Pub Date : 2023-08-25eCollection Date: 2023-09-01DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000971
Gerharda H Boerman, Heleen N Haspels, Matthijs de Hoog, Koen F Joosten
Objectives: To examine the characteristics of long-stay patients (LSPs) admitted to a PICU and to investigate discharge characteristics of medical complexity among discharged LSP.
Design: We performed a retrospective cohort study where clinical data were collected on all children admitted to our PICU between July 1, 2017, and January 1, 2020.
Setting: A single-center study based at Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, a level III interdisciplinary PICU in The Netherlands, providing all pediatric and surgical subspecialties.
Patients: LSP was defined as those admitted for at least 28 consecutive days.
Interventions: None.
Measurements: Length of PICU stay, diagnosis at admission, length of mechanical ventilation, need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, mortality, discharge location after PICU and hospital admission, medical technical support, medication use, and involvement of allied healthcare professionals after hospital discharge.
Main results: LSP represented a small proportion of total PICU patients (108 patients; 3.2%) but consumed 33% of the total admission days, 47% of all days on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and 38% of all days on mechanical ventilation. After discharge, most LSP could be classified as children with medical complexity (CMC) (76%); all patients received discharge medications (median 5.5; range 2-19), most patients suffered from a chronic disease (89%), leaving the hospital with one or more technological devices (82%) and required allied healthcare professional involvement after discharge (93%).
Conclusions: LSP consumes a considerable amount of resources in the PICU and its impact extends beyond the point of PICU discharge since the majority are CMC. This indicates complex care needs at home, high family needs, and a high burden on the healthcare system across hospital borders.
{"title":"Characteristics of Long-Stay Patients in a PICU and Healthcare Resource Utilization After Discharge.","authors":"Gerharda H Boerman, Heleen N Haspels, Matthijs de Hoog, Koen F Joosten","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000971","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000971","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the characteristics of long-stay patients (LSPs) admitted to a PICU and to investigate discharge characteristics of medical complexity among discharged LSP.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study where clinical data were collected on all children admitted to our PICU between July 1, 2017, and January 1, 2020.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A single-center study based at Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, a level III interdisciplinary PICU in The Netherlands, providing all pediatric and surgical subspecialties.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>LSP was defined as those admitted for at least 28 consecutive days.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Length of PICU stay, diagnosis at admission, length of mechanical ventilation, need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, mortality, discharge location after PICU and hospital admission, medical technical support, medication use, and involvement of allied healthcare professionals after hospital discharge.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>LSP represented a small proportion of total PICU patients (108 patients; 3.2%) but consumed 33% of the total admission days, 47% of all days on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and 38% of all days on mechanical ventilation. After discharge, most LSP could be classified as children with medical complexity (CMC) (76%); all patients received discharge medications (median 5.5; range 2-19), most patients suffered from a chronic disease (89%), leaving the hospital with one or more technological devices (82%) and required allied healthcare professional involvement after discharge (93%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LSP consumes a considerable amount of resources in the PICU and its impact extends beyond the point of PICU discharge since the majority are CMC. This indicates complex care needs at home, high family needs, and a high burden on the healthcare system across hospital borders.</p>","PeriodicalId":10759,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Explorations","volume":"5 9","pages":"e0971"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d5/2e/cc9-5-e0971.PMC10461958.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10119708","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-25eCollection Date: 2023-09-01DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000956
Kelli Keats, Andrea Sikora, Mojdeh S Heavner, Xianyan Chen, Susan E Smith
Background: The workload of healthcare professionals including physicians and nurses in the ICU has an established relationship to patient outcomes, including mortality, length of stay, and other quality indicators; however, the relationship of critical care pharmacist workload to outcomes has not been rigorously evaluated and determined. The objective of our study is to characterize the relationship of critical care pharmacist workload in the ICU as it relates to patient-centered outcomes of critically ill patients.
Methods: Optimizing Pharmacist Team-Integration for ICU patient Management is a multicenter, observational cohort study with a target enrollment of 20,000 critically ill patients. Participating critical care pharmacists will enroll patients managed in the ICU. Data collection will consist of two observational phases: prospective and retrospective. During the prospective phase, critical care pharmacists will record daily workload data (e.g., census, number of rounding teams). During the retrospective phase, patient demographics, severity of illness, medication regimen complexity, and outcomes will be recorded. The primary outcome is mortality. Multiple methods will be used to explore the primary outcome including multilevel multiple logistic regression with stepwise variable selection to exclude nonsignificant covariates from the final model, supervised and unsupervised machine learning techniques, and Bayesian analysis.
Results: Our protocol describes the processes and methods for an observational study in the ICU.
Conclusions: This study seeks to determine the relationship between pharmacist workload, as measured by pharmacist-to-patient ratio and the pharmacist clinical burden index, and patient-centered outcomes, including mortality and length of stay.
{"title":"Optimizing Pharmacist Team-Integration for ICU Patient Management: Rationale, Study Design, and Methods for a Multicentered Exploration of Pharmacist-to-Patient Ratio.","authors":"Kelli Keats, Andrea Sikora, Mojdeh S Heavner, Xianyan Chen, Susan E Smith","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000956","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000956","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The workload of healthcare professionals including physicians and nurses in the ICU has an established relationship to patient outcomes, including mortality, length of stay, and other quality indicators; however, the relationship of critical care pharmacist workload to outcomes has not been rigorously evaluated and determined. The objective of our study is to characterize the relationship of critical care pharmacist workload in the ICU as it relates to patient-centered outcomes of critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Optimizing Pharmacist Team-Integration for ICU patient Management is a multicenter, observational cohort study with a target enrollment of 20,000 critically ill patients. Participating critical care pharmacists will enroll patients managed in the ICU. Data collection will consist of two observational phases: prospective and retrospective. During the prospective phase, critical care pharmacists will record daily workload data (e.g., census, number of rounding teams). During the retrospective phase, patient demographics, severity of illness, medication regimen complexity, and outcomes will be recorded. The primary outcome is mortality. Multiple methods will be used to explore the primary outcome including multilevel multiple logistic regression with stepwise variable selection to exclude nonsignificant covariates from the final model, supervised and unsupervised machine learning techniques, and Bayesian analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our protocol describes the processes and methods for an observational study in the ICU.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study seeks to determine the relationship between pharmacist workload, as measured by pharmacist-to-patient ratio and the pharmacist clinical burden index, and patient-centered outcomes, including mortality and length of stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":10759,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Explorations","volume":"5 9","pages":"e0956"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4c/fd/cc9-5-e0956.PMC10461940.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10117767","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-21eCollection Date: 2023-08-01DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000954
George L Anesi, Ruiying Aria Xiong, M Kit Delgado
Objectives: To quantify the frequency, outside of the pandemic setting, with which individual healthcare facilities faced surge periods due to severe increases in demand for emergency department (ED) care.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: U.S. EDs.
Patients: All ED encounters in the all-payer, nationally representative Nationwide Emergency Department Sample from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, 2006-2019.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: Frequency of surge periods defined as ED months in which an individual facility ED saw a greater than 50% increase in ED visits per month above facility-/calendar month-specific medians. During 2006-2019, 3,317 U.S. EDs reported 354,534,229 ED visits across 142,035 ED months. Fifty-seven thousand four hundred ninety-five ED months (40.5%) during the study period had a 0% to 50% increase in ED visits that month above facility-specific medians and 1,952 ED months (1.4%) qualified as surge periods and had a greater than 50% increase in ED visits that month above facility-specific medians. These surge months were experienced by 397 unique facility EDs (12.0%). Compared with 2006, the most proximal pre-pandemic period of 2016-2019 had a notably elevated likelihood of ED-month surge periods (odds ratios [ORs], 2.36-2.84; all p < 0.0005). Compared with the calendar month of January, the winter ED months in December through March have similar likelihood of an ED-month qualifying as a surge period (ORs, 0.84-1.03; all p > 0.05), while the nonwinter ED months in April through November have a lower likelihood of an ED-month qualifying as a surge period (ORs, 0.65-0.81; all p < 0.05).
Conclusions: Understanding the frequency of surges in demand for ED care-which appear to have increased in frequency even before the COVID-19 pandemic and are concentrated in winter months-is necessary to better understand the burden of potential and realized acute surge events and to inform cost-effectiveness preparedness strategies.
目标:量化在大流行病环境之外,个别医疗机构因急诊科(ED)护理需求剧增而面临激增的频率:量化各医疗机构在大流行之外,因急诊科(ED)护理需求剧增而面临激增期的频率:设计:回顾性队列研究:患者干预措施:无:测量和主要结果激增期的频率,定义为单个机构急诊科每月急诊就诊人次比机构/日历月特定中位数增加 50%以上的急诊月。2006-2019 年间,美国有 3,317 家急诊室在 142,035 个急诊室月中报告了 354,534,229 次急诊室就诊。在研究期间,有 57495 个 ED 月(40.5%)的当月急诊就诊人次增幅在 0% 至 50% 之间,超过了特定机构的中位数;有 1952 个 ED 月(1.4%)属于激增期,当月急诊就诊人次增幅超过 50%,超过了特定机构的中位数。有 397 家医疗机构的急诊室(12.0%)经历了这些急诊量激增的月份。与 2006 年相比,2016-2019 年最接近流行前的时期出现 ED 月激增期的可能性明显增加(几率比 [ORs],2.36-2.84;所有 p <0.0005)。与 1 月份相比,12 月至 3 月的冬季 ED 月出现 ED 月激增期的可能性相似(ORs,0.84-1.03;所有 p > 0.05),而 4 月至 11 月的非冬季 ED 月出现 ED 月激增期的可能性较低(ORs,0.65-0.81;所有 p < 0.05):了解急诊室护理需求激增的频率--甚至在 COVID-19 大流行之前,这种频率似乎就已经增加,并且集中在冬季--对于更好地了解潜在和已发生的急性激增事件的负担以及为成本效益准备策略提供信息是非常必要的。
{"title":"Frequency and Trends of Pre-Pandemic Surge Periods in U.S. Emergency Departments, 2006-2019.","authors":"George L Anesi, Ruiying Aria Xiong, M Kit Delgado","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000954","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000954","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To quantify the frequency, outside of the pandemic setting, with which individual healthcare facilities faced surge periods due to severe increases in demand for emergency department (ED) care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>U.S. EDs.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>All ED encounters in the all-payer, nationally representative Nationwide Emergency Department Sample from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, 2006-2019.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Frequency of surge periods defined as ED months in which an individual facility ED saw a greater than 50% increase in ED visits per month above facility-/calendar month-specific medians. During 2006-2019, 3,317 U.S. EDs reported 354,534,229 ED visits across 142,035 ED months. Fifty-seven thousand four hundred ninety-five ED months (40.5%) during the study period had a 0% to 50% increase in ED visits that month above facility-specific medians and 1,952 ED months (1.4%) qualified as surge periods and had a greater than 50% increase in ED visits that month above facility-specific medians. These surge months were experienced by 397 unique facility EDs (12.0%). Compared with 2006, the most proximal pre-pandemic period of 2016-2019 had a notably elevated likelihood of ED-month surge periods (odds ratios [ORs], 2.36-2.84; all <i>p</i> < 0.0005). Compared with the calendar month of January, the winter ED months in December through March have similar likelihood of an ED-month qualifying as a surge period (ORs, 0.84-1.03; all <i>p</i> > 0.05), while the nonwinter ED months in April through November have a lower likelihood of an ED-month qualifying as a surge period (ORs, 0.65-0.81; all <i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Understanding the frequency of surges in demand for ED care-which appear to have increased in frequency even before the COVID-19 pandemic and are concentrated in winter months-is necessary to better understand the burden of potential and realized acute surge events and to inform cost-effectiveness preparedness strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10759,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Explorations","volume":"5 8","pages":"e0954"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/25/d4/cc9-5-e0954.PMC10443743.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10063600","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-21eCollection Date: 2023-08-01DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000957
Amber Meservey, Govind Krishnan, Cynthia L Green, Samantha Morrison, Craig R Rackley, Bryan D Kraft
Background: Carbon monoxide (CO) is an endogenous signaling molecule that activates cytoprotective programs implicated in the resolution of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and survival of critical illness. Because CO levels can be measured in blood as carboxyhemoglobin, we hypothesized that carboxyhemoglobin percent (COHb%) may associate with mortality.
Objectives: To examine the relationship between COHb% and outcomes in patients with ARDS requiring venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), a condition where elevated COHb% is commonly observed.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Academic medical center ICU.
Patients: Patients were included that had ARDS on venovenous ECMO.
Measurements and main results: We examined the association between COHb% and mortality using a Cox proportional hazards model. Secondary outcomes including ECMO duration, ventilator weaning, and hospital and ICU length of stay were examined using both subdistribution and causal-specific hazard models for competing risks. We identified 109 consecutive patients for analysis. Mortality significantly decreased per 1 U increase in COHb% below 3.25% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.35; 95% CI, 0.15-0.80; p = 0.013) and increased per 1 U increase above 3.25% (HR, 4.7; 95% CI, 1.5-14.7; p = 0.007) reflecting a nonlinear association (p = 0.006). Each unit increase in COHb% was associated with reduced likelihood of liberation from ECMO and mechanical ventilation, and increased time to hospital and ICU discharge (all p < 0.05). COHb% was significantly associated with hemolysis but not with initiation of hemodialysis or blood transfusions.
Conclusions: In patients with ARDS on venovenous ECMO, COHb% is a novel biomarker for mortality exhibiting a U-shaped pattern. Our findings suggest that too little CO (perhaps due to impaired host signaling) or excess CO (perhaps due to hemolysis) is associated with higher mortality. Patients with low COHb% may exhibit the most benefit from future therapies targeting anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory pathways such as low-dose inhaled CO gas.
背景:一氧化碳(CO)是一种激活细胞保护程序的内源性信号分子,与急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的缓解和危重病人的存活有关。由于 CO 水平可在血液中以碳氧血红蛋白的形式测量,我们假设碳氧血红蛋白百分比(COHb%)可能与死亡率有关:研究需要静脉体外膜氧合(ECMO)的 ARDS 患者 COHb% 与预后之间的关系:设计:回顾性队列研究:背景:学术医疗中心重症监护室:研究对象:使用静脉 ECMO 的 ARDS 患者:我们使用 Cox 比例危险模型研究了 COHb% 与死亡率之间的关系。次要结果包括 ECMO 持续时间、呼吸机断流、住院时间和重症监护室停留时间,我们使用了子分布和因果特异性危险模型来研究竞争风险。我们确定了 109 名连续患者进行分析。COHb% 低于 3.25% 时,死亡率每增加 1 U 就会明显下降(危险比 [HR],0.35;95% CI,0.15-0.80;p = 0.013),而高于 3.25% 时,死亡率每增加 1 U 就会上升(HR,4.7;95% CI,1.5-14.7;p = 0.007),这反映了一种非线性关联(p = 0.006)。COHb% 每增加一个单位,就会降低脱离 ECMO 和机械通气的可能性,并延长住院时间和 ICU 出院时间(所有 p <0.05)。COHb% 与溶血显著相关,但与开始血液透析或输血无关:结论:在使用静脉 ECMO 的 ARDS 患者中,COHb% 是一种新的死亡率生物标志物,呈现 U 型模式。我们的研究结果表明,过低的 CO(可能是由于宿主信号受损)或过高的 CO(可能是由于溶血)与较高的死亡率相关。COHb% 低的患者可能从未来针对抗氧化和抗炎途径的疗法(如低剂量吸入 CO 气体)中获益最多。
{"title":"U-Shaped Association Between Carboxyhemoglobin and Mortality in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome on Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.","authors":"Amber Meservey, Govind Krishnan, Cynthia L Green, Samantha Morrison, Craig R Rackley, Bryan D Kraft","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000957","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000957","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Carbon monoxide (CO) is an endogenous signaling molecule that activates cytoprotective programs implicated in the resolution of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and survival of critical illness. Because CO levels can be measured in blood as carboxyhemoglobin, we hypothesized that carboxyhemoglobin percent (COHb%) may associate with mortality.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the relationship between COHb% and outcomes in patients with ARDS requiring venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), a condition where elevated COHb% is commonly observed.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic medical center ICU.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients were included that had ARDS on venovenous ECMO.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>We examined the association between COHb% and mortality using a Cox proportional hazards model. Secondary outcomes including ECMO duration, ventilator weaning, and hospital and ICU length of stay were examined using both subdistribution and causal-specific hazard models for competing risks. We identified 109 consecutive patients for analysis. Mortality significantly decreased per 1 U increase in COHb% below 3.25% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.35; 95% CI, 0.15-0.80; <i>p</i> = 0.013) and increased per 1 U increase above 3.25% (HR, 4.7; 95% CI, 1.5-14.7; <i>p</i> = 0.007) reflecting a nonlinear association (<i>p</i> = 0.006). Each unit increase in COHb% was associated with reduced likelihood of liberation from ECMO and mechanical ventilation, and increased time to hospital and ICU discharge (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). COHb% was significantly associated with hemolysis but not with initiation of hemodialysis or blood transfusions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with ARDS on venovenous ECMO, COHb% is a novel biomarker for mortality exhibiting a U-shaped pattern. Our findings suggest that too little CO (perhaps due to impaired host signaling) or excess CO (perhaps due to hemolysis) is associated with higher mortality. Patients with low COHb% may exhibit the most benefit from future therapies targeting anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory pathways such as low-dose inhaled CO gas.</p>","PeriodicalId":10759,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Explorations","volume":"5 8","pages":"e0957"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c4/19/cc9-5-e0957.PMC10443764.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10056734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-21eCollection Date: 2023-08-01DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000961
Hernando Gómez, Alexander Zarbock, Stephen M Pastores, Gyorgy Frendl, Sven Bercker, Pierre Asfar, Steven A Conrad, Jaques Creteur, James Miner, Jean Paul Mira, Johan Motsch, Jean-Pierre Quenot, Thomas Rimmelé, Peter Rosenberger, Christophe Vinsonneau, Bob Birch, Fabienne Heskia, Julien Textoris, Luca Molinari, Louis M Guzzi, Claudio Ronco, John A Kellum
Objectives: To determine the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a biomarker-guided implementation of a kidney-sparing sepsis bundle (KSSB) of care in comparison with standard of care (SOC) on clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis.
Setting: Five University Hospitals in Europe and North America.
Patients: Adult patients, admitted to the ICU with an indwelling urinary catheter and diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock, without acute kidney injury (acute kidney injury) stage 2 or 3 or chronic kidney disease.
Interventions: A three-level KSSB based on Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGOs) recommendations guided by serial measurements of urinary tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 used as a combined biomarker [TIMP2]•[IGFBP7].
Measurements and main results: The trial was stopped for low enrollment related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Nineteen patients enrolled in five sites over 12 months were randomized to the SOC (n = 8, 42.0%) or intervention (n = 11, 58.0%). The primary outcome was feasibility, and key secondary outcomes were safety and efficacy. Adherence to protocol in patients assigned to the first two levels of KSSB was 15 of 19 (81.8%) and 19 of 19 (100%) but was 1 of 4 (25%) for level 3 KSSB. Serious adverse events were more frequent in the intervention arm (4/11, 36.4%) than in the control arm (1/8, 12.5%), but none were related to study interventions. The secondary efficacy outcome was a composite of death, dialysis, or progression of greater than or equal to 2 stages of acute kidney injury within 72 hours after enrollment and was reached by 3 of 8 (37.5%) patients in the control arm, and 0 of 11 (0%) patients in the intervention arm. In the control arm, two patients experienced progression of acute kidney injury, and one patient died.
Conclusions: Although the COVID-19 pandemic impeded recruitment, the actual implementation of a therapeutic strategy that deploys a KDIGO-based KSSB of care guided by risk stratification using urinary [TIMP2]•[IGFBP7] seems feasible and appears to be safe in patients with sepsis.
{"title":"Feasibility Assessment of a Biomarker-Guided Kidney-Sparing Sepsis Bundle: The Limiting Acute Kidney Injury Progression In Sepsis Trial.","authors":"Hernando Gómez, Alexander Zarbock, Stephen M Pastores, Gyorgy Frendl, Sven Bercker, Pierre Asfar, Steven A Conrad, Jaques Creteur, James Miner, Jean Paul Mira, Johan Motsch, Jean-Pierre Quenot, Thomas Rimmelé, Peter Rosenberger, Christophe Vinsonneau, Bob Birch, Fabienne Heskia, Julien Textoris, Luca Molinari, Louis M Guzzi, Claudio Ronco, John A Kellum","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000961","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000961","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a biomarker-guided implementation of a kidney-sparing sepsis bundle (KSSB) of care in comparison with standard of care (SOC) on clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Adaptive, multicenter, randomized clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Five University Hospitals in Europe and North America.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult patients, admitted to the ICU with an indwelling urinary catheter and diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock, without acute kidney injury (acute kidney injury) stage 2 or 3 or chronic kidney disease.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>A three-level KSSB based on Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGOs) recommendations guided by serial measurements of urinary tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 used as a combined biomarker [TIMP2]•[IGFBP7].</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The trial was stopped for low enrollment related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Nineteen patients enrolled in five sites over 12 months were randomized to the SOC (<i>n</i> = 8, 42.0%) or intervention (<i>n</i> = 11, 58.0%). The primary outcome was feasibility, and key secondary outcomes were safety and efficacy. Adherence to protocol in patients assigned to the first two levels of KSSB was 15 of 19 (81.8%) and 19 of 19 (100%) but was 1 of 4 (25%) for level 3 KSSB. Serious adverse events were more frequent in the intervention arm (4/11, 36.4%) than in the control arm (1/8, 12.5%), but none were related to study interventions. The secondary efficacy outcome was a composite of death, dialysis, or progression of greater than or equal to 2 stages of acute kidney injury within 72 hours after enrollment and was reached by 3 of 8 (37.5%) patients in the control arm, and 0 of 11 (0%) patients in the intervention arm. In the control arm, two patients experienced progression of acute kidney injury, and one patient died.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the COVID-19 pandemic impeded recruitment, the actual implementation of a therapeutic strategy that deploys a KDIGO-based KSSB of care guided by risk stratification using urinary [TIMP2]•[IGFBP7] seems feasible and appears to be safe in patients with sepsis.</p>","PeriodicalId":10759,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Explorations","volume":"5 8","pages":"e0961"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0f/3f/cc9-5-e0961.PMC10443738.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10069804","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-02eCollection Date: 2023-08-01DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000952
Stephen M Pastores, Natalie Kostelecky, Hao Zhang
A diverse and inclusive critical care workforce is vital to the provision of culturally appropriate and effective care to critically ill patients of all backgrounds.
Objectives: The purpose of this study is to determine the trends in gender, race, and ethnicity of U.S. critical care fellowships over the past 6 years (2016-2021).
Methods: Data on gender, race, and ethnicity of critical care fellows in five Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education-accredited training programs (internal medicine, pulmonary and critical care, anesthesiology, surgery, and pediatrics) from 2015 to 2016 to 2020-2021 were obtained from the joint reports of the American Medical Association (AMA) and Association of American Medical Colleges published annually in the Journal of the AMA.
Results: From 2016 to 2021, the number of U.S. critical care fellows increased annually, up 23.8%, with the largest number of fellows in pulmonary critical care medicine (60.1%). The percentage of female critical care fellows slightly increased from 38.7% to 39.4% (p = 0.57). White fellows significantly decreased from 57.4% to 49.3% (p = 0.0001); similarly, Asian fellows significantly decreased from 30.8% to 27.5% (p = 0.004). The percentage of Black or African American fellows was not statistically significantly different (4.9% vs 4.4%; p = 0.44). The number of fellows who self-identified as multiracial significantly increased from 52 (1.9%) to 91 (2.7%) (p = 0.043). The percentage of fellows who identified as Hispanic was not significantly different (6.7% vs 7.5%; p = 0.23).
Conclusions: The percentage of women and racially and ethnically minoritized fellows (Black and Hispanic) remain underrepresented in critical care fellowship programs. Additional research is needed to better understand these demographic trends in our emerging critical care physician workforce and enhance diversity.
{"title":"Gender, Race, and Ethnicity in Critical Care Fellowship Programs in the United States From 2016 to 2021.","authors":"Stephen M Pastores, Natalie Kostelecky, Hao Zhang","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000952","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000952","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A diverse and inclusive critical care workforce is vital to the provision of culturally appropriate and effective care to critically ill patients of all backgrounds.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study is to determine the trends in gender, race, and ethnicity of U.S. critical care fellowships over the past 6 years (2016-2021).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on gender, race, and ethnicity of critical care fellows in five Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education-accredited training programs (internal medicine, pulmonary and critical care, anesthesiology, surgery, and pediatrics) from 2015 to 2016 to 2020-2021 were obtained from the joint reports of the American Medical Association (AMA) and Association of American Medical Colleges published annually in the Journal of the AMA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2016 to 2021, the number of U.S. critical care fellows increased annually, up 23.8%, with the largest number of fellows in pulmonary critical care medicine (60.1%). The percentage of female critical care fellows slightly increased from 38.7% to 39.4% (<i>p</i> = 0.57). White fellows significantly decreased from 57.4% to 49.3% (<i>p</i> = 0.0001); similarly, Asian fellows significantly decreased from 30.8% to 27.5% (<i>p</i> = 0.004). The percentage of Black or African American fellows was not statistically significantly different (4.9% vs 4.4%; <i>p</i> = 0.44). The number of fellows who self-identified as multiracial significantly increased from 52 (1.9%) to 91 (2.7%) (<i>p</i> = 0.043). The percentage of fellows who identified as Hispanic was not significantly different (6.7% vs 7.5%; <i>p</i> = 0.23).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The percentage of women and racially and ethnically minoritized fellows (Black and Hispanic) remain underrepresented in critical care fellowship programs. Additional research is needed to better understand these demographic trends in our emerging critical care physician workforce and enhance diversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":10759,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Explorations","volume":"5 8","pages":"e0952"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/24/37/cc9-5-e0952.PMC10400040.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10006346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-01DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000950
Jeeyune Bahk, Bridget Dolan, Venus Sharma, Mantej Sehmbhi, Jennifer Y Fung, Young Im Lee
Outcomes of tracheostomized patients with COVID-19 are seldomly investigated with conflicting evidence from the existing literature.
Objectives: To create a study evaluating the impact of COVID-19 on tracheostomized patients by comparing clinical outcomes and weaning parameters in COVID-19 positive and negative cohorts.
Design setting and participants: A retrospective observational cohort study of 604 tracheostomized patients hospitalized in 16 ICUs in New York City between March 9, 2020, and September 8, 2021.
Main outcomes and measures: Patients were stratified into two cohorts: 398 COVID-19 negative (COVID-ve) and 206 COVID-19 positive (COVID+ve) patients. Clinical characteristics, outcomes, and weaning parameters (first pressure support [PS], tracheostomy collar [TC], speech valve placement, and decannulation) were analyzed.
Results: COVID+ve had fewer comorbidities including coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, malignancy, chronic kidney disease, liver disease, and HIV (p < 0.05). Higher Fio2 (53% vs 44%), positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) (7.15 vs 5.69), Pco2 (45.8 vs 38.2), and lower pH (7.41 vs 7.43) were observed at the time of tracheostomy in COVID+ve (p < 0.005). There was no statistical difference in post-tracheostomy complication rates. Longer time from intubation to tracheostomy (15.90 vs 13.60 d; p = 0.002), tracheostomy to first PS (2.87 vs 1.80 d; p = 0.005), and TC placement (11.07 vs 4.46 d; p < 0.001) were seen in COVID+ve. However, similar time to speech valve placement, decannulation, and significantly lower 1-year mortality (23.3% vs 36.7%; p = 0.001) with higher number of discharges to long-term acute care hospital (LTACH) (23.8% vs 13.6%; p = 0.015) were seen in COVID+ve.
Conclusions and relevance: Patients with COVID-19 required higher Fio2 and PEEP ventilatory support at the time of tracheostomy, with no observed change in complication rates. Despite longer initial weaning period with PS or TC, similar time to speech valve placement or decannulation with significantly lower mortality and higher LTACH discharges suggest favorable outcome in COVID-19 positive patients. Higher ventilatory support requirements and prolonged weaning should not be a deterrent to pursuing a tracheostomy.
由于现有文献中存在相互矛盾的证据,很少对经气管造口术的COVID-19患者的预后进行调查。目的:通过比较COVID-19阳性和阴性队列的临床结局和脱机参数,评估COVID-19对气管造口患者的影响。设计背景和参与者:一项回顾性观察队列研究,纳入2020年3月9日至2021年9月8日期间在纽约市16个icu住院的604例气管造口患者。主要结局和措施:患者被分为两组:398例COVID-19阴性(COVID-ve)和206例COVID-19阳性(COVID+ve)患者。分析临床特征、结局和脱机参数(第一压力支持、气管造口领、语音瓣膜置放和脱管)。结果:冠状动脉疾病、充血性心力衰竭、恶性肿瘤、慢性肾脏疾病、肝脏疾病、HIV等合并症较少(p < 0.05)。新冠肺炎患者气管造口时Fio2升高(53% vs 44%)、呼气末正压(PEEP)升高(7.15 vs 5.69)、Pco2升高(45.8 vs 38.2)、pH降低(7.41 vs 7.43) (p < 0.005)。气管切开术后并发症发生率无统计学差异。从插管到气管切开术所需时间更长(15.90 d vs 13.60 d;p = 0.002),气管造瘘至第一次PS (2.87 vs 1.80;p = 0.005)和TC放置(11.07 vs 4.46 d;p < 0.001)。然而,与语音瓣膜置放、脱脉术时间相近,1年死亡率显著降低(23.3% vs 36.7%;p = 0.001),长期急性护理医院(LTACH)的出院人数较高(23.8% vs 13.6%;p = 0.015)。结论及相关性:COVID-19患者在气管切开术时需要更高的Fio2和PEEP通气支持,未观察到并发症发生率的变化。尽管PS或TC的初始脱机时间较长,但与语音瓣膜置放或脱管时间相似,死亡率显著降低,LTACH出院率较高,这表明COVID-19阳性患者的预后良好。较高的通气支持要求和较长的脱机时间不应成为气管切开术的障碍。
{"title":"Characteristics and Outcomes of Tracheostomized Patients With and Without COVID-19.","authors":"Jeeyune Bahk, Bridget Dolan, Venus Sharma, Mantej Sehmbhi, Jennifer Y Fung, Young Im Lee","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000950","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000950","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Outcomes of tracheostomized patients with COVID-19 are seldomly investigated with conflicting evidence from the existing literature.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To create a study evaluating the impact of COVID-19 on tracheostomized patients by comparing clinical outcomes and weaning parameters in COVID-19 positive and negative cohorts.</p><p><strong>Design setting and participants: </strong>A retrospective observational cohort study of 604 tracheostomized patients hospitalized in 16 ICUs in New York City between March 9, 2020, and September 8, 2021.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Patients were stratified into two cohorts: 398 COVID-19 negative (COVID-ve) and 206 COVID-19 positive (COVID+ve) patients. Clinical characteristics, outcomes, and weaning parameters (first pressure support [PS], tracheostomy collar [TC], speech valve placement, and decannulation) were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>COVID+ve had fewer comorbidities including coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, malignancy, chronic kidney disease, liver disease, and HIV (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Higher Fio<sub>2</sub> (53% vs 44%), positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) (7.15 vs 5.69), Pco<sub>2</sub> (45.8 vs 38.2), and lower pH (7.41 vs 7.43) were observed at the time of tracheostomy in COVID+ve (<i>p</i> < 0.005). There was no statistical difference in post-tracheostomy complication rates. Longer time from intubation to tracheostomy (15.90 vs 13.60 d; <i>p</i> = 0.002), tracheostomy to first PS (2.87 vs 1.80 d; <i>p</i> = 0.005), and TC placement (11.07 vs 4.46 d; <i>p</i> < 0.001) were seen in COVID+ve. However, similar time to speech valve placement, decannulation, and significantly lower 1-year mortality (23.3% vs 36.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.001) with higher number of discharges to long-term acute care hospital (LTACH) (23.8% vs 13.6%; <i>p</i> = 0.015) were seen in COVID+ve.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Patients with COVID-19 required higher Fio<sub>2</sub> and PEEP ventilatory support at the time of tracheostomy, with no observed change in complication rates. Despite longer initial weaning period with PS or TC, similar time to speech valve placement or decannulation with significantly lower mortality and higher LTACH discharges suggest favorable outcome in COVID-19 positive patients. Higher ventilatory support requirements and prolonged weaning should not be a deterrent to pursuing a tracheostomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10759,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Explorations","volume":"5 8","pages":"e0950"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0d/f4/cc9-5-e0950.PMC10403025.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10006341","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-01DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000949
Maite M T van Haeren, Senta Jorinde Raasveld, Mina Karami, Dinis Dos Reis Miranda, Loes Mandigers, Dieter F Dauwe, Erwin De Troy, Federico Pappalardo, Evgeny Fominskiy, Walter M van den Bergh, Annemieke Oude Lansink-Hartgring, Franciska van der Velde, Jacinta J Maas, Pablo van de Berg, Maarten de Haan, Dirk W Donker, Christiaan L Meuwese, Fabio Silvio Taccone, Lorenzo Peluso, Roberto Lorusso, Thijs S R Delnoij, Erik Scholten, Martijn Overmars, Višnja Ivancan, Robert Bojčić, Jesse de Metz, Bas van den Bogaard, Martin de Bakker, Benjamin Reddi, Greet Hermans, Lars Mikael Broman, José P S Henriques, Jimmy Schenk, Alexander P J Vlaar, Marcella C A Müller
Objectives: To achieve optimal hemostatic balance in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), a liberal transfusion practice is currently applied despite clear evidence. We aimed to give an overview of the current use of plasma, fibrinogen concentrate, tranexamic acid (TXA), and prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) in patients on ECMO.
Design: A prespecified subanalysis of a multicenter retrospective study. Venovenous (VV)-ECMO and venoarterial (VA)-ECMO are analyzed as separate populations, comparing patients with and without bleeding and with and without thrombotic complications.
Setting: Sixteen international ICUs.
Patients: Adult patients on VA-ECMO or VV-ECMO.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: Of 420 VA-ECMO patients, 59% (n = 247) received plasma, 20% (n = 82) received fibrinogen concentrate, 17% (n = 70) received TXA, and 7% of patients (n = 28) received PCC. Fifty percent of patients (n = 208) suffered bleeding complications and 27% (n = 112) suffered thrombotic complications. More patients with bleeding complications than patients without bleeding complications received plasma (77% vs. 41%, p < 0.001), fibrinogen concentrate (28% vs 11%, p < 0.001), and TXA (23% vs 10%, p < 0.001). More patients with than without thrombotic complications received TXA (24% vs 14%, p = 0.02, odds ratio 1.75) in VA-ECMO, where no difference was seen in VV-ECMO. Of 205 VV-ECMO patients, 40% (n = 81) received plasma, 6% (n = 12) fibrinogen concentrate, 7% (n = 14) TXA, and 5% (n = 10) PCC. Thirty-nine percent (n = 80) of VV-ECMO patients suffered bleeding complications and 23% (n = 48) of patients suffered thrombotic complications. More patients with than without bleeding complications received plasma (58% vs 28%, p < 0.001), fibrinogen concentrate (13% vs 2%, p < 0.01), and TXA (11% vs 2%, p < 0.01).
Conclusions: The majority of patients on ECMO receive transfusions of plasma, procoagulant products, or antifibrinolytics. In a significant part of the plasma transfused patients, this was in the absence of bleeding or prolonged international normalized ratio. This poses the question if these plasma transfusions were administered for another indication or could have been avoided.
{"title":"Plasma Transfusion and Procoagulant Product Administration in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Secondary Analysis of an International Observational Study on Current Practices.","authors":"Maite M T van Haeren, Senta Jorinde Raasveld, Mina Karami, Dinis Dos Reis Miranda, Loes Mandigers, Dieter F Dauwe, Erwin De Troy, Federico Pappalardo, Evgeny Fominskiy, Walter M van den Bergh, Annemieke Oude Lansink-Hartgring, Franciska van der Velde, Jacinta J Maas, Pablo van de Berg, Maarten de Haan, Dirk W Donker, Christiaan L Meuwese, Fabio Silvio Taccone, Lorenzo Peluso, Roberto Lorusso, Thijs S R Delnoij, Erik Scholten, Martijn Overmars, Višnja Ivancan, Robert Bojčić, Jesse de Metz, Bas van den Bogaard, Martin de Bakker, Benjamin Reddi, Greet Hermans, Lars Mikael Broman, José P S Henriques, Jimmy Schenk, Alexander P J Vlaar, Marcella C A Müller","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000949","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000949","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To achieve optimal hemostatic balance in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), a liberal transfusion practice is currently applied despite clear evidence. We aimed to give an overview of the current use of plasma, fibrinogen concentrate, tranexamic acid (TXA), and prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) in patients on ECMO.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prespecified subanalysis of a multicenter retrospective study. Venovenous (VV)-ECMO and venoarterial (VA)-ECMO are analyzed as separate populations, comparing patients with and without bleeding and with and without thrombotic complications.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Sixteen international ICUs.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult patients on VA-ECMO or VV-ECMO.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Of 420 VA-ECMO patients, 59% (<i>n</i> = 247) received plasma, 20% (<i>n</i> = 82) received fibrinogen concentrate, 17% (<i>n</i> = 70) received TXA, and 7% of patients (<i>n</i> = 28) received PCC. Fifty percent of patients (<i>n</i> = 208) suffered bleeding complications and 27% (<i>n</i> = 112) suffered thrombotic complications. More patients with bleeding complications than patients without bleeding complications received plasma (77% vs. 41%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), fibrinogen concentrate (28% vs 11%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and TXA (23% vs 10%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). More patients with than without thrombotic complications received TXA (24% vs 14%, <i>p</i> = 0.02, odds ratio 1.75) in VA-ECMO, where no difference was seen in VV-ECMO. Of 205 VV-ECMO patients, 40% (<i>n</i> = 81) received plasma, 6% (<i>n</i> = 12) fibrinogen concentrate, 7% (<i>n</i> = 14) TXA, and 5% (<i>n</i> = 10) PCC. Thirty-nine percent (<i>n</i> = 80) of VV-ECMO patients suffered bleeding complications and 23% (<i>n</i> = 48) of patients suffered thrombotic complications. More patients with than without bleeding complications received plasma (58% vs 28%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), fibrinogen concentrate (13% vs 2%, <i>p</i> < 0.01), and TXA (11% vs 2%, <i>p</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The majority of patients on ECMO receive transfusions of plasma, procoagulant products, or antifibrinolytics. In a significant part of the plasma transfused patients, this was in the absence of bleeding or prolonged international normalized ratio. This poses the question if these plasma transfusions were administered for another indication or could have been avoided.</p>","PeriodicalId":10759,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Explorations","volume":"5 8","pages":"e0949"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/53/4b/cc9-5-e0949.PMC10443757.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10063601","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the disease it causes (COVID-19) have resulted in an increase in critical illness and in the prevalence of acute respiratory failure with the need for tracheostomy. The characteristics and long-term outcomes of this patient cohort are not well identified.
Research question: What are the characteristics of patients who develop the need for tracheostomy due to SARS-CoV-2 with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)? What is their 90-day and 1-year survival and are there any identifiable risk factors for mortality and ventilator dependency?
Study design and methods: Retrospective, follow-up cohort study of adult patients with COVID-19 infection and ARDS who required tracheostomy placement in a large healthcare system.
Results: One hundred sixty-four consecutive patients with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to ICUs for ARDS who required tracheostomy placement between March 2020 and March 2021 were identified. One hundred nine (66.5%) were male. Average age was 63.5 years. The most common comorbidities were obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), atrial fibrillation, and asthma. The most common complications during hospitalization were delirium, secondary infections, acute kidney injury, pneumothorax, and venous thromboembolism. Ninety-day and 1-year mortality were 29.9% and 44.5%, respectively. Ninety-six patients (58.5%) were liberated from the ventilator, and 84 (51.2%) had the tracheostomy tube decannulated. Asthma, COPD, atrial fibrillation, and renal replacement therapy requirement in the ICU correlated with increased risk of ventilator dependency. Among survivors at 1 year, 71 patients (43.3%) were residing at home and 20 patients (12.2%) remained in a skilled nursing facility.
Interpretation: COVID-19 has resulted in a significant burden of acute critical illness and acute respiratory failure with the need for tracheostomy. A significant percentage of patients with SARS-CoV-2 requiring tracheostomy were alive and at home 1 year after tracheostomy placement. Long-term care support, including tracheostomy, beyond 90 days appears to be beneficial in this patient population and warrants further investigation.
{"title":"One-Year Outcomes of Patients Requiring Tracheostomy Placement Due to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection.","authors":"Jafar J Abunasser, Oscar Perez, Xiaofeng Wang, Yifan Wang, Hassan Khouli, Abhijit Duggal","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000951","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000951","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the disease it causes (COVID-19) have resulted in an increase in critical illness and in the prevalence of acute respiratory failure with the need for tracheostomy. The characteristics and long-term outcomes of this patient cohort are not well identified.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>What are the characteristics of patients who develop the need for tracheostomy due to SARS-CoV-2 with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)? What is their 90-day and 1-year survival and are there any identifiable risk factors for mortality and ventilator dependency?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>Retrospective, follow-up cohort study of adult patients with COVID-19 infection and ARDS who required tracheostomy placement in a large healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred sixty-four consecutive patients with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to ICUs for ARDS who required tracheostomy placement between March 2020 and March 2021 were identified. One hundred nine (66.5%) were male. Average age was 63.5 years. The most common comorbidities were obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), atrial fibrillation, and asthma. The most common complications during hospitalization were delirium, secondary infections, acute kidney injury, pneumothorax, and venous thromboembolism. Ninety-day and 1-year mortality were 29.9% and 44.5%, respectively. Ninety-six patients (58.5%) were liberated from the ventilator, and 84 (51.2%) had the tracheostomy tube decannulated. Asthma, COPD, atrial fibrillation, and renal replacement therapy requirement in the ICU correlated with increased risk of ventilator dependency. Among survivors at 1 year, 71 patients (43.3%) were residing at home and 20 patients (12.2%) remained in a skilled nursing facility.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>COVID-19 has resulted in a significant burden of acute critical illness and acute respiratory failure with the need for tracheostomy. A significant percentage of patients with SARS-CoV-2 requiring tracheostomy were alive and at home 1 year after tracheostomy placement. Long-term care support, including tracheostomy, beyond 90 days appears to be beneficial in this patient population and warrants further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10759,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Explorations","volume":"5 8","pages":"e0951"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ba/52/cc9-5-e0951.PMC10400056.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10006342","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-01DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000955
Adam R Schertz, Ashley E Eisner, Sydney A Smith, Kristin M Lenoir, Karl W Thomas
Objectives: Clinical sepsis phenotypes may be defined by a wide range of characteristics such as site of infection, organ dysfunction patterns, laboratory values, and demographics. There is a paucity of literature regarding the impact of site of infection on the timing and pattern of clinical sepsis markers. This study hypothesizes that important phenotypic variation in clinical markers and outcomes of sepsis exists when stratified by infection site.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Five hospitals within the Wake Forest Health System from June 2019 to December 2019.
Patients: Six thousand seven hundred fifty-three hospitalized adults with a discharge International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision code for acute infection who met systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), or Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) criteria during the index hospitalization.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: The primary outcome of interest was a composite of 30-day mortality or shock. Infection site was determined by a two-reviewer process. Significant demographic, vital sign, and laboratory result differences were seen across all infection sites. For the composite outcome of shock or 30-day mortality, unknown or unspecified infections had the highest proportion (21.34%) and CNS infections had the lowest proportion (8.11%). Respiratory, vascular, and unknown or unspecified infection sites showed a significantly increased adjusted and unadjusted odds of the composite outcome as compared with the other infection sites except CNS. Hospital time prior to SIRS positivity was shortest in unknown or unspecified infections at a median of 0.88 hours (interquartile range [IQR], 0.22-5.05 hr), and hospital time prior to qSOFA and SOFA positivity was shortest in respiratory infections at a median of 54.83 hours (IQR, 9.55-104.67 hr) and 1.88 hours (IQR, 0.47-17.40 hr), respectively.
Conclusions: Phenotypic variation in illness severity and mortality exists when stratified by infection site. There is a significantly higher adjusted and unadjusted odds of the composite outcome of 30-day mortality or shock in respiratory, vascular, and unknown or unspecified infections as compared with other sites.
{"title":"Clinical Phenotypes of Sepsis in a Cohort of Hospitalized Patients According to Infection Site.","authors":"Adam R Schertz, Ashley E Eisner, Sydney A Smith, Kristin M Lenoir, Karl W Thomas","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000955","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000955","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Clinical sepsis phenotypes may be defined by a wide range of characteristics such as site of infection, organ dysfunction patterns, laboratory values, and demographics. There is a paucity of literature regarding the impact of site of infection on the timing and pattern of clinical sepsis markers. This study hypothesizes that important phenotypic variation in clinical markers and outcomes of sepsis exists when stratified by infection site.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Five hospitals within the Wake Forest Health System from June 2019 to December 2019.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Six thousand seven hundred fifty-three hospitalized adults with a discharge <i>International Classification of Diseases</i>, 10th Revision code for acute infection who met systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), or Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) criteria during the index hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The primary outcome of interest was a composite of 30-day mortality or shock. Infection site was determined by a two-reviewer process. Significant demographic, vital sign, and laboratory result differences were seen across all infection sites. For the composite outcome of shock or 30-day mortality, unknown or unspecified infections had the highest proportion (21.34%) and CNS infections had the lowest proportion (8.11%). Respiratory, vascular, and unknown or unspecified infection sites showed a significantly increased adjusted and unadjusted odds of the composite outcome as compared with the other infection sites except CNS. Hospital time prior to SIRS positivity was shortest in unknown or unspecified infections at a median of 0.88 hours (interquartile range [IQR], 0.22-5.05 hr), and hospital time prior to qSOFA and SOFA positivity was shortest in respiratory infections at a median of 54.83 hours (IQR, 9.55-104.67 hr) and 1.88 hours (IQR, 0.47-17.40 hr), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Phenotypic variation in illness severity and mortality exists when stratified by infection site. There is a significantly higher adjusted and unadjusted odds of the composite outcome of 30-day mortality or shock in respiratory, vascular, and unknown or unspecified infections as compared with other sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":10759,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Explorations","volume":"5 8","pages":"e0955"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7a/18/cc9-5-e0955.PMC10443761.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10069803","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}