Drugs最新文献

Axial spondyloarthritis is a common form of chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease in adults, the treatment of which is based on non-pharmacological elements on the one hand, and pharmacological options on the other, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the first line, followed by biological or targeted synthetic treatments. The therapeutic objective is remission or a low level of disease activity; if this objective is not achieved, the treatment is rotated or changed. Multiple changes is one factor illustrating the inability to achieve disease control and may lead to the notion of a difficult-to-treat disease (D2T). This requires a consensual definition including, beyond the number or therapeutic changes, the assessment of all the dimensions of the disease (objective signs of inflammation, residual pain, degenerative changes, psychosocial context). Recognising D2T patients will enable us to identify a particular population and the factors associated with this condition. When faced with a D2T disease, we need to analyse the causes of treatment failure and take into account the different components of the disease and the patient. In the absence of any prospect of new therapeutic targets in the short term for this disease, patient management may involve intensification of non-pharmacological means and evaluation of new therapeutic strategies such as combinations of targeted treatments.

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and consequent acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are substantial contributors to morbidity and mortality across Europe. Fortunately, as much as two thirds of this disease's burden is modifiable, in particular by lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). Current guidelines are based on the sound premise that, with respect to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), "lower is better for longer", and recent data have strongly emphasised the need for also "the earlier the better". In addition to statins, which have been available for several decades, ezetimibe, bempedoic acid (also as fixed dose combinations), and modulators of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9 inhibitors and inclisiran) are additionally very effective approaches to LLT, especially for those at very high and extremely high cardiovascular risk. In real life, however, clinical practice goals are still not met in a substantial proportion of patients (even in 70%). However, with the options we have available, we should render lipid disorders a rare disease. In April 2021, the International Lipid Expert Panel (ILEP) published its first position paper on the optimal use of LLT in post-ACS patients, which complemented the existing guidelines on the management of lipids in patients following ACS, which defined a group of "extremely high-risk" individuals and outlined scenarios where upfront combination therapy should be considered to improve access and adherence to LLT and, consequently, the therapy's effectiveness. These updated recommendations build on the previous work, considering developments in the evidential underpinning of combination LLT, ongoing education on the role of lipid disorder therapy, and changes in the availability of lipid-lowering drugs. Our aim is to provide a guide to address this unmet clinical need, to provide clear practical advice, whilst acknowledging the need for patient-centred care, and accounting for often large differences in the availability of LLTs between countries.

With rapid expansion of cannabis legalization worldwide, rates of cannabis use and cannabis use disorder (CUD) are increasing; the need for safe and effective medications to treat CUD is urgent. This narrative review evaluates evidence for promising pharmacotherapies to treat CUD from randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Pharmacotherapies for CUD are categorized based on compound targets (e.g., cannabinoid receptor 1 [CB1] agonists such as nabilone, serotonergic compounds such as bupropion, GABAergic compounds such as zolpidem) and outcomes are organized by predetermined withdrawal symptoms, cannabis craving, and cannabis relapse/use. Most promising pharmacotherapies for CUD are drugs that act on the endocannabinoid system and specifically at the CB1 receptor. Priority populations such as females, certain racial/ethnic groups, and age groups experience a different course of CUD progression, symptoms, and drug effects that are important to consider when evaluating outcomes related to CUD. Possible explanations for these disparities are explored, along with the clinical trials that explore these demographics in treating CUD with pharmacotherapies.

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a psychiatric disorder with defining abnormalities in memory, and psychedelics may be promising candidates for the treatment of PTSD given their effects on multiple memory systems. Most PTSD and psychedelic research has investigated memory with fear conditioning and extinction. While fruitful, conditioning and extinction provide a limited model of the complexity of PTSD and phenomenology of psychedelics, thereby limiting the refinement of therapies. In this review, we discuss abnormalities in fear conditioning and extinction in PTSD and review 25 studies testing psychedelics on these forms of memory. Perhaps the most reliable effect is that the acute effects of psychedelics can enhance extinction learning, which is impaired in PTSD. However, the post-acute effects may also enhance extinction learning, and the acute effects can also enhance fear conditioning. We then discuss abnormalities in episodic and semantic memory in PTSD and review current knowledge on how psychedelics impact these memory systems. Although PTSD and psychedelics acutely impair the formation of hippocampal-dependent episodic memories, psychedelics may acutely enhance cortical-dependent learning of semantic memories that could facilitate the integration of trauma memories and disrupt maladaptive beliefs. More research is needed on the acute effects of psychedelics on episodic memory consolidation, retrieval, and reconsolidation and post-acute effects of psychedelics on all phases of episodic memory. We conclude by discussing how targeting multiple memory mechanisms could improve upon the current psychedelic therapy paradigm for PTSD, thereby necessitating a greater emphasis on assessing diverse measures of memory in translational PTSD and psychedelic research.

Axatilimab (NIKTIMVO™; axatilimab-csfr), an anti-colony-stimulating Factor 1 Receptor (CSF-1R) humanized IgG4 (κ light chain) monoclonal antibody, is being developed by Incyte Corporation and Syndax Pharmaceuticals for the treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) and other indications, including idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). In August 2024, axatilimab was approved in the USA for the treatment of cGVHD after failure of at least two prior lines of systemic therapy in adult and paediatric patients weighing at least 40 kg. Axatilimab was added to the NCCN guidelines for cGVHD in August 2024. This article summarizes the development milestones leading to this first approval of axatilimab for the treatment of cGVHD.

Seladelpar (LIVDELZI^®) is an oral delpar [i.e. a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)δ agonist] being developed by Gilead Sciences for the treatment of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). On 14 August 2024, based on a reduction in alkaline phosphatase (ALP), it received accelerated approval in the USA for the treatment of PBC in combination with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in adults who have an inadequate response to UDCA, or as monotherapy in patients unable to tolerate UDCA. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory studies. A regulatory assessment for seladelpar for the treatment of PBC is underway in the EU and the UK. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of seladelpar leading to this first approval.

Background: Although a range of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) modulators are available for blood pressure lowering, the optimal choice within this class remains unclear. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of RAAS modulators in the adult hypertensive population.

Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, CENTRAL, and Embase. The primary efficacy outcome was all-cause mortality and the secondary efficacy outcome was cardiovascular mortality. Tolerability outcome was discontinuation due to adverse events. Safety outcomes included the occurrence of cough, dizziness, edema, hyperkalemia, and hypotension. Network meta-analyses were performed utilizing a random-effects model within a frequentist framework.

Results: We finally identified 51 articles from 49 randomized controlled trials. When compared to placebo, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) significantly reduced the risk of all-cause mortality (odds ratio (OR) 0.83; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74-0.92) and cardiovascular mortality (OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.68-0.93), while none of other RAAS modulators significantly lowered the risk of all-cause or cardiovascular mortality. Individual comparisons indicated that MRAs were associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality than the other RAAS modulators (reduction: 16% compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), 14% compared with angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), and 22% compared with direct renin inhibitors (DRIs)). No difference in discontinuation due to adverse events was found in a comparison of RAAS modulators with placebo. With regard to safety outcomes, ACEIs have a higher risk of cough (OR 4.68; 95% CI 1.61-13.60), ARBs have a higher risk of dizziness (OR 1.42; 95% CI 1.06-1.91), hypotension (OR 2.10; 95% CI 1.02-4.34), and hyperkalemia (OR 1.99; 95% CI 1.17-3.41), and MRAs had a higher risk of hyperkalemia (OR 2.68; 95% CI 1.99-3.62) when compared to placebo.

Conclusions: MRAs were the only RAAS modulators with a survival benefit in adults with hypertension, although they carried a higher risk of hyperkalemia. Our data challenge current hypertension guidelines which recommend MRAs as fourth-line therapy, and suggest that MRAs should be prescribed earlier and more widely.

Registration: PROSPERO identifier number CRD42023405714.

Efgartigimod (Vyvgart^®; Vyvgart^® Hytrulo) is a neonatal fragment crystallizable receptor (FcRn) antagonist indicated for the treatment of generalised myasthenia gravis (gMG) in adults who are acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody positive (Ab+). Efgartigimod is approved for both intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) use. In a pivotal phase III trial, IV efgartigimod was associated with significant and clinically meaningful improvements in myasthenia gravis symptoms and reductions in disease burden. The beneficial effects of IV efgartigimod were reproducible, durable and maintained over the long term. IV efgartigimod also improved health-related quality of life (HRQOL). In another phase III trial, SC efgartigimod PH20 was noninferior to IV efgartigimod in reducing total immunoglobulin G levels. Clinical improvement with SC efgartigimod PH20 was consistent with that of IV efgartigimod and was reproducible over the long term. Efgartigimod was generally well tolerated; the most common adverse events were headache and infections (with IV efgartigimod) and injection-site reactions (with SC efgartigimod PH20). Although further long-term data are required, IV and SC formulations of efgartigimod provide effective, generally well-tolerated and flexible treatment options for adults with AChR Ab+ gMG.

Orexins/hypocretins are neuropeptides produced by the hypothalamic neurons, binding two G-protein coupled receptors (orexin 1 and orexin 2 receptors) and playing a critical role in regulating arousal, wakefulness, and various physiological functions. Given the high prevalence of sleep disturbances in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and their reported involvement in AD pathophysiology, the orexin system is hypothesized to contribute to the disease pathogenesis. Specifically, recent evidence suggests that orexin's influence may extend beyond sleep regulation, potentially affecting amyloid-β and tau pathologies. Dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs), namely suvorexant, lemborexant, and daridorexant, demonstrated efficacy in treating chronic insomnia disorder across diverse clinical populations. Considering their stabilizing effects on sleep parameters and emerging evidence of a possible neuroprotective role, these agents represent a promising strategy for AD management. This leading article reviews the potential use of orexin receptor antagonists in AD, particularly focusing on their effect in modulating disease-associated sleep disturbances and clinical outcomes. Overall, clinical studies support the use of DORAs to enhance sleep quality in patients with AD with comorbid sleep and circadian sleep-wake rhythm disorders. Preliminary results also suggest that these compounds might influence AD pathology, potentially affecting disease progression. Conversely, research on selective orexin receptor antagonists in AD is currently limited. Further investigation is needed to explore orexin antagonism not only as a symptomatic treatment for sleep disturbances, but also for its broader implications in modifying AD neurodegeneration, emphasizing mechanisms of action and long-term outcomes.