European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine最新文献

Background: The needs of people with deafblindness remain poorly understood and addressed globally. This study is part of a larger body of work to develop Core Sets for deafblindness using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF).

Aim: To determine the perspectives on functioning of individuals with lived experience of deafblindness as they relate to the ICF.

Design: Cross-sectional interview study.

Setting: Global, representing all six regions of the World Health Organization.

Population: A diverse cohort of 72 individuals living with deafblindness or as close family members, ranging across the spectrum of severity.

Methods: Qualitative interviews and focus groups were used to explore six open-ended questions about perceived barriers and facilitators to functioning of body functions and structures, activities and participation, and environmental and personal factors. Data were synthesized using content analysis, and the resulting topics were linked to the ICF codes using established linking methodology prescribed by the World Health Organization's ICF Research Branch. Descriptive statistics summarized all demographic data.

Results: The analyses of the transcripts uncovered 2534 meaning units, leading to the identification of 492 corresponding distinct codes from the ICF framework, and spanning across 93.33% of coding categories available. Sensory (b2) and Mental Functions (b1) emerged as the most frequent Body Functions (b) codes. Most categories referred to Activities & Participation, with Mobility (d4) being the most frequently mentioned topic. Services, Systems and Policies (e5) was the most frequently used Environmental factor.

Conclusions: Over 93% of the ICF classification categories were accessed to code the data provided by participants, demonstrating the complexity of functioning with deafblindness. This study provides valuable information to shape policy and research by providing representation of lived experience towards the consensus conference for the comprehensive and abbreviated Core Sets for deafblindness.

Clinical rehabilitation impact: The inclusion of lived experience provides a holistic understanding of the daily challenges faced by individuals living with deafblindness. By being part of this process, they have a voice in shaping the classification system that will be used to describe their experiences, fostering a sense of ownership and empowerment.

Background: There is growing evidence on Commitment Therapy for people with low back pain (LBP). A self-reported questionnaire is lacking which evaluates commitment by relying on the most recommended actions, the most important core outcome domains, and the most evidenced treatment options.

Aim: To describe the development and psychometric validation of the Work In Progress (WIP) questionnaire.

Design: Development and psychometric validation of the WIP questionnaire in the context of people with LBP, as a means to evaluate Commitment.

Setting: Outpatient facilities.

Population: People with LBP.

Methods: The new instrument was created by item generation and selection. Face validity, appropriateness, acceptability and feasibility were investigated. Psychometric testing was carried out in a cross-sectional study and included: 1) exploratory factor analysis; 2) reliability by internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and test-retest measurement (Intra-class Correlation Coefficient, ICC2.1); and 3) construct validity by hypothesis testing the correlation of the WIP questionnaire with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and a pain intensity Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (Pearson's r correlations).

Results: The WIP questionnaire was successfully developed based on international guidelines and the testing of face validity, appropriateness, acceptability and feasibility were satisfactory. The instrument was administered to 102 people with LBP (39 females, mean age of 49.7±14.6 years [range 20-80], pain median duration of 42.1 weeks [range 3-360]). Factor analysis revealed a two-factor 10-item solution (57% of explained variance). The internal consistency was good (α=0.70-85) and test-retest assessment was excellent (ICC2.1=0.91-94). Construct validity was good, as ≥75% of hypotheses were confirmed.

Conclusions: The WIP questionnaire is a self-reported tool to evaluate commitment in persons with LBP showing satisfactory psychometric properties. It can be recommended for clinical and research purposes.

Clinical rehabilitation impact: This study adds original new data to the existing knowledge in the field of Commitment within the bio-psychosocial paradigm for disabled people. It is expected to contribute to the evaluative, clinical and rehabilitative approach of individuals with low back pain.

According to Cochrane Rehabilitation's recently published definition for research purposes, rehabilitation is inherently complex. Rehabilitation teams frequently implement multiple strategies concurrently, draw on input from a range of different health professionals, target multiple outcomes, and personalize therapeutic plans. The success of rehabilitation lies not only in the specific therapies employed, but also in how they are delivered, when they are delivered, and the capability and willingness of patients to engage in them. In 2021, the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) and the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) released the second major update of its framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions. This framework has direct relevance to the development and implementation of evidence-based practice in the field of rehabilitation. While previous iterations of this framework positioned complex interventions as anything that involved multiple components, multiple people, multiple settings, multiple targets of effect, and behavior change, this latest framework expanded on this concept of complexity to also include the characteristics and influence of the context in which interventions occur. The revised MRC-NIHR framework presents complex intervention research as comprising the following four inter-related and overlapping phases: 1) development or identification of the intervention; 2) feasibility; 3) evaluation; and 4) implementation, with different methods and tools required to address each of these phases. This paper provides an overview of the MRC-NIHR framework and its application to rehabilitation, with examples from past research. Rehabilitation researchers are encouraged to learn about the MRC-NIHR framework and its application. Funders of rehabilitation research are also encouraged to place greater emphasis on supporting studies that involve the right design to address key uncertainties in rehabilitation clinical practice. This will require investment into a broader range of types of research than simply individual-level randomized controlled trials. Rehabilitation research can both learn from and contribute to future iterations of the MRC-NIHR framework as it is an excellent environment for exploring complexity in clinical practice.

Background: The lack of standardized reporting for crucial organizational factors in rehabilitation poses a significant barrier to understanding their impact on patient outcomes in clinical trials and meta-analyses.

Aim: Based on the categories in the International Classification of Service Organization in Rehabilitation (ICSO-R 2.0), we aimed to develop reporting standards specifically for organizational factors in clinical trials.

Methods: A comprehensive two-step process was conducted. In Step 1, important categories were identified. The identification was based on previous results from a Delphi survey with international stakeholder participation, two systematic literature reviews and results from focus groups with users in Germany, Indonesia and Norway. Step 2 involved the necessary reduction of categories and the proposal of reporting specifications, achieved through two voting rounds among key researchers, stakeholders and users.

Results: The suggested minimum reporting set comprises Context and Setting as well as Quality assurance and management. The Context and Setting is proposed to include whether the intervention is delivered by Hospital, Community or Other service providers. The Mode of delivery is proposed to be specified as Inpatient, Outpatient, In-home, or Tele-rehabilitation. Furthermore, the Level of specialization (Primary/Secondary) and the Phase of service delivery Acute, Subacute or Long-term rehabilitation services should be reported. The Quality assurance and management should be reported as Yes or No, with the option Yes requiring description of the quality assurance applied in the methods section.

Conclusions: This study proposed a compulsory and standardized reporting of organizational factors in clinical trials to facilitate the generation of scientific evidence regarding effective service provision and delivery in rehabilitation medicine. Authors are encouraged to consider the proposed reporting set to testing, criticism, and modification to enhance its applicability and robustness.

Background: Obstetric brachial plexus injury (OBPI) is associated with several temporary or permanent impairments including muscle weakness/atrophy and retarded bone accrual, which negatively affect upper extremity functionality. Thus, to remedy these impairments, improved and unequivocally effective intervention strategies are required.

Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of a 12-week stretch-shortening cycle exercise (SSC-Ex) program on muscle strength, bone mineral density, and upper extremity function in a convenience sample of children with OBPI.

Design: A prospective, dual-group randomized controlled trial with the outcome assessor being blinded to the treatment allocation.

Population: Fifty-six children with a confirmed diagnosis of the upper-arm type of OBPI (i.e. categorized as level I [C5/C6 injury] or II [C5/C6/C7 injury] per Narakas classification system) and aged between 10 and 16 years were randomly allocated to either the SSC-Ex group (N.=28) or the control group (N.=28).

Methods: The SSC-Ex group participants underwent a supervised SSC-Ex regimen for ~35 minutes, twice/week (with 2-day recovery intervals at minimum) over 12 consecutive weeks (totaling 24 sessions), while the control received the standard exercises (equated for the training volume, frequency, and duration). The primary outcomes included an assessment of muscle strength - specifically, shoulder flexors, abductors, external rotators, elbow flexors, and extensors - as well as the bone mineralization of the humerus, radius, and ulna. Functional performance was considered as a secondary outcome. These measures were undertaken both pre- and post-intervention.

Results: The SSC-Ex group exhibited favorable pre-to-post improvement in muscle strength measures (P<0.05; η²partial ranged between 0.11 and 0.17), bone mineralization variables (P<0.05; η²partial ranged between 0.13 and 0.21), and functional performance (P=0.006; η²partial=0.13) when compared with the control group.

Conclusions: The SSC-Ex showed promise in enhancing strength, bone mineralization, and functional capacity in children with OBPI.

Clinical rehabilitation impact: The SSC-Ex can be a beneficial component of the rehabilitation program for children with OBPI. Physical rehabilitation specialists might opt for such a training paradigm to improve several aspects of motor functions, bone mineral properties, and upper extremity function based on empirical evidence.

Introduction: Spinal cord injuries have a considerable impact on healthcare in terms of mortality and morbidity. To address the difficulties faced by people affected by this condition and to raise awareness among stakeholders and policymakers, it is crucial to understand factors impacting survival. The purpose of this study is to systematically review the literature on life expectancy in people with traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI), identifying key factors influencing mortality and survival.

Evidence acquisition: We conducted a systematic review, searching the literature for articles published up to July 2023 in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and PEDro. Study outcomes had to be one of survival rate, life expectancy, standardized mortality ratio, or mortality rate. Only original research articles published in English were included. The quality of evidence was evaluated with the MINORS scale. The level of evidence was categorized according to the OCEBM model.

Evidence synthesis: A comprehensive literature search yielded 102 articles, after the selection process 20 studies were included in our review. The main factors negatively influencing survival and life expectancy included higher neurological level of injury (NLI), completeness of the lesion, need for mechanical ventilation, increasing age, and male gender. The development of SCI-related comorbidities also negatively impacted survival as well as the lack of specialized care, especially in low-income countries. Additionally, pre-injury health status and personal income may affect survival.

Conclusions: Current literature shows that people affected by tSCI have a shorter life expectancy compared to the general population, highlighting some factors as possible predictors. It is difficult to compare available evidence due to the methodological heterogeneity across studies, which makes it challenging to draw generalizable conclusions on life expectancy in people with tSCI. Further studies are required to address these issues and accurately estimate life expectancy accounting for gaps in the management of people affected by tSCI to improve their care.

Background: This randomized controlled trial examined the feasibility of adding eccentric exercise to a conventional cardiac rehabilitation program (CCRP) for coronary heart disease patients.

Methods: Ninety-three patients were randomly assigned to either the MIX group (eccentric ergometer + CCRP) or the CON group (concentric ergometer + CCRP) for 7 weeks. Training effectiveness was assessed based on "good responders" showing improved functional capacities, such as 6-minute walk test (6MWT) distance and maximal voluntary contraction of the plantar flexors (ankle MVC). Safety was monitored with a visual analog scale for muscle soreness, perceived exertion, and heart rate during training.

Results: The proportion of good responders was similar between groups (26% in MIX, 29% in CON, P=0.744). Both groups improved in 6MWT (CON: 12.6%, MIX: 16.14%) and ankle MVC (CON: 15.5%, MIX: 11.30%), with no significant differences. Exercise tolerance did not differ significantly between the groups, but perceived effort was significantly lower in the MIX group (P<0.0001) compared to the CON group.

Conclusions: Integrating eccentric exercise into cardiac rehabilitation is safe and well-tolerated. Nevertheless, this study did not find significant advantages over conventional programs for coronary heart disease patients. Further research should explore specific patient groups or conditions where eccentric exercise may be more beneficial, emphasizing personalized prescriptions and gradual workload progression for better cardiac rehabilitation outcomes.