Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy最新文献

Introduction: The rise in opioid use for managing chronic and oncologic pain has led to a significant increase in opioid-induced constipation (OIC) that impacts patient quality of life and pain management.

Areas covered: In this study, emerging therapies for OIC were criticized for refining advancements and novel treatment options. Key topics included the efficacy of peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs) such as methylnaltrexone, naloxegol, and naldemedine, which specifically target opioid-induced gut dysfunction. Other treatment options, including intestinal secretagogues like lubiprostone and linaclotide, selective 5-HT receptor agonists such as prucalopride, and emerging adjunctive therapies like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and electroacupuncture were mentioned. Current guidelines from the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) and the European consensus were criticized.

Expert opinion: Experts stress the importance of a stepwise approach to managing OIC, considering patient-specific factors and the efficacy of various treatments. While PAMORAs have demonstrated effectiveness in improving bowel function, their high cost and lack of extensive head-to-head comparisons with traditional laxatives are significant concerns. Emerging therapies and adjunctive treatments offer promising results but require further validation through rigorous studies. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and comparative effectiveness to better address the complex needs of patients with OIC and refine treatment protocols.

Background: When considering changing hypnotic pharmacotherapy, lemborexant has attracted attention as a candidate due to its effectiveness and safety profile. However, few studies have investigated switching patterns in clinical practice.

Research design and methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a nationwide claims database. Patients prescribed a single hypnotic who either subsequently switched to (switching cohort) or were additionally prescribed (add-on cohort) lemborexant between July 2020 and December 2021 were identified. Proportion of successful switching was defined as remaining on lemborexant alone or without any hypnotic at 6 months after lemborexant initiation.

Results: The success proportion was 70.1% in the switching cohort (n = 4,861) and 38.6% in the add-on cohort (n = 9,423). In the add-on cohort, the success proportion was lower in patients with a hypnotic history of ≥180 days (31.4%) and in patients whose prescribed hypnotic was a benzodiazepine or non-benzodiazepine (31.5% and 37.6%, respectively).

Conclusion: The proportion of successful switching was higher in patients who switched to lemborexant than in those who added lemborexant as a concomitant treatment. The lower success proportion in the add-on cohort might be related to clinically more severe insomnia, and/or a concomitant prescription of benzodiazepine or non-benzodiazepine, from which discontinuation may be challenging.

Introduction: The treatment landscape of polycythemia vera (PV) has seen major advancements within the last decade including approval of ruxolitinib in the second line setting after hydroxyurea, ropegylated interferon-α2b, and advanced clinical development of a novel class of agents called hepcidin mimetics.

Areas covered: We provide a comprehensive review of the evidence discussing the risk stratification, treatment indications, role and limitations of phlebotomy only approach and pivotal trials covering nuances related to the use of interferon-α (IFN-α), ruxolitinib, hepcidin mimetics, and upcoming investigational agents including HDAC and LSD1 inhibitors.

Expert opinion: The research paradigm in PV is slowly shifting from the sole focus on hematocrit control and moving toward disease modification. The discovery of hepcidin mimetics has come as a breakthrough in restoring iron homeostasis, achieving phlebotomy-independence and may lead to improved thrombosis-free survival with stricter hematocrit control. On the other hand, emerging data with IFN- α and ruxolitinib as well as combination of the two agents suggests the potential for achieving molecular remission in a subset of PV patients and long-term follow-up is awaited to validate the correlation of molecular responses with clinically relevant outcomes of progression-free and thrombosis-free survival.

Introduction: Cervical cancer, while highly preventable, remains an international public health challenge especially in under resourced regions. Although early-stage cervix confined cancers are often amenable to surgical resection, larger tumors deemed locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) necessitate systemic therapy as part of chemoradiation therapy. Moreover, systemic therapy is the standard therapeutic approach for those presenting with primary metastasis or recurrence.

Areas covered: While several agents have been approved to treat recurrent cervical cancer including checkpoint inhibitors as well as both biomarker agnostic and specific antibody drug conjugates, the development of agents added to chemoradiation has been less fruitful. Until recently, the addition of novel therapies to chemoradiation has been negative in terms of improving outcomes; however, results of a recent Phase III clinical trial (NCT04221945) in LACC demonstrated that the addition of pembrolizumab to standard of care chemoradiation was associated with an improvement in progression-free survival and resulted in an FDA approval for this therapy. This observation led to the first change in treating LACC since the early 2000s.

Expert opinion: Improvements in systemic therapy both alone and in combination with chemoradiation for cervical cancer have been realized. Ongoing research is needed for therapeutic options following immunotherapy.

Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis during chemoimmunotherapy with carboplatin plus etoposide and atezolizumab in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).

Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study enrolled ES-SCLC patients receiving carboplatin plus etoposide and atezolizumab, categorized into G-CSF and non-G-CSF groups. Demographic and disease-related data were collected. Response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity were analyzed.

Results: Of 119 patients (median age: 63 years), the overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 72.3% and 81.5%, respectively. In the G-CSF group, the ORR was 76.4% compared to 60.0% in the non-G-CSF group (p = 0.33), and the DCR was 85.4% versus 70.0%, respectively (p = 0.46). Median PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.8-9.8) in the G-CSF group and 6.8 months (95% CI, 6.2-7.5) in the non-G-CSF group (p = 0.24). Median OS was 13.8 months (95% CI, 9.6-18.1) for the G-CSF group and 10.6 months (95% CI, 7.9-13.3) for the non-G-CSF group (p = 0.47). Grade 3 ≥ adverse events were similar between groups (49.4% vs. 33.3%, respectively, p = 0.12).

Conclusion: G-CSF prophylaxis can be safely used in ES-SCLC patients undergoing carboplatin plus etoposide and atezolizumab regimen without significantly altering efficacy or increasing toxicity.

Introduction: Oncogenic tyrosine kinases (TK) are enzymes that play a key role in cell growth and proliferation and their mutations can lead to uncontrolled cell growth and development of aggressive cancer. This knowledge has led to the development of new classes of drugs, Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). They target oncogenic kinases who are associated with advanced radioactive iodine (RAI) refractory TC, which is not able to uptake RAI anymore and/or still grows between consecutive treatments with Iodine 131 (I131).

Areas covered: Since Lenvatinib and Sorafenib approval, several other molecular inhibitors have been studied and then introduced for the treatment of aggressive and refractory thyroid cancer (TC), and, although the development of adverse effects or tumor resistance mechanisms, more and more compounds are still under investigation. The literature search was executed in PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify relevant articles and clinical trials published until December 2023.

Expert opinion: In the context of clinical trials, driven by the presence of specific molecular mutations or even in the absence of both conditions, systemic therapy TKIs are valuable weapons to be used in patients affected by aggressive forms of TC, waiting for further expansion of the treatment landscape with more efficacious and safer drugs.

Introduction: Pharmacotherapy against hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has tremendously improved since the advent of interferon (IFN)-free direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). Additionally, fixed-dose pangenotypic DAAs, which are safe, potent, easy for use, and can cover a wide spectrum of patients, have been recommended by professional guidelines for DAA-naïve and DAA-experienced patients with HCV.

Areas covered: We review the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) of fixed-dose pangenotypic DAA regimens, including glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB), sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL), and sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX). Additionally, we summarize the efficacy and safety of these regimens in clinical trials as well as real-world studies for treating different populations. Lastly, we discuss unmet medical needs in managing HCV in the era of fixed-dose pangenotypic DAAs.

Expert opinion: Protease inhibitors (PIs), including GLE and VOX, are prone to have more frequent DDIs, compared to the non-structural (NS) 5A and 5B inhibitors. These regimens are generally well tolerated and can be applied to different populations, except for the contraindicated use of PI-containing DAA regimens in decompensated cirrhosis. Using the first-line GLE/PIB and SOF/VEL can eradicate HCV in more than 95% of DAA-naïve patients across different populations. The viral cure usually exceeds 95% when using the rescue SOF/VEL/VOX regimen for prior DAA failures.

Background: Obesity has been established as a significant risk factor for osteoarthritis. Anti-obesity medications (AOMs) have demonstrated efficacy in weight management. However, potential impact on osteoarthritis risk remains uncertain.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study used Kythera data from NOV2022 to JULY2024. Patients with obesity using AOMs were identified through diagnosis and prescription claims for tirzepatide, semaglutide, or liraglutide between 1NOV2023 and 31JAN2024, with a 6-month follow-up to assess OA risk. OA risk, analyzed using Cox regression and propensity score matching, controlled for comorbidities and sociodemographic factors.

Results: There were 39,394 patients living with obesity using AOM (23,933 semaglutide 12,854 tirzepatide, 2,607 liraglutide) and 72,405 without AOM use. The adjusted osteoarthritis risk was 27% % lower in AOM users than in non-users (hazard ratio (HR) = 073, 95% CI (0.67-0.79), p < 0.01). Among AOMs, tirzepatide was associated with a significantly lower osteoarthritis (OA) risk compared to semaglutide (HR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.50-0.65, p < 0.0001). Liraglutide was linked to a significantly higher OA risk vs tirzepatide (HR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.23-2.15, p = 0.0007).

Conclusions: AOM use was associated with a significantly lower risk of OA and may be an effective obesity management intervention.

Introduction: Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder, affecting about 0.6% to 1.3% of the population, and is characterized primarily by mucocutaneous bleeding secondary to defective platelet adhesion and aggregation. Current therapeutic options for those with severe disease are limited and require frequent intravenous infusions.

Areas covered: This review discusses the current and recently completed clinical trials involving pathways to FVIII augmentation for the treatment of VWD. Clinical trials registered on clinicaltrials.gov and published data via PubMed searches through June 2024 were included.

Expert opinion: Available treatment options to those with VWD are limited in part due to limited clinical trials, the complexity of VWD types, and the pharmacokinetics of current treatment options. The development of therapeutic options that reduce treatment burden is necessary to improve quality of life and reduce bleeding complications and in recent years there has been an increased interest from industry to apply novel therapeutics for VWD. The FVIII mimetic, emicizumab, has demonstrated early success in patients with severe VWD and is a promising treatment option for those who require prophylaxis. Furthermore, products like efanesoctocog alfa (Altuviiio®) and BT200 have achieved enhanced VWF/FVIII half-life extension could expand the current treatment landscape while concurrently minimizing treatment burden.

Introduction: The review article explores the evolving role of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors in immune-mediated dermatological conditions, addressing significant gaps in current treatment approaches.

Areas covered: The review comprehensively discusses the mechanisms of action of BTK inhibitors, including irreversible and reversible inhibitors. Clinical applications of BTK inhibitors in dermatological diseases such as pemphigus, chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and atopic dermatitis are explored, highlighting recent advancements and ongoing clinical trials. Potential advantages of BTK inhibitors over existing therapies and challenges in translating preclinical findings to clinical outcomes are discussed.

Expert opinion/commentary: BTK inhibitors represent a promising therapeutic avenue for immune-mediated dermatological conditions, offering oral administration, targeted pathway inhibition, and a favorable safety profile compared to biologic therapies. Ongoing research and clinical trials hold the potential to address unmet needs and reshape the therapeutic landscape in dermatology.