European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine最新文献

Background: Neck and back pain pathologies are currently the main cause of absenteeism from work in Spain and in the European Union, and represent a high socio-labor, economic and health cost for the Health Systems.

Aim: To assess the effectiveness of a Back School Program of a Spanish mutual insurance company (risk factors, pain and disability scales) in women workers with low back or neck pain.

Design: We combined a descriptive study of first-session data collected in the total sample and a prospective multicenter intervention study in those participants who completed the second and third check-up at 6 and 9 months.

Setting: Women workers with low back or neck pain, from different sectors and occupations, who participated in a Back School Program of Ibermutua, a Spanish mutual insurance company, during the period from April 1^st, 2009, to March 28^th, 2019.

Population: Overall, 1452 women workers participated in the first session, 150 in the second session (6-month review) and 133 in the third session (9-month review).

Methods: Different questionnaires and scales were used for data collection, Visual Analog Scale, Neck Disability Index, Oswestry Disability Index, Concept Check Questionnaire and Back School Program Effectiveness Questionnaires.

Results: A total of 1095 (75.4%) had low back pain and 742 (51.1%) had neck pain (497 of them had pain in both locations); 42.8% (622) related the pain to their work activity. One in four women workers (390, 26.9%) performed a high-risk work activity (handling, weight transport, mechanical vibrations), 27.4% were prolonged standing and 22.8% were prolonged sitting. The workers participated in the Back School Program for two purposes: therapeutic (1150 women, 79.2%) and preventive (302 women, 20.8%).

Conclusions: The Back School is an effective intervention to manage pain and reduce disability in women workers.

Clinical rehabilitation impact: This study provided evidence that the Back School Program can be suitable for preventing and improving low back and neck pain and functional disability among women workers. The success of the Back Schools depends on women workers becoming aware of the importance of preventive measures aimed at strengthening the back muscles and collaborating actively, thus significantly reducing the incidence of low back and cervical pain in the workplace.

Cochrane Rehabilitation and the World Health Organization (WHO) Rehabilitation Program are collaborating to produce four Cochrane overviews of systematic reviews that synthesize the current evidence from health policy and systems research (HPSR) in rehabilitation. They will focus on the four pillars of HPSR identified by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care (EPOC) taxonomy: delivery arrangements, financial arrangements, governance arrangements, and implementation strategies. The protocol describes why HPSR is currently needed in rehabilitation, provides detailed information on the four EPOC pillars in interaction with rehabilitation and reports the Cochrane methods that will be followed to produce the overviews. 1. Del Furia MJ, Minozzi S, Arienti C, Battel I, Capodaglio P, Côté P, Décary S, De Groote W, Duttine A, Frontera WR, Gimigliano F, Kiekens C, Mudau Q, Ryan R, Sabariego C, Negrini S. Delivery arrangements for rehabilitation services in health systems: an overview of systematic reviews. 2. Gimigliano F, Arienti C, Butzback OK, Capodaglio P, Côté P, Décary S, Del Furia MJ, De Groote W, Duttine A, Frontera WR, Iolascon G, Kiekens C, Liguori S, Minozzi S, Mudau Q, Negrini S, Paoletta M, Ryan R, Sabariego C, Moretti A. Financial arrangements for rehabilitation services in health systems: an overview of systematic reviews. 3. Atkinson-Graham M, Mior S, Bakaa N, Konstantinidis T, Wong J, Arienti C, Capodaglio P, Décary S, De Groote W, Del Furia MJ, Duttine A, Frontera WR, Kiekens C, Minozzi S, Gimigliano F, Mudau Q, Negrini S, Ryan R, Sabariego C, Côté P. Governance arrangements for rehabilitation services in health systems: an overview of systematic reviews. 4. Touhami D, Ryan R, Engeda EH, Arienti C, Capodaglio P, Côté P, Décary S, Del Furia MJ, De Groote W, Duttine A, Frontera WR, Gimigliano F, Kiekens C, Minozzi S, Mudau Q, Negrini S, Sabariego C. Implementation strategies for rehabilitation services in health systems: an overview of systematic reviews. The protocol is largely common to all four overviews. The individual parts of each overview can be identified by the sub-titles delivery arrangements, financial arrangements, governance arrangements, and implementation strategies for overviews 1 to 4.

Background: Balance deficits are one of the most common impairments in developmental coordination disorder (DCD) and cerebral palsy (CP), with shared characteristics between both groups. However, balance deficits in DCD are very heterogeneous, but unlike in CP, they are poorly understood.

Aim: To unravel the heterogeneity of balance performance in children with DCD by comparing them with CP and typical development (TD).

Design: Cross-sectional case-control study.

Setting: Different outpatient settings and the community.

Population: Children aged 5-10.9 years with TD (N.=64, boys: 34, mean [SD] age: 8.1 [1.6]), DCD (N.=39, boys: 32, mean [SD] age: 8.1 [1.5], formal diagnosis [N.=27]), and CP (N.=24, boys: 14, mean [SD] age: 7.5 [1.4], GMFCS level I [N.=14]/II [N.=10], unilateral [N.=13]/bilateral [N.=11]).

Methods: We evaluated balance performance with the extended version of the Kids-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Kids-BESTest). Between-group differences in domain and total scores (%) were assessed via ANCOVA (covariate: age), with Tukey post-hoc analyses (P≤0.01).

Results: Children with DCD and CP performed poorer than TD children on total and domain scores with large effects (domains: η²=0.25-0.66 [P<0.001], total: η²=0.71 [P<0.001]). Still, post hoc comparisons revealed that DCD children scored significantly better than CP on the total score and four domains (P≤0.009), while performing similarly on tasks related to stability limits (P=0.999) and gait stability (P=0.012).

Conclusions: There is a continuum of balance performance between children with TD, DCD and CP, but with great inter- and intra-individual heterogeneity in DCD and CP. DCD and CP children have difficulties with tasks requiring anticipatory postural adjustments, fast reactive responses, and with tasks that require complex sensory integration, suggesting an internal modeling deficit in both groups. This implies that these children must rely on slow conscious feedback-based control rather than fast feedforward control and fast automatic feedback. The performance of both DCD and CP children on their stability limits/verticality is similarly poor which further emphasizes a potential deficit in their sensory input and/or integration. Future research must focus on unraveling the control mechanisms, to further understand the heterogeneity of these balance deficits.

Clinical rehabilitation impact: The heterogeneous balance performances in both children with DCD and CP underscore the importance of comprehensively evaluating balance deficits in both groups. This comprehensive assessment contributes to a better understanding of individual balance deficits, thereby facilitating more tailored treatment programs.

Background: International studies identified comparable or better effects for telerehabilitation compared with face-to-face rehabilitation or no rehabilitation in people with back pain. In German rehabilitation centers, a standardized back school for patients with back pain is provided usually face-to-face as part of a multimodal rehabilitation program.

Aim: To examine the non-inferiority of a three-week, digitally assisted, multimodal rehabilitation that applies a digital version of a standardized back school (intervention group [IG]) against the same rehabilitation program applying the back school face-to-face (control group [CG]).

Design: Our study was a non-blinded multicenter randomized controlled trial. Recruitment was conducted from 2022 to 2023. We analyzed outcomes at the end of rehabilitation and 3 months later.

Setting: Implementation of the study and enrollment of participants was conducted in 8 German outpatient rehabilitation centers.

Population: Rehabilitants aged 18-65 years with back pain were included.

Methods: 284 patients with back pain were randomized into the IG or CG using computer-generated block randomization. We excluded 14 patients as they withdrew their consent and requested removal of their data. We finally included 270 patients (IG: N.=127, CG: N.=143). The primary outcome was self-reported pain self-efficacy (10-60 points). Secondary outcomes were, amongst others, current health status and pain.

Results: Our primary adjusted intention-to-treat analysis demonstrated that hybrid digitally assisted rehabilitation was non-inferior to face-to-face rehabilitation at the end of rehabilitation (b=-0.55; 95% CI=-2.75 to ∞) and at the 3-month follow-up (b=0.24; 95% CI=-2.86 to ∞). These results were in line with a non-adjusted intention-to-treat analysis, an adjusted complete case analysis, and an adjusted per-protocol analysis. Secondary outcomes were tested for superiority. Our primary adjusted intention-to-treat analysis found no significant group differences in the secondary outcomes.

Conclusions: This study provides evidence that hybrid digitally assisted rehabilitation in patients with back pain is a sound alternative to face-to-face rehabilitation in an outpatient rehabilitation setting.

Clinical rehabilitation impact: Hybrid digitally assisted rehabilitation can improve flexibility and access to rehabilitation. Further studies should examine which components and which time frame of rehabilitation can be digitized without any loss of effectiveness.

Introduction: Ultrasound-guided lavage (UGL) is a minimally invasive percutaneous treatment for rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy (RCCT). It involves the use of a syringe containing saline and/or anesthetic solution injected directly into the calcification allowing aspiration of the fragmented calcific material. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate if UGL is effective in improving pain, function, quality of life, range of motion (ROM), and in promoting complete resorption of calcifications in patients with RCCT.

Evidence acquisition: Only randomized controlled trials considering people diagnosed with RCCT, at any stage and at any time of the onset of symptoms treated with UGL, were included. Embase, CENTRAL, CINHAL, PEDro and MEDLINE were explored up until May 2024. Two independent authors selected randomized controlled trials by title and abstract; afterwards, the full text was thoroughly evaluated. The risk of bias (ROB) was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias 2 (ROB2) tool and the certainty of evidence was evaluated through the GRADE approach.

Evidence synthesis: Seven studies (709 subjects) were included. Overall, three studies were judged as low risk of bias. Pooled results showed non-significant differences between UGL and extracorporeal shock-wave therapy (ESWT) at 12 weeks (SMD=-0.52, 95% CI -1.57, 0.54, P=0.34, I²=93%) and at 26 weeks (MD=-1.20, 95% CI -2.66, 0.27, P=0.11, I²=82%), while a significant difference favoring UGL (SMD=-0.52, 95% CI -0.85, -0.19, P=0.002, I²=38%) resulted at 52 weeks. In regard to function, pooled results showed non-significant difference between UGL and ESWT at 6 weeks (MD=3.34, 95% CI -11.45, 18.12, P=0.66, I²=79%) and at 52 weeks (SMD=0.10, 95% CI -0.40, 0.60, P=0.69, I²=30%). Considering the rate of resorption of calcifications between UGL combined with subacromial corticosteroid injection (SCI) versus injection alone, pooled results showed significant difference favoring UGL at <52 weeks (RR=1.63 95% CI 1.34, 1.98, P<0.00001, I²=0%). Certainty of evidence ranged from low to very low.

Conclusions: UGL seems to be a reasonable and safe treatment for RCCT, however compared to other non/mini-invasive approaches, UGL showed doubtful results in controlling pain and increasing function and rate of calcifications resorption. These results should be interpreted with caution because certainty of evidence ranged from low to very low.

The randomized controlled trial (RCT) is the study design with the greatest potential to maximize internal validity when assessing the effectiveness of medical interventions, making it invaluable for evidence-based medicine. Yet, especially in the field of rehabilitation, it is not universally accepted as an unassailable gold standard due to serious problems of its implementation. This paper first examines three factors that limit the applicability of RCTs in rehabilitation practice. The first two factors stem from the nature of rehabilitative treatment itself: the complexity of rehabilitation interventions and the long-term and holistic nature of rehabilitation goals. The third factor relates to the differing functions of RCTs. Interventions vary in their complexity in increasing degree between component, measure, and program interventions. Lower complexity is associated with a greater likelihood of using high rigor efficacy studies. Methodological rigor further depends on the degree to which intervention conditions or contexts can be controlled for. This is particularly the case when examining body-related short-term outcomes. Whether it is reasonable to conduct an RCT also hinges on its function: to gain knowledge or to legitimate the utilization of an intervention in rehabilitation practice. The discussion highlights key challenges to RCT implementation and states questions that should help to identify an RCT as the most appropriate research design. Further empirical and theoretical research is indicated to clarify the distinction between levels of intervention, as this paper is based on theoretical considerations. Additionally, a concise explication of the different functions of an RCT and its meanings for their implementation is needed.

Introduction: Monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis is the most common voiding disorder and is associated with a decrease in the well-being and quality of life. Physiotherapy intervention has emerged as a second line treatment, and the treatment strategies that have been most commonly used to treat children and adolescents with monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis are electrostimulation, magnetotherapy, biofeedback, behavioral therapy and pelvic floor muscle training. Establishing the efficacy of these physiotherapy strategies in children and adolescents up to 16 years is the aim of this Systematic Review.

Evidence acquisition: Research was conducted from December 2022 to November 2023 in five databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Academic Search Complete, CINAHL Plus, and PEDro and two independent reviewers assessed titles and abstracts and judged each article for eligibility. Ten randomized-controlled trials written in English remained for analysis. PRISMA guidelines were followed, and the protocol was registered in PROSPERO database.

Evidence synthesis: Electrostimulation was the most studied therapeutic modality and the one that showed better results, with significant improvements on bladder volumes and wet nights frequency, especially when used in association with Behavioral Therapy, Biofeedback and Pelvic Floor Muscle Training. Magnetotherapy presented less evidence.

Conclusions: The obtained results demonstrated that physiotherapy treatment strategies may be of added value in clinical practice, as they were well tolerated, and provided a safe and effective contribution to second line treatment options for children and adolescents with refractory Monosymptomatic Nocturnal Enuresis to first line treatments.

Background: Low peak expiratory flow (PEF) rate is common in patients with stroke. Studies on changes in PEF rates in patients with stroke often have small sample sizes, limiting the generalizability of their findings.

Aim: This study aimed to compare the PEF rates between patients who were post-stroke with or without pneumonia and age- and sex-matched healthy controls and explore the PEF-pneumonia association among stroke survivors.

Design: Prospective observational study.

Setting: Department of Rehabilitation, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University.

Population: Initially, 809 patients with stroke undergoing inpatient rehabilitation were recruited.

Methods: Data collected included the demographics, stroke history, the presence of dysphagia, and the PEF rates on admission. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the PEF threshold as predictive of pneumonia after adjusting for confounders.

Results: Patients with stroke had a mean PEF rate of 243.89±139.38 L/min, significantly lower than that of the normal control group. The PEF rate was significantly lower in the pneumonia group than in the non-pneumonia group (P<0.001). Within the stroke cohort, the PEF rates were lower than the predicted rates (P<0.001). Older age, lower PEF(%),and dysphagia were associated with a higher pneumonia risk post-stroke per stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis. Furthermore, the combination of these three significant predictors (PEF(%), swallowing function, and age) yielded an area under the curve of 0.857 .Regarding age, the cut-off point of ≥65.5 years was the optimal level to discriminate the presence of pneumonia among patients with stroke. For PEF%,the cut-off point of <60% was the optimal level to discriminate the presence of pneumonia among patients with stroke. For screening dysphagia, the patients with impaired safety only and those with impaired safety and efficacy faced a higher pneumonia risk.

Conclusions: Patients with stroke exhibited significantly lower peak expiratory flow rates compared to healthy controls after adjusting for age and sex and when compared to their reference values. Decreased PEF rates were independently associated with pneumonia development during inpatient rehabilitation in post-stroke patients.

Clinical rehabilitation impact: This study suggests that low PEF rates may predict pneumonia and that the prevention of PEF rate decline may prevent pneumonia development.

Background: Patients' socioeconomic status on hospitals' efficiency in controlling for clinical component characteristics may have a role that has few been studied in rehabilitation centers.

Design: Because of the national health insurance system, rehabilitation centers are free of charge. To answer whether a patient's socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with efficiency and performance, we use a counterfactual analysis to get the patient's SES effect "as if" the patient's case was identical to whatever hospital. We restrained the data to patients from public acute care units where the decision on rehabilitation sector admission is based on availability, limiting bias by confounding factors. Besides, an analysis of six pathologies led to the same results.

Setting: An exhaustive, detailed administrative database on rehabilitation center stays in France. To define the patients' socioeconomic status, we use two sources of data: the information collected at the time of the patient's entry into rehabilitation care and the information collected during the patient's stay in acute care. This double information avoids possible loss of socio-economic details between the two admissions.

Population: Patients recruited were exhaustively admitted over the year 2018 for stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, or total hip replacement in France in the acute care unit and then in a rehab center. Mainly the elderly population. Information on patients' demography, comorbidities, and SES are coded due to the reimbursement system. Different dimensions controlling for factors (hospital ownership, patient clinical characteristics, rehabilitation care specificities, medical staff detailed information, and patients' socioeconomic status), were progressively added to control for any differences in baseline data between the two groups.

Methods: We assess rehabilitation centers' efficiency by combining selected outcome quality indicators (Physical score improvement, Cognitive score improvement, Mortality, Return-to-home). The specific Providers' Activity Index is used to get the performance index.

Conclusions: The performance of healthcare institutions is correlated not only to the case mix of their patients but also to the socioeconomic status of the patients admitted. The performance needs to be seen in light of patients' socioeconomic status.

Clinical rehabilitation impacts: The data reveals that patients' socioeconomic status affects rehabilitation care efficiency and performance. In controlling patients' socioeconomic status, for-profit rehabilitation hospitals seemed more efficient than public ones.