Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy最新文献

Introduction: Most patients with breast cancer have early-stage hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative disease. Even though the prognosis for most of these patients is good, there is a need to identify patients at risk for poor outcomes and to develop strategies to mitigate this risk.

Areas covered: The addition of immunotherapy to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy represents a promising option for select patients with HR-positive early breast cancer. Three randomized clinical trials have shown favorable results to date. In this review, we discuss the findings of I-SPY2, CheckMate 7FL (NCT04109066), and KEYNOTE-756 (NCT03725059).

Expert opinion: Despite the promising results of these trials, there are unanswered questions that need to be considered before incorporating neo/adjuvant immunotherapy in the treatment paradigm of early-stage HR-positive breast cancer. One example of an unanswered question is patient selection. Because the regimens used in these protocols are associated with long-term toxicities, identifying the patients who are more likely to derive a benefit from these agents, such as through the use of biomarkers, is critical. A second example is the optimal integration of adjuvant therapies that improve invasive disease-free survival, such as abemaciclib and ribociclib, which are not safely administered concurrently with immunotherapy.

Introduction: BCG-unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) represent a significant therapeutic challenge in the treatment of bladder cancer. Nadofaragene firadenovec, represents a breakthrough in this area, offering a novel approach for the treatment of BCG-unresponsive NMIBC.

Areas covered: This overview explores the historical development of nadofaragene firadenovec, assessing its efficacy and safety, and discusses future NMIBC therapy directions.

Expert opinion: Patients with high grade NMIBC who are BCG unresponsive will have a growing number of treatment alternatives to bladder removal. Nadofaragene firadenovec offers good short-term efficacy but lacks significant durability for most patients. Its strengths include ease of administration and low risk of adverse events. This will need to balance with risk of progression and cost. Furthermore, the likely approval of other agents will require consideration of which therapy to use and for which patient. The need for biomarkers to tailor treatment choices to individual patient needs is becoming more critical. The treatment field is rapidly advancing, with several Phase 3 single-arm trials underway, indicating a potential broader range of treatment options for NMIBC. Further research will be necessary to determine the optimal choice for patients.

Introduction: The prognosis of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is poor. Although cytotoxic drugs have been widely used in advanced ESCC, several antibody agents have recently been reported to be effective.

Areas covered: Nivolumab and pembrolizumab are anti-PD-1 antibodies that improve immunosuppression by binding to programmed death-1 (PD-1), leading to an antitumor effect. Randomized phase III trials have found these immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to be effective as second-line treatment. ATTRACTION-3, which compared nivolumab monotherapy with taxane monotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced ESCC, reported prolonged overall survival in the nivolumab group. KEYNOTE-181 found that overall survival was longer in patients with PD-L1-positive ESCC who received second-line treatment with pembrolizumab than in those who received chemotherapy. Sym004 and amivantamab are antibodies that target the epidermal growth factor receptor and have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of other tumors in recent phase I studies. Furthermore, clinical trials on antibody-drug conjugates such as enfortumab vedotin and DS-7300 for solid tumors are currently ongoing.

Expert opinion: The standard first-line treatments for patients with advanced ESCC contain ICIs. Therefore, drugs with different mechanisms of action that can overcome resistance to ICIs are needed as second-line or later-line treatments to improve clinical outcomes in these patients.

Introduction: Biological therapies have become the standard treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC). However, clinical remission rates post-induction therapy remain modest at 40-50%, with many initial responders losing response over time. Current treatment strategies frequently rely on a 'trial and error' approach, leading to prolonged periods of ineffective and costly therapies for patients, accompanied by associated treatment complications.

Area covered: This review discusses current evidence on risk stratification tools for predicting therapeutic efficacy and minimizing adverse events in UC management. Recent studies have identified predictive factors for biologic therapy response. In the context of personalized medicine, the goal is to identify patients at high risk of progression and complications, as well as those likely to respond to specific therapies. Essential risk stratification tools include clinical decision-making aids, biomarkers, genomics, multi-omics factors, endoscopic, imaging, and histological assessments.

Expert opinion: Employing risk stratification tools to predict therapeutic response and prevent treatment-related complications is essential for precision medicine in the biological management of UC. These tools are necessary to select the most suitable treatment for each individual patient, thereby enhancing efficacy and safety.

Introduction: Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents a significant global health burden, whose treatment has been recently revolutionized by the advent of biologic treatments. Despite that, innovative therapeutic regimens and approaches, especially immune-based, remain to be explored aiming at extending the therapeutic benefits to a wider population of patients.

Areas covered: This review comprehensively discusses the evolving landscape of biological treatment modalities for advanced HCC, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, antiangiogenic monoclonal antibodies, tumor-targeting monoclonal antibodies either naked or drug-conjugated, therapeutic vaccines, oncolytic viruses, adoptive cell therapies, and cytokine-based therapies. Key clinical trials and preclinical studies are examined, highlighting the actual or potential impact of these interventions in reshaping treatment paradigms for HCC.

Expert opinion: Tailored and rational combination strategies, leveraging the synergistic effects of different modalities, represent a promising approach to maximize treatment efficacy in advanced HCC, which should aim at conversion endpoints to increase the fraction of patients eligible for curative approaches. The identification of predictive biomarkers holds the key to optimizing patient selection and improving therapeutic outcomes.

Introduction: We evaluated a potential move from one rapid-acting insulin analog to another, or their biosimilars, to aid better and faster decisions for diabetes management.

Methods: A systematic literature review was performed according to PRISMA reporting guidelines. The MEDLINE/EMBASE/COCHRANE databases were searched for randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing aspart/lispro in type-1 (T1D) and type-2 (T2D) diabetes. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias assessment criteria.

Results: Of the 753 records retrieved, the six selected efficacy/safety RCTs and the additional three hand-searched pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics RCTs showed some heterogeneity in the presentation of the continuous variables; however, collectively, the outcomes demonstrated that lispro and aspart had comparable efficacy and safety in adult patients with T1D and T2D. Both treatments yielded a similar decrease in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and had similar dosing and weight changes, with similar treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) and serious adverse event (SAE) reporting, similar hypoglycemic episodes in both T1D and T2D populations, and no clinically significant differences for hyperglycemia, occlusions or other infusion site/set complications.

Conclusions: Aspart and lispro demonstrate comparative safety and efficacy in patients with T1D/T2D. Since both are deemed equally suitable for controlling prandial glycemic excursions and both have similar safety attributes, they may be used interchangeably in clinical practice.

Prospero registration number: CRD42023376793.

Introduction: At the 65th American Society of Hematology (ASH) 2023 Annual Meeting, the latest advancements in CD20×CD3 BsAbs for B-cell lymphoma (BCL) were highlighted, particularly in relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) and R/R diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

Areas covered: This summary highlights some of the major studies on CD20×CD3 BsAbs for BCL.

Expert opinion/commentary: CD20×CD3 is the most widely studied BsAb, with promising results in patients with R/R DLBCL and R/R FL ≥ two prior lines of systemic therapy. Trials with the first line of B-cell lymphoma also revealed promising results. Hopefully, BsAb monotherapy or BsAb-containing regimens may become the standard therapy in patients with FL and DLBCL.

Introduction: Approximately 50% of patients that receive a CGRP(r) MoAb for the preventative treatment of migraine are expected to discontinue therapy. For patients that discontinue CGRP(r) MoAb therapy, few clinical options are available. One potential option is to switch CGRP(r) MoAbs, however, data concerning the efficacy of this intervention is scarce.

Areas covered: This manuscript aims to summarize all available data concerning the potential efficacy of switching CGRP(r) MoAbs following previous medication discontinuation. Data was sourced by completing a database search for the terms: 'CGRP monoclonal antibody switch OR CGRP monoclonal antibody switching.'

Expert opinion: While data considering the potential efficacy of CGRP(r) switching continues to grow, our expert opinion supports the most recent European Headache Federation statement regarding CGRP(r) MoAb prescribing practices, concluding that there remains insufficient data to determine the efficacy of this intervention. As this topic is of significant clinical importance, we recommend a call-to-action to expand on current data considering the therapeutic options for patients that discontinue CGRP(r) MoAb therapy.

Introduction: Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), a BCMA-targeting CAR-T therapy, is approved in the United States and Europe for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and ≥1 prior line of therapy (LOT), including a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory drug, and are lenalidomide refractory.

Areas covered: We examine recent long-term data in heavily pretreated RRMM (LEGEND-2, CARTITUDE-1) and earlier LOTs (CARTITUDE-4) compared with standard therapy and discuss the rationale for investigating cilta-cel as frontline therapy for transplant-eligible and transplant-ineligible patients (CARTITUDE-5, CARTITUDE-6).

Expert opinion: CAR-T therapies can improve outcomes for patients with MM across different LOTs. CARTITUDE-1 and CARTITUDE-4 have set a new bar for efficacy, with median PFS of 34.9 months in heavily pretreated patients (CARTITUDE-1) and a 74% relative risk reduction for progression/death versus standard care in patients with 1-3 prior LOTs (CARTITUDE-4), with manageable safety. Response rates were consistent between the two studies: 98% in CARTITUDE-1 and approaching 100% for infused patients in CARTITUDE-4. Cilta-cel could be a key treatment choice for patients with RRMM after first LOT. Clinical trials investigating frontline cilta-cel therapy will provide valuable insights into optimizing treatment pathways with the aim to potentially cure MM.