European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine最新文献

Background: The needs of people with deafblindness remain poorly understood and addressed globally. This study is part of a larger body of work to develop Core Sets for deafblindness using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF).

Aim: To determine the perspectives on functioning of individuals with lived experience of deafblindness as they relate to the ICF.

Design: Cross-sectional interview study.

Setting: Global, representing all six regions of the World Health Organization.

Population: A diverse cohort of 72 individuals living with deafblindness or as close family members, ranging across the spectrum of severity.

Methods: Qualitative interviews and focus groups were used to explore six open-ended questions about perceived barriers and facilitators to functioning of body functions and structures, activities and participation, and environmental and personal factors. Data were synthesized using content analysis, and the resulting topics were linked to the ICF codes using established linking methodology prescribed by the World Health Organization's ICF Research Branch. Descriptive statistics summarized all demographic data.

Results: The analyses of the transcripts uncovered 2534 meaning units, leading to the identification of 492 corresponding distinct codes from the ICF framework, and spanning across 93.33% of coding categories available. Sensory (b2) and Mental Functions (b1) emerged as the most frequent Body Functions (b) codes. Most categories referred to Activities & Participation, with Mobility (d4) being the most frequently mentioned topic. Services, Systems and Policies (e5) was the most frequently used Environmental factor.

Conclusions: Over 93% of the ICF classification categories were accessed to code the data provided by participants, demonstrating the complexity of functioning with deafblindness. This study provides valuable information to shape policy and research by providing representation of lived experience towards the consensus conference for the comprehensive and abbreviated Core Sets for deafblindness.

Clinical rehabilitation impact: The inclusion of lived experience provides a holistic understanding of the daily challenges faced by individuals living with deafblindness. By being part of this process, they have a voice in shaping the classification system that will be used to describe their experiences, fostering a sense of ownership and empowerment.

Background: There is growing evidence on Commitment Therapy for people with low back pain (LBP). A self-reported questionnaire is lacking which evaluates commitment by relying on the most recommended actions, the most important core outcome domains, and the most evidenced treatment options.

Aim: To describe the development and psychometric validation of the Work In Progress (WIP) questionnaire.

Design: Development and psychometric validation of the WIP questionnaire in the context of people with LBP, as a means to evaluate Commitment.

Setting: Outpatient facilities.

Population: People with LBP.

Methods: The new instrument was created by item generation and selection. Face validity, appropriateness, acceptability and feasibility were investigated. Psychometric testing was carried out in a cross-sectional study and included: 1) exploratory factor analysis; 2) reliability by internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and test-retest measurement (Intra-class Correlation Coefficient, ICC2.1); and 3) construct validity by hypothesis testing the correlation of the WIP questionnaire with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and a pain intensity Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (Pearson's r correlations).

Results: The WIP questionnaire was successfully developed based on international guidelines and the testing of face validity, appropriateness, acceptability and feasibility were satisfactory. The instrument was administered to 102 people with LBP (39 females, mean age of 49.7±14.6 years [range 20-80], pain median duration of 42.1 weeks [range 3-360]). Factor analysis revealed a two-factor 10-item solution (57% of explained variance). The internal consistency was good (α=0.70-85) and test-retest assessment was excellent (ICC2.1=0.91-94). Construct validity was good, as ≥75% of hypotheses were confirmed.

Conclusions: The WIP questionnaire is a self-reported tool to evaluate commitment in persons with LBP showing satisfactory psychometric properties. It can be recommended for clinical and research purposes.

Clinical rehabilitation impact: This study adds original new data to the existing knowledge in the field of Commitment within the bio-psychosocial paradigm for disabled people. It is expected to contribute to the evaluative, clinical and rehabilitative approach of individuals with low back pain.

According to Cochrane Rehabilitation's recently published definition for research purposes, rehabilitation is inherently complex. Rehabilitation teams frequently implement multiple strategies concurrently, draw on input from a range of different health professionals, target multiple outcomes, and personalize therapeutic plans. The success of rehabilitation lies not only in the specific therapies employed, but also in how they are delivered, when they are delivered, and the capability and willingness of patients to engage in them. In 2021, the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) and the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) released the second major update of its framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions. This framework has direct relevance to the development and implementation of evidence-based practice in the field of rehabilitation. While previous iterations of this framework positioned complex interventions as anything that involved multiple components, multiple people, multiple settings, multiple targets of effect, and behavior change, this latest framework expanded on this concept of complexity to also include the characteristics and influence of the context in which interventions occur. The revised MRC-NIHR framework presents complex intervention research as comprising the following four inter-related and overlapping phases: 1) development or identification of the intervention; 2) feasibility; 3) evaluation; and 4) implementation, with different methods and tools required to address each of these phases. This paper provides an overview of the MRC-NIHR framework and its application to rehabilitation, with examples from past research. Rehabilitation researchers are encouraged to learn about the MRC-NIHR framework and its application. Funders of rehabilitation research are also encouraged to place greater emphasis on supporting studies that involve the right design to address key uncertainties in rehabilitation clinical practice. This will require investment into a broader range of types of research than simply individual-level randomized controlled trials. Rehabilitation research can both learn from and contribute to future iterations of the MRC-NIHR framework as it is an excellent environment for exploring complexity in clinical practice.

Background: The lack of standardized reporting for crucial organizational factors in rehabilitation poses a significant barrier to understanding their impact on patient outcomes in clinical trials and meta-analyses.

Aim: Based on the categories in the International Classification of Service Organization in Rehabilitation (ICSO-R 2.0), we aimed to develop reporting standards specifically for organizational factors in clinical trials.

Methods: A comprehensive two-step process was conducted. In Step 1, important categories were identified. The identification was based on previous results from a Delphi survey with international stakeholder participation, two systematic literature reviews and results from focus groups with users in Germany, Indonesia and Norway. Step 2 involved the necessary reduction of categories and the proposal of reporting specifications, achieved through two voting rounds among key researchers, stakeholders and users.

Results: The suggested minimum reporting set comprises Context and Setting as well as Quality assurance and management. The Context and Setting is proposed to include whether the intervention is delivered by Hospital, Community or Other service providers. The Mode of delivery is proposed to be specified as Inpatient, Outpatient, In-home, or Tele-rehabilitation. Furthermore, the Level of specialization (Primary/Secondary) and the Phase of service delivery Acute, Subacute or Long-term rehabilitation services should be reported. The Quality assurance and management should be reported as Yes or No, with the option Yes requiring description of the quality assurance applied in the methods section.

Conclusions: This study proposed a compulsory and standardized reporting of organizational factors in clinical trials to facilitate the generation of scientific evidence regarding effective service provision and delivery in rehabilitation medicine. Authors are encouraged to consider the proposed reporting set to testing, criticism, and modification to enhance its applicability and robustness.

Introduction: Spinal cord injuries have a considerable impact on healthcare in terms of mortality and morbidity. To address the difficulties faced by people affected by this condition and to raise awareness among stakeholders and policymakers, it is crucial to understand factors impacting survival. The purpose of this study is to systematically review the literature on life expectancy in people with traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI), identifying key factors influencing mortality and survival.

Evidence acquisition: We conducted a systematic review, searching the literature for articles published up to July 2023 in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and PEDro. Study outcomes had to be one of survival rate, life expectancy, standardized mortality ratio, or mortality rate. Only original research articles published in English were included. The quality of evidence was evaluated with the MINORS scale. The level of evidence was categorized according to the OCEBM model.

Evidence synthesis: A comprehensive literature search yielded 102 articles, after the selection process 20 studies were included in our review. The main factors negatively influencing survival and life expectancy included higher neurological level of injury (NLI), completeness of the lesion, need for mechanical ventilation, increasing age, and male gender. The development of SCI-related comorbidities also negatively impacted survival as well as the lack of specialized care, especially in low-income countries. Additionally, pre-injury health status and personal income may affect survival.

Conclusions: Current literature shows that people affected by tSCI have a shorter life expectancy compared to the general population, highlighting some factors as possible predictors. It is difficult to compare available evidence due to the methodological heterogeneity across studies, which makes it challenging to draw generalizable conclusions on life expectancy in people with tSCI. Further studies are required to address these issues and accurately estimate life expectancy accounting for gaps in the management of people affected by tSCI to improve their care.

Background: This randomized controlled trial examined the feasibility of adding eccentric exercise to a conventional cardiac rehabilitation program (CCRP) for coronary heart disease patients.

Methods: Ninety-three patients were randomly assigned to either the MIX group (eccentric ergometer + CCRP) or the CON group (concentric ergometer + CCRP) for 7 weeks. Training effectiveness was assessed based on "good responders" showing improved functional capacities, such as 6-minute walk test (6MWT) distance and maximal voluntary contraction of the plantar flexors (ankle MVC). Safety was monitored with a visual analog scale for muscle soreness, perceived exertion, and heart rate during training.

Results: The proportion of good responders was similar between groups (26% in MIX, 29% in CON, P=0.744). Both groups improved in 6MWT (CON: 12.6%, MIX: 16.14%) and ankle MVC (CON: 15.5%, MIX: 11.30%), with no significant differences. Exercise tolerance did not differ significantly between the groups, but perceived effort was significantly lower in the MIX group (P<0.0001) compared to the CON group.

Conclusions: Integrating eccentric exercise into cardiac rehabilitation is safe and well-tolerated. Nevertheless, this study did not find significant advantages over conventional programs for coronary heart disease patients. Further research should explore specific patient groups or conditions where eccentric exercise may be more beneficial, emphasizing personalized prescriptions and gradual workload progression for better cardiac rehabilitation outcomes.

Introduction: Plantar fasciopathy (PF) is a common musculoskeletal condition characterized by heel pain and functional impairment. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) has gained increasing interest in the treatment of PF, but the optimal ESWT program is still debated. Therefore, this systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression aimed at providing a comprehensive assessment of the efficacy and tolerability of ESWT in PF management.

Evidence acquisition: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published until February 2023 were systematically searched on PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and PEDro. Studies assessing adult patients with PF treated with ESWT were considered. The primary outcome was the tolerability of ESWT, measured by treatment adherence, dropouts, and safety. Secondary outcomes were pain intensity and functional outcomes. Meta-analysis and meta-regression were performed to examine the relationship between ESWT program characteristics and treatment outcomes. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Jadad scale and the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool.

Evidence synthesis: Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Our findings showed that ESWT is effective in reducing pain intensity assessed by Visual Analogue Scale [focal-ESWT: -2.818 (SE 0.803, -4.393, -1.244; P< 0.0001; radial-ESWT: -3.038 (SE 0.428, -3.878, -2.199; P<0.001)]. Meta-regression analysis indicated a positive relationship between specific ESWT parameters (frequency, number of pulses, energy flux density and frequency, and number of pulses, pressure) and pain intensity (all P<0.05) and dropout (all P<0.05).

Conclusions: ESWT seems to be an effective and tolerable treatment for PF, albeit the peculiarity of parameters might affect both the efficacy in pain relief and the adherence to the treatment. Physicians should consider individual patient characteristics when selecting the ESWT parameters for PF treatment. Further high-quality studies are warranted to establish the optimal ESWT protocol to treat PF.

Introduction: Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) pose significant challenges to public health, medicine, and society due to their substantial impact on victims, caregivers, and the community. While indicators like life expectancy or death rates provide insights into mortality and long-term outcomes, they fail to address how TBIs affect aging, neurological sequelae, cognitive impairment, and psychological or psychiatric disorders. Moreover, most studies are limited to North America, limiting the generalizability of findings across different social welfare systems. As a result, clinicians face difficulties in providing optimal care and prognosis, hindering the improvement of life quality for victims and caregivers and efficient public health service planning. This study aims to address these limitations by examining life expectancy, mortality rates, and long-term outcomes in severely injured individuals.

Evidence acquisition: PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and PEDro search engines were systematically searched for studies investigating life expectancy and long-term outcomes in severe traumatic brain injuries. The final search date for all sources/databases was July 31, 2023. We conducted a systematic review, and only original research articles published in English were eligible for inclusion. After the screening process, data were extracted about life expectancy, follow-up, and conclusions.

Evidence synthesis: This study analyzed 24 studies out of 343 identified. Life expectancy in the TBI population is lower than that of the general population. Older age and severity of functional impairments are major risk factors for mortality. Mortality rates are particularly high in the first two months. Mortality trends suggest a bimodal distribution, with a peak in the first five years followed by no further deaths until nine years after injury. The most influential factors include age, sex, trauma severity, independence in walking and feeding, time since injury, ventilator dependence, and cognitive and communication impairments. Respiratory and circulatory complications are among the leading causes of TBI-related deaths, followed by epilepsy, suicide, and respiratory infections.

Conclusions: Further research is required, considering the different long-term outcomes after TBI and their impact on families and society, to accurately estimate the life expectancy necessary for clinicians, caregivers, national health institutions, and medico-legal settlements.