Pub Date : 2025-01-06eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1494849
Shuanchi Wang, Jiabao Chen, Zhe Lu
Objective: To investigate the risk factors of low back pain after oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) in patients with low grade degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS).
Methods: This retrospective study included 116 patients with single-level low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis with low back pain who underwent OLIF surgery in our hospital from December 2017 to October 2020. Demographic, clinical, surgical, and radiological characteristics of this population were analyzed to determine the relationship between these characteristics and the degree of low back pain relief after OLIF.
Results: A total of 116 patients (average age 58.61 ± 7.01 years) were included in this study. Among them, 33 patients had poor improvement of low back pain after surgery, and 83 patients had satisfactory effect after surgery with obvious relief of low back pain. Postoperative disc height increase ≤2.5 mm (P = 0.000) was most correlated with poor improvement of low back pain symptoms after OLIF. The factors positively correlated with poor improvement of low back pain symptoms after OLIF in patients with low-grade degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis included the increase of spondylolisthesis grade (OR = 17.665; 95%CI: 3.262-95.678 P = 0.001), disc height increase ≤2.5 mm (OR = 34.377; 95%CI: 5.632-209.818 P = 0.000). The factors negatively correlated with poor improvement of low back pain symptoms after OLIF in patients with low-grade degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis included no osteoporosis (OR = 0.067; 95%CI: 0.013-0.350 P = 0.001), no cage subsidence (OR = 0.208; 95%CI: 0.048-0.903 P = 0.036), duration of preoperative low back pain symptoms ≤36 months (OR = 0.045; 95%CI: 0.007-0.277 P = 0.001).
Conclusions: OLIF can significantly improve the low back pain symptoms in patients with low-grade degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. High grade of spondylolisthesis before operation, duration of low back pain symptoms more than 36 months, osteoporosis, postoperative cage subsidence, and postoperative segmental disc height improvement less than 2.5 mm are risk factors for low back pain after operation.
目的:探讨低度退行性腰椎滑脱(DLS)患者行斜腰椎椎体间融合术(OLIF)后腰痛的危险因素。方法:回顾性研究2017年12月至2020年10月在我院行OLIF手术的116例单级别低度腰椎滑脱伴腰痛患者。分析该人群的人口学、临床、外科和放射学特征,以确定这些特征与OLIF后腰痛缓解程度之间的关系。结果:共纳入116例患者,平均年龄58.61±7.01岁。其中33例患者术后腰痛改善不佳,83例患者术后效果满意,腰痛明显缓解。术后椎间盘高度增加≤2.5 mm (P = 0.000)与OLIF术后腰痛症状改善不良最相关。轻度退行性腰椎滑脱患者行OLIF后腰痛症状改善不良的正相关因素包括:腰椎滑脱程度升高(OR = 17.665;95%CI: 3.262 ~ 95.678 P = 0.001),椎间盘高度增加≤2.5 mm (OR = 34.377;95%ci: 5.632-209.818 p = 0.000)。与低度退行性腰椎滑脱患者OLIF术后腰痛症状改善不良负相关的因素包括:无骨质疏松症(OR = 0.067;95%CI: 0.013-0.350 P = 0.001),无笼子下沉(OR = 0.208;95%CI: 0.048-0.903 P = 0.036),术前腰痛症状持续时间≤36个月(OR = 0.045;95%ci: 0.007-0.277 p = 0.001)。结论:OLIF可显著改善低度退行性腰椎滑脱患者腰痛症状。术前椎体滑脱程度高、腰痛症状持续时间超过36个月、骨质疏松、术后笼型下沉、术后节段椎间盘高度改善小于2.5 mm是发生术后腰痛的危险因素。
{"title":"Risk factors for low back pain after oblique lumbar interbody fusion in patients with low-grade degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a retrospective study.","authors":"Shuanchi Wang, Jiabao Chen, Zhe Lu","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1494849","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1494849","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the risk factors of low back pain after oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) in patients with low grade degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 116 patients with single-level low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis with low back pain who underwent OLIF surgery in our hospital from December 2017 to October 2020. Demographic, clinical, surgical, and radiological characteristics of this population were analyzed to determine the relationship between these characteristics and the degree of low back pain relief after OLIF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 116 patients (average age 58.61 ± 7.01 years) were included in this study. Among them, 33 patients had poor improvement of low back pain after surgery, and 83 patients had satisfactory effect after surgery with obvious relief of low back pain. Postoperative disc height increase ≤2.5 mm (<i>P</i> = 0.000) was most correlated with poor improvement of low back pain symptoms after OLIF. The factors positively correlated with poor improvement of low back pain symptoms after OLIF in patients with low-grade degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis included the increase of spondylolisthesis grade (OR = 17.665; 95%CI: 3.262-95.678 <i>P</i> = 0.001), disc height increase ≤2.5 mm (OR = 34.377; 95%CI: 5.632-209.818 <i>P</i> = 0.000). The factors negatively correlated with poor improvement of low back pain symptoms after OLIF in patients with low-grade degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis included no osteoporosis (OR = 0.067; 95%CI: 0.013-0.350 <i>P</i> = 0.001), no cage subsidence (OR = 0.208; 95%CI: 0.048-0.903 <i>P</i> = 0.036), duration of preoperative low back pain symptoms ≤36 months (OR = 0.045; 95%CI: 0.007-0.277 <i>P</i> = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>OLIF can significantly improve the low back pain symptoms in patients with low-grade degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. High grade of spondylolisthesis before operation, duration of low back pain symptoms more than 36 months, osteoporosis, postoperative cage subsidence, and postoperative segmental disc height improvement less than 2.5 mm are risk factors for low back pain after operation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"11 ","pages":"1494849"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11744013/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143003861","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objectives: To explore the experience of tumor control technique in robot-assisted laparoscopic bladder diverticulectomy (RALBD) in the treatment of bladder diverticulum tumor, intraoperative tumor control and postoperative comprehensive treatment.
Patients and methods: We treated three male patients with bladder diverticulum tumors. Case 1 involved a 63-year-old with a 3.0 cm tumor in the diverticulum on the right bladder wall. Case 2 involved a 70-year-old with a 1.0 cm cauliflower-like tumor in the diverticulum on the left bladder wall. Case 3 involved a 64-year-old with a 3.0 cm tumor in the diverticulum on the right bladder wall. Each patient underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic partial cystectomy (PC) with ureteral Double J (D-J) stent placement. To minimize the risk of intraoperative tumor spread, we implemented enhanced surgical techniques. Systemic chemotherapy and adjuvant intravesical chemotherapy were recommended to reduce the risk of tumor recurrence and metastasis.
Results: Postoperative pathology confirmed papillary urothelial carcinoma in all three cases. Each patient was followed up for over 20 months, with no evidence of recurrence or distant metastasis observed through cystoscopy and chest and abdominal CT scans.
Conclusion: For patients with urothelial carcinoma in a bladder diverticulum, robot-assisted laparoscopic bladder-sparing surgery is a viable option when appropriate cases are selected. Effective intraoperative tumor control and comprehensive postoperative treatment are crucial to minimizing recurrence and metastasis risks. The robotic approach offers enhanced precision and visualization compared to traditional open or laparoscopic techniques, potentially leading to improved outcomes regarding intraoperative tumor control and reduced postoperative complications. However, this study is limited by its small sample size of only three patients and short-term follow-up. A larger sample of patients is needed to confirm the advantages of the robotic approach.
{"title":"Case Report: Robot-assisted laparoscopic bladder diverticulectomy: a case series and initial experience.","authors":"Guangju Ge, Haihong Wang, Qiming Zheng, Shuai Zhang, Huan Wang, Liang Ma","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1453883","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1453883","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the experience of tumor control technique in robot-assisted laparoscopic bladder diverticulectomy (RALBD) in the treatment of bladder diverticulum tumor, intraoperative tumor control and postoperative comprehensive treatment.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We treated three male patients with bladder diverticulum tumors. Case 1 involved a 63-year-old with a 3.0 cm tumor in the diverticulum on the right bladder wall. Case 2 involved a 70-year-old with a 1.0 cm cauliflower-like tumor in the diverticulum on the left bladder wall. Case 3 involved a 64-year-old with a 3.0 cm tumor in the diverticulum on the right bladder wall. Each patient underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic partial cystectomy (PC) with ureteral Double J (D-J) stent placement. To minimize the risk of intraoperative tumor spread, we implemented enhanced surgical techniques. Systemic chemotherapy and adjuvant intravesical chemotherapy were recommended to reduce the risk of tumor recurrence and metastasis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative pathology confirmed papillary urothelial carcinoma in all three cases. Each patient was followed up for over 20 months, with no evidence of recurrence or distant metastasis observed through cystoscopy and chest and abdominal CT scans.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients with urothelial carcinoma in a bladder diverticulum, robot-assisted laparoscopic bladder-sparing surgery is a viable option when appropriate cases are selected. Effective intraoperative tumor control and comprehensive postoperative treatment are crucial to minimizing recurrence and metastasis risks. The robotic approach offers enhanced precision and visualization compared to traditional open or laparoscopic techniques, potentially leading to improved outcomes regarding intraoperative tumor control and reduced postoperative complications. However, this study is limited by its small sample size of only three patients and short-term follow-up. A larger sample of patients is needed to confirm the advantages of the robotic approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"11 ","pages":"1453883"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11743490/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143003937","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-06eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1519414
Selahaddin Aydemir, Ozgur Aydin, Mustafa Çeltik, Burak Duymaz, Mehmet Erduran
Retained drain fragments, though rare, can lead to significant complications in orthopedic surgery(1). This case report presents a 57-year-old woman who developed gluteal tendinopathy and Trendelenburg gait two years after a total hip arthroplasty (THA) due to a retained drain fragment. A less experienced surgeon encountered resistance during drain removal on the first postoperative day and applied excessive force, unknowingly leaving a fragment inside. The patient initially had no symptoms, but later presented with pain and gait disturbances. Radiographic evaluation revealed the retained drain, necessitating surgical removal and gluteus medius augmentation. The patient subsequently underwent a structured rehabilitation program. This case emphasizes the importance of careful drain management, proper postoperative evaluation, and collaborative patient-doctor decision-making to prevent such complications.
{"title":"Case Report: Trendelenburg gait caused by retained drain fragment: a rare complication of total hip arthroplasty.","authors":"Selahaddin Aydemir, Ozgur Aydin, Mustafa Çeltik, Burak Duymaz, Mehmet Erduran","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1519414","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1519414","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Retained drain fragments, though rare, can lead to significant complications in orthopedic surgery(1). This case report presents a 57-year-old woman who developed gluteal tendinopathy and Trendelenburg gait two years after a total hip arthroplasty (THA) due to a retained drain fragment. A less experienced surgeon encountered resistance during drain removal on the first postoperative day and applied excessive force, unknowingly leaving a fragment inside. The patient initially had no symptoms, but later presented with pain and gait disturbances. Radiographic evaluation revealed the retained drain, necessitating surgical removal and gluteus medius augmentation. The patient subsequently underwent a structured rehabilitation program. This case emphasizes the importance of careful drain management, proper postoperative evaluation, and collaborative patient-doctor decision-making to prevent such complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"11 ","pages":"1519414"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11743428/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143003938","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-06eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1359719
Michael F Levidy, Amanda Azer, Jasmine Shafei, Nivetha Srinivasan, Jasmine Mahajan, Shivani Gupta, George Abdelmalek, Krittika Pant, Kunj Jain, Yash Shah, Zheshi Zheng, Johnny Chuieng-Yi Lu, Tommy Nai-Jen Chang, Alice Chu, Aleksandra McGrath
Background: We analyzed trends in age at surgery and surgical approach over time and geography.
Methods: We performed a systematic review according to PRISMA-IPD guidelines to include individual patient data. Collected data included age at surgery, location of surgery, and surgical approach. The surgical approach was independently categorized as the exploration of the brachial plexus (EBP) or nerve transfer without root exploration (NTwoRE). EBP was defined as exploring the brachial plexus in the supraclavicular fossa and applying a choice of coaptation procedures. NTwoRE included those sourcing donor nerves from, or entirely occurring outside of the plexus without exploring the root of the brachial plexus.
Results: Regression analysis of age at surgery 1985-2020 showed that age at BPBI surgery is rising (p < 0.05). Surgery was performed at a younger age in patients from Europe (7.06 ± 7.77 months) and Asia (7.58 ± 5.33 months) than those from North America (10.44 ± 5.01 months) and South America (14.71 ± 4.53 months) (p < 0.05). NTwoRE was more common in North America (37%) and least common in Europe (12%). Age at EBP was 7.2 ± 5.77 months, and age at NTwoRE was 15.85 ± 13.18 months (p < 0.05). The incidence of NTwoRE is increasing time.
Conclusions: Age at NBPP surgery is increasing over time. Regional differences exist in age at NBPP surgery. Approaches to NBPP surgery that avoid exploration of BP roots are becoming more popular. Age at EBP is lower than age at NTwoRE.
背景:我们分析了手术年龄和手术入路随时间和地理的变化趋势。方法:我们根据PRISMA-IPD指南进行了系统评价,包括个体患者数据。收集的资料包括手术年龄、手术部位和手术入路。手术入路独立分为臂丛探查(EBP)或神经转移不探查(ntwear)。EBP被定义为探索锁骨上窝的臂丛,并应用选择的复位程序。ntwear包括那些供体神经来自臂丛或完全发生在臂丛外而不探索臂丛根的神经。结果:1985-2020年手术年龄回归分析显示,BPBI手术年龄呈上升趋势(p p p)。结论:NBPP手术年龄随时间的推移而增加。NBPP手术的年龄存在地区差异。避免探查BP根的NBPP手术方法正变得越来越流行。EBP的年龄低于ntwear的年龄。
{"title":"Global trends in surgical approach to neonatal brachial plexus palsy: a systematic review.","authors":"Michael F Levidy, Amanda Azer, Jasmine Shafei, Nivetha Srinivasan, Jasmine Mahajan, Shivani Gupta, George Abdelmalek, Krittika Pant, Kunj Jain, Yash Shah, Zheshi Zheng, Johnny Chuieng-Yi Lu, Tommy Nai-Jen Chang, Alice Chu, Aleksandra McGrath","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1359719","DOIUrl":"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1359719","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We analyzed trends in age at surgery and surgical approach over time and geography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review according to PRISMA-IPD guidelines to include individual patient data. Collected data included age at surgery, location of surgery, and surgical approach. The surgical approach was independently categorized as the exploration of the brachial plexus (EBP) or nerve transfer without root exploration (NTwoRE). EBP was defined as exploring the brachial plexus in the supraclavicular fossa and applying a choice of coaptation procedures. NTwoRE included those sourcing donor nerves from, or entirely occurring outside of the plexus without exploring the root of the brachial plexus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regression analysis of age at surgery 1985-2020 showed that age at BPBI surgery is rising (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Surgery was performed at a younger age in patients from Europe (7.06 ± 7.77 months) and Asia (7.58 ± 5.33 months) than those from North America (10.44 ± 5.01 months) and South America (14.71 ± 4.53 months) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). NTwoRE was more common in North America (37%) and least common in Europe (12%). Age at EBP was 7.2 ± 5.77 months, and age at NTwoRE was 15.85 ± 13.18 months (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The incidence of NTwoRE is increasing time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Age at NBPP surgery is increasing over time. Regional differences exist in age at NBPP surgery. Approaches to NBPP surgery that avoid exploration of BP roots are becoming more popular. Age at EBP is lower than age at NTwoRE.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"11 ","pages":"1359719"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11747984/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143003942","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-06eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1487979
Ye Zhang, Liaoyuan Zheng, Yongwei Huang, Zongping Li, Jing Feng
Background: Spinal cord vascular malformations (SCVMs) in children are relatively rare and present unique challenges due to their distinct physiological characteristics. These malformations often manifest with nonspecific clinical symptoms, increasing the likelihood of misdiagnosis. The treatment of pediatric SCVMs requires a tailored approach, with the choice between microsurgical intervention and endovascular embolization depending on the specific type of malformation and individual patient factors.
Case report: We report a case of a 6-year-old male who presented with a sudden onset of headache. Initial cranial imaging did not reveal any significant intracranial vascular malformations. However, thoracic spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) identified an abnormal signal, and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) confirmed the diagnosis of SCVMs. The patient underwent microsurgical treatment and was discharged in good health. Follow-up DSA confirmed the complete resolution of the vascular malformations.
Conclusion: This case, along with a review of the literature, underscores the importance of thorough spinal evaluations in pediatric patients with spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage, especially when intracranial vascular malformations are not identified. A high index of suspicion for SCVMs is crucial. Early and accurate diagnosis, followed by appropriate treatment through microsurgical resection or endovascular embolization, can significantly improve therapeutic outcomes in children with SCVMs.
{"title":"Subarachnoid hemorrhage triggered by spinal cord vascular malformation in a pediatric patient: case report and review of literature.","authors":"Ye Zhang, Liaoyuan Zheng, Yongwei Huang, Zongping Li, Jing Feng","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1487979","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1487979","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spinal cord vascular malformations (SCVMs) in children are relatively rare and present unique challenges due to their distinct physiological characteristics. These malformations often manifest with nonspecific clinical symptoms, increasing the likelihood of misdiagnosis. The treatment of pediatric SCVMs requires a tailored approach, with the choice between microsurgical intervention and endovascular embolization depending on the specific type of malformation and individual patient factors.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>We report a case of a 6-year-old male who presented with a sudden onset of headache. Initial cranial imaging did not reveal any significant intracranial vascular malformations. However, thoracic spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) identified an abnormal signal, and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) confirmed the diagnosis of SCVMs. The patient underwent microsurgical treatment and was discharged in good health. Follow-up DSA confirmed the complete resolution of the vascular malformations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This case, along with a review of the literature, underscores the importance of thorough spinal evaluations in pediatric patients with spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage, especially when intracranial vascular malformations are not identified. A high index of suspicion for SCVMs is crucial. Early and accurate diagnosis, followed by appropriate treatment through microsurgical resection or endovascular embolization, can significantly improve therapeutic outcomes in children with SCVMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"11 ","pages":"1487979"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11743362/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143003862","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The primary objective of this study was to estimate the effective cerebral perfusion pressure (CPPe), critical closing pressure (CrCP), and resistance-area product (RAP) of the intravascular common carotid artery using three different methods. These estimates were then compared to the reference method of linear regression (LR).
Methods: In our previous study, we employed linear regression to evaluate the values of CrCP and RAP. To assess the consistency of results obtained from alternative assessment methods (CPPe, CrCP, and RAP) with the linear regression LR, we conducted a secondary analysis of the previously collected data. We estimated the CPPe, CrCP, and RAP of the intravascular common carotid artery using three different methods: Belford's method (mean/diastolic pressure), Czosnyka's method (systolic/diastolic pressure, CZO), and Schmidt's method (systolic/diastolic pressure, SCH), and compared these estimates with LR. CPPe is calculated as the difference between mean arterial pressure and CrCP. The primary outcome was the mean differences and biases between CPPe, CrCP, and RAP of intravascular common carotid artery, the secondary outcome was correlations and agreement among these various estimates of CPPe measurements.
Results: Nineteen patients were included in this analysis. The median age was 53.5 ± 11.6 years, with 73.7% being men. There were no significant differences in CPPe, RAP and CrCP between the right common carotid artery (RCCA) and the left common carotid artery (LCCA) by using three different methods. Compared to the LR, the mean differences in CPPe and CrCP values were no significant for LCCA according to SCH, CZO and BEL method. But for RAP, the three methods are different in terms of mean differences compared with the LR. CPPe and CrCP revealed a small mean bias compared CPPCZO with CPPLR. Comparing CPPLR measurements with CPPBEL, the mean bias was higher with wider LoA. BEL and CZO showed a strong correlation with LR in Pearson correlation coefficients.
Conclusion: The CPPe, CrCP, and RAP values obtained using the CZO calculation methods are comparable to those measured using the reference method. These findings may provide valuable insights for patients undergoing digital subtraction brain angiography, aiding in the determination of the most suitable approach for individualized blood pressure management.
{"title":"The method described by Czosnyka is particularly suitable for measuring CPPe in patients undergoing cerebral angiography.","authors":"Yunyun Liang, Pei Mo, Yonghong Chen, Xinwu Liu, Lin Chen, Xiaomin Zhou, Zijing Wang, Junyi Fu, Longchang Xie","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1488265","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1488265","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The primary objective of this study was to estimate the effective cerebral perfusion pressure (CPPe), critical closing pressure (CrCP), and resistance-area product (RAP) of the intravascular common carotid artery using three different methods. These estimates were then compared to the reference method of linear regression (LR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In our previous study, we employed linear regression to evaluate the values of CrCP and RAP. To assess the consistency of results obtained from alternative assessment methods (CPPe, CrCP, and RAP) with the linear regression LR, we conducted a secondary analysis of the previously collected data. We estimated the CPPe, CrCP, and RAP of the intravascular common carotid artery using three different methods: Belford's method (mean/diastolic pressure), Czosnyka's method (systolic/diastolic pressure, CZO), and Schmidt's method (systolic/diastolic pressure, SCH), and compared these estimates with LR. CPPe is calculated as the difference between mean arterial pressure and CrCP. The primary outcome was the mean differences and biases between CPPe, CrCP, and RAP of intravascular common carotid artery, the secondary outcome was correlations and agreement among these various estimates of CPPe measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen patients were included in this analysis. The median age was 53.5 ± 11.6 years, with 73.7% being men. There were no significant differences in CPPe, RAP and CrCP between the right common carotid artery (RCCA) and the left common carotid artery (LCCA) by using three different methods. Compared to the LR, the mean differences in CPPe and CrCP values were no significant for LCCA according to SCH, CZO and BEL method. But for RAP, the three methods are different in terms of mean differences compared with the LR. CPPe and CrCP revealed a small mean bias compared CPP<sub>CZO</sub> with CPP<sub>LR</sub>. Comparing CPPLR measurements with CPPBEL, the mean bias was higher with wider LoA. BEL and CZO showed a strong correlation with LR in Pearson correlation coefficients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CPPe, CrCP, and RAP values obtained using the CZO calculation methods are comparable to those measured using the reference method. These findings may provide valuable insights for patients undergoing digital subtraction brain angiography, aiding in the determination of the most suitable approach for individualized blood pressure management.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"11 ","pages":"1488265"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11743654/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143003873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-06eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1494382
Ahmet Cihangir Emral, Merter Gülen, Bahadır Ege
Objective: The aim of this study is to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy of laser ablation and crystallized phenol application in the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease, focusing on treatment success, recurrence rates, complications, and the patients' return to normal life.
Material and method: Data from patients treated for pilonidal sinus disease with laser ablation and crystallized phenol application at our clinic between January 2020 and September 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative data including pit counts, disease stage, preoperative pilonidal abscess history, disease duration (week), treatment success, recurrence/persistent disease, postoperative complications, healing time (days), and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores on postoperative days 1 and 7, as well as return to normal life (days), were analyzed.
Results: A total of 121 patients were included in the study, with 51 receiving laser ablation and 70 receiving crystallized phenol application. The postoperative outcomes revealed that the wound healing period and postoperative VAS values were statistically significantly better in the laser ablation group.
Conclusion: Wound healing was faster and postoperative pain was less in the laser group compared to the phenol group. According to this study, both methods can successfully treat the disease in selected cases.
{"title":"Evaluating efficacy and outcomes: comparison of laser treatment and crystallized phenol in pilonidal sinus disease.","authors":"Ahmet Cihangir Emral, Merter Gülen, Bahadır Ege","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1494382","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1494382","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy of laser ablation and crystallized phenol application in the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease, focusing on treatment success, recurrence rates, complications, and the patients' return to normal life.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>Data from patients treated for pilonidal sinus disease with laser ablation and crystallized phenol application at our clinic between January 2020 and September 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative data including pit counts, disease stage, preoperative pilonidal abscess history, disease duration (week), treatment success, recurrence/persistent disease, postoperative complications, healing time (days), and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores on postoperative days 1 and 7, as well as return to normal life (days), were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 121 patients were included in the study, with 51 receiving laser ablation and 70 receiving crystallized phenol application. The postoperative outcomes revealed that the wound healing period and postoperative VAS values were statistically significantly better in the laser ablation group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Wound healing was faster and postoperative pain was less in the laser group compared to the phenol group. According to this study, both methods can successfully treat the disease in selected cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"11 ","pages":"1494382"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11743505/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143003941","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-06eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1536176
Daniele Bongetta, Cesare Zoia
{"title":"Editorial: Training and education in neurosurgery: strategies and challenges for the next ten years, volume II.","authors":"Daniele Bongetta, Cesare Zoia","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1536176","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1536176","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"11 ","pages":"1536176"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11743611/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143003940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: To develop an intelligent system based on artificial intelligence (AI) deep learning algorithms using deep learning tools, aiming to assist in the diagnosis of lumbar degenerative diseases by identifying lumbar spine magnetic resonance images (MRI) and improve the clinical efficiency of physicians.
Methods: The PP-YOLOv2 algorithm, a deep learning technique, was used to design a deep learning program capable of automatically identifying the spinal diseases (lumbar disc herniation or lumbar spondylolisthesis) based on the lumbar spine MR images. A retrospective analysis was conducted on lumbar spine MR images of patients who visited our hospital from January 2017 to January 2022. The collected images were divided into a training set and a testing set. The training set images were used to establish and validate the deep learning program's algorithm. The testing set images were annotated, and the experimental results were recorded by three spinal specialists. The training set images were also validated using the deep learning program, and the experimental results were recorded. Finally, a comparison of the accuracy of the deep learning algorithm and that of spinal surgeons was performed to determine the clinical usability of deep learning technology based on the PP-YOLOv2 algorithm. A total of 654 patients were included in the final study, with 604 cases in the training set and 50 cases in the testing set.
Results: The mean average precision (mAP) value of the deep learning algorithm reached 90.08% based on the PP-YOLOv2 algorithm. Through classification of the testing set, the deep learning algorithm showed higher sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in diagnosing lumbar spine MR images compared to manual identification. Additionally, the testing time of the deep learning program was significantly shorter than that of manual identification, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05).
Conclusions: Deep learning technology based on the PP-YOLOv2 algorithm can be used to identify normal intervertebral discs, lumbar disc herniation, and lumbar spondylolisthesis from lumbar MRI images. Its diagnostic performance is significantly higher than that of most spinal surgeons and can be practically applied in clinical settings.
{"title":"MRI to digital medicine diagnosis: integrating deep learning into clinical decision-making for lumbar degenerative diseases.","authors":"Baoyi Ke, Wenyu Ma, Junbo Xuan, Yinghao Liang, Liguang Zhou, Wenyong Jiang, Jing Lin, Guixiang Li","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1424716","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1424716","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To develop an intelligent system based on artificial intelligence (AI) deep learning algorithms using deep learning tools, aiming to assist in the diagnosis of lumbar degenerative diseases by identifying lumbar spine magnetic resonance images (MRI) and improve the clinical efficiency of physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PP-YOLOv2 algorithm, a deep learning technique, was used to design a deep learning program capable of automatically identifying the spinal diseases (lumbar disc herniation or lumbar spondylolisthesis) based on the lumbar spine MR images. A retrospective analysis was conducted on lumbar spine MR images of patients who visited our hospital from January 2017 to January 2022. The collected images were divided into a training set and a testing set. The training set images were used to establish and validate the deep learning program's algorithm. The testing set images were annotated, and the experimental results were recorded by three spinal specialists. The training set images were also validated using the deep learning program, and the experimental results were recorded. Finally, a comparison of the accuracy of the deep learning algorithm and that of spinal surgeons was performed to determine the clinical usability of deep learning technology based on the PP-YOLOv2 algorithm. A total of 654 patients were included in the final study, with 604 cases in the training set and 50 cases in the testing set.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean average precision (mAP) value of the deep learning algorithm reached 90.08% based on the PP-YOLOv2 algorithm. Through classification of the testing set, the deep learning algorithm showed higher sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in diagnosing lumbar spine MR images compared to manual identification. Additionally, the testing time of the deep learning program was significantly shorter than that of manual identification, and the differences were statistically significant (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Deep learning technology based on the PP-YOLOv2 algorithm can be used to identify normal intervertebral discs, lumbar disc herniation, and lumbar spondylolisthesis from lumbar MRI images. Its diagnostic performance is significantly higher than that of most spinal surgeons and can be practically applied in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"11 ","pages":"1424716"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11743461/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143003947","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-06eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1482067
Wenlong Hu, Fei He, Kai Sun, Haiwu Wan, Sijun Ruan, Bo Huang
Objective: Evaluating the clinical value of the modified single-incision posterior median approach with expandable tubular assistance for lumbar interbody fusion in managing degenerative lumbar spine diseases.
Method: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 121 patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spine disease treated in our spine surgery department from January 2017 to December 2021. Of these, 72 patients underwent a modified single-incision posterior median approach with expandable tubular assistance lumbar interbody fusion (single-incision MIS-TLIF group), while 49 patients received the classic open posterior median incision P-TLIF (open surgery group). We collected basic demographic data including age, gender, BMI, and surgical level. Surgical-related indicators such as operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, length of hospital stay, hospital costs, and complication rates were compared between the two groups. Laboratory results [whole blood C-reactive protein (CRP), serum creatine kinase (CK)] and clinical outcomes [VAS scores for low back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), excellent and good rate according to the modified MacNab criteria, and interbody fusion rate according to the Brantigan criteria] were also evaluated.
Result: There were no significant differences in the basic demographics between the two groups. The operation time, postoperative hospital stay, and hospital costs were also similar between the groups. However, significant differences were observed in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, and complication rates. On postoperative days 1 and 3, whole blood CRP and CK levels showed marked differences between the groups. At 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, the single-incision MIS-TLIF group had lower ODI scores and VAS scores for back pain compared to the open surgery group. The excellent and good rate according to the MacNab criteria was higher in the single-incision MIS-TLIF group. There were no significant differences in leg pain VAS scores and interbody fusion rates at 12 months postoperatively between the groups.
Conclusion: The modified single-incision posterior median approach with expandable tubular assistance lumbar interbody fusion is highly effective in treating degenerative lumbar spine diseases. It results in less postoperative pain, faster recovery, and significant improvement in postoperative functional outcomes, making it a valuable treatment option.
{"title":"Modified single-incision MIS-TLIF with expandable tubular assistance for degenerative lumbar spine diseases.","authors":"Wenlong Hu, Fei He, Kai Sun, Haiwu Wan, Sijun Ruan, Bo Huang","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1482067","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1482067","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluating the clinical value of the modified single-incision posterior median approach with expandable tubular assistance for lumbar interbody fusion in managing degenerative lumbar spine diseases.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 121 patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spine disease treated in our spine surgery department from January 2017 to December 2021. Of these, 72 patients underwent a modified single-incision posterior median approach with expandable tubular assistance lumbar interbody fusion (single-incision MIS-TLIF group), while 49 patients received the classic open posterior median incision P-TLIF (open surgery group). We collected basic demographic data including age, gender, BMI, and surgical level. Surgical-related indicators such as operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, length of hospital stay, hospital costs, and complication rates were compared between the two groups. Laboratory results [whole blood C-reactive protein (CRP), serum creatine kinase (CK)] and clinical outcomes [VAS scores for low back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), excellent and good rate according to the modified MacNab criteria, and interbody fusion rate according to the Brantigan criteria] were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>There were no significant differences in the basic demographics between the two groups. The operation time, postoperative hospital stay, and hospital costs were also similar between the groups. However, significant differences were observed in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, and complication rates. On postoperative days 1 and 3, whole blood CRP and CK levels showed marked differences between the groups. At 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, the single-incision MIS-TLIF group had lower ODI scores and VAS scores for back pain compared to the open surgery group. The excellent and good rate according to the MacNab criteria was higher in the single-incision MIS-TLIF group. There were no significant differences in leg pain VAS scores and interbody fusion rates at 12 months postoperatively between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The modified single-incision posterior median approach with expandable tubular assistance lumbar interbody fusion is highly effective in treating degenerative lumbar spine diseases. It results in less postoperative pain, faster recovery, and significant improvement in postoperative functional outcomes, making it a valuable treatment option.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"11 ","pages":"1482067"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11743704/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143003946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}