Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-11-05DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02117-1
Youssef Rizk, Giuseppe Lippi, Brandon M Henry, Kin Israel Notarte, John G Rizk
Mpox, caused by the monkeypox virus (MPXV), is categorized into two primary clades: Clade I and Clade II, with notable outbreaks linked to Clade IIb. Historically endemic in Africa, recent years have seen significant global spread. The World Health Organization (WHO) declared mpox a Public Health Emergency of International Concern in August 2024, highlighting the emergence of Clade Ib outside Africa and the broadening demographic impact of the outbreak. This review updates the current status of mpox vaccines and treatments, including their safety and effectiveness. There are two US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved vaccines for the prevention of mpox disease, JynneosTM and ACAM2000®. The JynneosTM vaccine, recommended for high-risk individuals, has seen limited uptake despite its efficacy in preventing disease. Tecovirimat, while FDA-approved for smallpox and available in the European Union for mpox, has shown mixed results in recent trials, with new data suggesting limited effectiveness in Clade I infections and emergence of new mutations with resistance to this drug. Brincidofovir and Vaccinia Immune Globulin Intravenous offer additional treatment options, particularly for severe cases, although their use is constrained by regulatory and logistical challenges. Furthermore, the WHO recently approved the first commercial molecular assay, the Alinity m MPXV assay by Abbott Molecular Inc., for emergency use-an essential step in expanding testing capacity in regions experiencing mpox outbreaks. These updates underscore the critical need for continued research to enhance therapeutic outcomes and adapt public health strategies. Ensuring equitable access to vaccines, treatments, and diagnostics remains a significant challenge as the global community responds to the evolving mpox situation.
由猴痘病毒(MPXV)引起的猴痘分为两个主要支系:支系 I 和支系 II,其中支系 IIb 的疫情较为突出。猴痘历来在非洲流行,近年来已在全球范围内显著蔓延。世界卫生组织(WHO)于 2024 年 8 月宣布 mpox 为国际关注的公共卫生紧急事件,强调了 Ib 支系在非洲以外地区的出现以及疫情对人口影响的扩大。本综述更新了麻痘疫苗和治疗方法的现状,包括其安全性和有效性。美国食品和药物管理局 (FDA) 批准了两种用于预防麻痘的疫苗:JynneosTM 和 ACAM2000®。JynneosTM 疫苗被推荐用于高危人群,尽管在预防疾病方面效果显著,但使用率有限。Tecovirimat 虽然已被美国食品及药物管理局批准用于天花,并在欧盟用于水痘,但最近的试验结果喜忧参半,新的数据表明它对 I 族感染的疗效有限,而且出现了对这种药物产生抗药性的新变异。Brincidofovir 和疫苗免疫球蛋白静脉注射提供了更多的治疗选择,尤其是针对重症病例,尽管它们的使用受到监管和后勤挑战的限制。此外,世卫组织最近批准了首个商业分子检测方法--雅培分子公司的 Alinity m MPXV 检测方法--用于紧急用途,这是扩大麻腮风疫情爆发地区检测能力的重要一步。这些更新强调了继续开展研究以提高治疗效果和调整公共卫生战略的迫切需要。在全球社会应对不断变化的水痘疫情时,确保公平获得疫苗、治疗和诊断方法仍然是一项重大挑战。
{"title":"Update on Mpox Management: Epidemiology, Vaccines and Therapeutics, and Regulatory Changes.","authors":"Youssef Rizk, Giuseppe Lippi, Brandon M Henry, Kin Israel Notarte, John G Rizk","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02117-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-024-02117-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mpox, caused by the monkeypox virus (MPXV), is categorized into two primary clades: Clade I and Clade II, with notable outbreaks linked to Clade IIb. Historically endemic in Africa, recent years have seen significant global spread. The World Health Organization (WHO) declared mpox a Public Health Emergency of International Concern in August 2024, highlighting the emergence of Clade Ib outside Africa and the broadening demographic impact of the outbreak. This review updates the current status of mpox vaccines and treatments, including their safety and effectiveness. There are two US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved vaccines for the prevention of mpox disease, Jynneos<sup>TM</sup> and ACAM2000<sup>®</sup>. The Jynneos<sup>TM</sup> vaccine, recommended for high-risk individuals, has seen limited uptake despite its efficacy in preventing disease. Tecovirimat, while FDA-approved for smallpox and available in the European Union for mpox, has shown mixed results in recent trials, with new data suggesting limited effectiveness in Clade I infections and emergence of new mutations with resistance to this drug. Brincidofovir and Vaccinia Immune Globulin Intravenous offer additional treatment options, particularly for severe cases, although their use is constrained by regulatory and logistical challenges. Furthermore, the WHO recently approved the first commercial molecular assay, the Alinity m MPXV assay by Abbott Molecular Inc., for emergency use-an essential step in expanding testing capacity in regions experiencing mpox outbreaks. These updates underscore the critical need for continued research to enhance therapeutic outcomes and adapt public health strategies. Ensuring equitable access to vaccines, treatments, and diagnostics remains a significant challenge as the global community responds to the evolving mpox situation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142575624","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-11-19DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02119-z
Matt Shirley
Enlonstobart (Enshuxing®), a recombinant, fully humanised immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody targeted against programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), is being developed by the CSPC Pharmaceutical Group for the treatment of advanced cervical cancer and other solid tumours. Enlonstobart received its first approval (a conditional marketing authorisation) in June 2024, in China, for use in patients with recurrent or metastatic programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive cervical cancer who have failed previous platinum-containing chemotherapy. Phase III clinical evaluation of enlonstobart for use as first-line treatment (in combination with chemotherapy ± bevacizumab) in patients with recurrent or metastatic PD-L1-positive cervical cancer is also underway in China. Additionally, phase II clinical development of enlonstobart (as a part of combination therapy) for use against a range of other solid tumour types is continuing. This article summarises the milestones in the development of enlonstobart leading to this first approval for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer.
{"title":"Enlonstobart: First Approval.","authors":"Matt Shirley","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02119-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-024-02119-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Enlonstobart (Enshuxing<sup>®</sup>), a recombinant, fully humanised immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody targeted against programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), is being developed by the CSPC Pharmaceutical Group for the treatment of advanced cervical cancer and other solid tumours. Enlonstobart received its first approval (a conditional marketing authorisation) in June 2024, in China, for use in patients with recurrent or metastatic programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive cervical cancer who have failed previous platinum-containing chemotherapy. Phase III clinical evaluation of enlonstobart for use as first-line treatment (in combination with chemotherapy ± bevacizumab) in patients with recurrent or metastatic PD-L1-positive cervical cancer is also underway in China. Additionally, phase II clinical development of enlonstobart (as a part of combination therapy) for use against a range of other solid tumour types is continuing. This article summarises the milestones in the development of enlonstobart leading to this first approval for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1659-1663"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142667053","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-10-26DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02085-6
Jennifer Ward, Anthony Grinstead, Amy Kemp, Paula Kersten, Annina B Schmid, Colette Ridehalgh
<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Highly variable pain mechanisms in people with low back pain or spine-related leg pain might contribute to inefficacy of neuropathic pain medication. This meta-analysis aimed to determine how neuropathic pain is identified in clinical trials for people taking neuropathic pain medication for low back pain or spine-related leg pain and whether subgrouping based on the presence of neuropathic pain influences efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, CINAHL [EBSCO], APA PsycINFO, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry were searched from inception to 14 May, 2024. Randomized and crossover trials comparing first-line neuropathic pain medication for people with low back pain or spine-related leg pain to placebo or usual care were included. Two independent authors extracted data. Random-effects meta-analyses of all studies combined, and pre-planned subgroup meta-analyses based on the certainty of neuropathic pain (according to the neuropathic pain Special Interest Group [NeuPSIG] neuropathic pain grading criteria) were completed. Certainty of evidence was judged using the grading of recommendations assessment development and evaluation [GRADE] framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven included studies reported on 3619 participants. Overall, 33% of studies were judged unlikely to include people with neuropathic pain, 26% remained unclear. Only 41% identified people with possible, probable, or definite neuropathic pain. For pain, general analyses revealed only small effects at short term (mean difference [MD] - 9.30 [95% confidence interval [CI] - 13.71, - 4.88], I<sup>2</sup> = 87%) and medium term (MD - 5.49 [95% CI - 7.24, - 3.74], I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Subgrouping at short term revealed studies including people with definite or probable neuropathic pain showed larger effects on pain (definite; MD - 16.65 [95% CI - 35.95, 2.65], I<sup>2</sup> = 84%; probable; MD - 10.45 [95% CI - 14.79, - 6.12], I<sup>2</sup> = 20%) than studies including people with possible (MD - 5.50 [95% CI - 20.52, 9.52], I<sup>2</sup> = 78%), unlikely (MD - 6.67 [95% CI - 10.58, 2.76], I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), or unclear neuropathic pain (MD - 8.93 [95% CI - 20.57, 2.71], I<sup>2</sup> = 96%). Similarly, general analyses revealed negligible effects on disability at short term (MD - 3.35 [95% CI - 9.00, 2.29], I<sup>2</sup> = 93%) and medium term (MD - 4.06 [95% CI - 5.63, - 2.48], I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Sub-grouping at short term revealed larger effects in studies including people with definite/probable neuropathic pain (MD - 9.25 [95% CI - 12.59, - 5.90], I<sup>2</sup> = 2%) compared with those with possible/unclear/unlikely neuropathic pain (MD -1.57 [95% CI - 8.96, 5.82] I<sup>2</sup> = 95%). Medium-term outcomes showed a similar trend, but were limited by low numbers of studies. Certainty of evidence was low to very low for all outcomes.
{"title":"A Meta-analysis Exploring the Efficacy of Neuropathic Pain Medication for Low Back Pain or Spine-Related Leg Pain: Is Efficacy Dependent on the Presence of Neuropathic Pain?","authors":"Jennifer Ward, Anthony Grinstead, Amy Kemp, Paula Kersten, Annina B Schmid, Colette Ridehalgh","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02085-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-024-02085-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Highly variable pain mechanisms in people with low back pain or spine-related leg pain might contribute to inefficacy of neuropathic pain medication. This meta-analysis aimed to determine how neuropathic pain is identified in clinical trials for people taking neuropathic pain medication for low back pain or spine-related leg pain and whether subgrouping based on the presence of neuropathic pain influences efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, CINAHL [EBSCO], APA PsycINFO, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry were searched from inception to 14 May, 2024. Randomized and crossover trials comparing first-line neuropathic pain medication for people with low back pain or spine-related leg pain to placebo or usual care were included. Two independent authors extracted data. Random-effects meta-analyses of all studies combined, and pre-planned subgroup meta-analyses based on the certainty of neuropathic pain (according to the neuropathic pain Special Interest Group [NeuPSIG] neuropathic pain grading criteria) were completed. Certainty of evidence was judged using the grading of recommendations assessment development and evaluation [GRADE] framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven included studies reported on 3619 participants. Overall, 33% of studies were judged unlikely to include people with neuropathic pain, 26% remained unclear. Only 41% identified people with possible, probable, or definite neuropathic pain. For pain, general analyses revealed only small effects at short term (mean difference [MD] - 9.30 [95% confidence interval [CI] - 13.71, - 4.88], I<sup>2</sup> = 87%) and medium term (MD - 5.49 [95% CI - 7.24, - 3.74], I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Subgrouping at short term revealed studies including people with definite or probable neuropathic pain showed larger effects on pain (definite; MD - 16.65 [95% CI - 35.95, 2.65], I<sup>2</sup> = 84%; probable; MD - 10.45 [95% CI - 14.79, - 6.12], I<sup>2</sup> = 20%) than studies including people with possible (MD - 5.50 [95% CI - 20.52, 9.52], I<sup>2</sup> = 78%), unlikely (MD - 6.67 [95% CI - 10.58, 2.76], I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), or unclear neuropathic pain (MD - 8.93 [95% CI - 20.57, 2.71], I<sup>2</sup> = 96%). Similarly, general analyses revealed negligible effects on disability at short term (MD - 3.35 [95% CI - 9.00, 2.29], I<sup>2</sup> = 93%) and medium term (MD - 4.06 [95% CI - 5.63, - 2.48], I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Sub-grouping at short term revealed larger effects in studies including people with definite/probable neuropathic pain (MD - 9.25 [95% CI - 12.59, - 5.90], I<sup>2</sup> = 2%) compared with those with possible/unclear/unlikely neuropathic pain (MD -1.57 [95% CI - 8.96, 5.82] I<sup>2</sup> = 95%). Medium-term outcomes showed a similar trend, but were limited by low numbers of studies. Certainty of evidence was low to very low for all outcomes.","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1603-1636"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7616789/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142497072","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-11-26DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02120-6
Yvette N Lamb
Fulzerasib (Dupert®; Innovent Biologics/GenFleet Therapeutics) is an orally active small molecule inhibitor of the KRAS G12C mutant protein being developed for the treatment of solid tumors harboring the KRAS G12C oncogenic driver mutation, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer. Fulzerasib received its first approval on 21 August 2024 in China, for the treatment of adults with KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC who have received at least one line of systemic therapy. This conditional approval was based on the positive results of a single-arm, phase II study. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of fulzerasib leading to this first approval for KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC.
{"title":"Fulzerasib: First Approval.","authors":"Yvette N Lamb","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02120-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-024-02120-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fulzerasib (Dupert<sup>®</sup>; Innovent Biologics/GenFleet Therapeutics) is an orally active small molecule inhibitor of the KRAS G12C mutant protein being developed for the treatment of solid tumors harboring the KRAS G12C oncogenic driver mutation, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer. Fulzerasib received its first approval on 21 August 2024 in China, for the treatment of adults with KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC who have received at least one line of systemic therapy. This conditional approval was based on the positive results of a single-arm, phase II study. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of fulzerasib leading to this first approval for KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1665-1671"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142715669","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-11-13DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02111-7
Robert Kester, Sunita Zalani, Scot Ebbinghaus, Eric Rubin
The accelerated approval (AA) pathway was established by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to provide earlier access to therapies for patients with serious medical conditions and unmet medical needs. Since its inception, the AA pathway has been used for novel treatments across different therapeutic areas, but most prominently in oncology, including the immune checkpoint inhibitor class. This review article describes the history of regulatory approvals for pembrolizumab, an immunotherapy agent targeting programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1), and use of the AA pathway and the corresponding regulatory decisions made by the FDA. From its first AA in September 2014 to February 2024, pembrolizumab has used the accelerated pathway for roughly 40% of the approved indications listed in the US Prescribing Information and was the first oncology therapy to receive an AA for an alternate dosing regimen and a tissue-agnostic indication. As of February 2024, 14 of the 18 indication-specific AAs and 1 post-marketing requirement (PMR) for the alternate dosing regimen AA were converted to traditional approvals. Accelerated approvals for two indications were withdrawn, and the remaining ongoing PMRs are not due until later in 2024 or 2025. The median conversion time from AA to traditional approval was 2.6 years, which is roughly 6 months earlier than the median time reported for oncology AAs. While FDA was the first agency to establish an expedited approval pathway, regulators from other countries have established similar pathways. For pembrolizumab, approximately half of the datasets that supported US AAs also supported expedited approval, or sometimes full approval, in Canada, EU, Australia or Japan. Ultimately, the AA pathway balances the provision of earlier access to therapies with overcoming uncertainty about potential effectiveness, and therefore it is important to confirm treatment benefit and withdraw indications that do not confirm benefit in a timely manner. The regulatory strategy and use of this expedited program for pembrolizumab highlights the importance of the AA pathway in providing oncology patients with earlier access to life-saving medications.
美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)建立了加速审批(AA)途径,为病情严重和医疗需求未得到满足的患者提供更早的治疗机会。自启动以来,AA 途径已用于不同治疗领域的新型疗法,但在肿瘤学领域最为突出,其中包括免疫检查点抑制剂类药物。这篇综述文章介绍了针对程序性死亡受体-1(PD-1)的免疫疗法药物 pembrolizumab 获得监管部门批准的历史,以及 AA 途径的使用和 FDA 做出的相应监管决定。从 2014 年 9 月首次获得 AA 到 2024 年 2 月,pembrolizumab 已在美国《处方信息》中列出的约 40% 的获批适应症中使用了加速途径,并且是首个在替代给药方案和组织诊断适应症中获得 AA 的肿瘤疗法。截至 2024 年 2 月,18 个特定适应症 AA 中的 14 个和 1 个交替给药方案 AA 的上市后要求 (PMR) 已转为传统批准。两个适应症的加速批准被撤回,其余正在进行的 PMR 要到 2024 年晚些时候或 2025 年才到期。从 AA 到传统批准的中位转换时间为 2.6 年,比肿瘤学 AA 报告的中位时间大约早 6 个月。虽然 FDA 是第一个建立加速审批途径的机构,但其他国家的监管机构也建立了类似的途径。就 pembrolizumab 而言,支持美国 AA 的数据集中约有一半也支持加拿大、欧盟、澳大利亚或日本的加速审批,有时甚至是完全审批。归根结底,AA 途径在提供更早的治疗机会与克服潜在疗效的不确定性之间取得了平衡,因此必须及时确认治疗获益并撤销无法确认获益的适应症。对 pembrolizumab 的监管策略和这一加速计划的使用,凸显了 AA 途径在让肿瘤患者更早地获得救命药物方面的重要性。
{"title":"The Utilization of the Accelerated Approval Pathway in Oncology: A Case Study of Pembrolizumab.","authors":"Robert Kester, Sunita Zalani, Scot Ebbinghaus, Eric Rubin","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02111-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-024-02111-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The accelerated approval (AA) pathway was established by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to provide earlier access to therapies for patients with serious medical conditions and unmet medical needs. Since its inception, the AA pathway has been used for novel treatments across different therapeutic areas, but most prominently in oncology, including the immune checkpoint inhibitor class. This review article describes the history of regulatory approvals for pembrolizumab, an immunotherapy agent targeting programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1), and use of the AA pathway and the corresponding regulatory decisions made by the FDA. From its first AA in September 2014 to February 2024, pembrolizumab has used the accelerated pathway for roughly 40% of the approved indications listed in the US Prescribing Information and was the first oncology therapy to receive an AA for an alternate dosing regimen and a tissue-agnostic indication. As of February 2024, 14 of the 18 indication-specific AAs and 1 post-marketing requirement (PMR) for the alternate dosing regimen AA were converted to traditional approvals. Accelerated approvals for two indications were withdrawn, and the remaining ongoing PMRs are not due until later in 2024 or 2025. The median conversion time from AA to traditional approval was 2.6 years, which is roughly 6 months earlier than the median time reported for oncology AAs. While FDA was the first agency to establish an expedited approval pathway, regulators from other countries have established similar pathways. For pembrolizumab, approximately half of the datasets that supported US AAs also supported expedited approval, or sometimes full approval, in Canada, EU, Australia or Japan. Ultimately, the AA pathway balances the provision of earlier access to therapies with overcoming uncertainty about potential effectiveness, and therefore it is important to confirm treatment benefit and withdraw indications that do not confirm benefit in a timely manner. The regulatory strategy and use of this expedited program for pembrolizumab highlights the importance of the AA pathway in providing oncology patients with earlier access to life-saving medications.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1579-1601"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11652590/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142616734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-11-19DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02112-6
Hannah A Blair
Odronextamab (Ordspono™), a CD20xCD3 bispecific antibody, is being developed by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals for the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. On 26 August 2024, odronextamab received its first approval in the EU as monotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) or relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after ≥ 2 lines of systemic therapy. Clinical trials in various other B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, including mantle cell lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, are underway in multiple countries. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of odronextamab leading to this first approval for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory FL or relapsed/refractory DLBCL.
Odronextamab(Ordspono™)是一种 CD20xCD3 双特异性抗体,由 Regeneron 制药公司开发,用于治疗 B 细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤。2024 年 8 月 26 日,odronextamab 首次获得欧盟批准,作为单一疗法用于治疗复发/难治性滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)或经≥ 2 线系统治疗后复发/难治性弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)成人患者。针对其他各种 B 细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤(包括套细胞淋巴瘤、边缘区淋巴瘤和慢性淋巴细胞白血病)的临床试验正在多个国家进行。本文总结了odronextamab开发过程中的里程碑事件,这些事件促成了odronextamab首次被批准用于治疗复发/难治性FL或复发/难治性DLBCL成人患者。
{"title":"Odronextamab: First Approval.","authors":"Hannah A Blair","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02112-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-024-02112-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Odronextamab (Ordspono<sup>™</sup>), a CD20xCD3 bispecific antibody, is being developed by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals for the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. On 26 August 2024, odronextamab received its first approval in the EU as monotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) or relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after ≥ 2 lines of systemic therapy. Clinical trials in various other B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, including mantle cell lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, are underway in multiple countries. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of odronextamab leading to this first approval for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory FL or relapsed/refractory DLBCL.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1651-1658"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142667054","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-10-17DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02099-0
C Omar F Kamlin, Timothy M Jenkins, Jamie L Heise, Naseem S Amin
Trientine tetrahydrochloride (TETA-4HCl, Cuvrior®) is a copper chelating agent with the active moiety triethylenetetramine (trientine), developed by Orphalan, Inc. to address the unmet needs in the treatment of Wilson disease. The journey from bench to bedside builds upon the documented safety profile of trientine hydrochloride capsules developed initially to meet the needs of individuals intolerant to D-penicillamine (DPA). Trientine hydrochloride capsules are inherently unstable requiring strict cold chain storage conditions from production, transportation, and use at home by the patient. Trientine tetrahydrochloride has a distinctive, patent-protected unique polymorphic form, which permits the production at scale of film-coated scored tablets deemed room temperature stable for 36 months. Trientine tetrahydrochloride is supported by a well-characterized pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and metabolic profile demonstrating reliable and predictable dose linearity and dose proportionality kinetics. Trientine tetrahydrochloride is the only trientine formulation that has been compared with DPA in a prospective randomized clinical trial, demonstrating non-inferiority to DPA in adults with stable Wilson disease. On 28 April, 2022, the US Food and Drug Administration approved TETA-4HCl for use in adult patients with Wilson disease who are de-coppered and tolerant to DPA. Health authorities in multiple countries worldwide have approved TETA-4HCl for the treatment of adults and children aged 5 years or more who are intolerant to DPA including the European Union, UK, Saudi Arabia, Switzerland, Colombia, Australia, New Zealand, and China. This article aims to provide a comprehensive narrative review of the key milestones in the development of TETA-4HCl.
{"title":"Trientine Tetrahydrochloride, From Bench to Bedside: A Narrative Review.","authors":"C Omar F Kamlin, Timothy M Jenkins, Jamie L Heise, Naseem S Amin","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02099-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-024-02099-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Trientine tetrahydrochloride (TETA-4HCl, Cuvrior<sup>®</sup>) is a copper chelating agent with the active moiety triethylenetetramine (trientine), developed by Orphalan, Inc. to address the unmet needs in the treatment of Wilson disease. The journey from bench to bedside builds upon the documented safety profile of trientine hydrochloride capsules developed initially to meet the needs of individuals intolerant to D-penicillamine (DPA). Trientine hydrochloride capsules are inherently unstable requiring strict cold chain storage conditions from production, transportation, and use at home by the patient. Trientine tetrahydrochloride has a distinctive, patent-protected unique polymorphic form, which permits the production at scale of film-coated scored tablets deemed room temperature stable for 36 months. Trientine tetrahydrochloride is supported by a well-characterized pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and metabolic profile demonstrating reliable and predictable dose linearity and dose proportionality kinetics. Trientine tetrahydrochloride is the only trientine formulation that has been compared with DPA in a prospective randomized clinical trial, demonstrating non-inferiority to DPA in adults with stable Wilson disease. On 28 April, 2022, the US Food and Drug Administration approved TETA-4HCl for use in adult patients with Wilson disease who are de-coppered and tolerant to DPA. Health authorities in multiple countries worldwide have approved TETA-4HCl for the treatment of adults and children aged 5 years or more who are intolerant to DPA including the European Union, UK, Saudi Arabia, Switzerland, Colombia, Australia, New Zealand, and China. This article aims to provide a comprehensive narrative review of the key milestones in the development of TETA-4HCl.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1509-1518"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11652397/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142460701","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-11-15DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02121-5
Anil Gulati, Sikandar Gokuldas Adwani, Pamidimukkala Vijaya, Nilesh Radheshyam Agrawal, T C R Ramakrishnan, Hari Prakash Rai, Dinesh Jain, Nagarjunakonda Venkata Sundarachary, Jeyaraj Durai Pandian, Vijay Sardana, Mridul Sharma, Gursaran Kaur Sidhu, Sidharth Shankar Anand, Deepti Vibha, Saroja Aralikatte, Dheeraj Khurana, Deepika Joshi, Ummer Karadan, Mohd Shafat Imam Siddiqui
<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Sovateltide (Tycamzzi™), an endothelin-B (ET-B) receptor agonist, increases cerebral blood flow, has anti-apoptotic activity, and promotes neural repair following cerebral ischaemic stroke. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sovateltide in adult participants with acute cerebral ischaemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, Phase III clinical trial of sovateltide in participants with cerebral ischaemic stroke receiving standard of care (SOC) in India. Patients aged 18-78 years presenting up to 24 h after the onset of symptoms with radiologic confirmation of ischaemic stroke and a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (NIHSS) of ≥ 6 were enrolled. Patients with recurrent stroke, receiving endovascular therapy, or with intracranial haemorrhage were excluded. The study drug (saline or sovateltide [0.3 µg/kg] was administered intravenously in three doses at 3 ± 1 h intervals on Days 1, 3, and 6, and follow-up was 90 days). The Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations (MICE) was used to impute the missing assessments on the endpoints. An unpaired t-test, two-way analysis of variance with Tukey's multiple comparison test, and the Chi-square test were used for the statistical analysis. The objective was to determine at Day 90 (1) the number of patients with a modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) 0-2, and (2) the number of patients with an NIHSS 0-5 at 90 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were randomised with 80 patients in the sovateltide and 78 in the control group. Patients received the investigational drug at about 18 h of stroke onset in both control and sovateltide groups. The median NIHSS at randomisation was 10.00 (95% CI 9.99-11.65) in the control group and 9.00 (95% CI 9.11-10.46) in the sovateltide group. Seventy patients completed the 90-day follow-up in the control group and 67 in the sovateltide group. The proportion of intention-to-treat (ITT) patients with mRS 0-2 score at Day 90 post-randomisation was 22.67% higher (odds ratio [OR] 2.75, 95% CI 1.37-5.57); similarly, the proportion of patients with NIHSS score of 0-5 at Day 90 was 17.05% more (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.27-5.90) in the sovateltide group than in the control group. An improvement of ≥ 2 points on the mRS was observed in 51.28% and 72.50% of patients in the control and sovateltide groups, respectively (OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.29-4.81). Seven of 78 patients (8.97%) in the control group and 7 of 80 (8.75%) in the sovateltide group developed intracranial haemorrhage (ICH). The adverse events were not related to sovateltide.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The sovateltide group had a greater number of cerebral ischaemic stroke patients with lower mRS and NIHSS scores at 90 days post-treatment than the control group. This trial supported the regulatory approval of sovateltide in India, but a multinational RESP
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Sovateltide in Patients with Acute Cerebral Ischaemic Stroke: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicentre, Phase III Clinical Trial.","authors":"Anil Gulati, Sikandar Gokuldas Adwani, Pamidimukkala Vijaya, Nilesh Radheshyam Agrawal, T C R Ramakrishnan, Hari Prakash Rai, Dinesh Jain, Nagarjunakonda Venkata Sundarachary, Jeyaraj Durai Pandian, Vijay Sardana, Mridul Sharma, Gursaran Kaur Sidhu, Sidharth Shankar Anand, Deepti Vibha, Saroja Aralikatte, Dheeraj Khurana, Deepika Joshi, Ummer Karadan, Mohd Shafat Imam Siddiqui","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02121-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-024-02121-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Sovateltide (Tycamzzi™), an endothelin-B (ET-B) receptor agonist, increases cerebral blood flow, has anti-apoptotic activity, and promotes neural repair following cerebral ischaemic stroke. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sovateltide in adult participants with acute cerebral ischaemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, Phase III clinical trial of sovateltide in participants with cerebral ischaemic stroke receiving standard of care (SOC) in India. Patients aged 18-78 years presenting up to 24 h after the onset of symptoms with radiologic confirmation of ischaemic stroke and a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (NIHSS) of ≥ 6 were enrolled. Patients with recurrent stroke, receiving endovascular therapy, or with intracranial haemorrhage were excluded. The study drug (saline or sovateltide [0.3 µg/kg] was administered intravenously in three doses at 3 ± 1 h intervals on Days 1, 3, and 6, and follow-up was 90 days). The Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations (MICE) was used to impute the missing assessments on the endpoints. An unpaired t-test, two-way analysis of variance with Tukey's multiple comparison test, and the Chi-square test were used for the statistical analysis. The objective was to determine at Day 90 (1) the number of patients with a modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) 0-2, and (2) the number of patients with an NIHSS 0-5 at 90 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were randomised with 80 patients in the sovateltide and 78 in the control group. Patients received the investigational drug at about 18 h of stroke onset in both control and sovateltide groups. The median NIHSS at randomisation was 10.00 (95% CI 9.99-11.65) in the control group and 9.00 (95% CI 9.11-10.46) in the sovateltide group. Seventy patients completed the 90-day follow-up in the control group and 67 in the sovateltide group. The proportion of intention-to-treat (ITT) patients with mRS 0-2 score at Day 90 post-randomisation was 22.67% higher (odds ratio [OR] 2.75, 95% CI 1.37-5.57); similarly, the proportion of patients with NIHSS score of 0-5 at Day 90 was 17.05% more (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.27-5.90) in the sovateltide group than in the control group. An improvement of ≥ 2 points on the mRS was observed in 51.28% and 72.50% of patients in the control and sovateltide groups, respectively (OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.29-4.81). Seven of 78 patients (8.97%) in the control group and 7 of 80 (8.75%) in the sovateltide group developed intracranial haemorrhage (ICH). The adverse events were not related to sovateltide.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The sovateltide group had a greater number of cerebral ischaemic stroke patients with lower mRS and NIHSS scores at 90 days post-treatment than the control group. This trial supported the regulatory approval of sovateltide in India, but a multinational RESP","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1637-1650"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11652401/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142616727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-10-28DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02102-8
Carmen Hidalgo-Tenorio, German Bou, Antonio Oliver, Montserrat Rodríguez-Aguirregabiria, Miguel Salavert, Luis Martínez-Martínez
Gram-negative multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria, including Enterobacterales, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, pose a significant challenge in clinical practice. Infections caused by metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Gram-negative organisms, in particular, require careful consideration due to their complexity and varied prevalence, given that the microbiological diagnosis of these pathogens is intricate and compounded by challenges in assessing the efficacy of anti-MBL antimicrobials. We discuss both established and new approaches in the treatment of MBL-producing Gram-negative infections, focusing on 3 strategies: colistin; the recently approved combination of aztreonam with avibactam (or with ceftazidime/avibactam); and cefiderocol. Despite its significant activity against various Gram-negative pathogens, the efficacy of colistin is limited by resistance mechanisms, while nephrotoxicity and acute renal injury call for careful dosing and monitoring in clinical practice. Aztreonam combined with avibactam (or with avibactam/ceftazidime if aztreonam plus avibactam is not available) exhibits potent activity against MBL-producing Gram-negative pathogens. Cefiderocol in monotherapy is effective against a wide range of multidrug-resistant organisms, including MBL producers, and favorable clinical outcomes have been observed in various clinical trials and case series. After examining scientific evidence in the management of infections caused by MBL-producing Gram-negative bacteria, we have developed a comprehensive clinical algorithm to guide therapeutic decision making. We recommend reserving colistin as a last-resort option for MDR Gram-negative infections. Cefiderocol and aztreonam/avibactam represent favorable options against MBL-producing pathogens. In the case of P. aeruginosa with MBL-producing enzymes and with difficult-to-treat resistance, cefiderocol is the preferred option. Further research is needed to optimize treatment strategies and minimize resistance.
{"title":"The Challenge of Treating Infections Caused by Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Gram-Negative Bacteria: A Narrative Review.","authors":"Carmen Hidalgo-Tenorio, German Bou, Antonio Oliver, Montserrat Rodríguez-Aguirregabiria, Miguel Salavert, Luis Martínez-Martínez","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02102-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-024-02102-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gram-negative multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria, including Enterobacterales, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, pose a significant challenge in clinical practice. Infections caused by metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Gram-negative organisms, in particular, require careful consideration due to their complexity and varied prevalence, given that the microbiological diagnosis of these pathogens is intricate and compounded by challenges in assessing the efficacy of anti-MBL antimicrobials. We discuss both established and new approaches in the treatment of MBL-producing Gram-negative infections, focusing on 3 strategies: colistin; the recently approved combination of aztreonam with avibactam (or with ceftazidime/avibactam); and cefiderocol. Despite its significant activity against various Gram-negative pathogens, the efficacy of colistin is limited by resistance mechanisms, while nephrotoxicity and acute renal injury call for careful dosing and monitoring in clinical practice. Aztreonam combined with avibactam (or with avibactam/ceftazidime if aztreonam plus avibactam is not available) exhibits potent activity against MBL-producing Gram-negative pathogens. Cefiderocol in monotherapy is effective against a wide range of multidrug-resistant organisms, including MBL producers, and favorable clinical outcomes have been observed in various clinical trials and case series. After examining scientific evidence in the management of infections caused by MBL-producing Gram-negative bacteria, we have developed a comprehensive clinical algorithm to guide therapeutic decision making. We recommend reserving colistin as a last-resort option for MDR Gram-negative infections. Cefiderocol and aztreonam/avibactam represent favorable options against MBL-producing pathogens. In the case of P. aeruginosa with MBL-producing enzymes and with difficult-to-treat resistance, cefiderocol is the preferred option. Further research is needed to optimize treatment strategies and minimize resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1519-1539"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11652570/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142521365","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-12-02DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02127-z
Yvette N Lamb
{"title":"Correction: Vorasidenib: First Approval.","authors":"Yvette N Lamb","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02127-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-024-02127-z","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1673"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11652565/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142767413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}