首页 > 最新文献

Critical reviews in oncology/hematology最新文献

英文 中文
TROP-2–directed antibody–drug conjugates in advanced NSCLC: A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, safety, and reconstructed survival outcomes trop -2导向抗体-药物偶联治疗晚期NSCLC:疗效、安全性和重建生存结果的系统回顾和荟萃分析
IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.105093
Muhammad Ansab , Shree Rath , Umama Alam , Muhammad Burhan , Hafiza Tooba Siddiqui , Aakash Desai

Introduction

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents the majority of lung cancer cases worldwide, with most patients diagnosed at advanced stages and limited by resistance to existing therapies. TROP-2, an epithelial cell surface glycoprotein overexpressed in many NSCLCs, has emerged as a promising therapeutic target for antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs). This study aims to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of TROP-2–directed ADCs in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC.

Methods

Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Clinical Trials and Cochrane Central) were searched up to November 2025 for studies reporting outcomes in advanced NSCLC patients treated with TROP-2–directed ADCs. Eligible studies included adult populations with advanced NSCLC that were treated with datopotamab deruxtecan, sacituzumab govitecan, or sacituzumab tirumotecan, and reported efficacy or safety outcomes. Pseudo–individual patient-level data for survival analyses were reconstructed from published Kaplan–Meier curves. Pooled effect sizes were estimated using random-effects meta-analytic models.

Results

Seven studies encompassing 1365 patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC were included. The pooled median overall survival (OS) was 16.38 months (95 % CI: 11.17–22.96), and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.08 months (95 % CI: 4.93–8.55). The objective response rate (ORR) across studies was 29 % (95 % CI: 19 %–39 %), with a disease control rate (DCR) of 79 % (95 % CI: 74 %–84 %). Subgroup analysis revealed patients with EGFR-mutated tumors had a significantly higher likelihood of response (risk ratio 1.70, 95 % CI: 1.11–2.61). Safety analysis showed treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in 98 % (95 % CI: 94 %–100 %), grade ≥ 3 TEAEs in 52 % (95 % CI: 38 %–67 %), and interstitial lung disease (ILD) in 9 % (95 % CI: 3 %–16 %).

Conclusion

TROP-2–directed ADCs demonstrate meaningful efficacy in previously treated advanced NSCLC, especially among EGFR-mutant and non-squamous histology patients, with survival and response outcomes superior to traditional chemotherapy. However, high rates of adverse events, particularly ILD, necessitate close monitoring. Further randomized and biomarker-driven studies are warranted to refine patient selection and optimize the therapeutic potential of these agents.
非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)占全球肺癌病例的大多数,大多数患者被诊断为晚期,并且受到对现有治疗方法的耐药性的限制。TROP-2是一种在许多非小细胞肺癌中过表达的上皮细胞表面糖蛋白,已成为抗体-药物偶联物(adc)的一个有希望的治疗靶点。本研究旨在系统评估trop -2导向adc在晚期或转移性NSCLC患者中的疗效和安全性。方法:检索截至2025年11月的电子数据库(PubMed、Embase、临床试验和Cochrane Central),以报告晚期非小细胞肺癌患者接受trop -2导向adc治疗的结果。符合条件的研究包括晚期NSCLC的成年人群,采用datopotamab deruxtecan、sacituzumab govitecan或sacituzumab tirumotecan进行干预,并报告了疗效或安全性结果。生存分析的伪个体患者水平数据由已发表的Kaplan-Meier曲线重建。使用随机效应荟萃分析模型估计合并效应大小。结果:包括1365例晚期或转移性NSCLC患者的7项研究被纳入。中位总生存期(OS)为16.38个月(95% CI: 11.17-22.96),中位无进展生存期(PFS)为6.08个月(95% CI: 4.93-8.55)。各研究的客观缓解率(ORR)为29% (95% CI: 19%-39%),疾病控制率(DCR)为79% (95% CI: 74%-84%)。亚组分析显示,egfr突变肿瘤患者的反应可能性明显更高(风险比1.70,95% CI: 1.11-2.61)。安全性分析显示,98% (95% CI: 94%-100%)出现治疗不良事件(teae), 52% (95% CI: 38%-67%)出现≥3级teae, 9% (95% CI: 3%-16%)出现间质性肺疾病(ILD)。结论:trop -2导向adc对先前治疗过的晚期NSCLC,特别是egfr突变和非鳞状组织学患者具有显著的疗效,其生存和反应结果优于传统化疗。然而,高发生率的不良事件,特别是ILD,需要密切监测。进一步的随机和生物标志物驱动的研究是必要的,以完善患者选择和优化这些药物的治疗潜力。
{"title":"TROP-2–directed antibody–drug conjugates in advanced NSCLC: A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, safety, and reconstructed survival outcomes","authors":"Muhammad Ansab ,&nbsp;Shree Rath ,&nbsp;Umama Alam ,&nbsp;Muhammad Burhan ,&nbsp;Hafiza Tooba Siddiqui ,&nbsp;Aakash Desai","doi":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.105093","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.105093","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents the majority of lung cancer cases worldwide, with most patients diagnosed at advanced stages and limited by resistance to existing therapies. TROP-2, an epithelial cell surface glycoprotein overexpressed in many NSCLCs, has emerged as a promising therapeutic target for antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs). This study aims to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of TROP-2–directed ADCs in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Clinical Trials and Cochrane Central) were searched up to November 2025 for studies reporting outcomes in advanced NSCLC patients treated with TROP-2–directed ADCs. Eligible studies included adult populations with advanced NSCLC that were treated with datopotamab deruxtecan, sacituzumab govitecan, or sacituzumab tirumotecan, and reported efficacy or safety outcomes. Pseudo–individual patient-level data for survival analyses were reconstructed from published Kaplan–Meier curves. Pooled effect sizes were estimated using random-effects meta-analytic models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seven studies encompassing 1365 patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC were included. The pooled median overall survival (OS) was 16.38 months (95 % CI: 11.17–22.96), and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.08 months (95 % CI: 4.93–8.55). The objective response rate (ORR) across studies was 29 % (95 % CI: 19 %–39 %), with a disease control rate (DCR) of 79 % (95 % CI: 74 %–84 %). Subgroup analysis revealed patients with EGFR-mutated tumors had a significantly higher likelihood of response (risk ratio 1.70, 95 % CI: 1.11–2.61). Safety analysis showed treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in 98 % (95 % CI: 94 %–100 %), grade ≥ 3 TEAEs in 52 % (95 % CI: 38 %–67 %), and interstitial lung disease (ILD) in 9 % (95 % CI: 3 %–16 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>TROP-2–directed ADCs demonstrate meaningful efficacy in previously treated advanced NSCLC, especially among EGFR-mutant and non-squamous histology patients, with survival and response outcomes superior to traditional chemotherapy. However, high rates of adverse events, particularly ILD, necessitate close monitoring. Further randomized and biomarker-driven studies are warranted to refine patient selection and optimize the therapeutic potential of these agents.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11358,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","volume":"218 ","pages":"Article 105093"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145829129","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of adding immune checkpoint inhibitors to standard therapies in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review of efficacy outcomes 在非小细胞肺癌标准疗法中加入免疫检查点抑制剂的影响:疗效结果的系统评价
IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.105098
Ana Pinto Correia , Adriana Marques , Bruno Sepodes , Carla Torre , João Rocha

Introduction

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for 85 % of all cases. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized NSCLC treatment, the extent to which they improve survival when combined with standard therapies, rather than used alone, remains unclear. Here, we systematically review published clinical trials evaluating ICIs combined with other standard systemic therapies versus each strategy alone. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE (via PubMed) and EMBASE, following PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials published until December 2024 that studied the efficacy of immunotherapy regimens combining approved ICIs and other systemic therapies in NSCLC were included. Results We included 36 RCTs with a combined 24,495 participants. Most were open-label (n = 21, 58.3 %), while the remaining studies were double-blinded (n = 15, 41.7 %). Most studies were phase 3 trials (n = 33, 91.7 %) and only three trials were phase 2 (8.3 %). Included trials utilized platinum-doublet chemotherapy as the backbone, with some also incorporating bevacizumab and/or additional immunotherapy. In the included studies, combining immunotherapy with other standard therapies significantly improved survival outcomes compared to either strategy alone. These benefits were consistent across histological subtypes, PD-L1 expression levels, and disease stage. However, the efficacy of this combined approach was limited in EGFR-mutated NSCLC after progression on tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Conclusions: By synthesizing existing evidence from RCTs, this systematic review demonstrates the benefits and limitations of combining immune checkpoint inhibitors with other systemic treatments, clarifying which clinical situations may benefit the most from a combined approach.
肺癌仍然是全球癌症相关死亡的主要原因,非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)占所有病例的85%。尽管免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)已经彻底改变了非小细胞肺癌的治疗,但它们与标准疗法联合使用而不是单独使用时提高生存率的程度仍不清楚。在这里,我们系统地回顾了已发表的临床试验,评估了ICIs联合其他标准全身治疗与单独使用每种策略的疗效。方法:遵循PRISMA指南,使用MEDLINE(通过PubMed)和EMBASE进行系统评价。截至2024年12月发表的随机对照试验,研究了免疫治疗方案联合批准的ICIs和其他全身治疗在非小细胞肺癌中的疗效。我们纳入了36项随机对照试验,共有24,495名受试者。大多数为开放标签研究(n=21, 58.3%),其余研究为双盲研究(n=15, 41.7%)。大多数研究为3期试验(n=33, 91.7%),只有3项试验为2期试验(8.3%)。纳入的试验以铂双药化疗为主要方案,其中一些还结合了贝伐单抗和/或额外的免疫治疗。在纳入的研究中,与单独使用任何一种策略相比,将免疫疗法与其他标准疗法联合使用显著改善了生存结果。这些益处在组织学亚型、PD-L1表达水平和疾病分期中是一致的。然而,在酪氨酸激酶抑制剂进展后egfr突变的NSCLC中,这种联合方法的疗效有限。结论:通过综合来自随机对照试验的现有证据,本系统综述展示了免疫检查点抑制剂与其他全身治疗联合的益处和局限性,阐明了哪些临床情况可能从联合治疗中获益最多。
{"title":"Impact of adding immune checkpoint inhibitors to standard therapies in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review of efficacy outcomes","authors":"Ana Pinto Correia ,&nbsp;Adriana Marques ,&nbsp;Bruno Sepodes ,&nbsp;Carla Torre ,&nbsp;João Rocha","doi":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.105098","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.105098","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for 85 % of all cases. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized NSCLC treatment, the extent to which they improve survival when combined with standard therapies, rather than used alone, remains unclear. Here, we systematically review published clinical trials evaluating ICIs combined with other standard systemic therapies versus each strategy alone. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE (via PubMed) and EMBASE, following PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials published until December 2024 that studied the efficacy of immunotherapy regimens combining approved ICIs and other systemic therapies in NSCLC were included. Results We included 36 RCTs with a combined 24,495 participants. Most were open-label (n = 21, 58.3 %), while the remaining studies were double-blinded (n = 15, 41.7 %). Most studies were phase 3 trials (n = 33, 91.7 %) and only three trials were phase 2 (8.3 %). Included trials utilized platinum-doublet chemotherapy as the backbone, with some also incorporating bevacizumab and/or additional immunotherapy. In the included studies, combining immunotherapy with other standard therapies significantly improved survival outcomes compared to either strategy alone. These benefits were consistent across histological subtypes, PD-L1 expression levels, and disease stage. However, the efficacy of this combined approach was limited in EGFR-mutated NSCLC after progression on tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Conclusions: By synthesizing existing evidence from RCTs, this systematic review demonstrates the benefits and limitations of combining immune checkpoint inhibitors with other systemic treatments, clarifying which clinical situations may benefit the most from a combined approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11358,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","volume":"218 ","pages":"Article 105098"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145806802","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A daily clinical practice decision-making overview for the present metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) management landscape 当前转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)管理景观的日常临床实践决策概述。
IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.105097
Sergio Bracarda , Fabio Calabrò , Ugo De Giorgi , Giuseppe Procopio , Roberto Sabbatini , Camillo Porta

Background

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC), originating from renal tubular epithelial cells, represents approximately 80 % of all primary kidney tumors. Roughly 30 % of cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage, and a similar proportion experience recurrence after surgery for localized disease. This recurrence rate may improve with the recent introduction of an effective adjuvant immunotherapy.

Objective

This work aims to assess the current therapeutic landscape of metastatic RCC (mRCC), with a focus on immunotherapy-based combinations, and to offer expert, real-world insights into clinical decision-making and adverse event (AE) management.

Methods

Six oncologists specialized in mRCC completed a structured survey covering four key areas: (1) overall survival, (2) safety of IO–IO and IO–TKI combinations, (3) treatment selection, and (4) sequential strategies. Responses were reviewed in a virtual meeting, with agreement defined as concurrence by at least five of the six participants. Any areas without unanimous agreement were addressed through subsequent discussion rounds until a final agreement was reached.

Results

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab provides durable responses and long-term survival, especially in intermediate- and poor-risk patients. TKI-based combinations, including cabozantinib and lenvatinib, achieve strong disease control, while axitinib offers a greater dosing flexibility due to its short half-life. Toxicity profiles differ by regimen, requiring careful management of immune-related and TKI-associated adverse events. Relapse risk after adjuvant pembrolizumab should guide first-line therapy choice for advanced disease, while metastasis-directed treatments should be considered by multidisciplinary teams.

Conclusions

Optimal first-line treatment for mRCC requires consideration of patient characteristics, clinical and molecular prognostic factors, treatment tolerability, all of these parameters should be evaluated during a multidisciplinary team discussion.
背景:肾细胞癌(RCC)起源于肾小管上皮细胞,约占所有原发性肾肿瘤的80%。大约30%的病例在晚期被诊断出来,类似比例的病例在局部疾病手术后复发。随着最近有效的辅助免疫治疗的引入,复发率可能会提高。目的:本研究旨在评估目前转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)的治疗前景,重点是基于免疫治疗的联合治疗,并为临床决策和不良事件(AE)管理提供专家的、真实的见解。方法:六位专攻mRCC的肿瘤学家完成了一项涵盖四个关键领域的结构化调查:(1)总生存期,(2)IO-IO和IO-TKI联合治疗的安全性,(3)治疗选择,(4)顺序策略。答复在虚拟会议中进行审查,6名参与者中至少有5人同意。未达成一致意见的领域将通过随后的几轮讨论加以解决,直至达成最终协议。结果:Nivolumab联合ipilimumab提供持久的反应和长期生存,特别是在中危和低危患者中。基于tki的组合,包括cabozantinib和lenvatinib,实现了强大的疾病控制,而阿西替尼由于半衰期短而提供了更大的剂量灵活性。毒性情况因治疗方案而异,需要仔细管理免疫相关和tki相关的不良事件。辅助派姆单抗后复发风险应指导晚期疾病的一线治疗选择,而转移导向治疗应由多学科团队考虑。结论:mRCC的最佳一线治疗需要考虑患者特征、临床和分子预后因素、治疗耐受性,所有这些参数都应该在多学科团队讨论中进行评估。
{"title":"A daily clinical practice decision-making overview for the present metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) management landscape","authors":"Sergio Bracarda ,&nbsp;Fabio Calabrò ,&nbsp;Ugo De Giorgi ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Procopio ,&nbsp;Roberto Sabbatini ,&nbsp;Camillo Porta","doi":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.105097","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.105097","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Renal cell carcinoma (RCC), originating from renal tubular epithelial cells, represents approximately 80 % of all primary kidney tumors. Roughly 30 % of cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage, and a similar proportion experience recurrence after surgery for localized disease. This recurrence rate may improve with the recent introduction of an effective adjuvant immunotherapy.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This work aims to assess the current therapeutic landscape of metastatic RCC (mRCC), with a focus on immunotherapy-based combinations, and to offer expert, real-world insights into clinical decision-making and adverse event (AE) management.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Six oncologists specialized in mRCC completed a structured survey covering four key areas: (1) overall survival, (2) safety of IO–IO and IO–TKI combinations, (3) treatment selection, and (4) sequential strategies. Responses were reviewed in a virtual meeting, with agreement defined as concurrence by at least five of the six participants. Any areas without unanimous agreement were addressed through subsequent discussion rounds until a final agreement was reached.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nivolumab plus ipilimumab provides durable responses and long-term survival, especially in intermediate- and poor-risk patients. TKI-based combinations, including cabozantinib and lenvatinib, achieve strong disease control, while axitinib offers a greater dosing flexibility due to its short half-life. Toxicity profiles differ by regimen, requiring careful management of immune-related and TKI-associated adverse events. Relapse risk after adjuvant pembrolizumab should guide first-line therapy choice for advanced disease, while metastasis-directed treatments should be considered by multidisciplinary teams.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Optimal first-line treatment for mRCC requires consideration of patient characteristics, clinical and molecular prognostic factors, treatment tolerability, all of these parameters should be evaluated during a multidisciplinary team discussion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11358,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","volume":"218 ","pages":"Article 105097"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145806795","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
To ablate or not to ablate? Outcomes of local ablative treatments (LAT) for oncogene addicted (OA) oligo-metastatic (OM) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A systematic review 烧蚀还是不烧蚀?局部消融治疗(LAT)治疗癌基因成瘾(OA)寡转移(OM)非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的结果:一项系统综述。
IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.105096
Fabrizio Citarella , Cristina Fragale , Matteo Fiorenti , Maria Luisa Di Guglielmo , Noemi Mindicini , Alessio Cortellini , Alessandro Russo , Giuseppe Bronte
Oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) encompasses distinct molecular phenotypes, each associated with specific clinical behavior and variable sensitivity to targeted therapies. Therapeutic advancements in the field enhanced clinical outcomes and overall prognostic improvement. Beyond the molecular profile, disease burden serves as a predictive marker for treatment response and overall prognostic outcomes. The current disease staging categorizes patients based on the number and sites of metastatic involvement. In this context, the addition of local ablative therapies (LAT) is candidate to enhance or prolong the effectiveness of standard systemic therapies. Our systematic review aims to summarize current evidence dealing with the outcomes of LAT in the context of oncogene addicted NSCLC. Over response results, we also reported side effects whenever available.
癌基因成瘾的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)包含不同的分子表型,每种表型都与特定的临床行为和对靶向治疗的不同敏感性相关。该领域的治疗进步增强了临床结果和整体预后的改善。除了分子特征外,疾病负担还可作为治疗反应和总体预后的预测指标。目前的疾病分期是根据转移灶的数量和部位对患者进行分类的。在这种情况下,局部消融治疗(LAT)的加入是增强或延长标准全身治疗有效性的候选方法。我们的系统综述旨在总结当前有关LAT治疗癌基因依赖性非小细胞肺癌的结果的证据。除了反应结果,我们还报告了副作用。
{"title":"To ablate or not to ablate? Outcomes of local ablative treatments (LAT) for oncogene addicted (OA) oligo-metastatic (OM) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A systematic review","authors":"Fabrizio Citarella ,&nbsp;Cristina Fragale ,&nbsp;Matteo Fiorenti ,&nbsp;Maria Luisa Di Guglielmo ,&nbsp;Noemi Mindicini ,&nbsp;Alessio Cortellini ,&nbsp;Alessandro Russo ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Bronte","doi":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.105096","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.105096","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) encompasses distinct molecular phenotypes, each associated with specific clinical behavior and variable sensitivity to targeted therapies. Therapeutic advancements in the field enhanced clinical outcomes and overall prognostic improvement. Beyond the molecular profile, disease burden serves as a predictive marker for treatment response and overall prognostic outcomes. The current disease staging categorizes patients based on the number and sites of metastatic involvement. In this context, the addition of local ablative therapies (LAT) is candidate to enhance or prolong the effectiveness of standard systemic therapies. Our systematic review aims to summarize current evidence dealing with the outcomes of LAT in the context of oncogene addicted NSCLC. Over response results, we also reported side effects whenever available.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11358,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","volume":"218 ","pages":"Article 105096"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145800848","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bidirectional role of neutrophils in lung cancer: Mechanisms and therapeutic implications 中性粒细胞在肺癌中的双向作用:机制和治疗意义。
IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.105087
Jing Wang , Meng Zhang , Zhiyue Cui , Jingjing Qu , Ruimin Chang
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) being the predominant subtype. Despite the availability of traditional treatments such as radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and surgery, as well as emerging immunotherapies, the five-year survival rate and prognosis remain suboptimal. Tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) are the most abundant immune cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME) of lung cancer, and understanding their role in cancer therapy is highly important. This review comprehensively discusses the dual role of TANs in lung cancer progression. First, we examined the recruitment, classification, and single-cell heterogeneity of TANs, highlighting the distinct molecular expression and functions across subpopulations. Mechanistically, TANs influence tumor behavior through direct cellcell interactions and cytokine production. Additionally, neutrophils engage with other cells in the TME via metabolic reprogramming, programmed cell death, epigenetic modifications, and vesicle secretion. To date, no studies have systematically summarized and connected these mechanisms. Finally, we summarize the clinical applications and prospects of TANs in lung cancer, including their potential role in assisting in diagnosis, predicting prognosis, and targeting neutrophils to increase the efficacy of radiation, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy. We hope that this review provides insights for future research aimed at improving lung cancer prognosis through the targeting of TANs.
肺癌是全球癌症相关死亡的主要原因,非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)是主要亚型。尽管传统的治疗方法如放疗、化疗、手术,以及新兴的免疫疗法,五年生存率和预后仍然不理想。肿瘤相关中性粒细胞(tumor -associated neutrophils, TANs)是肺癌肿瘤微环境(tumor microenvironment, TME)中最丰富的免疫细胞,了解其在肿瘤治疗中的作用非常重要。这篇综述全面讨论了TANs在肺癌进展中的双重作用。首先,我们研究了TANs的招募、分类和单细胞异质性,强调了不同亚群的不同分子表达和功能。从机制上讲,TANs通过直接的细胞相互作用和细胞因子的产生影响肿瘤行为。此外,中性粒细胞通过代谢重编程、程序性细胞死亡、表观遗传修饰和囊泡分泌与TME中的其他细胞发生作用。到目前为止,还没有研究系统地总结和联系这些机制。最后,我们总结了TANs在肺癌中的临床应用和前景,包括其在辅助诊断、预测预后以及靶向中性粒细胞提高放疗、化疗和免疫治疗疗效方面的潜在作用。我们希望本综述为未来通过靶向TANs改善肺癌预后的研究提供见解。
{"title":"Bidirectional role of neutrophils in lung cancer: Mechanisms and therapeutic implications","authors":"Jing Wang ,&nbsp;Meng Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhiyue Cui ,&nbsp;Jingjing Qu ,&nbsp;Ruimin Chang","doi":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.105087","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.105087","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) being the predominant subtype. Despite the availability of traditional treatments such as radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and surgery, as well as emerging immunotherapies, the five-year survival rate and prognosis remain suboptimal. Tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) are the most abundant immune cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME) of lung cancer, and understanding their role in cancer therapy is highly important. This review comprehensively discusses the dual role of TANs in lung cancer progression. First, we examined the recruitment, classification, and single-cell heterogeneity of TANs, highlighting the distinct molecular expression and functions across subpopulations. Mechanistically, TANs influence tumor behavior through direct cell<img>cell interactions and cytokine production. Additionally, neutrophils engage with other cells in the TME via metabolic reprogramming, programmed cell death, epigenetic modifications, and vesicle secretion. To date, no studies have systematically summarized and connected these mechanisms. Finally, we summarize the clinical applications and prospects of TANs in lung cancer, including their potential role in assisting in diagnosis, predicting prognosis, and targeting neutrophils to increase the efficacy of radiation, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy. We hope that this review provides insights for future research aimed at improving lung cancer prognosis through the targeting of TANs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11358,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","volume":"218 ","pages":"Article 105087"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145800883","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correlation of ORR and PFS with OS outcomes in phase III trials of immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC: Systematic review and meta-analysis 晚期NSCLC免疫治疗III期试验中ORR和PFS与OS结果的相关性:系统回顾和荟萃分析
IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.105092
Fabio Salomone , Massimo Di Maio , Angela Viggiano , Luigi Liguori , Carminia Maria Della Corte , Giuseppe Viscardi , Fabiana Vitiello , Fabiana Napolitano , Antonio Santaniello , Antonio Nuccio , Simeone D’Ambrosio , Filippo Vitale , Annarita Avanzo , Alessandra Bulotta , Luigi Formisano , Roberto Ferrara , Roberto Bianco , Valter Torri , Alberto Servetto

Background

The ability of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (ORR) to predict overall survival (OS) outcomes in cancer trials is matter of debate. Herein, we investigated whether PFS and ORR predicted OS results in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) testing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced NSCLC.

Methods

ORR (ORORR,%ORR), OS (HROS,mOS) and PFS (HRPFS,mPFS) data were collected from phase III RCTs investigating ICIs in advanced NSCLC. Linear regression, weighted by sample size, between surrogate endpoints and OS were calculated. The power of correlation was defined by the value of coefficient of determination R2 (≥0.7 strong, 0.69–0.50 moderate, <0.5 weak).

Results

Forty investigational arms of ICIs ± chemotherapy (ChT) were identified for further investigation. Arm-level analysis revealed that mPFS had a strong correlation with mOS in all comparisons (R2=0.71), in ICIs+ChT trials (R2=0.81) and in first-line setting (R2=0.71). A weak correlation was found between mPFS-mOS (R2=0.48) in trials of ICIs without chemotherapy. Next, trial-level analysis revealed a weak correlation between HROS and HRPFS in all different groups, except in ICIs+ChT trial (R2=0.60). In addition, based on arm-level analysis, mOS and %ORR had moderate correlation in all comparisons (R2=0.58), in ICIs+ChT (R2=0.58) or ICIs (R2=0.53). In trial-level analysis, ORORR and HROS had moderate correlation (R2=0.55) in first-line setting and a strong correlation in ICIs+ChT trials (R2=0.79).

Conclusions

Across trials investigating ICIs in advanced NSCLC, PFS and ORR demonstrated various degrees of relationship with OS. Caution should be taken when efficacy of novel ICIs regimens is evaluated only using surrogate outcomes.
背景:在癌症试验中,无进展生存期(PFS)和总缓解率(ORR)预测总生存期(OS)结果的能力是一个有争议的问题。在此,我们研究了PFS和ORR是否预测晚期NSCLC中免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的随机临床试验(rct)的OS结果。方法:收集晚期NSCLC ICIs患者的ORR (ORORR,%ORR)、OS (HROS,mOS)和PFS (HRPFS,mPFS)数据。计算替代终点和OS之间的线性回归,按样本量加权。相关性以决定系数R2(≥0.7强,0.69-0.50中)定义。结果:确定了40个ICIs±化疗(ChT)的研究组,供进一步研究。臂水平分析显示,在所有比较中,mPFS与mOS有很强的相关性(R2=0.71),在ICIs+ChT试验中(R2=0.81),在一线环境中(R2=0.71)。在没有化疗的ICIs试验中,mPFS-mOS之间存在弱相关性(R2=0.48)。接下来,试验水平分析显示,除ICIs+ChT试验外,所有不同组的HROS与HRPFS之间存在弱相关性(R2=0.60)。此外,基于臂水平分析,mOS与%ORR在所有比较(R2=0.58)、ICIs+ChT (R2=0.58)或ICIs (R2=0.53)中均有中度相关性。在试验水平分析中,ORORR与HROS在一线有中等相关性(R2=0.55),在ICIs+ChT试验中有强相关性(R2=0.79)。结论:在研究晚期NSCLC中ICIs的试验中,PFS和ORR显示出不同程度的与OS的关系。当仅使用替代结果评估新型ICIs方案的疗效时,应谨慎。
{"title":"Correlation of ORR and PFS with OS outcomes in phase III trials of immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC: Systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Fabio Salomone ,&nbsp;Massimo Di Maio ,&nbsp;Angela Viggiano ,&nbsp;Luigi Liguori ,&nbsp;Carminia Maria Della Corte ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Viscardi ,&nbsp;Fabiana Vitiello ,&nbsp;Fabiana Napolitano ,&nbsp;Antonio Santaniello ,&nbsp;Antonio Nuccio ,&nbsp;Simeone D’Ambrosio ,&nbsp;Filippo Vitale ,&nbsp;Annarita Avanzo ,&nbsp;Alessandra Bulotta ,&nbsp;Luigi Formisano ,&nbsp;Roberto Ferrara ,&nbsp;Roberto Bianco ,&nbsp;Valter Torri ,&nbsp;Alberto Servetto","doi":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.105092","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.105092","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The ability of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (ORR) to predict overall survival (OS) outcomes in cancer trials is matter of debate. Herein, we investigated whether PFS and ORR predicted OS results in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) testing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced NSCLC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>ORR (OR<sub>ORR</sub>,%ORR), OS (HR<sub>OS</sub>,mOS) and PFS (HR<sub>PFS</sub>,mPFS) data were collected from phase III RCTs investigating ICIs in advanced NSCLC. Linear regression, weighted by sample size, between surrogate endpoints and OS were calculated. The power of correlation was defined by the value of coefficient of determination R<sup>2</sup> (≥0.7 strong, 0.69–0.50 moderate, &lt;0.5 weak).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Forty investigational arms of ICIs ± chemotherapy (ChT) were identified for further investigation. Arm-level analysis revealed that mPFS had a strong correlation with mOS in all comparisons (R<sup>2</sup>=0.71), in ICIs+ChT trials (R<sup>2</sup>=0.81) and in first-line setting (R<sup>2</sup>=0.71). A weak correlation was found between mPFS-mOS (R<sup>2</sup>=0.48) in trials of ICIs without chemotherapy. Next, trial-level analysis revealed a weak correlation between HR<sub>OS</sub> and HR<sub>PFS</sub> in all different groups, except in ICIs+ChT trial (R<sup>2</sup>=0.60). In addition, based on arm-level analysis, mOS and %ORR had moderate correlation in all comparisons (R<sup>2</sup>=0.58), in ICIs+ChT (R<sup>2</sup>=0.58) or ICIs (R<sup>2</sup>=0.53). In trial-level analysis, OR<sub>ORR</sub> and HR<sub>OS</sub> had moderate correlation (R<sup>2</sup>=0.55) in first-line setting and a strong correlation in ICIs+ChT trials (R<sup>2</sup>=0.79).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Across trials investigating ICIs in advanced NSCLC, PFS and ORR demonstrated various degrees of relationship with OS. Caution should be taken when efficacy of novel ICIs regimens is evaluated only using surrogate outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11358,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","volume":"218 ","pages":"Article 105092"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145783896","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Non-coding RNAs and liquid biopsies: Emerging biomarkers for cervical cancer 非编码rna和液体活检:宫颈癌的新兴生物标志物。
IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.105091
Mariana Teixeira Costa , Valéria Tavares , Filomena Adega , Rui Medeiros
Cervical cancer (CC) is the fourth most common malignancy among women worldwide, highlighting the urgent need for improved predictive, diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers to enhance disease management and patient outcomes. Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), including long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), circular RNAs (circRNAs) and microRNAs (miRNAs), perform various functions in transcriptional, translational and post-translational regulation. Aberrant expression of ncRNAs in CC has been closely associated with disease initiation and progression, underscoring their potential as key regulators of cervical tumorigenesis. Several lncRNAs, such as HOTAIR and PVT1, contribute to cervical tumorigenesis by promoting cell proliferation, migration and invasion. Likewise, circRNAs, such as circ_0018289, act as miRNA sponges, leading to the dysregulation of key target genes. Moreover, specific miRNAs, such as miR-20a and miR-21, promote CC progression (oncogenic miRNAs), whereas others, including miR-214 and miR-218, exhibit a tumor suppressor role. Importantly, many ncRNAs are detectable in body fluids, representing stable and minimally invasive biomarkers suitable for liquid biopsy. Thus, in this comprehensive narrative review, we map the range of candidate ncRNAs reported in the literature and discuss their predictive, diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic value, including their potential as circulating biomarkers in CC. We also highlight, as a future perspective, how integrated profiling approaches could guide research and support the development of non-invasive strategies for diagnosis, prognostic assessment, and therapy monitoring in CC.
宫颈癌(CC)是全球女性中第四大最常见的恶性肿瘤,这突出表明迫切需要改进预测、诊断和预后生物标志物,以加强疾病管理和患者预后。非编码rna (ncRNAs),包括长链非编码rna (lncRNAs)、环状rna (circRNAs)和微rna (miRNAs),在转录、翻译和翻译后调控中发挥着多种功能。CC中ncrna的异常表达与疾病的发生和进展密切相关,强调了它们作为宫颈肿瘤发生的关键调节因子的潜力。一些lncrna,如HOTAIR和PVT1,通过促进细胞增殖、迁移和侵袭来促进宫颈肿瘤的发生。同样,circRNAs,如circ_0018289,作为miRNA海绵,导致关键靶基因的失调。此外,特异性mirna,如miR-20a和miR-21,促进CC进展(致癌mirna),而其他mirna,包括miR-214和miR-218,表现出肿瘤抑制作用。重要的是,许多ncrna可以在体液中检测到,代表了适合液体活检的稳定和微创生物标志物。因此,在这篇全面的叙述性综述中,我们绘制了文献中报道的候选ncrna的范围,并讨论了它们的预测、诊断、预后和治疗价值,包括它们作为CC循环生物标志物的潜力。我们还强调,作为未来的观点,综合分析方法如何指导研究并支持CC诊断、预后评估和治疗监测的非侵入性策略的发展。
{"title":"Non-coding RNAs and liquid biopsies: Emerging biomarkers for cervical cancer","authors":"Mariana Teixeira Costa ,&nbsp;Valéria Tavares ,&nbsp;Filomena Adega ,&nbsp;Rui Medeiros","doi":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.105091","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.105091","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cervical cancer (CC) is the fourth most common malignancy among women worldwide, highlighting the urgent need for improved predictive, diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers to enhance disease management and patient outcomes. Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), including long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), circular RNAs (circRNAs) and microRNAs (miRNAs), perform various functions in transcriptional, translational and post-translational regulation. Aberrant expression of ncRNAs in CC has been closely associated with disease initiation and progression, underscoring their potential as key regulators of cervical tumorigenesis. Several lncRNAs, such as HOTAIR and PVT1, contribute to cervical tumorigenesis by promoting cell proliferation, migration and invasion. Likewise, circRNAs, such as circ_0018289, act as miRNA sponges, leading to the dysregulation of key target genes. Moreover, specific miRNAs, such as miR-20a and miR-21, promote CC progression (oncogenic miRNAs), whereas others, including miR-214 and miR-218, exhibit a tumor suppressor role. Importantly, many ncRNAs are detectable in body fluids, representing stable and minimally invasive biomarkers suitable for liquid biopsy. Thus, in this comprehensive narrative review, we map the range of candidate ncRNAs reported in the literature and discuss their predictive, diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic value, including their potential as circulating biomarkers in CC. We also highlight, as a future perspective, how integrated profiling approaches could guide research and support the development of non-invasive strategies for diagnosis, prognostic assessment, and therapy monitoring in CC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11358,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","volume":"218 ","pages":"Article 105091"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145783973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Potential strategies to improve the therapeutic efficacy of oncolytic viruses for cancer through T and NK cells targeting 通过T和NK细胞靶向提高溶瘤病毒治疗癌症疗效的潜在策略。
IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.105086
Chuanjian Wu , Hanzhang Liu , Yujie Shi , Jie Tang , Rong Sun , Xudong Han , Yihui Fan
Oncolytic viruses (OVs) elicit potent tumor lysis and remodel the tumor microenvironment (TME) to activate adaptive and innate immunity, yet their efficacy depends critically on T and NK cell responses. Here, we review recent advances in the characterization and engineering of OVs to enhance lymphocyte-mediated tumor control. CD8⁺ cytotoxic T cells and CD4⁺ helper T cells drive durable antitumor immunity through OV-enhanced antigen presentation, memory formation, and modulation of Tregs, whereas T cell exhaustion and checkpoint interactions remain key barriers. Arming OVs with cytokines, chemokines, bispecific engagers, or metabolic modulators enhances effector T-cell expansion, infiltration, and cytotoxicity in solid tumors. In parallel, NK cells—whose efficacy is often limited by poor intratumoral activity and antiviral competition—are increasingly harnessed by OV platforms expressing immune stimulators or checkpoint modulators. Combination strategies with targeted therapies, checkpoint blockade, or adoptive NK/T cell transfer further potentiate therapeutic efficacy. Importantly, although OVs may inadvertently amplify dominant antiviral responses at the expense of antitumor activity, strategies incorporating tumor antigen encoding and TME reprogramming can overcome this limitation. Collectively, these findings underscore the central role of T and NK cells in OV-based immunotherapy and highlight rational arming and combination approaches to improve tumor control and long-term protection.
溶瘤病毒(OVs)可诱导有效的肿瘤裂解并重塑肿瘤微环境(TME)以激活适应性免疫和先天免疫,但其效果主要取决于T和NK细胞的反应。在这里,我们回顾了OVs的表征和工程的最新进展,以加强淋巴细胞介导的肿瘤控制。CD8 +细胞毒性T细胞和CD4 +辅助T细胞通过ov增强的抗原呈递、记忆形成和Tregs调节驱动持久的抗肿瘤免疫,而T细胞耗竭和检查点相互作用仍然是关键障碍。用细胞因子、趋化因子、双特异性参与物或代谢调节剂武装OVs可增强实体肿瘤中效应t细胞的扩增、浸润和细胞毒性。与此同时,NK细胞(其功效通常受到肿瘤内活性差和抗病毒竞争的限制)越来越多地被表达免疫刺激物或检查点调节剂的OV平台利用。联合靶向治疗、检查点阻断或过继NK/T细胞转移的策略进一步增强了治疗效果。重要的是,尽管OVs可能会无意中以牺牲抗肿瘤活性为代价放大显性抗病毒反应,但结合肿瘤抗原编码和TME重编程的策略可以克服这一限制。总的来说,这些发现强调了T和NK细胞在基于ov的免疫治疗中的核心作用,并强调了合理的武装和联合方法来改善肿瘤控制和长期保护。
{"title":"Potential strategies to improve the therapeutic efficacy of oncolytic viruses for cancer through T and NK cells targeting","authors":"Chuanjian Wu ,&nbsp;Hanzhang Liu ,&nbsp;Yujie Shi ,&nbsp;Jie Tang ,&nbsp;Rong Sun ,&nbsp;Xudong Han ,&nbsp;Yihui Fan","doi":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.105086","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.105086","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Oncolytic viruses (OVs) elicit potent tumor lysis and remodel the tumor microenvironment (TME) to activate adaptive and innate immunity, yet their efficacy depends critically on T and NK cell responses. Here, we review recent advances in the characterization and engineering of OVs to enhance lymphocyte-mediated tumor control. CD8⁺ cytotoxic T cells and CD4⁺ helper T cells drive durable antitumor immunity through OV-enhanced antigen presentation, memory formation, and modulation of Tregs, whereas T cell exhaustion and checkpoint interactions remain key barriers. Arming OVs with cytokines, chemokines, bispecific engagers, or metabolic modulators enhances effector T-cell expansion, infiltration, and cytotoxicity in solid tumors. In parallel, NK cells—whose efficacy is often limited by poor intratumoral activity and antiviral competition—are increasingly harnessed by OV platforms expressing immune stimulators or checkpoint modulators. Combination strategies with targeted therapies, checkpoint blockade, or adoptive NK/T cell transfer further potentiate therapeutic efficacy. Importantly, although OVs may inadvertently amplify dominant antiviral responses at the expense of antitumor activity, strategies incorporating tumor antigen encoding and TME reprogramming can overcome this limitation. Collectively, these findings underscore the central role of T and NK cells in OV-based immunotherapy and highlight rational arming and combination approaches to improve tumor control and long-term protection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11358,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","volume":"218 ","pages":"Article 105086"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145770172","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Epigenetic approaches to prostate cancer: Present landscape and future prospects 前列腺癌的表观遗传学方法:现状和未来展望。
IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.105083
Konstantinos Mesiakaris, Efthalia Kontogianni, Souzana Logotheti, Vasiliki Tzelepi
Genetic profiles alone do not fully describe the development and evolution of prostate cancer (PCa), whereas epigenetic alterations are emerging as promising therapeutic targets. This review explores FDA-approved and experimental epigenetic strategies, including DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTis), histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis), histone methyltransferase inhibitors, bromodomain and extra-terminal domain inhibitors (BETi), non-coding RNA therapies, antisense oligonucleotides, and future prospects such as chromatin remodeling, DNA hydroxymethylation, and RNA methylation. Although DNMTis and HDACis have historically dominated clinical trials, mainly in hematologic cancers, the 2020 approval of an epigenetic therapy for a solid tumor marked an important breakthrough. Despite this, epigenetic drugs remain underexplored in PCa: among 2254 clinical studies of such agents, only 58 (2.57 %) included PCa patients. This disparity highlights an urgent need for novel therapeutic approaches beyond chemotherapy and androgen deprivation. By assessing current progress and outlining opportunities in drug repositioning and novel targets, this review underscores epigenetics as a critical frontier for advancing PCa treatment.
遗传谱本身并不能完全描述前列腺癌(PCa)的发展和进化,而表观遗传改变正在成为有希望的治疗靶点。本文综述了fda批准的和实验性的表观遗传策略,包括DNA甲基转移酶抑制剂(DNMTis)、组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂(HDACis)、组蛋白甲基转移酶抑制剂、溴结构域和外端结构域抑制剂(BETi)、非编码RNA疗法、反义寡核苷酸以及染色质重塑、DNA羟甲基化和RNA甲基化等未来前景。尽管DNMTis和HDACis历来主导着临床试验,主要是在血液学癌症中,但2020年批准的一种用于实体肿瘤的表观遗传疗法标志着一个重要突破。尽管如此,表观遗传药物在PCa中的应用仍不充分:在2254项此类药物的临床研究中,只有58项(2.57%)纳入了PCa患者。这种差异突出了迫切需要新的治疗方法,而不是化疗和雄激素剥夺。通过评估目前的进展,概述药物重新定位和新靶点的机会,本综述强调表观遗传学是推进前列腺癌治疗的关键前沿。
{"title":"Epigenetic approaches to prostate cancer: Present landscape and future prospects","authors":"Konstantinos Mesiakaris,&nbsp;Efthalia Kontogianni,&nbsp;Souzana Logotheti,&nbsp;Vasiliki Tzelepi","doi":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.105083","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.105083","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Genetic profiles alone do not fully describe the development and evolution of prostate cancer (PCa), whereas epigenetic alterations are emerging as promising therapeutic targets. This review explores FDA-approved and experimental epigenetic strategies, including DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTis), histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis), histone methyltransferase inhibitors, bromodomain and extra-terminal domain inhibitors (BETi), non-coding RNA therapies, antisense oligonucleotides, and future prospects such as chromatin remodeling, DNA hydroxymethylation, and RNA methylation. Although DNMTis and HDACis have historically dominated clinical trials, mainly in hematologic cancers, the 2020 approval of an epigenetic therapy for a solid tumor marked an important breakthrough. Despite this, epigenetic drugs remain underexplored in PCa: among 2254 clinical studies of such agents, only 58 (2.57 %) included PCa patients. This disparity highlights an urgent need for novel therapeutic approaches beyond chemotherapy and androgen deprivation. By assessing current progress and outlining opportunities in drug repositioning and novel targets, this review underscores epigenetics as a critical frontier for advancing PCa treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11358,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","volume":"218 ","pages":"Article 105083"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145770169","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Histopathological ultrastaging of mesocolic lymph nodes after colon cancer resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis 结肠癌切除术后结肠系膜淋巴结的组织病理学超微转移:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.105089
Bart C.T. van de Laar , Daan J. Sikkenk , Gursah Kats-Ugurlu , Derk Jan A. de Groot , Wouter B. Nagengast , Esther C.J. Consten

Background

In colon cancer (CC), lymph node (LN) (micro)metastases determine the need for adjuvant chemotherapy. Routine single-section hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) may miss (micro)metastases, resulting in understaging. Histopathological ultrastaging using serial sectioning (SS) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) can improve metastasis detection, for example in the context of organ-preserving surgery using a sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedure. This review evaluates SS and IHC for detecting LN (micro)metastases and aims to identify the ultrastaging method with the highest detection rate. Isolated tumor cells were analyzed separately and were not considered indicative of nodal upstaging.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched. Studies were included if they evaluated histopathological ultrastaging alongside routine H&E in patients with CC and reported results separately. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2. Pooled proportions were calculated using random-effects models.

Results

Thirty studies (n = 1822 patients) using SS and IHC were included. In SLN studies (n = 23), 21 % (95 % CI: 12–31 %) of 1070 patients had LN (micro)metastases. Among node-positive patients, 25 % (95 % CI: 6.0–50 %) were identified only by SLN ultrastaging. The absolute benefit of ultrastaging in the total cohort was small, 3.0 % (95 % CI: 1.0–5.0 %), with moderate heterogeneity. In non-SLN studies (n = 7), ultrastaging of all LNs upstaged 6.0 % (95 % CI: 2.0–13 %) of 752 patients, with high heterogeneity. IHC identified only one additional micrometastasis beyond SS. Protocol heterogeneity was considerable.

Conclusion

Histopathological ultrastaging detects (micro)metastases, but its clinical impact on adjuvant chemotherapy benefit remains uncertain. Protocol standardization is needed, and the added value of IHC beyond SS appears minimal.
背景:在结肠癌(CC)中,淋巴结(LN)(微)转移决定了是否需要辅助化疗。常规单切片苏木精和伊红(H&E)可能错过(微)转移,导致分期不足。使用连续切片(SS)和免疫组织化学(IHC)的组织病理学超声可以提高转移检测,例如在使用前哨淋巴结(SLN)手术的器官保存手术的背景下。本文对SS和免疫组化检测LN(微)转移的方法进行评价,旨在找出检出率最高的超转移方法。分离的肿瘤细胞被单独分析,不被认为是淋巴结分期的指示。方法:检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆。如果研究评估CC患者的组织病理学超调和常规H&E,并单独报告结果,则纳入研究。使用QUADAS-2评估偏倚风险。采用随机效应模型计算合并比例。结果:纳入了30项使用SS和IHC的研究(n= 1822例)。在SLN研究中(n=23), 1,070例患者中有21% (95% CI: 12-31%)发生LN(微)转移。在淋巴结阳性的患者中,25% (95% CI: 6.0-50%)仅通过SLN超声检查确诊。在整个队列中,超转移的绝对获益很小,为3.0% (95% CI: 1.0-5.0%),具有中等异质性。在非sln研究中(n=7),所有ln的超转移率超过了752例患者的6.0% (95% CI: 2.0-13%),具有高度异质性。免疫组化只发现了SS以外的另一个微转移灶。结论:组织病理学超转移检测(微)转移,但其对辅助化疗疗效的临床影响尚不确定。方案标准化是必要的,而且体外受精的附加值在SS之外似乎微乎其微。
{"title":"Histopathological ultrastaging of mesocolic lymph nodes after colon cancer resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Bart C.T. van de Laar ,&nbsp;Daan J. Sikkenk ,&nbsp;Gursah Kats-Ugurlu ,&nbsp;Derk Jan A. de Groot ,&nbsp;Wouter B. Nagengast ,&nbsp;Esther C.J. Consten","doi":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.105089","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.105089","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In colon cancer (CC), lymph node (LN) (micro)metastases determine the need for adjuvant chemotherapy. Routine single-section hematoxylin and eosin (H&amp;E) may miss (micro)metastases, resulting in understaging. Histopathological ultrastaging using serial sectioning (SS) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) can improve metastasis detection, for example in the context of organ-preserving surgery using a sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedure. This review evaluates SS and IHC for detecting LN (micro)metastases and aims to identify the ultrastaging method with the highest detection rate. Isolated tumor cells were analyzed separately and were not considered indicative of nodal upstaging.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched. Studies were included if they evaluated histopathological ultrastaging alongside routine H&amp;E in patients with CC and reported results separately. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2. Pooled proportions were calculated using random-effects models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty studies (n = 1822 patients) using SS and IHC were included. In SLN studies (n = 23), 21 % (95 % CI: 12–31 %) of 1070 patients had LN (micro)metastases. Among node-positive patients, 25 % (95 % CI: 6.0–50 %) were identified only by SLN ultrastaging. The absolute benefit of ultrastaging in the total cohort was small, 3.0 % (95 % CI: 1.0–5.0 %), with moderate heterogeneity. In non-SLN studies (n = 7), ultrastaging of all LNs upstaged 6.0 % (95 % CI: 2.0–13 %) of 752 patients, with high heterogeneity. IHC identified only one additional micrometastasis beyond SS. Protocol heterogeneity was considerable.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Histopathological ultrastaging detects (micro)metastases, but its clinical impact on adjuvant chemotherapy benefit remains uncertain. Protocol standardization is needed, and the added value of IHC beyond SS appears minimal.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11358,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","volume":"218 ","pages":"Article 105089"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145770203","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Critical reviews in oncology/hematology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1