首页 > 最新文献

European Respiratory Review最新文献

英文 中文
Keep e-cigarette vaping away from juveniles: immediate interventions. 让青少年远离电子烟:立即干预。
IF 10.4 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-11-05 Print Date: 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0170-2025
Nobel Chenggong Zong, Yuhan Zhang, Yuanli Huang, Hua Cai
{"title":"Keep e-cigarette vaping away from juveniles: immediate interventions.","authors":"Nobel Chenggong Zong, Yuhan Zhang, Yuanli Huang, Hua Cai","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0170-2025","DOIUrl":"10.1183/16000617.0170-2025","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"34 178","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12588078/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145451354","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Admission of very old patients with respiratory infections to intensive care units: should we consider the sex in the decision-making process? 重症监护室收治高龄呼吸道感染患者:在决策过程中是否应考虑性别?
IF 10.4 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-11-05 Print Date: 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0061-2025
Antoine Guillon, Arthur Kassa-Sombo, Cyril Goulenok, Thomas Leonard, Leslie Grammatico-Guillon
{"title":"Admission of very old patients with respiratory infections to intensive care units: should we consider the sex in the decision-making process?","authors":"Antoine Guillon, Arthur Kassa-Sombo, Cyril Goulenok, Thomas Leonard, Leslie Grammatico-Guillon","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0061-2025","DOIUrl":"10.1183/16000617.0061-2025","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"34 178","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12588079/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145451363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Post-tuberculosis morbidities and their associated mortality: moving from challenges to solutions. 结核病后发病率及其相关死亡率:从挑战到解决办法。
IF 10.4 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-10-22 Print Date: 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0148-2025
Jinyu Wang, Bo Yuan, Yuanyuan Fang, Cong Zhao, Jie Liu, Ke Xiong

The case fatality of tuberculosis (TB) has progressively decreased since the use of antibiotics in anti-TB treatment, leaving 155 million TB survivors alive in 2020. Of the 122 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) due to TB in 2019, 58 million DALYs were attributed to the post-TB phase. TB causes massive lung structure damage, declined lung function and excessive inflammation, which persist even after microbiological cure and predispose to multiple lung diseases (e.g. COPD, chronic pulmonary aspergillosis, bronchiectasis and COVID-19). TB survivors also face a higher risk of cancers and cardiovascular diseases. These post-TB morbidities together with worse psychological and socioeconomic status lead to poor quality of life and a three- to four-fold higher mortality rate than the general population. Understanding the epidemiology of post-TB morbidities can help to set intervention and research priorities to lower public health burdens associated with post-TB morbidities. In this narrative review, we summarise what we know and do not know about the prevalence, risk factors and management of post-TB morbidities and their associated mortality. We identify the major post-TB morbidities based on current evidence. Delayed or incomplete TB treatment, residual lung structure damage and prolonged inflammation after TB treatment are important risk factors. Developing host-directed therapies to reduce lung structure damage, smoking cessation, implementing pulmonary rehabilitation to improve lung function and adopting well-tailored preventive strategies and screening protocols may improve the management of these post-TB morbidities and mortality and warrant future research.

自在抗结核治疗中使用抗生素以来,结核病病死率已逐步下降,到2020年仍有1.55亿结核病幸存者存活。在2019年因结核病导致的1.22亿残疾调整生命年(DALYs)中,5800万DALYs归因于结核病后阶段。结核病导致大量肺结构损伤、肺功能下降和过度炎症,即使在微生物治疗后仍持续存在,并易患多种肺部疾病(如慢性阻塞性肺病、慢性肺曲霉病、支气管扩张和COVID-19)。结核病幸存者还面临更高的癌症和心血管疾病风险。这些结核病后发病率加上更差的心理和社会经济状况,导致生活质量差,死亡率比一般人群高三到四倍。了解结核后发病的流行病学有助于确定干预和研究重点,以降低与结核后发病相关的公共卫生负担。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们总结了我们对结核病后发病率、危险因素和管理及其相关死亡率的了解和不了解的情况。我们根据目前的证据确定了主要的结核后发病率。结核治疗延迟或不完全、残余肺结构损伤和结核治疗后长期炎症是重要的危险因素。开发以宿主为导向的治疗方法来减少肺结构损伤、戒烟、实施肺康复以改善肺功能,以及采用量身定制的预防策略和筛查方案,可能会改善对这些结核病后发病率和死亡率的管理,并值得未来的研究。
{"title":"Post-tuberculosis morbidities and their associated mortality: moving from challenges to solutions.","authors":"Jinyu Wang, Bo Yuan, Yuanyuan Fang, Cong Zhao, Jie Liu, Ke Xiong","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0148-2025","DOIUrl":"10.1183/16000617.0148-2025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The case fatality of tuberculosis (TB) has progressively decreased since the use of antibiotics in anti-TB treatment, leaving 155 million TB survivors alive in 2020. Of the 122 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) due to TB in 2019, 58 million DALYs were attributed to the post-TB phase. TB causes massive lung structure damage, declined lung function and excessive inflammation, which persist even after microbiological cure and predispose to multiple lung diseases (<i>e.g.</i> COPD, chronic pulmonary aspergillosis, bronchiectasis and COVID-19). TB survivors also face a higher risk of cancers and cardiovascular diseases. These post-TB morbidities together with worse psychological and socioeconomic status lead to poor quality of life and a three- to four-fold higher mortality rate than the general population. Understanding the epidemiology of post-TB morbidities can help to set intervention and research priorities to lower public health burdens associated with post-TB morbidities. In this narrative review, we summarise what we know and do not know about the prevalence, risk factors and management of post-TB morbidities and their associated mortality. We identify the major post-TB morbidities based on current evidence. Delayed or incomplete TB treatment, residual lung structure damage and prolonged inflammation after TB treatment are important risk factors. Developing host-directed therapies to reduce lung structure damage, smoking cessation, implementing pulmonary rehabilitation to improve lung function and adopting well-tailored preventive strategies and screening protocols may improve the management of these post-TB morbidities and mortality and warrant future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"34 178","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12542837/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145344381","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effects of exercise on muscle fatigability in COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 运动对COPD患者肌肉疲劳的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
IF 10.4 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-10-22 Print Date: 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0008-2025
Simone Pancera, Riccardo Buraschi, Stefano Giuseppe Lazzarini, Paulien Mellaerts, Luca Nicola Cesare Bianchi, Massimiliano Gobbo, Thierry Troosters

This systematic review aims to summarise the impact of exercise training on peripheral muscle fatigability in people with COPD, addressing different assessment methods and exercise interventions (i.e. endurance, resistance and combined training).PubMed, CENTRAL, CINAHL and PEDro databases and trial registers were searched from inception to September 2024. We identified randomised and nonrandomised trials assessing pre-to-post-training changes in muscle fatigue resistance, assessed as a reduction in volitional or non-volitional measures of muscle strength or muscle total work output during standardised fatiguing protocols. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) and Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBIN-I) tools were used for assessing risk of bias in randomised controlled trials and nonrandomised studies of interventions, respectively, and meta-analyses were performed.A total of 20 studies (574 participants from 14 randomised controlled trials and 217 from six nonrandomised studies of interventions) were included. Overall, combined endurance and resistance training appeared to improve muscle fatigue resistance. While results varied by study design, type of training and fatiguing protocols, similar improvements were observed in quadriceps fatigue resistance regardless of the assessment method. In contrast, no significant improvements were observed in the fatigue resistance of the arm muscles. However, the presence of moderate to high risk of bias in several included studies may have influenced the results.The findings of this systematic review suggest a positive effect of exercise training in improving muscle fatigue resistance, particularly in the leg muscles, in people with COPD. Future research should establish standardised protocols for assessing muscle fatigability and explore alternative tools to facilitate the clinical implementation of muscle fatigability outcomes into COPD rehabilitation.

本系统综述旨在总结运动训练对COPD患者周围肌肉疲劳的影响,解决不同的评估方法和运动干预(即耐力,阻力和联合训练)。检索了PubMed、CENTRAL、CINAHL和PEDro数据库和试验注册库,检索时间从成立到2024年9月。我们确定了随机和非随机试验,评估了训练前后肌肉疲劳阻力的变化,评估了在标准化疲劳方案中肌肉力量或肌肉总功输出的自愿或非自愿测量的减少。Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2)和Risk of Bias in non - randomised Studies - of Interventions (ROBIN-I)工具分别用于评估随机对照试验和非随机干预研究的偏倚风险,并进行meta分析。总共纳入了20项研究(来自14项随机对照试验的574名参与者和来自6项非随机干预研究的217名参与者)。总的来说,耐力和阻力相结合的训练似乎可以提高肌肉的抗疲劳能力。虽然结果因研究设计、训练类型和疲劳方案而异,但无论采用何种评估方法,在股四头肌抗疲劳性方面都观察到类似的改善。相反,在手臂肌肉的抗疲劳性方面没有观察到明显的改善。然而,在一些纳入的研究中存在中度至高度偏倚风险可能影响了结果。本系统综述的研究结果表明,运动训练在改善COPD患者肌肉抗疲劳能力方面具有积极作用,尤其是腿部肌肉。未来的研究应建立评估肌肉疲劳的标准化方案,并探索替代工具,以促进COPD康复中肌肉疲劳结果的临床实施。
{"title":"Effects of exercise on muscle fatigability in COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Simone Pancera, Riccardo Buraschi, Stefano Giuseppe Lazzarini, Paulien Mellaerts, Luca Nicola Cesare Bianchi, Massimiliano Gobbo, Thierry Troosters","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0008-2025","DOIUrl":"10.1183/16000617.0008-2025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review aims to summarise the impact of exercise training on peripheral muscle fatigability in people with COPD, addressing different assessment methods and exercise interventions (<i>i.e.</i> endurance, resistance and combined training).PubMed, CENTRAL, CINAHL and PEDro databases and trial registers were searched from inception to September 2024. We identified randomised and nonrandomised trials assessing pre-to-post-training changes in muscle fatigue resistance, assessed as a reduction in volitional or non-volitional measures of muscle strength or muscle total work output during standardised fatiguing protocols. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) and Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBIN-I) tools were used for assessing risk of bias in randomised controlled trials and nonrandomised studies of interventions, respectively, and meta-analyses were performed.A total of 20 studies (574 participants from 14 randomised controlled trials and 217 from six nonrandomised studies of interventions) were included. Overall, combined endurance and resistance training appeared to improve muscle fatigue resistance. While results varied by study design, type of training and fatiguing protocols, similar improvements were observed in quadriceps fatigue resistance regardless of the assessment method. In contrast, no significant improvements were observed in the fatigue resistance of the arm muscles. However, the presence of moderate to high risk of bias in several included studies may have influenced the results.The findings of this systematic review suggest a positive effect of exercise training in improving muscle fatigue resistance, particularly in the leg muscles, in people with COPD. Future research should establish standardised protocols for assessing muscle fatigability and explore alternative tools to facilitate the clinical implementation of muscle fatigability outcomes into COPD rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"34 178","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12542840/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145344371","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Methods to assess atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in chronic respiratory diseases: a systematic review. 慢性呼吸系统疾病患者动脉粥样硬化性心血管风险评估方法综述
IF 10.4 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-10-22 Print Date: 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0050-2025
Omer Faruk Uysal, Tobin Joseph, Ahmad M Alharbi, Tanya Patrick, Aidan Yu, Amar J Shah, Swapna Mandal, Siegfried K Wagner, James Brown, Chris P Gale, John R Hurst

Background: Chronic respiratory diseases, such COPD and asthma, increase the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) through shared pathophysiological mechanisms and modifiable risk factors. There are a number of methods to assess ASCVD, and limited systematic information about how these may be applied to chronic respiratory diseases.

Objective: To systematically report existing methods of estimating ASCVD risk in chronic respiratory disease populations, highlighting strengths, limitations and clinical applicability.

Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL was conducted up to June 2025 following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO identifier CRD42024543335). An extended search was also performed. To assess search sensitivity, a random sample of 30 studies from the extended search were reviewed. Key international clinical guidelines were examined for recommended tools. Studies assessing ASCVD risk in chronic respiratory disease populations were included. A narrative synthesis was employed.

Results: 63 studies from 26 countries identified 68 ASCVD risk assessment tools and biomarkers in chronic respiratory disease. Imaging techniques such as coronary artery calcium scoring, and carotid intima-media thickness provide detailed anatomical information, but require equipment and expertise. Risk scores (Framingham Risk Score; Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation) are practical, although they lack precision at the individual level. Biomarkers and functional tests provide holistic measurements yet are often resource-demanding. Arterial stiffness measurement directly assesses vascular pathology and requires specialist equipment.

Conclusion: Multiple ASCVD risk assessment methods exist for chronic respiratory diseases, highlighting the need to understand the strengths and weaknesses of tools for tailored solutions. Future studies should address validation, accessibility and improved personalised risk stratification.

背景:慢性呼吸系统疾病,如COPD和哮喘,通过共同的病理生理机制和可改变的危险因素增加动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)的风险。有许多评估ASCVD的方法,但关于如何将这些方法应用于慢性呼吸系统疾病的系统信息有限。目的:系统报道慢性呼吸系统疾病人群中ASCVD风险评估的现有方法,突出其优势、局限性和临床适用性。方法:按照系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目(www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO标识符CRD42024543335),对MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus和CINAHL进行截至2025年6月的系统检索。还执行了扩展搜索。为了评估搜索的敏感性,从扩展搜索中随机抽取了30个研究样本进行了回顾。审查了主要的国际临床指南,以推荐工具。评估慢性呼吸系统疾病人群ASCVD风险的研究被纳入。采用了叙事综合。结果:来自26个国家的63项研究确定了68种慢性呼吸系统疾病ASCVD风险评估工具和生物标志物。成像技术,如冠状动脉钙评分和颈动脉内膜-中膜厚度提供详细的解剖信息,但需要设备和专业知识。风险评分(Framingham风险评分;系统性冠状动脉风险评估)是实用的,尽管它们在个体水平上缺乏精确性。生物标志物和功能测试提供了全面的测量,但往往需要资源。动脉硬度测量直接评估血管病理,需要专业设备。结论:慢性呼吸系统疾病存在多种ASCVD风险评估方法,需要了解各种工具的优缺点,以提供量身定制的解决方案。未来的研究应解决有效性、可及性和改进的个性化风险分层问题。
{"title":"Methods to assess atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in chronic respiratory diseases: a systematic review.","authors":"Omer Faruk Uysal, Tobin Joseph, Ahmad M Alharbi, Tanya Patrick, Aidan Yu, Amar J Shah, Swapna Mandal, Siegfried K Wagner, James Brown, Chris P Gale, John R Hurst","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0050-2025","DOIUrl":"10.1183/16000617.0050-2025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic respiratory diseases, such COPD and asthma, increase the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) through shared pathophysiological mechanisms and modifiable risk factors. There are a number of methods to assess ASCVD, and limited systematic information about how these may be applied to chronic respiratory diseases.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically report existing methods of estimating ASCVD risk in chronic respiratory disease populations, highlighting strengths, limitations and clinical applicability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL was conducted up to June 2025 following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO identifier CRD42024543335). An extended search was also performed. To assess search sensitivity, a random sample of 30 studies from the extended search were reviewed. Key international clinical guidelines were examined for recommended tools. Studies assessing ASCVD risk in chronic respiratory disease populations were included. A narrative synthesis was employed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>63 studies from 26 countries identified 68 ASCVD risk assessment tools and biomarkers in chronic respiratory disease. Imaging techniques such as coronary artery calcium scoring, and carotid intima-media thickness provide detailed anatomical information, but require equipment and expertise. Risk scores (Framingham Risk Score; Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation) are practical, although they lack precision at the individual level. Biomarkers and functional tests provide holistic measurements yet are often resource-demanding. Arterial stiffness measurement directly assesses vascular pathology and requires specialist equipment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multiple ASCVD risk assessment methods exist for chronic respiratory diseases, highlighting the need to understand the strengths and weaknesses of tools for tailored solutions. Future studies should address validation, accessibility and improved personalised risk stratification.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"34 178","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12542838/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145344440","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency and granulomatosis with polyangiitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. α -1抗胰蛋白酶缺乏和肉芽肿病合并多血管炎:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
IF 10.4 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-10-22 Print Date: 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0088-2025
Reem Alluhibi, Shashank Baradwaaj, Nina Heyer-Chauhan, Aileen Marshall, David A Lomas, Alan D Salama, John R Hurst

Introduction: Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) is a genetic disorder characterised by low circulating levels of alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) protein, a key inhibitor of neutrophil elastase and proteinase 3 (PR3) which is also the main autoantigen in granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA). This systematic review examines the association between AATD and GPA.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, EBSCO Medline and Scopus (December 2024) identified studies on AATD and GPA. Data extraction and quality assessment followed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to calculate pooled odds ratios and assess heterogeneity.

Results: 23 studies (9634 individuals) met inclusion criteria. The Z-allele prevalence was 11.65% in GPA compared to 3.29% in controls and the S-allele prevalence was 10.8% in GPA compared to 5.26% in controls. Among 1755 individuals with GPA across 10 studies that provided specific genotype data, 22 (1.25%) were homozygous for the Z-allele. Meta-analysis showed that Z-allele carriers had 3.11 times higher odds of developing GPA (eight studies; 95% CI 2.43-3.9; I2: 0%).

Conclusion: This meta-analysis reinforces the link between AATD and GPA, particularly in carriers of the Z-allele, supporting the role of PR3 dysregulation in GPA pathogenesis.

α -1抗胰蛋白酶缺乏症(AATD)是一种遗传性疾病,以α -1抗胰蛋白酶(AAT)蛋白的低循环水平为特征,AAT蛋白是中性粒细胞弹性酶和蛋白酶3 (PR3)的关键抑制剂,也是肉芽肿伴多血管炎(GPA)的主要自身抗原。本系统综述探讨了AATD和GPA之间的关系。方法:系统检索PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, EBSCO Medline和Scopus(2024年12月),确定AATD和GPA的研究。数据提取和质量评估遵循PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目)指南。随机效应荟萃分析计算合并优势比并评估异质性。结果:23项研究(9634人)符合纳入标准。GPA组z等位基因患病率为11.65%,对照组为3.29%;s等位基因患病率为10.8%,对照组为5.26%。在提供特定基因型数据的10项研究中,1755名GPA个体中,22名(1.25%)为z等位基因纯合。荟萃分析显示,z等位基因携带者发生GPA的几率高出3.11倍(8项研究;95% CI 2.43-3.9; I2: 0%)。结论:该荟萃分析强化了AATD与GPA之间的联系,特别是在z等位基因携带者中,支持PR3失调在GPA发病机制中的作用。
{"title":"Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency and granulomatosis with polyangiitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Reem Alluhibi, Shashank Baradwaaj, Nina Heyer-Chauhan, Aileen Marshall, David A Lomas, Alan D Salama, John R Hurst","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0088-2025","DOIUrl":"10.1183/16000617.0088-2025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) is a genetic disorder characterised by low circulating levels of alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) protein, a key inhibitor of neutrophil elastase and proteinase 3 (PR3) which is also the main autoantigen in granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA). This systematic review examines the association between AATD and GPA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, EBSCO Medline and Scopus (December 2024) identified studies on AATD and GPA. Data extraction and quality assessment followed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to calculate pooled odds ratios and assess heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>23 studies (9634 individuals) met inclusion criteria. The Z-allele prevalence was 11.65% in GPA compared to 3.29% in controls and the S-allele prevalence was 10.8% in GPA compared to 5.26% in controls. Among 1755 individuals with GPA across 10 studies that provided specific genotype data, 22 (1.25%) were homozygous for the Z-allele. Meta-analysis showed that Z-allele carriers had 3.11 times higher odds of developing GPA (eight studies; 95% CI 2.43-3.9; I<sup>2</sup>: 0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis reinforces the link between AATD and GPA, particularly in carriers of the Z-allele, supporting the role of PR3 dysregulation in GPA pathogenesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"34 178","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12542835/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145344427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prevalence and correlates of breathlessness in adults: an umbrella review and updated systematic review with meta-analysis in general and clinical populations. 成人呼吸困难的患病率和相关因素:一项综合综述和更新的系统综述,包括普通人群和临床人群的荟萃分析。
IF 10.4 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-10-22 Print Date: 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0104-2025
Cheng Cheng, Naomi Takemura, Helen K Reddel, Charles C Reilly, David Currow, Ka Yan Ho, Fanny Wai San Ko, Jane Phillips, Janelle Yorke

Background: Breathlessness is a debilitating symptom affecting many adults, yet its prevalence and correlates are not well summarised. This review synthesised evidence on breathlessness prevalence, correlates and assessment methods across general and clinical populations.

Methods: We undertook an umbrella review and updated systematic review using a comprehensive search of three databases up to January 2025. The umbrella review incorporated existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses, while the updated systematic review and meta-analysis included original studies published after the most recent eligible review.

Results: The umbrella review encompassed 10 reviews conducted between 2010 and 2025, incorporating 315 studies. The primary tool for assessing self-reported breathlessness was the Medical Research Council questionnaire and its modified version (mMRC). The prevalence of breathlessness ranged from 0.9% to 61.6% in general populations and from 20.4% to 87% in clinical populations. Six categories of breathlessness correlates were identified: sociodemographic, physiological, clinical, psychological, environmental and radiological/pathological factors. An updated systematic review and meta-analysis found 15 studies published between 2021 and 2024 reporting prevalence of breathlessness. Using the most common criterion of an mMRC score ≥2, the pooled prevalence was 12.5% (range 3.7-29.5%) in general populations and 37.5% (range 27.5-48.6%) in clinical populations. These studies reported diverse correlates of breathlessness, including psychological and clinical factors.

Discussion: Substantial variability exists in the prevalence and correlates of breathlessness, emphasising its complexity and multifaceted nature. This review highlights the need for standardised assessment of breathlessness to assess prevalence and comprehensive approaches to address its diverse factors.

背景:呼吸困难是一种影响许多成年人的衰弱症状,但其患病率和相关因素尚未得到很好的总结。本综述综合了一般人群和临床人群中呼吸困难患病率、相关因素和评估方法的证据。方法:我们对截至2025年1月的三个数据库进行了全面检索和更新的系统评价。总括性评价纳入了现有的系统评价和荟萃分析,而更新的系统评价和荟萃分析纳入了最近一次合格评价后发表的原始研究。结果:总括性综述包括2010年至2025年间进行的10项综述,纳入315项研究。评估自我报告的呼吸困难的主要工具是医学研究委员会问卷及其修改版本(mMRC)。呼吸困难的患病率在普通人群中为0.9%至61.6%,在临床人群中为20.4%至87%。确定了六类呼吸困难相关因素:社会人口学、生理、临床、心理、环境和放射学/病理因素。一项最新的系统综述和荟萃分析发现,2021年至2024年间发表的15项研究报告了呼吸困难的患病率。使用mMRC评分≥2的最常见标准,一般人群的总患病率为12.5%(范围3.7-29.5%),临床人群的总患病率为37.5%(范围27.5-48.6%)。这些研究报告了呼吸困难的多种相关因素,包括心理和临床因素。讨论:呼吸困难的患病率和相关因素存在很大的差异,强调了其复杂性和多面性。本综述强调需要对呼吸困难进行标准化评估,以评估患病率和综合方法,以解决其各种因素。
{"title":"Prevalence and correlates of breathlessness in adults: an umbrella review and updated systematic review with meta-analysis in general and clinical populations.","authors":"Cheng Cheng, Naomi Takemura, Helen K Reddel, Charles C Reilly, David Currow, Ka Yan Ho, Fanny Wai San Ko, Jane Phillips, Janelle Yorke","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0104-2025","DOIUrl":"10.1183/16000617.0104-2025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breathlessness is a debilitating symptom affecting many adults, yet its prevalence and correlates are not well summarised. This review synthesised evidence on breathlessness prevalence, correlates and assessment methods across general and clinical populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We undertook an umbrella review and updated systematic review using a comprehensive search of three databases up to January 2025. The umbrella review incorporated existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses, while the updated systematic review and meta-analysis included original studies published after the most recent eligible review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The umbrella review encompassed 10 reviews conducted between 2010 and 2025, incorporating 315 studies. The primary tool for assessing self-reported breathlessness was the Medical Research Council questionnaire and its modified version (mMRC). The prevalence of breathlessness ranged from 0.9% to 61.6% in general populations and from 20.4% to 87% in clinical populations. Six categories of breathlessness correlates were identified: sociodemographic, physiological, clinical, psychological, environmental and radiological/pathological factors. An updated systematic review and meta-analysis found 15 studies published between 2021 and 2024 reporting prevalence of breathlessness. Using the most common criterion of an mMRC score ≥2, the pooled prevalence was 12.5% (range 3.7-29.5%) in general populations and 37.5% (range 27.5-48.6%) in clinical populations. These studies reported diverse correlates of breathlessness, including psychological and clinical factors.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Substantial variability exists in the prevalence and correlates of breathlessness, emphasising its complexity and multifaceted nature. This review highlights the need for standardised assessment of breathlessness to assess prevalence and comprehensive approaches to address its diverse factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"34 178","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12542836/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145344408","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of air pollution on COVID-19 severity: a systematic review of underlying biological mechanisms. 空气污染对COVID-19严重程度的影响:对潜在生物学机制的系统综述
IF 10.4 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-10-08 Print Date: 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0070-2025
Laura Houweling, Iris Rots, Lizan D Bloemsma, Robert van Vorstenbosch, Simone Del Motto, Roel C H Vermeulen, Anke H Maitland-Van der Zee, Korneliusz Golebski, George S Downward

Background: Our recent systematic review highlighted key associations between ambient air pollution (AAP) exposure and COVID-19 severity. This systematic review aims to summarise toxicological studies on the biological mechanisms underlying these associations.

Methods: On 17 July 2025, PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for in vitro, in vivo and in silico studies that examined the biological mechanisms of AAP exposure on COVID-19 health outcomes. Two independent reviewers engaged in the selection and data extraction process. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed with the Toxicological Data Reliability Assessment Tool. The Integrated Network and Dynamical Reasoning Assembler (INDRA) was used to provide visual biomechanistic summaries of the included studies by creating knowledge graphs of the described mechanisms.

Results: A total of 18 studies were included in this review. Findings consistently indicated that AAP exposure can worsen COVID-19 severity through two key mechanisms 1) increased expression of viral entry factors (e.g. angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 and transmembrane serine protease 2), facilitating infection, and 2) immune dysregulation, resulting in increased inflammation and oxidative stress. These key mechanisms were also identified in the INDRA networks. While studies commonly focused on particulate matter (n=15), similar effects were seen with ultrafine particles and ozone.

Conclusion: These findings highlight the impact of AAP exposure on COVID-19 health outcomes on the molecular level. The findings of this review illustrate the urgent need for air quality improvements to help shape public health strategies to reduce and prevent future health impacts caused by AAP exposure.

背景:我们最近的系统综述强调了环境空气污染(AAP)暴露与COVID-19严重程度之间的关键关联。本系统综述的目的是总结毒理学研究的生物学机制背后的这些关联。方法:于2025年7月17日,检索PubMed、Embase、Scopus和Web of Science的体外、体内和计算机研究,研究AAP暴露对COVID-19健康结局的生物学机制。两名独立的审稿人参与了选择和数据提取过程。采用毒理学数据可靠性评估工具评估纳入研究的方法学质量。使用集成网络和动态推理汇编器(INDRA)通过创建描述机制的知识图,为所纳入的研究提供可视化的生物力学摘要。结果:本综述共纳入18项研究。研究结果一致表明,AAP暴露可通过两个关键机制加重COVID-19严重程度:1)增加病毒进入因子(如血管紧张素转换酶2和跨膜丝氨酸蛋白酶2)的表达,促进感染;2)免疫失调,导致炎症和氧化应激增加。在INDRA网络中也确定了这些关键机制。虽然研究通常集中在颗粒物(n=15)上,但在超细颗粒和臭氧上也看到了类似的效果。结论:这些发现在分子水平上突出了AAP暴露对COVID-19健康结局的影响。本综述的发现表明,迫切需要改善空气质量,以帮助制定公共卫生战略,以减少和预防未来由AAP暴露引起的健康影响。
{"title":"Impact of air pollution on COVID-19 severity: a systematic review of underlying biological mechanisms.","authors":"Laura Houweling, Iris Rots, Lizan D Bloemsma, Robert van Vorstenbosch, Simone Del Motto, Roel C H Vermeulen, Anke H Maitland-Van der Zee, Korneliusz Golebski, George S Downward","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0070-2025","DOIUrl":"10.1183/16000617.0070-2025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our recent systematic review highlighted key associations between ambient air pollution (AAP) exposure and COVID-19 severity. This systematic review aims to summarise toxicological studies on the biological mechanisms underlying these associations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>On 17 July 2025, PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for <i>in vitro</i>, <i>in vivo</i> and <i>in silico</i> studies that examined the biological mechanisms of AAP exposure on COVID-19 health outcomes. Two independent reviewers engaged in the selection and data extraction process. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed with the Toxicological Data Reliability Assessment Tool. The Integrated Network and Dynamical Reasoning Assembler (INDRA) was used to provide visual biomechanistic summaries of the included studies by creating knowledge graphs of the described mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 18 studies were included in this review. Findings consistently indicated that AAP exposure can worsen COVID-19 severity through two key mechanisms 1) increased expression of viral entry factors (<i>e.g.</i> angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 and transmembrane serine protease 2), facilitating infection, and 2) immune dysregulation, resulting in increased inflammation and oxidative stress. These key mechanisms were also identified in the INDRA networks. While studies commonly focused on particulate matter (n=15), similar effects were seen with ultrafine particles and ozone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings highlight the impact of AAP exposure on COVID-19 health outcomes on the molecular level. The findings of this review illustrate the urgent need for air quality improvements to help shape public health strategies to reduce and prevent future health impacts caused by AAP exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"34 178","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12505150/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145250197","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ultrasound innovations in diaphragm assessment: an integrative review of expanding clinical applications. 超声在隔膜评估中的创新:扩大临床应用的综合综述。
IF 10.4 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-10-08 Print Date: 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0089-2025
Ivo Neto Silva, Claire Bennett, José Alberto Duarte, Karim Bendjelid

Introduction: Diaphragm dysfunction is prevalent across various patient populations, requiring precise structural and functional assessment. Ultrasound, being bedside-accessible and radiation-free, has gained relevance for evaluating the diaphragm and other respiratory muscle. Recent advancements have introduced novel techniques that have expanding its assessment scope. This review aims to identify emerging ultrasound methods for quantitative diaphragm assessment in adults, emphasising reliability and clinical relevance.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using keywords related to the diaphragm, ultrasound techniques and innovation. We included original studies on adult participants using innovative ultrasound methods extending beyond conventional assessments. Studies lacking original data, case reports, animal studies and studies on automated analysis techniques were excluded. Screening and data extraction followed a structured process, with one researcher extracting data and a second verifying accuracy. Results were categorised by reliability and by physiological and clinical outcomes.

Results: Of 1411 records screened, 288 full-text articles were reviewed, and 36 studies met inclusion criteria, with four additional studies identified via reference analysis. These studies, published between 2013 and 2024, explored seven innovative techniques: the area method, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, echogenicity/echodensity, excursion of the zone of apposition, shear wave/strain elastography, speckle tracking and pulsed-wave tissue Doppler imaging. Studies focused on both healthy subjects and critically ill, surgical and COPD patients.

Conclusions: Recent ultrasound advancements enhance diaphragm assessment by evaluating muscle quality, functional mechanical properties and blood flow. These innovative methods also provide alternatives when conventional approaches are limited. Further research is essential to refine protocols, validate clinical applications and standardise assessments for broader implementation.

简介:横膈膜功能障碍在不同的患者群体中普遍存在,需要精确的结构和功能评估。超声由于床边可及且无辐射,已被用于评估横膈膜和其他呼吸肌。最近的进步引入了新的技术,扩大了其评估范围。这篇综述的目的是确定新兴的超声方法定量评估成人隔膜,强调可靠性和临床相关性。方法:采用隔膜、超声技术、创新等相关关键词进行系统文献检索。我们纳入了使用超越传统评估的创新超声方法对成人参与者进行的原始研究。缺乏原始数据、病例报告、动物研究和自动分析技术的研究被排除在外。筛选和数据提取遵循一个结构化的过程,由一名研究人员提取数据,另一名研究人员验证准确性。结果按可靠性、生理和临床结果进行分类。结果:在筛选的1411条记录中,288篇全文文章被审查,36项研究符合纳入标准,另外4项研究通过参考分析确定。这些研究发表于2013年至2024年之间,探索了七种创新技术:面积法、超声增强、回声增强/回声密度、邻近区偏移、剪切波/应变弹性成像、斑点跟踪和脉冲波组织多普勒成像。研究集中在健康受试者和危重病人、手术和COPD患者。结论:近年来超声技术的进步通过对肌肉质量、功能力学性能和血流的评估来加强对隔膜的评估。当传统方法受到限制时,这些创新方法也提供了替代方案。进一步的研究对于完善方案、验证临床应用和标准化评估以进行更广泛的实施至关重要。
{"title":"Ultrasound innovations in diaphragm assessment: an integrative review of expanding clinical applications.","authors":"Ivo Neto Silva, Claire Bennett, José Alberto Duarte, Karim Bendjelid","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0089-2025","DOIUrl":"10.1183/16000617.0089-2025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diaphragm dysfunction is prevalent across various patient populations, requiring precise structural and functional assessment. Ultrasound, being bedside-accessible and radiation-free, has gained relevance for evaluating the diaphragm and other respiratory muscle. Recent advancements have introduced novel techniques that have expanding its assessment scope. This review aims to identify emerging ultrasound methods for quantitative diaphragm assessment in adults, emphasising reliability and clinical relevance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted using keywords related to the diaphragm, ultrasound techniques and innovation. We included original studies on adult participants using innovative ultrasound methods extending beyond conventional assessments. Studies lacking original data, case reports, animal studies and studies on automated analysis techniques were excluded. Screening and data extraction followed a structured process, with one researcher extracting data and a second verifying accuracy. Results were categorised by reliability and by physiological and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1411 records screened, 288 full-text articles were reviewed, and 36 studies met inclusion criteria, with four additional studies identified <i>via</i> reference analysis. These studies, published between 2013 and 2024, explored seven innovative techniques: the area method, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, echogenicity/echodensity, excursion of the zone of apposition, shear wave/strain elastography, speckle tracking and pulsed-wave tissue Doppler imaging. Studies focused on both healthy subjects and critically ill, surgical and COPD patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recent ultrasound advancements enhance diaphragm assessment by evaluating muscle quality, functional mechanical properties and blood flow. These innovative methods also provide alternatives when conventional approaches are limited. Further research is essential to refine protocols, validate clinical applications and standardise assessments for broader implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"34 178","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12505151/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145250226","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Factors driving outcome variability in aspiration and community-acquired pneumonia: a meta-analysis. 导致吸入性和社区获得性肺炎结果变异性的因素:一项荟萃分析。
IF 10.4 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-10-08 Print Date: 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0037-2025
Jordi Almirall, Ramón Boixeda, Mari C de la Torre, Marcial Cariqueo, Antoni Torres

Background: Aspiration community-acquired pneumonia (ACAP) is common among older adults and is associated with worse outcomes than nonaspiration community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Understanding these differences is essential for improving patient care.

Objectives: To determine the prevalence of ACAP among pneumonia patients and compare clinical outcomes, including hospital length of stay, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and mortality rates, between patients with ACAP and those with CAP.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following MOOSE (Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Literature searches in PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar from January 1995 to January 2024 identified studies involving adults diagnosed with CAP or ACAP. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. Random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression analyses were conducted to identify sources of heterogeneity.

Results: 49 samples from 44 studies were included, encompassing 1 277 615 older adults (mean age 80.2 years). The pooled prevalence of ACAP was 25% (95% CI 19-31) and higher in studies with a mean age of 70 years or older at 32% (95% CI 25-39). Compared to CAP patients, those with ACAP had significantly longer hospital stays (mean difference 4.92 days, 95% CI 4.71-5.14), increased ICU admissions (risk ratio 2.33, 95% CI 1.77-3.07), higher in-hospital mortality (risk ratio 2.14, 95% CI 1.73-2.65), higher 30-day mortality (risk ratio 2.56, 95% CI 2.12-3.1), higher 1-year mortality (risk ratio 1.96, 95% CI 1.44-2.66) and greater recurrence rates (risk ratio 1.75, 95% CI 1.44-2.66). Meta-regression identified publication year, patient age, study design, nursing home residency and compliance with therapeutic guidelines as significant moderators explaining heterogeneity.

Conclusions: Patients with ACAP experience significantly worse clinical outcomes than those with CAP. These findings highlight the importance of early identification and management of aspiration risks, adherence to therapeutic guidelines and the need for standardised diagnostic criteria to improve outcomes in this vulnerable population.

背景:吸入性社区获得性肺炎(ACAP)在老年人中很常见,其预后比非吸入性社区获得性肺炎(CAP)更差。了解这些差异对于改善患者护理至关重要。目的:确定ACAP在肺炎患者中的患病率,并比较ACAP患者和cap患者的临床结果,包括住院时间、重症监护病房(ICU)入院率和死亡率。方法:根据MOOSE(流行病学观察性研究荟萃分析)和PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。1995年1月至2024年1月在PubMed、Embase和谷歌Scholar中检索文献,确定了涉及诊断为CAP或ACAP的成人的研究。数据提取和质量评估由两名审稿人独立完成。进行随机效应荟萃分析和荟萃回归分析以确定异质性的来源。结果:纳入44项研究的49个样本,包括1 277 615名老年人(平均年龄80.2岁)。ACAP的总患病率为25% (95% CI 19-31),在平均年龄为70岁或以上的研究中,ACAP的总患病率为32% (95% CI 25-39)。与CAP患者相比,ACAP患者的住院时间明显延长(平均差4.92天,95% CI 4.71-5.14), ICU入院率增加(风险比2.33,95% CI 1.77-3.07),住院死亡率更高(风险比2.14,95% CI 1.73-2.65), 30天死亡率更高(风险比2.56,95% CI 2.12-3.1), 1年死亡率更高(风险比1.96,95% CI 1.44-2.66),复发率更高(风险比1.75,95% CI 1.44-2.66)。meta回归发现发表年份、患者年龄、研究设计、养老院居住和治疗指南依从性是解释异质性的重要调节因素。结论:ACAP患者的临床结果明显比CAP患者差。这些发现强调了早期识别和管理误吸风险的重要性,遵守治疗指南,以及需要标准化的诊断标准来改善这一弱势人群的预后。
{"title":"Factors driving outcome variability in aspiration and community-acquired pneumonia: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Jordi Almirall, Ramón Boixeda, Mari C de la Torre, Marcial Cariqueo, Antoni Torres","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0037-2025","DOIUrl":"10.1183/16000617.0037-2025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aspiration community-acquired pneumonia (ACAP) is common among older adults and is associated with worse outcomes than nonaspiration community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Understanding these differences is essential for improving patient care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the prevalence of ACAP among pneumonia patients and compare clinical outcomes, including hospital length of stay, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and mortality rates, between patients with ACAP and those with CAP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following MOOSE (Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Literature searches in PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar from January 1995 to January 2024 identified studies involving adults diagnosed with CAP or ACAP. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. Random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression analyses were conducted to identify sources of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>49 samples from 44 studies were included, encompassing 1 277 615 older adults (mean age 80.2 years). The pooled prevalence of ACAP was 25% (95% CI 19-31) and higher in studies with a mean age of 70 years or older at 32% (95% CI 25-39). Compared to CAP patients, those with ACAP had significantly longer hospital stays (mean difference 4.92 days, 95% CI 4.71-5.14), increased ICU admissions (risk ratio 2.33, 95% CI 1.77-3.07), higher in-hospital mortality (risk ratio 2.14, 95% CI 1.73-2.65), higher 30-day mortality (risk ratio 2.56, 95% CI 2.12-3.1), higher 1-year mortality (risk ratio 1.96, 95% CI 1.44-2.66) and greater recurrence rates (risk ratio 1.75, 95% CI 1.44-2.66). Meta-regression identified publication year, patient age, study design, nursing home residency and compliance with therapeutic guidelines as significant moderators explaining heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with ACAP experience significantly worse clinical outcomes than those with CAP. These findings highlight the importance of early identification and management of aspiration risks, adherence to therapeutic guidelines and the need for standardised diagnostic criteria to improve outcomes in this vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"34 178","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12505152/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145250104","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
European Respiratory Review
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1