Pub Date : 2026-01-02DOI: 10.1007/s12178-025-10003-w
Ali Rezazadeh Shirazi, Ghazal Shahbakhsh, Sepehr Mehrpouyan, Mark Zayouna, Ali Bahman, Karim Gaber, Waleed Kishta
Purpose of review: Ponte osteotomy (PO) is frequently used in corrective surgery, yet its specific effect on vertebral rotation correction remains unclear. This study systematically reviewed the literature to compare PO with alternative techniques in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Following PRISMA methodology, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for comparative studies assessing axial rotation outcomes in idiopathic scoliosis treated with or without PO. The primary outcome was vertebral rotation correction.
Recent findings: Six studies were included, encompassing a total of 439 patients with mean ages ranging from 13.5 ± 2.8 to 17.5 ± 3.7 years. Most study populations were predominantly female in four studies, predominantly male in one, and evenly distributed in one. Two studies showed a meaningful improvement in postoperative thoracic rotation in the PO group compared to inferior facetectomy (IF). Other studies found PO to be superior to IF and posterior spinal fusion (PSF), although these differences were not statistically significant, except for one study that reported a statistically significant advantage of PO over PSF. No meaningful superiority was observed when comparing PO with skip pedicle screw fixation. Overall, intraoperative and postoperative complication rates were similar between PO and non-PO groups, although one study reported a higher rate of intraoperative neuromonitoring changes and reoperations in the PO group. Most studies to date have found that PO is associated with superior vertebral rotation outcomes compared to IF and PSF, with only half showing statistical significance. PO is also linked to longer operative time and greater blood loss, warranting further high-quality studies to clarify its risk-benefit profile.
回顾目的:桥骨切开术(Ponte osteotomy, PO)常用于矫正手术,但其对椎体旋转矫正的具体效果尚不清楚。本研究系统地回顾了文献,比较了PO与其他技术在特发性脊柱侧凸患者中的应用。按照PRISMA方法,MEDLINE、Embase和Web of Science检索了评估采用或不采用PO治疗特发性脊柱侧凸轴向旋转效果的比较研究。主要结果为椎体旋转矫正。最新发现:纳入6项研究,共纳入439例患者,平均年龄为13.5±2.8至17.5±3.7岁。在四项研究中,大多数研究人群以女性为主,在一项研究中以男性为主,在一项研究中分布均匀。两项研究显示,与下面切除术(IF)相比,PO组术后胸部旋转有显著改善。其他研究发现PO优于IF和后路脊柱融合术(PSF),尽管这些差异没有统计学意义,但有一项研究报道PO优于PSF。PO与跳跃椎弓根螺钉固定比较无明显优势。总的来说,尽管一项研究报告了PO组术中神经监测改变和再手术的发生率更高,但PO组和非PO组术中和术后并发症发生率相似。迄今为止,大多数研究发现,与IF和PSF相比,PO与更好的椎体旋转结果相关,只有一半具有统计学意义。PO还与更长的手术时间和更大的出血量有关,需要进一步的高质量研究来阐明其风险-收益概况。
{"title":"Effects of Ponte Osteotomy on Vertebral Rotation in Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Ali Rezazadeh Shirazi, Ghazal Shahbakhsh, Sepehr Mehrpouyan, Mark Zayouna, Ali Bahman, Karim Gaber, Waleed Kishta","doi":"10.1007/s12178-025-10003-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12178-025-10003-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Ponte osteotomy (PO) is frequently used in corrective surgery, yet its specific effect on vertebral rotation correction remains unclear. This study systematically reviewed the literature to compare PO with alternative techniques in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Following PRISMA methodology, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for comparative studies assessing axial rotation outcomes in idiopathic scoliosis treated with or without PO. The primary outcome was vertebral rotation correction.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Six studies were included, encompassing a total of 439 patients with mean ages ranging from 13.5 ± 2.8 to 17.5 ± 3.7 years. Most study populations were predominantly female in four studies, predominantly male in one, and evenly distributed in one. Two studies showed a meaningful improvement in postoperative thoracic rotation in the PO group compared to inferior facetectomy (IF). Other studies found PO to be superior to IF and posterior spinal fusion (PSF), although these differences were not statistically significant, except for one study that reported a statistically significant advantage of PO over PSF. No meaningful superiority was observed when comparing PO with skip pedicle screw fixation. Overall, intraoperative and postoperative complication rates were similar between PO and non-PO groups, although one study reported a higher rate of intraoperative neuromonitoring changes and reoperations in the PO group. Most studies to date have found that PO is associated with superior vertebral rotation outcomes compared to IF and PSF, with only half showing statistical significance. PO is also linked to longer operative time and greater blood loss, warranting further high-quality studies to clarify its risk-benefit profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":10950,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12764732/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145891826","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose of review: This review examines existing literature on how orthopaedic education develops critical thinking and decision-making in medical students and residents.
Recent findings: Scopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and PubMed were searched for English-language studies published between 2015 and 2025. Twenty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Most involved residents (n = 19), fewer focused on medical students (n = 8), and one included both groups (n = 1). Five themes were identified: technology-enhanced learning, reflective and analytical practice, mentorship and professional development, curriculum design and integration, and assessment and feedback. Simulation and digital tools improved procedural reasoning and engagement. Reflection and mentorship supported analytical and diagnostic skills. Non-operative and outpatient decision-making were rarely explored. Orthopaedic education increasingly uses technology and active learning. However, structured development of critical thinking and decision-making remains limited, especially outside surgical settings and early training. Embedding reasoning, reflection, and mentorship in curricula may better connect classroom learning with clinical decision-making.
综述目的:本综述回顾了有关骨科教育如何培养医学生和住院医师批判性思维和决策能力的现有文献。最近的发现:Scopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE和PubMed检索了2015年至2025年间发表的英语研究。28项研究符合纳入标准。其中住院医师最多(n = 19),医学生较少(n = 8),两组均有一例(n = 1)。确定了五个主题:技术促进学习、反思和分析实践、指导和专业发展、课程设计和整合、评估和反馈。模拟和数字工具改善了程序推理和参与。反思和指导支持分析和诊断技能。非手术和门诊决策很少探讨。骨科教育越来越多地使用技术和主动学习。然而,批判性思维和决策的结构化发展仍然有限,特别是在手术环境和早期培训之外。在课程中嵌入推理、反思和指导可以更好地将课堂学习与临床决策联系起来。
{"title":"From Classroom to Clinic: A Scoping Review of Critical Thinking and Decision-Making in Orthopaedic Education for Medical Students and Residents.","authors":"Jamie Rosen, Prerna Kartik, Martinique Vella-Baldacchino","doi":"10.1007/s12178-025-10002-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12178-025-10002-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review examines existing literature on how orthopaedic education develops critical thinking and decision-making in medical students and residents.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Scopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and PubMed were searched for English-language studies published between 2015 and 2025. Twenty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Most involved residents (n = 19), fewer focused on medical students (n = 8), and one included both groups (n = 1). Five themes were identified: technology-enhanced learning, reflective and analytical practice, mentorship and professional development, curriculum design and integration, and assessment and feedback. Simulation and digital tools improved procedural reasoning and engagement. Reflection and mentorship supported analytical and diagnostic skills. Non-operative and outpatient decision-making were rarely explored. Orthopaedic education increasingly uses technology and active learning. However, structured development of critical thinking and decision-making remains limited, especially outside surgical settings and early training. Embedding reasoning, reflection, and mentorship in curricula may better connect classroom learning with clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":10950,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12722595/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145809932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-17DOI: 10.1007/s12178-025-09999-y
Jacob E Milner, Allison Morgan, Jahnya Brown, Jonathan Westafer, Thomas Youm, Daniel J Kaplan
{"title":"The Relationship Between the Lumbopelvic Spine and Hip in Femoroacetabular Impingement Patients.","authors":"Jacob E Milner, Allison Morgan, Jahnya Brown, Jonathan Westafer, Thomas Youm, Daniel J Kaplan","doi":"10.1007/s12178-025-09999-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12178-025-09999-y","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10950,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12708429/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145767406","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-02DOI: 10.1007/s12178-025-10001-y
Prushoth Vivekanantha, Helena Son, Luca Bernardini, Marc Daniel Bouchard, Olufemi R Ayeni, Jeffrey Kay
Purpose of review: To analyze the efficacy and efficiency of current large language models (LLMs), specifically GPT-5 in screening titles and abstracts for three review topics within different subspecialties in orthopedics.
Recent findings: Python scripts were developed to call on the GPT-5 model via OpenAIs application programming interface (API). Two human reviewers simultaneously performed screening based on the same inclusion and exclusion criteria. Performance metrics such as specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive values (NPV), and F1 scores for GPT-5 were calculated based on a gold-standard inclusion and exclusion list developed by a third human adjudicator. Efficiency metrics included total cost and time to completion for each task. The number of titles and abstracts to screen ranged between 668 and 1,131 amongst the three review topics. All performance metrics were above 92.3% amongst all three topics, with sensitivities ranging from 94.1%-100%. Time to completion ranged between 38.5-174.3 minutes. Cost ranged from $1.32-$3.73USD GPT-5 demonstrated exceptional accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and F1 scores in automating title and abstract screening for three orthopedic systematic review topics in three different subspecialties. Results are similar to previous studies investigating the role of AI for screening, specifically increased accuracy and time-to-completion relative to humans. The average rate of screening ranged from 6.5-17.4 abstracts per minute and the average price ranged from $0.002-$0.0036USD per abstract, suggesting a high degree of efficiency compared to current standards.
{"title":"Evaluating the Efficacy and Efficiency of GPT-5 for Automated Title and Abstract Screening in Orthopedic Surgery Systematic Reviews.","authors":"Prushoth Vivekanantha, Helena Son, Luca Bernardini, Marc Daniel Bouchard, Olufemi R Ayeni, Jeffrey Kay","doi":"10.1007/s12178-025-10001-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12178-025-10001-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To analyze the efficacy and efficiency of current large language models (LLMs), specifically GPT-5 in screening titles and abstracts for three review topics within different subspecialties in orthopedics.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Python scripts were developed to call on the GPT-5 model via OpenAIs application programming interface (API). Two human reviewers simultaneously performed screening based on the same inclusion and exclusion criteria. Performance metrics such as specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive values (NPV), and F1 scores for GPT-5 were calculated based on a gold-standard inclusion and exclusion list developed by a third human adjudicator. Efficiency metrics included total cost and time to completion for each task. The number of titles and abstracts to screen ranged between 668 and 1,131 amongst the three review topics. All performance metrics were above 92.3% amongst all three topics, with sensitivities ranging from 94.1%-100%. Time to completion ranged between 38.5-174.3 minutes. Cost ranged from $1.32-$3.73USD GPT-5 demonstrated exceptional accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and F1 scores in automating title and abstract screening for three orthopedic systematic review topics in three different subspecialties. Results are similar to previous studies investigating the role of AI for screening, specifically increased accuracy and time-to-completion relative to humans. The average rate of screening ranged from 6.5-17.4 abstracts per minute and the average price ranged from $0.002-$0.0036USD per abstract, suggesting a high degree of efficiency compared to current standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":10950,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12669451/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145653711","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Language Barriers in the Delivery of Musculoskeletal Care and Future Directions.","authors":"Edgar Garcia-Lopez, Jamieson O'Marr, Rachel Gottlieb, Katherine Rebecca Miclau, Nirav Pandya","doi":"10.1007/s12178-025-09986-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12178-025-09986-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10950,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"559-567"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12446154/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144332626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-09-02DOI: 10.1007/s12178-025-09993-4
T Jason Meredith, Hannah Hornsby, Jackson Bagby, Scott Goodsell
Purpose of review: Tendinopathy is a common cause of musculoskeletal morbidity, resulting in frequent visits to primary care providers, orthopedists, and urgent care clinics. Six common regions of tendinopathy are discussed in this article, including up to date findings in their clinical history and exam findings, special testing, imaging, and treatment.
Recent findings: Point of care musculoskeletal ultrasound has gained popularity as a tool in the diagnosis of various tendinopathies. Advanced interventions, including extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) and injections modalities such as platelet rich plasma (PRP) are becoming more common in the treatment of tendinopathy; however, the evidence for these interventions is mixed with most providing some short-term relief in symptoms but no long-term improvement in outcomes.
Recent findings: Point of care musculoskeletal ultrasound has gained popularity as a tool in the diagnosis of various tendinopathies. Advanced interventions, including extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) and injections modalities such as platelet rich plasma (PRP) are becoming more common in the treatment of tendinopathy; however, the evidence for these interventions is mixed with most providing some short-term relief in symptoms but no long-term improvement in outcomes. The diagnosis of tendinopathy often remains a clinical diagnosis with the mainstay of treatment remaining activity modification, physical therapy, and anti-inflammatories for acute pain control. Recovery time is widely variable between patients and conditions.
{"title":"Diagnosis and Management of Common Tendinopathies.","authors":"T Jason Meredith, Hannah Hornsby, Jackson Bagby, Scott Goodsell","doi":"10.1007/s12178-025-09993-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12178-025-09993-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Tendinopathy is a common cause of musculoskeletal morbidity, resulting in frequent visits to primary care providers, orthopedists, and urgent care clinics. Six common regions of tendinopathy are discussed in this article, including up to date findings in their clinical history and exam findings, special testing, imaging, and treatment.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Point of care musculoskeletal ultrasound has gained popularity as a tool in the diagnosis of various tendinopathies. Advanced interventions, including extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) and injections modalities such as platelet rich plasma (PRP) are becoming more common in the treatment of tendinopathy; however, the evidence for these interventions is mixed with most providing some short-term relief in symptoms but no long-term improvement in outcomes.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Point of care musculoskeletal ultrasound has gained popularity as a tool in the diagnosis of various tendinopathies. Advanced interventions, including extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) and injections modalities such as platelet rich plasma (PRP) are becoming more common in the treatment of tendinopathy; however, the evidence for these interventions is mixed with most providing some short-term relief in symptoms but no long-term improvement in outcomes. The diagnosis of tendinopathy often remains a clinical diagnosis with the mainstay of treatment remaining activity modification, physical therapy, and anti-inflammatories for acute pain control. Recovery time is widely variable between patients and conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10950,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"620-626"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12446175/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144946022","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-08-26DOI: 10.1007/s12178-025-09992-5
Iyad S Ali, Yianni Bakaes, James S MacLeod, Tony Y Lee, Sia Cho, Wellington K Hsu
Purpose of review: There has been an expanding role of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in spine surgery, particularly in operative planning, intraoperative navigation, and postoperative management. With a focus on patient-specific surgical strategies, AI technologies offer new possibilities for improving surgical accuracy, reducing risks, and enhancing patient outcomes in spine care.
Recent findings: AI models have shown strong accuracy in preoperative planning, with neural networks outperforming traditional algorithms in patient selection and outcome prediction. Advances in 3D modeling, supported by machine learning, enable efficient, patient-specific anatomical reconstructions, reducing manual segmentation time from hours to seconds. In intraoperative navigation, AI-driven virtual and augmented reality systems enhance screw placement precision and reduce radiation exposure by up to 90%, improving workflow and safety. Additionally, real-time AI-based decision support has decreased operative time and postoperative risks, while postoperative AI applications now support mortality risk stratification and discharge planning, yielding significant predictive accuracy for adverse events and extended stays. AI technologies are transforming spine surgery by increasing surgical precision, optimizing clinical workflows, and personalizing patient care. While challenges remain regarding data diversity and ethical considerations, ongoing innovations indicate that AI will continue to refine spine surgery through personalized and efficient care solutions.
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence in Planning for Spine Surgery.","authors":"Iyad S Ali, Yianni Bakaes, James S MacLeod, Tony Y Lee, Sia Cho, Wellington K Hsu","doi":"10.1007/s12178-025-09992-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12178-025-09992-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>There has been an expanding role of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in spine surgery, particularly in operative planning, intraoperative navigation, and postoperative management. With a focus on patient-specific surgical strategies, AI technologies offer new possibilities for improving surgical accuracy, reducing risks, and enhancing patient outcomes in spine care.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>AI models have shown strong accuracy in preoperative planning, with neural networks outperforming traditional algorithms in patient selection and outcome prediction. Advances in 3D modeling, supported by machine learning, enable efficient, patient-specific anatomical reconstructions, reducing manual segmentation time from hours to seconds. In intraoperative navigation, AI-driven virtual and augmented reality systems enhance screw placement precision and reduce radiation exposure by up to 90%, improving workflow and safety. Additionally, real-time AI-based decision support has decreased operative time and postoperative risks, while postoperative AI applications now support mortality risk stratification and discharge planning, yielding significant predictive accuracy for adverse events and extended stays. AI technologies are transforming spine surgery by increasing surgical precision, optimizing clinical workflows, and personalizing patient care. While challenges remain regarding data diversity and ethical considerations, ongoing innovations indicate that AI will continue to refine spine surgery through personalized and efficient care solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10950,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"627-634"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12446165/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144946071","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-08-06DOI: 10.1007/s12178-025-09988-1
Haley E Smith, Andrea M Spiker
Purpose of review: Hip arthroscopy is an effective surgical procedure to treat intra-articular hip pathology including femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and labral tears. This review aims to synthesize current evidence on sex-based differences in the pathology, presentation, surgical management, and outcomes of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and hip arthroscopy.
Recent findings: Emerging evidence indicates distinct morphological and clinical patterns of FAI between sexes. Cam-type morphology is more prevalent in males, whereas females more frequently present with pincer morphology and generalized joint hypermobility. Sex-specific differences in acetabular and femoral version, pelvic anatomy, and ligamentous laxity may contribute to variable symptomatology and diagnostic challenges. Postoperative outcomes following hip arthroscopy also appear to vary, with some studies reporting inferior outcome scores in females while others report no differences based on patient sex. Sex-based anatomical and biomechanical differences in FAI are clinically significant and may impact diagnosis, treatment strategy, and surgical outcomes. Recognizing and addressing these distinctions can optimize outcomes for both male and female patients. Continued research is needed to refine our understanding sex-specific etiology, pathology, and management approaches to ultimately improve long-term hip preservation.
{"title":"Sex-Based Differences Femoroacetabular Impingement and Hip Arthroscopy.","authors":"Haley E Smith, Andrea M Spiker","doi":"10.1007/s12178-025-09988-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12178-025-09988-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Hip arthroscopy is an effective surgical procedure to treat intra-articular hip pathology including femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and labral tears. This review aims to synthesize current evidence on sex-based differences in the pathology, presentation, surgical management, and outcomes of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and hip arthroscopy.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Emerging evidence indicates distinct morphological and clinical patterns of FAI between sexes. Cam-type morphology is more prevalent in males, whereas females more frequently present with pincer morphology and generalized joint hypermobility. Sex-specific differences in acetabular and femoral version, pelvic anatomy, and ligamentous laxity may contribute to variable symptomatology and diagnostic challenges. Postoperative outcomes following hip arthroscopy also appear to vary, with some studies reporting inferior outcome scores in females while others report no differences based on patient sex. Sex-based anatomical and biomechanical differences in FAI are clinically significant and may impact diagnosis, treatment strategy, and surgical outcomes. Recognizing and addressing these distinctions can optimize outcomes for both male and female patients. Continued research is needed to refine our understanding sex-specific etiology, pathology, and management approaches to ultimately improve long-term hip preservation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10950,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"577-584"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12446180/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144788511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-08-12DOI: 10.1007/s12178-025-09990-7
Flynn P McGuire, Riley Martinez, Annika Lenz, Lee Skinner, Daniel M Cushman
{"title":"Regeneration or Risk? A Narrative Review of BPC-157 for Musculoskeletal Healing.","authors":"Flynn P McGuire, Riley Martinez, Annika Lenz, Lee Skinner, Daniel M Cushman","doi":"10.1007/s12178-025-09990-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12178-025-09990-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10950,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"611-619"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12446177/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144820821","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-08-19DOI: 10.1007/s12178-025-09991-6
Chloe J Leung, Frances Tao, Carlin Senter, Faustine D Ramirez, Stephanie E Wong
{"title":"Pregnancy-Related Hip and Pelvis Musculoskeletal Conditions, Risk Factors, and Prevention.","authors":"Chloe J Leung, Frances Tao, Carlin Senter, Faustine D Ramirez, Stephanie E Wong","doi":"10.1007/s12178-025-09991-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12178-025-09991-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10950,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"585-598"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12446167/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144871818","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}