首页 > 最新文献

Current Opinion in Urology最新文献

英文 中文
Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography for novel risk-stratification of biochemical recurrence. 前列腺特异性膜抗原正电子发射断层扫描用于生化复发的新型风险分层。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-23 DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001291
Madeleine J Karpinski, Claudia Kesch, Boris A Hadaschik, Wolfgang P Fendler

Purpose of review: The variety of prostate cancer aggressiveness in patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) leads to the unmet need of accurate risk stratification. This review examined the recently published risk stratification tool using prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography (PSMA-PET) compared to the risk categories by European Association of Urology (EAU).

Recent findings: The risk stratification by EAU was proposed for patients with BCR, including the doubling time of the prostate-specific-antigen and Gleason score as predictors for survival. Although stratification into low- vs. high-risk groups reached significant differences in the external validation, C-indices determined moderate discriminative ability and the need to improve the EAU risk categories. PSMA-PET was recently validated as prognostic biomarker and PSMA-PET standardized by Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation (PROMISE) metrics were combined to create a visual and a quantitative nomogram to predict overall survival.

Summary: The unmet need to improve risk stratification for prostate cancer patients experiencing BCR was addressed with PSMA-PET PROMISE (PPP) nomograms. Although PPP nomograms are not applied for individual patient counselling yet, they can be used additionally to EAU risk categories.

回顾目的:前列腺癌生化复发(BCR)患者侵袭性的多样性导致准确的风险分层的需求未得到满足。本综述对最近发表的前列腺特异性膜抗原正电子发射断层扫描(PSMA-PET)的风险分层工具与欧洲泌尿外科协会(EAU)的风险分类进行了比较。最近发现:对BCR患者提出了EAU风险分层,包括前列腺特异性抗原加倍时间和Gleason评分作为生存的预测指标。尽管在外部验证中将低风险组与高风险组分层存在显著差异,但c指数确定了中度判别能力和改善EAU风险类别的必要性。PSMA-PET最近被证实为预后生物标志物,PSMA-PET通过前列腺癌分子成像标准化评估(PROMISE)指标标准化,结合创建视觉和定量nomogram来预测总生存期。摘要:PSMA-PET PROMISE (PPP) x线图解决了前列腺癌BCR患者改善风险分层的未满足需求。虽然PPP线图尚未应用于个别患者咨询,但它们可以额外用于EAU风险类别。
{"title":"Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography for novel risk-stratification of biochemical recurrence.","authors":"Madeleine J Karpinski, Claudia Kesch, Boris A Hadaschik, Wolfgang P Fendler","doi":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001291","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001291","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The variety of prostate cancer aggressiveness in patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) leads to the unmet need of accurate risk stratification. This review examined the recently published risk stratification tool using prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography (PSMA-PET) compared to the risk categories by European Association of Urology (EAU).</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The risk stratification by EAU was proposed for patients with BCR, including the doubling time of the prostate-specific-antigen and Gleason score as predictors for survival. Although stratification into low- vs. high-risk groups reached significant differences in the external validation, C-indices determined moderate discriminative ability and the need to improve the EAU risk categories. PSMA-PET was recently validated as prognostic biomarker and PSMA-PET standardized by Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation (PROMISE) metrics were combined to create a visual and a quantitative nomogram to predict overall survival.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The unmet need to improve risk stratification for prostate cancer patients experiencing BCR was addressed with PSMA-PET PROMISE (PPP) nomograms. Although PPP nomograms are not applied for individual patient counselling yet, they can be used additionally to EAU risk categories.</p>","PeriodicalId":11093,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Urology","volume":" ","pages":"506-509"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143962052","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ultra-hypofractionation for the treatment of macroscopic prostate bed recurrence: a focus on stereotactic radiotherapy and brachytherapy. 超低分割治疗宏观前列腺床复发:立体定向放疗和近距离治疗的重点。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-04 DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001314
Magdalena Stankiewicz, Wojciech Majewski

Purpose of review: The aim of this review is to assess contemporary studies on ultra-hypofractionated local salvage therapies - stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and brachytherapy - for macroscopic prostate bed recurrence after radical prostatectomy, with or without prior external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), and to highlight knowledge gaps guiding current trials.

Recent findings: Recent studies, primarily retrospective, report 1-year biochemical control rates of 56-88% for SBRT and up to 87% for high-dose-rate brachytherapy, with low to moderate rates of severe genitourinary toxicity. Higher biologically effective doses and limited tumour volume predict improved outcomes, yet focal-only strategies carry some risk of out-of-field relapse within the prostate bed. The role of concomitant androgen deprivation therapy remains unclear. Several phase II trials (e.g. STARR, PROSTARE, REPAIR, and HypoFocal SRT) are underway.

Summary: Ultra-hypofractionated salvage radiotherapy offers effective disease control with manageable toxicity for selected patients and may defer systemic therapy. Further studies are needed to standardize imaging, biopsy confirmation, dose escalation, and systemic treatment integration. Prospective, randomized studies are crucial to define optimal modality, target volume, and patient selection criteria before widespread adoption.

综述的目的:本综述的目的是评估超低分割局部挽救治疗-立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)和近距离治疗-根治性前列腺切除术后宏观前列腺床复发,有或没有事先外部束放疗(EBRT)的当代研究,并强调指导当前试验的知识空白。最近的发现:最近的研究,主要是回顾性的,报告SBRT的1年生化控制率为56-88%,高剂量率近距离放疗的生化控制率高达87%,严重泌尿生殖系统毒性发生率低至中等。较高的生物有效剂量和有限的肿瘤体积预示着改善的结果,然而,仅局部策略有一些前列腺床外复发的风险。伴随雄激素剥夺治疗的作用尚不清楚。一些II期试验(如STARR、PROSTARE、REPAIR和HypoFocal SRT)正在进行中。摘要:超低分割补救性放射治疗为选定的患者提供了有效的疾病控制和可控的毒性,并可能推迟全身治疗。需要进一步的研究来规范影像学、活检确认、剂量递增和全身治疗整合。在广泛采用前,前瞻性、随机研究对于确定最佳治疗方式、靶量和患者选择标准至关重要。
{"title":"Ultra-hypofractionation for the treatment of macroscopic prostate bed recurrence: a focus on stereotactic radiotherapy and brachytherapy.","authors":"Magdalena Stankiewicz, Wojciech Majewski","doi":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001314","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001314","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The aim of this review is to assess contemporary studies on ultra-hypofractionated local salvage therapies - stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and brachytherapy - for macroscopic prostate bed recurrence after radical prostatectomy, with or without prior external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), and to highlight knowledge gaps guiding current trials.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent studies, primarily retrospective, report 1-year biochemical control rates of 56-88% for SBRT and up to 87% for high-dose-rate brachytherapy, with low to moderate rates of severe genitourinary toxicity. Higher biologically effective doses and limited tumour volume predict improved outcomes, yet focal-only strategies carry some risk of out-of-field relapse within the prostate bed. The role of concomitant androgen deprivation therapy remains unclear. Several phase II trials (e.g. STARR, PROSTARE, REPAIR, and HypoFocal SRT) are underway.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Ultra-hypofractionated salvage radiotherapy offers effective disease control with manageable toxicity for selected patients and may defer systemic therapy. Further studies are needed to standardize imaging, biopsy confirmation, dose escalation, and systemic treatment integration. Prospective, randomized studies are crucial to define optimal modality, target volume, and patient selection criteria before widespread adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":11093,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Urology","volume":" ","pages":"583-589"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144574950","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The role of radiotherapy in pelvic nodal recurrence following definitive treatment for prostate cancer. 放疗在前列腺癌明确治疗后盆腔淋巴结复发中的作用。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-17 DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001322
Alessandro Dematteis, Marcin Miszczyk, Angelo Cormio, Akihiro Matsukawa, Paolo Gontero, Shahrokh F Shariat

Purpose of review: To summarize recent evidence on the role of radiotherapy in managing pelvic lymph node (PLN) recurrence following curative-intent primary therapy for prostate cancer (PCa), focusing on radiotherapy strategies, novel medical imaging, and oncological outcomes.

Recent findings: Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET (PSMA-PET) has improved accuracy of staging in patients with PCa; however, more often than not, it fails to correctly identify PLN metastases, and the impact on clinical outcomes of the patients is uncertain. Metastasis-directed therapies (MDT) combined with short-term androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with PLN recurrence are associated with a significantly higher risk of recurrence compared to more comprehensive approaches. Emerging data support the role of elective nodal radiotherapy (ENRT) combined with short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and radiotherapy boost to the PLN metastases to enhance disease control. Notably, despite treating a more extensive pelvic region than MDT, ENRT does not appear to significantly increase acute toxicity or negatively impact quality of life (QoL). Recent evidence suggests a role for androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI), such as enzalutamide, in patients with high-risk biochemical recurrence, introducing a new treatment paradigm for patients ineligible for salvage radiotherapy. Ongoing prospective studies are refining the role of radiotherapy in combination with systemic treatments.

Summary: Despite PSMA-PET allowing for improved staging and better patient-tailored decisions, patients with PLN recurrence continue to benefit from comprehensive multimodal treatment approach. Elective PLN irradiation combined with radiotherapy boost and ADT lead to improved disease control, without compromising safety and toxicity. ARPI+ADT and ARPI-monotherapy emerge as alternatives for select patients.

综述目的:总结放疗在治疗前列腺癌(PCa)原发性治疗后盆腔淋巴结(PLN)复发中的作用的最新证据,重点是放疗策略、新的医学影像学和肿瘤预后。前列腺特异性膜抗原PET (PSMA-PET)提高了前列腺癌患者分期的准确性;然而,它往往不能正确识别PLN转移,对患者临床结果的影响是不确定的。与更全面的治疗方法相比,转移导向治疗(MDT)联合短期雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)治疗PLN复发患者的复发风险明显更高。新出现的数据支持选择性淋巴结放疗(ENRT)联合短期雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)和放疗促进PLN转移的作用,以加强疾病控制。值得注意的是,尽管比MDT治疗更广泛的骨盆区域,ENRT似乎没有显著增加急性毒性或对生活质量(QoL)产生负面影响。最近的证据表明,雄激素受体途径抑制剂(ARPI),如enzalutamide,在高危生化复发患者中的作用,为不符合补救性放疗条件的患者引入了新的治疗模式。正在进行的前瞻性研究正在完善放射治疗与全身治疗相结合的作用。总结:尽管PSMA-PET允许改善分期和更好的患者定制决策,但PLN复发患者继续受益于综合多模式治疗方法。选择性PLN照射联合放疗强化和ADT可改善疾病控制,同时不影响安全性和毒性。ARPI+ADT和ARPI单药治疗可作为选择性患者的替代方案。
{"title":"The role of radiotherapy in pelvic nodal recurrence following definitive treatment for prostate cancer.","authors":"Alessandro Dematteis, Marcin Miszczyk, Angelo Cormio, Akihiro Matsukawa, Paolo Gontero, Shahrokh F Shariat","doi":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001322","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001322","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To summarize recent evidence on the role of radiotherapy in managing pelvic lymph node (PLN) recurrence following curative-intent primary therapy for prostate cancer (PCa), focusing on radiotherapy strategies, novel medical imaging, and oncological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET (PSMA-PET) has improved accuracy of staging in patients with PCa; however, more often than not, it fails to correctly identify PLN metastases, and the impact on clinical outcomes of the patients is uncertain. Metastasis-directed therapies (MDT) combined with short-term androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with PLN recurrence are associated with a significantly higher risk of recurrence compared to more comprehensive approaches. Emerging data support the role of elective nodal radiotherapy (ENRT) combined with short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and radiotherapy boost to the PLN metastases to enhance disease control. Notably, despite treating a more extensive pelvic region than MDT, ENRT does not appear to significantly increase acute toxicity or negatively impact quality of life (QoL). Recent evidence suggests a role for androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI), such as enzalutamide, in patients with high-risk biochemical recurrence, introducing a new treatment paradigm for patients ineligible for salvage radiotherapy. Ongoing prospective studies are refining the role of radiotherapy in combination with systemic treatments.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Despite PSMA-PET allowing for improved staging and better patient-tailored decisions, patients with PLN recurrence continue to benefit from comprehensive multimodal treatment approach. Elective PLN irradiation combined with radiotherapy boost and ADT lead to improved disease control, without compromising safety and toxicity. ARPI+ADT and ARPI-monotherapy emerge as alternatives for select patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11093,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Urology","volume":" ","pages":"574-582"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12337913/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144625578","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What's in a name? Why differentiation between biochemical recurrence and metastatic prostate cancer matters. 名字里有什么?为什么区分生化复发和转移性前列腺癌很重要。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-07 DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001317
Anael S Rizzo, Pratik Kanabur, Adam B Weiner

Purpose of review: The natural history of biochemical recurrence (BCR) is highly variable, complicating the distinction between BCR and metastasis. A targeted approach to risk stratifying disease progression is needed. This review proposes a 'framework,' that categorizes disease progression into five distinct groups: low-risk BCR, high-risk BCR, oligometastatic disease, low-volume metastatic disease, and high-volume metastatic disease. Each group is defined by clinicopathological and molecular features, along with targeted treatment strategies to tailor therapy and optimize disease management.

Recent findings: Recent clinical trials and updates to guidelines have focused on treatment intensification and early identification of patients at risk for recurrence. In addition, the utilization of molecular imaging and implementation of metastasis directed therapy has led to a change in the conventions of recurrence and metastasis. Therefore, the patients with BCR or metastatic disease require a more individualized and multimodal treatment for their prostate cancer.

Summary: Distinguishing BCR from metastatic disease has important implications. It offers ways to avoid unnecessary treatment in patients who are less likely to progress and helps identify those who are more likely to benefit from earlier or more aggressive interventions.

回顾目的:生物化学复发(BCR)的自然史是高度可变的,使BCR和转移的区分复杂化。需要一种有针对性的方法对疾病进展进行风险分层。本综述提出了一个“框架”,将疾病进展分为五个不同的组:低风险BCR、高风险BCR、低转移性疾病、低容量转移性疾病和高容量转移性疾病。每组由临床病理和分子特征来定义,以及有针对性的治疗策略来定制治疗和优化疾病管理。最近的发现:最近的临床试验和指南的更新都集中在治疗强化和复发风险患者的早期识别上。此外,分子成像的应用和转移定向治疗的实施已经导致复发和转移的惯例发生了变化。因此,BCR或转移性疾病的患者需要对其前列腺癌进行更个性化和多模式的治疗。总结:区分BCR和转移性疾病具有重要意义。它提供了避免对不太可能进展的患者进行不必要治疗的方法,并帮助确定那些更有可能从早期或更积极的干预中受益的患者。
{"title":"What's in a name? Why differentiation between biochemical recurrence and metastatic prostate cancer matters.","authors":"Anael S Rizzo, Pratik Kanabur, Adam B Weiner","doi":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001317","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001317","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The natural history of biochemical recurrence (BCR) is highly variable, complicating the distinction between BCR and metastasis. A targeted approach to risk stratifying disease progression is needed. This review proposes a 'framework,' that categorizes disease progression into five distinct groups: low-risk BCR, high-risk BCR, oligometastatic disease, low-volume metastatic disease, and high-volume metastatic disease. Each group is defined by clinicopathological and molecular features, along with targeted treatment strategies to tailor therapy and optimize disease management.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent clinical trials and updates to guidelines have focused on treatment intensification and early identification of patients at risk for recurrence. In addition, the utilization of molecular imaging and implementation of metastasis directed therapy has led to a change in the conventions of recurrence and metastasis. Therefore, the patients with BCR or metastatic disease require a more individualized and multimodal treatment for their prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Distinguishing BCR from metastatic disease has important implications. It offers ways to avoid unnecessary treatment in patients who are less likely to progress and helps identify those who are more likely to benefit from earlier or more aggressive interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11093,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Urology","volume":" ","pages":"535-540"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144583346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Should we redefine the Phoenix criteria for biochemical recurrence after primary radiotherapy? 是否应该重新定义初次放疗后生化复发的凤凰标准?
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-04 DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001313
Ugo Giovanni Falagario, Francesco Pellegrino, Peter Wiklund

Purpose of review: The Phoenix criteria, which define biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radiotherapy as a prostate specific antigen (PSA) rise of at least 2 ng/ml above nadir, were developed to improve consistency in outcome reporting and distinguish genuine cancer recurrence from transient, noncancerous PSA fluctuations, commonly referred to as PSA "bounces". However, in the current era of advanced imaging and precision oncology, this definition is increasingly viewed as inadequate. This review critically examines recent evidence challenging the clinical utility of the Phoenix definition and explores potential alternatives that better reflect disease biology and patient outcomes.

Recent findings: Modern imaging techniques, particularly prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/computed tomography (CT), have demonstrated the ability to detect recurrent prostate cancer at PSA levels well below the Phoenix threshold, allowing for earlier salvage interventions. Additionally, PSA kinetics such as nadir levels and doubling time provide superior prognostic information compared to static PSA thresholds. Multiparametric risk models that also incorporate PSMA PET/CT findings, PSA kinetics and clinical features may enable more accurate stratification of patients into low-risk and high-risk BCR categories. This evolving approach supports the notion that early, risk-adapted treatment can improve outcomes in high-risk patients, while reducing overtreatment in those at low risk.

Summary: The Phoenix criteria no longer align with the capabilities of current diagnostic and prognostic tools. Redefining BCR using dynamic PSA metrics and advanced imaging could facilitate timely salvage treatment in patients at a high risk and allow surveillance strategies in those unlikely to progress. Prospective validation is warranted to inform future clinical guidelines.

回顾目的:Phoenix标准将放疗后生化复发(BCR)定义为前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)高于最低水平至少2 ng/ml,旨在提高结果报告的一致性,并区分真正的癌症复发与短暂的非癌性PSA波动(通常称为PSA“反弹”)。然而,在当今先进的成像和精确肿瘤学时代,这一定义越来越被认为是不充分的。这篇综述批判性地审查了最近对Phoenix定义的临床应用提出质疑的证据,并探索了更好地反映疾病生物学和患者预后的潜在替代方案。最新发现:现代成像技术,特别是前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA) PET/计算机断层扫描(CT),已经证明能够在PSA水平远低于凤凰阈值时检测到复发性前列腺癌,从而允许早期抢救干预。此外,与静态PSA阈值相比,PSA动力学(如最低点水平和加倍时间)提供了更好的预后信息。多参数风险模型还包括PSMA PET/CT结果、PSA动力学和临床特征,可以更准确地将患者分为低风险和高风险BCR类别。这种不断发展的方法支持这样一种观点,即早期适应风险的治疗可以改善高风险患者的预后,同时减少低风险患者的过度治疗。总结:Phoenix标准不再符合当前诊断和预后工具的能力。使用动态PSA指标和先进的成像技术重新定义BCR可以促进对高风险患者的及时抢救治疗,并允许对那些不太可能进展的患者实施监测策略。前瞻性验证有必要为未来的临床指南提供信息。
{"title":"Should we redefine the Phoenix criteria for biochemical recurrence after primary radiotherapy?","authors":"Ugo Giovanni Falagario, Francesco Pellegrino, Peter Wiklund","doi":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001313","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001313","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The Phoenix criteria, which define biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radiotherapy as a prostate specific antigen (PSA) rise of at least 2 ng/ml above nadir, were developed to improve consistency in outcome reporting and distinguish genuine cancer recurrence from transient, noncancerous PSA fluctuations, commonly referred to as PSA \"bounces\". However, in the current era of advanced imaging and precision oncology, this definition is increasingly viewed as inadequate. This review critically examines recent evidence challenging the clinical utility of the Phoenix definition and explores potential alternatives that better reflect disease biology and patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Modern imaging techniques, particularly prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/computed tomography (CT), have demonstrated the ability to detect recurrent prostate cancer at PSA levels well below the Phoenix threshold, allowing for earlier salvage interventions. Additionally, PSA kinetics such as nadir levels and doubling time provide superior prognostic information compared to static PSA thresholds. Multiparametric risk models that also incorporate PSMA PET/CT findings, PSA kinetics and clinical features may enable more accurate stratification of patients into low-risk and high-risk BCR categories. This evolving approach supports the notion that early, risk-adapted treatment can improve outcomes in high-risk patients, while reducing overtreatment in those at low risk.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The Phoenix criteria no longer align with the capabilities of current diagnostic and prognostic tools. Redefining BCR using dynamic PSA metrics and advanced imaging could facilitate timely salvage treatment in patients at a high risk and allow surveillance strategies in those unlikely to progress. Prospective validation is warranted to inform future clinical guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":11093,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Urology","volume":" ","pages":"499-505"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144574949","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adjuvant radiotherapy following radical cystectomy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a narrative review. 肌肉浸润性膀胱癌根治性膀胱切除术后的辅助放疗:一个叙述性的回顾。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-20 DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001310
Agata Suleja, Ekaterina Laukhtina, Angelo Cormio, Marcin Miszczyk, Shahrokh F Shariat

Purpose of review: This review aims to synthesize emerging evidence on the role of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) following radical cystectomy (RC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).

Recent findings: A randomized trial comparing adjuvant chemoradiotherapy to chemotherapy alone in 125 MIBC patients demonstrated a significant improvement in 2-year local recurrence- free survival (LRFS) (96% vs. 69%; P  < 0.01). Three studies have evaluated adjuvant RT alone. A single-arm study reported a 5-year local control rate of 79% among 72 patients, with 17% experiencing serious gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs). A randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving 122 patients found improved 3-year LRFS in the RT arm (81% vs. 71% at three years; P  = 0.046), with low rate of severe GI AEs (3%); however, the survival difference was not statistically significant. Another RCT with 153 patients showed similar rates of acute severe AEs between RT and observation groups (1.6% vs. 4.2%; P  = 0.34). Key limitations across studies include heterogeneity in design, lack of statistical power to detect survival differences, limited patient-reported outcome data, and absence of direct comparisons with immune checkpoint inhibitors - the current standard of care in the adjuvant setting.

Summary: Modern adjuvant RT appears to be associated with acceptable toxicity, likely due to improved delivery techniques. Although data suggest a benefit in local-regional control, an overall survival advantage has not been demonstrated. Adjuvant RT may be considered in selected high-risk patients, particularly in settings where access to salvage therapies or immunotherapy is limited.

综述目的:本综述旨在综合有关肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)根治性膀胱切除术(RC)后辅助放疗(RT)作用的新证据。最近的发现:一项随机试验比较了125名MIBC患者的辅助放化疗与单独化疗,结果显示,2年局部无复发生存率(LRFS)显著提高(96% vs 69%;总结:现代辅助放疗似乎与可接受的毒性相关,可能是由于改进的给药技术。虽然数据表明局部-区域控制有好处,但总体生存优势尚未得到证实。选择性高风险患者可考虑辅助RT,特别是在获得挽救性治疗或免疫治疗有限的情况下。
{"title":"Adjuvant radiotherapy following radical cystectomy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a narrative review.","authors":"Agata Suleja, Ekaterina Laukhtina, Angelo Cormio, Marcin Miszczyk, Shahrokh F Shariat","doi":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001310","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001310","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review aims to synthesize emerging evidence on the role of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) following radical cystectomy (RC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>A randomized trial comparing adjuvant chemoradiotherapy to chemotherapy alone in 125 MIBC patients demonstrated a significant improvement in 2-year local recurrence- free survival (LRFS) (96% vs. 69%; P  < 0.01). Three studies have evaluated adjuvant RT alone. A single-arm study reported a 5-year local control rate of 79% among 72 patients, with 17% experiencing serious gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs). A randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving 122 patients found improved 3-year LRFS in the RT arm (81% vs. 71% at three years; P  = 0.046), with low rate of severe GI AEs (3%); however, the survival difference was not statistically significant. Another RCT with 153 patients showed similar rates of acute severe AEs between RT and observation groups (1.6% vs. 4.2%; P  = 0.34). Key limitations across studies include heterogeneity in design, lack of statistical power to detect survival differences, limited patient-reported outcome data, and absence of direct comparisons with immune checkpoint inhibitors - the current standard of care in the adjuvant setting.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Modern adjuvant RT appears to be associated with acceptable toxicity, likely due to improved delivery techniques. Although data suggest a benefit in local-regional control, an overall survival advantage has not been demonstrated. Adjuvant RT may be considered in selected high-risk patients, particularly in settings where access to salvage therapies or immunotherapy is limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":11093,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Urology","volume":" ","pages":"549-553"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144474206","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Artificial intelligence in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: opportunities, challenges, and clinical impact. 人工智能在肌肉浸润性膀胱癌中的应用:机遇、挑战和临床影响。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-11 DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001309
Federico Mastroleo, Giulia Marvaso, Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa

Purpose of review: Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) represents an aggressive malignancy with significant morbidity and mortality. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) offer promising opportunities to enhance patient care across the entire MIBC management spectrum. This comprehensive review examines the current state and future potential of AI applications in MIBC, from diagnosis through treatment to response assessment.

Recent findings: In the diagnostic domain, AI systems demonstrate superior accuracy in cystoscopic cancer detection and staging, with deep learning models achieving high performance in differentiating muscle-invasive from noninvasive disease. For treatment planning, AI facilitates precise tumor delineation for radiotherapy, automates adaptive planning, and supports surgical decision-making through predictive lymph node involvement models. In treatment response evaluation, machine learning algorithms show encouraging results in predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy outcomes, while radiomics and quantitative imaging biomarkers enable early response assessment. Despite these advances, significant challenges persist, including methodological limitations, dataset heterogeneity, workflow integration barriers, and regulatory uncertainties. Future directions should prioritize prospective clinical validation, federated learning approaches to address data scarcity, development of interpretable AI models, and interdisciplinary collaboration.

Summary: The integration of AI in MIBC management represents a paradigm shift toward personalized medicine, with the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy, optimize treatment selection, and enhance response prediction.

回顾目的:肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)是一种具有显著发病率和死亡率的侵袭性恶性肿瘤。人工智能(AI)的最新进展为在整个MIBC管理范围内加强患者护理提供了有希望的机会。这篇综合综述探讨了人工智能在MIBC中的应用现状和未来潜力,从诊断到治疗再到反应评估。最新发现:在诊断领域,人工智能系统在膀胱镜下癌症检测和分期方面表现出卓越的准确性,深度学习模型在区分肌肉侵入性和非侵入性疾病方面表现出色。在治疗计划方面,人工智能有助于精确的肿瘤描绘放疗,自动化适应性计划,并通过预测淋巴结受累模型支持手术决策。在治疗反应评估中,机器学习算法在预测新辅助化疗结果方面显示出令人鼓舞的结果,而放射组学和定量成像生物标志物则可以进行早期反应评估。尽管取得了这些进步,但仍然存在重大挑战,包括方法限制、数据集异质性、工作流程集成障碍和监管不确定性。未来的方向应该优先考虑前瞻性临床验证、解决数据短缺的联合学习方法、可解释的人工智能模型的开发以及跨学科合作。总结:人工智能在MIBC管理中的整合代表了向个性化医疗的范式转变,具有提高诊断准确性、优化治疗选择和增强反应预测的潜力。
{"title":"Artificial intelligence in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: opportunities, challenges, and clinical impact.","authors":"Federico Mastroleo, Giulia Marvaso, Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa","doi":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001309","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000001309","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) represents an aggressive malignancy with significant morbidity and mortality. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) offer promising opportunities to enhance patient care across the entire MIBC management spectrum. This comprehensive review examines the current state and future potential of AI applications in MIBC, from diagnosis through treatment to response assessment.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>In the diagnostic domain, AI systems demonstrate superior accuracy in cystoscopic cancer detection and staging, with deep learning models achieving high performance in differentiating muscle-invasive from noninvasive disease. For treatment planning, AI facilitates precise tumor delineation for radiotherapy, automates adaptive planning, and supports surgical decision-making through predictive lymph node involvement models. In treatment response evaluation, machine learning algorithms show encouraging results in predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy outcomes, while radiomics and quantitative imaging biomarkers enable early response assessment. Despite these advances, significant challenges persist, including methodological limitations, dataset heterogeneity, workflow integration barriers, and regulatory uncertainties. Future directions should prioritize prospective clinical validation, federated learning approaches to address data scarcity, development of interpretable AI models, and interdisciplinary collaboration.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The integration of AI in MIBC management represents a paradigm shift toward personalized medicine, with the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy, optimize treatment selection, and enhance response prediction.</p>","PeriodicalId":11093,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Urology","volume":"35 5","pages":"543-548"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144788524","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer - toward precision in definition, diagnosis, and management. 前列腺癌生化复发的精确定义、诊断和治疗。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-07 DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001316
Tobias Maurer, Fabian Falkenbach
{"title":"Biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer - toward precision in definition, diagnosis, and management.","authors":"Tobias Maurer, Fabian Falkenbach","doi":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001316","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000001316","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11093,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Urology","volume":"35 5","pages":"497-498"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144788525","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Carbon ion radiotherapy as a dose escalation tool in the treatment of primary high-risk prostate cancer. 碳离子放疗作为一种剂量递增治疗原发性高危前列腺癌的工具。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-17 DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001327
Matthias Moll, Piero Fossati, Carola Lütgendorf-Caucig, Eugen Hug

Purpose of review: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men. In the high-risk group, carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is being developed as a state-of-the-art alternative for treatment.

Recent findings: Data conducted from studies in Japan, as published by the J-CROS group, suggest that CIRT provides a tool to deliver a treatment for high-risk prostate cancer that delivers tumour control similar to a brachytherapy boost, but without the associated increase in toxicity.

Summary: While a considerable number of patients has been treated with CIRT, a randomized controlled trial showing the benefits of low toxicity while maintaining excellent tumour control has not yet been published and is highly warranted.

综述目的:前列腺癌是男性最常见的癌症。在高危人群中,碳离子放射治疗(CIRT)正在发展成为一种最先进的治疗方法。最近的发现:J-CROS小组发表的日本研究数据表明,CIRT为高风险前列腺癌的治疗提供了一种工具,可以提供类似于近距离治疗的肿瘤控制,但没有相关的毒性增加。摘要:虽然相当多的患者已经接受了CIRT治疗,但一项随机对照试验显示,在保持良好的肿瘤控制的同时,低毒性的益处尚未发表,这是非常有根据的。
{"title":"Carbon ion radiotherapy as a dose escalation tool in the treatment of primary high-risk prostate cancer.","authors":"Matthias Moll, Piero Fossati, Carola Lütgendorf-Caucig, Eugen Hug","doi":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001327","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000001327","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men. In the high-risk group, carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is being developed as a state-of-the-art alternative for treatment.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Data conducted from studies in Japan, as published by the J-CROS group, suggest that CIRT provides a tool to deliver a treatment for high-risk prostate cancer that delivers tumour control similar to a brachytherapy boost, but without the associated increase in toxicity.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>While a considerable number of patients has been treated with CIRT, a randomized controlled trial showing the benefits of low toxicity while maintaining excellent tumour control has not yet been published and is highly warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":11093,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Urology","volume":"35 5","pages":"568-573"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144788526","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Recent advancements in personalized management of prostate cancer biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. 根治性前列腺切除术后前列腺癌生化复发的个体化治疗进展。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-14 DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001305
Fabian Falkenbach, Jonas Ekrutt, Tobias Maurer

Purpose of review: Biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy exhibits heterogeneous prognostic implications. Recent advancements in imaging and biomarkers have high potential for personalizing care.

Recent findings: Prostate-specific membrane antigen imaging (PSMA)-PET/CT has revolutionized the BCR management in prostate cancer by detecting microscopic lesions earlier than conventional staging, leading to improved cancer control outcomes and changes in treatment plans in approximately two-thirds of cases. Salvage radiotherapy, often combined with androgen deprivation therapy, remains the standard treatment for high-risk BCR postprostatectomy, with PSMA-PET/CT guiding treatment adjustments, such as the radiation field, and improving progression-free survival. Advancements in biomarkers, genomic classifiers, and artificial intelligence-based models have enhanced risk stratification and personalized treatment planning, resulting in both treatment intensification and de-escalation.

Summary: While conventional risk grouping relying on Gleason score and PSA level and kinetics remain the foundation for BCR management, PSMA-PET/CT, novel biomarkers, and artificial intelligence may enable more personalized treatment strategies.

综述目的:根治性前列腺切除术后的生化复发(BCR)表现出不同的预后意义。成像和生物标志物的最新进展为个性化护理提供了巨大的潜力。最近发现:前列腺特异性膜抗原成像(PSMA)-PET/CT通过比常规分期更早地检测显微病变,彻底改变了前列腺癌的BCR管理,改善了癌症控制结果,并改变了大约三分之二的病例的治疗计划。补救性放疗通常联合雄激素剥夺治疗,仍然是高风险BCR前列腺切除术后的标准治疗方法,PSMA-PET/CT指导治疗调整,如放疗领域,提高无进展生存期。生物标记物、基因组分类器和基于人工智能的模型的进步增强了风险分层和个性化治疗计划,导致治疗强化和降级。摘要:虽然基于格里森评分、PSA水平和动力学的传统风险分组仍然是BCR管理的基础,但PSMA-PET/CT、新型生物标志物和人工智能可以实现更个性化的治疗策略。
{"title":"Recent advancements in personalized management of prostate cancer biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.","authors":"Fabian Falkenbach, Jonas Ekrutt, Tobias Maurer","doi":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001305","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001305","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy exhibits heterogeneous prognostic implications. Recent advancements in imaging and biomarkers have high potential for personalizing care.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Prostate-specific membrane antigen imaging (PSMA)-PET/CT has revolutionized the BCR management in prostate cancer by detecting microscopic lesions earlier than conventional staging, leading to improved cancer control outcomes and changes in treatment plans in approximately two-thirds of cases. Salvage radiotherapy, often combined with androgen deprivation therapy, remains the standard treatment for high-risk BCR postprostatectomy, with PSMA-PET/CT guiding treatment adjustments, such as the radiation field, and improving progression-free survival. Advancements in biomarkers, genomic classifiers, and artificial intelligence-based models have enhanced risk stratification and personalized treatment planning, resulting in both treatment intensification and de-escalation.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>While conventional risk grouping relying on Gleason score and PSA level and kinetics remain the foundation for BCR management, PSMA-PET/CT, novel biomarkers, and artificial intelligence may enable more personalized treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11093,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Urology","volume":" ","pages":"522-526"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144076678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Current Opinion in Urology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1