Pub Date : 2025-11-14DOI: 10.1007/s10633-025-10058-7
George N Thomas, Sze Chuan Ong, Hwei Wuen Chan, Melissa Tien, Philip F Stanley, Adrian H C Koh, Graham E Holder
Purpose: To report a series of Asian patients with unilateral pigmentary retinopathy.
Methods: Retrospective case series. Clinical features, fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence imaging (FAF), visual fields, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and electrophysiology were reviewed in 6 patients referred to two Singaporean inherited retinal disease clinics with suspected "unilateral retinitis pigmentosa".
Results: Four patients presented with unilateral blurring of vision; 2 were asymptomatic. All index eyes and one fellow eye had FAF abnormalities consistent with visible fundus abnormalities. Visual fields were abnormal in all index and 2 fellow eyes. Macular OCT showed disruption of outer retinal layers in all index eyes and 1 fellow eye. Five index eyes had abnormal rod and cone full field electroretinogram (ERG) amplitudes, while one index eye had localized rod ERG amplitude abnormality. Two index eyes had 30 Hz flicker peak time delay. Three index eyes displayed cone greater than rod system involvement. Pattern electroretinography (PERG) demonstrated macular dysfunction in 5 index eyes and 2 fellow eyes. One case was diagnosed with possible RP. Alternative diagnoses (trauma and autoimmune retinopathy) were ascertained in 4 cases.
Conclusion: Electrophysiology was more sensitive than clinical examination and imaging in detecting retinopathy or maculopathy. In only 1 of 6 patients referred for possible unilateral RP was that diagnosis sustainable; four could be attributed to an identified acquired etiology. Although the diagnosis was unclear in the remaining case, the clinical findings and investigations were not compatible with an inherited disorder.
{"title":"Unilateral pigmentary retinopathy in an Asian population.","authors":"George N Thomas, Sze Chuan Ong, Hwei Wuen Chan, Melissa Tien, Philip F Stanley, Adrian H C Koh, Graham E Holder","doi":"10.1007/s10633-025-10058-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-025-10058-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To report a series of Asian patients with unilateral pigmentary retinopathy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective case series. Clinical features, fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence imaging (FAF), visual fields, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and electrophysiology were reviewed in 6 patients referred to two Singaporean inherited retinal disease clinics with suspected \"unilateral retinitis pigmentosa\".</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four patients presented with unilateral blurring of vision; 2 were asymptomatic. All index eyes and one fellow eye had FAF abnormalities consistent with visible fundus abnormalities. Visual fields were abnormal in all index and 2 fellow eyes. Macular OCT showed disruption of outer retinal layers in all index eyes and 1 fellow eye. Five index eyes had abnormal rod and cone full field electroretinogram (ERG) amplitudes, while one index eye had localized rod ERG amplitude abnormality. Two index eyes had 30 Hz flicker peak time delay. Three index eyes displayed cone greater than rod system involvement. Pattern electroretinography (PERG) demonstrated macular dysfunction in 5 index eyes and 2 fellow eyes. One case was diagnosed with possible RP. Alternative diagnoses (trauma and autoimmune retinopathy) were ascertained in 4 cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Electrophysiology was more sensitive than clinical examination and imaging in detecting retinopathy or maculopathy. In only 1 of 6 patients referred for possible unilateral RP was that diagnosis sustainable; four could be attributed to an identified acquired etiology. Although the diagnosis was unclear in the remaining case, the clinical findings and investigations were not compatible with an inherited disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":11207,"journal":{"name":"Documenta Ophthalmologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145522544","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate whether Posner-Schlossman Syndrome (PSS), is strictly unilateral, to determine the presence of subclinical abnormalities in the contralateral eye, and to analyze the relationship between retinal function and the corneal sub-basal nerve in such patients.
Methods: The patients included in this study were diagnosed with PSS. 14 patients with PSS and 21 healthy controls were recruited for this study. Both eyes of the patients and one eye of the healthy controls underwent full-field electroretinography (ffERG) examination. Additionally, in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) was performed on the affected eyes of the patients to assess the status of their corneal sub-basal nerve.
Results: Compared with healthy controls, patients with PSS exhibited significantly reduced amplitudes and abnormal peak times in dark-adapted oscillatory potentials, light-adapted 3 ERG, and light-adapted 30 Hz flicker ERG in both eyes. However, no statistically significant differences were observed in dark-adapted 0.01 ERG, dark-adapted 3.0 ERG, and dark-adapted 10.0 ERG. All ffERG parameters in the affected eyes of patients showed no significant correlations with the total nerve length of corneal sub-basal nerve.
Conclusions: The results demonstrate that PSS is not a strictly unilateral disease. Through ffERG, it is possible to identify cases of bilateral involvement that are difficult to detect, thereby enabling early intervention against potential disease progression.
{"title":"Bilateral retinal dysfunction in Posner-Schlossman syndrome: subclinical abnormalities revealed by full-field electroretinography.","authors":"Xin Ge, Jingyi Li, Xin Xie, Xiaojun He, Zhaoxiang Lu, Yun Feng","doi":"10.1007/s10633-025-10063-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-025-10063-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate whether Posner-Schlossman Syndrome (PSS), is strictly unilateral, to determine the presence of subclinical abnormalities in the contralateral eye, and to analyze the relationship between retinal function and the corneal sub-basal nerve in such patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The patients included in this study were diagnosed with PSS. 14 patients with PSS and 21 healthy controls were recruited for this study. Both eyes of the patients and one eye of the healthy controls underwent full-field electroretinography (ffERG) examination. Additionally, in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) was performed on the affected eyes of the patients to assess the status of their corneal sub-basal nerve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with healthy controls, patients with PSS exhibited significantly reduced amplitudes and abnormal peak times in dark-adapted oscillatory potentials, light-adapted 3 ERG, and light-adapted 30 Hz flicker ERG in both eyes. However, no statistically significant differences were observed in dark-adapted 0.01 ERG, dark-adapted 3.0 ERG, and dark-adapted 10.0 ERG. All ffERG parameters in the affected eyes of patients showed no significant correlations with the total nerve length of corneal sub-basal nerve.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results demonstrate that PSS is not a strictly unilateral disease. Through ffERG, it is possible to identify cases of bilateral involvement that are difficult to detect, thereby enabling early intervention against potential disease progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":11207,"journal":{"name":"Documenta Ophthalmologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145523108","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-12DOI: 10.1007/s10633-025-10064-9
Anna Polosa, Melissa Lu, Allison L Dorfman, Marisse Masis-Solano, Santiago Costantino, Cynthia X Qian
Purpose: To assess functional and anatomical impairments in pediatric patients and their affected adult family members with juvenile-onset Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD).
Methods: Fifteen genetically confirmed BVMD patients (10 pediatric and 5 adults) underwent a comprehensive ophthalmic examination with multimodal imaging and electrophysiological testing. We quantified BVMD lesion volumes using sequential spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT) scans, facilitating correlation with clinical parameters and electroretinogram (ERG) findings.
Results: Children presented less advanced stages of BVMD than adults, had better visual acuity [Log MAR 0.13 ± 0.17] than adults [Log MAR 0.91 ± 0.52, p < 0.001], and displayed lower lesion volumes [0.93 ± 0.71 mm3] compared to adults [1.80 ± 0.79 mm3, p < 0.001]. Interestingly, in 3 eyes in Stage 3 disease (pseudohypopyon stage), despite a high lesion volume (1.74 ± 0.66 mm3), a good visual acuity was still observed (LogMAR of 0.00 in all 3 eyes). Multifocal ERG (mfERG) revealed macular dysfunction in all patients mostly pronounced in the 3 central rings [% of P1 reduction from control in Ring 1 in children and adults: 51% and 51%, Ring 2: 17% and 36% and Ring 3: 8% and 15%, respectively]. Furthermore, higher lesion volumes showed more affected mfERG responses. Full-field flash ERGs were normal in children, while reduced amplitudes and delayed responses were observed in some adults.
Conclusion: While juvenile presentations of BVMD are less severe and more circumscribed, adult presentations demonstrate more widespread functional abnormalities in both amplitude and implicit times correlated with anatomical progression and clinical progression. Interestingly, mfERG responses in children with 20/20 vision also revealed functional impairment, correlating more strongly with the degree of vitelliform liquefaction on OCT than with visual acuity. Our findings suggest that mfERG may serve as an early, reliable indicator of functional defects in BVMD.
目的:评估儿童期起病的最佳黄斑营养不良症(BVMD)患儿及其成年家庭成员的功能和解剖损伤。方法:15例遗传确诊的BVMD患者(10例儿童,5例成人)接受了综合眼科检查,包括多模态成像和电生理检查。我们使用序列谱域OCT (SD-OCT)扫描量化BVMD病变体积,促进与临床参数和视网膜电图(ERG)结果的关联。结果:儿童BVMD的进展期少于成人,视力[Log MAR 0.13±0.17]优于成人[Log MAR 0.91±0.52,p 3]优于成人[Log MAR 0.80±0.79 mm3, p 3],仍保持良好的视力(3眼LogMAR均为0.00)。多焦点ERG (mfERG)显示,所有患者的黄斑功能障碍主要表现在3个中心环[环1中P1比对照组减少%,儿童和成人分别为51%和51%,环2分别为17%和36%,环3分别为8%和15%]。此外,病灶体积越大,mfERG反应受影响越大。在儿童中,全视场闪光电图是正常的,而在一些成年人中观察到振幅降低和反应延迟。结论:虽然BVMD的青少年表现不那么严重,更有局限性,但成人表现在与解剖进展和临床进展相关的振幅和隐性时间上表现出更广泛的功能异常。有趣的是,20/20视力儿童的mfERG反应也显示出功能障碍,与OCT上卵黄液化程度的相关性比与视力的相关性更强。我们的研究结果表明,mfERG可以作为BVMD功能缺陷的早期可靠指标。
{"title":"Characterization of functional and structural impairments in best vitelliform macular dystrophy using visual electrophysiology and optical coherence tomography in pediatric and adult patients.","authors":"Anna Polosa, Melissa Lu, Allison L Dorfman, Marisse Masis-Solano, Santiago Costantino, Cynthia X Qian","doi":"10.1007/s10633-025-10064-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-025-10064-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess functional and anatomical impairments in pediatric patients and their affected adult family members with juvenile-onset Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen genetically confirmed BVMD patients (10 pediatric and 5 adults) underwent a comprehensive ophthalmic examination with multimodal imaging and electrophysiological testing. We quantified BVMD lesion volumes using sequential spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT) scans, facilitating correlation with clinical parameters and electroretinogram (ERG) findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Children presented less advanced stages of BVMD than adults, had better visual acuity [Log MAR 0.13 ± 0.17] than adults [Log MAR 0.91 ± 0.52, p < 0.001], and displayed lower lesion volumes [0.93 ± 0.71 mm<sup>3</sup>] compared to adults [1.80 ± 0.79 mm<sup>3</sup>, p < 0.001]. Interestingly, in 3 eyes in Stage 3 disease (pseudohypopyon stage), despite a high lesion volume (1.74 ± 0.66 mm<sup>3</sup>), a good visual acuity was still observed (LogMAR of 0.00 in all 3 eyes). Multifocal ERG (mfERG) revealed macular dysfunction in all patients mostly pronounced in the 3 central rings [% of P1 reduction from control in Ring 1 in children and adults: 51% and 51%, Ring 2: 17% and 36% and Ring 3: 8% and 15%, respectively]. Furthermore, higher lesion volumes showed more affected mfERG responses. Full-field flash ERGs were normal in children, while reduced amplitudes and delayed responses were observed in some adults.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While juvenile presentations of BVMD are less severe and more circumscribed, adult presentations demonstrate more widespread functional abnormalities in both amplitude and implicit times correlated with anatomical progression and clinical progression. Interestingly, mfERG responses in children with 20/20 vision also revealed functional impairment, correlating more strongly with the degree of vitelliform liquefaction on OCT than with visual acuity. Our findings suggest that mfERG may serve as an early, reliable indicator of functional defects in BVMD.</p>","PeriodicalId":11207,"journal":{"name":"Documenta Ophthalmologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145494914","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-10DOI: 10.1007/s10633-025-10061-y
Marie Chutná, Jan Kremláček, Miroslav Kuba, Zuzana Kubová, Jana Szanyi, František Vít, Jana Langrová
Purpose: This study compared the variability of visual evoked potential (VEP) in response to stimulation of eyes affected by unilateral optic neuritis with that of fellow (non-affected) eyes.
Methods: Pattern-reversal VEP (PVEP) and motion-onset VEP (MVEP) recordings from thirty-six subjects with unilateral optic neuritis at different intervals from disease onset were retrospectively evaluated, and differences in the following parameters were compared: signal‒to‒noise ratio (SRN), interquartile range of the response jitter (jitter IQR), and number of trials corresponding to the average response (corresponding N).
Results: In the PVEP recordings, the P1 peak times of the fellow eyes were significantly shorter than those of the affected eyes (Cohen's d = -1.470, p < 0.001). P1 amplitudes were significantly greater in fellow eyes (d = 1.17, p < 0.001). Significant differences were found in the SNR (d = 0.782, p < 0.001), jitter IQR (d = -0.874, p < 0.001), and corresponding N (d = 0.700, p < 0.001). MVEP presented significantly shorter N2 peak times in fellow eyes than in affected eyes (d = 0.840, p < 0.01) and significantly greater amplitudes (d = 0.494, p = 0.002). There was a significant difference in the SNRs (d = 0.440, p = 0.01) and corresponding N values (d = 0.415, p = 0.01). There was no difference in the jitter IQR (d = 0.143, p = 0.230).
Conclusions: The increased variability in eyes affected by optic neuritis compared with fellow eyes (in particular, in pattern-reversal VEP, which predominantly represents the activity of the macular-papillary fibers of the optic nerves) may represent important pathophysiologic features and may add valuable information to diagnostics via VEP examinations.
目的:本研究比较了单侧视神经炎影响的眼睛与未影响的眼睛在刺激下的视觉诱发电位(VEP)的变异性。方法:回顾性评价36例单侧视神经炎患者发病后不同时间间隔的模式反转VEP (PVEP)和运动发作VEP (MVEP)记录,并比较以下参数的差异:信噪比(SRN)、反应抖动的四分位数范围(jitter IQR)和平均反应对应的试验次数(对应的N)。结果:在PVEP记录中,伴眼的P1峰值时间明显短于患眼(Cohen’s d = -1.470, p)。视神经炎影响的眼睛与其他眼睛相比变异性增加(特别是模式反转VEP,它主要代表视神经黄斑-乳头状纤维的活动)可能代表重要的病理生理特征,并可能通过VEP检查为诊断提供有价值的信息。
{"title":"Comparison of visual evoked potential variability in eyes affected by optic neuritis and fellow eyes.","authors":"Marie Chutná, Jan Kremláček, Miroslav Kuba, Zuzana Kubová, Jana Szanyi, František Vít, Jana Langrová","doi":"10.1007/s10633-025-10061-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10633-025-10061-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study compared the variability of visual evoked potential (VEP) in response to stimulation of eyes affected by unilateral optic neuritis with that of fellow (non-affected) eyes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pattern-reversal VEP (PVEP) and motion-onset VEP (MVEP) recordings from thirty-six subjects with unilateral optic neuritis at different intervals from disease onset were retrospectively evaluated, and differences in the following parameters were compared: signal‒to‒noise ratio (SRN), interquartile range of the response jitter (jitter IQR), and number of trials corresponding to the average response (corresponding N).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the PVEP recordings, the P1 peak times of the fellow eyes were significantly shorter than those of the affected eyes (Cohen's d = -1.470, p < 0.001). P1 amplitudes were significantly greater in fellow eyes (d = 1.17, p < 0.001). Significant differences were found in the SNR (d = 0.782, p < 0.001), jitter IQR (d = -0.874, p < 0.001), and corresponding N (d = 0.700, p < 0.001). MVEP presented significantly shorter N2 peak times in fellow eyes than in affected eyes (d = 0.840, p < 0.01) and significantly greater amplitudes (d = 0.494, p = 0.002). There was a significant difference in the SNRs (d = 0.440, p = 0.01) and corresponding N values (d = 0.415, p = 0.01). There was no difference in the jitter IQR (d = 0.143, p = 0.230).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The increased variability in eyes affected by optic neuritis compared with fellow eyes (in particular, in pattern-reversal VEP, which predominantly represents the activity of the macular-papillary fibers of the optic nerves) may represent important pathophysiologic features and may add valuable information to diagnostics via VEP examinations.</p>","PeriodicalId":11207,"journal":{"name":"Documenta Ophthalmologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145488117","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-07DOI: 10.1007/s10633-025-10062-x
Shi Pei Loo, Chloe Shipton, Mark Hamilton, Andrew Brown, Eoghan Millar, Iqbal Malik, Madeleine Craig, Ruth Hamilton
Purpose: Incomplete congenital stationary night blindness (icCSNB) is a subtype of inherited, non-progressive retinal diseases. Most cases of icCSNB result from mutations in the X-linked gene CACNA1F. We describe the clinical findings of two male siblings diagnosed with icCSNB, both carrying a novel variant c.4008 + 5G > T in CACNA1F inherited from their mother.
Methods: We carried out a comprehensive ophthalmic assessment, including fundus imaging, optical coherence tomography (OCT) scanning and electroretinography. We performed genetic testing with next generation sequencing, in-silico and functional analyses to further characterise the novel variant.
Results: Two male siblings presented with high myopia and reduced visual acuities at age three. Examination and OCT demonstrated no significant abnormalities in both siblings. Full-field electroretinogram (ffERG) testing demonstrated markedly reduced amplitude to weak flashes and an electronegative waveform to strong flashes in dark-adapted ERGs, resembling that of icCSNB, leading to its diagnosis in both children. Next generation sequencing in the older sibling identified a novel hemizygous c.4008 + 5G > T variant in CACNA1F. In-silico analysis of this variant predicted that it would disrupt normal splicing of CACNA1F, though it was not possible to confirm this by RNA sequencing. This same variant was found in the younger sibling, as well as in their mother who had normal examination and ffERG findings.
Conclusions: We report a novel CACNA1F variant not previously identified in the literature in three patients. Although functional analyses were unable to confirm pathogenicity of this variant, in-silico tools predicted that its effect is consistent with the pathogenesis of icCSNB. Reporting of this family further widens the genotypic spectrum of icCSNB.
{"title":"Incomplete congenital stationary night blindness associated with a novel variant in the CACNA1F gene.","authors":"Shi Pei Loo, Chloe Shipton, Mark Hamilton, Andrew Brown, Eoghan Millar, Iqbal Malik, Madeleine Craig, Ruth Hamilton","doi":"10.1007/s10633-025-10062-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-025-10062-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Incomplete congenital stationary night blindness (icCSNB) is a subtype of inherited, non-progressive retinal diseases. Most cases of icCSNB result from mutations in the X-linked gene CACNA1F. We describe the clinical findings of two male siblings diagnosed with icCSNB, both carrying a novel variant c.4008 + 5G > T in CACNA1F inherited from their mother.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We carried out a comprehensive ophthalmic assessment, including fundus imaging, optical coherence tomography (OCT) scanning and electroretinography. We performed genetic testing with next generation sequencing, in-silico and functional analyses to further characterise the novel variant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two male siblings presented with high myopia and reduced visual acuities at age three. Examination and OCT demonstrated no significant abnormalities in both siblings. Full-field electroretinogram (ffERG) testing demonstrated markedly reduced amplitude to weak flashes and an electronegative waveform to strong flashes in dark-adapted ERGs, resembling that of icCSNB, leading to its diagnosis in both children. Next generation sequencing in the older sibling identified a novel hemizygous c.4008 + 5G > T variant in CACNA1F. In-silico analysis of this variant predicted that it would disrupt normal splicing of CACNA1F, though it was not possible to confirm this by RNA sequencing. This same variant was found in the younger sibling, as well as in their mother who had normal examination and ffERG findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We report a novel CACNA1F variant not previously identified in the literature in three patients. Although functional analyses were unable to confirm pathogenicity of this variant, in-silico tools predicted that its effect is consistent with the pathogenesis of icCSNB. Reporting of this family further widens the genotypic spectrum of icCSNB.</p>","PeriodicalId":11207,"journal":{"name":"Documenta Ophthalmologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145457763","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-04DOI: 10.1007/s10633-025-10060-z
Elisabeth V Quanz, Khaldoon O Al-Nosairy, Francie H Stolle, Juliane Kuske, Sven P Heinrich, Michael Bach, Michael B Hoffmann
Purpose: Quanz et al. (Sci Rep 14:16797, 2024) reported that participants with nystagmus had higher objective visual evoked potential visual acuity estimates (VAVEP) by 0.12 logMAR relative compared to standard psychophysical VA (VAPsych_Stat). The cause of this modest, but significant VAVEP overestimation remains unclear. Here we investigated its association with the pattern-pulse stimulation mode applied for steady state VEP recording for VAVEP estimation. Specifically, we tested whether psychophysical visual acuity to pulsed optotypes (VAPsych_Pulsed) also exceeds standard optotype VAPsych_Stat.
Methods: Twelve participants with nystagmus were included in this analysis. VAVEP was determined for pattern-pulse steady-state VEP stimulation (Quanz et al. in Sci Rep 14:16797, 2024) using EP2000, psychophysical VA was determined to stationary (VAPsych_Stat) and to pulsed (VAPsych_Pulsed) Landolt-C optotypes employing a modified version of the Freiburg Vision Test (FrACT). Pulsed stimulus timing was identical for VEP and VA (40 ms on and 93 ms off, i.e. at 7.5 Hz). In a separate measurement, fixation stability within the central 4° was determined using microperimetry (Nidek MP-1), and the eye with the stronger fixation instability was selected for the analysis (12 eyes). LogMAR differences were assessed with a paired t-test and the correlation of fixation stability and VA differences (ΔVAPsych = VAPsych_Pulsed - VAPsych_Stat) was tested.
Results: VAPsych_Stat (0.43 ± 0.06 logMAR) and VAPsych_Pulsed (0.45 ± 0.06 logMAR, P = 0.15) did not differ from each other, but from VAVEP (0.26 ± 0.08 logMAR, P = 0.02 and P = 0.01, respectively). There was no correlation of ΔVAPsych with fixation instability (r2 = 0.002, P = 0.89).
Conclusion: Pulsed stimulation appears not to be the reason for the VAVEP overestimation in nystagmus. Further research should address whether differences in the spatial stimulus properties might be of relevance, as VAPsych is tested with optotypes, VAVEP with extended patterns.
目的:Quanz等人(Sci Rep 14:16797, 2024)报道,与标准的心理物理VA (VAPsych_Stat)相比,眼球震颤患者的客观视觉诱发电位视觉灵敏度(VAVEP)相对较高0.12 logMAR。这种适度但显著的VAVEP高估的原因尚不清楚。在这里,我们研究了它与用于稳态VEP记录的模式脉冲刺激模式的关联,以估计VAVEP。具体来说,我们测试了脉冲光型的心理物理视敏度(VAPsych_Pulsed)是否也超过标准光型VAPsych_Stat。方法:对12例眼球震颤患者进行分析。使用EP2000测定模式脉冲稳态VEP刺激的VAVEP (Quanz et al. in Sci Rep 14:16797, 2024),使用改进版的Freiburg视觉测试(FrACT)测定心理物理VA为平稳(VAPsych_Stat)和脉冲(VAPsych_Pulsed) Landolt-C光型。VEP和VA的脉冲刺激时间相同(打开40毫秒,关闭93毫秒,即7.5 Hz)。在另一个单独的测量中,使用显微镜(Nidek MP-1)测定中心4°内的固定稳定性,并选择固定不稳定性较强的眼睛进行分析(12只眼睛)。采用配对t检验评估LogMAR差异,并检验固定稳定性与VA差异的相关性(ΔVAPsych = VAPsych_Pulsed - VAPsych_Stat)。结果:VAPsych_Stat(0.43±0.06 logMAR)和VAPsych_Pulsed(0.45±0.06 logMAR, P = 0.15)与VAVEP(0.26±0.08 logMAR, P = 0.02和P = 0.01)差异无统计学意义。ΔVAPsych与固定不稳定无相关性(r2 = 0.002, P = 0.89)。结论:脉冲刺激似乎不是眼球震颤时VAVEP高估的原因。进一步的研究应该解决空间刺激特性的差异是否可能相关,因为VAPsych是用光型测试的,VAVEP是用扩展模式测试的。
{"title":"Impact of pulsed stimulation on objective and subjective visual acuity measurements in nystagmus.","authors":"Elisabeth V Quanz, Khaldoon O Al-Nosairy, Francie H Stolle, Juliane Kuske, Sven P Heinrich, Michael Bach, Michael B Hoffmann","doi":"10.1007/s10633-025-10060-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-025-10060-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Quanz et al. (Sci Rep 14:16797, 2024) reported that participants with nystagmus had higher objective visual evoked potential visual acuity estimates (VA<sub>VEP</sub>) by 0.12 logMAR relative compared to standard psychophysical VA (VA<sub>Psych_Stat</sub>). The cause of this modest, but significant VA<sub>VEP</sub> overestimation remains unclear. Here we investigated its association with the pattern-pulse stimulation mode applied for steady state VEP recording for VA<sub>VEP</sub> estimation. Specifically, we tested whether psychophysical visual acuity to pulsed optotypes (VA<sub>Psych_Pulsed</sub>) also exceeds standard optotype VA<sub>Psych_Stat</sub>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve participants with nystagmus were included in this analysis. VA<sub>VEP</sub> was determined for pattern-pulse steady-state VEP stimulation (Quanz et al. in Sci Rep 14:16797, 2024) using EP2000, psychophysical VA was determined to stationary (VA<sub>Psych_Stat</sub>) and to pulsed (VA<sub>Psych_Pulsed</sub>) Landolt-C optotypes employing a modified version of the Freiburg Vision Test (FrACT). Pulsed stimulus timing was identical for VEP and VA (40 ms on and 93 ms off, i.e. at 7.5 Hz). In a separate measurement, fixation stability within the central 4° was determined using microperimetry (Nidek MP-1), and the eye with the stronger fixation instability was selected for the analysis (12 eyes). LogMAR differences were assessed with a paired t-test and the correlation of fixation stability and VA differences (ΔVA<sub>Psych</sub> = VA<sub>Psych_Pulsed</sub> - VA<sub>Psych_Stat</sub>) was tested.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VA<sub>Psych_Stat</sub> (0.43 ± 0.06 logMAR) and VA<sub>Psych_Pulsed</sub> (0.45 ± 0.06 logMAR, P = 0.15) did not differ from each other, but from VA<sub>VEP</sub> (0.26 ± 0.08 logMAR, P = 0.02 and P = 0.01, respectively). There was no correlation of ΔVA<sub>Psych</sub> with fixation instability (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.002, P = 0.89).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pulsed stimulation appears not to be the reason for the VA<sub>VEP</sub> overestimation in nystagmus. Further research should address whether differences in the spatial stimulus properties might be of relevance, as VA<sub>Psych</sub> is tested with optotypes, VA<sub>VEP</sub> with extended patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":11207,"journal":{"name":"Documenta Ophthalmologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145437690","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-22DOI: 10.1007/s10633-025-10053-y
Nagham Maher Elbagoury, Mona Lotfi Essawi, Heba Mahmoud Fathy, Ola Mohamed Eid, Mostafa Nabih, Amal Mahmoud Mohamed, Caroline Atef Tawfik
Background: Foveoschisis refers to the splitting of retinal layers involving the macula that may have different causes with variable structural-functional natural histories. Idiopathic cases are seen in the absence of inherited or acquired predisposing conditions and referred to as stellate nonhereditary idiopathic foveomacular retinoschisis (SNIFR). Our study aimed to clinically and genetically characterize females presenting with foveoschisis (including affected male siblings where present).
Methods: Five patients (3 females and 2 males) from 3 consanguineous families presenting with foveoschisis underwent complete ophthalmological evaluation, multimodal imaging including color, infrared, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), electroretinogram (ERG), and molecular evaluation including Sanger sequencing of the RS1 gene and whole exome sequencing (WES). Main outcome measures were age at first visit, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), peripheral retinal changes, FAF pattern, ERG findings, and RS1 variants.
Results: The mean age was 21.8 years. The BCVA ranged from 20/100 to 20/20. Peripheral retinal changes ranged from a tapetal reflex, peripheral retinoschisis, vitreous veils, to vitreoretinal traction. A ring of increased signal was the most common FAF abnormality, while one patient exhibited a double-ring hyperautofluorescence. All patients demonstrated an electronegative ERG. One female was considered to have a molecularly undiagnosed inherited retinal disease (IRD). Another female was considered stellate nonhereditary idiopathic foveomacular retinoschisis (SNIFR) after exclusion of other causes. Three patients showed a novel nonsense variant in the RS1 gene; homozygous in the female sibling and hemizygous in the male siblings. Familial segregation revealed an unaffected father and a carrier mother. Trio SNP array confirmed maternal segmental uniparental isodisomy (seg UPiD).
Conclusion: This is the first reported X-linked retinoschisis (XLRS) case with seg UPiD. We emphasize the significance of SNP arrays in elucidating non-Mendelian inheritance cases. We report a novel variant, which is the first to be detected in the RS1 domain in a female.
{"title":"Molecular analysis of foveoschisis in females reveals a novel case of segmental uniparental disomy in X-linked retinoschisis.","authors":"Nagham Maher Elbagoury, Mona Lotfi Essawi, Heba Mahmoud Fathy, Ola Mohamed Eid, Mostafa Nabih, Amal Mahmoud Mohamed, Caroline Atef Tawfik","doi":"10.1007/s10633-025-10053-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-025-10053-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Foveoschisis refers to the splitting of retinal layers involving the macula that may have different causes with variable structural-functional natural histories. Idiopathic cases are seen in the absence of inherited or acquired predisposing conditions and referred to as stellate nonhereditary idiopathic foveomacular retinoschisis (SNIFR). Our study aimed to clinically and genetically characterize females presenting with foveoschisis (including affected male siblings where present).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five patients (3 females and 2 males) from 3 consanguineous families presenting with foveoschisis underwent complete ophthalmological evaluation, multimodal imaging including color, infrared, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), electroretinogram (ERG), and molecular evaluation including Sanger sequencing of the RS1 gene and whole exome sequencing (WES). Main outcome measures were age at first visit, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), peripheral retinal changes, FAF pattern, ERG findings, and RS1 variants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 21.8 years. The BCVA ranged from 20/100 to 20/20. Peripheral retinal changes ranged from a tapetal reflex, peripheral retinoschisis, vitreous veils, to vitreoretinal traction. A ring of increased signal was the most common FAF abnormality, while one patient exhibited a double-ring hyperautofluorescence. All patients demonstrated an electronegative ERG. One female was considered to have a molecularly undiagnosed inherited retinal disease (IRD). Another female was considered stellate nonhereditary idiopathic foveomacular retinoschisis (SNIFR) after exclusion of other causes. Three patients showed a novel nonsense variant in the RS1 gene; homozygous in the female sibling and hemizygous in the male siblings. Familial segregation revealed an unaffected father and a carrier mother. Trio SNP array confirmed maternal segmental uniparental isodisomy (seg UPiD).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first reported X-linked retinoschisis (XLRS) case with seg UPiD. We emphasize the significance of SNP arrays in elucidating non-Mendelian inheritance cases. We report a novel variant, which is the first to be detected in the RS1 domain in a female.</p>","PeriodicalId":11207,"journal":{"name":"Documenta Ophthalmologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145344085","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-17DOI: 10.1007/s10633-025-10059-6
János Radó, Eszter Mikó-Baráth, Péter Hegyi, Vanda A Nemes, Gábor Jandó, Péter Buzás
Purpose: This study aimed to optimize dynamic random dot correlogram (DRDC) and stereogram (DRDS) stimuli to evoke steady-state visual evoked potentials (ssVEP) on multiple EEG channels for the objective assessment of stereopsis.
Methods: EEG recordings were conducted on 22 healthy adults (mean age: 30.2 ± 5.8 years) while viewing cyclopean and control stimuli. DRDC and DRDS were presented at three temporal frequencies (0.9375, 1.875, and 3.75 cycles per second, cps) using anaglyphic channel separation. The ssVEP responses were analyzed using T2circ statistical test to determine the most effective stimulus for eliciting significant cortical activity.
Results: DRDC at 1.875 cps evoked significant ssVEP responses in 93% of participants on at least one occipital electrode (O1, Oz, O2) and in 100% when including parietal-occipital electrodes. DRDS at similar frequencies also produced robust responses but required additional parietal electrode monitoring. Monocular control measurements confirmed that responses were stereo-specific.
Conclusions: DRDC at 1.875 cps was the most effective stimulus for objective electrophysiological assessment of stereopsis, demonstrating high reliability with minimal electrode setups. These findings support the integration of optimized ssVEP protocols into clinical assessments, particularly for non-verbal or pediatric populations.
{"title":"Optimizing cyclopean stimuli for the evaluation of stereo vision by steady-state visual evoked potentials.","authors":"János Radó, Eszter Mikó-Baráth, Péter Hegyi, Vanda A Nemes, Gábor Jandó, Péter Buzás","doi":"10.1007/s10633-025-10059-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-025-10059-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to optimize dynamic random dot correlogram (DRDC) and stereogram (DRDS) stimuli to evoke steady-state visual evoked potentials (ssVEP) on multiple EEG channels for the objective assessment of stereopsis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EEG recordings were conducted on 22 healthy adults (mean age: 30.2 ± 5.8 years) while viewing cyclopean and control stimuli. DRDC and DRDS were presented at three temporal frequencies (0.9375, 1.875, and 3.75 cycles per second, cps) using anaglyphic channel separation. The ssVEP responses were analyzed using T<sup>2</sup><sub>circ</sub> statistical test to determine the most effective stimulus for eliciting significant cortical activity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DRDC at 1.875 cps evoked significant ssVEP responses in 93% of participants on at least one occipital electrode (O1, Oz, O2) and in 100% when including parietal-occipital electrodes. DRDS at similar frequencies also produced robust responses but required additional parietal electrode monitoring. Monocular control measurements confirmed that responses were stereo-specific.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DRDC at 1.875 cps was the most effective stimulus for objective electrophysiological assessment of stereopsis, demonstrating high reliability with minimal electrode setups. These findings support the integration of optimized ssVEP protocols into clinical assessments, particularly for non-verbal or pediatric populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":11207,"journal":{"name":"Documenta Ophthalmologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145307093","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-15DOI: 10.1007/s10633-025-10054-x
Márton Viktor Edelmayer, Torsten Strasser, Ronja Jung, Anton Sonntag, Ricarda Jendritza, Felix Tonagel, Tobias Peters, Helmut Wilhelm, Barbara Wilhelm, Carina Kelbsch
Purpose: This study assessed the diagnostic potential of chromatic pupil campimetry (CPC) using relative maximal constriction amplitude (relMCA), pupillary light response (PLR) latency, and pupillary escape to differentiate optic neuropathies (ON) from healthy individuals and identify specific ON subtypes.
Methods: CPC testing used red and blue stimuli at central (0°) and peripheral (20°) locations to measure relMCA, latency, and pupillary escape. Patients with various ON etiologies, including glaucoma (n = 20), optic nerve compression by meningioma (n = 18), chiasm compression (n = 4), Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON; n = 4), and autosomal dominant optic atrophy (ADOA; n = 3), were tested. Linear mixed-effects models and post hoc Tukey tests were used to analyze differences across subgroups of ON etiologies and a healthy control group (n = 40), regarding signal eccentricities and locations.
Results: Pupillary escape was significantly higher in ON patients during central red stimulation (p = 0.0007). Glaucoma and meningioma groups showed reduced relMCA and prolonged latency for both stimuli compared to controls (p < 0.0001 to p = 0.0058). RelMCA during blue stimulation was lower in glaucoma patients than in ADOA (p = 0.0183). LHON patients exhibited significantly prolonged PLR latency during blue stimulation compared to healthy (p = 0.0284).
Conclusion: CPC effectively distinguished glaucoma and meningioma from healthy controls but was less reliable for differentiating ON subtypes. Our results indicate, that central pupillary escape is associated with inner retinal dysfunction.
目的:本研究通过相对最大收缩幅度(relMCA)、瞳孔光反应(PLR)潜伏期和瞳孔逃逸来评估彩色瞳孔运动测量(CPC)在区分健康人视神经病变(ON)和识别特定ON亚型方面的诊断潜力。方法:CPC测试采用中央(0°)和外周(20°)位置的红色和蓝色刺激来测量relMCA、潜伏期和瞳孔逃逸。我们检测了各种ON病因的患者,包括青光眼(n = 20)、脑膜瘤压迫视神经(n = 18)、交叉压迫(n = 4)、Leber遗传性视神经病变(LHON, n = 4)和常染色体显性视神经萎缩(ADOA, n = 3)。使用线性混合效应模型和临时Tukey检验来分析ON病因亚组和健康对照组(n = 40)在信号偏心率和位置方面的差异。结果:中枢红色刺激时ON患者瞳孔逸出率显著增高(p = 0.0007)。与对照组相比,青光眼和脑膜瘤组在两种刺激下均表现出relMCA减少和潜伏期延长(p结论:CPC能有效区分青光眼和脑膜瘤与健康对照组,但在区分ON亚型方面不太可靠。我们的研究结果表明,中央瞳孔逃逸与内视网膜功能障碍有关。
{"title":"Chromatic pupil campimetry as objective diagnostic tool for progressive optic neuropathies.","authors":"Márton Viktor Edelmayer, Torsten Strasser, Ronja Jung, Anton Sonntag, Ricarda Jendritza, Felix Tonagel, Tobias Peters, Helmut Wilhelm, Barbara Wilhelm, Carina Kelbsch","doi":"10.1007/s10633-025-10054-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-025-10054-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study assessed the diagnostic potential of chromatic pupil campimetry (CPC) using relative maximal constriction amplitude (relMCA), pupillary light response (PLR) latency, and pupillary escape to differentiate optic neuropathies (ON) from healthy individuals and identify specific ON subtypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CPC testing used red and blue stimuli at central (0°) and peripheral (20°) locations to measure relMCA, latency, and pupillary escape. Patients with various ON etiologies, including glaucoma (n = 20), optic nerve compression by meningioma (n = 18), chiasm compression (n = 4), Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON; n = 4), and autosomal dominant optic atrophy (ADOA; n = 3), were tested. Linear mixed-effects models and post hoc Tukey tests were used to analyze differences across subgroups of ON etiologies and a healthy control group (n = 40), regarding signal eccentricities and locations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pupillary escape was significantly higher in ON patients during central red stimulation (p = 0.0007). Glaucoma and meningioma groups showed reduced relMCA and prolonged latency for both stimuli compared to controls (p < 0.0001 to p = 0.0058). RelMCA during blue stimulation was lower in glaucoma patients than in ADOA (p = 0.0183). LHON patients exhibited significantly prolonged PLR latency during blue stimulation compared to healthy (p = 0.0284).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CPC effectively distinguished glaucoma and meningioma from healthy controls but was less reliable for differentiating ON subtypes. Our results indicate, that central pupillary escape is associated with inner retinal dysfunction.</p>","PeriodicalId":11207,"journal":{"name":"Documenta Ophthalmologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145298921","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}