首页 > 最新文献

Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine最新文献

英文 中文
Return to Sport Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Scoping Review of Criteria Determining Return to Sport Readiness. 前十字韧带重建术后重返运动场:确定恢复运动能力标准的范围审查。
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI: 10.1007/s12178-024-09934-7
Elisa Kodama, Sina Tartibi, Robert H Brophy, Matthew V Smith, Matthew J Matava, Derrick M Knapik

Purpose of review: Provide a concise review of currently utilized functional metrics and patient reported outcomes measures (PROMs) determining appropriate return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

Recent findings: When determining return to sport following ACLR, a limb symmetry index (LSI) ≥ 90% when compared to the contralateral extremity is the most commonly reported functional metric. LSI is most commonly assessed using isokinetic quadriceps strength, followed by single-leg vertical hop and cross-over hop test. A minimum ACL-Return to Sport Index (ACL-RSI) score of 68.2 was reported, as well as a mean International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score of 88.3%. A minimum Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Quality of Life (KOOS-QoL) of 62.5% was reported in a single investigation. There remains limited data on reported metrics guiding return to sport following ACLR. Evaluation of LSI when compared to the contralateral extremity is the most commonly reported functional measure, with ACL-RSI, IKDC and KOOS-QoL also being reported. Further investigations examining return to sport rate and the incidence of recurrent injury, factoring in differences in sex, competition level, and the presence or absence of concomitant meniscal injuries, based on functional metrics and PROMs is warranted to better understand which outcome measures are predictive of successful return to sport following ACLR.

综述目的:简要回顾目前使用的功能指标和患者报告结果指标(PROMs),以确定前交叉韧带重建术(ACLR)后恢复运动的适当程度:在确定前交叉韧带重建术后恢复运动时,与对侧肢体相比,肢体对称指数(LSI)≥ 90% 是最常报告的功能指标。LSI 最常用的评估方法是等动股四头肌力量,其次是单腿垂直跳跃和交叉跳跃测试。据报道,前交叉韧带恢复运动指数(ACL-RSI)最低得分为 68.2,国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)平均得分为 88.3%。一项调查报告显示,膝关节损伤和骨关节炎生活质量评分(KOOS-QoL)最低为 62.5%。有关前交叉韧带重建后恢复运动的指导指标的报告数据仍然有限。与对侧肢体相比,评估 LSI 是最常报道的功能性指标,此外还有 ACL-RSI、IKDC 和 KOOS-QoL 的报道。为了更好地了解哪些结果指标可预测前交叉韧带置换术后成功重返运动场的情况,有必要根据功能指标和PROMs对重返运动场率和复发性损伤发生率进行进一步调查,并考虑性别、比赛水平以及是否合并半月板损伤等因素的差异。
{"title":"Return to Sport Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Scoping Review of Criteria Determining Return to Sport Readiness.","authors":"Elisa Kodama, Sina Tartibi, Robert H Brophy, Matthew V Smith, Matthew J Matava, Derrick M Knapik","doi":"10.1007/s12178-024-09934-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-024-09934-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Provide a concise review of currently utilized functional metrics and patient reported outcomes measures (PROMs) determining appropriate return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>When determining return to sport following ACLR, a limb symmetry index (LSI) ≥ 90% when compared to the contralateral extremity is the most commonly reported functional metric. LSI is most commonly assessed using isokinetic quadriceps strength, followed by single-leg vertical hop and cross-over hop test. A minimum ACL-Return to Sport Index (ACL-RSI) score of 68.2 was reported, as well as a mean International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score of 88.3%. A minimum Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Quality of Life (KOOS-QoL) of 62.5% was reported in a single investigation. There remains limited data on reported metrics guiding return to sport following ACLR. Evaluation of LSI when compared to the contralateral extremity is the most commonly reported functional measure, with ACL-RSI, IKDC and KOOS-QoL also being reported. Further investigations examining return to sport rate and the incidence of recurrent injury, factoring in differences in sex, competition level, and the presence or absence of concomitant meniscal injuries, based on functional metrics and PROMs is warranted to better understand which outcome measures are predictive of successful return to sport following ACLR.</p>","PeriodicalId":10950,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142675333","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Advanced Non-Operative Interventions for Anterior Knee Pain. 膝关节前侧疼痛的高级非手术干预治疗。
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI: 10.1007/s12178-024-09930-x
Nicole B Katz, Nicholas Tsitsilianos, Andrew S Nowak, Stephanie R Douglas, Adam S Tenforde, Joanne Borg-Stein

Purpose of review: This review presents evidence for advanced non-operative interventions, including extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT), prolotherapy, platelet-rich plasma (PRP), adipose tissue-derived cells, bone marrow aspirate concentrate, various additional non-corticosteroid injectates, and needle-based interventions for common causes of anterior knee pain in the adult population. These etiologies include osteoarthritis of the knee, patellofemoral pain syndrome, chondromalacia patella, Hoffa fat pad impingement syndrome, patellar/quadriceps tendinopathy, and prepatellar bursitis. This review discusses patient care options using a case-based understanding of interventions by condition while recognizing strength of evidence.

Recent findings: ESWT and PRP are the most robustly studied and have greatest evidence for treating tibiofemoral osteoarthritis and for long-term benefit in treating patellar tendinopathy. PRP may have evidence for treatment of chondromalacia and prolotherapy for management of tibiofemoral arthritis; both have limited evidence. Botulinum neurotoxin type A has strong evidence to support use in treating patellofemoral pain syndrome. There is limited evidence to support the use of viscosupplementation, percutaneous needle tenotomy, and medicinal signaling cell-based therapies beyond platelet-rich plasma for anterior knee pain. There is limited research on the management of quadriceps tendinopathy, prepatellar bursitis, patellofemoral osteoarthritis, and Hoffa's fat pad impingement syndrome. Further research and standardization of protocols are necessary to fully assess these treatments' efficacy. ESWT, cell-based, and needle-based interventions, may serve as effective treatment options for patients with anterior knee pain. Selection of each intervention requires understanding the evidence, level of risk, and appropriate application based on a patient's level of activity to enable clinicians to enhance patient outcomes and quality of life.

综述目的:本综述介绍了先进的非手术干预措施的证据,包括体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)、增生疗法、富血小板血浆(PRP)、脂肪组织衍生细胞、骨髓抽吸物浓缩物、各种额外的非皮质类固醇注射剂,以及针对成人膝关节前侧疼痛常见病因的针刺干预措施。这些病因包括膝关节骨性关节炎、髌股关节疼痛综合征、髌骨软化症、霍法脂肪垫撞击综合征、髌骨/股四头肌腱病和髌前滑囊炎。这篇综述以病例为基础,讨论了患者护理方案,并根据病情对干预措施进行了理解,同时承认了证据的有效性:最新研究结果:ESWT 和 PRP 的研究最为深入,在治疗胫股骨骨关节炎和髌骨肌腱病的长期疗效方面证据最为充分。PRP 可用于治疗软骨软化症,增殖疗法可用于治疗胫骨股骨关节炎;两者的证据都很有限。A 型肉毒杆菌神经毒素在治疗髌骨股骨疼痛综合征方面有强有力的证据支持。除富血小板血浆外,支持使用粘度补充剂、经皮针刺腱切开术和基于药物信号细胞的疗法治疗膝关节前部疼痛的证据有限。对股四头肌腱病、髌前滑囊炎、髌骨骨关节炎和霍法脂肪垫撞击综合征的治疗研究有限。要全面评估这些疗法的疗效,还需要进一步的研究和标准化方案。ESWT、细胞疗法和针刺疗法可作为膝关节前部疼痛患者的有效治疗选择。选择每种干预方法都需要了解相关证据、风险程度,并根据患者的活动水平进行适当应用,从而使临床医生能够提高患者的治疗效果和生活质量。
{"title":"Advanced Non-Operative Interventions for Anterior Knee Pain.","authors":"Nicole B Katz, Nicholas Tsitsilianos, Andrew S Nowak, Stephanie R Douglas, Adam S Tenforde, Joanne Borg-Stein","doi":"10.1007/s12178-024-09930-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-024-09930-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review presents evidence for advanced non-operative interventions, including extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT), prolotherapy, platelet-rich plasma (PRP), adipose tissue-derived cells, bone marrow aspirate concentrate, various additional non-corticosteroid injectates, and needle-based interventions for common causes of anterior knee pain in the adult population. These etiologies include osteoarthritis of the knee, patellofemoral pain syndrome, chondromalacia patella, Hoffa fat pad impingement syndrome, patellar/quadriceps tendinopathy, and prepatellar bursitis. This review discusses patient care options using a case-based understanding of interventions by condition while recognizing strength of evidence.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>ESWT and PRP are the most robustly studied and have greatest evidence for treating tibiofemoral osteoarthritis and for long-term benefit in treating patellar tendinopathy. PRP may have evidence for treatment of chondromalacia and prolotherapy for management of tibiofemoral arthritis; both have limited evidence. Botulinum neurotoxin type A has strong evidence to support use in treating patellofemoral pain syndrome. There is limited evidence to support the use of viscosupplementation, percutaneous needle tenotomy, and medicinal signaling cell-based therapies beyond platelet-rich plasma for anterior knee pain. There is limited research on the management of quadriceps tendinopathy, prepatellar bursitis, patellofemoral osteoarthritis, and Hoffa's fat pad impingement syndrome. Further research and standardization of protocols are necessary to fully assess these treatments' efficacy. ESWT, cell-based, and needle-based interventions, may serve as effective treatment options for patients with anterior knee pain. Selection of each intervention requires understanding the evidence, level of risk, and appropriate application based on a patient's level of activity to enable clinicians to enhance patient outcomes and quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":10950,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142616429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patient Expectations and Satisfaction in Pediatric Orthopedics. 儿童骨科患者的期望和满意度。
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-20 DOI: 10.1007/s12178-023-09869-5
Alejandro Cazzulino, Katherine Bach, Rafael Cordero, Ishaan Swarup

Purpose of review: The purpose of the current review is to analyze the current literature regarding the tools available to evaluate patient expectations and satisfaction. There have been an increasing number of tools that have been developed and validated for various orthopedic procedures. Despite the growing number of tools, there are a limited number of tools available for pediatric patients.

Recent findings: Several tools have been developed in orthopedics to evaluate patient expectations. However, there are no tools that have been validated in the pediatric population. In addition, pediatric patient expectations should be collected in conjunction with parent/caregiver expectations. Although not specifically validated for pediatric patients, there are several tools available that may pertain to pediatric patients including the HSS ACL Expectations Survey, HSS Shoulder Expectations Survey, HSS Knee Surgery Expectations Survey, HSS Foot and Ankle Surgery Expectation Survey, Sunnybrook Surgery Expectations Survey, Musculoskeletal Outcomes Data Evaluation and Management System (MODEMS) Instruments, Quick DASH, and DASH. In terms of patient satisfaction, there are even fewer tools available. Several tools have been developed to evaluate patient satisfaction and five additional tools within orthopedics. Of these tools, there are two that have been validated for pediatric patients: The Swedish Parents Satisfaction Questionnaire and the Scoliosis Research Society-22. There are a growing number of tools to evaluate patient's expectations and satisfaction in the orthopedic literature. Given most of these tools pertain to adult patients, there is a need for further development of tools specifically validated for pediatric patients and their parents/caregivers. Through the measurement of expectations and satisfaction, medical professionals can hope to improve satisfaction and outcomes.

综述的目的:当前综述的目的是分析当前关于评估患者期望和满意度的工具的文献。为各种骨科手术开发和验证的工具越来越多。尽管工具数量不断增加,但可用于儿科患者的工具数量有限。最近的发现:骨科已经开发了几种工具来评估患者的期望值。然而,目前还没有在儿科人群中得到验证的工具。此外,儿科患者的期望值应与父母/护理人员的期望值一起收集。虽然没有专门针对儿科患者进行验证,但有几种工具可能适用于儿科患者,包括HSS ACL期望调查、HSS肩部期望调查、HSS-膝关节手术期望调查、,肌肉骨骼结果数据评估和管理系统(MODEMS)仪器、Quick DASH和DASH。就患者满意度而言,可用的工具更少。已经开发了几种工具来评估患者满意度,并在骨科领域开发了另外五种工具。在这些工具中,有两种已经为儿科患者验证:瑞典父母满意度问卷和脊柱侧弯研究协会-22。骨科文献中有越来越多的工具来评估患者的期望和满意度。鉴于这些工具大多适用于成年患者,因此需要进一步开发专门针对儿科患者及其父母/照顾者的工具。通过测量期望和满意度,医疗专业人员可以希望提高满意度和结果。
{"title":"Patient Expectations and Satisfaction in Pediatric Orthopedics.","authors":"Alejandro Cazzulino, Katherine Bach, Rafael Cordero, Ishaan Swarup","doi":"10.1007/s12178-023-09869-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12178-023-09869-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The purpose of the current review is to analyze the current literature regarding the tools available to evaluate patient expectations and satisfaction. There have been an increasing number of tools that have been developed and validated for various orthopedic procedures. Despite the growing number of tools, there are a limited number of tools available for pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Several tools have been developed in orthopedics to evaluate patient expectations. However, there are no tools that have been validated in the pediatric population. In addition, pediatric patient expectations should be collected in conjunction with parent/caregiver expectations. Although not specifically validated for pediatric patients, there are several tools available that may pertain to pediatric patients including the HSS ACL Expectations Survey, HSS Shoulder Expectations Survey, HSS Knee Surgery Expectations Survey, HSS Foot and Ankle Surgery Expectation Survey, Sunnybrook Surgery Expectations Survey, Musculoskeletal Outcomes Data Evaluation and Management System (MODEMS) Instruments, Quick DASH, and DASH. In terms of patient satisfaction, there are even fewer tools available. Several tools have been developed to evaluate patient satisfaction and five additional tools within orthopedics. Of these tools, there are two that have been validated for pediatric patients: The Swedish Parents Satisfaction Questionnaire and the Scoliosis Research Society-22. There are a growing number of tools to evaluate patient's expectations and satisfaction in the orthopedic literature. Given most of these tools pertain to adult patients, there is a need for further development of tools specifically validated for pediatric patients and their parents/caregivers. Through the measurement of expectations and satisfaction, medical professionals can hope to improve satisfaction and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10950,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"518-525"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11464795/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41107424","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Arthroscopic Bone Block Stabilization for Anterior Shoulder Instability with Subcritical Glenohumeral Bone Loss. 关节镜骨块稳定术治疗肩关节前方失稳伴亚临界盂肱骨缺失。
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-19 DOI: 10.1007/s12178-024-09921-y
Benjamin W Hoyt, Robert T Tisherman, Adam J Popchak, Jonathan F Dickens

Purpose of review: The management options for anterior shoulder instability with minimal bone loss or with critical bone loss are well established. However, there is less clear evidence to guide management for patients with subcritical bone loss, the spectrum of pathology where soft tissue repair alone is prone to higher rates of failures. In this range of bone loss, likely around 13.5% to 20%, the goal of surgery is to restore function and stability while limiting morbidity. As with many procedures in the shoulder, this decision should be tailored to patient anatomy, functional goals, and risk factors. This article provides a review of our current understanding of subcritical bone loss and treatment strategies as well as innovations in management.

Recent findings: While surgeons have largely understood that restoration of anatomy is important to optimize outcomes after stabilization surgery, there is increasing evidence that reconstructing bony anatomy and addressing both osseous and soft tissue structures yields better results than either alone. Even in the setting of subcritical bone loss, there is likely a benefit to combined osseous augmentation with soft tissue management. Additionally, there is new evidence to support management of even on-track humeral lesions when the distance to dislocation is sufficiently small, particularly for athletes. Surgeons must balance bony and soft tissue restoration to achieve optimal outcomes for anterior instability with subcritical bone loss. There are still significant limitations in the literature and several emerging techniques for management will require further study to prove their long-term efficacy. Beyond surgery, there should be a focus on a collaborative treatment strategy with the surgeon, patient, and therapists to achieve high-level function and minimize recurrence.

审查目的:对于骨质流失量极少或骨质流失量严重的肩关节前部不稳定患者,其治疗方案已得到广泛认可。然而,对于亚临界骨质缺失患者的治疗,目前尚无明确的指导性证据,因为在亚临界骨质缺失的病理范围内,单纯软组织修复的失败率较高。在这一骨丢失范围内(可能在13.5%到20%左右),手术的目标是恢复功能和稳定性,同时限制发病率。与肩部的许多手术一样,这一决定应根据患者的解剖结构、功能目标和风险因素来制定。本文回顾了我们目前对亚临界骨质疏松和治疗策略的理解,以及在管理方面的创新:最近的研究结果:虽然外科医生已基本认识到恢复解剖结构对稳定手术后的最佳疗效非常重要,但越来越多的证据表明,重建骨性解剖结构并同时处理骨性和软组织结构比单独处理任何一种结构都能产生更好的疗效。即使是在亚临界骨质流失的情况下,将骨质增强与软组织处理相结合也可能会带来益处。此外,有新的证据表明,当脱位距离足够小时,即使是赛道上的肱骨病变也能得到治疗,尤其是对运动员而言。外科医生必须平衡骨性和软组织修复,以达到治疗亚临界骨丢失的前方不稳定的最佳效果。目前的文献仍存在很大的局限性,一些新出现的治疗技术还需要进一步的研究来证明其长期疗效。除手术治疗外,还应将重点放在与外科医生、患者和治疗师的合作治疗策略上,以实现高水平的功能并尽量减少复发。
{"title":"Arthroscopic Bone Block Stabilization for Anterior Shoulder Instability with Subcritical Glenohumeral Bone Loss.","authors":"Benjamin W Hoyt, Robert T Tisherman, Adam J Popchak, Jonathan F Dickens","doi":"10.1007/s12178-024-09921-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12178-024-09921-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The management options for anterior shoulder instability with minimal bone loss or with critical bone loss are well established. However, there is less clear evidence to guide management for patients with subcritical bone loss, the spectrum of pathology where soft tissue repair alone is prone to higher rates of failures. In this range of bone loss, likely around 13.5% to 20%, the goal of surgery is to restore function and stability while limiting morbidity. As with many procedures in the shoulder, this decision should be tailored to patient anatomy, functional goals, and risk factors. This article provides a review of our current understanding of subcritical bone loss and treatment strategies as well as innovations in management.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>While surgeons have largely understood that restoration of anatomy is important to optimize outcomes after stabilization surgery, there is increasing evidence that reconstructing bony anatomy and addressing both osseous and soft tissue structures yields better results than either alone. Even in the setting of subcritical bone loss, there is likely a benefit to combined osseous augmentation with soft tissue management. Additionally, there is new evidence to support management of even on-track humeral lesions when the distance to dislocation is sufficiently small, particularly for athletes. Surgeons must balance bony and soft tissue restoration to achieve optimal outcomes for anterior instability with subcritical bone loss. There are still significant limitations in the literature and several emerging techniques for management will require further study to prove their long-term efficacy. Beyond surgery, there should be a focus on a collaborative treatment strategy with the surgeon, patient, and therapists to achieve high-level function and minimize recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":10950,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"465-475"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11464743/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141999570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Timing of Surgery & Rehabilitation After Multiligamentous Knee Reconstruction. 多韧带膝关节重建术后的手术和康复时机。
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-23 DOI: 10.1007/s12178-024-09923-w
Zachary J Herman, Janina Kaarre, Anja M Wackerle, Ariana Lott, Nicholas A Apseloff, Bryson P Lesniak, James J Irrgang, Volker Musahl

Purpose of review: To provide an overview of the current evidence of the timing of surgery and rehabilitation after multiligamentous knee injuries (MLKIs) and offer insights into the ongoing multi-center randomized controlled study, the 'STaR trial'.

Recent findings: Due to the complexity of the MKLIs, they are usually treated surgically with the goal of either repairing or reconstructing the injured ligaments. Although the current literature on MLKIs is relatively extensive, the consensus on the timing of surgery or rehabilitation following surgery for MLKIs is still lacking. While current literature mostly suggests early treatment, there is also evidence preferring delayed treatment. Furthermore, evidence on the timing of postoperative rehabilitation is limited. Thus, the current multi-center randomized controlled study, the 'STaR trial', is expected to respond to these questions by adding new high-level evidence. The MLKIs are often associated with knee dislocation and constitute a highly complex entity, including concomitant injuries, such as neurovascular, meniscal, and cartilaginous injuries. The treatment of MLKIs usually aims to either repair or reconstruct the injured ligaments, however, there is no general consensus on the timing of surgery or rehabilitation following an MLKI surgery. This current review stresses the need for more high-level research to address the paucity of evidence-based treatment guidelines for the treatment of complex MLKIs.

综述目的:概述膝关节多韧带损伤(MLKIs)后手术和康复时机的现有证据,并对正在进行的多中心随机对照研究 "STAR 试验 "提出见解:由于多韧带膝关节损伤的复杂性,通常采用手术治疗,目的是修复或重建受伤的韧带。尽管目前关于多发性韧带损伤的文献相对较多,但对于多发性韧带损伤的手术时机或术后康复仍缺乏共识。虽然目前的文献大多建议尽早治疗,但也有证据表明患者更倾向于延迟治疗。此外,关于术后康复时机的证据也很有限。因此,目前的多中心随机对照研究 "STAR 试验 "有望通过增加新的高水平证据来回答这些问题。MLKI通常与膝关节脱位有关,是一种非常复杂的疾病,包括神经血管、半月板和软骨损伤等并发症。治疗 MLKI 的目的通常是修复或重建受伤的韧带,但对于 MLKI 手术后的手术时机或康复治疗,目前尚无普遍共识。本综述强调有必要开展更高层次的研究,以解决治疗复杂韧带损伤缺乏循证治疗指南的问题。
{"title":"Timing of Surgery & Rehabilitation After Multiligamentous Knee Reconstruction.","authors":"Zachary J Herman, Janina Kaarre, Anja M Wackerle, Ariana Lott, Nicholas A Apseloff, Bryson P Lesniak, James J Irrgang, Volker Musahl","doi":"10.1007/s12178-024-09923-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12178-024-09923-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To provide an overview of the current evidence of the timing of surgery and rehabilitation after multiligamentous knee injuries (MLKIs) and offer insights into the ongoing multi-center randomized controlled study, the 'STaR trial'.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Due to the complexity of the MKLIs, they are usually treated surgically with the goal of either repairing or reconstructing the injured ligaments. Although the current literature on MLKIs is relatively extensive, the consensus on the timing of surgery or rehabilitation following surgery for MLKIs is still lacking. While current literature mostly suggests early treatment, there is also evidence preferring delayed treatment. Furthermore, evidence on the timing of postoperative rehabilitation is limited. Thus, the current multi-center randomized controlled study, the 'STaR trial', is expected to respond to these questions by adding new high-level evidence. The MLKIs are often associated with knee dislocation and constitute a highly complex entity, including concomitant injuries, such as neurovascular, meniscal, and cartilaginous injuries. The treatment of MLKIs usually aims to either repair or reconstruct the injured ligaments, however, there is no general consensus on the timing of surgery or rehabilitation following an MLKI surgery. This current review stresses the need for more high-level research to address the paucity of evidence-based treatment guidelines for the treatment of complex MLKIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":10950,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"476-483"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11464971/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142035494","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Preventing Infections in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty. 预防反向肩关节置换术中的感染。
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-02 DOI: 10.1007/s12178-024-09918-7
Maarouf A Saad, Michael A Moverman, Adrik Z Da Silva, Peter N Chalmers

Purpose of review: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is a commonly performed procedure to treat degenerative conditions of the shoulder. With its growing utilization, techniques to reliably diagnose and treat prosthetic joint infection (PJI) have become increasingly important. In this review we outline the current research and prevention methods of prosthetic joint infection in rTSA. This includes preoperative considerations, intraoperative, and postoperative treatment algorithms.

Recent findings: There is currently no established standardized protocol for preoperative infection prevention or post operative management. However, recent studies have identified risk factors for infection, as well as successful prevention techniques that can be implemented to minimize infection risk. Although there is no standardized protocol currently utilized to diagnose and treat shoulder PJI, we outline a potential set of preventative measures and postoperative management strategies that clinicians can use to properly diagnose and treat patients with this difficult condition.

审查目的:反向肩关节置换术(rTSA)是治疗肩关节退行性病变的常用手术。随着其使用率的不断提高,可靠诊断和治疗假体关节感染(PJI)的技术变得越来越重要。在这篇综述中,我们概述了目前对 rTSA 中假体关节感染的研究和预防方法。这包括术前考虑、术中和术后治疗算法:目前还没有一套成熟的术前感染预防或术后管理标准方案。不过,最近的研究已经确定了感染的风险因素,以及可以将感染风险降至最低的成功预防技术。虽然目前还没有用于诊断和治疗肩关节 PJI 的标准化方案,但我们概述了一套潜在的预防措施和术后管理策略,临床医生可利用这些措施和策略来正确诊断和治疗患有这种疑难病症的患者。
{"title":"Preventing Infections in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.","authors":"Maarouf A Saad, Michael A Moverman, Adrik Z Da Silva, Peter N Chalmers","doi":"10.1007/s12178-024-09918-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12178-024-09918-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is a commonly performed procedure to treat degenerative conditions of the shoulder. With its growing utilization, techniques to reliably diagnose and treat prosthetic joint infection (PJI) have become increasingly important. In this review we outline the current research and prevention methods of prosthetic joint infection in rTSA. This includes preoperative considerations, intraoperative, and postoperative treatment algorithms.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>There is currently no established standardized protocol for preoperative infection prevention or post operative management. However, recent studies have identified risk factors for infection, as well as successful prevention techniques that can be implemented to minimize infection risk. Although there is no standardized protocol currently utilized to diagnose and treat shoulder PJI, we outline a potential set of preventative measures and postoperative management strategies that clinicians can use to properly diagnose and treat patients with this difficult condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":10950,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"456-464"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11465022/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141878522","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What's in a Name? Defining 'Failure' in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review. 名字有什么意义?前交叉韧带重建随机对照试验中 "失败 "的定义:系统回顾。
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-28 DOI: 10.1007/s12178-024-09924-9
Vincent Milantoni, Praveen Sritharan, Hassaan Abdel Khalik, Fares AlKatanani, Matey Juric, Darren de Sa

Purpose of review: Graft failure, one of the most common outcomes in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction randomized controlled trials, lacks a consensus definition. The purpose of this study was to systematically summarize current practice and parameters in defining anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft 'failure'.

Recent findings: Forty studies (4466 participants) satisfied the inclusion criteria. Of these, 90% either defined failure formally or referenced the etiology of failure, the remaining 10% used the term failure without referencing the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft. Among the included studies, there was a high level of inconsistency between the definitions of graft failure. The extracted data was categorized into broader groups, revealing abnormal knee laxity (80%) and graft re-rupture (37.5%) as the most common parameters incorporated in the definitions of graft failure in high-level randomized controlled trials. This review shows that anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction randomized controlled trials lack a consistent definition for graft failure. A universal definition is vital for clarity in medical practice and research, ideally incorporating both objective (e.g. graft re-rupture) and subjective (e.g. validated questionnaires) parameters. A composite outcome should be established which includes some of the common parameters highlighted in this review. In the future, this review can be used to assist orthopaedic surgeons to establish a formal definition of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft 'failure'.

综述的目的:移植物失败是前交叉韧带重建随机对照试验中最常见的结果之一,但缺乏一致的定义。本研究的目的是系统地总结当前定义前交叉韧带重建移植物 "失败 "的实践和参数:40项研究(4466名参与者)符合纳入标准。其中,90%的研究对失败进行了正式定义或提到了失败的病因,其余 10%的研究使用了失败一词,但没有提到前交叉韧带重建移植物。在纳入的研究中,移植物失败的定义存在很大的不一致性。对提取的数据进行分类后发现,在高级别随机对照试验中,膝关节异常松弛(80%)和移植物再断裂(37.5%)是移植物失败定义中最常见的参数。本综述显示,前交叉韧带重建随机对照试验对移植物失败缺乏一致的定义。一个通用的定义对于明确医疗实践和研究至关重要,最好同时包含客观(如移植物再断裂)和主观(如有效问卷)参数。应建立一个综合结果,其中包括本综述中强调的一些常见参数。将来,本综述可用于帮助矫形外科医生确定前交叉韧带重建移植物 "失败 "的正式定义。
{"title":"What's in a Name? Defining 'Failure' in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Vincent Milantoni, Praveen Sritharan, Hassaan Abdel Khalik, Fares AlKatanani, Matey Juric, Darren de Sa","doi":"10.1007/s12178-024-09924-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12178-024-09924-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Graft failure, one of the most common outcomes in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction randomized controlled trials, lacks a consensus definition. The purpose of this study was to systematically summarize current practice and parameters in defining anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft 'failure'.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Forty studies (4466 participants) satisfied the inclusion criteria. Of these, 90% either defined failure formally or referenced the etiology of failure, the remaining 10% used the term failure without referencing the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft. Among the included studies, there was a high level of inconsistency between the definitions of graft failure. The extracted data was categorized into broader groups, revealing abnormal knee laxity (80%) and graft re-rupture (37.5%) as the most common parameters incorporated in the definitions of graft failure in high-level randomized controlled trials. This review shows that anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction randomized controlled trials lack a consistent definition for graft failure. A universal definition is vital for clarity in medical practice and research, ideally incorporating both objective (e.g. graft re-rupture) and subjective (e.g. validated questionnaires) parameters. A composite outcome should be established which includes some of the common parameters highlighted in this review. In the future, this review can be used to assist orthopaedic surgeons to establish a formal definition of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft 'failure'.</p>","PeriodicalId":10950,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"496-517"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11465010/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142079545","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy: Indications, Outcomes, and Complications. 胫骨结节截骨术:适应症、结果和并发症。
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-05 DOI: 10.1007/s12178-024-09915-w
Daniel J Stokes, Bryant P Elrick, Melissa L Carpenter, Yazdan Raji, Kade S McQuivey, Seth L Sherman, Rachel M Frank

Purpose of review: The tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) is a versatile surgical technique used to treat a range of patellofemoral disorders, including patellar instability, painful malalignment, focal chondral defects, and patellar maltracking that have failed conservative therapies. TTO is a personalized procedure that can be tailored to the pathoanatomy of the patient based on physical examination and imaging. The complication rate associated with TTO strongly depends on the indication for surgery, the severity of the patient's condition, and the surgical approach. Despite the literature on TTO, to our knowledge, no single source has addressed the indications, techniques, outcomes, and complications of this procedure. The purpose of this article is to serve as such a valuable resource.

Recent findings: Highlights from recent studies we would like to emphasize are two-fold. First, maintaining a distal cortical hinge yields lower complication rates than osteotomies involving complete tubercle detachment with classic or standard techniques. Second, based on current evidence, TTO consistently provides symptomatic relief, and most patients can return to work or sport at their pre-operative level within 3 and 6 months, respectively. TTO is a personalizable surgical technique that may be utilized for multiple patellofemoral disorders and is associated with good outcomes.

审查目的:胫骨结节截骨术(TTO)是一种多功能手术技术,用于治疗一系列髌骨股骨疾病,包括保守疗法失败的髌骨不稳、疼痛性错位、局灶性软骨缺损和髌骨畸形。TTO是一种个性化手术,可根据体格检查和影像学检查结果为患者量身定制病理解剖方案。与 TTO 相关的并发症发生率主要取决于手术指征、患者病情的严重程度以及手术方法。尽管有关 TTO 的文献很多,但据我们所知,还没有任何一个资料来源对该手术的适应症、技术、结果和并发症进行过阐述。本文的目的就是提供这样一个宝贵的资料来源:我们想强调的近期研究重点有两个方面。首先,与采用经典或标准技术进行涉及完全结节剥离的截骨术相比,保持远端皮质铰链可降低并发症发生率。其次,根据目前的证据,TTO 可持续缓解症状,大多数患者可分别在 3 个月和 6 个月内恢复到术前的工作或运动水平。TTO是一种可个性化的手术技术,可用于多种髌骨股骨疾病,且疗效良好。
{"title":"Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy: Indications, Outcomes, and Complications.","authors":"Daniel J Stokes, Bryant P Elrick, Melissa L Carpenter, Yazdan Raji, Kade S McQuivey, Seth L Sherman, Rachel M Frank","doi":"10.1007/s12178-024-09915-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12178-024-09915-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) is a versatile surgical technique used to treat a range of patellofemoral disorders, including patellar instability, painful malalignment, focal chondral defects, and patellar maltracking that have failed conservative therapies. TTO is a personalized procedure that can be tailored to the pathoanatomy of the patient based on physical examination and imaging. The complication rate associated with TTO strongly depends on the indication for surgery, the severity of the patient's condition, and the surgical approach. Despite the literature on TTO, to our knowledge, no single source has addressed the indications, techniques, outcomes, and complications of this procedure. The purpose of this article is to serve as such a valuable resource.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Highlights from recent studies we would like to emphasize are two-fold. First, maintaining a distal cortical hinge yields lower complication rates than osteotomies involving complete tubercle detachment with classic or standard techniques. Second, based on current evidence, TTO consistently provides symptomatic relief, and most patients can return to work or sport at their pre-operative level within 3 and 6 months, respectively. TTO is a personalizable surgical technique that may be utilized for multiple patellofemoral disorders and is associated with good outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10950,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"484-495"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11479627/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141888737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Achieving Health Equity: Combatting the Disparities in American Access to Musculoskeletal Care : Disparities Exist in Every Aspect of Orthopaedic Care in the United States - Access to Outpatient Visits, Discretionary and Unplanned Surgical Care, and Postoperative Outcomes. What Can We Do? 实现健康公平:消除美国人在获得肌肉骨骼医疗服务方面的差距:美国骨科医疗的方方面面都存在着差距--门诊就诊、酌情和计划外手术治疗以及术后结果。我们能做些什么?
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-02 DOI: 10.1007/s12178-024-09926-7
Amanda Michelle Faust, Christopher J Dy

Purpose of review: Healthcare disparities influence multiple dimensions of orthopaedic care including access, burden and incidence of disease, and outcome in varying populations. These disparities impact healthcare at both the micro and macro scale of the healthcare experience from individual patient-physician relationships to reimbursement rates across the United States. This article provides a review of how healthcare disparities contribute to the landscape of orthopaedic care and specifically highlights how disparities affect outpatient visits, discretionary and unplanned surgical care, and postoperative outcomes.

Recent findings: Current research demonstrates the widespread presence of healthcare disparities in the field of orthopaedics and gives both objective and subjective evidence confirming disparities' measurable influence. The disparities most highlighted by our review include differences in orthopaedic care based on insurance type and race. Currently disparities in orthopaedic care are deeply connected to patient insurance status and race. In the outpatient setting insurance significantly impacts access to care, travel burden, and utilization of services. The emergent setting is similarly influenced with measurable differences in lack of access to acute care, rates of inappropriate triage, and timeliness of care based on insurance status and race. Additionally, the postoperative period is not immune to disparities with likelihood of follow up, experience of catastrophic medical expenses, and postoperative outcomes also being affected. Addressing these disparities is a pressing need and may include solutions like wider expansion and acceptance of publicly funded insurance and the development of readily available and easily measurable metrics for healthcare equity and quality in vulnerable populations.

审查目的:医疗差距影响着骨科医疗的多个方面,包括不同人群的就医机会、疾病负担和发病率以及治疗效果。这些差异从微观和宏观两个层面影响着医疗保健体验,从患者与医生的个人关系到全美的报销比例。本文回顾了医疗差距是如何影响骨科医疗的,并特别强调了医疗差距是如何影响门诊就诊、酌情和计划外手术治疗以及术后效果的:目前的研究表明,骨科领域普遍存在医疗差距,并提供了客观和主观证据,证实差距的影响是可以衡量的。我们的综述中最突出的差异包括基于保险类型和种族的骨科护理差异。目前,骨科治疗中的差异与患者的保险状况和种族有很大关系。在门诊环境中,保险对获得护理、旅行负担和服务利用率有很大影响。急诊环境同样受到保险状况和种族的影响,在无法获得急诊护理、不适当的分诊率以及护理的及时性方面存在可衡量的差异。此外,术后阶段也不能幸免,随访的可能性、灾难性医疗支出的经历和术后结果也会受到影响。解决这些差距是当务之急,其中可能包括更广泛地扩大和接受公共资助的保险,以及为弱势人群的医疗保健公平和质量制定现成的、易于衡量的指标等解决方案。
{"title":"Achieving Health Equity: Combatting the Disparities in American Access to Musculoskeletal Care : Disparities Exist in Every Aspect of Orthopaedic Care in the United States - Access to Outpatient Visits, Discretionary and Unplanned Surgical Care, and Postoperative Outcomes. What Can We Do?","authors":"Amanda Michelle Faust, Christopher J Dy","doi":"10.1007/s12178-024-09926-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12178-024-09926-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Healthcare disparities influence multiple dimensions of orthopaedic care including access, burden and incidence of disease, and outcome in varying populations. These disparities impact healthcare at both the micro and macro scale of the healthcare experience from individual patient-physician relationships to reimbursement rates across the United States. This article provides a review of how healthcare disparities contribute to the landscape of orthopaedic care and specifically highlights how disparities affect outpatient visits, discretionary and unplanned surgical care, and postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Current research demonstrates the widespread presence of healthcare disparities in the field of orthopaedics and gives both objective and subjective evidence confirming disparities' measurable influence. The disparities most highlighted by our review include differences in orthopaedic care based on insurance type and race. Currently disparities in orthopaedic care are deeply connected to patient insurance status and race. In the outpatient setting insurance significantly impacts access to care, travel burden, and utilization of services. The emergent setting is similarly influenced with measurable differences in lack of access to acute care, rates of inappropriate triage, and timeliness of care based on insurance status and race. Additionally, the postoperative period is not immune to disparities with likelihood of follow up, experience of catastrophic medical expenses, and postoperative outcomes also being affected. Addressing these disparities is a pressing need and may include solutions like wider expansion and acceptance of publicly funded insurance and the development of readily available and easily measurable metrics for healthcare equity and quality in vulnerable populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10950,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"449-455"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11464980/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142105219","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Global Health Inequities in Orthopaedic Care: Perspectives Beyond the US. 矫形外科护理中的全球健康不平等:美国以外的视角。
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-06 DOI: 10.1007/s12178-024-09917-8
Emily L DeMaio, Guido Marra, Linda I Suleiman, Vehniah K Tjong

Purpose of review: The burden of musculoskeletal disease is increasing globally and disproportionately affecting people in low and middle income countries (LMIC). We sought to review global access to orthopaedic care, burden of trauma, research infrastructure, impact of surgical mission trips, implant availability, and the effect of COVID-19 upon the delivery of orthopaedic care worldwide.

Recent findings: The majority of people in LMIC do not have access to safe, quality surgical care, and there are few fellowship-trained orthopaedic traumatologists. Road traffic accidents are the leading cause of long bone fractures in LMIC and result in significant morbidity and mortality. Of the orthopaedic literature published globally in the last 10 years, less than 15% had authors from LMIC. There has been growth in surgical mission trips to LMIC, but few organizations have established bidirectional partnerships. Among the challenges to delivering quality musculoskeletal care in LMIC is timely access to quality orthopaedic implants. Implant options in LMIC are more limited and subjected to less rigorous testing and regulation than high income countries (HIC). The COVID-19 pandemic dramatically reduced elective surgeries but saw the increase in telemedicine utilization which has prevailed in both HIC and LMIC. Awareness of global inequities in orthopaedic care is growing. Much can be learned through collaborations between orthopaedic surgeons from HIC and LMIC to advance patient care worldwide. There is a need for high quality, accurate data regarding incidence and prevalence of musculoskeletal disease, care utilization/availability, and postoperative outcomes so resources can be allotted to make orthopaedic care more equitable globally.

审查目的:在全球范围内,肌肉骨骼疾病的负担日益加重,对中低收入国家(LMIC)人民的影响尤为严重。我们试图回顾全球骨科医疗服务的可及性、创伤负担、研究基础设施、手术任务旅行的影响、植入物的可用性以及 COVID-19 对全球骨科医疗服务的影响:最近的研究结果:在低收入和中等收入国家,大多数人无法获得安全、优质的外科医疗服务,而且接受过研究员培训的创伤骨科医生也很少。在低收入国家,道路交通事故是造成长骨骨折的主要原因,并导致严重的发病率和死亡率。在过去 10 年全球发表的骨科文献中,只有不到 15%的作者来自低收入和中等收入国家。前往低收入国家和地区的手术任务有所增加,但很少有组织建立起双向合作关系。在低收入国家和地区提供高质量的肌肉骨骼治疗所面临的挑战之一是及时获得高质量的骨科植入物。与高收入国家(HIC)相比,低收入国家(LMIC)的植入物选择更为有限,所接受的测试和监管也没有那么严格。COVID-19 大流行大大减少了选择性手术,但远程医疗的使用却有所增加,这在高收入国家和低收入国家都很普遍。人们越来越意识到全球骨科医疗的不平等。通过来自高收入国家和低收入国家的骨科外科医生之间的合作,我们可以学到很多东西,从而在全球范围内促进对患者的护理。我们需要有关肌肉骨骼疾病的发病率和流行率、护理利用率/可用性以及术后效果的高质量准确数据,以便分配资源,使全球骨科护理更加公平。
{"title":"Global Health Inequities in Orthopaedic Care: Perspectives Beyond the US.","authors":"Emily L DeMaio, Guido Marra, Linda I Suleiman, Vehniah K Tjong","doi":"10.1007/s12178-024-09917-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12178-024-09917-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The burden of musculoskeletal disease is increasing globally and disproportionately affecting people in low and middle income countries (LMIC). We sought to review global access to orthopaedic care, burden of trauma, research infrastructure, impact of surgical mission trips, implant availability, and the effect of COVID-19 upon the delivery of orthopaedic care worldwide.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The majority of people in LMIC do not have access to safe, quality surgical care, and there are few fellowship-trained orthopaedic traumatologists. Road traffic accidents are the leading cause of long bone fractures in LMIC and result in significant morbidity and mortality. Of the orthopaedic literature published globally in the last 10 years, less than 15% had authors from LMIC. There has been growth in surgical mission trips to LMIC, but few organizations have established bidirectional partnerships. Among the challenges to delivering quality musculoskeletal care in LMIC is timely access to quality orthopaedic implants. Implant options in LMIC are more limited and subjected to less rigorous testing and regulation than high income countries (HIC). The COVID-19 pandemic dramatically reduced elective surgeries but saw the increase in telemedicine utilization which has prevailed in both HIC and LMIC. Awareness of global inequities in orthopaedic care is growing. Much can be learned through collaborations between orthopaedic surgeons from HIC and LMIC to advance patient care worldwide. There is a need for high quality, accurate data regarding incidence and prevalence of musculoskeletal disease, care utilization/availability, and postoperative outcomes so resources can be allotted to make orthopaedic care more equitable globally.</p>","PeriodicalId":10950,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"439-448"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11465105/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142139477","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1