首页 > 最新文献

European urology oncology最新文献

英文 中文
Reply to: Letter to the Editor EUONCO-D-26-00110 Re: Riccardo Bertolo, Antonio Luigi Pastore, Paolo Verze, et al. Real-World Burden and Management of Late Genitourinary toxicity After Prostate RT: Insights from IRRADIaTE, the Italian Registry of RT-Associated Disorders and Urological Treatment & Evaluation. Eur Urol Oncol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2026.01.005. 回复:给编辑的信EUONCO-D-26-00110回复:Riccardo Bertolo, Antonio Luigi Pastore, Paolo Verze等。前列腺放射治疗后晚期泌尿生殖系统毒性的现实世界负担和管理:来自意大利放射治疗相关疾病和泌尿外科治疗和评估登记处的见解Eur Eur Eur Eur Eur。在出版社。https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2026.01.005。
IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2026.02.021
Riccardo Bertolo, Alessandro Antonelli
{"title":"Reply to: Letter to the Editor EUONCO-D-26-00110 Re: Riccardo Bertolo, Antonio Luigi Pastore, Paolo Verze, et al. Real-World Burden and Management of Late Genitourinary toxicity After Prostate RT: Insights from IRRADIaTE, the Italian Registry of RT-Associated Disorders and Urological Treatment & Evaluation. Eur Urol Oncol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2026.01.005.","authors":"Riccardo Bertolo, Alessandro Antonelli","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2026.02.021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2026.02.021","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147321567","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Long Noncoding RNA-based Classifier for Identifying More Aggressive Low-grade Ta Bladder Cancer with Elevated FGFR3 Activity. 一种基于长非编码rna的分类器用于识别FGFR3活性升高的侵袭性低级别膀胱癌。
IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2026.02.020
Tran Anh Thu Phung, Rachel Weng, Peter C Black, Lars Dyrskjøt, Joep J de Jong, Ewan A Gibb

Background and objective: Low-grade, stage Ta (TaLG) non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is generally nonaggressive; yet, some patients experience recurrence or progression. We previously identified long noncoding RNA cluster 2 (LC2) as an aggressive TaLG subgroup via consensus clustering, which required a cohort-level analysis. We developed a single-sample transcriptome classifier for patient-level LC2 identification.

Methods: Using the UROMOL cohort (n = 276) for training/testing and the Hurst (Stage-stratified molecular profiling of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer enhances biological, clinical, and therapeutic insight. Cell Rep Med 2021;2:100472) cohort (n = 72) for validation, we performed feature selection via median absolute deviation and nested cross-validation. An elastic net regression model (α = 0.5) was trained using ten-fold cross-validation. Performance was evaluated through a pathway analysis, with prognostic significance assessed by Kaplan-Meier and univariable Cox regression.

Key findings and limitations: Biological characterization revealed that LC2 tumors exhibited higher proliferation (G2M/E2F signatures), elevated FGFR3 pathway activity, and reduced sonic hedgehog signaling and immune activity (p < 0.001). The classifier identified 7/72 LC2 tumors in the Hurst cohort. LC2-TaLG patients had significantly worse recurrence-free survival (log-rank p < 0.001). On univariable Cox regression analysis, LC2 status was strongly associated with recurrence (hazard ratio 4.52, 95% confidence interval 1.78-11.5; p = 0.001). LC2-predicted tumors in the Hurst cohort showed similar biological patterns.

Conclusions and clinical implications: We developed a single-sample transcriptomic classifier identifying aggressive TaLG NMIBC, demonstrating reproducibility across platforms. If validated, this model has the potential to support clinical decision-making.

背景与目的:低级别Ta期(TaLG)非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)通常是非侵袭性的;然而,一些患者出现复发或进展。我们之前通过共识聚类确定了长链非编码RNA簇2 (LC2)为侵袭性TaLG亚群,这需要队列水平的分析。我们开发了一种用于患者水平LC2鉴定的单样本转录组分类器。方法:使用UROMOL队列(n = 276)进行训练/测试,并对非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌进行Hurst分期分层分子谱分析,以提高生物学、临床和治疗方面的认识。Cell Rep Med 2021;2:100 . 472)队列(n = 72)进行验证,我们通过中位数绝对偏差和嵌套交叉验证进行特征选择。采用十倍交叉验证方法训练弹性网络回归模型(α = 0.5)。通过途径分析评估表现,通过Kaplan-Meier和单变量Cox回归评估预后意义。主要发现和局限性:生物学特性显示LC2肿瘤具有更高的增殖(G2M/E2F特征),FGFR3通路活性升高,sonic hedgehog信号和免疫活性降低(p结论和临床意义:我们开发了一种单样本转录组分类器,用于识别侵袭性TaLG NMIBC,并证明了跨平台的可重复性。如果得到验证,该模型有可能支持临床决策。
{"title":"A Long Noncoding RNA-based Classifier for Identifying More Aggressive Low-grade Ta Bladder Cancer with Elevated FGFR3 Activity.","authors":"Tran Anh Thu Phung, Rachel Weng, Peter C Black, Lars Dyrskjøt, Joep J de Jong, Ewan A Gibb","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2026.02.020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2026.02.020","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Low-grade, stage Ta (TaLG) non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is generally nonaggressive; yet, some patients experience recurrence or progression. We previously identified long noncoding RNA cluster 2 (LC2) as an aggressive TaLG subgroup via consensus clustering, which required a cohort-level analysis. We developed a single-sample transcriptome classifier for patient-level LC2 identification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the UROMOL cohort (n = 276) for training/testing and the Hurst (Stage-stratified molecular profiling of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer enhances biological, clinical, and therapeutic insight. Cell Rep Med 2021;2:100472) cohort (n = 72) for validation, we performed feature selection via median absolute deviation and nested cross-validation. An elastic net regression model (α = 0.5) was trained using ten-fold cross-validation. Performance was evaluated through a pathway analysis, with prognostic significance assessed by Kaplan-Meier and univariable Cox regression.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Biological characterization revealed that LC2 tumors exhibited higher proliferation (G2M/E2F signatures), elevated FGFR3 pathway activity, and reduced sonic hedgehog signaling and immune activity (p < 0.001). The classifier identified 7/72 LC2 tumors in the Hurst cohort. LC2-TaLG patients had significantly worse recurrence-free survival (log-rank p < 0.001). On univariable Cox regression analysis, LC2 status was strongly associated with recurrence (hazard ratio 4.52, 95% confidence interval 1.78-11.5; p = 0.001). LC2-predicted tumors in the Hurst cohort showed similar biological patterns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>We developed a single-sample transcriptomic classifier identifying aggressive TaLG NMIBC, demonstrating reproducibility across platforms. If validated, this model has the potential to support clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147321524","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Radiation Therapy Combined with Immunotherapy Before Radical Cystectomy in Locally Advanced Bladder Cancer: A Prospective, Single-arm, Multicenter, Phase 2 Trial (RACE-IT). 局部晚期膀胱癌根治性膀胱切除术前放射治疗联合免疫治疗:一项前瞻性、单臂、多中心、2期试验(RACE-IT)
IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2026.02.019
Sebastian C Schmid, Matthias Jahnen, Kilian Schiller, Andreas Sauter, Anna K Seitz, Florestan Koll, Franziska Wieck, Philipp Korn, Philipp Maisch, Kristina Schwamborn, Michael Flentje, Thomas Wiegel, Stephanie E Combs, Friedemann Zengerling, Christian Bolenz, Hubert Kübler, Claus Rödel, Jürgen E Gschwend, Margitta Retz, Jonas Lewerich

Background and objective: Patients with locally advanced bladder cancer have a poor prognosis despite radical surgery. Early data on neoadjuvant immunotherapy are promising, with possible synergistic effects with radiation therapy. Therefore, this prospective multicenter phase 2 trial evaluated, for the first time, the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of neoadjuvant radioimmunotherapy before radical cystectomy.

Methods: Patients with locally advanced urothelial bladder cancer (cT3/4 cN0/N+ cM0) eligible for radical cystectomy but unfit or refusing neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy were included in this prospective phase 2 trial. Patients received four cycles of nivolumab 240 mg every 2 wk combined with radiotherapy of the pelvis with a maximum dose of 50.4 Gy. Patients underwent radical cystectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy between weeks 11 and 15. The primary endpoint was feasibility, defined as a minimum completed treatment rate of >70% at the end of week 15.

Key findings and limitations: Thirty-three patients were included. For the primary endpoint and efficacy analysis, 31 patients were eligible. The trial met its primary endpoint with a completed treatment rate of 87% (27/31). The pathological response rates were 39% with ypT0 ypN0 cM0, 58% with ≤ypT1 ypN0 cM0, and 74% with ≤ypT2 ypN0 cM0. Immune-related adverse events of all grades occurred in 55%, and grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 33% of patients. There were no treatment-related deaths.

Conclusions and clinical implications: By meeting its primary endpoint, this trial demonstrated for the first time the feasibility and safety of neoadjuvant radioimmunotherapy prior to radical cystectomy in patients with locally advanced bladder cancer, warranting further investigation in a randomized setting.

背景与目的:局部晚期膀胱癌患者虽行根治性手术,但预后较差。新辅助免疫治疗的早期数据很有希望,可能与放射治疗有协同作用。因此,这项前瞻性多中心2期试验首次评估了根治性膀胱切除术前新辅助放射免疫治疗的可行性、安全性和有效性。方法:适合根治性膀胱切除术但不适合或拒绝新辅助顺铂化疗的局部晚期尿路上皮性膀胱癌(cT3/4 cN0/N+ cM0)患者纳入了这项前瞻性2期试验。患者接受4个疗程的纳武单抗240mg / 2周联合骨盆放疗,最大剂量为50.4 Gy。患者在第11周至第15周接受根治性膀胱切除术和盆腔淋巴结切除术。主要终点是可行性,定义为在第15周结束时的最低完成治疗率为70%。主要发现和局限性:纳入33例患者。对于主要终点和疗效分析,31例患者符合条件。该试验达到了主要终点,完成治疗率为87%(27/31)。ypT0型ypN0 cM0的病理反应率为39%,≤ypT1型ypN0 cM0的为58%,≤ypT2型ypN0 cM0的为74%。55%的患者发生了所有级别的免疫相关不良事件,33%的患者发生了3/4级不良事件。没有与治疗相关的死亡。结论和临床意义:通过满足其主要终点,该试验首次证明了局部晚期膀胱癌患者根治性膀胱切除术前新辅助放射免疫治疗的可行性和安全性,值得在随机环境中进一步研究。
{"title":"Radiation Therapy Combined with Immunotherapy Before Radical Cystectomy in Locally Advanced Bladder Cancer: A Prospective, Single-arm, Multicenter, Phase 2 Trial (RACE-IT).","authors":"Sebastian C Schmid, Matthias Jahnen, Kilian Schiller, Andreas Sauter, Anna K Seitz, Florestan Koll, Franziska Wieck, Philipp Korn, Philipp Maisch, Kristina Schwamborn, Michael Flentje, Thomas Wiegel, Stephanie E Combs, Friedemann Zengerling, Christian Bolenz, Hubert Kübler, Claus Rödel, Jürgen E Gschwend, Margitta Retz, Jonas Lewerich","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2026.02.019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2026.02.019","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Patients with locally advanced bladder cancer have a poor prognosis despite radical surgery. Early data on neoadjuvant immunotherapy are promising, with possible synergistic effects with radiation therapy. Therefore, this prospective multicenter phase 2 trial evaluated, for the first time, the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of neoadjuvant radioimmunotherapy before radical cystectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with locally advanced urothelial bladder cancer (cT3/4 cN0/N+ cM0) eligible for radical cystectomy but unfit or refusing neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy were included in this prospective phase 2 trial. Patients received four cycles of nivolumab 240 mg every 2 wk combined with radiotherapy of the pelvis with a maximum dose of 50.4 Gy. Patients underwent radical cystectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy between weeks 11 and 15. The primary endpoint was feasibility, defined as a minimum completed treatment rate of >70% at the end of week 15.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Thirty-three patients were included. For the primary endpoint and efficacy analysis, 31 patients were eligible. The trial met its primary endpoint with a completed treatment rate of 87% (27/31). The pathological response rates were 39% with ypT0 ypN0 cM0, 58% with ≤ypT1 ypN0 cM0, and 74% with ≤ypT2 ypN0 cM0. Immune-related adverse events of all grades occurred in 55%, and grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 33% of patients. There were no treatment-related deaths.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>By meeting its primary endpoint, this trial demonstrated for the first time the feasibility and safety of neoadjuvant radioimmunotherapy prior to radical cystectomy in patients with locally advanced bladder cancer, warranting further investigation in a randomized setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147303963","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging with [18F]PARPi for Precision Guidance of Poly ADP-ribose Polymerase Inhibitor Therapy in Homologous Recombination Repair Mutated and Nonmutated Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer. 正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层成像与[18F]PARPi精确指导聚adp核糖聚合酶抑制剂治疗同源重组修复突变和非突变转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌。
IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2026.02.012
Heidemarie Ofner, Holger Einspieler, Marius Ozenil, Clemens P Spielvogel, Ilva Kristiana Langrate, Karsten Bamminger, Melanie R Hassler, Pascal A T Baltzer, Shahrokh F Shariat, Marcus Hacker, Sazan Rasul, Gero Kramer

Background and objective: Poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have become an important treatment option for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), targeting PARP1-mediated DNA repair. We investigated [18F]PARPi positron emission tomography (PET) uptake as a predictive biomarker of mCRPC.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 15 mCRPC patients who underwent [18F]PARPi PET/computed tomography (CT) examinations and were subsequently treated with PARP inhibitors andrs; homologous recombination repair alterations were detected in two patients. Lesions exhibiting uptake above the background were segmented and quantified. Target to background ratios (TBRs) were derived using the abdominal aorta as a blood pool to normalize interpatient biodistribution. Baseline uptake metrics were correlated with the percentage of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response.

Key findings and limitations: Most patients presented with osseous metastases (n = 13) on [18F]PARPi PET, followed by nodal (n = 9), visceral (n = 3), and prostatic (n = 1) lesions. During PARP inhibition, of the 15 patients, six achieved a ≥50% PSA decline, eight showed a <50% decline, and one experienced a >100% PSA increase. The median time to PSA nadir was 40 d (interquartile range [IQR] 20-76 d). The percentage of PSA change correlated well with [18F]PARPi PET mean, peak, and maximum TBRs of bone lesions (all r = 0.72-0.79; all p < 0.05), with weaker, nonsignificant correlations for nodal lesions (r = 0.49-0.53; all p > 0.05). Five patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events (AEs) after a median of 28 d (IQR 27-69 d). Patients without AEs (n = 3) exhibited higher bone lesion TBRs than those with AEs (n = 12, p < 0.05). The limitations of this study are its retrospective nature and small sample size.

Conclusions and clinical implications: Baseline [18F]PARPi uptake in mCRPC lesions was associated with a PSA response to PARP inhibition. Higher TBRs particularly in bone lesions predicted a greater PSA decline. These findings support [18F]PARPi PET/CT as a promising tool for patient selection and therapy monitoring, warranting prospective trials with histopathological validation and survival endpoints.

背景与目的:聚adp核糖聚合酶(PARP)抑制剂已成为转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)的重要治疗选择,靶向parp1介导的DNA修复。我们研究了[18F]PARPi正电子发射断层扫描(PET)摄取作为mCRPC的预测性生物标志物。方法:我们回顾性分析了15例mCRPC患者,他们接受了[18F]PARPi PET/计算机断层扫描(CT)检查,随后接受了PARP抑制剂和抗生素治疗;在两例患者中检测到同源重组修复改变。在背景上方显示摄取的病灶被分割和量化。靶本底比(TBRs)采用腹主动脉作为血池,以使患者间生物分布正常化。基线摄取指标与前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)应答百分比相关。主要发现和局限性:大多数患者在[18F]PARPi PET上表现为骨转移(n = 13),其次是淋巴结(n = 9)、内脏(n = 3)和前列腺(n = 1)病变。在PARP抑制期间,15例患者中,6例PSA下降≥50%,8例PSA升高100%。PSA降至最低点的中位时间为40 d(四分位数间距[IQR] 20-76 d)。PSA变化百分比与[18F]PARPi PET的骨病变平均、峰值和最大tbr呈正相关(均r = 0.72-0.79;均p 0.05)。5例患者在平均28天(IQR 27-69天)后因不良事件(ae)停止治疗。无不良反应的患者(n = 3)比有不良反应的患者表现出更高的骨病变tbr (n = 12, p)结论和临床意义:mCRPC病变中PARPi的基线[18F]摄取与PSA对PARP抑制的反应相关。更高的tbr,特别是在骨病变中,预示着更大的PSA下降。这些发现支持[18F]PARPi PET/CT作为一种有希望的患者选择和治疗监测工具,保证具有组织病理学验证和生存终点的前瞻性试验。
{"title":"Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging with [<sup>18</sup>F]PARPi for Precision Guidance of Poly ADP-ribose Polymerase Inhibitor Therapy in Homologous Recombination Repair Mutated and Nonmutated Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.","authors":"Heidemarie Ofner, Holger Einspieler, Marius Ozenil, Clemens P Spielvogel, Ilva Kristiana Langrate, Karsten Bamminger, Melanie R Hassler, Pascal A T Baltzer, Shahrokh F Shariat, Marcus Hacker, Sazan Rasul, Gero Kramer","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2026.02.012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2026.02.012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have become an important treatment option for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), targeting PARP1-mediated DNA repair. We investigated [<sup>18</sup>F]PARPi positron emission tomography (PET) uptake as a predictive biomarker of mCRPC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 15 mCRPC patients who underwent [<sup>18</sup>F]PARPi PET/computed tomography (CT) examinations and were subsequently treated with PARP inhibitors andrs; homologous recombination repair alterations were detected in two patients. Lesions exhibiting uptake above the background were segmented and quantified. Target to background ratios (TBRs) were derived using the abdominal aorta as a blood pool to normalize interpatient biodistribution. Baseline uptake metrics were correlated with the percentage of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Most patients presented with osseous metastases (n = 13) on [<sup>18</sup>F]PARPi PET, followed by nodal (n = 9), visceral (n = 3), and prostatic (n = 1) lesions. During PARP inhibition, of the 15 patients, six achieved a ≥50% PSA decline, eight showed a <50% decline, and one experienced a >100% PSA increase. The median time to PSA nadir was 40 d (interquartile range [IQR] 20-76 d). The percentage of PSA change correlated well with [<sup>18</sup>F]PARPi PET mean, peak, and maximum TBRs of bone lesions (all r = 0.72-0.79; all p < 0.05), with weaker, nonsignificant correlations for nodal lesions (r = 0.49-0.53; all p > 0.05). Five patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events (AEs) after a median of 28 d (IQR 27-69 d). Patients without AEs (n = 3) exhibited higher bone lesion TBRs than those with AEs (n = 12, p < 0.05). The limitations of this study are its retrospective nature and small sample size.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Baseline [<sup>18</sup>F]PARPi uptake in mCRPC lesions was associated with a PSA response to PARP inhibition. Higher TBRs particularly in bone lesions predicted a greater PSA decline. These findings support [<sup>18</sup>F]PARPi PET/CT as a promising tool for patient selection and therapy monitoring, warranting prospective trials with histopathological validation and survival endpoints.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147303887","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prediction Models for Shared Decision-making by Patients with Localised Renal Masses: A Systematic Review and a Survey of Patient and Clinician Priorities. 局部肾肿块患者共同决策的预测模型:一项系统综述和对患者和临床医生优先事项的调查。
IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2026.02.008
James P Blackmur, Sabrina H Rossi, Teele Kuusk, Geraldine Fox, Andrew Greaves, Malcolm Packer, Grant D Stewart, Tom J Mitchell

Counselling a patient with a localised renal mass (LRM) can be complex. While many models can predict various outcomes (nature of the mass, survival, technical points of the intervention), none is widely used. We conducted a systematic review of models that could potentially be used to assist patients' decision-making for LRMs (PROSPERO 1048873). Among 6833 records screened, 284 met the inclusion criteria covering nine broad categories (benign vs malignant, specific pathology, grade, adverse pathology, survival, genomics, renal function, complications, technical factors), of which 101 used existing nomograms (predominantly nephrometry scores). Of the 195 studies that developed an original model, 79 (40.5%) provided a nomogram that could be used for patient decision-making, while 105 (53.8%) provided no validation for the new model. We conducted an online survey that was completed by 31 clinicians and 35 patients/carers and identified six priority areas when considering treatment for a newly diagnosed LRM. Twenty models covered aspects of these priority areas, but no single model adequately covered them all. Further research is required for proper assessment of clinician and patient/carer priorities, but the results from our review and the survey that included multiple stakeholders provide clarity on clinical utility across the heterogeneous field of models available. The design of future models should include clinically relevant outputs, should clearly state the nature of the development cohort and model performance, and should ideally provide a user-friendly version of the model via which patients can obtain relevant information.

咨询患者与局部肾肿块(LRM)可以是复杂的。虽然许多模型可以预测各种结果(肿块的性质、生存、干预的技术要点),但没有一个被广泛使用。我们对可能用于帮助患者对lrm进行决策的模型进行了系统评价(PROSPERO 1048873)。在筛选的6833份记录中,284份符合纳入标准,涵盖九大类(良性与恶性、特定病理、分级、不良病理、生存、基因组学、肾功能、并发症、技术因素),其中101份使用了现有的形态图(主要是肾测量评分)。在195项建立原始模型的研究中,79项(40.5%)提供了可用于患者决策的nomogram,而105项(53.8%)没有对新模型进行验证。我们进行了一项在线调查,由31名临床医生和35名患者/护理人员完成,并确定了在考虑治疗新诊断的LRM时的六个优先领域。20个模型涵盖了这些优先领域的各个方面,但没有一个模型充分涵盖了它们的全部。需要进一步的研究来正确评估临床医生和患者/护理人员的优先级,但我们的综述和包括多个利益相关者的调查的结果为不同领域的可用模型的临床效用提供了清晰的信息。未来模型的设计应包括临床相关的输出,应清楚地说明开发队列的性质和模型的性能,并理想地提供一个用户友好的模型版本,通过该模型,患者可以获得相关信息。
{"title":"Prediction Models for Shared Decision-making by Patients with Localised Renal Masses: A Systematic Review and a Survey of Patient and Clinician Priorities.","authors":"James P Blackmur, Sabrina H Rossi, Teele Kuusk, Geraldine Fox, Andrew Greaves, Malcolm Packer, Grant D Stewart, Tom J Mitchell","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2026.02.008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2026.02.008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Counselling a patient with a localised renal mass (LRM) can be complex. While many models can predict various outcomes (nature of the mass, survival, technical points of the intervention), none is widely used. We conducted a systematic review of models that could potentially be used to assist patients' decision-making for LRMs (PROSPERO 1048873). Among 6833 records screened, 284 met the inclusion criteria covering nine broad categories (benign vs malignant, specific pathology, grade, adverse pathology, survival, genomics, renal function, complications, technical factors), of which 101 used existing nomograms (predominantly nephrometry scores). Of the 195 studies that developed an original model, 79 (40.5%) provided a nomogram that could be used for patient decision-making, while 105 (53.8%) provided no validation for the new model. We conducted an online survey that was completed by 31 clinicians and 35 patients/carers and identified six priority areas when considering treatment for a newly diagnosed LRM. Twenty models covered aspects of these priority areas, but no single model adequately covered them all. Further research is required for proper assessment of clinician and patient/carer priorities, but the results from our review and the survey that included multiple stakeholders provide clarity on clinical utility across the heterogeneous field of models available. The design of future models should include clinically relevant outputs, should clearly state the nature of the development cohort and model performance, and should ideally provide a user-friendly version of the model via which patients can obtain relevant information.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147303974","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Targeted, Perilesional, and Distant Biopsies in Prostate Cancer. 前列腺癌的靶向、病灶周围和远处活检。
IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2026.02.006
Michael Baboudjian, Alessandro Uleri, Julien Anract, Luc Brabant, Grégoire Assenmacher, Arthur Baudewyns, Arthur Peyrottes, Francesco Sanguedolce, Gaelle Fiard, Raphaele Renard-Penna, Nicolai Hubner, Aurel Messas, Olivier Windisch, Thibaut Long-Depaquit, Harry Toledano, Federica Sordelli, Valentin Colinet, Cyrille Bastide, Alexandre Peltier, Guillaume Ploussard, Romain Diamand

Background and objective: Targeted plus perilesional biopsies are recommended for men with prostate lesions visible on magnetic resonance imaging. However, available data are mainly retrospective, without predefined biopsy scheme protocols. The MRI-Integrated Regional and targeted Approach, recommendations, and Guidelines for prostate biopsies (MIRAGE) study is the first prospective European study designed to evaluate the outcomes when perilesional biopsies are incorporated deliberately into the biopsy protocol.

Methods: MIRAGE was a prospective, observational, multicenter study conducted across ten European centers between January and June 2025. We enrolled 912 men with a single Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) ≥3 lesion. Targeted and perilesional biopsies were mandated, while distant biopsies (ie, cores taken beyond the perilesional zone) were left to the discretion of investigators. Detection rates of Gleason grade (GG) group ≥2 and 1 lesions were calculated separately for each scheme: targeted, perilesional, and distant biopsies.

Key findings and limitations: Targeted biopsy detected GG group ≥2 lesions in 380 men (41%). Compared with targeted biopsy alone, perilesional sampling increased GG group ≥2 lesion detection by +3.6% at the cost of +1% GG group 1 lesion detection. The greatest benefit of perilesional sampling was observed in biopsy-naïve men and those with PI-RADS 4-5 lesions. Conversely, in those with PI-RADS 3 or a prior negative biopsy, perilesional sampling yielded more cases of GG group 1 than of GG group ≥2. Distant sampling provided minimal incremental GG group ≥2 (contralateral: +1.6%; ipsilateral: +1.4%) but more GG group 1 (contralateral: +2.5%; ipsilateral: +2.9%) cases.

Conclusions and clinical implications: The MIRAGE study provides prospective evidence that, when a targeted plus perilesional biopsy strategy is applied, distant biopsies add minimal diagnostic benefit and should be omitted.

背景和目的:对于磁共振成像上可见前列腺病变的男性,建议进行定向加病灶周围活检。然而,现有的数据主要是回顾性的,没有预定义的活检方案方案。MIRAGE研究是欧洲首个前瞻性研究,旨在评估将肿瘤周围活检纳入活检方案后的结果。MIRAGE是一项前瞻性、观察性、多中心研究,于2025年1月至6月在10个欧洲中心进行。我们招募了912名前列腺影像学报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)≥3个病变的男性。目标活检和病灶周围活检是强制性的,而远处活检(即病灶周围区域以外的岩心)则由调查人员自行决定。分别计算Gleason分级(GG)≥2组和≥1组病变的检出率,分别为靶向活检、病灶周围活检和远处活检。主要发现和局限性:在380名男性(41%)中,靶向活检检测到GG组≥2个病变。与单纯靶向活检相比,病灶周围取样使GG≥2组病变检出率提高了3.6%,而GG 1组病变检出率提高了1%。在biopsy-naïve男性和PI-RADS 4-5病变中观察到病灶周围取样的最大益处。相反,在PI-RADS为3或既往活检阴性的患者中,病灶周围取样中GG组1的病例多于GG组≥2的病例。远端采样提供最小GG增量≥2组(对侧:+1.6%;同侧:+1.4%),但更多GG 1组(对侧:+2.5%;同侧:+2.9%)病例。结论和临床意义:MIRAGE研究提供了前瞻性证据,当应用靶向加病灶周围活检策略时,远处活检的诊断价值很小,应该忽略。
{"title":"Targeted, Perilesional, and Distant Biopsies in Prostate Cancer.","authors":"Michael Baboudjian, Alessandro Uleri, Julien Anract, Luc Brabant, Grégoire Assenmacher, Arthur Baudewyns, Arthur Peyrottes, Francesco Sanguedolce, Gaelle Fiard, Raphaele Renard-Penna, Nicolai Hubner, Aurel Messas, Olivier Windisch, Thibaut Long-Depaquit, Harry Toledano, Federica Sordelli, Valentin Colinet, Cyrille Bastide, Alexandre Peltier, Guillaume Ploussard, Romain Diamand","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2026.02.006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2026.02.006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Targeted plus perilesional biopsies are recommended for men with prostate lesions visible on magnetic resonance imaging. However, available data are mainly retrospective, without predefined biopsy scheme protocols. The MRI-Integrated Regional and targeted Approach, recommendations, and Guidelines for prostate biopsies (MIRAGE) study is the first prospective European study designed to evaluate the outcomes when perilesional biopsies are incorporated deliberately into the biopsy protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MIRAGE was a prospective, observational, multicenter study conducted across ten European centers between January and June 2025. We enrolled 912 men with a single Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) ≥3 lesion. Targeted and perilesional biopsies were mandated, while distant biopsies (ie, cores taken beyond the perilesional zone) were left to the discretion of investigators. Detection rates of Gleason grade (GG) group ≥2 and 1 lesions were calculated separately for each scheme: targeted, perilesional, and distant biopsies.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Targeted biopsy detected GG group ≥2 lesions in 380 men (41%). Compared with targeted biopsy alone, perilesional sampling increased GG group ≥2 lesion detection by +3.6% at the cost of +1% GG group 1 lesion detection. The greatest benefit of perilesional sampling was observed in biopsy-naïve men and those with PI-RADS 4-5 lesions. Conversely, in those with PI-RADS 3 or a prior negative biopsy, perilesional sampling yielded more cases of GG group 1 than of GG group ≥2. Distant sampling provided minimal incremental GG group ≥2 (contralateral: +1.6%; ipsilateral: +1.4%) but more GG group 1 (contralateral: +2.5%; ipsilateral: +2.9%) cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>The MIRAGE study provides prospective evidence that, when a targeted plus perilesional biopsy strategy is applied, distant biopsies add minimal diagnostic benefit and should be omitted.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147282828","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reply to Armando Stabile, Giorgio Gandaglia, and Francesco Montorsi's Letter to the Editor re: Jianliang Liu, Laurence Harewood, Dominic Bagguley, et al. Early Results from the CONFIRM Trial: Utility of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 2025;8:1118-25. 回复Armando Stabile, Giorgio Gandaglia和Francesco Montorsi给编辑的信。回复:Jianliang Liu, Laurence Harewood, Dominic Bagguley等。来自CONFIRM试验的早期结果:前列腺特异性膜抗原正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描在前列腺癌主动监测中的应用。欧洲医学杂志,2015;8:1118-25。
IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2026.02.015
Jianliang Liu, Thilakavathi Chengodu, Andrew Ryan, Kenny Sim, Wayland Wang, James Sheldon, Nathan Lawrentschuk
{"title":"Reply to Armando Stabile, Giorgio Gandaglia, and Francesco Montorsi's Letter to the Editor re: Jianliang Liu, Laurence Harewood, Dominic Bagguley, et al. Early Results from the CONFIRM Trial: Utility of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 2025;8:1118-25.","authors":"Jianliang Liu, Thilakavathi Chengodu, Andrew Ryan, Kenny Sim, Wayland Wang, James Sheldon, Nathan Lawrentschuk","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2026.02.015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2026.02.015","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147270196","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
WOMBAT (ANZUP 2201): A Phase 2, Single-arm Study of Bipolar Androgen Therapy in Patients with Nonmetastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer with Prostate-specific Antigen Progression on Darolutamide. WOMBAT (ANZUP 2201):双极雄激素治疗伴有前列腺特异性抗原进展的非转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌患者的2期单组研究。
IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2026.02.004
Barak Talmor, Carole A Harris, Christopher Gianacas, David Pook, Thean Hsiang Tan, Ian D Davis, Laurence Krieger, Gavin Marx, Arsha Anton, Sharad Sharma, Jeffrey C Goh, Kay Xu, Ganes Pranavan, Haryani M Dhillon, Emmanuel S Antonarakis, Samuel R Denmeade, Lisa Horvath, Samantha R Oakes, Ray Allen, Antoinette Fontela, Elizabeth Reich, Megan Crumbaker, Joshua Hurwitz, Anthony M Joshua
<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Resistance to androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) such as darolutamide signals impending metastatic progression of prostate cancer (PC) with limited subsequent therapeutic options. It has been shown that bipolar androgen therapy (BAT) resensitizes castration-resistant PC (CRPC) cells to ARPIs. The objective of the WOMBAT trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BAT in men with nonmetastatic CRPC (nmCRPC) experiencing biochemical-only progression on darolutamide.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial design and timeframe: </strong>WOMBAT is a prospective, single-arm, multicenter, phase 2 trial enrolling ∼69 participants. The trial uses a Simon optimal two-stage design with an interim futility analysis, which provides 80% power for detection of a clinically significant improvement in metastasis-free survival (MFS; hazard ratio ∼0.68). Patients receive 56-d treatment cycles comprising sequential intramuscular testosterone and intermittent oral darolutamide on a continuous androgen deprivation therapy backbone. Treatment continues until progression, with a 24-mo follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Endpoints: </strong>The primary endpoint is MFS. Secondary endpoints include safety and tolerability, the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate, time to PSA progression, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and changes in metabolic and bone turnover markers.</p><p><strong>Strengths and limitations: </strong>This is the first trial to investigate BAT in the specific clinical setting of nmCRPC progression on darolutamide. Strengths include a strong biological rationale and extensive collection of translational and HRQoL data. The single-arm design is a limitation. Furthermore, while MFS is a regulatory-accepted primary endpoint in this disease state, it is not a validated surrogate for overall survival for this novel therapeutic strategy, as the intervention could theoretically impact postprogression survival. A further limitation is the potential for conventional imaging to misinterpret early changes during BAT as true disease progression. The imaging schedule (every 8 wk), while aligned with prior BAT trials for comparability, may not fully capture transient "flare" phenomena that could precede a response to subsequent intermittent darolutamide. Finally, the optimal duration for cycling of BAT and darolutamide is unknown. According to prior experience, a return to castrate testosterone levels can take up to four half-lives (∼28-36 d). Therefore, a limitation of the study is that each 56-d cycle may be insufficient to induce maximum and durable resensitization to darolutamide before subsequent testosterone administration.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>WOMBAT is funded by a grant from Bayer to ANZUP. ANZUP also receives infrastructure funding from the Australian Government via Cancer Australia.</p><p><strong>Ethics and trial registration: </strong>The trial has been approved by the ethics committee
背景和目的:对雄激素受体途径抑制剂(arpi)(如darolutamide)的耐药性表明前列腺癌(PC)即将发生转移进展,后续治疗选择有限。研究表明,双极雄激素治疗(BAT)可使去势抵抗PC (CRPC)细胞对arpi重新敏感。WOMBAT试验的目的是评估BAT在非转移性CRPC (nmCRPC)患者服用达罗卢胺后仅发生生化进展时的疗效和安全性。临床试验设计和时间框架:WOMBAT是一项前瞻性、单臂、多中心、2期试验,纳入约69名参与者。该试验采用Simon最佳两阶段设计,并进行了中期无效分析,该设计为无转移生存(MFS)的临床显著改善提供了80%的检测能力(风险比0.68)。患者接受56天的治疗周期,包括连续肌内注射睾酮和间歇性口服达洛鲁胺,持续雄激素剥夺治疗骨干。治疗持续至进展,随访24个月。终点:主要终点是MFS。次要终点包括安全性和耐受性、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)应答率、PSA进展时间、健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)以及代谢和骨转换标志物的变化。优势和局限性:这是首个在darolutamide治疗nmCRPC进展的特定临床环境中研究BAT的试验。优势包括强大的生物学原理和广泛收集的翻译和HRQoL数据。单臂设计是一个限制。此外,虽然MFS是这种疾病状态的一个监管认可的主要终点,但它并不是这种新型治疗策略的总生存期的有效替代指标,因为干预在理论上可能影响进展后生存期。进一步的限制是常规影像学可能将BAT期间的早期变化误解为真正的疾病进展。成像时间表(每8 周)虽然与先前的BAT试验具有可比性,但可能无法完全捕获可能先于后续间歇性达罗他胺反应的短暂“耀斑”现象。最后,BAT和darolutamide的最佳循环时间是未知的。根据以往的经验,恢复到去势睾丸激素水平可能需要长达四个半衰期(~ 28-36 d)。因此,该研究的一个局限性是,每个56天的周期可能不足以在随后的睾酮治疗前诱导对达罗卢胺的最大和持久的再敏化。资助:袋熊由拜耳公司资助澳新大学。澳新大学还通过澳大利亚癌症协会获得澳大利亚政府的基础设施资助。伦理和试验注册:该试验已获得悉尼圣文森特医院伦理委员会的批准,并在ANZCTR (ACTRN12624000582550)和ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06594926)上注册。患者总结:不再接受标准激素治疗的前列腺癌患者有癌症进展的风险。这项研究将测试一种叫做双极雄激素疗法(BAT)的实验性治疗方法。英美烟草公司周期性地使用高剂量睾丸激素,以观察它是否能使癌细胞对治疗重新敏感,并延缓癌症向身体其他部位的扩散。临床试验背景:在非转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(nmCRPC)中,对雄激素受体途径抑制剂(arpi)如darolutamide的耐药性标志着即将发生的转移进展,因此在这种情况下存在临床未满足的需求。虽然双极雄激素治疗(BAT)可以使转移性CRPC的肿瘤对arpi重新敏感,但其在预防或延缓nmCRPC转移中的作用尚未得到评估。WOMBAT是一项前瞻性、多中心、单组、2期研究,纳入约69名接受达罗他胺治疗的nmCRPC患者。参与者接受的治疗包括高剂量肌内睾酮(BAT),随后是间歇性达罗卢胺,在56天周期内持续进行雄激素剥夺治疗。主要终点是无转移生存期。该试验旨在研究一种新的策略,通过使癌细胞对雄激素受体抑制重新敏感来延长达罗卢胺的治疗窗口期并延迟转移。独特的是,生理上的睾酮周期性管理有可能减轻长期阉割的累积毒性,从而提供改善健康相关的生活质量和骨密度。作为首个研究BAT在nmCRPC中的作用的研究,WOMBAT可以为darolutamide难治性疾病建立新的治疗模式。
{"title":"WOMBAT (ANZUP 2201): A Phase 2, Single-arm Study of Bipolar Androgen Therapy in Patients with Nonmetastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer with Prostate-specific Antigen Progression on Darolutamide.","authors":"Barak Talmor, Carole A Harris, Christopher Gianacas, David Pook, Thean Hsiang Tan, Ian D Davis, Laurence Krieger, Gavin Marx, Arsha Anton, Sharad Sharma, Jeffrey C Goh, Kay Xu, Ganes Pranavan, Haryani M Dhillon, Emmanuel S Antonarakis, Samuel R Denmeade, Lisa Horvath, Samantha R Oakes, Ray Allen, Antoinette Fontela, Elizabeth Reich, Megan Crumbaker, Joshua Hurwitz, Anthony M Joshua","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2026.02.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2026.02.004","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background and objective: &lt;/strong&gt;Resistance to androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) such as darolutamide signals impending metastatic progression of prostate cancer (PC) with limited subsequent therapeutic options. It has been shown that bipolar androgen therapy (BAT) resensitizes castration-resistant PC (CRPC) cells to ARPIs. The objective of the WOMBAT trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BAT in men with nonmetastatic CRPC (nmCRPC) experiencing biochemical-only progression on darolutamide.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Clinical trial design and timeframe: &lt;/strong&gt;WOMBAT is a prospective, single-arm, multicenter, phase 2 trial enrolling ∼69 participants. The trial uses a Simon optimal two-stage design with an interim futility analysis, which provides 80% power for detection of a clinically significant improvement in metastasis-free survival (MFS; hazard ratio ∼0.68). Patients receive 56-d treatment cycles comprising sequential intramuscular testosterone and intermittent oral darolutamide on a continuous androgen deprivation therapy backbone. Treatment continues until progression, with a 24-mo follow-up period.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Endpoints: &lt;/strong&gt;The primary endpoint is MFS. Secondary endpoints include safety and tolerability, the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate, time to PSA progression, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and changes in metabolic and bone turnover markers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Strengths and limitations: &lt;/strong&gt;This is the first trial to investigate BAT in the specific clinical setting of nmCRPC progression on darolutamide. Strengths include a strong biological rationale and extensive collection of translational and HRQoL data. The single-arm design is a limitation. Furthermore, while MFS is a regulatory-accepted primary endpoint in this disease state, it is not a validated surrogate for overall survival for this novel therapeutic strategy, as the intervention could theoretically impact postprogression survival. A further limitation is the potential for conventional imaging to misinterpret early changes during BAT as true disease progression. The imaging schedule (every 8 wk), while aligned with prior BAT trials for comparability, may not fully capture transient \"flare\" phenomena that could precede a response to subsequent intermittent darolutamide. Finally, the optimal duration for cycling of BAT and darolutamide is unknown. According to prior experience, a return to castrate testosterone levels can take up to four half-lives (∼28-36 d). Therefore, a limitation of the study is that each 56-d cycle may be insufficient to induce maximum and durable resensitization to darolutamide before subsequent testosterone administration.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Funding: &lt;/strong&gt;WOMBAT is funded by a grant from Bayer to ANZUP. ANZUP also receives infrastructure funding from the Australian Government via Cancer Australia.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ethics and trial registration: &lt;/strong&gt;The trial has been approved by the ethics committee","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147270250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reply to Filippo Alongi, Giulia Marvaso, and Ciro Franzese's Letter to the Editor re: Riccardo Bertolo, Antonio Luigi Pastore, Paolo Verze, et al. Real-World Burden and Management of Late Genitourinary toxicity After Prostate Radiotherapy: Insights from IRRADIaTE, the Italian Registry of Radiotherapy-Associated Disorders and Urological Treatment & Evaluation. Eur Urol Oncol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2026.01.005. 回复Filippo Alongi, Giulia Marvaso和Ciro Franzese给编辑的信。回复:Riccardo Bertolo, Antonio Luigi Pastore, Paolo Verze等。前列腺放射治疗后晚期泌尿生殖系统毒性的现实世界负担和管理:来自意大利放射治疗相关疾病和泌尿外科治疗和评估登记处的见解。Eur Eur Eur Eur Eur。在出版社。https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2026.01.005。
IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2026.02.018
Riccardo Bertolo, Alessandro Antonelli
{"title":"Reply to Filippo Alongi, Giulia Marvaso, and Ciro Franzese's Letter to the Editor re: Riccardo Bertolo, Antonio Luigi Pastore, Paolo Verze, et al. Real-World Burden and Management of Late Genitourinary toxicity After Prostate Radiotherapy: Insights from IRRADIaTE, the Italian Registry of Radiotherapy-Associated Disorders and Urological Treatment & Evaluation. Eur Urol Oncol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2026.01.005.","authors":"Riccardo Bertolo, Alessandro Antonelli","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2026.02.018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2026.02.018","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146776186","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Real-world Adherence to European Association of Urology-recommended Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Management: From Evidence-based Practice to Oncological Outcomes. 欧洲泌尿外科协会推荐的非肌肉侵袭性膀胱癌治疗:从循证实践到肿瘤学结果
IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2026.02.005
Mattia Longoni, Pietro Scilipoti, Mario De Angelis, Paolo Zaurito, Giovanni Tremolada, Alfonso Santangelo, Giuseppe Simone, Riccardo Mastroianni, Chiara Lonati, Stefania Zamboni, Nazareno Suardi, Gautier Marcq, Aleksandra Szostek, Jorge Caño Velasco, Alfonso Lafuente Puentedura, José Daniel Subiela, Pedro Del Olmo Durán, Aleksander Ślusarczyk, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Benjamin Pradere, Francesco Soria, Paolo Gontero, Morgan Rouprêt, Francesco Montorsi, Andrea Salonia, Alberto Briganti, Marco Moschini

Background and objective: Adherence to European Association of Urology (EAU) guideline-recommended management of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is essential for optimal outcomes. We quantified real-world adherence to early instillation (EI), second-look transurethral resection of bladder tumor (re-TURBT), and risk-adapted intravesical therapy, and assessed their impact on oncological outcomes.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 2194 consecutive NMIBC patients treated with TURBT at six European tertiary centers (2014-2021). Eligibility for EI, re-TURBT, and intravesical instillations was defined using the EAU criteria. Adherence was evaluated through Sankey plots. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analyses with inverse probability of treatment weighting and compared by adherence status. Cox regression models were also fitted.

Key findings and limitations: Tumor stage distribution was as follows: 63% Ta, 32% T1, and 5.4% Tis stage; 60% were of high grade. Risk distribution was as follows: 22% low, 27% intermediate, 38% high, and 13% very high. EI was recommended in 1333 patients and performed in 290 (22%) patients. Re-TURBT was indicated in 1006 patients and performed in 445 (44%) patients. Intravesical instillations were recommended in 1713 patients and initiated in 497 (29%) patients. Adherence to EI (79% vs 61%; hazard ratio [HR] 0.60), re-TURBT (70% vs 54%; HR 0.53), and instillations (72% vs 53%; HR 0.49) was associated with superior RFS; re-TURBT (94% vs 87%; HR 0.41) and instillations (95% vs 89%; HR 0.47) also improved PFS (all p < 0.001). Nonadherence reasons were not reported.

Conclusions and clinical implications: In real-world practice, adherence to EAU-recommended NMIBC management remains low; yet, it is associated with more favorable outcomes. Improving delivery of guideline-based care through standardized pathways should be a priority in NMIBC management.

背景和目的:坚持欧洲泌尿外科协会(EAU)指南推荐的非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)治疗对于获得最佳结果至关重要。我们量化了早期灌注(EI)、二次经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(re-TURBT)和风险适应膀胱内治疗的实际依从性,并评估了它们对肿瘤预后的影响。方法:我们回顾性分析了6个欧洲三级中心(2014-2021)2194例连续接受TURBT治疗的NMIBC患者。使用EAU标准定义EI、re-TURBT和膀胱内滴注的资格。通过Sankey图评估依从性。无复发生存期(RFS)和无进展生存期(PFS)采用Kaplan-Meier分析和治疗加权逆概率进行评估,并与依从性状况进行比较。Cox回归模型也进行了拟合。主要发现和局限性:肿瘤分期分布:Ta期63%,T1期32%,Tis期5.4%;60%为高等级。风险分布如下:22%低,27%中等,38%高,13%非常高。1333例患者推荐了EI, 290例(22%)患者接受了EI治疗。1006例患者接受了Re-TURBT手术,445例(44%)患者接受了Re-TURBT手术。1713例患者推荐膀胱内滴注,497例(29%)患者开始滴注。EI依从性(79% vs 61%;风险比[HR] 0.60)、re-TURBT (70% vs 54%;风险比0.53)和滴注(72% vs 53%;风险比0.49)与较好的RFS相关;re-TURBT (94% vs 87%; HR 0.41)和滴注(95% vs 89%; HR 0.47)也改善了PFS(所有p结论和临床意义:在现实世界的实践中,eau推荐的NMIBC管理的依从性仍然很低;然而,它与更有利的结果相关。通过标准化途径改善基于指南的护理应成为NMIBC管理的优先事项。
{"title":"Real-world Adherence to European Association of Urology-recommended Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Management: From Evidence-based Practice to Oncological Outcomes.","authors":"Mattia Longoni, Pietro Scilipoti, Mario De Angelis, Paolo Zaurito, Giovanni Tremolada, Alfonso Santangelo, Giuseppe Simone, Riccardo Mastroianni, Chiara Lonati, Stefania Zamboni, Nazareno Suardi, Gautier Marcq, Aleksandra Szostek, Jorge Caño Velasco, Alfonso Lafuente Puentedura, José Daniel Subiela, Pedro Del Olmo Durán, Aleksander Ślusarczyk, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Benjamin Pradere, Francesco Soria, Paolo Gontero, Morgan Rouprêt, Francesco Montorsi, Andrea Salonia, Alberto Briganti, Marco Moschini","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2026.02.005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2026.02.005","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Adherence to European Association of Urology (EAU) guideline-recommended management of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is essential for optimal outcomes. We quantified real-world adherence to early instillation (EI), second-look transurethral resection of bladder tumor (re-TURBT), and risk-adapted intravesical therapy, and assessed their impact on oncological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 2194 consecutive NMIBC patients treated with TURBT at six European tertiary centers (2014-2021). Eligibility for EI, re-TURBT, and intravesical instillations was defined using the EAU criteria. Adherence was evaluated through Sankey plots. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analyses with inverse probability of treatment weighting and compared by adherence status. Cox regression models were also fitted.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Tumor stage distribution was as follows: 63% Ta, 32% T1, and 5.4% Tis stage; 60% were of high grade. Risk distribution was as follows: 22% low, 27% intermediate, 38% high, and 13% very high. EI was recommended in 1333 patients and performed in 290 (22%) patients. Re-TURBT was indicated in 1006 patients and performed in 445 (44%) patients. Intravesical instillations were recommended in 1713 patients and initiated in 497 (29%) patients. Adherence to EI (79% vs 61%; hazard ratio [HR] 0.60), re-TURBT (70% vs 54%; HR 0.53), and instillations (72% vs 53%; HR 0.49) was associated with superior RFS; re-TURBT (94% vs 87%; HR 0.41) and instillations (95% vs 89%; HR 0.47) also improved PFS (all p < 0.001). Nonadherence reasons were not reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>In real-world practice, adherence to EAU-recommended NMIBC management remains low; yet, it is associated with more favorable outcomes. Improving delivery of guideline-based care through standardized pathways should be a priority in NMIBC management.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146257884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
European urology oncology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1