Sara Ellegaard Paaske, Simon Mark Dahl Baunwall, Tone Rubak, Nina Rågård, Jens Kelsen, Mette Mejlby Hansen, Anders Bergh Lødrup, Søren Lyhne, Emilie Glavind, Christa Marie Culmback Fernis, Stine Hald, Lise Tornvig Erikstrup, Lars Vinter-Jensen, Simon Lal, Susan Mikkelsen, Christian Erikstrup, Jens Frederik Dahlerup, Christian Lodberg Hvas
The cover image is based on the article Improving clinical outcomes of encapsulated faecal microbiota transplantation for Clostridioides difficile infection through empirical donor selection and optimised dosing: a quality improvement study by Sara Ellegaard Paaske et al., https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70395.
Quinn Goddard, Ante Markovinović, Paul E. Ronksley, Cynthia Seow, Christopher Ma, Abdel‐Aziz Shaheen, Gilaad G. Kaplan
Background and Aims Disentangling whether disordered eating is a cause, consequence or manifestation of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) symptoms remains a challenge. We conducted an updated systematic review and the first meta‐analysis to estimate the prevalence of eating disorders in individuals with IBD. Methods We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO from inception to 28 October 2025, for original observational studies reporting the prevalence of at least one eating disorder in an IBD population. Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated using random‐effects models and stratified by IBD type, sex, age and assessment method. Between‐study heterogeneity was assessed using Q and I2 statistics. Results Twenty‐three studies were included. Prevalence estimates varied substantially depending on how eating disorders were assessed. Studies using self‐report questionnaires yielded a pooled prevalence of 13.60% (95% CI = 9.86%–17.81%; I2 = 90.7%; n = 18), whereas studies employing physician‐assigned diagnoses yielded a lower pooled prevalence of 2.84% (95% CI = 0.00%–9.03%; I2 = 99.9%; n = 5). The highest prevalence was observed in studies using the Nine‐Item Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Screen, with a pooled estimate of 17.10% (95% CI = 12.81%–21.88%; I2 = 87.4%; n = 9). No significant differences in prevalence were found by sex, IBD subtype, age at time of study or disease activity. Conclusions Eating disorders are prevalent among individuals with IBD, particularly avoidant/restrictive types. These findings highlight the need for improved screening and greater clinical awareness to better detect and manage disordered eating in the IBD population.
背景和目的弄清楚饮食失调是炎症性肠病（IBD）症状的原因、后果还是表现，仍然是一个挑战。我们进行了一项最新的系统综述和首次荟萃分析，以估计IBD患者饮食失调的患病率。方法：我们系统地检索MEDLINE、Embase和PsycINFO数据库，从数据库建立到2025年10月28日，检索报告IBD人群中至少一种饮食失调患病率的原始观察性研究。使用随机效应模型计算合并患病率估计值，并按IBD类型、性别、年龄和评估方法分层。采用Q和I 2统计评估研究间异质性。结果纳入了23项研究。根据对饮食失调的评估方式，患病率估计有很大差异。使用自我报告问卷的研究得出的总患病率为13.60% (95% CI = 9.86%-17.81%; I 2 = 90.7%; n = 18)，而采用医生分配诊断的研究得出的总患病率较低，为2.84% （95% CI = 0.00%-9.03%; I 2 = 99.9%; n = 5）。在使用九项回避/限制性食物摄入障碍筛查的研究中观察到最高的患病率，合并估计为17.10% （95% CI = 12.81%-21.88%; I 2 = 87.4%; n = 9）。性别、IBD亚型、研究时年龄或疾病活动度在患病率方面没有显著差异。结论：进食障碍在IBD患者中普遍存在，尤其是回避型/限制性型。这些发现强调需要改进筛查和提高临床意识，以便更好地发现和管理IBD人群中的饮食失调。
{"title":"Meta‐Analysis: Prevalence of Eating Disorders in Inflammatory Bowel Disease","authors":"Quinn Goddard, Ante Markovinović, Paul E. Ronksley, Cynthia Seow, Christopher Ma, Abdel‐Aziz Shaheen, Gilaad G. Kaplan","doi":"10.1111/apt.70492","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70492","url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims Disentangling whether disordered eating is a cause, consequence or manifestation of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) symptoms remains a challenge. We conducted an updated systematic review and the first meta‐analysis to estimate the prevalence of eating disorders in individuals with IBD. Methods We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO from inception to 28 October 2025, for original observational studies reporting the prevalence of at least one eating disorder in an IBD population. Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated using random‐effects models and stratified by IBD type, sex, age and assessment method. Between‐study heterogeneity was assessed using <jats:italic>Q</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>I</jats:italic> <jats:sup>2</jats:sup> statistics. Results Twenty‐three studies were included. Prevalence estimates varied substantially depending on how eating disorders were assessed. Studies using self‐report questionnaires yielded a pooled prevalence of 13.60% (95% CI = 9.86%–17.81%; <jats:italic>I</jats:italic> <jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 90.7%; <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 18), whereas studies employing physician‐assigned diagnoses yielded a lower pooled prevalence of 2.84% (95% CI = 0.00%–9.03%; <jats:italic>I</jats:italic> <jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 99.9%; <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 5). The highest prevalence was observed in studies using the Nine‐Item Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Screen, with a pooled estimate of 17.10% (95% CI = 12.81%–21.88%; <jats:italic>I</jats:italic> <jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 87.4%; <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 9). No significant differences in prevalence were found by sex, IBD subtype, age at time of study or disease activity. Conclusions Eating disorders are prevalent among individuals with IBD, particularly avoidant/restrictive types. These findings highlight the need for improved screening and greater clinical awareness to better detect and manage disordered eating in the IBD population.","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145844744","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Xiao‐Dong Zhou, Yusuf Yilmaz, Mazen Noureddin, Hung N. Luu, Ming‐Hua Zheng
{"title":"Editorial: Combination Therapies for MASH : A Step Forward or More Complexity?","authors":"Xiao‐Dong Zhou, Yusuf Yilmaz, Mazen Noureddin, Hung N. Luu, Ming‐Hua Zheng","doi":"10.1111/apt.70487","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70487","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145836129","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
William Chai, Nicole E. Rich, Yan Liu, Juana Campos, Lisa Quirk, Jennifer R. Kramer, Jahna Anyanwu, Amanda Gibbons, Aaron Loewy, Dalal Youssef, Riya Malhorta, Hadley McGhee, Meena Tadros, Fasiha Kanwal, Amit G. Singal
Background Patient‐reported barriers to care can delay treatment and increase mortality. Addressing these barriers can improve clinical outcomes and reduce disparities, underscoring the importance to understand their prevalence in patients with cirrhosis. Methods We invited adults with cirrhosis at four US health systems (two tertiary care referral centres, one safety‐net health system, and one Veterans Affairs medical center) to complete a survey assessing barriers to care. Questions for barriers to care were adapted from prior surveys as available. Responses were summarised using descriptive statistics, and Chi‐square analysis was used to examine differences by study site and race/ethnicity. Results Of 5197 patients contacted by telephone, 1332 (25.6%) completed the survey and were eligible for analyses. The most frequent barriers to care included time to travel to clinic (22.7%), long wait times for appointments (21.6%), and difficulty scheduling visits (19.2%). Conversely, few patients reported competing demands or difficulty finding time for liver appointments, difficulty discussing concerns with their physicians, or lack of physician engagement with concerns. Several barriers to care significantly differed by study site but were generally consistent across racial and ethnic subgroups. Conclusion Patients with cirrhosis report frequent barriers to medical care including limited access to clinic appointments, although barriers vary by healthcare system. Barriers to care serve as intervention targets to improve outcomes for patients with cirrhosis.
{"title":"Barriers to Medical Care Are Frequently Reported by Patients With Cirrhosis","authors":"William Chai, Nicole E. Rich, Yan Liu, Juana Campos, Lisa Quirk, Jennifer R. Kramer, Jahna Anyanwu, Amanda Gibbons, Aaron Loewy, Dalal Youssef, Riya Malhorta, Hadley McGhee, Meena Tadros, Fasiha Kanwal, Amit G. Singal","doi":"10.1111/apt.70511","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70511","url":null,"abstract":"Background Patient‐reported barriers to care can delay treatment and increase mortality. Addressing these barriers can improve clinical outcomes and reduce disparities, underscoring the importance to understand their prevalence in patients with cirrhosis. Methods We invited adults with cirrhosis at four US health systems (two tertiary care referral centres, one safety‐net health system, and one Veterans Affairs medical center) to complete a survey assessing barriers to care. Questions for barriers to care were adapted from prior surveys as available. Responses were summarised using descriptive statistics, and Chi‐square analysis was used to examine differences by study site and race/ethnicity. Results Of 5197 patients contacted by telephone, 1332 (25.6%) completed the survey and were eligible for analyses. The most frequent barriers to care included time to travel to clinic (22.7%), long wait times for appointments (21.6%), and difficulty scheduling visits (19.2%). Conversely, few patients reported competing demands or difficulty finding time for liver appointments, difficulty discussing concerns with their physicians, or lack of physician engagement with concerns. Several barriers to care significantly differed by study site but were generally consistent across racial and ethnic subgroups. Conclusion Patients with cirrhosis report frequent barriers to medical care including limited access to clinic appointments, although barriers vary by healthcare system. Barriers to care serve as intervention targets to improve outcomes for patients with cirrhosis.","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145836123","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Editorial: Combination Therapies for MASH : A Step Forward or More Complexity? Authors' Reply","authors":"Eric Lawitz, Linda Greenbaum","doi":"10.1111/apt.70510","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70510","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145836125","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
BACKGROUNDSteatotic liver disease (SLD) and cardiometabolic risk factors (CMRFs) are common in chronic hepatitis C (CHC). The risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) after sustained virological response (SVR) remains elusive.AIMSThis study assessed the impact of CMRFs on cardiovascular outcomes in CHC patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) after achieving SVR.METHODSWe recruited SLD patients from the nationwide multicenter cohorts in Taiwan. Their CMRFs and fibrosis stage were assessed after SVR. Competing risk analyses, including Grey's method and Cox regression, were performed to estimate cardiovascular outcomes.RESULTSAmong 8755 patients, 624 developed MACEs during a mean follow-up of 3.9 years. The incidence of MACEs was significantly higher in patients with MASLD than in the simple SLD group (190.2 vs. 84.0 per 10,000 person-years, p < 0.001). Age, advanced fibrosis, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and CMRFs burden were independently associated with MACEs. The MACEs risk increased with CMRFs burden, with adjusted hazard ratios from 1.72 for one CMRF to 2.33 for ≥ four CMRFs. The risk was significantly higher in patients without advanced fibrosis or CKD than in their counterparts.CONCLUSIONSCMRFs burden, advanced fibrosis, and CKD predicted MACEs in CHC patients with MASLD after achieving SVR. CMRFs monitoring and management should be prioritised in high-risk patients.
背景：脂肪变性肝病（SLD）和心脏代谢危险因素（cmrf）在慢性丙型肝炎（CHC）中很常见。持续病毒学反应（SVR）后发生主要不良心血管事件（mace）的风险仍然难以捉摸。目的：本研究评估CMRFs对CHC合并代谢功能障碍相关脂肪变性肝病（MASLD）患者达到SVR后心血管结局的影响。方法：我们从台湾的全国性多中心队列中招募SLD患者。SVR后评估cmrf和纤维化分期。竞争风险分析，包括Grey's方法和Cox回归，用于估计心血管预后。结果8755例患者中，624例在平均3.9年的随访期间发生mace。MASLD患者的mace发生率显著高于单纯SLD组（190.2 vs 84.0 / 10000人年，p < 0.001）。年龄、晚期纤维化、慢性肾脏疾病（CKD）和CMRFs负担与mace独立相关。mace风险随着CMRF负担的增加而增加，调整后的风险比从1个CMRF的1.72增加到≥4个CMRF的2.33。无晚期纤维化或CKD患者的风险明显高于对照组。结论scmrfs负担、晚期纤维化和CKD可预测CHC合并MASLD患者在达到SVR后的mace。高危患者应优先监测和管理cmrf。
{"title":"Advanced Fibrosis and Cardiometabolic Risk Burden Increase Major Cardiovascular Events in Chronic Hepatitis C Patients With Steatotic Liver Disease After Viral Eradication.","authors":"Pei-Chien Tsai,Chung-Feng Huang,Ming-Lun Yeh,Yu-Ju Wei,Chih-Wen Wang,Tyng-Yuan Jang,Po-Cheng Liang,Yi-Hung Lin,Chia-Yen Dai,Jee-Fu Huang,Wan-Long Chuang,Ming-Lung Yu, ","doi":"10.1111/apt.70500","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70500","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDSteatotic liver disease (SLD) and cardiometabolic risk factors (CMRFs) are common in chronic hepatitis C (CHC). The risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) after sustained virological response (SVR) remains elusive.AIMSThis study assessed the impact of CMRFs on cardiovascular outcomes in CHC patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) after achieving SVR.METHODSWe recruited SLD patients from the nationwide multicenter cohorts in Taiwan. Their CMRFs and fibrosis stage were assessed after SVR. Competing risk analyses, including Grey's method and Cox regression, were performed to estimate cardiovascular outcomes.RESULTSAmong 8755 patients, 624 developed MACEs during a mean follow-up of 3.9 years. The incidence of MACEs was significantly higher in patients with MASLD than in the simple SLD group (190.2 vs. 84.0 per 10,000 person-years, p < 0.001). Age, advanced fibrosis, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and CMRFs burden were independently associated with MACEs. The MACEs risk increased with CMRFs burden, with adjusted hazard ratios from 1.72 for one CMRF to 2.33 for ≥ four CMRFs. The risk was significantly higher in patients without advanced fibrosis or CKD than in their counterparts.CONCLUSIONSCMRFs burden, advanced fibrosis, and CKD predicted MACEs in CHC patients with MASLD after achieving SVR. CMRFs monitoring and management should be prioritised in high-risk patients.","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"184 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145830338","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mais Khasawneh, Vivek C. Goodoory, Cho Ee Ng, Alexander C. Ford, Christopher J. Black
Background Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common disorder characterised by recurrent abdominal pain and altered bowel habits. Although IBS is classified according to stool form, symptom patterns fluctuate over time, posing challenges for subtype‐based management. Aims To assess stability of IBS classification over 12 months using four approaches: stool form, most troublesome symptom, a seven‐cluster latent class analysis (LCA) incorporating gastrointestinal and psychological symptoms and a simplified LCA based on degree of psychological burden. Methods Participants were recruited from ContactME‐IBS, a national UK registry. Individuals meeting Rome IV criteria for IBS completed validated online questionnaires at baseline and 12 months assessing gastrointestinal and psychological symptoms. Participants were sub grouped according to the four classification methods, and stability between baseline and follow‐up was evaluated using Cohen's kappa statistic. Results Of 752 participants meeting Rome IV criteria at baseline, 352 completed 12‐month follow‐up, with 259 (73.6%) continuing to meet Rome IV criteria. The highest stability was observed for stool form‐based subtyping (κ = 0.60), particularly in IBS with diarrhoea (83% remained stable). Classification based on psychological burden showed similar stability (κ = 0.54). In contrast, subgrouping by most troublesome symptom (κ = 0.47) and the seven‐cluster LCA (κ = 0.37) demonstrated lower stability. Conclusion Different IBS classifications showed only moderate stability over 12 months, highlighting the fluctuating nature of the disorder. Stool form and psychological burden‐based systems were most stable, but no method fully captured IBS variability. Future work could develop dynamic models integrating gastrointestinal and psychological factors to better guide management.
{"title":"Stability of Classification Systems for Irritable Bowel Syndrome","authors":"Mais Khasawneh, Vivek C. Goodoory, Cho Ee Ng, Alexander C. Ford, Christopher J. Black","doi":"10.1111/apt.70503","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70503","url":null,"abstract":"Background Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common disorder characterised by recurrent abdominal pain and altered bowel habits. Although IBS is classified according to stool form, symptom patterns fluctuate over time, posing challenges for subtype‐based management. Aims To assess stability of IBS classification over 12 months using four approaches: stool form, most troublesome symptom, a seven‐cluster latent class analysis (LCA) incorporating gastrointestinal and psychological symptoms and a simplified LCA based on degree of psychological burden. Methods Participants were recruited from ContactME‐IBS, a national UK registry. Individuals meeting Rome IV criteria for IBS completed validated online questionnaires at baseline and 12 months assessing gastrointestinal and psychological symptoms. Participants were sub grouped according to the four classification methods, and stability between baseline and follow‐up was evaluated using Cohen's kappa statistic. Results Of 752 participants meeting Rome IV criteria at baseline, 352 completed 12‐month follow‐up, with 259 (73.6%) continuing to meet Rome IV criteria. The highest stability was observed for stool form‐based subtyping (κ = 0.60), particularly in IBS with diarrhoea (83% remained stable). Classification based on psychological burden showed similar stability (κ = 0.54). In contrast, subgrouping by most troublesome symptom (κ = 0.47) and the seven‐cluster LCA (κ = 0.37) demonstrated lower stability. Conclusion Different IBS classifications showed only moderate stability over 12 months, highlighting the fluctuating nature of the disorder. Stool form and psychological burden‐based systems were most stable, but no method fully captured IBS variability. Future work could develop dynamic models integrating gastrointestinal and psychological factors to better guide management.","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145822907","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Saqr Alsakarneh, Omar Al Ta’ani, Madi Y. Mahmoud, Wing‐Kin Syn, James K. Ruffle, Qasim Aziz, Adam D. Farmer
Background Ehlers–Danlos syndrome (EDS) comprises inherited connective tissue disorders characterised by joint hypermobility, skin hyperextensibility and tissue fragility. It links to systemic comorbidities, including gastrointestinal (GI) disorders, but hitherto large‐scale data remain limited. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of GI, systemic and psychological comorbidities in EDS patients versus propensity score‐matched controls, using a comprehensive research network database. Design This was a retrospective, propensity‐matched analysis (2005–2023) utilising the TriNetX network. We identified EDS patients (excluding Marfan's syndrome). Propensity score matching (1:1) generated balanced cohorts for age, sex and baseline characteristics. Comorbidities were analysed via prevalence rates and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Matched cohorts included 59,128 pairs. Among GI disorders, gastroesophageal reflux disease was most common in EDS (18.4%, OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.4–1.5, p < 0.001), followed by constipation (12.4%, OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.7–1.9, p < 0.001), irritable bowel syndrome (7.3%, OR 2.6, 95% CI 2.5–2.8, p < 0.001) and gastroparesis (4.7%, OR 8.2, 95% CI 7.3–9.2, p < 0.001). Psychiatric conditions showed heightened prevalence of anxiety (26.1%, OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.7–1.8, p < 0.001) and depression (18.7%, OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.2–1.3, p < 0.001). Systemic comorbidities included postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (13.2%, OR 899.7, 95% CI 483.8–1673.0, p < 0.001), chronic pain (7.9%, OR 7.0, 95% CI 6.4–7.6, p < 0.001), migraines (19.7%, OR 2.5, 95% CI 2.4–2.6, p < 0.001) and fibromyalgia (9.5%, OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.6–1.8, p < 0.001). Conclusion EDS patients exhibit heightened risk for GI, systemic and psychological comorbidities, highlighting the importance of multidisciplinary approaches for effective management.
背景Ehlers-Danlos综合征（EDS）包括遗传性结缔组织疾病，其特征是关节过度活动，皮肤过度伸展和组织脆弱。它与包括胃肠道（GI）疾病在内的全身性合并症有关，但迄今为止大规模的数据仍然有限。我们的目的是利用一个综合的研究网络数据库，评估EDS患者与倾向评分匹配对照的胃肠道、全身和心理合并症的患病率。这是一项回顾性的倾向匹配分析（2005-2023），利用TriNetX网络。我们确定了EDS患者（不包括马凡氏综合征）。倾向评分匹配（1:1）生成年龄、性别和基线特征的平衡队列。通过患病率和95%置信区间（ci）的优势比（ORs）分析合并症。结果匹配的队列包括59,128对。在胃肠道疾病中，胃食管反流病在EDS中最常见（18.4%,OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.4-1.5, p < 0.001），其次是便秘（12.4%,OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.7-1.9, p < 0.001），肠易激综合征（7.3%,OR 2.6, 95% CI 2.5-2.8, p < 0.001）和胃轻瘫（4.7%,OR 8.2, 95% CI 7.3-9.2, p < 0.001）。精神疾病显示焦虑（26.1%,OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.7-1.8, p < 0.001）和抑郁（18.7%,OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.2-1.3, p < 0.001）的患病率升高。全身性合并症包括体位性心动过速综合征（13.2%,OR 899.7, 95% CI 483.8-1673.0, p < 0.001）、慢性疼痛（7.9%,OR 7.0, 95% CI 6.4-7.6, p < 0.001）、偏头痛（19.7%,OR 2.5, 95% CI 2.4-2.6, p < 0.001）和纤维肌痛（9.5%,OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.6-1.8, p < 0.001）。结论EDS患者出现胃肠道、全身和心理合并症的风险较高，强调了多学科方法对有效治疗的重要性。
{"title":"Comprehensive Risk Profile of Gastrointestinal and Extra Articular Comorbidities in Ehlers–Danlos Syndrome: A Propensity‐Matched Analysis of 118,256 Individuals","authors":"Saqr Alsakarneh, Omar Al Ta’ani, Madi Y. Mahmoud, Wing‐Kin Syn, James K. Ruffle, Qasim Aziz, Adam D. Farmer","doi":"10.1111/apt.70506","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70506","url":null,"abstract":"Background Ehlers–Danlos syndrome (EDS) comprises inherited connective tissue disorders characterised by joint hypermobility, skin hyperextensibility and tissue fragility. It links to systemic comorbidities, including gastrointestinal (GI) disorders, but hitherto large‐scale data remain limited. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of GI, systemic and psychological comorbidities in EDS patients versus propensity score‐matched controls, using a comprehensive research network database. Design This was a retrospective, propensity‐matched analysis (2005–2023) utilising the TriNetX network. We identified EDS patients (excluding Marfan's syndrome). Propensity score matching (1:1) generated balanced cohorts for age, sex and baseline characteristics. Comorbidities were analysed via prevalence rates and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Matched cohorts included 59,128 pairs. Among GI disorders, gastroesophageal reflux disease was most common in EDS (18.4%, OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.4–1.5, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.001), followed by constipation (12.4%, OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.7–1.9, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.001), irritable bowel syndrome (7.3%, OR 2.6, 95% CI 2.5–2.8, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.001) and gastroparesis (4.7%, OR 8.2, 95% CI 7.3–9.2, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.001). Psychiatric conditions showed heightened prevalence of anxiety (26.1%, OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.7–1.8, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.001) and depression (18.7%, OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.2–1.3, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.001). Systemic comorbidities included postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (13.2%, OR 899.7, 95% CI 483.8–1673.0, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.001), chronic pain (7.9%, OR 7.0, 95% CI 6.4–7.6, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.001), migraines (19.7%, OR 2.5, 95% CI 2.4–2.6, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.001) and fibromyalgia (9.5%, OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.6–1.8, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.001). Conclusion EDS patients exhibit heightened risk for GI, systemic and psychological comorbidities, highlighting the importance of multidisciplinary approaches for effective management.","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"250 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145807674","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Scott Silvey, Nilang Patel, Jacqueline G. O'Leary, Timothy Morgan, John D. Markley, Sofia S. Jakab, Heather Patton, Shari Rogal, Jasmohan S. Bajaj
Background With changes in bacteriology and cirrhosis demographics, the impact of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) on cirrhosis outcomes needs re‐evaluation. Aim Determine the importance of SBP on mortality and liver transplant (LT) across occurrence/recurrence and prophylaxis in a national cohort of Veterans with decompensated cirrhosis. Method Veterans admitted with their first hepatic decompensation between 2009 and 2019 were evaluated for SBP development, and use of primary/secondary SBP prophylaxis (PSPr/SSPr) to determine the associations between SBP and interaction with mortality and LT. Results 52,392 Veterans were included and followed for 7.51 ± 3.83 years, during which 77% died and 2.4% received LT. 16.7% developed one SBP episode, 2.3% two episodes and 0.8% ≥ 3 episodes. Patients on PSPr versus not showed a 24% higher mortality risk, those on SSPr versus not had a 5% increased mortality risk with first and 28% higher mortality risk with additional recurrences. SBPPr interacted with SBP episode number (1.4× PSPr and 1.76× for SSPr) for mortality but not LT. SBP cultures showed higher resistance with increasing SBP episodes (2nd vs. 1st: OR = 2.51, p < 0.001; ≥ 3 vs. 2nd: OR = 7.84, p < 0.001) and with SBPPr (PSPr vs. no prophylaxis: OR = 2.30; SSPr vs. no at first recurrence: OR = 3.70; SSPr vs. no at ≥ 2 recurrences: OR = 10.79, all p < 0.001). Despite documented resistance on PSPr, 82% of patients were continued on the same medication for SSPr, with similar rates of continuation after repeat infection while on SSPr. Conclusion In a national cohort of newly decompensated cirrhosis Veterans, SBP increased mortality, which worsened with recurrence. SBP prophylaxis (primary or secondary) showed an interaction with higher mortality but not LT. Antibiotic resistance increased with SBPPr, but culture results were not followed while resuming/initiating SBPPr. Novel strategies to prevent SBP recurrence and mortality are needed.
{"title":"Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis Is Associated With High Mortality, Which Interacts With Antibiotic Prophylaxis in a National Cirrhosis Cohort","authors":"Scott Silvey, Nilang Patel, Jacqueline G. O'Leary, Timothy Morgan, John D. Markley, Sofia S. Jakab, Heather Patton, Shari Rogal, Jasmohan S. Bajaj","doi":"10.1111/apt.70498","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70498","url":null,"abstract":"Background With changes in bacteriology and cirrhosis demographics, the impact of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) on cirrhosis outcomes needs re‐evaluation. Aim Determine the importance of SBP on mortality and liver transplant (LT) across occurrence/recurrence and prophylaxis in a national cohort of Veterans with decompensated cirrhosis. Method Veterans admitted with their first hepatic decompensation between 2009 and 2019 were evaluated for SBP development, and use of primary/secondary SBP prophylaxis (PSPr/SSPr) to determine the associations between SBP and interaction with mortality and LT. Results 52,392 Veterans were included and followed for 7.51 ± 3.83 years, during which 77% died and 2.4% received LT. 16.7% developed one SBP episode, 2.3% two episodes and 0.8% ≥ 3 episodes. Patients on PSPr versus not showed a 24% higher mortality risk, those on SSPr versus not had a 5% increased mortality risk with first and 28% higher mortality risk with additional recurrences. SBPPr interacted with SBP episode number (1.4× PSPr and 1.76× for SSPr) for mortality but not LT. SBP cultures showed higher resistance with increasing SBP episodes (2nd vs. 1st: OR = 2.51, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.001; ≥ 3 vs. 2nd: OR = 7.84, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.001) and with SBPPr (PSPr vs. no prophylaxis: OR = 2.30; SSPr vs. no at first recurrence: OR = 3.70; SSPr vs. no at ≥ 2 recurrences: OR = 10.79, all <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.001). Despite documented resistance on PSPr, 82% of patients were continued on the same medication for SSPr, with similar rates of continuation after repeat infection while on SSPr. Conclusion In a national cohort of newly decompensated cirrhosis Veterans, SBP increased mortality, which worsened with recurrence. SBP prophylaxis (primary or secondary) showed an interaction with higher mortality but not LT. Antibiotic resistance increased with SBPPr, but culture results were not followed while resuming/initiating SBPPr. Novel strategies to prevent SBP recurrence and mortality are needed.","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"182 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145801022","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marco Vincenzo Lenti, Giovanni Santacroce, Antonio Di Sabatino
{"title":"Editorial: The Hidden Burden—Stigmatisation in Inflammatory Bowel Disease","authors":"Marco Vincenzo Lenti, Giovanni Santacroce, Antonio Di Sabatino","doi":"10.1111/apt.70478","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70478","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145801021","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号