Clinical chemistry最新文献

Background: There are limited data regarding the utility of follow-up cardiac troponin (cTn) measurements after admission for acute chest pain and how long-term stability of myocardial injury and prognostic value differ when using cardiac troponin T (cTnT) or I (cTnI).

Methods: We measured high-sensitivity (hs)-cTnT (Roche Diagnostics) and hs-cTnI (Siemens Healthineers) during hospitalization for acute chest pain and after 3 months. Acute myocardial injury was defined as concentrations > sex-specific upper reference limit (URL) during hospitalization and ≤URL at 3-months. Chronic myocardial injury (CMI) was defined as concentrations > URL at both time points. Patients were followed from the 3-month sampling point for a median of 1586 (IQR 1161-1786) days for a primary composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), revascularization, and heart failure, and a secondary endpoint of all-cause mortality.

Results: Among 754 patients, 33.8% (hs-cTnT) and 19.2% (hs-cTnI) had myocardial injury during hospitalization. The rate of CMI was 5 times higher by hs-cTnT (20%) assay than hs-cTnI (4%), while acute myocardial injury was equally common; 14% (hs-cTnT) and 15% (hs-cTnI), respectively (6% and 5% when excluding index non-ST-elevation MI (NSTEMI). For hs-cTnT, peak index concentration, 3-month concentration and classification of CMI predicted the primary endpoint; hazard ratios (HRs) 1.38 (95% CI 1.20-1.58), 2.34 (1.70-3.20), and 2.31 (1.30-4.12), respectively. For hs-cTnI, peak index concentration predicted the primary endpoint; HR 1.14 (1.03-1.25). This association was nonsignificant after excluding index NSTEMI.

Conclusions: Acute myocardial injury is equally frequent, whereas CMI is more prevalent using hs-cTnT assay than hs-cTnI. Measuring hs-cTnT 3 months after an acute chest pain episode could assist in further long-term risk assessment. ClinicalTrials.gov Registration Number: NCT02620202.

Background: Timely and accurate notification of critical results is crucial in laboratory medicine and mandated by accreditation standards like ISO15189. Alert lists do, however, vary widely and clinical laboratories typically rely on a combination of in-house agreed and/or literature-based critical values. Communication by phone is still the preferred method of notification, but digital communication could help improve communication of critical results.

Content: We review the available evidence concerning critical result thresholds and critical result notification practices. The evidence is ranked using an adaptation of the Stockholm Hierarchy. In addition, we propose an evidence-based list of critical result thresholds for hospitalized patients that laboratories can use as a starter list and further customize based on the clinical needs of their patient population.

Summary: A clear distinction between critical results and significantly abnormal results is essential for effective and timely healthcare interventions. Implementation of a policy using differentiated thresholds taking into account individual patient characteristics and how fast medical attention is needed, and the use alternative communication methods could enhance communication efficiency and reduce notification fatigue.

Background: The influence of age on cardiac troponin is unclear and may vary between cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and I (cTnI). We aimed to compare the impact of age on the diagnostic and prognostic utility of cTnT and cTnI.

Methods: This Danish nationwide, register-based cohort study included patients with at least one cardiac troponin (cTn) measurement from 2009 through June 2022, stratified into decades of age. We used peak cTn concentration during admission, dichotomized as positive/negative and normalized to the 99th percentile. Receiver operating characteristics for myocardial infarction (MI) and logistic regression were used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) for mortality at 1 year.

Results: We included 541 817 patients; median age 66 years (interquartile range [IQR] 51-77) and 256 545 (47%) female. A total of 40 359 (7.4%) had an MI, and 59 800 (14.1%) patients died within 1 year of admission. The predictive ability of both cTns for MI were highest for patients 30 to 50 years. This was most pronounced for cTnT, the specificity of which fell from 83% among patients 40 to 49 years to 4% for patients ≥90 years. The prognostic ability of both cTns for 1-year mortality declined with age. cTnT had stronger prognostic ability for all age-groups; OR for a positive cTnT 28.4 (95% CI, 20.1-41.0) compared with 9.4 (95% CI, 5.0-16.7) for cTnI among patients <30 years.

Conclusions: The predictive and prognostic ability of cTnT and cTnI declined with age. cTnT had a low specificity for MI in elderly patients. However, cTnT was the strongest prognostic marker among all age groups.