{"title":"Addressing methodological considerations in the assessment of the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists on risk of diabetic eye complications.","authors":"Yi-Hsuan Tsai, Nefertiti OjiNjideka Hemphill, Tobias Kurth","doi":"10.1007/s00125-024-06300-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-024-06300-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11164,"journal":{"name":"Diabetologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142544321","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-30DOI: 10.1007/s00125-024-06290-6
Pernille E Hostrup, Tobias Schmidt, Simon B Hellsten, Rebekka H Gerwig, Joachim Størling, Jesper Johannesen, Karolina Sulek, Morten Hostrup, Henrik U Andersen, Karsten Buschard, Yasmin Hamid, Flemming Pociot
Aims/hypothesis: Fenofibrate, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha agonist, shows some promise in alleviating beta cell stress and preserving beta cell function in preclinical studies of type 1 diabetes. The aim of this phase 2, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, randomised clinical trial was to investigate the efficacy and safety of fenofibrate in adults and adolescents with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes.
Methods: We enrolled 58 individuals (aged 16 to 40 years old) with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes and randomised them to daily oral treatment with fenofibrate 160 mg or placebo for 52 weeks (in a block design with a block size of 4, assigned in a 1:1 ratio). Our primary outcome was change in beta cell function after 52 weeks of treatment, assessed by AUC for C-peptide levels following a 2 h mixed-meal tolerance test. Secondary outcomes included glycaemic control (assessed by HbA1c and continuous glucose monitoring), daily insulin use, and proinsulin/C-peptide (PI/C) ratio as a marker of beta cell stress. We assessed outcome measures before and after 4, 12, 26 and 52 weeks of treatment. Blinding was maintained for participants, their healthcare providers and all staff involved in handling outcome samples and assessment.
Results: The statistical analyses for the primary outcome included 56 participants (n=27 in the fenofibrate group, after two withdrawals, and n=29 in the placebo group). We found no significant differences between the groups in either 2 h C-peptide levels (mean difference of 0.08 nmol/l [95% CI -0.05, 0.23]), insulin use or glycaemic control after 52 weeks of treatment. On the contrary, the fenofibrate group showed a higher PI/C ratio at week 52 compared with placebo (mean difference of 0.024 [95% CI 0.000, 0.048], p<0.05). Blood lipidome analysis revealed that fenofibrate repressed pathways involved in sphingolipid metabolism and signalling at week 52 compared with placebo. The 52 week intervention evoked few adverse events and no serious adverse events. Follow-up in vitro experiments in human pancreatic islets demonstrated a stress-inducing effect of fenofibrate.
Conclusions/interpretation: Contrary to the beneficial effects of fenofibrate found in preclinical studies, this longitudinal, randomised, placebo-controlled trial does not support the use of fenofibrate for preserving beta cell function in individuals with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes.
Trial registration: EudraCT number: 2019-004434-41 FUNDING: This study was funded by the Sehested Hansens Foundation.
目的/假设:非诺贝特是一种过氧化物酶体增殖激活受体α激动剂,在1型糖尿病的临床前研究中,非诺贝特在缓解β细胞压力和保护β细胞功能方面显示出一定的前景。这项 2 期安慰剂对照双盲随机临床试验旨在研究非诺贝特对新诊断为 1 型糖尿病的成人和青少年患者的疗效和安全性:我们招募了58名新确诊的1型糖尿病患者(年龄在16至40岁之间),并随机安排他们每天口服非诺贝特160毫克或安慰剂,疗程为52周(按1:1的比例分配,每组4人)。我们的主要研究结果是治疗52周后β细胞功能的变化,通过2小时混合餐耐受试验后C肽水平的AUC进行评估。次要结果包括血糖控制(通过 HbA1c 和连续血糖监测评估)、每日胰岛素用量以及作为β细胞应激标志物的胰岛素/C肽(PI/C)比率。我们对治疗前后 4 周、12 周、26 周和 52 周的结果进行了评估。对参与者、他们的医疗服务提供者以及所有参与处理结果样本和评估的工作人员都进行了盲法处理:主要结果的统计分析包括56名参与者(非诺贝特组27人,其中2人退出;安慰剂组29人)。我们发现,治疗 52 周后,两组之间在 2 h C 肽水平(平均差异为 0.08 nmol/l [95% CI -0.05, 0.23])、胰岛素使用或血糖控制方面均无明显差异。相反,与安慰剂相比,非诺贝特组在第52周的PI/C比值更高(平均差异为0.024 [95% CI 0.000, 0.048], p结论/解释:与临床前研究中发现的非诺贝特的有益作用相反,这项纵向、随机、安慰剂对照试验并不支持使用非诺贝特来保护新诊断的1型糖尿病患者的β细胞功能:EudraCT number: 2019-004434-41 FUNDING:本研究由Sehested Hansens基金会资助。
{"title":"Effect of fenofibrate on residual beta cell function in adults and adolescents with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes: a randomised clinical trial.","authors":"Pernille E Hostrup, Tobias Schmidt, Simon B Hellsten, Rebekka H Gerwig, Joachim Størling, Jesper Johannesen, Karolina Sulek, Morten Hostrup, Henrik U Andersen, Karsten Buschard, Yasmin Hamid, Flemming Pociot","doi":"10.1007/s00125-024-06290-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-024-06290-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims/hypothesis: </strong>Fenofibrate, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha agonist, shows some promise in alleviating beta cell stress and preserving beta cell function in preclinical studies of type 1 diabetes. The aim of this phase 2, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, randomised clinical trial was to investigate the efficacy and safety of fenofibrate in adults and adolescents with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 58 individuals (aged 16 to 40 years old) with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes and randomised them to daily oral treatment with fenofibrate 160 mg or placebo for 52 weeks (in a block design with a block size of 4, assigned in a 1:1 ratio). Our primary outcome was change in beta cell function after 52 weeks of treatment, assessed by AUC for C-peptide levels following a 2 h mixed-meal tolerance test. Secondary outcomes included glycaemic control (assessed by HbA<sub>1c</sub> and continuous glucose monitoring), daily insulin use, and proinsulin/C-peptide (PI/C) ratio as a marker of beta cell stress. We assessed outcome measures before and after 4, 12, 26 and 52 weeks of treatment. Blinding was maintained for participants, their healthcare providers and all staff involved in handling outcome samples and assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The statistical analyses for the primary outcome included 56 participants (n=27 in the fenofibrate group, after two withdrawals, and n=29 in the placebo group). We found no significant differences between the groups in either 2 h C-peptide levels (mean difference of 0.08 nmol/l [95% CI -0.05, 0.23]), insulin use or glycaemic control after 52 weeks of treatment. On the contrary, the fenofibrate group showed a higher PI/C ratio at week 52 compared with placebo (mean difference of 0.024 [95% CI 0.000, 0.048], p<0.05). Blood lipidome analysis revealed that fenofibrate repressed pathways involved in sphingolipid metabolism and signalling at week 52 compared with placebo. The 52 week intervention evoked few adverse events and no serious adverse events. Follow-up in vitro experiments in human pancreatic islets demonstrated a stress-inducing effect of fenofibrate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/interpretation: </strong>Contrary to the beneficial effects of fenofibrate found in preclinical studies, this longitudinal, randomised, placebo-controlled trial does not support the use of fenofibrate for preserving beta cell function in individuals with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>EudraCT number: 2019-004434-41 FUNDING: This study was funded by the Sehested Hansens Foundation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11164,"journal":{"name":"Diabetologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142544323","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-30DOI: 10.1007/s00125-024-06310-5
Yu Kuei Lin, Wen Ye, Emily Hepworth, Annika Agni, Austin M Matus, Anneliese J Flatt, James A M Shaw, Michael R Rickels, Stephanie A Amiel, Jane Speight
Aims/hypothesis: We aimed to: (1) externally validate the five-item Hypoglycaemia Awareness Questionnaire (HypoA-Q) impaired awareness subscale (HypoA-Q IA); (2) examine how impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IAH) relates to the risk of severe hypoglycaemia and level 2 hypoglycaemia; and (3) identify factors associated with IAH.
Methods: Nationwide survey of T1D Exchange registrants was conducted to collect data on demographics, 6 month severe-hypoglycaemia history, hypoglycaemia awareness status (via HypoA-Q IA, the Gold instrument and the Clarke instrument) and continuous glucose monitor (CGM) measures. The Clarke hypoglycaemia awareness factor (Clarke-HAF) was calculated to exclude severe-hypoglycaemia history items. Analyses included Cronbach's α, Spearman correlations and logistic regression.
Results: Valid survey responses were collected from N=1580 adults with type 1 diabetes (median age, 44 years; 52% female participants; median HbA1c, 48 mmol/mol [6.5%]). Of these, 94% of participants were using CGMs and 69% were using hybrid closed-loop (HCL) systems; 30% had at least one severe-hypoglycaemia episode in the past 6 months. The HypoA-Q IA had satisfactory internal reliability (α=0.79) and construct validity. Higher HypoA-Q IA scores were independently associated with greater risk of severe hypoglycaemia (p<0.001), performing comparably to the Gold instrument and the Clarke-HAF instrument. HypoA-Q IA-determined IAH was independently associated with 88% higher odds of developing severe hypoglycaemia (p<0.001) and twofold higher odds for spending ≥1% of time in level 2 hypoglycaemia (p=0.011). Higher age and longer diabetes duration were associated with higher IAH risk (p<0.001). CGM and HCL use was associated with lower IAH risk (p<0.001).
Conclusions/interpretation: The HypoA-Q IA is a brief, valid and reliable tool for assessing IAH in today's technology-oriented era. IAH was independently associated with severe hypoglycaemia and level 2 hypoglycaemia in a cohort with high prevalence of advanced diabetes technology use and HbA1c within the recommended range. CGM and HCL use was related to lower IAH risk.
{"title":"Characterising impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia and associated risks through HypoA-Q: findings from a T1D Exchange cohort.","authors":"Yu Kuei Lin, Wen Ye, Emily Hepworth, Annika Agni, Austin M Matus, Anneliese J Flatt, James A M Shaw, Michael R Rickels, Stephanie A Amiel, Jane Speight","doi":"10.1007/s00125-024-06310-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-024-06310-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims/hypothesis: </strong>We aimed to: (1) externally validate the five-item Hypoglycaemia Awareness Questionnaire (HypoA-Q) impaired awareness subscale (HypoA-Q IA); (2) examine how impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IAH) relates to the risk of severe hypoglycaemia and level 2 hypoglycaemia; and (3) identify factors associated with IAH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nationwide survey of T1D Exchange registrants was conducted to collect data on demographics, 6 month severe-hypoglycaemia history, hypoglycaemia awareness status (via HypoA-Q IA, the Gold instrument and the Clarke instrument) and continuous glucose monitor (CGM) measures. The Clarke hypoglycaemia awareness factor (Clarke-HAF) was calculated to exclude severe-hypoglycaemia history items. Analyses included Cronbach's α, Spearman correlations and logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Valid survey responses were collected from N=1580 adults with type 1 diabetes (median age, 44 years; 52% female participants; median HbA<sub>1c</sub>, 48 mmol/mol [6.5%]). Of these, 94% of participants were using CGMs and 69% were using hybrid closed-loop (HCL) systems; 30% had at least one severe-hypoglycaemia episode in the past 6 months. The HypoA-Q IA had satisfactory internal reliability (α=0.79) and construct validity. Higher HypoA-Q IA scores were independently associated with greater risk of severe hypoglycaemia (p<0.001), performing comparably to the Gold instrument and the Clarke-HAF instrument. HypoA-Q IA-determined IAH was independently associated with 88% higher odds of developing severe hypoglycaemia (p<0.001) and twofold higher odds for spending ≥1% of time in level 2 hypoglycaemia (p=0.011). Higher age and longer diabetes duration were associated with higher IAH risk (p<0.001). CGM and HCL use was associated with lower IAH risk (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions/interpretation: </strong>The HypoA-Q IA is a brief, valid and reliable tool for assessing IAH in today's technology-oriented era. IAH was independently associated with severe hypoglycaemia and level 2 hypoglycaemia in a cohort with high prevalence of advanced diabetes technology use and HbA<sub>1c</sub> within the recommended range. CGM and HCL use was related to lower IAH risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":11164,"journal":{"name":"Diabetologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142544322","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-29DOI: 10.1007/s00125-024-06311-4
Philip J G M Voets
{"title":"A modified total body water deficit formula for use in diabetes care.","authors":"Philip J G M Voets","doi":"10.1007/s00125-024-06311-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-024-06311-4","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11164,"journal":{"name":"Diabetologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142544320","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-29DOI: 10.1007/s00125-024-06298-y
Stephanie J Hanna, Rachel H Bonami, Brian Corrie, Monica Westley, Amanda L Posgai, Eline T Luning Prak, Felix Breden, Aaron W Michels, Todd M Brusko
Human molecular genetics has brought incredible insights into the variants that confer risk for the development of tissue-specific autoimmune diseases, including type 1 diabetes. The hallmark cell-mediated immune destruction that is characteristic of type 1 diabetes is closely linked with risk conferred by the HLA class II gene locus, in combination with a broad array of additional candidate genes influencing islet-resident beta cells within the pancreas, as well as function, phenotype and trafficking of immune cells to tissues. In addition to the well-studied germline SNP variants, there are critical contributions conferred by T cell receptor (TCR) and B cell receptor (BCR) genes that undergo somatic recombination to yield the Adaptive Immune Receptor Repertoire (AIRR) responsible for autoimmunity in type 1 diabetes. We therefore created the T1D TCR/BCR Repository (The Type 1 Diabetes T Cell Receptor and B Cell Receptor Repository) to study these highly variable and dynamic gene rearrangements. In addition to processed TCR and BCR sequences, the T1D TCR/BCR Repository includes detailed metadata (e.g. participant demographics, disease-associated parameters and tissue type). We introduce the Type 1 Diabetes AIRR Consortium goals and outline methods to use and deposit data to this comprehensive repository. Our ultimate goal is to facilitate research community access to rich, carefully annotated immune AIRR datasets to enable new scientific inquiry and insight into the natural history and pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes.
人类分子遗传学使人们对组织特异性自身免疫疾病(包括 1 型糖尿病)的发病风险变异有了惊人的了解。1 型糖尿病所特有的细胞介导的免疫破坏与 HLA II 类基因位点所带来的风险密切相关,同时还与影响胰岛内驻留的 beta 细胞以及免疫细胞的功能、表型和向组织的迁移的大量其他候选基因有关。除了研究得很清楚的种系 SNP 变异外,T 细胞受体 (TCR) 和 B 细胞受体 (BCR) 基因也有重要作用,它们经过体细胞重组产生了适应性免疫受体汇辑 (AIRR),导致了 1 型糖尿病的自身免疫。因此,我们创建了 T1D TCR/BCR 资源库(1 型糖尿病 T 细胞受体和 B 细胞受体资源库),以研究这些高度可变和动态的基因重排。除了处理过的 TCR 和 BCR 序列外,T1D TCR/BCR 资源库还包括详细的元数据(如参与者人口统计数据、疾病相关参数和组织类型)。我们介绍了 1 型糖尿病 AIRR 联合会的目标,并概述了使用和将数据存入这个综合资料库的方法。我们的最终目标是促进研究界访问丰富的、经过仔细注释的免疫 AIRR 数据集,以便对 1 型糖尿病的自然史和发病机制进行新的科学探索和深入了解。
{"title":"The Type 1 Diabetes T Cell Receptor and B Cell Receptor Repository in the AIRR Data Commons: a practical guide for access, use and contributions through the Type 1 Diabetes AIRR Consortium.","authors":"Stephanie J Hanna, Rachel H Bonami, Brian Corrie, Monica Westley, Amanda L Posgai, Eline T Luning Prak, Felix Breden, Aaron W Michels, Todd M Brusko","doi":"10.1007/s00125-024-06298-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-024-06298-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human molecular genetics has brought incredible insights into the variants that confer risk for the development of tissue-specific autoimmune diseases, including type 1 diabetes. The hallmark cell-mediated immune destruction that is characteristic of type 1 diabetes is closely linked with risk conferred by the HLA class II gene locus, in combination with a broad array of additional candidate genes influencing islet-resident beta cells within the pancreas, as well as function, phenotype and trafficking of immune cells to tissues. In addition to the well-studied germline SNP variants, there are critical contributions conferred by T cell receptor (TCR) and B cell receptor (BCR) genes that undergo somatic recombination to yield the Adaptive Immune Receptor Repertoire (AIRR) responsible for autoimmunity in type 1 diabetes. We therefore created the T1D TCR/BCR Repository (The Type 1 Diabetes T Cell Receptor and B Cell Receptor Repository) to study these highly variable and dynamic gene rearrangements. In addition to processed TCR and BCR sequences, the T1D TCR/BCR Repository includes detailed metadata (e.g. participant demographics, disease-associated parameters and tissue type). We introduce the Type 1 Diabetes AIRR Consortium goals and outline methods to use and deposit data to this comprehensive repository. Our ultimate goal is to facilitate research community access to rich, carefully annotated immune AIRR datasets to enable new scientific inquiry and insight into the natural history and pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11164,"journal":{"name":"Diabetologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142521337","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-28DOI: 10.1007/s00125-024-06303-4
Cornelia Santoso, Yuxia Wei, Emma Ahlqvist, Tiinamaija Tuomi, Sofia Carlsson
Aims/hypothesis: The aim of this study was to clarify the impact of autoimmune disease (AD) comorbidity on the risk and prognosis of latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA).
Methods: We used data from a Swedish study comprising newly diagnosed cases of LADA (n=586, stratified into LADAlow and LADAhigh by autoantibody levels), type 2 diabetes (n=2003) and matched control participants (n=2355). Information on 33 ADs and diabetic retinopathy was obtained by linkage to regional and national registers. We estimated the ORs for LADA and type 2 diabetes in relation to ADs before diabetes diagnosis, and the HRs for diabetic retinopathy after diabetes diagnosis. We performed functional pathway analyses to explore biological mechanisms driving the associations.
Results: Individuals with ADs exhibit an increased susceptibility to LADA (OR 1.70; 95% CI 1.36, 2.13), particularly those with thyroid dysfunction (OR 1.88; 95% CI 1.38, 2.56), inflammatory bowel disease (OR 1.78; 95% CI 1.00, 3.16) or vitiligo (OR 3.91; 95% CI 1.93, 7.94), with stronger associations being observed for the LADAhigh phenotype. Only psoriasis was linked to type 2 diabetes (OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.08, 1.99). The biological pathways shared by LADA and ADs revolved around immune responses, including innate and adaptive immune pathways. The HRs for diabetic retinopathy in LADA patients with and without AD vs those with type 2 diabetes were 2.11 (95% CI 1.34, 3.32) and 1.68 (95% CI 1.15, 2.45), respectively.
Conclusions/interpretation: We confirm that several common ADs confer an excess risk of LADA, especially LADA with higher GADA levels, but having such a comorbidity does not appear to affect the risk of diabetic retinopathy.
目的/假设:本研究旨在阐明自身免疫性疾病(AD)合并症对成人潜伏自身免疫性糖尿病(LADA)风险和预后的影响:我们使用了一项瑞典研究的数据,其中包括新诊断的LADA病例(人数=586,按自身抗体水平分为LADA低和LADA高)、2型糖尿病(人数=2003)和匹配的对照参与者(人数=2355)。通过与地区和国家登记簿的链接,我们获得了 33 种 AD 和糖尿病视网膜病变的信息。我们估算了糖尿病确诊前 LADA 和 2 型糖尿病与 ADs 的 ORs,以及糖尿病确诊后糖尿病视网膜病变的 HRs。我们进行了功能通路分析,以探究驱动这些关联的生物学机制:结果:ADs 患者对 LADA 的易感性增加(OR 1.70;95% CI 1.36,2.13),尤其是甲状腺功能障碍(OR 1.88;95% CI 1.38,2.56)、炎症性肠病(OR 1.78;95% CI 1.00,3.16)或白癜风(OR 3.91;95% CI 1.93,7.94)患者,LADA 高表型患者的相关性更强。只有银屑病与 2 型糖尿病有关(OR 1.47;95% CI 1.08,1.99)。LADA 和 ADs 的共同生物通路围绕着免疫反应,包括先天性免疫通路和适应性免疫通路。有AD和无AD的LADA患者与2型糖尿病患者相比,糖尿病视网膜病变的HRs分别为2.11(95% CI 1.34,3.32)和1.68(95% CI 1.15,2.45):我们证实,几种常见的AD会增加罹患LADA的风险,尤其是GADA水平较高的LADA,但这种合并症似乎不会影响糖尿病视网膜病变的风险。
{"title":"Autoimmune diseases and the risk and prognosis of latent autoimmune diabetes in adults.","authors":"Cornelia Santoso, Yuxia Wei, Emma Ahlqvist, Tiinamaija Tuomi, Sofia Carlsson","doi":"10.1007/s00125-024-06303-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-024-06303-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims/hypothesis: </strong>The aim of this study was to clarify the impact of autoimmune disease (AD) comorbidity on the risk and prognosis of latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from a Swedish study comprising newly diagnosed cases of LADA (n=586, stratified into LADA<sup>low</sup> and LADA<sup>high</sup> by autoantibody levels), type 2 diabetes (n=2003) and matched control participants (n=2355). Information on 33 ADs and diabetic retinopathy was obtained by linkage to regional and national registers. We estimated the ORs for LADA and type 2 diabetes in relation to ADs before diabetes diagnosis, and the HRs for diabetic retinopathy after diabetes diagnosis. We performed functional pathway analyses to explore biological mechanisms driving the associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals with ADs exhibit an increased susceptibility to LADA (OR 1.70; 95% CI 1.36, 2.13), particularly those with thyroid dysfunction (OR 1.88; 95% CI 1.38, 2.56), inflammatory bowel disease (OR 1.78; 95% CI 1.00, 3.16) or vitiligo (OR 3.91; 95% CI 1.93, 7.94), with stronger associations being observed for the LADA<sup>high</sup> phenotype. Only psoriasis was linked to type 2 diabetes (OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.08, 1.99). The biological pathways shared by LADA and ADs revolved around immune responses, including innate and adaptive immune pathways. The HRs for diabetic retinopathy in LADA patients with and without AD vs those with type 2 diabetes were 2.11 (95% CI 1.34, 3.32) and 1.68 (95% CI 1.15, 2.45), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/interpretation: </strong>We confirm that several common ADs confer an excess risk of LADA, especially LADA with higher GADA levels, but having such a comorbidity does not appear to affect the risk of diabetic retinopathy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11164,"journal":{"name":"Diabetologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142521330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-28DOI: 10.1007/s00125-024-06302-5
Jessica Edstorp, Marios Rossides, Emma Ahlqvist, Lars Alfredsson, Johan Askling, Daniela Di Giuseppe, Valdemar Grill, Elin P Sorgjerd, Tiinamaija Tuomi, Bjørn O Åsvold, Sofia Carlsson
Aims/hypothesis: Some studies find an increased risk of type 1 diabetes in children exposed to antibiotics. We investigated if exposure to antibiotics increases the risk of latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) and type 2 diabetes.
Methods: We used data from a Swedish case-control study (Epidemiological Study of Risk Factors for LADA and Type 2 Diabetes [ESTRID]: LADA, n=597; type 2 diabetes, n=2065; control participants matched on participation time, n=2386) and a case-control study nested within the Norwegian Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT) (n=82/1279/2050). Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) codes indicating antibiotic dispensations were retrieved from the Swedish National Prescribed Drug Register and Norwegian Prescription Database. Multivariable adjusted ORs with 95% CIs were estimated by conditional logistic regression and pooled using fixed-effects inverse-variance weighting.
Results: We observed no increased risk of LADA with exposure to antibiotics up to 1 year (ORpooled 1.15, 95% CI 0.93, 1.41) or 1-5 years (ORpooled 0.98, 95% CI 0.80, 1.20) prior to diagnosis/matching for one or more vs no dispensation of any type of antibiotic. An increased risk was observed for one or more vs no dispensations of narrow-spectrum antibiotics, but not broad-spectrum antibiotics, 6-10 years prior to LADA diagnosis (ORpooled 1.39, 95% CI 1.01, 1.91), which was driven by the Swedish data. There was little evidence of an increased risk of type 2 diabetes associated with antibiotic exposure 1-10 years prior to diagnosis.
Conclusions/interpretation: We found no evidence that exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics up to 10 years prior to diagnosis increases the risk of LADA. There was some indication of increased LADA risk with exposure to narrow-spectrum antibiotics, which warrants further investigation.
目的/假设:一些研究发现,接触抗生素的儿童罹患1型糖尿病的风险增加。我们研究了接触抗生素是否会增加成人潜伏性自身免疫性糖尿病(LADA)和2型糖尿病的风险:我们使用了瑞典病例对照研究(LADA 和 2 型糖尿病风险因素流行病学研究 [ESTRID])的数据:LADA,n=597;2型糖尿病,n=2065;根据参与时间匹配的对照参与者,n=2386)和嵌套在挪威特伦德拉格健康研究(HUNT)中的病例对照研究(n=82/1279/2050)的数据。从瑞典国家处方药登记册和挪威处方数据库中检索了表示抗生素配药情况的解剖治疗化学(ATC)代码。通过条件逻辑回归估算了多变量调整后的ORs及95% CI,并使用固定效应逆方差加权法进行了汇总:我们观察到,在诊断/配型前 1 年内(ORpooled 1.15,95% CI 0.93,1.41)或 1-5 年内(ORpooled 0.98,95% CI 0.80,1.20)接触过一种或多种抗生素与未接触过任何类型的抗生素相比,LADA 风险均未增加。在 LADA 诊断前 6-10 年使用过一次或多次窄谱抗生素而未使用过广谱抗生素的风险增加(ORpooled 1.39,95% CI 1.01,1.91),这是由于瑞典的数据所致。几乎没有证据表明2型糖尿病风险的增加与诊断前1-10年的抗生素暴露有关:我们没有发现证据表明在确诊前10年内接触广谱抗生素会增加LADA的风险。有迹象表明,接触窄谱抗生素会增加 LADA 风险,这值得进一步研究。
{"title":"Exposure to antibiotics and risk of latent autoimmune diabetes in adults and type 2 diabetes: results from a Swedish case-control study (ESTRID) and the Norwegian HUNT study.","authors":"Jessica Edstorp, Marios Rossides, Emma Ahlqvist, Lars Alfredsson, Johan Askling, Daniela Di Giuseppe, Valdemar Grill, Elin P Sorgjerd, Tiinamaija Tuomi, Bjørn O Åsvold, Sofia Carlsson","doi":"10.1007/s00125-024-06302-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-024-06302-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims/hypothesis: </strong>Some studies find an increased risk of type 1 diabetes in children exposed to antibiotics. We investigated if exposure to antibiotics increases the risk of latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) and type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from a Swedish case-control study (Epidemiological Study of Risk Factors for LADA and Type 2 Diabetes [ESTRID]: LADA, n=597; type 2 diabetes, n=2065; control participants matched on participation time, n=2386) and a case-control study nested within the Norwegian Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT) (n=82/1279/2050). Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) codes indicating antibiotic dispensations were retrieved from the Swedish National Prescribed Drug Register and Norwegian Prescription Database. Multivariable adjusted ORs with 95% CIs were estimated by conditional logistic regression and pooled using fixed-effects inverse-variance weighting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed no increased risk of LADA with exposure to antibiotics up to 1 year (OR<sub>pooled</sub> 1.15, 95% CI 0.93, 1.41) or 1-5 years (OR<sub>pooled</sub> 0.98, 95% CI 0.80, 1.20) prior to diagnosis/matching for one or more vs no dispensation of any type of antibiotic. An increased risk was observed for one or more vs no dispensations of narrow-spectrum antibiotics, but not broad-spectrum antibiotics, 6-10 years prior to LADA diagnosis (OR<sub>pooled</sub> 1.39, 95% CI 1.01, 1.91), which was driven by the Swedish data. There was little evidence of an increased risk of type 2 diabetes associated with antibiotic exposure 1-10 years prior to diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/interpretation: </strong>We found no evidence that exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics up to 10 years prior to diagnosis increases the risk of LADA. There was some indication of increased LADA risk with exposure to narrow-spectrum antibiotics, which warrants further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11164,"journal":{"name":"Diabetologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142521331","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-26DOI: 10.1007/s00125-024-06289-z
David Nathanson, Katarina Eeg-Olofsson, Tim Spelman, Erik Bülow, Mattias Kyhlstedt, Fleur Levrat-Guillen, Jan Bolinder
Aims/hypothesis
We assessed the impact of initiating intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) compared with capillary blood glucose monitoring (BGM) on HbA1c levels and hospitalisations for diabetes-related complications in adults with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes in Sweden.
Methods
This retrospective comparative cohort study included adults with type 2 diabetes who had a National Diabetes Register initiation date for isCGM after 1 June 2017. Prescribed Drug Register records identified subgroups treated with multiple daily insulin injections (T2D-MDI) or basal insulin (T2D-B), with or without other glucose-lowering drugs. The National Patient Register provided data on hospitalisation rates.
Results
We identified 2876 adults in the T2D-MDI group and 2292 in the T2D-B group with an isCGM index date after 1 June 2017, matched with 33,584 and 43,424 BGM control participants, respectively. The baseline-adjusted difference in the change in mean HbA1c for isCGM users vs BGM control participants in the T2D-MDI cohort was −3.7 mmol/mol (−0.34%) at 6 months, and this was maintained at 24 months. The baseline-adjusted difference in the change in HbA1c for isCGM users vs BGM control participants in the T2D-B cohort was −3.5 mmol/mol (−0.32%) at 6 months, and this was also maintained at 24 months. Compared with BGM control participants, isCGM users in the T2D-MDI cohort had a significantly lower RR of admission for severe hypoglycaemia (0.51; 95% CI 0.27, 0.95), stroke (0.54; 95% CI 0.39, 0.73), acute non-fatal myocardial infarction (0.75; 95% CI 0.57, 0.99) or hospitalisation for any reason (0.84; 95% CI 0.77, 0.90). isCGM users in the T2D-B cohort had a lower RR of admission for heart failure (0.63; 95% CI 0.46, 0.87) or hospitalisation for any reason (0.76; 95% CI 0.69, 0.84).
Conclusions/interpretation
This study shows that Swedish adults with type 2 diabetes on insulin who are using isCGM have a significantly reduced HbA1c and fewer hospital admissions for diabetes-related complications compared with BGM control participants.