首页 > 最新文献

European urology oncology最新文献

英文 中文
Room for improvement when approaching RCC in the solitary kidney: surgery is not the only choice. 治疗单肾 RCC 的改进空间:手术并非唯一选择。
IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.009
Rohann J M Correa, Alexander V Louie, Shankar Siva
{"title":"Room for improvement when approaching RCC in the solitary kidney: surgery is not the only choice.","authors":"Rohann J M Correa, Alexander V Louie, Shankar Siva","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.009","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142344438","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative Cardiovascular Safety of Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Antagonists and Agonists Among Patients Diagnosed with Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Real-world Evidence Studies. 前列腺癌患者促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂和激动剂的心血管安全性比较:真实世界证据研究的系统回顾和元分析》。
IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.004
Savan Patel, Kexin Zhu, Chintan V Dave, Mina Ghajar, Yingting Zhang, Biren Saraiya, Elisa V Bandera, Farzin Khosrow-Khavar

Background and objective: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists and agonists are cornerstone treatments in prostate cancer. However, evidence regarding the comparative cardiovascular safety of these drugs from clinical trials is inconclusive. The objective of this study was to systematically assess the risk of adverse cardiovascular events of GnRH antagonists compared with GnRH agonists across real-world evidence studies.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science (2008-2023). We included real-world evidence studies comparing the risk of cardiovascular outcomes of GnRH antagonists with those of GnRH agonists among patients with prostate cancer. We conducted a meta-analysis of effect estimates across studies at a low or moderate risk of bias, assessed via the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool, using random-effect models.

Key findings and limitations: Among ten included studies, four were classified as having a moderate and six as having a serious risk of bias. Across three studies at a moderate risk of bias in the primary analysis, degarelix was associated with an increased risk (pooled relative risk [RR]: 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14-1.51) of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). An augmented risk was observed in two studies among patients with a history of cardiovascular disease (pooled RR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.11-1.56) compared with one study among patients without a history of cardiovascular disease (RR: 1.15, 95% CI: 0.83-1.59).

Conclusions and clinical implications: Real-world evidence studies indicate that degarelix, compared with GnRH agonists, is associated with a modest increased risk of MACEs, particularly among patients with a history of cardiovascular disease. However, residual confounding due to the treatment of high-risk patients with degarelix may account for these findings. Additional large studies with detailed data on tumor characteristics and cardiovascular risk factors are needed to confirm these findings.

Patient summary: In this systematic evaluation of evidence among patients diagnosed with prostate cancer in routine care, degarelix was associated with higher cardiovascular adverse outcomes than gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists.

背景和目的:促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)拮抗剂和激动剂是治疗前列腺癌的基础药物。然而,临床试验中有关这些药物的心血管安全性比较的证据尚无定论。本研究旨在系统评估真实世界证据研究中 GnRH 拮抗剂与 GnRH 促效剂发生不良心血管事件的风险:我们对 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Scopus 和 Web of Science(2008-2023 年)进行了系统检索。我们纳入了对前列腺癌患者使用 GnRH 拮抗剂和 GnRH 激动剂的心血管后果风险进行比较的真实世界证据研究。我们使用随机效应模型对存在低度或中度偏倚风险的研究的效果估计值进行了荟萃分析,该分析是通过非随机干预研究中的偏倚风险(ROBINS-I)工具进行评估的:在纳入的 10 项研究中,有 4 项研究存在中度偏倚风险,6 项研究存在严重偏倚风险。在主要分析中,三项研究存在中度偏倚风险,其中地加瑞克与主要不良心血管事件(MACEs)风险增加有关(汇总相对风险[RR]:1.31,95%置信区间[CI]:1.14-1.51)。两项研究观察到,有心血管疾病史的患者的风险增加(汇总相对风险:1.31,95% 置信区间:1.11-1.56),而一项研究观察到无心血管疾病史的患者的风险增加(相对风险:1.15,95% 置信区间:0.83-1.59):真实世界的证据研究表明,与GnRH激动剂相比,地加瑞克会适度增加MACE的风险,尤其是在有心血管疾病史的患者中。然而,用地加瑞克治疗高危患者可能会导致这些结果。患者总结:在这项对常规治疗中确诊为前列腺癌的患者进行的系统性证据评估中,与促性腺激素释放激素激动剂相比,地加瑞克与较高的心血管不良结局相关。
{"title":"Comparative Cardiovascular Safety of Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Antagonists and Agonists Among Patients Diagnosed with Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Real-world Evidence Studies.","authors":"Savan Patel, Kexin Zhu, Chintan V Dave, Mina Ghajar, Yingting Zhang, Biren Saraiya, Elisa V Bandera, Farzin Khosrow-Khavar","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists and agonists are cornerstone treatments in prostate cancer. However, evidence regarding the comparative cardiovascular safety of these drugs from clinical trials is inconclusive. The objective of this study was to systematically assess the risk of adverse cardiovascular events of GnRH antagonists compared with GnRH agonists across real-world evidence studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science (2008-2023). We included real-world evidence studies comparing the risk of cardiovascular outcomes of GnRH antagonists with those of GnRH agonists among patients with prostate cancer. We conducted a meta-analysis of effect estimates across studies at a low or moderate risk of bias, assessed via the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool, using random-effect models.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Among ten included studies, four were classified as having a moderate and six as having a serious risk of bias. Across three studies at a moderate risk of bias in the primary analysis, degarelix was associated with an increased risk (pooled relative risk [RR]: 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14-1.51) of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). An augmented risk was observed in two studies among patients with a history of cardiovascular disease (pooled RR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.11-1.56) compared with one study among patients without a history of cardiovascular disease (RR: 1.15, 95% CI: 0.83-1.59).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Real-world evidence studies indicate that degarelix, compared with GnRH agonists, is associated with a modest increased risk of MACEs, particularly among patients with a history of cardiovascular disease. However, residual confounding due to the treatment of high-risk patients with degarelix may account for these findings. Additional large studies with detailed data on tumor characteristics and cardiovascular risk factors are needed to confirm these findings.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>In this systematic evaluation of evidence among patients diagnosed with prostate cancer in routine care, degarelix was associated with higher cardiovascular adverse outcomes than gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142344433","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical Implementation of Urinary Biomarkers for Surveillance of Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC): Considerations from the European Association of Urology NMIBC Guideline Panel. 用于监测非肌层浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)的尿液生物标记物的临床实施:欧洲泌尿学协会非肌浸润性膀胱癌指南小组的考虑因素。
IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.011
Fredrik Liedberg, Paramananthan Mariappan, Paolo Gontero

Although high-level evidence is currently lacking, noninferiority randomised controlled trials in predefined risk groups in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer are under way to scientifically prove the safety of urinary biomarker-guided follow-up. To facilitate recommendations for clinical use, it is essential to comply with the EU certification for in vitro diagnostics and to demonstrate cost effectiveness.

虽然目前还缺乏高水平的证据,但正在对非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的预定风险组进行非劣效性随机对照试验,以科学地证明尿液生物标志物指导随访的安全性。为了便于推荐临床使用,必须符合欧盟的体外诊断认证并证明其成本效益。
{"title":"Clinical Implementation of Urinary Biomarkers for Surveillance of Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC): Considerations from the European Association of Urology NMIBC Guideline Panel.","authors":"Fredrik Liedberg, Paramananthan Mariappan, Paolo Gontero","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although high-level evidence is currently lacking, noninferiority randomised controlled trials in predefined risk groups in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer are under way to scientifically prove the safety of urinary biomarker-guided follow-up. To facilitate recommendations for clinical use, it is essential to comply with the EU certification for in vitro diagnostics and to demonstrate cost effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142344432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Determining Long-term Prostate Cancer Outcomes for Active Surveillance Patients Without Early Disease Progression: Implications for Slowing or Stopping Surveillance. 确定无早期疾病进展的主动监测患者的前列腺癌长期预后:放慢或停止监测的意义。
IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.008
Kevin Shee, James Nie, Janet E Cowan, Lufan Wang, Samuel L Washington, Katsuto Shinohara, Hao G Nguyen, Matthew R Cooperberg, Peter R Carroll

Background and objective: Active surveillance (AS) of prostate cancer (PCa) is the standard of care for low-grade disease, but there is limited guidance on tailoring protocols for stable patients. We investigated long-term outcomes for patients without initial progression and risk factors for upgrade.

Methods: Men on AS with Gleason grade group (GG) 1 PCa on three serial biopsies, ≥5 yr without progression, and ≥10 yr of follow-up were included. Outcomes were upgrade (GG ≥2), major upgrade (GG ≥3), progression to treatment, metastasis, PCa-specific survival, and overall survival. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the associations between patient characteristics and risk of upgrade.

Key findings and limitations: A total of 774 men met the inclusion criteria. At 10, 12, and 15 yr, upgrade-free survival rates were 56%, 45%, and 21%; major upgrade-free survival rates were 88%, 83%, and 61%; treatment-free survival rates were 86%, 83%, and 73%; metastasis-free survival rates were 99%, 99%, and 98%; and overall survival rates were 98%, 96%, and 95%, respectively. PCa-specific survival was 100% at 15 yr. On a multivariable analysis, year of diagnosis, age, body mass index (BMI), and biopsy core positivity were associated with upgrade (all p < 0.01), whereas age and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density were associated with major upgrade.

Conclusions and clinical implications: Patients without progression for 5 yr on AS had modest rates of upgrade and low rates of metastasis, and mortality at 15 yr of follow-up. Year of diagnosis, older age, increased BMI, and increased biopsy core positivity were associated with upgrade, whereas older age and greater PSA density were associated with an increased risk of major upgrade. A subset of these patients may benefit from deintensification of AS protocols.

Patient summary: There are little reported data or clinical guidelines for patients with PCa who are stable for many years on active surveillance (AS). We show, in a large cohort, that PCa patients without progression for 5 yr on AS have modest rates of upgrade and very low rates of metastasis, and mortality rates at 15 yr of follow-up, and that older age, increased body mass index, and increased PCa volume are associated with an increased likelihood of future upgrade. This study supports continued AS in this patient population and deintensification in select patients.

背景和目的:前列腺癌(PCa)的主动监测(AS)是低级别疾病的标准治疗方法,但针对稳定期患者的定制方案指导有限。我们调查了没有初始进展的患者的长期治疗效果以及升级的风险因素:方法:纳入三次连续活检均为 Gleason 等级组(GG)1 PCa 的男性 AS 患者,随访≥10 年且≥5 年无进展。结果包括升级(GG ≥2)、重大升级(GG ≥3)、治疗进展、转移、PCa 特异性生存率和总生存率。Cox比例危险回归模型用于估计患者特征与升级风险之间的关系:共有 774 名男性符合纳入标准。10、12和15年后,无升级生存率分别为56%、45%和21%;无重大升级生存率分别为88%、83%和61%;无治疗生存率分别为86%、83%和73%;无转移生存率分别为99%、99%和98%;总生存率分别为98%、96%和95%。在多变量分析中,诊断年份、年龄、体重指数(BMI)和活检核心阳性率与升级(所有 p 结论和临床影响)相关:接受强直性脊柱炎治疗5年无进展的患者在随访15年时的升级率、转移率和死亡率都不高。诊断年份、年龄、体重指数(BMI)升高和活检核心阳性率升高与病情升级有关,而年龄升高和 PSA 密度升高与病情重大升级风险升高有关。这些患者中的一部分可能会从减弱主动监测方案的强度中获益。患者总结:对于多年稳定接受主动监测(AS)的 PCa 患者,几乎没有相关的数据报告或临床指南。我们在一项大型队列研究中发现,PCa 患者在接受主动监测 5 年后病情未见进展,随访 15 年后,病情升级率不高,转移率和死亡率很低,而且年龄增大、体重指数增加和 PCa 体积增大与未来病情升级的可能性增加有关。这项研究支持在这一患者群体中继续进行AS治疗,并对部分患者进行减量化治疗。
{"title":"Determining Long-term Prostate Cancer Outcomes for Active Surveillance Patients Without Early Disease Progression: Implications for Slowing or Stopping Surveillance.","authors":"Kevin Shee, James Nie, Janet E Cowan, Lufan Wang, Samuel L Washington, Katsuto Shinohara, Hao G Nguyen, Matthew R Cooperberg, Peter R Carroll","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Active surveillance (AS) of prostate cancer (PCa) is the standard of care for low-grade disease, but there is limited guidance on tailoring protocols for stable patients. We investigated long-term outcomes for patients without initial progression and risk factors for upgrade.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Men on AS with Gleason grade group (GG) 1 PCa on three serial biopsies, ≥5 yr without progression, and ≥10 yr of follow-up were included. Outcomes were upgrade (GG ≥2), major upgrade (GG ≥3), progression to treatment, metastasis, PCa-specific survival, and overall survival. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the associations between patient characteristics and risk of upgrade.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>A total of 774 men met the inclusion criteria. At 10, 12, and 15 yr, upgrade-free survival rates were 56%, 45%, and 21%; major upgrade-free survival rates were 88%, 83%, and 61%; treatment-free survival rates were 86%, 83%, and 73%; metastasis-free survival rates were 99%, 99%, and 98%; and overall survival rates were 98%, 96%, and 95%, respectively. PCa-specific survival was 100% at 15 yr. On a multivariable analysis, year of diagnosis, age, body mass index (BMI), and biopsy core positivity were associated with upgrade (all p < 0.01), whereas age and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density were associated with major upgrade.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Patients without progression for 5 yr on AS had modest rates of upgrade and low rates of metastasis, and mortality at 15 yr of follow-up. Year of diagnosis, older age, increased BMI, and increased biopsy core positivity were associated with upgrade, whereas older age and greater PSA density were associated with an increased risk of major upgrade. A subset of these patients may benefit from deintensification of AS protocols.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>There are little reported data or clinical guidelines for patients with PCa who are stable for many years on active surveillance (AS). We show, in a large cohort, that PCa patients without progression for 5 yr on AS have modest rates of upgrade and very low rates of metastasis, and mortality rates at 15 yr of follow-up, and that older age, increased body mass index, and increased PCa volume are associated with an increased likelihood of future upgrade. This study supports continued AS in this patient population and deintensification in select patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142344434","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Lights and Shadows of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)-exposed and BCG-unresponsive Definitions: A Practical Overview. 卡介苗(BCG)暴露和卡介苗无反应定义的光与影:实用概述。
IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.010
Luca Afferi, Andrea Gallioli, Damiano Stracci, Agostino Mattei, Christian Fankhauser, Marco Moschini, Peter C Black, Benjamin Pradere, Jorge Huguet Pérez, Oscar Rodriguez-Faba, Joan Palou, Alberto Breda

According to the current definitions of recurrence of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer after bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), patients in the BCG-exposed and late relapse categories might benefit from further instillations. Patients with BCG-unresponsive disease could be included in clinical trials, but otherwise radical cystectomy is the preferred treatment. BCG-intolerant disease still represents an area of debate, with limited evidence regarding the best treatment for these patients.

根据目前对卡介苗(BCG)治疗后非肌层浸润性膀胱癌复发的定义,卡介苗暴露和晚期复发类别的患者可能会从进一步灌注中获益。对卡介苗无反应的患者可参加临床试验,但除此之外,根治性膀胱切除术是首选治疗方法。卡介苗不耐受的疾病仍是一个争论不休的领域,有关这些患者最佳治疗方法的证据有限。
{"title":"Lights and Shadows of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)-exposed and BCG-unresponsive Definitions: A Practical Overview.","authors":"Luca Afferi, Andrea Gallioli, Damiano Stracci, Agostino Mattei, Christian Fankhauser, Marco Moschini, Peter C Black, Benjamin Pradere, Jorge Huguet Pérez, Oscar Rodriguez-Faba, Joan Palou, Alberto Breda","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.010","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>According to the current definitions of recurrence of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer after bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), patients in the BCG-exposed and late relapse categories might benefit from further instillations. Patients with BCG-unresponsive disease could be included in clinical trials, but otherwise radical cystectomy is the preferred treatment. BCG-intolerant disease still represents an area of debate, with limited evidence regarding the best treatment for these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142344435","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Immune-based Approach for Renal Cell Carcinoma: Pros, Cons, and Future Directions. 肾细胞癌的新辅助和辅助免疫疗法:利弊与未来方向
IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.002
Laura Marandino, Riccardo Campi, Daniele Amparore, Zayd Tippu, Laurence Albiges, Umberto Capitanio, Rachel H Giles, Silke Gillessen, Alexander Kutikov, James Larkin, Robert J Motzer, Phillip M Pierorazio, Thomas Powles, Morgan Roupret, Grant D Stewart, Samra Turajlic, Axel Bex

Context: Immune-oncology strategies are revolutionising the perioperative treatment in several tumour types. The perioperative setting of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is an evolving field, and the advent of immunotherapy is producing significant advances.

Objective: To critically review the potential pros and cons of adjuvant and neoadjuvant immune-based therapeutic strategies in RCC, and to provide insights for future research in this field.

Evidence acquisition: We performed a collaborative narrative review of the existing literature.

Evidence synthesis: Adjuvant immunotherapy with pembrolizumab is a new standard of care for patients at a higher risk of recurrence after nephrectomy, demonstrating a disease-free survival and overall survival benefit in the phase 3 KEYNOTE-564 trial. Current data do not support neoadjuvant therapy use outside clinical trials. While both adjuvant and neoadjuvant immune-based approaches are driven by robust biological rationale, neoadjuvant immunotherapy may enable a stronger and more durable antitumour immune response. If neoadjuvant single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors demonstrated limited activity on the primary tumour, immune-based combinations may show increased activity. Overtreatment and a risk of relevant toxicity for patients who are cured by surgery alone are common concerns for both neoadjuvant and adjuvant strategies. Biomarkers helping patient selection and treatment deintensification are lacking in RCC. No results from randomised trials comparing neoadjuvant or perioperative immune-based therapy with adjuvant immunotherapy are available.

Conclusions: Adjuvant immunotherapy is a new standard of care in RCC. Both neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy strategies have potential advantages and disadvantages. Optimising perioperative treatment strategies is nuanced, with the role of neoadjuvant immune-based therapies yet to be defined. Given strong biological rationale for a pre/perioperative approach, there is a need for prospective clinical trials to determine clinical efficacy. Research investigating biomarkers aiding patient selection and treatment deintensification strategies is needed.

Patient summary: Immunotherapy is transforming the treatment of kidney cancer. In this review, we looked at the studies investigating immunotherapy strategies before and/or after surgery for patients with kidney cancer to assess potential pros and cons. We concluded that both neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy strategies may have potential advantages and disadvantages. While immunotherapy administered after surgery is already a standard of care, immunotherapy before surgery should be better investigated in future studies. Future trials should also focus on the selection of patients in order to spare toxicity for patients who will be cured by surgery alone.

背景:免疫肿瘤学策略正在彻底改变几种肿瘤类型的围手术期治疗。肾细胞癌(RCC)的围手术期治疗是一个不断发展的领域,免疫疗法的出现正在取得重大进展:批判性地回顾RCC辅助和新辅助免疫治疗策略的潜在利弊,并为该领域的未来研究提供见解:证据综述:pembrolizumab辅助免疫疗法是肾切除术后复发风险较高患者的新治疗标准,在KEYNOTE-564三期试验中显示了无病生存期和总生存期获益。目前的数据并不支持在临床试验之外使用新辅助疗法。虽然辅助治疗和新辅助免疫疗法都是基于可靠的生物学原理,但新辅助免疫疗法可以产生更强、更持久的抗肿瘤免疫反应。如果新辅助单药免疫检查点抑制剂对原发肿瘤的活性有限,那么基于免疫的联合疗法可能会显示出更强的活性。过度治疗以及仅通过手术治愈的患者面临相关毒性风险是新辅助治疗和辅助治疗策略共同面临的问题。RCC缺乏有助于选择患者和减轻治疗强度的生物标志物。目前还没有将新辅助或围手术期免疫疗法与辅助免疫疗法进行比较的随机试验结果:结论:辅助免疫疗法是RCC治疗的新标准。结论:辅助免疫疗法是 RCC 治疗的新标准。新辅助和辅助免疫疗法策略各有利弊。围手术期治疗策略的优化是细致入微的,新辅助免疫疗法的作用尚待明确。鉴于采用术前/围手术期治疗方法有很强的生物学依据,因此需要进行前瞻性临床试验来确定临床疗效。还需要研究生物标志物,以帮助选择患者和简化治疗策略。患者摘要:免疫疗法正在改变肾癌的治疗方法。在这篇综述中,我们研究了肾癌患者手术前和/或手术后的免疫疗法策略,以评估潜在的利弊。我们的结论是,新辅助和辅助免疫疗法策略可能都有潜在的优点和缺点。虽然手术后进行免疫治疗已成为一种标准治疗方法,但在今后的研究中应更好地探讨手术前的免疫治疗。未来的试验还应关注患者的选择,以避免仅通过手术治愈的患者产生毒性。
{"title":"Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Immune-based Approach for Renal Cell Carcinoma: Pros, Cons, and Future Directions.","authors":"Laura Marandino, Riccardo Campi, Daniele Amparore, Zayd Tippu, Laurence Albiges, Umberto Capitanio, Rachel H Giles, Silke Gillessen, Alexander Kutikov, James Larkin, Robert J Motzer, Phillip M Pierorazio, Thomas Powles, Morgan Roupret, Grant D Stewart, Samra Turajlic, Axel Bex","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Immune-oncology strategies are revolutionising the perioperative treatment in several tumour types. The perioperative setting of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is an evolving field, and the advent of immunotherapy is producing significant advances.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To critically review the potential pros and cons of adjuvant and neoadjuvant immune-based therapeutic strategies in RCC, and to provide insights for future research in this field.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>We performed a collaborative narrative review of the existing literature.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Adjuvant immunotherapy with pembrolizumab is a new standard of care for patients at a higher risk of recurrence after nephrectomy, demonstrating a disease-free survival and overall survival benefit in the phase 3 KEYNOTE-564 trial. Current data do not support neoadjuvant therapy use outside clinical trials. While both adjuvant and neoadjuvant immune-based approaches are driven by robust biological rationale, neoadjuvant immunotherapy may enable a stronger and more durable antitumour immune response. If neoadjuvant single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors demonstrated limited activity on the primary tumour, immune-based combinations may show increased activity. Overtreatment and a risk of relevant toxicity for patients who are cured by surgery alone are common concerns for both neoadjuvant and adjuvant strategies. Biomarkers helping patient selection and treatment deintensification are lacking in RCC. No results from randomised trials comparing neoadjuvant or perioperative immune-based therapy with adjuvant immunotherapy are available.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adjuvant immunotherapy is a new standard of care in RCC. Both neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy strategies have potential advantages and disadvantages. Optimising perioperative treatment strategies is nuanced, with the role of neoadjuvant immune-based therapies yet to be defined. Given strong biological rationale for a pre/perioperative approach, there is a need for prospective clinical trials to determine clinical efficacy. Research investigating biomarkers aiding patient selection and treatment deintensification strategies is needed.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>Immunotherapy is transforming the treatment of kidney cancer. In this review, we looked at the studies investigating immunotherapy strategies before and/or after surgery for patients with kidney cancer to assess potential pros and cons. We concluded that both neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy strategies may have potential advantages and disadvantages. While immunotherapy administered after surgery is already a standard of care, immunotherapy before surgery should be better investigated in future studies. Future trials should also focus on the selection of patients in order to spare toxicity for patients who will be cured by surgery alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142344436","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk of Progression of High-grade Primary T1 Non-muscle-invasive Bladder cancer in a Contemporary Cohort. 当代队列中高级别原发性 T1 非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的进展风险。
IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.006
Olga M Pijpers, Lisa M C van Hoogstraten, Sebastiaan Remmers, Irene J Beijert, Jorg R Oddens, J Alfred Witjes, Lambertus A Kiemeney, Katja K H Aben, Joost L Boormans

Patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) receive bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) instillations to reduce the risk of progression. For patients with very high-risk NMIBC, immediate radical cystectomy may be considered, as patients who experience disease progression despite BCG treatment have a worse prognosis. However, guideline-recommended stratification for the risk of progression is based on data from patients who were not exposed to BCG. We evaluated the risk of progression in a contemporary cohort of patients with primary high-grade/grade 3 (HG/G3) T1 NMIBC (n = 1268) who received at least one BCG instillation and underwent at least one cystoscopic evaluation. The primary endpoint was the 1-yr risk of progression for all patients and for the subgroup that received adequate BCG, defined as at least five induction instillations and at least two instillations provided as a second BCG course within 6 mo. Progression was defined as detrusor muscle invasion or lymph node or distant metastasis. The 1-yr risk of progression was 6.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.2-8.0) for patients with primary HG/G3 T1 NMIBC who started BCG treatment, and 4.6% (95% CI 3.3-6.4) 1 yr after the first instillation of the second BCG course for patients who received adequate BCG (n = 746). In conclusion, the contemporary risk of progression for patients with HG/G3 T1 NMIBC who receive BCG appears to be low, especially for patients who receive adequate BCG treatment. PATIENT SUMMARY: Our study shows that for patients with a high-grade bladder tumor who received in-bladder BCG (bacillus Calmette-Guérin), the risk of disease progression was 6.5% at 1 yr after their first BCG instillation. For patients who continued with BCG maintenance treatments, the risk of progression was 4.6% after the first BCG maintenance instillation.

高危非肌层浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)患者接受卡介苗(BCG)注射,以降低病情恶化的风险。对于风险极高的非肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者,可考虑立即进行根治性膀胱切除术,因为尽管接受了卡介苗治疗,但病情仍出现进展的患者预后较差。然而,指南推荐的疾病进展风险分层是基于未接受卡介苗治疗的患者的数据。我们对至少接受过一次卡介苗灌注并至少接受过一次膀胱镜评估的原发性高级别/3 级(HG/G3)T1 NMIBC 患者(n = 1268)的进展风险进行了评估。主要终点是所有患者和接受过充分卡介苗灌注的亚组(定义为至少五次诱导灌注和至少两次灌注,作为6个月内的第二个卡介苗疗程)的1年进展风险。病情恶化的定义是:侵入逼尿肌、淋巴结或远处转移。开始接受卡介苗治疗的原发性HG/G3 T1 NMIBC患者的1年进展风险为6.5%(95%置信区间[CI] 5.2-8.0),而接受了充分卡介苗治疗的患者(n = 746)在首次注射第二个卡介苗疗程后1年的进展风险为4.6%(95%置信区间[CI] 3.3-6.4)。总之,接受卡介苗治疗的 HG/G3 T1 NMIBC 患者,尤其是接受充分卡介苗治疗的患者,其病情恶化的当代风险似乎很低。患者总结:我们的研究表明,接受膀胱内卡介苗(卡介苗)治疗的高级别膀胱肿瘤患者在首次卡介苗灌注后 1 年的疾病进展风险为 6.5%。对于继续接受卡介苗维持治疗的患者,首次卡介苗维持灌注后病情恶化的风险为 4.6%。
{"title":"Risk of Progression of High-grade Primary T1 Non-muscle-invasive Bladder cancer in a Contemporary Cohort.","authors":"Olga M Pijpers, Lisa M C van Hoogstraten, Sebastiaan Remmers, Irene J Beijert, Jorg R Oddens, J Alfred Witjes, Lambertus A Kiemeney, Katja K H Aben, Joost L Boormans","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) receive bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) instillations to reduce the risk of progression. For patients with very high-risk NMIBC, immediate radical cystectomy may be considered, as patients who experience disease progression despite BCG treatment have a worse prognosis. However, guideline-recommended stratification for the risk of progression is based on data from patients who were not exposed to BCG. We evaluated the risk of progression in a contemporary cohort of patients with primary high-grade/grade 3 (HG/G3) T1 NMIBC (n = 1268) who received at least one BCG instillation and underwent at least one cystoscopic evaluation. The primary endpoint was the 1-yr risk of progression for all patients and for the subgroup that received adequate BCG, defined as at least five induction instillations and at least two instillations provided as a second BCG course within 6 mo. Progression was defined as detrusor muscle invasion or lymph node or distant metastasis. The 1-yr risk of progression was 6.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.2-8.0) for patients with primary HG/G3 T1 NMIBC who started BCG treatment, and 4.6% (95% CI 3.3-6.4) 1 yr after the first instillation of the second BCG course for patients who received adequate BCG (n = 746). In conclusion, the contemporary risk of progression for patients with HG/G3 T1 NMIBC who receive BCG appears to be low, especially for patients who receive adequate BCG treatment. PATIENT SUMMARY: Our study shows that for patients with a high-grade bladder tumor who received in-bladder BCG (bacillus Calmette-Guérin), the risk of disease progression was 6.5% at 1 yr after their first BCG instillation. For patients who continued with BCG maintenance treatments, the risk of progression was 4.6% after the first BCG maintenance instillation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142344437","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for the Workup and Treatment of Local Intraprostatic Recurrence of Prostate Cancer Following Definitive Radiotherapy. 美国镭学会《明确放疗后前列腺癌局部前列腺内复发的检查和治疗适当使用标准》。
IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.005
Luca F Valle, Tommy Jiang, Ashton Rosenbloom, Nicholas G Zaorsky, Clara Hwang, Abhishek Solanki, Daniel Dickstein, Timur Mitin, Thomas Schroeder, Louis Potters, Shane Lloyd, Tim Showalter, Hilary P Bagshaw, R Jeffrey Karnes, Karen E Hoffman, Paul L Nguyen, Amar U Kishan
<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Local intraprostatic radiorecurrence of prostate cancer (IPR-PC) can be associated with an aggressive natural history and impact long-term disease-specific survival. While appropriate local salvage intervention can be curative, best practices for workup and local salvage of intraprostatic recurrence are poorly defined. The American Radium Society (ARS) Genitourinary Appropriate Use Criteria Committee sought to develop evidence-based recommendations to address this gap.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed and Embase were searched to retrieve a comprehensive set of relevant peer-reviewed articles on four topics relevant to the workup and treatment of IPR-PC. The literature was evaluated and summarized by three investigators, and clinical variants were created for each of the four topics. The ARS Genitourinary AUC multidisciplinary expert panel voted on the most appropriate procedures for each variant, and a modified Delphi approach was used to summarize recommendations.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>The panel concluded that radiographic staging via prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging should be performed to exclude patients with metastatic disease and identify the local extent of radiorecurrence. Biopsy is required before local salvage to avoid excessive toxicity in patients whose radiographic recurrence represents a treatment effect. Consideration of local salvage is preferred in lieu of noncurative hormonal manipulation alone, although shared decision-making is critical. Salvage reirradiation approaches are recommended to limit toxicity. Hormonal therapy may be beneficial for radiosensitization when radiotherapeutic salvage is pursued, but only of short duration, and classic androgen deprivation therapies are preferred over novel hormonal agents. Focal salvage should be pursued when confidence in focal recurrence can be confirmed via multiple radiographic and tissue sampling modalities, although the toxicity associated with whole-gland salvage appears to be very tolerable. Several radiotherapeutic salvage regimens exist, most of which can be carried out in six or fewer fractions. The data informing this guideline are limited to individuals initially treated with conventionally fractionated external beam radiotherapy and with workup for recurrence before the PSMA PET era.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>This consensus guideline provides evidence-based guidance on the appropriate procedures for workup and treatment of IPR-PC. Prospective evidence to enrich these guidelines is eagerly anticipated.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>We summarize evidence for the best workup and treatment for patients with local recurrence of prostate cancer after radiotherapy. A panel of experts evaluated previous studies and voted on the procedures that should be performed and
背景和目的:前列腺癌的局部前列腺内放射复发(IPR-PC)可能与侵袭性自然病史有关,并影响长期疾病特异性生存。虽然适当的局部抢救干预可起到治愈作用,但前列腺内复发的检查和局部抢救的最佳实践还不十分明确。美国镭学会(ARS)泌尿生殖系统适当使用标准委员会试图制定以证据为基础的建议来填补这一空白:方法:对 PubMed 和 Embase 进行了检索,以获取与 IPR-PC 检查和治疗相关的四个主题的一整套相关同行评审文章。三位研究人员对文献进行了评估和总结,并为四个主题分别创建了临床变体。ARS泌尿生殖系统AUC多学科专家小组就每种变异的最合适程序进行了投票,并采用改良的德尔菲法对建议进行了总结:专家组认为,应通过前列腺特异性膜抗原正电子发射断层扫描(PSMA PET)和多参数磁共振成像进行放射学分期,以排除转移性疾病患者并确定局部放射复发范围。局部抢救前必须进行活检,以避免放射复发代表治疗效果的患者出现过度毒性。尽管共同决策至关重要,但考虑局部救治以取代单纯的非治愈性激素治疗是首选方案。建议采用挽救性再照射方法来限制毒性。在进行放射治疗挽救时,激素治疗可能有利于放射增敏,但持续时间较短,传统的雄激素剥夺疗法优于新型激素药物。通过多种放射影像学和组织取样方式确认病灶复发后,应采取病灶挽救治疗,尽管全腺挽救治疗的相关毒性似乎非常容易耐受。目前已有几种放射治疗挽救方案,其中大多数可以在六次或更少的分次内完成。本指南所参考的数据仅限于最初接受传统分次体外放射治疗的患者,以及在 PSMA PET 时代到来之前接受复发检查的患者:本共识指南为 IPR-PC 的适当检查和治疗程序提供了循证指导。患者摘要:我们总结了放疗后前列腺癌局部复发患者最佳检查和治疗的证据。一个专家小组对以往的研究进行了评估,并投票决定了应该进行的手术和应该避免的手术。本指南是帮助医生讨论最佳治疗方案的有用工具,可最大限度地提高治愈几率,同时将副作用降至最低。
{"title":"American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for the Workup and Treatment of Local Intraprostatic Recurrence of Prostate Cancer Following Definitive Radiotherapy.","authors":"Luca F Valle, Tommy Jiang, Ashton Rosenbloom, Nicholas G Zaorsky, Clara Hwang, Abhishek Solanki, Daniel Dickstein, Timur Mitin, Thomas Schroeder, Louis Potters, Shane Lloyd, Tim Showalter, Hilary P Bagshaw, R Jeffrey Karnes, Karen E Hoffman, Paul L Nguyen, Amar U Kishan","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.005","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background and objective: &lt;/strong&gt;Local intraprostatic radiorecurrence of prostate cancer (IPR-PC) can be associated with an aggressive natural history and impact long-term disease-specific survival. While appropriate local salvage intervention can be curative, best practices for workup and local salvage of intraprostatic recurrence are poorly defined. The American Radium Society (ARS) Genitourinary Appropriate Use Criteria Committee sought to develop evidence-based recommendations to address this gap.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;PubMed and Embase were searched to retrieve a comprehensive set of relevant peer-reviewed articles on four topics relevant to the workup and treatment of IPR-PC. The literature was evaluated and summarized by three investigators, and clinical variants were created for each of the four topics. The ARS Genitourinary AUC multidisciplinary expert panel voted on the most appropriate procedures for each variant, and a modified Delphi approach was used to summarize recommendations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Key findings and limitations: &lt;/strong&gt;The panel concluded that radiographic staging via prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging should be performed to exclude patients with metastatic disease and identify the local extent of radiorecurrence. Biopsy is required before local salvage to avoid excessive toxicity in patients whose radiographic recurrence represents a treatment effect. Consideration of local salvage is preferred in lieu of noncurative hormonal manipulation alone, although shared decision-making is critical. Salvage reirradiation approaches are recommended to limit toxicity. Hormonal therapy may be beneficial for radiosensitization when radiotherapeutic salvage is pursued, but only of short duration, and classic androgen deprivation therapies are preferred over novel hormonal agents. Focal salvage should be pursued when confidence in focal recurrence can be confirmed via multiple radiographic and tissue sampling modalities, although the toxicity associated with whole-gland salvage appears to be very tolerable. Several radiotherapeutic salvage regimens exist, most of which can be carried out in six or fewer fractions. The data informing this guideline are limited to individuals initially treated with conventionally fractionated external beam radiotherapy and with workup for recurrence before the PSMA PET era.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions and clinical implications: &lt;/strong&gt;This consensus guideline provides evidence-based guidance on the appropriate procedures for workup and treatment of IPR-PC. Prospective evidence to enrich these guidelines is eagerly anticipated.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Patient summary: &lt;/strong&gt;We summarize evidence for the best workup and treatment for patients with local recurrence of prostate cancer after radiotherapy. A panel of experts evaluated previous studies and voted on the procedures that should be performed and ","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142282705","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Frailty and Renal Cell Carcinoma: Integration of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment into Shared Decision-making. 虚弱与肾细胞癌:将老年病综合评估纳入共同决策。
IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.001
Alessio Pecoraro, Giuseppe Dario Testa, Laura Marandino, Laurence Albiges, Axel Bex, Umberto Capitanio, Ilaria Cappiello, Lorenzo Masieri, Carme Mir, Morgan Roupret, Sergio Serni, Andrea Ungar, Giulia Rivasi, Riccardo Campi

Context: Frailty, a geriatric syndrome characterized by decreased resilience and physiological reserve, impacts the prognosis and management of older adults significantly, particularly in the context of surgical and oncological care.

Objective: To provide an overview of frailty assessment in the management of older patients with a renal mass/renal cell carcinoma (RCC), focusing on its implications for diagnostic workup, treatment decisions, and clinical outcomes.

Evidence acquisition: A narrative review of the literature was conducted, focusing on frailty definitions, assessment tools, and their application in geriatric oncology, applied to the field of RCC. Relevant studies addressing the prognostic value of frailty, its impact on treatment outcomes, and potential interventions were summarized.

Evidence synthesis: Frailty is a poor prognostic factor and can influence decision-making in the management of both localized and metastatic RCC. Screening tools such as the Geriatric Screening Tool 8 (G8) and the Mini-COG test can aid clinicians to select older patients (ie, aged ≥65 yr) for a further comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) performed by dedicated geriatricians. The CGA provides insights to risk stratify patients and guide subsequent treatment pathways. As such, the involvement of geriatricians in multidisciplinary tumor boards emerges as an essential priority to address the complex needs of frail patients and optimize clinical outcomes. Herein, we propose a dedicated care pathway as a first key step to implement frailty assessment in clinical practice and research for RCC.

Conclusions: Frailty has emerged as a crucial factor influencing the management and outcomes of older patients with RCC. Involvement of geriatricians in diagnostic and therapeutic pathways represents a pragmatic approach to screen and assess frailty, fostering individualized treatment decisions according to holistic patient risk stratification.

Patient summary: Frailty, a decline in resilience and physiological reserve, influences treatment decisions and outcomes in elderly patients with renal cell carcinoma, guiding personalized care. In this review, we focused on pragmatic strategies to screen patients with a renal mass suspected for renal cell carcinoma, who are older than 65 yr, for frailty and on personalized management algorithms integrating geriatric input beyond patient- and tumor-related factors.

背景:虚弱是一种老年综合征,其特点是恢复能力和生理储备下降,对老年人的预后和管理有很大影响,尤其是在外科和肿瘤护理方面:概述肾肿块/肾细胞癌(RCC)老年患者管理中的虚弱评估,重点关注其对诊断工作、治疗决策和临床结果的影响:对文献进行了叙述性综述,重点关注虚弱的定义、评估工具及其在老年肿瘤学中的应用,并将其应用于 RCC 领域。对涉及虚弱的预后价值、其对治疗结果的影响以及潜在干预措施的相关研究进行了总结:虚弱是一种不良预后因素,会影响局部和转移性 RCC 的治疗决策。老年病筛查工具 8 (G8) 和 Mini-COG 测试等筛查工具可帮助临床医生选择老年患者(即年龄≥65 岁),由专门的老年病学专家进行进一步的全面老年病学评估 (CGA)。CGA 可为患者的风险分层提供见解,并为后续治疗路径提供指导。因此,要满足体弱患者的复杂需求并优化临床疗效,老年病学专家参与多学科肿瘤委员会的工作就显得尤为重要。在此,我们提出了一个专门的护理路径,作为在 RCC 临床实践和研究中实施虚弱评估的第一步:虚弱已成为影响老年 RCC 患者管理和预后的关键因素。老年病学专家参与诊断和治疗路径是筛查和评估虚弱程度的实用方法,有助于根据患者整体风险分层做出个性化治疗决定:虚弱是指恢复能力和生理储备的下降,它影响着老年肾细胞癌患者的治疗决策和治疗效果,并指导着个性化治疗。在这篇综述中,我们重点讨论了对 65 岁以上疑似肾细胞癌的肾肿块患者进行虚弱筛查的实用策略,以及在患者和肿瘤相关因素之外整合老年医学意见的个性化管理算法。
{"title":"Frailty and Renal Cell Carcinoma: Integration of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment into Shared Decision-making.","authors":"Alessio Pecoraro, Giuseppe Dario Testa, Laura Marandino, Laurence Albiges, Axel Bex, Umberto Capitanio, Ilaria Cappiello, Lorenzo Masieri, Carme Mir, Morgan Roupret, Sergio Serni, Andrea Ungar, Giulia Rivasi, Riccardo Campi","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Frailty, a geriatric syndrome characterized by decreased resilience and physiological reserve, impacts the prognosis and management of older adults significantly, particularly in the context of surgical and oncological care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide an overview of frailty assessment in the management of older patients with a renal mass/renal cell carcinoma (RCC), focusing on its implications for diagnostic workup, treatment decisions, and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A narrative review of the literature was conducted, focusing on frailty definitions, assessment tools, and their application in geriatric oncology, applied to the field of RCC. Relevant studies addressing the prognostic value of frailty, its impact on treatment outcomes, and potential interventions were summarized.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Frailty is a poor prognostic factor and can influence decision-making in the management of both localized and metastatic RCC. Screening tools such as the Geriatric Screening Tool 8 (G8) and the Mini-COG test can aid clinicians to select older patients (ie, aged ≥65 yr) for a further comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) performed by dedicated geriatricians. The CGA provides insights to risk stratify patients and guide subsequent treatment pathways. As such, the involvement of geriatricians in multidisciplinary tumor boards emerges as an essential priority to address the complex needs of frail patients and optimize clinical outcomes. Herein, we propose a dedicated care pathway as a first key step to implement frailty assessment in clinical practice and research for RCC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Frailty has emerged as a crucial factor influencing the management and outcomes of older patients with RCC. Involvement of geriatricians in diagnostic and therapeutic pathways represents a pragmatic approach to screen and assess frailty, fostering individualized treatment decisions according to holistic patient risk stratification.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>Frailty, a decline in resilience and physiological reserve, influences treatment decisions and outcomes in elderly patients with renal cell carcinoma, guiding personalized care. In this review, we focused on pragmatic strategies to screen patients with a renal mass suspected for renal cell carcinoma, who are older than 65 yr, for frailty and on personalized management algorithms integrating geriatric input beyond patient- and tumor-related factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142282707","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk of Biochemical Recurrence and Metastasis in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy After a 10-year Disease-free Interval. 接受根治性前列腺切除术的前列腺癌患者在 10 年无病间隔期后的生化复发和转移风险。
IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.08.008
Benedikt Hoeh, Felix Preisser, Fabio Zattoni, Alexander Kretschmer, Thilo Westhofen, Jonathan Olivier, Timo F W Soeterik, Roderick C N van den Bergh, Philipp Mandel, Markus Graefen, Derya Tilki

Background and objective: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is used to follow up prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP). Research on PSA thresholds for identifying PCa patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) who are at a higher risk of progression yielded inconclusive results. This study aims to investigate the risk of late BCR in PCa patients treated with RP and long postoperative (120 mo) undetectable PSA follow-up, and to identify prognostic factors for late BCR within this patient cohort.

Methods: PCa patients treated with curative RP (1992-2012) and free of BCR during the first 120 mo following RP were retrospectively identified within five European tertiary centers; BCR was defined as two consecutive PSA values of ≥0.2 ng/ml. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models tested for an association between BCR and patient or tumor characteristics.

Key findings and limitations: The study cohort consisted of 4639 patients, of whom 243 (5.2%) developed BCR at a medium follow-up of 147 mo. Of those with BCR, 23 (9.5%) subsequently developed metastatic progression. In Kaplan-Meier models, BCR-free survival differed according to advanced tumor status. In multivariable Cox regression models, pT stage (pT3a: hazard ratio [HR]: 1.46; pT3b: HR: 2.42), pathological Gleason score (pGS 3 + 4: HR: 1.71; pGS ≥4 + 3: HR: 2.47), surgical margin (R1/Rx: HR: 1.72), and pNx stage (pNx: HR: 0.72) represented independent predictors for BCR (all p < 0.05). Conversely, age, PSA at diagnosis, and year of surgery failed to achieve independent predictor status for BCR.

Conclusions and clinical implications: Among PCa patients with an uneventful follow-up of at least 10 yr after RP, still one in 20 patients subsequently develop late BCR. Nevertheless, late BCR and subsequent progression to metastasis (0.3%) rates in patients with pT2 stage and pGS ≤3 + 4 were strikingly low, implicating that abandoning follow-up beyond an uneventful period of 10 yr is justifiable within this cohort of patients.

Patient summary: In this study, prostate cancer patients treated with a radical prostatectomy and at least 10 yr of uneventful prostate-specific antigen testing were identified within five European centers. Relying on these patients, the rate of subsequent late biochemical recurrence was calculated and risk factors were identified for biochemical recurrence following 10 yr of uneventful prostate-specific antigen testing.

背景和目的:前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测用于随访接受根治性前列腺切除术(RP)治疗的前列腺癌(PCa)患者。有关确定生化复发(BCR)PCa 患者的 PSA 临界值的研究没有得出结论。本研究旨在调查接受 RP 治疗且术后长期(120 个月)随访未检测到 PSA 的 PCa 患者的晚期 BCR 风险,并确定该患者群中晚期 BCR 的预后因素:方法: 在欧洲五家三级医疗中心内,对接受根治性 RP 治疗(1992-2012 年)且在 RP 术后 120 个月内未出现 BCR 的 PCa 患者进行回顾性研究;BCR 的定义是 PSA 值连续两次≥0.2 纳克/毫升。Kaplan-Meier和Cox回归模型检验了BCR与患者或肿瘤特征之间的关系:研究队列由4639名患者组成,其中243人(5.2%)在147个月的中期随访中出现了BCR。在 Kaplan-Meier 模型中,无 BCR 生存期因晚期肿瘤状态而异。在多变量 Cox 回归模型中,pT 分期(pT3a:危险比 [HR]:1.46;pT3b:HR:2.42)、病理 Gleason 评分(pGS 3 + 4:HR:1.71;pGS ≥4 + 3:HR:2.47)、手术切缘(R1/Rx:HR:1.72)和 pNx 分期(pNx:HR:0.72)是 BCR 的独立预测因素(所有 p 结论和临床影响):在 RP 术后随访至少 10 年的 PCa 患者中,仍有二十分之一的患者会出现晚期 BCR。然而,pT2 期和 pGS ≤3 + 4 的患者中,晚期 BCR 和随后进展为转移(0.3%)的发生率非常低,这意味着在这批患者中,在 10 年的平稳随访期之后放弃随访是合理的。根据这些患者的情况,计算了随后的晚期生化复发率,并确定了前列腺特异性抗原检测10年无异常后生化复发的风险因素。
{"title":"Risk of Biochemical Recurrence and Metastasis in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy After a 10-year Disease-free Interval.","authors":"Benedikt Hoeh, Felix Preisser, Fabio Zattoni, Alexander Kretschmer, Thilo Westhofen, Jonathan Olivier, Timo F W Soeterik, Roderick C N van den Bergh, Philipp Mandel, Markus Graefen, Derya Tilki","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.08.008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.08.008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is used to follow up prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP). Research on PSA thresholds for identifying PCa patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) who are at a higher risk of progression yielded inconclusive results. This study aims to investigate the risk of late BCR in PCa patients treated with RP and long postoperative (120 mo) undetectable PSA follow-up, and to identify prognostic factors for late BCR within this patient cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PCa patients treated with curative RP (1992-2012) and free of BCR during the first 120 mo following RP were retrospectively identified within five European tertiary centers; BCR was defined as two consecutive PSA values of ≥0.2 ng/ml. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models tested for an association between BCR and patient or tumor characteristics.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>The study cohort consisted of 4639 patients, of whom 243 (5.2%) developed BCR at a medium follow-up of 147 mo. Of those with BCR, 23 (9.5%) subsequently developed metastatic progression. In Kaplan-Meier models, BCR-free survival differed according to advanced tumor status. In multivariable Cox regression models, pT stage (pT3a: hazard ratio [HR]: 1.46; pT3b: HR: 2.42), pathological Gleason score (pGS 3 + 4: HR: 1.71; pGS ≥4 + 3: HR: 2.47), surgical margin (R1/Rx: HR: 1.72), and pNx stage (pNx: HR: 0.72) represented independent predictors for BCR (all p < 0.05). Conversely, age, PSA at diagnosis, and year of surgery failed to achieve independent predictor status for BCR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Among PCa patients with an uneventful follow-up of at least 10 yr after RP, still one in 20 patients subsequently develop late BCR. Nevertheless, late BCR and subsequent progression to metastasis (0.3%) rates in patients with pT2 stage and pGS ≤3 + 4 were strikingly low, implicating that abandoning follow-up beyond an uneventful period of 10 yr is justifiable within this cohort of patients.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>In this study, prostate cancer patients treated with a radical prostatectomy and at least 10 yr of uneventful prostate-specific antigen testing were identified within five European centers. Relying on these patients, the rate of subsequent late biochemical recurrence was calculated and risk factors were identified for biochemical recurrence following 10 yr of uneventful prostate-specific antigen testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142282710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
European urology oncology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1