Pub Date : 2026-01-29DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaf190
Annelies Emmaneel,Jana Neirinck,Alba Torres-Valle,Sofie Van Gassen,Sarah Bonte,Malicorne Buysse,Jacques J M van Dongen,Alberto Orfao,Mirjam van der Burg,Tomas Kalina,Bart N Lambrecht,Ciel De Vriendt,Tessa Kerre,Filomeen Haerynck,Martin Pérez-Andrés,Mattias Hofmans,Carolien Bonroy,Yvan Saeys
BACKGROUNDPrimary immunodeficiencies (PIDs) are rare disorders caused by immune system defects that are commonly screened using multi-parameter flow cytometry (FCM). To counter the subjective and time-consuming manual data analysis of FCM data, we present PIDgeon, a fully automated computational pipeline based on artificial intelligence (AI) techniques. PIDgeon is designed to characterize PID immune profiles, suggest PID subtypes based on altered immune profiles, age, and immunoglobulin levels, and generate interpretable reports.METHODSThe PIDgeon pipeline, including FlowSOM and extreme gradient boosting models, was trained and tested on standardized FCM data generated according to EuroFlow procedures on 74 healthy controls and 399 patients (281 lymphoid-PID patients and 118 non-PID diseased controls) collected by the Ghent University Hospital. Subsequently, multi-centric validation was performed on internal (n = 211) and external (n = 338) independent data sets collected across 4 EuroFlow centers.RESULTSValidation demonstrated high accuracy in cell count enumeration, achieving correlation scores above 0.90 for the major lymphocyte subsets. Interestingly, PIDgeon showed high sensitivity (93% to 100%) in predicting PID with severe T-cell defects, such as severe combined immunodeficiency and late-onset combined immunodeficiency, and low false-negative rates (1.5% to 5.4%) for distinguishing other lymphoid-PID vs non-PID diseased controls across data sets. Additionally, PIDgeon gives a first hint toward prediction of subtypes of primary antibody deficiencies, such as common variable immunodeficiency.CONCLUSIONSIn summary, PIDgeon is an accessible and explainable AI-pipeline aligned with current clinical needs, aiding laboratory immunologists in early PID diagnostics and increasing data analysis efficiency.
{"title":"PIDgeon: An Explainable AI Model for Improved Flow Cytometry-Based Screening of Lymphoid Primary Immunodeficiencies.","authors":"Annelies Emmaneel,Jana Neirinck,Alba Torres-Valle,Sofie Van Gassen,Sarah Bonte,Malicorne Buysse,Jacques J M van Dongen,Alberto Orfao,Mirjam van der Burg,Tomas Kalina,Bart N Lambrecht,Ciel De Vriendt,Tessa Kerre,Filomeen Haerynck,Martin Pérez-Andrés,Mattias Hofmans,Carolien Bonroy,Yvan Saeys","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvaf190","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf190","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDPrimary immunodeficiencies (PIDs) are rare disorders caused by immune system defects that are commonly screened using multi-parameter flow cytometry (FCM). To counter the subjective and time-consuming manual data analysis of FCM data, we present PIDgeon, a fully automated computational pipeline based on artificial intelligence (AI) techniques. PIDgeon is designed to characterize PID immune profiles, suggest PID subtypes based on altered immune profiles, age, and immunoglobulin levels, and generate interpretable reports.METHODSThe PIDgeon pipeline, including FlowSOM and extreme gradient boosting models, was trained and tested on standardized FCM data generated according to EuroFlow procedures on 74 healthy controls and 399 patients (281 lymphoid-PID patients and 118 non-PID diseased controls) collected by the Ghent University Hospital. Subsequently, multi-centric validation was performed on internal (n = 211) and external (n = 338) independent data sets collected across 4 EuroFlow centers.RESULTSValidation demonstrated high accuracy in cell count enumeration, achieving correlation scores above 0.90 for the major lymphocyte subsets. Interestingly, PIDgeon showed high sensitivity (93% to 100%) in predicting PID with severe T-cell defects, such as severe combined immunodeficiency and late-onset combined immunodeficiency, and low false-negative rates (1.5% to 5.4%) for distinguishing other lymphoid-PID vs non-PID diseased controls across data sets. Additionally, PIDgeon gives a first hint toward prediction of subtypes of primary antibody deficiencies, such as common variable immunodeficiency.CONCLUSIONSIn summary, PIDgeon is an accessible and explainable AI-pipeline aligned with current clinical needs, aiding laboratory immunologists in early PID diagnostics and increasing data analysis efficiency.","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146069894","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-28DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaf187
Anna C H Hoge,Thomas E Grys,Erin H Graf
BACKGROUNDWhile most pulmonary infections with Coccidioides spp. are self-limited, a subset of patients is at higher risk for severe disease and extrapulmonary dissemination, including individuals with certain ethnic backgrounds. Disseminated disease can involve soft tissues, bones, and the central nervous system with high morbidity and mortality in the absence of antifungal treatment. Diagnosis of coccidioidomycosis can be challenged by the availability of specimens for culture or histopathology, confusion with, or lack of availability of various antibody tests and overall lack of consideration of Coccidioides spp. as the etiology of disease, especially in immunocompetent hosts.METHODSWe set out to characterize cases of disseminated coccidioidomycosis at our institution over a 7-year period, solely in immunocompetent hosts, to highlight diagnostic delays and determine which, if any, primary screening test might be the most useful.RESULTSA total of 40 cases met our inclusion criteria, and 100% of these cases had positive immunoglobulin G antibodies on a US FDA-cleared Coccidioides spp. enzyme immunoassay. Nearly all of the cases (87%) had a delay in diagnosis and associated worsening of disease (71%). Locations of initial presentations that led to delayed recognition included primary care settings (56%), emergency departments (33%), and urgent care centers (11%), all in the region of Coccidioides spp. endemicity.CONCLUSIONSThese findings highlight the need for interventions to increase awareness of the risk factors for, the symptoms of, and the appropriate testing options to diagnose disseminated coccidioidomycosis.
{"title":"Disseminated Coccidioidomycosis in Immunocompetent Hosts: Opportunities for Increased Recognition and Timely Diagnosis.","authors":"Anna C H Hoge,Thomas E Grys,Erin H Graf","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvaf187","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf187","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDWhile most pulmonary infections with Coccidioides spp. are self-limited, a subset of patients is at higher risk for severe disease and extrapulmonary dissemination, including individuals with certain ethnic backgrounds. Disseminated disease can involve soft tissues, bones, and the central nervous system with high morbidity and mortality in the absence of antifungal treatment. Diagnosis of coccidioidomycosis can be challenged by the availability of specimens for culture or histopathology, confusion with, or lack of availability of various antibody tests and overall lack of consideration of Coccidioides spp. as the etiology of disease, especially in immunocompetent hosts.METHODSWe set out to characterize cases of disseminated coccidioidomycosis at our institution over a 7-year period, solely in immunocompetent hosts, to highlight diagnostic delays and determine which, if any, primary screening test might be the most useful.RESULTSA total of 40 cases met our inclusion criteria, and 100% of these cases had positive immunoglobulin G antibodies on a US FDA-cleared Coccidioides spp. enzyme immunoassay. Nearly all of the cases (87%) had a delay in diagnosis and associated worsening of disease (71%). Locations of initial presentations that led to delayed recognition included primary care settings (56%), emergency departments (33%), and urgent care centers (11%), all in the region of Coccidioides spp. endemicity.CONCLUSIONSThese findings highlight the need for interventions to increase awareness of the risk factors for, the symptoms of, and the appropriate testing options to diagnose disseminated coccidioidomycosis.","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146056876","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-28DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaf168
Brandon R Allen,Jessica L Guidi,Gary Headden,Nicole Winden,Dileepa Alahapperuma,Robert H Christenson,W Franklin Peacock,Sean Collins,Elizabeth L Walters,James L Januzzi
BACKGROUNDDiagnosis and risk stratification of acute heart failure (HF) in the emergency department (ED) remains challenging. N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) measurement is useful in evaluating acute dyspnea. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a new Access NT-proBNP assay in a large cohort of ED patients presenting with suspected acute HF.METHODSThis prospective study enrolled 2701 ED patients across 17 US sites (Nov 2019 to May 2022). Diagnoses were adjudicated by a blinded Clinical Events Committee. The diagnostic performance of the new NT-proBNP assay was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Secondary analyses included association of NT-proBNP levels with HF severity and 90-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).RESULTSAmong 2384 patients, 45.5% had acute HF. The Access NT-proBNP assay demonstrated an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.87 (P < 0.001). Sensitivity across age-based cutoffs was high: 96% (<300 ng/L), 90% (<450 ng/L under age 50), 85% (<900 ng/L ages 50 to 75), and 79% (<1800 ng/L over age 75). At a 300 ng/L threshold, NPV was 95% and PPV was 73%. Higher NT-proBNP levels correlated with greater HF severity and predicted shorter MACE-free survival. The Access assay showed similar performance (AUC 0.8536 vs 0.8562) as the Elecsys proBNP II assay.CONCLUSIONSThe new Access NT-proBNP assay provides strong diagnostic and prognostic performance in ED patients with suspected acute HF, with results comparable to a reference NT-proBNP assay.
{"title":"Evaluation of a New Antibody-Based NT-proBNP Assay for Acute Dyspnea in the Emergency Department.","authors":"Brandon R Allen,Jessica L Guidi,Gary Headden,Nicole Winden,Dileepa Alahapperuma,Robert H Christenson,W Franklin Peacock,Sean Collins,Elizabeth L Walters,James L Januzzi","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvaf168","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf168","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDDiagnosis and risk stratification of acute heart failure (HF) in the emergency department (ED) remains challenging. N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) measurement is useful in evaluating acute dyspnea. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a new Access NT-proBNP assay in a large cohort of ED patients presenting with suspected acute HF.METHODSThis prospective study enrolled 2701 ED patients across 17 US sites (Nov 2019 to May 2022). Diagnoses were adjudicated by a blinded Clinical Events Committee. The diagnostic performance of the new NT-proBNP assay was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Secondary analyses included association of NT-proBNP levels with HF severity and 90-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).RESULTSAmong 2384 patients, 45.5% had acute HF. The Access NT-proBNP assay demonstrated an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.87 (P < 0.001). Sensitivity across age-based cutoffs was high: 96% (<300 ng/L), 90% (<450 ng/L under age 50), 85% (<900 ng/L ages 50 to 75), and 79% (<1800 ng/L over age 75). At a 300 ng/L threshold, NPV was 95% and PPV was 73%. Higher NT-proBNP levels correlated with greater HF severity and predicted shorter MACE-free survival. The Access assay showed similar performance (AUC 0.8536 vs 0.8562) as the Elecsys proBNP II assay.CONCLUSIONSThe new Access NT-proBNP assay provides strong diagnostic and prognostic performance in ED patients with suspected acute HF, with results comparable to a reference NT-proBNP assay.","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146056877","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-28DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaf176
Stephen A Bustin,Carl T Wittwer
BACKGROUNDReal-time reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) is utilized in many areas of the life sciences, diagnostics, and forensics, yet concerns about methodological quality and reporting transparency persist. Diagnostic testing during the recent pandemic brought those concerns into the public domain. The Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative PCR Experiments (MIQE) guidelines, introduced in 2009 and updated in 2025, were intended to standardize assay design and reporting, but their impact has been modest.CONTENTWe assessed trends in RT-qPCR methodological reporting between 2007 and 2025 using PubMed Central searches and manual evaluation of 355 full-text articles from 2019 and 2024. Parameters analyzed included RNA integrity assessment, oligonucleotide sequence disclosure, reference gene validation, PCR efficiency reporting, and MIQE citation. In addition, targeted cohorts of 50 "reference gene" and 50 "PCR efficiency" publications from 2024/25 were evaluated. Results were compared across timepoints, geographic regions, and MIQE-citing vs non-citing studies.SUMMARYReporting of core parameters remained low or declined. Between 2019 and 2024, RNA integrity reporting fell (22% to 11%), reference gene validation was rare (13% to 5%), and PCR efficiency reporting collapsed (13% to 1%). MIQE-citing papers in 2024 showed better adherence (31% RNA integrity, 47% reference gene validation, and 40% PCR efficiency) but still omitted essential details. Asia now dominates RT-qPCR output by volume, while Europe contributes most MIQE-citing studies. Targeted cohorts reported more methodological information, yet many still failed to meet basic standards. These findings confirm that incomplete experimental design and reporting continue to undermine reproducibility and robustness of RT-qPCR assays.
{"title":"Real-Time Reverse Transcription Quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) Methodological Standards and Reporting Practices.","authors":"Stephen A Bustin,Carl T Wittwer","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvaf176","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf176","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDReal-time reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) is utilized in many areas of the life sciences, diagnostics, and forensics, yet concerns about methodological quality and reporting transparency persist. Diagnostic testing during the recent pandemic brought those concerns into the public domain. The Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative PCR Experiments (MIQE) guidelines, introduced in 2009 and updated in 2025, were intended to standardize assay design and reporting, but their impact has been modest.CONTENTWe assessed trends in RT-qPCR methodological reporting between 2007 and 2025 using PubMed Central searches and manual evaluation of 355 full-text articles from 2019 and 2024. Parameters analyzed included RNA integrity assessment, oligonucleotide sequence disclosure, reference gene validation, PCR efficiency reporting, and MIQE citation. In addition, targeted cohorts of 50 \"reference gene\" and 50 \"PCR efficiency\" publications from 2024/25 were evaluated. Results were compared across timepoints, geographic regions, and MIQE-citing vs non-citing studies.SUMMARYReporting of core parameters remained low or declined. Between 2019 and 2024, RNA integrity reporting fell (22% to 11%), reference gene validation was rare (13% to 5%), and PCR efficiency reporting collapsed (13% to 1%). MIQE-citing papers in 2024 showed better adherence (31% RNA integrity, 47% reference gene validation, and 40% PCR efficiency) but still omitted essential details. Asia now dominates RT-qPCR output by volume, while Europe contributes most MIQE-citing studies. Targeted cohorts reported more methodological information, yet many still failed to meet basic standards. These findings confirm that incomplete experimental design and reporting continue to undermine reproducibility and robustness of RT-qPCR assays.","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146056878","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-21DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvag011
Lori B Daniels,Christian Mueller,Evangelos Giannitsis,Steven J R Meex,David Buehlmann,Peter Dilba,Garnet Bendig,Mette Cole,Richard Body,Robert H Christenson,Christa Cobbaert,Christopher R deFilippi,Kai M Eggers,Kenji Inoue,Allan S Jaffe,Cian P McCarthy,James McCord,Johannes T Neumann,Torbjørn Omland,Cynthia Papendick,Yader Sandoval,Jack Wei Chieh Tan,Martin P Than,Raphael Twerenbold,W Frank Peacock,Nicholas L Mills
BACKGROUNDMeasurement of cardiac troponin (cTn) using high-sensitivity assays is recommended for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction. We determined sex-specific and uniform 99th percentile upper reference limits (URLs) using the new Elecsys® Troponin T high-sensitivity Gen 6 assay in a global, healthy reference range cohort.METHODSLithium-heparin (Li-Hep) plasma and serum samples were prospectively collected from apparently healthy individuals aged ≥20 years across 34 global sites in the United States, Europe, China, and Japan. cTnT was measured using the Troponin T high-sensitivity Gen 6 assay on the Cobas® e 801 analyzer. Exclusion criteria were defined according to the 2022 International Federation of Clinical Chemistry guidance. Uniform and sex-specific 99th percentile URLs and non-parametric 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined in plasma and serum separately and combined.RESULTSThe final study population comprised 4147 participants (52.5% female) with a median (25-75th percentiles) age of 48.0 (33.0-59.0) years; 45.8%, 47.9%, 5.2% and 1.1% were White, Asian, Black, and other/unknown, respectively. For sample matrices combined (n=8294), 81.0% and 99.2% of cTnT values were above the limit of detection in females and males, respectively. Sex-specific 99th percentile URLs (95% CI) were 18 (16-23) ng/L for females and 32 (28-35) ng/L for males; the uniform 99th percentile URL was 27 (24-31) ng/L. URLs were comparable in plasma and serum samples.CONCLUSIONSThis study determined sex-specific and uniform 99th percentile URLs for the Troponin T high-sensitivity Gen 6 assay that were comparable irrespective of the matrix used, in a large, global, healthy reference population.
{"title":"Establishing Reference Values in Healthy Participants for the Cardiac Troponin T High-Sensitivity Gen 6 Assay: REF-TSIX Global Reference Study.","authors":"Lori B Daniels,Christian Mueller,Evangelos Giannitsis,Steven J R Meex,David Buehlmann,Peter Dilba,Garnet Bendig,Mette Cole,Richard Body,Robert H Christenson,Christa Cobbaert,Christopher R deFilippi,Kai M Eggers,Kenji Inoue,Allan S Jaffe,Cian P McCarthy,James McCord,Johannes T Neumann,Torbjørn Omland,Cynthia Papendick,Yader Sandoval,Jack Wei Chieh Tan,Martin P Than,Raphael Twerenbold,W Frank Peacock,Nicholas L Mills","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvag011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvag011","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDMeasurement of cardiac troponin (cTn) using high-sensitivity assays is recommended for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction. We determined sex-specific and uniform 99th percentile upper reference limits (URLs) using the new Elecsys® Troponin T high-sensitivity Gen 6 assay in a global, healthy reference range cohort.METHODSLithium-heparin (Li-Hep) plasma and serum samples were prospectively collected from apparently healthy individuals aged ≥20 years across 34 global sites in the United States, Europe, China, and Japan. cTnT was measured using the Troponin T high-sensitivity Gen 6 assay on the Cobas® e 801 analyzer. Exclusion criteria were defined according to the 2022 International Federation of Clinical Chemistry guidance. Uniform and sex-specific 99th percentile URLs and non-parametric 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined in plasma and serum separately and combined.RESULTSThe final study population comprised 4147 participants (52.5% female) with a median (25-75th percentiles) age of 48.0 (33.0-59.0) years; 45.8%, 47.9%, 5.2% and 1.1% were White, Asian, Black, and other/unknown, respectively. For sample matrices combined (n=8294), 81.0% and 99.2% of cTnT values were above the limit of detection in females and males, respectively. Sex-specific 99th percentile URLs (95% CI) were 18 (16-23) ng/L for females and 32 (28-35) ng/L for males; the uniform 99th percentile URL was 27 (24-31) ng/L. URLs were comparable in plasma and serum samples.CONCLUSIONSThis study determined sex-specific and uniform 99th percentile URLs for the Troponin T high-sensitivity Gen 6 assay that were comparable irrespective of the matrix used, in a large, global, healthy reference population.","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146015130","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-19DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaf185
{"title":"Correction to: Impact of Clinical Variables on cfDNA Fragmentomic Signatures and Their Potential as Confounders in Cancer Detection.","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvaf185","DOIUrl":"10.1093/clinchem/hvaf185","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146002847","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-16DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaf191
Young Jin Ko,Jared Castor,Trever D Kuralt,Erin A Goecker,Gregory Pepper,Jonathan C Reed,Alexander L Greninger
BACKGROUNDQuantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (qHBsAg) assays are important tools for monitoring hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and treatment response and constitute the primary endpoint in most HBV antiviral trials. To date, no qHBsAg assay has been authorized by the FDA for use in the United States, highlighting the need for performance evaluation and harmonization of available methods.METHODSWe evaluated the analytical performance of three commercial assays for qHBsAg measurement: Architect HBsAg Qualitative (Abbott) adapted for quantitative use, Elecsys HBsAg II quant II (Roche), and LIAISON XL Murex HBsAg Quant (DiaSorin). Performance characteristics including precision, accuracy, analytical sensitivity, linearity, and lot-to-lot variability were assessed using World Health Organization (WHO) International Standards 12/226 and 03/262, following CLSI guidelines. Clinical accuracy was also evaluated using 72 HBsAg-positive clinical specimens.RESULTSThe lower limit of quantification was 0.02 IU/mL for Architect, 0.07 IU/mL for Elecsys, and 1.02 IU/mL for LIAISON. The LIAISON exhibited limited linearity and significantly greater variability in samples with high HBsAg levels, as well as significant lot-to-lot variability. Ultimately, all three assays demonstrated acceptable precision and accuracy, though the LIAISON had to be recalibrated specifically with WHO International Standard 03/262.CONCLUSIONSThe Architect and Elecsys qHBsAg assays demonstrated sufficient analytical performance for clinical use, while the LIAISON was limited by its linearity, lower limit of quantification, and lot-to-lot variability. Standardization is essential to ensure consistent and accurate quantification of HBsAg for effective clinical monitoring and the establishment of treatment goals.
{"title":"Analytical Performance Comparison of Three Quantitative Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Assays.","authors":"Young Jin Ko,Jared Castor,Trever D Kuralt,Erin A Goecker,Gregory Pepper,Jonathan C Reed,Alexander L Greninger","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvaf191","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf191","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDQuantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (qHBsAg) assays are important tools for monitoring hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and treatment response and constitute the primary endpoint in most HBV antiviral trials. To date, no qHBsAg assay has been authorized by the FDA for use in the United States, highlighting the need for performance evaluation and harmonization of available methods.METHODSWe evaluated the analytical performance of three commercial assays for qHBsAg measurement: Architect HBsAg Qualitative (Abbott) adapted for quantitative use, Elecsys HBsAg II quant II (Roche), and LIAISON XL Murex HBsAg Quant (DiaSorin). Performance characteristics including precision, accuracy, analytical sensitivity, linearity, and lot-to-lot variability were assessed using World Health Organization (WHO) International Standards 12/226 and 03/262, following CLSI guidelines. Clinical accuracy was also evaluated using 72 HBsAg-positive clinical specimens.RESULTSThe lower limit of quantification was 0.02 IU/mL for Architect, 0.07 IU/mL for Elecsys, and 1.02 IU/mL for LIAISON. The LIAISON exhibited limited linearity and significantly greater variability in samples with high HBsAg levels, as well as significant lot-to-lot variability. Ultimately, all three assays demonstrated acceptable precision and accuracy, though the LIAISON had to be recalibrated specifically with WHO International Standard 03/262.CONCLUSIONSThe Architect and Elecsys qHBsAg assays demonstrated sufficient analytical performance for clinical use, while the LIAISON was limited by its linearity, lower limit of quantification, and lot-to-lot variability. Standardization is essential to ensure consistent and accurate quantification of HBsAg for effective clinical monitoring and the establishment of treatment goals.","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145986614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) is widely recognized for its high sensitivity in detecting low-frequency variants; however, conventional 2-color systems have limited multiplex capacity. Expanding this capability is essential for simultaneous detection of multiple driver mutations in cancer-related genes. KRAS and GNAS are key driver genes in the early development of pancreatic cancer and its precursor lesions, and mutations in these genes are often present at low abundance in clinical samples.
Methods: Two 6-color dPCR assays were developed using a droplet-based platform. PlexScreen-dPCR is a multicolored drop-off assay designed to screen for mutations in KRAS codons 12/13 and 61 and GNAS codon 201, without specifying individual variants. PlexID-dPCR employs variant-specific probes to distinguish among 14 predefined KRAS and GNAS mutations in a single reaction. The assays were validated using synthetic DNA, cell lines, 23 tissue samples, and 12 duodenal fluid samples. Customized primer/probe sets with 6 fluorophores were employed in a 6-color droplet dPCR system, and the limits of detection (LOD) were determined.
Results: PlexScreen-dPCR, applied in contrived samples, demonstrated LODs as low as 0.03% to 0.06%, enabling high-sensitivity detection of low-abundance mutations. PlexID-dPCR accurately identified all 14 variants in a single well. Both assays showed complete concordance with conventional methods, exhibiting a strong correlation for variant allele frequency quantification.
Conclusions: These 6-color dPCR assays offer scalable solutions for improved throughput detection of KRAS and GNAS mutations. Their compatibility with commercially available platforms and streamlined workflow support their integration into clinical practice. Further optimization can enhance cluster interpretation in high-plex settings and facilitate expansion toward broader genomic targets.
{"title":"Six-Color Multiplex Digital PCR Assays for Comprehensive Screening and Identification of Multiple Driver Mutations Associated with Pancreatic Carcinogenesis.","authors":"Chiho Maeda, Yusuke Ono, Kenji Takahashi, Miyuki Mori, Mayumi Suzuki, Nobue Tamamura, Yanpeng Sun, Taito Itoh, Hiroki Tanaka, Hidemasa Kawabata, Tetsuhiro Okada, Kazuya Koyama, Yu Ohtaki, Yuko Omori, Takuya Yamamoto, Yusuke Mizukami","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvaf181","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf181","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) is widely recognized for its high sensitivity in detecting low-frequency variants; however, conventional 2-color systems have limited multiplex capacity. Expanding this capability is essential for simultaneous detection of multiple driver mutations in cancer-related genes. KRAS and GNAS are key driver genes in the early development of pancreatic cancer and its precursor lesions, and mutations in these genes are often present at low abundance in clinical samples.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two 6-color dPCR assays were developed using a droplet-based platform. PlexScreen-dPCR is a multicolored drop-off assay designed to screen for mutations in KRAS codons 12/13 and 61 and GNAS codon 201, without specifying individual variants. PlexID-dPCR employs variant-specific probes to distinguish among 14 predefined KRAS and GNAS mutations in a single reaction. The assays were validated using synthetic DNA, cell lines, 23 tissue samples, and 12 duodenal fluid samples. Customized primer/probe sets with 6 fluorophores were employed in a 6-color droplet dPCR system, and the limits of detection (LOD) were determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PlexScreen-dPCR, applied in contrived samples, demonstrated LODs as low as 0.03% to 0.06%, enabling high-sensitivity detection of low-abundance mutations. PlexID-dPCR accurately identified all 14 variants in a single well. Both assays showed complete concordance with conventional methods, exhibiting a strong correlation for variant allele frequency quantification.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These 6-color dPCR assays offer scalable solutions for improved throughput detection of KRAS and GNAS mutations. Their compatibility with commercially available platforms and streamlined workflow support their integration into clinical practice. Further optimization can enhance cluster interpretation in high-plex settings and facilitate expansion toward broader genomic targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145932732","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-07DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaf182
Stylianos G Mouslech, Sven Wijnants, Anne-Lisanne van der Schagt, Lieve Van Hoovels, Roxane Deley, Matthijs Oyaert, Jana Neirinck, Jaak Billen, Glynis Frans, Maarten De Vos
Background: Urinalysis is a standard clinical test that includes the microscopic examination of urinary sediment to identify formed elements. Manual evaluation by laboratory technicians is time-intensive and subject to human error. Automated analysis using digital microscopy images presents a potential alternative. This study evaluates the integration of a deep learning approach to automatically classify urinary sediment images in the clinical laboratory, including independent prospective validation of its performance.
Methods: An annotated data set comprising 13 classes of urinary sediment elements was created from a database of Sysmex UD-10 digital microscope images. An EfficientNet-based model was trained and tested across three experimental scenarios to evaluate the effects of data collection strategies on performance. Uncertainty calibration was examined. The model's robustness and interpretability were examined using gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) to visualize influential image regions and t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) to analyze learned feature embeddings. Lastly, a graphical user interface was developed for a prospective evaluation in the laboratory.
Results: The model achieved approximately 97% overall accuracy on the test set. Experiments revealed sensitivity to data set variability, suggesting that performance may improve by integrating additional training examples. Confidence scores aligned with accuracy, and interpretability analyses showed that the model focused on relevant image regions and learned embeddings demonstrated clear class separation. In the prospective evaluation, top 1 and top 3 accuracies decreased to approximately 78% and 92%, respectively.
Conclusions: Our results indicate that a lightweight deep learning model can achieve high performance in classifying urine particles. Analysis of discrepancies between retrospective and prospective evaluations provides important insights toward reliable clinical application.
{"title":"Towards Clinical Integration of Deep Learning-Based Classification of Urinary Sediment Particles from Digital Microscopy Images: A Prospective Study.","authors":"Stylianos G Mouslech, Sven Wijnants, Anne-Lisanne van der Schagt, Lieve Van Hoovels, Roxane Deley, Matthijs Oyaert, Jana Neirinck, Jaak Billen, Glynis Frans, Maarten De Vos","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvaf182","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf182","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Urinalysis is a standard clinical test that includes the microscopic examination of urinary sediment to identify formed elements. Manual evaluation by laboratory technicians is time-intensive and subject to human error. Automated analysis using digital microscopy images presents a potential alternative. This study evaluates the integration of a deep learning approach to automatically classify urinary sediment images in the clinical laboratory, including independent prospective validation of its performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An annotated data set comprising 13 classes of urinary sediment elements was created from a database of Sysmex UD-10 digital microscope images. An EfficientNet-based model was trained and tested across three experimental scenarios to evaluate the effects of data collection strategies on performance. Uncertainty calibration was examined. The model's robustness and interpretability were examined using gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) to visualize influential image regions and t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) to analyze learned feature embeddings. Lastly, a graphical user interface was developed for a prospective evaluation in the laboratory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model achieved approximately 97% overall accuracy on the test set. Experiments revealed sensitivity to data set variability, suggesting that performance may improve by integrating additional training examples. Confidence scores aligned with accuracy, and interpretability analyses showed that the model focused on relevant image regions and learned embeddings demonstrated clear class separation. In the prospective evaluation, top 1 and top 3 accuracies decreased to approximately 78% and 92%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results indicate that a lightweight deep learning model can achieve high performance in classifying urine particles. Analysis of discrepancies between retrospective and prospective evaluations provides important insights toward reliable clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145917160","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Neurofilament light chain (Nf-L) is a key early biomarker for axonal damage and neurodegeneration, increasingly used in clinical practice for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment monitoring. To ensure reliable clinical implementation, standardized measurement procedures and calibrators traceable to the International System of Units (SI) are needed. Although a few mass-spectrometry methods for Nf-L quantification in cerebrospinal fluid CSF) and plasma have been described, none currently use properly defined SI-traceable calibrators and existing harmonization efforts rely solely on immunoassays. This study presents a validated immunoprecipitation (IP)-LC-MS/MS assay using an SI-traceable calibrator and compares it with Lumipulse and Simoa platforms to assess agreement and bias.
Methods: A new IP-LC-MS/MS method was developed based on SI-traceable calibrator quantification and analytically validated using International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) guidelines. Analysis of 69 CSF samples by MS assay and Lumipulse (Fujirebio®) was performed as well as head-to-head comparisons between MS, Simoa (Quanterix®) and Lumipulse assays on 12 CSF pools.
Results: The method relying on 3 peptides was validated analytically. Significant results (P < 0.05) were obtained between amyloid positive to negative group when using the LC-MS/MS assay. MS and Lumipulse results were correlated. Head-to-head comparison of the 3 methods showed great correlation (r2 > 0.98) but systematic bias was identified between all techniques.
Conclusion: A new IP-LC-MS/MS method using a SI-traceable calibrator was developed, and analytically and clinically validated. Comparison between available immunoassays resulted in great correlation but biases were identified reinforcing the need of standardization for Nf-L measurement.
{"title":"Development of a Novel Liquid Chromatography Coupled to Multiple Reaction Monitoring (LC-MRM) Assay for the Quantification of Neurofilament Light Chain in Cerebrospinal Fluid and Comparison with Ultra-Sensitive Immunoassay: A Step toward Standardization.","authors":"Salomé Coppens, Jérôme Vialaret, Etienne Mondésert, Giles Drinkwater, Luise Luckau, Sylvain Lehmann, Christophe Hirtz","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvaf180","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf180","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neurofilament light chain (Nf-L) is a key early biomarker for axonal damage and neurodegeneration, increasingly used in clinical practice for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment monitoring. To ensure reliable clinical implementation, standardized measurement procedures and calibrators traceable to the International System of Units (SI) are needed. Although a few mass-spectrometry methods for Nf-L quantification in cerebrospinal fluid CSF) and plasma have been described, none currently use properly defined SI-traceable calibrators and existing harmonization efforts rely solely on immunoassays. This study presents a validated immunoprecipitation (IP)-LC-MS/MS assay using an SI-traceable calibrator and compares it with Lumipulse and Simoa platforms to assess agreement and bias.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A new IP-LC-MS/MS method was developed based on SI-traceable calibrator quantification and analytically validated using International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) guidelines. Analysis of 69 CSF samples by MS assay and Lumipulse (Fujirebio®) was performed as well as head-to-head comparisons between MS, Simoa (Quanterix®) and Lumipulse assays on 12 CSF pools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The method relying on 3 peptides was validated analytically. Significant results (P < 0.05) were obtained between amyloid positive to negative group when using the LC-MS/MS assay. MS and Lumipulse results were correlated. Head-to-head comparison of the 3 methods showed great correlation (r2 > 0.98) but systematic bias was identified between all techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A new IP-LC-MS/MS method using a SI-traceable calibrator was developed, and analytically and clinically validated. Comparison between available immunoassays resulted in great correlation but biases were identified reinforcing the need of standardization for Nf-L measurement.</p>","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145917151","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}