首页 > 最新文献

Current Opinion in Urology最新文献

英文 中文
Advancements in radiotherapy for genitourinary cancers. 泌尿生殖系统癌放射治疗的进展。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-07 DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001320
Marcin Miszczyk
{"title":"Advancements in radiotherapy for genitourinary cancers.","authors":"Marcin Miszczyk","doi":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001320","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001320","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11093,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Urology","volume":"35 5","pages":"541-542"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12337925/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144788523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Blood- and urine-based biomarkers for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: a contemporary review. 基于血液和尿液的生物标志物检测临床意义重大的前列腺癌:当代回顾。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-27 DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001308
Keavash D Assani, Janene M Pierce, Lan Anh Galloway, Jeffrey J Tosoian

Purpose of review: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignancy in men. While prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening aids early detection, its low specificity leads to unnecessary biopsies and overdiagnosis of low-grade cancers. Blood- and urine-based biomarkers are proposed by clinical guidelines to better identify patients with elevated PSA that can safely avoid more intensive testing (e.g. imaging, biopsy). The current article aims to provide clinicians and researchers with a contemporary assessment of prostate cancer biomarker tests.

Recent findings: This review focused on prebiopsy blood- and urine-based biomarker tests that are commercially-available and included in clinical guidelines. A systematic search identified 955 studies, of which 14 were published in the past 18 months (July 2023-January 2025) and reported performance metrics for clinically significant PCa (csPCa, defined as grade group ≥2). The literature revealed that blood- [Prostate Health Index (PHI), 4Kscore, and IsoPSA] and urine-based tests [SelectMDx, ExoDx IntelliScore (EPI), and MyProstateScore (MPS, MPS2)] maintained high sensitivity for csPCa while significantly reducing unnecessary biopsies performed relative to PSA-based testing. Furthermore, available data suggest that biomarkers can inform the need for biopsy in patients with equivocal (PI-RADS 3) mpMRI.

Summary: Commercially-available, noninvasive biomarker tests consistently outperformed PSA and PSA-based risk calculators for detection of csPCa. Clinical use of these tests appears to substantially reduce the proportion of unnecessary biopsies performed, while maintaining detection of the vast majority of significant cancers.

综述目的:前列腺癌(PCa)是男性最常见的恶性肿瘤。虽然前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)筛查有助于早期发现,但其低特异性导致不必要的活组织检查和低级别癌症的过度诊断。临床指南建议使用基于血液和尿液的生物标志物来更好地识别PSA升高的患者,从而可以安全地避免更密集的检测(如成像、活检)。本文旨在为临床医生和研究人员提供前列腺癌生物标志物测试的当代评估。最新发现:本综述主要关注活检前基于血液和尿液的生物标志物测试,这些测试已上市并被纳入临床指南。一项系统检索确定了955项研究,其中14项研究发表于过去18个月(2023年7月至2025年1月),并报告了临床显著性PCa (csPCa,定义为分级≥2)的表现指标。文献显示,血液-[前列腺健康指数(PHI), 4Kscore和IsoPSA]和基于尿液的测试[SelectMDx, ExoDx IntelliScore (EPI)和myprostatcore (MPS, MPS2)]对csPCa保持了高灵敏度,同时相对于基于psa的测试显著减少了不必要的活检。此外,现有数据表明,生物标志物可以告知模棱两可(PI-RADS 3) mpMRI患者是否需要活检。摘要:在检测csPCa方面,市面上可用的无创生物标志物检测始终优于PSA和基于PSA的风险计算器。这些检查的临床应用似乎大大减少了进行不必要的活组织检查的比例,同时保持了对绝大多数重大癌症的检测。
{"title":"Blood- and urine-based biomarkers for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: a contemporary review.","authors":"Keavash D Assani, Janene M Pierce, Lan Anh Galloway, Jeffrey J Tosoian","doi":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001308","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001308","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignancy in men. While prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening aids early detection, its low specificity leads to unnecessary biopsies and overdiagnosis of low-grade cancers. Blood- and urine-based biomarkers are proposed by clinical guidelines to better identify patients with elevated PSA that can safely avoid more intensive testing (e.g. imaging, biopsy). The current article aims to provide clinicians and researchers with a contemporary assessment of prostate cancer biomarker tests.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>This review focused on prebiopsy blood- and urine-based biomarker tests that are commercially-available and included in clinical guidelines. A systematic search identified 955 studies, of which 14 were published in the past 18 months (July 2023-January 2025) and reported performance metrics for clinically significant PCa (csPCa, defined as grade group ≥2). The literature revealed that blood- [Prostate Health Index (PHI), 4Kscore, and IsoPSA] and urine-based tests [SelectMDx, ExoDx IntelliScore (EPI), and MyProstateScore (MPS, MPS2)] maintained high sensitivity for csPCa while significantly reducing unnecessary biopsies performed relative to PSA-based testing. Furthermore, available data suggest that biomarkers can inform the need for biopsy in patients with equivocal (PI-RADS 3) mpMRI.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Commercially-available, noninvasive biomarker tests consistently outperformed PSA and PSA-based risk calculators for detection of csPCa. Clinical use of these tests appears to substantially reduce the proportion of unnecessary biopsies performed, while maintaining detection of the vast majority of significant cancers.</p>","PeriodicalId":11093,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Urology","volume":" ","pages":"590-596"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144505082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Technological innovation and revolution with single-use digital flexible ureteroscopes: a review from section of EAU Endourology. 一次性数字化柔性输尿管镜的技术革新与革命:来自EAU输尿管学分会的综述。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-07 DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001260
Ali Talyshinskii, Lazaros Tzelves, Eugenio Ventimiglia, Steffi Kar Kai Yuen, Vineet Gauhar, Oliver Traxer, Bhaskar Somani

Purpose of review: Numerous scope-related innovations have taken place in the field of endourology. The presented analytical review is aimed at studying the technical innovations of the single-use digital flexible ureteroscopes. In November 2024, a comprehensive search was done for information on latest disposable flexible digital ureteroscopes, as well as their various unique characteristics. A thorough examination was conducted for image qualities; sizes and channels; and deflection capabilities. Furthermore, supplementary features about the latest advances were assigned to a separate group including 'Unique' solutions. Using the last search query, various innovations in flexible ureteroscopy in general were also searched and sorted into appropriate groups.

Recent findings: Modern single-use flexible digital ureteroscopes are characterized by advanced technologies for transmitting light and images, miniaturization, as well as by a number of unique solutions that were previously characteristic only of semi-rigid or fiberoptic endoscopes. These include features such as integrated buttons for data recording, self-locking mechanism, separate ports, rotating shaft, direct-in-scope suction, pressure monitoring, enhanced tip control and customizable settings.

Summary: Since their introduction in urology, endoscopes have undergone many changes, as illustrated by the example of single-use flexible digital ureteroscopes. The imaging quality has improved, the dimensions of both the distal tip and shaft have decreased, with over 15 manufactures producing and distributing these scopes. A lot of new additional new features are likely to enhance the efficacy and safety of ureteroscopic procedures.

综述目的:在内分泌学领域已经发生了许多与范围相关的创新。本文就一次性数字输尿管软镜的技术创新进行分析综述。2024年11月,我们全面检索了最新的一次性柔性数字输尿管镜的信息,以及它们的各种独特之处。对图像质量进行了彻底检查;尺寸和渠道;以及偏转能力。此外,关于最新进展的补充功能被分配到一个单独的组,包括“独特”解决方案。使用最后一个搜索查询,各种创新的输尿管软镜一般也被搜索和分类到适当的组。最新发现:现代一次性柔性数字输尿管镜的特点是采用先进的技术传输光和图像,小型化,以及许多独特的解决方案,以前只有半刚性或光纤内窥镜具有这种特点。这些功能包括用于数据记录的集成按钮、自锁机构、独立端口、旋转轴、直接范围吸入、压力监测、增强的尖端控制和可定制设置。摘要:自从内窥镜被引入泌尿外科以来,它经历了许多变化,例如一次性柔性数字输尿管镜。成像质量得到了提高,远端尖端和轴的尺寸都减小了,有超过15家制造商生产和销售这些瞄准镜。许多新的附加的新特征可能会提高输尿管镜手术的疗效和安全性。
{"title":"Technological innovation and revolution with single-use digital flexible ureteroscopes: a review from section of EAU Endourology.","authors":"Ali Talyshinskii, Lazaros Tzelves, Eugenio Ventimiglia, Steffi Kar Kai Yuen, Vineet Gauhar, Oliver Traxer, Bhaskar Somani","doi":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001260","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001260","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Numerous scope-related innovations have taken place in the field of endourology. The presented analytical review is aimed at studying the technical innovations of the single-use digital flexible ureteroscopes. In November 2024, a comprehensive search was done for information on latest disposable flexible digital ureteroscopes, as well as their various unique characteristics. A thorough examination was conducted for image qualities; sizes and channels; and deflection capabilities. Furthermore, supplementary features about the latest advances were assigned to a separate group including 'Unique' solutions. Using the last search query, various innovations in flexible ureteroscopy in general were also searched and sorted into appropriate groups.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Modern single-use flexible digital ureteroscopes are characterized by advanced technologies for transmitting light and images, miniaturization, as well as by a number of unique solutions that were previously characteristic only of semi-rigid or fiberoptic endoscopes. These include features such as integrated buttons for data recording, self-locking mechanism, separate ports, rotating shaft, direct-in-scope suction, pressure monitoring, enhanced tip control and customizable settings.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Since their introduction in urology, endoscopes have undergone many changes, as illustrated by the example of single-use flexible digital ureteroscopes. The imaging quality has improved, the dimensions of both the distal tip and shaft have decreased, with over 15 manufactures producing and distributing these scopes. A lot of new additional new features are likely to enhance the efficacy and safety of ureteroscopic procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":11093,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Urology","volume":" ","pages":"360-367"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142946217","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Optimizing clinical risk stratification of localized prostate cancer. 优化局限性前列腺癌的临床风险分层。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-02 DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001294
Vincent J Gnanapragasam

Purpose of review: To review the current risk and prognostic stratification systems in localised prostate cancer. To explore some of the most promising adjuncts to clinical models and what the evidence has shown regarding their value.

Recent findings: There are many new biomarker-based models seeking to improve, optimise or replace clinical models. There are promising data on the value of MRI, radiomics, genomic classifiers and most recently artificial intelligence tools in refining stratification. Despite the extensive literature however, there remains uncertainty on where in pathways they can provide the most benefit and whether a biomarker is most useful for prognosis or predictive use. Comparisons studies have also often overlooked the fact that clinical models have themselves evolved and the context of the baseline used in biomarker studies that have shown superiority have to be considered.

Summary: For new biomarkers to be included in stratification models, well designed prospective clinical trials are needed. Until then, there needs to be caution in interpretation of their use for day-to-day decision making. It is critical that users balance any purported incremental value against the performance of the latest clinical classification and multivariate models especially as the latter are cost free and widely available.

综述的目的:回顾当前局限性前列腺癌的风险和预后分层系统。探索一些最有希望的辅助临床模型和证据表明,关于他们的价值。最近的发现:有许多新的基于生物标志物的模型寻求改进、优化或取代临床模型。MRI、放射组学、基因组分类器和最近的人工智能工具在细化分层方面的价值有很好的数据。然而,尽管有大量的文献,但对于它们在哪些途径中可以提供最大的益处,以及生物标志物是否对预后或预测用途最有用,仍然存在不确定性。比较研究也常常忽略了这样一个事实,即临床模型本身也在进化,必须考虑生物标志物研究中使用的基线背景。摘要:为了将新的生物标志物纳入分层模型,需要精心设计的前瞻性临床试验。在此之前,在解释它们在日常决策中的用途时需要谨慎。至关重要的是,用户平衡任何所谓的增量价值与最新的临床分类和多变量模型的性能,特别是因为后者是免费和广泛使用的。
{"title":"Optimizing clinical risk stratification of localized prostate cancer.","authors":"Vincent J Gnanapragasam","doi":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001294","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001294","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To review the current risk and prognostic stratification systems in localised prostate cancer. To explore some of the most promising adjuncts to clinical models and what the evidence has shown regarding their value.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>There are many new biomarker-based models seeking to improve, optimise or replace clinical models. There are promising data on the value of MRI, radiomics, genomic classifiers and most recently artificial intelligence tools in refining stratification. Despite the extensive literature however, there remains uncertainty on where in pathways they can provide the most benefit and whether a biomarker is most useful for prognosis or predictive use. Comparisons studies have also often overlooked the fact that clinical models have themselves evolved and the context of the baseline used in biomarker studies that have shown superiority have to be considered.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>For new biomarkers to be included in stratification models, well designed prospective clinical trials are needed. Until then, there needs to be caution in interpretation of their use for day-to-day decision making. It is critical that users balance any purported incremental value against the performance of the latest clinical classification and multivariate models especially as the latter are cost free and widely available.</p>","PeriodicalId":11093,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Urology","volume":" ","pages":"426-431"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12147731/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143989019","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Measuring kidney stone volume - practical considerations and current evidence from the EAU endourology section. 测量肾结石体积-实际考虑和当前证据从EAU泌尿科。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-21 DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001271
Nico C Grossmann, Frederic Panthier, Luca Afferi, Panagiotis Kallidonis, Bhaskar K Somani

Purpose of review: This narrative review provides an overview of the use, differences, and clinical impact of current methods for kidney stone volume assessment.

Recent findings: The different approaches to volume measurement are based on noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT). While volume measurement using formulas is sufficient for smaller stones, it tends to overestimate volume for larger or irregularly shaped calculi. In contrast, software-based segmentation significantly improves accuracy and reproducibility, and artificial intelligence based volumetry additionally shows excellent agreement with reference standards while reducing observer variability and measurement time. Moreover, specific CT preparation protocols may further enhance image quality and thus improve measurement accuracy. Clinically, stone volume has proven to be a superior predictor of stone-related events during follow-up, spontaneous stone passage under conservative management, and stone-free rates after shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) and ureteroscopy (URS) compared to linear measurements.

Summary: Although manual measurement remains practical, its accuracy diminishes for complex or larger stones. Software-based segmentation and volumetry offer higher precision and efficiency but require established standards and broader access to dedicated software for routine clinical use.

综述目的:本文综述了肾结石体积评估的常用方法、差异和临床影响。最近的发现:不同的体积测量方法是基于非对比计算机断层扫描(NCCT)。虽然使用公式测量体积对于较小的结石是足够的,但对于较大或不规则形状的结石,它往往会高估体积。相比之下,基于软件的分割显著提高了准确性和再现性,而基于人工智能的体积法在减少观察者变异和测量时间的同时,也与参考标准表现出了良好的一致性。此外,特定的CT制备方案可以进一步提高图像质量,从而提高测量精度。临床上,与线性测量相比,结石体积已被证明是随访期间结石相关事件、保守治疗下自发结石排出以及冲击波碎石(SWL)和输尿管镜检查(URS)后结石清除率的优越预测指标。虽然人工测量仍然是实用的,但对于复杂或较大的石头,其精度会降低。基于软件的分割和体积测定提供了更高的精度和效率,但需要建立标准,并且需要更广泛地访问常规临床使用的专用软件。
{"title":"Measuring kidney stone volume - practical considerations and current evidence from the EAU endourology section.","authors":"Nico C Grossmann, Frederic Panthier, Luca Afferi, Panagiotis Kallidonis, Bhaskar K Somani","doi":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001271","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001271","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This narrative review provides an overview of the use, differences, and clinical impact of current methods for kidney stone volume assessment.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The different approaches to volume measurement are based on noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT). While volume measurement using formulas is sufficient for smaller stones, it tends to overestimate volume for larger or irregularly shaped calculi. In contrast, software-based segmentation significantly improves accuracy and reproducibility, and artificial intelligence based volumetry additionally shows excellent agreement with reference standards while reducing observer variability and measurement time. Moreover, specific CT preparation protocols may further enhance image quality and thus improve measurement accuracy. Clinically, stone volume has proven to be a superior predictor of stone-related events during follow-up, spontaneous stone passage under conservative management, and stone-free rates after shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) and ureteroscopy (URS) compared to linear measurements.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Although manual measurement remains practical, its accuracy diminishes for complex or larger stones. Software-based segmentation and volumetry offer higher precision and efficiency but require established standards and broader access to dedicated software for routine clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":11093,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Urology","volume":" ","pages":"323-330"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143491057","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Tissue-based gene expression testing in localized prostate cancer. 局部前列腺癌组织基因表达检测。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-02 DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001289
Nethusan Sivanesan, Gabriela M Diaz, Preston C Sprenkle

Purpose of review: This review presents the latest research in tissue-based genomic testing in localized prostate cancer (PCa). Here we explore the current and most commonly used genomic assays, their clinical applications, current challenges, and the future of genomic testing.

Recent findings: The management of localized PCa has evolved with the integration of genomic assays, offering a more personalized approach to risk stratification and treatment decision-making. Traditional clinical markers such as PSA levels and Gleason scores are often insufficient in capturing clinically significant cancer due to disease heterogeneity.

Summary: Tissue-based genomic tests, such as Decipher, Oncotype DX (GPS), and Prolaris, have emerged as prognostic tools for assessing tumor aggressiveness and metastatic potential. Current evidence supports Decipher's prognostic capabilities with studies demonstrating risk stratification while further research is needed for Prolaris and GPS to solidify their role in PCa risk stratification. These assays are intended to guide therapeutic choices, reducing overtreatment in low-risk cases while identifying high-risk patients who may benefit from more aggressive or definitive intervention. Despite growing clinical adoption, challenges such as cost, disparities in access, and variability in physician utilization still remain. Further prospective studies and randomized trials are required to optimize clinical implementation and validate the long-term impact of genomic testing on PCa outcomes.

综述目的:本文综述了局限性前列腺癌(PCa)基于组织的基因组检测的最新研究进展。在这里,我们将探讨当前和最常用的基因组分析,它们的临床应用,当前的挑战,以及基因组检测的未来。最近发现:随着基因组分析的整合,局部PCa的管理已经发展,为风险分层和治疗决策提供了更个性化的方法。由于疾病的异质性,传统的临床标志物如PSA水平和Gleason评分往往不足以捕获具有临床意义的癌症。摘要:基于组织的基因组检测,如Decipher、Oncotype DX (GPS)和Prolaris,已经成为评估肿瘤侵袭性和转移潜力的预后工具。目前的证据支持破译的预后能力,研究表明风险分层,但需要进一步的研究来巩固Prolaris和GPS在前列腺癌风险分层中的作用。这些试验旨在指导治疗选择,减少低风险病例的过度治疗,同时确定可能从更积极或更明确的干预中受益的高风险患者。尽管越来越多的临床应用,挑战,如成本,可及性的差异,并在医生使用的变化仍然存在。需要进一步的前瞻性研究和随机试验来优化临床实施,并验证基因组检测对PCa结果的长期影响。
{"title":"Tissue-based gene expression testing in localized prostate cancer.","authors":"Nethusan Sivanesan, Gabriela M Diaz, Preston C Sprenkle","doi":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001289","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001289","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review presents the latest research in tissue-based genomic testing in localized prostate cancer (PCa). Here we explore the current and most commonly used genomic assays, their clinical applications, current challenges, and the future of genomic testing.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The management of localized PCa has evolved with the integration of genomic assays, offering a more personalized approach to risk stratification and treatment decision-making. Traditional clinical markers such as PSA levels and Gleason scores are often insufficient in capturing clinically significant cancer due to disease heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Tissue-based genomic tests, such as Decipher, Oncotype DX (GPS), and Prolaris, have emerged as prognostic tools for assessing tumor aggressiveness and metastatic potential. Current evidence supports Decipher's prognostic capabilities with studies demonstrating risk stratification while further research is needed for Prolaris and GPS to solidify their role in PCa risk stratification. These assays are intended to guide therapeutic choices, reducing overtreatment in low-risk cases while identifying high-risk patients who may benefit from more aggressive or definitive intervention. Despite growing clinical adoption, challenges such as cost, disparities in access, and variability in physician utilization still remain. Further prospective studies and randomized trials are required to optimize clinical implementation and validate the long-term impact of genomic testing on PCa outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11093,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Urology","volume":" ","pages":"432-438"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143982096","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
En bloc resection of large bladder tumor: is it feasible and reasonable? 膀胱大肿瘤整体切除是否可行、合理?
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-20 DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001265
Diana Babaevskaya, Andrey Morozov, Eddie Fridman, Larisa Tsoy, Shahrokh F Shariat, Yossef Molchanov, Maxim Yakimov, Eva Compérat, Thomas R W Herrmann, Dmitry Enikeev

Purpose of review: Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) remains the basis of bladder tumor diagnosis and an effective means of treating nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). There are several limitations to this procedure: TURBT may cause free floating of malignant cells in the bladder and as a result re-implantation and early recurrence. Also, it does not allow the pathologist to define the correct spatial orientation of the specimen. The development of en bloc resection of bladder tumor (ERBT) has helped overcome the abovementioned key disadvantages of TURBT. However, many urologists doubt whether this approach is feasible for treating larger tumors.

Recent findings: In this review, it is shown that ERBT of large bladder tumor (>3 cm) is in fact a feasible and well tolerated method. Although there is a lack of comparative data proving its advantages over TURBT, en bloc in large tumor seems to result in better local cancer control (due to higher prevalence of detrusor specimen, lower need for re-TURBT), lower rate of relapse outside the resection area (due to lower risk of tumor cells circulation), and higher quality of pathology specimen.

Summary: Despite the skepticism of some surgeons, potential difficulties caused by larger tumor size may be overcome easily, and most agree that tumor size should not limit the implementation of the method in their daily practice.

综述目的:经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(turt)仍然是膀胱肿瘤诊断的基础,也是治疗非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)的有效手段。该手术有几个局限性:TURBT可能导致恶性细胞在膀胱内自由漂浮,导致再植入术和早期复发。此外,它不允许病理学家定义标本的正确空间方向。膀胱肿瘤整体切除(ERBT)的发展有助于克服TURBT的上述主要缺点。然而,许多泌尿科医生怀疑这种方法是否适用于治疗较大的肿瘤。最近的研究结果:本综述表明,ERBT治疗膀胱大肿瘤(bbb3cm)是一种可行且耐受性良好的方法。虽然缺乏对比数据证明其优于TURBT,但在大肿瘤中,整体切除似乎可以更好地局部控制肿瘤(因为逼尿肌标本的患病率更高,重新TURBT的需求更低),切除区域外复发率更低(因为肿瘤细胞循环风险更低),病理标本质量更高。总结:尽管一些外科医生持怀疑态度,但较大肿瘤大小带来的潜在困难可能很容易克服,大多数人认为肿瘤大小不应限制该方法在日常实践中的实施。
{"title":"En bloc resection of large bladder tumor: is it feasible and reasonable?","authors":"Diana Babaevskaya, Andrey Morozov, Eddie Fridman, Larisa Tsoy, Shahrokh F Shariat, Yossef Molchanov, Maxim Yakimov, Eva Compérat, Thomas R W Herrmann, Dmitry Enikeev","doi":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001265","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001265","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) remains the basis of bladder tumor diagnosis and an effective means of treating nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). There are several limitations to this procedure: TURBT may cause free floating of malignant cells in the bladder and as a result re-implantation and early recurrence. Also, it does not allow the pathologist to define the correct spatial orientation of the specimen. The development of en bloc resection of bladder tumor (ERBT) has helped overcome the abovementioned key disadvantages of TURBT. However, many urologists doubt whether this approach is feasible for treating larger tumors.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>In this review, it is shown that ERBT of large bladder tumor (>3 cm) is in fact a feasible and well tolerated method. Although there is a lack of comparative data proving its advantages over TURBT, en bloc in large tumor seems to result in better local cancer control (due to higher prevalence of detrusor specimen, lower need for re-TURBT), lower rate of relapse outside the resection area (due to lower risk of tumor cells circulation), and higher quality of pathology specimen.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Despite the skepticism of some surgeons, potential difficulties caused by larger tumor size may be overcome easily, and most agree that tumor size should not limit the implementation of the method in their daily practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":11093,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Urology","volume":" ","pages":"385-389"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143001822","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Obesity and BMI score as risk factors for urolithiasis: a systematic review over 30 years. 肥胖和BMI评分作为尿石症的危险因素:一项超过30年的系统回顾
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-05 DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001298
Megha Garg, Philip Joseph, Hans Johnson, Joseph Vayalil Lawrence, Bhaskar Somani, Bhavan Prasad Rai, Joe Philip

Purpose of review: To examine association between high BMI, obesity, and kidney stone disease (KSD). For this, systematic review of empirical studies was performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PRISMA) guidelines. Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, AMED, Emcare, Clinicaltrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP were searched for English language population-based studies published from inception to October 2024, including adults aged at least 18 years reporting on high BMI, obesity and overweight, with incidence of KSD.

Recent findings: The search identified 943 records, of which 15 relevant articles with 97 645 participants and 17 158 cases in total were enrolled in the narrative synthesis. A high heterogeneity and imbalance were observed among baseline distribution of cohorts in most studies. Thirteen studies provided comparative data on stone occurrence in obese and nonobese participants, and on per-patient analysis, three studies demonstrated a lower risk (RR < 1; 95% CI: 0.78-1.03), four studies a higher risk (RR>1; 95% CI: 0.77-2.32), and six studies depicted similar risk (RR = 1; 95% CI: 0.94-1.06) of stone occurrence between the two cohorts.

Summary: Evidence in this study suggests an association between high BMI, being overweight, obesity, and increased risk of developing kidney stone disease. In the context of optimizing treatment, KSD should be considered a metabolic disease, with treatment to include dietary regimes, exercise intervention alongside pharmacotherapy to help reduce renal stone disease recurrence risk, alongside managing associated chronic diseases such as hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and coronary artery disease.

综述的目的:探讨高BMI、肥胖和肾结石疾病(KSD)之间的关系。为此,使用系统评价和荟萃分析指南(PRISMA)指南对实证研究进行了系统评价。我们检索了Cochrane Library、EMBASE、MEDLINE、CINAHL、AMED、Emcare、Clinicaltrials.gov和WHO ICTRP从一开始到2024年10月发表的基于英语人群的研究,包括18岁以上报告高BMI、肥胖和超重以及KSD发病率的成年人。最新发现:检索确定了943条记录,其中15篇相关文章,97645名参与者,共计17158例病例被纳入叙事综合。在大多数研究中,在基线队列分布中观察到高度异质性和不平衡。13项研究提供了肥胖和非肥胖参与者结石发生的比较数据,在每例患者分析中,3项研究显示风险较低(RR 1;95% CI: 0.77-2.32), 6项研究描述了类似的风险(RR = 1;95% CI: 0.94-1.06)。摘要:本研究的证据表明,高BMI、超重、肥胖和患肾结石风险增加之间存在关联。在优化治疗的背景下,KSD应被视为一种代谢性疾病,治疗包括饮食方案、运动干预和药物治疗,以帮助降低肾结石疾病复发的风险,同时管理相关的慢性疾病,如高血压、2型糖尿病和冠状动脉疾病。
{"title":"Obesity and BMI score as risk factors for urolithiasis: a systematic review over 30 years.","authors":"Megha Garg, Philip Joseph, Hans Johnson, Joseph Vayalil Lawrence, Bhaskar Somani, Bhavan Prasad Rai, Joe Philip","doi":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001298","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001298","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To examine association between high BMI, obesity, and kidney stone disease (KSD). For this, systematic review of empirical studies was performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PRISMA) guidelines. Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, AMED, Emcare, Clinicaltrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP were searched for English language population-based studies published from inception to October 2024, including adults aged at least 18 years reporting on high BMI, obesity and overweight, with incidence of KSD.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The search identified 943 records, of which 15 relevant articles with 97 645 participants and 17 158 cases in total were enrolled in the narrative synthesis. A high heterogeneity and imbalance were observed among baseline distribution of cohorts in most studies. Thirteen studies provided comparative data on stone occurrence in obese and nonobese participants, and on per-patient analysis, three studies demonstrated a lower risk (RR < 1; 95% CI: 0.78-1.03), four studies a higher risk (RR>1; 95% CI: 0.77-2.32), and six studies depicted similar risk (RR = 1; 95% CI: 0.94-1.06) of stone occurrence between the two cohorts.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Evidence in this study suggests an association between high BMI, being overweight, obesity, and increased risk of developing kidney stone disease. In the context of optimizing treatment, KSD should be considered a metabolic disease, with treatment to include dietary regimes, exercise intervention alongside pharmacotherapy to help reduce renal stone disease recurrence risk, alongside managing associated chronic diseases such as hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and coronary artery disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":11093,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Urology","volume":" ","pages":"338-346"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143969355","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Salvage treatment of local recurrence following radical and partial nephrectomy. 根治性和部分性肾切除术后局部复发的抢救治疗。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-04 DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001286
Davide Perri, Carlotta Palumbo, Alessandro Volpe

Purpose of review: Standardized definition of local recurrence after radical or partial nephrectomy is still lacking. Due to its rarity, data on natural history, oncological outcomes and prognostic factors are scarce and specific treatment recommendations cannot be made.

Recent findings: Surgery is still the preferred option to treat a local recurrence of renal cell carcinoma, with favorable survival outcomes. However, nonsurgical options like thermal ablation techniques may represent a valid alternative mainly in patients where a nephron-sparing treatment is imperative. Systemic therapy seems to have a limited role in this setting.

Summary: According to available data, surgical excision of local recurrence should be attempted whenever feasible. Alternatively, thermal ablation represents a reliable and repeatable option after partial nephrectomy, with low complication rate and good oncologic outcomes. However, the evidence comes mainly from limited, heterogeneous case series. Further high-quality studies are needed to properly define the most appropriate for each individual patient.

综述目的:目前还缺乏对完全或部分肾切除术后局部复发的标准化定义。由于其罕见性,有关自然史、肿瘤结果和预后因素的数据很少,因此无法提出具体的治疗建议。最近的研究结果:手术仍然是治疗肾细胞癌局部复发的首选选择,具有良好的生存结果。然而,像热消融技术这样的非手术选择可能是一种有效的选择,主要是在需要保留肾单元治疗的患者中。在这种情况下,全身治疗的作用似乎有限。总结:根据现有资料,局部复发应尽可能尝试手术切除。另外,热消融是部分肾切除术后可靠且可重复的选择,并发症发生率低,肿瘤预后良好。然而,证据主要来自有限的异质病例系列。需要进一步的高质量研究来正确定义每个患者最合适的治疗方案。
{"title":"Salvage treatment of local recurrence following radical and partial nephrectomy.","authors":"Davide Perri, Carlotta Palumbo, Alessandro Volpe","doi":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001286","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001286","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Standardized definition of local recurrence after radical or partial nephrectomy is still lacking. Due to its rarity, data on natural history, oncological outcomes and prognostic factors are scarce and specific treatment recommendations cannot be made.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Surgery is still the preferred option to treat a local recurrence of renal cell carcinoma, with favorable survival outcomes. However, nonsurgical options like thermal ablation techniques may represent a valid alternative mainly in patients where a nephron-sparing treatment is imperative. Systemic therapy seems to have a limited role in this setting.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>According to available data, surgical excision of local recurrence should be attempted whenever feasible. Alternatively, thermal ablation represents a reliable and repeatable option after partial nephrectomy, with low complication rate and good oncologic outcomes. However, the evidence comes mainly from limited, heterogeneous case series. Further high-quality studies are needed to properly define the most appropriate for each individual patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":11093,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Urology","volume":" ","pages":"481-488"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143972328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Toxicities of radioligand and radioisotope therapy in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 放射配体和放射性同位素治疗前列腺癌的毒性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-05 DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001300
David Ventura, Benjamin Noto, Nadir Rodriguez Jauregui, Wolfgang Roll, Kambiz Rahbar

Purpose of review: This systematic review and meta-analysis investigate the toxicities of radioligand and radioisotope therapies - [ 177 Lu]lutetium-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) (Lu-PSMA), [ 225 Ac]actinium-PSMA (Ac-PSMA), and [ 223 Ra]radium-dichloride (223-Radium) - in metastatic prostate cancer. While previous studies have explored this topic, most failed to differentiate between treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and preexisting conditions, leading to inflated toxicity rates. By focusing exclusively on TEAEs, this study provides a more accurate and clinically relevant assessment.

Recent findings: This meta-analysis of 65 studies including 8706 patients identified haematotoxicities as the most frequent TEAEs across all therapies, affecting 10-20% of patients. Fatigue is a common nonhematologic adverse event in all treatments. Low grade xerostomia is specifically associated with Lu-PSMA and Ac-PSMA therapies, occurring in 30% and 84% of patients, respectively, while 223-Radium is uniquely linked to an increased fracture risk. Severe toxicities (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events ≥ 3) are rare across all therapies. By clearly distinguishing TEAEs from baseline conditions, this study addresses a gap in the existing literature.

Summary: Severe TEAEs are uncommon across Lu-PSMA, Ac-PSMA, and 223-Radium therapies. Still, monitoring and managing specific toxicities to optimize the safety and tolerability of these therapies in clinical practice is mandatory, especially concerning xerostomia in Ac-PSMA therapy.

综述目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析研究了放射性配体和放射性同位素治疗- [177Lu]镥-前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA) (Lu-PSMA), [225Ac]锕-PSMA (Ac-PSMA)和[223Ra]二氯化镭(223-镭)-在转移性前列腺癌中的毒性。虽然之前的研究已经探讨了这一主题,但大多数研究未能区分治疗后出现的不良事件(teae)和先前存在的疾病,导致毒性率过高。通过专门关注teae,本研究提供了更准确和临床相关的评估。最近的发现:这项荟萃分析了65项研究,包括8706名患者,发现血液毒性是所有治疗中最常见的teae,影响10-20%的患者。疲劳是所有治疗中常见的非血液学不良事件。低级别口干症与Lu-PSMA和Ac-PSMA治疗相关,分别发生在30%和84%的患者中,而223-Radium则与骨折风险增加有关。严重毒性(不良事件≥3的通用术语标准)在所有治疗中都很少见。通过明确区分teae与基线条件,本研究解决了现有文献中的空白。总结:严重teae在Lu-PSMA、Ac-PSMA和223-镭治疗中并不常见。然而,在临床实践中,监测和管理特定的毒性以优化这些疗法的安全性和耐受性是必要的,特别是在Ac-PSMA治疗中的口干症方面。
{"title":"Toxicities of radioligand and radioisotope therapy in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"David Ventura, Benjamin Noto, Nadir Rodriguez Jauregui, Wolfgang Roll, Kambiz Rahbar","doi":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001300","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001300","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis investigate the toxicities of radioligand and radioisotope therapies - [ 177 Lu]lutetium-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) (Lu-PSMA), [ 225 Ac]actinium-PSMA (Ac-PSMA), and [ 223 Ra]radium-dichloride (223-Radium) - in metastatic prostate cancer. While previous studies have explored this topic, most failed to differentiate between treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and preexisting conditions, leading to inflated toxicity rates. By focusing exclusively on TEAEs, this study provides a more accurate and clinically relevant assessment.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>This meta-analysis of 65 studies including 8706 patients identified haematotoxicities as the most frequent TEAEs across all therapies, affecting 10-20% of patients. Fatigue is a common nonhematologic adverse event in all treatments. Low grade xerostomia is specifically associated with Lu-PSMA and Ac-PSMA therapies, occurring in 30% and 84% of patients, respectively, while 223-Radium is uniquely linked to an increased fracture risk. Severe toxicities (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events ≥ 3) are rare across all therapies. By clearly distinguishing TEAEs from baseline conditions, this study addresses a gap in the existing literature.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Severe TEAEs are uncommon across Lu-PSMA, Ac-PSMA, and 223-Radium therapies. Still, monitoring and managing specific toxicities to optimize the safety and tolerability of these therapies in clinical practice is mandatory, especially concerning xerostomia in Ac-PSMA therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11093,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Urology","volume":" ","pages":"472-480"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143977015","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Current Opinion in Urology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1