Pub Date : 2024-10-30eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1416096
Candon Johnson, Jose Martinez
Introduction: Variation in smoking cessation behaviors and motivators across the United States may contribute to health disparities. This study investigates regional differences over time in two key cessation motivators (quit interest and doctor's advice to quit) and two cessation behaviors (past-year quit attempts and recent successful cessation) across diverse demographic factors.
Methods: Data were analyzed from two releases of the Tobacco Use Supplement to the U.S. Census Bureau's Current Population Survey (TUS-CPS) for the years 2014-15 and 2018-19. The analysis included sex, age, race and ethnicity, education, marital status, employment status, and household income.
Results: Findings from 2018 to 2019 TUS-CPS revealed that quit interest was highest in the Northeast and lowest in the Midwest, while doctor's advice to quit was most prevalent in the Northeast and least in the West. Past-year quit attempts were most common in the Northeast and least in the South. Recent successful cessation (defined as quitting for 6 to 12 months) was highest in the Northeast and Midwest, with the South showing the lowest rates. Compared to the 2014-15 survey, 14 demographic groups (7 in the Midwest, 6 in the South, and 1 in the West) showed decreases in both quit interest and actions to quit. Notably, the Asian non-Hispanic group in the Northeast experienced a significant decrease in quit interest (-17.9%) but an increase in recent successful cessation (+369.2%).
Discussion: Overall, the study indicates that while quit interest was highest in the West, the South exhibited the lowest rates of quit attempts and successful cessation. Significant differences were also noted between age groups. These findings highlight the need for further research into cessation behaviors at more granular levels to inform policies aimed at reducing smoking-related health disparities among populations facing the greatest challenges in cessation.
{"title":"Regional and social disparities in cessation behavior and motivation to quit among U.S. adult current smokers, Tobacco Use Supplement to the U.S. Census Bureau's Current Population Survey 2014-15 and 2018-19.","authors":"Candon Johnson, Jose Martinez","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2024.1416096","DOIUrl":"10.3389/fpubh.2024.1416096","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Variation in smoking cessation behaviors and motivators across the United States may contribute to health disparities. This study investigates regional differences over time in two key cessation motivators (quit interest and doctor's advice to quit) and two cessation behaviors (past-year quit attempts and recent successful cessation) across diverse demographic factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were analyzed from two releases of the Tobacco Use Supplement to the U.S. Census Bureau's Current Population Survey (TUS-CPS) for the years 2014-15 and 2018-19. The analysis included sex, age, race and ethnicity, education, marital status, employment status, and household income.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings from 2018 to 2019 TUS-CPS revealed that quit interest was highest in the Northeast and lowest in the Midwest, while doctor's advice to quit was most prevalent in the Northeast and least in the West. Past-year quit attempts were most common in the Northeast and least in the South. Recent successful cessation (defined as quitting for 6 to 12 months) was highest in the Northeast and Midwest, with the South showing the lowest rates. Compared to the 2014-15 survey, 14 demographic groups (7 in the Midwest, 6 in the South, and 1 in the West) showed decreases in both quit interest and actions to quit. Notably, the Asian non-Hispanic group in the Northeast experienced a significant decrease in quit interest (-17.9%) but an increase in recent successful cessation (+369.2%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Overall, the study indicates that while quit interest was highest in the West, the South exhibited the lowest rates of quit attempts and successful cessation. Significant differences were also noted between age groups. These findings highlight the need for further research into cessation behaviors at more granular levels to inform policies aimed at reducing smoking-related health disparities among populations facing the greatest challenges in cessation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"1416096"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11557426/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142618176","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-30eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1442773
Elaine Cooper Russell, Tolulope M Abidogun, Lisa L Lindley, Kenneth W Griffin
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic led to major disruptions in the lives of university students, which is a population that is already at a greater risk of mental health concerns. Little is known about how the pandemic impacted distress and mental health services utilization among university students across the United States.
Methods: Using survey data from the National College Health Assessment, both before the COVID-19 pandemic (pre-March 2020, n = 88,986) and during the pandemic (Spring 2021, n = 96,489), the present study examined mental health symptoms and utilization of mental health services among undergraduate students attending four-year universities in the United States.
Results: There were notable increases in measures of psychological distress and reductions in well-being from before the pandemic to during the pandemic. However, overall utilization rates of mental health services slightly decreased from pre-pandemic to during the pandemic. Predictors of severe psychological distress included those who experienced loneliness, COVID-19 related stressors, and loss of a loved one from COVID-19. COVID-related stressors and loneliness were associated with higher utilization rates of mental health services, while well-being and resilience were associated with lower utilization rates.
Discussion: Analyses revealed that several demographic groups were at an elevated risk for severe psychological distress, including non-binary, female, and sexual minority students, and especially those who identify as both non-binary and non-heterosexual. Results indicated that students of color, especially female students of color, were less likely to receive mental health services. Future research is needed to increase our understanding of the barriers to mental health service use among high-risk university students.
{"title":"Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on university students' psychological distress, well-being, and utilization of mental health services in the United States: populations at greatest risk.","authors":"Elaine Cooper Russell, Tolulope M Abidogun, Lisa L Lindley, Kenneth W Griffin","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2024.1442773","DOIUrl":"10.3389/fpubh.2024.1442773","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic led to major disruptions in the lives of university students, which is a population that is already at a greater risk of mental health concerns. Little is known about how the pandemic impacted distress and mental health services utilization among university students across the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using survey data from the National College Health Assessment, both before the COVID-19 pandemic (pre-March 2020, <i>n</i> = 88,986) and during the pandemic (Spring 2021, <i>n</i> = 96,489), the present study examined mental health symptoms and utilization of mental health services among undergraduate students attending four-year universities in the United States.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were notable increases in measures of psychological distress and reductions in well-being from before the pandemic to during the pandemic. However, overall utilization rates of mental health services slightly decreased from pre-pandemic to during the pandemic. Predictors of severe psychological distress included those who experienced loneliness, COVID-19 related stressors, and loss of a loved one from COVID-19. COVID-related stressors and loneliness were associated with higher utilization rates of mental health services, while well-being and resilience were associated with lower utilization rates.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Analyses revealed that several demographic groups were at an elevated risk for severe psychological distress, including non-binary, female, and sexual minority students, and especially those who identify as both non-binary and non-heterosexual. Results indicated that students of color, especially female students of color, were less likely to receive mental health services. Future research is needed to increase our understanding of the barriers to mental health service use among high-risk university students.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"1442773"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11557483/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142617722","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-30eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1488065
Bin Zhou, Jiaxiang Zhang
<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of the study was to investigate the occupational epidemiological characteristics of hearing loss among noise-exposed workers through a cross-sectional study and to explore the impact of combined noise and dust exposure on workers' hearing loss through a longitudinal study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This cross-sectional study revealed that the risk of speech-frequency hearing loss increases with age (OR = 1.096, 95%CI = 1.081-1.111). Independent factors influencing high-frequency hearing loss include sex, age, hazardous factors, industry category, and enterprise size. Scientific research and technical services (OR = 1.607, 95%CI = 1.111-2.324), wholesale and retail (OR = 2.144, 95%CI = 1.479-3.107), manufacturing (OR = 1.907, 95%CI = 1.429-2.545), and other industries (OR = 1.583, 95%CI = 1.002-2.502) are risk factors for high-frequency hearing loss, whereas being female (OR = 0.297, 95%CI = 0.236-0.373) is a protective factor against high-frequency hearing loss. Independent factors influencing occupational noise-induced hearing loss include sex, working age, hazardous factors, industry category, smoking, and drinking, with the risk of occupational noise-induced hearing loss increasing with working age (OR = 1.045, 95%CI = 1.031-1.058). Noise and dust work (OR = 1.271, 95%CI = 1.011-1.597), other work (OR = 0.619, 95%CI = 0.479-0.800), manufacturing (OR = 2.085, 95%CI = 1.336-3.254), other industries (OR = 2.063, 95%CI = 1.060-4.012), occasional smokers (OR = 0.863, 95%CI = 0.652-1.142), regular smokers (OR = 1.216, 95% CI = 0.987-1.497), and excessive drinkers (OR = 2.171, 95%CI = 1.476-3.193) are risk factors for occupational noise-induced hearing loss, whereas being female (OR = 0.496, 95%CI = 0.347-0.709) is a protective factor against occupational noise-induced hearing loss. The longitudinal study revealed differences in pure-tone hearing threshold test results at 500 Hz, 1,000 Hz, 3,000 Hz, 4,000 Hz, and 6,000 Hz in both ears before and after enrollment among noise-exposed workers (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Combined noise and dust exposure (OR = 4.660, 95%CI = 1.584-13.711), 1st year (OR = 1.540, 95%CI = 1.128-2.103), 2nd year (OR = 1.994, 95%CI = 1.409-2.821), and 3rd year (OR = 1.628, 95%CI = 1.170-2.264) were risk factors for high-frequency hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Combined noise and dust exposure is a risk factor for occupational noise-induced hearing loss. Additionally, occupational noise-induced hearing loss is influenced by gender, working age, enterprise industry category, smoking, and drinking. Employers should enhance occupational health management and improve workers' occupational health literacy, with a particular focus on older male workers of long working age, and those with unhealthy habits. Combined exposure to noise and dust may have a synergistic effect on causing high-frequency hearing loss, and comprehensive protective measures should be implemented for worke
{"title":"Occupational epidemiological characteristics of noise-induced hearing loss and the impact of combined exposure to noise and dust on workers' hearing-a retrospective study.","authors":"Bin Zhou, Jiaxiang Zhang","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2024.1488065","DOIUrl":"10.3389/fpubh.2024.1488065","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of the study was to investigate the occupational epidemiological characteristics of hearing loss among noise-exposed workers through a cross-sectional study and to explore the impact of combined noise and dust exposure on workers' hearing loss through a longitudinal study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This cross-sectional study revealed that the risk of speech-frequency hearing loss increases with age (OR = 1.096, 95%CI = 1.081-1.111). Independent factors influencing high-frequency hearing loss include sex, age, hazardous factors, industry category, and enterprise size. Scientific research and technical services (OR = 1.607, 95%CI = 1.111-2.324), wholesale and retail (OR = 2.144, 95%CI = 1.479-3.107), manufacturing (OR = 1.907, 95%CI = 1.429-2.545), and other industries (OR = 1.583, 95%CI = 1.002-2.502) are risk factors for high-frequency hearing loss, whereas being female (OR = 0.297, 95%CI = 0.236-0.373) is a protective factor against high-frequency hearing loss. Independent factors influencing occupational noise-induced hearing loss include sex, working age, hazardous factors, industry category, smoking, and drinking, with the risk of occupational noise-induced hearing loss increasing with working age (OR = 1.045, 95%CI = 1.031-1.058). Noise and dust work (OR = 1.271, 95%CI = 1.011-1.597), other work (OR = 0.619, 95%CI = 0.479-0.800), manufacturing (OR = 2.085, 95%CI = 1.336-3.254), other industries (OR = 2.063, 95%CI = 1.060-4.012), occasional smokers (OR = 0.863, 95%CI = 0.652-1.142), regular smokers (OR = 1.216, 95% CI = 0.987-1.497), and excessive drinkers (OR = 2.171, 95%CI = 1.476-3.193) are risk factors for occupational noise-induced hearing loss, whereas being female (OR = 0.496, 95%CI = 0.347-0.709) is a protective factor against occupational noise-induced hearing loss. The longitudinal study revealed differences in pure-tone hearing threshold test results at 500 Hz, 1,000 Hz, 3,000 Hz, 4,000 Hz, and 6,000 Hz in both ears before and after enrollment among noise-exposed workers (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Combined noise and dust exposure (OR = 4.660, 95%CI = 1.584-13.711), 1st year (OR = 1.540, 95%CI = 1.128-2.103), 2nd year (OR = 1.994, 95%CI = 1.409-2.821), and 3rd year (OR = 1.628, 95%CI = 1.170-2.264) were risk factors for high-frequency hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Combined noise and dust exposure is a risk factor for occupational noise-induced hearing loss. Additionally, occupational noise-induced hearing loss is influenced by gender, working age, enterprise industry category, smoking, and drinking. Employers should enhance occupational health management and improve workers' occupational health literacy, with a particular focus on older male workers of long working age, and those with unhealthy habits. Combined exposure to noise and dust may have a synergistic effect on causing high-frequency hearing loss, and comprehensive protective measures should be implemented for worke","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"1488065"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11557527/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142618154","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-29eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1469091
Daniel M Mwanga, Henry Owoko Odero, Damazo T Kadengye, Sally Atieno Odunga, Eva Muluve, Bylhah Mugotitsa, Ruth Nanjekho Wafubwa, Karen Austrian, Sylvia Kiwuwa-Muyingo
Background: COVID-19 pandemic had devastating socio-economic and health effects, including mental health. This study examines the intersectionality between gender and mental health outcomes among Kenyan adults in informal settlements of Nairobi, Kisumu, and Kilifi Counties during the COVID-19 crisis. This is necessary to inform mental health response in case of another pandemic.
Methods: We analyzed data collected in a longitudinal survey between July 2020 (fourth round) and February 2021 (fifth round). The data covered COVID-19-related effects on job loss, food insecurity, access to health services, and mental health. Participants were randomly sampled from existing cohorts at the Population Council. The outcomes of interest were depressive and anxiety disorders, combined into a binary composite outcome variable. Descriptive statistics included means for continuous variables and frequencies and proportions for categorical variables. Chi-square tests were used to examine the differences between groups. The relationship between the gendered COVID-19 socio-economic effects and participants' mental health was examined using modified Poisson regression.
Results: A total of 4,050 participants were interviewed, 66% female and median age 38 [interquartile range (IQR): 29-46]. Complete income loss was strongly associated with negative mental health outcomes in multiple intersections with varied magnitudes. The association was larger among older females (≥50 years) (PR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.17-1.51, p < 0.001) than older males (PR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.17-1.27, p < 0.001). Partial loss of income was protective against negative mental health outcomes among young males (18-29 years) (PR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.76-0.87, p < 0.001) but linked to negative outcomes among middle-aged males (30-49 years old) (PR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.12-1.16, p < 0.001). Skipping meals was associated with negative mental health outcomes for both genders particularly the married (married male: PR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.22-1.83, p < 0.001; married female: PR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.26-1.60, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: We observed significant gender differences in the prevalence of depressive symptoms and anxiety disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic, underscoring the importance of socio-economic factors and health services access in shaping mental health outcomes. Interventions targeting pandemic-related mental health issues should be gender-sensitive and address economic vulnerabilities such as job losses and food insecurity. Policies to mitigate these effects, especially for at-risk groups are crucial for reducing mental health burden in future crises.
背景:COVID-19 大流行对社会经济和健康(包括心理健康)造成了破坏性影响。本研究探讨了在 COVID-19 危机期间,内罗毕、基苏木和基利菲县非正规定居点中肯尼亚成年人的性别与心理健康结果之间的交叉性。这对再次发生大流行病时的心理健康应对措施很有必要:我们分析了 2020 年 7 月(第四轮)至 2021 年 2 月(第五轮)期间纵向调查收集的数据。这些数据涵盖了 COVID-19 对失业、粮食不安全、医疗服务获取和心理健康的相关影响。参与者是从人口委员会现有队列中随机抽样的。关注的结果是抑郁症和焦虑症,两者合并为一个二元复合结果变量。描述性统计包括连续变量的平均值以及分类变量的频率和比例。采用卡方检验来检验组间差异。使用修正的泊松回归法检验了 COVID-19 社会经济效应的性别差异与参与者心理健康之间的关系:共有 4,050 名参与者接受了访谈,其中 66% 为女性,年龄中位数为 38 岁[四分位数间距(IQR):29-46]。在多个交叉点上,完全丧失收入与负面心理健康结果密切相关,且相关程度各不相同。老年女性(≥50 岁)的相关性更大(PR = 1.33,95% CI = 1.17-1.51,p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p 结论:我们观察到,在 COVID-19 大流行期间,抑郁症状和焦虑症的患病率存在明显的性别差异,这突出表明了社会经济因素和医疗服务的获取在影响心理健康结果方面的重要性。针对与大流行病相关的心理健康问题的干预措施应该对性别问题有敏感认识,并解决经济脆弱性问题,如失业和粮食不安全。减轻这些影响的政策,尤其是针对高危群体的政策,对于减轻未来危机中的心理健康负担至关重要。
{"title":"Gendered socio-economic and mental health effects of the COVID-19 pandemic among adults living in selected informal settlements in Kenya: an intersectional analysis.","authors":"Daniel M Mwanga, Henry Owoko Odero, Damazo T Kadengye, Sally Atieno Odunga, Eva Muluve, Bylhah Mugotitsa, Ruth Nanjekho Wafubwa, Karen Austrian, Sylvia Kiwuwa-Muyingo","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2024.1469091","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1469091","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>COVID-19 pandemic had devastating socio-economic and health effects, including mental health. This study examines the intersectionality between gender and mental health outcomes among Kenyan adults in informal settlements of Nairobi, Kisumu, and Kilifi Counties during the COVID-19 crisis. This is necessary to inform mental health response in case of another pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data collected in a longitudinal survey between July 2020 (fourth round) and February 2021 (fifth round). The data covered COVID-19-related effects on job loss, food insecurity, access to health services, and mental health. Participants were randomly sampled from existing cohorts at the Population Council. The outcomes of interest were depressive and anxiety disorders, combined into a binary composite outcome variable. Descriptive statistics included means for continuous variables and frequencies and proportions for categorical variables. Chi-square tests were used to examine the differences between groups. The relationship between the gendered COVID-19 socio-economic effects and participants' mental health was examined using modified Poisson regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4,050 participants were interviewed, 66% female and median age 38 [interquartile range (IQR): 29-46]. Complete income loss was strongly associated with negative mental health outcomes in multiple intersections with varied magnitudes. The association was larger among older females (≥50 years) (PR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.17-1.51, <i>p</i> < 0.001) than older males (PR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.17-1.27, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Partial loss of income was protective against negative mental health outcomes among young males (18-29 years) (PR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.76-0.87, <i>p</i> < 0.001) but linked to negative outcomes among middle-aged males (30-49 years old) (PR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.12-1.16, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Skipping meals was associated with negative mental health outcomes for both genders particularly the married (married male: PR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.22-1.83, <i>p</i> < 0.001; married female: PR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.26-1.60, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We observed significant gender differences in the prevalence of depressive symptoms and anxiety disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic, underscoring the importance of socio-economic factors and health services access in shaping mental health outcomes. Interventions targeting pandemic-related mental health issues should be gender-sensitive and address economic vulnerabilities such as job losses and food insecurity. Policies to mitigate these effects, especially for at-risk groups are crucial for reducing mental health burden in future crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"1469091"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11554471/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142617407","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-29eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1450167
Xiaotong Wang, Pei Hu, Yating Ai, Shi Zhou, Yucan Li, Pengjun Zhou, Gao Chen, Yuncui Wang, Hui Hu
Background: As individuals age, they commonly experience reduced physical activity and cognitive decline. While evidence, there is limited trajectory research on their concurrent progression and interrelation in individuals over 55 years old.
Methods: The data was collected from 5,765 individuals aged over 55 years who participated in the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) between 2011 and 2020. Physical activity was measured by IPAQ, cognitive function by episodic memory, and mental intactness score. Separate sets of group-based trajectory models were fitted to identify physical activity trajectories and cognitive function trajectories. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the association between baseline characteristics and each set of trajectories. Group-based dual trajectory modeling (GBDTM) was applied to quantify these associations.
Results: GBDTM identified three distinct trajectory groups for physical activity and cognitive outcomes. The physical activity trajectories were classified as "Persistently low physical activity" (74.2%), "Decreasing physical activity" (13.7%), and "Rising physical activity" (12.1%). Similarly, cognitive function trajectories were categorized as "Persistently low cognitive function" (22.2%), "Persistently moderate cognitive function" (37.9%), and "Persistently high cognitive function" (39.9%). Notably, 15.6% of participants followed the trajectories of "Persistently low physical activity" and "Persistently low cognitive function." The presence of a severe decline in physical activity was associated with an increased likelihood of poor cognitive function and vice versa. Age, sex, education, residential status, BMI, and visual impairment were identified as significant predictors for physical activity and cognitive decline.
Conclusion: This study found that the GBDTM can determine the consistent trajectories of physical activity and cognitive function trajectories that persistently decline in individuals over 55 years. Analyses of predictive factors can be instrumental in promoting physical activity and delaying cognitive decline.
{"title":"Dual group-based trajectories of physical activity and cognitive function in aged over 55: a nationally representative cohort study.","authors":"Xiaotong Wang, Pei Hu, Yating Ai, Shi Zhou, Yucan Li, Pengjun Zhou, Gao Chen, Yuncui Wang, Hui Hu","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2024.1450167","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1450167","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As individuals age, they commonly experience reduced physical activity and cognitive decline. While evidence, there is limited trajectory research on their concurrent progression and interrelation in individuals over 55 years old.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data was collected from 5,765 individuals aged over 55 years who participated in the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) between 2011 and 2020. Physical activity was measured by IPAQ, cognitive function by episodic memory, and mental intactness score. Separate sets of group-based trajectory models were fitted to identify physical activity trajectories and cognitive function trajectories. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the association between baseline characteristics and each set of trajectories. Group-based dual trajectory modeling (GBDTM) was applied to quantify these associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GBDTM identified three distinct trajectory groups for physical activity and cognitive outcomes. The physical activity trajectories were classified as \"Persistently low physical activity\" (74.2%), \"Decreasing physical activity\" (13.7%), and \"Rising physical activity\" (12.1%). Similarly, cognitive function trajectories were categorized as \"Persistently low cognitive function\" (22.2%), \"Persistently moderate cognitive function\" (37.9%), and \"Persistently high cognitive function\" (39.9%). Notably, 15.6% of participants followed the trajectories of \"Persistently low physical activity\" and \"Persistently low cognitive function.\" The presence of a severe decline in physical activity was associated with an increased likelihood of poor cognitive function and vice versa. Age, sex, education, residential status, BMI, and visual impairment were identified as significant predictors for physical activity and cognitive decline.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found that the GBDTM can determine the consistent trajectories of physical activity and cognitive function trajectories that persistently decline in individuals over 55 years. Analyses of predictive factors can be instrumental in promoting physical activity and delaying cognitive decline.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"1450167"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11554534/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142618418","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-29eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1481537
Nicole Bijlsma, Russell Conduit, Gerard Kennedy, Marc Cohen
The most common source of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Field (RF-EMF) exposures during sleep includes digital devices, yet there are no studies investigating the impact of multi-night exposure to electromagnetic fields emitted from a baby monitor on sleep under real-world conditions in healthy adults. Given the rise in the number of people reporting to be sensitive to manmade electromagnetic fields, the ubiquitous use of Wi-Fi enabled digital devices and the lack of real-world data, we investigated the effect of 2.45 GHz radiofrequency exposure during sleep on subjective sleep quality, and objective sleep measures, heart rate variability and actigraphy in healthy adults. This pilot study was a 4-week randomised, double-blind, crossover trial of 12 healthy adults. After a one-week run-in period, participants were randomised to exposure from either an active or inactive (sham) baby monitor for 7 nights and then crossed over to the alternate intervention after a one-week washout period. Subjective and objective assessments of sleep included the Pittsburgh Insomnia Rating Scale (PIRS-20), electroencephalography (EEG), actigraphy and heart rate variability (HRV) derived from electrocardiogram. Sleep quality was reduced significantly (p < 0.05) and clinically meaningful during RF-EMF exposure compared to sham-exposure as indicated by the PIRS-20 scores. Furthermore, at higher frequencies (gamma, beta and theta bands), EEG power density significantly increased during the Non-Rapid Eye Movement sleep (p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences in HRV or actigraphy were detected. Our findings suggest that exposure to a 2.45 GHz radiofrequency device (baby monitor) may impact sleep in some people under real-world conditions however further large-scale real-world investigations with specified dosimetry are required to confirm these findings.
{"title":"Does radiofrequency radiation impact sleep? A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover pilot study.","authors":"Nicole Bijlsma, Russell Conduit, Gerard Kennedy, Marc Cohen","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2024.1481537","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1481537","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The most common source of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Field (RF-EMF) exposures during sleep includes digital devices, yet there are no studies investigating the impact of multi-night exposure to electromagnetic fields emitted from a baby monitor on sleep under real-world conditions in healthy adults. Given the rise in the number of people reporting to be sensitive to manmade electromagnetic fields, the ubiquitous use of Wi-Fi enabled digital devices and the lack of real-world data, we investigated the effect of 2.45 GHz radiofrequency exposure during sleep on subjective sleep quality, and objective sleep measures, heart rate variability and actigraphy in healthy adults. This pilot study was a 4-week randomised, double-blind, crossover trial of 12 healthy adults. After a one-week run-in period, participants were randomised to exposure from either an active or inactive (sham) baby monitor for 7 nights and then crossed over to the alternate intervention after a one-week washout period. Subjective and objective assessments of sleep included the Pittsburgh Insomnia Rating Scale (PIRS-20), electroencephalography (EEG), actigraphy and heart rate variability (HRV) derived from electrocardiogram. Sleep quality was reduced significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and clinically meaningful during RF-EMF exposure compared to sham-exposure as indicated by the PIRS-20 scores. Furthermore, at higher frequencies (gamma, beta and theta bands), EEG power density significantly increased during the Non-Rapid Eye Movement sleep (<i>p</i> < 0.05). No statistically significant differences in HRV or actigraphy were detected. Our findings suggest that exposure to a 2.45 GHz radiofrequency device (baby monitor) may impact sleep in some people under real-world conditions however further large-scale real-world investigations with specified dosimetry are required to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"1481537"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11554657/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142618417","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: This study used data from the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) database to systematically assess the magnitude of drug use disorders (DUD) burden between 1990 and 2021.
Methods: This study used GBD data to analyze the trends in ASIR, DALYs and other DUD indicators from 1990 to 2021, and compared them among different regions and countries. The Estimated Annual Percentage Change (EAPC) and its 95% Confidence Interval (CI) were calculated to assess the temporal and geographical disparities. ASIR and DALYs were used to evaluate the burden of DUDs, and socio-demographic index (SDI) was used to measure the socio-economic development level of each country.
Results: The global ASIR of DUDs showed a slight downward trend (EAPC = -0.26). The age-standardized DALY rate (per 100,000) significantly declined from 1990 to 2021 (EAPC = -1.44). Among the regions, the high SDI region exhibited the most substantial increase in ASIR (EAPC = 0.65). On a regional level, the high-income North America region had the highest EAPC for both age-standardized DALYs and ASIR (EAPC = 4.82, 1.02, respectively). Nationally, the United States of America reported the largest increase in age-standardized DALY rates and EAPC for ASIR (EAPC of 4.88, 1.05, respectively), while South Africa had the most significant decrease in EAPC (EAPC of -3.62, -1.52, respectively). In 2021, the highest ASIR was observed in high-income North America at 520.07; Central Asia had the highest age-standardized DALY rate. Globally, age-standardized DALYs and ASIR for DUDs were generally higher in men than in women, and the burden of DUDs decreased with age.
Conclusion: The global burden of DUDs has shown complex and changing trends over the last decades, with large differences in burden between regions and countries. This highlights the need for targeted public health policies and interventions in High income North America region and Eastern Europe.
{"title":"Global burden of drug use disorders by region and country, 1990-2021.","authors":"Shuyan Zhang, Xiaoying Qi, Yingying Wang, Keyuan Fang","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2024.1470809","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1470809","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study used data from the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) database to systematically assess the magnitude of drug use disorders (DUD) burden between 1990 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used GBD data to analyze the trends in ASIR, DALYs and other DUD indicators from 1990 to 2021, and compared them among different regions and countries. The Estimated Annual Percentage Change (EAPC) and its 95% Confidence Interval (CI) were calculated to assess the temporal and geographical disparities. ASIR and DALYs were used to evaluate the burden of DUDs, and socio-demographic index (SDI) was used to measure the socio-economic development level of each country.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The global ASIR of DUDs showed a slight downward trend (EAPC = -0.26). The age-standardized DALY rate (per 100,000) significantly declined from 1990 to 2021 (EAPC = -1.44). Among the regions, the high SDI region exhibited the most substantial increase in ASIR (EAPC = 0.65). On a regional level, the high-income North America region had the highest EAPC for both age-standardized DALYs and ASIR (EAPC = 4.82, 1.02, respectively). Nationally, the United States of America reported the largest increase in age-standardized DALY rates and EAPC for ASIR (EAPC of 4.88, 1.05, respectively), while South Africa had the most significant decrease in EAPC (EAPC of -3.62, -1.52, respectively). In 2021, the highest ASIR was observed in high-income North America at 520.07; Central Asia had the highest age-standardized DALY rate. Globally, age-standardized DALYs and ASIR for DUDs were generally higher in men than in women, and the burden of DUDs decreased with age.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The global burden of DUDs has shown complex and changing trends over the last decades, with large differences in burden between regions and countries. This highlights the need for targeted public health policies and interventions in High income North America region and Eastern Europe.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"1470809"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11554507/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142617434","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-29eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1443862
Ísis de Siqueira Silva, Cícera Renata Diniz Vieira Silva, Claudia Santos Martiniano, Aguinaldo José de Araújo, Renan Cabral de Figueirêdo, Luís Velez Lapão, Renan Cipriano Moioli, Ewerton William Gomes Brito, Severina Alice da Costa Uchôa
<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The implementation of technologies in Primary Health Care with monitoring and evaluation of the quality of health care is fundamental to direct the access and quality of health care in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals. Our objective was to develop a model for evaluating digital health interventions in primary care, considering its impact on first contact, longitudinality, integrality and coordination in health.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This is an exploratory methodological study of a qualitative nature. This study seeks to explore strategic actors' perceptions of an evaluation model, and was developed in a process between June 2021 and March 2024. The following stages were followed: Identification of previous models available in the literature, model development, model validation, model update. We performed a nominal group consensus technique online with seven experts. Stages taken to define the design of the model: sending the elaborated model, together with an electronic form with 18 subjective questions, such as brainstorming strategy, for recording impressions, judgment of agreement and suggestions; workshop for discussion by videoconference, at the time the objectives and the model diagram were presented, followed by debate with clarification of doubts and suggestions for clarification of the step-by-step design. After incorporating the suggestions, the model agreed upon in the workshop was subjected to another analysis by the same experts, sent in an online Google document, in which possible inconsistencies between the proposed model and the agreed one were verified, as well as the final agreement on the recommended proposal. At the end of this stage, with synchronous and asynchronous remote procedures, consensus was reached.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proposed evaluation model presents as primary categories, structure, process and result. The structure encompasses four indicators, namely, employees; financial resources; infrastructure resources; and regulatory and strategic resources. The process is organized into three dimensions, namely: technical dimension, organizational dimension and relational dimension. The results will be evaluated in products; intermediate results; and impacts (short, medium and long term). The results will be measured by the seven pillars of quality: efficacy, effectiveness, efficiency, optimization, acceptability, legitimacy, equity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study achieved the goal of developing a model to evaluate digital health interventions in Primary Health Care, helping to identify adequate and useful evaluation methods filling the gap of the lack of quality evaluation standards in the brazilian Digital Health Strategy. It presents an important difference in relation to models from different countries, as it considers the impacts on Primary Health Care quality attributes such as first contact care, longitudinality, integral
{"title":"Digital health and quality of care in Primary Health Care: an evaluation model.","authors":"Ísis de Siqueira Silva, Cícera Renata Diniz Vieira Silva, Claudia Santos Martiniano, Aguinaldo José de Araújo, Renan Cabral de Figueirêdo, Luís Velez Lapão, Renan Cipriano Moioli, Ewerton William Gomes Brito, Severina Alice da Costa Uchôa","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2024.1443862","DOIUrl":"10.3389/fpubh.2024.1443862","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The implementation of technologies in Primary Health Care with monitoring and evaluation of the quality of health care is fundamental to direct the access and quality of health care in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals. Our objective was to develop a model for evaluating digital health interventions in primary care, considering its impact on first contact, longitudinality, integrality and coordination in health.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This is an exploratory methodological study of a qualitative nature. This study seeks to explore strategic actors' perceptions of an evaluation model, and was developed in a process between June 2021 and March 2024. The following stages were followed: Identification of previous models available in the literature, model development, model validation, model update. We performed a nominal group consensus technique online with seven experts. Stages taken to define the design of the model: sending the elaborated model, together with an electronic form with 18 subjective questions, such as brainstorming strategy, for recording impressions, judgment of agreement and suggestions; workshop for discussion by videoconference, at the time the objectives and the model diagram were presented, followed by debate with clarification of doubts and suggestions for clarification of the step-by-step design. After incorporating the suggestions, the model agreed upon in the workshop was subjected to another analysis by the same experts, sent in an online Google document, in which possible inconsistencies between the proposed model and the agreed one were verified, as well as the final agreement on the recommended proposal. At the end of this stage, with synchronous and asynchronous remote procedures, consensus was reached.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proposed evaluation model presents as primary categories, structure, process and result. The structure encompasses four indicators, namely, employees; financial resources; infrastructure resources; and regulatory and strategic resources. The process is organized into three dimensions, namely: technical dimension, organizational dimension and relational dimension. The results will be evaluated in products; intermediate results; and impacts (short, medium and long term). The results will be measured by the seven pillars of quality: efficacy, effectiveness, efficiency, optimization, acceptability, legitimacy, equity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study achieved the goal of developing a model to evaluate digital health interventions in Primary Health Care, helping to identify adequate and useful evaluation methods filling the gap of the lack of quality evaluation standards in the brazilian Digital Health Strategy. It presents an important difference in relation to models from different countries, as it considers the impacts on Primary Health Care quality attributes such as first contact care, longitudinality, integral","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"1443862"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11580794/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142686725","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Studies have shown that the co-infection of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) poses a major threat to the public health due to their combined negative impacts on health and increased risk of complications. Even though, some scholars formulated and analyzed the HBV and HIV co-infection model they did not consider the compartment that contains protected individuals against both HBV and HIV infections. They incorporated the optimal control theory and cost-effectiveness analysis simultaneously. With this in mind, we are motivated to formulate and analyze the HBV and HIV co-infection model, considering the protected group and incorporating optimal control theory and cost-effectiveness. In this study, we have theoretically computed all of the models disease-free equilibrium points, all the models effective reproduction numbers and unique endemic equilibrium points. The two sub-models disease-free equilibrium points are locally as well as globally asymptotically stable whenever their associated effective reproduction numbers are less than one. We reformulated the optimal control problem by incorporating five time-dependent control measures and conducted its theoretical analysis by utilizing the Pontryagin's maximum principle. Using the fourth order Runge-Kutta numerical method and MATLAB ODE45, we performed the numerical simulations with various combinations of control efforts to verify the theoretical results and investigate the impacts of the suggested protection and treatment control strategies for both the HBV and HIV diseases. Also, we carried out a cost-effectiveness analysis of the proposed control strategies. Eventually, we compared our model results with other researcher similar model results whenever cost-effectiveness analysis is not carried out the findings of this particular study suggest that implementing each of the proposed control strategies simultaneously has a high potential to reduce and control the spread of HBV and HIV co-infections in the community. According to the cost-effectiveness analysis, implementing the HBV treatment and the HIV and HBV co-infection treatment measures has a high potential effect on reducing and controlling the HBV and HIV co-infection transmission problem in the community.
研究表明,人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)和乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)的合并感染对公众健康构成了重大威胁,因为它们会对健康产生负面影响,并增加并发症的风险。尽管一些学者制定并分析了 HBV 和 HIV 合并感染模型,但他们并没有考虑到包含受保护个体的区块,以防止 HBV 和 HIV 感染。他们同时纳入了最优控制理论和成本效益分析。有鉴于此,我们有动力制定和分析 HBV 和 HIV 合并感染模型,考虑受保护群体,并纳入最优控制理论和成本效益。在本研究中,我们从理论上计算了所有模型的无病平衡点、所有模型的有效繁殖数和唯一的流行平衡点。只要相关的有效繁殖数小于 1,两个子模型的无病平衡点都是局部和全局渐近稳定的。我们结合五种随时间变化的控制措施重新提出了最优控制问题,并利用庞特里亚金最大原则进行了理论分析。利用四阶 Runge-Kutta 数值方法和 MATLAB ODE45,我们对各种控制措施组合进行了数值模拟,以验证理论结果,并研究了所建议的保护和治疗控制策略对 HBV 和 HIV 疾病的影响。此外,我们还对建议的控制策略进行了成本效益分析。最后,我们将我们的模型结果与其他研究者的类似模型结果进行了比较,只要不进行成本效益分析。根据成本效益分析,实施 HBV 治疗以及 HIV 和 HBV 合并感染治疗措施对减少和控制 HBV 和 HIV 合并感染在社区的传播问题具有很高的潜在效果。
{"title":"A dynamical optimal control theory and cost-effectiveness analyses of the HBV and HIV/AIDS co-infection model.","authors":"Shewafera Wondimagegnhu Teklu, Abushet Hayalu Workie","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2024.1444911","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1444911","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies have shown that the co-infection of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) poses a major threat to the public health due to their combined negative impacts on health and increased risk of complications. Even though, some scholars formulated and analyzed the HBV and HIV co-infection model they did not consider the compartment that contains protected individuals against both HBV and HIV infections. They incorporated the optimal control theory and cost-effectiveness analysis simultaneously. With this in mind, we are motivated to formulate and analyze the HBV and HIV co-infection model, considering the protected group and incorporating optimal control theory and cost-effectiveness. In this study, we have theoretically computed all of the models disease-free equilibrium points, all the models effective reproduction numbers and unique endemic equilibrium points. The two sub-models disease-free equilibrium points are locally as well as globally asymptotically stable whenever their associated effective reproduction numbers are less than one. We reformulated the optimal control problem by incorporating five time-dependent control measures and conducted its theoretical analysis by utilizing the Pontryagin's maximum principle. Using the fourth order Runge-Kutta numerical method and MATLAB ODE45, we performed the numerical simulations with various combinations of control efforts to verify the theoretical results and investigate the impacts of the suggested protection and treatment control strategies for both the HBV and HIV diseases. Also, we carried out a cost-effectiveness analysis of the proposed control strategies. Eventually, we compared our model results with other researcher similar model results whenever cost-effectiveness analysis is not carried out the findings of this particular study suggest that implementing each of the proposed control strategies simultaneously has a high potential to reduce and control the spread of HBV and HIV co-infections in the community. According to the cost-effectiveness analysis, implementing the HBV treatment and the HIV and HBV co-infection treatment measures has a high potential effect on reducing and controlling the HBV and HIV co-infection transmission problem in the community.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"1444911"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11554508/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142618396","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-29eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1469203
Matthias Hans Belau
Background: Adverse socioeconomic conditions at the individual and regional levels are associated with an increased risk of mortality. However, few studies have examined this relationship using multilevel analysis and, if so, only within a single country. This study aimed to examine this relationship using data from several European countries.
Methods: Individual-level data were obtained from Waves 5 to 9 of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe, while regional-level data were obtained from the Luxembourg Income Study Database. Cox regression analysis with gamma-shared frailty and a random intercept for country of residence was used to examine the association between individual mortality from all causes, cancer, heart attack, and stroke and measures of socioeconomic deprivation at the individual level, including material and social deprivation indices, and at the area level, including the Gini index.
Results: The risk of mortality from all causes was increased for respondents with material deprivation (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.77, 95% CI = [1.60, 1.96]) and social deprivation (HR = 7.63, 95% CI = [6.42, 9.07]) compared with those without. A similar association was observed between individual deprivation and the risk of mortality from cancer, heart attack, or stroke. Regional deprivation had a modest contextual effect on the individual risk of death from all causes and cancer. However, when individual-level deprivation was included in the models, no contextual effects were found.
Conclusion: The results indicate that individual socioeconomic conditions significantly predict causes of death in older European adults, with those with material deprivation and social deprivation having a higher risk of death from all causes, including cancer, heart attack, and stroke, while the Gini index has a minimal effect, although the Gini index reflects regional disparities across Europe.
背景:个人和地区层面的不利社会经济条件与死亡风险增加有关。然而,很少有研究采用多层次分析来研究这种关系,即使有,也只是在一个国家内进行。本研究旨在利用几个欧洲国家的数据研究这种关系:个人层面的数据来自欧洲健康、老龄和退休调查的第 5 至第 9 波,地区层面的数据来自卢森堡收入研究数据库。采用伽马分担虚弱和居住国随机截距的考克斯回归分析,研究了个人因各种原因、癌症、心脏病发作和中风导致的死亡率与个人层面(包括物质和社会剥夺指数)和地区层面(包括基尼指数)的社会经济剥夺措施之间的关系:与物质匮乏(危险比 (HR) = 1.77,95% CI = [1.60,1.96])和社会匮乏(HR = 7.63,95% CI = [6.42,9.07])的受访者相比,非物质匮乏的受访者因各种原因死亡的风险增加。在个人贫困与癌症、心脏病或中风死亡风险之间也发现了类似的关联。地区贫困对个人死于各种原因和癌症的风险影响不大。然而,如果将个人层面的贫困因素纳入模型,则未发现任何背景影响:结果表明,个人的社会经济条件可显著预测欧洲老年人的死因,物质匮乏和社会匮乏的老年人死于癌症、心脏病和中风等所有死因的风险较高,而基尼系数的影响很小,尽管基尼系数反映了欧洲各地的地区差异。
{"title":"Material and social deprivation associated with public health actual causes of death among older people in Europe: longitudinal and multilevel results from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).","authors":"Matthias Hans Belau","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2024.1469203","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1469203","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adverse socioeconomic conditions at the individual and regional levels are associated with an increased risk of mortality. However, few studies have examined this relationship using multilevel analysis and, if so, only within a single country. This study aimed to examine this relationship using data from several European countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individual-level data were obtained from Waves 5 to 9 of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe, while regional-level data were obtained from the Luxembourg Income Study Database. Cox regression analysis with gamma-shared frailty and a random intercept for country of residence was used to examine the association between individual mortality from all causes, cancer, heart attack, and stroke and measures of socioeconomic deprivation at the individual level, including material and social deprivation indices, and at the area level, including the Gini index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The risk of mortality from all causes was increased for respondents with material deprivation (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.77, 95% CI = [1.60, 1.96]) and social deprivation (HR = 7.63, 95% CI = [6.42, 9.07]) compared with those without. A similar association was observed between individual deprivation and the risk of mortality from cancer, heart attack, or stroke. Regional deprivation had a modest contextual effect on the individual risk of death from all causes and cancer. However, when individual-level deprivation was included in the models, no contextual effects were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results indicate that individual socioeconomic conditions significantly predict causes of death in older European adults, with those with material deprivation and social deprivation having a higher risk of death from all causes, including cancer, heart attack, and stroke, while the Gini index has a minimal effect, although the Gini index reflects regional disparities across Europe.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"1469203"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556392/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142618153","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}