首页 > 最新文献

European Respiratory Review最新文献

英文 中文
Short-term and long-term effects of air pollution on acute lower respiratory infections incidence and mortality: an overview and critical appraisal of systematic reviews. 空气污染对急性下呼吸道感染发病率和死亡率的短期和长期影响:系统综述的概述和关键评价。
IF 10.4 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-11-26 Print Date: 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0129-2025
Rossella Murtas, Paola Schiattarella, Annafrancesca Smimmo, Alessio Perilli, Ilaria Stanisci, Laura Bonvicini, Elisa Borroni, Isabella Bottini, Daniela Fortuna, Sara Tunesi, Serena Broccoli, Gea Oliveri Conti, Federica Parmagnani, Antonio Giampiero Russo

Background: Acute lower respiratory infections (ALRIs) are a significant health concern, particularly affecting children and older adults. Air pollution is a known risk factor. Despite numerous systematic reviews exploring this relationship, varying methodological quality hinders the derivation of reliable concentration-response functions essential for health risk assessment.

Methods: We critically appraised systematic reviews investigating the association between air pollution and ALRI incidence and mortality, evaluating both short-term and long-term effects across age groups. Comprehensive searches were conducted in PubMed and Embase (up to November 2024). Included systematic reviews were evaluated using AMSTAR2-EH (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews-Environmental Health), assessing methodological quality specific to environmental epidemiology.

Results: Among 330 unique systematic reviews, 15 met inclusion criteria. Short-term systematic reviews did not meet methodological appraisal standards. Studies on other pollutants, like ozone (O3) and sulfur dioxide (SO2), lacked conclusive methodologically high-quality evidence. Long-term systematic reviews generally demonstrated methodological rigour, linking nitrogen dioxide (NO2) exposure to ALRI incidence in children (relative risk 1.09, 95% CI 1.03-1.16) and ALRI mortality in adults (relative risk 1.06, 95% CI 1.02-1.10 and 1.08, 95% CI 1.04-1.12 for NO2; relative risk 1.204, 95% CI 1.095-1.325 for particulate matter with a 50% cut-off aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 µm (PM2.5)).

Conclusions: This overview systematically assessed systematic reviews using AMSTAR2-EH, highlighting methodological gaps, particularly in short-term studies, bias assessment and protocol registration. Overall, the evidence suggests a mild but significant association between short-term exposure to air pollutants and pneumonia incidence, and a stronger, more consistent association between long-term exposure and ALRI incidence and mortality, especially for NO2 and PM2.5. These findings can inform public health policies and environmental regulations aimed at reducing respiratory disease burden due to air pollution.

背景:急性下呼吸道感染(ALRIs)是一个重要的健康问题,特别是影响儿童和老年人。空气污染是一个已知的危险因素。尽管有许多系统综述探讨了这种关系,但不同的方法质量阻碍了健康风险评估所必需的可靠浓度-反应函数的推导。方法:我们对调查空气污染与ALRI发病率和死亡率之间关系的系统综述进行了批判性评价,评估了各年龄组的短期和长期影响。在PubMed和Embase中进行了综合检索(截至2024年11月)。采用AMSTAR2-EH(评估系统评价的测量工具-环境健康)评估纳入的系统评价,评估环境流行病学特有的方法学质量。结果:330篇独特的系统评价中,15篇符合纳入标准。短期系统评价不符合方法学评价标准。对其他污染物的研究,如臭氧(O3)和二氧化硫(SO2),在方法学上缺乏结论性的高质量证据。长期系统评价总体上证明了方法的严谨性,将二氧化氮(NO2)暴露与儿童ALRI发病率(相对危险度1.09,95% CI 1.03-1.16)和成人ALRI死亡率(NO2相对危险度1.06,95% CI 1.02-1.10和1.08,95% CI 1.04-1.12)联系起来;50%截止空气动力学直径为2.5µm (PM2.5)的颗粒物相对危险度1.204,95% CI 1.095-1.325)。结论:本综述使用AMSTAR2-EH系统地评估了系统评价,突出了方法学上的差距,特别是在短期研究、偏倚评估和方案注册方面。总体而言,有证据表明,短期暴露于空气污染物与肺炎发病率之间存在轻微但显著的关联,而长期暴露于空气污染物与ALRI发病率和死亡率之间存在更强、更一致的关联,尤其是二氧化氮和PM2.5。这些发现可以为旨在减少空气污染造成的呼吸系统疾病负担的公共卫生政策和环境法规提供信息。
{"title":"Short-term and long-term effects of air pollution on acute lower respiratory infections incidence and mortality: an overview and critical appraisal of systematic reviews.","authors":"Rossella Murtas, Paola Schiattarella, Annafrancesca Smimmo, Alessio Perilli, Ilaria Stanisci, Laura Bonvicini, Elisa Borroni, Isabella Bottini, Daniela Fortuna, Sara Tunesi, Serena Broccoli, Gea Oliveri Conti, Federica Parmagnani, Antonio Giampiero Russo","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0129-2025","DOIUrl":"10.1183/16000617.0129-2025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute lower respiratory infections (ALRIs) are a significant health concern, particularly affecting children and older adults. Air pollution is a known risk factor. Despite numerous systematic reviews exploring this relationship, varying methodological quality hinders the derivation of reliable concentration-response functions essential for health risk assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We critically appraised systematic reviews investigating the association between air pollution and ALRI incidence and mortality, evaluating both short-term and long-term effects across age groups. Comprehensive searches were conducted in PubMed and Embase (up to November 2024). Included systematic reviews were evaluated using AMSTAR2-EH (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews-Environmental Health), assessing methodological quality specific to environmental epidemiology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 330 unique systematic reviews, 15 met inclusion criteria. Short-term systematic reviews did not meet methodological appraisal standards. Studies on other pollutants, like ozone (O<sub>3</sub>) and sulfur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>), lacked conclusive methodologically high-quality evidence. Long-term systematic reviews generally demonstrated methodological rigour, linking nitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>) exposure to ALRI incidence in children (relative risk 1.09, 95% CI 1.03-1.16) and ALRI mortality in adults (relative risk 1.06, 95% CI 1.02-1.10 and 1.08, 95% CI 1.04-1.12 for NO<sub>2</sub>; relative risk 1.204, 95% CI 1.095-1.325 for particulate matter with a 50% cut-off aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 µm (PM<sub>2.5</sub>)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This overview systematically assessed systematic reviews using AMSTAR2-EH, highlighting methodological gaps, particularly in short-term studies, bias assessment and protocol registration. Overall, the evidence suggests a mild but significant association between short-term exposure to air pollutants and pneumonia incidence, and a stronger, more consistent association between long-term exposure and ALRI incidence and mortality, especially for NO<sub>2</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub>. These findings can inform public health policies and environmental regulations aimed at reducing respiratory disease burden due to air pollution.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"34 178","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12648268/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145631758","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hyperconcentrated mucus in small airways: a mechanistic model for the pathogenesis of paediatric bronchiectasis. 小气道内高浓度粘液:儿童支气管扩张发病机制模型。
IF 10.4 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-11-26 Print Date: 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0124-2025
Grigorios Chatziparasidis, Anne B Chang, Andrew Bush, Ahmad Kantar, Kostas N Priftis

Background: Childhood bronchiectasis is an under-recognised and increasingly prevalent lung disease with a poorly understood pathogenesis. Traditional models focus on the damage in the large airways and the resultant microbial colonisation; however, the initiating events remain unclear.

Objective: We propose a unified, evidence-based model in which injury to the small airway epithelium leads to the formation of hyperconcentrated, stagnant mucus. This initiates a muco-inflammatory positive feedback loop that causes small airway wall thickening. The development of bronchiectasis in the large airways represents the final stage of this process.

Content: This review synthesises emerging clinical, histological and experimental data suggesting that small airway obstruction from hyperconcentrated mucus leads to localised hypoxia. In turn, hypoxic epithelial cells and stagnant mucus promote the release of alarmins, driving neutrophilic infiltration in the absence of infection. This process establishes a self-perpetuating muco-inflammatory loop characterised by excessive mucin production and immune dysregulation, which results in progressive thickening of the small airway walls through the formation of lymphoid follicles. Neutrophil recruitment into the major airways follows, marking the next step in the pathophysiology cascade. These events precede microbial colonisation and the characteristic radiological features of bronchiectasis.

Conclusion: By redefining hyperconcentrated mucus and small airway dysfunction as the initial events in the bronchiectasis cascade, our model offers novel mechanistic insight. Targeted interventions at various stages of this cascade are clearly needed. If validated, this model could shift therapeutic focus in paediatric bronchiectasis, from antibiotics toward muco-regulatory or anti-inflammatory agents, especially during the early, often asymptomatic stages of the disease.

背景:儿童支气管扩张是一种未被充分认识且日益普遍的肺部疾病,其发病机制尚不清楚。传统模型关注大气道的损伤和由此产生的微生物定植;然而,引发事件的原因尚不清楚。目的:我们提出了一个统一的、以证据为基础的模型,其中小气道上皮损伤导致高浓度、停滞粘液的形成。这引发了黏膜炎症的正反馈循环,导致小气道壁增厚。大气道支气管扩张的发展是这一过程的最后阶段。内容:这篇综述综合了新出现的临床、组织学和实验数据,表明高浓度粘液引起的小气道阻塞导致局部缺氧。反过来,缺氧的上皮细胞和停滞的粘液促进警报的释放,在没有感染的情况下驱动中性粒细胞浸润。这个过程建立了一个自我延续的粘膜炎症循环,其特征是过量的粘蛋白产生和免疫失调,通过形成淋巴滤泡导致小气道壁逐渐增厚。中性粒细胞进入主要气道,标志着病理生理学级联的下一步。这些事件先于微生物定植和支气管扩张的特征性放射学特征。结论:通过将高黏液和小气道功能障碍重新定义为支气管扩张级联的初始事件,我们的模型提供了新的机制见解。显然需要在这一级联的各个阶段采取有针对性的干预措施。如果得到验证,该模型可以将儿科支气管扩张的治疗重点从抗生素转向粘膜调节剂或抗炎药,特别是在疾病的早期,通常是无症状阶段。
{"title":"Hyperconcentrated mucus in small airways: a mechanistic model for the pathogenesis of paediatric bronchiectasis.","authors":"Grigorios Chatziparasidis, Anne B Chang, Andrew Bush, Ahmad Kantar, Kostas N Priftis","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0124-2025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0124-2025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Childhood bronchiectasis is an under-recognised and increasingly prevalent lung disease with a poorly understood pathogenesis. Traditional models focus on the damage in the large airways and the resultant microbial colonisation; however, the initiating events remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We propose a unified, evidence-based model in which injury to the small airway epithelium leads to the formation of hyperconcentrated, stagnant mucus. This initiates a muco-inflammatory positive feedback loop that causes small airway wall thickening. The development of bronchiectasis in the large airways represents the final stage of this process.</p><p><strong>Content: </strong>This review synthesises emerging clinical, histological and experimental data suggesting that small airway obstruction from hyperconcentrated mucus leads to localised hypoxia. In turn, hypoxic epithelial cells and stagnant mucus promote the release of alarmins, driving neutrophilic infiltration in the absence of infection. This process establishes a self-perpetuating muco-inflammatory loop characterised by excessive mucin production and immune dysregulation, which results in progressive thickening of the small airway walls through the formation of lymphoid follicles. Neutrophil recruitment into the major airways follows, marking the next step in the pathophysiology cascade. These events precede microbial colonisation and the characteristic radiological features of bronchiectasis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By redefining hyperconcentrated mucus and small airway dysfunction as the initial events in the bronchiectasis cascade, our model offers novel mechanistic insight. Targeted interventions at various stages of this cascade are clearly needed. If validated, this model could shift therapeutic focus in paediatric bronchiectasis, from antibiotics toward muco-regulatory or anti-inflammatory agents, especially during the early, often asymptomatic stages of the disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"34 178","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12648269/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145631614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The respiratory epithelium in the era of vaping: insights from in vitro, in vivo and human studies. 电子烟时代的呼吸上皮:来自体外、体内和人体研究的见解。
IF 10.4 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-11-26 Print Date: 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0256-2024
Anvita Gandhi, Claire E Lee, Amelia L Beaumont, Sarah Ozeki, Caleb J Parambil, Russell P Bowler, Fariba Rezaee

Since their market introduction in 2007, electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have rapidly gained popularity, often marketed as a safer alternative to traditional smoking. Their appeal, especially among adolescents, is heightened by the wide variety of available flavours. However, both acute and chronic exposure to e-cigarettes has been linked to adverse health effects, including oxidative stress, inflammation and airway barrier dysfunction. While several cell culture and animal studies have explored the effects of e-cigarette exposure on the respiratory tract, comprehensive comparisons of the cellular and physiological outcomes across in vitro, in vivo and human studies remain limited. In this review, we evaluate in vitro and in vivo models of e-cigarette exposure, alongside human studies examining the respiratory outcomes of e-cigarette use. Common in vitro models, such as human bronchial epithelial cells and primary lung fibroblasts, have been exposed to e-cigarettes, with assessments including cell viability and cytokine release. Similarly, in vivo models using mice or rats exposed to e-cigarette aerosols or extracts have revealed effects ranging from inflammation to lung tissue damage. Additionally, we review human studies that track biomarker changes to directly assess the impact of e-cigarette smoke on participants' respiratory health. By integrating findings from diverse approaches, we aim to provide greater insight on the impact of e-cigarettes on lung health that will guide future research in selecting the most appropriate models for studying airway damage. Ultimately, this synthesis of research will contribute to advancing the scientific dialogue on e-cigarette use and its implications for respiratory health.

自2007年进入市场以来,电子烟(电子烟)迅速受到欢迎,通常作为传统吸烟的更安全替代品进行营销。它们的吸引力,尤其是在青少年中,因为口味的多样性而增强。然而,急性和慢性接触电子烟都与不利的健康影响有关,包括氧化应激、炎症和气道屏障功能障碍。虽然一些细胞培养和动物研究已经探索了电子烟暴露对呼吸道的影响,但在体外、体内和人体研究中对细胞和生理结果的全面比较仍然有限。在本综述中,我们评估了电子烟暴露的体外和体内模型,以及检查电子烟使用呼吸结果的人体研究。常见的体外模型,如人类支气管上皮细胞和原代肺成纤维细胞,已经暴露于电子烟中,评估包括细胞活力和细胞因子释放。同样,使用暴露于电子烟气溶胶或提取物的小鼠或大鼠的体内模型显示了从炎症到肺组织损伤的各种影响。此外,我们回顾了跟踪生物标志物变化的人类研究,以直接评估电子烟烟雾对参与者呼吸健康的影响。通过整合不同方法的研究结果,我们的目标是更深入地了解电子烟对肺部健康的影响,这将指导未来的研究选择最合适的模型来研究气道损伤。最终,这项综合研究将有助于推进关于电子烟使用及其对呼吸健康影响的科学对话。
{"title":"The respiratory epithelium in the era of vaping: insights from <i>in vitro</i>, <i>in vivo</i> and human studies.","authors":"Anvita Gandhi, Claire E Lee, Amelia L Beaumont, Sarah Ozeki, Caleb J Parambil, Russell P Bowler, Fariba Rezaee","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0256-2024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0256-2024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since their market introduction in 2007, electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have rapidly gained popularity, often marketed as a safer alternative to traditional smoking. Their appeal, especially among adolescents, is heightened by the wide variety of available flavours. However, both acute and chronic exposure to e-cigarettes has been linked to adverse health effects, including oxidative stress, inflammation and airway barrier dysfunction. While several cell culture and animal studies have explored the effects of e-cigarette exposure on the respiratory tract, comprehensive comparisons of the cellular and physiological outcomes across <i>in vitro</i>, <i>in vivo</i> and human studies remain limited. In this review, we evaluate <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> models of e-cigarette exposure, alongside human studies examining the respiratory outcomes of e-cigarette use. Common <i>in vitro</i> models, such as human bronchial epithelial cells and primary lung fibroblasts, have been exposed to e-cigarettes, with assessments including cell viability and cytokine release. Similarly, <i>in vivo</i> models using mice or rats exposed to e-cigarette aerosols or extracts have revealed effects ranging from inflammation to lung tissue damage. Additionally, we review human studies that track biomarker changes to directly assess the impact of e-cigarette smoke on participants' respiratory health. By integrating findings from diverse approaches, we aim to provide greater insight on the impact of e-cigarettes on lung health that will guide future research in selecting the most appropriate models for studying airway damage. Ultimately, this synthesis of research will contribute to advancing the scientific dialogue on e-cigarette use and its implications for respiratory health.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"34 178","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12648270/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145631749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical care in interstitial lung disease: a critical appraisal of clinical guidance documents. 间质性肺疾病的临床护理:对临床指导文件的批判性评价
IF 10.4 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-11-26 Print Date: 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0064-2025
Ming Hui Victoria Ng, Pulasthi Vinu Wettesinghe, Christopher J Ryerson, Yet Hong Khor

Introduction: Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are complex, requiring multifaceted care for optimal management of patients' symptoms and health outcomes. This systematic review evaluated the content coverage of currently available clinical guidance documents ILD.

Methods: A systematic search was performed to identify clinical guidance documents published between 2011 and March 2025 in the Embase, Ovid Medline and Trip databases. Document characteristics, quality and contents covered were independently assessed by two reviewers.

Results: A total of 79 ILD clinical guidance documents were identified, with clinical practice guidelines (n=50) having superior quality based on the Institute of Medicine standards. The content of most documents (84%) focused on ILD aetiology, with connective tissue disease (44%) being the most discussed. Only 46% of documents covered pulmonary manifestations, which often encompassed pulmonary hypertension (30%) and hypoxaemia (28%). Extrapulmonary morbidities were covered in 28% of documents, with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (23%) and obstructive sleep apnoea (10%) being commonly presented. Behavioural and lifestyle factors were covered in 34% of documents, with most addressing physical inactivity (30%). Additionally, 51% of documents covered overall diagnostic approach for ILD, 35% lung transplantation, 22% acute exacerbations and 19% palliative care.

Conclusion: Despite growing awareness of ILD, most clinical guidance documents have limited coverage for domains of patient care outside of diagnosis and pharmacotherapies. Future clinical guidance documents on ILD should address the content gaps to deliver comprehensive care for patients with ILD, with engagement of different stakeholders from various regions.

简介:间质性肺疾病(ILDs)是复杂的,需要多方面的护理,以最佳管理患者的症状和健康结果。本系统综述评估了目前可用的ILD临床指导文件的内容覆盖范围。方法:系统检索2011年至2025年3月在Embase、Ovid Medline和Trip数据库中发表的临床指导文件。文献特征、质量和内容由两名审稿人独立评估。结果:共鉴定出79份ILD临床指导文件,其中临床实践指南(n=50)根据美国医学研究所的标准具有更高的质量。大多数文献(84%)的内容集中在ILD的病因学上,结缔组织疾病(44%)是讨论最多的。只有46%的文献涉及肺部表现,通常包括肺动脉高压(30%)和低氧血症(28%)。28%的文献涵盖了肺外疾病,其中胃食管反流病(23%)和阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(10%)是常见的症状。34%的文件涉及行为和生活方式因素,其中大多数涉及缺乏身体活动(30%)。此外,51%的文献涉及ILD的整体诊断方法,35%的肺移植,22%的急性加重和19%的姑息治疗。结论:尽管越来越多的人意识到ILD,但大多数临床指导文件对诊断和药物治疗之外的患者护理领域的覆盖有限。未来关于ILD的临床指导文件应该解决内容差距,在不同地区不同利益相关者的参与下,为ILD患者提供全面的护理。
{"title":"Clinical care in interstitial lung disease: a critical appraisal of clinical guidance documents.","authors":"Ming Hui Victoria Ng, Pulasthi Vinu Wettesinghe, Christopher J Ryerson, Yet Hong Khor","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0064-2025","DOIUrl":"10.1183/16000617.0064-2025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are complex, requiring multifaceted care for optimal management of patients' symptoms and health outcomes. This systematic review evaluated the content coverage of currently available clinical guidance documents ILD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was performed to identify clinical guidance documents published between 2011 and March 2025 in the Embase, Ovid Medline and Trip databases. Document characteristics, quality and contents covered were independently assessed by two reviewers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 79 ILD clinical guidance documents were identified, with clinical practice guidelines (n=50) having superior quality based on the Institute of Medicine standards. The content of most documents (84%) focused on ILD aetiology, with connective tissue disease (44%) being the most discussed. Only 46% of documents covered pulmonary manifestations, which often encompassed pulmonary hypertension (30%) and hypoxaemia (28%). Extrapulmonary morbidities were covered in 28% of documents, with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (23%) and obstructive sleep apnoea (10%) being commonly presented. Behavioural and lifestyle factors were covered in 34% of documents, with most addressing physical inactivity (30%). Additionally, 51% of documents covered overall diagnostic approach for ILD, 35% lung transplantation, 22% acute exacerbations and 19% palliative care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite growing awareness of ILD, most clinical guidance documents have limited coverage for domains of patient care outside of diagnosis and pharmacotherapies. Future clinical guidance documents on ILD should address the content gaps to deliver comprehensive care for patients with ILD, with engagement of different stakeholders from various regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"34 178","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12648271/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145631625","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Valid surrogate end-points in nonsmall cell lung cancer peri-operative systemic therapy trials: a systematic review. 非小细胞肺癌围手术期全身治疗试验的有效替代终点:系统回顾。
IF 10.4 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-11-12 Print Date: 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0034-2025
Kohei Somekawa, Nobuyuki Horita, Satoshi Nagaoka, Yukihito Kajita, Suguru Muraoka, Ami Izawa, Yukiko Otsu, Ayami Kaneko, Momo Hirata, Rei Inoue, Sousuke Kubo, Katsushi Tanaka, Ryo Nagasawa, Hiroyuki Yagyu, Kota Murohashi, Ayako Aoki, Yohei Kameda, Hiroaki Fujii, Keisuke Watanabe, Yu Hara, Hiroyuki Adachi, Nobuaki Kobayashi, Aya Saito, Takeshi Kaneko

Background: Recurrence-, progression-, disease- and event-free survival are often selected as the primary end-points for trials assessing peri-operative systemic therapy for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). As overall survival (OS) has increased, these surrogates, which we hereafter collectively term "recurrence-/progression-free survivals (RPFS)", have become more attractive end-points.

Methods: This systematic review, without meta-analysis, was conducted in accordance with the guidelines established by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (UMIN000052558). Electronic databases were searched on 11 October 2023. English-language articles presenting a randomised controlled trial assessing neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant systemic therapy for NSCLC were included. The main outcome was the weighted Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (r) between the hazard ratios (HRs) of OS (HRos) and RPFS (HRrpfs). The weight assigned to each study was determined using the inverse variance of the log HRos. Pathological subtype and driver mutations were not questioned.

Results: We identified 31 trials with a total of 15 776 patients. The weighted correlation coefficient was 0.86 based on the raw data from the 31 trials. After reciprocal duplication, the weighted correlation coefficient was 0.91 (p<0.001 for unweighted r). Subgroup analyses showed the correlation was 0.98 for trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors but was 0.54 for molecular targeted therapy CONCLUSIONS: We hope that our data will justify the use of the HRs of recurrence-, progression-, disease- and event-free survival as primary end-points in peri-operative immune checkpoint inhibitor regimens for NSCLC.

背景:在评估非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)围手术期全身治疗的试验中,复发生存期、进展生存期、疾病生存期和无事件生存期通常被选择作为主要终点。随着总生存期(OS)的增加,这些替代指标,我们将其统称为“无复发/无进展生存期(RPFS)”,已成为更有吸引力的终点。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(UMIN000052558)制定的指南进行本系统评价,未进行荟萃分析。于2023年10月11日检索了电子数据库。纳入了一项评估NSCLC新辅助和/或辅助全身治疗的随机对照试验的英文文章。主要观察指标为OS (HRos)与RPFS (HRrpfs)风险比(HRs)之间的加权Spearman等级相关系数(r)。分配给每个研究的权重是用对数hro的逆方差来确定的。病理亚型和驱动突变没有受到质疑。结果:我们纳入31项试验,共纳入15776例患者。基于31项试验的原始数据,加权相关系数为0.86。反向重复后,加权相关系数为0.91 (p
{"title":"Valid surrogate end-points in nonsmall cell lung cancer peri-operative systemic therapy trials: a systematic review.","authors":"Kohei Somekawa, Nobuyuki Horita, Satoshi Nagaoka, Yukihito Kajita, Suguru Muraoka, Ami Izawa, Yukiko Otsu, Ayami Kaneko, Momo Hirata, Rei Inoue, Sousuke Kubo, Katsushi Tanaka, Ryo Nagasawa, Hiroyuki Yagyu, Kota Murohashi, Ayako Aoki, Yohei Kameda, Hiroaki Fujii, Keisuke Watanabe, Yu Hara, Hiroyuki Adachi, Nobuaki Kobayashi, Aya Saito, Takeshi Kaneko","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0034-2025","DOIUrl":"10.1183/16000617.0034-2025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recurrence-, progression-, disease- and event-free survival are often selected as the primary end-points for trials assessing peri-operative systemic therapy for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). As overall survival (OS) has increased, these surrogates, which we hereafter collectively term \"recurrence-/progression-free survivals (RPFS)\", have become more attractive end-points.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review, without meta-analysis, was conducted in accordance with the guidelines established by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (UMIN000052558). Electronic databases were searched on 11 October 2023. English-language articles presenting a randomised controlled trial assessing neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant systemic therapy for NSCLC were included. The main outcome was the weighted Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (r) between the hazard ratios (HRs) of OS (HRos) and RPFS (HRrpfs). The weight assigned to each study was determined using the inverse variance of the log HRos. Pathological subtype and driver mutations were not questioned.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 31 trials with a total of 15 776 patients. The weighted correlation coefficient was 0.86 based on the raw data from the 31 trials. After reciprocal duplication, the weighted correlation coefficient was 0.91 (p<0.001 for unweighted r). Subgroup analyses showed the correlation was 0.98 for trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors but was 0.54 for molecular targeted therapy CONCLUSIONS: We hope that our data will justify the use of the HRs of recurrence-, progression-, disease- and event-free survival as primary end-points in peri-operative immune checkpoint inhibitor regimens for NSCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"34 178","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12606065/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145503002","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mendelian causes of early-onset emphysema: a review of the current literature. 早发性肺气肿的孟德尔病因:当前文献综述。
IF 10.4 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-11-12 Print Date: 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0125-2025
Antonia Karabatic, Maarten van den Berge, Tomás P Carroll, Victor Guryev, Alen Faiz

Currently, the only known clinically relevant hereditary risk factor for emphysema is limited to mutations within the SERPINA1 gene, encoding alpha-1 antitrypsin. Although several additional rare high-impact variants have been proposed, their role in emphysema pathophysiology is unclear. This review discusses recent cases investigating novel candidate genes that may be Mendelian causes for emphysema development. We also explore potential methods to confirm the causal relation to COPD. Identifying potential new rare high-impact genetic variants may lead to novel therapeutic targets, thus improving the personalised treatment of COPD. Several gene mutations have been implicated in emphysema development, including SERPINA1, SERPINA3, PTPN6, TERT, TR, NAF1, BICD1, ELN, FBLN, FLNA and SFTPC Mutations of the SERPINA1 and PTPN6 genes are considered definitive causes of emphysema. Studies have ascertained rare variants in cutis laxa genes (ELN, FBLN and FLNA), which cause early-onset emphysema in infants and children via defective elastin synthesis. Telomerase pathway genes (TERT, TR, NAF1 and BICD1) have also been implicated in increased COPD risk along with another member of the serpin family (SERPINA3) and SFTPC These probable mutations for emphysema tend to present later in life. Due to being unconfirmed, they may involve a more complex gene interaction that requires further interrogation with next-generation sequencing and molecular methods, including CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) screening libraries, whole-exome sequencing or whole-genome sequencing. Although multiple novel mutations have been reported to cause emphysema, further validation is needed. Next-generation sequencing offers a promising method to understand early-onset emphysema and COPD pathogenesis.

目前,唯一已知的与肺气肿临床相关的遗传危险因素仅限于编码α -1抗胰蛋白酶的SERPINA1基因的突变。虽然已经提出了一些罕见的高影响变异,但它们在肺气肿病理生理中的作用尚不清楚。这篇综述讨论了最近研究可能是肺气肿发展的孟德尔原因的新候选基因的病例。我们还探索了潜在的方法来确认与COPD的因果关系。识别潜在的新的罕见的高影响基因变异可能导致新的治疗靶点,从而改善COPD的个性化治疗。一些基因突变与肺气肿的发展有关,包括SERPINA1、SERPINA3、PTPN6、TERT、TR、NAF1、BICD1、ELN、FBLN、FLNA和SFTPC, SERPINA1和PTPN6基因的突变被认为是肺气肿的决定性原因。研究已经确定了皮肤松弛基因(ELN, FBLN和FLNA)的罕见变异,这些基因通过弹性蛋白合成缺陷导致婴儿和儿童早发性肺气肿。端粒酶途径基因(TERT, TR, NAF1和BICD1)也与serpin家族的另一成员(SERPINA3)和SFTPC一起与COPD风险增加有关。这些可能的肺气肿突变往往在生命后期出现。由于尚未得到证实,它们可能涉及更复杂的基因相互作用,需要使用下一代测序和分子方法进行进一步的研究,包括CRISPR(聚集规律间隔短回文重复序列)筛选文库、全外显子组测序或全基因组测序。虽然已经报道了多种新的突变导致肺气肿,但还需要进一步的验证。下一代测序为了解早发性肺气肿和COPD发病机制提供了有希望的方法。
{"title":"Mendelian causes of early-onset emphysema: a review of the current literature.","authors":"Antonia Karabatic, Maarten van den Berge, Tomás P Carroll, Victor Guryev, Alen Faiz","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0125-2025","DOIUrl":"10.1183/16000617.0125-2025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Currently, the only known clinically relevant hereditary risk factor for emphysema is limited to mutations within the <i>SERPINA1</i> gene, encoding alpha-1 antitrypsin. Although several additional rare high-impact variants have been proposed, their role in emphysema pathophysiology is unclear. This review discusses recent cases investigating novel candidate genes that may be Mendelian causes for emphysema development. We also explore potential methods to confirm the causal relation to COPD. Identifying potential new rare high-impact genetic variants may lead to novel therapeutic targets, thus improving the personalised treatment of COPD. Several gene mutations have been implicated in emphysema development, including <i>SERPINA1</i>, <i>SERPINA3</i>, <i>PTPN6</i>, <i>TERT</i>, <i>TR</i>, <i>NAF1</i>, <i>BICD1</i>, <i>ELN</i>, <i>FBLN</i>, <i>FLNA</i> and <i>SFTPC</i> Mutations of the <i>SERPINA1</i> and <i>PTPN6</i> genes are considered definitive causes of emphysema. Studies have ascertained rare variants in cutis laxa genes (<i>ELN, FBLN</i> and <i>FLNA)</i>, which cause early-onset emphysema in infants and children <i>via</i> defective elastin synthesis. Telomerase pathway genes (<i>TERT</i>, <i>TR</i>, <i>NAF1</i> and <i>BICD1</i>) have also been implicated in increased COPD risk along with another member of the serpin family (<i>SERPINA3</i>) and <i>SFTPC</i> These probable mutations for emphysema tend to present later in life. Due to being unconfirmed, they may involve a more complex gene interaction that requires further interrogation with next-generation sequencing and molecular methods, including CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) screening libraries, whole-exome sequencing or whole-genome sequencing. Although multiple novel mutations have been reported to cause emphysema, further validation is needed. Next-generation sequencing offers a promising method to understand early-onset emphysema and COPD pathogenesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"34 178","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12606066/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145503047","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Recommendations on PCV20 vaccine in adults and at-risk populations. 对成人和高危人群接种PCV20疫苗的建议。
IF 10.4 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-11-12 Print Date: 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0016-2025
Giovanni Sotgiu, Mariangela Puci, Michele Bartoletti, Francesco Blasi, Paolo Bonanni, Stefano Aliberti

Introduction: Streptococcus pneumoniae is a common cause of bacterial pneumonia, bacteraemia and meningitis in adults, especially among older adults and individuals with specific underlying medical conditions. The composition of the capsular polysaccharides distinguishes different pneumococcal serotypes and serves as the target for commercially available vaccines. The 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20) was introduced in 2021, conferring protection to seven additional serotypes over PCV13 and five over PCV15, and, thus, providing increased coverage against common serotypes that cause invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) and community-acquired pneumonia. The present narrative review summarises current recommendations for pneumococcal vaccination in different countries, focusing on adult and at-risk populations, safety, tolerability, and cost-effectiveness.

Methods: A comprehensive search of existing literature was conducted on PubMed, Scopus and government websites to gather relevant articles, studies and recommendations about PCV20. The information was summarised to provide an overview.

Results: The recommendations for adults over 65 years of age support the use of a single dose of PCV20, and a single booster of PCV20 for people who had previously received PCV13 or PPSV23. The administration of PCV20 is also recommended for those who have not completed the vaccine schedules for PCV13 or PPSV23. Several countries have recently included PCV20 in the vaccination of adults and children at higher risk of developing IPD.

Conclusion: The efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of PCV20 support its use in preventing invasive and noninvasive pneumococcal disease across age groups, including those with underlying health conditions.

肺炎链球菌是成人细菌性肺炎、菌血症和脑膜炎的常见病因,特别是在老年人和有特定潜在疾病的个体中。荚膜多糖的组成可区分不同的肺炎球菌血清型,并可作为市售疫苗的靶标。20价肺炎球菌结合疫苗(PCV20)于2021年推出,比PCV13多保护7种血清型,比PCV15多保护5种血清型,从而提高了对导致侵袭性肺炎球菌病(IPD)和社区获得性肺炎的常见血清型的覆盖范围。本综述总结了目前不同国家对肺炎球菌疫苗接种的建议,重点关注成人和高危人群、安全性、耐受性和成本效益。方法:综合检索PubMed、Scopus及政府网站现有文献,收集PCV20相关文章、研究及推荐。对这些资料进行了总结,以提供一个概览。结果:对于65岁以上的成年人,建议使用单剂PCV20,对于以前接受过PCV13或PPSV23的人,建议使用单剂PCV20加强剂。还建议未完成PCV13或PPSV23疫苗接种计划的人接种PCV20。一些国家最近将PCV20纳入了对患IPD风险较高的成人和儿童的疫苗接种。结论:PCV20的有效性、安全性和成本效益支持其在各年龄组预防侵袭性和非侵袭性肺炎球菌疾病的应用,包括那些有潜在健康状况的人。
{"title":"Recommendations on PCV20 vaccine in adults and at-risk populations.","authors":"Giovanni Sotgiu, Mariangela Puci, Michele Bartoletti, Francesco Blasi, Paolo Bonanni, Stefano Aliberti","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0016-2025","DOIUrl":"10.1183/16000617.0016-2025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong><i>Streptococcus pneumoniae</i> is a common cause of bacterial pneumonia, bacteraemia and meningitis in adults, especially among older adults and individuals with specific underlying medical conditions. The composition of the capsular polysaccharides distinguishes different pneumococcal serotypes and serves as the target for commercially available vaccines. The 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20) was introduced in 2021, conferring protection to seven additional serotypes over PCV13 and five over PCV15, and, thus, providing increased coverage against common serotypes that cause invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) and community-acquired pneumonia. The present narrative review summarises current recommendations for pneumococcal vaccination in different countries, focusing on adult and at-risk populations, safety, tolerability, and cost-effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of existing literature was conducted on PubMed, Scopus and government websites to gather relevant articles, studies and recommendations about PCV20. The information was summarised to provide an overview.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The recommendations for adults over 65 years of age support the use of a single dose of PCV20, and a single booster of PCV20 for people who had previously received PCV13 or PPSV23. The administration of PCV20 is also recommended for those who have not completed the vaccine schedules for PCV13 or PPSV23. Several countries have recently included PCV20 in the vaccination of adults and children at higher risk of developing IPD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of PCV20 support its use in preventing invasive and noninvasive pneumococcal disease across age groups, including those with underlying health conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"34 178","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12606068/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145503075","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Knowledge translation strategies to enhance lung cancer screening programme implementation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 加强肺癌筛查项目实施的知识转化策略:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 10.4 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-11-12 Print Date: 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0065-2025
Paul Dawkins, Gabrielle Ou, Angela Melder, Shi Lee, Nicholas Ye, Rob G Stirling

Introduction: Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening (LCS) improves outcomes including mortality in clinical trials, but it is unclear whether this evidence is implemented effectively in real-world practice settings. This systematic review explored how knowledge translation (KT) strategies have been used to improve knowledge, decisional confidence and participation in LDCT LCS programmes.

Methods: Literature searches were performed for comparative studies incorporating KT strategies in relation to LDCT LCS. Articles included a KT intervention intended to facilitate knowledge, participation in screening, improve decisional confidence or increase screening uptake.

Results: 40 studies were selected for data extraction. Studies emanated from the USA (36), Canada (one), the UK (two) and Japan (one), published between 2014 and 2024. KT interventions reported included 41 implementation strategies targeting staff training, patient and provider education, shared decision-making tools, nurse clinics, navigators, forms, electronic reminders and triggers, data presentation modalities, materials targeting specific populations, and quality improvement tools. Meta-analysis identified significant increase in knowledge of risk (OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.29-6.38), LCS candidacy (OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.51-4.14), risk-benefit knowledge (OR 2.82, 95% CI 1.21-6.58), awareness of screening test (OR 11.91, 9.00-15.76) and increased LCS screening participation (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.44-3.47) in response to KT strategies.

Conclusion: This systematic review identified multiple studies addressing the utilisation and effectiveness of implementation science strategies in KT interventions in the context of LCS. These included a broad range of implementation strategies and KT methodologies that were associated with increased LCS knowledge and participation. There is an urgent need to identify effective implementation strategies leading to enhanced knowledge and screening participation amongst at risk individuals in LDCT LCS programmes.

在临床试验中,低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)肺癌筛查(LCS)改善了包括死亡率在内的结果,但尚不清楚这一证据是否在现实世界的实践环境中有效实施。这篇系统综述探讨了知识转化(KT)策略如何用于提高LDCT LCS项目的知识、决策信心和参与。方法:文献检索与LDCT LCS相关的KT策略的比较研究。文章包括KT干预,旨在促进知识,参与筛查,提高决策信心或增加筛查吸收。结果:选取40项研究进行数据提取。研究来自美国(36)、加拿大(1)、英国(2)和日本(1),发表于2014年至2024年之间。报告的KT干预措施包括41项实施战略,目标是员工培训、患者和提供者教育、共享决策工具、护士诊所、导航器、表格、电子提醒和触发器、数据呈现方式、针对特定人群的材料和质量改进工具。荟萃分析发现,在KT策略的响应中,风险知识(OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.29-6.38)、LCS候选性(OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.51-4.14)、风险-收益知识(OR 2.82, 95% CI 1.21-6.58)、筛查试验意识(OR 11.91, 9.00-15.76)和LCS筛查参与(OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.44-3.47)显著增加。结论:本系统综述确定了多个研究,涉及LCS背景下KT干预中实施科学策略的利用和有效性。其中包括与增加LCS知识和参与相关的广泛实施战略和KT方法。迫切需要确定有效的实施战略,从而提高高危人群在LDCT和LCS规划中的知识和筛查参与。
{"title":"Knowledge translation strategies to enhance lung cancer screening programme implementation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Paul Dawkins, Gabrielle Ou, Angela Melder, Shi Lee, Nicholas Ye, Rob G Stirling","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0065-2025","DOIUrl":"10.1183/16000617.0065-2025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening (LCS) improves outcomes including mortality in clinical trials, but it is unclear whether this evidence is implemented effectively in real-world practice settings. This systematic review explored how knowledge translation (KT) strategies have been used to improve knowledge, decisional confidence and participation in LDCT LCS programmes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literature searches were performed for comparative studies incorporating KT strategies in relation to LDCT LCS. Articles included a KT intervention intended to facilitate knowledge, participation in screening, improve decisional confidence or increase screening uptake.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>40 studies were selected for data extraction. Studies emanated from the USA (36), Canada (one), the UK (two) and Japan (one), published between 2014 and 2024. KT interventions reported included 41 implementation strategies targeting staff training, patient and provider education, shared decision-making tools, nurse clinics, navigators, forms, electronic reminders and triggers, data presentation modalities, materials targeting specific populations, and quality improvement tools. Meta-analysis identified significant increase in knowledge of risk (OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.29-6.38), LCS candidacy (OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.51-4.14), risk-benefit knowledge (OR 2.82, 95% CI 1.21-6.58), awareness of screening test (OR 11.91, 9.00-15.76) and increased LCS screening participation (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.44-3.47) in response to KT strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review identified multiple studies addressing the utilisation and effectiveness of implementation science strategies in KT interventions in the context of LCS. These included a broad range of implementation strategies and KT methodologies that were associated with increased LCS knowledge and participation. There is an urgent need to identify effective implementation strategies leading to enhanced knowledge and screening participation amongst at risk individuals in LDCT LCS programmes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"34 178","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12606067/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145503005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Structured narrative review on lung cancer screening: current evidence, clinical practice implications and implementation insights from a multidisciplinary task force and patient representatives. 肺癌筛查的结构化叙述性综述:来自多学科工作组和患者代表的当前证据、临床实践意义和实施见解。
IF 10.4 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-11-05 Print Date: 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0249-2024
Georgia Hardavella, Kyriaki Tavernaraki, Dimitrios Lioumpas, Efimia Boutsikou, Eleni Karetsi, Elli Keramida, Alexandros Letsos, Konstantinos Livanios, Ιra Michailidou, Stylianos Benakis, Aggeliki Pandi, Leonidas Papastavrou, Konstantinos Stefanidis, Eleftherios Zervas, Theoni Agapitou, Martha Andritsou, Stavros Anevlavis, Gerasimos Apollonatos, Kathi Apostolidou, Katerina Bakiri, Zafeiria Barmparessou, Elena Bellou, Danai Bisirtzoglou, Loukas Dagdilelis, Eleni Fili, Christophoros Foroulis, Stylianos Gaitanakis, Christina Gkriniouk, George Kapetanakis, Konstantinos Karagiannis, Ioannis Karampinis, Eleni Kokkotou, Alexandra Kote, Athanasios Kostoulas, Sofia Lambaki, Dimitrios Magouliotis, Maria Mani, Gerasimos Metaxas, Aggeliki Miziou, Katerina Mproupi, Styliani Mytilinaiou, Konstantinos Potaris, Konstantinos Samitas, Vasilios Skouras, Dionysis Spyratos, Andreas Stathoulopoulos, Myrsini Stasinopoulou, Lamprini Stournara, Emmanouil Theodorakis, Sokratis Tsagaropoulos, Stylianos Vittorakis, Charalampos Zisis, Panagiotis Zois, Ioannis Gkiozos

Introduction: Lung cancer screening (LCS) is an evolving field with variations in its implementation worldwide. National LCS programmes are limited and preliminary data from national implementation are scarce.

Aim: An up-to-date overview of the available literature about 12 LCS-related topics that were identified as priorities by a multidisciplinary task force (TF) panel and patient representatives as well as synthesis of published evidence to inform clinical practice and health decision-making about LCS implementation. In specific areas where the scientific evidence is limited or mixed, the limitations are discussed and best practices based on available evidence are concluded.

Materials and methods: A multidisciplinary TF expert panel collaborated with patient representatives, identified 12 areas of interest and incorporated patient priorities. A systematic literature search was conducted, followed by screening, review and synthesis of available evidence.

Results: There is a lack of national LCS programmes in most countries worldwide. LCS benefits and potential risks are well established. Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) combined with smoking cessation should be offered as part of a LCS strategy to ensure optimal clinical outcomes. Age and smoking status cut-offs as well as other inclusion criteria vary and should be based on national epidemiological data. Available LCS risk predictor models and biomarkers require further clinical validation prior to implementation across the entire spectrum of LCS candidates. LCS frequency remains controversial with biennial LDCT being supported by current evidence. Technical standards, quality assurance and LCS management protocols are essential in LCS implementation.

Conclusions: LCS benefits override potential risks. There is slim evidence for specific cut-off values for inclusion criteria, the optimal duration of LCS programmes and the application of LCS biomarkers in clinical practice. Smoking cessation should be integrated within LCS programmes. Ongoing scientific activity in the area is expected to provide answers in the near future.

肺癌筛查(LCS)是一个不断发展的领域,在世界范围内的实施存在差异。国家LCS方案有限,国家执行情况的初步数据很少。目的:对由多学科工作组(TF)小组和患者代表确定为优先事项的12个LCS相关主题的现有文献进行最新概述,并综合已发表的证据,为LCS实施的临床实践和健康决策提供信息。在科学证据有限或混杂的特定领域,讨论其局限性,并根据现有证据总结最佳做法。材料和方法:多学科TF专家小组与患者代表合作,确定了12个感兴趣的领域并纳入了患者的优先事项。进行了系统的文献检索,然后对现有证据进行筛选、回顾和综合。结果:世界上大多数国家缺乏国家LCS规划。LCS的好处和潜在风险已得到充分确认。低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)结合戒烟应作为LCS策略的一部分,以确保最佳的临床结果。年龄和吸烟状况临界值以及其他纳入标准各不相同,应以国家流行病学数据为基础。现有的LCS风险预测模型和生物标志物需要进一步的临床验证才能在整个LCS候选者中实施。LCS频率仍有争议,目前的证据支持两年一次的LDCT。技术标准、质量保证和LCS管理协议是LCS实施的关键。结论:LCS的益处超过了潜在的风险。关于纳入标准、LCS项目的最佳持续时间和LCS生物标志物在临床实践中的应用的特定临界值的证据很少。戒烟应纳入LCS规划。该地区正在进行的科学活动有望在不久的将来提供答案。
{"title":"Structured narrative review on lung cancer screening: current evidence, clinical practice implications and implementation insights from a multidisciplinary task force and patient representatives.","authors":"Georgia Hardavella, Kyriaki Tavernaraki, Dimitrios Lioumpas, Efimia Boutsikou, Eleni Karetsi, Elli Keramida, Alexandros Letsos, Konstantinos Livanios, Ιra Michailidou, Stylianos Benakis, Aggeliki Pandi, Leonidas Papastavrou, Konstantinos Stefanidis, Eleftherios Zervas, Theoni Agapitou, Martha Andritsou, Stavros Anevlavis, Gerasimos Apollonatos, Kathi Apostolidou, Katerina Bakiri, Zafeiria Barmparessou, Elena Bellou, Danai Bisirtzoglou, Loukas Dagdilelis, Eleni Fili, Christophoros Foroulis, Stylianos Gaitanakis, Christina Gkriniouk, George Kapetanakis, Konstantinos Karagiannis, Ioannis Karampinis, Eleni Kokkotou, Alexandra Kote, Athanasios Kostoulas, Sofia Lambaki, Dimitrios Magouliotis, Maria Mani, Gerasimos Metaxas, Aggeliki Miziou, Katerina Mproupi, Styliani Mytilinaiou, Konstantinos Potaris, Konstantinos Samitas, Vasilios Skouras, Dionysis Spyratos, Andreas Stathoulopoulos, Myrsini Stasinopoulou, Lamprini Stournara, Emmanouil Theodorakis, Sokratis Tsagaropoulos, Stylianos Vittorakis, Charalampos Zisis, Panagiotis Zois, Ioannis Gkiozos","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0249-2024","DOIUrl":"10.1183/16000617.0249-2024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lung cancer screening (LCS) is an evolving field with variations in its implementation worldwide. National LCS programmes are limited and preliminary data from national implementation are scarce.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>An up-to-date overview of the available literature about 12 LCS-related topics that were identified as priorities by a multidisciplinary task force (TF) panel and patient representatives as well as synthesis of published evidence to inform clinical practice and health decision-making about LCS implementation. In specific areas where the scientific evidence is limited or mixed, the limitations are discussed and best practices based on available evidence are concluded.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary TF expert panel collaborated with patient representatives, identified 12 areas of interest and incorporated patient priorities. A systematic literature search was conducted, followed by screening, review and synthesis of available evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There is a lack of national LCS programmes in most countries worldwide. LCS benefits and potential risks are well established. Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) combined with smoking cessation should be offered as part of a LCS strategy to ensure optimal clinical outcomes. Age and smoking status cut-offs as well as other inclusion criteria vary and should be based on national epidemiological data. Available LCS risk predictor models and biomarkers require further clinical validation prior to implementation across the entire spectrum of LCS candidates. LCS frequency remains controversial with biennial LDCT being supported by current evidence. Technical standards, quality assurance and LCS management protocols are essential in LCS implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LCS benefits override potential risks. There is slim evidence for specific cut-off values for inclusion criteria, the optimal duration of LCS programmes and the application of LCS biomarkers in clinical practice. Smoking cessation should be integrated within LCS programmes. Ongoing scientific activity in the area is expected to provide answers in the near future.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"34 178","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12588082/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145451408","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A systematic review of tetracyclines for nontuberculous mycobacteria: focus on rapidly growing mycobacteria. 四环素类药物治疗非结核分枝杆菌的系统综述:重点关注快速生长的分枝杆菌。
IF 10.4 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-11-05 Print Date: 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0038-2025
Charles L Daley, Patrick A Flume, Jakko van Ingen, Reeti Khare, Christina M Mingora, Minh-Vu H Nguyen, Kevin L Winthrop, B Shoshana Zha

Background: The incidence and prevalence of disease caused by nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are increasing globally, yet treatment regimens remain complex and often ineffective. Newer tetracyclines have shown promise as a potent therapeutic. In this systematic review, we assessed the evidence for the use of tetracyclines for the treatment of NTM disease, complemented by a narrative review of nonclinical data.

Methods: Medline (PubMed) and Web of Science were searched from inception to February 2024 for clinical studies that assessed the safety, tolerability or efficacy of tetracyclines for NTM disease. Search results were screened against pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Nonclinical data were identified using a targeted literature search and are presented in a narrative synthesis.

Results: A total of 89 citations were included, comprising 43 clinical studies (six prospective observational studies, 18 retrospective studies and 19 case series) and 46 nonclinical studies. Nonclinical studies demonstrated potent in vitro activity for tigecycline, omadacycline and eravacycline, particularly against rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM). No randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. Most clinical experience was for RGM (largely Mycobacterium abscessus) and supported the use of newer tetracyclines. Evidence for the treatment of slowly growing mycobacteria, particularly Mycobacterium avium complex, was more limited.

Conclusions: There remains a significant unmet need for effective, well-tolerated therapies for the treatment of NTM, especially those that improve quality of life. Although tetracyclines have not been evaluated in RCTs, clinical evidence suggests that tetracyclines may contribute to the efficacy of combination regimens used to treat NTM disease and further RCTs are warranted.

背景:由非结核分枝杆菌(NTM)引起的疾病的发病率和患病率在全球范围内不断增加,但治疗方案仍然复杂且往往无效。较新的四环素已显示出作为一种有效治疗药物的希望。在这篇系统综述中,我们评估了四环素类药物治疗NTM疾病的证据,并辅以非临床数据的叙述性综述。方法:检索Medline (PubMed)和Web of Science从成立到2024年2月评估四环素治疗NTM疾病的安全性、耐受性或有效性的临床研究。根据预先定义的纳入和排除标准筛选搜索结果。使用有针对性的文献检索确定非临床数据,并以叙事综合的方式呈现。结果:共纳入89篇引文,包括43项临床研究(6项前瞻性观察性研究、18项回顾性研究和19项病例系列研究)和46项非临床研究。非临床研究表明,替加环素、奥马达环素和依拉瓦环素的体外活性很强,特别是对快速生长的分枝杆菌(RGM)。未发现随机对照试验(rct)。大多数临床经验是RGM(主要是脓肿分枝杆菌),并支持使用较新的四环素。治疗生长缓慢的分枝杆菌,特别是鸟分枝杆菌复合体的证据更为有限。结论:对于治疗NTM的有效、耐受性良好的治疗方法,特别是那些改善生活质量的治疗方法,仍有很大的需求未得到满足。尽管四环素类药物尚未在随机对照试验中进行评估,但临床证据表明,四环素类药物可能有助于用于治疗NTM疾病的联合方案的疗效,进一步的随机对照试验是有必要的。
{"title":"A systematic review of tetracyclines for nontuberculous mycobacteria: focus on rapidly growing mycobacteria.","authors":"Charles L Daley, Patrick A Flume, Jakko van Ingen, Reeti Khare, Christina M Mingora, Minh-Vu H Nguyen, Kevin L Winthrop, B Shoshana Zha","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0038-2025","DOIUrl":"10.1183/16000617.0038-2025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incidence and prevalence of disease caused by nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are increasing globally, yet treatment regimens remain complex and often ineffective. Newer tetracyclines have shown promise as a potent therapeutic. In this systematic review, we assessed the evidence for the use of tetracyclines for the treatment of NTM disease, complemented by a narrative review of nonclinical data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medline (PubMed) and Web of Science were searched from inception to February 2024 for clinical studies that assessed the safety, tolerability or efficacy of tetracyclines for NTM disease. Search results were screened against pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Nonclinical data were identified using a targeted literature search and are presented in a narrative synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 89 citations were included, comprising 43 clinical studies (six prospective observational studies, 18 retrospective studies and 19 case series) and 46 nonclinical studies. Nonclinical studies demonstrated potent <i>in vitro</i> activity for tigecycline, omadacycline and eravacycline, particularly against rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM). No randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. Most clinical experience was for RGM (largely <i>Mycobacterium abscessus)</i> and supported the use of newer tetracyclines. Evidence for the treatment of slowly growing mycobacteria, particularly <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> complex, was more limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There remains a significant unmet need for effective, well-tolerated therapies for the treatment of NTM, especially those that improve quality of life. Although tetracyclines have not been evaluated in RCTs, clinical evidence suggests that tetracyclines may contribute to the efficacy of combination regimens used to treat NTM disease and further RCTs are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"34 178","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12588081/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145451392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
European Respiratory Review
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1