Allan, Sarah. “Interpreting the Decoration of Early Chinese Bronze Vessels.” In Mirroring China’s Past: Emperors, Scholars, and Their Bronzes, ed. Wang Tao, 38–43. Chicago: The Art Institute of Chicago, 2018. Bagley, Robert. “The Bronze Age before the Zhou Dynasty.” In Routledge Handbook of Early Chinese History, ed. Paul R. Goldin, 61–83. London: Routledge, 2018. Boehm, Christian. “Lead-Glazed Earthenwares from the Eastern Han to the Liao Dynasty in the Shangyatang Collection.” Arts of Asia 48.1 (2018), 50–57. Campbell, Roderick. Violence, Kinship and the Early Chinese State: The Shang and Their World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. Cao, Wei, Yuanqing Liu, Katheryn M. Linduff, and Yan Sun. “The Rise of States and the Formation of Group Identities in the Western Regions of the Inner Asian Frontier (c. 1500 to the Eighth Century bce).” In Ancient China and Its Eurasian Neighbors: Artifacts, Identity and Death in the Frontier, 3000–700 bce, ed. Katheryn M. Linduff, Yuanqing Liu, Wei Cao, and Yan Sun, 146–214. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2018. Childs-Johnson, Elizabeth. “Jade Dragons and Dragon Origins.” In Mythical Beasts: The Divinity of Dragons, catalog, Throckmorton Fine Art, NY, 2017, 9–19. Childs-Johnson, Elizabeth. “Urban Daemons of Early Shang.” Archaeological Research in Asia 14 (2018), 135–50. D’alpoim Guedes, Jade, and Anke Hein. “Landscapes of Prehistoric Northwestern Sichuan: From Early Agriculture to Pastoralist Lifestyles.” Journal of Field Archaeology 43.2 (2018), 121–35. Feinman, Gary M., Hui Fang, and Linda M. Nicholas. “China during the Neolithic Period.” In China: Visions Through the Ages, ed. Lisa C. Niziolek, Deborah A. Bekken, and Gary M. Feinman, 69–88. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2017.
艾伦,萨拉。“解读中国早期青铜器的装饰。”《镜像中国的过去:皇帝、学者和他们的青铜器》，王涛编，38-43页。芝加哥:芝加哥艺术学院，2018。巴格利,罗伯特。“周朝以前的青铜器时代。”《劳特利奇中国早期历史手册》，保罗·r·戈尔丁编，第61-83页。伦敦:劳特利奇出版社，2018。Boehm,基督徒。《上雅堂馆藏东汉至辽铅釉陶器》亚洲艺术48.1(2018)，50-57。坎贝尔,罗德里克。暴力、亲属关系与中国早期国家:商朝及其世界。剑桥:剑桥大学出版社，2018。曹，魏，刘元庆，Katheryn M. Linduff，孙燕。内亚边境西部地区国家的兴起和群体认同的形成(公元前1500年至公元前8世纪)。《古代中国及其欧亚邻国:公元前3000-700年边疆地区的文物、身份与死亡》，林达夫、刘元庆、曹伟、孙岩编，第146-214页。纽约:剑桥大学出版社，2018。Childs-Johnson,伊丽莎白。《玉龙与龙的起源》《神话野兽:龙之神》，目录，思罗克莫顿美术，纽约，2017,9-19。Childs-Johnson,伊丽莎白。《商代早期的城市精灵》亚洲考古研究14(2018)，135-50。D 'alpoim Guedes, Jade和Anke Hein。四川西北史前景观:从早期农业到游牧生活方式野地考古学报43.2(2018)，121-35。费曼，加里·M，方慧，琳达·M·尼古拉斯。“新石器时代的中国。”《在中国:跨越时代的愿景》，丽莎·c·尼齐奥莱克、黛博拉·a·贝肯、加里·m·费曼主编，第69-88页。芝加哥:芝加哥大学出版社，2017。
{"title":"ANNUAL BIBLIOGRAPHY","authors":"A. Harrer","doi":"10.1017/eac.2018.11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/eac.2018.11","url":null,"abstract":"Allan, Sarah. “Interpreting the Decoration of Early Chinese Bronze Vessels.” In Mirroring China’s Past: Emperors, Scholars, and Their Bronzes, ed. Wang Tao, 38–43. Chicago: The Art Institute of Chicago, 2018. Bagley, Robert. “The Bronze Age before the Zhou Dynasty.” In Routledge Handbook of Early Chinese History, ed. Paul R. Goldin, 61–83. London: Routledge, 2018. Boehm, Christian. “Lead-Glazed Earthenwares from the Eastern Han to the Liao Dynasty in the Shangyatang Collection.” Arts of Asia 48.1 (2018), 50–57. Campbell, Roderick. Violence, Kinship and the Early Chinese State: The Shang and Their World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. Cao, Wei, Yuanqing Liu, Katheryn M. Linduff, and Yan Sun. “The Rise of States and the Formation of Group Identities in the Western Regions of the Inner Asian Frontier (c. 1500 to the Eighth Century bce).” In Ancient China and Its Eurasian Neighbors: Artifacts, Identity and Death in the Frontier, 3000–700 bce, ed. Katheryn M. Linduff, Yuanqing Liu, Wei Cao, and Yan Sun, 146–214. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2018. Childs-Johnson, Elizabeth. “Jade Dragons and Dragon Origins.” In Mythical Beasts: The Divinity of Dragons, catalog, Throckmorton Fine Art, NY, 2017, 9–19. Childs-Johnson, Elizabeth. “Urban Daemons of Early Shang.” Archaeological Research in Asia 14 (2018), 135–50. D’alpoim Guedes, Jade, and Anke Hein. “Landscapes of Prehistoric Northwestern Sichuan: From Early Agriculture to Pastoralist Lifestyles.” Journal of Field Archaeology 43.2 (2018), 121–35. Feinman, Gary M., Hui Fang, and Linda M. Nicholas. “China during the Neolithic Period.” In China: Visions Through the Ages, ed. Lisa C. Niziolek, Deborah A. Bekken, and Gary M. Feinman, 69–88. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2017.","PeriodicalId":11463,"journal":{"name":"Early China","volume":"41 1","pages":"477 - 504"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/eac.2018.11","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"56560029","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This is an insightful book exploring early Chinese mortuary religion by focusing on archaeological materials. It distinguishes itself by the author’s solid knowledge of the primary and secondary literature in this field and, more importantly, by adopting various perspectives and methodologies from archaeologists, art historians, and anthropologists. The object of this book is to explore “burial practices of Warring States (ca. 453–221 b.c.e.), Qin (221–206 b.c.e.), and early Han (206 b.c.e.–9 c.e.).” Recent archaeological discoveries greatly enrich our knowledge of this period, and this particular era witnessed significant changes in mortuary practices such as the emergence of horizontal chamber tombs, the pervasive use of spirit artifacts (mingqi 明器), more frequent appearance of anthropomorphic and hybrid images, buried manuscripts, and newly introduced burial objects. The author traces the evolution of these changes and provides provocative interpretations of their meanings in a comparative framework. Following the archaeology of religion proposed by Buddhologist Gregory Schopen (p. 14), the author treats archaeological discoveries as an independent source of cultural and religious expression: independent in the sense that archaeological finds do not serve to validate conventional claims preserved in our transmitted texts. But it is challenging and risky to generate meaning and thereby reconstruct a cultural and theological milieu from those excavated artifacts. The reason for this is simple. Both the preservation and excavation of archeological remains are conditioned by various factors. Remains are fragmentary, representing only a fraction of the material culture in a historical period. While we search for coherent and seamless narratives to explain the religious practices of a particular place and time, we must acknowledge the coexistences of different and even contradictory beliefs and traditions. Making a sound interpretation requires us to analyze available data carefully in historical, sociopolitical, and archeological contexts, but we
{"title":"Guolong Lai. Excavating the Afterlife: The Archaeology of Early Chinese Religion. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2015.","authors":"L. Cai","doi":"10.1017/eac.2018.19","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/eac.2018.19","url":null,"abstract":"This is an insightful book exploring early Chinese mortuary religion by focusing on archaeological materials. It distinguishes itself by the author’s solid knowledge of the primary and secondary literature in this field and, more importantly, by adopting various perspectives and methodologies from archaeologists, art historians, and anthropologists. The object of this book is to explore “burial practices of Warring States (ca. 453–221 b.c.e.), Qin (221–206 b.c.e.), and early Han (206 b.c.e.–9 c.e.).” Recent archaeological discoveries greatly enrich our knowledge of this period, and this particular era witnessed significant changes in mortuary practices such as the emergence of horizontal chamber tombs, the pervasive use of spirit artifacts (mingqi 明器), more frequent appearance of anthropomorphic and hybrid images, buried manuscripts, and newly introduced burial objects. The author traces the evolution of these changes and provides provocative interpretations of their meanings in a comparative framework. Following the archaeology of religion proposed by Buddhologist Gregory Schopen (p. 14), the author treats archaeological discoveries as an independent source of cultural and religious expression: independent in the sense that archaeological finds do not serve to validate conventional claims preserved in our transmitted texts. But it is challenging and risky to generate meaning and thereby reconstruct a cultural and theological milieu from those excavated artifacts. The reason for this is simple. Both the preservation and excavation of archeological remains are conditioned by various factors. Remains are fragmentary, representing only a fraction of the material culture in a historical period. While we search for coherent and seamless narratives to explain the religious practices of a particular place and time, we must acknowledge the coexistences of different and even contradictory beliefs and traditions. Making a sound interpretation requires us to analyze available data carefully in historical, sociopolitical, and archeological contexts, but we","PeriodicalId":11463,"journal":{"name":"Early China","volume":"41 1","pages":"461 - 464"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/eac.2018.19","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"56560794","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract The Qin jiandu yanjiu 秦簡牘研究 (Research on Qin strips) book series, edited by Chen Wei 陳偉, presents important findings from the “Comprehensive Arrangement and Study of the Qin Bamboo Slip Manuscripts” research project. Organized thematically into five volumes, detailed case studies on newly unearthed Qin texts address issues in institutional history, law, geography, mantic arts, and linguistics. The Qin jiandu yanjiu series supplements the Qin jiandu heji 秦簡牘合集 (Corpus of Qin documents written on bamboo and wood) and Liye Qin jiandu jiaoshi (diyi juan) 里耶秦簡牘校釋(第一卷) (Annotated transcriptions of the Liye Qin strips (volume one)) reference works, and indirectly serves as a state of the field for Qin manuscript studies. 提要 陳偉主編的《秦簡牘研究》叢書發表了“秦簡牘的綜合整理與研究”項目的重要研究成果。通過對出土秦簡牘資料的分析，這套五卷本分别考察了制度、律令、地理、數術及語法等專題。《秦簡牘研究》叢書與《秦簡牘合集》及《里耶秦簡牘校釋（第一卷）》參考書相輔相成，且《秦簡牘研究》這套書系可間接作為秦簡牘學領域最新發展綜述。
Abstract The Qin jiandu yanjiu 秦简牍研究 (Research on Qin strips) book series, edited by Chen Wei 陈伟, presents important findings from the “Comprehensive Arrangement and Study of the Qin Bamboo Slip Manuscripts” research project. Organized thematically into five volumes, detailed case studies on newly unearthed Qin texts address issues in institutional history, law, geography, mantic arts, and linguistics. The Qin jiandu yanjiu series supplements the Qin jiandu heji 秦简牍合集 (Corpus of Qin documents written on bamboo and wood) and Liye Qin jiandu jiaoshi (diyi juan) 里耶秦简牍校释(第一卷) (Annotated transcriptions of the Liye Qin strips (volume one)) reference works, and indirectly serves as a state of the field for Qin manuscript studies. 提要 陈伟主编的《秦简牍研究》丛书发表了“秦简牍的综合整理与研究”项目的重要研究成果。通过对出土秦简牍资料的分析，这套五卷本分别考察了制度、律令、地理、数术及语法等专题。《秦简牍研究》丛书与《秦简牍合集》及《里耶秦简牍校释（第一卷）》参考书相辅相成，且《秦简牍研究》这套书系可间接作为秦简牍学领域最新发展综述。
{"title":"CHEN WEI 陳偉 (ed.), QIN JIANDU YANJIU 秦簡牘研究 (RESEARCH ON QIN STRIPS) FIVE VOLUME BOOK SERIES: A REVIEW ARTICLE","authors":"Christopher J. 希明 Foster 傅","doi":"10.1017/eac.2018.13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/eac.2018.13","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Qin jiandu yanjiu 秦簡牘研究 (Research on Qin strips) book series, edited by Chen Wei 陳偉, presents important findings from the “Comprehensive Arrangement and Study of the Qin Bamboo Slip Manuscripts” research project. Organized thematically into five volumes, detailed case studies on newly unearthed Qin texts address issues in institutional history, law, geography, mantic arts, and linguistics. The Qin jiandu yanjiu series supplements the Qin jiandu heji 秦簡牘合集 (Corpus of Qin documents written on bamboo and wood) and Liye Qin jiandu jiaoshi (diyi juan) 里耶秦簡牘校釋(第一卷) (Annotated transcriptions of the Liye Qin strips (volume one)) reference works, and indirectly serves as a state of the field for Qin manuscript studies. 提要 陳偉主編的《秦簡牘研究》叢書發表了“秦簡牘的綜合整理與研究”項目的重要研究成果。通過對出土秦簡牘資料的分析，這套五卷本分别考察了制度、律令、地理、數術及語法等專題。《秦簡牘研究》叢書與《秦簡牘合集》及《里耶秦簡牘校釋（第一卷）》參考書相輔相成，且《秦簡牘研究》這套書系可間接作為秦簡牘學領域最新發展綜述。","PeriodicalId":11463,"journal":{"name":"Early China","volume":"41 1","pages":"435 - 451"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/eac.2018.13","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"56560059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract This is a short review of the “Mirroring China's Past” exhibition at the Art Institute of Chicago (February 25th–May 13th, 2018). For reference, the exhibition catalog is: Tao Wang 汪涛 et al. Mirroring China's Past: Emperors, Scholars, and Their Bronzes [吉金鑒古]. The Art Institute of Chicago, 2018. Distributed by Yale University Press, New Haven and London. 摘要 芝加哥藝術美院《吉金鑒古》展覽的評論。
{"title":"NEW EXHIBITION EXAMINES THE SOCIAL LIFE OF BRONZES THROUGH THE CENTURIES","authors":"Martin 華石 Powers 包","doi":"10.1017/eac.2018.6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/eac.2018.6","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This is a short review of the “Mirroring China's Past” exhibition at the Art Institute of Chicago (February 25th–May 13th, 2018). For reference, the exhibition catalog is: Tao Wang 汪涛 et al. Mirroring China's Past: Emperors, Scholars, and Their Bronzes [吉金鑒古]. The Art Institute of Chicago, 2018. Distributed by Yale University Press, New Haven and London. 摘要 芝加哥藝術美院《吉金鑒古》展覽的評論。","PeriodicalId":11463,"journal":{"name":"Early China","volume":"41 1","pages":"453 - 456"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/eac.2018.6","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"56561892","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract The influential Chu ci zhangju 楚辭章句, the earliest received edition of the foundational poetry anthology Chuci 楚辭, performs a distinct gender bias in its exegesis of deities, and this bias accords with the Eastern Han ideology of the editor Wang Yi 王逸 (2nd c. CE) more than with immanent features of the original Warring States texts. The gender bias is an essential feature of Wang Yi’s canonization of the Chuci, and it lays the groundwork of the allegorical tradition of interpreting the Chuci. This paper analyzes the zhangju presentation of archetypal Chuci texts to elucidate the hermeneutic transformation of gender and religion in early China, comparing the Eastern Han exegeses with earlier and later interpretations, immanent textual features, and fresh perspectives on Warring States and Han culture that have emerged from archeological evidence. The analysis demonstrates that the Chuci zhangju treats the male deities more literally than the female deities, reflecting the reduction in status of goddesses in late Han discourse. The history of gender ideology is an essential critical lens for understanding the Chuci and the tradition that emerged from it. 提要 著名的《楚辭章句》是現存最早的《楚辭》傳世注本，其對於神靈精怪的解釋有明顯的性別偏見。編者王逸的偏見符合東漢的意識形態，卻與戰國的《楚辭》正文內在意義有所落差。《楚辭章句》的性別偏見也奠定了《楚辭》寓言闡釋傳統的基礎。本文在比較東漢註解與早期詮釋、後世註疏、文本內在特徵、現代考古研究等的基礎上，闡明古代中國性別與宗教觀在詮釋上產生的變化。研究指出《楚辭章句》中男性神靈的解釋與女性神靈的詮釋相比要來得直接，反映出漢代晚期女神地位下降的事實。研究性別意識的演變是理解《楚辭》及其傳統的重要視角 。
{"title":"WANTON GODDESSES TO UNSPOKEN WORTHIES: GENDERED HERMENEUTICS IN THE CHU CI ZHANGJU","authors":"Monica E. M. 思清 Zikpi 馬","doi":"10.1017/eac.2018.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/eac.2018.1","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The influential Chu ci zhangju 楚辭章句, the earliest received edition of the foundational poetry anthology Chuci 楚辭, performs a distinct gender bias in its exegesis of deities, and this bias accords with the Eastern Han ideology of the editor Wang Yi 王逸 (2nd c. CE) more than with immanent features of the original Warring States texts. The gender bias is an essential feature of Wang Yi’s canonization of the Chuci, and it lays the groundwork of the allegorical tradition of interpreting the Chuci. This paper analyzes the zhangju presentation of archetypal Chuci texts to elucidate the hermeneutic transformation of gender and religion in early China, comparing the Eastern Han exegeses with earlier and later interpretations, immanent textual features, and fresh perspectives on Warring States and Han culture that have emerged from archeological evidence. The analysis demonstrates that the Chuci zhangju treats the male deities more literally than the female deities, reflecting the reduction in status of goddesses in late Han discourse. The history of gender ideology is an essential critical lens for understanding the Chuci and the tradition that emerged from it. 提要 著名的《楚辭章句》是現存最早的《楚辭》傳世注本，其對於神靈精怪的解釋有明顯的性別偏見。編者王逸的偏見符合東漢的意識形態，卻與戰國的《楚辭》正文內在意義有所落差。《楚辭章句》的性別偏見也奠定了《楚辭》寓言闡釋傳統的基礎。本文在比較東漢註解與早期詮釋、後世註疏、文本內在特徵、現代考古研究等的基礎上，闡明古代中國性別與宗教觀在詮釋上產生的變化。研究指出《楚辭章句》中男性神靈的解釋與女性神靈的詮釋相比要來得直接，反映出漢代晚期女神地位下降的事實。研究性別意識的演變是理解《楚辭》及其傳統的重要視角 。","PeriodicalId":11463,"journal":{"name":"Early China","volume":"41 1","pages":"333 - 374"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/eac.2018.1","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"56559928","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract In his Research Note, “Shun 舜 and the Interpretation of Early Orthographical Variation,” in this issue of Early China, Jonathan Smith made several claims about the early evolution of the graph 舜, in particular suggesting that it should be identified with the graph lin 粦 that occurs in certain Western Zhou bronze inscriptions. While showing that these claims are ill-supported, I nevertheless concur in the identification with the bronze-inscriptional graph, but show that the word being written is 濬 ~ 浚 “deep, profound” and in no way connected with lin 粦. 提要 Jonathan M. Smith 提出了有關“舜”之古文字寫法的一些觀點，並指出“舜”字與見於西周銅器銘文中過去被釋為“粦”的一個字具有發展演變關係。本文認爲 Jonathan Smith 提出的部分觀點是不正確的，但同時認爲西周金文中所謂“粦”字確實與“舜”字有密切關係，只不過將該字釋為“粦”還不如讀之為“濬 ”或“浚”。
Abstract In his Research Note, “Shun 舜 and the Interpretation of Early Orthographical Variation,” in this issue of Early China, Jonathan Smith made several claims about the early evolution of the graph 舜, in particular suggesting that it should be identified with the graph lin 粦 that occurs in certain Western Zhou bronze inscriptions. While showing that these claims are ill-supported, I nevertheless concur in the identification with the bronze-inscriptional graph, but show that the word being written is 濬 ~ 浚 “deep, profound” and in no way connected with lin 粦. 提要 Jonathan M. Smith 提出了有关“舜”之古文字写法的一些观点，并指出“舜”字与见于西周铜器铭文中过去被释为“粦”的一个字具有发展演变关系。本文认为 Jonathan Smith 提出的部分观点是不正确的，但同时认为西周金文中所谓“粦”字确实与“舜”字有密切关系，只不过将该字释为“粦”还不如读之为“濬 ”或“浚”。
{"title":"REJOINDER TO JONATHAN SMITH, RESEARCH NOTE ON SHUN 舜","authors":"Adam D. 當 Smith 亞","doi":"10.1017/eac.2018.16","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/eac.2018.16","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In his Research Note, “Shun 舜 and the Interpretation of Early Orthographical Variation,” in this issue of Early China, Jonathan Smith made several claims about the early evolution of the graph 舜, in particular suggesting that it should be identified with the graph lin 粦 that occurs in certain Western Zhou bronze inscriptions. While showing that these claims are ill-supported, I nevertheless concur in the identification with the bronze-inscriptional graph, but show that the word being written is 濬 ~ 浚 “deep, profound” and in no way connected with lin 粦. 提要 Jonathan M. Smith 提出了有關“舜”之古文字寫法的一些觀點，並指出“舜”字與見於西周銅器銘文中過去被釋為“粦”的一個字具有發展演變關係。本文認爲 Jonathan Smith 提出的部分觀點是不正確的，但同時認爲西周金文中所謂“粦”字確實與“舜”字有密切關係，只不過將該字釋為“粦”還不如讀之為“濬 ”或“浚”。","PeriodicalId":11463,"journal":{"name":"Early China","volume":"41 1","pages":"423 - 433"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/eac.2018.16","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"56560643","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The redoubtable Ying-shih Yü’s most important studies in English have been republished in two volumes as part of the Masters of Chinese Studies series, edited by David Der-wei Wang for Columbia University Press. Because the chapters are sequenced chronologically, the ones that will most interest readers of Early China are in volume I. Volume II stretches from the seventeenth to the twentieth centuries. The collection had apparently been planned for several years, but in late 2014, when Yü’s medical condition prevented him from proofreading the final text, Wang called on Josephine Chiu-Duke and Michael S. Duke to help complete the project (p. xvi). The process of digitally formatting the files had resulted in the loss of significant amounts of text, which Chiu-Duke and Duke restored by referring to the original publications. In addition, they made “a few minor changes” (not further documented) and added some Chinese graphs for the sake of clarity. Since these volumes could not have been published without their painstaking labor, the entire field is in their debt. The first seven chapters focus on early China: “Between the Heavenly and the Human” (pp. 1–19), “Life and Immortality in the Mind of Han China” (pp. 20–57), “‘O Soul, Come Back!’: A Study in the Changing Conceptions of the Soul and Afterlife in Pre-Buddhist China” (pp. 58–84), “New Evidence on the Early Chinese Conception of the Afterlife” (pp. 85–90), “Food in Chinese Culture: The Han Period (206 B.C.E.–220 C.E.)” (pp. 91–121), “The Seating Order at the Hong Men Banquet” (pp. 122–33), and “Individualism and the Neo-Daoist Movement in Wei-Jin China” (pp. 134–65). The last of these, despite the title, trenchantly discusses Wang Chong 王充 (27–c. 100 c.e.) and his reception in the Six Dynasties, and thus will undoubtedly interest Han
令人敬畏的英时Yü最重要的英语研究已被重新出版为两卷，作为中国研究大师系列的一部分，由王德伟为哥伦比亚大学出版社编辑。因为这些章节是按时间顺序排列的，所以对早期中国的读者最感兴趣的章节是在第一卷。第二卷从十七世纪延伸到二十世纪。收集显然已经计划了几年，但在2014年底，当Yü的健康状况使他无法校对最后的文本时，王呼吁Josephine Chiu-Duke和Michael s. Duke帮助完成该项目(第xvi页)。数字格式化文件的过程导致大量文本丢失，Chiu-Duke和Duke通过参考原始出版物来恢复。此外，他们做了“一些小改动”(没有进一步记录)，并为了清晰起见添加了一些中文图表。由于没有他们的辛勤劳动，这些书是不可能出版的，因此整个领域都亏欠了他们。前七章聚焦早期中国:“在天人之间”(第1-19页)、“汉人思想中的生命与不朽”(第20-57页)、“灵魂啊，回来吧!”《中国早期来世观念的新证据》(第85-90页)、《中国文化中的饮食:汉代(公元前206年-公元220年)》(第91-121页)、《洪门宴的座次》(第122-33页)和《魏晋中国的个人主义与新道家运动》(第134-65页)。最后一本书，尽管标题，尖锐地讨论了王冲(27-c .)。(公元100年)和他在六朝的接待，因此无疑会引起汉朝的兴趣
{"title":"Ying-shih Yü. Chinese History and Culture, vol. I: Sixth Century B.C.E. to Seventeenth Century. Eds. Josephine Chiu-Duke and Michael S. Duke. Masters of Chinese Studies. New York: Columbia University Press, 2016.","authors":"P. Goldin","doi":"10.1017/EAC.2018.18","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/EAC.2018.18","url":null,"abstract":"The redoubtable Ying-shih Yü’s most important studies in English have been republished in two volumes as part of the Masters of Chinese Studies series, edited by David Der-wei Wang for Columbia University Press. Because the chapters are sequenced chronologically, the ones that will most interest readers of Early China are in volume I. Volume II stretches from the seventeenth to the twentieth centuries. The collection had apparently been planned for several years, but in late 2014, when Yü’s medical condition prevented him from proofreading the final text, Wang called on Josephine Chiu-Duke and Michael S. Duke to help complete the project (p. xvi). The process of digitally formatting the files had resulted in the loss of significant amounts of text, which Chiu-Duke and Duke restored by referring to the original publications. In addition, they made “a few minor changes” (not further documented) and added some Chinese graphs for the sake of clarity. Since these volumes could not have been published without their painstaking labor, the entire field is in their debt. The first seven chapters focus on early China: “Between the Heavenly and the Human” (pp. 1–19), “Life and Immortality in the Mind of Han China” (pp. 20–57), “‘O Soul, Come Back!’: A Study in the Changing Conceptions of the Soul and Afterlife in Pre-Buddhist China” (pp. 58–84), “New Evidence on the Early Chinese Conception of the Afterlife” (pp. 85–90), “Food in Chinese Culture: The Han Period (206 B.C.E.–220 C.E.)” (pp. 91–121), “The Seating Order at the Hong Men Banquet” (pp. 122–33), and “Individualism and the Neo-Daoist Movement in Wei-Jin China” (pp. 134–65). The last of these, despite the title, trenchantly discusses Wang Chong 王充 (27–c. 100 c.e.) and his reception in the Six Dynasties, and thus will undoubtedly interest Han","PeriodicalId":11463,"journal":{"name":"Early China","volume":"41 1","pages":"457 - 459"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/EAC.2018.18","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"56560747","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"WANTON GODDESSES TO UNSPOKEN WORTHIES: GENDERED HERMENEUTICS IN THE CHUCI ZHANGJU – ERRATUM","authors":"Monica E. M. Zikpi","doi":"10.1017/EAC.2018.24","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/EAC.2018.24","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11463,"journal":{"name":"Early China","volume":"41 1","pages":"519 - 519"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/EAC.2018.24","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"56561399","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Slowly, but unrelentingly, the generation of those unusual Western sinologists who spent their childhood in pre-1949 Republican China is fading away. Gerhard Schmitt, who passed away on November 26, 2017, in Berlin, in the wake of an emergency ileus operation after a long struggle with Parkinson’s disease, was born in Canton on September 28, 1933. His parents Friedrich and Albertine were missionaries, who seem to have fit the cliché of those “Chinadeutsche” who failed to develop any deeper relationship with the country and its inhabitants—a commonly encountered colonial syndrome recently diagnosed again with lavish materials in Barbara Schmitt-Englert’s Deutsche in China 1920–1950: Alltagsleben und Veränderungen1 for the expat communities of Shanghai, Beijing, and Tianjin. Schmitt learned Cantonese from his ayi and attended the Deutsche Oberschulein Canton after 1939. Much against the will of his father he exchanged marbles for his first Chinese characters with his Chinese playmates and used his pocket money to “bribe” the nanny to teach him written and Classical Chinese as well. Equipped with a phenomenal memory, by his teens he had already managed to memorize large parts of the classics. After repatriation to Germany in 1946—in the limbo after the end of World War II in Europe and before the founding of the People’s Republic—he continued his education, attending West German schools in Korntal (Baden-Württemberg), Düsseldorf, and Berlin-Steglitz. Strongly opposed to his parents’ religious beliefs and increasingly drawn towards socialism, he decided to leave home for good in 1950, and he obtained his leaving school certificate at the Aufbauschule Neu-Lichtenberg in East Berlin. At a time when many East German intellectuals were heading West, Schmitt thus migrated in the other direction, opting for an “Übersiedlung in den Demokratischen Sektor,” as his dissertation CV laconically states. At Humboldt University he read Sinology, Japanology, and General and Comparative Linguistics, and was assigned as “Aspirant” to the
那些在1949年前的中国度过童年的不同寻常的西方汉学家正在缓慢而无情地消失。格哈德·施密特于1933年9月28日出生在广州，在与帕金森病长期斗争后，于2017年11月26日在柏林因紧急肠梗阻手术去世。他的父母弗里德里希和艾伯丁是传教士，他们似乎符合那些未能与中国及其居民建立任何更深关系的“德意志人”的陈词滥调——这是一种常见的殖民综合症，最近在芭芭拉·施密特-恩格尔特的《德意志人在中国1920-1950:上海、北京和天津的外国人社区的Alltagsleben und Veränderungen1》一书中被大量材料再次诊断出来。施密特跟随他的阿姨学习广东话，1939年后进入德国高等学校。他不顾父亲的反对，用弹珠和中国玩伴交换了第一个汉字，并用自己的零花钱“贿赂”保姆教他文言文。他有着惊人的记忆力，十几岁的时候就能记住大部分经典名著。1946年，在欧洲第二次世界大战结束后、中华人民共和国成立前的动荡时期，他回到德国，继续接受教育，在科恩塔尔(巴登-符腾堡州)、德塞道夫和柏林-施特格里茨的西德学校就读。他强烈反对父母的宗教信仰，越来越倾向于社会主义，1950年他决定永远离开家，并在东柏林的Aufbauschule new - lichtenberg获得了毕业证书。当许多东德知识分子前往西德的时候，施密特选择了另一个方向，选择了“Übersiedlung in den Demokratischen sector”，正如他的论文简历中简洁地描述的那样。在洪堡大学，他读了汉学、日本学、普通语言学和比较语言学，并被分配为“有志者”
{"title":"GERHARD SCHMITT (1933–2017)","authors":"Wolfgang 鶚 Behr 畢","doi":"10.1017/eac.2018.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/eac.2018.2","url":null,"abstract":"Slowly, but unrelentingly, the generation of those unusual Western sinologists who spent their childhood in pre-1949 Republican China is fading away. Gerhard Schmitt, who passed away on November 26, 2017, in Berlin, in the wake of an emergency ileus operation after a long struggle with Parkinson’s disease, was born in Canton on September 28, 1933. His parents Friedrich and Albertine were missionaries, who seem to have fit the cliché of those “Chinadeutsche” who failed to develop any deeper relationship with the country and its inhabitants—a commonly encountered colonial syndrome recently diagnosed again with lavish materials in Barbara Schmitt-Englert’s Deutsche in China 1920–1950: Alltagsleben und Veränderungen1 for the expat communities of Shanghai, Beijing, and Tianjin. Schmitt learned Cantonese from his ayi and attended the Deutsche Oberschulein Canton after 1939. Much against the will of his father he exchanged marbles for his first Chinese characters with his Chinese playmates and used his pocket money to “bribe” the nanny to teach him written and Classical Chinese as well. Equipped with a phenomenal memory, by his teens he had already managed to memorize large parts of the classics. After repatriation to Germany in 1946—in the limbo after the end of World War II in Europe and before the founding of the People’s Republic—he continued his education, attending West German schools in Korntal (Baden-Württemberg), Düsseldorf, and Berlin-Steglitz. Strongly opposed to his parents’ religious beliefs and increasingly drawn towards socialism, he decided to leave home for good in 1950, and he obtained his leaving school certificate at the Aufbauschule Neu-Lichtenberg in East Berlin. At a time when many East German intellectuals were heading West, Schmitt thus migrated in the other direction, opting for an “Übersiedlung in den Demokratischen Sektor,” as his dissertation CV laconically states. At Humboldt University he read Sinology, Japanology, and General and Comparative Linguistics, and was assigned as “Aspirant” to the","PeriodicalId":11463,"journal":{"name":"Early China","volume":"41 1","pages":"9 - 23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/eac.2018.2","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"56560883","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：