Pub Date : 2024-08-02DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104465
Ovarian cancer, an aggressive malignancy of the female reproductive tract, is frequently linked to an elevated risk of thrombotic events. This association is manifested by a pronounced rise in platelet counts and activation levels. Current research firmly supports the pivotal role of platelets in the oncogenic processes of ovarian cancer, influencing tumor cell proliferation and metastasis. Platelets influence these processes through direct interactions with tumor cells or by secreting cytokines and growth factors that enhance tumor growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis. This review aims to thoroughly dissect the interactions between platelets and ovarian cancer cells, emphasizing their combined role in tumor progression and associated thrombotic events. Additionally, it summarizes therapeutic strategies targeting platelet-cancer interface which show significant promise. Such approaches could not only be effective in managing the primary ovarian tumor but also play a pivotal role in preventing metastasis and attenuating thrombotic complications associated with ovarian cancer.
{"title":"Unlocking the intricacies: Exploring the complex interplay between platelets and ovarian cancer","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104465","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104465","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ovarian cancer, an aggressive malignancy of the female reproductive tract, is frequently linked to an elevated risk of thrombotic events. This association is manifested by a pronounced rise in platelet counts and activation levels. Current research firmly supports the pivotal role of platelets in the oncogenic processes of ovarian cancer, influencing tumor cell proliferation and metastasis. Platelets influence these processes through direct interactions with tumor cells or by secreting cytokines and growth factors that enhance tumor growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis. This review aims to thoroughly dissect the interactions between platelets and ovarian cancer cells, emphasizing their combined role in tumor progression and associated thrombotic events. Additionally, it summarizes therapeutic strategies targeting platelet-cancer interface which show significant promise. Such approaches could not only be effective in managing the primary ovarian tumor but also play a pivotal role in preventing metastasis and attenuating thrombotic complications associated with ovarian cancer.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11358,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141891330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-02DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104463
The role of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in thyroid cancer (TC) remains contentious due to limited data. Retrospective studies suggest adjuvant EBRT benefits high-risk differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) and limited-stage anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC), enhancing locoregional control and progression-free survival when combined with surgery and chemotherapy. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and particle therapy (PT), including protons, carbon ions, and Boron Neutron Capture Therapy (BNCT), represent advances in TC treatment. Following PRISMA guidelines, we reviewed 471 studies from January 2002 to January 2024, selecting 14 articles (10 preclinical, 4 clinical). Preclinical research focused on BNCT in ATC mouse models, showing promising local control rates. Clinical studies explored proton, neutron, or photon radiotherapy, reporting favorable outcomes and manageable toxicity. While PT shows promise supported by biological rationale, further research is necessary to clarify its role and potential combination with systemic treatments in TC management.
{"title":"Charged particle radiotherapy for thyroid cancer. A systematic review","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104463","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104463","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The role of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in thyroid cancer (TC) remains contentious due to limited data. Retrospective studies suggest adjuvant EBRT benefits high-risk differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) and limited-stage anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC), enhancing locoregional control and progression-free survival when combined with surgery and chemotherapy. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and particle therapy (PT), including protons, carbon ions, and Boron Neutron Capture Therapy (BNCT), represent advances in TC treatment. Following PRISMA guidelines, we reviewed 471 studies from January 2002 to January 2024, selecting 14 articles (10 preclinical, 4 clinical). Preclinical research focused on BNCT in ATC mouse models, showing promising local control rates. Clinical studies explored proton, neutron, or photon radiotherapy, reporting favorable outcomes and manageable toxicity. While PT shows promise supported by biological rationale, further research is necessary to clarify its role and potential combination with systemic treatments in TC management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11358,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141891327","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-02DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104462
Background
Patients with melanoma brain metastases are now frequently treated with immunotherapy (IMT) or targeted therapy (TT). The aim of this systematic review was to determine relative survival outcomes after combining radiotherapy (RT) with IMT or TT.
Methods
126 studies were identified by searching Medline, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL (to 7Aug 2023).
Results
Multivariable analyses showed that the risk of death was reduced by 30 % for combined stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)+IMT compared to IMT alone, by 65 % for patients treated with SRS+anti-PD1 and by 59 % for patients treated with SRS+anti-CTLA4 and/or anti-PD1 (HR 0.41, 95 %CI 0.31–0.54) compared to SRS alone. Four studies compared SRS+anti-CTLA4 with SRS+anti-PD1, showing a 42 % reduction in risk of death with SRS+anti-PD1 treatment. Combined treatment with SRS+TT showed a 59 % reduction in risk compared to SRS alone.
Conclusion
The systematic review suggests a substantial survival benefit for combining SRS with IMT or TT for patients with melanoma brain metastases.
{"title":"Treatment of melanoma brain metastases with radiation and immunotherapy or targeted therapy: A systematic review with meta-analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104462","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104462","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Patients with melanoma brain metastases are now frequently treated with immunotherapy (IMT) or targeted therapy (TT). The aim of this systematic review was to determine relative survival outcomes after combining radiotherapy (RT) with IMT or TT.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>126 studies were identified by searching Medline, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL (to 7Aug 2023).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Multivariable analyses showed that the risk of death was reduced by 30 % for combined stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)+IMT compared to IMT alone, by 65 % for patients treated with SRS+anti-PD1 and by 59 % for patients treated with SRS+anti-CTLA4 and/or anti-PD1 (HR 0.41, 95 %CI 0.31–0.54) compared to SRS alone. Four studies compared SRS+anti-CTLA4 with SRS+anti-PD1, showing a 42 % reduction in risk of death with SRS+anti-PD1 treatment. Combined treatment with SRS+TT showed a 59 % reduction in risk compared to SRS alone.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The systematic review suggests a substantial survival benefit for combining SRS with IMT or TT for patients with melanoma brain metastases.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11358,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040842824002051/pdfft?md5=1e4cb9abf412462f7b738dd9ab674c2c&pid=1-s2.0-S1040842824002051-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141891329","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-31DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104464
Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors (FGFRs) are emerging as key factors involved in tumorigenesis, tumor microenvironment remodeling and acquired resistance to targeted therapies. Pemigatinib is a Tyrosine-Kinase Inhibitor that selectively targets aberrant FGFR1, FGFR2 and FGFR3. Pemigatinib is now approved for advanced-stage cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) but data suggests that other tumor histotypes exhibit FGFR alterations, thus hypothesizing its potential efficacy in other cancer settings. The present systematic review, based on PRISMA guidelines, aims to synthetize and critically interpret the results of all available preclinical and clinical evidence regarding Pemigatinib use in cancer. In April 2024, an extensive search was performed in PubMed, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases using the keyword "Pemigatinib". Twenty-seven studies finally met all inclusion criteria. The promising results emerging from Pemigatinib preclinical and clinical studies pave the way for Pemigatinib extension to multiple solid cancer settings.
{"title":"Precision oncology targeting FGFRs: A systematic review on pre-clinical activity and clinical outcomes of pemigatinib","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104464","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104464","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors (FGFRs) are emerging as key factors involved in tumorigenesis, tumor microenvironment remodeling and acquired resistance to targeted therapies. Pemigatinib is a Tyrosine-Kinase Inhibitor that selectively targets aberrant FGFR1, FGFR2 and FGFR3. Pemigatinib is now approved for advanced-stage cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) but data suggests that other tumor histotypes exhibit FGFR alterations, thus hypothesizing its potential efficacy in other cancer settings. The present systematic review, based on PRISMA guidelines, aims to synthetize and critically interpret the results of all available preclinical and clinical evidence regarding Pemigatinib use in cancer. In April 2024, an extensive search was performed in PubMed, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases using the keyword \"Pemigatinib\". Twenty-seven studies finally met all inclusion criteria. The promising results emerging from Pemigatinib preclinical and clinical studies pave the way for Pemigatinib extension to multiple solid cancer settings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11358,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040842824002075/pdfft?md5=33f6b9511156effc06c307e9c5028396&pid=1-s2.0-S1040842824002075-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141880008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-27DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104458
Background
Melanoma metastasis to distant sites is associated with diminished survival rates and poor prognosis. Except of Breslow thickness and ulceration that are currently used in melanoma staging, the investigation of additional clinicopathological, dermatoscopic and molecular factors that could predict tumors with aggressive biologic behavior is of paramount importance.
Methods
A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane databases and gray literature until November 2023. Observational studies (including cohorts and case-control studies) were included and clinical and histopathological factors of primary cutaneous melanomas, along with dermatoscopic and molecular predictors of distant metastasis (DM) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were assessed. Random – effect models were preferred, the results were presented as Hazard Ratios (HRs) with 95 %Confidence Intervals (CIs) and the I2 index quantified heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis according to AJCC stage and sensitivity analysis were also conducted.
Results
One hundred forty-three and 101 studies were included in the qualitive and quantitative synthesis, respectively. Regarding clinical factors, males, compared to females, and head and neck location, compared to trunk, demonstrated higher risk for DM [n=36, HR 1.49, 95%CI 1.36 – 1.63, I2 33% and n=21, HR 1.24, 95 %CI 1.01 – 1.52, I2 62 %]. Both factors had similar effects on DMFS. Breslow thickness and ulceration were significant predictors or DM. Additional factors that posed an increased risk for DM were nodular (n=15, HR 2.51, 95 %CI 1.83 – 3.43, I2 56 %) and lentigo maligna subtypes (n=12, HR 1.87, 95 %CI 1.27 – 2.75, I2 0 %), compared to superficial spreading subtype, lymphovascular invasion (n=9, HR 2.05, 95 %CI 1.18 – 3.58, I2 78 %), SLN positivity and BRAF+ mutational status. In contrast, regression was a negative predictor of DM (n=15, HR 0.59, 95 %CI 0.44 – 0.79, I2 68 %). Two studies focused on dermatoscopic factors and found that low pigmentation and the presence of blue-white veil might predict DM development. The results of subgroup analysis for stage I-II patients were essentially similar and sensitivity analysis did not reveal significant alterations, despite the moderate or high heterogeneity in some categories.
Conclusions
Clinical and histological characteristics of the tumor along with dermatoscopic features and molecular parameters hold significant prognostic information and could be incorporated into models to predict melanomas with high metastatic potential.
{"title":"Clinical, dermatoscopic, histological and molecular predictive factors of distant melanoma metastasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104458","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104458","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Melanoma metastasis to distant sites is associated with diminished survival rates and poor prognosis. Except of Breslow thickness and ulceration that are currently used in melanoma staging, the investigation of additional clinicopathological, dermatoscopic and molecular factors that could predict tumors with aggressive biologic behavior is of paramount importance.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane databases and gray literature until November 2023. Observational studies (including cohorts and case-control studies) were included and clinical and histopathological factors of primary cutaneous melanomas, along with dermatoscopic and molecular predictors of distant metastasis (DM) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were assessed. Random – effect models were preferred, the results were presented as Hazard Ratios (HRs) with 95 %Confidence Intervals (CIs) and the I<sup>2</sup> index quantified heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis according to AJCC stage and sensitivity analysis were also conducted.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>One hundred forty-three and 101 studies were included in the qualitive and quantitative synthesis, respectively. Regarding clinical factors, males, compared to females, and head and neck location, compared to trunk, demonstrated higher risk for DM [n=36, HR 1.49, 95%CI 1.36 – 1.63, I<sup>2</sup> 33% and n=21, HR 1.24, 95 %CI 1.01 – 1.52, I<sup>2</sup> 62 %]. Both factors had similar effects on DMFS. Breslow thickness and ulceration were significant predictors or DM. Additional factors that posed an increased risk for DM were nodular (n=15, HR 2.51, 95 %CI 1.83 – 3.43, I<sup>2</sup> 56 %) and lentigo maligna subtypes (n=12, HR 1.87, 95 %CI 1.27 – 2.75, I<sup>2</sup> 0 %), compared to superficial spreading subtype, lymphovascular invasion (n=9, HR 2.05, 95 %CI 1.18 – 3.58, I<sup>2</sup> 78 %), SLN positivity and BRAF+ mutational status. In contrast, regression was a negative predictor of DM (n=15, HR 0.59, 95 %CI 0.44 – 0.79, I<sup>2</sup> 68 %). Two studies focused on dermatoscopic factors and found that low pigmentation and the presence of blue-white veil might predict DM development. The results of subgroup analysis for stage I-II patients were essentially similar and sensitivity analysis did not reveal significant alterations, despite the moderate or high heterogeneity in some categories.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Clinical and histological characteristics of the tumor along with dermatoscopic features and molecular parameters hold significant prognostic information and could be incorporated into models to predict melanomas with high metastatic potential.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11358,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141794280","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-26DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104455
Aim
To explore the impact of previous treatment on the efficacy of investigational new drugs in registration trials for 1st line metastatic breast cancer (MBC).
Methods
Thirteen US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved indications for 1st line MBC between 1/2000–12/2023 were identified and their supporting publications were searched in the ClinicalTrials.gov and Google Scholar. Where available, hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for overall-survival (OS) were pooled into meta-analysis and the difference in the magnitude of OS benefit between treatment naïve and previously treated patients was analyzed.
Results
There was no difference in the magnitude of OS benefit between treatment-naïve and previously treated patients (HR=0.72 versus 0.80,p for difference=0.25). In indications for triple-negative BC, treatment-naïve patients had higher magnitude of OS benefit compared to previously treated patients (HR=0.53 versus 0.81,p=0.03). In indications for luminal disease, the magnitude of benefit was comparable between the subgroups.
Conclusions
In trials supporting 1st line therapy for TNBC the magnitude of benefit is significantly higher in treatment naïve compared to previously treated patients. Our findings may represent a previously unrecognized bias, potentially over-estimating the benefit of triple-negative BC new drugs.
{"title":"The impact of previous therapy on overall-survival in registration clinical trials for 1st line metastatic breast cancer a systemic review","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104455","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104455","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To explore the impact of previous treatment on the efficacy of investigational new drugs in registration trials for 1st line metastatic breast cancer (MBC).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Thirteen US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved indications for 1st line MBC between 1/2000–12/2023 were identified and their supporting publications were searched in the ClinicalTrials.gov and Google Scholar. Where available, hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for overall-survival (OS) were pooled into meta-analysis and the difference in the magnitude of OS benefit between treatment naïve and previously treated patients was analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was no difference in the magnitude of OS benefit between treatment-naïve and previously treated patients (HR=0.72 versus 0.80,p for difference=0.25). In indications for triple-negative BC, treatment-naïve patients had higher magnitude of OS benefit compared to previously treated patients (HR=0.53 versus 0.81,p=0.03). In indications for luminal disease, the magnitude of benefit was comparable between the subgroups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In trials supporting 1st line therapy for TNBC the magnitude of benefit is significantly higher in treatment naïve compared to previously treated patients. Our findings may represent a previously unrecognized bias, potentially over-estimating the benefit of triple-negative BC new drugs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11358,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141790290","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-21DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104454
Colorectal cancer remains the third most common cancer worldwide and the second cause of cancer-related death. Treatment advances and precision oncological medicine for these tumours have been stalled in comparison to those for other common tumours such as lung and breast cancer. However, the recent publication of the SUNLIGHT trial results with the trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102)–bevacizumab combination and the irruption of new molecular targets with guided treatments have opened new possibilities in third-line metastatic colorectal cancer management. Anti-EGFR rechallenge, anti-HER2 targeted therapies or the promising results of Pressurised Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC), are some of the available options that may modify what is presumably third-line colorectal treatment. Hereby, we present the evidence of the different treatment options in third-line colorectal cancer and beyond, as well as the possibilities of sequencing them.
{"title":"Third-line treatment and beyond in metastatic colorectal cancer: What do we have and what can we expect?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104454","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104454","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Colorectal cancer remains the third most common cancer worldwide and the second cause of cancer-related death. Treatment advances and precision oncological medicine for these tumours have been stalled in comparison to those for other common tumours such as lung and breast cancer. However, the recent publication of the SUNLIGHT trial results with the trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102)–bevacizumab combination and the irruption of new molecular targets with guided treatments have opened new possibilities in third-line metastatic colorectal cancer management. Anti-EGFR rechallenge, anti-HER2 targeted therapies or the promising results of Pressurised Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC), are some of the available options that may modify what is presumably third-line colorectal treatment. Hereby, we present the evidence of the different treatment options in third-line colorectal cancer and beyond, as well as the possibilities of sequencing them.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11358,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141753593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-20DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104457
Tumor resistance poses a significant challenge to effective cancer treatment, making it imperative to explore new therapeutic strategies. Recent studies have highlighted the profound involvement of immune cells in the development of tumor resistance. Within the tumor microenvironment, macrophages undergo polarization into the M2 phenotype, thus promoting the emergence of drug-resistant tumors. Neutrophils contribute to tumor resistance by forming extracellular traps. While T cells and natural killer (NK) cells exert their impact through direct cytotoxicity against tumor cells. Additionally, dendritic cells (DCs) have been implicated in preventing tumor drug resistance by stimulating T cell activation. In this review, we provide a comprehensive summary of the current knowledge regarding immune cell-mediated modulation of tumor resistance at the molecular level, with a particular focus on macrophages, neutrophils, DCs, T cells, and NK cells. The targeting of immune cell modulation exhibits considerable potential for addressing drug resistance, and an in-depth understanding of the molecular interactions between immune cells and tumor cells holds promise for the development of innovative therapies. Furthermore, we explore the clinical implications of these immune cells in the treatment of drug-resistant tumors. This review emphasizes the exploration of novel approaches that harness the functional capabilities of immune cells to effectively overcome drug-resistant tumors.
肿瘤抗药性是有效治疗癌症的重大挑战,因此探索新的治疗策略势在必行。最近的研究突出表明,免疫细胞在肿瘤抗药性的形成过程中扮演着重要角色。在肿瘤微环境中,巨噬细胞极化为 M2 表型,从而促进了耐药性肿瘤的出现。中性粒细胞通过形成细胞外捕获器促进肿瘤抗药性的产生。而 T 细胞和自然杀伤(NK)细胞则通过对肿瘤细胞的直接细胞毒性发挥影响。此外,树突状细胞(DCs)通过刺激 T 细胞活化,也被认为与防止肿瘤耐药性有关。在这篇综述中,我们全面总结了目前有关免疫细胞介导的分子水平肿瘤耐药性调节的知识,尤其关注巨噬细胞、中性粒细胞、DCs、T 细胞和 NK 细胞。针对免疫细胞的调控在解决耐药性问题上具有相当大的潜力,深入了解免疫细胞与肿瘤细胞之间的分子相互作用为开发创新疗法带来了希望。此外,我们还探讨了这些免疫细胞在治疗耐药性肿瘤方面的临床意义。本综述强调探索利用免疫细胞的功能来有效克服耐药性肿瘤的新方法。
{"title":"Novel insights into immune cells modulation of tumor resistance","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104457","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104457","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Tumor resistance poses a significant challenge to effective cancer treatment, making it imperative to explore new therapeutic strategies. Recent studies have highlighted the profound involvement of immune cells in the development of tumor resistance. Within the tumor microenvironment, macrophages undergo polarization into the M2 phenotype, thus promoting the emergence of drug-resistant tumors. Neutrophils contribute to tumor resistance by forming extracellular traps. While T cells and natural killer (NK) cells exert their impact through direct cytotoxicity against tumor cells. Additionally, dendritic cells (DCs) have been implicated in preventing tumor drug resistance by stimulating T cell activation. In this review, we provide a comprehensive summary of the current knowledge regarding immune cell-mediated modulation of tumor resistance at the molecular level, with a particular focus on macrophages, neutrophils, DCs, T cells, and NK cells. The targeting of immune cell modulation exhibits considerable potential for addressing drug resistance, and an in-depth understanding of the molecular interactions between immune cells and tumor cells holds promise for the development of innovative therapies. Furthermore, we explore the clinical implications of these immune cells in the treatment of drug-resistant tumors. This review emphasizes the exploration of novel approaches that harness the functional capabilities of immune cells to effectively overcome drug-resistant tumors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11358,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141750035","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-19DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104456
High grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) is the most common and the deadliest histologic subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer. HGSC is a therapeutic challenge, as it recurs in 80 % of patients diagnosed, often as chemoresistant disease. The mechanism of this chemoresistance is not fully elucidated, but it is partly attributed to the ability of HGSC to maintain a stem-like phenotype that enables development of resistance to current therapies. Polycomb Repressor Complexes 1 and 2 (PRC1/2) have been implicated in the maintenance of the stem cell compartment through silencing tumor suppressor genes and regulating stem cells. These complexes are comprised of multiple polycomb group (PcG) proteins that play a role in normal development, and when deregulated contribute to the development of cancer [2]. Proteins included in PRC1 include B lymphoma mouse Moloney leukemia virus insertion region (BMI1), RING1, and chromobox (CBX) proteins.
We aimed to review each of the protein components of PRC1 and their mechanistic relationships to promoting chemoresistant recurrences and propagation of ovarian cancer. Where possible, we reviewed therapeutic investigations of these proteins. We utilized a scoping literature review through Covidence to identify 42 articles meeting criteria for inclusion. The authors identified four relevant articles and the Yale MeSH Analysis Grid Generator was used to establish additional keywords and heading terms. A medical librarian used these terms and articles to draft an initial search strategy within each of the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science Core Collection, yielding 439 articles based on title and abstract. Abstracts were independently reviewed by the authors, identifying 77 articles for full text review, of which 35 were ultimately excluded, leaving 42 articles for full review.
Our review identified the currently known mechanisms of the subunits of PRC1 that contribute to HGSC development, recurrence, and chemoresistance. By compiling a comprehensive review of available scientific knowledge, we support and direct further investigation into PRC1 that can affect meaningful advances in the treatment of HGSC.
{"title":"Polycomb Repressor Complex 1 (PRC1) in ovarian cancer: A scoping literature review","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104456","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104456","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>High grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) is the most common and the deadliest histologic subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer. HGSC is a therapeutic challenge, as it recurs in 80 % of patients diagnosed, often as chemoresistant disease. The mechanism of this chemoresistance is not fully elucidated, but it is partly attributed to the ability of HGSC to maintain a stem-like phenotype that enables development of resistance to current therapies. Polycomb Repressor Complexes 1 and 2 (PRC1/2) have been implicated in the maintenance of the stem cell compartment through silencing tumor suppressor genes and regulating stem cells. These complexes are comprised of multiple polycomb group (PcG) proteins that play a role in normal development, and when deregulated contribute to the development of cancer [2]. Proteins included in PRC1 include B lymphoma mouse Moloney leukemia virus insertion region (BMI1), RING1, and chromobox (CBX) proteins.</p><p>We aimed to review each of the protein components of PRC1 and their mechanistic relationships to promoting chemoresistant recurrences and propagation of ovarian cancer. Where possible, we reviewed therapeutic investigations of these proteins. We utilized a scoping literature review through Covidence to identify 42 articles meeting criteria for inclusion. The authors identified four relevant articles and the Yale MeSH Analysis Grid Generator was used to establish additional keywords and heading terms. A medical librarian used these terms and articles to draft an initial search strategy within each of the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science Core Collection, yielding 439 articles based on title and abstract. Abstracts were independently reviewed by the authors, identifying 77 articles for full text review, of which 35 were ultimately excluded, leaving 42 articles for full review.</p><p>Our review identified the currently known mechanisms of the subunits of PRC1 that contribute to HGSC development, recurrence, and chemoresistance. By compiling a comprehensive review of available scientific knowledge, we support and direct further investigation into PRC1 that can affect meaningful advances in the treatment of HGSC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11358,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141736026","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-16DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104443
Randomized clinical trials demonstrated a recurrence-free survival benefit with adjuvant anti-programmed death-1 (anti-PD1) inhibitors of resected stage IIB-IV melanoma. However, no improvement in overall survival has been observed thus far. Furthermore, there are no predictive markers for immunotherapy response in melanoma, therefore adjuvant treatment is offered to all comers based exclusively on the pathological and clinical stages. Additionally, one year of treatment duration and the risk of chronic immune-related adverse effects may negatively impact patients´ quality of life. In this review, we will try to answer whether the currently available data on adjuvant anti-PD1 therapy of stage IIB-IV resected melanoma is sufficient to make this strategy available to all patients. We will also discuss the economic impact of this therapy on healthcare system budgets. Recent studies suggest that the high cost of cancer drugs may affect access to these agents globally by raising questions of sustainability for patients and society.
{"title":"Adjuvant anti-PD1 immunotherapy of resected skin melanoma: an example of non-personalized medicine with no overall survival benefit","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104443","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104443","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Randomized clinical trials demonstrated a recurrence-free survival benefit with adjuvant anti-programmed death-1 (anti-PD1) inhibitors of resected stage IIB-IV melanoma. However, no improvement in overall survival has been observed thus far. Furthermore, there are no predictive markers for immunotherapy response in melanoma, therefore adjuvant treatment is offered to <em>all comers</em> based exclusively on the pathological and clinical stages. Additionally, one year of treatment duration and the risk of chronic immune-related adverse effects may negatively impact patients´ quality of life. In this review, we will try to answer whether the currently available data on adjuvant anti-PD1 therapy of stage IIB-IV resected melanoma is sufficient to make this strategy available to all patients. We will also discuss the economic impact of this therapy on healthcare system budgets. Recent studies suggest that the high cost of cancer drugs may affect access to these agents globally by raising questions of sustainability for patients and society.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11358,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141725308","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}