首页 > 最新文献

Drugs最新文献

英文 中文
A Meta-analysis Exploring the Efficacy of Neuropathic Pain Medication for Low Back Pain or Spine-Related Leg Pain: Is Efficacy Dependent on the Presence of Neuropathic Pain? 探索神经性疼痛药物对腰痛或脊柱相关腿痛疗效的 Meta 分析:疗效是否取决于神经性疼痛的存在?
IF 13 1区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-26 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02085-6
Jennifer Ward, Anthony Grinstead, Amy Kemp, Paula Kersten, Annina B Schmid, Colette Ridehalgh
<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Highly variable pain mechanisms in people with low back pain or spine-related leg pain might contribute to inefficacy of neuropathic pain medication. This meta-analysis aimed to determine how neuropathic pain is identified in clinical trials for people taking neuropathic pain medication for low back pain or spine-related leg pain and whether subgrouping based on the presence of neuropathic pain influences efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, CINAHL [EBSCO], APA PsycINFO, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry were searched from inception to 14 May, 2024. Randomized and crossover trials comparing first-line neuropathic pain medication for people with low back pain or spine-related leg pain to placebo or usual care were included. Two independent authors extracted data. Random-effects meta-analyses of all studies combined, and pre-planned subgroup meta-analyses based on the certainty of neuropathic pain (according to the neuropathic pain Special Interest Group [NeuPSIG] neuropathic pain grading criteria) were completed. Certainty of evidence was judged using the grading of recommendations assessment development and evaluation [GRADE] framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven included studies reported on 3619 participants. Overall, 33% of studies were judged unlikely to include people with neuropathic pain, 26% remained unclear. Only 41% identified people with possible, probable, or definite neuropathic pain. For pain, general analyses revealed only small effects at short term (mean difference [MD] - 9.30 [95% confidence interval [CI] - 13.71, - 4.88], I<sup>2</sup> = 87%) and medium term (MD - 5.49 [95% CI - 7.24, - 3.74], I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Subgrouping at short term revealed studies including people with definite or probable neuropathic pain showed larger effects on pain (definite; MD - 16.65 [95% CI - 35.95, 2.65], I<sup>2</sup> = 84%; probable; MD - 10.45 [95% CI - 14.79, - 6.12], I<sup>2</sup> = 20%) than studies including people with possible (MD - 5.50 [95% CI - 20.52, 9.52], I<sup>2</sup> = 78%), unlikely (MD - 6.67 [95% CI - 10.58, 2.76], I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), or unclear neuropathic pain (MD - 8.93 [95% CI - 20.57, 2.71], I<sup>2</sup> = 96%). Similarly, general analyses revealed negligible effects on disability at short term (MD - 3.35 [95% CI - 9.00, 2.29], I<sup>2</sup> = 93%) and medium term (MD - 4.06 [95% CI - 5.63, - 2.48], I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Sub-grouping at short term revealed larger effects in studies including people with definite/probable neuropathic pain (MD - 9.25 [95% CI - 12.59, - 5.90], I<sup>2</sup> = 2%) compared with those with possible/unclear/unlikely neuropathic pain (MD -1.57 [95% CI - 8.96, 5.82] I<sup>2</sup> = 95%). Medium-term outcomes showed a similar trend, but were limited by low numbers of studies. Certainty of evidence was low to very low for all outcomes.
背景和目的:腰痛或脊柱相关腿痛患者的疼痛机制千差万别,这可能导致神经性疼痛药物疗效不佳。本荟萃分析旨在确定在针对腰痛或脊柱相关腿痛患者服用神经性疼痛药物的临床试验中如何识别神经性疼痛,以及根据神经性疼痛的存在进行分组是否会影响疗效:方法:检索了 EMBASE、MEDLINE、Cochrane Central、CINAHL [EBSCO]、APA PsycINFO、ClinicalTrials.gov 和世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册中心(World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry)从开始到 2024 年 5 月 14 日的数据。纳入的随机和交叉试验比较了治疗腰痛或脊柱相关腿痛患者的一线神经病理性疼痛药物与安慰剂或常规护理。两名独立作者提取了数据。对所有研究进行随机效应荟萃分析,并根据神经病理性疼痛的确定性(根据神经病理性疼痛特殊兴趣小组[NeuPSIG]神经病理性疼痛分级标准)进行预先计划的亚组荟萃分析。证据的确定性采用建议评估开发和评价分级[GRADE]框架进行判断:纳入的 27 项研究报告了 3619 名参与者的情况。总体而言,33%的研究被判定为不可能纳入神经病理性疼痛患者,26%的研究仍不明确。只有 41% 的研究确定了可能、疑似或明确的神经性疼痛患者。对于疼痛,一般分析显示短期(平均差 [MD] - 9.30 [95% 置信区间 [CI] - 13.71, - 4.88],I2 = 87%)和中期(MD - 5.49 [95% CI - 7.24, - 3.74],I2 = 0%)影响较小。短期分组显示,包括明确或可能患有神经病理性疼痛的患者在内的研究对疼痛的影响更大(明确;MD - 16.65 [95% CI - 35.95, 2.65],I2 = 84%;可能;MD - 10.45 [95% CI - 14.79, - 6.12],I2 = 20%)。12],I2 = 20%)高于包括可能(MD - 5.50 [95% CI - 20.52, 9.52],I2 = 78%)、不可能(MD - 6.67 [95% CI - 10.58, 2.76],I2 = 0%)或不明确神经病理性疼痛(MD - 8.93 [95% CI - 20.57, 2.71],I2 = 96%)患者的研究。同样,一般分析显示,短期(MD - 3.35 [95% CI - 9.00, 2.29],I2 = 93%)和中期(MD - 4.06 [95% CI - 5.63, - 2.48],I2 = 0%)对残疾的影响可以忽略不计。短期分组显示,与可能/不明确/不确定的神经痛患者(MD - -1.57 [95% CI - 8.96, 5.82] I2 = 95%)相比,明确/可能的神经痛患者(MD - 9.25 [95% CI - 12.59, - 5.90],I2 = 2%)的研究效果更大。中期结果显示出类似的趋势,但由于研究数量较少而受到限制。所有结果的证据确定性都较低或很低:大多数使用神经性疼痛药物治疗腰痛或脊柱相关腿痛的研究未能充分考虑神经性疼痛的存在。元分析表明,神经病理性疼痛药物可能对具有明确/可能神经病理性疼痛成分的腰痛或脊柱相关腿痛患者最有效。然而,由于证据的确定性较低或很低,且大多数研究对神经病理性疼痛的识别较差,因此无法提出明确的建议。
{"title":"A Meta-analysis Exploring the Efficacy of Neuropathic Pain Medication for Low Back Pain or Spine-Related Leg Pain: Is Efficacy Dependent on the Presence of Neuropathic Pain?","authors":"Jennifer Ward, Anthony Grinstead, Amy Kemp, Paula Kersten, Annina B Schmid, Colette Ridehalgh","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02085-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-024-02085-6","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background and objective: &lt;/strong&gt;Highly variable pain mechanisms in people with low back pain or spine-related leg pain might contribute to inefficacy of neuropathic pain medication. This meta-analysis aimed to determine how neuropathic pain is identified in clinical trials for people taking neuropathic pain medication for low back pain or spine-related leg pain and whether subgrouping based on the presence of neuropathic pain influences efficacy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, CINAHL [EBSCO], APA PsycINFO, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry were searched from inception to 14 May, 2024. Randomized and crossover trials comparing first-line neuropathic pain medication for people with low back pain or spine-related leg pain to placebo or usual care were included. Two independent authors extracted data. Random-effects meta-analyses of all studies combined, and pre-planned subgroup meta-analyses based on the certainty of neuropathic pain (according to the neuropathic pain Special Interest Group [NeuPSIG] neuropathic pain grading criteria) were completed. Certainty of evidence was judged using the grading of recommendations assessment development and evaluation [GRADE] framework.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Twenty-seven included studies reported on 3619 participants. Overall, 33% of studies were judged unlikely to include people with neuropathic pain, 26% remained unclear. Only 41% identified people with possible, probable, or definite neuropathic pain. For pain, general analyses revealed only small effects at short term (mean difference [MD] - 9.30 [95% confidence interval [CI] - 13.71, - 4.88], I&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 87%) and medium term (MD - 5.49 [95% CI - 7.24, - 3.74], I&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 0%). Subgrouping at short term revealed studies including people with definite or probable neuropathic pain showed larger effects on pain (definite; MD - 16.65 [95% CI - 35.95, 2.65], I&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 84%; probable; MD - 10.45 [95% CI - 14.79, - 6.12], I&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 20%) than studies including people with possible (MD - 5.50 [95% CI - 20.52, 9.52], I&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 78%), unlikely (MD - 6.67 [95% CI - 10.58, 2.76], I&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 0%), or unclear neuropathic pain (MD - 8.93 [95% CI - 20.57, 2.71], I&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 96%). Similarly, general analyses revealed negligible effects on disability at short term (MD - 3.35 [95% CI - 9.00, 2.29], I&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 93%) and medium term (MD - 4.06 [95% CI - 5.63, - 2.48], I&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 0%). Sub-grouping at short term revealed larger effects in studies including people with definite/probable neuropathic pain (MD - 9.25 [95% CI - 12.59, - 5.90], I&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 2%) compared with those with possible/unclear/unlikely neuropathic pain (MD -1.57 [95% CI - 8.96, 5.82] I&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 95%). Medium-term outcomes showed a similar trend, but were limited by low numbers of studies. Certainty of evidence was low to very low for all outcomes.","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1603-1636"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7616789/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142497072","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Fulzerasib: First Approval. Fulzerasib:首次批准。
IF 13 1区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-26 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02120-6
Yvette N Lamb

Fulzerasib (Dupert®; Innovent Biologics/GenFleet Therapeutics) is an orally active small molecule inhibitor of the KRAS G12C mutant protein being developed for the treatment of solid tumors harboring the KRAS G12C oncogenic driver mutation, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer. Fulzerasib received its first approval on 21 August 2024 in China, for the treatment of adults with KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC who have received at least one line of systemic therapy. This conditional approval was based on the positive results of a single-arm, phase II study. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of fulzerasib leading to this first approval for KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC.

Fulzerasib(Dupert®;Innovent Biologics/GenFleet Therapeutics)是一种口服活性小分子KRAS G12C突变蛋白抑制剂,目前正在开发用于治疗携带KRAS G12C致癌驱动突变的实体瘤,包括非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)和结直肠癌。Fulzerasib 于 2024 年 8 月 21 日在中国首次获得批准,用于治疗已接受至少一线系统治疗的 KRAS G12C 突变晚期 NSCLC 成人患者。这项有条件批准是基于一项单臂 II 期研究的积极结果。本文总结了fulzerasib研发过程中的里程碑事件,这些事件促成了该药首次获批用于治疗KRAS G12C突变的晚期NSCLC。
{"title":"Fulzerasib: First Approval.","authors":"Yvette N Lamb","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02120-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-024-02120-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fulzerasib (Dupert<sup>®</sup>; Innovent Biologics/GenFleet Therapeutics) is an orally active small molecule inhibitor of the KRAS G12C mutant protein being developed for the treatment of solid tumors harboring the KRAS G12C oncogenic driver mutation, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer. Fulzerasib received its first approval on 21 August 2024 in China, for the treatment of adults with KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC who have received at least one line of systemic therapy. This conditional approval was based on the positive results of a single-arm, phase II study. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of fulzerasib leading to this first approval for KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1665-1671"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142715669","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Utilization of the Accelerated Approval Pathway in Oncology: A Case Study of Pembrolizumab. 肿瘤学加速审批途径的利用:Pembrolizumab 案例研究。
IF 13 1区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-13 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02111-7
Robert Kester, Sunita Zalani, Scot Ebbinghaus, Eric Rubin

The accelerated approval (AA) pathway was established by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to provide earlier access to therapies for patients with serious medical conditions and unmet medical needs. Since its inception, the AA pathway has been used for novel treatments across different therapeutic areas, but most prominently in oncology, including the immune checkpoint inhibitor class. This review article describes the history of regulatory approvals for pembrolizumab, an immunotherapy agent targeting programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1), and use of the AA pathway and the corresponding regulatory decisions made by the FDA. From its first AA in September 2014 to February 2024, pembrolizumab has used the accelerated pathway for roughly 40% of the approved indications listed in the US Prescribing Information and was the first oncology therapy to receive an AA for an alternate dosing regimen and a tissue-agnostic indication. As of February 2024, 14 of the 18 indication-specific AAs and 1 post-marketing requirement (PMR) for the alternate dosing regimen AA were converted to traditional approvals. Accelerated approvals for two indications were withdrawn, and the remaining ongoing PMRs are not due until later in 2024 or 2025. The median conversion time from AA to traditional approval was 2.6 years, which is roughly 6 months earlier than the median time reported for oncology AAs. While FDA was the first agency to establish an expedited approval pathway, regulators from other countries have established similar pathways. For pembrolizumab, approximately half of the datasets that supported US AAs also supported expedited approval, or sometimes full approval, in Canada, EU, Australia or Japan. Ultimately, the AA pathway balances the provision of earlier access to therapies with overcoming uncertainty about potential effectiveness, and therefore it is important to confirm treatment benefit and withdraw indications that do not confirm benefit in a timely manner. The regulatory strategy and use of this expedited program for pembrolizumab highlights the importance of the AA pathway in providing oncology patients with earlier access to life-saving medications.

美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)建立了加速审批(AA)途径,为病情严重和医疗需求未得到满足的患者提供更早的治疗机会。自启动以来,AA 途径已用于不同治疗领域的新型疗法,但在肿瘤学领域最为突出,其中包括免疫检查点抑制剂类药物。这篇综述文章介绍了针对程序性死亡受体-1(PD-1)的免疫疗法药物 pembrolizumab 获得监管部门批准的历史,以及 AA 途径的使用和 FDA 做出的相应监管决定。从 2014 年 9 月首次获得 AA 到 2024 年 2 月,pembrolizumab 已在美国《处方信息》中列出的约 40% 的获批适应症中使用了加速途径,并且是首个在替代给药方案和组织诊断适应症中获得 AA 的肿瘤疗法。截至 2024 年 2 月,18 个特定适应症 AA 中的 14 个和 1 个交替给药方案 AA 的上市后要求 (PMR) 已转为传统批准。两个适应症的加速批准被撤回,其余正在进行的 PMR 要到 2024 年晚些时候或 2025 年才到期。从 AA 到传统批准的中位转换时间为 2.6 年,比肿瘤学 AA 报告的中位时间大约早 6 个月。虽然 FDA 是第一个建立加速审批途径的机构,但其他国家的监管机构也建立了类似的途径。就 pembrolizumab 而言,支持美国 AA 的数据集中约有一半也支持加拿大、欧盟、澳大利亚或日本的加速审批,有时甚至是完全审批。归根结底,AA 途径在提供更早的治疗机会与克服潜在疗效的不确定性之间取得了平衡,因此必须及时确认治疗获益并撤销无法确认获益的适应症。对 pembrolizumab 的监管策略和这一加速计划的使用,凸显了 AA 途径在让肿瘤患者更早地获得救命药物方面的重要性。
{"title":"The Utilization of the Accelerated Approval Pathway in Oncology: A Case Study of Pembrolizumab.","authors":"Robert Kester, Sunita Zalani, Scot Ebbinghaus, Eric Rubin","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02111-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-024-02111-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The accelerated approval (AA) pathway was established by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to provide earlier access to therapies for patients with serious medical conditions and unmet medical needs. Since its inception, the AA pathway has been used for novel treatments across different therapeutic areas, but most prominently in oncology, including the immune checkpoint inhibitor class. This review article describes the history of regulatory approvals for pembrolizumab, an immunotherapy agent targeting programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1), and use of the AA pathway and the corresponding regulatory decisions made by the FDA. From its first AA in September 2014 to February 2024, pembrolizumab has used the accelerated pathway for roughly 40% of the approved indications listed in the US Prescribing Information and was the first oncology therapy to receive an AA for an alternate dosing regimen and a tissue-agnostic indication. As of February 2024, 14 of the 18 indication-specific AAs and 1 post-marketing requirement (PMR) for the alternate dosing regimen AA were converted to traditional approvals. Accelerated approvals for two indications were withdrawn, and the remaining ongoing PMRs are not due until later in 2024 or 2025. The median conversion time from AA to traditional approval was 2.6 years, which is roughly 6 months earlier than the median time reported for oncology AAs. While FDA was the first agency to establish an expedited approval pathway, regulators from other countries have established similar pathways. For pembrolizumab, approximately half of the datasets that supported US AAs also supported expedited approval, or sometimes full approval, in Canada, EU, Australia or Japan. Ultimately, the AA pathway balances the provision of earlier access to therapies with overcoming uncertainty about potential effectiveness, and therefore it is important to confirm treatment benefit and withdraw indications that do not confirm benefit in a timely manner. The regulatory strategy and use of this expedited program for pembrolizumab highlights the importance of the AA pathway in providing oncology patients with earlier access to life-saving medications.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1579-1601"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11652590/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142616734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Odronextamab: First Approval. 奥曲肽:首次批准。
IF 13 1区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-19 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02112-6
Hannah A Blair

Odronextamab (Ordspono), a CD20xCD3 bispecific antibody, is being developed by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals for the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. On 26 August 2024, odronextamab received its first approval in the EU as monotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) or relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after ≥ 2 lines of systemic therapy. Clinical trials in various other B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, including mantle cell lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, are underway in multiple countries. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of odronextamab leading to this first approval for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory FL or relapsed/refractory DLBCL.

Odronextamab(Ordspono™)是一种 CD20xCD3 双特异性抗体,由 Regeneron 制药公司开发,用于治疗 B 细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤。2024 年 8 月 26 日,odronextamab 首次获得欧盟批准,作为单一疗法用于治疗复发/难治性滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)或经≥ 2 线系统治疗后复发/难治性弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)成人患者。针对其他各种 B 细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤(包括套细胞淋巴瘤、边缘区淋巴瘤和慢性淋巴细胞白血病)的临床试验正在多个国家进行。本文总结了odronextamab开发过程中的里程碑事件,这些事件促成了odronextamab首次被批准用于治疗复发/难治性FL或复发/难治性DLBCL成人患者。
{"title":"Odronextamab: First Approval.","authors":"Hannah A Blair","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02112-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-024-02112-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Odronextamab (Ordspono<sup>™</sup>), a CD20xCD3 bispecific antibody, is being developed by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals for the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. On 26 August 2024, odronextamab received its first approval in the EU as monotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) or relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after ≥ 2 lines of systemic therapy. Clinical trials in various other B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, including mantle cell lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, are underway in multiple countries. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of odronextamab leading to this first approval for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory FL or relapsed/refractory DLBCL.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1651-1658"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142667054","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trientine Tetrahydrochloride, From Bench to Bedside: A Narrative Review. 四盐酸三苯汀,从工作台到床边:叙述性综述。
IF 13 1区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-17 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02099-0
C Omar F Kamlin, Timothy M Jenkins, Jamie L Heise, Naseem S Amin

Trientine tetrahydrochloride (TETA-4HCl, Cuvrior®) is a copper chelating agent with the active moiety triethylenetetramine (trientine), developed by Orphalan, Inc. to address the unmet needs in the treatment of Wilson disease. The journey from bench to bedside builds upon the documented safety profile of trientine hydrochloride capsules developed initially to meet the needs of individuals intolerant to D-penicillamine (DPA). Trientine hydrochloride capsules are inherently unstable requiring strict cold chain storage conditions from production, transportation, and use at home by the patient. Trientine tetrahydrochloride has a distinctive, patent-protected unique polymorphic form, which permits the production at scale of film-coated scored tablets deemed room temperature stable for 36 months. Trientine tetrahydrochloride is supported by a well-characterized pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and metabolic profile demonstrating reliable and predictable dose linearity and dose proportionality kinetics. Trientine tetrahydrochloride is the only trientine formulation that has been compared with DPA in a prospective randomized clinical trial, demonstrating non-inferiority to DPA in adults with stable Wilson disease. On 28 April, 2022, the US Food and Drug Administration approved TETA-4HCl for use in adult patients with Wilson disease who are de-coppered and tolerant to DPA. Health authorities in multiple countries worldwide have approved TETA-4HCl for the treatment of adults and children aged 5 years or more who are intolerant to DPA including the European Union, UK, Saudi Arabia, Switzerland, Colombia, Australia, New Zealand, and China. This article aims to provide a comprehensive narrative review of the key milestones in the development of TETA-4HCl.

四盐酸三戊烯胺(TETA-4HCl,Cuvrior®)是一种活性分子为三乙烯四胺(三戊烯胺)的铜螯合剂,由 Orphalan 公司开发,以满足治疗威尔逊病的未满足需求。盐酸曲安奈德胶囊最初是为了满足对D-青霉胺(DPA)不耐受的患者的需求而开发的,其安全性已得到证实。盐酸三苯汀胶囊本身并不稳定,从生产、运输到患者在家中使用都需要严格的冷链储存条件。盐酸三苯汀四盐酸盐具有与众不同的、受专利保护的独特多晶型,可以大规模生产薄膜包衣片剂,其室温稳定性可达 36 个月。四盐酸三苯汀具有良好的药效学、药代动力学和新陈代谢特征,显示出可靠、可预测的剂量线性和剂量比例动力学。在一项前瞻性随机临床试验中,四盐酸三苯汀是唯一一种与 DPA 进行过比较的三苯汀制剂,在患有稳定型威尔逊病的成人患者中,其疗效不劣于 DPA。2022 年 4 月 28 日,美国食品和药物管理局批准 TETA-4HCl 用于对 DPA 无耐受性的威尔森氏病成人患者。全球多个国家的卫生部门已批准 TETA-4HCl 用于治疗对 DPA 不耐受的成人和 5 岁以上儿童,包括欧盟、英国、沙特阿拉伯、瑞士、哥伦比亚、澳大利亚、新西兰和中国。本文旨在全面回顾 TETA-4HCl 开发过程中的重要里程碑。
{"title":"Trientine Tetrahydrochloride, From Bench to Bedside: A Narrative Review.","authors":"C Omar F Kamlin, Timothy M Jenkins, Jamie L Heise, Naseem S Amin","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02099-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-024-02099-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Trientine tetrahydrochloride (TETA-4HCl, Cuvrior<sup>®</sup>) is a copper chelating agent with the active moiety triethylenetetramine (trientine), developed by Orphalan, Inc. to address the unmet needs in the treatment of Wilson disease. The journey from bench to bedside builds upon the documented safety profile of trientine hydrochloride capsules developed initially to meet the needs of individuals intolerant to D-penicillamine (DPA). Trientine hydrochloride capsules are inherently unstable requiring strict cold chain storage conditions from production, transportation, and use at home by the patient. Trientine tetrahydrochloride has a distinctive, patent-protected unique polymorphic form, which permits the production at scale of film-coated scored tablets deemed room temperature stable for 36 months. Trientine tetrahydrochloride is supported by a well-characterized pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and metabolic profile demonstrating reliable and predictable dose linearity and dose proportionality kinetics. Trientine tetrahydrochloride is the only trientine formulation that has been compared with DPA in a prospective randomized clinical trial, demonstrating non-inferiority to DPA in adults with stable Wilson disease. On 28 April, 2022, the US Food and Drug Administration approved TETA-4HCl for use in adult patients with Wilson disease who are de-coppered and tolerant to DPA. Health authorities in multiple countries worldwide have approved TETA-4HCl for the treatment of adults and children aged 5 years or more who are intolerant to DPA including the European Union, UK, Saudi Arabia, Switzerland, Colombia, Australia, New Zealand, and China. This article aims to provide a comprehensive narrative review of the key milestones in the development of TETA-4HCl.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1509-1518"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11652397/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142460701","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy and Safety of Sovateltide in Patients with Acute Cerebral Ischaemic Stroke: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicentre, Phase III Clinical Trial. 索伐他汀对急性缺血性脑卒中患者的疗效和安全性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心、III 期临床试验。
IF 13 1区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-15 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02121-5
Anil Gulati, Sikandar Gokuldas Adwani, Pamidimukkala Vijaya, Nilesh Radheshyam Agrawal, T C R Ramakrishnan, Hari Prakash Rai, Dinesh Jain, Nagarjunakonda Venkata Sundarachary, Jeyaraj Durai Pandian, Vijay Sardana, Mridul Sharma, Gursaran Kaur Sidhu, Sidharth Shankar Anand, Deepti Vibha, Saroja Aralikatte, Dheeraj Khurana, Deepika Joshi, Ummer Karadan, Mohd Shafat Imam Siddiqui
<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Sovateltide (Tycamzzi™), an endothelin-B (ET-B) receptor agonist, increases cerebral blood flow, has anti-apoptotic activity, and promotes neural repair following cerebral ischaemic stroke. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sovateltide in adult participants with acute cerebral ischaemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, Phase III clinical trial of sovateltide in participants with cerebral ischaemic stroke receiving standard of care (SOC) in India. Patients aged 18-78 years presenting up to 24 h after the onset of symptoms with radiologic confirmation of ischaemic stroke and a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (NIHSS) of ≥ 6 were enrolled. Patients with recurrent stroke, receiving endovascular therapy, or with intracranial haemorrhage were excluded. The study drug (saline or sovateltide [0.3 µg/kg] was administered intravenously in three doses at 3 ± 1 h intervals on Days 1, 3, and 6, and follow-up was 90 days). The Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations (MICE) was used to impute the missing assessments on the endpoints. An unpaired t-test, two-way analysis of variance with Tukey's multiple comparison test, and the Chi-square test were used for the statistical analysis. The objective was to determine at Day 90 (1) the number of patients with a modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) 0-2, and (2) the number of patients with an NIHSS 0-5 at 90 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were randomised with 80 patients in the sovateltide and 78 in the control group. Patients received the investigational drug at about 18 h of stroke onset in both control and sovateltide groups. The median NIHSS at randomisation was 10.00 (95% CI 9.99-11.65) in the control group and 9.00 (95% CI 9.11-10.46) in the sovateltide group. Seventy patients completed the 90-day follow-up in the control group and 67 in the sovateltide group. The proportion of intention-to-treat (ITT) patients with mRS 0-2 score at Day 90 post-randomisation was 22.67% higher (odds ratio [OR] 2.75, 95% CI 1.37-5.57); similarly, the proportion of patients with NIHSS score of 0-5 at Day 90 was 17.05% more (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.27-5.90) in the sovateltide group than in the control group. An improvement of ≥ 2 points on the mRS was observed in 51.28% and 72.50% of patients in the control and sovateltide groups, respectively (OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.29-4.81). Seven of 78 patients (8.97%) in the control group and 7 of 80 (8.75%) in the sovateltide group developed intracranial haemorrhage (ICH). The adverse events were not related to sovateltide.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The sovateltide group had a greater number of cerebral ischaemic stroke patients with lower mRS and NIHSS scores at 90 days post-treatment than the control group. This trial supported the regulatory approval of sovateltide in India, but a multinational RESP
背景和目的:舒伐他汀(Tycamzzi™)是一种内皮素-B(ET-B)受体激动剂,可增加脑血流量,具有抗细胞凋亡活性,促进脑缺血中风后的神经修复。本研究旨在评估索伐他汀对急性脑缺血中风成年患者的疗效和安全性:这是一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心、III 期临床试验,对象是印度接受标准治疗 (SOC) 的脑缺血中风患者。患者年龄在 18-78 岁之间,发病后 24 小时内出现症状,影像学证实为缺血性中风,美国国立卫生研究院中风量表(NIHSS)评分≥ 6 分。复发性中风、接受血管内治疗或颅内出血的患者除外。研究药物(生理盐水或舒伐他汀[0.3 µg/kg],在第 1、3 和 6 天分三次静脉注射,每次间隔 3 ± 1 小时,随访 90 天)。采用多变量链式方程归约法(MICE)来归约终点评估的缺失。统计分析采用了非配对 t 检验、带 Tukey 多重比较检验的双向方差分析和卡方检验。目标是确定第90天时(1)改良Rankin量表评分(mRS)为0-2分的患者人数,以及(2)90天时NIHSS为0-5分的患者人数:患者被随机分为索伐他汀组和对照组,索伐他汀组有 80 名患者,对照组有 78 名患者。对照组和舒伐他汀组患者均在中风发生约 18 小时后接受研究药物治疗。随机分组时,对照组的 NIHSS 中位数为 10.00(95% CI 9.99-11.65),而索伐他汀组的 NIHSS 中位数为 9.00(95% CI 9.11-10.46)。对照组有 70 名患者完成了 90 天的随访,索伐他汀组有 67 名患者完成了 90 天的随访。随机后第90天mRS 0-2分的意向治疗(ITT)患者比例比对照组高22.67%(比值比[OR]2.75,95% CI 1.37-5.57);同样,第90天NIHSS 0-5分的患者比例在索伐他汀组比对照组高17.05%(OR 2.67,95% CI 1.27-5.90)。对照组和索伐他汀组分别有51.28%和72.50%的患者mRS改善≥2分(OR 2.50,95% CI 1.29-4.81)。对照组 78 例患者中有 7 例(8.97%)和舒伐他汀组 80 例患者中有 7 例(8.75%)出现颅内出血(ICH)。这些不良事件与舒伐他汀无关:结论:与对照组相比,索伐他汀组有更多的缺血性脑卒中患者在治疗后 90 天的 mRS 和 NIHSS 评分较低。这项试验支持了印度监管部门对索伐他汀的批准,但为了获得美国的批准,还将进行一项跨国 RESPECT-ETB 试验:试验注册:印度临床试验登记处(CTRI/2019/09/021373)和美国国家医学图书馆临床试验登记处(NCT04047563)。
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Sovateltide in Patients with Acute Cerebral Ischaemic Stroke: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicentre, Phase III Clinical Trial.","authors":"Anil Gulati, Sikandar Gokuldas Adwani, Pamidimukkala Vijaya, Nilesh Radheshyam Agrawal, T C R Ramakrishnan, Hari Prakash Rai, Dinesh Jain, Nagarjunakonda Venkata Sundarachary, Jeyaraj Durai Pandian, Vijay Sardana, Mridul Sharma, Gursaran Kaur Sidhu, Sidharth Shankar Anand, Deepti Vibha, Saroja Aralikatte, Dheeraj Khurana, Deepika Joshi, Ummer Karadan, Mohd Shafat Imam Siddiqui","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02121-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-024-02121-5","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background and objectives: &lt;/strong&gt;Sovateltide (Tycamzzi™), an endothelin-B (ET-B) receptor agonist, increases cerebral blood flow, has anti-apoptotic activity, and promotes neural repair following cerebral ischaemic stroke. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sovateltide in adult participants with acute cerebral ischaemic stroke.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;This was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, Phase III clinical trial of sovateltide in participants with cerebral ischaemic stroke receiving standard of care (SOC) in India. Patients aged 18-78 years presenting up to 24 h after the onset of symptoms with radiologic confirmation of ischaemic stroke and a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (NIHSS) of ≥ 6 were enrolled. Patients with recurrent stroke, receiving endovascular therapy, or with intracranial haemorrhage were excluded. The study drug (saline or sovateltide [0.3 µg/kg] was administered intravenously in three doses at 3 ± 1 h intervals on Days 1, 3, and 6, and follow-up was 90 days). The Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations (MICE) was used to impute the missing assessments on the endpoints. An unpaired t-test, two-way analysis of variance with Tukey's multiple comparison test, and the Chi-square test were used for the statistical analysis. The objective was to determine at Day 90 (1) the number of patients with a modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) 0-2, and (2) the number of patients with an NIHSS 0-5 at 90 days.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Patients were randomised with 80 patients in the sovateltide and 78 in the control group. Patients received the investigational drug at about 18 h of stroke onset in both control and sovateltide groups. The median NIHSS at randomisation was 10.00 (95% CI 9.99-11.65) in the control group and 9.00 (95% CI 9.11-10.46) in the sovateltide group. Seventy patients completed the 90-day follow-up in the control group and 67 in the sovateltide group. The proportion of intention-to-treat (ITT) patients with mRS 0-2 score at Day 90 post-randomisation was 22.67% higher (odds ratio [OR] 2.75, 95% CI 1.37-5.57); similarly, the proportion of patients with NIHSS score of 0-5 at Day 90 was 17.05% more (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.27-5.90) in the sovateltide group than in the control group. An improvement of ≥ 2 points on the mRS was observed in 51.28% and 72.50% of patients in the control and sovateltide groups, respectively (OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.29-4.81). Seven of 78 patients (8.97%) in the control group and 7 of 80 (8.75%) in the sovateltide group developed intracranial haemorrhage (ICH). The adverse events were not related to sovateltide.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;The sovateltide group had a greater number of cerebral ischaemic stroke patients with lower mRS and NIHSS scores at 90 days post-treatment than the control group. This trial supported the regulatory approval of sovateltide in India, but a multinational RESP","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1637-1650"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11652401/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142616727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Challenge of Treating Infections Caused by Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Gram-Negative Bacteria: A Narrative Review. 治疗产生金属-β-乳酰胺酶的革兰氏阴性细菌引起的感染所面临的挑战:综述。
IF 13 1区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-28 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02102-8
Carmen Hidalgo-Tenorio, German Bou, Antonio Oliver, Montserrat Rodríguez-Aguirregabiria, Miguel Salavert, Luis Martínez-Martínez

Gram-negative multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria, including Enterobacterales, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, pose a significant challenge in clinical practice. Infections caused by metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Gram-negative organisms, in particular, require careful consideration due to their complexity and varied prevalence, given that the microbiological diagnosis of these pathogens is intricate and compounded by challenges in assessing the efficacy of anti-MBL antimicrobials. We discuss both established and new approaches in the treatment of MBL-producing Gram-negative infections, focusing on 3 strategies: colistin; the recently approved combination of aztreonam with avibactam (or with ceftazidime/avibactam); and cefiderocol. Despite its significant activity against various Gram-negative pathogens, the efficacy of colistin is limited by resistance mechanisms, while nephrotoxicity and acute renal injury call for careful dosing and monitoring in clinical practice. Aztreonam combined with avibactam (or with avibactam/ceftazidime if aztreonam plus avibactam is not available) exhibits potent activity against MBL-producing Gram-negative pathogens. Cefiderocol in monotherapy is effective against a wide range of multidrug-resistant organisms, including MBL producers, and favorable clinical outcomes have been observed in various clinical trials and case series. After examining scientific evidence in the management of infections caused by MBL-producing Gram-negative bacteria, we have developed a comprehensive clinical algorithm to guide therapeutic decision making. We recommend reserving colistin as a last-resort option for MDR Gram-negative infections. Cefiderocol and aztreonam/avibactam represent favorable options against MBL-producing pathogens. In the case of P. aeruginosa with MBL-producing enzymes and with difficult-to-treat resistance, cefiderocol is the preferred option. Further research is needed to optimize treatment strategies and minimize resistance.

革兰氏阴性耐多药(MDR)细菌,包括肠杆菌、鲍曼不动杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌,给临床实践带来了巨大挑战。产金属-β-内酰胺酶(MBL)的革兰氏阴性菌引起的感染因其复杂性和不同的流行率而尤其需要慎重考虑,因为这些病原体的微生物学诊断错综复杂,而且在评估抗MBL抗菌药的疗效方面也面临挑战。我们讨论了治疗产生 MBL 的革兰氏阴性菌感染的既有方法和新方法,重点讨论了三种策略:可乐定;最近批准的阿曲南加阿维巴坦(或头孢唑肟/阿维巴坦)组合;以及头孢啶醇。尽管大肠杆菌素对各种革兰氏阴性病原体具有显著的活性,但其疗效受到耐药机制的限制,同时肾毒性和急性肾损伤要求在临床实践中谨慎用药和监测。氨曲南与阿维菌素联用(如果没有氨曲南和阿维菌素,则与阿维菌素/头孢唑肟联用)对产生 MBL 的革兰氏阴性病原体具有强效作用。头孢妥昔洛单药治疗对多种耐多药病菌(包括产生 MBL 的病菌)有效,各种临床试验和病例系列观察到了良好的临床效果。在研究了治疗由产 MBL 革兰阴性菌引起的感染的科学证据后,我们制定了一套全面的临床算法来指导治疗决策。我们建议将可乐定作为 MDR 革兰氏阴性菌感染的最后选择。头孢克肟和阿曲南类/阿维菌素是对付产生 MBL 的病原体的有利选择。如果铜绿假单胞菌能产生 MBL 酶,且具有难以治疗的耐药性,则首选头孢代醇。要优化治疗策略并尽量减少耐药性,还需要进一步的研究。
{"title":"The Challenge of Treating Infections Caused by Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Gram-Negative Bacteria: A Narrative Review.","authors":"Carmen Hidalgo-Tenorio, German Bou, Antonio Oliver, Montserrat Rodríguez-Aguirregabiria, Miguel Salavert, Luis Martínez-Martínez","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02102-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-024-02102-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gram-negative multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria, including Enterobacterales, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, pose a significant challenge in clinical practice. Infections caused by metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Gram-negative organisms, in particular, require careful consideration due to their complexity and varied prevalence, given that the microbiological diagnosis of these pathogens is intricate and compounded by challenges in assessing the efficacy of anti-MBL antimicrobials. We discuss both established and new approaches in the treatment of MBL-producing Gram-negative infections, focusing on 3 strategies: colistin; the recently approved combination of aztreonam with avibactam (or with ceftazidime/avibactam); and cefiderocol. Despite its significant activity against various Gram-negative pathogens, the efficacy of colistin is limited by resistance mechanisms, while nephrotoxicity and acute renal injury call for careful dosing and monitoring in clinical practice. Aztreonam combined with avibactam (or with avibactam/ceftazidime if aztreonam plus avibactam is not available) exhibits potent activity against MBL-producing Gram-negative pathogens. Cefiderocol in monotherapy is effective against a wide range of multidrug-resistant organisms, including MBL producers, and favorable clinical outcomes have been observed in various clinical trials and case series. After examining scientific evidence in the management of infections caused by MBL-producing Gram-negative bacteria, we have developed a comprehensive clinical algorithm to guide therapeutic decision making. We recommend reserving colistin as a last-resort option for MDR Gram-negative infections. Cefiderocol and aztreonam/avibactam represent favorable options against MBL-producing pathogens. In the case of P. aeruginosa with MBL-producing enzymes and with difficult-to-treat resistance, cefiderocol is the preferred option. Further research is needed to optimize treatment strategies and minimize resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1519-1539"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11652570/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142521365","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Difficult-to-Treat Axial Spondyloarthritis: A New Challenge. 难以治疗的轴性脊柱关节炎:新挑战。
IF 13 1区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-10 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02100-w
Daniel Wendling

Axial spondyloarthritis is a common form of chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease in adults, the treatment of which is based on non-pharmacological elements on the one hand, and pharmacological options on the other, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the first line, followed by biological or targeted synthetic treatments. The therapeutic objective is remission or a low level of disease activity; if this objective is not achieved, the treatment is rotated or changed. Multiple changes is one factor illustrating the inability to achieve disease control and may lead to the notion of a difficult-to-treat disease (D2T). This requires a consensual definition including, beyond the number or therapeutic changes, the assessment of all the dimensions of the disease (objective signs of inflammation, residual pain, degenerative changes, psychosocial context). Recognising D2T patients will enable us to identify a particular population and the factors associated with this condition. When faced with a D2T disease, we need to analyse the causes of treatment failure and take into account the different components of the disease and the patient. In the absence of any prospect of new therapeutic targets in the short term for this disease, patient management may involve intensification of non-pharmacological means and evaluation of new therapeutic strategies such as combinations of targeted treatments.

轴性脊柱关节炎是成人慢性炎症性风湿病的一种常见形式,其治疗一方面基于非药物因素,另一方面基于药物选择,如第一线使用非甾体抗炎药,然后使用生物或靶向合成疗法。治疗目标是缓解或降低疾病活动度;如果达不到这一目标,则轮换或改变治疗方法。多次换药是无法实现疾病控制的一个因素,可能会导致难治性疾病(D2T)的概念。这就需要有一个共识性的定义,除治疗变化的次数外,还包括对疾病所有方面(炎症的客观迹象、残余疼痛、退行性变化、社会心理背景)的评估。识别 D2T 患者将使我们能够确定一个特定的人群以及与这种疾病相关的因素。面对 D2T 疾病,我们需要分析治疗失败的原因,并考虑到疾病和患者的不同因素。由于在短期内还没有针对这种疾病的新治疗靶点,患者管理可能需要加强非药物治疗手段,并评估新的治疗策略,如靶向治疗的组合。
{"title":"Difficult-to-Treat Axial Spondyloarthritis: A New Challenge.","authors":"Daniel Wendling","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02100-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-024-02100-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Axial spondyloarthritis is a common form of chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease in adults, the treatment of which is based on non-pharmacological elements on the one hand, and pharmacological options on the other, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the first line, followed by biological or targeted synthetic treatments. The therapeutic objective is remission or a low level of disease activity; if this objective is not achieved, the treatment is rotated or changed. Multiple changes is one factor illustrating the inability to achieve disease control and may lead to the notion of a difficult-to-treat disease (D2T). This requires a consensual definition including, beyond the number or therapeutic changes, the assessment of all the dimensions of the disease (objective signs of inflammation, residual pain, degenerative changes, psychosocial context). Recognising D2T patients will enable us to identify a particular population and the factors associated with this condition. When faced with a D2T disease, we need to analyse the causes of treatment failure and take into account the different components of the disease and the patient. In the absence of any prospect of new therapeutic targets in the short term for this disease, patient management may involve intensification of non-pharmacological means and evaluation of new therapeutic strategies such as combinations of targeted treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1501-1508"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142460699","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction: Vorasidenib: First Approval. 更正:Vorasidenib:首次批准。
IF 13 1区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-02 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02127-z
Yvette N Lamb
{"title":"Correction: Vorasidenib: First Approval.","authors":"Yvette N Lamb","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02127-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-024-02127-z","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1673"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11652565/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142767413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
2024 Recommendations on the Optimal Use of Lipid-Lowering Therapy in Established Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and Following Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Position Paper of the International Lipid Expert Panel (ILEP). 2024 关于已确立的动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病和急性冠状动脉综合征后降脂疗法最佳应用的建议:国际血脂专家组 (ILEP) 的立场文件。
IF 13 1区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-04 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02105-5
Maciej Banach, Željko Reiner, Stanisław Surma, Gani Bajraktari, Agata Bielecka-Dabrowa, Matjaz Bunc, Ibadete Bytyçi, Richard Ceska, Arrigo F G Cicero, Dariusz Dudek, Krzysztof Dyrbuś, Jan Fedacko, Zlatko Fras, Dan Gaita, Dov Gavish, Marek Gierlotka, Robert Gil, Ioanna Gouni-Berthold, Piotr Jankowski, Zoltán Járai, Jacek Jóźwiak, Niki Katsiki, Gustavs Latkovskis, Stefania Lucia Magda, Eduard Margetic, Roman Margoczy, Olena Mitchenko, Azra Durak-Nalbantic, Petr Ostadal, Gyorgy Paragh, Zaneta Petrulioniene, Francesco Paneni, Ivan Pećin, Daniel Pella, Arman Postadzhiyan, Anca Pantea Stoian, Matias Trbusic, Cristian Alexandru Udroiu, Margus Viigimaa, Dragos Vinereanu, Charalambos Vlachopoulos, Michal Vrablik, Dusko Vulic, Peter E Penson

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and consequent acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are substantial contributors to morbidity and mortality across Europe. Fortunately, as much as two thirds of this disease's burden is modifiable, in particular by lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). Current guidelines are based on the sound premise that, with respect to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), "lower is better for longer", and recent data have strongly emphasised the need for also "the earlier the better". In addition to statins, which have been available for several decades, ezetimibe, bempedoic acid (also as fixed dose combinations), and modulators of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9 inhibitors and inclisiran) are additionally very effective approaches to LLT, especially for those at very high and extremely high cardiovascular risk. In real life, however, clinical practice goals are still not met in a substantial proportion of patients (even in 70%). However, with the options we have available, we should render lipid disorders a rare disease. In April 2021, the International Lipid Expert Panel (ILEP) published its first position paper on the optimal use of LLT in post-ACS patients, which complemented the existing guidelines on the management of lipids in patients following ACS, which defined a group of "extremely high-risk" individuals and outlined scenarios where upfront combination therapy should be considered to improve access and adherence to LLT and, consequently, the therapy's effectiveness. These updated recommendations build on the previous work, considering developments in the evidential underpinning of combination LLT, ongoing education on the role of lipid disorder therapy, and changes in the availability of lipid-lowering drugs. Our aim is to provide a guide to address this unmet clinical need, to provide clear practical advice, whilst acknowledging the need for patient-centred care, and accounting for often large differences in the availability of LLTs between countries.

动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)和随之而来的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)是造成整个欧洲发病率和死亡率的主要原因。幸运的是,多达三分之二的疾病负担是可以改变的,特别是通过降脂治疗(LLT)。对于低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C),目前的指导方针基于一个合理的前提,即 "越低越好,越久越好",而最近的数据也有力地强调了 "越早越好 "的必要性。除了已经上市几十年的他汀类药物外,依折麦布、贝美多酸(也可作为固定剂量的复方制剂)和 9 型丙蛋白转换酶亚基酶/kexin 调节剂(PCSK9 抑制剂和 inclisiran)也是非常有效的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇治疗方法,尤其是对于心血管风险极高和极高的人群。然而,在现实生活中,仍有相当一部分患者(甚至 70%)无法达到临床实践目标。不过,通过我们现有的选择,我们应该让血脂紊乱成为一种罕见疾病。2021 年 4 月,国际血脂专家小组(ILEP)发布了第一份关于在 ACS 后患者中优化使用 LLT 的立场文件,该文件对现有的 ACS 后患者血脂管理指南进行了补充,其中定义了一组 "极高风险 "人群,并概述了在哪些情况下应考虑进行前期联合治疗,以提高 LLT 的可及性和依从性,从而提高治疗效果。这些更新的建议以之前的工作为基础,考虑到了低密度脂蛋白胆固醇联合疗法证据基础的发展、有关血脂紊乱治疗作用的持续教育以及降脂药物供应方面的变化。我们的目标是提供一份指南,以满足这一尚未得到满足的临床需求,提供明确的实用建议,同时承认以患者为中心的护理需求,并考虑到各国在降脂药物供应方面往往存在的巨大差异。
{"title":"2024 Recommendations on the Optimal Use of Lipid-Lowering Therapy in Established Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and Following Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Position Paper of the International Lipid Expert Panel (ILEP).","authors":"Maciej Banach, Željko Reiner, Stanisław Surma, Gani Bajraktari, Agata Bielecka-Dabrowa, Matjaz Bunc, Ibadete Bytyçi, Richard Ceska, Arrigo F G Cicero, Dariusz Dudek, Krzysztof Dyrbuś, Jan Fedacko, Zlatko Fras, Dan Gaita, Dov Gavish, Marek Gierlotka, Robert Gil, Ioanna Gouni-Berthold, Piotr Jankowski, Zoltán Járai, Jacek Jóźwiak, Niki Katsiki, Gustavs Latkovskis, Stefania Lucia Magda, Eduard Margetic, Roman Margoczy, Olena Mitchenko, Azra Durak-Nalbantic, Petr Ostadal, Gyorgy Paragh, Zaneta Petrulioniene, Francesco Paneni, Ivan Pećin, Daniel Pella, Arman Postadzhiyan, Anca Pantea Stoian, Matias Trbusic, Cristian Alexandru Udroiu, Margus Viigimaa, Dragos Vinereanu, Charalambos Vlachopoulos, Michal Vrablik, Dusko Vulic, Peter E Penson","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02105-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-024-02105-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and consequent acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are substantial contributors to morbidity and mortality across Europe. Fortunately, as much as two thirds of this disease's burden is modifiable, in particular by lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). Current guidelines are based on the sound premise that, with respect to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), \"lower is better for longer\", and recent data have strongly emphasised the need for also \"the earlier the better\". In addition to statins, which have been available for several decades, ezetimibe, bempedoic acid (also as fixed dose combinations), and modulators of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9 inhibitors and inclisiran) are additionally very effective approaches to LLT, especially for those at very high and extremely high cardiovascular risk. In real life, however, clinical practice goals are still not met in a substantial proportion of patients (even in 70%). However, with the options we have available, we should render lipid disorders a rare disease. In April 2021, the International Lipid Expert Panel (ILEP) published its first position paper on the optimal use of LLT in post-ACS patients, which complemented the existing guidelines on the management of lipids in patients following ACS, which defined a group of \"extremely high-risk\" individuals and outlined scenarios where upfront combination therapy should be considered to improve access and adherence to LLT and, consequently, the therapy's effectiveness. These updated recommendations build on the previous work, considering developments in the evidential underpinning of combination LLT, ongoing education on the role of lipid disorder therapy, and changes in the availability of lipid-lowering drugs. Our aim is to provide a guide to address this unmet clinical need, to provide clear practical advice, whilst acknowledging the need for patient-centred care, and accounting for often large differences in the availability of LLTs between countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1541-1577"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11652584/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142575616","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Drugs
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1