Pub Date : 2024-10-09Print Date: 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0114-2024
Menne R van Boven, Gerard J Hutten, Rianne Richardson, Marsh Königs, Aleid G Leemhuis, Wes Onland, Suzanne W J Terheggen-Lagro, Jaap Oosterlaan, Anton H van Kaam
Background: Immature lung development and respiratory morbidity place preterm-born children at high risk of long-term pulmonary sequelae. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to quantify lung function in preterm-born children and identify risk factors for a compromised lung function.
Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus for relevant studies published on preterm cohorts born since 1990. Studies comparing forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) in preterm-born children aged ≥5 years to term-born controls or normative data were included. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies. Standardised mean differences in FEV1 and secondary spirometry outcomes per study were pooled using meta-analysis. The impact of different demographic and neonatal variables on studies' FEV1 effect sizes was investigated by meta-regression analyses. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations framework.
Results: We identified 42 studies with unique cohorts including 4743 preterm children and 9843 controls. Median gestational age in the studies was 28.0 weeks and age at assessment ranged from 6.7 to 16.7 years. Preterm children had lower FEV1 than controls (-0.58 sd, 95% CI -0.69- -0.47 sd, p<0.001) resulting in a relative risk of 2.9 (95% CI 2.4-3.4) for abnormal outcome, with high certainty of evidence. FEV1 was significantly associated with gestational age, birthweight, bronchopulmonary dysplasia and invasive mechanical ventilation in univariate meta-regression analyses (R2=36-96%).
Conclusion: This systematic review shows robust evidence of impaired lung function in preterm-born children with a high certainty of evidence.
{"title":"Impaired lung function and associated risk factors in children born prematurely: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Menne R van Boven, Gerard J Hutten, Rianne Richardson, Marsh Königs, Aleid G Leemhuis, Wes Onland, Suzanne W J Terheggen-Lagro, Jaap Oosterlaan, Anton H van Kaam","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0114-2024","DOIUrl":"10.1183/16000617.0114-2024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immature lung development and respiratory morbidity place preterm-born children at high risk of long-term pulmonary sequelae. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to quantify lung function in preterm-born children and identify risk factors for a compromised lung function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus for relevant studies published on preterm cohorts born since 1990. Studies comparing forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV<sub>1</sub>) in preterm-born children aged ≥5 years to term-born controls or normative data were included. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies. Standardised mean differences in FEV<sub>1</sub> and secondary spirometry outcomes per study were pooled using meta-analysis. The impact of different demographic and neonatal variables on studies' FEV<sub>1</sub> effect sizes was investigated by meta-regression analyses. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 42 studies with unique cohorts including 4743 preterm children and 9843 controls. Median gestational age in the studies was 28.0 weeks and age at assessment ranged from 6.7 to 16.7 years. Preterm children had lower FEV<sub>1</sub> than controls (-0.58 sd, 95% CI -0.69- -0.47 sd, p<0.001) resulting in a relative risk of 2.9 (95% CI 2.4-3.4) for abnormal outcome, with high certainty of evidence. FEV<sub>1</sub> was significantly associated with gestational age, birthweight, bronchopulmonary dysplasia and invasive mechanical ventilation in univariate meta-regression analyses (R<sup>2</sup>=36-96%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review shows robust evidence of impaired lung function in preterm-born children with a high certainty of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"33 174","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11462300/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142389204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-09Print Date: 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0095-2024
Sara Manti, Paola Magri, Annalisa De Silvestri, Maria De Filippo, Martina Votto, Gian Luigi Marseglia, Amelia Licari
Background: Severe asthma significantly impacts a minority of children with asthma, leading to frequent symptoms, hospitalisations and potential long-term health consequences. However, accurate global data on severe asthma epidemiology is lacking. This study aims to address this gap, providing data on severe asthma epidemiology, regional differences and associated comorbidities.
Methods: We conducted a rigorous systematic review and meta-analysis following a registered protocol (PROSPERO CRD42023472845). We searched PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science for cohort or cross-sectional studies published since 2003, evaluating severe asthma incidence and prevalence in children. Study quality and risk of bias were assessed using STROBE guidelines.
Results: Nine studies investigating European children with asthma (aged 5-18 years) were included in the meta-analysis. No significant publication bias was found. The overall severe asthma prevalence in children with asthma was 3% (95% CI 1-6; I2=99.9%; p<0.001), with no significant difference between males and females. Prevalence estimates varied significantly depending on the diagnostic criteria used (Global Initiative for Asthma: 6%; European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society: 1%; other: 3%). Because none of the examined studies were prospectively designed, incidence rates could not be determined.
Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis provide the first robust assessment of severe asthma prevalence among European children. Our findings underscore the need for comprehensive research to address knowledge gaps in severe asthma, including determining incidence rates, standardising definitions, investigating regional differences and evaluating comorbidities and treatment strategies.
背景:重症哮喘对少数哮喘儿童造成严重影响,导致频繁出现症状、住院治疗和潜在的长期健康后果。然而,全球缺乏有关重症哮喘流行病学的准确数据。本研究旨在填补这一空白,提供有关重症哮喘流行病学、地区差异及相关合并症的数据:我们按照注册协议(PROSPERO CRD42023472845)进行了严格的系统综述和荟萃分析。我们在 PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 上检索了自 2003 年以来发表的队列研究或横断面研究,这些研究评估了儿童重症哮喘的发病率和流行率。研究质量和偏倚风险根据 STROBE 指南进行评估:荟萃分析纳入了九项调查欧洲哮喘儿童(5-18 岁)的研究。未发现明显的出版偏倚。哮喘儿童中严重哮喘的总体发病率为 3% (95% CI 1-6; I2=99.9%; pConclusions:本系统综述和荟萃分析首次对欧洲儿童重症哮喘患病率进行了可靠评估。我们的研究结果表明,有必要开展综合研究,以弥补重症哮喘方面的知识差距,包括确定发病率、统一定义、调查地区差异以及评估合并症和治疗策略。
{"title":"Epidemiology of severe asthma in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Sara Manti, Paola Magri, Annalisa De Silvestri, Maria De Filippo, Martina Votto, Gian Luigi Marseglia, Amelia Licari","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0095-2024","DOIUrl":"10.1183/16000617.0095-2024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Severe asthma significantly impacts a minority of children with asthma, leading to frequent symptoms, hospitalisations and potential long-term health consequences. However, accurate global data on severe asthma epidemiology is lacking. This study aims to address this gap, providing data on severe asthma epidemiology, regional differences and associated comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a rigorous systematic review and meta-analysis following a registered protocol (PROSPERO CRD42023472845). We searched PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science for cohort or cross-sectional studies published since 2003, evaluating severe asthma incidence and prevalence in children. Study quality and risk of bias were assessed using STROBE guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies investigating European children with asthma (aged 5-18 years) were included in the meta-analysis. No significant publication bias was found. The overall severe asthma prevalence in children with asthma was 3% (95% CI 1-6; I<sup>2</sup>=99.9%; p<0.001), with no significant difference between males and females. Prevalence estimates varied significantly depending on the diagnostic criteria used (Global Initiative for Asthma: 6%; European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society: 1%; other: 3%). Because none of the examined studies were prospectively designed, incidence rates could not be determined.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis provide the first robust assessment of severe asthma prevalence among European children. Our findings underscore the need for comprehensive research to address knowledge gaps in severe asthma, including determining incidence rates, standardising definitions, investigating regional differences and evaluating comorbidities and treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"33 174","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11462310/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142389203","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Several genetic variants are associated with the risk of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). These have not been systematically reviewed.
Methods: We searched the PubMed, Embase and GWAS Catalog databases for studies indexed between inception and 15 January 2024 describing genetic variants associated with IPF susceptibility. We included studies describing common associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). We excluded studies describing rare variants, non-SNP variants and those without an allelic model analysis. We recorded study type, participant characteristics, genotyping methods, IPF diagnostic criteria, the SNPs and the respective genes, odds ratios, and other details. We also searched databases for functions of the identified genes.
Results: The primary search retrieved 2697 publications; we included 42 studies. There were nine genome-wide association/linkage studies, while 27 were candidate gene studies. The studies included 22-11 160 IPF subjects. 88 SNPs in 58 genes or loci were found associated with IPF susceptibility. MUC5B rs35705950 was the most studied SNP. Most (n=51) SNPs were in the intronic or intergenic regions; only 11 were coding sequence variants. The SNPs had odds ratios ranging from 0.27 to 7.82 for an association with IPF. Only 22 SNPs had moderate-large effects (OR >1.5 or <0.67). Only 49.1% of the associated genes have a known functional role in IPF; the role of G protein-related signalling and transcriptional regulation (zinc-finger proteins) remain unexplored.
Conclusion: Several common SNPs in over 50 genes have been found associated with IPF susceptibility. These variants may inform gene panels for future studies (PROSPERO CRD42023408912).
{"title":"Common single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review.","authors":"Sahajal Dhooria, Riya Sharma, Amanjit Bal, Inderpaul Singh Sehgal, Dharambir Kashyap, Valliappan Muthu, Kuruswamy Thurai Prasad, Ritesh Agarwal, Ashutosh Nath Aggarwal","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0018-2024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0018-2024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several genetic variants are associated with the risk of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). These have not been systematically reviewed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched the PubMed, Embase and GWAS Catalog databases for studies indexed between inception and 15 January 2024 describing genetic variants associated with IPF susceptibility. We included studies describing common associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). We excluded studies describing rare variants, non-SNP variants and those without an allelic model analysis. We recorded study type, participant characteristics, genotyping methods, IPF diagnostic criteria, the SNPs and the respective genes, odds ratios, and other details. We also searched databases for functions of the identified genes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary search retrieved 2697 publications; we included 42 studies. There were nine genome-wide association/linkage studies, while 27 were candidate gene studies. The studies included 22-11 160 IPF subjects. 88 SNPs in 58 genes or loci were found associated with IPF susceptibility. <i>MUC5B</i> rs35705950 was the most studied SNP. Most (n=51) SNPs were in the intronic or intergenic regions; only 11 were coding sequence variants. The SNPs had odds ratios ranging from 0.27 to 7.82 for an association with IPF. Only 22 SNPs had moderate-large effects (OR >1.5 or <0.67). Only 49.1% of the associated genes have a known functional role in IPF; the role of G protein-related signalling and transcriptional regulation (zinc-finger proteins) remain unexplored.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Several common SNPs in over 50 genes have been found associated with IPF susceptibility. These variants may inform gene panels for future studies (PROSPERO CRD42023408912).</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"33 173","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11423133/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142344364","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-25Print Date: 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0045-2024
Isabelle Fajac, Pierre-Régis Burgel, Clémence Martin
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a genetic disease caused by variants in the gene encoding for the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein, a chloride and bicarbonate channel. CFTR dysfunction results in a multiorgan disease with the main clinical features being exocrine pancreatic insufficiency and diffuse bronchiectasis with chronic airway infection leading to respiratory failure and premature death. Over the past decades, major progress has been made by implementing multidisciplinary care, including nutritional support, airway clearance techniques and antibiotics in specialised CF centres. The past decade has further seen the progressive development of oral medications, called CFTR modulators, for which around 80% of people with CF are genetically eligible in Europe. CFTR modulators partially restore ion transport and lead to a rapid and major improvement in clinical manifestations and lung function, presumably resulting in longer survival. CFTR modulators have been game-changing in the care of people with CF. However, many questions remain unanswered, such as the long-term effects of CFTR modulators, especially when treatment is started very early in life, or the new CF-related disease emerging due to CFTR modulators. Moreover, severe complications of CF, such as diabetes or cirrhosis, are not reversed on CFTR modulators and around 20% of people with CF bear CFTR variants leading to a CFTR protein that is unresponsive to CFTR modulators. Challenges also arise in adapting CF care to a changing disease. In this review article, we highlight the new questions and challenges emerging from this revolution in CF care.
{"title":"New drugs, new challenges in cystic fibrosis care.","authors":"Isabelle Fajac, Pierre-Régis Burgel, Clémence Martin","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0045-2024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0045-2024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a genetic disease caused by variants in the gene encoding for the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein, a chloride and bicarbonate channel. CFTR dysfunction results in a multiorgan disease with the main clinical features being exocrine pancreatic insufficiency and diffuse bronchiectasis with chronic airway infection leading to respiratory failure and premature death. Over the past decades, major progress has been made by implementing multidisciplinary care, including nutritional support, airway clearance techniques and antibiotics in specialised CF centres. The past decade has further seen the progressive development of oral medications, called CFTR modulators, for which around 80% of people with CF are genetically eligible in Europe. CFTR modulators partially restore ion transport and lead to a rapid and major improvement in clinical manifestations and lung function, presumably resulting in longer survival. CFTR modulators have been game-changing in the care of people with CF. However, many questions remain unanswered, such as the long-term effects of CFTR modulators, especially when treatment is started very early in life, or the new CF-related disease emerging due to CFTR modulators. Moreover, severe complications of CF, such as diabetes or cirrhosis, are not reversed on CFTR modulators and around 20% of people with CF bear <i>CFTR</i> variants leading to a CFTR protein that is unresponsive to CFTR modulators. Challenges also arise in adapting CF care to a changing disease. In this review article, we highlight the new questions and challenges emerging from this revolution in CF care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"33 173","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11423132/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142336359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-25Print Date: 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0096-2024
Hayoung Choi, Jin-Fu Xu, Sanjay H Chotirmall, James D Chalmers, Lucy C Morgan, Raja Dhar
Recent bronchiectasis studies from large-scale multinational, multicentre registries have demonstrated that the characteristics of the disease vary according to geographic region. However, most perspectives on bronchiectasis are dominated by data from Western countries. This review intends to provide an Asian perspective on the disease, focusing on the established registries in India, Korea and China. Asian patients with bronchiectasis are less likely to show female predominance and experience exacerbations, are more likely to be younger, have milder disease, and have fewer options for guideline-recommended treatment than those living in other global regions. Furthermore, Asian bronchiectasis patients demonstrate different comorbidities, microbiological profiles and unique endophenotypes, including post-tuberculosis and dry bronchiectasis. Notably, each Asian region reveals further geographic variations and inter-patient differences. Future studies are warranted to better characterise Asian patients with bronchiectasis.
{"title":"Bronchiectasis in Asia: a review of current status and challenges.","authors":"Hayoung Choi, Jin-Fu Xu, Sanjay H Chotirmall, James D Chalmers, Lucy C Morgan, Raja Dhar","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0096-2024","DOIUrl":"10.1183/16000617.0096-2024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent bronchiectasis studies from large-scale multinational, multicentre registries have demonstrated that the characteristics of the disease vary according to geographic region. However, most perspectives on bronchiectasis are dominated by data from Western countries. This review intends to provide an Asian perspective on the disease, focusing on the established registries in India, Korea and China. Asian patients with bronchiectasis are less likely to show female predominance and experience exacerbations, are more likely to be younger, have milder disease, and have fewer options for guideline-recommended treatment than those living in other global regions. Furthermore, Asian bronchiectasis patients demonstrate different comorbidities, microbiological profiles and unique endophenotypes, including post-tuberculosis and dry bronchiectasis. Notably, each Asian region reveals further geographic variations and inter-patient differences. Future studies are warranted to better characterise Asian patients with bronchiectasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"33 173","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11423131/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142344363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-25Print Date: 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0251-2023
Ciara Ottewill, Margaret Gleeson, Patrick Kerr, Elaine Mac Hale, Richard W Costello
Digital medicine is already well established in respiratory medicine through remote monitoring digital devices which are used in the day-to-day care of patients with asthma, COPD and sleep disorders. Image recognition software, deployed in thoracic radiology for many applications including lung cancer screening, is another application of digital medicine. Used as clinical decision support, this software will soon become part of day-to-day practice once concerns regarding generalisability have been addressed. Embodied in the electronic health record, digital medicine also plays a substantial role in the day-to-day clinical practice of respiratory medicine. Given the considerable work the electronic health record demands from clinicians, the next tangible impact of digital medicine may be artificial intelligence that aids administration, makes record keeping easier and facilitates better digital communication with patients. Future promises of digital medicine are based on their potential to analyse and characterise the large amounts of digital clinical data that are collected in routine care. Offering the potential to predict outcomes and personalise therapy, there is much to be excited by in this new epoch of innovation. However, these digital tools are by no means a silver bullet. It remains uncertain whether, let alone when, the promises of better models of personalisation and prediction will translate into clinically meaningful and cost-effective products for clinicians.
{"title":"Digital health delivery in respiratory medicine: adjunct, replacement or cause for division?","authors":"Ciara Ottewill, Margaret Gleeson, Patrick Kerr, Elaine Mac Hale, Richard W Costello","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0251-2023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0251-2023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Digital medicine is already well established in respiratory medicine through remote monitoring digital devices which are used in the day-to-day care of patients with asthma, COPD and sleep disorders. Image recognition software, deployed in thoracic radiology for many applications including lung cancer screening, is another application of digital medicine. Used as clinical decision support, this software will soon become part of day-to-day practice once concerns regarding generalisability have been addressed. Embodied in the electronic health record, digital medicine also plays a substantial role in the day-to-day clinical practice of respiratory medicine. Given the considerable work the electronic health record demands from clinicians, the next tangible impact of digital medicine may be artificial intelligence that aids administration, makes record keeping easier and facilitates better digital communication with patients. Future promises of digital medicine are based on their potential to analyse and characterise the large amounts of digital clinical data that are collected in routine care. Offering the potential to predict outcomes and personalise therapy, there is much to be excited by in this new epoch of innovation. However, these digital tools are by no means a silver bullet. It remains uncertain whether, let alone when, the promises of better models of personalisation and prediction will translate into clinically meaningful and cost-effective products for clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"33 173","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11423130/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142344365","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-18DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0046-2024
Prasanth Balasubramanian, David Abia-Trujillo, Alana Barrios-Ruiz, Ana Garza-Salas, Anoop Koratala, Nikitha C. Chandra, Alejandra Yu Lee-Mateus, Gonzalo Labarca, Sebastian Fernandez-Bussy