Sthela M. Murad-Regadas, Jose Jader Araujo de Mendonça Filho, F Sergio P. Regadas Filho, Carlos Magno Queiroz da Cunha, Matheus E. de Brito Castelo Branco, Marina Murad Regadas
{"title":"Perineal rupture: Overlapping or end-to-end sphincteroplasty? A video vignette","authors":"Sthela M. Murad-Regadas, Jose Jader Araujo de Mendonça Filho, F Sergio P. Regadas Filho, Carlos Magno Queiroz da Cunha, Matheus E. de Brito Castelo Branco, Marina Murad Regadas","doi":"10.1111/codi.70357","DOIUrl":"10.1111/codi.70357","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10512,"journal":{"name":"Colorectal Disease","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145910684","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Reassessing drainage strategies for anastomotic leak after elective anterior resection: Insights from a systematic review and pooled analysis","authors":"Sithdharthan Ravikumar, Aravindan Narayanan","doi":"10.1111/codi.70361","DOIUrl":"10.1111/codi.70361","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10512,"journal":{"name":"Colorectal Disease","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145910750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Eleftherios Gialamas, Isabelle Uhe, Pierre-Alain Tokoto, Emilie Liot, Frédéric Ris, Steven D. Wexner, Jeremy Meyer, Guillaume Meurette, the International Rectopexy Collaborative Group
Aim
Rectopexy is the preferred abdominal intervention for rectal prolapse. Despite similar procedural steps – rectal mobilisation, prolapse reduction, and fixation – techniques vary widely, and onsensus on the optimal approach is lacking. This study aimed to assess global surgeon preferences and practices in rectopexy.
Methods
An international 28-item online survey was distributed between November 2023 and March 2024 through professional networks and social media. Questions addressed surgeon demographics, perioperative strategies, and technical approaches to rectopexy. Responses were analysed descriptively and stratified by region and specialty.
Results
A total of 226 surgeons from 36 countries across four continents completed the survey. Most respondents (79.6%) administered preoperative intravenous antibiotics, and 80.5% used some form of mechanical bowel preparation. Minimally invasive approaches predominated (81%), with laparoscopy being most common. Posterior dissection was preferred by 61.5%, while 38.5% favoured ventral (anterior) dissection. Two-thirds (68.1%) routinely used mesh, predominantly synthetic. Only 15% performed rectopexy as a day-case procedure. Regional and specialty-related variations were evident in approach, mesh type, and perioperative protocols.
Conclusion
This international survey reveals marked variability in rectopexy practice worldwide. Despite common principles, surgeon preference and regional factors strongly influence decision-making. The findings emphasise the need for updated international guidelines to harmonise technique selection and perioperative management in rectal prolapse surgery.
{"title":"Surgeon preferences and practice patterns in rectopexy: Results of an international survey","authors":"Eleftherios Gialamas, Isabelle Uhe, Pierre-Alain Tokoto, Emilie Liot, Frédéric Ris, Steven D. Wexner, Jeremy Meyer, Guillaume Meurette, the International Rectopexy Collaborative Group","doi":"10.1111/codi.70355","DOIUrl":"10.1111/codi.70355","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Aim</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Rectopexy is the preferred abdominal intervention for rectal prolapse. Despite similar procedural steps – rectal mobilisation, prolapse reduction, and fixation – techniques vary widely, and onsensus on the optimal approach is lacking. This study aimed to assess global surgeon preferences and practices in rectopexy.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>An international 28-item online survey was distributed between November 2023 and March 2024 through professional networks and social media. Questions addressed surgeon demographics, perioperative strategies, and technical approaches to rectopexy. Responses were analysed descriptively and stratified by region and specialty.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A total of 226 surgeons from 36 countries across four continents completed the survey. Most respondents (79.6%) administered preoperative intravenous antibiotics, and 80.5% used some form of mechanical bowel preparation. Minimally invasive approaches predominated (81%), with laparoscopy being most common. Posterior dissection was preferred by 61.5%, while 38.5% favoured ventral (anterior) dissection. Two-thirds (68.1%) routinely used mesh, predominantly synthetic. Only 15% performed rectopexy as a day-case procedure. Regional and specialty-related variations were evident in approach, mesh type, and perioperative protocols.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This international survey reveals marked variability in rectopexy practice worldwide. Despite common principles, surgeon preference and regional factors strongly influence decision-making. The findings emphasise the need for updated international guidelines to harmonise technique selection and perioperative management in rectal prolapse surgery.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":10512,"journal":{"name":"Colorectal Disease","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12765771/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145899227","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Cristina Reguero Fernández, Omar Carreño-Sáenz, José Bueno Lledó, Providencia García Pastor, Santiago Bonafé Diana, Victoria Pareja Ibars, Salvador Pous Serrano
{"title":"Keyhole laparoscopic technique for parastomal hernia repair with prior optimization using botulinum toxin and pneumoperitoneum—A video vignette","authors":"Cristina Reguero Fernández, Omar Carreño-Sáenz, José Bueno Lledó, Providencia García Pastor, Santiago Bonafé Diana, Victoria Pareja Ibars, Salvador Pous Serrano","doi":"10.1111/codi.70354","DOIUrl":"10.1111/codi.70354","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10512,"journal":{"name":"Colorectal Disease","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145888159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Post-operative sarcopenia kinetics as an emerging target for improved colorectal cancer outcomes","authors":"Xinyi Xiong, Qian Cao, Guang Yang","doi":"10.1111/codi.70337","DOIUrl":"10.1111/codi.70337","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10512,"journal":{"name":"Colorectal Disease","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145862294","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Simona F, Jan B, Christine N, Wladyslawa C. ‘And don't say everything will be normal!’: An international cross-sectional survey on the patients’ unmet sexual wellbeing needs after ostomy formation. Colorectal Dis. 2025;27(10):1–10.
The author names in the original published version appeared with given names and surnames in inverse order. They were presented as:
Simona Fourie, Jan Bornschein, Christine Norton, Wladyslawa Czuber-Dochan
This has now been corrected.
We apologize for this error.
Simona F, Jan B, Christine N, Wladyslawa C.不要说一切都会恢复正常！：一项关于造口术后患者未满足的性健康需求的国际横断面调查。大肠癌杂志，2025;27(10):1-10。在最初出版的版本中，作者的名字和姓氏以相反的顺序出现。正确的作者名字应该是：Simona Fourie， Bornschein Jan, Norton Christine, Czuber-Dochan Wladyslawa。这已经被更正了。我们为这个错误道歉。
{"title":"Correction to ‘‘And don't say everything will be normal!’: An international cross-sectional survey on the patients' unmet sexual wellbeing needs after ostomy formation’. 2025:27(10):1–10","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/codi.70350","DOIUrl":"10.1111/codi.70350","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Simona F, Jan B, Christine N, Wladyslawa C. ‘And don't say everything will be normal!’: An international cross-sectional survey on the patients’ unmet sexual wellbeing needs after ostomy formation. <i>Colorectal Dis</i>. 2025;27(10):1–10.</p><p>The author names in the original published version appeared with given names and surnames in inverse order. They were presented as:</p><p>Fourie Simona, Bornschein Jan, Norton Christine, Czuber-Dochan Wladyslawa</p><p>The correct author names should read:</p><p>Simona Fourie, Jan Bornschein, Christine Norton, Wladyslawa Czuber-Dochan</p><p>This has now been corrected.</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":10512,"journal":{"name":"Colorectal Disease","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/codi.70350","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145854630","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Charles T. West, Yousif Salem, Siddharth Jain, Lewis Matthews, Julian Smith, Marios Nicolaou, Hideaki Yano, Malcolm A. West, Alex H. Mirnezami
Aim
Pelvic exenteration (PE) is the only curative option for extensive pelvic cancers. Advances have facilitated increasingly complex resectional and reconstructive components, including per-operative oncological adjuncts such as intraoperative radiotherapy. Cumulatively, these components increase operative duration beyond what is feasible within a single conventional operating day. Two-day/two-stage PE addresses this, but little is known about this approach. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility, safety and medium-term outcomes of a two-day/two-stage PE.
Method
Consecutive patients (2010–2025) from a prospectively maintained high-volume PE unit database (n = 373) undergoing two-day/two-stage PE were compared against a matched control cohort of single-day cases lasting ≥15 h. EQ5D-5L and decision regret scores were longitudinally collected after 2021. Surgical, oncological and health-related quality-of-life outcomes were evaluated.
Results
Twenty-seven patients underwent two-day/two-stage PE, and 38 had one-day PE; more anal cancers were in the two-day/two-stage group (p = 0.012); median follow-up was 24.2 months. No 90-day mortalities occurred; 3-year overall survival was 54.4% for two-day/two-stage PE and 70.5% for one-day PE (p = 0.31); and R0-resection rates were 82% and 76%, respectively (p = 0.76). Major morbidity occurred in 56% and 47% (p = 0.62), with a median length of stay of 37 and 27 days (p = 0.07) and intensive care days of 5 and 3 (p = 0.08). 12-month EQ5D-5L utility scores were 0.79 and 0.81 (p = 0.96), with low 12-month decision regret in both groups (p = 0.15).
Conclusion
Two-day/two-stage PE is safe and feasible, potentially representing the only option for highly selected patients needing high-complexity PE with multiple components. Although equivalent R0-resections were obtained, medium-term oncological outcomes were poorer in patients undergoing two-day/two-stage interventions.
{"title":"Prospective case-control cohort analysis of two-day/two-stage pelvic exenteration surgery: Safety, feasibility, acceptability and medium-term outcomes","authors":"Charles T. West, Yousif Salem, Siddharth Jain, Lewis Matthews, Julian Smith, Marios Nicolaou, Hideaki Yano, Malcolm A. West, Alex H. Mirnezami","doi":"10.1111/codi.70353","DOIUrl":"10.1111/codi.70353","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Aim</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Pelvic exenteration (PE) is the only curative option for extensive pelvic cancers. Advances have facilitated increasingly complex resectional and reconstructive components, including per-operative oncological adjuncts such as intraoperative radiotherapy. Cumulatively, these components increase operative duration beyond what is feasible within a single conventional operating day. Two-day/two-stage PE addresses this, but little is known about this approach. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility, safety and medium-term outcomes of a two-day/two-stage PE.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Method</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Consecutive patients (2010–2025) from a prospectively maintained high-volume PE unit database (<i>n</i> = 373) undergoing two-day/two-stage PE were compared against a matched control cohort of single-day cases lasting ≥15 h. EQ5D-5L and decision regret scores were longitudinally collected after 2021. Surgical, oncological and health-related quality-of-life outcomes were evaluated.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Twenty-seven patients underwent two-day/two-stage PE, and 38 had one-day PE; more anal cancers were in the two-day/two-stage group (<i>p</i> = 0.012); median follow-up was 24.2 months. No 90-day mortalities occurred; 3-year overall survival was 54.4% for two-day/two-stage PE and 70.5% for one-day PE (<i>p</i> = 0.31); and R0-resection rates were 82% and 76%, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.76). Major morbidity occurred in 56% and 47% (<i>p</i> = 0.62), with a median length of stay of 37 and 27 days (<i>p</i> = 0.07) and intensive care days of 5 and 3 (<i>p</i> = 0.08). 12-month EQ5D-5L utility scores were 0.79 and 0.81 (<i>p</i> = 0.96), with low 12-month decision regret in both groups (<i>p</i> = 0.15).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Two-day/two-stage PE is safe and feasible, potentially representing the only option for highly selected patients needing high-complexity PE with multiple components. Although equivalent R0-resections were obtained, medium-term oncological outcomes were poorer in patients undergoing two-day/two-stage interventions.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":10512,"journal":{"name":"Colorectal Disease","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12748039/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145854582","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Ileoanal pouch surgery in 2026","authors":"Guy Worley","doi":"10.1111/codi.70352","DOIUrl":"10.1111/codi.70352","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10512,"journal":{"name":"Colorectal Disease","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145849104","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lucas Monteiro Delgado, Gabriel Leal Barone, Giulia Luiza Garcia, Henrique Vaz da Mota, Giovanna Barbaroto Pilon, Lucas Soares de Souza Pinto Guedes, Sérgio Mazzola Poli de Figueiredo, Bernardo Fontel Pompeu, Fernanda Bellotti Formiga
Background
Extended left hemicolectomies may result in a short transverse colon and excessive mesenteric tension, precluding a tension-free anastomosis. The Deloyers procedure is a colonic rotation technique that facilitates anastomosis without total colectomy. This study aimed to evaluate short-term outcomes following the Deloyers procedure in patients undergoing left-sided colorectal resections.
Methods
A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using PubMed, Scopus and the Cochrane Central Register to identify observational studies published up to March 2025. Continuous outcomes were pooled as means with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and binary outcomes as proportions. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic and Cochrane Q-test. All analyses were performed using R (v4.4.1).
Results
Thirteen studies including 287 patients undergoing the Deloyers procedure were analysed. The pooled mean operating time was 256.7 min (95% CI, 188.5–349.6), intraoperative blood loss was 327.5 mL (95% CI, 227.9–470.6) and the perioperative transfusion rate was 25% (95% CI, 16%–35%). Postoperative recovery outcomes included a mean hospital stay of 9.9 days (95% CI, 7.6–12.9), an ileus rate of 15% (95% CI, 7%–30%) and an average of 2.9 bowel movements per day (95% CI, 2.4–3.5). Reported complications included Clavien–Dindo grade I–II events in 36% of patients (95% CI, 14%–66%) and grade III–IV events in 12% (95% CI, 5%–24%). The pooled rate of surgical site infection was 13% (95% CI, 4%–34%), small bowel obstruction 6% (95% CI, 0%–35%) and anastomotic leakage 1% (95% CI, 0%–7%). The overall mortality rate was 0% (95% CI, 0%–1%), with two deaths reported in patients with significant comorbidities and advanced oncological disease.
Conclusion
The Deloyers procedure is a feasible surgical alternative in patients requiring extended left-sided colectomy, providing acceptable operative times, functional recovery and complication rates. It may help avoid total colectomy in anatomically complex cases.
{"title":"Outcomes of the Deloyers procedure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of proportions","authors":"Lucas Monteiro Delgado, Gabriel Leal Barone, Giulia Luiza Garcia, Henrique Vaz da Mota, Giovanna Barbaroto Pilon, Lucas Soares de Souza Pinto Guedes, Sérgio Mazzola Poli de Figueiredo, Bernardo Fontel Pompeu, Fernanda Bellotti Formiga","doi":"10.1111/codi.70346","DOIUrl":"10.1111/codi.70346","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Extended left hemicolectomies may result in a short transverse colon and excessive mesenteric tension, precluding a tension-free anastomosis. The Deloyers procedure is a colonic rotation technique that facilitates anastomosis without total colectomy. This study aimed to evaluate short-term outcomes following the Deloyers procedure in patients undergoing left-sided colorectal resections.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using PubMed, Scopus and the Cochrane Central Register to identify observational studies published up to March 2025. Continuous outcomes were pooled as means with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and binary outcomes as proportions. Heterogeneity was assessed using the <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> statistic and Cochrane <i>Q</i>-test. All analyses were performed using R (v4.4.1).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Thirteen studies including 287 patients undergoing the Deloyers procedure were analysed. The pooled mean operating time was 256.7 min (95% CI, 188.5–349.6), intraoperative blood loss was 327.5 mL (95% CI, 227.9–470.6) and the perioperative transfusion rate was 25% (95% CI, 16%–35%). Postoperative recovery outcomes included a mean hospital stay of 9.9 days (95% CI, 7.6–12.9), an ileus rate of 15% (95% CI, 7%–30%) and an average of 2.9 bowel movements per day (95% CI, 2.4–3.5). Reported complications included Clavien–Dindo grade I–II events in 36% of patients (95% CI, 14%–66%) and grade III–IV events in 12% (95% CI, 5%–24%). The pooled rate of surgical site infection was 13% (95% CI, 4%–34%), small bowel obstruction 6% (95% CI, 0%–35%) and anastomotic leakage 1% (95% CI, 0%–7%). The overall mortality rate was 0% (95% CI, 0%–1%), with two deaths reported in patients with significant comorbidities and advanced oncological disease.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The Deloyers procedure is a feasible surgical alternative in patients requiring extended left-sided colectomy, providing acceptable operative times, functional recovery and complication rates. It may help avoid total colectomy in anatomically complex cases.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":10512,"journal":{"name":"Colorectal Disease","volume":"27 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12722197/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145809958","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Robotic management of a diverticular sigmoido-vesical fistula using ureteric ICG guidance and total intracorporeal anastomosis – A video vignette","authors":"Giulia Staccini, Dimitrios Christoforidis, Sotirios Georgios Popeskou","doi":"10.1111/codi.70345","DOIUrl":"10.1111/codi.70345","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10512,"journal":{"name":"Colorectal Disease","volume":"27 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145809953","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号