Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-09-27DOI: 10.1007/s40265-025-02239-0
Hannah A Blair
Sebetralstat (EKTERLY®), an orally available plasma kallikrein inhibitor, is being developed by KalVista Pharmaceuticals for the on-demand treatment of acute attacks of hereditary angioedema (HAE). On 7 July 2025, sebetralstat received its first approval in the USA for the treatment of acute attacks of HAE in adult and pediatric patients aged 12 years and older. The drug has since been approved on 15 July 2025 in the UK for the treatment of HAE attacks in adults and adolescents aged 12 years and older. Sebetralstat has also received a positive opinion in the EU for the symptomatic treatment of acute attacks of HAE in adults and adolescents aged 12 years and older. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of sebetralstat leading to this first approval for HAE.
{"title":"Sebetralstat: First Approval.","authors":"Hannah A Blair","doi":"10.1007/s40265-025-02239-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-025-02239-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sebetralstat (EKTERLY<sup>®</sup>), an orally available plasma kallikrein inhibitor, is being developed by KalVista Pharmaceuticals for the on-demand treatment of acute attacks of hereditary angioedema (HAE). On 7 July 2025, sebetralstat received its first approval in the USA for the treatment of acute attacks of HAE in adult and pediatric patients aged 12 years and older. The drug has since been approved on 15 July 2025 in the UK for the treatment of HAE attacks in adults and adolescents aged 12 years and older. Sebetralstat has also received a positive opinion in the EU for the symptomatic treatment of acute attacks of HAE in adults and adolescents aged 12 years and older. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of sebetralstat leading to this first approval for HAE.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1499-1505"},"PeriodicalIF":14.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145174221","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-08-30DOI: 10.1007/s40265-025-02229-2
Arrigo F G Cicero, Giuliano Tocci, Ashot Avagimyan, Peter Penson, Giulia Nardoianni, Francesco Perone, Claudio Borghi, Federica Fogacci
Background: Resistant hypertension (RHT) is a challenging clinical condition characterized by persistently elevated blood pressure despite adherence to lifestyle modifications and the use of at least three antihypertensive agents, including a high-dose diuretic. RHT is a heterogeneous condition, influenced by multiple pathophysiological mechanisms such as sodium retention, sympathetic overactivity, and vascular dysfunction. Among these, hyperaldosteronism plays a pivotal role in a subset of patients.
Methods: This systematic review examines in depth the pharmacokinetic properties of aldosterone synthase inhibitors (ASIs), with a focus on their therapeutic potential in patients with RHT. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify clinical trials and pharmacological studies investigating ASIs, including baxdrostat, dexfadrostat, lorundrostat, LY3045697, and osilodrostat (LCI699).
Results: ASIs have shown compelling efficacy in lowering both office-based and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure, particularly in patients with elevated aldosterone levels. These findings underscore the critical role of aldosterone-mediated mechanisms in the pathophysiology of RHT. The inhibitors differ substantially in their metabolic pathways, selectivity profiles, and pharmacokinetic characteristics.
Conclusions: Emerging data support the potential of ASIs as a therapeutic option for RHT, particularly when treatment is individualized based on renal function, dietary sodium intake, and comorbidities. Personalized treatment strategies may enhance efficacy, improve tolerability, and support durable blood pressure control in this difficult-to-treat population.
Registration: PROSPERO identifier number CRD42024522918 [Graphical abstract available].
{"title":"Aldosterone Synthase Inhibitors for Resistant Hypertension: Pharmacological Insights - A Systematic Review.","authors":"Arrigo F G Cicero, Giuliano Tocci, Ashot Avagimyan, Peter Penson, Giulia Nardoianni, Francesco Perone, Claudio Borghi, Federica Fogacci","doi":"10.1007/s40265-025-02229-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-025-02229-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Resistant hypertension (RHT) is a challenging clinical condition characterized by persistently elevated blood pressure despite adherence to lifestyle modifications and the use of at least three antihypertensive agents, including a high-dose diuretic. RHT is a heterogeneous condition, influenced by multiple pathophysiological mechanisms such as sodium retention, sympathetic overactivity, and vascular dysfunction. Among these, hyperaldosteronism plays a pivotal role in a subset of patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review examines in depth the pharmacokinetic properties of aldosterone synthase inhibitors (ASIs), with a focus on their therapeutic potential in patients with RHT. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify clinical trials and pharmacological studies investigating ASIs, including baxdrostat, dexfadrostat, lorundrostat, LY3045697, and osilodrostat (LCI699).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ASIs have shown compelling efficacy in lowering both office-based and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure, particularly in patients with elevated aldosterone levels. These findings underscore the critical role of aldosterone-mediated mechanisms in the pathophysiology of RHT. The inhibitors differ substantially in their metabolic pathways, selectivity profiles, and pharmacokinetic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Emerging data support the potential of ASIs as a therapeutic option for RHT, particularly when treatment is individualized based on renal function, dietary sodium intake, and comorbidities. Personalized treatment strategies may enhance efficacy, improve tolerability, and support durable blood pressure control in this difficult-to-treat population.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>PROSPERO identifier number CRD42024522918 [Graphical abstract available].</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1429-1453"},"PeriodicalIF":14.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12572095/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144946794","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-09-30DOI: 10.1007/s40265-025-02231-8
Stephanie Young Moss, Angie Lee, James A Simon
Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) are considered the cardinal symptoms of menopause, affecting up to 80% of American women at some point during the menopausal transition. VMS, particularly if they are moderate to severe, frequent, or cause sleep disturbances, can have a negative impact on a woman's quality of life, physical and mental health, and professional life. Furthermore, VMS have been associated with negative health outcomes, including an increased risk of coronary heart disease and cognitive impairment. Menopausal hormonal therapy (MHT) is supported by level 1 evidence and can address many of the negative impacts associated with menopause, including VMS. However, not all women can take MHT (owing to having contraindications to their use) or choose not to take MHT. In addition to MHT, non-hormonal therapy options, which include neurokinin (NK)-targeted therapies, are also available. Fezolinetant (NK3 receptor antagonist) and the newly approved elinzanetant (NK1 and NK3 receptor antagonist) are non-hormonal treatment options approved for the treatment of VMS associated with menopause. These approvals expand the treatment options for women. A number of investigational agents are currently in phase 2 trials for potential future use for VMS; these include Q-122, PhytoSERM, NOE-115, GS1-144, and HS-10384. In this review, we highlight the recent advancements in our understanding of the pathophysiology of VMS and consider the current, new, and investigational treatment options for the treatment of VMS.
{"title":"Advances in Pharmacotherapy for Menopausal Vasomotor Symptoms.","authors":"Stephanie Young Moss, Angie Lee, James A Simon","doi":"10.1007/s40265-025-02231-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-025-02231-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) are considered the cardinal symptoms of menopause, affecting up to 80% of American women at some point during the menopausal transition. VMS, particularly if they are moderate to severe, frequent, or cause sleep disturbances, can have a negative impact on a woman's quality of life, physical and mental health, and professional life. Furthermore, VMS have been associated with negative health outcomes, including an increased risk of coronary heart disease and cognitive impairment. Menopausal hormonal therapy (MHT) is supported by level 1 evidence and can address many of the negative impacts associated with menopause, including VMS. However, not all women can take MHT (owing to having contraindications to their use) or choose not to take MHT. In addition to MHT, non-hormonal therapy options, which include neurokinin (NK)-targeted therapies, are also available. Fezolinetant (NK3 receptor antagonist) and the newly approved elinzanetant (NK1 and NK3 receptor antagonist) are non-hormonal treatment options approved for the treatment of VMS associated with menopause. These approvals expand the treatment options for women. A number of investigational agents are currently in phase 2 trials for potential future use for VMS; these include Q-122, PhytoSERM, NOE-115, GS1-144, and HS-10384. In this review, we highlight the recent advancements in our understanding of the pathophysiology of VMS and consider the current, new, and investigational treatment options for the treatment of VMS.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1363-1379"},"PeriodicalIF":14.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12572072/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145198819","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-08-29DOI: 10.1007/s40265-025-02233-6
Leslie Cheng, Kate Newbold
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have revolutionised systemic therapy for advanced thyroid cancers, including radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC), anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) and medullary thyroid cancer (MTC), which respond poorly to conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy. The treatment of advanced thyroid cancer is also increasingly personalised, with recent advances in genomic-driven, highly selective targeted therapies. This review summarises contemporary evidence regarding the efficacy, safety and clinical application of drug therapies in thyroid cancers, whilst exploring their evolving role in the age of personalised medicine. Multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) such as sorafenib, lenvatinib, vandetanib and cabozantinib have demonstrated significant improvements in progression-free survival and objective response rates in patients with RR-DTC and MTC. In ATC-a highly lethal tumour-BRAF-directed therapies have shown promising efficacy in patients harbouring the BRAF V600E mutation, yielding enhanced survival outcomes. Moreover, highly-selective inhibitors targeting RET, NTRK and other actionable alterations have refined treatment paradigms by increased integration of molecular testing via next-generation sequencing, ensuring treatments are tailored to the genetic profile of an individual tumour. Despite significant progress, management of advanced thyroid cancer remains challenged by drug resistance and toxicity, underscoring the need for ongoing research and innovation. Furthermore, vast improvements are still required to ensure universal access to molecular testing and targeted therapies.
{"title":"Systemic Therapy for Advanced Thyroid Cancer-New Personalized Options.","authors":"Leslie Cheng, Kate Newbold","doi":"10.1007/s40265-025-02233-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-025-02233-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have revolutionised systemic therapy for advanced thyroid cancers, including radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC), anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) and medullary thyroid cancer (MTC), which respond poorly to conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy. The treatment of advanced thyroid cancer is also increasingly personalised, with recent advances in genomic-driven, highly selective targeted therapies. This review summarises contemporary evidence regarding the efficacy, safety and clinical application of drug therapies in thyroid cancers, whilst exploring their evolving role in the age of personalised medicine. Multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) such as sorafenib, lenvatinib, vandetanib and cabozantinib have demonstrated significant improvements in progression-free survival and objective response rates in patients with RR-DTC and MTC. In ATC-a highly lethal tumour-BRAF-directed therapies have shown promising efficacy in patients harbouring the BRAF V600E mutation, yielding enhanced survival outcomes. Moreover, highly-selective inhibitors targeting RET, NTRK and other actionable alterations have refined treatment paradigms by increased integration of molecular testing via next-generation sequencing, ensuring treatments are tailored to the genetic profile of an individual tumour. Despite significant progress, management of advanced thyroid cancer remains challenged by drug resistance and toxicity, underscoring the need for ongoing research and innovation. Furthermore, vast improvements are still required to ensure universal access to molecular testing and targeted therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1381-1390"},"PeriodicalIF":14.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144946829","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-09-28DOI: 10.1007/s40265-025-02250-5
Susan Abushakra, Aidan Power, David Watson, Anton Porsteinsson, Marwan Sabbagh, Emer MacSweeney, Sharon Cohen, Mercè Boada Rovira, P Murali Doraiswamy, Earvin Liang, Susan Flint, J Patrick Kesslak, Rosalind McLaine, Adem Albayrak, Jean Schaefer, Jeremy Yu, Luke Tolar, Sam Dickson, John A Hey, Martin Tolar
<p><strong>Background: </strong>The apolipoprotein E ε4 (APOE ε4) allele is the strongest genetic risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD), with homozygotes accumulating a high burden of cerebral beta-amyloid (Aβ) pathology. Valiltramiprosate/ALZ-801 is a small-molecule potent inhibitor of Aβ-oligomer formation. The efficacy, safety/tolerability, and brain volume effects of oral valiltramiprosate were evaluated in this phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center, 78-week trial in homozygotes with early symptomatic AD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study enrolled eligible APOE4/4 subjects aged 50-80 years with Early AD (Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] 22-30), which included mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and mild dementia, Clinical Dementia Rating-Global Score (CDR-G) of 0.5 or 1, who were randomized 1:1 to valiltramiprosate (265 mg twice/day) or placebo. The primary outcome was AD Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13); the key secondary outcomes were CDR-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) and Amsterdam-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), and a secondary outcome was Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD). The main imaging outcome was hippocampal volume on MRI; diffusion tensor imaging (MRI-DTI) assessed microstructural tissue integrity. Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) were monitored with MRIs every 26 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 325 participants enrolled and received study drug. At 78 weeks, the overall efficacy population did not show significant effects on ADAS-Cog13 or other clinical outcomes compared with placebo (ADAS-Cog13: 11% slowing; p = 0.607, N = 320), but showed significant slowing of hippocampal atrophy (18%, p = 0.017, N = 290). Prespecified analyses by disease severity (stratification variable) showed no significant clinical effects in mild AD (MMSE ≤26, N = 195). The prespecified MCI group (MMSE >26, N = 125) showed nominally significant positive effects on ADAS-Cog13 (52%, nominal p = 0.041) and DAD (96%, nominal p = 0.016), positive trend on CDR-SB (102%, nominal p = 0.053), with significant hippocampal atrophy slowing (26%, p = 0.004), and positive grey/white matter effects on MRI-DTI. In the MCI group, positive ADAS-Cog13 drug effects showed significant subject-level correlations with positive effects on imaging outcomes. The most common adverse events were nausea, vomiting, and decreased appetite (more than double placebo rate), with no increased risk of brain edema or microhemorrhages.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The APOE4/4 Early AD population did not show significant clinical efficacy at 78 weeks but showed significant brain atrophy slowing. Prespecified analyses at the MCI stage showed nominally significant slowing of clinical decline with significant hippocampal atrophy slowing. Oral valiltramiprosate may provide a favorable benefit-risk profile and simple treatment paradigm for homozygotes with MCI. These results will inform the
背景:载脂蛋白E ε4 (APOE ε4)等位基因是阿尔茨海默病(AD)最强的遗传危险因素,其纯合子积累了大脑β -淀粉样蛋白(a β)病理学的高负担。valiltramiproate /ALZ-801是a - β-寡聚物形成的小分子有效抑制剂。在这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心、78周的III期临床试验中,对早期症状性阿尔茨海默病纯合子患者进行了口服缬曲美酸钠的疗效、安全性/耐受性和脑容量效应的评估。方法:本研究纳入符合条件的APOE4/4受试者,年龄50-80岁,伴有早期AD (Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] 22-30),包括轻度认知障碍(MCI)和轻度痴呆,临床痴呆评分-全局评分(CDR-G)为0.5或1,按1:1随机分配给缬氨前列酸(265 mg 2次/天)或安慰剂。主要结果为AD评估量表-认知量表(ADAS-Cog13);关键的次要结局是cdr - box sum (CDR-SB)和Amsterdam-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL),次要结局是失能评估(DAD)。MRI主要成像结果为海马体积;扩散张量成像(MRI-DTI)评估微结构组织完整性。每26周用mri监测淀粉样蛋白相关成像异常(ARIA)。结果:共有325名参与者入组并接受了研究药物。在78周时,与安慰剂相比,总体疗效人群在ADAS-Cog13或其他临床结果方面没有显示出显着影响(ADAS-Cog13:减缓11%;p = 0.607, N = 320),但海马萎缩明显减缓(18%,p = 0.017, N = 290)。按疾病严重程度(分层变量)预先指定的分析显示,轻度AD (MMSE≤26,N = 195)的临床效果不显著。预先指定的MCI组(MMSE bbb26, N = 125)在ADAS-Cog13(52%,名义p = 0.041)和DAD(96%,名义p = 0.016)上显示显着的阳性效果,CDR-SB呈阳性趋势(102%,名义p = 0.053),海马萎缩明显减缓(26%,名义p = 0.004), MRI-DTI呈阳性灰质/白质效应。在MCI组中,ADAS-Cog13阳性药物效应与成像结果的阳性效应在受试者水平上显示出显著的相关性。最常见的不良事件是恶心、呕吐和食欲下降(安慰剂率的两倍以上),没有增加脑水肿或微出血的风险。结论:APOE4/4早期AD人群在78周时没有表现出明显的临床疗效,但表现出明显的脑萎缩减缓。预先指定的MCI阶段分析显示,名义上临床衰退显著减缓,海马萎缩显著减缓。口服缬曲密丙酸可能为MCI纯合子提供有利的获益-风险概况和简单的治疗范例。这些结果将为未来MCI试验的设计提供信息。试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04770220;稿号:2020-005755-20。
{"title":"Clinical Efficacy, Safety and Imaging Effects of Oral Valiltramiprosate in APOEε4/ε4 Homozygotes with Early Alzheimer's Disease: Results of the Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 78-Week APOLLOE4 Trial.","authors":"Susan Abushakra, Aidan Power, David Watson, Anton Porsteinsson, Marwan Sabbagh, Emer MacSweeney, Sharon Cohen, Mercè Boada Rovira, P Murali Doraiswamy, Earvin Liang, Susan Flint, J Patrick Kesslak, Rosalind McLaine, Adem Albayrak, Jean Schaefer, Jeremy Yu, Luke Tolar, Sam Dickson, John A Hey, Martin Tolar","doi":"10.1007/s40265-025-02250-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-025-02250-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The apolipoprotein E ε4 (APOE ε4) allele is the strongest genetic risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD), with homozygotes accumulating a high burden of cerebral beta-amyloid (Aβ) pathology. Valiltramiprosate/ALZ-801 is a small-molecule potent inhibitor of Aβ-oligomer formation. The efficacy, safety/tolerability, and brain volume effects of oral valiltramiprosate were evaluated in this phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center, 78-week trial in homozygotes with early symptomatic AD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study enrolled eligible APOE4/4 subjects aged 50-80 years with Early AD (Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] 22-30), which included mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and mild dementia, Clinical Dementia Rating-Global Score (CDR-G) of 0.5 or 1, who were randomized 1:1 to valiltramiprosate (265 mg twice/day) or placebo. The primary outcome was AD Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13); the key secondary outcomes were CDR-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) and Amsterdam-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), and a secondary outcome was Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD). The main imaging outcome was hippocampal volume on MRI; diffusion tensor imaging (MRI-DTI) assessed microstructural tissue integrity. Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) were monitored with MRIs every 26 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 325 participants enrolled and received study drug. At 78 weeks, the overall efficacy population did not show significant effects on ADAS-Cog13 or other clinical outcomes compared with placebo (ADAS-Cog13: 11% slowing; p = 0.607, N = 320), but showed significant slowing of hippocampal atrophy (18%, p = 0.017, N = 290). Prespecified analyses by disease severity (stratification variable) showed no significant clinical effects in mild AD (MMSE ≤26, N = 195). The prespecified MCI group (MMSE >26, N = 125) showed nominally significant positive effects on ADAS-Cog13 (52%, nominal p = 0.041) and DAD (96%, nominal p = 0.016), positive trend on CDR-SB (102%, nominal p = 0.053), with significant hippocampal atrophy slowing (26%, p = 0.004), and positive grey/white matter effects on MRI-DTI. In the MCI group, positive ADAS-Cog13 drug effects showed significant subject-level correlations with positive effects on imaging outcomes. The most common adverse events were nausea, vomiting, and decreased appetite (more than double placebo rate), with no increased risk of brain edema or microhemorrhages.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The APOE4/4 Early AD population did not show significant clinical efficacy at 78 weeks but showed significant brain atrophy slowing. Prespecified analyses at the MCI stage showed nominally significant slowing of clinical decline with significant hippocampal atrophy slowing. Oral valiltramiprosate may provide a favorable benefit-risk profile and simple treatment paradigm for homozygotes with MCI. These results will inform the ","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1455-1472"},"PeriodicalIF":14.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12572085/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145184945","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-08-05DOI: 10.1007/s40265-025-02214-9
Susan J Keam
Gepotidacin (BLUJEPA), a small molecule triazaacenaphthylene bacterial type II topoisomerase inhibitor (BTI) antibacterial, has been developed by GSK for the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs) and uncomplicated urogenital gonorrhoea (uUGC). In March 2025, gepotidacin was approved for the treatment of uUTIs caused by susceptible isolates of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Citrobacter freundii complex, Staphylococcus saprophyticus and Enterococcus faecalis in female adult and paediatric patients aged ≥ 12 years and weighing ≥ 40 kg in the USA. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of gepotidacin leading to this first approval for the treatment of bacterial uUTIs.
{"title":"Gepotidacin: First Approval.","authors":"Susan J Keam","doi":"10.1007/s40265-025-02214-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-025-02214-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gepotidacin (BLUJEPA), a small molecule triazaacenaphthylene bacterial type II topoisomerase inhibitor (BTI) antibacterial, has been developed by GSK for the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs) and uncomplicated urogenital gonorrhoea (uUGC). In March 2025, gepotidacin was approved for the treatment of uUTIs caused by susceptible isolates of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Citrobacter freundii complex, Staphylococcus saprophyticus and Enterococcus faecalis in female adult and paediatric patients aged ≥ 12 years and weighing ≥ 40 kg in the USA. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of gepotidacin leading to this first approval for the treatment of bacterial uUTIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1479-1485"},"PeriodicalIF":14.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144783823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-09-06DOI: 10.1007/s40265-025-02227-4
Charles Smoller, Emily Schiller, Kyla Yamashita, Bret David Silverglate, George Thomas Grossberg
This narrative review explores current pharmacological treatments for agitation in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Agitation, a common and difficult-to-manage symptom in AD, often requires targeted intervention. While nonpharmacological methods, such as behavioral therapy and environmental modifications, are considered first line, they may not always be effective. In cases where these approaches fail, pharmacological treatment can become a necessary component of care. Historically, antipsychotics have been the mainstay of pharmacological treatment for agitation in AD; however, safety and efficacy concerns have prompted exploration into alternative treatments. The purpose of this narrative review is to synthesize current literature on pharmacological treatments for agitation in AD with a focus on new and repurposed drugs. It also examines agents that have failed to demonstrate clinical benefit, offering insights into the ongoing challenges of drug development in this area. This review synthesizes recent findings on various drug classes, including anticonvulsants, antipsychotics, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), atypical antidepressants, sedatives, anti-dementia drugs, dextromethorphan, and cannabinoids. Both brexpiprazole and risperidone have demonstrated efficacy and received approval from government agencies, including brexpiprazole in the USA and risperidone in parts of Europe. Despite these advances, concerns remain regarding their long-term use and safety profiles. As a result, multiple other therapies are currently being studied as possible alternative solutions. However, no other pharmacological agents are currently approved, underscoring the need for further research on safe and effective options for this vulnerable population.
{"title":"Current and Emerging Pharmacological Approaches to Agitation in Alzheimer's Disease: A Narrative Review of New and Repurposed Therapies.","authors":"Charles Smoller, Emily Schiller, Kyla Yamashita, Bret David Silverglate, George Thomas Grossberg","doi":"10.1007/s40265-025-02227-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-025-02227-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This narrative review explores current pharmacological treatments for agitation in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Agitation, a common and difficult-to-manage symptom in AD, often requires targeted intervention. While nonpharmacological methods, such as behavioral therapy and environmental modifications, are considered first line, they may not always be effective. In cases where these approaches fail, pharmacological treatment can become a necessary component of care. Historically, antipsychotics have been the mainstay of pharmacological treatment for agitation in AD; however, safety and efficacy concerns have prompted exploration into alternative treatments. The purpose of this narrative review is to synthesize current literature on pharmacological treatments for agitation in AD with a focus on new and repurposed drugs. It also examines agents that have failed to demonstrate clinical benefit, offering insights into the ongoing challenges of drug development in this area. This review synthesizes recent findings on various drug classes, including anticonvulsants, antipsychotics, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), atypical antidepressants, sedatives, anti-dementia drugs, dextromethorphan, and cannabinoids. Both brexpiprazole and risperidone have demonstrated efficacy and received approval from government agencies, including brexpiprazole in the USA and risperidone in parts of Europe. Despite these advances, concerns remain regarding their long-term use and safety profiles. As a result, multiple other therapies are currently being studied as possible alternative solutions. However, no other pharmacological agents are currently approved, underscoring the need for further research on safe and effective options for this vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1391-1411"},"PeriodicalIF":14.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145006034","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-09-23DOI: 10.1007/s40265-025-02235-4
Richard J Kelly, Matthew Holt, Jeff Szer
Paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH) is an ultra-rare acquired genetic stem cell disorder based on a mutation in the PIGA gene that results in susceptibility of resulting blood cells to complement-mediated intravascular haemolysis (IVH). In countries where anti-complement therapy is available, pharmacological treatments have transformed this disease from a highly morbid and sometimes lethal disorder. The first treatment developed was the terminal complement (C5) monoclonal antibody inhibitor eculizumab, in 2002. This has been largely supplanted by a longer-acting antibody, ravulizumab, targeting the same binding site on C5. These agents significantly modify the natural history of the disease by reducing the risk of thrombosis, the most lethal complication of PNH, as well as reducing transfusion dependence and improving renal function, quality of life and probably, survival. Other terminal inhibitors available include eculizumab biosimilars, crovalimab, pozelimab and cemdisiran (combination). Despite this, a proportion of patients develop extravascular haemolysis (EVH) based on the accumulation of C3 components on these PNH blood cells, which no longer undergo IVH because of C5 inhibition. This has led to the development of proximal complement inhibitors, which have been generally successful at reducing this iatrogenic complication, improving haemoglobin concentrations, reducing transfusion dependency and improving quality of life. Currently available proximal inhibitors (and their targets) are pegcetacoplan (C3), danicopan (Factor D) and iptacopan (Factor B). While effective, as with all other complement inhibitors, there is a risk of breakthrough IVH with their use and approaches to manage this complication are being developed.
{"title":"Pharmacological Therapies in Paroxysmal Nocturnal Haemoglobinuria: Focus on Complement Inhibition.","authors":"Richard J Kelly, Matthew Holt, Jeff Szer","doi":"10.1007/s40265-025-02235-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-025-02235-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH) is an ultra-rare acquired genetic stem cell disorder based on a mutation in the PIGA gene that results in susceptibility of resulting blood cells to complement-mediated intravascular haemolysis (IVH). In countries where anti-complement therapy is available, pharmacological treatments have transformed this disease from a highly morbid and sometimes lethal disorder. The first treatment developed was the terminal complement (C5) monoclonal antibody inhibitor eculizumab, in 2002. This has been largely supplanted by a longer-acting antibody, ravulizumab, targeting the same binding site on C5. These agents significantly modify the natural history of the disease by reducing the risk of thrombosis, the most lethal complication of PNH, as well as reducing transfusion dependence and improving renal function, quality of life and probably, survival. Other terminal inhibitors available include eculizumab biosimilars, crovalimab, pozelimab and cemdisiran (combination). Despite this, a proportion of patients develop extravascular haemolysis (EVH) based on the accumulation of C3 components on these PNH blood cells, which no longer undergo IVH because of C5 inhibition. This has led to the development of proximal complement inhibitors, which have been generally successful at reducing this iatrogenic complication, improving haemoglobin concentrations, reducing transfusion dependency and improving quality of life. Currently available proximal inhibitors (and their targets) are pegcetacoplan (C3), danicopan (Factor D) and iptacopan (Factor B). While effective, as with all other complement inhibitors, there is a risk of breakthrough IVH with their use and approaches to manage this complication are being developed.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1413-1428"},"PeriodicalIF":14.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12572029/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145123965","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-08-05DOI: 10.1007/s40265-025-02215-8
Hannah A Blair
Avutometinib and defactinib (AVMAPKI™ FAKZYNJA™ CO-PACK) is a co-packaged rapidly accelerating fibrosarcoma (RAF)/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor (avutometinib) and focal adhesion kinase (FAK)/proline-rich tyrosine kinase-2 (Pyk2) inhibitor (defactinib) being developed by Verastem Oncology for the treatment of RAS/MAPK pathway-driven cancers. In May 2025, avutometinib and defactinib was approved in the USA for the treatment of adult patients with KRAS-mutated recurrent low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) who have received prior systemic therapy. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of avutometinib and defactinib leading to this first approval for KRAS-mutated recurrent LGSOC.
Avutometinib and defactinib (AVMAPKI™FAKZYNJA™CO-PACK)是一种共包装的快速纤维肉瘤(RAF)/丝裂原活化蛋白激酶(MEK)抑制剂(Avutometinib)和局点粘附激酶(FAK)/富含脯氨酸的酪氨酸激酶-2 (Pyk2)抑制剂(defactinib),由Verastem Oncology公司开发,用于治疗RAS/MAPK通路驱动的癌症。2025年5月,avutometinib和defactinib在美国被批准用于治疗既往接受过全身治疗的kras突变复发性低级别浆液性卵巢癌(LGSOC)的成年患者。本文总结了avutometinib和defactinib在kras突变的复发性LGSOC中首次获批的里程碑。
{"title":"Avutometinib and Defactinib: First Approval.","authors":"Hannah A Blair","doi":"10.1007/s40265-025-02215-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-025-02215-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Avutometinib and defactinib (AVMAPKI<sup>™</sup> FAKZYNJA<sup>™</sup> CO-PACK) is a co-packaged rapidly accelerating fibrosarcoma (RAF)/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor (avutometinib) and focal adhesion kinase (FAK)/proline-rich tyrosine kinase-2 (Pyk2) inhibitor (defactinib) being developed by Verastem Oncology for the treatment of RAS/MAPK pathway-driven cancers. In May 2025, avutometinib and defactinib was approved in the USA for the treatment of adult patients with KRAS-mutated recurrent low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) who have received prior systemic therapy. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of avutometinib and defactinib leading to this first approval for KRAS-mutated recurrent LGSOC.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1319-1327"},"PeriodicalIF":14.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144783822","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}