Pub Date : 2024-10-09Print Date: 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0092-2024
Alexandra Arvanitaki, Gerhard Paul Diller, Michael A Gatzoulis, Colm McCabe, Laura C Price, S John Wort
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is highly prevalent in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Widely available noninvasive screening tools are warranted to identify patients at risk for PH, especially severe PH, that could be managed at expert centres. This review summarises current evidence on noninvasive diagnostic modalities and prediction models for the timely detection of PH in patients with ILD. It critically evaluates these approaches and discusses future perspectives in the field. A comprehensive literature search was carried out in PubMed and Scopus, identifying 39 articles that fulfilled inclusion criteria. There is currently no single noninvasive test capable of accurately detecting and diagnosing PH in ILD patients. Estimated right ventricular pressure (RVSP) on Doppler echocardiography remains the single most predictive factor of PH, with other indirect echocardiographic markers increasing its diagnostic accuracy. However, RVSP can be difficult to estimate in patients due to suboptimal views from extensive lung disease. The majority of existing composite scores, including variables obtained from chest computed tomography, pulmonary function tests and cardiopulmonary exercise tests, were derived from retrospective studies, whilst lacking validation in external cohorts. Only two available scores, one based on a stepwise echocardiographic approach and the other on functional parameters, predicted the presence of PH with sufficient accuracy and used a validation cohort. Although several methodological limitations prohibit their generalisability, their use may help physicians to detect PH earlier. Further research on the potential of artificial intelligence may guide a more tailored approach, for timely PH diagnosis.
{"title":"Noninvasive diagnostic modalities and prediction models for detecting pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease: a narrative review.","authors":"Alexandra Arvanitaki, Gerhard Paul Diller, Michael A Gatzoulis, Colm McCabe, Laura C Price, S John Wort","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0092-2024","DOIUrl":"10.1183/16000617.0092-2024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is highly prevalent in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Widely available noninvasive screening tools are warranted to identify patients at risk for PH, especially severe PH, that could be managed at expert centres. This review summarises current evidence on noninvasive diagnostic modalities and prediction models for the timely detection of PH in patients with ILD. It critically evaluates these approaches and discusses future perspectives in the field. A comprehensive literature search was carried out in PubMed and Scopus, identifying 39 articles that fulfilled inclusion criteria. There is currently no single noninvasive test capable of accurately detecting and diagnosing PH in ILD patients. Estimated right ventricular pressure (RVSP) on Doppler echocardiography remains the single most predictive factor of PH, with other indirect echocardiographic markers increasing its diagnostic accuracy. However, RVSP can be difficult to estimate in patients due to suboptimal views from extensive lung disease. The majority of existing composite scores, including variables obtained from chest computed tomography, pulmonary function tests and cardiopulmonary exercise tests, were derived from retrospective studies, whilst lacking validation in external cohorts. Only two available scores, one based on a stepwise echocardiographic approach and the other on functional parameters, predicted the presence of PH with sufficient accuracy and used a validation cohort. Although several methodological limitations prohibit their generalisability, their use may help physicians to detect PH earlier. Further research on the potential of artificial intelligence may guide a more tailored approach, for timely PH diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"33 174","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11462299/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142389205","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-09Print Date: 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0027-2024
Angela T Burge, Adelle M Gadowski, Lorena Romero, Guido Vagheggini, Anna Spathis, Natasha E Smallwood, Magnus Ekström, Anne E Holland
Background: In adults with serious respiratory illness, fatigue is prevalent and under-recognised, with few treatment options. The aim of this review was to assess the impact of graded exercise therapy (GET) on fatigue in adults with serious respiratory illness.
Methods: Electronic databases were searched to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) testing GET (involving incremental increases in exercise from an established baseline) in adults with serious respiratory illness. The primary outcome was fatigue and secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and adverse events. Two authors independently screened for inclusion, evaluated risk of bias and extracted data.
Results: 76 RCTs were included with 3309 participants, most with a diagnosis of COPD or asthma. Reductions in fatigue measured by the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire fatigue domain score were demonstrated following GET consisting of aerobic with/without resistance training (mean difference (MD) 0.53 points, 95% CI 0.41-0.65, 11 RCTs, 624 participants) and GET using resistance training alone (MD 0.58 points, 95% CI 0.21-0.96, two RCTs, 82 participants) compared with usual care. Although the mean effect exceeded the minimal important difference, the lower end of the confidence intervals did not always exceed this threshold so the clinical significance could not be confirmed. GET consistently improved HRQoL in people with a range of chronic respiratory diseases on multiple HRQoL measures. No serious adverse events related to GET were reported.
Conclusion: GET may improve fatigue alongside consistent improvements in HRQoL in people with serious respiratory illness. These findings support the use of GET in the care of people with serious respiratory illness.
{"title":"The effect of graded exercise therapy on fatigue in people with serious respiratory illness: a systematic review.","authors":"Angela T Burge, Adelle M Gadowski, Lorena Romero, Guido Vagheggini, Anna Spathis, Natasha E Smallwood, Magnus Ekström, Anne E Holland","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0027-2024","DOIUrl":"10.1183/16000617.0027-2024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In adults with serious respiratory illness, fatigue is prevalent and under-recognised, with few treatment options. The aim of this review was to assess the impact of graded exercise therapy (GET) on fatigue in adults with serious respiratory illness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic databases were searched to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) testing GET (involving incremental increases in exercise from an established baseline) in adults with serious respiratory illness. The primary outcome was fatigue and secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and adverse events. Two authors independently screened for inclusion, evaluated risk of bias and extracted data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>76 RCTs were included with 3309 participants, most with a diagnosis of COPD or asthma. Reductions in fatigue measured by the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire fatigue domain score were demonstrated following GET consisting of aerobic with/without resistance training (mean difference (MD) 0.53 points, 95% CI 0.41-0.65, 11 RCTs, 624 participants) and GET using resistance training alone (MD 0.58 points, 95% CI 0.21-0.96, two RCTs, 82 participants) compared with usual care. Although the mean effect exceeded the minimal important difference, the lower end of the confidence intervals did not always exceed this threshold so the clinical significance could not be confirmed. GET consistently improved HRQoL in people with a range of chronic respiratory diseases on multiple HRQoL measures. No serious adverse events related to GET were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GET may improve fatigue alongside consistent improvements in HRQoL in people with serious respiratory illness. These findings support the use of GET in the care of people with serious respiratory illness.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"33 174","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11462302/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142389207","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-09Print Date: 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0091-2024
Mattia Nigro, Irena F Laska, Letizia Traversi, Edoardo Simonetta, Eva Polverino
Bronchiectasis is a chronic respiratory disease characterised by permanent enlargement of the airways associated with cough, sputum production and a history of pulmonary exacerbations. In the past few years, incidence and prevalence of bronchiectasis have increased worldwide, possibly due to advances in imaging techniques and disease awareness, leading to increased socioeconomic burden and healthcare costs. Consistently, a mortality increase in bronchiectasis patient cohorts has been demonstrated in certain areas of the globe, with mortality rates of 16-24.8% over 4-5 years of follow-up. However, heterogeneity in epidemiological data is consistent, as reported prevalence in the general population ranges from 52.3 to more than 1000 per 100 000. Methodological flaws in the designs of available studies are likely to underestimate the proportion of people suffering from this condition worldwide and comparisons between different areas of the globe might be unreliable due to different assessment methods or local implementation of the same method in different contexts. Differences in disease severity associated with diverse geographical distribution of aetiologies, comorbidities and microbiology might explain an additional quota of heterogeneity. Finally, limited access to care in certain geographical areas is associated with both underestimation of the disease and increased severity and mortality. The aim of this review is to provide a snapshot of available real-world epidemiological data describing incidence and prevalence of bronchiectasis in the general population. Furthermore, data on mortality, healthcare burden and high-risk populations are provided. Finally, an analysis of the geographical distribution of determinants contributing to differences in bronchiectasis epidemiology is offered.
{"title":"Epidemiology of bronchiectasis.","authors":"Mattia Nigro, Irena F Laska, Letizia Traversi, Edoardo Simonetta, Eva Polverino","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0091-2024","DOIUrl":"10.1183/16000617.0091-2024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bronchiectasis is a chronic respiratory disease characterised by permanent enlargement of the airways associated with cough, sputum production and a history of pulmonary exacerbations. In the past few years, incidence and prevalence of bronchiectasis have increased worldwide, possibly due to advances in imaging techniques and disease awareness, leading to increased socioeconomic burden and healthcare costs. Consistently, a mortality increase in bronchiectasis patient cohorts has been demonstrated in certain areas of the globe, with mortality rates of 16-24.8% over 4-5 years of follow-up. However, heterogeneity in epidemiological data is consistent, as reported prevalence in the general population ranges from 52.3 to more than 1000 per 100 000. Methodological flaws in the designs of available studies are likely to underestimate the proportion of people suffering from this condition worldwide and comparisons between different areas of the globe might be unreliable due to different assessment methods or local implementation of the same method in different contexts. Differences in disease severity associated with diverse geographical distribution of aetiologies, comorbidities and microbiology might explain an additional quota of heterogeneity. Finally, limited access to care in certain geographical areas is associated with both underestimation of the disease and increased severity and mortality. The aim of this review is to provide a snapshot of available real-world epidemiological data describing incidence and prevalence of bronchiectasis in the general population. Furthermore, data on mortality, healthcare burden and high-risk populations are provided. Finally, an analysis of the geographical distribution of determinants contributing to differences in bronchiectasis epidemiology is offered.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"33 174","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11462313/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142389202","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-09Print Date: 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0265-2023
Natasha E Smallwood, Amy Pascoe, Marlies Wijsenbeek, Anne-Marie Russell, Anne E Holland, Lorena Romero, Magnus Ekström
Background: People living with serious respiratory illness experience a high burden of distressing symptoms. Although opioids are prescribed for symptom management, they generate adverse events, and their benefits are unclear.
Methods: We examined the efficacy and safety of opioids for symptom management in people with serious respiratory illness. Embase, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to 11 July 2022. Reports of randomised controlled trials administering opioids to treat symptoms in people with serious respiratory illness were included. Key exclusion criteria included <80% of participants having a nonmalignant lung disease. Data were extracted regarding study characteristics, outcomes of breathlessness, cough, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and adverse events. Treatment effects were pooled using a generic inverse variance model with random effects. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool version 1.
Results: Out of 17 included trials, six were laboratory-based exercise trials (n=70), 10 were home studies measuring breathlessness in daily life (n=788) and one (n=18) was conducted in both settings. Overall certainty of evidence was "very low" to "low". Opioids reduced breathlessness intensity during laboratory exercise testing (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.37, 95% CI -0.67- -0.07), but not breathlessness measured in daily life (SMD -0.10, 95% CI -0.64-0.44). No effects on HRQoL (SMD -0.42, 95% CI -0.98-0.13) or cough (SMD -1.42, 95% CI -3.99-1.16) were detected. In at-home studies, opioids led to increased frequency of nausea/vomiting (OR 3.32, 95% CI 1.70-6.51), constipation (OR 3.08, 95% CI 1.69-5.61) and drowsiness (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.01-1.86), with serious adverse events including hospitalisation and death identified.
Conclusions: Opioids improved exertional breathlessness in laboratory exercise studies, but did not improve breathlessness, cough or HRQoL measured in daily life at home. There were significant adverse events, which may outweigh any benefits.
背景:患有严重呼吸系统疾病的患者承受着沉重的痛苦症状负担。虽然阿片类药物可用于症状控制,但它们会产生不良反应,其益处也不明确:我们研究了阿片类药物对严重呼吸系统疾病患者症状控制的有效性和安全性。我们检索了截至 2022 年 7 月 11 日的 Embase、MEDLINE 和 Cochrane 对照试验中央登记册。纳入了使用阿片类药物治疗严重呼吸系统疾病患者症状的随机对照试验报告。主要排除标准包括 结果:在17项纳入的试验中,有6项是基于实验室的运动试验(n=70),10项是测量日常生活中呼吸困难的家庭研究(n=788),1项(n=18)是在两种环境下进行的。总体证据确定性为 "极低 "至 "低"。阿片类药物降低了实验室运动测试中的窒息强度(标准化平均差(SMD)-0.37,95% CI -0.67--0.07),但没有降低日常生活中的窒息强度(SMD -0.10,95% CI -0.64-0.44)。未发现对 HRQoL(SMD -0.42,95% CI -0.98-0.13)或咳嗽(SMD -1.42,95% CI -3.99-1.16)有影响。在居家研究中,阿片类药物导致恶心/呕吐(OR 3.32,95% CI 1.70-6.51)、便秘(OR 3.08,95% CI 1.69-5.61)和嗜睡(OR 1.37,95% CI 1.01-1.86)的频率增加,并发现了包括住院和死亡在内的严重不良事件:结论:阿片类药物可改善实验室运动研究中的劳累性呼吸困难,但不能改善呼吸困难、咳嗽或在家中日常生活中测量的 HRQoL。阿片类药物可改善实验室运动研究中的劳累性呼吸困难,但不能改善呼吸困难、咳嗽或在家日常生活中的 HRQoL。
{"title":"Opioids for the palliation of symptoms in people with serious respiratory illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Natasha E Smallwood, Amy Pascoe, Marlies Wijsenbeek, Anne-Marie Russell, Anne E Holland, Lorena Romero, Magnus Ekström","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0265-2023","DOIUrl":"10.1183/16000617.0265-2023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People living with serious respiratory illness experience a high burden of distressing symptoms. Although opioids are prescribed for symptom management, they generate adverse events, and their benefits are unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined the efficacy and safety of opioids for symptom management in people with serious respiratory illness. Embase, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to 11 July 2022. Reports of randomised controlled trials administering opioids to treat symptoms in people with serious respiratory illness were included. Key exclusion criteria included <80% of participants having a nonmalignant lung disease. Data were extracted regarding study characteristics, outcomes of breathlessness, cough, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and adverse events. Treatment effects were pooled using a generic inverse variance model with random effects. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool version 1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 17 included trials, six were laboratory-based exercise trials (n=70), 10 were home studies measuring breathlessness in daily life (n=788) and one (n=18) was conducted in both settings. Overall certainty of evidence was \"very low\" to \"low\". Opioids reduced breathlessness intensity during laboratory exercise testing (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.37, 95% CI -0.67- -0.07), but not breathlessness measured in daily life (SMD -0.10, 95% CI -0.64-0.44). No effects on HRQoL (SMD -0.42, 95% CI -0.98-0.13) or cough (SMD -1.42, 95% CI -3.99-1.16) were detected. In at-home studies, opioids led to increased frequency of nausea/vomiting (OR 3.32, 95% CI 1.70-6.51), constipation (OR 3.08, 95% CI 1.69-5.61) and drowsiness (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.01-1.86), with serious adverse events including hospitalisation and death identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Opioids improved exertional breathlessness in laboratory exercise studies, but did not improve breathlessness, cough or HRQoL measured in daily life at home. There were significant adverse events, which may outweigh any benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"33 174","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11462312/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142389206","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-09Print Date: 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0106-2024
Emma L Coindy, Claudia Efstathiou, Shubha Talwar, Annick Moureau, Charlotte Vernhes, Peter J M Openshaw, Ryan S Thwaites
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a major global pathogen, causing lower respiratory tract disease in at-risk populations including young children. Antibodies form a crucial layer of protection from RSV disease, particularly in immunologically naïve infants. Such antibodies are derived from the mother via transplacental transfer and breast milk, but may be particularly low in high-risk infants such as those born preterm. Maternally derived antibodies can now be supplemented by the administration of anti-RSV monoclonal antibodies, while a rising wave of maternal and paediatric vaccine strategies are approaching. The implementation of these prophylactics may profoundly decrease the healthcare burden of RSV. In this article, we review the role of antibody-mediated immunity in protecting children from RSV. We focus on maternally derived antibodies as the main source of protection against RSV and study factors that influence the scale of this transfer. The role of passive and active prophylactic approaches in protecting infants against RSV are discussed and knowledge gaps in our understanding of antibody-mediated protection against RSV are identified.
{"title":"Antibody-mediated protection against respiratory syncytial virus in children.","authors":"Emma L Coindy, Claudia Efstathiou, Shubha Talwar, Annick Moureau, Charlotte Vernhes, Peter J M Openshaw, Ryan S Thwaites","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0106-2024","DOIUrl":"10.1183/16000617.0106-2024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a major global pathogen, causing lower respiratory tract disease in at-risk populations including young children. Antibodies form a crucial layer of protection from RSV disease, particularly in immunologically naïve infants. Such antibodies are derived from the mother <i>via</i> transplacental transfer and breast milk, but may be particularly low in high-risk infants such as those born preterm. Maternally derived antibodies can now be supplemented by the administration of anti-RSV monoclonal antibodies, while a rising wave of maternal and paediatric vaccine strategies are approaching. The implementation of these prophylactics may profoundly decrease the healthcare burden of RSV. In this article, we review the role of antibody-mediated immunity in protecting children from RSV. We focus on maternally derived antibodies as the main source of protection against RSV and study factors that influence the scale of this transfer. The role of passive and active prophylactic approaches in protecting infants against RSV are discussed and knowledge gaps in our understanding of antibody-mediated protection against RSV are identified.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"33 174","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11462297/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142389201","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-09Print Date: 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0114-2024
Menne R van Boven, Gerard J Hutten, Rianne Richardson, Marsh Königs, Aleid G Leemhuis, Wes Onland, Suzanne W J Terheggen-Lagro, Jaap Oosterlaan, Anton H van Kaam
Background: Immature lung development and respiratory morbidity place preterm-born children at high risk of long-term pulmonary sequelae. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to quantify lung function in preterm-born children and identify risk factors for a compromised lung function.
Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus for relevant studies published on preterm cohorts born since 1990. Studies comparing forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) in preterm-born children aged ≥5 years to term-born controls or normative data were included. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies. Standardised mean differences in FEV1 and secondary spirometry outcomes per study were pooled using meta-analysis. The impact of different demographic and neonatal variables on studies' FEV1 effect sizes was investigated by meta-regression analyses. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations framework.
Results: We identified 42 studies with unique cohorts including 4743 preterm children and 9843 controls. Median gestational age in the studies was 28.0 weeks and age at assessment ranged from 6.7 to 16.7 years. Preterm children had lower FEV1 than controls (-0.58 sd, 95% CI -0.69- -0.47 sd, p<0.001) resulting in a relative risk of 2.9 (95% CI 2.4-3.4) for abnormal outcome, with high certainty of evidence. FEV1 was significantly associated with gestational age, birthweight, bronchopulmonary dysplasia and invasive mechanical ventilation in univariate meta-regression analyses (R2=36-96%).
Conclusion: This systematic review shows robust evidence of impaired lung function in preterm-born children with a high certainty of evidence.
{"title":"Impaired lung function and associated risk factors in children born prematurely: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Menne R van Boven, Gerard J Hutten, Rianne Richardson, Marsh Königs, Aleid G Leemhuis, Wes Onland, Suzanne W J Terheggen-Lagro, Jaap Oosterlaan, Anton H van Kaam","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0114-2024","DOIUrl":"10.1183/16000617.0114-2024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immature lung development and respiratory morbidity place preterm-born children at high risk of long-term pulmonary sequelae. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to quantify lung function in preterm-born children and identify risk factors for a compromised lung function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus for relevant studies published on preterm cohorts born since 1990. Studies comparing forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV<sub>1</sub>) in preterm-born children aged ≥5 years to term-born controls or normative data were included. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies. Standardised mean differences in FEV<sub>1</sub> and secondary spirometry outcomes per study were pooled using meta-analysis. The impact of different demographic and neonatal variables on studies' FEV<sub>1</sub> effect sizes was investigated by meta-regression analyses. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 42 studies with unique cohorts including 4743 preterm children and 9843 controls. Median gestational age in the studies was 28.0 weeks and age at assessment ranged from 6.7 to 16.7 years. Preterm children had lower FEV<sub>1</sub> than controls (-0.58 sd, 95% CI -0.69- -0.47 sd, p<0.001) resulting in a relative risk of 2.9 (95% CI 2.4-3.4) for abnormal outcome, with high certainty of evidence. FEV<sub>1</sub> was significantly associated with gestational age, birthweight, bronchopulmonary dysplasia and invasive mechanical ventilation in univariate meta-regression analyses (R<sup>2</sup>=36-96%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review shows robust evidence of impaired lung function in preterm-born children with a high certainty of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"33 174","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11462300/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142389204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-09Print Date: 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0095-2024
Sara Manti, Paola Magri, Annalisa De Silvestri, Maria De Filippo, Martina Votto, Gian Luigi Marseglia, Amelia Licari
Background: Severe asthma significantly impacts a minority of children with asthma, leading to frequent symptoms, hospitalisations and potential long-term health consequences. However, accurate global data on severe asthma epidemiology is lacking. This study aims to address this gap, providing data on severe asthma epidemiology, regional differences and associated comorbidities.
Methods: We conducted a rigorous systematic review and meta-analysis following a registered protocol (PROSPERO CRD42023472845). We searched PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science for cohort or cross-sectional studies published since 2003, evaluating severe asthma incidence and prevalence in children. Study quality and risk of bias were assessed using STROBE guidelines.
Results: Nine studies investigating European children with asthma (aged 5-18 years) were included in the meta-analysis. No significant publication bias was found. The overall severe asthma prevalence in children with asthma was 3% (95% CI 1-6; I2=99.9%; p<0.001), with no significant difference between males and females. Prevalence estimates varied significantly depending on the diagnostic criteria used (Global Initiative for Asthma: 6%; European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society: 1%; other: 3%). Because none of the examined studies were prospectively designed, incidence rates could not be determined.
Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis provide the first robust assessment of severe asthma prevalence among European children. Our findings underscore the need for comprehensive research to address knowledge gaps in severe asthma, including determining incidence rates, standardising definitions, investigating regional differences and evaluating comorbidities and treatment strategies.
背景:重症哮喘对少数哮喘儿童造成严重影响,导致频繁出现症状、住院治疗和潜在的长期健康后果。然而,全球缺乏有关重症哮喘流行病学的准确数据。本研究旨在填补这一空白,提供有关重症哮喘流行病学、地区差异及相关合并症的数据:我们按照注册协议(PROSPERO CRD42023472845)进行了严格的系统综述和荟萃分析。我们在 PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 上检索了自 2003 年以来发表的队列研究或横断面研究,这些研究评估了儿童重症哮喘的发病率和流行率。研究质量和偏倚风险根据 STROBE 指南进行评估:荟萃分析纳入了九项调查欧洲哮喘儿童(5-18 岁)的研究。未发现明显的出版偏倚。哮喘儿童中严重哮喘的总体发病率为 3% (95% CI 1-6; I2=99.9%; pConclusions:本系统综述和荟萃分析首次对欧洲儿童重症哮喘患病率进行了可靠评估。我们的研究结果表明,有必要开展综合研究,以弥补重症哮喘方面的知识差距,包括确定发病率、统一定义、调查地区差异以及评估合并症和治疗策略。
{"title":"Epidemiology of severe asthma in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Sara Manti, Paola Magri, Annalisa De Silvestri, Maria De Filippo, Martina Votto, Gian Luigi Marseglia, Amelia Licari","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0095-2024","DOIUrl":"10.1183/16000617.0095-2024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Severe asthma significantly impacts a minority of children with asthma, leading to frequent symptoms, hospitalisations and potential long-term health consequences. However, accurate global data on severe asthma epidemiology is lacking. This study aims to address this gap, providing data on severe asthma epidemiology, regional differences and associated comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a rigorous systematic review and meta-analysis following a registered protocol (PROSPERO CRD42023472845). We searched PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science for cohort or cross-sectional studies published since 2003, evaluating severe asthma incidence and prevalence in children. Study quality and risk of bias were assessed using STROBE guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies investigating European children with asthma (aged 5-18 years) were included in the meta-analysis. No significant publication bias was found. The overall severe asthma prevalence in children with asthma was 3% (95% CI 1-6; I<sup>2</sup>=99.9%; p<0.001), with no significant difference between males and females. Prevalence estimates varied significantly depending on the diagnostic criteria used (Global Initiative for Asthma: 6%; European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society: 1%; other: 3%). Because none of the examined studies were prospectively designed, incidence rates could not be determined.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis provide the first robust assessment of severe asthma prevalence among European children. Our findings underscore the need for comprehensive research to address knowledge gaps in severe asthma, including determining incidence rates, standardising definitions, investigating regional differences and evaluating comorbidities and treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"33 174","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11462310/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142389203","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Several genetic variants are associated with the risk of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). These have not been systematically reviewed.
Methods: We searched the PubMed, Embase and GWAS Catalog databases for studies indexed between inception and 15 January 2024 describing genetic variants associated with IPF susceptibility. We included studies describing common associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). We excluded studies describing rare variants, non-SNP variants and those without an allelic model analysis. We recorded study type, participant characteristics, genotyping methods, IPF diagnostic criteria, the SNPs and the respective genes, odds ratios, and other details. We also searched databases for functions of the identified genes.
Results: The primary search retrieved 2697 publications; we included 42 studies. There were nine genome-wide association/linkage studies, while 27 were candidate gene studies. The studies included 22-11 160 IPF subjects. 88 SNPs in 58 genes or loci were found associated with IPF susceptibility. MUC5B rs35705950 was the most studied SNP. Most (n=51) SNPs were in the intronic or intergenic regions; only 11 were coding sequence variants. The SNPs had odds ratios ranging from 0.27 to 7.82 for an association with IPF. Only 22 SNPs had moderate-large effects (OR >1.5 or <0.67). Only 49.1% of the associated genes have a known functional role in IPF; the role of G protein-related signalling and transcriptional regulation (zinc-finger proteins) remain unexplored.
Conclusion: Several common SNPs in over 50 genes have been found associated with IPF susceptibility. These variants may inform gene panels for future studies (PROSPERO CRD42023408912).
{"title":"Common single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review.","authors":"Sahajal Dhooria, Riya Sharma, Amanjit Bal, Inderpaul Singh Sehgal, Dharambir Kashyap, Valliappan Muthu, Kuruswamy Thurai Prasad, Ritesh Agarwal, Ashutosh Nath Aggarwal","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0018-2024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0018-2024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several genetic variants are associated with the risk of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). These have not been systematically reviewed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched the PubMed, Embase and GWAS Catalog databases for studies indexed between inception and 15 January 2024 describing genetic variants associated with IPF susceptibility. We included studies describing common associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). We excluded studies describing rare variants, non-SNP variants and those without an allelic model analysis. We recorded study type, participant characteristics, genotyping methods, IPF diagnostic criteria, the SNPs and the respective genes, odds ratios, and other details. We also searched databases for functions of the identified genes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary search retrieved 2697 publications; we included 42 studies. There were nine genome-wide association/linkage studies, while 27 were candidate gene studies. The studies included 22-11 160 IPF subjects. 88 SNPs in 58 genes or loci were found associated with IPF susceptibility. <i>MUC5B</i> rs35705950 was the most studied SNP. Most (n=51) SNPs were in the intronic or intergenic regions; only 11 were coding sequence variants. The SNPs had odds ratios ranging from 0.27 to 7.82 for an association with IPF. Only 22 SNPs had moderate-large effects (OR >1.5 or <0.67). Only 49.1% of the associated genes have a known functional role in IPF; the role of G protein-related signalling and transcriptional regulation (zinc-finger proteins) remain unexplored.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Several common SNPs in over 50 genes have been found associated with IPF susceptibility. These variants may inform gene panels for future studies (PROSPERO CRD42023408912).</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"33 173","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11423133/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142344364","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-25Print Date: 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0045-2024
Isabelle Fajac, Pierre-Régis Burgel, Clémence Martin
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a genetic disease caused by variants in the gene encoding for the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein, a chloride and bicarbonate channel. CFTR dysfunction results in a multiorgan disease with the main clinical features being exocrine pancreatic insufficiency and diffuse bronchiectasis with chronic airway infection leading to respiratory failure and premature death. Over the past decades, major progress has been made by implementing multidisciplinary care, including nutritional support, airway clearance techniques and antibiotics in specialised CF centres. The past decade has further seen the progressive development of oral medications, called CFTR modulators, for which around 80% of people with CF are genetically eligible in Europe. CFTR modulators partially restore ion transport and lead to a rapid and major improvement in clinical manifestations and lung function, presumably resulting in longer survival. CFTR modulators have been game-changing in the care of people with CF. However, many questions remain unanswered, such as the long-term effects of CFTR modulators, especially when treatment is started very early in life, or the new CF-related disease emerging due to CFTR modulators. Moreover, severe complications of CF, such as diabetes or cirrhosis, are not reversed on CFTR modulators and around 20% of people with CF bear CFTR variants leading to a CFTR protein that is unresponsive to CFTR modulators. Challenges also arise in adapting CF care to a changing disease. In this review article, we highlight the new questions and challenges emerging from this revolution in CF care.
{"title":"New drugs, new challenges in cystic fibrosis care.","authors":"Isabelle Fajac, Pierre-Régis Burgel, Clémence Martin","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0045-2024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0045-2024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a genetic disease caused by variants in the gene encoding for the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein, a chloride and bicarbonate channel. CFTR dysfunction results in a multiorgan disease with the main clinical features being exocrine pancreatic insufficiency and diffuse bronchiectasis with chronic airway infection leading to respiratory failure and premature death. Over the past decades, major progress has been made by implementing multidisciplinary care, including nutritional support, airway clearance techniques and antibiotics in specialised CF centres. The past decade has further seen the progressive development of oral medications, called CFTR modulators, for which around 80% of people with CF are genetically eligible in Europe. CFTR modulators partially restore ion transport and lead to a rapid and major improvement in clinical manifestations and lung function, presumably resulting in longer survival. CFTR modulators have been game-changing in the care of people with CF. However, many questions remain unanswered, such as the long-term effects of CFTR modulators, especially when treatment is started very early in life, or the new CF-related disease emerging due to CFTR modulators. Moreover, severe complications of CF, such as diabetes or cirrhosis, are not reversed on CFTR modulators and around 20% of people with CF bear <i>CFTR</i> variants leading to a CFTR protein that is unresponsive to CFTR modulators. Challenges also arise in adapting CF care to a changing disease. In this review article, we highlight the new questions and challenges emerging from this revolution in CF care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"33 173","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11423132/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142336359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-25Print Date: 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0096-2024
Hayoung Choi, Jin-Fu Xu, Sanjay H Chotirmall, James D Chalmers, Lucy C Morgan, Raja Dhar
Recent bronchiectasis studies from large-scale multinational, multicentre registries have demonstrated that the characteristics of the disease vary according to geographic region. However, most perspectives on bronchiectasis are dominated by data from Western countries. This review intends to provide an Asian perspective on the disease, focusing on the established registries in India, Korea and China. Asian patients with bronchiectasis are less likely to show female predominance and experience exacerbations, are more likely to be younger, have milder disease, and have fewer options for guideline-recommended treatment than those living in other global regions. Furthermore, Asian bronchiectasis patients demonstrate different comorbidities, microbiological profiles and unique endophenotypes, including post-tuberculosis and dry bronchiectasis. Notably, each Asian region reveals further geographic variations and inter-patient differences. Future studies are warranted to better characterise Asian patients with bronchiectasis.
{"title":"Bronchiectasis in Asia: a review of current status and challenges.","authors":"Hayoung Choi, Jin-Fu Xu, Sanjay H Chotirmall, James D Chalmers, Lucy C Morgan, Raja Dhar","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0096-2024","DOIUrl":"10.1183/16000617.0096-2024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent bronchiectasis studies from large-scale multinational, multicentre registries have demonstrated that the characteristics of the disease vary according to geographic region. However, most perspectives on bronchiectasis are dominated by data from Western countries. This review intends to provide an Asian perspective on the disease, focusing on the established registries in India, Korea and China. Asian patients with bronchiectasis are less likely to show female predominance and experience exacerbations, are more likely to be younger, have milder disease, and have fewer options for guideline-recommended treatment than those living in other global regions. Furthermore, Asian bronchiectasis patients demonstrate different comorbidities, microbiological profiles and unique endophenotypes, including post-tuberculosis and dry bronchiectasis. Notably, each Asian region reveals further geographic variations and inter-patient differences. Future studies are warranted to better characterise Asian patients with bronchiectasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"33 173","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11423131/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142344363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}