Pub Date : 2024-11-10DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31110517
Giovanni Emanuele Ricciardi, Rita Cuciniello, Emanuele De Ponti, Carlo Lunetti, Flavia Pennisi, Carlo Signorelli, Cristina Renzi
Background: The aim of this study is to assess the impact of disability on participation in CRC screening and to determine the overall effect size.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare CRC screening participation in individuals with and without disabilities. The search encompassed five databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Google Scholar, medRxiv). Pooled estimates were calculated for each type of CRC screening and disability categories to synthesize the findings. The participation in CRC screening was derived using a random effects model.
Results: A total of 20 articles were included, most of them from the USA. Based on pooled estimates, individuals with disabilities have lower odds of undergoing CRC screening versus those without disabilities (OR = 0.80, 95%CI 0.73-0.87). Analysis by screening type indicated that individuals with a disability have lower odds of a fecal occult blood test or a fecal immunochemical test (OR: 0.72, 95%CI 0.65-0.81), with no significant difference for a colonoscopy. Individuals with intellectual disabilities had significantly lower rates of CRC screening participation (OR = 0.65, 95%CI 0.53-0.79), especially for FOBT/FIT (OR = 0.58, 95%CI 0.49-0.69).
Conclusions: Disparities exist for CRC screening participation in people with disabilities. Further research and coordinated efforts are essential to develop interventions for improving early cancer diagnosis for this non-negligible patient group.
{"title":"Disability and Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Giovanni Emanuele Ricciardi, Rita Cuciniello, Emanuele De Ponti, Carlo Lunetti, Flavia Pennisi, Carlo Signorelli, Cristina Renzi","doi":"10.3390/curroncol31110517","DOIUrl":"10.3390/curroncol31110517","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study is to assess the impact of disability on participation in CRC screening and to determine the overall effect size.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare CRC screening participation in individuals with and without disabilities. The search encompassed five databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Google Scholar, medRxiv). Pooled estimates were calculated for each type of CRC screening and disability categories to synthesize the findings. The participation in CRC screening was derived using a random effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 articles were included, most of them from the USA. Based on pooled estimates, individuals with disabilities have lower odds of undergoing CRC screening versus those without disabilities (OR = 0.80, 95%CI 0.73-0.87). Analysis by screening type indicated that individuals with a disability have lower odds of a fecal occult blood test or a fecal immunochemical test (OR: 0.72, 95%CI 0.65-0.81), with no significant difference for a colonoscopy. Individuals with intellectual disabilities had significantly lower rates of CRC screening participation (OR = 0.65, 95%CI 0.53-0.79), especially for FOBT/FIT (OR = 0.58, 95%CI 0.49-0.69).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Disparities exist for CRC screening participation in people with disabilities. Further research and coordinated efforts are essential to develop interventions for improving early cancer diagnosis for this non-negligible patient group.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"31 11","pages":"7023-7039"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11593103/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142726668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-09DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31110516
Jacob Murphy, R Taylor Sundby, Erin E Resch, Ruyan Rahnama, Kathryn M Lemberg, Alexandre Maalouf, Aditya Suru, Jason Fixler, Brian H Ladle, Daniel S Rhee, Adam S Levin, Aparna Pallavajjala, Christopher Gocke, Matthew M Ladra, Mari L Groves, Sahaja Acharya, John M Gross, Nicolas J Llosa, Christine A Pratilas
Background: Brain metastases in pediatric osteosarcoma are infrequent but associated with a dire prognosis.
Methods: This retrospective study examined six pediatric patients at Johns Hopkins Hospital who developed brain metastases from osteosarcoma between April 2015 and November 2023.
Results: Median survival post-brain metastasis was 2.5 months. The patients underwent various treatments, including chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation. Despite these interventions, outcomes were uniformly fatal. Notably, one patient survived over 13 months post-brain metastasis with a treatment regimen of cabozantinib and nivolumab along with surgical resection and radiation, highlighting the potential efficacy of multimodal treatment regimens. This case demonstrated changes in the immune microenvironment, hinting at an anti-tumoral response, although no histologic response was observed.
Conclusions: These findings emphasize the critical need for vigilant clinical monitoring, especially in patients with new neurological symptoms. The study highlights the diagnostic challenges and the rapid progression of brain metastases, underscoring the necessity for further research. Prospective studies and clinical trials focusing on novel therapeutic strategies are essential to improve outcomes. Disease biology studies examining tumor features across primary, pulmonary, and brain metastatic sites may offer insights into the mechanisms of metastasis and potential therapeutic targets, providing a foundation for better management of this devastating complication.
{"title":"Brain Metastasis in Pediatric Patients with Osteosarcoma.","authors":"Jacob Murphy, R Taylor Sundby, Erin E Resch, Ruyan Rahnama, Kathryn M Lemberg, Alexandre Maalouf, Aditya Suru, Jason Fixler, Brian H Ladle, Daniel S Rhee, Adam S Levin, Aparna Pallavajjala, Christopher Gocke, Matthew M Ladra, Mari L Groves, Sahaja Acharya, John M Gross, Nicolas J Llosa, Christine A Pratilas","doi":"10.3390/curroncol31110516","DOIUrl":"10.3390/curroncol31110516","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brain metastases in pediatric osteosarcoma are infrequent but associated with a dire prognosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study examined six pediatric patients at Johns Hopkins Hospital who developed brain metastases from osteosarcoma between April 2015 and November 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median survival post-brain metastasis was 2.5 months. The patients underwent various treatments, including chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation. Despite these interventions, outcomes were uniformly fatal. Notably, one patient survived over 13 months post-brain metastasis with a treatment regimen of cabozantinib and nivolumab along with surgical resection and radiation, highlighting the potential efficacy of multimodal treatment regimens. This case demonstrated changes in the immune microenvironment, hinting at an anti-tumoral response, although no histologic response was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings emphasize the critical need for vigilant clinical monitoring, especially in patients with new neurological symptoms. The study highlights the diagnostic challenges and the rapid progression of brain metastases, underscoring the necessity for further research. Prospective studies and clinical trials focusing on novel therapeutic strategies are essential to improve outcomes. Disease biology studies examining tumor features across primary, pulmonary, and brain metastatic sites may offer insights into the mechanisms of metastasis and potential therapeutic targets, providing a foundation for better management of this devastating complication.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"31 11","pages":"7014-7022"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11592575/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142726557","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-09DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31110515
Giancarlo Pecorari, Simone Moglio, Dario Gamba, Marco Briguglio, Ester Cravero, Eugenio Sportoletti Baduel, Giuseppe Riva
Background: Patients with head and neck cancer often experience impaired sleep. Moreover, the treatment may negatively affect sleep quality. The aim of this observational study was to evaluate the sleep quality after treatment for head and neck cancer, and its relationship with quality of life and psychological distress.
Methods: A total of 151 patients who underwent treatment for head and neck cancer at our department were included in the study. Quality of life, sleep quality, risk of sleep apnea, sleepiness, pain, and psychological distress were assessed by means of specific questionnaires.
Results: The median follow-up was 30 months. Poor sleep quality was observed in 55.6% of the cases. An association between PSQI global sleep quality and EORTC global health status was found. The DT, HADS anxiety, and HADS depression scores were associated to PSQI global score, sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep disturbances, and daytime dysfunction.
Conclusions: Sleep disturbances, particularly OSA and insomnia, are frequent in HNC patients, and significantly impact their quality of life and psychological well-being. Given the effect of sleep on overall well-being, addressing sleep disorders should be a priority in the care of HNC patients.
{"title":"Sleep Quality in Head and Neck Cancer.","authors":"Giancarlo Pecorari, Simone Moglio, Dario Gamba, Marco Briguglio, Ester Cravero, Eugenio Sportoletti Baduel, Giuseppe Riva","doi":"10.3390/curroncol31110515","DOIUrl":"10.3390/curroncol31110515","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with head and neck cancer often experience impaired sleep. Moreover, the treatment may negatively affect sleep quality. The aim of this observational study was to evaluate the sleep quality after treatment for head and neck cancer, and its relationship with quality of life and psychological distress.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 151 patients who underwent treatment for head and neck cancer at our department were included in the study. Quality of life, sleep quality, risk of sleep apnea, sleepiness, pain, and psychological distress were assessed by means of specific questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up was 30 months. Poor sleep quality was observed in 55.6% of the cases. An association between PSQI global sleep quality and EORTC global health status was found. The DT, HADS anxiety, and HADS depression scores were associated to PSQI global score, sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep disturbances, and daytime dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sleep disturbances, particularly OSA and insomnia, are frequent in HNC patients, and significantly impact their quality of life and psychological well-being. Given the effect of sleep on overall well-being, addressing sleep disorders should be a priority in the care of HNC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"31 11","pages":"7000-7013"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11593185/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142726651","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-08DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31110514
Parneet K Cheema, Paul F Wheatley-Price, Matthew J Cecchini, Peter M Ellis, Alexander V Louie, Sara Moore, Brandon S Sheffield, Jonathan D Spicer, Patrick James Villeneuve, Natasha B Leighl
Therapeutic strategies for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are advancing, with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and targeted therapies making their way into neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. With recent advances, there was a need for multidisciplinary lung cancer healthcare providers from across Ontario to convene and review recent data from practical and implementation standpoints. The focus was on the following questions: (1) To what extent do patient (e.g., history of smoking) and disease (e.g., histology, tumor burden, nodal involvement) characteristics influence treatment approaches? (2) What are the surgical considerations in early-stage NSCLC? (3) What is the role of radiation therapy in the context of recent evidence? (4) What is the impact of biomarker testing on treatment planning? Ongoing challenges, treatment gaps, outstanding questions, and controversies with the data were assessed through a pre-meeting survey, interactive cases, and polling questions. By reviewing practice patterns across Ontario cancer centers in the context of evolving clinical data, Health Canada indications, and provincial (Cancer Care Ontario [CCO]) funding approvals, physicians treating lung cancer voiced their opinions on how new approaches should be integrated into provincial treatment algorithms. This report summarizes the forum outcomes, including pre-meeting survey and polling question results, as well as agreements on treatment approaches based on specific patient scenarios.
{"title":"Update on Practical Management of Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A Report from the Ontario Forum.","authors":"Parneet K Cheema, Paul F Wheatley-Price, Matthew J Cecchini, Peter M Ellis, Alexander V Louie, Sara Moore, Brandon S Sheffield, Jonathan D Spicer, Patrick James Villeneuve, Natasha B Leighl","doi":"10.3390/curroncol31110514","DOIUrl":"10.3390/curroncol31110514","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Therapeutic strategies for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are advancing, with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and targeted therapies making their way into neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. With recent advances, there was a need for multidisciplinary lung cancer healthcare providers from across Ontario to convene and review recent data from practical and implementation standpoints. The focus was on the following questions: (1) To what extent do patient (e.g., history of smoking) and disease (e.g., histology, tumor burden, nodal involvement) characteristics influence treatment approaches? (2) What are the surgical considerations in early-stage NSCLC? (3) What is the role of radiation therapy in the context of recent evidence? (4) What is the impact of biomarker testing on treatment planning? Ongoing challenges, treatment gaps, outstanding questions, and controversies with the data were assessed through a pre-meeting survey, interactive cases, and polling questions. By reviewing practice patterns across Ontario cancer centers in the context of evolving clinical data, Health Canada indications, and provincial (Cancer Care Ontario [CCO]) funding approvals, physicians treating lung cancer voiced their opinions on how new approaches should be integrated into provincial treatment algorithms. This report summarizes the forum outcomes, including pre-meeting survey and polling question results, as well as agreements on treatment approaches based on specific patient scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"31 11","pages":"6979-6999"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11592966/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142726743","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-07DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31110513
Ally C Farrell, Jessica A Lawson, Ovarian Cancer Canada's Patient Partners In Research Team, Alison Ross, Alicia A Tone
Ovarian Cancer Canada's Patient Partners in Research (PPiR) is a national volunteer-based program that trains and connects individuals with lived ovarian cancer (OC) experience to diverse research opportunities, to maximize the clinical relevance and real-life impact of OC research in Canada. A steadily increasing demand for patient partners to be involved as research team members and decision-makers led us to co-develop with the PPiR team a series of "best practices" for researcher-patient partnerships. This framework formalizes our evolving approach to patient engagement and begins to address challenges that can arise in research settings focused on less commonly diagnosed yet significant and fatal diseases such as OC: (1) Start early. (2) Foster collaboration among the entire research team. (3) Establish expectations and communicate regularly. (4) Report impact of patient partner contributions. (5) Ensure adequate resources. While there are ongoing challenges associated with patient engagement that need to be addressed, data collected from an anonymous survey of Canadian OC researchers show a marked improvement in perceived benefits of patient engagement over time and validate the best practices presented herein. Developed in the context of OC research, these best practices can be adapted to a variety of health research settings with similar challenges.
{"title":"Advancing Research Alongside Patient Partners: Next-Generation Best Practices for Effective Collaboration in Health Research.","authors":"Ally C Farrell, Jessica A Lawson, Ovarian Cancer Canada's Patient Partners In Research Team, Alison Ross, Alicia A Tone","doi":"10.3390/curroncol31110513","DOIUrl":"10.3390/curroncol31110513","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ovarian Cancer Canada's Patient Partners in Research (PPiR) is a national volunteer-based program that trains and connects individuals with lived ovarian cancer (OC) experience to diverse research opportunities, to maximize the clinical relevance and real-life impact of OC research in Canada. A steadily increasing demand for patient partners to be involved as research team members and decision-makers led us to co-develop with the PPiR team a series of \"best practices\" for researcher-patient partnerships. This framework formalizes our evolving approach to patient engagement and begins to address challenges that can arise in research settings focused on less commonly diagnosed yet significant and fatal diseases such as OC: (1) Start early. (2) Foster collaboration among the entire research team. (3) Establish expectations and communicate regularly. (4) Report impact of patient partner contributions. (5) Ensure adequate resources. While there are ongoing challenges associated with patient engagement that need to be addressed, data collected from an anonymous survey of Canadian OC researchers show a marked improvement in perceived benefits of patient engagement over time and validate the best practices presented herein. Developed in the context of OC research, these best practices can be adapted to a variety of health research settings with similar challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"31 11","pages":"6956-6978"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11592903/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142726827","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-06DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31110510
Małgorzata Edyta Wojtyś, Konstantinos Kostopanagiotou, Dawid Kordykiewicz, Patryk Skórka, Alexandros Polykarpos Gkioulekas, Julia Augusta Guimarães Dourado, Janusz Wójcik, Periklis Tomos
Mediastinal yolk sac tumors (YST) constitute a highly malignant subtype of primary non-seminomatous germ cell tumors, which are often locally advanced and unresectable at diagnosis. Due to their rarity and aggressiveness, there is not yet a standard optimal treatment approach. A widely employed multimodal strategy involves neoadjuvant cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy followed by consolidation surgery. Tumor infiltration into the lungs and adjacent cardiovascular structures is common, such that surgical intervention typically requires extensive resections, performed either by sternotomy or thoracotomy. For this review, we extensively searched the PubMed and Embase medical databases, identifying articles describing surgical treatment of mediastinal yolk sac tumors. The current literature provides limited details regarding the utilized surgical procedures, leaving clinicians without comprehensive guidance about the demanding nature of these resections. Here, we present a narrative description of the range of current surgical procedures. By highlighting these techniques, we provide a comprehensive overview of the current surgical landscape, thereby helping clinicians understand the potential complexities and considerations involved in managing these rare and aggressive tumors.
{"title":"Current Trends in the Surgical Management of Yolk Sac Tumors.","authors":"Małgorzata Edyta Wojtyś, Konstantinos Kostopanagiotou, Dawid Kordykiewicz, Patryk Skórka, Alexandros Polykarpos Gkioulekas, Julia Augusta Guimarães Dourado, Janusz Wójcik, Periklis Tomos","doi":"10.3390/curroncol31110510","DOIUrl":"10.3390/curroncol31110510","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mediastinal yolk sac tumors (YST) constitute a highly malignant subtype of primary non-seminomatous germ cell tumors, which are often locally advanced and unresectable at diagnosis. Due to their rarity and aggressiveness, there is not yet a standard optimal treatment approach. A widely employed multimodal strategy involves neoadjuvant cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy followed by consolidation surgery. Tumor infiltration into the lungs and adjacent cardiovascular structures is common, such that surgical intervention typically requires extensive resections, performed either by sternotomy or thoracotomy. For this review, we extensively searched the PubMed and Embase medical databases, identifying articles describing surgical treatment of mediastinal yolk sac tumors. The current literature provides limited details regarding the utilized surgical procedures, leaving clinicians without comprehensive guidance about the demanding nature of these resections. Here, we present a narrative description of the range of current surgical procedures. By highlighting these techniques, we provide a comprehensive overview of the current surgical landscape, thereby helping clinicians understand the potential complexities and considerations involved in managing these rare and aggressive tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"31 11","pages":"6898-6908"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11592850/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142726703","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-06DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31110512
Teresa E Brown, Angela Byrnes, Aaron C Chan, Kathleen Dwyer, Anna Edwards, Claire L Blake, Merrilyn D Banks, Brett G M Hughes, Charles Y Lin, Lizbeth M Kenny, Ann-Louise Spurgin, Judith D Bauer
The Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (RBWH) Swallowing and Nutrition Management Guidelines for Patients with Head and Neck Cancer were developed to enable evidence-based decision-making by the Head and Neck Multidisciplinary Team (H&N MDT) regarding enteral nutrition support options. The purpose of this study was to revalidate these guidelines in a cohort of patients receiving helical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (H-IMRT) compared to a historical cohort who received primarily 3D-conformal radiotherapy. Eligible patients attending the RBWH H&N MDT between 2013 and 2014 (n = 315) were assessed by the guidelines, with high-risk patients being recommended proactive gastrostomy tube placement. Data were collected on guideline adherence, gastrostomy tube insertions, the duration of enteral tube use and weight change. Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive and negative predictive values were calculated and compared with the historical cohort. Overall guideline adherence was 84%, with 60% and 96% adherence to the high-risk and low-risk pathways, respectively. Seventy patients underwent proactive gastrostomy tube placement (n = 62 high-risk; n = 8 low-risk). Validation outcomes were sensitivity 73% (compared to 72%) and specificity 86% (compared to 96%). The guidelines yielded a high sensitivity and specificity, remaining valid in a cohort of patients treated with H-IMRT. Further studies are recommended to improve the sensitivity and understand the decrease in specificity in order to make ongoing guideline improvements.
{"title":"Revalidation of Proactive Gastrostomy Tube Placement Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancer Patients Receiving Helical Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy.","authors":"Teresa E Brown, Angela Byrnes, Aaron C Chan, Kathleen Dwyer, Anna Edwards, Claire L Blake, Merrilyn D Banks, Brett G M Hughes, Charles Y Lin, Lizbeth M Kenny, Ann-Louise Spurgin, Judith D Bauer","doi":"10.3390/curroncol31110512","DOIUrl":"10.3390/curroncol31110512","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (RBWH) Swallowing and Nutrition Management Guidelines for Patients with Head and Neck Cancer were developed to enable evidence-based decision-making by the Head and Neck Multidisciplinary Team (H&N MDT) regarding enteral nutrition support options. The purpose of this study was to revalidate these guidelines in a cohort of patients receiving helical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (H-IMRT) compared to a historical cohort who received primarily 3D-conformal radiotherapy. Eligible patients attending the RBWH H&N MDT between 2013 and 2014 (n = 315) were assessed by the guidelines, with high-risk patients being recommended proactive gastrostomy tube placement. Data were collected on guideline adherence, gastrostomy tube insertions, the duration of enteral tube use and weight change. Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive and negative predictive values were calculated and compared with the historical cohort. Overall guideline adherence was 84%, with 60% and 96% adherence to the high-risk and low-risk pathways, respectively. Seventy patients underwent proactive gastrostomy tube placement (n = 62 high-risk; n = 8 low-risk). Validation outcomes were sensitivity 73% (compared to 72%) and specificity 86% (compared to 96%). The guidelines yielded a high sensitivity and specificity, remaining valid in a cohort of patients treated with H-IMRT. Further studies are recommended to improve the sensitivity and understand the decrease in specificity in order to make ongoing guideline improvements.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"31 11","pages":"6938-6955"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11592900/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142726632","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-06DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31110511
Ryan Michael Antar, Christopher Fawaz, Diego Gonzalez, Vincent Eric Xu, Arthur Pierre Drouaud, Jason Krastein, Faozia Pio, Andeulazia Murdock, Kirolos Youssef, Stanislav Sobol, Michael J Whalen
The genetic landscape of urologic cancers has evolved with the identification of actionable mutations that impact diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic strategies. This narrative review consolidates existing literature on genetic mutations across key urologic cancers, including bladder, renal, prostate, upper tract urothelial, testicular, and penile. The review highlights mutations in DNA damage repair genes, such as BRCA1/2 and PTEN, as well as pathway alterations like FGFR and PD-L1 overexpression. These mutations influence tumor behavior and therapeutic outcomes, emphasizing the need for precision oncology approaches. Molecular profiling, through tools like next-generation sequencing, has revolutionized patient care by enabling targeted treatment strategies, especially in cancers with distinct molecular subtypes such as luminal or basal bladder cancer and clear cell renal carcinoma. Emerging therapies, including FGFR inhibitors and immune checkpoint blockade, offer new treatment avenues, although resistance mechanisms remain a challenge. We also emphasize the importance of biomarker identification for personalized management, especially in metastatic settings where treatment intensification is often required. Future research is needed to further elucidate our understanding of the genetics affecting urologic cancers, which will help develop novel, individualized therapies to enhance oncologic outcomes.
随着影响诊断、预后和治疗策略的可操作突变的确定,泌尿系统癌症的基因状况也在发生变化。这篇叙述性综述整合了有关膀胱癌、肾癌、前列腺癌、上尿路尿道癌、睾丸癌和阴茎癌等主要泌尿系统癌症基因突变的现有文献。综述强调了 DNA 损伤修复基因(如 BRCA1/2 和 PTEN)的突变,以及 FGFR 和 PD-L1 过表达等通路的改变。这些突变影响着肿瘤的行为和治疗效果,强调了精准肿瘤学方法的必要性。通过下一代测序等工具进行的分子图谱分析实现了靶向治疗策略,为患者护理带来了革命性的变化,尤其是在具有不同分子亚型的癌症中,如腔隙性或基底型膀胱癌和透明细胞肾癌。包括表皮生长因子受体(FGFR)抑制剂和免疫检查点阻断剂在内的新兴疗法提供了新的治疗途径,但耐药机制仍是一项挑战。我们还强调了生物标志物鉴定对个性化治疗的重要性,尤其是在通常需要加强治疗的转移性环境中。未来的研究需要进一步阐明我们对影响泌尿系统癌症的遗传学的理解,这将有助于开发新型的个体化疗法,提高肿瘤治疗效果。
{"title":"The Evolving Molecular Landscape and Actionable Alterations in Urologic Cancers.","authors":"Ryan Michael Antar, Christopher Fawaz, Diego Gonzalez, Vincent Eric Xu, Arthur Pierre Drouaud, Jason Krastein, Faozia Pio, Andeulazia Murdock, Kirolos Youssef, Stanislav Sobol, Michael J Whalen","doi":"10.3390/curroncol31110511","DOIUrl":"10.3390/curroncol31110511","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The genetic landscape of urologic cancers has evolved with the identification of actionable mutations that impact diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic strategies. This narrative review consolidates existing literature on genetic mutations across key urologic cancers, including bladder, renal, prostate, upper tract urothelial, testicular, and penile. The review highlights mutations in DNA damage repair genes, such as BRCA1/2 and PTEN, as well as pathway alterations like FGFR and PD-L1 overexpression. These mutations influence tumor behavior and therapeutic outcomes, emphasizing the need for precision oncology approaches. Molecular profiling, through tools like next-generation sequencing, has revolutionized patient care by enabling targeted treatment strategies, especially in cancers with distinct molecular subtypes such as luminal or basal bladder cancer and clear cell renal carcinoma. Emerging therapies, including FGFR inhibitors and immune checkpoint blockade, offer new treatment avenues, although resistance mechanisms remain a challenge. We also emphasize the importance of biomarker identification for personalized management, especially in metastatic settings where treatment intensification is often required. Future research is needed to further elucidate our understanding of the genetics affecting urologic cancers, which will help develop novel, individualized therapies to enhance oncologic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"31 11","pages":"6909-6937"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11593205/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142726702","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-04DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31110509
Julie Coussirou, Magali Ravoire, Alma Stancu, Léa Vazquez
Lyell's syndrome or Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) is a rare and life-threatening dermatological disease. Most commonly, this syndrome is drug-induced, and is a result of an immune-allergic reaction to medications. Anti-cancer drugs were not the most frequent groups of therapeutic agents related to Lyell's syndrome, but the emergence of new therapeutic classes, particularly targeted therapy and immunotherapy, is changing current data. We present two cases of Lyell's syndrome induced by anticancer drugs. (1) TEN in a man treated for metastatic urothelial carcinoma with Enfortumab Vedotin. (2) TEN in a man with metastatic melanoma treated with Nivolumab and Ipilimumab. Despite quick medical treatment and transfer to a severe burn unit, both patients died of TEN.
{"title":"Anti-Cancer Drug-Induced Lyell's Syndrome: A Series of Two Patients.","authors":"Julie Coussirou, Magali Ravoire, Alma Stancu, Léa Vazquez","doi":"10.3390/curroncol31110509","DOIUrl":"10.3390/curroncol31110509","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lyell's syndrome or Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) is a rare and life-threatening dermatological disease. Most commonly, this syndrome is drug-induced, and is a result of an immune-allergic reaction to medications. Anti-cancer drugs were not the most frequent groups of therapeutic agents related to Lyell's syndrome, but the emergence of new therapeutic classes, particularly targeted therapy and immunotherapy, is changing current data. We present two cases of Lyell's syndrome induced by anticancer drugs. (1) TEN in a man treated for metastatic urothelial carcinoma with Enfortumab Vedotin. (2) TEN in a man with metastatic melanoma treated with Nivolumab and Ipilimumab. Despite quick medical treatment and transfer to a severe burn unit, both patients died of TEN.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"31 11","pages":"6891-6897"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11593297/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142726519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-03DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31110508
Natale Quartuccio, Vincenzo Militano, Marco Pappalardo, Luca Filippi, Oreste Bagni, Antonino Maria Moreci, Salvatore Ialuna
Aim: To meta-analyze the utility of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in patients with liver metastatic breast cancer (BC), based on the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR).
Methods: A literature search was performed retrieving studies with (1) at least 10 patients with liver metastatic BC treated with TARE and (2) adequate information to derive ORR and DCR. The ORR is the ratio between patients with liver lesions showing complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) over the total number of patients treated with TARE; the DCR is the ratio between patients with CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) over the total number of patients treated with TARE.
Results: Eighteen studies (650 patients) were eligible; the ORR of TARE resulted 50.71% (95% C.I.: 40.04-61.36) and the DCR resulted 88.37% (95% C.I.: 81.89-93.57). Taking into account resin spheres (395 patients), the ORR was 60.35% (95% C.I.: 46.55-73.36) and the DCR was 92.73% (95% C.I.: 87.17-96.80%). Considering glass spheres (144 patients), the ORR was 32.38% (95% C.I.: 18.43-48.16) and the DCR was 82.69% (95% C.I.: 59.29-97.26).
Conclusions: This meta-analysis favors the use of TARE in patients with liver metastatic BC either with resin or glass spheres.
{"title":"The Objective Response and Disease Control Rates in Patients with Liver Metastastic Breast Cancer Receiving Transarterial Radioembolization: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Natale Quartuccio, Vincenzo Militano, Marco Pappalardo, Luca Filippi, Oreste Bagni, Antonino Maria Moreci, Salvatore Ialuna","doi":"10.3390/curroncol31110508","DOIUrl":"10.3390/curroncol31110508","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To meta-analyze the utility of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in patients with liver metastatic breast cancer (BC), based on the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was performed retrieving studies with (1) at least 10 patients with liver metastatic BC treated with TARE and (2) adequate information to derive ORR and DCR. The ORR is the ratio between patients with liver lesions showing complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) over the total number of patients treated with TARE; the DCR is the ratio between patients with CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) over the total number of patients treated with TARE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen studies (650 patients) were eligible; the ORR of TARE resulted 50.71% (95% C.I.: 40.04-61.36) and the DCR resulted 88.37% (95% C.I.: 81.89-93.57). Taking into account resin spheres (395 patients), the ORR was 60.35% (95% C.I.: 46.55-73.36) and the DCR was 92.73% (95% C.I.: 87.17-96.80%). Considering glass spheres (144 patients), the ORR was 32.38% (95% C.I.: 18.43-48.16) and the DCR was 82.69% (95% C.I.: 59.29-97.26).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis favors the use of TARE in patients with liver metastatic BC either with resin or glass spheres.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"31 11","pages":"6879-6890"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11592458/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142726667","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}