Plum pox virus (PPV, genus Potyvirus) is one of the most economically important plant viruses. The PPV M strain (PPV-M) was first isolated in Japan in 2016. While a broad host range of the PPV M strain from trees to weeds has been widely reported, host range and the contribution of weeds to the PPV infection cycle in Japan remained unknown. In this study, we examined the host range of PPV-M in Japan within the Asteraceae weeds and explored its potential role as an intermediate host. By mechanically inoculating twelve herbaceous species belonging to Asteraceae (alternatively Compositae) in orchards with PPV-M, we found that all were susceptible to the virus. Of those, Hemisteptia lyrata showed high infection rates on the upper leaves, typically favored by aphids. A subsequent survey of multiple aphid species feeding on H. lyrata showed a seasonal infection cycle in which the aphid Aphis fabae solanella likely transmitted PPV-M from Japanese apricot leaves to H. lyrata in the spring. Then, A. spiraecola, an efficient PPV vector known to shift between hosts in summer and autumn, transmitted the disease to healthy Japanese apricot seedlings from PPV-M infected H. lyrata in autumn. It is conceivable that PPV-M in Japanese apricot orchards follows a seasonal infection cycle, potentially involving an intermediate host (Asteraceae) and two aphid species.
梅花痘病毒(PPV,Potyvirus 属)是最具经济价值的植物病毒之一。2016 年,日本首次分离出 PPV M 株(PPV-M)。虽然 PPV M 株的寄主范围很广,从树木到杂草都有广泛报道,但在日本,寄主范围和杂草对 PPV 感染循环的贡献仍然未知。在这项研究中,我们考察了 PPV-M 在日本菊科杂草中的寄主范围,并探讨了其作为中间寄主的潜在作用。通过机械接种果园中的 12 种菊科杂草(也可能是菊科),我们发现它们都对 PPV-M 病毒易感。其中,Hemisteptia lyrata 的上部叶片感染率很高,而这正是蚜虫最喜欢的部位。随后对以 H. lyrata 为食的多种蚜虫进行的调查显示,蚜虫的季节性感染周期是:春季,蚜虫 Aphis fabae solanella 可能会将 PPV-M 从日本杏叶传播到 H. lyrata。然后,已知在夏季和秋季会在寄主间转移的 PPV 高效载体 A. spiraecola 在秋季将 PPV-M 从感染了 H. lyrata 的日本杏幼苗上传播到健康的日本杏幼苗上。可以想象,日本杏园中的 PPV-M 是一个季节性感染周期,可能涉及一个中间宿主(菊科)和两个蚜虫种类。
{"title":"A host range survey of the M strain of plum pox virus in native Asteraceae weeds in Japanese apricot orchards and a possible infection cycle","authors":"Shunta Ishizaki, Moeka Okada, Takeshi Nishio, Shinya Tsuda","doi":"10.1007/s10658-024-02887-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-024-02887-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Plum pox virus (PPV, genus <i>Potyvirus</i>) is one of the most economically important plant viruses. The PPV M strain (PPV-M) was first isolated in Japan in 2016. While a broad host range of the PPV M strain from trees to weeds has been widely reported, host range and the contribution of weeds to the PPV infection cycle in Japan remained unknown. In this study, we examined the host range of PPV-M in Japan within the Asteraceae weeds and explored its potential role as an intermediate host. By mechanically inoculating twelve herbaceous species belonging to Asteraceae (alternatively Compositae) in orchards with PPV-M, we found that all were susceptible to the virus. Of those, <i>Hemisteptia lyrata</i> showed high infection rates on the upper leaves, typically favored by aphids. A subsequent survey of multiple aphid species feeding on <i>H. lyrata</i> showed a seasonal infection cycle in which the aphid <i>Aphis fabae</i> solanella likely transmitted PPV-M from Japanese apricot leaves to <i>H. lyrata</i> in the spring. Then, <i>A. spiraecola</i>, an efficient PPV vector known to shift between hosts in summer and autumn, transmitted the disease to healthy Japanese apricot seedlings from PPV-M infected <i>H. lyrata</i> in autumn. It is conceivable that PPV-M in Japanese apricot orchards follows a seasonal infection cycle, potentially involving an intermediate host (Asteraceae) and two aphid species.</p>","PeriodicalId":12052,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Plant Pathology","volume":"111 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141197790","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-27DOI: 10.1007/s10658-024-02883-4
Juha Piispanen, Ulrich Bergmann, Jouni Karhu, Tuomas Kauppila, Johanna Witzell, Juha Kaitera
Cronartium pini and C. ribicola are rust fungi that cause destructive diseases of pines (Pinus spp.). These rusts spread via alternate hosts, among which Melampyrum spp., Veronica spp. and Impatiens spp. are important for C. pini and Ribes spp. for C. ribicola. Congeneric alternate hosts vary in their susceptibility to Cronartium rusts, but the reasons for this variation are not clear. To clarify whether internal, endophytic fungi could explain these differences, we investigated the temporal and spatial variation in fungal endophyte composition of C. pini-resistant M. pratense, V. chamaedrys and I. glandulifera, C. pini-susceptible M. sylvaticum, V. longifolia and I. balsamina, C. ribicola-resistant R. rubrum and C. ribicola-susceptible R. nigrum. In total, 2695 fungal endophytic isolates were obtained and classified into 37 morphotypes, with 1373 cultures isolated in early summer and 1322 in late summer. Fifty-two isolates were identified to species or genus level. The most common morphotypes were identified as Heterophoma sp. Some variation in the abundance of morphotypes occurred between collection sites, but the same morphotypes dominated across the sites and species. The diversity of morphotypes was higher in early September than in late June in all species and the same morphotypes dominated in both early and late season. The diversity of fungal endophytes was higher in resistant Veronica and Ribes than in susceptible congeneric species, but the results suggest that the diversity or abundance of culturable fungal endophytes does not explain the differences in the congeneric species’ susceptibility to rust fungi.
{"title":"Diversity and abundance of culturable fungal endophytes in leaves of susceptible and resistant alternate hosts of Cronartium pini and C. ribicola","authors":"Juha Piispanen, Ulrich Bergmann, Jouni Karhu, Tuomas Kauppila, Johanna Witzell, Juha Kaitera","doi":"10.1007/s10658-024-02883-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-024-02883-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Cronartium pini</i> and <i>C. ribicola</i> are rust fungi that cause destructive diseases of pines (<i>Pinus</i> spp.). These rusts spread via alternate hosts, among which <i>Melampyrum</i> spp., <i>Veronica</i> spp. and <i>Impatiens</i> spp. are important for <i>C. pini</i> and <i>Ribes</i> spp. for <i>C. ribicola</i>. Congeneric alternate hosts vary in their susceptibility to <i>Cronartium</i> rusts, but the reasons for this variation are not clear. To clarify whether internal, endophytic fungi could explain these differences, we investigated the temporal and spatial variation in fungal endophyte composition of <i>C. pini</i>-resistant <i>M. pratense</i>, <i>V. chamaedrys</i> and <i>I. glandulifera</i>, <i>C. pini</i>-susceptible <i>M. sylvaticum</i>, <i>V. longifolia</i> and <i>I. balsamina</i>, <i>C. ribicola</i>-resistant <i>R. rubrum</i> and <i>C. ribicola</i>-susceptible <i>R. nigrum</i>. In total, 2695 fungal endophytic isolates were obtained and classified into 37 morphotypes, with 1373 cultures isolated in early summer and 1322 in late summer. Fifty-two isolates were identified to species or genus level. The most common morphotypes were identified as <i>Heterophoma</i> sp. Some variation in the abundance of morphotypes occurred between collection sites, but the same morphotypes dominated across the sites and species. The diversity of morphotypes was higher in early September than in late June in all species and the same morphotypes dominated in both early and late season. The diversity of fungal endophytes was higher in resistant <i>Veronica</i> and <i>Ribes</i> than in susceptible congeneric species, but the results suggest that the diversity or abundance of culturable fungal endophytes does not explain the differences in the congeneric species’ susceptibility to rust fungi.</p>","PeriodicalId":12052,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Plant Pathology","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141166002","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}