Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2025.2596875
Vincenzo Giosuè Giambusso, Martina Rafanelli, Robert S Sheldon
Introduction: Vasovagal syncope is a frequent problem affecting nearly half the population. The symptom burden is wide, ranging from once to hundreds of times. It reduces quality of life and causes injuries. Physicians, particularly front-line physicians such as family doctors, need a simple, practical approach.
Areas covered: We provide context on syncope frequency, competing diagnoses, and natural history, usually characterized by improvement and remissions. Quality of life is reduced and accompanied by anxiety and improves with care. Injuries are common but serious injuries are rare. Treatment begins with advice on salt and fluid intake and physical maneuvers. Fludrocortisone, midodrine, and 2 serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitors are effective, and beta blockers should not be used. Atomoxetine is under investigation. Pacemakers and ablation must be reserved for the rare patient who has not responded to more conservative treatments.
Expert opinion: Patients usually do well and respond to ongoing support and simple dietary advice and physical tips. Some benefit from fludrocortisone, midodrine, or serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitors. Almost all patients eventually stop fainting, and invasive treatments should be used last and for the very few highly afflicted patients who do not improve with safer measures.
{"title":"Progress in the pharmacological management of vasovagal syncope.","authors":"Vincenzo Giosuè Giambusso, Martina Rafanelli, Robert S Sheldon","doi":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2596875","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2596875","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vasovagal syncope is a frequent problem affecting nearly half the population. The symptom burden is wide, ranging from once to hundreds of times. It reduces quality of life and causes injuries. Physicians, particularly front-line physicians such as family doctors, need a simple, practical approach.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>We provide context on syncope frequency, competing diagnoses, and natural history, usually characterized by improvement and remissions. Quality of life is reduced and accompanied by anxiety and improves with care. Injuries are common but serious injuries are rare. Treatment begins with advice on salt and fluid intake and physical maneuvers. Fludrocortisone, midodrine, and 2 serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitors are effective, and beta blockers should not be used. Atomoxetine is under investigation. Pacemakers and ablation must be reserved for the rare patient who has not responded to more conservative treatments.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Patients usually do well and respond to ongoing support and simple dietary advice and physical tips. Some benefit from fludrocortisone, midodrine, or serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitors. Almost all patients eventually stop fainting, and invasive treatments should be used last and for the very few highly afflicted patients who do not improve with safer measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":12207,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"977-988"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145631300","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-12-10DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2025.2600408
Brenna Champlin, Katherine Keefe, Andrew C Birkeland, Shiruyeh Schokrpur
Introduction: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains a treatment challenge, with frequent recurrences following localized disease and guarded outcomes in recurrent/metastatic (R/M) settings. While cytotoxic therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have produced incremental survival benefits, many patients still exhibit limited response or acquire resistance to treatment, highlighting a critical need for more personalized and novel therapeutic strategies.
Areas covered: This review discusses personalized therapy approaches in HNSCC from 2020 to 2025, focusing on immune checkpoint blockade and newer therapeutic modalities. Additionally, this review highlights key biomarkers that are currently being evaluated for predictive and prognostic value in HNSCC. The literature was sourced through PubMed, Google Scholar, and conference abstracts from ASCO, ESMO, and AACR, covering publications from January 2020-June 2025, with a focus on peer-reviewed trials and translational studies in human subjects.
Expert opinion: The future of HNSCC treatment lies in the development of novel treatment combinations integrating immunotherapy using immune checkpoint blockade with newer therapeutic approaches. Understanding which agents to use, and when in the course of treatment, stands as a challenge that will shape the future of precision therapy for HNSCC, with integration of biomarkers promising to guide this transition.
{"title":"The importance of specificity of drug treatment in head and neck cancer: current developments in personalized medicine to improve safety and tolerability.","authors":"Brenna Champlin, Katherine Keefe, Andrew C Birkeland, Shiruyeh Schokrpur","doi":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2600408","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2600408","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains a treatment challenge, with frequent recurrences following localized disease and guarded outcomes in recurrent/metastatic (R/M) settings. While cytotoxic therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have produced incremental survival benefits, many patients still exhibit limited response or acquire resistance to treatment, highlighting a critical need for more personalized and novel therapeutic strategies.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review discusses personalized therapy approaches in HNSCC from 2020 to 2025, focusing on immune checkpoint blockade and newer therapeutic modalities. Additionally, this review highlights key biomarkers that are currently being evaluated for predictive and prognostic value in HNSCC. The literature was sourced through PubMed, Google Scholar, and conference abstracts from ASCO, ESMO, and AACR, covering publications from January 2020-June 2025, with a focus on peer-reviewed trials and translational studies in human subjects.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The future of HNSCC treatment lies in the development of novel treatment combinations integrating immunotherapy using immune checkpoint blockade with newer therapeutic approaches. Understanding which agents to use, and when in the course of treatment, stands as a challenge that will shape the future of precision therapy for HNSCC, with integration of biomarkers promising to guide this transition.</p>","PeriodicalId":12207,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"1005-1017"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12777937/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145667863","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2026-01-02DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2025.2606262
John Tetteh, Zenas Z N Yiu
Introduction: Cholesterol-lowering medications (CLMs) are used globally. Cholesterol is a key stratum corneum lipid that helps maintain epidermal barrier integrity. Barrier dysfunction contribute to pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis (AD). Clarifying whether CLMs impact AD has implications for dermatology and cardiology.
Areas covered: We synthesized evidence from experimental, clinical, and genetic epidemiology through targeted literature searches and expert selections. It focuses on 1) skin barrier biology and epidermal cholesterol metabolism, and 2) potential effect of CLMs on AD. We discuss findings from experimental studies comparing topical versus systemic statins; population-based observations of AD among CLM users; and Mendelian randomization analyses of CLMs.
Expert opinion: Effect of CLMs on AD is biologically plausible but clinically unproven. Signals of concern are most consistent for 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase and Niemann-Pick C1-Like 1 (NPC1L1) inhibition, whereas Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibition appears protective in some populations. Current studies are limited by confounding, heterogeneous outcomes and sparse ancestry-specific analyses. Until robust causal and pharmacoepidemiologic studies across ancestries are available, clinicians should prioritize established cardiovascular benefit of lipid reduction while monitoring for new or worsening dermatitis after therapy initiation. Future work should triangulate Mendelian randomization with pharmacoepidemiology designs in large, diverse datasets to deliver definitive guidance.
简介:降胆固醇药物(CLMs)在全球范围内使用。胆固醇是角质层的关键脂质,有助于维持表皮屏障的完整性。屏障功能障碍与特应性皮炎(AD)的发病机制有关。澄清CLMs是否影响AD对皮肤病学和心脏病学的影响。涵盖领域:我们通过有针对性的文献检索和专家选择,综合了来自实验、临床和遗传流行病学的证据。重点关注1)皮肤屏障生物学和表皮胆固醇代谢;2)CLMs对AD的潜在影响。我们讨论了比较局部和全身他汀类药物的实验研究结果;基于人群的CLM用户AD观察;clm的孟德尔随机化分析。专家意见:CLMs对AD的作用在生物学上是合理的,但临床未经证实。3-羟基-3-甲基戊二酰辅酶A (HMG-CoA)还原酶抑制和Niemann-Pick C1-Like 1 (NPC1L1)的信号最为一致,而在某些人群中,蛋白转化酶subtilisin/ keexin type 9 (PCSK9)抑制似乎具有保护作用。目前的研究受到混杂、异质性结果和稀疏的特异性分析的限制。在有可靠的跨祖先因果和药物流行病学研究之前,临床医生应优先考虑已确定的心血管益处,同时监测治疗开始后新发或恶化的皮炎。未来的工作应该将孟德尔随机化与药物流行病学设计在大型、多样化的数据集中进行三角测量,以提供明确的指导。
{"title":"Is there a link between cholesterol-lowering medications and atopic dermatitis?","authors":"John Tetteh, Zenas Z N Yiu","doi":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2606262","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2606262","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cholesterol-lowering medications (CLMs) are used globally. Cholesterol is a key stratum corneum lipid that helps maintain epidermal barrier integrity. Barrier dysfunction contribute to pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis (AD). Clarifying whether CLMs impact AD has implications for dermatology and cardiology.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>We synthesized evidence from experimental, clinical, and genetic epidemiology through targeted literature searches and expert selections. It focuses on 1) skin barrier biology and epidermal cholesterol metabolism, and 2) potential effect of CLMs on AD. We discuss findings from experimental studies comparing topical versus systemic statins; population-based observations of AD among CLM users; and Mendelian randomization analyses of CLMs.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Effect of CLMs on AD is biologically plausible but clinically unproven. Signals of concern are most consistent for 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase and Niemann-Pick C1-Like 1 (NPC1L1) inhibition, whereas Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibition appears protective in some populations. Current studies are limited by confounding, heterogeneous outcomes and sparse ancestry-specific analyses. Until robust causal and pharmacoepidemiologic studies across ancestries are available, clinicians should prioritize established cardiovascular benefit of lipid reduction while monitoring for new or worsening dermatitis after therapy initiation. Future work should triangulate Mendelian randomization with pharmacoepidemiology designs in large, diverse datasets to deliver definitive guidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":12207,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"969-976"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145767687","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-11-24DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2025.2594489
Hira Bakhtiar Khan, Pragnitha Chitteti, Mehwash Nadeem
Introduction: Botulinum toxin (BoNT), recognized for its distinctive pharmacological properties, has become a highly effective therapeutic agent with a wide range of clinical applications. Among its serotypes, botulinum toxin A (BoNT A) is the most extensively used, with established roles in conditions such as limb spasticity, overactive bladder, and neuropathic pain. Despite its broad utility, careful consideration is required to minimize adverse outcomes, underscoring the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration to ensure patient safety.
Areas covered: This expert review is developed through the evaluation of experimental studies and systematic reviews, which were integrated to generate a practice-oriented expert perspective. Although we have provided an overview of all BoNTs, our primary focus has been BoNT A. We have particularly focused on key considerations for the use of BoNT, including immunogenicity and its utility in special populations such as pregnant patients, individuals with pulmonary compromise, older adults, and children.
Expert opinion: Despite the practical challenges of prescribing BoNT A, it is generally regarded as an effective therapy. Its use requires careful risk vs benefit evaluation and strict adherence to guidelines to reduce adverse outcomes. Non-response and immunogenicity remain important barriers, although ongoing research and engineered toxins point toward a future with more precision-based applications.
{"title":"Botulinum toxin in focus: evolution, pharmacology, and its expanding clinical impact.","authors":"Hira Bakhtiar Khan, Pragnitha Chitteti, Mehwash Nadeem","doi":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2594489","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2594489","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Botulinum toxin (BoNT), recognized for its distinctive pharmacological properties, has become a highly effective therapeutic agent with a wide range of clinical applications. Among its serotypes, botulinum toxin A (BoNT A) is the most extensively used, with established roles in conditions such as limb spasticity, overactive bladder, and neuropathic pain. Despite its broad utility, careful consideration is required to minimize adverse outcomes, underscoring the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration to ensure patient safety.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This expert review is developed through the evaluation of experimental studies and systematic reviews, which were integrated to generate a practice-oriented expert perspective. Although we have provided an overview of all BoNTs, our primary focus has been BoNT A. We have particularly focused on key considerations for the use of BoNT, including immunogenicity and its utility in special populations such as pregnant patients, individuals with pulmonary compromise, older adults, and children.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Despite the practical challenges of prescribing BoNT A, it is generally regarded as an effective therapy. Its use requires careful risk vs benefit evaluation and strict adherence to guidelines to reduce adverse outcomes. Non-response and immunogenicity remain important barriers, although ongoing research and engineered toxins point toward a future with more precision-based applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":12207,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"1053-1062"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145563303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Monitoring the safety of drugs regarding their potential for misuse falls within the scope of international conventions on narcotic and psychotropic drugs. In the U.S. a surveillance approach based on multiple sources has been implemented for decades and identified the opioid epidemic in the early 2000s. In Europe, this monitoring is carried out by the European Union Drugs Agency (EUDA) for substance abuse and by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) through pharmacovigilance activities for substances for therapeutic use.
Areas covered: Due to the hidden nature of prescription drug misuse, spontaneous pharmacovigilance reporting is rarely sufficient to quantify this complex phenomenon. This narrative review presents examples of a multisource approach based on a PubMed literature search using the terms 'pharmacovigilance' and 'addiction,' 'drug abuse,' or 'drug misuse.' These examples mainly concern the U.S. and the addictovigilance monitoring system in France.
Expert opinion: Because of the constant changes in the drug misuse phenomenon and the effectiveness of addictovigilance in addressing it, other countries should strongly consider adapting this approach (with the necessary adaptations) into their national monitoring systems and adopting the addictovigilance terminology.
{"title":"Pharmacovigilance in the field of addiction: challenges and emerging solutions.","authors":"Maryse Lapeyre-Mestre, Joëlle Micallef, Romain Hacquet, Emilie Jouanjus","doi":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2600414","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2600414","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Monitoring the safety of drugs regarding their potential for misuse falls within the scope of international conventions on narcotic and psychotropic drugs. In the U.S. a surveillance approach based on multiple sources has been implemented for decades and identified the opioid epidemic in the early 2000s. In Europe, this monitoring is carried out by the European Union Drugs Agency (EUDA) for substance abuse and by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) through pharmacovigilance activities for substances for therapeutic use.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Due to the hidden nature of prescription drug misuse, spontaneous pharmacovigilance reporting is rarely sufficient to quantify this complex phenomenon. This narrative review presents examples of a multisource approach based on a PubMed literature search using the terms 'pharmacovigilance' and 'addiction,' 'drug abuse,' or 'drug misuse.' These examples mainly concern the U.S. and the addictovigilance monitoring system in France.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Because of the constant changes in the drug misuse phenomenon and the effectiveness of addictovigilance in addressing it, other countries should strongly consider adapting this approach (with the necessary adaptations) into their national monitoring systems and adopting the addictovigilance terminology.</p>","PeriodicalId":12207,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"989-1003"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145667843","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Nonalcoholic fatty liver diseases (NAFLD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver diseases (MAFLD) are closely associated with metabolic syndrome, including obesity, dyslipidemia, and insulin resistance (IR). Thus, stains may be considered for the management of NAFLD/MAFLD. However, its efficacy and safety remain unclear in NAFLD/MAFLD.
Methods: The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and/or safety of statins in NAFLD/MAFLD. Risk ratios (RRs) and weight mean differences (WMDs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.
Results: Seven studies involving 993 patients with NAFLD/MAFLD were included. Statins were significantly associated with reductions in alanine aminotransferase (ALT, WMD = -9.76 U/L, 95%CI: -17.28, -2.24, p = 0.010), aspartate aminotransferase (AST, WMD = -4.46 U/L, 95%CI: -9.03, 0.11, p = 0.060), gamma-glutamyl-transpeptidase (GGT, WMD = -10.18 U/L, 95%CI: -13.65, -6.70, p < 0.001), low-density lipoprotein (LDL, WMD = -0.86 mmol/L, 95%CI: -1.06, -0.66, p < 0.001), total cholesterol (TC, WMD = -0.88 mmol/L, 95%CI: -1.14, -0.61, p < 0.001), and triglyceride (TG, WMD = -0.32 mmol/L, 95%CI: -0.45, -0.19, p < 0.001) levels. Additionally, statins did not increase the risk of myalgia (RR = 0.96, 95%CI: 0.10, 9.00, p = 0.970).
Conclusions: Statins could improve liver function and lipid profiles in NAFLD/MAFLD. No myalgia was reported as AEs in the studies we included and the overall safety was favorable.Protocol registration: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD42025630809.
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of statins for nonalcoholic/metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Xiaohui Fang, Yuhang Yin, Qinke Wu, Lu Chai, Yifan Guo, Zhenhua Tong, Nahum Méndez-Sánchez, Xingshun Qi","doi":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2600410","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2600410","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nonalcoholic fatty liver diseases (NAFLD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver diseases (MAFLD) are closely associated with metabolic syndrome, including obesity, dyslipidemia, and insulin resistance (IR). Thus, stains may be considered for the management of NAFLD/MAFLD. However, its efficacy and safety remain unclear in NAFLD/MAFLD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and/or safety of statins in NAFLD/MAFLD. Risk ratios (RRs) and weight mean differences (WMDs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies involving 993 patients with NAFLD/MAFLD were included. Statins were significantly associated with reductions in alanine aminotransferase (ALT, WMD = -9.76 U/L, 95%CI: -17.28, -2.24, <i>p</i> = 0.010), aspartate aminotransferase (AST, WMD = -4.46 U/L, 95%CI: -9.03, 0.11, <i>p</i> = 0.060), gamma-glutamyl-transpeptidase (GGT, WMD = -10.18 U/L, 95%CI: -13.65, -6.70, <i>p</i> < 0.001), low-density lipoprotein (LDL, WMD = -0.86 mmol/L, 95%CI: -1.06, -0.66, <i>p</i> < 0.001), total cholesterol (TC, WMD = -0.88 mmol/L, 95%CI: -1.14, -0.61, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and triglyceride (TG, WMD = -0.32 mmol/L, 95%CI: -0.45, -0.19, <i>p</i> < 0.001) levels. Additionally, statins did not increase the risk of myalgia (RR = 0.96, 95%CI: 0.10, 9.00, <i>p</i> = 0.970).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Statins could improve liver function and lipid profiles in NAFLD/MAFLD. No myalgia was reported as AEs in the studies we included and the overall safety was favorable.<b>Protocol registration:</b> www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD42025630809.</p>","PeriodicalId":12207,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"1095-1106"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145676783","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-12-24DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2025.2606258
Jack C Stromatt, Anika T Chowdhury, Kevin M Huang, Shuiying Hu, Alex Sparreboom, Sharyn D Baker, Eric D Eisenmann
Introduction: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have significantly improved outcomes for cancer patients. However, TKIs have a narrow therapeutic window, impact a high-risk population, and are frequently combined with additional medications, each of which increases the risk of drug-drug interactions (DDIs). As polypharmacy becomes more common, especially in older and higher-risk groups that are prescribed TKIs, there is an increased risk for harmful DDIs.
Areas covered: TKI-related DDIs can lead to toxicity or reduced efficacy, which worsens patient outcomes and quality of life. In this review, we utilized the Drug Interaction Database (DIDB), FDA labels, and PubMed TKI DDI/ADME queries to outline the mechanisms underlying both pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) DDIs with TKIs. Pharmacokinetic DDIs involve changes in the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) of a molecule (victim) caused by another drug (perpetrator). These DDIs may involve direct inhibition, post-translational modification, or transcriptional regulation. Pharmacodynamic DDIs involve overlapping mechanisms resulting in additive, synergistic, or antagonistic effects when two medications are combined.
Expert opinion: Understanding the mechanisms underlying DDIs facilitates a better grasp of TKI clinical pharmacology and will help in the development of strategies to optimize drug dosing and avoid DDIs.
{"title":"Drug-drug interactions in targeted cancer therapies: a focus on tyrosine kinase inhibitors.","authors":"Jack C Stromatt, Anika T Chowdhury, Kevin M Huang, Shuiying Hu, Alex Sparreboom, Sharyn D Baker, Eric D Eisenmann","doi":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2606258","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2606258","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have significantly improved outcomes for cancer patients. However, TKIs have a narrow therapeutic window, impact a high-risk population, and are frequently combined with additional medications, each of which increases the risk of drug-drug interactions (DDIs). As polypharmacy becomes more common, especially in older and higher-risk groups that are prescribed TKIs, there is an increased risk for harmful DDIs.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>TKI-related DDIs can lead to toxicity or reduced efficacy, which worsens patient outcomes and quality of life. In this review, we utilized the Drug Interaction Database (DIDB), FDA labels, and PubMed TKI DDI/ADME queries to outline the mechanisms underlying both pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) DDIs with TKIs. Pharmacokinetic DDIs involve changes in the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) of a molecule (victim) caused by another drug (perpetrator). These DDIs may involve direct inhibition, post-translational modification, or transcriptional regulation. Pharmacodynamic DDIs involve overlapping mechanisms resulting in additive, synergistic, or antagonistic effects when two medications are combined.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Understanding the mechanisms underlying DDIs facilitates a better grasp of TKI clinical pharmacology and will help in the development of strategies to optimize drug dosing and avoid DDIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12207,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"1019-1035"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12834180/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145780516","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-11-28DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2025.2594496
Eric Snoeck, Nicolas Luyckx, Andreas Lindauer, Lourdes Ochoa Díaz de Monasterioguren, Lourdes Anta, Javier Martínez-González, Ibón Gutierro
Background: Risperidone ISM® does not require loading dose or oral supplementation. Dopamine D2 Receptor Occupancy (D2RO) profiles between Risperidone ISM® versus oral risperidone (OR) and monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) were compared.
Methods: D2RO time profiles were simulated using population pharmacokinetic models in conjunction with an Emax model relating D2RO with plasma levels.
Results: The median time <65% D2RO threshold was predicted to be 0 days for 100 mg Risperidone ISM® versus 5 and 13 days for 8 mg OR, if an intermediate or poor adherence.A D2RO of more than 65% was predicted to be reached within 1 day after the first injection of Risperidone ISM®. Less than 1% of patients treated with Risperidone ISM were predicted to remain below 65% D2RO, while ranged 7-17% on treated with 150 PP1M would be below this threshold for the 28 day-period along the 4 months studied.
Conclusions: Risperidone ISM® achieves threshold D2RO on the first injection day and predicts higher median time above 65% D2RO than high OR doses in real clinical practice. A much faster onset of action and better D2RO coverage during the dosing interval was predicted for Risperidone ISM® versus PP1M. Simulations suggest that Risperidone ISM® compares favorably with high doses of OR and PP1M, making it an effective therapeutic strategy for rapid and sustained symptom reduction.
{"title":"Comparison of dopamine D2 receptor occupancy profiles between risperidone ISM versus oral risperidone and monthly paliperidone palmitate based on population pharmacokinetic modelling and simulations.","authors":"Eric Snoeck, Nicolas Luyckx, Andreas Lindauer, Lourdes Ochoa Díaz de Monasterioguren, Lourdes Anta, Javier Martínez-González, Ibón Gutierro","doi":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2594496","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2594496","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Risperidone ISM® does not require loading dose or oral supplementation. Dopamine D2 Receptor Occupancy (D2RO) profiles between Risperidone ISM® versus oral risperidone (OR) and monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) were compared.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>D2RO time profiles were simulated using population pharmacokinetic models in conjunction with an Emax model relating D2RO with plasma levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median time <65% D2RO threshold was predicted to be 0 days for 100 mg Risperidone ISM® versus 5 and 13 days for 8 mg OR, if an intermediate or poor adherence.A D2RO of more than 65% was predicted to be reached within 1 day after the first injection of Risperidone ISM®. Less than 1% of patients treated with Risperidone ISM were predicted to remain below 65% D2RO, while ranged 7-17% on treated with 150 PP1M would be below this threshold for the 28 day-period along the 4 months studied.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Risperidone ISM® achieves threshold D2RO on the first injection day and predicts higher median time above 65% D2RO than high OR doses in real clinical practice. A much faster onset of action and better D2RO coverage during the dosing interval was predicted for Risperidone ISM® versus PP1M. Simulations suggest that Risperidone ISM® compares favorably with high doses of OR and PP1M, making it an effective therapeutic strategy for rapid and sustained symptom reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":12207,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"957-967"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145603276","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2025.2595682
Xavier Thomas
Introduction: The goal of treatment in older patients (≥60 years) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has recently switched from only improving quality of life to achieving long-term survival via prolonged therapy. Novel therapeutic drugs have indeed recently been approved and tested in combination therapy. In this setting, the combination of venetoclax with a hypomethylating agent (HMA) has emerged as a new standard of care in this patient population.
Areas covered: This review summarizes promising emerging strategies combining target-directed agents for the treatment of older patients with AML. A comprehensive search was made on pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, ashpublications.org, library.ehaweb.org, and clinicaltrials.gov to look for efficacy and safety of emerging therapeutic agents.
Expert opinion: Over the last 5 years, the landscape of AML therapy in older patients with AML has moved from uniform approaches toward more personalized therapy based on molecularly defined subtypes that benefit from target-directed therapy. Favorable results obtained with the synergistic combination venetoclax/HMA are currently opening a new active treatment research era by adding other specific drugs to this backbone regimen.
{"title":"The continuing search for effective treatments for older adults with acute myeloid leukemia.","authors":"Xavier Thomas","doi":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2595682","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2595682","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The goal of treatment in older patients (≥60 years) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has recently switched from only improving quality of life to achieving long-term survival via prolonged therapy. Novel therapeutic drugs have indeed recently been approved and tested in combination therapy. In this setting, the combination of venetoclax with a hypomethylating agent (HMA) has emerged as a new standard of care in this patient population.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review summarizes promising emerging strategies combining target-directed agents for the treatment of older patients with AML. A comprehensive search was made on pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, ashpublications.org, library.ehaweb.org, and clinicaltrials.gov to look for efficacy and safety of emerging therapeutic agents.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Over the last 5 years, the landscape of AML therapy in older patients with AML has moved from uniform approaches toward more personalized therapy based on molecularly defined subtypes that benefit from target-directed therapy. Favorable results obtained with the synergistic combination venetoclax/HMA are currently opening a new active treatment research era by adding other specific drugs to this backbone regimen.</p>","PeriodicalId":12207,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"871-882"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145603352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) contribute to adverse outcomes. Deprescribing, the supervised withdrawal of PIMs, is a key strategy to reduce these risks. Identifying the most targeted PIMs and commonly used tools for deprescribing remains essential. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the medication classes targeted by deprescribing tools, stratified by tool type and frequency and to evaluate the availability of medication-specific tools.
Methods: A systematic search of Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Medline (2010-2023) identified observational and experimental studies using polypharmacy and deprescribing terms. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2) were used for quality assessment. Medication classes and tools/interventions were summarized in the TOTALLY TARGETED List.
Results: Eighty-two studies identified 44 deprescribing tools targeting 77 medication classes. The top PIMs were benzodiazepines, antipsychotics, alpha-receptor blockers, proton pump inhibitors, and Z-hypnotics. The most used tools were Screening Tool of Older People's Prescriptions (STOPP) Frail, American Geriatric Society (AGS) Beers Criteria, STOPP Criteria, and STOPPFall. Several medication-specific tools (e.g. PIMs in cognitively impaired patients) were also identified.
Conclusion: This review identified the most targeted medication classes and deprescribing tools, emphasizing the need for medication-specific and patient-centered approaches to improve safety and outcomes.
{"title":"A comprehensive systematic review of the types of medication classes targeted by deprescribing tools and the tools/interventions applied to each class.","authors":"Faisal Madanat, Solafa Noorsaeed, Rahaf Alkhlaifat, Tanja Mueller, Amanj Kurdi","doi":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2585449","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2585449","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) contribute to adverse outcomes. Deprescribing, the supervised withdrawal of PIMs, is a key strategy to reduce these risks. Identifying the most targeted PIMs and commonly used tools for deprescribing remains essential. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the medication classes targeted by deprescribing tools, stratified by tool type and frequency and to evaluate the availability of medication-specific tools.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Medline (2010-2023) identified observational and experimental studies using polypharmacy and deprescribing terms. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2) were used for quality assessment. Medication classes and tools/interventions were summarized in the TOTALLY TARGETED List.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-two studies identified 44 deprescribing tools targeting 77 medication classes. The top PIMs were benzodiazepines, antipsychotics, alpha-receptor blockers, proton pump inhibitors, and Z-hypnotics. The most used tools were Screening Tool of Older People's Prescriptions (STOPP) Frail, American Geriatric Society (AGS) Beers Criteria, STOPP Criteria, and STOPPFall. Several medication-specific tools (e.g. PIMs in cognitively impaired patients) were also identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review identified the most targeted medication classes and deprescribing tools, emphasizing the need for medication-specific and patient-centered approaches to improve safety and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Protocol registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero//CRD42023442654.</p>","PeriodicalId":12207,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"913-933"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145437897","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}