Pub Date : 2019-03-11DOI: 10.4324/9780429038891-21
M. Skully
{"title":"The Development of the Pawnshop Industry in East Asia","authors":"M. Skully","doi":"10.4324/9780429038891-21","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429038891-21","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":115960,"journal":{"name":"Financial Landscapes Reconstructed","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126421150","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Structuring Credit to Manage Real Risks","authors":"J. Von Pischke","doi":"10.4324/9780429038891-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429038891-4","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":115960,"journal":{"name":"Financial Landscapes Reconstructed","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127867924","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-03-11DOI: 10.4324/9780429038891-20
H. Schrader
{"title":"Moneylenders and Merchant Bankers in India and Indonesia","authors":"H. Schrader","doi":"10.4324/9780429038891-20","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429038891-20","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":115960,"journal":{"name":"Financial Landscapes Reconstructed","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129473971","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Informal Rural Finance: An Aladdin’s Lamp of Information 1","authors":"F. Bouman","doi":"10.4324/9780429038891-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429038891-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":115960,"journal":{"name":"Financial Landscapes Reconstructed","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121595694","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1992-10-01DOI: 10.4324/9780429038891-11
D. W. Adams, F. Bouman, O. Hospes
For centuries discussions about informal finance have been filled with confusion and controversy (Nelson 1949)1. Moralists condemn it, politicians attempt to control and regulate it, sociologists debate its usefulness, economists dissect it looking for imperfections -while billions of people voluntarily participate in it. Fashioning a composite picture of informal finance is similar to summing the disjointed reports of judgmental blind people who have independently felt an elephant’s appendage; the parts depicted do not add to a coherent whole. This confusion justifies looking for new ways of analyzing informal finance, ways that do not prejudge the virtue of the activities and people involved, that employ common units of analysis, and that also apply research techniques representing the manner in which people make decisions. I propose using contracts as a framework for such analysis. Because of my professional interests I stress their economic aspects.
{"title":"Using Contracts to Analyze Informal Finance","authors":"D. W. Adams, F. Bouman, O. Hospes","doi":"10.4324/9780429038891-11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429038891-11","url":null,"abstract":"For centuries discussions about informal finance have been filled with confusion and controversy (Nelson 1949)1. Moralists condemn it, politicians attempt to control and regulate it, sociologists debate its usefulness, economists dissect it looking for imperfections -while billions of people voluntarily participate in it. Fashioning a composite picture of informal finance is similar to summing the disjointed reports of judgmental blind people who have independently felt an elephant’s appendage; the parts depicted do not add to a coherent whole. This confusion justifies looking for new ways of analyzing informal finance, ways that do not prejudge the virtue of the activities and people involved, that employ common units of analysis, and that also apply research techniques representing the manner in which people make decisions. I propose using contracts as a framework for such analysis. Because of my professional interests I stress their economic aspects.","PeriodicalId":115960,"journal":{"name":"Financial Landscapes Reconstructed","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1992-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131460155","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
During the 1980s, there has been a fundamental shift from a supply-leading to a demand-oriented approach to the development of rural financial markets in developing countries. Dale Adams (1984) and his colleagues at Ohio State University provided increasingly persuasive evidence that the supply-leading approach to agricultural credit has failed. This approach was based on the assumption that the savings potential and the supply of finance in rural areas was insufficient for setting development in motion. Therefore, it was suggested to inject cheap funds from government and external sources into rural areas, regularly targeted at specified groups for predetermined productive purposes (investments, fertilizer, seeds, feed, etc.). Specialized, often stateowned agricultural banks, were established with the sole purpose of channelling production credit to a limited clientele. With many of these financial institutions failing, attention has shifted to building financial markets based on rural clients’ demand. The rationale of providing credit for production purposes was simple: credit, used to enhance the productive capacity of the borrower, will increase his future income, which, in turn, will allow him to pay interest and repay the loan. The actual performance of agricultural credit programs in many developing countries, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa, seems to suggest that borrowers failed to follow this rationale on both accounts: the economic efficiency of credit use has often been low; the repayment performance has been poor. Many agricultural lending institutions operated with losses, and some collapsed when governments became unable to sustain them financially. Cheap credit policies, often implying negative real interest rates, have been seen to be an important contributor to institutional collapse (Adams 1984). Low interest rates make it difficult for commercial banks to mobilize savings. They tend to lower the margin on lending, causing banks to ration credit to a few and generally the larger and wealthier borrowers. Market determined interest rates are likely to reduce the lending bias towards large borrowers and to support the availability of credit for consumption purposes. The central argument of this chapter is that limiting credit to productive purposes is not only futile because of the fungibility of financial resources, but that it is also inappropriate and even counterproductive in the endeavor to build sustainable rural financial institutions. Providing production credit is only one of the three needs financial markets must address at the micro level. Failure to address the other needs will hamper financial market development. The chapter first discusses the functions financial markets have for rural households and then shortly addresses the difficulties in separating consumption and investment expenditure in rural households. Thereafter, a brief review of rural households’ needs for financial services follows. Based on surveys
在1980年代,发展中国家农村金融市场的发展发生了根本性的转变,从供应导向转向需求导向。俄亥俄州立大学(Ohio State University)的戴尔•亚当斯(Dale Adams, 1984)及其同事提供了越来越有说服力的证据,证明供应主导的农业信贷方法已经失败。这一办法所依据的假设是,农村地区的储蓄潜力和资金供应不足以推动发展。因此,建议从政府和外部来源向农村地区注入廉价资金,定期针对特定群体,用于预定的生产目的(投资、肥料、种子、饲料等)。专门的(通常是国有的)农业银行成立的唯一目的是向有限的客户提供生产信贷。随着这些金融机构中的许多倒闭,人们的注意力已经转移到建立基于农村客户需求的金融市场上。为生产目的提供信贷的理由很简单:信贷用于提高借款人的生产能力,将增加他未来的收入,这反过来又使他能够支付利息和偿还贷款。在许多发展中国家,特别是撒哈拉以南非洲地区,农业信贷项目的实际表现似乎表明,借款人在两个方面都未能遵循这一基本原理:信贷使用的经济效率往往很低;还款表现一直不佳。许多农业贷款机构亏损经营,一些机构在政府无法提供资金支持时倒闭。廉价的信贷政策,通常意味着负的实际利率,被认为是制度崩溃的一个重要因素(Adams 1984)。低利率使商业银行难以调动储蓄。它们往往会降低贷款的利润率,导致银行将信贷配给少数人,通常是规模更大、更富有的借款人。市场决定的利率可能会减少对大型借贷者的贷款倾向,并支持用于消费目的的信贷供应。本章的中心论点是,由于金融资源的可替代性,限制信贷用于生产目的不仅是徒劳的,而且在建立可持续农村金融机构的努力中也是不合适的,甚至适得其反。提供生产信贷只是金融市场必须在微观层面解决的三个需求之一。其他需求得不到满足将阻碍金融市场的发展。本章首先论述了金融市场对农户的作用,然后简要论述了农户消费支出与投资支出分离的困难。随后,简要回顾农村家庭对金融服务的需求。根据喀麦隆和贝宁的调查,将显示消费目的在信贷需求中发挥重要甚至主导作用。除了贷款服务,农村家庭对储蓄机会表现出强烈的偏好。同样明显的是,农村家庭认为金融市场提供了重要的保险功能。基于在贝宁和喀麦隆的实地调查,并考虑到其他具有消费信贷成分的创新信贷方案的经验,我们将试图表明,消费信贷导向的信贷方案在目标群体导向和外联方面表现良好,并且显示出比传统的以生产为导向的信贷方案更好或至少不差的还款结果。
{"title":"Consumption Credit in Rural Financial Market Development","authors":"F. Heidhues, F. Bouman, O. Hospes","doi":"10.4324/9780429038891-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429038891-3","url":null,"abstract":"During the 1980s, there has been a fundamental shift from a supply-leading to a demand-oriented approach to the development of rural financial markets in developing countries. Dale Adams (1984) and his colleagues at Ohio State University provided increasingly persuasive evidence that the supply-leading approach to agricultural credit has failed. This approach was based on the assumption that the savings potential and the supply of finance in rural areas was insufficient for setting development in motion. Therefore, it was suggested to inject cheap funds from government and external sources into rural areas, regularly targeted at specified groups for predetermined productive purposes (investments, fertilizer, seeds, feed, etc.). Specialized, often stateowned agricultural banks, were established with the sole purpose of channelling production credit to a limited clientele. With many of these financial institutions failing, attention has shifted to building financial markets based on rural clients’ demand. The rationale of providing credit for production purposes was simple: credit, used to enhance the productive capacity of the borrower, will increase his future income, which, in turn, will allow him to pay interest and repay the loan. The actual performance of agricultural credit programs in many developing countries, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa, seems to suggest that borrowers failed to follow this rationale on both accounts: the economic efficiency of credit use has often been low; the repayment performance has been poor. Many agricultural lending institutions operated with losses, and some collapsed when governments became unable to sustain them financially. Cheap credit policies, often implying negative real interest rates, have been seen to be an important contributor to institutional collapse (Adams 1984). Low interest rates make it difficult for commercial banks to mobilize savings. They tend to lower the margin on lending, causing banks to ration credit to a few and generally the larger and wealthier borrowers. Market determined interest rates are likely to reduce the lending bias towards large borrowers and to support the availability of credit for consumption purposes. The central argument of this chapter is that limiting credit to productive purposes is not only futile because of the fungibility of financial resources, but that it is also inappropriate and even counterproductive in the endeavor to build sustainable rural financial institutions. Providing production credit is only one of the three needs financial markets must address at the micro level. Failure to address the other needs will hamper financial market development. The chapter first discusses the functions financial markets have for rural households and then shortly addresses the difficulties in separating consumption and investment expenditure in rural households. Thereafter, a brief review of rural households’ needs for financial services follows. Based on surveys ","PeriodicalId":115960,"journal":{"name":"Financial Landscapes Reconstructed","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115628225","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.4324/9780429038891-14
O. Hospes, F. Bouman
Every agro-ecological situation implies a specific pattern of production and a particular combination of savings, borrowing and insurance behavior of producers. Likewise, the strategies and services of agricultural traders and other financial intermediaries depend very much on the agro-ecological situation. Soil conditions, cropping patterns, water supply and drought might have a strong impact on the nature and number of financial services in rural areas of developing countries. Predictability, periodicity and diversity of agricultural production directly affect decisions of producers related to savings, borrowing and insurance. Platteau and Abraham (1987) argue that credit has evolved as a hunger insurance mechanism in fishing communities in India as a result of daily fluctuations of fishing incomes: a fisherman with surplus income lends money to his less fortunate fellow fishermen, who are supposed to help him in return when short of money and food. Southwold (1990) describes how coconut evolved as the major form of collateral for credit for securing food in a period of drought, failure of the paddy crop and restricted money circulation in rural Sri Lanka. The regular and relatively predictable income from coconut proved a solid base for copra traders and shopkeepers to supply credit in cash or goods to farmers. Borren (1986) reports the existence of different flows and forms of credit in three ecological zones in the Great Scarcies Area of Sierra Leone, each characterized by a particular cropping pattern. Van Nieuwkoop (1986) finds that in Malaysia, “Paddy farmers who have an income that is generated only once or twice a year use more informal credit than rubber farmers who have a much more regular income” (p.60). These observations would lead one to expect that the relationship between particular agro-ecological conditions and savings strategies, credit transactions and redistribution of risk, has been the subject of much research and policy debate. However, only a few empirical studies have explored this relationship, and it is questionable whether their findings have influenced policy debate at all. Of course, this question is only one of many issues which arise in the field of rural finance, that is, the complex of decisions of individuals and groups regarding insurance, savings and credit; services of financial intermediaries; and existing relations and conditions that affect these decisions and services (cf. Schmidt and Kropp 1987). However, even at a time when the role of agricultural credit as a development tool was widely discussed, this “agrarian question” was hardly addressed (AID Spring Review of Small Farmer Credit 1973). Yet the considerable difficulties in defining “the small farmer” would have provided ample reason to do so. Rice (1973) mentions that, “no single satisfactory definition is available to distinguish small farmers from medium and large farmers in all parts of the world” (p.3). However, this conclusion was not follo
{"title":"The Agrarian Question of Financial Landscapes: The Case of Ambon","authors":"O. Hospes, F. Bouman","doi":"10.4324/9780429038891-14","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429038891-14","url":null,"abstract":"Every agro-ecological situation implies a specific pattern of production and a particular combination of savings, borrowing and insurance behavior of producers. Likewise, the strategies and services of agricultural traders and other financial intermediaries depend very much on the agro-ecological situation. Soil conditions, cropping patterns, water supply and drought might have a strong impact on the nature and number of financial services in rural areas of developing countries. Predictability, periodicity and diversity of agricultural production directly affect decisions of producers related to savings, borrowing and insurance. Platteau and Abraham (1987) argue that credit has evolved as a hunger insurance mechanism in fishing communities in India as a result of daily fluctuations of fishing incomes: a fisherman with surplus income lends money to his less fortunate fellow fishermen, who are supposed to help him in return when short of money and food. Southwold (1990) describes how coconut evolved as the major form of collateral for credit for securing food in a period of drought, failure of the paddy crop and restricted money circulation in rural Sri Lanka. The regular and relatively predictable income from coconut proved a solid base for copra traders and shopkeepers to supply credit in cash or goods to farmers. Borren (1986) reports the existence of different flows and forms of credit in three ecological zones in the Great Scarcies Area of Sierra Leone, each characterized by a particular cropping pattern. Van Nieuwkoop (1986) finds that in Malaysia, “Paddy farmers who have an income that is generated only once or twice a year use more informal credit than rubber farmers who have a much more regular income” (p.60). These observations would lead one to expect that the relationship between particular agro-ecological conditions and savings strategies, credit transactions and redistribution of risk, has been the subject of much research and policy debate. However, only a few empirical studies have explored this relationship, and it is questionable whether their findings have influenced policy debate at all. Of course, this question is only one of many issues which arise in the field of rural finance, that is, the complex of decisions of individuals and groups regarding insurance, savings and credit; services of financial intermediaries; and existing relations and conditions that affect these decisions and services (cf. Schmidt and Kropp 1987). However, even at a time when the role of agricultural credit as a development tool was widely discussed, this “agrarian question” was hardly addressed (AID Spring Review of Small Farmer Credit 1973). Yet the considerable difficulties in defining “the small farmer” would have provided ample reason to do so. Rice (1973) mentions that, “no single satisfactory definition is available to distinguish small farmers from medium and large farmers in all parts of the world” (p.3). However, this conclusion was not follo","PeriodicalId":115960,"journal":{"name":"Financial Landscapes Reconstructed","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131082177","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.4324/9780429038891-10
C. Abugre, F. Bouman, O. Hospes
Consider this chapter as a critical assessment of the involvement of operational and donor NGOs with credit activities. It is drawn from ACORD’s2 direct experiences with designing and implementing various microcredit systems in 10 countries in Africa and through association with several local and international NGOs. Africa is the one place where many foreign NGOs like ACORD still operate directly in the field. Many local NGOs are more or less created by donor NGOs in their own image, or encouraged to serve as conduit for aid funds. Therefore, drawing upon the lessons of ACORD may not only be applicable to other northern donor NGOs, but to many African NGOs as well. It must be emphasized from the outset, however, that observations in this paper do not represent the totality of ACORD’s experiences but only those from which ACORD has drawn its own lessons. Like many development efforts, these lessons are very much the benefit of hindsight -learning from doing. It is in support of continuous improvement in the learning curve that this paper is directed. There has been no shortage of conferences on credit within NGO circles over the past few years. In most of these conferences, there has been much discussion about how to improve mechanisms for delivering credit to the poor or, at least improve their access to credit. Fewer have explored how to make the poor “bankable”, meaning how to mobilize savings. Fewer still have discussed how and when not to provide credit, or how not to destroy the financial systems of the poor. It was not long ago that NGOs3 concentrated mainly on the provision of welfare services. From a hands-off credit attitude in the 1950s and 1960s, based partly on a belief that interest-earning credit was usurious and therefore unethical, the 1970s represented a major u-turn. There was a visible shift from emphasis based on the provision of welfare and relief services towards increasing production and incomes by which the poor would provide for themselves in the future (sustainability), enabling the donor NGO or organization to build in a “withdrawal” time-table. The shift towards production and income generation was also brought about by the realization that welfare services alone did not seem to be creating a fast enough impact on poverty alleviation. Credit became a central plank of this approach, together with skill training, organizational and marketing support. NGOs arguing that the poor are creditworthy, became vehicles for transmitting large volumes of financial services to the poor. According to international donor agencies, NGOs offer less risk, are closer to the poor and more trusted by them (Remenyi 1991; IFAD 1987). Others occasionally slapped a credit component onto an already complex set of activities as if credit was simply a bundle of used clothing meant to be briefly worn and rapidly discarded. Yet, while the role of NGOs in the provision of financial services is growing by the day, the evaluation of their performances
{"title":"When Credit Is Not Due: A Critical Evaluation of Donor NGO Experiences with Credit","authors":"C. Abugre, F. Bouman, O. Hospes","doi":"10.4324/9780429038891-10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429038891-10","url":null,"abstract":"Consider this chapter as a critical assessment of the involvement of operational and donor NGOs with credit activities. It is drawn from ACORD’s2 direct experiences with designing and implementing various microcredit systems in 10 countries in Africa and through association with several local and international NGOs. Africa is the one place where many foreign NGOs like ACORD still operate directly in the field. Many local NGOs are more or less created by donor NGOs in their own image, or encouraged to serve as conduit for aid funds. Therefore, drawing upon the lessons of ACORD may not only be applicable to other northern donor NGOs, but to many African NGOs as well. It must be emphasized from the outset, however, that observations in this paper do not represent the totality of ACORD’s experiences but only those from which ACORD has drawn its own lessons. Like many development efforts, these lessons are very much the benefit of hindsight -learning from doing. It is in support of continuous improvement in the learning curve that this paper is directed. There has been no shortage of conferences on credit within NGO circles over the past few years. In most of these conferences, there has been much discussion about how to improve mechanisms for delivering credit to the poor or, at least improve their access to credit. Fewer have explored how to make the poor “bankable”, meaning how to mobilize savings. Fewer still have discussed how and when not to provide credit, or how not to destroy the financial systems of the poor. It was not long ago that NGOs3 concentrated mainly on the provision of welfare services. From a hands-off credit attitude in the 1950s and 1960s, based partly on a belief that interest-earning credit was usurious and therefore unethical, the 1970s represented a major u-turn. There was a visible shift from emphasis based on the provision of welfare and relief services towards increasing production and incomes by which the poor would provide for themselves in the future (sustainability), enabling the donor NGO or organization to build in a “withdrawal” time-table. The shift towards production and income generation was also brought about by the realization that welfare services alone did not seem to be creating a fast enough impact on poverty alleviation. Credit became a central plank of this approach, together with skill training, organizational and marketing support. NGOs arguing that the poor are creditworthy, became vehicles for transmitting large volumes of financial services to the poor. According to international donor agencies, NGOs offer less risk, are closer to the poor and more trusted by them (Remenyi 1991; IFAD 1987). Others occasionally slapped a credit component onto an already complex set of activities as if credit was simply a bundle of used clothing meant to be briefly worn and rapidly discarded. Yet, while the role of NGOs in the provision of financial services is growing by the day, the evaluation of their performances ","PeriodicalId":115960,"journal":{"name":"Financial Landscapes Reconstructed","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129799233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}