Carlyn Patterson Gentile, Geoffrey K Aguirre, Andrew D Hershey, Christina L Szperka
{"title":"Headache-associated photophobia is more prevalent during winter: A cross-sectional study from a pediatric headache registry.","authors":"Carlyn Patterson Gentile, Geoffrey K Aguirre, Andrew D Hershey, Christina L Szperka","doi":"10.1111/head.70072","DOIUrl":"10.1111/head.70072","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147343993","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Masahito Katsuki, Kieran Moran, Muneto Tatsumoto, Keisuke Suzuki, Tomokazu Shimazu, Yasuhiko Matsumori, Yutaro Fuse, Miguel Á Huerta, Daijiro Sugiyama, Jackson T S Cheung, Siobhán O'Connor, Tomás Ward, Takahiro Tabuchi
Objectives/background: Heated tobacco products (HTPs) are novel alternatives to conventional cigarettes that heat tobacco leaves to generate nicotine-containing aerosols for inhalation. This study aimed to investigate the association between both conventional cigarette use and HTP use with self-reported frequent headache. Although the association between cigarette smoking and headache has been reported, evidence regarding HTPs remains limited.
Methods: We utilized data from the Japan Society and New Tobacco Internet Survey, an ongoing internet-based cohort cross-sectional study launched in 2015 to monitor conventional cigarette and HTP use. Participants were recruited from a nationally representative online panel, comprising over 2 million individuals. Among 28,000 respondents in the 2025 wave, we included 23,228 individuals with valid responses. Self-reported frequent headache was defined as responding "occasionally" or "frequently" to the question, "Have you experienced headaches in the past year?" (other options: "never" and "rarely"). We conducted a multivariable analysis adjusting for demographic, socioeconomic, lifestyle, and clinical variables. We then compared the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of conventional cigarettes and HTP use for the prevalence of self-reported frequent headache.
Results: Of the 23,228 participants, 25.5% (5923/23,228) reported headaches. Regarding tobacco use, 12.2% (2823/23,228) were current cigarette users, 31.8% (7393/23,228) were former cigarette users, 56.0% (13,012/23,228) were never cigarette users; 11.6% (2688/23,228) were current HTP users, 10.0% (2326/23,228) were former HTP users, and 78.4% (18,214/23,228) were never HTP users. Multivariable analysis with multiple imputation revealed that current (aOR = 1.71 [95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.44-2.03]) and former (aOR = 1.54 [95% CI = 1.37-1.73]) cigarette use, and current (aOR = 1.15 [95% CI = 1.01-1.32]) HTP use were significantly associated with self-reported frequent headache. Former HTP use was not significantly associated with headache (aOR = 1.09 [95% CI = 0.96-1.24]). Postestimation comparisons indicated a weaker association for HTPs than for cigarettes (current smokers vs. current HTP users: ratio of aORs = 1.48 [95% CI = 1.19-1.84]).
Conclusion: Both current and former cigarette use were significantly associated with a higher prevalence of self-reported frequent headache, and current HTP use also showed a modest but significant association. Although HTPs are often perceived as less harmful, they still emit nicotine and other constituents, which may be associated with self-reported frequent headache.
目的/背景:加热烟草制品(HTPs)是传统卷烟的新替代品,它加热烟叶以产生含尼古丁的气溶胶供吸入。本研究旨在调查传统香烟使用和HTP使用与自我报告的频繁头痛之间的关系。尽管吸烟与头痛之间的关联已被报道,但有关热传导效应诱发肽的证据仍然有限。方法:我们利用了来自日本协会和新烟草互联网调查的数据,这是一项正在进行的基于互联网的队列横断面研究,于2015年启动,旨在监测传统卷烟和HTP的使用情况。参与者是从一个具有全国代表性的在线小组中招募的,该小组由200多万人组成。在2025年的2.8万名受访者中,我们包括了23228名有效回复的人。自我报告的频繁头痛被定义为“偶尔”或“频繁”回答这个问题,“你在过去一年中经历过头痛吗?”(其他选项:“never”和“rarely”)。我们进行了多变量分析,调整了人口统计学、社会经济、生活方式和临床变量。然后,我们比较了传统香烟和HTP使用对自我报告的频繁头痛患病率的调整优势比(aORs)。结果:在23,228名参与者中,25.5%(5923/23,228)报告头痛。在烟草使用方面,12.2%(2823/ 23228)是目前的卷烟使用者,31.8%(7393/ 23228)是曾经的卷烟使用者,56.0%(13012 / 23228)从未吸烟;11.6%(2688/23,228)是当前的http用户,10.0%(2326/23,228)是以前的http用户,78.4%(18,214/23,228)从未使用过http。多变量分析显示,当前(aOR = 1.71[95%可信区间[CI] = 1.44-2.03])和以前(aOR = 1.54 [95% CI = 1.37-1.73])吸烟和当前(aOR = 1.15 [95% CI = 1.01-1.32])使用HTP与自述频繁头痛显著相关。前HTP使用与头痛无显著相关性(aOR = 1.09 [95% CI = 0.96-1.24])。后估计比较表明,HTP与吸烟的相关性较弱(当前吸烟者与当前HTP使用者:aor比值= 1.48 [95% CI = 1.19-1.84])。结论:当前和以前的吸烟习惯与自我报告的频繁头痛的较高患病率显著相关,当前的HTP使用也显示出适度但显著的关联。虽然htp通常被认为危害较小,但它们仍会释放尼古丁和其他成分,这可能与自我报告的频繁头痛有关。
{"title":"Conventional cigarettes, novel heated tobacco products, and self-reported frequent headache association in Japanese individuals: Insights from the JASTIS study, a Japanese cross-sectional analysis.","authors":"Masahito Katsuki, Kieran Moran, Muneto Tatsumoto, Keisuke Suzuki, Tomokazu Shimazu, Yasuhiko Matsumori, Yutaro Fuse, Miguel Á Huerta, Daijiro Sugiyama, Jackson T S Cheung, Siobhán O'Connor, Tomás Ward, Takahiro Tabuchi","doi":"10.1111/head.70068","DOIUrl":"10.1111/head.70068","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives/background: </strong>Heated tobacco products (HTPs) are novel alternatives to conventional cigarettes that heat tobacco leaves to generate nicotine-containing aerosols for inhalation. This study aimed to investigate the association between both conventional cigarette use and HTP use with self-reported frequent headache. Although the association between cigarette smoking and headache has been reported, evidence regarding HTPs remains limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized data from the Japan Society and New Tobacco Internet Survey, an ongoing internet-based cohort cross-sectional study launched in 2015 to monitor conventional cigarette and HTP use. Participants were recruited from a nationally representative online panel, comprising over 2 million individuals. Among 28,000 respondents in the 2025 wave, we included 23,228 individuals with valid responses. Self-reported frequent headache was defined as responding \"occasionally\" or \"frequently\" to the question, \"Have you experienced headaches in the past year?\" (other options: \"never\" and \"rarely\"). We conducted a multivariable analysis adjusting for demographic, socioeconomic, lifestyle, and clinical variables. We then compared the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of conventional cigarettes and HTP use for the prevalence of self-reported frequent headache.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 23,228 participants, 25.5% (5923/23,228) reported headaches. Regarding tobacco use, 12.2% (2823/23,228) were current cigarette users, 31.8% (7393/23,228) were former cigarette users, 56.0% (13,012/23,228) were never cigarette users; 11.6% (2688/23,228) were current HTP users, 10.0% (2326/23,228) were former HTP users, and 78.4% (18,214/23,228) were never HTP users. Multivariable analysis with multiple imputation revealed that current (aOR = 1.71 [95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.44-2.03]) and former (aOR = 1.54 [95% CI = 1.37-1.73]) cigarette use, and current (aOR = 1.15 [95% CI = 1.01-1.32]) HTP use were significantly associated with self-reported frequent headache. Former HTP use was not significantly associated with headache (aOR = 1.09 [95% CI = 0.96-1.24]). Postestimation comparisons indicated a weaker association for HTPs than for cigarettes (current smokers vs. current HTP users: ratio of aORs = 1.48 [95% CI = 1.19-1.84]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both current and former cigarette use were significantly associated with a higher prevalence of self-reported frequent headache, and current HTP use also showed a modest but significant association. Although HTPs are often perceived as less harmful, they still emit nicotine and other constituents, which may be associated with self-reported frequent headache.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147343919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-01-28DOI: 10.1111/head.70045
Keshet Pardo, Christopher J Boes, Narayan R Kissoon
{"title":"Temporary occipital nerve stimulation as transitional therapy for chronic intractable cluster headache: A case report and proof of concept.","authors":"Keshet Pardo, Christopher J Boes, Narayan R Kissoon","doi":"10.1111/head.70045","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70045","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":"66 3","pages":"773-774"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147325784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-01-29DOI: 10.1111/head.70055
Esra Kochan Kizilkilic
{"title":"Management of nummular headache with local lidocaine: A case report.","authors":"Esra Kochan Kizilkilic","doi":"10.1111/head.70055","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70055","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":"66 3","pages":"775-776"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147325852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-10-16DOI: 10.1111/head.15076
Lucia Jimena Zavala, Andreina Gil Ramirez, Kjersti Grøtta Vetvik, Rigmor Højland Jensen, Anders Hougaard
Objective: To assess the prevalence, frequency, and characteristics of headache disorders in transgender individuals receiving gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT), and to explore the relationship between GAHT and headache pathophysiology. We hypothesized that estrogen-based GAHT would be associated with increased risk of headache, particularly migraine, whereas testosterone-based GAHT would be associated with reduced headache burden.
Background: Migraine is a highly disabling headache disorder that disproportionately affects cisgender women, with hormonal fluctuations playing a key role in its pathophysiology. Despite extensive research in cisgender populations, there is a gap in our understanding about the prevalence and characteristics of headache disorders, including migraine, in transgender and nonbinary individuals undergoing GAHT, and there is true urgency to fill this knowledge gap.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, observational study using an anonymous online survey targeting transgender and nonbinary individuals in Argentina from October 2023 to February 2024. Eligible participants were aged ≥18 years and receiving GAHT. The validated Migraine Screen Questionnaire (MS-Q) was used to identify migraine-like headaches. Additional items assessed changes in headache characteristics associated with GAHT.
Results: Of 160 participants, 102 (63.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 56.1%-70.8%) reported experiencing headaches. Of these, 86.3% (number [n] = 88) were receiving testosterone, 11.8% (n = 12) estrogens, and 2.0% (n = 2) were receiving other GAHT. Only 24.5% (n = 24) reported a prior headache diagnosis, including 18 participants (17.6%; 95% CI 11.3%-26.2%) with migraine. Based on the MS-Q, 46.1% (n = 47) screened positive for migraine-like headaches. New headache or worsening of headache was more frequently reported by estrogen users (66.6%) compared to those using testosterone (27.2%). Improvement or resolution of headaches was reported by 26.1% of testosterone users compared to 8.3% of estrogen users.
Conclusion: Estrogen-based GAHT was associated with a higher proportion of individuals reporting new or worsening headaches, whereas testosterone-based GAHT was more often associated with headache improvement. These associations underscore the need for further research into how GAHT modulates headache patterns, as well as the high rate of underdiagnosed headache disorders in this population.
{"title":"Headache in individuals undergoing hormone therapy for gender transition: A cross-sectional, observational study.","authors":"Lucia Jimena Zavala, Andreina Gil Ramirez, Kjersti Grøtta Vetvik, Rigmor Højland Jensen, Anders Hougaard","doi":"10.1111/head.15076","DOIUrl":"10.1111/head.15076","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the prevalence, frequency, and characteristics of headache disorders in transgender individuals receiving gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT), and to explore the relationship between GAHT and headache pathophysiology. We hypothesized that estrogen-based GAHT would be associated with increased risk of headache, particularly migraine, whereas testosterone-based GAHT would be associated with reduced headache burden.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Migraine is a highly disabling headache disorder that disproportionately affects cisgender women, with hormonal fluctuations playing a key role in its pathophysiology. Despite extensive research in cisgender populations, there is a gap in our understanding about the prevalence and characteristics of headache disorders, including migraine, in transgender and nonbinary individuals undergoing GAHT, and there is true urgency to fill this knowledge gap.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional, observational study using an anonymous online survey targeting transgender and nonbinary individuals in Argentina from October 2023 to February 2024. Eligible participants were aged ≥18 years and receiving GAHT. The validated Migraine Screen Questionnaire (MS-Q) was used to identify migraine-like headaches. Additional items assessed changes in headache characteristics associated with GAHT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 160 participants, 102 (63.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 56.1%-70.8%) reported experiencing headaches. Of these, 86.3% (number [n] = 88) were receiving testosterone, 11.8% (n = 12) estrogens, and 2.0% (n = 2) were receiving other GAHT. Only 24.5% (n = 24) reported a prior headache diagnosis, including 18 participants (17.6%; 95% CI 11.3%-26.2%) with migraine. Based on the MS-Q, 46.1% (n = 47) screened positive for migraine-like headaches. New headache or worsening of headache was more frequently reported by estrogen users (66.6%) compared to those using testosterone (27.2%). Improvement or resolution of headaches was reported by 26.1% of testosterone users compared to 8.3% of estrogen users.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Estrogen-based GAHT was associated with a higher proportion of individuals reporting new or worsening headaches, whereas testosterone-based GAHT was more often associated with headache improvement. These associations underscore the need for further research into how GAHT modulates headache patterns, as well as the high rate of underdiagnosed headache disorders in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":"725-732"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12951696/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145307770","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-01-13DOI: 10.1111/head.70044
Timothy Daly
{"title":"Letter to the Editor regarding \"Letters from nobody: The problem of AI-written Letters to the Editor\".","authors":"Timothy Daly","doi":"10.1111/head.70044","DOIUrl":"10.1111/head.70044","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":"575"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145965897","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-10-26DOI: 10.1111/head.15038
Nazia Karsan, Nicolas Vandenbussche, Robyn Jenia-Wilcha, Pubudu Amarasena, Pannathat Soontrapa, Karthik Nagaraj, Carlo Lastarria Perez, Peter J Goadsby
Objective: We set out to examine detailed phenotypic data from our clinic for associations of vertigo in chronic migraine.
Background: Vertigo is a non-canonical, common symptom of migraine. Little is known about its associations with other symptoms within the migraine phenotype. There is significant methodological heterogeneity and therefore inadequate overall evidence about the potential differences in efficacy of any migraine treatments in patients with problematic vertigo associated with migraine, compared to those without vertigo. Enhancing understanding of migraine-related vertigo could help guide treatment and inform on mechanisms of vestibular migraine, a poorly understood diagnostic entity.
Methods: Chronic migraine extended phenotypes of patients seen within the adult headache service at King's College Hospital Tertiary Headache Service between January 2014 and December 2021 (n = 589) were extracted from the first documented clinic consultation letter retrospectively. For those with information about vertigo (n = 562), potential associations of interest for the presence of vertigo (gender, allodynia, aura, photophobia, phonophobia and osmophobia, baseline headache frequency, number of premonitory symptoms, presence of cranial autonomic symptoms, and age) were analyzed using a regression model (IBM SPSS v 29). Missing data were excluded (final n = 435).
Results: The total sample size for analysis in the regression model was n = 435, after excluding missing data (n = 126) and outliers (n = 1). Patients were 16-92 years old (median, 47; interquartile range, 37-55), and the majority (83.4%) were female. Vertigo associated with migraine was present in 275 of 562 (49%) patients. Within the regression model, the presence of aura (odds ratio, 2.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-3.23, P < 0.001) and allodynia (odds ratio, 2.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.76-4.26, P < 0.001) were positively associated with vertigo.
Conclusions: Vertigo in chronic migraine is common and may be associated with a more enriched phenotype independent of baseline headache frequency. Future treatment strategies should be evaluated for their effects on this often under-recognized yet disabling symptom.
{"title":"Evaluating associations of migraine-related vertigo.","authors":"Nazia Karsan, Nicolas Vandenbussche, Robyn Jenia-Wilcha, Pubudu Amarasena, Pannathat Soontrapa, Karthik Nagaraj, Carlo Lastarria Perez, Peter J Goadsby","doi":"10.1111/head.15038","DOIUrl":"10.1111/head.15038","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We set out to examine detailed phenotypic data from our clinic for associations of vertigo in chronic migraine.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Vertigo is a non-canonical, common symptom of migraine. Little is known about its associations with other symptoms within the migraine phenotype. There is significant methodological heterogeneity and therefore inadequate overall evidence about the potential differences in efficacy of any migraine treatments in patients with problematic vertigo associated with migraine, compared to those without vertigo. Enhancing understanding of migraine-related vertigo could help guide treatment and inform on mechanisms of vestibular migraine, a poorly understood diagnostic entity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Chronic migraine extended phenotypes of patients seen within the adult headache service at King's College Hospital Tertiary Headache Service between January 2014 and December 2021 (n = 589) were extracted from the first documented clinic consultation letter retrospectively. For those with information about vertigo (n = 562), potential associations of interest for the presence of vertigo (gender, allodynia, aura, photophobia, phonophobia and osmophobia, baseline headache frequency, number of premonitory symptoms, presence of cranial autonomic symptoms, and age) were analyzed using a regression model (IBM SPSS v 29). Missing data were excluded (final n = 435).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total sample size for analysis in the regression model was n = 435, after excluding missing data (n = 126) and outliers (n = 1). Patients were 16-92 years old (median, 47; interquartile range, 37-55), and the majority (83.4%) were female. Vertigo associated with migraine was present in 275 of 562 (49%) patients. Within the regression model, the presence of aura (odds ratio, 2.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-3.23, P < 0.001) and allodynia (odds ratio, 2.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.76-4.26, P < 0.001) were positively associated with vertigo.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Vertigo in chronic migraine is common and may be associated with a more enriched phenotype independent of baseline headache frequency. Future treatment strategies should be evaluated for their effects on this often under-recognized yet disabling symptom.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":"595-603"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12951697/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145372466","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: This study was conducted to investigate the association between migraine frequency and insomnia severity.
Background: Migraine and insomnia frequently co-occur, yet the relationship between migraine characteristics and insomnia severity remains poorly understood. Both conditions substantially impair quality of life and daily functioning, potentially because of shared pathophysiological mechanisms. In this study, we investigated the association between migraine frequency and insomnia severity and examined the impact of aura, psychological factors, and restless legs syndrome (RLS).
Methods: This cross-sectional controlled study included 2155 participants (1954 individuals with migraine and 201 controls) who visited the neurology outpatient department of a tertiary medical center between January 2019 and October 2023. Migraine diagnosis adhered to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition criteria, with all participants evaluated by a board-certified neurologist and headache specialist. Insomnia severity was assessed using the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and psychological factors were measured using the Beck Depression Inventory-II and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. RLS was diagnosed as per international criteria, and individuals with migraine were stratified by headache frequency (1-7, 8-14, or ≥15 days/month) and aura status.
Results: High migraine frequency was associated with increased ISI scores (adjusted regression coefficient [β] = 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-1.01) and increased prevalence of clinical insomnia (ISI ≥ 15) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.34; 95% CI, 1.17-1.53) after controlling for demographic, lifestyle, and clinical factors. In the univariate analysis, patients with migraine with aura showed higher ISI scores than those without aura (p < 0.001); however, this difference was no longer significant after adjustment for migraine frequency, depression, anxiety, RLS, and other confounders (adjusted β = 0.48; 95% CI, -0.24 to 1.20; p = 0.191). Multivariable analyses revealed significant associations between ISI total score and depression (adjusted β = 0.21; 95% CI, 0.17-0.24), anxiety (adjusted β = 0.34; 95% CI, 0.27-0.41), and RLS (adjusted β = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.53-1.51). RLS prevalence was significantly higher in the migraine group than in the control group (32.4% vs. 12.9%).
Conclusions: Migraine frequency showed a graded association with insomnia severity, with additional independent contributions from psychological factors and RLS, but not from aura status. These findings underscore the multifactorial nature of sleep disturbances in migraine and the need for comprehensive management strategies that address both headache-specific factors and comorbid conditions.
{"title":"Insomnia severity in migraine: The role of headache frequency, aura status, and comorbidities-A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Kuang-Heng Lee, Chih-Sung Liang, Po-Kuan Yeh, Chia-Kuang Tsai, Chia-Lin Tsai, Yu-Kai Lin, Guan-Yu Lin, Ming-Chen Tsai, Yi Liu, Yuan-Zhen Ruan, Fu-Chi Yang","doi":"10.1111/head.15055","DOIUrl":"10.1111/head.15055","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was conducted to investigate the association between migraine frequency and insomnia severity.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Migraine and insomnia frequently co-occur, yet the relationship between migraine characteristics and insomnia severity remains poorly understood. Both conditions substantially impair quality of life and daily functioning, potentially because of shared pathophysiological mechanisms. In this study, we investigated the association between migraine frequency and insomnia severity and examined the impact of aura, psychological factors, and restless legs syndrome (RLS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional controlled study included 2155 participants (1954 individuals with migraine and 201 controls) who visited the neurology outpatient department of a tertiary medical center between January 2019 and October 2023. Migraine diagnosis adhered to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition criteria, with all participants evaluated by a board-certified neurologist and headache specialist. Insomnia severity was assessed using the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and psychological factors were measured using the Beck Depression Inventory-II and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. RLS was diagnosed as per international criteria, and individuals with migraine were stratified by headache frequency (1-7, 8-14, or ≥15 days/month) and aura status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High migraine frequency was associated with increased ISI scores (adjusted regression coefficient [β] = 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-1.01) and increased prevalence of clinical insomnia (ISI ≥ 15) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.34; 95% CI, 1.17-1.53) after controlling for demographic, lifestyle, and clinical factors. In the univariate analysis, patients with migraine with aura showed higher ISI scores than those without aura (p < 0.001); however, this difference was no longer significant after adjustment for migraine frequency, depression, anxiety, RLS, and other confounders (adjusted β = 0.48; 95% CI, -0.24 to 1.20; p = 0.191). Multivariable analyses revealed significant associations between ISI total score and depression (adjusted β = 0.21; 95% CI, 0.17-0.24), anxiety (adjusted β = 0.34; 95% CI, 0.27-0.41), and RLS (adjusted β = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.53-1.51). RLS prevalence was significantly higher in the migraine group than in the control group (32.4% vs. 12.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Migraine frequency showed a graded association with insomnia severity, with additional independent contributions from psychological factors and RLS, but not from aura status. These findings underscore the multifactorial nature of sleep disturbances in migraine and the need for comprehensive management strategies that address both headache-specific factors and comorbid conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":"633-645"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12951709/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145086044","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-10-22DOI: 10.1111/head.15068
Rebeca Oliveira da Silva, Frederico de Sousa Marinho Mendes Filho, João Guilherme Gomes Pedrosa, Giovanna Salema Pascual, Saul Dominici, Elizabet Taylor Pimenta Weba, Christian Ken Fukunaga, David Abraham Batista da Hora, Ocílio Ribeiro Gonçalves, Rafaela Farias Vidigal Nascimento, Daniel Vicente de Siqueira Lima
Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, retrieving data from PubMed, Elsevier, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials . Primary outcomes included changes from baseline in acute headache medication days and monthly migraine days (MMD). Secondary outcomes comprised the incidence of adverse events (AEs), common AEs, and the proportion of patients achieving a ≥ 50% reduction in MMDs.
Results: Five randomized controlled trials including 875 patients (mean age of 42.7 years) were analyzed. Erenumab treatment was associated with significant reductions in acute headache medication days (mean difference = -1.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.81 to -0.62; p = 0.002) and MMDs (mean difference = -1.88; 95% CI: -2.68 to -1.07; p < 0.001). Whereas erenumab increased the risk of common AEs such as constipation (risk ratio [RR] = 1.43; 95% CI: 1.17 to 1.76; I2 = 14%), the overall incidence of AEs was not significantly different compared to placebo (RR = 1.02; 95% CI: 0.92 to 1.14; I2 = 57%). A higher proportion of patients achieved a ≥50% reduction in MMDs after 3 months in the erenumab group (RR = 1.49; 95% CI: 1.26 to 1.77; I2 = 22%).
Conclusion: Erenumab appears effective in reducing migraine frequency and symptomatic medication use among patients with chronic migraine MOH, with an acceptable tolerability profile.
{"title":"Efficacy and tolerability of erenumab for chronic migraine in association with medication overuse: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Rebeca Oliveira da Silva, Frederico de Sousa Marinho Mendes Filho, João Guilherme Gomes Pedrosa, Giovanna Salema Pascual, Saul Dominici, Elizabet Taylor Pimenta Weba, Christian Ken Fukunaga, David Abraham Batista da Hora, Ocílio Ribeiro Gonçalves, Rafaela Farias Vidigal Nascimento, Daniel Vicente de Siqueira Lima","doi":"10.1111/head.15068","DOIUrl":"10.1111/head.15068","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, retrieving data from PubMed, Elsevier, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials . Primary outcomes included changes from baseline in acute headache medication days and monthly migraine days (MMD). Secondary outcomes comprised the incidence of adverse events (AEs), common AEs, and the proportion of patients achieving a ≥ 50% reduction in MMDs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five randomized controlled trials including 875 patients (mean age of 42.7 years) were analyzed. Erenumab treatment was associated with significant reductions in acute headache medication days (mean difference = -1.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.81 to -0.62; p = 0.002) and MMDs (mean difference = -1.88; 95% CI: -2.68 to -1.07; p < 0.001). Whereas erenumab increased the risk of common AEs such as constipation (risk ratio [RR] = 1.43; 95% CI: 1.17 to 1.76; I<sup>2</sup> = 14%), the overall incidence of AEs was not significantly different compared to placebo (RR = 1.02; 95% CI: 0.92 to 1.14; I<sup>2</sup> = 57%). A higher proportion of patients achieved a ≥50% reduction in MMDs after 3 months in the erenumab group (RR = 1.49; 95% CI: 1.26 to 1.77; I<sup>2</sup> = 22%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Erenumab appears effective in reducing migraine frequency and symptomatic medication use among patients with chronic migraine MOH, with an acceptable tolerability profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":"744-754"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145345040","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-10-16DOI: 10.1111/head.15081
Sharoon Qaiser, Kristine Shady
{"title":"Serum magnesium levels in children and adolescents with migraine: A prospective observational study.","authors":"Sharoon Qaiser, Kristine Shady","doi":"10.1111/head.15081","DOIUrl":"10.1111/head.15081","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":"736-737"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145307787","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}