首页 > 最新文献

Colorectal Disease最新文献

英文 中文
Translating rectopexy practice variability into precision care innovative directions 将直肠矫正术实践的可变性转化为精准护理的创新方向。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-31 DOI: 10.1111/codi.70391
Zejun Song, Yiqi Guo
{"title":"Translating rectopexy practice variability into precision care innovative directions","authors":"Zejun Song, Yiqi Guo","doi":"10.1111/codi.70391","DOIUrl":"10.1111/codi.70391","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10512,"journal":{"name":"Colorectal Disease","volume":"28 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146092200","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
When the colon falls short: A technical note on tension-free colorectal anastomosis via duodenal window – A video vignette 当结肠不通畅时:经十二指肠窗无张力结直肠吻合术的技术说明-视频片段。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-31 DOI: 10.1111/codi.70384
Pablo Baeza-Ibáñez, Valentina Maluenda-Almonacid
{"title":"When the colon falls short: A technical note on tension-free colorectal anastomosis via duodenal window – A video vignette","authors":"Pablo Baeza-Ibáñez, Valentina Maluenda-Almonacid","doi":"10.1111/codi.70384","DOIUrl":"10.1111/codi.70384","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10512,"journal":{"name":"Colorectal Disease","volume":"28 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146092165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Diagnostic utility of bowel ultrasonography in adults with inflammatory bowel disease: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis 肠超声检查在成人炎症性肠病诊断中的应用:一项最新的系统综述和荟萃分析。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-30 DOI: 10.1111/codi.70370
Hareesha Rishab Bharadwaj, Syed Hasham Ali, Hassam Ali, Priyal Dalal, Aditya Gaur, Sushil Rayamajhi, Arkadeep Dhali, Umar Akram, Thai Hau Koo, Yash Shah, Fariha Hasan, Dushyant Singh Dahiya

Background

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), necessitates frequent disease monitoring to guide management. While colonoscopy remains the gold standard for assessing disease activity, its invasive nature limits its feasibility. Bowel ultrasonography (BUS) has emerged as a noninvasive alternative.

Objective

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of BUS in detecting IBD activity compared to colonoscopy.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, CINAHL and Embase was conducted, including 37 studies evaluating BUS modalities such as colour Doppler, small intestine contrast ultrasonography (SICUS) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratios (DOR) and likelihood ratios were calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed based on diagnostic modality and IBD subtype.

Results

The overall pooled sensitivity and specificity of BUS in IBD were 90.0% and 83.5%, respectively. SICUS had the highest sensitivity (95.0%), while BUS with colour Doppler had the highest specificity (85.1%). CEUS demonstrated the highest DOR (75.52). BUS performed best in detecting postoperative CD recurrence (sensitivity 91.9%, DOR 61.9). Meta-regression identified surgical anastomosis type as a significant predictor of diagnostic performance.

Conclusion

BUS is a highly effective noninvasive imaging modality for diagnosing and monitoring IBD. Its accuracy varies by modality, with SICUS optimal for screening and colour Doppler BUS for confirmation. Future studies should standardize BUS protocols and evaluate its role alongside MRI and CT enterography.

背景:炎症性肠病(IBD),包括克罗恩病(CD)和溃疡性结肠炎(UC),需要频繁的疾病监测来指导治疗。虽然结肠镜检查仍然是评估疾病活动的金标准,但其侵入性限制了其可行性。肠超声检查(BUS)已成为一种无创的替代方法。目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析比较了BUS在检测IBD活动性方面与结肠镜检查的诊断准确性。方法:综合检索PubMed、CINAHL、Embase等文献,纳入彩色多普勒、小肠对比超声(SICUS)、增强超声(CEUS)等评价BUS的37项研究。计算了合并敏感性、特异性、诊断优势比(DOR)和似然比。根据诊断方式和IBD亚型进行亚组分析。结果:BUS在IBD中的总体敏感性和特异性分别为90.0%和83.5%。SICUS的灵敏度最高(95.0%),而BUS与彩色多普勒的特异性最高(85.1%)。超声造影DOR最高(75.52)。BUS在检测术后CD复发方面表现最佳(敏感性91.9%,DOR 61.9)。meta回归确定手术吻合类型是诊断性能的重要预测因子。结论:BUS是诊断和监测IBD的一种有效的无创成像方式。其准确性因模式而异,SICUS最适合筛查,彩色多普勒BUS用于确认。未来的研究应标准化BUS方案,并评估其与MRI和CT肠造影的作用。
{"title":"Diagnostic utility of bowel ultrasonography in adults with inflammatory bowel disease: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Hareesha Rishab Bharadwaj,&nbsp;Syed Hasham Ali,&nbsp;Hassam Ali,&nbsp;Priyal Dalal,&nbsp;Aditya Gaur,&nbsp;Sushil Rayamajhi,&nbsp;Arkadeep Dhali,&nbsp;Umar Akram,&nbsp;Thai Hau Koo,&nbsp;Yash Shah,&nbsp;Fariha Hasan,&nbsp;Dushyant Singh Dahiya","doi":"10.1111/codi.70370","DOIUrl":"10.1111/codi.70370","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), necessitates frequent disease monitoring to guide management. While colonoscopy remains the gold standard for assessing disease activity, its invasive nature limits its feasibility. Bowel ultrasonography (BUS) has emerged as a noninvasive alternative.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of BUS in detecting IBD activity compared to colonoscopy.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, CINAHL and Embase was conducted, including 37 studies evaluating BUS modalities such as colour Doppler, small intestine contrast ultrasonography (SICUS) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratios (DOR) and likelihood ratios were calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed based on diagnostic modality and IBD subtype.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The overall pooled sensitivity and specificity of BUS in IBD were 90.0% and 83.5%, respectively. SICUS had the highest sensitivity (95.0%), while BUS with colour Doppler had the highest specificity (85.1%). CEUS demonstrated the highest DOR (75.52). BUS performed best in detecting postoperative CD recurrence (sensitivity 91.9%, DOR 61.9). Meta-regression identified surgical anastomosis type as a significant predictor of diagnostic performance.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>BUS is a highly effective noninvasive imaging modality for diagnosing and monitoring IBD. Its accuracy varies by modality, with SICUS optimal for screening and colour Doppler BUS for confirmation. Future studies should standardize BUS protocols and evaluate its role alongside MRI and CT enterography.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":10512,"journal":{"name":"Colorectal Disease","volume":"28 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146084487","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rectal cancer following radiotherapy for prostate cancer: A propensity-matched analysis 前列腺癌放疗后直肠癌:倾向匹配分析。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-28 DOI: 10.1111/codi.70365
M. Goldenshluger, M. A. Abbas, M. Belkovsky, A. Alipouriani, K. Erozkan, G. Alon, M. A. Valente, S. R. Steele, S. D. Holubar, D. Liska, E. Gorgun
<div> <section> <h3> Aim</h3> <p>Patients who have previously received radiation therapy for primary prostate cancer (PPC) face an elevated risk of developing secondary rectal cancer (SRC). However, the clinical presentation, surgical outcomes, and oncological results of SRC in this context remain poorly characterized.</p> <p>This study aims to compare the clinical and pathological features, as well as treatment outcomes, of patients with primary rectal cancer (PRC) and those with SRC following radiation for prostate cancer.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Methods</h3> <p>Retrospective cohort study using univariate and propensity-matched analyses.</p> <p>Data extracted from electronic medical records at a single tertiary institution [2001–2021].</p> <p>Male patients with rectal cancer (RC) who underwent oncological resection with or without a prior history of prostate cancer radiation. Patients with a <3-year interval between radiotherapy and RC diagnosis were excluded. The main outcome measures were pathological analysis, postoperative complications and overall survival.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Results</h3> <p>Out of 1,755 patients with RC, 50 cases (2.9%) had SRC. Forty-three out of the 50 patients were included in the analysis. The median time from radiotherapy to SRC diagnosis was 8 ± 4 years (IQR). Patients with SRC were older, with a mean age of 73.7 ± 8.5 versus 61.1 ± 13 years in the control group (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and a higher American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score (<i>p</i> = 0.006). Most SRCs were distal with a median distance from the anal verge of 4.25 cm (IQR 9.5 cm). Only seven patients (16.3%) in the SRC group received neoadjuvant radiation therapy versus 764 (44.8%) of PRC (<i>p</i> = 0.001). SRC patients required more extensive surgical interventions, including abdominoperineal resection (46.5% vs. 29.9%), pelvic exenteration (4.7% vs. 0.4%), and fewer sphincter-preserving procedures, including low anterior resection (48.8% vs. 68.2%) and transanal resection (0% vs. 1.5%) (<i>p</i> = 0.02). Propensity score matching with a 1:2 ratio matching for age, body mass index (BMI), ASA score, type of surgery, and pathological staging revealed no differences between the groups regarding tumour differentiation, staging, or postoperative complications. Survival analysis at 6 years showed no significant difference in overall survival between the SRC (53.2%, 95% CI: 35%–71%) and PRC (50.3%, 95% CI: 36%–64%) groups (<i>p</i> = 0.61).</p> </section> <section> <h
目的:先前接受过原发性前列腺癌(PPC)放射治疗的患者患继发性直肠癌(SRC)的风险升高。然而,在这种情况下,SRC的临床表现、手术结果和肿瘤结果仍然缺乏特征。本研究旨在比较原发性直肠癌(PRC)患者和SRC患者在前列腺癌放疗后的临床和病理特征以及治疗结果。方法:回顾性队列研究,采用单变量分析和倾向匹配分析。数据摘自单一高等教育机构的电子病历[2001-2021]。有或没有前列腺癌放疗史的男性直肠癌(RC)患者行肿瘤切除术。结果:在1755例RC患者中,50例(2.9%)发生了SRC。50名患者中的43名被纳入分析。从放疗到SRC诊断的中位时间为8±4年(IQR)。SRC患者年龄较大,平均年龄为73.7±8.5岁,对照组为61.1±13岁(p局限性:回顾性设计和对单一机构电子病历的依赖)。结论:PPC患者在放疗后10年出现SRC。SRC患者通常年龄较大,合并症较多。与PRC患者相比,接受新辅助治疗的SRC患者较少,并且作为一个群体,与PRC患者相比,需要更广泛的手术,括约肌保留率更低。尽管存在这些差异,与PRC患者相比,SRC患者具有相似的病理结果和总生存期。
{"title":"Rectal cancer following radiotherapy for prostate cancer: A propensity-matched analysis","authors":"M. Goldenshluger,&nbsp;M. A. Abbas,&nbsp;M. Belkovsky,&nbsp;A. Alipouriani,&nbsp;K. Erozkan,&nbsp;G. Alon,&nbsp;M. A. Valente,&nbsp;S. R. Steele,&nbsp;S. D. Holubar,&nbsp;D. Liska,&nbsp;E. Gorgun","doi":"10.1111/codi.70365","DOIUrl":"10.1111/codi.70365","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Aim&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Patients who have previously received radiation therapy for primary prostate cancer (PPC) face an elevated risk of developing secondary rectal cancer (SRC). However, the clinical presentation, surgical outcomes, and oncological results of SRC in this context remain poorly characterized.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;This study aims to compare the clinical and pathological features, as well as treatment outcomes, of patients with primary rectal cancer (PRC) and those with SRC following radiation for prostate cancer.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Methods&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Retrospective cohort study using univariate and propensity-matched analyses.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Data extracted from electronic medical records at a single tertiary institution [2001–2021].&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Male patients with rectal cancer (RC) who underwent oncological resection with or without a prior history of prostate cancer radiation. Patients with a &lt;3-year interval between radiotherapy and RC diagnosis were excluded. The main outcome measures were pathological analysis, postoperative complications and overall survival.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Results&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Out of 1,755 patients with RC, 50 cases (2.9%) had SRC. Forty-three out of the 50 patients were included in the analysis. The median time from radiotherapy to SRC diagnosis was 8 ± 4 years (IQR). Patients with SRC were older, with a mean age of 73.7 ± 8.5 versus 61.1 ± 13 years in the control group (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; &lt; 0.001), and a higher American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.006). Most SRCs were distal with a median distance from the anal verge of 4.25 cm (IQR 9.5 cm). Only seven patients (16.3%) in the SRC group received neoadjuvant radiation therapy versus 764 (44.8%) of PRC (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.001). SRC patients required more extensive surgical interventions, including abdominoperineal resection (46.5% vs. 29.9%), pelvic exenteration (4.7% vs. 0.4%), and fewer sphincter-preserving procedures, including low anterior resection (48.8% vs. 68.2%) and transanal resection (0% vs. 1.5%) (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.02). Propensity score matching with a 1:2 ratio matching for age, body mass index (BMI), ASA score, type of surgery, and pathological staging revealed no differences between the groups regarding tumour differentiation, staging, or postoperative complications. Survival analysis at 6 years showed no significant difference in overall survival between the SRC (53.2%, 95% CI: 35%–71%) and PRC (50.3%, 95% CI: 36%–64%) groups (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.61).&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h","PeriodicalId":10512,"journal":{"name":"Colorectal Disease","volume":"28 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12852529/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146092197","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Experiences of LGB patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery: A focus on sexuality 结直肠癌手术中LGB患者的经验:对性的关注。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-28 DOI: 10.1111/codi.70375
Anna Provoost, Louis Onghena, Khushi Jeswani, Yves van Nieuwenhove, Eva Pape, Gabrielle H. van Ramshorst

Purpose

This study aimed to delineate the existing knowledge regarding the impact of colorectal cancer surgery on the sexuality of LGB patients, highlighting the need for culturally competent care tailored to their unique needs.

Methods

A comprehensive search was conducted from October 2024 onwards across PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus, PsychINFO, Cochrane Library, and Joanna Briggs Institute using the MeSH terms ‘sexual and gender minorities’, ‘colorectal surgery’, ‘colorectal neoplasms’ and ‘sexuality’. Inclusion criteria required LGB patients over 18 years, at least 50% of the sample diagnosed with colorectal cancer and treated operatively. All studies were critically appraised.

Results

Six studies from the UK and the US were included. Sample size ranged from 1 to 480. Participants identifying as LGB ranged from 26.4 to 100%. Key findings revealed LGB patients experience similar physical consequences to heterosexual patients (erectile and ejaculatory dysfunction, dyspareunia, vaginal dryness), but implications might differ, e.g., regarding anal intercourse. A lower mental quality of life was reported, including body image issues related to stomas. Relationship challenges and intimacy issues were highlighted. The cultural competence of healthcare providers has a significant influence on patient experiences, highlighting a gap in inclusive care. Critical appraisal revealed both methodological strengths and weaknesses.

Conclusion

This review highlighted the sexual health challenges of LGB patients after colorectal cancer surgery, with issues like sexual function and mental wellbeing often being underreported. Cultural competence training for healthcare providers and integrating patients' partners into cancer care are crucial for a holistic approach.

目的:本研究旨在描述关于结直肠癌手术对LGB患者性取向影响的现有知识,强调需要针对他们的独特需求量身定制具有文化能力的护理。方法:从2024年10月起在PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、b谷歌Scholar、Web of Science、Scopus、PsychINFO、Cochrane Library和Joanna Briggs Institute进行全面检索,使用MeSH术语“性和性别少数群体”、“结直肠外科”、“结直肠肿瘤”和“性”。纳入标准要求18岁以上的LGB患者,至少50%的样本被诊断为结直肠癌并接受手术治疗。所有的研究都经过严格的评价。结果:纳入了来自英国和美国的6项研究。样本量从1到480。认同为LGB的参与者从26.4%到100%不等。主要研究结果显示,LGB患者与异性恋患者经历相似的生理后果(勃起和射精功能障碍、性交困难、阴道干燥),但含义可能有所不同,例如,在肛交方面。据报道,精神生活质量较低,包括与气孔有关的身体形象问题。强调了关系挑战和亲密问题。医疗保健提供者的文化能力对患者体验有重大影响,突出了包容性护理的差距。批判性评价揭示了方法论的优点和缺点。结论:本综述强调了结直肠癌手术后LGB患者的性健康挑战,性功能和心理健康等问题往往被低估。对医疗保健提供者进行文化能力培训,并将患者的合作伙伴纳入癌症护理中,这对整体方法至关重要。
{"title":"Experiences of LGB patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery: A focus on sexuality","authors":"Anna Provoost,&nbsp;Louis Onghena,&nbsp;Khushi Jeswani,&nbsp;Yves van Nieuwenhove,&nbsp;Eva Pape,&nbsp;Gabrielle H. van Ramshorst","doi":"10.1111/codi.70375","DOIUrl":"10.1111/codi.70375","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study aimed to delineate the existing knowledge regarding the impact of colorectal cancer surgery on the sexuality of LGB patients, highlighting the need for culturally competent care tailored to their unique needs.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A comprehensive search was conducted from October 2024 onwards across PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus, PsychINFO, Cochrane Library, and Joanna Briggs Institute using the MeSH terms ‘sexual and gender minorities’, ‘colorectal surgery’, ‘colorectal neoplasms’ and ‘sexuality’. Inclusion criteria required LGB patients over 18 years, at least 50% of the sample diagnosed with colorectal cancer and treated operatively. All studies were critically appraised.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Six studies from the UK and the US were included. Sample size ranged from 1 to 480. Participants identifying as LGB ranged from 26.4 to 100%. Key findings revealed LGB patients experience similar physical consequences to heterosexual patients (erectile and ejaculatory dysfunction, dyspareunia, vaginal dryness), but implications might differ, e.g., regarding anal intercourse. A lower mental quality of life was reported, including body image issues related to stomas. Relationship challenges and intimacy issues were highlighted. The cultural competence of healthcare providers has a significant influence on patient experiences, highlighting a gap in inclusive care. Critical appraisal revealed both methodological strengths and weaknesses.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This review highlighted the sexual health challenges of LGB patients after colorectal cancer surgery, with issues like sexual function and mental wellbeing often being underreported. Cultural competence training for healthcare providers and integrating patients' partners into cancer care are crucial for a holistic approach.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":10512,"journal":{"name":"Colorectal Disease","volume":"28 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146084660","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A stepped nurse-led LARS clinic: A qualitative evaluation 阶梯式护士主导的LARS诊所:定性评价。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-27 DOI: 10.1111/codi.70379
Noa Bornauw, Gabriëlle H. van Ramshorst, Yves Van Nieuwenhove, Dirk Van de Putte, Kjell Fierens, Paul Pattyn, Karen Geboes, Ann Van Hecke, Eva Pape

Aim

This study aimed to evaluate the significance of a stepped nurse-led low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) clinic for patients.

Methods

A Nurse-Led Clinic (NLC) with a stepped intervention approach for patients with LARS was developed and implemented. An exploratory study was conducted in three hospitals to evaluate the nurse-led clinic. Adult rectal cancer patients experiencing LARS who attended the NLC were recruited via maximum variation sampling for semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis was performed, employing researcher triangulation to enhance reliability.

Results

Seventeen participants were interviewed to evaluate the clinic. Participants described five characteristics: (1) presence of the nurse, (2) accessibility, (3) providing recognition, affirmation and understanding, (4) coordinating and (5) timing of the consultation. In addition, participants outlined four principal tasks: (1) providing information, (2) management of symptoms, (3) support and (4) follow-up and continuity of care.

Conclusion

The NLC offered meaningful support by addressing patients' concerns comprehensively. It normalised the condition, empowered patients with tailored information and provided effective symptom management strategies.

Reporting Method

SRQR checklist.

目的:本研究旨在评价阶梯式护士引导下下前切除术综合征(LARS)门诊对患者的意义。方法:建立护士主导诊所(NLC),对LARS患者进行阶梯式干预。在三家医院进行了一项探索性研究,以评估护士主导的诊所。参加NLC的经历LARS的成年直肠癌患者通过最大变异抽样进行半结构化访谈。采用研究者三角法进行专题分析,以提高可靠性。结果:对17名参试者进行访谈评价。参与者描述了五个特征:(1)护士在场;(2)无障碍;(3)提供认可、肯定和理解;(4)协调和(5)咨询的时机。此外,与会者概述了四项主要任务:(1)提供信息;(2)管理症状;(3)支持;(4)跟踪和持续护理。结论:NLC全面解决了患者的担忧,提供了有意义的支持。它使病情正常化,为患者提供量身定制的信息,并提供有效的症状管理策略。报告方法:SRQR清单。
{"title":"A stepped nurse-led LARS clinic: A qualitative evaluation","authors":"Noa Bornauw,&nbsp;Gabriëlle H. van Ramshorst,&nbsp;Yves Van Nieuwenhove,&nbsp;Dirk Van de Putte,&nbsp;Kjell Fierens,&nbsp;Paul Pattyn,&nbsp;Karen Geboes,&nbsp;Ann Van Hecke,&nbsp;Eva Pape","doi":"10.1111/codi.70379","DOIUrl":"10.1111/codi.70379","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Aim</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study aimed to evaluate the significance of a stepped nurse-led low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) clinic for patients.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A Nurse-Led Clinic (NLC) with a stepped intervention approach for patients with LARS was developed and implemented. An exploratory study was conducted in three hospitals to evaluate the nurse-led clinic. Adult rectal cancer patients experiencing LARS who attended the NLC were recruited via maximum variation sampling for semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis was performed, employing researcher triangulation to enhance reliability.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Seventeen participants were interviewed to evaluate the clinic. Participants described five characteristics: (1) presence of the nurse, (2) accessibility, (3) providing recognition, affirmation and understanding, (4) coordinating and (5) timing of the consultation. In addition, participants outlined four principal tasks: (1) providing information, (2) management of symptoms, (3) support and (4) follow-up and continuity of care.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The NLC offered meaningful support by addressing patients' concerns comprehensively. It normalised the condition, empowered patients with tailored information and provided effective symptom management strategies.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Reporting Method</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>SRQR checklist.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":10512,"journal":{"name":"Colorectal Disease","volume":"28 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146060587","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The significance of MRI-detected lateral lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer on local recurrence and survival—A nationwide cohort study mri检测的直肠癌侧淋巴结转移对局部复发和生存的意义——一项全国队列研究。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-26 DOI: 10.1111/codi.70377
Erik Agger, Cecilia Dahlbäck, Cedric Delorme, Pamela Buchwald

Aim

This retrospective observational cohort study aimed to investigate the prevalence of suspected lateral lymph node metastases (LLNM), as diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and its impact on local recurrence (LR) and overall survival (OS). Patients who underwent dissection of suspected lymph nodes were evaluated in subgroup analysis.

Method

Patients diagnosed with rectal cancer in Sweden between 2017 and 2021 were identified through the Swedish colorectal cancer registry and grouped by MRI findings. Main outcome measures were LR at 3 years and OS at 3 and 5 years.

Results

In all, 2779 patients were analysed. Frequency of lateral lymph node (LLN) enlargement on MRI was 9.4%. In univariable analysis, the risk of LR at 3 years was increased in LLN-positive patients, HR 2.79 (CI 1.55–5.03). In multivariable analysis, adjusted for patient, tumour and neoadjuvant treatment factors, this difference remained (HR 1.97 (CI 1.04–3.73)). No difference in 3-year OS was observed. At 5 years, univariable analysis indicated increased mortality in LLN-positive patients (HR 1.64 (CI 1.24–2.17)), but not in multivariable analysis.

Among LLN-positive patients, those who had undergone LLN dissection (LLND) had an LR rate of 12.5% and increased risk at 3 years in univariable analysis (HR 3.73 (CI 1.93–10.76)). However, in multivariable analysis, there was no difference in LR risk or OS.

Conclusion

MRI-detected LLN positivity is associated with a higher risk of LR and correlates with other adverse prognostic factors. The effect of LLND on LR remains unclear. Further research is needed to optimize treatment strategies for patients with suspected LLNM.

目的:本回顾性观察队列研究旨在探讨磁共振成像(MRI)诊断的疑似侧淋巴结转移(LLNM)的患病率及其对局部复发(LR)和总生存期(OS)的影响。在亚组分析中对疑似淋巴结清扫的患者进行评估。方法:通过瑞典结直肠癌登记处确定2017年至2021年间在瑞典诊断为直肠癌的患者,并根据MRI结果进行分组。主要结局指标为3年的LR、3年和5年的OS。结果:共分析2779例患者。MRI上外侧淋巴结(LLN)增大的频率为9.4%。在单变量分析中,lln阳性患者3年发生LR的风险增加,HR为2.79 (CI为1.55-5.03)。在多变量分析中,调整了患者、肿瘤和新辅助治疗因素,这一差异仍然存在(HR 1.97 (CI 1.04-3.73))。3年OS无差异。在5年时,单变量分析显示lln阳性患者的死亡率增加(HR 1.64 (CI 1.24-2.17)),但在多变量分析中没有出现这种情况。在LLN阳性患者中,接受LLN剥离(LLND)的患者LR率为12.5%,单变量分析显示,3年后风险增加(HR 3.73 (CI 1.93-10.76))。然而,在多变量分析中,LR风险和OS没有差异。结论:mri检测到的LLN阳性与LR的高风险相关,并与其他不良预后因素相关。LLND对LR的影响尚不清楚。需要进一步的研究来优化疑似LLNM患者的治疗策略。
{"title":"The significance of MRI-detected lateral lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer on local recurrence and survival—A nationwide cohort study","authors":"Erik Agger,&nbsp;Cecilia Dahlbäck,&nbsp;Cedric Delorme,&nbsp;Pamela Buchwald","doi":"10.1111/codi.70377","DOIUrl":"10.1111/codi.70377","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Aim</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This retrospective observational cohort study aimed to investigate the prevalence of suspected lateral lymph node metastases (LLNM), as diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and its impact on local recurrence (LR) and overall survival (OS). Patients who underwent dissection of suspected lymph nodes were evaluated in subgroup analysis.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Method</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Patients diagnosed with rectal cancer in Sweden between 2017 and 2021 were identified through the Swedish colorectal cancer registry and grouped by MRI findings. Main outcome measures were LR at 3 years and OS at 3 and 5 years.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In all, 2779 patients were analysed. Frequency of lateral lymph node (LLN) enlargement on MRI was 9.4%. In univariable analysis, the risk of LR at 3 years was increased in LLN-positive patients, HR 2.79 (CI 1.55–5.03). In multivariable analysis, adjusted for patient, tumour and neoadjuvant treatment factors, this difference remained (HR 1.97 (CI 1.04–3.73)). No difference in 3-year OS was observed. At 5 years, univariable analysis indicated increased mortality in LLN-positive patients (HR 1.64 (CI 1.24–2.17)), but not in multivariable analysis.</p>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Among LLN-positive patients, those who had undergone LLN dissection (LLND) had an LR rate of 12.5% and increased risk at 3 years in univariable analysis (HR 3.73 (CI 1.93–10.76)). However, in multivariable analysis, there was no difference in LR risk or OS.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>MRI-detected LLN positivity is associated with a higher risk of LR and correlates with other adverse prognostic factors. The effect of LLND on LR remains unclear. Further research is needed to optimize treatment strategies for patients with suspected LLNM.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":10512,"journal":{"name":"Colorectal Disease","volume":"28 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/codi.70377","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146050673","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Stoma irrigation among patients with a permanent colostoma—a cross-sectional survey of stoma care nurses in Austria and Germany 永久性结肠造口患者的造口冲洗——对奥地利和德国造口护理护士的横断面调查。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-26 DOI: 10.1111/codi.70363
Laura-Maria Tades, Harald Rosen, Alois Fürst, Christoph Ausch, Christian Sebesta Jr., Christian Sebesta

Background

Colostomy irrigation is a well-established technique used for bowel management in patients with a permanent, left-sided colostomy. When performed routinely every 24–48 hours, it enables stool-free intervals, often allowing the use of only a stoma cap or simple dressing. Scientific evidence has shown significant improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for patients using this method.

Aim

This study aimed to evaluate the current application of colostomy irrigation in Germany and Austria and to identify reasons for its limited use, despite known benefits. A specific focus was placed on the perspectives and practices of stoma care nurses.

Methods

A cross-sectional, retrospective survey was conducted among certified stoma care nurses in both countries. Data were collected anonymously and analysed descriptively, including the use of interval-weighted means.

Results

A mean of 39 patients per stoma therapist per year with a permanent colostomy in the descending or sigmoid colon—regions anatomically suitable for irrigation—were reported. However, irrigation had been recommended to only 43.6% of these patients, and just 53% of those adopted it in daily practice. This results in an average of only nine patients per stoma expert using the technique annually. Reported barriers included time constraints, perceived patient reluctance, short inpatient stays and doubts regarding clinical indication.

Conclusion

Stoma irrigation therapy has shown potential to improve autonomy, self-image and everyday function. This study contributes valuable insights into under-explored care practices in the German-speaking context and underlines the need for enhanced training and awareness among healthcare professionals to better integrate irrigation therapy into routine care.

背景:结肠造口冲洗是一种成熟的技术,用于永久性左侧结肠造口患者的肠道管理。当每24-48小时常规进行一次时,它可以实现无大便间隔,通常只允许使用造口帽或简单的敷料。科学证据表明,使用这种方法可以显著改善患者的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。目的:本研究旨在评估目前在德国和奥地利结肠造口灌洗的应用,并确定其使用有限的原因,尽管已知的好处。一个具体的重点放在观点和做法的造口护理护士。方法:对两国经认证的造口护理护士进行横断面回顾性调查。数据匿名收集和描述性分析,包括使用区间加权平均数。结果:据报道,平均每位造口师每年有39例患者在降结肠或乙状结肠(解剖上适合冲洗的区域)进行永久性结肠造口。然而,只有43.6%的患者推荐冲洗,只有53%的患者在日常实践中采用冲洗。这导致每位造口专家每年平均只有9名患者使用该技术。报告的障碍包括时间限制、患者不情愿、住院时间短和对临床适应症的怀疑。结论:造口冲洗治疗具有改善自主、自我形象和日常功能的潜力。这项研究为德语背景下未被探索的护理实践提供了有价值的见解,并强调需要加强医疗保健专业人员的培训和意识,以更好地将冲洗疗法纳入日常护理。
{"title":"Stoma irrigation among patients with a permanent colostoma—a cross-sectional survey of stoma care nurses in Austria and Germany","authors":"Laura-Maria Tades,&nbsp;Harald Rosen,&nbsp;Alois Fürst,&nbsp;Christoph Ausch,&nbsp;Christian Sebesta Jr.,&nbsp;Christian Sebesta","doi":"10.1111/codi.70363","DOIUrl":"10.1111/codi.70363","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Colostomy irrigation is a well-established technique used for bowel management in patients with a permanent, left-sided colostomy. When performed routinely every 24–48 hours, it enables stool-free intervals, often allowing the use of only a stoma cap or simple dressing. Scientific evidence has shown significant improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for patients using this method.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Aim</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study aimed to evaluate the current application of colostomy irrigation in Germany and Austria and to identify reasons for its limited use, despite known benefits. A specific focus was placed on the perspectives and practices of stoma care nurses.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A cross-sectional, retrospective survey was conducted among certified stoma care nurses in both countries. Data were collected anonymously and analysed descriptively, including the use of interval-weighted means.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A mean of 39 patients per stoma therapist per year with a permanent colostomy in the descending or sigmoid colon—regions anatomically suitable for irrigation—were reported. However, irrigation had been recommended to only 43.6% of these patients, and just 53% of those adopted it in daily practice. This results in an average of only nine patients per stoma expert using the technique annually. Reported barriers included time constraints, perceived patient reluctance, short inpatient stays and doubts regarding clinical indication.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Stoma irrigation therapy has shown potential to improve autonomy, self-image and everyday function. This study contributes valuable insights into under-explored care practices in the German-speaking context and underlines the need for enhanced training and awareness among healthcare professionals to better integrate irrigation therapy into routine care.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":10512,"journal":{"name":"Colorectal Disease","volume":"28 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146050763","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A pelvic-first approach to total mesorectal excision following total neoadjuvant therapy—A video vignette 全新辅助治疗后盆腔先入路全直肠系膜切除术-视频片段。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-26 DOI: 10.1111/codi.70383
Shunjin Ryu, Yuta Imaizumi, Shunsuke Nakashima, Hyuga Kawakubo, Daiki Suzuki, Ryusuke Ito
{"title":"A pelvic-first approach to total mesorectal excision following total neoadjuvant therapy—A video vignette","authors":"Shunjin Ryu,&nbsp;Yuta Imaizumi,&nbsp;Shunsuke Nakashima,&nbsp;Hyuga Kawakubo,&nbsp;Daiki Suzuki,&nbsp;Ryusuke Ito","doi":"10.1111/codi.70383","DOIUrl":"10.1111/codi.70383","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10512,"journal":{"name":"Colorectal Disease","volume":"28 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146050738","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Damage control surgery in perforated diverticulitis reduces the stoma rate: A multicentre international retrospective cohort study 穿孔性憩室炎的损伤控制手术可降低造瘘率:一项多中心国际回顾性队列研究。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-24 DOI: 10.1111/codi.70356
Maximilian Sohn, Valentin Ritschl, Dario Tartaglia, Massimo Chiarugi, Silvia Strambi, Antonio Brillantino, Ayman Agha, Maria May, Mia Kim, Malik Maghames, Ingo Hofmann, Tanja Stamm, Johannes Lauscher, Igors Iesalnieks, Jaroslav Presl, Tarkan Jäger, Philipp Schredl, Ramin Raul Ossami Saidy, Elisabeth Gasser, Reinhold Kafka-Ritsch, Franz Bader, Alfred Hochrein, Roland Scherer, Sven Jonas, Johann Pratschke, Alexander Perathoner, Paul Ritschl

Aim

Perforated diverticulitis of the left colon with peritonitis remains life-threatening. However, the optimal surgical strategy is still under debate. The presented study compares the impact of a routinely applied two-stage damage control strategy (DCS) in perforated purulent or faeculent diverticulitis with currently used non-DCS strategies.

Methods

This international multicentre retrospective cohort study was conducted in nine European hospitals. In five hospitals, the therapeutic algorithm covered the routine application of a two-stage DCS as a surgical standard for treating perforated diverticulitis. Four hospitals performed conventional one-stage surgeries and served as controls. The primary outcome was stoma rate at the end of the initial hospital stay. The key secondary outcomes were morbidity and mortality rates.

Results

Overall, data from 558 patients were included, 365 of whom were from DCS centres with equally distributed sex. Patients treated in DCS centres were significantly younger (67 ± 14 vs. 70 ± 14, p = 0.007) but showed a higher Mannheim peritonitis index (22.3 ± 7.9 vs. 20.4 ± 8.0, p = 0.008). At discharge, patients treated in DCS hospitals had a significantly lower stoma rate (stoma-free: DCS, 45.6% vs. non-DCS, 20.8%; p = 0.001).

Secondary outcome parameters showed no differences between the investigated cohorts, in addition to significantly longer ICU stays (7.28 ± 11.13 vs. 5.15 ± 9.60 days; p < 0.001) and an increased number of surgical interventions during the hospital stay in DCS centres (2.64 ± 1.89 vs. 1.51 ± 1.10; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Patients treated in DCS hospitals for perforated diverticulitis are significantly more likely to be discharged without a stoma than patients treated in hospitals using the current standard treatment.

目的:左结肠穿孔性憩室炎合并腹膜炎仍然危及生命。然而,最佳的手术策略仍在争论中。本研究比较了常规应用的两阶段损伤控制策略(DCS)与目前使用的非DCS策略对穿孔化脓性或溃烂性憩室炎的影响。方法:这项国际多中心回顾性队列研究在欧洲9家医院进行。在五家医院中,治疗算法包括常规应用两阶段DCS作为治疗穿孔性憩室炎的手术标准。四家医院进行常规一期手术,并作为对照。主要观察指标是首次住院结束时的造口率。主要的次要结局是发病率和死亡率。结果:总体而言,纳入了558例患者的数据,其中365例来自DCS中心,性别分布均匀。在DCS中心治疗的患者明显更年轻(67±14比70±14,p = 0.007),但Mannheim腹膜炎指数更高(22.3±7.9比20.4±8.0,p = 0.008)。出院时,在DCS医院治疗的患者的造口率明显较低(无造口:DCS, 45.6% vs.非DCS, 20.8%; p = 0.001)。次要结局参数在调查队列之间没有差异,除了ICU住院时间明显更长(7.28±11.13天vs 5.15±9.60天);p结论:在DCS医院治疗穿孔性憩室炎的患者比在医院使用目前标准治疗的患者更有可能无造口出院。
{"title":"Damage control surgery in perforated diverticulitis reduces the stoma rate: A multicentre international retrospective cohort study","authors":"Maximilian Sohn,&nbsp;Valentin Ritschl,&nbsp;Dario Tartaglia,&nbsp;Massimo Chiarugi,&nbsp;Silvia Strambi,&nbsp;Antonio Brillantino,&nbsp;Ayman Agha,&nbsp;Maria May,&nbsp;Mia Kim,&nbsp;Malik Maghames,&nbsp;Ingo Hofmann,&nbsp;Tanja Stamm,&nbsp;Johannes Lauscher,&nbsp;Igors Iesalnieks,&nbsp;Jaroslav Presl,&nbsp;Tarkan Jäger,&nbsp;Philipp Schredl,&nbsp;Ramin Raul Ossami Saidy,&nbsp;Elisabeth Gasser,&nbsp;Reinhold Kafka-Ritsch,&nbsp;Franz Bader,&nbsp;Alfred Hochrein,&nbsp;Roland Scherer,&nbsp;Sven Jonas,&nbsp;Johann Pratschke,&nbsp;Alexander Perathoner,&nbsp;Paul Ritschl","doi":"10.1111/codi.70356","DOIUrl":"10.1111/codi.70356","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Aim</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Perforated diverticulitis of the left colon with peritonitis remains life-threatening. However, the optimal surgical strategy is still under debate. The presented study compares the impact of a routinely applied two-stage damage control strategy (DCS) in perforated purulent or faeculent diverticulitis with currently used non-DCS strategies.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This international multicentre retrospective cohort study was conducted in nine European hospitals. In five hospitals, the therapeutic algorithm covered the routine application of a two-stage DCS as a surgical standard for treating perforated diverticulitis. Four hospitals performed conventional one-stage surgeries and served as controls. The primary outcome was stoma rate at the end of the initial hospital stay. The key secondary outcomes were morbidity and mortality rates.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Overall, data from 558 patients were included, 365 of whom were from DCS centres with equally distributed sex. Patients treated in DCS centres were significantly younger (67 ± 14 vs. 70 ± 14, <i>p</i> = 0.007) but showed a higher Mannheim peritonitis index (22.3 ± 7.9 vs. 20.4 ± 8.0, <i>p</i> = 0.008). At discharge, patients treated in DCS hospitals had a significantly lower stoma rate (stoma-free: DCS, 45.6% vs. non-DCS, 20.8%; <i>p</i> = 0.001).</p>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Secondary outcome parameters showed no differences between the investigated cohorts, in addition to significantly longer ICU stays (7.28 ± 11.13 vs. 5.15 ± 9.60 days; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and an increased number of surgical interventions during the hospital stay in DCS centres (2.64 ± 1.89 vs. 1.51 ± 1.10; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Patients treated in DCS hospitals for perforated diverticulitis are significantly more likely to be discharged without a stoma than patients treated in hospitals using the current standard treatment.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":10512,"journal":{"name":"Colorectal Disease","volume":"28 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146043937","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Colorectal Disease
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1