Global Spine Journal最新文献

Study design: A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant and aggregated data.

Objectives: To define the learning curves of endoscopic discectomies using unified statistical methodologies.

Methods: Searches returned 913 records, with 118 full-text articles screened. Studies of endoscopic lumbar spine surgery reporting outcomes by case order were included. Mixed-effects nonlinear, logistic, and beta meta-regressions prdwere conducted to define the learning curves.

Results: 13 studies involving 864 patients among 15 surgeons were included in total. For transforaminal endoscopic discectomy, the estimated operating time for the first case was 95 min [CI: 87-104], and the estimated plateau was 66 minutes [CI: 51-81]. An estimated 21 cases [CI: 18-25] were required to overcome 80% of this deficit, but near-plateau performance was expected only after 59 cases [CI: 51-70]. The estimated risk of surgical complications on the first case was 25% [CI: 11%-46%], with an 80% reduction in relative risk requiring an estimated 41 cases. The expected postoperative VAS leg pain score after the first case was 2.7 [CI: 1.8-3.8], with an 80% improvement requiring an estimated 96 cases. Similar numbers were required to overcome the learning curves in interlaminar and biportal endoscopic discectomies.

Conclusions: Approximately 60 cases are required to achieve proficiency in endoscopic lumbar spine surgery, although the greatest part of the learning curve can be overcome with 20 cases. This should be considered when designing implementation programmes for surgeons and service providers that wish to incorporate endoscopic spinal surgery into their practice.

Study design: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Objectives: There is an ongoing debate as to the influence of specialty training on spine surgery. Alomari et al. indicated the influence of specialty on ACDF procedures. However, deeper analysis into other spine procedures and lower-acuity procedures has yet to occur. In this study, we aim to determine if the outcomes of the low American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification (ASA 1&2) patients undergoing spine surgery vary based on whether the operating surgeon was an orthopedic surgeon or a neurosurgeon.

Methods: The NSQIP databases from 2015 to 2021 were queried based on the CPT code for nine common spine procedures. Indicators of surgical course and successful outcomes were documented and compared between specialties.

Results: Neurosurgeons had minimally shorter operative times in the ASA 1&2 combined classification (ASA-C) group for cervical, lumbar, and combined spinal procedural groups. Neurosurgeons had a slightly lower percentage of perioperative transfusions in select ASA-C classes. Orthopedic surgeons had shorter lengths of stay for the cervical groups in ASA-C and ASA-1 classes (ASA-1). However, many specialty differences found in spine patients become less pronounced when considering only ASA-1 patients. Finally, postoperative complication outcomes and re-admission were similar between orthopedic and neurological surgeons in all cases.

Conclusions: These results, while statistically significant, are very likely clinically insignificant. They demonstrate that both orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons perform spinal surgery exceedingly safely with similarly low complication rates. This lays the groundwork for future exploration and benchmarking of performance in spine surgeries across neurosurgery and orthopedics.

Study design: Retrospective series.

Objective: Screw loosening in the surgical treatment of lumbar spine disease is a major complication of osteopenia or osteoporosis. This study investigated the risk of screw loosening following either MIS-TLIF or pedicle screw-based dynamic stabilization (DS) in patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis.

Methods: We retrospectively enrolled patients receiving 1- or 2-level MIS-TLIF or DS in a single institute. All patients were diagnosed as having lumbar spondylosis without concurrent spondylolisthesis and found by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to have osteopenia or osteoporosis. Screw loosening was identified by X-ray and CT. Clinical outcomes were also assessed.

Results: A total of 103 patients (50 MIS-TLIF and 53 DS) were confirmed to have osteopenia (-2.5P = 0.960). While both groups had significant improvements in back and leg pain assessed by VAS, ODI, and JOA scores, there was a significant difference in overall screw loosening rates between the MIS-TLIF and DS groups analyzed by percent of patients 38% and 18.9% (P = 0.039*) and by percent of screws 16.9% and 8% (P = 0.002*), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed a significant difference in screw loosening rate in osteopenia patients (P = 0.039* by person; P = 0.002* by screw), but no difference in osteoporosis patients.

Conclusion: The screw loosening rate was higher in the MIS-TLIF group in the entire cohort. Osteopenia patients receiving MIS-TLIF were at significantly higher risk of screw loosening, while that risk was not different for osteoporosis patients, compared to DS.

Study design: A multicenter retrospective study.

Objectives: To determine the rate of Apex facet fusion in children with Early Onset Scoliosis treated surgically with the Active Apex Correction (APC) technique.

Methods: Seventeen patients were treated with the APC technique as index surgery for Early Onset Scoliosis with more than 1 year of follow-up. A 3D CT scan was done to determine the facet fusion rate in the deformity's apex controlled with posterior tethering.

Results: The average follow-up time was 26.4 months (12-56), Average age at index surgery was 81.2 months (30-132), and average number of surgeries done 1.3. Apical vertebrae studied for facet fusion were the 3 vertebrae in the apex in each patient that were subjected to posterior tethering according to the APC technique. In total they were 86 apical vertebrae (172 Facets studied with 86 convex side, 86 concave side). Our observations showed that 29 facet joints were fused (16% of the total facets studied),15 were on the convex, 14 on the concave side (no statistically significant difference). Regarding the facet joint distance in the non-fused facets was 0.99 mm on the convex side and 1.08 mm on the concave side with no statistical significance difference.

Conclusion: APC for Early Onset Scoliosis achieves apical growth modulation and control utilizing posterior tethering without inducing fusion. This study demonstrated that APC is an effective non-fusion technique through the low incidence of facet fusion levels at the Apex, limiting the crankshaft phenomena seen in cases with apex control through arthrodesis.

Study design: Retrospective comparative study.

Objectives: This study aimed to determine whether the severity of preoperative gait disturbance remains after surgical resection in patients with intramedullary spinal cord tumors (IMSCTs), and to identify any factors influencing poor improvement in postoperative gait disturbance.

Methods: The study included a total of 128 patients with IMSCTs requiring surgical excision between 2006 and 2019. Based on the degree of preoperative gait disturbance assessed by the modified McCormick scale (MMCS) grade, patients were categorized into Mild (I-II) and Severe (III-V) groups. The mean postoperative follow-up period was 55.5 ± 34.3 months, and demographic and surgical characteristics were compared between the two groups.

Results: Significant differences were observed in age at surgery, tumor location, tumor size, estimated blood loss, intraoperative motor-evoked potential disappearance, extent of resection, and tumor histopathology between the Mild and Severe groups. In the Mild group, at the final follow-up, only 7.3% of patients experienced improvement, 56.0% showed no changes, and 36.7% experienced deterioration. Conversely, in the Severe group, 26.3% of patients experienced improvement, 31.6% showed no changes, and 42.1% experienced deterioration. Tumor location and age at surgery were identified as factors correlated with poor improvement in postoperative gait disturbance in the Mild group.

Conclusions: Irrespective of the preoperative gait disturbance degree, approximately 40% of patients with IMSCTs experienced deterioration in gait after tumor resection. For preoperative MMCS grade I-II cases, older age at surgery and thoracic IMSCTs would be important factors associated with poor improvement in postoperative gait disturbance.

Study design: Cross-sectional survey.

Objectives: Injury classifications are important tools to identify fracture patterns, guide treatment-decisions and aid to identify optimal treatment plans. The AO Spine-DGOU Osteoporotic Fracture (OF) classification system was developed, and the aim of this study was to assess the reliability of this new classification system.

Methods: 23 Members of the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Trauma participated in the validation process. Participants were asked to rate 33 cases according to the OF classification at 2 time points, 4 weeks apart (assessment 1 and 2). The kappa statistic (κ) was calculated to assess inter-observer reliability and intra-rater reproducibility. The gold master key for each case was determined by approval of at least 5 out of 7 members of the DGOU.

Results: A total of 1386 ratings (21 raters) were performed. The overall inter-rater agreement was moderate with a combined kappa statistic for the OF classification of 0.496 in assessment 1 and 0.482 in assessment 2. The combined percentage of correct ratings (compared to gold-standard) in assessment 1 was 71.4% and 67.4% in assessment 2. The average intra-rater reproducibility was substantial (κ = 0.74, median 0.76, range 0.55 to 1.00, SD 0.13) for the assessed fracture types.

Conclusions: The assessed overall inter-rater reliability was moderate and substantial in some instances. The average intra-rater reproducibility is substantial. It seems that appropriate training of the classification system can enhance inter- and intra-rater reliability.

Study design: A retrospective study.

Objectives: To investigate and compare the clinical and radiographical outcomes of endoscopic decompression alone and limited decompression/fusion surgery in the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS).

Methods: Follow-up data of 53 patients with lower limb radiculopathy associated with ADS who underwent focal surgical treatment were collected (endoscope group: 31 patients treated by transforaminal endoscopic decompression alone; fusion group: 22 patients who underwent limited decompression/fusion). The following data were retrospectively analyzed and compared between the two group: the demographics, Lenke-Silva level, radiographic parameters, surgical data, visual analogue scale (VAS) for back/leg pain, the Oswestry disability index (ODI), and the modified MacNab criteria.

Results: The mean follow-up period was 15.68 ± 3.26 months. The most frequent Lenke-Silva level was I in the endoscope group, and III in the fusion group. Preoperative Cobb angle in the endoscope group was significantly lower than that in the fusion group (23.92 ± 9.06 vs 39.58 ± 13.12, P < 0.05). All patients exhibited improved VAS and ODI scores postoperatively (P < 0.05). At the last follow-up, the Cobb angle had progressed by 1.51° in the endoscope group, whereas radiographic parameters were significantly improved in the fusion group. The reoperation and complication rate in the endoscope group were lower than those in the fusion group. The satisfaction rate post-surgery was comparable between the two groups.

Conclusions: For patients with focal ADS, both limited decompression/fusion and transforaminal endoscopic decompression are viable treatment options. Advanced transforaminal endoscopic techniques enable effective decompression of the symptomatic foramen with minimal complication risk and negligible deformity progression, even in cases of significant scoliosis. While limited fusion surgery can achieve comparable clinical outcomes, it offers inferior deformity correction.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objectives: The impact of delayed access to operative treatment on patient reported outcomes (PROs) for lumbar degenerative conditions remains unclear. The goal of this study is to evaluate the association between wait times for elective lumbar spine surgery and post-operative PROs.

Methods: This study is a retrospective analysis of patients surgically treated for a degenerative lumbar conditions. Wait times were calculated from primary care referral to surgery, termed the cumulative wait time (CWT). CWT benchmarks were created at 3, 6 and 12 months. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to measure the associations between CWT and meeting the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) for the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score at 12 months post-operatively.

Results: A total of 2281 patients were included in the study cohort. The average age was 59.4 years (SD 14.8). The median CWT was 43.1 weeks (IQR 17.8 - 60.6) and only 30.9% had treatment within 6 months. Patients were more likely achieve the MCID for the ODI at 12 months post-operatively if they had surgery within 6 months of referral from primary care (OR 1.22; 95% CI 1.11 - 1.34). This relationship was also found at a benchmark CWT time of 3 months (OR 1.33; 95% CI 1.15 - 1.54) though not at 12 months (OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.97 - 1.20).

Conclusions: Patients who received operative treatment within a 3- and 6-month benchmark between referral and surgery were more likely to experience noticeable improvement in post-operative function.

Study design: A retrospective study.

Objectives: To explore the relationship between K-line tilt and short-term surgical outcomes following laminoplasty in patients with multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM), and to evaluate the potential of K-line tilt as a reliable preoperative predictor.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed for 125 consecutive patients who underwent laminoplasty for multilevel DCM. The radiographic parameters utilized in this study encompassed T1 slope (T1S), C2-C7 lordosis (CL), C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), T1 slope minus C2-C7 lordosis (T1S-CL), C2-C7 range of motion (ROM), and K-line tilt. The neurological recovery was evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to assess the relationship between K-line tilt and other classical cervical parameters. Logistic regression analysis was employed to examine the association between K-line tilt and surgical outcomes.

Results: Of the 125 patients, 89 were men. The mean age of the patients was 61.74 ± 11.31 years. The results indicated a correlation between the K-line tilt and the cSVA (r = 0.628, P < 0.001), T1S (r = 0.259, P = 0.004), and T1S-CL (r = 0.307, P < 0.001). The K-line tilt showed an association with the failure of the JOA recovery rate (RR) to reach the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and the occurrence of postoperative kyphotic deformity. We identified cutoff values for the K-line tilt which predict the failure of the JOA RR to reach the MCID and postoperative kyphotic deformity as 10.13° and 9.93°, respectively.

Conclusions: The K-line tilt is an independent preoperative risk factor associated with both the failure of the JOA RR to reach the MCID and the occurrence of postoperative kyphotic deformity in patients with multilevel DCM after laminoplasty.

Study design: Systematic review.

Objective: This systematic review aims to identify prognostic factors, encompassing biomedical and psychosocial variables, linked to outcome of fusion surgery for chronic low back pain (CLBP) in single or two-level lumbar degenerative spinal disorders. Identifying these factors is crucial for decision making and therefore long-term treatment outcome.

Methods: A systematic search (PROSPERO ID: CRD4202018927) from January 2010 to October 2022 was conducted, utilizing Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR, CENTRAL). Prognostic factors associated with various outcomes, including functional status, back and leg pain, health-related quality of life, complications, return to work, and analgesic use, were assessed. Risk of bias was determined using QUIPS, and the quality of evidence was evaluated using GRADE approach.

Results: Of the 9852 initially screened studies, eleven studies (n = 16,482) were included in the analysis. In total, 161 associations were identified, with 67 prognostic factors showing statistical significance (P < 0.05). Thirty associations were supported by two or more studies, and only eight associations were eligible for meta-analyses: female gender remained statistically significant associated with decreased postoperative back pain, but negatively associated with complication rates and functional status, and smoking with increased postoperative back pain.

Conclusion: Only female gender and smoking were consistently associated with outcome of fusion for CLBP. Most of the included studies exhibited low to moderate methodological quality, which may explain the relatively weak associations identified for the assessed prognostic factors.