Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-09-24DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2024.2407513
Madhura Roy, Rizwana Parveen, Parvej Khan, Haya Majid, Mani Pathak, Rajesh Saxena, Nidhi
Background: Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) has been a common metabolic and endocrinal disorder, prevalent amongst women belonging to the reproductive age group. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the safety and efficacy profile of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors (Canagliflozin, Dapagliflozin, Empagliflozin, and Licogliflozin) for the treatment of women suffering from PCOS.
Methods: A literature search in PubMed, Science Direct, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted for randomized clinical trials of SGLT-2 inhibitors in PCOS patients by applying predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The articles in English language were included.
Results: Four randomized controlled trials including 146 subjects were included in the review. The clinical studies indicated a significant decrease in the levels of total testosterone, free androgen index, total body fat, homeostasis model assessment-estimated insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), body mass index (BMI), dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG). However, no significant difference was reported in levels of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG). Overall, there was improvement in metabolic and endocrine profiles, suggesting a potentially beneficial impact of SGLT2 inhibitors in the management of PCOS.
Conclusion: There is a requirement for large extensive clinical trials to demonstrate the efficacy of SGLT-2 inhibitors in PCOS patients.
{"title":"A systematic review on effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors on the metabolic and endocrinological profile of patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome.","authors":"Madhura Roy, Rizwana Parveen, Parvej Khan, Haya Majid, Mani Pathak, Rajesh Saxena, Nidhi","doi":"10.1080/14656566.2024.2407513","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14656566.2024.2407513","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) has been a common metabolic and endocrinal disorder, prevalent amongst women belonging to the reproductive age group. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the safety and efficacy profile of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors (Canagliflozin, Dapagliflozin, Empagliflozin, and Licogliflozin) for the treatment of women suffering from PCOS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search in PubMed, Science Direct, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted for randomized clinical trials of SGLT-2 inhibitors in PCOS patients by applying predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The articles in English language were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four randomized controlled trials including 146 subjects were included in the review. The clinical studies indicated a significant decrease in the levels of total testosterone, free androgen index, total body fat, homeostasis model assessment-estimated insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), body mass index (BMI), dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG). However, no significant difference was reported in levels of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG). Overall, there was improvement in metabolic and endocrine profiles, suggesting a potentially beneficial impact of SGLT2 inhibitors in the management of PCOS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a requirement for large extensive clinical trials to demonstrate the efficacy of SGLT-2 inhibitors in PCOS patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12184,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1953-1960"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142282677","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-10-07DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2024.2409950
Hannah Delp, Gabrielle A Gibson, Sara A Buckman
Introduction: Intra-abdominal infections are becoming increasingly common and can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. The incidence of these infections due to resistant gram-negative organisms is also increasing. Given this resistance, new antibiotic combinations are being developed, often utilizing older antibiotics and newer β-lactamase inhibitors. Aztreonam/avibactam (ATM-AVI) is one of the combination antibiotics, which combines aztreonam, a monobactam, with avibactam, a broad-spectrum β-lactamase inhibitor for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in combination with metronidazole.
Areas covered: In this drug evaluation manuscript, we provide an overview of intra-abdominal infections and an overview of currently available antimicrobial agents used to treat these infections. ATM-AVI is introduced, including chemistry, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and clinical studies of this compound.
Expert opinion: There are limited treatment options for complicated intra-abdominal infections due to resistant gram-negative organisms, especially those with metallo-β-lactamases. One treatment option for these infections is ATM-AVI, which was recently approved in Europe, in addition to metronidazole. These bacteria are difficult to treat, and this new compound is a safe and effective option for empiric treatment in places with a high incidence of infections due to these bacteria, and also treatment for infections when these resistant bacteria are isolated in culture.
{"title":"Aztreonam-avibactam for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.","authors":"Hannah Delp, Gabrielle A Gibson, Sara A Buckman","doi":"10.1080/14656566.2024.2409950","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14656566.2024.2409950","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intra-abdominal infections are becoming increasingly common and can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. The incidence of these infections due to resistant gram-negative organisms is also increasing. Given this resistance, new antibiotic combinations are being developed, often utilizing older antibiotics and newer β-lactamase inhibitors. Aztreonam/avibactam (ATM-AVI) is one of the combination antibiotics, which combines aztreonam, a monobactam, with avibactam, a broad-spectrum β-lactamase inhibitor for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in combination with metronidazole.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this drug evaluation manuscript, we provide an overview of intra-abdominal infections and an overview of currently available antimicrobial agents used to treat these infections. ATM-AVI is introduced, including chemistry, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and clinical studies of this compound.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>There are limited treatment options for complicated intra-abdominal infections due to resistant gram-negative organisms, especially those with metallo-β-lactamases. One treatment option for these infections is ATM-AVI, which was recently approved in Europe, in addition to metronidazole. These bacteria are difficult to treat, and this new compound is a safe and effective option for empiric treatment in places with a high incidence of infections due to these bacteria, and also treatment for infections when these resistant bacteria are isolated in culture.</p>","PeriodicalId":12184,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1867-1872"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142344275","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-09-29DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2024.2410398
Jonathan Douxfils, Charlotte Beaudart, Jean-Michel Dogné
{"title":"Fezolinetant: a novel nonhormonal therapy for vasomotor symptoms due to menopause requiring a careful evaluation of the benefit-risk balance.","authors":"Jonathan Douxfils, Charlotte Beaudart, Jean-Michel Dogné","doi":"10.1080/14656566.2024.2410398","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14656566.2024.2410398","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12184,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1971-1972"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142344277","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-09-27DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2024.2409324
Stephen J Nicholls, Sean Tan, Julie Butters, Adam J Nelson
Introduction: Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) plays an important role in lipid metabolism. Early interest in the development of CETP inhibitors proved to be disappointing. Recent interest has focused on the potential for CETP inhibition to reduce cardiovascular risk by lowering levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C).
Areas covered: The data suggesting that low CETP activity may associate with lower levels of cardiovascular risk and early experience with CETP inhibitors focused on raising HDL-C levels. More recent data that suggests that any potential to reduce cardiovascular risk by inhibition of CETP is more likely to result from lowering levels of atherogenic lipid parameters. The development of obicetrapib, a potent CETP inhibitor, with robust lowering of apoB and LDL-C, will be summarized as a potential approach to the prevention of cardiovascular disease.
Expert opinion: Obicetrapib is a potent CETP inhibitor, with a demonstrated ability to lower levels of apoB and LDL-C as monotherapy and in addition to high intensity statin therapy. The ultimate impact of obicetrapib on cardiovascular events will be evaluated by ongoing clinical trials.
{"title":"Evaluating obicetrapib as an emerging treatment for patients with dyslipidemia: a game changer?","authors":"Stephen J Nicholls, Sean Tan, Julie Butters, Adam J Nelson","doi":"10.1080/14656566.2024.2409324","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14656566.2024.2409324","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) plays an important role in lipid metabolism. Early interest in the development of CETP inhibitors proved to be disappointing. Recent interest has focused on the potential for CETP inhibition to reduce cardiovascular risk by lowering levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C).</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The data suggesting that low CETP activity may associate with lower levels of cardiovascular risk and early experience with CETP inhibitors focused on raising HDL-C levels. More recent data that suggests that any potential to reduce cardiovascular risk by inhibition of CETP is more likely to result from lowering levels of atherogenic lipid parameters. The development of obicetrapib, a potent CETP inhibitor, with robust lowering of apoB and LDL-C, will be summarized as a potential approach to the prevention of cardiovascular disease.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Obicetrapib is a potent CETP inhibitor, with a demonstrated ability to lower levels of apoB and LDL-C as monotherapy and in addition to high intensity statin therapy. The ultimate impact of obicetrapib on cardiovascular events will be evaluated by ongoing clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":12184,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1879-1885"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142344276","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-10-06DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2024.2411009
Jiang Wang, Ze-Fan Mao, Lei Cheng
Introduction: Decongestants are commonly used drugs in clinical practice, and they can relieve nasal congestion caused by factors like influenza, rhinitis, and acute upper respiratory tract infection.
Areas covered: In this article, we review the research outcomes about decongestants, which aim to provide beneficial information that can guide the clinical application of decongestants for clinicians.
Expert opinion: Although the use of nasal decongestants is increasingly limited, caution rather than prohibition is now advocated. Scientific and accurate use of nasal decongestants can achieve satisfactory clinical effectiveness on nasal congestion, and it is not easy to produce adverse reactions. Patients with severe nasal congestion may use nasal decongestants solely or in combination with nasal corticosteroids or nasal antihistamines to exert a synergistic effect. The concentration, dose, frequency, and time of nasal decongestants determine whether drug-induced rhinitis will occur. Additionally, we recommend patients not to buy nasal sprays with unknown ingredients on the internet or in pharmacy, so as to avoid the risk of rhinitis medicamentosa. For patients with rhinitis medicamentosa, the use of nasal decongestants should be stopped immediately. However, more evidence is still needed to standardize the clinical use of nasal decongestants.
{"title":"Rise and fall of decongestants in treating nasal congestion related diseases.","authors":"Jiang Wang, Ze-Fan Mao, Lei Cheng","doi":"10.1080/14656566.2024.2411009","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14656566.2024.2411009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Decongestants are commonly used drugs in clinical practice, and they can relieve nasal congestion caused by factors like influenza, rhinitis, and acute upper respiratory tract infection.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this article, we review the research outcomes about decongestants, which aim to provide beneficial information that can guide the clinical application of decongestants for clinicians.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Although the use of nasal decongestants is increasingly limited, caution rather than prohibition is now advocated. Scientific and accurate use of nasal decongestants can achieve satisfactory clinical effectiveness on nasal congestion, and it is not easy to produce adverse reactions. Patients with severe nasal congestion may use nasal decongestants solely or in combination with nasal corticosteroids or nasal antihistamines to exert a synergistic effect. The concentration, dose, frequency, and time of nasal decongestants determine whether drug-induced rhinitis will occur. Additionally, we recommend patients not to buy nasal sprays with unknown ingredients on the internet or in pharmacy, so as to avoid the risk of rhinitis medicamentosa. For patients with rhinitis medicamentosa, the use of nasal decongestants should be stopped immediately. However, more evidence is still needed to standardize the clinical use of nasal decongestants.</p>","PeriodicalId":12184,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1943-1951"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142344279","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-10-16DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2024.2416585
Pierfrancesco Visaggi, Luisa Bertin, Andrea Pasta, Francesco Calabrese, Matteo Ghisa, Elisa Marabotto, Mentore Ribolsi, Vincenzo Savarino, Nicola de Bortoli, Edoardo Vincenzo Savarino
Introduction: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic disease of the esophagus characterized by the regurgitation of stomach contents into the esophagus, causing troublesome symptoms and/or complications. Among patients with GERD, around 30% of patients have visible mucosal damage, while 70% have normal esophageal mucosa. Accordingly, the optimal pharmacological treatment of GERD should address different disease manifestations, including symptoms, the mucosal damage when present, and possible chronic complications, including strictures, Barrett's esophagus, and esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Areas covered: Available medical treatments for GERD include proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), potassium-competitive acid blockers (PCABs), histamine receptor antagonists (H2-RAs), prokinetics, and mucosal protectants, such as alginates, hyaluronic acid/chondroitin-sulfate, and poliprotect. Each compound has its own advantages and disadvantages, and knowledge of expected benefits and tips for their use is paramount for the success of treatment. In addition, the appropriateness of indications for initiating treatment is also crucial to achieve positive results when managing GERD patients.
Expert opinion: PPIs, PCABs, H2-RAs, prokinetics, and mucosal protectants can all be used in patients with GERD, but careful assessment of patients' characteristics as well as advantages and disadvantages of each therapeutic compound is essential to ensure successful treatment of GERD.
{"title":"Pharmacological management of gastro-esophageal reflux disease: state of the art in 2024.","authors":"Pierfrancesco Visaggi, Luisa Bertin, Andrea Pasta, Francesco Calabrese, Matteo Ghisa, Elisa Marabotto, Mentore Ribolsi, Vincenzo Savarino, Nicola de Bortoli, Edoardo Vincenzo Savarino","doi":"10.1080/14656566.2024.2416585","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14656566.2024.2416585","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic disease of the esophagus characterized by the regurgitation of stomach contents into the esophagus, causing troublesome symptoms and/or complications. Among patients with GERD, around 30% of patients have visible mucosal damage, while 70% have normal esophageal mucosa. Accordingly, the optimal pharmacological treatment of GERD should address different disease manifestations, including symptoms, the mucosal damage when present, and possible chronic complications, including strictures, Barrett's esophagus, and esophageal adenocarcinoma.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Available medical treatments for GERD include proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), potassium-competitive acid blockers (PCABs), histamine receptor antagonists (H2-RAs), prokinetics, and mucosal protectants, such as alginates, hyaluronic acid/chondroitin-sulfate, and poliprotect. Each compound has its own advantages and disadvantages, and knowledge of expected benefits and tips for their use is paramount for the success of treatment. In addition, the appropriateness of indications for initiating treatment is also crucial to achieve positive results when managing GERD patients.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>PPIs, PCABs, H2-RAs, prokinetics, and mucosal protectants can all be used in patients with GERD, but careful assessment of patients' characteristics as well as advantages and disadvantages of each therapeutic compound is essential to ensure successful treatment of GERD.</p>","PeriodicalId":12184,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"2077-2088"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142399858","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-10-09DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2024.2412252
Diana Paredes-Ruiz, Daniel Martin-Iglesias, Laura Amo, Guillermo Ruiz-Irastorza
Introduction: Antimalarials (AMs) are old drugs with a wide range of beneficial effects in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) beyond the control of activity. The most recent debate is focused on defining the optimal doses to assure the best benefit/risk ratio.
Areas covered: We have reviewed the pharmacological basis underlying the various therapeutic effects of AMs and the beneficial and toxic effects of HCQ, also discussing the role of mepacrine not only as a substitute in cases of maculopathy, but also as a very effective therapy combined with HCQ. We searched PubMed and Embase for articles published in English at any time. We used the terms "hydroxychloroquine" or "mepacrine" or "chloroquine" or "antimalarials", "pharmacokinetics", "efficacy", "remission", "toxicity", "adherence". We reviewed original research articles, large observational studies, systematic reviews, and expert consensus statements. Additionally, studies were identified through the assessment of the reference lists of the evaluated manuscripts.
Expert opinion: We advocate for the widespread use of HCQ at stable doses of 200 mg/d (≤4 mg/kg/d for most patients) and also for the early combination therapy with mepacrine to assure a good control of SLE activity, and also a durable and safe use of these essential drugs for the management of SLE.
{"title":"Elucidating the mechanisms and efficacy of antimalarial drugs in systemic lupus erythematosus.","authors":"Diana Paredes-Ruiz, Daniel Martin-Iglesias, Laura Amo, Guillermo Ruiz-Irastorza","doi":"10.1080/14656566.2024.2412252","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14656566.2024.2412252","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Antimalarials (AMs) are old drugs with a wide range of beneficial effects in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) beyond the control of activity. The most recent debate is focused on defining the optimal doses to assure the best benefit/risk ratio.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>We have reviewed the pharmacological basis underlying the various therapeutic effects of AMs and the beneficial and toxic effects of HCQ, also discussing the role of mepacrine not only as a substitute in cases of maculopathy, but also as a very effective therapy combined with HCQ. We searched PubMed and Embase for articles published in English at any time. We used the terms \"hydroxychloroquine\" or \"mepacrine\" or \"chloroquine\" or \"antimalarials\", \"pharmacokinetics\", \"efficacy\", \"remission\", \"toxicity\", \"adherence\". We reviewed original research articles, large observational studies, systematic reviews, and expert consensus statements. Additionally, studies were identified through the assessment of the reference lists of the evaluated manuscripts.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>We advocate for the widespread use of HCQ at stable doses of 200 mg/d (≤4 mg/kg/d for most patients) and also for the early combination therapy with mepacrine to assure a good control of SLE activity, and also a durable and safe use of these essential drugs for the management of SLE.</p>","PeriodicalId":12184,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"2047-2060"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142361377","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-10-14DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2024.2416034
Megan Z Roberts, Miranda R Andrus
{"title":"Reply to 'fezolinetant: a novel nonhormonal therapy for vasomotor symptoms due to menopause requiring careful evaluation of the benefit-risk balance'.","authors":"Megan Z Roberts, Miranda R Andrus","doi":"10.1080/14656566.2024.2416034","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14656566.2024.2416034","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12184,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1973-1974"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142399859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a clonal hematological disorder characterized by bone marrow fibrosis, splenomegaly, and inflammatory cytokine dysregulation. While the role of steroids in MF is not fully defined, their anti-inflammatory properties may offer therapeutic benefits, particularly in managing anemia and other cytopenias. Steroids exert their effects by suppressing pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL1, IL6, and TNF, and by enhancing anti-inflammatory cytokines like IL4 and IL10. Elevated levels of IL6 and other cytokines in MF are associated with anemia and poor prognosis, suggesting that steroid therapy could mitigate these effects.
Areas covered: In this manuscript, we review clinical studies which evaluated the safety and efficacy of steroids in MF patients. Moreover, we examine clinical data of the combination of steroids with immunomodulatory agents and JAK inhibitors. Our literature search consisted of an extensive review of PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov.
Expert opinion: The role of steroids in the management of MF remains poorly defined, though emerging evidence suggests a potential therapeutic benefit, particularly in managing anemia and other cytopenias. The combination with IMIDs has also yielded positive outcomes as demonstrated in several studies. Steroids may also play a crucial role in managing cytopenias in MF patients receiving JAKi.
{"title":"The role of corticosteroids in the current treatment paradigm for myelofibrosis.","authors":"Antonella Bruzzese, Enrica Antonia Martino, Caterina Labanca, Francesco Mendicino, Eugenio Lucia, Virginia Olivito, Teresa Rossi, Antonino Neri, Fortunato Morabito, Ernesto Vigna, Massimo Gentile","doi":"10.1080/14656566.2024.2415710","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14656566.2024.2415710","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Myelofibrosis (MF) is a clonal hematological disorder characterized by bone marrow fibrosis, splenomegaly, and inflammatory cytokine dysregulation. While the role of steroids in MF is not fully defined, their anti-inflammatory properties may offer therapeutic benefits, particularly in managing anemia and other cytopenias. Steroids exert their effects by suppressing pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL1, IL6, and TNF, and by enhancing anti-inflammatory cytokines like IL4 and IL10. Elevated levels of IL6 and other cytokines in MF are associated with anemia and poor prognosis, suggesting that steroid therapy could mitigate these effects.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this manuscript, we review clinical studies which evaluated the safety and efficacy of steroids in MF patients. Moreover, we examine clinical data of the combination of steroids with immunomodulatory agents and JAK inhibitors. Our literature search consisted of an extensive review of PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The role of steroids in the management of MF remains poorly defined, though emerging evidence suggests a potential therapeutic benefit, particularly in managing anemia and other cytopenias. The combination with IMIDs has also yielded positive outcomes as demonstrated in several studies. Steroids may also play a crucial role in managing cytopenias in MF patients receiving JAKi.</p>","PeriodicalId":12184,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"2015-2022"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142389212","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-10-10DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2024.2412247
Enrique R Soriano, Eduardo Mysler, Carlos Rios, Ricardo M Xavier, Mario H Cardiel, Gustavo Citera
Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) poses significant healthcare challenges in Latin America (LA) due to its high prevalence and unique healthcare dynamics. Despite global advancements, LA faces specific hurdles in effectively managing RA.
Areas covered: This review examines RA epidemiology, treatment strategies, and clinical challenges in LA. RA prevalence varies, with higher rates among indigenous populations. While conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) are recommended as first-line therapy, access remains inconsistent. Biologics and targeted synthetic DMARDs are available, but biosimilars have limited accessibility, with drug prices varying significantly. Key barriers include supply interruptions, diagnosis delays, and high non-adherence rates driven by socioeconomic factors. A severe shortage of rheumatologists, particularly in rural areas, affects patient care. Cardiovascular events, comorbidities, and endemic infections further complicate RA management.
Expert opinion: Although RA care in LA has improved through better use of csDMARDs and advanced treatments, major challenges persist, such as a shortage of specialists, limited medical education, and fragmented healthcare systems. Expanding training programs, enhancing telemedicine, and ensuring drug supply continuity are essential. Strengthening clinical research, improving access to affordable treatments, and developing comprehensive, region-specific strategies are crucial to closing the gap between LA and more developed regions in RA care..
导言:类风湿关节炎(RA)因其高发病率和独特的医疗动态,给拉丁美洲(LA)的医疗保健带来了巨大挑战。尽管全球取得了进步,但拉丁美洲在有效管理 RA 方面仍面临特殊障碍:本手稿回顾了拉丁美洲和加勒比海地区 RA 的流行病学、药物治疗和临床挑战。RA的发病率各不相同,土著居民的发病率更高。治疗指南建议将传统的改变病情抗风湿药物(csDMARDs)作为一线治疗,但使用情况并不一致。大多数洛杉矶国家都能买到生物制剂和靶向合成 DMARDs,但生物仿制药较难买到,而且药价差异很大。治疗障碍包括供应中断、诊断延误以及与社会经济因素相关的高不依从率。风湿病医生的严重短缺,尤其是在农村地区,影响了患者的治疗效果。心血管事件、其他合并症和地方性感染使洛杉矶的 RA 管理更加复杂:随着csDMARDs、靶向治疗策略和先进疗法的更好使用,洛杉矶的RA管理有所改善。然而,挑战依然存在,包括风湿免疫科医生的短缺、有限的继续医学教育、地方性感染以及分散的医疗保健系统。要解决这些问题,就必须扩大培训计划、利用远程医疗并确保药品供应的一致性。加强临床研究和本地数据信息,改善负担得起的治疗方法的获取途径,对于改善患者的治疗效果至关重要。要缩小洛杉矶与较发达地区在乳房疼痛治疗方面的差距,需要制定针对具体地区的综合战略。
{"title":"Rheumatoid arthritis in Latin America: pharmacotherapy and clinical challenges.","authors":"Enrique R Soriano, Eduardo Mysler, Carlos Rios, Ricardo M Xavier, Mario H Cardiel, Gustavo Citera","doi":"10.1080/14656566.2024.2412247","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14656566.2024.2412247","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) poses significant healthcare challenges in Latin America (LA) due to its high prevalence and unique healthcare dynamics. Despite global advancements, LA faces specific hurdles in effectively managing RA.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review examines RA epidemiology, treatment strategies, and clinical challenges in LA. RA prevalence varies, with higher rates among indigenous populations. While conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) are recommended as first-line therapy, access remains inconsistent. Biologics and targeted synthetic DMARDs are available, but biosimilars have limited accessibility, with drug prices varying significantly. Key barriers include supply interruptions, diagnosis delays, and high non-adherence rates driven by socioeconomic factors. A severe shortage of rheumatologists, particularly in rural areas, affects patient care. Cardiovascular events, comorbidities, and endemic infections further complicate RA management.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Although RA care in LA has improved through better use of csDMARDs and advanced treatments, major challenges persist, such as a shortage of specialists, limited medical education, and fragmented healthcare systems. Expanding training programs, enhancing telemedicine, and ensuring drug supply continuity are essential. Strengthening clinical research, improving access to affordable treatments, and developing comprehensive, region-specific strategies are crucial to closing the gap between LA and more developed regions in RA care..</p>","PeriodicalId":12184,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"2023-2033"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142375358","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}