Pub Date : 2026-01-13DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2026.2615995
Alessandro Rametta, Noemi Crippa, Simone Rota, Eleonora Gusmaroli, Marco Stellato, Elena Verzoni, Amedeo Nuzzo, Melanie Claps, Valentina Guadalupi, Giuseppe Procopio
Introduction: Non - clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) encompasses a heterogeneous group of rare malignancies, representing approximately 20-25% of all renal cancers. Unlike clear cell RCC (ccRCC), these subtypes - papillary, chromophobe, collecting duct, translocation, molecularly defined variants and others - display distinct biological behaviors, genetic profiles, and therapeutic sensitivities, which preclude a uniform treatment approach.
Areas covered: This review provides an updated overview of systemic therapy for nccRCC, integrating evidence from prospective trials, retrospective series, and translational research. For most of these histologies, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) - based combinations (e.g. pembrolizumab - lenvatinib, nivolumab - cabozantinib or nivolumab-ipilimumab) have demonstrated the best activity. In chromophobe RCC (chRCC), also mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibition appears particularly relevant, whereas in collecting duct carcinoma and renal medullary carcinoma platinum-based chemotherapy continue to have an important role, with cabozantinib showing encouraging results. Novel biomarker-driven approaches are emerging for selected molecular subsets.
Expert opinion: Although remarkable progress has been achieved, the optimal therapeutic strategy for nccRCC remains undefined. Future efforts should focus on histology- and biomarker-driven clinical trials, molecular stratification, to optimize efficacy across subtypes. International collaboration is crucial to overcome the challenges posed by the rarity and biological heterogeneity of these tumors.
{"title":"An update on the treatment paradigm for non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma.","authors":"Alessandro Rametta, Noemi Crippa, Simone Rota, Eleonora Gusmaroli, Marco Stellato, Elena Verzoni, Amedeo Nuzzo, Melanie Claps, Valentina Guadalupi, Giuseppe Procopio","doi":"10.1080/17512433.2026.2615995","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17512433.2026.2615995","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Non - clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) encompasses a heterogeneous group of rare malignancies, representing approximately 20-25% of all renal cancers. Unlike clear cell RCC (ccRCC), these subtypes - papillary, chromophobe, collecting duct, translocation, molecularly defined variants and others - display distinct biological behaviors, genetic profiles, and therapeutic sensitivities, which preclude a uniform treatment approach.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review provides an updated overview of systemic therapy for nccRCC, integrating evidence from prospective trials, retrospective series, and translational research. For most of these histologies, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) - based combinations (e.g. pembrolizumab - lenvatinib, nivolumab - cabozantinib or nivolumab-ipilimumab) have demonstrated the best activity. In chromophobe RCC (chRCC), also mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibition appears particularly relevant, whereas in collecting duct carcinoma and renal medullary carcinoma platinum-based chemotherapy continue to have an important role, with cabozantinib showing encouraging results. Novel biomarker-driven approaches are emerging for selected molecular subsets.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Although remarkable progress has been achieved, the optimal therapeutic strategy for nccRCC remains undefined. Future efforts should focus on histology- and biomarker-driven clinical trials, molecular stratification, to optimize efficacy across subtypes. International collaboration is crucial to overcome the challenges posed by the rarity and biological heterogeneity of these tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":12207,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145943033","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-09DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2026.2612770
Claudio Laudani, Luis Ortega-Paz, Francesco Franchi, Fabiana Rollini, Ali Zgheib, Georges El Khoury, Maryam Farahmandsadr, Mohmmad Alawajneh, Marco Spagnolo, Giovanni Occhipinti, Davide Capodanno, Dominick J Angiolillo
Introduction: In patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), long-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is the current standard of care. However, recent evidence suggests that shortening DAPT duration in favor of single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) can optimize the overall clinical benefit, as it can prevent bleeding without significant tradeoff in ischemic events.
Areas covered: In this narrative review, we synthesize current evidence from PubMed and SCOPUS on SAPT vs DAPT regimens in CAD patients undergoing PCI, including pharmacodynamic and clinical outcomes data, and we propose an algorithm for appropriate antiplatelet regimen selection depending on the ischemic and bleeding risk profile of the individual patient.
Expert opinion: The landscape of antiplatelet treatment regimens has significantly evolved over time, with the current trend being toward a tailored approach based on risk profile, aiming to reduce the risk of bleeding while maintaining ischemic protection. The accurate evaluation of each patient's ischemic and bleeding risk profile is of utmost importance. Dedicated tools have been developed to optimize patient risk profiling and help guide the selection of the antiplatelet regimen. Based on risk estimation, several strategies can be used to reduce the overall risk, including the selection and duration of the antiplatelet regimen.
{"title":"The pharmacology and clinical evidence for the use of dual versus single antiplatelet therapy.","authors":"Claudio Laudani, Luis Ortega-Paz, Francesco Franchi, Fabiana Rollini, Ali Zgheib, Georges El Khoury, Maryam Farahmandsadr, Mohmmad Alawajneh, Marco Spagnolo, Giovanni Occhipinti, Davide Capodanno, Dominick J Angiolillo","doi":"10.1080/17512433.2026.2612770","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17512433.2026.2612770","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), long-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is the current standard of care. However, recent evidence suggests that shortening DAPT duration in favor of single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) can optimize the overall clinical benefit, as it can prevent bleeding without significant tradeoff in ischemic events.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this narrative review, we synthesize current evidence from PubMed and SCOPUS on SAPT vs DAPT regimens in CAD patients undergoing PCI, including pharmacodynamic and clinical outcomes data, and we propose an algorithm for appropriate antiplatelet regimen selection depending on the ischemic and bleeding risk profile of the individual patient.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The landscape of antiplatelet treatment regimens has significantly evolved over time, with the current trend being toward a tailored approach based on risk profile, aiming to reduce the risk of bleeding while maintaining ischemic protection. The accurate evaluation of each patient's ischemic and bleeding risk profile is of utmost importance. Dedicated tools have been developed to optimize patient risk profiling and help guide the selection of the antiplatelet regimen. Based on risk estimation, several strategies can be used to reduce the overall risk, including the selection and duration of the antiplatelet regimen.</p>","PeriodicalId":12207,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145911309","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-04DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2025.2611291
Bryan Richard Sasmita, Linfeng Xie, Yuanzhu Li, Zhu Li, Siyuan Xie, Suxin Luo
Background: Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitors is the first antiplatelet of choice for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but alternatives are needed for patients at high bleeding risk or with aspirin intolerance/hypersensitivity. This observational study investigated the efficacy and safety of indobufen, a reversible COX-1 inhibitor, among AMI patients compared to those receiving aspirin.
Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 907 consecutive AMI patients treated between June 2021 and June 2024. The primary endpoints were GUSTO bleeding and MACE between aspirin and indobufen.
Results: Patients receiving indobufen were older and had higher rates of comorbidities such as type 2 diabetes, gastritis, and peptic ulcers (all p < 0.05). Over a median follow-up of 462 days, aspirin was associated with a higher incidence of GUSTO mild bleeding (23.8% vs. 8.6%, p < 0.001), with no significant differences in moderate/severe bleeding, re-infarction, stroke, heart failure, rehospitalization, or MACE (all p > 0.05). Multivariate regression confirmed indobufen independently reduced GUSTO mild bleeding risk. Boruta and SHAP analyses identified antiplatelet therapy, particularly aspirin, as a predictor of GUSTO mild bleeding.
Conclusions: Indobufen may be considered an alternative antiplatelet therapy for AMI patients with a high bleeding risk and/or aspirin intolerance/hypersensitivity, however, prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
{"title":"The efficacy and safety of indobufen versus aspirin in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a retrospective observational study.","authors":"Bryan Richard Sasmita, Linfeng Xie, Yuanzhu Li, Zhu Li, Siyuan Xie, Suxin Luo","doi":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2611291","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2611291","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitors is the first antiplatelet of choice for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but alternatives are needed for patients at high bleeding risk or with aspirin intolerance/hypersensitivity. This observational study investigated the efficacy and safety of indobufen, a reversible COX-1 inhibitor, among AMI patients compared to those receiving aspirin.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively enrolled 907 consecutive AMI patients treated between June 2021 and June 2024. The primary endpoints were GUSTO bleeding and MACE between aspirin and indobufen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients receiving indobufen were older and had higher rates of comorbidities such as type 2 diabetes, gastritis, and peptic ulcers (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). Over a median follow-up of 462 days, aspirin was associated with a higher incidence of GUSTO mild bleeding (23.8% vs. 8.6%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), with no significant differences in moderate/severe bleeding, re-infarction, stroke, heart failure, rehospitalization, or MACE (all <i>p</i> > 0.05). Multivariate regression confirmed indobufen independently reduced GUSTO mild bleeding risk. Boruta and SHAP analyses identified antiplatelet therapy, particularly aspirin, as a predictor of GUSTO mild bleeding.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Indobufen may be considered an alternative antiplatelet therapy for AMI patients with a high bleeding risk and/or aspirin intolerance/hypersensitivity, however, prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12207,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145848903","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-29DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2025.2609659
William Manning Olsen, Kitty St Pierre, Wade Thompson, Kristie Rebecca Weir, Christopher Robert Freeman, Ruth Bohill, Barbara Farrell, Aili Veronica Langford, Lisa Kouladjian O'Donnell, Emily Reeve, Shin J Liau, Aisling Mary McEvoy, Shakti Shrestha, Wubshet Tesfaye, Juanita Breen, Christopher Etherton-Beer, Jerry Yik, Justin Turner, Nagham J Ailabouni
Introduction: Medicine-related harm associated with polypharmacy is a pertinent global health challenge. Deprescribing (reducing or stopping) medicines that cause more potential harm than benefit could mitigate the risk of medicine-related harm. However, the existing deprescribing research-to-practice gap threatens the long-term sustainability and scalability of deprescribing efforts.
Research design and methods: To address this, key stakeholders including healthcare practitioners, academics, policymakers and representatives of peak professional organizations, gathered at a World Café workshop to reflect on progress achieved in the deprescribing research and practice landscape while exploring the top future priorities for deprescribing.
Results: Thirty participants agreed on three top priorities: improving the clinical management of deprescribing; engaging consumers and gaining their perspectives; and raising awareness to enhance communication. Emerging themes and related barriers and catalysts were derived and mapped to a socio-ecological model offering a bird-eye's view of these factors on an individual, interpersonal, organizational, and societal level.
Conclusions: Our World Cafe' highlights opportunities for future deprescribing research and practice. To promote the uptake of deprescribing in practice, catalysts could include leveraging new technology, promoting deprescribing via social media and optimizing workforce staff and knowledge. Ultimately, this knowledge may motivate deprescribing efforts and bridge the research-to-practice gap.
{"title":"Shaping future deprescribing priorities: outcomes of a World Café stakeholder workshop.","authors":"William Manning Olsen, Kitty St Pierre, Wade Thompson, Kristie Rebecca Weir, Christopher Robert Freeman, Ruth Bohill, Barbara Farrell, Aili Veronica Langford, Lisa Kouladjian O'Donnell, Emily Reeve, Shin J Liau, Aisling Mary McEvoy, Shakti Shrestha, Wubshet Tesfaye, Juanita Breen, Christopher Etherton-Beer, Jerry Yik, Justin Turner, Nagham J Ailabouni","doi":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2609659","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2609659","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Medicine-related harm associated with polypharmacy is a pertinent global health challenge. Deprescribing (reducing or stopping) medicines that cause more potential harm than benefit could mitigate the risk of medicine-related harm. However, the existing deprescribing research-to-practice gap threatens the long-term sustainability and scalability of deprescribing efforts.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>To address this, key stakeholders including healthcare practitioners, academics, policymakers and representatives of peak professional organizations, gathered at a World Café workshop to reflect on progress achieved in the deprescribing research and practice landscape while exploring the top future priorities for deprescribing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty participants agreed on three top priorities: improving the clinical management of deprescribing; engaging consumers and gaining their perspectives; and raising awareness to enhance communication. Emerging themes and related barriers and catalysts were derived and mapped to a socio-ecological model offering a bird-eye's view of these factors on an individual, interpersonal, organizational, and societal level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our World Cafe' highlights opportunities for future deprescribing research and practice. To promote the uptake of deprescribing in practice, catalysts could include leveraging new technology, promoting deprescribing via social media and optimizing workforce staff and knowledge. Ultimately, this knowledge may motivate deprescribing efforts and bridge the research-to-practice gap.</p>","PeriodicalId":12207,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145827133","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-29DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2025.2611431
Hamza Sayadi, Yeleen Fromage, Marc Labriffe, Cyrielle Codde, Caroline Monchaud, Pierre Marquet, Laure Ponthier, Jean-Baptiste Woillard
Introduction: Traditional therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) faces limitations in accuracy and adaptability, often failing to optimize therapy for complex patients. Machine learning (ML) is emerging as a powerful tool to overcome these challenges, offering a data-driven paradigm to enhance therapeutic outcomes and minimize toxicity for drugs with narrow therapeutic indices.
Areas covered: This review synthesizes the evolution of ML in TDM. We cover foundational models that predict drug exposure from sparse data using either real-world or simulation-based training. We then explore the extension of these techniques to proactive first-dose optimization and the recent development of hybrid models, which integrate the physiological interpretability of population pharmacokinetic frameworks with the corrective power of ML.
Expert opinion: The future of TDM lies not in replacing mechanistic models, but in their convergence with ML. While promising, clinical translation requires overcoming critical barriers in data access, model interpretability, and workflow integration. The long-term trajectory points toward dynamic Digital Twins capable of forecasting patient-specific benefit-risk profiles. Ultimately, validated hybrid tools embedded in clinical decision support systems could establish proactive, individualized dosing as the new standard of care in personalized pharmacotherapy.
{"title":"Optimized therapeutic drug monitoring: the role of machine learning models.","authors":"Hamza Sayadi, Yeleen Fromage, Marc Labriffe, Cyrielle Codde, Caroline Monchaud, Pierre Marquet, Laure Ponthier, Jean-Baptiste Woillard","doi":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2611431","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17512433.2025.2611431","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Traditional therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) faces limitations in accuracy and adaptability, often failing to optimize therapy for complex patients. Machine learning (ML) is emerging as a powerful tool to overcome these challenges, offering a data-driven paradigm to enhance therapeutic outcomes and minimize toxicity for drugs with narrow therapeutic indices.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review synthesizes the evolution of ML in TDM. We cover foundational models that predict drug exposure from sparse data using either real-world or simulation-based training. We then explore the extension of these techniques to proactive first-dose optimization and the recent development of hybrid models, which integrate the physiological interpretability of population pharmacokinetic frameworks with the corrective power of ML.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The future of TDM lies not in replacing mechanistic models, but in their convergence with ML. While promising, clinical translation requires overcoming critical barriers in data access, model interpretability, and workflow integration. The long-term trajectory points toward dynamic Digital Twins capable of forecasting patient-specific benefit-risk profiles. Ultimately, validated hybrid tools embedded in clinical decision support systems could establish proactive, individualized dosing as the new standard of care in personalized pharmacotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12207,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145855196","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-09-22DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2025.2556122
Emily Francis, Samantha Paylor, Cindy Van, Bindu Mathews, Millad J Sobhanian, Daniel Z Mansour, George Hennawi, Nicole J Brandt
Introduction: Alzheimer's disease (AD) remains a major public health challenge, with growing prevalence and limited treatment options that modify disease progression. Recent advances have led to the development and approval of Anti-amyloid-β (Aβ) monoclonal antibodies, which represent a paradigm shift from symptomatic management to targeted disease modification.
Areas ccovered: Agents such as lecanemab and donanemab selectively bind aggregated forms of Aβ and have demonstrated modest but statistically significant slowing of cognitive and functional decline in early AD. However, these therapies are associated with amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), particularly in individuals carrying the APOE ε4 allele, necessitating close monitoring and individualized risk assessment. Implementation challenges, including high treatment burden, cost, and real-world applicability, have limited broad clinical adoption. This review examines the mechanistic differences, clinical trial outcomes, and safety considerations of Aβ monoclonal antibodies, while also highlighting emerging therapies and the need for inclusive, precision-guided approaches.
Expert opinion: As research continues to evolve, balancing clinical benefits with safety and accessibility will be critical in defining the role of anti-amyloid-β therapies within the broader landscape of AD care.
阿尔茨海默病(AD)仍然是一项重大的公共卫生挑战,其患病率不断上升,但改变疾病进展的治疗选择有限。最近的进展导致了抗淀粉样蛋白-β (a β)单克隆抗体的开发和批准,这代表了从症状管理到靶向疾病修饰的范式转变。研究领域:lecanemab和donanemab等药物选择性结合Aβ聚集形式,并显示出适度但统计学上显著的早期AD认知和功能衰退减缓。然而,这些疗法与淀粉样蛋白相关成像异常(ARIA)有关,特别是在携带APOE ε4等位基因的个体中,需要密切监测和个体化风险评估。实施方面的挑战,包括高昂的治疗负担、成本和现实世界的适用性,限制了广泛的临床应用。本文综述了Aβ单克隆抗体的机制差异、临床试验结果和安全性考虑,同时也强调了新兴疗法和对包容性、精确指导方法的需求。专家意见:随着研究的不断发展,平衡临床获益与安全性和可及性将是确定抗淀粉样蛋白疗法在阿尔茨海默病治疗的更广泛领域中的作用的关键。
{"title":"Review of anti-amyloid-beta (Aβ) monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.","authors":"Emily Francis, Samantha Paylor, Cindy Van, Bindu Mathews, Millad J Sobhanian, Daniel Z Mansour, George Hennawi, Nicole J Brandt","doi":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2556122","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2556122","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Alzheimer's disease (AD) remains a major public health challenge, with growing prevalence and limited treatment options that modify disease progression. Recent advances have led to the development and approval of Anti-amyloid-β (Aβ) monoclonal antibodies, which represent a paradigm shift from symptomatic management to targeted disease modification.</p><p><strong>Areas ccovered: </strong>Agents such as lecanemab and donanemab selectively bind aggregated forms of Aβ and have demonstrated modest but statistically significant slowing of cognitive and functional decline in early AD. However, these therapies are associated with amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), particularly in individuals carrying the APOE ε4 allele, necessitating close monitoring and individualized risk assessment. Implementation challenges, including high treatment burden, cost, and real-world applicability, have limited broad clinical adoption. This review examines the mechanistic differences, clinical trial outcomes, and safety considerations of Aβ monoclonal antibodies, while also highlighting emerging therapies and the need for inclusive, precision-guided approaches.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>As research continues to evolve, balancing clinical benefits with safety and accessibility will be critical in defining the role of anti-amyloid-β therapies within the broader landscape of AD care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12207,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"1063-1078"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145052654","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-12-04DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2025.2597512
Noor E Eden, Ammara Zamir, Hamid Saeed, Faleh Alqahtani, Muhammad Fawad Rasool
Introduction: Canagliflozin (CFZ), is a commonly used sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor drug for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This review comprehensively compiles existing research studies regarding the clinical pharmacokinetic (PK) behavior of canagliflozin, primarily focusing on exploring effects of different disease conditions, potential drug interactions, and genetic polymorphism.
Areas covered: A comprehensive review of scholarly literature was conducted by using leading databases, i.e. Google Scholar, Science Direct, PubMed, and Cochrane, to identify clinical PK studies of CFZ. The comprehensive literature search identified 25 articles that met the inclusion standards. A linear relationship was observed between the administered doses and PK parameters such as area under the curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax). The findings from T2DM patients with moderate renal impairment displayed a 27% increase in AUC0-∞ of canagliflozin. Furthermore, co-administration of CFZ with rifampin in humans reduced Cmax by 28%, while with telmisartan in rats, CL/F decreased 31.1% initially, but increased 62.9% after 7 days.
Expert opinion: This review integrates all significant human PK parameters of CFZ by combining findings from existing studies, allowing researchers to develop and evaluate PK models for recommending model-based dose optimization.
{"title":"Clinical pharmacokinetics on canagliflozin: a systematic review of <i>in-vitro</i> and <i>in-vivo</i> studies.","authors":"Noor E Eden, Ammara Zamir, Hamid Saeed, Faleh Alqahtani, Muhammad Fawad Rasool","doi":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2597512","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2597512","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Canagliflozin (CFZ), is a commonly used sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor drug for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This review comprehensively compiles existing research studies regarding the clinical pharmacokinetic (PK) behavior of canagliflozin, primarily focusing on exploring effects of different disease conditions, potential drug interactions, and genetic polymorphism.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>A comprehensive review of scholarly literature was conducted by using leading databases, i.e. Google Scholar, Science Direct, PubMed, and Cochrane, to identify clinical PK studies of CFZ. The comprehensive literature search identified 25 articles that met the inclusion standards. A linear relationship was observed between the administered doses and PK parameters such as area under the curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC<sub>0-∞</sub>) and maximum plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>). The findings from T2DM patients with moderate renal impairment displayed a 27% increase in AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> of canagliflozin. Furthermore, co-administration of CFZ with rifampin in humans reduced Cmax by 28%, while with telmisartan in rats, CL/F decreased 31.1% initially, but increased 62.9% after 7 days.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>This review integrates all significant human PK parameters of CFZ by combining findings from existing studies, allowing researchers to develop and evaluate PK models for recommending model-based dose optimization.</p><p><strong>Protocol registration: </strong>CRD420251054714.</p>","PeriodicalId":12207,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"1079-1094"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145631249","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-12-24DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2025.2606982
Chiara Sepulcri, Francesca Saluzzo, Daniele Roberto Giacobbe, Antonio Di Biagio, Daniela Maria Cirillo, Matteo Bassetti
Introduction: Drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) still represents a critical global health threat despite recent therapeutic advances. The shift from long, injectable-based regimens to shorter, all-oral regimens has improved outcomes, yet substantial challenges remain in ensuring efficacy, safety, and equitable access.
Areas covered: We reviewed recent literature (2020-2025) searching PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar, clinicaltrials.gov, WHO guidelines, conference abstract books focusing on recent policy-changing, or knowledge-advancing Phase II/III clinical trials assessing novel DR-TB drugs/regimens.We reported the persisting issues of drug toxicity and acquisition of drug resistance, reviewing evidence from trials, surveillance data, and real-life studies. We provided an overview of new compounds and regimens in the pipeline and underlined the critical role of drug-susceptibility testing.
Expert opinion: The availability of multiple short, all-oral regimens offers unprecedented therapeutic opportunities for drug-resistant tuberculosis. At the same time, the rise in bedaquiline resistance hampers the efficacy of these regimens and represents a global health threat. A promising rich pipeline of new compounds under development holds an important transformational potential in TB treatment; however, integrated drug-diagnostic development is needed to avoid past mistakes. Global advocacy for equitable access to TB treatment is fundamental to pairing scientific progress with concrete impact.
{"title":"Recent advances and unmet needs in the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis.","authors":"Chiara Sepulcri, Francesca Saluzzo, Daniele Roberto Giacobbe, Antonio Di Biagio, Daniela Maria Cirillo, Matteo Bassetti","doi":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2606982","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2606982","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) still represents a critical global health threat despite recent therapeutic advances. The shift from long, injectable-based regimens to shorter, all-oral regimens has improved outcomes, yet substantial challenges remain in ensuring efficacy, safety, and equitable access.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>We reviewed recent literature (2020-2025) searching PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar, clinicaltrials.gov, WHO guidelines, conference abstract books focusing on recent policy-changing, or knowledge-advancing Phase II/III clinical trials assessing novel DR-TB drugs/regimens.We reported the persisting issues of drug toxicity and acquisition of drug resistance, reviewing evidence from trials, surveillance data, and real-life studies. We provided an overview of new compounds and regimens in the pipeline and underlined the critical role of drug-susceptibility testing.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The availability of multiple short, all-oral regimens offers unprecedented therapeutic opportunities for drug-resistant tuberculosis. At the same time, the rise in bedaquiline resistance hampers the efficacy of these regimens and represents a global health threat. A promising rich pipeline of new compounds under development holds an important transformational potential in TB treatment; however, integrated drug-diagnostic development is needed to avoid past mistakes. Global advocacy for equitable access to TB treatment is fundamental to pairing scientific progress with concrete impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":12207,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"1037-1051"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145773864","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2025.2596875
Vincenzo Giosuè Giambusso, Martina Rafanelli, Robert S Sheldon
Introduction: Vasovagal syncope is a frequent problem affecting nearly half the population. The symptom burden is wide, ranging from once to hundreds of times. It reduces quality of life and causes injuries. Physicians, particularly front-line physicians such as family doctors, need a simple, practical approach.
Areas covered: We provide context on syncope frequency, competing diagnoses, and natural history, usually characterized by improvement and remissions. Quality of life is reduced and accompanied by anxiety and improves with care. Injuries are common but serious injuries are rare. Treatment begins with advice on salt and fluid intake and physical maneuvers. Fludrocortisone, midodrine, and 2 serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitors are effective, and beta blockers should not be used. Atomoxetine is under investigation. Pacemakers and ablation must be reserved for the rare patient who has not responded to more conservative treatments.
Expert opinion: Patients usually do well and respond to ongoing support and simple dietary advice and physical tips. Some benefit from fludrocortisone, midodrine, or serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitors. Almost all patients eventually stop fainting, and invasive treatments should be used last and for the very few highly afflicted patients who do not improve with safer measures.
{"title":"Progress in the pharmacological management of vasovagal syncope.","authors":"Vincenzo Giosuè Giambusso, Martina Rafanelli, Robert S Sheldon","doi":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2596875","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2596875","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vasovagal syncope is a frequent problem affecting nearly half the population. The symptom burden is wide, ranging from once to hundreds of times. It reduces quality of life and causes injuries. Physicians, particularly front-line physicians such as family doctors, need a simple, practical approach.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>We provide context on syncope frequency, competing diagnoses, and natural history, usually characterized by improvement and remissions. Quality of life is reduced and accompanied by anxiety and improves with care. Injuries are common but serious injuries are rare. Treatment begins with advice on salt and fluid intake and physical maneuvers. Fludrocortisone, midodrine, and 2 serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitors are effective, and beta blockers should not be used. Atomoxetine is under investigation. Pacemakers and ablation must be reserved for the rare patient who has not responded to more conservative treatments.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Patients usually do well and respond to ongoing support and simple dietary advice and physical tips. Some benefit from fludrocortisone, midodrine, or serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitors. Almost all patients eventually stop fainting, and invasive treatments should be used last and for the very few highly afflicted patients who do not improve with safer measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":12207,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"977-988"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145631300","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}