Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology最新文献

Background: We aimed to investigate the effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RA) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in clinical practice.

Research design and methods: A total of 340 patients were included. Data on age, gender, antidiabetic medications, and bioanalytical parameters were collected at baseline and one year later. Were analyzed estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), blood sodium and potassium levels, blood pressure, weight, cardiovascular risk, and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c).

Results: Patients treated with SGLT2i exhibited a significant improvement in eGFR at the endpoint compared to baseline (p = 0.006). Both treatment groups experienced reductions in systolic blood pressure at the endpoint; especially patients treated with SGLT2i (p = 0.0002). GLP1RA treatment resulted in a statistically significant weight reduction from baseline to endpoint (p < 0.0001), with a higher percentage of patients achieving ≥ 5% weight loss compared to the non-GLP1RA group (33.6% vs. 19.8%). Both SGLT2i and GLP1RA treatments significantly reduced cardiovascular risk scores (p = 0.004 and p = 0.002, respectively). Additionally, both treatments were associated with a significant reduction in HbA1c levels at the endpoint (p = 0.010 and p = 0.002, respectively).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that SGLT2i and GLP1RA offer beneficial effects in patients with T2DM.

Introduction: Pediatric low-grade glioma (pLGG) is the most prevalent childhood brain tumor group, currently regarded as a chronic disease. On 23 April 2024, the U.S. FDA approved a new type II RAF inhibitor, tovorafenib (OJEMDA^TM), previously known as DAY101, for the treatment of patients aged 6 months and older with relapsed or refractory (R/R) pLGG harboring a BRAF fusion or rearrangement, or BRAF V600E mutation.

Areas covered: This article aims to review the pharmacological properties of tovorafenib and evaluate its efficacy and safety in the treatment of R/R pLGG. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed and Web of Science databases for English-language publications related to tovorafenib, including journal articles and conference abstracts, up through 20 August 2024.

Expert opinion: As the first and only FDA-approved medicine for children with BRAF fusions or rearrangements, which are the most common molecular alteration in pLGG, tovorafenib shows superior central nervous system penetration without the paradoxical activation of the MAPK pathway reported for type I BRAF inhibitors. Phase 1 and the pivotal phase 2 trials have demonstrated that tovorafenib monotherapy is generally well-tolerated and exhibits encouraging signs of meaningful, rapid and sustained clinical activity in children and young adults with BRAF-altered pLGG.

Introduction: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory and degenerative autoimmune condition, resulting frequently in a disabling condition. Significant improvements of long-term prognosis have been recently achieved with an early and more aggressive use of disease modifying therapies (DMTs). Addressing the complexity of managing its progressive forms remains a significant challenge.

Areas covered: This review provides an update on DMTs for relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and progressive MS and their efficacy, safety, and mechanism of action, emphasizing the critical role of biomarkers in optimizing treatment decisions. Moreover, some key information on drugs used to manage symptoms such as pain, fatigue, spasticity and urinary problems will be provided. The literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases covering the period from January 2000 to January 2024.

Expert opinion: Major advances have been achieved in the treatment of RRMS. Treatment should start immediately as soon as the neurologist is confident with the diagnosis and its choice should be based on the prognostic profile and on the patient's propensity to accept drug-related risks. The therapeutic landscape for progressive MS is quite disappointing and necessitates further innovation. Personalized medicine, leveraging biomarker insights, holds promise for refining treatment efficacy and patient outcomes.

Introduction: We aimed to synthesize the information on the risks and benefits of clozapine prescription for resistant challenging behavior in persons with neurodevelopmental disorders.

Methods: Articles were identified with MEDLINE, Web of Sciences, and PsycINFO search from inception through January 2024. The review was restricted to persons with intellectual disability (ID) and/or autism spectrum disorder (ASD) without comorbid psychotic or affective disorder. Data were synthesized narratively.

Results: We identified 24 articles (13 case reports, eight chart studies, two controlled studies, one pharmaco-epidemiological study) including 296 patients with ID (n = 222) or ASD (n = 74) (10% aged ≤ 18 years). After clozapine initiation, a decreased frequency of challenging behavior persisting over time was reported in most participants included in clinical studies, and a significant reduction in the number of admissions in the population-based two-year mirror-image study. Adverse drug reactions were those commonly observed with clozapine, i.e. constipation, sedation, and weight gain.

Conclusions: Since only four participants were included in the controlled studies, the benefits of clozapine in neurodevelopmental disorders are supported by a body of evidence exclusively drawn from observational studies. Further studies are required to clarify the indications of clozapine with respect to the unmet need induced by resistant challenging behavior.

Registration: PROSPERO database registration number CRD42024522343.

Objectives: Ulinastatin has been applied in various diseases associated with inflammation, but its effectiveness lacks real-world evidence. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ulinastatin based on a real-world database in the intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. ICU patient data from multi-centers in China were collected. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied. The effectiveness of ulinastatin was evaluated by mortality, length of stay in the ICU and mechanical ventilation duration. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the hazard ratio and plot the survival curve.

Results: A total of 2036 patients were analyzed after PSM. Mortality was significantly lower in the ulinastatin group than in the non-ulinastatin group (hazard ratio for death: 0.77; 95% confidence interval: 0.62-0.96; p = 0.018). Ulinastatin significantly reduced mortality at 28 days (10.0% vs. 13.6%), 60 days (13.9% vs. 18.2%) and 90 days (14.7% vs. 18.5%), length of stay in the ICU (median 8.0 d vs. 13.0 d), and mechanical ventilation duration (median 24.0 h vs. 25.0 h; p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Ulinastatin was beneficial for patients in the ICU, mainly by reducing mortality, length of ICU stay, and mechanical ventilation duration. This study provides evidence of the clinical effectiveness of ulinastatin.

Objective: We aimed to investigate the ambiguous findings of earlier research regarding the reduction of quetiapine plasma levels when combined with lamotrigine, most likely via UDP-glucuronosyltransferase induction by lamotrigine.

Methods: One thousand one hundred and fifty samples, divided into four groups of patients receiving either quetiapine immediate- (IR) or extended-release (XR) without or in combination with lamotrigine were compared regarding absolute and dose-adjusted plasma concentrations. Furthermore, samples of intra-individual controls were analyzed.

Results: Patients receiving quetiapine IR in combination with lamotrigine showed 31% lower plasma (p = 0.002) and 23% lower dose-adjusted plasma concentrations (p = 0.004) compared to those receiving IR monotherapy. The proportion of patients with quetiapine plasma concentrations below the lower limit of the therapeutic reference range was 50% and 30% in the combination group and in patients receiving monotherapy, respectively (p = 0.03). However, no significant differences regarding plasma concentration (p = 0.13) and dose-adjusted plasma concentration (p = 0.42) were observed in patients with combination vs. monotherapy with the XR formulation of quetiapine. In the intra-individual controls, no trends could be identified, possibly due to insufficient number of samples (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: The combination of quetiapine IR with lamotrigine is associated with significantly lower drug concentrations of quetiapine, potentially impacting quetiapine effectiveness. For quetiapine ER, a significant interaction is less likely.

Introduction: This systematic review aimed to determine the effect of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (TNF-αI) in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) based on real-world evidence, as results from published meta-analyses based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) may not fully capture the nuances of clinical practice due to strict criteria.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to 1 August 2023. Cohort studies comparing TDM (proactive and reactive) with empirical management were included. Primary outcome was effectiveness [for IBDs: clinical remission; for rheumatic diseases: clinical remission or low disease activity], with certainty of evidence appraised using the GRADE approach. Secondary outcomes included treatment failure, serious adverse events (SAEs), IMIDs-related surgeries or hospitalizations, and anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) development risk.

Results: Twenty-four cohort studies were included and almost all were on infliximab. For IBDs, compared with empirical management, proactive TDM significantly improved clinical remission (RR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.04-1.28), reduced IBDs-related surgeries (RR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.26-0.81), hospitalizations (RR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.43-0.83), SAEs (RR = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.07-0.76), and ADAs development risk (RR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.19-0.60). Reactive TDM significantly lowered hospitalization rates and might be cost-effective. Proactive TDM outperformed reactive TDM in secondary outcomes. For rheumatic diseases, benefits of TDM were inconclusive due to limited evidence.

Conclusions: Real-world evidence supports proactive TDM of TNF-αI (particularly infliximab) in IBDs to improve effectiveness, safety, and immunogenicity. However, benefits of TDM for different TNF-αI in other IMIDs remain uncertain.

Protocol registration: www.crd.york.ac.uk/ PROSPERO identifier is CRD42022370846.

Introduction: Obesity is a pandemic, linked with increased morbidity including diabetes mellitus (DM) and certain cancer types. Amylin is a major regulatory hormone for satiation and food intake perception in humans. Amylin analogs (pramlintide and cagrilintide) are emerging as promising anti-obesity agents in non-DM subjects.

Areas covered: Pramlintide, the first amylin analog, initially used for the treatment of both type 1 and type 2 DM, has demonstrated weight-lowering action. Clinical trials confirmed a weight loss exceeding 3% in the study period without major untoward effects, which was maintained beyond the follow-up period. Recently, cagrilintide, a long-lasting synthetic amylin analog has been introduced. Cagrilintide has achieved adequate weight loss, reaching even more than 10% of the total weight in early clinical trials. However, adverse gastrointestinal effects, particularly nausea, were more frequent compared with pramlintide. Clinical trials have also confirmed the effectiveness of cagrilintide in comparison with glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists.

Expert opinion: Amylin analogs will certainly enrich the growing therapeutic armamentarium aimed at tackling obesity. The most exciting future research venue could be the development of their combinations with other weight-lowering drugs, especially dual and triple incretin-based co-agonists, thus potentially providing massive weight-loss effects.