首页 > 最新文献

Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics最新文献

英文 中文
Letter: Circulating CD4+PD-1+T Cell Ratio Predicts Response to Pegylated Interferon-Alpha Therapy in Chronic Hepatitis B. 信:循环CD4+PD-1+T细胞比例预测聚乙二醇化干扰素- α治疗对慢性乙型肝炎的反应。
IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-26 DOI: 10.1111/apt.70646
Yonghong Wang,Bei Cai,Chengrun Song,Jiangnan Peng,Taoyou Zhou,Jiajie Lu,Xuezhong Lei,Enqiang Chen
{"title":"Letter: Circulating CD4+PD-1+T Cell Ratio Predicts Response to Pegylated Interferon-Alpha Therapy in Chronic Hepatitis B.","authors":"Yonghong Wang,Bei Cai,Chengrun Song,Jiangnan Peng,Taoyou Zhou,Jiajie Lu,Xuezhong Lei,Enqiang Chen","doi":"10.1111/apt.70646","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70646","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"191 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147518500","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Systematic Review: Imaging-Based Morphological Criteria for Liver Cirrhosis—A Call to Standardise 系统综述:基于影像学的肝硬化形态学标准——对标准化的呼吁
IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-25 DOI: 10.1111/apt.70629
Mei Chin Lim, Ethan Joo Wei Quek, Talia Yi Hui Chan, Margaret Teng, Cheng Han Ng, Mirudhula Gnanavelou, Vincent L. Chen, Jonathan A. Fallowfield, Huimiao Zhang, Mazen Noureddin, Donghyun Ko, Benjamin Nah, Hirokazu Takahashi, Mohammad Shadab Siddiqui, Jimmy Che-To Lai, Karn Wijarnpreecha, Minghua Zheng, Rahul Kumar, Chitchai Rattananukrom, Alfred Kow, Nicholas Syn, Yuan-Cheng Wang, Atsushi Nakajima, An Tang, Jeong Min Lee, Daniel Q. Huang, Mark Muthiah, Claude B. Sirlin
Cirrhosis is the irreversible architectural endpoint of chronic liver disease and is the greatest risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Despite its centrality in HCC management algorithms, there are no standardised morphologic criteria for diagnosing cirrhosis on cross-sectional imaging. Criteria used in clinical studies and clinical practice guidelines have not been reviewed systematically. We aim to assess cross-sectional imaging criteria in clinical practice guidelines and clinical studies.
肝硬化是慢性肝病不可逆转的结构终点,是肝细胞癌(HCC)的最大危险因素。尽管肝硬化在HCC管理算法中处于中心地位,但在横断面成像上诊断肝硬化尚无标准化的形态学标准。临床研究和临床实践指南中使用的标准尚未得到系统的审查。我们的目的是评估临床实践指南和临床研究中的横断成像标准。
{"title":"Systematic Review: Imaging-Based Morphological Criteria for Liver Cirrhosis—A Call to Standardise","authors":"Mei Chin Lim, Ethan Joo Wei Quek, Talia Yi Hui Chan, Margaret Teng, Cheng Han Ng, Mirudhula Gnanavelou, Vincent L. Chen, Jonathan A. Fallowfield, Huimiao Zhang, Mazen Noureddin, Donghyun Ko, Benjamin Nah, Hirokazu Takahashi, Mohammad Shadab Siddiqui, Jimmy Che-To Lai, Karn Wijarnpreecha, Minghua Zheng, Rahul Kumar, Chitchai Rattananukrom, Alfred Kow, Nicholas Syn, Yuan-Cheng Wang, Atsushi Nakajima, An Tang, Jeong Min Lee, Daniel Q. Huang, Mark Muthiah, Claude B. Sirlin","doi":"10.1111/apt.70629","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70629","url":null,"abstract":"Cirrhosis is the irreversible architectural endpoint of chronic liver disease and is the greatest risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Despite its centrality in HCC management algorithms, there are no standardised morphologic criteria for diagnosing cirrhosis on cross-sectional imaging. Criteria used in clinical studies and clinical practice guidelines have not been reviewed systematically. We aim to assess cross-sectional imaging criteria in clinical practice guidelines and clinical studies.","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147507613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial: Predicting Hepatocellular Cancer in Clinical Practice. Authors' Reply 社论:在临床实践中预测肝细胞癌。作者的回复
IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-25 DOI: 10.1111/apt.70647
Shuaibing Ying, Yunqing Qiu, Yan Lou
<p>We thank Professor Taha for the insightful Editorial on our study addressing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk prediction after hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance [<span>1, 2</span>]. His comments appropriately highlight emerging priorities in the future management of HCC, particularly the need for refined risk stratification and stage-shifting surveillance strategies [<span>3</span>]. We are encouraged that the clinical relevance of our model, particularly its capacity to identify early-stage HCC, has been recognized.</p><p>Our study was designed to address a clinically under-recognized population, patients achieving HBsAg seroclearance, who retain a measurable but heterogeneous residual risk of HCC [<span>4</span>]. By focusing specifically on this population, our model integrates six routinely available clinical parameters to provide a simple and clinically implementable tool for risk stratification. We acknowledge that the CAMP-B model has also demonstrated robust performance in this setting [<span>5</span>]. Our model builds upon these prior efforts by further refining risk stratification in this population and offering complementary clinical value.</p><p>Importantly, the limitations highlighted in the Editorial also point towards several directions for future research. The absence of detailed viral factors, performance status, and potentially protective exposures reflects inherent constraints of real-world retrospective datasets, but also underscores the need for prospective cohorts with more comprehensive phenotyping. In the context of HBsAg seroclearance, viral replication is typically minimal or undetectable, as serum HBsAg levels are thought to reflect intrahepatic cccDNA transcriptional activity and HBV DNA integration-derived transcripts [<span>6</span>]. However, this suggests that traditional virological markers may have limited ability to capture the underlying biological heterogeneity in this setting, thereby necessitating the exploration of alternative biomarkers. Importantly, HBV DNA integration can persist within the host genome even after effective viral suppression, and the burden of viral integration—particularly the number of integration breakpoints—has been shown to correlate with the likelihood of HBsAg loss [<span>7</span>]. These findings highlight that integration-related heterogeneity may contribute to differential clinical outcomes following seroclearance. In addition, performance status, such as Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score, has been well established as a prognostic factor in oncology [<span>8</span>]. However, in real-world outpatient cohorts with regular follow-up, there may be an inherent selection towards patients with preserved functional status. Future studies are therefore warranted to clarify the role of functional status in both HBsAg seroclearance and subsequent HCC risk. Furthermore, metabolic comorbidities, including diabetes, metabolic associated fatty liver disease, an
我们感谢Taha教授对我们乙肝表面抗原(HBsAg)血清清除后肝细胞癌(HCC)风险预测的研究发表了有见地的社论[1,2]。他的评论恰当地强调了未来HCC管理中出现的优先事项,特别是需要精确的风险分层和阶段转移监测策略[10]。令人鼓舞的是,我们的模型的临床相关性,特别是其识别早期HCC的能力,已得到认可。我们的研究旨在解决临床未被充分认识的人群,即达到HBsAg血清清除的患者,他们保留了可测量的但异质性的HCC残余风险。通过特别关注这一人群,我们的模型整合了六个常规可用的临床参数,为风险分层提供了一个简单且临床上可实施的工具。我们承认,CAMP-B模型在这种情况下也表现出了强大的性能。我们的模型建立在这些先前的努力的基础上,进一步完善了这一人群的风险分层,并提供了补充的临床价值。重要的是,社论中强调的局限性也指出了未来研究的几个方向。缺乏详细的病毒因素、表现状态和潜在的保护性暴露反映了现实世界回顾性数据集的固有局限性,但也强调了对更全面表型的前瞻性队列的需求。在HBsAg血清清除的情况下,病毒复制通常是最小的或无法检测到的,因为血清HBsAg水平被认为反映了肝内cccDNA转录活性和HBV DNA整合衍生转录物[6]。然而,这表明传统的病毒学标记在这种情况下捕捉潜在的生物异质性的能力可能有限,因此有必要探索替代生物标记。重要的是,即使在有效的病毒抑制后,HBV DNA整合也可以在宿主基因组中持续存在,并且病毒整合的负担-特别是整合断点的数量-已被证明与HBsAg损失的可能性相关。这些发现强调整合相关的异质性可能导致血清清除后临床结果的差异。此外,表现状况,如东部肿瘤合作小组评分,已被确定为肿瘤bb0的预后因素。然而,在现实世界中,定期随访的门诊队列中,可能存在对保留功能状态的患者的固有选择。因此,未来的研究有必要阐明功能状态在HBsAg血清清除率和随后的HCC风险中的作用。此外,代谢性合并症,包括糖尿病、代谢性相关脂肪性肝病和高血压,已经越来越多地被认为是肝癌发生的因素。相应地,针对这些情况的药物可能对HBsAg血清清除后患者的HCC发展具有保护作用,尽管强有力的证据仍然有限。这突出了未来研究的重要途径,特别是与优化这一人群的长期管理策略有关。从转化的角度来看,我们的研究结果支持向适应风险的监测策略转变。进一步的外部验证和前瞻性研究将至关重要,以确认其临床应用,并促进其融入日常实践。将临床风险评分与新兴的机器学习方法或多组学数据相结合,可能会提供改进个性化预测和改善早期检测的机会。总之,我们的研究结果为HBsAg血清清除后的风险分层提供了一个实用的框架。
{"title":"Editorial: Predicting Hepatocellular Cancer in Clinical Practice. Authors' Reply","authors":"Shuaibing Ying, Yunqing Qiu, Yan Lou","doi":"10.1111/apt.70647","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70647","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;We thank Professor Taha for the insightful Editorial on our study addressing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk prediction after hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance [&lt;span&gt;1, 2&lt;/span&gt;]. His comments appropriately highlight emerging priorities in the future management of HCC, particularly the need for refined risk stratification and stage-shifting surveillance strategies [&lt;span&gt;3&lt;/span&gt;]. We are encouraged that the clinical relevance of our model, particularly its capacity to identify early-stage HCC, has been recognized.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt;Our study was designed to address a clinically under-recognized population, patients achieving HBsAg seroclearance, who retain a measurable but heterogeneous residual risk of HCC [&lt;span&gt;4&lt;/span&gt;]. By focusing specifically on this population, our model integrates six routinely available clinical parameters to provide a simple and clinically implementable tool for risk stratification. We acknowledge that the CAMP-B model has also demonstrated robust performance in this setting [&lt;span&gt;5&lt;/span&gt;]. Our model builds upon these prior efforts by further refining risk stratification in this population and offering complementary clinical value.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt;Importantly, the limitations highlighted in the Editorial also point towards several directions for future research. The absence of detailed viral factors, performance status, and potentially protective exposures reflects inherent constraints of real-world retrospective datasets, but also underscores the need for prospective cohorts with more comprehensive phenotyping. In the context of HBsAg seroclearance, viral replication is typically minimal or undetectable, as serum HBsAg levels are thought to reflect intrahepatic cccDNA transcriptional activity and HBV DNA integration-derived transcripts [&lt;span&gt;6&lt;/span&gt;]. However, this suggests that traditional virological markers may have limited ability to capture the underlying biological heterogeneity in this setting, thereby necessitating the exploration of alternative biomarkers. Importantly, HBV DNA integration can persist within the host genome even after effective viral suppression, and the burden of viral integration—particularly the number of integration breakpoints—has been shown to correlate with the likelihood of HBsAg loss [&lt;span&gt;7&lt;/span&gt;]. These findings highlight that integration-related heterogeneity may contribute to differential clinical outcomes following seroclearance. In addition, performance status, such as Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score, has been well established as a prognostic factor in oncology [&lt;span&gt;8&lt;/span&gt;]. However, in real-world outpatient cohorts with regular follow-up, there may be an inherent selection towards patients with preserved functional status. Future studies are therefore warranted to clarify the role of functional status in both HBsAg seroclearance and subsequent HCC risk. Furthermore, metabolic comorbidities, including diabetes, metabolic associated fatty liver disease, an","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147507614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial: Predicting Hepatocellular Cancer in Clinical Practice 社论:在临床实践中预测肝细胞癌
IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-25 DOI: 10.1111/apt.70644
Ali S. Taha
<p>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with approximately 900,000 new cases and 830,000 deaths per year, making it the sixth most common cancer and the third most lethal cancer worldwide [<span>1, 2</span>]. Using both alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) measurement and ultrasound scans to screen patients in dedicated cirrhosis clinics has yielded a steady rise in the incidence of HCC but without necessarily improving the mortality outcomes [<span>3</span>]. Besides cirrhosis, other key risk factors for HCC include chronic viral hepatitis, haemochromatosis and, increasingly, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, MASLD [<span>2, 3</span>].</p><p>It is, therefore, understandable that attempts continue to be made to predict HCC and identify it in its early and potentially treatable stages. Predictions have involved the analysis of demographic, aetiological, laboratory and imaging findings. Machine Learning (AI) Models have been tested, such as the Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Random Survival Forests (RSF), which are used to analyse electronic health records, focusing on age, gender and comorbidities, often without using laboratory results. Risk Scores and biomarkers were also used including the GALAD Score (combining Gender, Age and three biomarkers [AFP, AFP-L3, DCP] for high accuracy); aMAP Score (uses Age, Male gender, Albumin-bilirubin and Platelets); and AAAPD-C Score (focusing on patients with hepatitis C after treatment [Age, Albumin, AFP, Platelets, Diabetes status]) [<span>4-8</span>].</p><p>Despite the existence of this multitude of scoring systems, in this issue of <i>AP&T</i>, Dr. Ying and colleagues shift the focus to the prediction of HCC after hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) [<span>9</span>]. This is justifiable by the ongoing common nature of hepatitis B, affecting 254 million people globally, and the still rising death rates from viral hepatitis despite recent advances in prevention and management [<span>10</span>]. Other risk models have already been proposed for the prediction of HCC development, including PAGE-B, modified PAGE-B (mPAGE-B) for CHB and Yang's model, CAMP-B model for HBsAg seroclearance patients; but as Dr. Ying and colleagues point out, most existing models were derived from cohorts of patients with ongoing CHB infection, and their applicability to patients who have achieved HBsAg seroclearance remains uncertain. The authors found six independent risk factors capable of predicting HCC occurrence, including age ≥ 50 years, male, platelet count ≤ 150 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L, albumin level ≤ 44 g/L, with cirrhosis at HBsAg seroclearance and AVT-induced HBsAg seroclearance. They concluded that their six-factor model enables risk stratification among patients achieving HBsAg seroclearance and may assist in informing surveillance strategies in clinical practice. Their data do not adjus
肝细胞癌(HCC)仍然是全球癌症相关死亡的主要原因之一,每年约有90万新病例和83万例死亡,使其成为全球第六大常见癌症和第三大致命癌症[1,2]。在专门的肝硬化诊所,使用甲胎蛋白(AFP)测量和超声扫描来筛查患者,发现HCC的发病率稳步上升,但不一定能改善死亡率。除肝硬化外,HCC的其他关键危险因素包括慢性病毒性肝炎、血色素病以及越来越多的代谢功能障碍相关的脂肪变性肝病(MASLD)[2,3]。因此,继续尝试预测HCC并在其早期和可能治疗的阶段识别它是可以理解的。预测包括对人口统计学、病因学、实验室和影像学结果的分析。机器学习(AI)模型已经经过测试,例如卷积神经网络(CNN)和随机生存森林(RSF),它们被用于分析电子健康记录,重点关注年龄、性别和合并症,通常不使用实验室结果。还使用了风险评分和生物标志物,包括GALAD评分(结合性别、年龄和三种生物标志物[AFP, AFP- l3, DCP]以提高准确性);aMAP评分(使用年龄、男性、白蛋白-胆红素和血小板);AAAPD-C评分(重点关注治疗后丙型肝炎患者[年龄、白蛋白、AFP、血小板、糖尿病状况])[4-8]。尽管存在如此众多的评分系统,但在这一期的《AP&;T》中,Ying博士及其同事将重点转移到慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者乙型肝炎表面抗原血清清除后肝癌的预测上。这是合理的,因为乙型肝炎仍然具有普遍性,影响全球2.54亿人,尽管最近在预防和管理方面取得了进展,但病毒性肝炎的死亡率仍在上升。其他预测HCC发展的风险模型已经被提出,包括CHB的PAGE-B,改良的PAGE-B (PAGE-B)和Yang模型,HBsAg血清清除率患者的CAMP-B模型;但正如Ying博士及其同事所指出的那样,大多数现有模型都是来自持续慢性乙型肝炎感染患者的队列,它们对HBsAg血清清除患者的适用性仍不确定。作者发现6个能够预测HCC发生的独立危险因素,包括年龄≥50岁,男性,血小板计数≤150 × 109/L,白蛋白水平≤44 g/L,肝硬化HBsAg血清清除率和avt诱导的HBsAg血清清除率。他们的结论是,他们的六因素模型可以在达到HBsAg血清清除的患者中进行风险分层,并有助于在临床实践中告知监测策略。他们的数据没有调整潜在的保护因素,如阿司匹林的使用,并且关于患者的基线表现状态(如ECOG评分)[3]或病毒因素的信息不完整,因为较高的基线HBV DNA水平(高达106单位)可能表明HCC发展的风险较高。然而,除了简单之外,所提出的模型能够预测67.9%-100%的巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC)[3]期早期阶段。这支持了其与临床实践中监测策略的相关性。
{"title":"Editorial: Predicting Hepatocellular Cancer in Clinical Practice","authors":"Ali S. Taha","doi":"10.1111/apt.70644","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70644","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with approximately 900,000 new cases and 830,000 deaths per year, making it the sixth most common cancer and the third most lethal cancer worldwide [&lt;span&gt;1, 2&lt;/span&gt;]. Using both alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) measurement and ultrasound scans to screen patients in dedicated cirrhosis clinics has yielded a steady rise in the incidence of HCC but without necessarily improving the mortality outcomes [&lt;span&gt;3&lt;/span&gt;]. Besides cirrhosis, other key risk factors for HCC include chronic viral hepatitis, haemochromatosis and, increasingly, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, MASLD [&lt;span&gt;2, 3&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt;It is, therefore, understandable that attempts continue to be made to predict HCC and identify it in its early and potentially treatable stages. Predictions have involved the analysis of demographic, aetiological, laboratory and imaging findings. Machine Learning (AI) Models have been tested, such as the Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Random Survival Forests (RSF), which are used to analyse electronic health records, focusing on age, gender and comorbidities, often without using laboratory results. Risk Scores and biomarkers were also used including the GALAD Score (combining Gender, Age and three biomarkers [AFP, AFP-L3, DCP] for high accuracy); aMAP Score (uses Age, Male gender, Albumin-bilirubin and Platelets); and AAAPD-C Score (focusing on patients with hepatitis C after treatment [Age, Albumin, AFP, Platelets, Diabetes status]) [&lt;span&gt;4-8&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt;Despite the existence of this multitude of scoring systems, in this issue of &lt;i&gt;AP&amp;T&lt;/i&gt;, Dr. Ying and colleagues shift the focus to the prediction of HCC after hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) [&lt;span&gt;9&lt;/span&gt;]. This is justifiable by the ongoing common nature of hepatitis B, affecting 254 million people globally, and the still rising death rates from viral hepatitis despite recent advances in prevention and management [&lt;span&gt;10&lt;/span&gt;]. Other risk models have already been proposed for the prediction of HCC development, including PAGE-B, modified PAGE-B (mPAGE-B) for CHB and Yang's model, CAMP-B model for HBsAg seroclearance patients; but as Dr. Ying and colleagues point out, most existing models were derived from cohorts of patients with ongoing CHB infection, and their applicability to patients who have achieved HBsAg seroclearance remains uncertain. The authors found six independent risk factors capable of predicting HCC occurrence, including age ≥ 50 years, male, platelet count ≤ 150 × 10&lt;sup&gt;9&lt;/sup&gt;/L, albumin level ≤ 44 g/L, with cirrhosis at HBsAg seroclearance and AVT-induced HBsAg seroclearance. They concluded that their six-factor model enables risk stratification among patients achieving HBsAg seroclearance and may assist in informing surveillance strategies in clinical practice. Their data do not adjus","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147506732","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial: Personalising the Low FODMAP Diet to Achieve Therapeutic Benefit Whilst Reducing Burden and Maintaining Dietary Diversity in Irritable Bowel Syndrome 社论:个性化低FODMAP饮食,在减轻肠易激综合征负担和保持饮食多样性的同时获得治疗效益
IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-25 DOI: 10.1111/apt.70626
Kevin Whelan
<p>Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a disorder of gut-brain interaction featuring recurrent abdominal pain or discomfort in conjunction with altered bowel habit [<span>1</span>]. Diet is a mainstay of IBS management, with first-line dietary advice being the NICE diet that recommends regular meal size and frequency; maintaining hydration; restricting fatty, spicy and processed foods; and limiting caffeine and alcohol.</p><p>Second line dietary advice is for the low FODMAP diet (LFD), the most extensively researched whole diet intervention in IBS. FODMAPs are fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols, some of which increase small intestinal luminal water and some of which undergo colonic fermentation to produce gas that can contribute to IBS symptoms in those with visceral hypersensitivity [<span>2</span>].</p><p>The LFD has numerous limitations, including being restrictive for patients, risking excessive or prolonged restriction in some, and can impact the gut microbiome [<span>3</span>]. The LFD therefore requires expert advice and management from a dietitian, which can be challenging in some healthcare settings for a prevalent disorder commonly managed in the community [<span>3</span>].</p><p>In this issue of <i>Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics</i>, Garcia-Cedillo and colleagues [<span>4</span>] present data from a randomised clinical trial of a personalised-LFD. The personalised-LFD differed from the full LFD in two ways: first, it only restricted FODMAPs that appeared to result in symptom exacerbation from prospective recording, and second, only major sources of the relevant FODMAPs were reduced and even then only by approximately 50%. The goal of the personalised-LFD was to achieve the therapeutic benefits of the full LFD while maintaining dietary diversity [<span>4</span>].</p><p>In this randomised clinical trial, there was no difference in the numbers experiencing adequate relief between the personalised-LFD (54.5%) and NICE diet (41.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.33) [<span>4</span>]. Response rates to the personalised-LFD (54.5%) were in keeping with some trials of the full LFD that report responses including 52% [<span>5</span>], 55% [<span>6</span>] and 57% [<span>7</span>]. Large reductions in energy intake (circa −750 kcal/d) were identified in both groups that do not reflect evidence from other studies, at least some of which may represent under-reporting due to social desirability bias [<span>8</span>].</p><p>This is not the first study to investigate modification to the LFD. In a small feeding study, blanket restriction only of oligosaccharides (fructans and galacto-oligosaccharides, termed ‘FODMAP simple’) led to no difference in symptom response compared with the full LFD [<span>9</span>].</p><p>In the current study [<span>4</span>], two active dietary interventions are shown to be no different, which is different from proving they are the same (which would require an equivalence trial) or no wor
肠易激综合征(IBS)是一种肠脑相互作用紊乱,表现为反复腹痛或不适,并伴有排便习惯改变。饮食是肠易激综合征管理的支柱,一线饮食建议是NICE饮食,建议有规律的进餐量和频率;保持水化;限制高脂肪、辛辣和加工食品;限制咖啡因和酒精。第二线饮食建议是低FODMAP饮食(LFD),这是对肠易激综合征研究最广泛的全饮食干预。FODMAPs是可发酵的低聚糖、双糖、单糖和多元醇,其中一些可增加小肠内水分,另一些经结肠发酵产生气体,可导致内脏超敏[2]患者出现IBS症状。LFD有许多局限性,包括对患者有限制,对某些患者有过度或长时间限制的风险,并可能影响肠道微生物群。因此,LFD需要来自营养师的专家建议和管理,这在一些医疗保健机构中可能是具有挑战性的,因为这种疾病通常在社区医院管理。在这一期的《消化药理学与治疗学》中,Garcia-Cedillo和他的同事发表了一项个体化lfd随机临床试验的数据。个性化的LFD与完整的LFD在两个方面不同:首先,它只限制了从前瞻性记录来看似乎导致症状加重的fodmap,其次,只有相关fodmap的主要来源减少了,即使这样也只减少了大约50%。个性化LFD的目标是在保持饮食多样性的同时实现完整LFD的治疗效果。在这项随机临床试验中,在个性化lfd(54.5%)和NICE饮食(41.2%,p = 0.33)之间,经历充分缓解的人数没有差异。个性化LFD的应答率(54.5%)与完整LFD的一些试验保持一致,这些试验报告的应答率包括52%[5],55%[6]和57%[7]。在两组中都发现了能量摄入的大量减少(约- 750千卡/天),这并没有反映其他研究的证据,至少其中一些可能是由于社会期望偏见而少报的。这并不是第一个对LFD进行修改的研究。在一项小型喂养研究中,仅限低聚糖(果聚糖和半乳糖低聚糖,称为“FODMAP简单”)与全LFD喂养相比,在症状反应方面没有差异。在目前的研究[4]中,两种积极的饮食干预被证明是没有区别的,这与证明它们是相同的(这需要等效试验)或不比另一个差(这需要非劣效性试验)不同。由于它们都是积极干预,而且没有对照组,我们还不知道个性化lfd和NICE饮食是否“同样有效”或“同样无效”。在饮食干预试验中,安慰剂效应可能相当大。“个性化”或“简化”LFD的益处或其他方面,现在需要通过与盲法对照组(以确定是否有任何益处大于安慰剂)和完整LFD(以确定是否有任何益处与LFD一样好)的比较,在充分支持的试验中进行评估。Garcia-Cedillo及其同事提供的数据为这种精心实施的饮食干预试验提供了证据。
{"title":"Editorial: Personalising the Low FODMAP Diet to Achieve Therapeutic Benefit Whilst Reducing Burden and Maintaining Dietary Diversity in Irritable Bowel Syndrome","authors":"Kevin Whelan","doi":"10.1111/apt.70626","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70626","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a disorder of gut-brain interaction featuring recurrent abdominal pain or discomfort in conjunction with altered bowel habit [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. Diet is a mainstay of IBS management, with first-line dietary advice being the NICE diet that recommends regular meal size and frequency; maintaining hydration; restricting fatty, spicy and processed foods; and limiting caffeine and alcohol.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt;Second line dietary advice is for the low FODMAP diet (LFD), the most extensively researched whole diet intervention in IBS. FODMAPs are fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols, some of which increase small intestinal luminal water and some of which undergo colonic fermentation to produce gas that can contribute to IBS symptoms in those with visceral hypersensitivity [&lt;span&gt;2&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt;The LFD has numerous limitations, including being restrictive for patients, risking excessive or prolonged restriction in some, and can impact the gut microbiome [&lt;span&gt;3&lt;/span&gt;]. The LFD therefore requires expert advice and management from a dietitian, which can be challenging in some healthcare settings for a prevalent disorder commonly managed in the community [&lt;span&gt;3&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt;In this issue of &lt;i&gt;Alimentary Pharmacology &amp; Therapeutics&lt;/i&gt;, Garcia-Cedillo and colleagues [&lt;span&gt;4&lt;/span&gt;] present data from a randomised clinical trial of a personalised-LFD. The personalised-LFD differed from the full LFD in two ways: first, it only restricted FODMAPs that appeared to result in symptom exacerbation from prospective recording, and second, only major sources of the relevant FODMAPs were reduced and even then only by approximately 50%. The goal of the personalised-LFD was to achieve the therapeutic benefits of the full LFD while maintaining dietary diversity [&lt;span&gt;4&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt;In this randomised clinical trial, there was no difference in the numbers experiencing adequate relief between the personalised-LFD (54.5%) and NICE diet (41.2%, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.33) [&lt;span&gt;4&lt;/span&gt;]. Response rates to the personalised-LFD (54.5%) were in keeping with some trials of the full LFD that report responses including 52% [&lt;span&gt;5&lt;/span&gt;], 55% [&lt;span&gt;6&lt;/span&gt;] and 57% [&lt;span&gt;7&lt;/span&gt;]. Large reductions in energy intake (circa −750 kcal/d) were identified in both groups that do not reflect evidence from other studies, at least some of which may represent under-reporting due to social desirability bias [&lt;span&gt;8&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt;This is not the first study to investigate modification to the LFD. In a small feeding study, blanket restriction only of oligosaccharides (fructans and galacto-oligosaccharides, termed ‘FODMAP simple’) led to no difference in symptom response compared with the full LFD [&lt;span&gt;9&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt;In the current study [&lt;span&gt;4&lt;/span&gt;], two active dietary interventions are shown to be no different, which is different from proving they are the same (which would require an equivalence trial) or no wor","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147507612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Letter: From Safety to Precision-Optimising the Use of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Gastroenterology: Authors' Reply. 信:从安全到精确-优化GLP-1受体激动剂在胃肠病学中的使用:作者的答复。
IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-24 DOI: 10.1111/apt.70547
Sydney Pomenti,Annabel Gerber,David Katzka,Michael Camilleri,Chin Hur
{"title":"Letter: From Safety to Precision-Optimising the Use of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Gastroenterology: Authors' Reply.","authors":"Sydney Pomenti,Annabel Gerber,David Katzka,Michael Camilleri,Chin Hur","doi":"10.1111/apt.70547","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70547","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"08 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147502500","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Disordered Bile Acid Metabolism in Alcohol-Related Hepatitis. 酒精相关性肝炎中胆汁酸代谢紊乱
IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-23 DOI: 10.1111/apt.70616
Luke D Tyson,Stephen Atkinson,Benjamin H Mullish,Alexandros Pechlivanis,Michael Allison,Andrew Austin,Katie Chappell,Stuart J Forbes,Ewan H Forrest,Alastair M Kilpatrick,Tong Liu,Laura Martinez-Gili,Steven Masson,Mark J W McPhail,Joao Nunes,Paul Richardson,Daniel Rodrigo-Torres,Stephen D Ryder,Mark Wright,Vishal C Patel,Nikhil Vergis,Elaine Holmes,Mark R Thursz
BACKGROUNDAlcohol-related hepatitis (AH) is characterised by acute cholestasis and liver dysfunction in patients consuming alcohol.AIMSTo define the bile acid (BA) profile in AH compared to decompensated alcohol-related cirrhosis (DC) and healthy controls (HC).METHODSSerum and faecal BAs were measured by UHPLC-MS; FGF19 by ELISA; RNA-sequencing data obtained from liver biopsies; serum cytokines and growth factors quantified by multiplex immunoassay. Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) was applied to primary human hepatocytes (PHH) and BA transporter expression was assessed by RT-qPCR.RESULTSIn two cohorts (Cohort 1: 164 AH, 63 DC, 36 HC; Cohort 2: 94 AH, 175 DC, 72 HC), total serum BAs were highest in AH (median concentration 186.0 μM vs. 64.5 DC vs. 5.0 HC), driven by elevated conjugated primary BAs (182.0 μM vs. 54.0 vs. 2.2). Unconjugated primary BAs were highest in DC. Serum BAs distinguished AH from DC (Cohort 1 AUROC 0.964; Cohort 2 0.922; p < 0.001). Faecal BAs were reduced in AH (0.47 mg/g vs. 1.11 DC vs. 2.64 HC); serum FGF19 elevated (5835 pg/mL AH vs. 865 jaundiced DC [bilirubin > 80 μmol/L]). Serum conjugated BAs correlated negatively with NTCP expression (n = 25, Spearman's rho -0.432, p = 0.031). CYP7A1 was below the limit of detection. HGF was elevated in AH (7899 pg/mL vs. 2607 DC, p < 0.001). HGF treatment reduced PHH BSEP expression.CONCLUSIONSerum conjugated primary BAs accumulate in AH. Elevated HGF may detrimentally affect the hepatoprotective adaptive reduction in NTCP/increase in BSEP seen in cholestasis, contributing to the AH BA profile.
背景:酒精相关性肝炎(AH)以急性胆汁淤积和肝功能障碍为特征。目的:与失代偿性酒精相关性肝硬化(DC)和健康对照组(HC)比较,确定AH患者的胆汁酸(BA)谱。方法采用高效液相色谱-质谱法测定血清和粪便中的BAs;ELISA检测FGF19;肝活检获得的rna测序数据;多重免疫分析法定量测定血清细胞因子和生长因子。将肝细胞生长因子(HGF)应用于原代人肝细胞(PHH), RT-qPCR检测BA转运蛋白的表达。结果在两个队列(队列1:164 AH, 63 DC, 36 HC;队列2:94 AH, 175 DC, 72 HC)中,AH患者的血清总BAs最高(中位浓度186.0 μM vs. 64.5 DC vs. 5.0 HC),这是由升高的共轭初级BAs (182.0 μM vs. 54.0 vs. 2.2)驱动的。未结合的初级BAs在DC中含量最高。血清BAs可区分AH和DC(队列1 AUROC 0.964;队列2 0.922;p 80 μmol/L)。血清共轭BAs与NTCP表达呈负相关(n = 25, Spearman’s ρ -0.432, p = 0.031)。CYP7A1低于检出限。HGF在AH组升高(7899 pg/mL vs. 2607 DC, p < 0.001)。HGF处理降低了PHH BSEP的表达。结论血清结合原发性BAs在AH中蓄积。升高的HGF可能会对肝保护性的NTCP适应性降低/胆汁淤滞中BSEP的增加产生不利影响,从而导致AH - BA。
{"title":"Disordered Bile Acid Metabolism in Alcohol-Related Hepatitis.","authors":"Luke D Tyson,Stephen Atkinson,Benjamin H Mullish,Alexandros Pechlivanis,Michael Allison,Andrew Austin,Katie Chappell,Stuart J Forbes,Ewan H Forrest,Alastair M Kilpatrick,Tong Liu,Laura Martinez-Gili,Steven Masson,Mark J W McPhail,Joao Nunes,Paul Richardson,Daniel Rodrigo-Torres,Stephen D Ryder,Mark Wright,Vishal C Patel,Nikhil Vergis,Elaine Holmes,Mark R Thursz","doi":"10.1111/apt.70616","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70616","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDAlcohol-related hepatitis (AH) is characterised by acute cholestasis and liver dysfunction in patients consuming alcohol.AIMSTo define the bile acid (BA) profile in AH compared to decompensated alcohol-related cirrhosis (DC) and healthy controls (HC).METHODSSerum and faecal BAs were measured by UHPLC-MS; FGF19 by ELISA; RNA-sequencing data obtained from liver biopsies; serum cytokines and growth factors quantified by multiplex immunoassay. Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) was applied to primary human hepatocytes (PHH) and BA transporter expression was assessed by RT-qPCR.RESULTSIn two cohorts (Cohort 1: 164 AH, 63 DC, 36 HC; Cohort 2: 94 AH, 175 DC, 72 HC), total serum BAs were highest in AH (median concentration 186.0 μM vs. 64.5 DC vs. 5.0 HC), driven by elevated conjugated primary BAs (182.0 μM vs. 54.0 vs. 2.2). Unconjugated primary BAs were highest in DC. Serum BAs distinguished AH from DC (Cohort 1 AUROC 0.964; Cohort 2 0.922; p < 0.001). Faecal BAs were reduced in AH (0.47 mg/g vs. 1.11 DC vs. 2.64 HC); serum FGF19 elevated (5835 pg/mL AH vs. 865 jaundiced DC [bilirubin > 80 μmol/L]). Serum conjugated BAs correlated negatively with NTCP expression (n = 25, Spearman's rho -0.432, p = 0.031). CYP7A1 was below the limit of detection. HGF was elevated in AH (7899 pg/mL vs. 2607 DC, p < 0.001). HGF treatment reduced PHH BSEP expression.CONCLUSIONSerum conjugated primary BAs accumulate in AH. Elevated HGF may detrimentally affect the hepatoprotective adaptive reduction in NTCP/increase in BSEP seen in cholestasis, contributing to the AH BA profile.","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147495170","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Meta-Analysis: PPAR Agonists for Pruritus and Quality of Life in Primary Biliary Cholangitis. 荟萃分析:PPAR激动剂对原发性胆道胆管炎患者瘙痒和生活质量的影响。
IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-23 DOI: 10.1111/apt.70634
Adrielly Martins,Nidah S Khakoo,Christophe Corpechot,Alexandra Rousseau,John M Reynolds,Andreas E Kremer,M Hassan Murad,Shahnaz Sultan,Cynthia Levy
BACKGROUND AND AIMSPruritus is a frequent and debilitating symptom in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), substantially impairing sleep, mood and quality of life. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonists are promising second-line therapies for patients with an inadequate response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of PPAR agonists on pruritus and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in PBC.METHODSWe systematically searched for randomised placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) of PPAR agonists in PBC through December 2025. Eligible studies reported validated pruritus or HRQoL outcomes. Main outcomes were NRS and PBC-40 total score. Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models and expressed as mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).RESULTSFive RCTs evaluating bezafibrate, elafibranor and seladelpar (n = 660; 390 PPAR agonist; 270 placebo) met the inclusion criteria. For pruritus intensity analyses, data were restricted to participants with moderate-to-severe baseline symptoms (NRS ≥ 4) when available. PPAR agonists significantly reduced NRS scores at 3 months (MD, -1.38; 95% CI, -2.62 to -0.14), 6 months (MD, -1.13; 95% CI, -1.98 to -0.27) and 12 months (MD, -1.73; 95% CI, -3.00 to -0.46); in individual agent analyses, bezafibrate and seladelpar reached statistical significance at one or more time points. While improvements were also noted in PBC-40 itch-domain and 5D-itch score, an impact on overall HRQoL as reflected by PBC-40 total score could not be demonstrated, with a lower level of certainty.CONCLUSIONSPPAR agonists, notably bezafibrate and seladelpar, reduce pruritus severity in PBC patients with moderate-to-severe symptoms and consistently improve itch-specific outcomes. However, effects on global HRQoL remain uncertain. These findings underscore the incorporation of validated, symptom-focused endpoints in future PBC trials.
背景和目的:瘙痒是原发性胆道胆管炎(PBC)中一种常见的衰弱症状,严重影响睡眠、情绪和生活质量。过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体(PPAR)激动剂是治疗熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)反应不足患者的二线治疗方法。我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估PPAR激动剂对PBC患者瘙痒和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的疗效。方法:我们系统地检索了截至2025年12月的PBC中PPAR激动剂的随机安慰剂对照试验(RCTs)。符合条件的研究报告了证实的瘙痒或HRQoL结果。主要结局指标为NRS和PBC-40总分。使用随机效应模型计算合并估计,并以95%置信区间(CI)的均值差(MD)表示。结果5项评价贝扎布特、艾拉布诺和塞拉得帕的随机对照试验(n = 660; PPAR激动剂390;安慰剂270)符合纳入标准。对于瘙痒强度分析,数据仅限于具有中度至重度基线症状(NRS≥4)的参与者。PPAR激动剂显著降低3个月(MD, -1.38, 95% CI, -2.62至-0.14)、6个月(MD, -1.13, 95% CI, -1.98至-0.27)和12个月(MD, -1.73, 95% CI, -3.00至-0.46)的NRS评分;在单个药物分析中,贝扎布特和塞拉德帕在一个或多个时间点达到统计学意义。虽然PBC-40瘙痒域和5d -瘙痒评分也有改善,但PBC-40总分反映的总体HRQoL的影响无法证明,确定性较低。结论:sppar激动剂,特别是贝扎布特和塞拉得帕,可减轻中度至重度PBC患者的瘙痒严重程度,并持续改善瘙痒特异性结局。然而,对全球HRQoL的影响仍不确定。这些发现强调了在未来的PBC试验中纳入经过验证的、以症状为中心的终点。
{"title":"Meta-Analysis: PPAR Agonists for Pruritus and Quality of Life in Primary Biliary Cholangitis.","authors":"Adrielly Martins,Nidah S Khakoo,Christophe Corpechot,Alexandra Rousseau,John M Reynolds,Andreas E Kremer,M Hassan Murad,Shahnaz Sultan,Cynthia Levy","doi":"10.1111/apt.70634","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70634","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND AND AIMSPruritus is a frequent and debilitating symptom in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), substantially impairing sleep, mood and quality of life. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonists are promising second-line therapies for patients with an inadequate response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of PPAR agonists on pruritus and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in PBC.METHODSWe systematically searched for randomised placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) of PPAR agonists in PBC through December 2025. Eligible studies reported validated pruritus or HRQoL outcomes. Main outcomes were NRS and PBC-40 total score. Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models and expressed as mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).RESULTSFive RCTs evaluating bezafibrate, elafibranor and seladelpar (n = 660; 390 PPAR agonist; 270 placebo) met the inclusion criteria. For pruritus intensity analyses, data were restricted to participants with moderate-to-severe baseline symptoms (NRS ≥ 4) when available. PPAR agonists significantly reduced NRS scores at 3 months (MD, -1.38; 95% CI, -2.62 to -0.14), 6 months (MD, -1.13; 95% CI, -1.98 to -0.27) and 12 months (MD, -1.73; 95% CI, -3.00 to -0.46); in individual agent analyses, bezafibrate and seladelpar reached statistical significance at one or more time points. While improvements were also noted in PBC-40 itch-domain and 5D-itch score, an impact on overall HRQoL as reflected by PBC-40 total score could not be demonstrated, with a lower level of certainty.CONCLUSIONSPPAR agonists, notably bezafibrate and seladelpar, reduce pruritus severity in PBC patients with moderate-to-severe symptoms and consistently improve itch-specific outcomes. However, effects on global HRQoL remain uncertain. These findings underscore the incorporation of validated, symptom-focused endpoints in future PBC trials.","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147495186","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk Prediction of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Seroclearance in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B. 慢性乙型肝炎患者乙型肝炎表面抗原血清清除后肝细胞癌的风险预测
IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-23 DOI: 10.1111/apt.70637
Shuaibing Ying,Jinyao Dai,Qiudan Zhang,Yujing Wang,Yina Yu,Zhijuan Zhang,Shaohua Dong,Yichun Zhang,Haoyang Hu,Yuqi Hong,Yi Liu,Yuqi Guo,Haomin Yan,Yunqing Qiu,Yan Lou
BACKGROUNDPrediction of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) after hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance is important for optimizing surveillance strategies.AIMThis study aimed to identify independent risk factors of HCC after HBsAg seroclearance and to develop and validate a risk prediction model.METHODSA total of 6536 CHB patients who achieved HBsAg seroclearance between January 2006 and June 2025 were retrospectively screened, with 3852 patients meeting the criteria for final analysis. A predictive model was developed via multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, with discrimination assessed using Harrell's C-index and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve area under the curve (AUC). Internal validation of the model was conducted through bootstrap resampling analysis.RESULTSDuring 21,711 person-years of follow-up, 128 patients (3.3%) developed HCC (incidence rate: 0.59% per year). Multivariable analysis identified age, male sex, cirrhosis, antiviral therapy (AVT)-induced seroclearance and lower levels of platelets and albumin as independent predictors of HCC. The six independent variables were used for constructing the novel prediction model. Harrell's C-index of the model was 0.766. The novel model has a good predictive ability for HCC risk in the 3-year (AUC = 0.785), 5-year (AUC = 0.775) and 10-year (AUC = 0.830) with similar discriminative performance observed in internal validation.CONCLUSIONSThe independent risk factors of HCC occurrence are age ≥ 50 years, male, platelet count≤ 150 × 109/L, albumin level ≤ 44 g/L, with cirrhosis at HBsAg seroclearance and AVT-induced HBsAg seroclearance. Our six-factor model enables risk stratification among patients achieving HBsAg seroclearance and may assist in informing surveillance strategies in clinical practice.
背景:乙型肝炎表面抗原(HBsAg)血清清除后预测慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者发生肝细胞癌(HCC)的风险对优化监测策略具有重要意义。目的本研究旨在确定HBsAg血清清除后HCC的独立危险因素,并建立和验证风险预测模型。方法回顾性筛选2006年1月至2025年6月期间达到HBsAg清除率的CHB患者6536例,其中3852例符合最终分析标准。通过多变量Cox比例风险回归分析建立预测模型,并使用Harrell's c指数和随时间变化的受试者工作特征曲线曲线下面积(AUC)评估辨别性。通过自举重采样分析对模型进行了内部验证。结果在21,711人年的随访中,128例(3.3%)发生HCC(发病率:0.59% /年)。多变量分析发现,年龄、男性、肝硬化、抗病毒治疗(AVT)诱导的血清清除率和较低水平的血小板和白蛋白是HCC的独立预测因素。利用这6个自变量构建新的预测模型。模型的Harrell c指数为0.766。该模型对3年(AUC = 0.785)、5年(AUC = 0.775)和10年(AUC = 0.830)的HCC风险具有良好的预测能力,在内部验证中观察到相似的判别性能。结论HCC发生的独立危险因素为年龄≥50岁、男性、血小板计数≤150 × 109/L、白蛋白水平≤44 g/L、肝硬化伴HBsAg血清清除率及avt诱导的HBsAg血清清除率。我们的六因素模型可以在达到HBsAg血清清除的患者中进行风险分层,并有助于在临床实践中告知监测策略。
{"title":"Risk Prediction of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Seroclearance in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B.","authors":"Shuaibing Ying,Jinyao Dai,Qiudan Zhang,Yujing Wang,Yina Yu,Zhijuan Zhang,Shaohua Dong,Yichun Zhang,Haoyang Hu,Yuqi Hong,Yi Liu,Yuqi Guo,Haomin Yan,Yunqing Qiu,Yan Lou","doi":"10.1111/apt.70637","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70637","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDPrediction of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) after hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance is important for optimizing surveillance strategies.AIMThis study aimed to identify independent risk factors of HCC after HBsAg seroclearance and to develop and validate a risk prediction model.METHODSA total of 6536 CHB patients who achieved HBsAg seroclearance between January 2006 and June 2025 were retrospectively screened, with 3852 patients meeting the criteria for final analysis. A predictive model was developed via multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, with discrimination assessed using Harrell's C-index and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve area under the curve (AUC). Internal validation of the model was conducted through bootstrap resampling analysis.RESULTSDuring 21,711 person-years of follow-up, 128 patients (3.3%) developed HCC (incidence rate: 0.59% per year). Multivariable analysis identified age, male sex, cirrhosis, antiviral therapy (AVT)-induced seroclearance and lower levels of platelets and albumin as independent predictors of HCC. The six independent variables were used for constructing the novel prediction model. Harrell's C-index of the model was 0.766. The novel model has a good predictive ability for HCC risk in the 3-year (AUC = 0.785), 5-year (AUC = 0.775) and 10-year (AUC = 0.830) with similar discriminative performance observed in internal validation.CONCLUSIONSThe independent risk factors of HCC occurrence are age ≥ 50 years, male, platelet count≤ 150 × 109/L, albumin level ≤ 44 g/L, with cirrhosis at HBsAg seroclearance and AVT-induced HBsAg seroclearance. Our six-factor model enables risk stratification among patients achieving HBsAg seroclearance and may assist in informing surveillance strategies in clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"92 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147502507","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Letter: Thiopurines the Silent Workhorse for Many Patients After a Flare of Ulcerative Colitis. Authors' Reply 信:硫嘌呤是溃疡性结肠炎爆发后许多患者沉默的主力。作者的回复
IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-19 DOI: 10.1111/apt.70624
Ankit Kumar, Amol Patil, Vishal Sharma
{"title":"Letter: Thiopurines the Silent Workhorse for Many Patients After a Flare of Ulcerative Colitis. Authors' Reply","authors":"Ankit Kumar, Amol Patil, Vishal Sharma","doi":"10.1111/apt.70624","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70624","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"231 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147478122","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1