jean Nicolas Westenberg, Benjamin Klemperer, Kenneth M Dürsteler, Matthias E Liechti, Jan Thomann, Dino Luethi, Urs Duthaler, Marc Vogel","doi":"10.1007/s40263-025-01189-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40263-025-01189-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intranasal diacetylmorphine (IN DAM) represents a promising new route of administration, which is currently under investigation as a novel treatment approach for opioid use disorder in Switzerland. This study characterized the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of therapeutically relevant intranasal doses of DAM and its metabolites in patients with severe opioid use disorder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective observational study, patients on intranasal heroin-assisted treatment (HAT) in Basel, Switzerland, self-administered their usual dose of IN DAM before receiving their daily maintenance dose. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years and current participation in IN HAT. Plasma concentrations of diacetylmorphine, 6-monoacetylmorphine (6-MAM), morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide, and morphine-3-glucuronide were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry at baseline and at 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 120, and 180 min. Acute subjective effects and cravings were assessed repeatedly using visual analog scales, withdrawal symptoms were measured using the Short Opiate Withdrawal Scale, and autonomic responses were recorded over the 3 h after IN DAM administration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 14 patients were included in the study. The mean self-administered IN DAM dose was 346 mg (range 190-700 mg) delivered over a mean time of 3.8 min (range 1-9 min). IN DAM elicited moderate-to-strong peak drug effects, with marked reductions in heroin craving and withdrawal symptoms. No clinically relevant respiratory depression or decrease in oxygenation saturation was observed. Subjective effects occurred rapidly within the first 2 min after the start of administration. These effects gradually increased and peaked at 30-35 min, which paralleled the rising plasma concentrations of DAM and 6-MAM, while the sustained heroin-like effects best correlated with morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide plasma concentrations. Plasma half-lives of diacetylmorphine and 6-monoacetylmorphine were longer, and time to maximal plasma concentration was later than previously reported, suggesting saturated absorption at high intranasal doses and volumes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IN DAM has a good safety profile and should be considered as an effective alternative for patients in HAT, offering rapid onset of effects without significant side effects. Optimization of intranasal delivery may further improve absorption and clinical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":10508,"journal":{"name":"CNS drugs","volume":" ","pages":"807-817"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12263744/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144246800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-07-10DOI: 10.1007/s40263-025-01203-6
Nicolas Phielipp, Claire Henchcliffe
Since the publication of the first gene therapy clinical trial in Parkinson's disease (PD) in 2007, rapid advances have resulted in escalating interest in applying this technology to manipulate various cellular processes altered in PD. There is now a rich literature describing the various approaches taken, including modulating aberrant networks, restoring dopamine, and mitigating deleterious effects of known gene mutations or as a restorative therapy. Evidence has accrued supporting feasibility, safety, and tolerability of initial gene therapy approaches, as well as providing initial indications of efficacy in several cases. However, there have also been unexpected challenges, and technology is still evolving, making this an important time point to evaluate what has been learned and to place it in context to support ongoing and future efforts. In this review, we focus on the potential of gene therapy to ameliorate symptoms and modify disease progression in PD. We critically review previous clinical research, we address potential benefits and predicted limitations, and we address pipeline approaches aiming to bring a gene therapy approach to the clinic.
{"title":"Investigational Gene Therapies for Parkinson's Disease.","authors":"Nicolas Phielipp, Claire Henchcliffe","doi":"10.1007/s40263-025-01203-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40263-025-01203-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since the publication of the first gene therapy clinical trial in Parkinson's disease (PD) in 2007, rapid advances have resulted in escalating interest in applying this technology to manipulate various cellular processes altered in PD. There is now a rich literature describing the various approaches taken, including modulating aberrant networks, restoring dopamine, and mitigating deleterious effects of known gene mutations or as a restorative therapy. Evidence has accrued supporting feasibility, safety, and tolerability of initial gene therapy approaches, as well as providing initial indications of efficacy in several cases. However, there have also been unexpected challenges, and technology is still evolving, making this an important time point to evaluate what has been learned and to place it in context to support ongoing and future efforts. In this review, we focus on the potential of gene therapy to ameliorate symptoms and modify disease progression in PD. We critically review previous clinical research, we address potential benefits and predicted limitations, and we address pipeline approaches aiming to bring a gene therapy approach to the clinic.</p>","PeriodicalId":10508,"journal":{"name":"CNS drugs","volume":" ","pages":"725-737"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12263715/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144607672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}