Current oncology最新文献

Background: Access to cancer screening services is crucial for early detection and improved survival rates, yet older adults in Saudi Arabia face significant barriers. Recent data from the Saudi Health Ministry indicate that cancer incidence in this demographic is rising, underscoring the urgent need for enhanced screening efforts. This study explores the factors influencing cancer screening behaviors among older adults in Riyadh, using a mixed-methods approach to identify and address these barriers effectively.

Methods: The study integrated quantitative data from 100 participants aged 60 and above who attended King Saud University-affiliated healthcare centers, and qualitative insights from 20 semi-structured interviews. The Barriers to Cancer Screening Scale (BCSS) quantitatively assessed barriers, while the thematic analysis of interview data helped identify key themes.

Results: Findings revealed significant barriers, categorized into three primary themes: accessibility challenges, psychological barriers, and social influences. These include logistical difficulties related to transportation and service availability, fears and anxieties regarding cancer diagnoses, and a lack of family support and cultural stigma, all of which impact participants' willingness to engage in screening.

Conclusion: The study underscores the multifaceted barriers faced by older adults in accessing cancer screening in Saudi Arabia. Tailored interventions that address logistical, psychological, and social factors are essential to enhance screening uptake and ensure equitable access to preventive services. These findings contribute to the ongoing discussions on public health strategies and underscore the necessity for community and healthcare provider engagement to improve cancer screening rates in this population.

Ovarian cancer (OC) is diagnosed at a locally advanced stage in two-thirds of cases. The first line of treatment consists of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant chemotherapy. However, CRS can be associated with high rates of postoperative complications (POCs), and detection of fragile patients at high risk of POCs is important. The American College of Surgeons Surgical Risk Calculator (ACS-SRC) provides a predictive model for early POCs (30 days) for any given surgical procedure. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the ACS-SRC in predicting the occurrence of early POCs for patients undergoing CRS for OC. This was a retrospective study that included patients undergoing CRS for advanced OC between January 2010 and December 2022. Early POCs were reviewed, and the rate of POCs was compared with those predicted by the ACS-SRC to evaluate its accuracy (i.e., discrimination and calibration). A total of 218 patients were included, 112 of whom underwent extensive surgery/resection. A total of 94 complications were recorded. This cohort demonstrated correct calibration of the ACS-SRC for the prediction of surgical site infection, readmission, and the need for nursing care post-discharge (NCPD; transfer to revalidation center or need for nursing care at home). Using both the discrimination and calibration methods, the score only predicted NCPD. In this study, the ACS-SRC was shown to be of little value for patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery for ovarian peritoneal carcinomatosis, as it only accurately predicted NCPD.

Although the literature on patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) continues to expand, challenges persist in selecting reliable and valid instruments for assessing peripheral neuropathy (PN) in patients with cancer. This systematic review aimed to identify all validated self-report PN scales and critically appraise their measurement properties. This review was conducted using the COSMIN methodology for PROMs and the PRISMA statement. Five databases were searched from inception to August 2024, identifying 46 eligible studies and 16 PROMs. Evidence quality ranged from "very low" to "moderate", with notable inconsistencies in the content and structural validity phases of most instruments. Instruments such as the Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy assessment tool and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity demonstrated moderate quality and potential utility in clinical practice, while others, including the Location-based assessment of sensory symptoms in cancer and the Measure of Ovarian Symptoms and Treatment, had insufficient evidence to support their use. Importantly, all PROMs focused on chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, highlighting a significant gap in instruments addressing other PN causes, such as radiotherapy or tumor-related nerve damage. Further research should prioritize developing and validating instruments for distinct cancer populations, ensuring robust psychometric properties and clinical applicability.

Frailty and myosteatosis are each prognostic of all-cause mortality (ACM) in patients with cancer. However, it is unclear whether myosteatosis adds value to frailty for predicting ACM. We assessed whether myosteatosis improves the predictive ability of frailty for ACM in older adults undergoing chemotherapy. This was a retrospective study of older adults (≥65 years) initiating chemotherapy between June 2015 and June 2022. Frailty was assessed using a 24-item frailty index (FI). Myosteatosis was evaluated via computed tomography scans at the third lumbar vertebra (L3).. Multivariable Cox regression and Uno's c-statistic determined the predictive performance of the FI and myosteatosis. In total, 115 participants (mean age: 77.1 years) were included. Frailty alone (adjusted hazards ratio (aHR) = 1.68, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) = 1.03-2.72, p = 0.037) and myosteatosis alone (aHR = 2.14, 95%CI = 1.07-4.30, p = 0.032) exhibited similar performance (c-statistic = 0.66) in predicting ACM in multivariable analyses adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, and treatment intent. However, the highest predictive performance for ACM was observed after inclusion of both myosteatosis and frailty in the multivariable model (c-statistic = 0.70). Myosteatosis improves the performance of frailty for predicting ACM in older adults with cancer. Prospective studies to assess the effect of exercise on myosteatosis in older patients are warranted.

Upper para-aortic lymph node dissection (PALND) is one of the most challenging gynecologic robotic procedures. This study aimed to evaluate the oncologic and operative outcomes of robotic staging surgery, including upper PALND, using low pelvic port placement (LP3) in 22 patients with high-risk endometrial cancer. High-risk was defined as patients who showed deep myometrial invasion with grade III, cervical involvement, or high-risk histology. The mean patient age and body mass index were 58 years and 24 kg/m². The mean operative time was 263 min. The mean number of total LNs and upper PALNs obtained was 31 and 10. Two patients received lymphangiography to reduce the amount of drained lymphatic fluid after surgery. The recurrence rate was 13.6% (3/22). There were two LN recurrences and one at the peritoneum in the intra-abdominal cavity. Robotic staging surgery using LP3 was feasible for performing PALND as well as procedures in the pelvic cavity simultaneously. It provides important techniques for performing optimal surgical procedures when surgeons decide to perform comprehensive PALND in instances of isolated recurrence or unexpected LN enlargement as well as high-risk endometrial cancer. Consequently, surgeons can achieve surgical consistency and reproducibility for PALND, leading to improved operative and survival outcomes in high-risk endometrial cancer.

Most abscopal effects are reported as sporadic and unpredictable events following radiotherapy at symptomatic sites. Herein, we report a case in which a planned abscopal effect was induced following deliberate radiotherapy and concurrent systemic immunotherapy. A 53-year-old man with a combined positive score ≥10 developed extensive metastatic bladder cancer after progressing on conventional chemotherapy. Extensive metastases were identified in his liver, lungs, and bones. He later had four cycles of single-agent pembrolizumab and planned hypofractionated radiotherapy at an ablative dose to selected metastatic lung tumors and developed complete remission of disease even when pembrolizumab was discontinued. This is a clear demonstration that the abscopal effect could be harnessed in a systematic manner with a combined positive score and aggressive local radiotherapy.

Background: Colorectal cancer is the third most common malignancy globally. Early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) is becoming a growing healthcare focus globally, particularly in North America. We estimated trends in incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for EOCRC in Canada between 1990 and 2019.

Methods: We used the Global Burden of Diseases Study to evaluate trends in incidence, mortality, and DALYs for EOCRC in Canada between 1990 and 2019. Rates were estimated per 100,000 persons at risk with associated uncertainty intervals (UIs). Annual percentage changes (APC) were estimated using joinpoint regression with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: In 2019, the incidence, mortality, and DALYs rates for EOCRC were 10.89 (95% UI 8.09, 14.34), 2.24 (95% UI 2.00, 2.51), and 111.37 (95% UI 99.34, 124.78) per 100,000 individuals, respectively. Incidence increased during the study period by 1.12%/year (95% CI 1.03%, 1.22%; p < 0.001). The largest increase in incidence in EOCRC occurred between 1990 and 2007, with an APC of 2.23% (95% CI 2.09%, 2.37%; p < 0.001). Mortality (APC 2.95%, 95% CI 1.89%, 4.02%; p < 0.001) and DALY (APC 2.96%, 95% CI 1.84%, 4.09%; p < 0.001) rates increased for males between 2001 and 2006.

Conclusions: Our study reveals a substantial burden in EOCRC in Canada, with a significant increase in incidence.

Background: There is ongoing discussion around the optimal course of treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) following the second line. Trifluridine/tipiracil (T) and regorafenib (R) have been the mainstay of therapy in this situation, as they both increased overall survival (OS) in comparison to a placebo. Despite the paucity of evidence, therapy rechallenge is also recognized as an option for practical use. In the third-line scenario of mCRC, we planned to investigate the survival outcomes using (T) and (R), both with and without prior rechallenge treatment.

Materials and methods: Between 2012 and 2023, we examined the medical records of 1156 patients with refractory mCRC who were enrolled in the multicenter retrospective ReTrITA study. We then separated the patients into two cohorts based on the rechallenge therapy that was given before regorafenib and/or trifluridine/tipiracil at 17 Italian centres.

Results: A total of 981 patients underwent T and/or R therapy, while 175 patients had therapy rechallenge before T and/or R. The median overall survival (mOS) for patients treated with T/R and R/T sequences in the rechallenge therapy cohort was 14.5 months and 17.6 months, respectively (p = 0.1955). A statistically significant survival benefit was observed in patients who received monotheraphy with R (mOS: 6 months) compared to the T group (mOS: 4.2 months) (p = 0.0332). In the same cohort, a median progression-free survival (mPFS) benefit was demonstrated in favour of the R/T group (11.3 months) vs. 9 months of the reverse sequence (p = 0.4004). In the no-rechallenge cohort, the mOS was statistically longer in the R/T sequence than in the T/R sequence (16.2 months vs. 12.3 months, respectively; p = 0.0014). In terms of the mPFS, we saw the same significant result for the adoption of R/T treatment (11.5 months vs. 8.4 months, respectively; p < 0.0001). The two monotherapy groups did not reveal any significant differences.

Conclusions: This study suggests that rechallenge therapy may improve survival rates in the third-line treatment of mCRC, particularly if it is administered before sequential R/T treatment. This could allow for the extension of mCRC treatment choices until prospective studies are finished or randomised trials are performed.

(1) Background: Breast cancer (BC) has a high incidence in Europe, particularly in older adults. Traditionally under-represented in clinical trials, this age group is often undertreated due to ageism. This study aims to characterize frail older adults (≥70 years) with BC based on a comprehensive geriatric assessment, to guide individualized treatment decision-making. (2) Methods: A descriptive analysis of older adults with BC treated from January 2021 to December 2022 was performed. Data were analyzed based on anonymized electronic medical records. (3) Results: Of 123 patients (mean age 84.0 ± 5.6 years), 122 (99.2%) were women. The mean G8 screening score was 12.1 ± 2.5. Most had functional dependence (69.9% Barthel Index, 81.3% Lawton/Brody Scale) and a moderate-to-high risk of falling (76.4% Tinetti index). Cognitive impairment and malnutrition risk were present in 15.4% and 30.1%, respectively. Prehabilitation inclusive strategies led to adapted treatment in 55.3% of cases. Endocrine therapy, surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy was used in 99.2%, 56.1%, 35.0%, and 8.9% of patients, respectively. (4) Conclusions: Our comprehensive oncogeriatric strategy promotes personalized oncologic treatment, improves outcomes by addressing frailty, and enhances treatment tolerability in older patients with BC, validating the expansion of this combined team approach to other cancer types and institutions.

Gastric cancer is common globally and has a generally poor prognosis with a low 5-year survival rate. Targeted therapies and immunotherapies have improved the treatment landscape, providing more options for efficacious treatment. The use of these therapies requires predictive biomarker testing to identify patients who can benefit from their use. New therapies on the horizon, such as CLDN18.2 monoclonal antibody therapy, require laboratories to implement new biomarker tests. A multidisciplinary pan-Canadian expert working group was convened to develop guidance for pathologists and oncologists on the implementation of CLDN18.2 IHC testing for gastric and gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma in Canada, as well as general recommendations to optimize predictive biomarker testing in G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. The expert working group recommendations highlight the importance of reflex testing for HER2, MMR and/or MSI, CLDN18, and PD-L1 in all patients at first diagnosis of G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. Testing for NTRK fusions may also be included in reflex testing or requested by the treating clinician when third-line therapy is being considered. The expert working group also made recommendations for pre-analytic, analytic, and post-analytic considerations for predictive biomarker testing in G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. Implementation of these recommendations will provide medical oncologists with accurate, timely biomarker results to use for treatment decision-making.