Pub Date : 2024-10-14DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-05122-8
Gerald Wai Kit Ho, Thirumeninathan Thaarun, Neo Jean Ee, Teo Chong Boon, Koh Zheng Ning, Matthew Edward Cove, Will Ne-Hooi Loh
To conduct a systematic review looking into the use of sevoflurane in the management of status asthmaticus (SA) in adults. We performed a systematic search on PubMed, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library – CENTRAL through 23rd August 2023, restricting to studies reported in English. We included studies reporting use of sevoflurane in asthmatics beyond its use as an anaesthetic agent in surgeries i.e. in the emergency department (ED) and critical care setting, and focused on patient’s clinical parameters, ventilation pressures and weaning of invasive ventilation. A total of 13 publications fulfilled the inclusion criteria, comprising of 18 cases. All publications were of case reports/ series and conference abstracts, and no randomised trials were available. Most patients required intubation despite best medical management before sevoflurane administration, and high airway pressures and respiratory acidosis were apparent. There was significant heterogeneity regarding severity of asthma, treatment instituted, and the delivery, duration and concentration of sevoflurane administered. Many of the studies also did not quantify the changes in parameters pre- and post-sevoflurane. Sixteen patients experienced improvements in clinical status with sevoflurane administration—one required escalation to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and another did not survive. The systematic review suggests sevoflurane can be a valuable treatment option in SA. As these cases are rare and heterogenous, further prospective case series are needed to support this.
对七氟烷在成人哮喘(SA)治疗中的应用进行系统综述。截至 2023 年 8 月 23 日,我们在 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane Library - CENTRAL 上进行了系统性检索,仅限于用英语报告的研究。我们纳入了报告七氟醚在哮喘患者中的使用情况的研究,而不局限于七氟醚作为手术麻醉剂在急诊科(ED)和重症监护环境中的使用,并重点关注患者的临床参数、通气压力和有创通气的断流情况。共有 13 篇文献符合纳入标准,包括 18 个病例。所有出版物均为病例报告/系列报道和会议摘要,没有随机试验。尽管在使用七氟烷前已采取了最佳的医疗措施,但大多数患者仍需要插管,而且气道压力过高和呼吸性酸中毒症状明显。在哮喘的严重程度、所采取的治疗方法以及七氟烷的给药方式、持续时间和浓度方面存在很大的异质性。许多研究也没有量化七氟烷前后的参数变化。16名患者在使用七氟烷后临床状态有所改善,其中一名患者需要升级为体外膜氧合(ECMO),另一名患者未能存活。该系统性综述表明,七氟醚是治疗 SA 的重要选择。由于这些病例非常罕见且具有异质性,因此需要进一步的前瞻性病例系列来支持这一观点。
{"title":"A systematic review on the use of sevoflurane in the management of status asthmaticus in adults","authors":"Gerald Wai Kit Ho, Thirumeninathan Thaarun, Neo Jean Ee, Teo Chong Boon, Koh Zheng Ning, Matthew Edward Cove, Will Ne-Hooi Loh","doi":"10.1186/s13054-024-05122-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05122-8","url":null,"abstract":"To conduct a systematic review looking into the use of sevoflurane in the management of status asthmaticus (SA) in adults. We performed a systematic search on PubMed, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library – CENTRAL through 23rd August 2023, restricting to studies reported in English. We included studies reporting use of sevoflurane in asthmatics beyond its use as an anaesthetic agent in surgeries i.e. in the emergency department (ED) and critical care setting, and focused on patient’s clinical parameters, ventilation pressures and weaning of invasive ventilation. A total of 13 publications fulfilled the inclusion criteria, comprising of 18 cases. All publications were of case reports/ series and conference abstracts, and no randomised trials were available. Most patients required intubation despite best medical management before sevoflurane administration, and high airway pressures and respiratory acidosis were apparent. There was significant heterogeneity regarding severity of asthma, treatment instituted, and the delivery, duration and concentration of sevoflurane administered. Many of the studies also did not quantify the changes in parameters pre- and post-sevoflurane. Sixteen patients experienced improvements in clinical status with sevoflurane administration—one required escalation to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and another did not survive. The systematic review suggests sevoflurane can be a valuable treatment option in SA. As these cases are rare and heterogenous, further prospective case series are needed to support this.","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"94 1","pages":"334"},"PeriodicalIF":15.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142440219","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-09DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-05118-4
Laura Marchasson, Christophe Rault, Sylvain Le Pape, François Arrivé, Rémi Coudroy, Jean-Pierre Frat, Vanessa Bironneau, Etienne-Marie Jutant, Quentin Heraud, Xavier Drouot, Arnaud W Thille
Background: Sleep deprivation is common in intensive care units (ICUs) and may alter respiratory performance. Few studies have assessed the role of sleep disturbances on outcomes in critically ill patients.
Objectives: We hypothesized that sleep disturbances may be associated with poor outcomes in ICUs.
Methods: Post-hoc analysis pooling three observational studies assessing sleep by complete polysomnography in 131 conscious and non-sedated patients included at different times of their ICU stay. Sleep was assessed early in a group of patients admitted for acute respiratory failure while breathing spontaneously (n = 34), or under mechanical ventilation in patients with weaning difficulties (n = 45), or immediately after extubation (n = 52). Patients admitted for acute respiratory failure who required intubation, those under mechanical ventilation who had prolonged weaning, and those who required reintubation after extubation were considered as having poor clinical outcomes. Durations of deep sleep, rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, and atypical sleep were compared according to the timing of polysomnography and the clinical outcomes.
Results: Whereas deep sleep remained preserved in patients admitted for acute respiratory failure, it was markedly reduced under mechanical ventilation and after extubation (p < 0.01). Atypical sleep was significantly more frequent in patients under mechanical ventilation than in those breathing spontaneously (p < 0.01). REM sleep was uncommon at any time of their ICU stay. Patients with complete disappearance of REM sleep (50% of patients) were more likely to have poor clinical outcomes than those with persistent REM sleep (24% vs. 9%, p = 0.03).
Conclusion: Complete disappearance of REM sleep was significantly associated with poor clinical outcomes in critically ill patients.
{"title":"Impact of sleep disturbances on outcomes in intensive care units.","authors":"Laura Marchasson, Christophe Rault, Sylvain Le Pape, François Arrivé, Rémi Coudroy, Jean-Pierre Frat, Vanessa Bironneau, Etienne-Marie Jutant, Quentin Heraud, Xavier Drouot, Arnaud W Thille","doi":"10.1186/s13054-024-05118-4","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13054-024-05118-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sleep deprivation is common in intensive care units (ICUs) and may alter respiratory performance. Few studies have assessed the role of sleep disturbances on outcomes in critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We hypothesized that sleep disturbances may be associated with poor outcomes in ICUs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Post-hoc analysis pooling three observational studies assessing sleep by complete polysomnography in 131 conscious and non-sedated patients included at different times of their ICU stay. Sleep was assessed early in a group of patients admitted for acute respiratory failure while breathing spontaneously (n = 34), or under mechanical ventilation in patients with weaning difficulties (n = 45), or immediately after extubation (n = 52). Patients admitted for acute respiratory failure who required intubation, those under mechanical ventilation who had prolonged weaning, and those who required reintubation after extubation were considered as having poor clinical outcomes. Durations of deep sleep, rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, and atypical sleep were compared according to the timing of polysomnography and the clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Whereas deep sleep remained preserved in patients admitted for acute respiratory failure, it was markedly reduced under mechanical ventilation and after extubation (p < 0.01). Atypical sleep was significantly more frequent in patients under mechanical ventilation than in those breathing spontaneously (p < 0.01). REM sleep was uncommon at any time of their ICU stay. Patients with complete disappearance of REM sleep (50% of patients) were more likely to have poor clinical outcomes than those with persistent REM sleep (24% vs. 9%, p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Complete disappearance of REM sleep was significantly associated with poor clinical outcomes in critically ill patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"28 1","pages":"331"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11466020/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142388743","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-09DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-05110-y
Ali Ait Hssain, Matthieu Petit, Clemens Wiest, Laura Simon, Abdulrahman A Al-Fares, Ahmed Hany, Dafna I Garcia-Gomez, Santiago Besa, Saad Nseir, Christophe Guervilly, Wael Alqassem, Mathieu Lesouhaitier, Adrian Chelaru, Simon Wc Sin, Roberto Roncon-Albuquerque, Marco Giani, Philipp M Lepper, Jean-Rémi Lavillegrand, Sunghoon Park, Peter Schellongowski, Ibrahim Fawzy Hassan, Alain Combes, Romain Sonneville, Matthieu Schmidt
Objective: To report the outcomes of patients with severe tuberculosis (TB)-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), including predictors of 90-day mortality and associated complications.
Methods: An international multicenter retrospective study was conducted in 20 ECMO centers across 13 countries between 2002 and 2022.
Results: We collected demographic data, clinical details, ECMO-related complications, and 90-day survival status for 79 patients (median APACHE II score of 20 [25th to 75th percentile, 16 to 28], median age 39 [28 to 48] years, PaO2/FiO2 ratio of 69 [55 to 82] mmHg before ECMO) who met the inclusion criteria. Thoracic computed tomography showed that 61 patients (77%) had cavitary TB, while 18 patients (23%) had miliary TB. ECMO-related complications included major bleeding (23%), ventilator-associated pneumonia (41%), and bloodstream infections (32%). The overall 90-day survival rate was 51%, with a median ECMO duration of 20 days [10 to 34] and a median ICU stay of 42 days [24 to 65]. Among patients on VV ECMO, those with miliary TB had a higher 90-day survival rate than those with cavitary TB (90-day survival rates of 81% vs. 46%, respectively; log-rank P = 0.02). Multivariable analyses identified older age, drug-resistant TB, and pre-ECMO SOFA scores as independent predictors of 90-day mortality.
Conclusion: The use of ECMO for TB-related ARDS appears to be justifiable. Patients with miliary TB have a much better prognosis compared to those with cavitary TB on VV ECMO.
{"title":"Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for tuberculosis-related acute respiratory distress syndrome: An international multicentre retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Ali Ait Hssain, Matthieu Petit, Clemens Wiest, Laura Simon, Abdulrahman A Al-Fares, Ahmed Hany, Dafna I Garcia-Gomez, Santiago Besa, Saad Nseir, Christophe Guervilly, Wael Alqassem, Mathieu Lesouhaitier, Adrian Chelaru, Simon Wc Sin, Roberto Roncon-Albuquerque, Marco Giani, Philipp M Lepper, Jean-Rémi Lavillegrand, Sunghoon Park, Peter Schellongowski, Ibrahim Fawzy Hassan, Alain Combes, Romain Sonneville, Matthieu Schmidt","doi":"10.1186/s13054-024-05110-y","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13054-024-05110-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To report the outcomes of patients with severe tuberculosis (TB)-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), including predictors of 90-day mortality and associated complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An international multicenter retrospective study was conducted in 20 ECMO centers across 13 countries between 2002 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We collected demographic data, clinical details, ECMO-related complications, and 90-day survival status for 79 patients (median APACHE II score of 20 [25th to 75th percentile, 16 to 28], median age 39 [28 to 48] years, PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratio of 69 [55 to 82] mmHg before ECMO) who met the inclusion criteria. Thoracic computed tomography showed that 61 patients (77%) had cavitary TB, while 18 patients (23%) had miliary TB. ECMO-related complications included major bleeding (23%), ventilator-associated pneumonia (41%), and bloodstream infections (32%). The overall 90-day survival rate was 51%, with a median ECMO duration of 20 days [10 to 34] and a median ICU stay of 42 days [24 to 65]. Among patients on VV ECMO, those with miliary TB had a higher 90-day survival rate than those with cavitary TB (90-day survival rates of 81% vs. 46%, respectively; log-rank P = 0.02). Multivariable analyses identified older age, drug-resistant TB, and pre-ECMO SOFA scores as independent predictors of 90-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of ECMO for TB-related ARDS appears to be justifiable. Patients with miliary TB have a much better prognosis compared to those with cavitary TB on VV ECMO.</p>","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"28 1","pages":"332"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11465915/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142388742","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-08DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-05121-9
Christopher Blum, Micha Landoll, Stephan E. Strassmann, Ulrich Steinseifer, Michael Neidlin, Christian Karagiannidis
Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) has become standard of care in patients with the most severe forms of acute respiratory distress syndrome. However, hemolysis and bleeding are one of the most frequent side effects, affecting mortality. Despite the widespread use of VV ECMO, current protocols lack detailed, in-vivo data-based recommendations for safe ECMO pump operating conditions. This study aims to comprehensively analyze the impact of VV ECMO pump operating conditions on hemolysis by combining in-silico modeling and clinical data analysis. We combined data from 580 patients treated with VV ECMO in conjunction with numerical predictions of hemolysis using computational fluid dynamics and reduced order modeling of the Rotaflow (Getinge) and DP3 (Xenios) pumps. Blood trauma parameters across 94,779 pump operating points were associated with numerical predictions of shear induced hemolysis. Minimal hemolysis was observed at low pump pressures and low circuit resistance across all flow rates, whereas high pump pressures and circuit resistance consistently precipitated substantial hemolysis, irrespective of flow rate. However, the lower the flow rate, the more pronounced the influence of circuit resistance on hemolysis became. Numerical models validated against clinical data demonstrated a strong association (Spearman’s r = 0.8) between simulated and observed hemolysis, irrespective of the pump type. Integrating in-silico predictions with clinical data provided a novel approach in understanding and potentially reducing blood trauma in VV ECMO. This study further demonstrated that a key factor in lowering side effects of ECMO support is the maintenance of low circuit resistance, including oxygenators with the lowest possible resistance, the shortest feasible circuit tubing, and cannulae with an optimal diameter.
{"title":"Blood trauma in veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: low pump pressures and low circuit resistance matter","authors":"Christopher Blum, Micha Landoll, Stephan E. Strassmann, Ulrich Steinseifer, Michael Neidlin, Christian Karagiannidis","doi":"10.1186/s13054-024-05121-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05121-9","url":null,"abstract":"Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) has become standard of care in patients with the most severe forms of acute respiratory distress syndrome. However, hemolysis and bleeding are one of the most frequent side effects, affecting mortality. Despite the widespread use of VV ECMO, current protocols lack detailed, in-vivo data-based recommendations for safe ECMO pump operating conditions. This study aims to comprehensively analyze the impact of VV ECMO pump operating conditions on hemolysis by combining in-silico modeling and clinical data analysis. We combined data from 580 patients treated with VV ECMO in conjunction with numerical predictions of hemolysis using computational fluid dynamics and reduced order modeling of the Rotaflow (Getinge) and DP3 (Xenios) pumps. Blood trauma parameters across 94,779 pump operating points were associated with numerical predictions of shear induced hemolysis. Minimal hemolysis was observed at low pump pressures and low circuit resistance across all flow rates, whereas high pump pressures and circuit resistance consistently precipitated substantial hemolysis, irrespective of flow rate. However, the lower the flow rate, the more pronounced the influence of circuit resistance on hemolysis became. Numerical models validated against clinical data demonstrated a strong association (Spearman’s r = 0.8) between simulated and observed hemolysis, irrespective of the pump type. Integrating in-silico predictions with clinical data provided a novel approach in understanding and potentially reducing blood trauma in VV ECMO. This study further demonstrated that a key factor in lowering side effects of ECMO support is the maintenance of low circuit resistance, including oxygenators with the lowest possible resistance, the shortest feasible circuit tubing, and cannulae with an optimal diameter.","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142385148","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-08DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-05112-w
Jason H. T. Bates, David W. Kaczka, Michaela Kollisch-Singule, Gary F. Nieman, Donald P. Gaver
Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) has been shown to be protective against atelectrauma if expirations are brief. We hypothesize that this is protective because epithelial surfaces are not given enough time to come together and adhere during expiration, thereby avoiding their highly damaging forced separation during inspiration. We investigated this hypothesis in a porcine model of ARDS induced by Tween lavage. Animals were ventilated with APRV in 4 groups based on whether inspiratory pressure was 28 or 40 cmH2O, and whether expiration was terminated when end-expiratory flow reached either 75% (a shorter expiration) or 25% (a longer expiration) of its initial peak value. A mathematical model of respiratory system mechanics that included a volume-dependent elastance term characterized by the parameter $${E}_{2}$$ was fit to airway pressure-flow data obtained each hour for 6 h post-Tween injury during both expiration and inspiration. We also measured respiratory system impedance between 5 and 19 Hz continuously through inspiration at the same time points from which we derived a time-course for respiratory system resistance ( $${R}_{rs}$$ ). $${E}_{2}$$ during both expiration and inspiration was significantly different between the two longer expiration versus the two shorter expiration groups (ANOVA, p < 0.001). We found that $${E}_{2}$$ was most depressed during inspiration in the higher-pressure group receiving the longer expiration, suggesting that $${E}_{2}$$ reflects a balance between strain stiffening of the lung parenchyma and ongoing recruitment as lung volume increases. We also found in this group that $${R}_{rs}$$ increased progressively during the first 0.5 s of inspiration and then began to decrease again as inspiration continued, which we interpret as corresponding to the point when continuing derecruitment was reversed by progressive lung inflation. These findings support the hypothesis that sufficiently short expiratory durations protect against atelectrauma because they do not give derecruitment enough time to manifest. This suggests a means for the personalized adjustment of mechanical ventilation.
{"title":"Atelectrauma can be avoided if expiration is sufficiently brief: evidence from inverse modeling and oscillometry during airway pressure release ventilation","authors":"Jason H. T. Bates, David W. Kaczka, Michaela Kollisch-Singule, Gary F. Nieman, Donald P. Gaver","doi":"10.1186/s13054-024-05112-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05112-w","url":null,"abstract":"Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) has been shown to be protective against atelectrauma if expirations are brief. We hypothesize that this is protective because epithelial surfaces are not given enough time to come together and adhere during expiration, thereby avoiding their highly damaging forced separation during inspiration. We investigated this hypothesis in a porcine model of ARDS induced by Tween lavage. Animals were ventilated with APRV in 4 groups based on whether inspiratory pressure was 28 or 40 cmH2O, and whether expiration was terminated when end-expiratory flow reached either 75% (a shorter expiration) or 25% (a longer expiration) of its initial peak value. A mathematical model of respiratory system mechanics that included a volume-dependent elastance term characterized by the parameter $${E}_{2}$$ was fit to airway pressure-flow data obtained each hour for 6 h post-Tween injury during both expiration and inspiration. We also measured respiratory system impedance between 5 and 19 Hz continuously through inspiration at the same time points from which we derived a time-course for respiratory system resistance ( $${R}_{rs}$$ ). $${E}_{2}$$ during both expiration and inspiration was significantly different between the two longer expiration versus the two shorter expiration groups (ANOVA, p < 0.001). We found that $${E}_{2}$$ was most depressed during inspiration in the higher-pressure group receiving the longer expiration, suggesting that $${E}_{2}$$ reflects a balance between strain stiffening of the lung parenchyma and ongoing recruitment as lung volume increases. We also found in this group that $${R}_{rs}$$ increased progressively during the first 0.5 s of inspiration and then began to decrease again as inspiration continued, which we interpret as corresponding to the point when continuing derecruitment was reversed by progressive lung inflation. These findings support the hypothesis that sufficiently short expiratory durations protect against atelectrauma because they do not give derecruitment enough time to manifest. This suggests a means for the personalized adjustment of mechanical ventilation.","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142385151","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-07DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-05102-y
Michael Beshara, Edward A. Bittner, Alberto Goffi, Lorenzo Berra, Marvin G. Chang
Point of Care ultrasound (POCUS) of the lungs, also known as lung ultrasound (LUS), has emerged as a technique that allows for the diagnosis of many respiratory pathologies with greater accuracy and speed compared to conventional techniques such as chest x-ray and auscultation. The goal of this narrative review is to provide a simple and practical approach to LUS for critical care, pulmonary, and anesthesia providers, as well as respiratory therapists and other health care providers to be able to implement this technique into their clinical practice. In this review, we will discuss the basic physics of LUS, provide a hands-on scanning technique, describe LUS findings seen in normal and pathological conditions (such as mainstem intubation, pneumothorax, atelectasis, pneumonia, aspiration, COPD exacerbation, cardiogenic pulmonary edema, ARDS, and pleural effusion) and also review the training necessary to achieve competence in LUS.
{"title":"Nuts and bolts of lung ultrasound: utility, scanning techniques, protocols, and findings in common pathologies","authors":"Michael Beshara, Edward A. Bittner, Alberto Goffi, Lorenzo Berra, Marvin G. Chang","doi":"10.1186/s13054-024-05102-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05102-y","url":null,"abstract":"Point of Care ultrasound (POCUS) of the lungs, also known as lung ultrasound (LUS), has emerged as a technique that allows for the diagnosis of many respiratory pathologies with greater accuracy and speed compared to conventional techniques such as chest x-ray and auscultation. The goal of this narrative review is to provide a simple and practical approach to LUS for critical care, pulmonary, and anesthesia providers, as well as respiratory therapists and other health care providers to be able to implement this technique into their clinical practice. In this review, we will discuss the basic physics of LUS, provide a hands-on scanning technique, describe LUS findings seen in normal and pathological conditions (such as mainstem intubation, pneumothorax, atelectasis, pneumonia, aspiration, COPD exacerbation, cardiogenic pulmonary edema, ARDS, and pleural effusion) and also review the training necessary to achieve competence in LUS.","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142384156","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-07DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-05107-7
Sung‑Min Cho, Jaeho Hwang, Giovanni Chiarini, Marwa Amer, Marta V. Antonini, Nicholas Barrett, Jan Belohlavek, Daniel Brodie, Heidi J. Dalton, Rodrigo Diaz, Alyaa Elhazmi, Pouya Tahsili‑Fahadan, Jonathon Fanning, John Fraser, Aparna Hoskote, Jae‑Seung Jung, Christopher Lotz, Graeme MacLaren, Giles Peek, Angelo Polito, Jan Pudil, Lakshmi Raman, Kollengode Ramanathan, Dinis Dos Reis Miranda, Daniel Rob, Leonardo Salazar Rojas, Fabio Silvio Taccone, Glenn Whitman, Akram M. Zaaqoq, Roberto Lorusso
<p><b>Correction to</b><b>: </b><b>Critical Care (2024) 28:296 </b><b>https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05082-z</b></p><p>Following publication of the original article [1], the authors identified an error that it lacked the statement: This article has been co-published with permission in <i>Critical Care</i> and the <i>ASAIO Journal</i>.</p><p>The statement has been indicated in this correction article.</p><ol data-track-component="outbound reference" data-track-context="references section"><li data-counter="1."><p>Cho SM, Hwang J, Chiarini G, et al. Neurological monitoring and management for adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients: Extracorporeal Life Support Organization consensus guidelines. Crit Care. 2024;28:296. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05082-z.</p><p>Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar </p></li></ol><p>Download references<svg aria-hidden="true" focusable="false" height="16" role="img" width="16"><use xlink:href="#icon-eds-i-download-medium" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"></use></svg></p><span>Author notes</span><ol><li><p>Akram M. Zaaqoq and Roberto Lorusso have contributed equally as senior authors.</p></li></ol><h3>Authors and Affiliations</h3><ol><li><p>Divisions of Neuroscience Critical Care and Cardiac Surgery Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Phipps 455, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA</p><p>Sung‑Min Cho, Jaeho Hwang & Pouya Tahsili‑Fahadan</p></li><li><p>Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA</p><p>Sung‑Min Cho & Glenn Whitman</p></li><li><p>Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, Heart and Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands</p><p>Giovanni Chiarini & Roberto Lorusso</p></li><li><p>Division of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Spedali Civili University, Affiliated Hospital of Brescia, Brescia, Italy</p><p>Giovanni Chiarini</p></li><li><p>Medical/Critical Pharmacy Division, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, 11564 Al Mathar Ash Shamali, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia</p><p>Marwa Amer & Alyaa Elhazmi</p></li><li><p>Alfaisal University College of Medicine, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia</p><p>Marwa Amer & Alyaa Elhazmi</p></li><li><p>Bufalini Hospital, AUSL Della Romagna, Cesena, Italy</p><p>Marta V. Antonini</p></li><li><p>Department of Critical Care Medicine, Guy’s and St Thomas’ National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, UK</p><p>Nicholas Barrett</p></li><li><p>2nd Department of Medicine, Cardiology and Angiologiy, General University Hospital and 1St School of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic</p><p>Jan Belohlavek & Daniel Rob</p></li><li><p>Division of Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Univers
Antonini查看作者发表的作品您也可以在PubMed Google Scholar中搜索该作者Nicholas Barrett查看作者发表的作品您也可以在PubMed Google Scholar中搜索该作者Jan Belohlavek查看作者发表的作品您也可以在PubMed Google Scholar中搜索该作者Daniel Brodie查看作者发表的作品您也可以在PubMed Google Scholar中搜索该作者Heidi J. Dalton查看作者发表的作品您也可以在PubMed Google Scholar中搜索该作者Rodrigo Diaz查看作者发表的作品您也可以在PubMed Google Scholar中搜索该作者DaltonView作者发表作品您也可以在PubMed Google Scholar中搜索该作者Rodrigo DiazView作者发表作品您也可以在PubMed Google Scholar中搜索该作者Alyaa ElhazmiView作者发表作品您也可以在PubMed Google Scholar中搜索该作者Pouya Tahsili-FahadanView作者发表作品您也可以在PubMed Google Scholar中搜索该作者Jonathon FanningView作者发表作品您也可以在PubMed Google Scholar中搜索该作者JohnFraserView 作者发表作品您也可以在 PubMed Google ScholarAparna HoskoteView 作者发表作品您也可以在 PubMed Google ScholarJae-Seung JungView 作者发表作品您也可以在 PubMed Google ScholarChristopher LotzView 作者发表作品您也可以在 PubMed Google ScholarGraeme MacLarenView 作者发表作品您也可以在 PubMed Google ScholarGilesPeekView 作者发表作品您也可以在 PubMed Google ScholarAngelo PolitoView 作者发表作品您也可以在 PubMed Google ScholarJan PudilView 作者发表作品您也可以在 PubMed Google ScholarLakshmi RamanView 作者发表作品您也可以在 PubMed Google ScholarKollengode RamanathanView 作者发表作品您也可以在 PubMed Google ScholarDinis Dos ReisMirandaView 作者发表作品您也可以在 PubMed Google ScholarDaniel RobView 作者发表作品您也可以在 PubMed Google ScholarLeonardo Salazar RojasView 作者发表作品您也可以在 PubMed Google ScholarFabio Silvio TacconeView 作者发表作品您也可以在 PubMed Google ScholarGlenn WhitmanView 作者发表作品您也可以在 PubMed Google ScholarAkram M. Zaaqoq查看作者ZaaqoqView author publications您也可以在PubMed Google Scholar中搜索该作者Roberto LorussoView author publications您也可以在PubMed Google Scholar中搜索该作者Corresponding authorCorrespondence to Sung-Min Cho.出版商说明Springer Nature对出版地图和机构隶属关系中的管辖权主张保持中立。开放获取 本文采用知识共享署名 4.0 国际许可协议,该协议允许以任何媒介或格式使用、共享、改编、分发和复制本文,但须注明原作者和出处,提供知识共享许可协议的链接,并说明是否进行了修改。本文中的图片或其他第三方材料均包含在文章的知识共享许可协议中,除非在材料的署名栏中另有说明。如果材料未包含在文章的知识共享许可协议中,且您打算使用的材料不符合法律规定或超出许可使用范围,则您需要直接从版权所有者处获得许可。如需查看该许可的副本,请访问 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.Reprints and permissionsCite this articleCho, S., Hwang, J., Chiarini, G. et al. Correction to:成人体外膜氧合患者的神经监测和管理:体外生命支持组织共识指南》。Crit Care 28, 327 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05107-7Download citationPublished: 07 October 2024DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05107-7Share this articleAnyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:Get shareable linkSorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
{"title":"Correction to: Neurological monitoring and management for adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients: Extracorporeal Life Support Organization consensus guidelines","authors":"Sung‑Min Cho, Jaeho Hwang, Giovanni Chiarini, Marwa Amer, Marta V. Antonini, Nicholas Barrett, Jan Belohlavek, Daniel Brodie, Heidi J. Dalton, Rodrigo Diaz, Alyaa Elhazmi, Pouya Tahsili‑Fahadan, Jonathon Fanning, John Fraser, Aparna Hoskote, Jae‑Seung Jung, Christopher Lotz, Graeme MacLaren, Giles Peek, Angelo Polito, Jan Pudil, Lakshmi Raman, Kollengode Ramanathan, Dinis Dos Reis Miranda, Daniel Rob, Leonardo Salazar Rojas, Fabio Silvio Taccone, Glenn Whitman, Akram M. Zaaqoq, Roberto Lorusso","doi":"10.1186/s13054-024-05107-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05107-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Correction to</b><b>: </b><b>Critical Care (2024) 28:296 </b><b>https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05082-z</b></p><p>Following publication of the original article [1], the authors identified an error that it lacked the statement: This article has been co-published with permission in <i>Critical Care</i> and the <i>ASAIO Journal</i>.</p><p>The statement has been indicated in this correction article.</p><ol data-track-component=\"outbound reference\" data-track-context=\"references section\"><li data-counter=\"1.\"><p>Cho SM, Hwang J, Chiarini G, et al. Neurological monitoring and management for adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients: Extracorporeal Life Support Organization consensus guidelines. Crit Care. 2024;28:296. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05082-z.</p><p>Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar </p></li></ol><p>Download references<svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" role=\"img\" width=\"16\"><use xlink:href=\"#icon-eds-i-download-medium\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"></use></svg></p><span>Author notes</span><ol><li><p>Akram M. Zaaqoq and Roberto Lorusso have contributed equally as senior authors.</p></li></ol><h3>Authors and Affiliations</h3><ol><li><p>Divisions of Neuroscience Critical Care and Cardiac Surgery Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Phipps 455, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA</p><p>Sung‑Min Cho, Jaeho Hwang & Pouya Tahsili‑Fahadan</p></li><li><p>Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA</p><p>Sung‑Min Cho & Glenn Whitman</p></li><li><p>Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, Heart and Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands</p><p>Giovanni Chiarini & Roberto Lorusso</p></li><li><p>Division of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Spedali Civili University, Affiliated Hospital of Brescia, Brescia, Italy</p><p>Giovanni Chiarini</p></li><li><p>Medical/Critical Pharmacy Division, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, 11564 Al Mathar Ash Shamali, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia</p><p>Marwa Amer & Alyaa Elhazmi</p></li><li><p>Alfaisal University College of Medicine, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia</p><p>Marwa Amer & Alyaa Elhazmi</p></li><li><p>Bufalini Hospital, AUSL Della Romagna, Cesena, Italy</p><p>Marta V. Antonini</p></li><li><p>Department of Critical Care Medicine, Guy’s and St Thomas’ National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, UK</p><p>Nicholas Barrett</p></li><li><p>2nd Department of Medicine, Cardiology and Angiologiy, General University Hospital and 1St School of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic</p><p>Jan Belohlavek & Daniel Rob</p></li><li><p>Division of Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Univers","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142383839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-04DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-05103-x
Meryl Vedrenne-Cloquet, Y Ito, J Hotz, M J Klein, M Herrera, D Chang, A K Bhalla, C J L Newth, R G Khemani
Background: Monitoring respiratory effort and drive during mechanical ventilation is needed to deliver lung and diaphragm protection. Esophageal pressure (∆PES) is the gold standard measure of respiratory effort but is not routinely available. Airway occlusion pressure in the first 100 ms of the breath (P0.1) is a readily available surrogate for both respiratory effort and drive but is only modestly correlated with ∆PES in children. We sought to identify risk factors for P0.1 over or underestimating ∆PES in ventilated children.
Methods: Secondary analysis of physiological data from children and young adults enrolled in a randomized controlled trial testing lung and diaphragm protective ventilation in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS) (NCT03266016). ∆PES (∆PES-REAL), P0.1 and predicted ∆PES (∆PES-PRED = 5.91*P0.1) were measured daily to identify phenotypes based upon the level of respiratory effort and drive: one passive (no spontaneous breathing), three where ∆PES-REAL and ∆PES-PRED were aligned (low, normal, and high effort and drive), two where ∆PES-REAL and ∆PES-PRED were mismatched (high underestimated effort, and overestimated effort). Logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with each mismatch phenotype (High underestimated effort, or overestimated effort) as compared to all other spontaneous breathing phenotypes.
Results: We analyzed 953 patient days (222 patients). ∆PES-REAL and ∆PES-PRED were aligned in 536 (77%) of the active patient days. High underestimated effort (n = 119 (12%)) was associated with higher airway resistance (adjusted OR 5.62 (95%CI 2.58, 12.26) per log unit increase, p < 0.001), higher tidal volume (adjusted OR 1.53 (95%CI 1.04, 2.24) per cubic unit increase, p = 0.03), higher opioid use (adjusted OR 2.4 (95%CI 1.12, 5.13, p = 0.024), and lower set ventilator rate (adjusted OR 0.96 (95%CI 0.93, 0.99), p = 0.005). Overestimated effort was rare (n = 37 (4%)) and associated with higher alveolar dead space (adjusted OR 1.05 (95%CI 1.01, 1.09), p = 0.007) and lower respiratory resistance (adjusted OR 0.32 (95%CI 0.13, 0.81), p = 0.017).
Conclusions: In patients with PARDS, P0.1 commonly underestimated high respiratory effort particularly with high airway resistance, high tidal volume, and high doses of opioids. Future studies are needed to investigate the impact of measures of respiratory effort, drive, and the presence of a mismatch phenotype on clinical outcome.
{"title":"Phenotypes based on respiratory drive and effort to identify the risk factors when P0.1 fails to estimate ∆P<sub>ES</sub> in ventilated children.","authors":"Meryl Vedrenne-Cloquet, Y Ito, J Hotz, M J Klein, M Herrera, D Chang, A K Bhalla, C J L Newth, R G Khemani","doi":"10.1186/s13054-024-05103-x","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13054-024-05103-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Monitoring respiratory effort and drive during mechanical ventilation is needed to deliver lung and diaphragm protection. Esophageal pressure (∆P<sub>ES</sub>) is the gold standard measure of respiratory effort but is not routinely available. Airway occlusion pressure in the first 100 ms of the breath (P0.1) is a readily available surrogate for both respiratory effort and drive but is only modestly correlated with ∆P<sub>ES</sub> in children. We sought to identify risk factors for P0.1 over or underestimating ∆P<sub>ES</sub> in ventilated children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Secondary analysis of physiological data from children and young adults enrolled in a randomized controlled trial testing lung and diaphragm protective ventilation in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS) (NCT03266016). ∆P<sub>ES</sub> (∆P<sub>ES-REAL</sub>), P0.1 and predicted ∆P<sub>ES</sub> (∆P<sub>ES-PRED</sub> = 5.91*P0.1) were measured daily to identify phenotypes based upon the level of respiratory effort and drive: one passive (no spontaneous breathing), three where ∆P<sub>ES-REAL</sub> and ∆P<sub>ES-PRED</sub> were aligned (low, normal, and high effort and drive), two where ∆P<sub>ES-REAL</sub> and ∆P<sub>ES-PRED</sub> were mismatched (high underestimated effort, and overestimated effort). Logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with each mismatch phenotype (High underestimated effort, or overestimated effort) as compared to all other spontaneous breathing phenotypes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 953 patient days (222 patients). ∆P<sub>ES-REAL</sub> and ∆P<sub>ES-PRED</sub> were aligned in 536 (77%) of the active patient days. High underestimated effort (n = 119 (12%)) was associated with higher airway resistance (adjusted OR 5.62 (95%CI 2.58, 12.26) per log unit increase, p < 0.001), higher tidal volume (adjusted OR 1.53 (95%CI 1.04, 2.24) per cubic unit increase, p = 0.03), higher opioid use (adjusted OR 2.4 (95%CI 1.12, 5.13, p = 0.024), and lower set ventilator rate (adjusted OR 0.96 (95%CI 0.93, 0.99), p = 0.005). Overestimated effort was rare (n = 37 (4%)) and associated with higher alveolar dead space (adjusted OR 1.05 (95%CI 1.01, 1.09), p = 0.007) and lower respiratory resistance (adjusted OR 0.32 (95%CI 0.13, 0.81), p = 0.017).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with PARDS, P0.1 commonly underestimated high respiratory effort particularly with high airway resistance, high tidal volume, and high doses of opioids. Future studies are needed to investigate the impact of measures of respiratory effort, drive, and the presence of a mismatch phenotype on clinical outcome.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT03266016; August 23, 2017.</p>","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"28 1","pages":"325"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11453010/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142375276","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-04DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-05101-z
Myeongji Kim, Maryam Mahmood, Lynn L Estes, John W Wilson, Nathaniel J Martin, Joseph E Marcus, Ankit Mittal, Casey R O'Connell, Aditya Shah
The optimal dosing strategy of antimicrobial agents in critically ill patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is unknown. We conducted comprehensive review of existing literature on effect of ECMO on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antimicrobials, including antibacterials, antifungals, and antivirals that are commonly used in critically ill patients. We aim to provide practical guidance to clinicians on empiric dosing strategy for these patients. Finally, we discuss importance of therapeutic drug monitoring, limitations of current literature, and future research directions.
{"title":"A narrative review on antimicrobial dosing in adult critically ill patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.","authors":"Myeongji Kim, Maryam Mahmood, Lynn L Estes, John W Wilson, Nathaniel J Martin, Joseph E Marcus, Ankit Mittal, Casey R O'Connell, Aditya Shah","doi":"10.1186/s13054-024-05101-z","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13054-024-05101-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The optimal dosing strategy of antimicrobial agents in critically ill patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is unknown. We conducted comprehensive review of existing literature on effect of ECMO on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antimicrobials, including antibacterials, antifungals, and antivirals that are commonly used in critically ill patients. We aim to provide practical guidance to clinicians on empiric dosing strategy for these patients. Finally, we discuss importance of therapeutic drug monitoring, limitations of current literature, and future research directions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"28 1","pages":"326"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11453026/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142375275","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>With great interest we read the recent network meta-analysis by Zhou et al. which found that the intravenous plus inhaled polymyxin-containing regimen could reduce the all-cause mortality of patients with pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacterial (MDRGNB) [1]. This is undoubtedly an encouraging result and provides evidence for the subsequent clinical implementation of such regimens. However, there are still some issues that need further attention.</p><p>Pneumonia caused by MDRGNB remains a huge challenge in the intensive care unit (ICU). Currently, the available effective antibiotics are limited, and polymyxins are still the cornerstones for treatment. However, with the introduction of new antibiotics into clinical practice (especially new beta-lactam and beta-lactamase inhibitor combination) and the potential renal toxicity of polymyxins, since 2020, the performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) have canceled the susceptibility breakpoints of polymyxins for <i>Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii</i>. It defines a minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ≤ 2 ug/mL as intermediate (https://clsi.org). At present, the newly available antibiotics for the treatment of MDRGNB pneumonia in China is limited. Therefore, Chinese Medical Association (CMA) still define MIC ≤ 2 ug/mL as susceptible according to the previous versions of CLSI before 2020 or the 10th version of European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST), to guide clinical treatment. The international approved and recognized method for susceptibility testing of polymyxins is broth microdilution (BMD), but its manual operation is complex and time-consuming, making it difficult for laboratories to routinely carry out. Thus, most laboratories still use automated or semi-automated instruments nowadays to detect the susceptibility, and the accuracy of the results still needs further evaluation.</p><p>In addition, the clinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target of polymyxins for efficacy is unclear [2]. Some guidelines recommended that for polymyxin B the AUC<sub>ss,24h</sub> should be about 50 mg h/L and possibly 50–100 mg h/L, with the latter corresponding to an average steady-state concentration across 24 h (C<sub>ss,avg</sub>) of 2–4 ug/mL for pathogens with MIC of ≤ 2 ug/mL [3]. Therefore, careful interpretation is needed for the susceptible judgment of polymyxins, the optimal PK/PD index, and the effectiveness of antibiotic therapy.</p><p>The presence of the blood-alveolar barrier prevents satisfactory concentrations of antibiotics in the epithelial lining fluid (ELF) when antibiotics are administered intravenously, and increasing the dosage of intravenous administration may lead to high rate of side effects such as acute kidney injury. Nebulization therapy can convert liquid antibiotic preparations into particles of 3–5
{"title":"Polymyxin-containing regimens for treating of pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria: Mind the breakpoints and the standardization of nebulization therapy","authors":"Lihui Wang, Chunhui Xu, Lining Si, Guifen Gan, Bin Lin, Yuetian Yu","doi":"10.1186/s13054-024-05111-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05111-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p>With great interest we read the recent network meta-analysis by Zhou et al. which found that the intravenous plus inhaled polymyxin-containing regimen could reduce the all-cause mortality of patients with pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacterial (MDRGNB) [1]. This is undoubtedly an encouraging result and provides evidence for the subsequent clinical implementation of such regimens. However, there are still some issues that need further attention.</p><p>Pneumonia caused by MDRGNB remains a huge challenge in the intensive care unit (ICU). Currently, the available effective antibiotics are limited, and polymyxins are still the cornerstones for treatment. However, with the introduction of new antibiotics into clinical practice (especially new beta-lactam and beta-lactamase inhibitor combination) and the potential renal toxicity of polymyxins, since 2020, the performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) have canceled the susceptibility breakpoints of polymyxins for <i>Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii</i>. It defines a minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ≤ 2 ug/mL as intermediate (https://clsi.org). At present, the newly available antibiotics for the treatment of MDRGNB pneumonia in China is limited. Therefore, Chinese Medical Association (CMA) still define MIC ≤ 2 ug/mL as susceptible according to the previous versions of CLSI before 2020 or the 10th version of European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST), to guide clinical treatment. The international approved and recognized method for susceptibility testing of polymyxins is broth microdilution (BMD), but its manual operation is complex and time-consuming, making it difficult for laboratories to routinely carry out. Thus, most laboratories still use automated or semi-automated instruments nowadays to detect the susceptibility, and the accuracy of the results still needs further evaluation.</p><p>In addition, the clinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target of polymyxins for efficacy is unclear [2]. Some guidelines recommended that for polymyxin B the AUC<sub>ss,24h</sub> should be about 50 mg h/L and possibly 50–100 mg h/L, with the latter corresponding to an average steady-state concentration across 24 h (C<sub>ss,avg</sub>) of 2–4 ug/mL for pathogens with MIC of ≤ 2 ug/mL [3]. Therefore, careful interpretation is needed for the susceptible judgment of polymyxins, the optimal PK/PD index, and the effectiveness of antibiotic therapy.</p><p>The presence of the blood-alveolar barrier prevents satisfactory concentrations of antibiotics in the epithelial lining fluid (ELF) when antibiotics are administered intravenously, and increasing the dosage of intravenous administration may lead to high rate of side effects such as acute kidney injury. Nebulization therapy can convert liquid antibiotic preparations into particles of 3–5 ","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"205 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142374095","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}