Tatiana Cornelissen, Gisele M. Mendes, Fernando A. O. Silveira, Wesley Dáttilo, Roger Guevara, Ramiro Aguilar, Maria Gabriela Boaventura, Ricardo Campos, Ek del Val, Guilherme Ramos Demetrio, Marcilio Fagundes, Rafael de Paiva Farias, Geraldo W. Fernandes, Tiago Fernandes, Inácio Gomes, Thiago Kloss, Juliana Kuchenbecker, Leandro Maracahipes, Frederico Neves, Lucas Paolucci, Cássio Cardoso Pereira, Elenir Queiroz, Letícia Ramos, Sérvio P. Ribeiro, Gustavo Q. Romero, Carolina Oliveira, Jhonathan O. Silva, Tathiana Sobrinho, Ricardo Solar, Heraldo Vasconcelos, Gabriela Zorzal, William C. Wetzel
Leaf herbivory is a ubiquitous ecological interaction that varies significantly in intensity across species, habitats, and biogeographic regions. Although quantification of leaf damage is crucial for understanding many ecological processes, the accuracy and precision of various damage estimation methods used by researchers, including visual estimation, digital image analysis, and artificial intelligence, have not been evaluated and compared. We use a phylogenetically diverse group of tropical plants to compare the accuracy and precision of damage estimation methods and use the results to provide a guide to herbivory estimation that balances the advantages and disadvantages of each method. We found that visual estimation tended to overestimate herbivory levels compared to digital methods but was 15 times faster and improved in accuracy and speed with training. Conversely, deep-learning algorithms underestimated herbivory relative to image analysis with ImageJ when it was on the margin, but showed similar accuracy for damage inside of leaf margins. Our results indicate that while visual methods allow for rapid assessment of large sample sizes and are suitable for detecting broad patterns of damage, image analysis is crucial for accurate and precise quantification. The disadvantages of each method, however, can be minimized through proper training and efficient use of each tool, and we therefore provide a guide of practical approaches to herbivory estimation.
{"title":"Quantifying leaf herbivory: A guide to methodological trade-offs and best practices","authors":"Tatiana Cornelissen, Gisele M. Mendes, Fernando A. O. Silveira, Wesley Dáttilo, Roger Guevara, Ramiro Aguilar, Maria Gabriela Boaventura, Ricardo Campos, Ek del Val, Guilherme Ramos Demetrio, Marcilio Fagundes, Rafael de Paiva Farias, Geraldo W. Fernandes, Tiago Fernandes, Inácio Gomes, Thiago Kloss, Juliana Kuchenbecker, Leandro Maracahipes, Frederico Neves, Lucas Paolucci, Cássio Cardoso Pereira, Elenir Queiroz, Letícia Ramos, Sérvio P. Ribeiro, Gustavo Q. Romero, Carolina Oliveira, Jhonathan O. Silva, Tathiana Sobrinho, Ricardo Solar, Heraldo Vasconcelos, Gabriela Zorzal, William C. Wetzel","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70308","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ecy.70308","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Leaf herbivory is a ubiquitous ecological interaction that varies significantly in intensity across species, habitats, and biogeographic regions. Although quantification of leaf damage is crucial for understanding many ecological processes, the accuracy and precision of various damage estimation methods used by researchers, including visual estimation, digital image analysis, and artificial intelligence, have not been evaluated and compared. We use a phylogenetically diverse group of tropical plants to compare the accuracy and precision of damage estimation methods and use the results to provide a guide to herbivory estimation that balances the advantages and disadvantages of each method. We found that visual estimation tended to overestimate herbivory levels compared to digital methods but was 15 times faster and improved in accuracy and speed with training. Conversely, deep-learning algorithms underestimated herbivory relative to image analysis with ImageJ when it was on the margin, but showed similar accuracy for damage inside of leaf margins. Our results indicate that while visual methods allow for rapid assessment of large sample sizes and are suitable for detecting broad patterns of damage, image analysis is crucial for accurate and precise quantification. The disadvantages of each method, however, can be minimized through proper training and efficient use of each tool, and we therefore provide a guide of practical approaches to herbivory estimation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"107 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12867601/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146115096","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kateřina Brynychová, Jan Cukor, Richard Ševčík, Jan Matějů, František Jarkovský, Zdeněk Matějů
<p>Infanticide is defined as the killing of young offspring that are dependent on maternal care and can be driven by a variety of reasons (Li, <span>2022</span>). It may be unintentional, occurring as a by-product of behavior not directly aimed at killing conspecifics or intentional, when the individual gains a certain benefit from the act (Hausfater & Hrdy, <span>2017</span>; Ryazanov, <span>2021</span>). In biological and ecological contexts, male-motivated infanticide may serve various adaptive functions. According to the predation hypothesis, males may kill infants to gain nutritional benefits or as a by-product of aggression toward other males or females (Doidge et al., <span>1984</span>; Ebensperger, <span>1998</span>; Hrdy, <span>1979</span>). In some cases, males also consume the cubs they kill (Hausfater & Hrdy, <span>2017</span>). Male-motivated infanticide is also often part of a reproductive strategy (Hrdy, <span>1979</span>; Palombit, <span>2012</span>). The sexual selection hypothesis proposes that males commit infanticide to eliminate the offspring of other males and increase their chances of mating. When a female is caring for her young, she typically remains in anestrus for an extended period. However, if her brood is lost, she often returns to reproductive receptivity within days or weeks, depending on the species' life history. Following such a loss, the male responsible for the act frequently stays near the female, who subsequently mates with him (Pusey & Packer, <span>1994</span>). Finally, the resource competition hypothesis states that infanticide may reduce competition for limited resources such as food, nesting sites, or space, but is more likely committed by competitive females (Ebensperger, <span>1998</span>). Despite infanticide being confirmed in a wide range of animal taxa, it remains an understudied phenomenon among carnivores, with most documented cases limited to large species such as lions (<i>Panthera leo</i>; Pusey & Packer, <span>1994</span>), pumas (<i>Puma concolor</i>; Ruth et al., <span>2011</span>), leopards (<i>Panthera pardus</i>; Balme & Hunter, <span>2013</span>), and brown bears (<i>Ursus arctos</i>; Steyaert et al., <span>2014</span>). Until now, infanticide had not been confirmed in the northern raccoon (<i>Procyon lotor</i>), a native North American carnivore that has become an invasive species in Eurasia over the past century. European raccoon populations are genetically less diverse than native ones, mainly due to founder effects, although some variation has been maintained through multiple introductions and mixing of individuals (Biedrzycka et al., <span>2014</span>). As an opportunistic species, the raccoon adapts to new environments and occupies comparable habitats in Europe as in its original North American range, including forests, mixed agricultural landscapes, and urban areas (Cunze et al., <span>2023</span>). Despite its widespread distribution, relatively little is k
杀婴被定义为杀害依赖于母亲照顾的年轻后代,并可能由多种原因驱动(Li, 2022)。当个体从行为中获得一定的利益时,它可能是无意的,作为行为的副产品而发生,而不是直接旨在杀死同类或故意的(Hausfater & Hrdy, 2017; Ryazanov, 2021)。在生物学和生态学背景下,男性动机的杀婴行为可能具有各种适应功能。根据捕食假说,雄性可能会为了获取营养或作为攻击其他雄性或雌性的副产品而杀死幼崽(Doidge et al., 1984; Ebensperger, 1998; Hrdy, 1979)。在某些情况下,雄性也会吃掉它们杀死的幼崽(Hausfater & Hrdy, 2017)。男性动机的杀婴行为通常也是生殖策略的一部分(Hrdy, 1979; Palombit, 2012)。性选择假说认为,雄性杀死幼崽是为了消灭其他雄性的后代,增加交配的机会。当雌性照顾幼崽时,通常会保持一段较长的发情期。然而,如果她失去了孩子,她通常会在几天或几周内恢复生殖能力,这取决于物种的生活史。在这样的损失之后,负责行为的雄性经常呆在雌性附近,雌性随后会与它交配(Pusey & Packer, 1994)。最后,资源竞争假说指出,杀婴行为可能会减少对有限资源(如食物、筑巢地点或空间)的竞争,但更有可能是竞争性的雌性犯下的(Ebensperger, 1998)。尽管在广泛的动物分类群中证实了杀婴行为,但在食肉动物中,这一现象仍未得到充分研究,大多数记录在案的案例仅限于大型物种,如狮子(Panthera leo; Pusey & Packer, 1994)、美洲狮(Puma concolor; Ruth et al., 2011)、豹子(Panthera pardus; Balme & Hunter, 2013)和棕熊(Ursus arctos; Steyaert et al., 2014)。直到现在,北方浣熊(Procyon lotor)的杀婴行为还没有得到证实。北方浣熊是一种北美本土食肉动物,在过去的一个世纪里已经成为欧亚大陆的入侵物种。欧洲浣熊种群的遗传多样性低于本土浣熊种群,这主要是由于创始人效应,尽管通过多次引入和个体混合保持了一些变异(Biedrzycka et al., 2014)。作为一种机会主义物种,浣熊适应新的环境,并在欧洲占据了与其原始北美范围相当的栖息地,包括森林,混合农业景观和城市地区(Cunze et al., 2023)。尽管其分布广泛,但对其生态和行为的了解相对较少。然而,由于其主要的夜间习性,通过直接观察来研究浣熊是具有挑战性的。虽然杀婴行为在此之前尚未得到证实(Gehrt & Fritzell, 1999; Hauver et al., 2010),但雌性可能保护幼崽的某些行为表明,该物种确实存在杀婴行为的威胁。例如,在分娩后,雌性通常会尽量减少其家庭范围的大小,并在夜间花费更少的时间觅食(Schneider, 1968)。雌性也会对同种访客更具攻击性(Bissonnette & Csech, 1938; Hauver et al., 2010)。在某些情况下,母熊也会将幼崽从原来的巢穴中迁移出去(Hauver et al., 2010; Wilson & Nielsen, 2007)。自2024年春季以来,通过GPS遥测技术对捷克共和国卡罗维发利地区的浣熊进行了监测,以更好地了解它们的空间生态。这种非本地物种的种群已经在该地区发现了大约20年(mat<e:1>杰特等人,2012)。FELIS发射机(Ecotone, Telemetry Company,波兰)的改进版本用于数据收集,个人也被贴上耳朵标签,以便在现场进行视觉识别。在GPS数据的基础上,系统地调查了静息点。3月1日捕获一只雌性成年浣熊(Hermína, 5.1公斤),监测至2025年5月31日。在此期间,她在nov<s:1> Kyselka村(50°15 ' N 12°59 ' E)附近14.5公顷的森林斑块内至少使用了三个不同的休息地点。在一棵古老的菩提树(tila cordata)、断柳(Salix alba)和桤木(Alnus glutinosa)树的一个洞中发现了休息的地方,这些树离地面的高度都在10到15米之间。后来,Hermína开始喜欢菩提树的洞,这表明她可能在那里生过孩子。从4月21日起,使用捕影器对这棵树进行监测。2025年5月8日,我亲自仔细检查了这个洞穴,发现了三只幼崽。同一天,在距离洞穴两米的地方安装了一台Reolink摄像机,以便在不打扰母熊或幼崽的情况下进行持续监控。摄像机连续记录了8天。 从录像中,我们提取了Hermína进出母穴的所有实例,包括发生在树洞内或周围的任何值得注意的事件。这些观察结果随后被用于评估产后早期产妇的行为和活动模式。从2025年5月8日起,Hermína白天和她的幼崽呆在树洞里,定期在晚上(21:00至23:00)离开,并在凌晨(03:00至04:00)返回。5月10日,另一只成年大小的浣熊第一次进入山谷(01:38)并杀死了一只幼崽。根据外生殖器,入侵者被确认为男性。当Hermína在他在场的时候回到山谷时,一场打斗爆发了,她试图保护自己的幼崽,并成功地赶走了公熊。类似的事件发生在5月13日,当时观察到雄性再次进入母亲的洞穴(00:28,图1a,b)并杀死了第二只幼崽。接着又是一场打斗,Hermína又一次设法把他赶走了。第二天,她两次试图把最后一只幼崽从洞中移走,第一次是在下午15:14,第二次是在晚上21:02。然而,她没有成功,最终和最后一只幼崽在山谷里日夜待在一起,直到5月15日才离开。5月15日,闯入的公浣熊于22:15(图1c)返回并杀死并吃掉了最后一只幼崽(图1d)。Hermína再次在现场遇到了他,导致了另一次对抗。5月16日,Hermína最后一次访问这个现已空无一人的山谷,而这只雄性浣熊最后一次在那里被记录是在5月18日。目前还不清楚这只闯入的浣熊是否是同一只雄性。然而,根据视觉记录和浣熊每隔两天出现一次的事实,我们认为这几乎是肯定的。Hermína及其幼崽的整个监测周期如图2所示(参见brynychov<e:1> et al., 2025在Dryad储藏库中的视频)。一个可能的动机是雄性熊的杀婴行为可能是一个简单的食物来源,即没有防御能力的幼崽。在这种情况下,幼崽被杀死并吃掉,这意味着雄浣熊犯下了同类相食的罪行。在猎杀和吃掉幼崽之间相对较长的间隔可能支持了营养动机。相反,如果这种行为是由对交配机会的竞争所驱动的,人们会期望所有的幼崽都在一次事件中迅速被杀死。雄性杀婴行为的另一个可能动机可能是试图在正在进行的繁殖季节增加交配机会。这种行为可能是特别有利的,因为雌性浣熊在失去最初的幼崽后可以在同一个季节进入第二次发情,从而为杀婴的雄性提供了繁殖自己幼崽的机会(Gehrt & Fritzell, 1999)。然而,我们无法证实这一点,因为没有记录到个人之间的其他互动。除了雄性浣熊的功能动机之外,这一观察还引起了对杀婴行为
{"title":"When the natal den is not safe: First evidence of infanticide in the northern raccoon (Procyon lotor)","authors":"Kateřina Brynychová, Jan Cukor, Richard Ševčík, Jan Matějů, František Jarkovský, Zdeněk Matějů","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70314","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ecy.70314","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Infanticide is defined as the killing of young offspring that are dependent on maternal care and can be driven by a variety of reasons (Li, <span>2022</span>). It may be unintentional, occurring as a by-product of behavior not directly aimed at killing conspecifics or intentional, when the individual gains a certain benefit from the act (Hausfater & Hrdy, <span>2017</span>; Ryazanov, <span>2021</span>). In biological and ecological contexts, male-motivated infanticide may serve various adaptive functions. According to the predation hypothesis, males may kill infants to gain nutritional benefits or as a by-product of aggression toward other males or females (Doidge et al., <span>1984</span>; Ebensperger, <span>1998</span>; Hrdy, <span>1979</span>). In some cases, males also consume the cubs they kill (Hausfater & Hrdy, <span>2017</span>). Male-motivated infanticide is also often part of a reproductive strategy (Hrdy, <span>1979</span>; Palombit, <span>2012</span>). The sexual selection hypothesis proposes that males commit infanticide to eliminate the offspring of other males and increase their chances of mating. When a female is caring for her young, she typically remains in anestrus for an extended period. However, if her brood is lost, she often returns to reproductive receptivity within days or weeks, depending on the species' life history. Following such a loss, the male responsible for the act frequently stays near the female, who subsequently mates with him (Pusey & Packer, <span>1994</span>). Finally, the resource competition hypothesis states that infanticide may reduce competition for limited resources such as food, nesting sites, or space, but is more likely committed by competitive females (Ebensperger, <span>1998</span>). Despite infanticide being confirmed in a wide range of animal taxa, it remains an understudied phenomenon among carnivores, with most documented cases limited to large species such as lions (<i>Panthera leo</i>; Pusey & Packer, <span>1994</span>), pumas (<i>Puma concolor</i>; Ruth et al., <span>2011</span>), leopards (<i>Panthera pardus</i>; Balme & Hunter, <span>2013</span>), and brown bears (<i>Ursus arctos</i>; Steyaert et al., <span>2014</span>). Until now, infanticide had not been confirmed in the northern raccoon (<i>Procyon lotor</i>), a native North American carnivore that has become an invasive species in Eurasia over the past century. European raccoon populations are genetically less diverse than native ones, mainly due to founder effects, although some variation has been maintained through multiple introductions and mixing of individuals (Biedrzycka et al., <span>2014</span>). As an opportunistic species, the raccoon adapts to new environments and occupies comparable habitats in Europe as in its original North American range, including forests, mixed agricultural landscapes, and urban areas (Cunze et al., <span>2023</span>). Despite its widespread distribution, relatively little is k","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"107 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146109148","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Guorui Hu, He Mao, Haonan Bai, Yunpeng Zhao, Zengpeng Guo, Ning Chen, Miaojun Ma
Spatial pattern formation is recognized as a signal of ecological resilience, which could enhance ecosystems' persistence to environmental stress and make them evade catastrophic transitions. However, there is a lack of evidence and mechanisms for this phenomenon in natural ecosystems. Here, we conducted a large-scale plant community and spatial pattern survey across 116 sites in the alpine marshes on the eastern Tibetan Plateau. Our results showed that the alpine marsh shifted to a stable state characterized by multiple hummock characteristics during degradation. The hummock formation enhanced the compositional similarity between hummock-associated communities and the desired alpine marsh, thereby driving ecological resilience and making the system less susceptible to catastrophic transitions. Furthermore, an increase in hummock area and height, coupled with a reduction in hummock number, enhanced both environmental heterogeneity and plant beta diversity. In turn, greater environmental heterogeneity positively influenced beta diversity, which subsequently promoted higher compositional similarity across communities, ultimately contributing to increased ecological resilience. This study provides evidence and a mechanism for showing that spatial pattern formation drives resilience in real-world ecosystems. The findings highlight the necessity of incorporating spatial patterns into strategies for conserving biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, as well as enhancing ecological resilience in the face of accelerating environmental change.
{"title":"Spatial pattern formation enhances alpine marsh ecological resilience","authors":"Guorui Hu, He Mao, Haonan Bai, Yunpeng Zhao, Zengpeng Guo, Ning Chen, Miaojun Ma","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70301","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ecy.70301","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Spatial pattern formation is recognized as a signal of ecological resilience, which could enhance ecosystems' persistence to environmental stress and make them evade catastrophic transitions. However, there is a lack of evidence and mechanisms for this phenomenon in natural ecosystems. Here, we conducted a large-scale plant community and spatial pattern survey across 116 sites in the alpine marshes on the eastern Tibetan Plateau. Our results showed that the alpine marsh shifted to a stable state characterized by multiple hummock characteristics during degradation. The hummock formation enhanced the compositional similarity between hummock-associated communities and the desired alpine marsh, thereby driving ecological resilience and making the system less susceptible to catastrophic transitions. Furthermore, an increase in hummock area and height, coupled with a reduction in hummock number, enhanced both environmental heterogeneity and plant beta diversity. In turn, greater environmental heterogeneity positively influenced beta diversity, which subsequently promoted higher compositional similarity across communities, ultimately contributing to increased ecological resilience. This study provides evidence and a mechanism for showing that spatial pattern formation drives resilience in real-world ecosystems. The findings highlight the necessity of incorporating spatial patterns into strategies for conserving biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, as well as enhancing ecological resilience in the face of accelerating environmental change.</p>","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"107 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146109150","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jocelyn E. Behm, Jacintha Ellers, Wendy A. M. Jesse, Tyler J. Tran, Matthew R. Helmus
A major challenge in invasion ecology is determining which introduced species pose a threat to resident species through competitive displacement. Since it is impossible to allocate management resources to preventing interactions among all resident and introduced species, methods for identifying instances of potential competitive displacement would greatly help focus precious management resources. Additionally, methods that use readily available data, such as species counts or functional traits, are especially advantageous under urgent invasion timelines compared to those requiring more time-intensive experimental data. Here, we provide a framework for estimating competition outcomes—including displacement—between resident and invading species using species count and functional trait data, two readily available data sources. Our framework provides methods for estimating displacement that is possibly in progress from species count data and estimating possible displacement from functional traits. We apply this framework to the native and introduced gecko species on the Caribbean island of Curaçao. Our work indicates a potential for the displacement of all three native species by introduced species and suggests that the displacement of one native species may already be underway. Given the urgency of the biodiversity crisis, our framework provides a usable tool for the early identification of potentially detrimental interactions from introduced species and provides insights to focus future studies and guide management efforts.
{"title":"Estimating competition outcomes between native and invading species using trait and count data","authors":"Jocelyn E. Behm, Jacintha Ellers, Wendy A. M. Jesse, Tyler J. Tran, Matthew R. Helmus","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70304","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ecy.70304","url":null,"abstract":"<p>A major challenge in invasion ecology is determining which introduced species pose a threat to resident species through competitive displacement. Since it is impossible to allocate management resources to preventing interactions among all resident and introduced species, methods for identifying instances of potential competitive displacement would greatly help focus precious management resources. Additionally, methods that use readily available data, such as species counts or functional traits, are especially advantageous under urgent invasion timelines compared to those requiring more time-intensive experimental data. Here, we provide a framework for estimating competition outcomes—including displacement—between resident and invading species using species count and functional trait data, two readily available data sources. Our framework provides methods for estimating displacement that is possibly in progress from species count data and estimating possible displacement from functional traits. We apply this framework to the native and introduced gecko species on the Caribbean island of Curaçao. Our work indicates a potential for the displacement of all three native species by introduced species and suggests that the displacement of one native species may already be underway. Given the urgency of the biodiversity crisis, our framework provides a usable tool for the early identification of potentially detrimental interactions from introduced species and provides insights to focus future studies and guide management efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"107 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146109175","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Stephanie R. Valdez, Rachel K. Gittman, Megan E. Geesin, Brandon J. Puckett, Mariko A. Polk, Carolyn A. Currin, Carter S. Smith
Living shorelines, a prevalent nature-based coastal infrastructure technique, typically merge the restoration of coastal habitats (e.g., salt marsh, oyster reef) with gray infrastructure (e.g., rock or concrete breakwaters) to provide coastal erosion protection. With increasingly frequent and severe storms, living shorelines have been shown to effectively limit coastal erosion and loss; however, there is still uncertainty regarding the effects of living shorelines on nekton communities as compared to natural marshes and gray coastal protection strategies like bulkheads. Here, we present a dataset of living shoreline-associated nekton species recorded over a 20-year period in North Carolina, USA. We harmonized nekton abundance and biomass data from five different studies (each ranging in duration from 2 to 4 years) across 12 living shorelines with paired natural marshes and, in some cases, bulkheads. These studies used different gear types and sampling methodologies, and therefore future users of this dataset must carefully consider the limitations of different subsets of the data and ensure that they do not make direct catch comparisons across sites that used different methodologies. Altogether, we identified a total of 62 species groups at living shorelines, natural reference marshes, and bulkheads across three categories (i.e., crustacean, mollusk, and fish) between 2001 and 2024. We identified 49 species groups on living shorelines, 49 species groups in natural marshes, and 5 species groups on bulkheads. For each living shoreline and paired natural marsh and/or bulkhead shoreline, we report individual species counts, biomass (when available), and the sampling method. In addition, we report on the living shoreline type, age, and location. In total, these data provide vital insight into how living shorelines function as habitat for nekton, and they can be used to evaluate living shoreline effectiveness as a predominant nature-based solution for coastal protection and biodiversity enhancement. The data are released under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
{"title":"A multiyear dataset detailing nekton abundance and biomass along living shorelines","authors":"Stephanie R. Valdez, Rachel K. Gittman, Megan E. Geesin, Brandon J. Puckett, Mariko A. Polk, Carolyn A. Currin, Carter S. Smith","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70295","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ecy.70295","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Living shorelines, a prevalent nature-based coastal infrastructure technique, typically merge the restoration of coastal habitats (e.g., salt marsh, oyster reef) with gray infrastructure (e.g., rock or concrete breakwaters) to provide coastal erosion protection. With increasingly frequent and severe storms, living shorelines have been shown to effectively limit coastal erosion and loss; however, there is still uncertainty regarding the effects of living shorelines on nekton communities as compared to natural marshes and gray coastal protection strategies like bulkheads. Here, we present a dataset of living shoreline-associated nekton species recorded over a 20-year period in North Carolina, USA. We harmonized nekton abundance and biomass data from five different studies (each ranging in duration from 2 to 4 years) across 12 living shorelines with paired natural marshes and, in some cases, bulkheads. These studies used different gear types and sampling methodologies, and therefore future users of this dataset must carefully consider the limitations of different subsets of the data and ensure that they do not make direct catch comparisons across sites that used different methodologies. Altogether, we identified a total of 62 species groups at living shorelines, natural reference marshes, and bulkheads across three categories (i.e., crustacean, mollusk, and fish) between 2001 and 2024. We identified 49 species groups on living shorelines, 49 species groups in natural marshes, and 5 species groups on bulkheads. For each living shoreline and paired natural marsh and/or bulkhead shoreline, we report individual species counts, biomass (when available), and the sampling method. In addition, we report on the living shoreline type, age, and location. In total, these data provide vital insight into how living shorelines function as habitat for nekton, and they can be used to evaluate living shoreline effectiveness as a predominant nature-based solution for coastal protection and biodiversity enhancement. The data are released under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</p>","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"107 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecy.70295","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146109172","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hanwen Cui, Shuyan Chen, Ziyang Liu, Hongxian Song, Jingwei Chen, Anning Zhang, Sa Xiao, Yajun Wang, Jiajia Wang, Xin Li, Lizhe An, Haitao Ding, Nicolas Fanin
Plant functional group is increasingly recognized as vital for supporting multiple ecosystem functions simultaneously. However, variations in “ecosystem multifunctionality” relative to plant functional groups remain unclear, particularly in Antarctic terrestrial ecosystems. In particular, how plant presence relates to multifunctionality, whether this directly relates to their carbon inputs, or indirectly, via local changes in abiotic (soil moisture and pH), and biotic (soil biodiversity and their interactions) factors, is still an unresolved question. In this study, we collected soil samples from five areas in the Antarctic region, ranging from bare soil to areas dominated by nonvascular plants such as lichens, mosses, and vascular plants. We examined 12 ecosystem functions associated with carbon sequestration, nitrogen stock and cycling, soil organic matter (SOM) decomposition, microbial biomass and pathogen control to calculate ecosystem multifunctionality. Our results showed that ecosystem multifunctionality was higher in areas colonized by nonvascular plants and vascular plants compared to bare soil, which was concurrent with enhanced levels of carbon sequestration, SOM decomposition, and microbial biomass. Our structural equation model (SEM) showed that increased ecosystem multifunctionality beneath plants was associated with a higher number of microbial module hubs (indicative of stronger interdependence among microbial taxa) in nonvascular plants, but not in vascular plants. Analysis of SEM standardized contributions revealed the direct pathway as predominant in the connectivity pattern between vascular plant presence and ecosystem multifunctionality. Overall, these findings enhance our understanding of the differences in the pathways linking nonvascular plants, vascular plants, and ecosystem multifunctionality. It further highlights the necessity of incorporating microbial interactions to more effectively evaluate ecosystem multifunctionality, particularly in the context of Antarctic ecosystems.
{"title":"Multifunctionality changes with plant functional groups in Antarctica","authors":"Hanwen Cui, Shuyan Chen, Ziyang Liu, Hongxian Song, Jingwei Chen, Anning Zhang, Sa Xiao, Yajun Wang, Jiajia Wang, Xin Li, Lizhe An, Haitao Ding, Nicolas Fanin","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70279","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ecy.70279","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Plant functional group is increasingly recognized as vital for supporting multiple ecosystem functions simultaneously. However, variations in “ecosystem multifunctionality” relative to plant functional groups remain unclear, particularly in Antarctic terrestrial ecosystems. In particular, how plant presence relates to multifunctionality, whether this directly relates to their carbon inputs, or indirectly, via local changes in abiotic (soil moisture and pH), and biotic (soil biodiversity and their interactions) factors, is still an unresolved question. In this study, we collected soil samples from five areas in the Antarctic region, ranging from bare soil to areas dominated by nonvascular plants such as lichens, mosses, and vascular plants. We examined 12 ecosystem functions associated with carbon sequestration, nitrogen stock and cycling, soil organic matter (SOM) decomposition, microbial biomass and pathogen control to calculate ecosystem multifunctionality. Our results showed that ecosystem multifunctionality was higher in areas colonized by nonvascular plants and vascular plants compared to bare soil, which was concurrent with enhanced levels of carbon sequestration, SOM decomposition, and microbial biomass. Our structural equation model (SEM) showed that increased ecosystem multifunctionality beneath plants was associated with a higher number of microbial module hubs (indicative of stronger interdependence among microbial taxa) in nonvascular plants, but not in vascular plants. Analysis of SEM standardized contributions revealed the direct pathway as predominant in the connectivity pattern between vascular plant presence and ecosystem multifunctionality. Overall, these findings enhance our understanding of the differences in the pathways linking nonvascular plants, vascular plants, and ecosystem multifunctionality. It further highlights the necessity of incorporating microbial interactions to more effectively evaluate ecosystem multifunctionality, particularly in the context of Antarctic ecosystems.</p>","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"107 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146109229","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bingxin Li, Tao Zhong, Jiashu Wang, Hui Wang, Feixiang Wu, Karl Niklas, Jinzhuang Xue
{"title":"Dandelion-like mode of seed dispersal in an early Carboniferous gymnosperm","authors":"Bingxin Li, Tao Zhong, Jiashu Wang, Hui Wang, Feixiang Wu, Karl Niklas, Jinzhuang Xue","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70280","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ecy.70280","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"107 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146109155","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Fungus gnat pollination of the inconspicuous orchid Conchidium muscicola in the rainy season of southern Yunnan, China","authors":"Shi-Mao Wu, Sheng Zhang, Jiang-Yun Gao","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70309","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ecy.70309","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"107 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146070576","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Gbolahan A. Reis, Matthew L. Forister, Christopher A. Halsch, Clare M. Dittemore, Arthur M. Shapiro, Zachariah Gompert
Climate change has substantially shifted the phenology of many organisms. These shifts vary across species and habitats and are shaped by species' natural history traits and local environmental conditions, yet the relative importance of these drivers remains unclear. Moreover, climate can have diverse effects on different aspects of phenology, such as the timing and duration of activity, but this complexity is rarely captured by commonly used phenological metrics. We used multidecadal butterfly surveys and climate data from five montane sites spanning an elevational gradient to investigate how climate affects different aspects of the annual flight period of 135 butterfly species. Using a hierarchical Bayesian framework, we modeled annual probability of occurrence distributions for species using polynomial models that capture changes in abundance, timing, and length of flight. Spring maximum and minimum temperatures and winter precipitation were the best predictors of interannual variation in phenology. High winter precipitation, which usually comes in the form of snow, delayed phenology, while warmer spring maximum temperatures advanced phenology across elevations. Even modest increases in spring minimum (nighttime) temperatures caused strong phenological shifts. Climate effects varied among sites, among species within sites, and even among populations of the same species across sites, with particularly pronounced variation among species at a single location. Variation in climate effects was slightly better explained by local climate than by natural history traits. Among natural history traits, voltinism and overwintering stage were particularly influential. Importantly, climate influenced different aspects of the flight period (e.g., timing versus duration) in distinct ways, with both natural history traits and local climate modulating these responses. Our findings highlight the often-overlooked importance of winter precipitation and nighttime temperatures in shaping phenology and demonstrate the value of considering the entire flight period, rather than distinct aspects alone, to improve our understanding and predictions of species response to climate change.
{"title":"Climate and species traits give rise to complex phenological dynamics","authors":"Gbolahan A. Reis, Matthew L. Forister, Christopher A. Halsch, Clare M. Dittemore, Arthur M. Shapiro, Zachariah Gompert","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70297","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ecy.70297","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Climate change has substantially shifted the phenology of many organisms. These shifts vary across species and habitats and are shaped by species' natural history traits and local environmental conditions, yet the relative importance of these drivers remains unclear. Moreover, climate can have diverse effects on different aspects of phenology, such as the timing and duration of activity, but this complexity is rarely captured by commonly used phenological metrics. We used multidecadal butterfly surveys and climate data from five montane sites spanning an elevational gradient to investigate how climate affects different aspects of the annual flight period of 135 butterfly species. Using a hierarchical Bayesian framework, we modeled annual probability of occurrence distributions for species using polynomial models that capture changes in abundance, timing, and length of flight. Spring maximum and minimum temperatures and winter precipitation were the best predictors of interannual variation in phenology. High winter precipitation, which usually comes in the form of snow, delayed phenology, while warmer spring maximum temperatures advanced phenology across elevations. Even modest increases in spring minimum (nighttime) temperatures caused strong phenological shifts. Climate effects varied among sites, among species within sites, and even among populations of the same species across sites, with particularly pronounced variation among species at a single location. Variation in climate effects was slightly better explained by local climate than by natural history traits. Among natural history traits, voltinism and overwintering stage were particularly influential. Importantly, climate influenced different aspects of the flight period (e.g., timing versus duration) in distinct ways, with both natural history traits and local climate modulating these responses. Our findings highlight the often-overlooked importance of winter precipitation and nighttime temperatures in shaping phenology and demonstrate the value of considering the entire flight period, rather than distinct aspects alone, to improve our understanding and predictions of species response to climate change.</p>","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"107 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146069375","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Quantitative evidence synthesis is a prominent path towards generality in ecology. Generality is typically discussed in terms of central tendencies, such as an average effect across a compilation of studies, and the role of heterogeneity for assessing generality is less well developed. Heterogeneity examines the transferability of ecological effects across contexts, though between-study variance is typically assumed as constant (i.e., homoscedastic). Here, I use two case studies to show how location-scale models that relax the assumption of homoscedasticity and cross validation can combine to further the goals of evidence syntheses. First, I examine scale-dependent heterogeneity for a meta-analysis of plant native-exotic species richness relationships, quantifying the relationships among unexplained effect size variation, spatial grain and extent. Second, I examine relationships among habitat fragment size, study-level covariates and unexplained variation in patch-scale species richness using a database of fragmentation studies. Heteroscedastic models quantify where effects can be transferred with more or less certainty and provide new descriptions of transferability for both case studies. Cross validation can be applied to a single or multiple models, adapted to either the goal of assessing intervention efficacy or generalization and, for the case studies examined here, showed that assuming homoscedasticity limits transferability.
{"title":"Location-scale models and cross validation to advance quantitative evidence synthesis","authors":"Shane A. Blowes","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70303","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ecy.70303","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Quantitative evidence synthesis is a prominent path towards generality in ecology. Generality is typically discussed in terms of central tendencies, such as an average effect across a compilation of studies, and the role of heterogeneity for assessing generality is less well developed. Heterogeneity examines the transferability of ecological effects across contexts, though between-study variance is typically assumed as constant (i.e., homoscedastic). Here, I use two case studies to show how location-scale models that relax the assumption of homoscedasticity and cross validation can combine to further the goals of evidence syntheses. First, I examine scale-dependent heterogeneity for a meta-analysis of plant native-exotic species richness relationships, quantifying the relationships among unexplained effect size variation, spatial grain and extent. Second, I examine relationships among habitat fragment size, study-level covariates and unexplained variation in patch-scale species richness using a database of fragmentation studies. Heteroscedastic models quantify where effects can be transferred with more or less certainty and provide new descriptions of transferability for both case studies. Cross validation can be applied to a single or multiple models, adapted to either the goal of assessing intervention efficacy or generalization and, for the case studies examined here, showed that assuming homoscedasticity limits transferability.</p>","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"107 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12834672/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146055519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}