首页 > 最新文献

Emergency Medicine Australasia最新文献

英文 中文
Effects of a Virtual Trauma Clinic on admissions and length of stay for minor to moderate trauma. 虚拟创伤诊所对轻度至中度创伤入院和住院时间的影响。
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.14531
Amber Shuja, Fay Balian, Michael M Dinh, Radhika Seimon, Jameela Truman, Matthew Oliver

Objective: To investigate the feasibility of a Virtual Trauma Clinic (VTC) for patients with minor to moderate trauma, and evaluate patient satisfaction and outcomes.

Methods: One hundred VTC patients were matched 1:1 with historical patients from the hospital trauma registry who received conventional care. Matching was based on age ± 5 years, sex, mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score ± 2, trauma team activation and day of week of presentation. VTC patients were sent surveys on experience and outcome measures.

Results: VTC was associated with reduced average hospital length of stay for admitted patients by 1.81 days (95% CI = -2.82, -0.79; P = 0.001) and reduced hospital admissions (odds ratio 0.26; 95% CI = 0.14, 0.48; P < 0.001). There was an avoidance of 199 inpatient bed days in total, with no trauma-related readmissions within 30 days post-hospital discharge. 92% of respondents (n = 22) rated the care they received from VTC as excellent or good. Patient-reported outcome surveys showed overall improvement in functional domains but evidence of ongoing disability, with persistent issues of pain and psychological distress at 1 month post-injury.

Conclusion: Patients with minor to moderate trauma have ongoing care needs with high rates of pain, psychological distress and disability remaining prevalent long after discharge. VTC provided an innovative strategy for hospital avoidance with high levels of patient satisfaction and no adverse effects on safety. The overall quality of care for these patients was enhanced through the provision of standardised, patient-centred and multidisciplinary follow-up.

目的研究为轻度至中度创伤患者开设虚拟创伤诊所(VTC)的可行性,并评估患者的满意度和治疗效果:将 100 名 VTC 患者与医院创伤登记册中接受常规治疗的历史患者进行 1:1 匹配。配对基于年龄(± 5 岁)、性别、受伤机制、受伤严重程度评分(± 2 分)、创伤团队激活情况和发病周日。对自愿接受创伤治疗的患者进行了经验和结果调查:VTC 与入院患者的平均住院时间缩短 1.81 天(95% CI = -2.82,-0.79;P = 0.001)和入院次数减少(几率比 0.26;95% CI = 0.14,0.48;P 结论:VTC 与轻度至中度创伤患者的平均住院时间缩短 1.81 天(95% CI = -2.82,-0.79;P = 0.001)和入院次数减少有关:轻度至中度创伤患者需要持续护理,出院后疼痛、心理压力和残疾的发生率仍然很高。虚拟治疗中心提供了一种避免住院的创新策略,患者满意度高,且对安全无不良影响。通过提供标准化、以病人为中心和多学科的后续服务,这些病人的整体护理质量得到了提高。
{"title":"Effects of a Virtual Trauma Clinic on admissions and length of stay for minor to moderate trauma.","authors":"Amber Shuja, Fay Balian, Michael M Dinh, Radhika Seimon, Jameela Truman, Matthew Oliver","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.14531","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.14531","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the feasibility of a Virtual Trauma Clinic (VTC) for patients with minor to moderate trauma, and evaluate patient satisfaction and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred VTC patients were matched 1:1 with historical patients from the hospital trauma registry who received conventional care. Matching was based on age ± 5 years, sex, mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score ± 2, trauma team activation and day of week of presentation. VTC patients were sent surveys on experience and outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VTC was associated with reduced average hospital length of stay for admitted patients by 1.81 days (95% CI = -2.82, -0.79; P = 0.001) and reduced hospital admissions (odds ratio 0.26; 95% CI = 0.14, 0.48; P < 0.001). There was an avoidance of 199 inpatient bed days in total, with no trauma-related readmissions within 30 days post-hospital discharge. 92% of respondents (n = 22) rated the care they received from VTC as excellent or good. Patient-reported outcome surveys showed overall improvement in functional domains but evidence of ongoing disability, with persistent issues of pain and psychological distress at 1 month post-injury.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with minor to moderate trauma have ongoing care needs with high rates of pain, psychological distress and disability remaining prevalent long after discharge. VTC provided an innovative strategy for hospital avoidance with high levels of patient satisfaction and no adverse effects on safety. The overall quality of care for these patients was enhanced through the provision of standardised, patient-centred and multidisciplinary follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142617060","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reducing mechanical restraint in emergency departments: International perspectives and Taiwan's experience. 减少急诊科的机械束缚:国际视角与台湾经验。
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.14534
Chi-Hua Lan, Lien-Chung Wei
{"title":"Reducing mechanical restraint in emergency departments: International perspectives and Taiwan's experience.","authors":"Chi-Hua Lan, Lien-Chung Wei","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.14534","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.14534","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142617062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Implementing the electronic HEEADSSS screening tool in a paediatric emergency department 在儿科急诊室实施电子 HEEADSSS 筛查工具。
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.14509
Jessica WS Wong, Nicolene Shipton, Matthew Edwards, Kate Bradman
{"title":"Implementing the electronic HEEADSSS screening tool in a paediatric emergency department","authors":"Jessica WS Wong,&nbsp;Nicolene Shipton,&nbsp;Matthew Edwards,&nbsp;Kate Bradman","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.14509","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1742-6723.14509","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142343837","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Review article: A primer for clinical researchers in the emergency department: Part XIII. Strategies to engage staff and enhance participant recruitment in emergency department research 评论文章:急诊科临床研究人员入门指南:第 XIII 部分.让员工参与急诊科研究并加强参与者招募的策略。
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.14505
Sharon O'Brien BN, PhD, Catherine Wilson MPH, Ms, Megan Duck BN, GDipHlthRes, Gaby Nieva BNurs, GradDipNurs, Medhawani P Rao BHSc (Nsg) and PGDip AdvNsg, Libby Haskell NP, PhD

Conducting research in ED is important and necessary to improve emergency care. Effective recruitment is an essential ingredient for the success of a research project and must be carefully monitored. Research coordinators are focused on optimising recruitment to research studies while also ensuring that the needs of participants and their families are met, and the research is acceptable to ED staff. In this paper, a group of experienced research coordinators from Australia and New Zealand have shared their strategies to engage staff and enhance recruitment of participants in emergency research. Although this paper is from a paediatric research network, the findings are applicable for EDs in general, both in Australasia and elsewhere.

在急诊室开展研究对于改善急诊护理非常重要和必要。有效的人员招募是研究项目取得成功的关键因素,因此必须对其进行仔细监控。研究协调员的工作重点是优化研究项目的招募工作,同时确保满足参与者及其家属的需求,并使急诊室工作人员能够接受研究项目。在本文中,来自澳大利亚和新西兰的一组经验丰富的研究协调员分享了他们在急诊研究中吸引员工参与并提高参与者招募率的策略。虽然本文来自儿科研究网络,但研究结果适用于大洋洲和其他地区的一般急诊室。
{"title":"Review article: A primer for clinical researchers in the emergency department: Part XIII. Strategies to engage staff and enhance participant recruitment in emergency department research","authors":"Sharon O'Brien BN, PhD,&nbsp;Catherine Wilson MPH, Ms,&nbsp;Megan Duck BN, GDipHlthRes,&nbsp;Gaby Nieva BNurs, GradDipNurs,&nbsp;Medhawani P Rao BHSc (Nsg) and PGDip AdvNsg,&nbsp;Libby Haskell NP, PhD","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.14505","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1742-6723.14505","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Conducting research in ED is important and necessary to improve emergency care. Effective recruitment is an essential ingredient for the success of a research project and must be carefully monitored. Research coordinators are focused on optimising recruitment to research studies while also ensuring that the needs of participants and their families are met, and the research is acceptable to ED staff. In this paper, a group of experienced research coordinators from Australia and New Zealand have shared their strategies to engage staff and enhance recruitment of participants in emergency research. Although this paper is from a paediatric research network, the findings are applicable for EDs in general, both in Australasia and elsewhere.</p>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142343839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Review article: Strategies to improve emergency department care for adults living with disability: A systematic review 评论文章:改善急诊科对成年残疾人护理的策略:系统综述。
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.14500
Bronwyn Newman PhD, Colleen Cheek PhD, Lieke Richardson BSc, Donna Gillies PhD, Karen Hutchinson PhD, Elizabeth Austin PhD, Margaret Murphy RN, PhD, Luke Testa PhD, Christina Rojas MPH, Louise Raggett PhD, Amanda Dominello MPH, Kylie Smith, Robyn Clay-Williams PhD

Equitable access means that timely, sensitive and respectful treatment is offered to all people. Adults with disability access ED care more frequently than the general population. However, in Australia and internationally, people with disability experience poorer healthcare access and outcomes than the general population. There is acknowledgement that ED environments and processes of care could be better designed to promote equitable access, so as not to further disadvantage, disable and create vulnerability. This systematic review aimed to locate and describe evaluated strategies implemented to improve care for people with disability (aged 18–65 years) in the ED. Four databases were searched from inception to June 2024. 1936 peer-reviewed papers were reviewed by pairs of independent reviewers. Four studies met our inclusion criteria, demonstrating the limited peer-reviewed literature reporting on evaluated strategies to improve ED care for adults aged 18–65 years. Three studies focused on the needs of people with intellectual disability, and one created a specific treatment pathway for people experiencing status epilepticus. No studies evaluated across patient experience, patient outcomes, system performance and staff experience, with limited evaluation of patient outcomes and system performance measures. We have referenced helpful resources published elsewhere and drawn from our previous reviews of ED care to provide guidance for the development and evaluation of targeted initiatives.

公平就医是指为所有人提供及时、敏感和受尊重的治疗。与普通人相比,成年残疾人获得急诊室医疗服务的频率更高。然而,在澳大利亚和国际上,残障人士获得医疗服务的机会和结果都比普通人要少。人们认识到,急诊室的环境和护理流程可以设计得更好,以促进公平就医,从而避免使残疾人处于更加不利的地位、丧失能力并造成脆弱性。本系统性综述旨在查找并描述为改善急诊室对残疾人(18-65 岁)的护理而实施的评估策略。我们检索了从开始到 2024 年 6 月的四个数据库。1936 篇经同行评审的论文由一对独立评审员进行了评审。有四项研究符合我们的纳入标准,这表明同行评审文献中关于改善 18-65 岁成人急诊室护理的评估策略的报道非常有限。三项研究关注智障人士的需求,一项研究为癫痫状态患者创建了特定的治疗路径。没有研究对患者体验、患者疗效、系统性能和员工体验进行评估,对患者疗效和系统性能指标的评估也很有限。我们参考了其他地方发表的有用资源,并借鉴了我们之前对急诊室护理的回顾,为制定和评估有针对性的措施提供指导。
{"title":"Review article: Strategies to improve emergency department care for adults living with disability: A systematic review","authors":"Bronwyn Newman PhD,&nbsp;Colleen Cheek PhD,&nbsp;Lieke Richardson BSc,&nbsp;Donna Gillies PhD,&nbsp;Karen Hutchinson PhD,&nbsp;Elizabeth Austin PhD,&nbsp;Margaret Murphy RN, PhD,&nbsp;Luke Testa PhD,&nbsp;Christina Rojas MPH,&nbsp;Louise Raggett PhD,&nbsp;Amanda Dominello MPH,&nbsp;Kylie Smith,&nbsp;Robyn Clay-Williams PhD","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.14500","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1742-6723.14500","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Equitable access means that timely, sensitive and respectful treatment is offered to all people. Adults with disability access ED care more frequently than the general population. However, in Australia and internationally, people with disability experience poorer healthcare access and outcomes than the general population. There is acknowledgement that ED environments and processes of care could be better designed to promote equitable access, so as not to further disadvantage, disable and create vulnerability. This systematic review aimed to locate and describe evaluated strategies implemented to improve care for people with disability (aged 18–65 years) in the ED. Four databases were searched from inception to June 2024. 1936 peer-reviewed papers were reviewed by pairs of independent reviewers. Four studies met our inclusion criteria, demonstrating the limited peer-reviewed literature reporting on evaluated strategies to improve ED care for adults aged 18–65 years. Three studies focused on the needs of people with intellectual disability, and one created a specific treatment pathway for people experiencing status epilepticus. No studies evaluated across patient experience, patient outcomes, system performance and staff experience, with limited evaluation of patient outcomes and system performance measures. We have referenced helpful resources published elsewhere and drawn from our previous reviews of ED care to provide guidance for the development and evaluation of targeted initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1742-6723.14500","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142307369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Process and implementation evaluation of a virtual hospital model of care for low back pain (Back@Home) 腰痛虚拟医院护理模式(Back@Home)的过程和实施评估。
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.14487
Alla Melman BAppSci, MSc, PhD, Min J Teng BAppSci, MHSM, Danielle M Coombs BAppSci, PhD, Qiang Li MSc, Laurent Billot MSc, MRes, Thomas Lung MSc, PhD, Eileen Rogan MBBS, MHSM, PhD, Mona Marabani MBBS, Owen Hutchings MBBS, Joshua R Zadro BAppSci, PhD, Chris G Maher BAppSci, DMedSc, PhD, Gustavo C Machado BPhty, PhD, The Back@Home Investigators

Objectives

Low back pain was the sixth most common reason for an ED visit in 2022–2023 in Australia, one-third of these patients were subsequently admitted to hospital. Therefore, we have assessed whether some patients could be diverted to alternate clinical pathways, via admission to a virtual hospital (rpavirtual), and be cared for remotely in their own homes.

Methods

Ethics approval was granted for protocols X21-0278 & 2021/ETH10967 and X21-0094 & 2021/ETH00591. We conducted a mixed-method process evaluation, using the RE-AIM framework (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance) to answer key questions regarding the Back@Home model of care.

Results

This preliminary evaluation describes a cohort of the first 50 patients who received care between 13 February and 31 July 2023. The service had high levels of reach and adoption, very low levels of ED representation, and no AEs. Virtual care cost a median of AU$2215 (interquartile range = AU$1724–AU$2855) per admission. Patients admitted virtually had the same high satisfaction with care as traditionally admitted patients and reported less pain and better physical function.

Conclusions

Preliminary findings suggest that this model of care is a safe, acceptable, and feasible alternative to hospitalisation for non-serious low back pain, in a select cohort of patients meeting inclusion criteria. Further data collection will inform whether Back@Home has had an impact on length of stay or traditional admission rates.

目的:2022-2023 年,腰痛是澳大利亚急诊室就诊的第六大常见原因,其中三分之一的患者随后入院治疗。因此,我们评估了一些患者是否可以通过入住虚拟医院(rpavirtual)转入其他临床路径,并在自己家中接受远程护理:X21-0278和2021/ETH10967以及X21-0094和2021/ETH00591方案已获得伦理批准。我们采用RE-AIM框架(覆盖面、有效性、采用、实施和维护)进行了混合方法过程评估,以回答有关 "Back@Home "护理模式的关键问题:本初步评估描述了 2023 年 2 月 13 日至 7 月 31 日期间接受护理的首批 50 名患者。该服务的覆盖率和采用率都很高,急诊室代表率很低,且没有发生AE。虚拟医疗的每次入院费用中位数为 2215 澳元(四分位间范围 = 1724 澳元 - 2855 澳元)。虚拟入院患者对护理的满意度与传统入院患者一样高,并表示疼痛较轻、身体功能较好:初步研究结果表明,在符合纳入标准的特定患者群体中,这种护理模式是一种安全、可接受且可行的非严重腰背痛住院治疗替代方案。进一步的数据收集将有助于了解 "回到家 "是否对住院时间或传统入院率产生了影响。
{"title":"Process and implementation evaluation of a virtual hospital model of care for low back pain (Back@Home)","authors":"Alla Melman BAppSci, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Min J Teng BAppSci, MHSM,&nbsp;Danielle M Coombs BAppSci, PhD,&nbsp;Qiang Li MSc,&nbsp;Laurent Billot MSc, MRes,&nbsp;Thomas Lung MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Eileen Rogan MBBS, MHSM, PhD,&nbsp;Mona Marabani MBBS,&nbsp;Owen Hutchings MBBS,&nbsp;Joshua R Zadro BAppSci, PhD,&nbsp;Chris G Maher BAppSci, DMedSc, PhD,&nbsp;Gustavo C Machado BPhty, PhD,&nbsp;The Back@Home Investigators","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.14487","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1742-6723.14487","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Low back pain was the sixth most common reason for an ED visit in 2022–2023 in Australia, one-third of these patients were subsequently admitted to hospital. Therefore, we have assessed whether some patients could be diverted to alternate clinical pathways, via admission to a virtual hospital (<b>rpa</b>virtual), and be cared for remotely in their own homes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Ethics approval was granted for protocols X21-0278 &amp; 2021/ETH10967 and X21-0094 &amp; 2021/ETH00591. We conducted a mixed-method process evaluation, using the RE-AIM framework (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance) to answer key questions regarding the Back@Home model of care.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This preliminary evaluation describes a cohort of the first 50 patients who received care between 13 February and 31 July 2023. The service had high levels of reach and adoption, very low levels of ED representation, and no AEs. Virtual care cost a median of AU$2215 (interquartile range = AU$1724–AU$2855) per admission. Patients admitted virtually had the same high satisfaction with care as traditionally admitted patients and reported less pain and better physical function.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Preliminary findings suggest that this model of care is a safe, acceptable, and feasible alternative to hospitalisation for non-serious low back pain, in a select cohort of patients meeting inclusion criteria. Further data collection will inform whether Back@Home has had an impact on length of stay or traditional admission rates.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1742-6723.14487","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142282194","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring the value, enablers and barriers of being a clinician-coach: A qualitative pilot study of clinician-coaches in emergency medicine 探索临床医生教练的价值、促进因素和障碍:急诊医学临床医师教练定性试点研究
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.14501
Andrew Rixon B.Sc(hons), GCLT, FCHSM, PhD, Samuel Wilson BA, BCom, MPsych, PhD, Lee Wong MBBS (hons), GradDipClinEd, FACEM, PhD, Elizabeth Elder BA, BN, MAdvPrac, MNurs, PhD

Objective

To explore how clinicians understand coaching and their clinician-coach practice in emergency medicine.

Methods

Participants were surveyed about the value of coaching and their beliefs about the enablers of, and barriers to, being a clinician-coach.

Results

Three themes were developed for the value of coaching: empowerment and growth; enhanced interpersonal dynamics; and reflective transformation. Key enablers were supportive infrastructure, self-driven development and recognition of value. Key barriers were time constraints and scheduling conflicts, cultural challenges and financial and structural obstacles.

Conclusions

Fostering a supportive environment for coaching could significantly enhance clinician competence and well-being, healthcare delivery and professional development.

方法对参与者进行调查,了解教练的价值以及他们对成为临床医生教练的促进因素和障碍的看法。结果就教练的价值提出了三个主题:授权与成长;增强人际动力;反思转型。主要促进因素包括支持性基础设施、自我驱动发展和价值认可。主要障碍是时间限制和日程安排冲突、文化挑战以及财务和结构障碍。结论营造一个支持性的教练环境可以显著提高临床医生的能力和福祉,促进医疗服务的提供和专业发展。
{"title":"Exploring the value, enablers and barriers of being a clinician-coach: A qualitative pilot study of clinician-coaches in emergency medicine","authors":"Andrew Rixon B.Sc(hons), GCLT, FCHSM, PhD,&nbsp;Samuel Wilson BA, BCom, MPsych, PhD,&nbsp;Lee Wong MBBS (hons), GradDipClinEd, FACEM, PhD,&nbsp;Elizabeth Elder BA, BN, MAdvPrac, MNurs, PhD","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.14501","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1742-6723.14501","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To explore how clinicians understand coaching and their clinician-coach practice in emergency medicine.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Participants were surveyed about the value of coaching and their beliefs about the enablers of, and barriers to, being a clinician-coach.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Three themes were developed for the value of coaching: empowerment and growth; enhanced interpersonal dynamics; and reflective transformation. Key enablers were supportive infrastructure, self-driven development and recognition of value. Key barriers were time constraints and scheduling conflicts, cultural challenges and financial and structural obstacles.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Fostering a supportive environment for coaching could significantly enhance clinician competence and well-being, healthcare delivery and professional development.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1742-6723.14501","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142252037","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Recommendations for developing a comprehensive point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) program in the emergency department: an Emergency Medicine Ultrasound Group advocacy statement 关于在急诊科制定全面的护理点超声检查 (POCUS) 计划的建议:急诊医学超声检查小组倡议声明。
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.14484
Luke Phillips MBBS, BSc (BioMed) (Hons), FACEM, CCPU, GradCertClinSim, Alastair Maclean MB ChB, BSc Med Sci (Hons), Post Grad Cert CPU, MRCP (Lon), FRCEM, FACEM, Josh Monester MBBS(Hons), CCPU, GradCertClinEd, Joanne Douglas DMU, SEED, ASUM CCPU provider, Stacey Davidson ICF ACC, Zenergy Master Facilitator, Gabriela King MBBS, FACEM, Post Grad Cert CPU

Objectives

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use is widespread in EDs and throughout those practising medicine. Between institutions and specialities, there is widespread variety and training. With this comes the risk of patient harm and backlash to a clinically useful modality. Our objective is to form a statement that encompasses current published and unpublished guidance for creating and maintaining robust POCUS programs in EDs.

Methods

Emergency Medicine Ultrasound Group (EMUG) identified this gap and volunteers from the group undertook a literature search of current best practice and institution guidelines relating to POCUS programs. They contacted colleagues from other specialities to find and get access to other countries and colleges' POCUS guidelines. EMUGs regularly run discussion forums (Collab-labs) and points from these were considered. Recommendations were then formed from these and recurrent unpublished obstacles the group had encountered. The result was reviewed by clinical leaders in ultrasound and POCUS users in Australasia.

Results

The recommendations were organised under five pillars: Infrastructure, Governance, Administration, Education and Quality.

Conclusion

These recommendations complement existing guidelines and are not intended to replace them; however, we hope to promote discussion and provide reference support for those developing POCUS programs. Implementing a comprehensive and robust ED POCUS program will ensure safe, effective and standardised high-quality POCUS use, with the aim of improving patient care across Australia and New Zealand. Patient safety will be enhanced through effective risk management and quality assurance and there will be consistency in POCUS education, training and credentialing across institutions.

目的:护理点超声波 (POCUS) 在急诊室和所有行医者中广泛使用。在不同的机构和专科之间,其种类和培训都很广泛。随之而来的是对患者造成伤害的风险,以及对临床实用方式的反弹。我们的目标是形成一份声明,涵盖当前已发表和未发表的指南,以便在急诊室创建和维护稳健的 POCUS 计划:急诊医学超声小组(EMUG)发现了这一空白,该小组的志愿者对当前与 POCUS 项目相关的最佳实践和机构指南进行了文献检索。他们与其他专科的同事取得联系,寻找并获取其他国家和学院的 POCUS 指南。EMUG定期举办讨论论坛(Collab-labs),并对论坛中的观点进行审议。然后,根据这些要点和小组反复遇到的未发表的障碍形成建议。结果由澳大拉西亚的超声临床领导者和 POCUS 用户进行了审核:结果:建议分为五大支柱:结果:建议分为五大支柱:基础设施、治理、行政、教育和质量:这些建议是对现有指南的补充,并不打算取代现有指南;但是,我们希望能促进讨论,并为制定 POCUS 计划的人员提供参考支持。实施全面而稳健的急诊室 POCUS 计划将确保安全、有效和标准化地使用高质量的 POCUS,从而改善澳大利亚和新西兰的患者护理。通过有效的风险管理和质量保证,患者安全将得到加强,各机构的 POCUS 教育、培训和资格认证也将保持一致。
{"title":"Recommendations for developing a comprehensive point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) program in the emergency department: an Emergency Medicine Ultrasound Group advocacy statement","authors":"Luke Phillips MBBS, BSc (BioMed) (Hons), FACEM, CCPU, GradCertClinSim,&nbsp;Alastair Maclean MB ChB, BSc Med Sci (Hons), Post Grad Cert CPU, MRCP (Lon), FRCEM, FACEM,&nbsp;Josh Monester MBBS(Hons), CCPU, GradCertClinEd,&nbsp;Joanne Douglas DMU, SEED, ASUM CCPU provider,&nbsp;Stacey Davidson ICF ACC, Zenergy Master Facilitator,&nbsp;Gabriela King MBBS, FACEM, Post Grad Cert CPU","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.14484","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1742-6723.14484","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use is widespread in EDs and throughout those practising medicine. Between institutions and specialities, there is widespread variety and training. With this comes the risk of patient harm and backlash to a clinically useful modality. Our objective is to form a statement that encompasses current published and unpublished guidance for creating and maintaining robust POCUS programs in EDs.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Emergency Medicine Ultrasound Group (EMUG) identified this gap and volunteers from the group undertook a literature search of current best practice and institution guidelines relating to POCUS programs. They contacted colleagues from other specialities to find and get access to other countries and colleges' POCUS guidelines. EMUGs regularly run discussion forums (Collab-labs) and points from these were considered. Recommendations were then formed from these and recurrent unpublished obstacles the group had encountered. The result was reviewed by clinical leaders in ultrasound and POCUS users in Australasia.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The recommendations were organised under five pillars: Infrastructure, Governance, Administration, Education and Quality.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>These recommendations complement existing guidelines and are not intended to replace them; however, we hope to promote discussion and provide reference support for those developing POCUS programs. Implementing a comprehensive and robust ED POCUS program will ensure safe, effective and standardised high-quality POCUS use, with the aim of improving patient care across Australia and New Zealand. Patient safety will be enhanced through effective risk management and quality assurance and there will be consistency in POCUS education, training and credentialing across institutions.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1742-6723.14484","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142132175","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Optimising POCUS programs: A summary of EMUG's recommendations for the development and maintenance of ED POCUS programs 优化 POCUS 计划:EMUG关于制定和维护 ED POCUS 计划的建议摘要。
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.14485
Luke Phillips MBBS, BSc (BioMed) (Hons), FACEM, CCPU, MClinSim, Alastair Maclean MB ChB, BSc Med Sci (Hons), Post Grad Cert CPU, MRCP (Lon), FRCEM, FACEM, Josh Monester MBBS(Hons), CCPU, GradCertClinEd, Joanne Douglas DMU, SEED, ASUM CCPU provider, Stacey Davidson ICF ACC, Zenergy Master Facilitator, Gabriela King MBBS, FACEM, Post Grad Cert CPU

Objectives

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use is widespread in EDs and throughout those practising medicine. Between institutions and specialities, there is widespread variety and training. With this comes risk of patient harm and backlash to a clinically useful modality. Our objective is to form a statement that encompasses current published and unpublished guidance for creating and maintaining robust POCUS programs in EDs.

Methods

Emergency Medicine Ultrasound Group (EMUG) identified this gap and volunteers from the group undertook a literature search of current best practice and institution guidelines relating to POCUS programs. They contacted colleagues from other specialities to find and get access to other countries and colleges' POCUS guidelines. EMUGs regularly run discussion forums (Collab-labs) and points from these were considered. Recommendations were then formed from these and recurrent unpublished obstacles the group had encountered. The result was reviewed by Clinical Leads in Ultrasound and POCUS users in Australasia.

Results

The recommendations were organised under five pillars: Infrastructure, Governance, Administration, Education and Quality.

Conclusion

These recommendations complement existing guidelines and are not intended to replace them; however, we hope to promote discussion and provide reference support for those developing POCUS programs. Implementing a comprehensive and robust ED POCUS program will ensure safe, effective, and standardised high-quality POCUS use, with the aim of improving patient care across Australia and New Zealand. Patient safety will be enhanced through effective risk management and quality assurance and there will be consistency in POCUS education, training and credentialing across institutions.

目的:护理点超声波 (POCUS) 在急诊室和所有行医者中广泛使用。在不同的机构和专科之间,其种类和培训都很广泛。随之而来的是对患者造成伤害的风险,以及对临床有用方式的反弹。我们的目标是形成一份声明,涵盖当前已发表和未发表的指南,以便在急诊室创建和维护稳健的 POCUS 计划:急诊医学超声小组(EMUG)发现了这一空白,该小组的志愿者对当前与 POCUS 项目相关的最佳实践和机构指南进行了文献检索。他们与其他专科的同事取得联系,寻找并获取其他国家和学院的 POCUS 指南。EMUG定期举办讨论论坛(Collab-labs),并对论坛中的观点进行审议。然后,根据这些要点和小组反复遇到的未发表的障碍形成建议。澳大拉西亚的超声临床负责人和 POCUS 用户对结果进行了审核:结果:建议分为五大支柱:结果:建议分为五大支柱:基础设施、治理、行政、教育和质量:这些建议是对现有指南的补充,并不打算取代现有指南;但是,我们希望能促进讨论,并为制定 POCUS 计划的人员提供参考支持。实施全面而稳健的急诊室 POCUS 计划将确保安全、有效和标准化的高质量 POCUS 使用,从而改善澳大利亚和新西兰的患者护理。通过有效的风险管理和质量保证,患者安全将得到加强,各机构的 POCUS 教育、培训和资格认证也将保持一致。
{"title":"Optimising POCUS programs: A summary of EMUG's recommendations for the development and maintenance of ED POCUS programs","authors":"Luke Phillips MBBS, BSc (BioMed) (Hons), FACEM, CCPU, MClinSim,&nbsp;Alastair Maclean MB ChB, BSc Med Sci (Hons), Post Grad Cert CPU, MRCP (Lon), FRCEM, FACEM,&nbsp;Josh Monester MBBS(Hons), CCPU, GradCertClinEd,&nbsp;Joanne Douglas DMU, SEED, ASUM CCPU provider,&nbsp;Stacey Davidson ICF ACC, Zenergy Master Facilitator,&nbsp;Gabriela King MBBS, FACEM, Post Grad Cert CPU","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.14485","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1742-6723.14485","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use is widespread in EDs and throughout those practising medicine. Between institutions and specialities, there is widespread variety and training. With this comes risk of patient harm and backlash to a clinically useful modality. Our objective is to form a statement that encompasses current published and unpublished guidance for creating and maintaining robust POCUS programs in EDs.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Emergency Medicine Ultrasound Group (EMUG) identified this gap and volunteers from the group undertook a literature search of current best practice and institution guidelines relating to POCUS programs. They contacted colleagues from other specialities to find and get access to other countries and colleges' POCUS guidelines. EMUGs regularly run discussion forums (Collab-labs) and points from these were considered. Recommendations were then formed from these and recurrent unpublished obstacles the group had encountered. The result was reviewed by Clinical Leads in Ultrasound and POCUS users in Australasia.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The recommendations were organised under five pillars: Infrastructure, Governance, Administration, Education and Quality.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>These recommendations complement existing guidelines and are not intended to replace them; however, we hope to promote discussion and provide reference support for those developing POCUS programs. Implementing a comprehensive and robust ED POCUS program will ensure safe, effective, and standardised high-quality POCUS use, with the aim of improving patient care across Australia and New Zealand. Patient safety will be enhanced through effective risk management and quality assurance and there will be consistency in POCUS education, training and credentialing across institutions.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1742-6723.14485","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142132174","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Review article: Back to life from being declared dead in the Resus Bay: An integrative review of the phenomenon of autoresuscitation and learning for ED 评论文章:在 Resus Bay 被宣布死亡后重获新生:对 ED 自动复苏现象和学习的综合回顾。
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.14482
Joanna Manton BSc (Hons), MBChB, FACEM, CCPU

This is a literature review of ED autoresuscitation. The impetus for this review was a case which revealed a lack of understanding about Lazarus syndrome among ED staff. The primary objective was to see the proportion of cases who survived neurologically intact to discharge and the time frame when this occurred after death had been declared. A secondary outcome was to see whether these studies mention whether bedside echo was performed prior to deciding whether to terminate resuscitation. A systematic search of five databases was undertaken with keywords, ‘autoresuscitation’, ‘cardiac arrest’ and ‘emergency department’. Articles published in the English language were selected for inclusion. No time frame was selected because of the low number of articles. A total of 240 articles were identified, that yielded 26 cases that were relevant and could be synthesised to create a discussion on the current clinical guidelines around resuscitation. Our analysis demonstrates that of the 11 survivors who were discharged neurologically intact, the average age was 42.9 years; otherwise, the average was 62.6 years. The majority (23/26) 88% auto-resuscitated within 10 min after being pronounced dead. Only five patients are mentioned as having had a bedside echo prior to deciding to cease efforts. Under-reporting of autoresuscitation is suspected because of fears of blame. Passive monitoring for 10 min after resuscitation is ceased, is recommended. There is need for more data on this phenomenon to help inform further research on the topic.

这是一篇关于急诊室自动复苏的文献综述。这篇综述的起因是一个病例,该病例显示急诊室工作人员对拉扎罗斯综合征缺乏了解。研究的主要目的是了解神经系统完好无损地存活到出院的病例比例,以及在宣布死亡后发生这种情况的时间范围。次要目标是了解这些研究是否提及在决定是否终止复苏之前是否进行了床旁回声检查。以 "自动复苏"、"心脏骤停 "和 "急诊科 "为关键词对五个数据库进行了系统检索。所选文章均以英文发表。由于文章数量较少,因此没有选择时间范围。我们共筛选出 240 篇文章,其中 26 个案例与复苏相关,我们可以将这些案例综合起来,就复苏方面的现行临床指南展开讨论。我们的分析表明,在出院时神经功能完好的 11 名幸存者中,平均年龄为 42.9 岁;在其他情况下,平均年龄为 62.6 岁。大多数患者(23/26)88%在被宣布死亡后 10 分钟内进行了自动复苏。只有五名患者在决定停止抢救前进行了床旁回访。由于担心受到指责,因此怀疑对自动复苏的报告不足。建议在停止复苏后进行 10 分钟的被动监测。有必要提供更多有关这一现象的数据,以便为有关该主题的进一步研究提供信息。
{"title":"Review article: Back to life from being declared dead in the Resus Bay: An integrative review of the phenomenon of autoresuscitation and learning for ED","authors":"Joanna Manton BSc (Hons), MBChB, FACEM, CCPU","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.14482","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1742-6723.14482","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This is a literature review of ED autoresuscitation. The impetus for this review was a case which revealed a lack of understanding about Lazarus syndrome among ED staff. The primary objective was to see the proportion of cases who survived neurologically intact to discharge and the time frame when this occurred after death had been declared. A secondary outcome was to see whether these studies mention whether bedside echo was performed prior to deciding whether to terminate resuscitation. A systematic search of five databases was undertaken with keywords, ‘autoresuscitation’, ‘cardiac arrest’ and ‘emergency department’. Articles published in the English language were selected for inclusion. No time frame was selected because of the low number of articles. A total of 240 articles were identified, that yielded 26 cases that were relevant and could be synthesised to create a discussion on the current clinical guidelines around resuscitation. Our analysis demonstrates that of the 11 survivors who were discharged neurologically intact, the average age was 42.9 years; otherwise, the average was 62.6 years. The majority (23/26) 88% auto-resuscitated within 10 min after being pronounced dead. Only five patients are mentioned as having had a bedside echo prior to deciding to cease efforts. Under-reporting of autoresuscitation is suspected because of fears of blame. Passive monitoring for 10 min after resuscitation is ceased, is recommended. There is need for more data on this phenomenon to help inform further research on the topic.</p>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142072288","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Emergency Medicine Australasia
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1