Pub Date : 2024-06-05DOI: 10.1007/s00455-024-10722-1
Rebecca S Bartlett, Andrew S Walters, Heidi A Wayment
Although the psychosocial sequelae of living with dysphagia secondary to Parkinson disease (PD) are described in the literature as challenging, there has been little focus on using this information to influence the design of dysphagia treatment. A more nuanced understanding of the psychosocial experiences of this population may assist clinicians in providing a patient-centered approach to care. Our study was designed to gather insight into the common psychosocial experiences associated with dysphagia in the context of PD. A semi-structured interview consisting of open- and closed items was conducted with 25 individuals from regions across the country with self-reported oropharyngeal dysphagia secondary to PD. Questions were developed using comprehensive stress and coping frameworks that emphasized psychosocial predictors of specific affective reactions (e.g., grief, anxiety, depression), including self-evaluation (e.g., self-identity), coping strategies, social support, personal expectations (including perceived control over symptoms and prognosis), positive experiences, and perceptions of personal growth. Interview responses were subjected to a qualitative analysis and revealed three dominant themes: (1) Recalibration of a PD Diagnosis, (2) Vigilant Caution to Swallowing, and (3) Grieving the Loss of the Communal Meal. Using these data interpretations, we discuss three concepts for speech-language pathologists working with individuals with dysphagia and PD to consider during clinical interactions; these are reframing swallowing vigilance to engagement with mindful eating, using biofeedback to align patient perceptions and swallow physiology, and understanding the consequences of loss (of their former swallowing ability) through grief and growth reactions.
{"title":"Psychosocial Experiences Associated with Dysphagia and Relevant Clinical Implications Among Adults with Parkinson Disease.","authors":"Rebecca S Bartlett, Andrew S Walters, Heidi A Wayment","doi":"10.1007/s00455-024-10722-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-024-10722-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although the psychosocial sequelae of living with dysphagia secondary to Parkinson disease (PD) are described in the literature as challenging, there has been little focus on using this information to influence the design of dysphagia treatment. A more nuanced understanding of the psychosocial experiences of this population may assist clinicians in providing a patient-centered approach to care. Our study was designed to gather insight into the common psychosocial experiences associated with dysphagia in the context of PD. A semi-structured interview consisting of open- and closed items was conducted with 25 individuals from regions across the country with self-reported oropharyngeal dysphagia secondary to PD. Questions were developed using comprehensive stress and coping frameworks that emphasized psychosocial predictors of specific affective reactions (e.g., grief, anxiety, depression), including self-evaluation (e.g., self-identity), coping strategies, social support, personal expectations (including perceived control over symptoms and prognosis), positive experiences, and perceptions of personal growth. Interview responses were subjected to a qualitative analysis and revealed three dominant themes: (1) Recalibration of a PD Diagnosis, (2) Vigilant Caution to Swallowing, and (3) Grieving the Loss of the Communal Meal. Using these data interpretations, we discuss three concepts for speech-language pathologists working with individuals with dysphagia and PD to consider during clinical interactions; these are reframing swallowing vigilance to engagement with mindful eating, using biofeedback to align patient perceptions and swallow physiology, and understanding the consequences of loss (of their former swallowing ability) through grief and growth reactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11508,"journal":{"name":"Dysphagia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141261471","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-05DOI: 10.1007/s00455-024-10719-w
Emma Charters, Anna Lawless, Jonathan R Clark, Natalie McCabe, Chris Milross, Rafe Britton, Gillian Heller, Raymond Wu
Background: The radiation dose to dysphagia and aspiration-related structures (DARS) for patients undergoing transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and post-operative radiation therapy (PORT) for primary oropharyngeal carcinoma is unknown.
Methods: This prospective study measured swallowing using the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory at baseline and then 12-months after PORT. Dosimetric parameters were collected.
Results: 19 patients were recruited between 2017 and 2019. Worse swallow function at 12-months after PORT was associated with dose-parameters to the oesophageal inlet muscle, superior pharyngeal constrictor muscle and cervical oesophagus. Mean dose, V50Gy, and V60Gy to the base of tongue and pharyngeal constrictors was significantly lower in those receiving PORT to the neck alone.
Conclusion: Dose to DARS was lower in patients who received PORT to the neck alone. In patients treated with TORS and PORT, poorer swallowing outcomes at 12 months post-treatment were associated with increased dose to oesophageal inlet muscle, superior constrictor muscle, and cervical oesophagus.
背景:接受经口机器人手术(TORS)和术后放疗(PORT)治疗原发性口咽癌的患者吞咽困难和吸入相关结构(DARS)的辐射剂量尚不清楚:这项前瞻性研究使用 MD 安德森吞咽困难量表在基线和 PORT 术后 12 个月测量吞咽情况。收集了剂量参数:2017年至2019年期间招募了19名患者。PORT术后12个月吞咽功能变差与食道入口肌、咽上收缩肌和颈食管的剂量参数有关。仅接受颈部PORT治疗的患者,其舌根和咽部收缩肌的平均剂量、V50Gy和V60Gy明显较低:结论:仅接受颈部PORT治疗的患者DARS剂量较低。在接受 TORS 和 PORT 治疗的患者中,治疗后 12 个月吞咽效果较差与食道入口肌、上收缩肌和颈食道的剂量增加有关。
{"title":"Association between Swallowing Outcomes and Dose to Critical Swallow Structures in Patients Undergoing Transoral Robotic Surgery and Post-Operative Radiation Therapy.","authors":"Emma Charters, Anna Lawless, Jonathan R Clark, Natalie McCabe, Chris Milross, Rafe Britton, Gillian Heller, Raymond Wu","doi":"10.1007/s00455-024-10719-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-024-10719-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The radiation dose to dysphagia and aspiration-related structures (DARS) for patients undergoing transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and post-operative radiation therapy (PORT) for primary oropharyngeal carcinoma is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study measured swallowing using the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory at baseline and then 12-months after PORT. Dosimetric parameters were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>19 patients were recruited between 2017 and 2019. Worse swallow function at 12-months after PORT was associated with dose-parameters to the oesophageal inlet muscle, superior pharyngeal constrictor muscle and cervical oesophagus. Mean dose, V50Gy, and V60Gy to the base of tongue and pharyngeal constrictors was significantly lower in those receiving PORT to the neck alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dose to DARS was lower in patients who received PORT to the neck alone. In patients treated with TORS and PORT, poorer swallowing outcomes at 12 months post-treatment were associated with increased dose to oesophageal inlet muscle, superior constrictor muscle, and cervical oesophagus.</p>","PeriodicalId":11508,"journal":{"name":"Dysphagia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141261449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2023-08-21DOI: 10.1007/s00455-023-10616-8
Adolfo A Ocampo, Robert M Genta, Evan S Dellon
It is not known whether esophageal mast cells may be a cause of unexplained esophageal symptoms. We aimed to determine the prevalence of esophageal mastocytosis in patients without other underlying causes of symptoms and assess the relationship between symptoms and mast cells. In this retrospective study, we identified adults with esophageal symptoms, a normal endoscopy, normal esophageal biopsies, and no definitive diagnosis during clinical evaluation. We quantified mast cell density (mast cells/mm2) in archived esophageal biopsies using tryptase immunohistochemistry, and compared mast cell levels by clinical features and physiologic testing. In the 87 patients identified (mean age 37, 72% female, 63% white, 92% non-Hispanic), common symptoms were dysphagia (76%), heartburn (71%), and chest pain (25%). Overall, the mean esophageal epithelial mast cell count was 83.0 ± 51.8 mast cells/mm2; 60% of patients had ≥ 60 mast/mm2, and 17% had ≥ 120 masts/mm2. There were no differences in mast cell counts by type of esophageal testing. Mast cell levels did not differ significantly by type of symptoms, atopic status, medications, smoking status, or alcohol use. There were also no major differences in clinical characteristics by mast cell quartiles or thresholds. In conclusion, esophageal mast cell infiltration was common in patients with symptoms unexplained by prior testing, and levels were higher than previously published values for patients with no underlying esophageal condition. Mast cell esophagitis could be a novel cause of unexplained esophageal symptoms in a subset of patients, though it reamins to be determined if such patients benefit from mast cell-targeted treatment.
{"title":"Mast Cell Esophagitis: A Novel Entity in Patients with Unexplained Esophageal Symptoms.","authors":"Adolfo A Ocampo, Robert M Genta, Evan S Dellon","doi":"10.1007/s00455-023-10616-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00455-023-10616-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is not known whether esophageal mast cells may be a cause of unexplained esophageal symptoms. We aimed to determine the prevalence of esophageal mastocytosis in patients without other underlying causes of symptoms and assess the relationship between symptoms and mast cells. In this retrospective study, we identified adults with esophageal symptoms, a normal endoscopy, normal esophageal biopsies, and no definitive diagnosis during clinical evaluation. We quantified mast cell density (mast cells/mm<sup>2</sup>) in archived esophageal biopsies using tryptase immunohistochemistry, and compared mast cell levels by clinical features and physiologic testing. In the 87 patients identified (mean age 37, 72% female, 63% white, 92% non-Hispanic), common symptoms were dysphagia (76%), heartburn (71%), and chest pain (25%). Overall, the mean esophageal epithelial mast cell count was 83.0 ± 51.8 mast cells/mm<sup>2</sup>; 60% of patients had ≥ 60 mast/mm<sup>2</sup>, and 17% had ≥ 120 masts/mm<sup>2</sup>. There were no differences in mast cell counts by type of esophageal testing. Mast cell levels did not differ significantly by type of symptoms, atopic status, medications, smoking status, or alcohol use. There were also no major differences in clinical characteristics by mast cell quartiles or thresholds. In conclusion, esophageal mast cell infiltration was common in patients with symptoms unexplained by prior testing, and levels were higher than previously published values for patients with no underlying esophageal condition. Mast cell esophagitis could be a novel cause of unexplained esophageal symptoms in a subset of patients, though it reamins to be determined if such patients benefit from mast cell-targeted treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11508,"journal":{"name":"Dysphagia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10879451/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10193934","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The risk of dysphagia and/or aspiration is determined using screening tests, such as the repeated saliva swallowing test and modified water swallowing test, which evaluate cued swallowing. However, humans masticate and swallow foods with various consistencies, forms, and amounts, without conscious awareness. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the difference in the behavior of masticatory and swallowing muscles during spontaneous versus cued swallowing through a series of mastication and swallowing processes by evaluating surface electromyogram (sEMG) signals. The effect of the consistency and amount of food on the behavior of these muscles was also investigated. The sEMG recordings of the masseter muscles and anterior belly of the digastric muscle for 12 subjects, and genioglossus muscle for 5 subjects were obtained. The genioglossus activity was recorded using custom-made ball electrodes. The test foods were cookies and tofu, in amounts of 2 g and 4 g. The normalized muscle activity (integrated EMG), duration of the muscle activity, initial activation timepoint of each muscle, and total duration of swallowing were compared among four conditions. The activity of each muscle was significantly higher during the swallowing of cookies than tofu, for 4 g vs 2 g, and for cued versus spontaneous swallowing. The duration of each muscle activity, initial activation timepoint, and total duration of swallowing were significantly longer for cookies versus tofu, for 4 g vs 2 g, and for spontaneous versus cued swallowing. These results suggest that the behavior of the masticatory and swallowing muscles is affected by cued swallowing and by the consistency and amount of food.
{"title":"Difference in the Electromyographic Behavior of the Masticatory and Swallowing Muscles During Cued Versus Spontaneous Swallowing.","authors":"Naoya Saito, Toru Ogawa, Naru Shiraishi, Rie Koide, Hideya Komine, Masayoshi Yokoyama, Soshi Hanawa, Keiichi Sasaki","doi":"10.1007/s00455-023-10621-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00455-023-10621-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The risk of dysphagia and/or aspiration is determined using screening tests, such as the repeated saliva swallowing test and modified water swallowing test, which evaluate cued swallowing. However, humans masticate and swallow foods with various consistencies, forms, and amounts, without conscious awareness. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the difference in the behavior of masticatory and swallowing muscles during spontaneous versus cued swallowing through a series of mastication and swallowing processes by evaluating surface electromyogram (sEMG) signals. The effect of the consistency and amount of food on the behavior of these muscles was also investigated. The sEMG recordings of the masseter muscles and anterior belly of the digastric muscle for 12 subjects, and genioglossus muscle for 5 subjects were obtained. The genioglossus activity was recorded using custom-made ball electrodes. The test foods were cookies and tofu, in amounts of 2 g and 4 g. The normalized muscle activity (integrated EMG), duration of the muscle activity, initial activation timepoint of each muscle, and total duration of swallowing were compared among four conditions. The activity of each muscle was significantly higher during the swallowing of cookies than tofu, for 4 g vs 2 g, and for cued versus spontaneous swallowing. The duration of each muscle activity, initial activation timepoint, and total duration of swallowing were significantly longer for cookies versus tofu, for 4 g vs 2 g, and for spontaneous versus cued swallowing. These results suggest that the behavior of the masticatory and swallowing muscles is affected by cued swallowing and by the consistency and amount of food.</p>","PeriodicalId":11508,"journal":{"name":"Dysphagia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11127863/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41102237","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2023-11-19DOI: 10.1007/s00455-023-10635-5
Merertu Kitila, James C Borders, Gintas P Krisciunas, Edel McNally, Jessica M Pisegna
This study investigated rater confidence when rating airway invasion with the penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) on flexible endoscopic evaluations of swallowing (FEES), raters' accuracy against a referent-standard, inter-rater reliability, and potential associations between clinician confidence, experience, and accuracy. Thirty-one clinicians who use FEES in their daily practice were asked to judge airway invasion with the PAS and to rate their confidence that their score was correct (0-100) for 40 video clips, five in each of the 8 PAS categories. We found that raters were most confident in rating PAS 1, 7, and 8. The average confidence score across all videos was 76/100. Confidence did not have a significant relationship with accuracy against the referent-standard. Accuracy was highest for PAS 1 (92%), followed by PAS 8 (80%), PAS 7 (77%), and PAS 4 (72%). Accuracy was below 60% for PAS 2, 3, 5, and 6, the lowest being for PAS 3 (49%). Mean accuracy for all ratings, compared to referent-standard ratings, was highest for the intermediate group (71%), followed by expert (68%) and novice (65%). In general, we found that certain PAS scores tend to be rated more accurately, and that participating SLPs had varied confidence in PAS ratings on FEES. Potential reasons for these findings as well as suggested next steps are discussed.
本研究调查了在柔性内镜吞咽评估(FEES)中使用穿透-吸入量表(PAS)评定气道侵犯时的评分者置信度,评分者相对于参考标准的准确性,评分者间的可靠性,以及临床医生信心、经验和准确性之间的潜在关联。31名在日常实践中使用FEES的临床医生被要求用PAS来判断气道侵犯,并对40个视频片段(8个PAS类别中每个类别5个)的得分进行信心评分(0-100)。我们发现评分者对PAS 1、7和8的评分最有信心。所有视频的平均信心得分为76/100。信心与对照标准的准确度无显著关系。PAS 1的准确率最高(92%),其次是PAS 8 (80%), PAS 7(77%)和PAS 4(72%)。PAS 2、3、5和6的准确率低于60%,PAS 3的准确率最低(49%)。与参考标准评分相比,所有评分的平均准确率在中间组最高(71%),其次是专家(68%)和新手(65%)。总的来说,我们发现某些PAS分数往往被更准确地评定,并且参与的slp对PAS对费用的评分有不同的信心。讨论了这些发现的潜在原因以及建议的下一步措施。
{"title":"Confidence, Accuracy, and Reliability of Penetration-Aspiration Scale Ratings on Flexible Endoscopic Evaluations of Swallowing by Speech Pathologists.","authors":"Merertu Kitila, James C Borders, Gintas P Krisciunas, Edel McNally, Jessica M Pisegna","doi":"10.1007/s00455-023-10635-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00455-023-10635-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated rater confidence when rating airway invasion with the penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) on flexible endoscopic evaluations of swallowing (FEES), raters' accuracy against a referent-standard, inter-rater reliability, and potential associations between clinician confidence, experience, and accuracy. Thirty-one clinicians who use FEES in their daily practice were asked to judge airway invasion with the PAS and to rate their confidence that their score was correct (0-100) for 40 video clips, five in each of the 8 PAS categories. We found that raters were most confident in rating PAS 1, 7, and 8. The average confidence score across all videos was 76/100. Confidence did not have a significant relationship with accuracy against the referent-standard. Accuracy was highest for PAS 1 (92%), followed by PAS 8 (80%), PAS 7 (77%), and PAS 4 (72%). Accuracy was below 60% for PAS 2, 3, 5, and 6, the lowest being for PAS 3 (49%). Mean accuracy for all ratings, compared to referent-standard ratings, was highest for the intermediate group (71%), followed by expert (68%) and novice (65%). In general, we found that certain PAS scores tend to be rated more accurately, and that participating SLPs had varied confidence in PAS ratings on FEES. Potential reasons for these findings as well as suggested next steps are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":11508,"journal":{"name":"Dysphagia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138046638","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Timely and complete laryngeal closure is critical for a successful swallow. Researchers have studied laryngeal closure, including true vocal cords (TVC) closure, closure of the arytenoids to the epiglottis base (laryngeal vestibule closure), and epiglottic inversion, but the most commonly available imaging tools have limitations that do not allow the study of these components individually. Swallowing computerized tomography (CT) has enabled three-dimensional dynamic visualization and quantitative evaluation of swallowing events providing a unique view of swallowing-related structures and their motion. Using CT, TVC closure can be visualized and evaluated on any plane or cross-section without being obscured by of laryngeal vestibule closure or epiglottis inversion. The current review summarizes the results of five papers evaluating the effects of bolus consistency and volume, posture, and age on TVC closure. The combined results of these studies suggest that TVC closure is responsive to oral sensory input based on bolus consistency and size and can be modulated in response to conditions perceived to increase the risk of airway invasion. These results are meaningful for dysphagia rehabilitation as it suggests that interventions to improve TVC closure are likely to enhance airway protection.
{"title":"Timing of True Vocal Cords Closure for Safe Swallowing: A Review of 5 Studies Using 3D Analysis Using Computerized Tomography (CT).","authors":"Yoko Inamoto, Marlís González-Fernández, Eiichi Saitoh","doi":"10.1007/s00455-023-10620-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00455-023-10620-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Timely and complete laryngeal closure is critical for a successful swallow. Researchers have studied laryngeal closure, including true vocal cords (TVC) closure, closure of the arytenoids to the epiglottis base (laryngeal vestibule closure), and epiglottic inversion, but the most commonly available imaging tools have limitations that do not allow the study of these components individually. Swallowing computerized tomography (CT) has enabled three-dimensional dynamic visualization and quantitative evaluation of swallowing events providing a unique view of swallowing-related structures and their motion. Using CT, TVC closure can be visualized and evaluated on any plane or cross-section without being obscured by of laryngeal vestibule closure or epiglottis inversion. The current review summarizes the results of five papers evaluating the effects of bolus consistency and volume, posture, and age on TVC closure. The combined results of these studies suggest that TVC closure is responsive to oral sensory input based on bolus consistency and size and can be modulated in response to conditions perceived to increase the risk of airway invasion. These results are meaningful for dysphagia rehabilitation as it suggests that interventions to improve TVC closure are likely to enhance airway protection.</p>","PeriodicalId":11508,"journal":{"name":"Dysphagia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41126994","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2023-11-01DOI: 10.1007/s00455-023-10626-6
Zhenni Wang, Zihao Xiao, Qin Shen, Na Zhao, Weiming Zhang
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is a novel treatment method that stimulates patients' swallowing functions. This systemic review was designed to evaluate the impact of NMES on dysphagia in stroke patients. Databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched from the date of establishment to January 28th, 2022. Two investigators identified all included studies and compared the swallowing function after NMES treatment with traditional therapy (TT). The Cochrane risk bias assessment tool was utilized to analyze the quality of included studies. Research outcomes included Swallowing Quality of Life (SWAL-QoL), Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS), Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), Dysphagia Outcomes and Severity Scale (DOSS), the Repeat Salivary Swallowing Test (RSST), and Water Swallowing Test (WST). We extracted the mean and standard deviation of specific outcomes at the baseline level and after the treatment in both NMES and TT groups for subsequent meta-analysis. 9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs were included, and remarkable differences were found between patients treated with or without NMES in respect of FOIS scores (SMD = 0.48; 95% CI 0.26-0.70, P < 0.0001), PAS scores (SMD = - 0.56; 95% CI 1.01-0.10, P = 0.02), and SWAL-QoL scores (SMD = 0.57; 95% CI 0.00-1.14, P = 0.05). No significant difference was manifested in WST, RSST, and DOSS (SMD: - 0.02; 95% CI 0.38-0.35, P = 0.93). Evidence suggests that NMES is more effective for post-stroke dysphagia patients than treatment without NMES.
神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)是一种刺激患者吞咽功能的新型治疗方法。本系统综述旨在评估NMES对中风患者吞咽困难的影响。从成立之日到2022年1月28日,检索了PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Library等数据库。两名研究人员确定了所有纳入的研究,并比较了NMES治疗与传统治疗(TT)后的吞咽功能。采用Cochrane风险偏倚评估工具对纳入研究的质量进行分析。研究结果包括吞咽生活质量(SWAL-QoL)、渗透吸入量表(PAS)、功能性口腔摄入量表(FOIS)、吞咽困难结果和严重程度量表(DOSS)、重复唾液吞咽测试(RSST)和饮水吞咽测试(WST)。我们提取了NMES组和TT组在基线水平和治疗后的具体结果的平均值和标准差,用于随后的荟萃分析。包括9项随机对照试验(RCT)和准随机对照试验,在接受NMES或不接受NMES治疗的患者之间,FOIS评分(SMD = 0.48;95%置信区间0.26-0.70,P
{"title":"Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Post-Stroke Dysphagia Treatment: A Systemic Evaluation and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Zhenni Wang, Zihao Xiao, Qin Shen, Na Zhao, Weiming Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s00455-023-10626-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00455-023-10626-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is a novel treatment method that stimulates patients' swallowing functions. This systemic review was designed to evaluate the impact of NMES on dysphagia in stroke patients. Databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched from the date of establishment to January 28th, 2022. Two investigators identified all included studies and compared the swallowing function after NMES treatment with traditional therapy (TT). The Cochrane risk bias assessment tool was utilized to analyze the quality of included studies. Research outcomes included Swallowing Quality of Life (SWAL-QoL), Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS), Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), Dysphagia Outcomes and Severity Scale (DOSS), the Repeat Salivary Swallowing Test (RSST), and Water Swallowing Test (WST). We extracted the mean and standard deviation of specific outcomes at the baseline level and after the treatment in both NMES and TT groups for subsequent meta-analysis. 9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs were included, and remarkable differences were found between patients treated with or without NMES in respect of FOIS scores (SMD = 0.48; 95% CI 0.26-0.70, P < 0.0001), PAS scores (SMD = - 0.56; 95% CI 1.01-0.10, P = 0.02), and SWAL-QoL scores (SMD = 0.57; 95% CI 0.00-1.14, P = 0.05). No significant difference was manifested in WST, RSST, and DOSS (SMD: - 0.02; 95% CI 0.38-0.35, P = 0.93). Evidence suggests that NMES is more effective for post-stroke dysphagia patients than treatment without NMES.</p>","PeriodicalId":11508,"journal":{"name":"Dysphagia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71421678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2023-09-20DOI: 10.1007/s00455-023-10617-7
Peter Bánovčin, Peter Lipták, Diana Vážanová, Jakub Hoferica, Miloš Tatár, Martin Ďuriček
Menthol is thought to trigger gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms by influencing esophageal peristalsis and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) function. We evaluated the effect of esophageal menthol infusion on esophageal motility and the LES in healthy volunteers and in patients with GERD. High resolution manometry (HRM) catheter with attached thin tube for menthol infusion was placed transnasally. Protocol which included baseline recording, 16 water swallows (5 ml, 10 ml, and 15 ml) and the multiple rapid swallows was performed before and after esophageal infusion of menthol (3 mM, 20 min, 8 ml/min). We evaluated the effect of this infusion on the HRM parameters of esophageal peristalsis (distal contractile integral, distal latency, contractile front velocity) and the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) barrier function (integrated relaxation pressure and the inspiratory augmentation of the LES). Simultaneously we evaluated the quality and intensity of the symptoms during the menthol infusion. Esophageal infusion of menthol did not appreciably affect HRM measurements characterizing esophageal peristalsis and LES pressure in healthy subjects (N = 13) or GERD patients (N = 11). The magnitude of the distal contractile integral (5 ml) was changed neither in the healthy volunteers' group, (735 ± 127 vs. 814 ± 117 mmHg, p = 0.5), nor in the GERD patients (295 ± 78 vs. 338 ± 96 mmHg, p = 0.99). In healthy volunteers menthol did not change the inspiratory augmentation of the LES (8.67 ± 1.09 vs. 7.69 ± 0.96 mmHg, p = 0.15) and neither did for GERD patients (8.8 ± 1.18 vs. 8.22 ± 0.91 mmHg, p = 0.43). We observed no significant difference in any HRM parameter following menthol infusion, except for distal latency in 10 ml swallows. By contrast, menthol infusion induced significantly more intense discomfort in GERD patient than in healthy volunteers. Our results suggest no significant temporal effect of menthol on the esophageal motility or LES function, neither in healthy volunteers, nor in GERD. Arguably, other mechanisms are responsible for menthol-related heartburn.
{"title":"Esophageal Infusion of Menthol Does Not Affect Esophageal Motility in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.","authors":"Peter Bánovčin, Peter Lipták, Diana Vážanová, Jakub Hoferica, Miloš Tatár, Martin Ďuriček","doi":"10.1007/s00455-023-10617-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00455-023-10617-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Menthol is thought to trigger gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms by influencing esophageal peristalsis and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) function. We evaluated the effect of esophageal menthol infusion on esophageal motility and the LES in healthy volunteers and in patients with GERD. High resolution manometry (HRM) catheter with attached thin tube for menthol infusion was placed transnasally. Protocol which included baseline recording, 16 water swallows (5 ml, 10 ml, and 15 ml) and the multiple rapid swallows was performed before and after esophageal infusion of menthol (3 mM, 20 min, 8 ml/min). We evaluated the effect of this infusion on the HRM parameters of esophageal peristalsis (distal contractile integral, distal latency, contractile front velocity) and the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) barrier function (integrated relaxation pressure and the inspiratory augmentation of the LES). Simultaneously we evaluated the quality and intensity of the symptoms during the menthol infusion. Esophageal infusion of menthol did not appreciably affect HRM measurements characterizing esophageal peristalsis and LES pressure in healthy subjects (N = 13) or GERD patients (N = 11). The magnitude of the distal contractile integral (5 ml) was changed neither in the healthy volunteers' group, (735 ± 127 vs. 814 ± 117 mmHg, p = 0.5), nor in the GERD patients (295 ± 78 vs. 338 ± 96 mmHg, p = 0.99). In healthy volunteers menthol did not change the inspiratory augmentation of the LES (8.67 ± 1.09 vs. 7.69 ± 0.96 mmHg, p = 0.15) and neither did for GERD patients (8.8 ± 1.18 vs. 8.22 ± 0.91 mmHg, p = 0.43). We observed no significant difference in any HRM parameter following menthol infusion, except for distal latency in 10 ml swallows. By contrast, menthol infusion induced significantly more intense discomfort in GERD patient than in healthy volunteers. Our results suggest no significant temporal effect of menthol on the esophageal motility or LES function, neither in healthy volunteers, nor in GERD. Arguably, other mechanisms are responsible for menthol-related heartburn.</p>","PeriodicalId":11508,"journal":{"name":"Dysphagia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11127881/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41095155","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2023-09-21DOI: 10.1007/s00455-023-10619-5
Francesco Mozzanica, Nicole Pizzorni, Angelo Eplite, Daniela Ginocchio, Anna Colombo, Gabriele Mora, Federico Ambrogi, Tobias Warnecke, Antonio Schindler
Patients with multiple system atrophy (MSA) frequently experience dysphagia but only few studies analyzed its characteristics. The aim of this study was to describe the swallowing characteristics in these patients using fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). In addition, the swallowing abilities in patients with predominantly cerebellar MSA (MSA-C) and predominantly parkinsonian MSA (MSA-P) were compared. Twenty-five patients with MSA (16 MSA-P and 9 MSA-C) were enrolled. Clinical data including age, sex, functional oral intake scale (FOIS) score, body mass index (BMI) and the results of the global disability-unified MSA rating scale (GD-UMSARS) were collected. Three different textures of food (liquid, semisolid, solid) were provided during FEES examination. The characteristics of dysphagia (safety, efficiency, phenotype) and laryngeal movement alterations were analyzed. Delayed pharyngeal phase (92%) and posterior oral incontinence (52%) were the phenotypes more frequently seen. Penetration was more frequent with Liquid (68%), while aspiration occurred only with Liquid (20%). Residues of ingested food were demonstrated both in the pyriform sinus and in the vallecula with all the consistencies. Vocal fold motion impairment was the laryngeal movement alteration most frequently encountered (56%). No significant differences between patients with MSA-P and MSA-C in the dysphagia characteristics and laryngeal movement alterations were found. Patients with MSA frequently experience swallowing impairment and altered laryngeal mobility. Dysphagia characteristics and laryngeal movements alterations seems to be similar in MSA-C and MSA-P.
{"title":"Swallowing Characteristics in Patients with Multiple System Atrophy Analyzed Using FEES Examination.","authors":"Francesco Mozzanica, Nicole Pizzorni, Angelo Eplite, Daniela Ginocchio, Anna Colombo, Gabriele Mora, Federico Ambrogi, Tobias Warnecke, Antonio Schindler","doi":"10.1007/s00455-023-10619-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00455-023-10619-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with multiple system atrophy (MSA) frequently experience dysphagia but only few studies analyzed its characteristics. The aim of this study was to describe the swallowing characteristics in these patients using fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). In addition, the swallowing abilities in patients with predominantly cerebellar MSA (MSA-C) and predominantly parkinsonian MSA (MSA-P) were compared. Twenty-five patients with MSA (16 MSA-P and 9 MSA-C) were enrolled. Clinical data including age, sex, functional oral intake scale (FOIS) score, body mass index (BMI) and the results of the global disability-unified MSA rating scale (GD-UMSARS) were collected. Three different textures of food (liquid, semisolid, solid) were provided during FEES examination. The characteristics of dysphagia (safety, efficiency, phenotype) and laryngeal movement alterations were analyzed. Delayed pharyngeal phase (92%) and posterior oral incontinence (52%) were the phenotypes more frequently seen. Penetration was more frequent with Liquid (68%), while aspiration occurred only with Liquid (20%). Residues of ingested food were demonstrated both in the pyriform sinus and in the vallecula with all the consistencies. Vocal fold motion impairment was the laryngeal movement alteration most frequently encountered (56%). No significant differences between patients with MSA-P and MSA-C in the dysphagia characteristics and laryngeal movement alterations were found. Patients with MSA frequently experience swallowing impairment and altered laryngeal mobility. Dysphagia characteristics and laryngeal movements alterations seems to be similar in MSA-C and MSA-P.</p>","PeriodicalId":11508,"journal":{"name":"Dysphagia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11127813/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41110742","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2023-08-24DOI: 10.1007/s00455-023-10615-9
Sophia M Colevas, Lily N Stalter, Corinne A Jones, Timothy M McCulloch
The upper esophageal sphincter (UES) is the high-pressure zone marking the transition between the hypopharynx and esophagus. There is limited research surrounding the resting UES using pharyngeal high-resolution manometry (HRM) and existing normative data varies widely. This study describes the manometric representation of the resting UES using a clinically accessible method of measurement. Data were obtained from 87 subjects in a normative database of pharyngeal HRM with simultaneous videofluoroscopy. The resting UES manometric region was identified and ten measurement segments of this region were taken throughout the duration of the study using the Smart Mouse function within the manometry software. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to analyze within-subject reliability across measurements. Linear mixed-effects regression models were used to analyze how subject characteristics and manometric conditions influence resting UES pressure. There was excellent within-subject reliability between resting UES mean pressures (ICC = 0.96). In bivariate analysis, there were significant effects of age, number of sensors contained within the resting UES, and preceding swallow volume on mean resting UES pressure. For every 1 unit increase in age, there was a 0.19 unit decrease in resting UES pressure (p = 0.008). For every 1 unit increase in number of sensors contained within the resting UES, there was a 3.71 unit increase in resting UES pressure (p < 0.001). This study presents normative data for the resting UES, using a comprehensive and clinically accessible protocol that can provide standard comparison for the study of populations with swallowing disorders, particularly UES dysfunction, and provides support for UES-directed interventions.
{"title":"The Manometric Representation of the Upper Esophageal Sphincter During the Resting State: A Descriptive Study.","authors":"Sophia M Colevas, Lily N Stalter, Corinne A Jones, Timothy M McCulloch","doi":"10.1007/s00455-023-10615-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00455-023-10615-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The upper esophageal sphincter (UES) is the high-pressure zone marking the transition between the hypopharynx and esophagus. There is limited research surrounding the resting UES using pharyngeal high-resolution manometry (HRM) and existing normative data varies widely. This study describes the manometric representation of the resting UES using a clinically accessible method of measurement. Data were obtained from 87 subjects in a normative database of pharyngeal HRM with simultaneous videofluoroscopy. The resting UES manometric region was identified and ten measurement segments of this region were taken throughout the duration of the study using the Smart Mouse function within the manometry software. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to analyze within-subject reliability across measurements. Linear mixed-effects regression models were used to analyze how subject characteristics and manometric conditions influence resting UES pressure. There was excellent within-subject reliability between resting UES mean pressures (ICC = 0.96). In bivariate analysis, there were significant effects of age, number of sensors contained within the resting UES, and preceding swallow volume on mean resting UES pressure. For every 1 unit increase in age, there was a 0.19 unit decrease in resting UES pressure (p = 0.008). For every 1 unit increase in number of sensors contained within the resting UES, there was a 3.71 unit increase in resting UES pressure (p < 0.001). This study presents normative data for the resting UES, using a comprehensive and clinically accessible protocol that can provide standard comparison for the study of populations with swallowing disorders, particularly UES dysfunction, and provides support for UES-directed interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11508,"journal":{"name":"Dysphagia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10123585","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}