首页 > 最新文献

Headache最新文献

英文 中文
Plain language summary publication: Role of diffusion tensor imaging in the evaluation of white matter integrity in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. 通俗易懂的摘要出版物:弥散张量成像在评估特发性颅内高压白质完整性中的作用。
IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI: 10.1111/head.14847
Bahar Atasoy, Asli Yaman Kula, Serdar Balsak, Yagmur Basak Polat, Zeynep Donmez, Ahmet Akcay, Abdusselim Adil Peker, Ozlem Toluk, Alpay Alkan
{"title":"Plain language summary publication: Role of diffusion tensor imaging in the evaluation of white matter integrity in idiopathic intracranial hypertension.","authors":"Bahar Atasoy, Asli Yaman Kula, Serdar Balsak, Yagmur Basak Polat, Zeynep Donmez, Ahmet Akcay, Abdusselim Adil Peker, Ozlem Toluk, Alpay Alkan","doi":"10.1111/head.14847","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14847","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142345159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Remote electrical neuromodulation to treat children and adolescents with migraine in the emergency department: A randomized double‐dummy pilot trial 在急诊科治疗儿童和青少年偏头痛的远程电神经调控:随机双盲试验
IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI: 10.1111/head.14838
Serena Laura Orr, Jonathan Kuziek, Samina Ali, Eva Anderson, Kathryn A. Birnie, Andrew D. Hershey, Prachi Khanna, Adam Kirton, Tolulope Sajobi, Stephen B. Freedman
ObjectiveUsing a double‐dummy pilot randomized controlled trial design, we aimed to determine the feasibility and acceptability of comparing remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) to typical care intravenous pharmacologic interventions for the treatment of children and adolescents visiting the emergency department (ED) with migraine, and to compare parallel‐group versus crossover trial designs.BackgroundThere are limited data to guide the management of migraine in the ED. Children and adolescents are interested in neuromodulation, and specifically REN, for treatment in this setting, but there are no existing data on this approach.MethodsWe employed a double‐dummy, double‐blind, pilot randomized controlled trial that tested two designs in two phases: a parallel‐group design and a crossover design (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05102591). The intervention arms consisted of: (i) active REN stimulation with matched normal saline placebo intravenously, and (ii) matched sham REN stimulation, intravenous metoclopramide (0.15 mg/kg, maximum 10 mg), and intravenous ketorolac (0.5 mg/kg, maximum 30 mg). Youth aged 8.0–<18.0 years visiting a Canadian tertiary care pediatric ED with migraine attacks as per criteria B–E of the International Classification of Headache Disorders third edition were eligible. Primary outcomes were focused on trial feasibility and acceptability, and preliminary efficacy and safety data were also collected.ResultsA total of 34% (22/65) of those who screened eligible were enrolled. Three participants (14%) withdrew prior to receiving any study interventions. In all, 10 participants were allocated to typical care, and nine to REN. All treated participants (19/19) completed all assessments. Recruitment was higher during the parallel‐group phase: 1.1 participants/month versus 0.6 participants/month, and 36% (17/47) versus 28% (five of 18) of screened eligible were enrolled in the parallel‐group and crossover phases, respectively. Participants reported positive impressions of REN use in the ED, e.g., higher mean (standard deviation [SD]) levels of interest in using REN only at 3.7 (1.0) versus 2.8 (1.0) in using intravenous interventions only for a future ED visit. Participants and clinical staff reported overall positive impressions regarding the study protocol. Employing an 11‐point pain numerical rating scale, the mean (SD) reduction in pain severity score was 2.1 (1.3) and 2.9 (2.9) from baseline to 1 h, and 2.4 (1.6) and 4.0 (3.5) from baseline to 2 h for REN and intravenous interventions, respectively. One participant in the typical care group and none in the REN group experienced adverse events.ConclusionWe demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of our trial protocol and of using REN to treat youth presenting to the ED with migraine. The parallel‐group design generated a higher recruitment rate than the crossover design. Our preliminary efficacy and safety data suggest that REN could be non‐inferior to typical car
背景用于指导急诊室偏头痛治疗的数据非常有限,儿童和青少年对神经调控,特别是远程神经调控(REN)治疗偏头痛很感兴趣,但目前还没有这方面的数据。儿童和青少年对神经调节,特别是 REN,在这种情况下的治疗很感兴趣,但目前还没有关于这种方法的数据。方法我们采用了一项双盲、双假、试验性随机对照试验,分两个阶段测试了两种设计:平行组设计和交叉设计(ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT05102591)。干预臂包括:(i) 静脉注射活性 REN 刺激剂和匹配的生理盐水安慰剂;(ii) 匹配的假 REN 刺激剂、静脉注射甲氧氯普胺(0.15 毫克/千克,最多 10 毫克)和静脉注射酮咯酸(0.5 毫克/千克,最多 30 毫克)。根据《国际头痛疾病分类》第三版的标准B-E,年龄在8.0-<18.0岁之间、因偏头痛发作前往加拿大三级医疗机构儿科急诊室就诊的青少年均符合条件。主要结果侧重于试验的可行性和可接受性,同时还收集了初步的疗效和安全性数据。三名参与者(14%)在接受任何研究干预之前退出。共有 10 名参与者被分配到常规护理,9 名参与者被分配到 REN。所有接受治疗的参与者(19/19)都完成了所有评估。平行组阶段的招募人数较多:在平行组和交叉组阶段,分别有 1.1 名/月和 0.6 名/月的参与者和 36% (17/47)和 28% (18 人中的 5 人)的筛选合格者被录取。参与者对在急诊室使用 REN 有积极的印象,例如,对未来急诊室就诊时仅使用 REN 的兴趣平均值(标准差 [SD] )为 3.7(1.0),而仅使用静脉干预的兴趣平均值(标准差 [SD] )为 2.8(1.0)。参与者和临床工作人员对研究方案的总体印象良好。采用 11 点疼痛数字评分量表,从基线到 1 小时,REN 和静脉干预的疼痛严重程度评分的平均(标度)降低幅度分别为 2.1 (1.3) 和 2.9 (2.9);从基线到 2 小时,REN 和静脉干预的疼痛严重程度评分的平均(标度)降低幅度分别为 2.4 (1.6) 和 4.0 (3.5)。结论我们证明了试验方案的可行性和可接受性,以及使用 REN 治疗因偏头痛而到急诊室就诊的青少年的可行性和可接受性。与交叉设计相比,平行组设计的招募率更高。我们的初步疗效和安全性数据表明,REN 的疗效可能不逊于普通护理,但我们没有为这些结果提供动力。我们有必要进一步研究 REN 在急诊室环境中的应用。
{"title":"Remote electrical neuromodulation to treat children and adolescents with migraine in the emergency department: A randomized double‐dummy pilot trial","authors":"Serena Laura Orr, Jonathan Kuziek, Samina Ali, Eva Anderson, Kathryn A. Birnie, Andrew D. Hershey, Prachi Khanna, Adam Kirton, Tolulope Sajobi, Stephen B. Freedman","doi":"10.1111/head.14838","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14838","url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveUsing a double‐dummy pilot randomized controlled trial design, we aimed to determine the feasibility and acceptability of comparing remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) to typical care intravenous pharmacologic interventions for the treatment of children and adolescents visiting the emergency department (ED) with migraine, and to compare parallel‐group versus crossover trial designs.BackgroundThere are limited data to guide the management of migraine in the ED. Children and adolescents are interested in neuromodulation, and specifically REN, for treatment in this setting, but there are no existing data on this approach.MethodsWe employed a double‐dummy, double‐blind, pilot randomized controlled trial that tested two designs in two phases: a parallel‐group design and a crossover design (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05102591). The intervention arms consisted of: (i) active REN stimulation with matched normal saline placebo intravenously, and (ii) matched sham REN stimulation, intravenous metoclopramide (0.15 mg/kg, maximum 10 mg), and intravenous ketorolac (0.5 mg/kg, maximum 30 mg). Youth aged 8.0–&lt;18.0 years visiting a Canadian tertiary care pediatric ED with migraine attacks as per criteria B–E of the International Classification of Headache Disorders third edition were eligible. Primary outcomes were focused on trial feasibility and acceptability, and preliminary efficacy and safety data were also collected.ResultsA total of 34% (22/65) of those who screened eligible were enrolled. Three participants (14%) withdrew prior to receiving any study interventions. In all, 10 participants were allocated to typical care, and nine to REN. All treated participants (19/19) completed all assessments. Recruitment was higher during the parallel‐group phase: 1.1 participants/month versus 0.6 participants/month, and 36% (17/47) versus 28% (five of 18) of screened eligible were enrolled in the parallel‐group and crossover phases, respectively. Participants reported positive impressions of REN use in the ED, e.g., higher mean (standard deviation [SD]) levels of interest in using REN only at 3.7 (1.0) versus 2.8 (1.0) in using intravenous interventions only for a future ED visit. Participants and clinical staff reported overall positive impressions regarding the study protocol. Employing an 11‐point pain numerical rating scale, the mean (SD) reduction in pain severity score was 2.1 (1.3) and 2.9 (2.9) from baseline to 1 h, and 2.4 (1.6) and 4.0 (3.5) from baseline to 2 h for REN and intravenous interventions, respectively. One participant in the typical care group and none in the REN group experienced adverse events.ConclusionWe demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of our trial protocol and of using REN to treat youth presenting to the ED with migraine. The parallel‐group design generated a higher recruitment rate than the crossover design. Our preliminary efficacy and safety data suggest that REN could be non‐inferior to typical car","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142254373","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Predictors of migraine interictal burden: The hidden role of subjective memory complaints 偏头痛发作间期负担的预测因素:主观记忆抱怨的隐性作用
IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI: 10.1111/head.14819
Filipa Dourado Sotero, João Nobre, Beatriz Nunes Vicente, Isabel Pavão Martins
BackgroundThe “interictal burden of migraine” (MIB) is a new concept that encompasses the overall impact of the disease between migraine episodes. However, the factors that contribute to this interictal burden are still unclear.ObjectiveThis study aimed to identify explanatory factors of interictal burden in patients with migraine.MethodsThis prospective cross‐sectional observational including 200 patients with migraine (92% [n = 184] female, with a mean [standard deviation] age of 44.8 [12] years, 53% [n = 106] with chronic migraine) completed a clinical and questionnaire assessment targeting MIB, migraine impact, and depressive and cognitive complaints.ResultsMore than three‐fourths (76% [n = 152]) of patients had moderate‐to‐severe interictal burden. Higher interictal burden (MIB Scale ≥2) was associated with higher headache frequency (eight vs. 14, p = 0.001) and intensity (headache index score 17.0 vs. 30.0, p = 0.002), higher headache impact (six‐item Headache Impact Test score 59.2 vs. 63.9, p = 0.001), and more subjective memory complaints (Subjective Memory Complaints Questionnaire [SMC] score 9.0 vs. 4.5, p = 0.001), as well as anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)‐Anxiety score 5 vs. 10, p < 0.001) and depression symptoms (HADS‐Depression score 5 vs. 8, p < 0.001). Once accounted for these potential explanatory variables, subjective memory complaints and impact of headache during ictal phase remained as individual determinants of the interictal burden, with SMC explaining 15% (odds ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval 1.03–1.28; p = 0.010) of the interictal burden.ConclusionThis finding highlights the need to consider cognitive complaints as part of the construct of interictal burden of these patients to refine the focus of their management.
背景 "偏头痛发作间期负担"(MIB)是一个新概念,包括偏头痛发作间期疾病的总体影响。本研究旨在确定偏头痛患者发作间期负担的解释因素。方法这项前瞻性横断面观察包括 200 名偏头痛患者(92% [n = 184] 为女性,平均 [标准差] 年龄为 44.结果 四分之三以上(76% [n = 152])的患者有中度至重度发作间期负担。较高的发作间期负担(MIB量表≥2)与较高的头痛频率(8 vs. 14,p = 0.001)和强度(头痛指数得分 17.0 vs. 30.0,p = 0.002)、较高的头痛影响(六项头痛影响测试得分 59.2 vs. 63.9,p = 0.001)、更多的主观记忆抱怨(主观记忆抱怨问卷 [SMC] 得分 9.0 vs. 4.5,p = 0.001)以及焦虑(医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)-焦虑得分 5 vs. 10,p <0.001)和抑郁症状(HADS-抑郁得分 5 vs. 8,p <0.001)。一旦考虑到这些潜在的解释变量,主观记忆主诉和发作期头痛的影响仍是发作间期负担的单独决定因素,SMC可解释15%的发作间期负担(几率比1.15,95%置信区间1.03-1.28;p = 0.010)。
{"title":"Predictors of migraine interictal burden: The hidden role of subjective memory complaints","authors":"Filipa Dourado Sotero, João Nobre, Beatriz Nunes Vicente, Isabel Pavão Martins","doi":"10.1111/head.14819","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14819","url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundThe “interictal burden of migraine” (MIB) is a new concept that encompasses the overall impact of the disease between migraine episodes. However, the factors that contribute to this interictal burden are still unclear.ObjectiveThis study aimed to identify explanatory factors of interictal burden in patients with migraine.MethodsThis prospective cross‐sectional observational including 200 patients with migraine (92% [<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 184] female, with a mean [standard deviation] age of 44.8 [12] years, 53% [<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 106] with chronic migraine) completed a clinical and questionnaire assessment targeting MIB, migraine impact, and depressive and cognitive complaints.ResultsMore than three‐fourths (76% [<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 152]) of patients had moderate‐to‐severe interictal burden. Higher interictal burden (MIB Scale ≥2) was associated with higher headache frequency (eight vs. 14, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.001) and intensity (headache index score 17.0 vs. 30.0, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.002), higher headache impact (six‐item Headache Impact Test score 59.2 vs. 63.9, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.001), and more subjective memory complaints (Subjective Memory Complaints Questionnaire [SMC] score 9.0 vs. 4.5, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.001), as well as anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)‐Anxiety score 5 vs. 10, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001) and depression symptoms (HADS‐Depression score 5 vs. 8, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001). Once accounted for these potential explanatory variables, subjective memory complaints and impact of headache during ictal phase remained as individual determinants of the interictal burden, with SMC explaining 15% (odds ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval 1.03–1.28; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.010) of the interictal burden.ConclusionThis finding highlights the need to consider cognitive complaints as part of the construct of interictal burden of these patients to refine the focus of their management.","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142254377","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Heightened migraine risk in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A national retrospective cohort study 类风湿性关节炎患者偏头痛风险增加:一项全国性回顾性队列研究
IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI: 10.1111/head.14832
Seonyoung Kang, Yeonghee Eun, Kyungdo Han, Jinhyung Jung, Hyungjin Kim, Ju‐Hong Min, Seulkee Lee, Hoon‐Suk Cha, Dong Wook Shin, Jaejoon Lee
ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the association between rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and subsequent migraine risk using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database.BackgroundMigraine may be related to immune dysfunction and previous studies have suggested an association with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases; however, the relationship between RA and migraine remains unclear.MethodsThis was a population‐based, nationwide, retrospective, longitudinal cohort study. Participants were enrolled from 2010 to 2017 and followed up until 2019. A total of 42,674 patients who had undergone a health checkup within 2 years prior to the initial diagnosis of RA were included in the study, after applying the exclusion criteria (previous migraine, other rheumatic disease, missing variables of interest). A non‐RA control was obtained by age and sex‐matching (1:5). Finally, 42,644 patients with RA were enrolled, with 213,370 individuals without RA included as controls. Among the patients with RA, 29,744 had seropositive RA (SPRA), and 12,900 had seronegative RA (SNRA). SPRA was defined by the International Classification of Diseases 10th revision (ICD‐10) code M05, prescription of disease‐modifying anti‐rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), and enrollment in a special copayment reduction program. SNRA was defined by the ICD‐10 code M06 and prescription of any DMARD. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of migraine incidents, defined using the ICD‐10 code of migraine (G43).ResultsA total of 22,294 migraine cases (17,912/213,370 [8.3%] in controls and 4382/42,674 [10.2%] in RA) were reported during a mean follow‐up of 4.4 years after a 1‐year lag period. Patients with RA had a 1.2‐fold higher risk of migraine compared with controls (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17–1.26). Increased risk of migraine was found in both patients with SNRA and SPRA compared with controls (aHR 1.20, CI 1.15–1.24 in SPRA; aHR 1.26, CI 1.19–1.34 in SNRA). Compared to patients with SNRA, those with SPRA did not demonstrate a heightened risk (aHR 0.94, CI 0.88–1.01). A significant interaction was confirmed between covariates (male, current smoker, those with diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia) and the risk of migraine (p for interaction of <0.05).ConclusionRA was linked to a higher migraine risk, regardless of seropositivity.
背景偏头痛可能与免疫功能紊乱有关,以往的研究表明偏头痛与慢性炎症性风湿性疾病有关;然而,RA与偏头痛之间的关系仍不清楚。方法这是一项基于人群的全国性回顾性纵向队列研究。这项研究以人口为基础,在全国范围内开展回顾性纵向队列研究,参与者从2010年至2017年登记入组,并随访至2019年。在应用排除标准(既往偏头痛、其他风湿性疾病、相关变量缺失)后,共有42674名在初次诊断为RA前两年内接受过健康检查的患者被纳入研究。通过年龄和性别配对(1:5)获得了非 RA 对照组。最后,42,644 名患有风湿性关节炎的患者被纳入研究,213,370 名未患有风湿性关节炎的患者被纳入对照组。在 RA 患者中,29744 人为血清阳性 RA(SPRA),12900 人为血清阴性 RA(SNRA)。SPRA 的定义是:国际疾病分类第 10 次修订版(ICD-10)代码 M05、处方改变病情抗风湿药(DMARDs)和参加特别共付额减免计划。SNRA的定义是ICD-10代码M06和开具任何DMARD处方。结果 在1年滞后期后的平均4.4年随访期间,共报告了22294例偏头痛病例(对照组为17912/213370 [8.3%],RA患者为4382/42674 [10.2%])。与对照组相比,RA 患者发生偏头痛的风险高出 1.2 倍(调整后危险比 [aHR] 1.21,95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.17-1.26)。与对照组相比,SNRA 和 SPRA 患者的偏头痛风险均有所增加(SPRA 患者的 aHR 为 1.20,CI 为 1.15-1.24;SNRA 患者的 aHR 为 1.26,CI 为 1.19-1.34)。与 SNRA 患者相比,SPRA 患者的风险并没有增加(aHR 0.94,CI 0.88-1.01)。协变量(男性、吸烟者、糖尿病患者和血脂异常者)与偏头痛风险之间存在明显的交互作用(交互作用的 p 为 0.05)。
{"title":"Heightened migraine risk in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A national retrospective cohort study","authors":"Seonyoung Kang, Yeonghee Eun, Kyungdo Han, Jinhyung Jung, Hyungjin Kim, Ju‐Hong Min, Seulkee Lee, Hoon‐Suk Cha, Dong Wook Shin, Jaejoon Lee","doi":"10.1111/head.14832","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14832","url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the association between rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and subsequent migraine risk using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database.BackgroundMigraine may be related to immune dysfunction and previous studies have suggested an association with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases; however, the relationship between RA and migraine remains unclear.MethodsThis was a population‐based, nationwide, retrospective, longitudinal cohort study. Participants were enrolled from 2010 to 2017 and followed up until 2019. A total of 42,674 patients who had undergone a health checkup within 2 years prior to the initial diagnosis of RA were included in the study, after applying the exclusion criteria (previous migraine, other rheumatic disease, missing variables of interest). A non‐RA control was obtained by age and sex‐matching (1:5). Finally, 42,644 patients with RA were enrolled, with 213,370 individuals without RA included as controls. Among the patients with RA, 29,744 had seropositive RA (SPRA), and 12,900 had seronegative RA (SNRA). SPRA was defined by the International Classification of Diseases 10th revision (ICD‐10) code M05, prescription of disease‐modifying anti‐rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), and enrollment in a special copayment reduction program. SNRA was defined by the ICD‐10 code M06 and prescription of any DMARD. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of migraine incidents, defined using the ICD‐10 code of migraine (G43).ResultsA total of 22,294 migraine cases (17,912/213,370 [8.3%] in controls and 4382/42,674 [10.2%] in RA) were reported during a mean follow‐up of 4.4 years after a 1‐year lag period. Patients with RA had a 1.2‐fold higher risk of migraine compared with controls (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17–1.26). Increased risk of migraine was found in both patients with SNRA and SPRA compared with controls (aHR 1.20, CI 1.15–1.24 in SPRA; aHR 1.26, CI 1.19–1.34 in SNRA). Compared to patients with SNRA, those with SPRA did not demonstrate a heightened risk (aHR 0.94, CI 0.88–1.01). A significant interaction was confirmed between covariates (male, current smoker, those with diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia) and the risk of migraine (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> for interaction of &lt;0.05).ConclusionRA was linked to a higher migraine risk, regardless of seropositivity.","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142254375","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of clinical pharmacist practitioners’ headache care roles across clinical contexts within the Veterans Health Administration: Optimizing pharmacist integration 退伍军人健康管理局内不同临床环境下临床药剂师头痛护理角色的比较:优化药剂师整合
IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI: 10.1111/head.14834
Roberta E. Goldman, Teresa M. Damush, Alexander B. Guirguis, Olivia Datre, Sean A. Baird, Jason J. Sico
BackgroundStudies show interdisciplinary treatment is highly effective for addressing chronic pain syndromes, including headache disorders. Increasingly, advanced practice pharmacists work collaboratively with physicians to apply their unique skills to enhance patient outcomes.ObjectiveThis qualitative study aimed to elucidate the potential in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) for increased roles of clinical pharmacist practitioners (CPPs)—advanced practice pharmacists with a scope of practice—in collaborative, interdisciplinary headache care teams. Our research question was: How do CPPs integrate with interdisciplinary headache care teams in Headache Centers of Excellence (HCoE) and non‐HCoE VHA facilities, and how can their roles be configured to optimize headache specialty care services?MethodsThis cross‐sectional qualitative study used purposive sampling to recruit CPPs providing headache care within HCoEs and in non‐HCoE VHA facilities for virtual, recorded, individual interviews. Multi‐stage qualitative data analysis entailed: team discussions; immersion/crystallization for close reading of transcripts to identify emerging patterns of HCoE/non‐HCoE comparison of CPPs’ experiences; team data sorting using spreadsheets; and further immersion into sorted data for final identification of comparisons and interpretation of the data.ResultsA total of 15 CPPs involved in headache care were interviewed, with about half working in HCoEs and half in non‐HCoE VHA facilities across the United States. CPPs’ roles within and outside HCoEs have considerable overlap as both groups co‐manage patients with headache with physicians. CPPs have independent and collaborative responsibilities as they extend headache specialists’ services by providing direct patient care and referring to additional providers for headache treatment. When their roles differ within and outside HCoEs it is largely due to level of integration on interdisciplinary headache or pain teams. CPPs in HCoEs collaborate with headache neurologists and interdisciplinary teams; some outside HCoEs do as well, while others work with primary care. CPPs’ weekly time dedicated specifically to headache tends to be greater in HCoEs. Nevertheless, most interviewees in both groups stated patient need exceeds CPP availability at their facilities for conducting detailed chart reviews, initial visits to understand the context of patients’ headache, and scheduled follow‐ups over time to monitor and adjust treatment. CPPs also consult with and educate physicians on headache pharmacy, particularly regarding appropriate use of non‐formulary medications.ConclusionFindings from this study suggest that CPPs’ roles in headache care are valuable to clinical colleagues and their patients and should be leveraged and expanded within HCoEs and non‐HCoE VHA facilities. When substantively integrated into interdisciplinary headache care teams, CPPs offer unique knowledge, headache management and patient behavior chang
背景研究表明,跨学科治疗对解决包括头痛疾病在内的慢性疼痛综合征非常有效。本定性研究旨在阐明退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)中临床执业药师(CPPs)--具有执业范围的高级执业药师--在跨学科头痛护理协作团队中发挥更大作用的潜力。我们的研究问题是在头痛卓越中心(HCoE)和非头痛卓越中心的美国退伍军人管理局(VHA)机构中,临床药剂师如何与跨学科头痛护理团队融合,以及如何配置他们的角色以优化头痛专科护理服务?方法这项横断面定性研究采用有目的的抽样方法,招募在头痛卓越中心(HCoE)和非头痛卓越中心的美国退伍军人管理局(VHA)机构中提供头痛护理服务的临床药剂师进行虚拟、录音、个人访谈。多阶段定性数据分析包括:团队讨论;沉浸/结晶,仔细阅读记录誊本,以确定 CPP 经验的 HCoE 与非 HCoE 比较的新模式;使用电子表格对团队数据进行分类;进一步沉浸到分类数据中,以最终确定比较结果并对数据进行解释。CPP在HCoE内外的角色有很大的重叠,因为这两个群体都与医生共同管理头痛患者。CPPs 承担着独立和协作的责任,他们通过提供直接的患者护理和转诊到其他医疗机构进行头痛治疗来扩展头痛专科医生的服务。当他们在HCoE内外的角色不同时,主要是由于跨学科头痛或疼痛团队的整合程度不同。HCoE内的CPP与头痛神经科医生和跨学科团队合作;HCoE外的一些CPP也与他们合作,而另一些则与初级医疗机构合作。在HCoE中,CPP每周专门用于头痛的时间往往更多。尽管如此,两组受访者中的大多数人都表示,患者的需求超过了他们机构中 CPP 的可用性,CPP 可以进行详细的病历审查、初次就诊以了解患者头痛的背景情况,以及定期随访以监测和调整治疗方案。CPP 还向医生提供头痛药学方面的咨询和教育,特别是关于非处方药物的适当使用。结论本研究的结果表明,CPP 在头痛护理中的作用对临床同事及其患者都很有价值,应在 HCoE 和非 HCoE 的 VHA 机构中加以利用和扩展。当CPP实质性地融入跨学科头痛护理团队时,他们可以提供独特的知识、头痛管理和患者行为改变技能,扩展头痛专家的服务,并提供患者和医生教育。这些综合职责有助于提高患者的治疗效果,促进患者持续获得高质量的循证头痛治疗。
{"title":"Comparison of clinical pharmacist practitioners’ headache care roles across clinical contexts within the Veterans Health Administration: Optimizing pharmacist integration","authors":"Roberta E. Goldman, Teresa M. Damush, Alexander B. Guirguis, Olivia Datre, Sean A. Baird, Jason J. Sico","doi":"10.1111/head.14834","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14834","url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundStudies show interdisciplinary treatment is highly effective for addressing chronic pain syndromes, including headache disorders. Increasingly, advanced practice pharmacists work collaboratively with physicians to apply their unique skills to enhance patient outcomes.ObjectiveThis qualitative study aimed to elucidate the potential in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) for increased roles of clinical pharmacist practitioners (CPPs)—advanced practice pharmacists with a scope of practice—in collaborative, interdisciplinary headache care teams. Our research question was: How do CPPs integrate with interdisciplinary headache care teams in Headache Centers of Excellence (HCoE) and non‐HCoE VHA facilities, and how can their roles be configured to optimize headache specialty care services?MethodsThis cross‐sectional qualitative study used purposive sampling to recruit CPPs providing headache care within HCoEs and in non‐HCoE VHA facilities for virtual, recorded, individual interviews. Multi‐stage qualitative data analysis entailed: team discussions; immersion/crystallization for close reading of transcripts to identify emerging patterns of HCoE/non‐HCoE comparison of CPPs’ experiences; team data sorting using spreadsheets; and further immersion into sorted data for final identification of comparisons and interpretation of the data.ResultsA total of 15 CPPs involved in headache care were interviewed, with about half working in HCoEs and half in non‐HCoE VHA facilities across the United States. CPPs’ roles within and outside HCoEs have considerable overlap as both groups co‐manage patients with headache with physicians. CPPs have independent and collaborative responsibilities as they extend headache specialists’ services by providing direct patient care and referring to additional providers for headache treatment. When their roles differ within and outside HCoEs it is largely due to level of integration on interdisciplinary headache or pain teams. CPPs in HCoEs collaborate with headache neurologists and interdisciplinary teams; some outside HCoEs do as well, while others work with primary care. CPPs’ weekly time dedicated specifically to headache tends to be greater in HCoEs. Nevertheless, most interviewees in both groups stated patient need exceeds CPP availability at their facilities for conducting detailed chart reviews, initial visits to understand the context of patients’ headache, and scheduled follow‐ups over time to monitor and adjust treatment. CPPs also consult with and educate physicians on headache pharmacy, particularly regarding appropriate use of non‐formulary medications.ConclusionFindings from this study suggest that CPPs’ roles in headache care are valuable to clinical colleagues and their patients and should be leveraged and expanded within HCoEs and non‐HCoE VHA facilities. When substantively integrated into interdisciplinary headache care teams, CPPs offer unique knowledge, headache management and patient behavior chang","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":"101 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142254374","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Persistence, effectiveness, and tolerability of anti‐calcitonin gene–related peptide monoclonal antibodies in patients with chronic migraine 抗降钙素基因相关肽单克隆抗体在慢性偏头痛患者中的持续性、有效性和耐受性
IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI: 10.1111/head.14827
Anna de Dios, Neus Pagès‐Puigdemont, Sergio Ojeda, Pau Riera, Rebeca Pelegrín, Noemí Morollon, Robert Belvís, Jordi Real, Montserrat Masip
ObjectiveTo evaluate, in patients with chronic migraine (CM) in real‐world conditions, the persistence, effectiveness, and tolerability of erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab anti‐calcitonin gene–related peptide (anti‐CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and the persistence and effects of switching.BackgroundAnti‐CGRP mAbs represent a novel therapeutic approach to the management of CM; however, real‐world data on persistence, effectiveness, and tolerability, especially after switching, are scarce.MethodsThis was a retrospective observational cohort study including all patients with CM treated with erenumab, fremanezumab, and/or galcanezumab in a tertiary hospital between January 2019 and December 2022. Treatment persistence was measured as the number of days between treatment start and end dates or the end of follow‐up and also as a percentage of persistent patients at 3, 6, and 12 months; effectiveness as a ≥50% reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD); and tolerability as the number and type of adverse events.ResultsIncluded were 281 patients (383 treatments) with CM (91.5% [257/281] female) receiving anti‐CGRP mAbs. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) treatment persistence was 267 (103–550) days. At 12 months, persistence was greater for the first (66.7%) compared to the second (49.8%) and third (37.2%) anti‐CGRP mAb treatments (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.35–2.74; HR = 2.75, 95% CI: 1.69–4.47, respectively). Persistence minimum observed median (IQR) was also greater for the first (291 [112–594] days) compared to both the second (188 [90–403] days; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.001) and third (167 [89–352] days; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.001) anti‐CGRP mAb treatments. For the first anti‐CGRP mAb treatment, there were no differences in persistence among the different drugs. In terms of effectiveness of the first, second, and third anti‐CGRP mAb treatments, a ≥50% reduction in MMD was achieved by 57.6% (117/203), 25.0% (11/44), and 11.8% (2/17) of patients, respectively, at 3 months, and by 55.8% (87/156), 29.6% (8/27), and 12.5% (1/8) of patients, respectively, at 6 months. At 12 months, no significant effectiveness differences were observed among anti‐CGRP mAb treatments. As for tolerability, 55 adverse events were reported by 43 (15.3%) patients, mostly mild and leading to treatment discontinuation in only 14 (5.0%) patients. The most common adverse events were constipation, injection site reaction, and pruritus. Erenumab patients (3%, 3/99) experienced a higher rate of discontinuation for constipation.ConclusionsOur findings showed a 12‐month higher treatment persistence with the use of a first anti‐CGRP mAb treatment when the switch to a second treatment was due to ineffectiveness or severe side events. This persistence was lower after a second or third anti‐CGRP. Additionally, in terms of effectiveness, the first anti‐CGRP treatment achieved a higher response in terms of ≥50% reduction in MMD
目的评估在真实世界条件下慢性偏头痛(CM)患者使用erenumab、fremanezumab和galcanezumab抗降钙素基因相关肽(anti-CGRP)单克隆抗体(mAbs)的持续性、有效性和耐受性,以及换药后的持续性和效果。背景抗CGRP mAbs是治疗CM的一种新型治疗方法;然而,有关持续性、有效性和耐受性(尤其是转换后)的真实世界数据却很少。方法这是一项回顾性观察队列研究,包括2019年1月至2022年12月期间在一家三级医院接受erenumab、fremanezumab和/或galcanezumab治疗的所有CM患者。治疗持续性以治疗开始和结束日期或随访结束日期之间的天数来衡量,也以3个月、6个月和12个月时持续性患者的百分比来衡量;有效性以每月偏头痛天数(MMD)减少≥50%来衡量;耐受性以不良事件的数量和类型来衡量。结果纳入了281名接受抗CGRP mAbs治疗的CM患者(383次治疗)(91.5% [257/281]为女性)。治疗持续时间的中位数(四分位数间距[IQR])为267(103-550)天。12 个月时,第一次(66.7%)抗 CGRP mAb 治疗的持续率高于第二次(49.8%)和第三次(37.2%)抗 CGRP mAb 治疗的持续率(危险比 [HR] = 1.93,95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.35-2.74;HR = 1.35-2.74,95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.35-2.74):分别为 1.35-2.74; HR = 2.75, 95% CI: 1.69-4.47)。与第二次(188 [90-403] 天;p < 0.001)和第三次(167 [89-352] 天;p < 0.001)抗 CGRP mAb 治疗相比,第一次(291 [112-594] 天)的最低观察中位数(IQR)也更高。对于第一次抗 CGRP mAb 治疗,不同药物的持续时间没有差异。就第一次、第二次和第三次抗 CGRP mAb 治疗的疗效而言,3 个月时分别有 57.6%(117/203)、25.0%(11/44)和 11.8%(2/17)的患者 MMD 减少≥50%,6 个月时分别有 55.8%(87/156)、29.6%(8/27)和 12.5%(1/8)的患者 MMD 减少≥50%。12个月时,抗CGRP mAb疗法的疗效无明显差异。在耐受性方面,43 名患者(15.3%)报告了 55 例不良反应,大部分为轻微不良反应,仅有 14 名患者(5.0%)因此中断治疗。最常见的不良反应是便秘、注射部位反应和瘙痒。结论:我们的研究结果表明,由于疗效不佳或严重副作用而转用第二种治疗方法时,使用第一种抗 CGRP mAb 治疗方法的 12 个月治疗持续率较高。而在使用第二或第三种抗 CGRP 后,治疗的持续率较低。此外,就疗效而言,第一种抗CGRP治疗在MMD减少≥50%方面取得了更高的反应;然而,一些患者可能会从转换策略中获益。最后,抗CGRP mAbs的耐受性良好。需要进一步研究以确定从第一种抗CGRP mAb治疗转换后的反应预测因素。
{"title":"Persistence, effectiveness, and tolerability of anti‐calcitonin gene–related peptide monoclonal antibodies in patients with chronic migraine","authors":"Anna de Dios, Neus Pagès‐Puigdemont, Sergio Ojeda, Pau Riera, Rebeca Pelegrín, Noemí Morollon, Robert Belvís, Jordi Real, Montserrat Masip","doi":"10.1111/head.14827","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14827","url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveTo evaluate, in patients with chronic migraine (CM) in real‐world conditions, the persistence, effectiveness, and tolerability of erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab anti‐calcitonin gene–related peptide (anti‐CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and the persistence and effects of switching.BackgroundAnti‐CGRP mAbs represent a novel therapeutic approach to the management of CM; however, real‐world data on persistence, effectiveness, and tolerability, especially after switching, are scarce.MethodsThis was a retrospective observational cohort study including all patients with CM treated with erenumab, fremanezumab, and/or galcanezumab in a tertiary hospital between January 2019 and December 2022. Treatment persistence was measured as the number of days between treatment start and end dates or the end of follow‐up and also as a percentage of persistent patients at 3, 6, and 12 months; effectiveness as a ≥50% reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD); and tolerability as the number and type of adverse events.ResultsIncluded were 281 patients (383 treatments) with CM (91.5% [257/281] female) receiving anti‐CGRP mAbs. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) treatment persistence was 267 (103–550) days. At 12 months, persistence was greater for the first (66.7%) compared to the second (49.8%) and third (37.2%) anti‐CGRP mAb treatments (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.35–2.74; HR = 2.75, 95% CI: 1.69–4.47, respectively). Persistence minimum observed median (IQR) was also greater for the first (291 [112–594] days) compared to both the second (188 [90–403] days; &lt;jats:italic&gt;p&lt;/jats:italic&gt; &lt; 0.001) and third (167 [89–352] days; &lt;jats:italic&gt;p&lt;/jats:italic&gt; &lt; 0.001) anti‐CGRP mAb treatments. For the first anti‐CGRP mAb treatment, there were no differences in persistence among the different drugs. In terms of effectiveness of the first, second, and third anti‐CGRP mAb treatments, a ≥50% reduction in MMD was achieved by 57.6% (117/203), 25.0% (11/44), and 11.8% (2/17) of patients, respectively, at 3 months, and by 55.8% (87/156), 29.6% (8/27), and 12.5% (1/8) of patients, respectively, at 6 months. At 12 months, no significant effectiveness differences were observed among anti‐CGRP mAb treatments. As for tolerability, 55 adverse events were reported by 43 (15.3%) patients, mostly mild and leading to treatment discontinuation in only 14 (5.0%) patients. The most common adverse events were constipation, injection site reaction, and pruritus. Erenumab patients (3%, 3/99) experienced a higher rate of discontinuation for constipation.ConclusionsOur findings showed a 12‐month higher treatment persistence with the use of a first anti‐CGRP mAb treatment when the switch to a second treatment was due to ineffectiveness or severe side events. This persistence was lower after a second or third anti‐CGRP. Additionally, in terms of effectiveness, the first anti‐CGRP treatment achieved a higher response in terms of ≥50% reduction in MMD","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142254426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Role of diffusion tensor imaging in the evaluation of white matter integrity in idiopathic intracranial hypertension 弥散张量成像在评估特发性颅内高压白质完整性中的作用
IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI: 10.1111/head.14825
Bahar Atasoy, Asli Yaman Kula, Serdar Balsak, Yagmur Basak Polat, Zeynep Donmez, Ahmet Akcay, Abdusselim Adil Peker, Ozlem Toluk, Alpay Alkan
ObjectivesTo determine whether idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) may affect white matter integrity and optic pathways by using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and to correlate the DTI metrics with intracranial pressure (ICP).MethodsThis study is a retrospective case–control study. A total of 42 patients who underwent lumbar puncture and those with elevated ICP, meeting the diagnostic criteria for IIH, were included in the study. All patients had supportive magnetic resonance imaging findings for the diagnosis of IIH. The headache control group comprised 36 patients who presented to the Neurology Department with infrequent episodic tension‐type headache, had a normal neurologic examination, and had clinical and radiological findings suggestive of normal ICP. For each patient with IIH, clinical findings and ophthalmological measurements were recorded. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), fractional anisotropy (FA), axial diffusivity (AD), and radial diffusivity (RD) values were calculated using a region of interest‐based method in different white matter tracts and optic pathways and compared.ResultsA total of 42 patients diagnosed with IIH (three males, 39 females), with a mean (standard deviation [SD] age of 38.1 (8.9) years), and 36 headache controls (10 males, 26 females, mean [SD] age; 38.1 [9.4] years) were included in the study. The mean (SD) body mass index (BMI) of the patients with IIH was 25.2 (1.9) kg/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>, and the mean (SD) BMI of the headache controls was 23.3 (1.5) kg/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.001). Decreased FA values and increased RD values in the cingulum were detected in patients with IIH compared to the headache controls (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.003, Cohen's <jats:italic>d</jats:italic> = 0.681; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.002 Cohen's <jats:italic>d</jats:italic> = −0.710). Decreased AD values in the left and right superior cerebellar peduncle and increased ADC values in the middle cerebellar peduncle were detected in patients with IIH compared to the headache controls (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.001, Cohen's <jats:italic>d</jats:italic> = 0.961; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.009, Cohen's <jats:italic>d</jats:italic> = 0.607; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.015, Cohen's <jats:italic>d</jats:italic> = −0.564). Increased ADC and RD values and decreased FA values in optic nerve were detected in patients with IIH (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.010, Cohen's <jats:italic>d</jats:italic> = −0.603; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.004, Cohen's <jats:italic>d</jats:italic> = −0.676; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.015 Cohen's <jats:italic>d</jats:italic> = 0.568). A positive correlation was found between the cerebrospinal fluid pressure and ADC values of the left and right superior and left inferior longitudinal fasciculus, genu of the corpus callosum, and right optic radiation (<jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = 0.43, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic
目的 通过使用弥散张量成像(DTI)确定特发性颅内高压(IIH)是否会影响白质完整性和视路,并将 DTI 指标与颅内压(ICP)相关联。本研究是一项回顾性病例对照研究,共纳入 42 名接受腰椎穿刺的患者,这些患者的ICP升高,符合IIH的诊断标准。所有患者的磁共振成像结果均支持 IIH 诊断。头痛对照组由 36 名患者组成,他们因不经常发作的紧张型头痛到神经内科就诊,神经系统检查正常,临床和放射学检查结果提示 ICP 正常。每位 IIH 患者的临床表现和眼科测量结果均被记录在案。采用基于感兴趣区的方法计算不同白质束和视通路的表观扩散系数(ADC)、分数各向异性(FA)、轴向扩散率(AD)和径向扩散率(RD)值,并进行比较。结果 共有42名确诊为IIH的患者(3名男性,39名女性)(平均(标准差[SD])年龄为38.1(8.9)岁)和36名头痛对照组患者(10名男性,26名女性,平均[SD]年龄为38.1[9.4]岁)参加了研究。IIH 患者的平均(标清)体重指数(BMI)为 25.2 (1.9) kg/m2,头痛对照组的平均(标清)体重指数(BMI)为 23.3 (1.5) kg/m2 (p <0.001)。与头痛对照组相比,发现IIH患者脑干的FA值降低,RD值升高(P = 0.003,Cohen's d = 0.681;P = 0.002 Cohen's d = -0.710)。与头痛对照组相比,IIH 患者左侧和右侧小脑上梗的 AD 值降低,小脑中梗的 ADC 值升高(p < 0.001,Cohen's d = 0.961;p = 0.009,Cohen's d = 0.607;p = 0.015,Cohen's d = -0.564)。在 IIH 患者中发现视神经的 ADC 值和 RD 值增加,FA 值降低(P = 0.010,Cohen's d = -0.603;P = 0.004,Cohen's d = -0.676;P = 0.015,Cohen's d = 0.568)。脑脊液压力与左右上、左下纵束、胼胝体底部和右视神经辐射的 ADC 值呈正相关(r = 0.43,p = 0.005;r = 0.31,p = 0.044;r = 0.39,p = 0.010;r = 0.35,p = 0.024;r = 0.41,p = 0.007)。结论颅高压可能与 DTI 值恶化有关,这可能被解释为脑室周围白质以外的许多脑区白质微结构完整性受损的迹象。压力引起的水肿和轴突变性可能是这种微结构损伤的潜在机制。
{"title":"Role of diffusion tensor imaging in the evaluation of white matter integrity in idiopathic intracranial hypertension","authors":"Bahar Atasoy, Asli Yaman Kula, Serdar Balsak, Yagmur Basak Polat, Zeynep Donmez, Ahmet Akcay, Abdusselim Adil Peker, Ozlem Toluk, Alpay Alkan","doi":"10.1111/head.14825","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14825","url":null,"abstract":"ObjectivesTo determine whether idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) may affect white matter integrity and optic pathways by using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and to correlate the DTI metrics with intracranial pressure (ICP).MethodsThis study is a retrospective case–control study. A total of 42 patients who underwent lumbar puncture and those with elevated ICP, meeting the diagnostic criteria for IIH, were included in the study. All patients had supportive magnetic resonance imaging findings for the diagnosis of IIH. The headache control group comprised 36 patients who presented to the Neurology Department with infrequent episodic tension‐type headache, had a normal neurologic examination, and had clinical and radiological findings suggestive of normal ICP. For each patient with IIH, clinical findings and ophthalmological measurements were recorded. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), fractional anisotropy (FA), axial diffusivity (AD), and radial diffusivity (RD) values were calculated using a region of interest‐based method in different white matter tracts and optic pathways and compared.ResultsA total of 42 patients diagnosed with IIH (three males, 39 females), with a mean (standard deviation [SD] age of 38.1 (8.9) years), and 36 headache controls (10 males, 26 females, mean [SD] age; 38.1 [9.4] years) were included in the study. The mean (SD) body mass index (BMI) of the patients with IIH was 25.2 (1.9) kg/m&lt;jats:sup&gt;2&lt;/jats:sup&gt;, and the mean (SD) BMI of the headache controls was 23.3 (1.5) kg/m&lt;jats:sup&gt;2&lt;/jats:sup&gt; (&lt;jats:italic&gt;p&lt;/jats:italic&gt; &lt; 0.001). Decreased FA values and increased RD values in the cingulum were detected in patients with IIH compared to the headache controls (&lt;jats:italic&gt;p&lt;/jats:italic&gt; = 0.003, Cohen's &lt;jats:italic&gt;d&lt;/jats:italic&gt; = 0.681; &lt;jats:italic&gt;p&lt;/jats:italic&gt; = 0.002 Cohen's &lt;jats:italic&gt;d&lt;/jats:italic&gt; = −0.710). Decreased AD values in the left and right superior cerebellar peduncle and increased ADC values in the middle cerebellar peduncle were detected in patients with IIH compared to the headache controls (&lt;jats:italic&gt;p&lt;/jats:italic&gt; &lt; 0.001, Cohen's &lt;jats:italic&gt;d&lt;/jats:italic&gt; = 0.961; &lt;jats:italic&gt;p&lt;/jats:italic&gt; = 0.009, Cohen's &lt;jats:italic&gt;d&lt;/jats:italic&gt; = 0.607; &lt;jats:italic&gt;p&lt;/jats:italic&gt; = 0.015, Cohen's &lt;jats:italic&gt;d&lt;/jats:italic&gt; = −0.564). Increased ADC and RD values and decreased FA values in optic nerve were detected in patients with IIH (&lt;jats:italic&gt;p&lt;/jats:italic&gt; = 0.010, Cohen's &lt;jats:italic&gt;d&lt;/jats:italic&gt; = −0.603; &lt;jats:italic&gt;p&lt;/jats:italic&gt; = 0.004, Cohen's &lt;jats:italic&gt;d&lt;/jats:italic&gt; = −0.676; &lt;jats:italic&gt;p&lt;/jats:italic&gt; = 0.015 Cohen's &lt;jats:italic&gt;d&lt;/jats:italic&gt; = 0.568). A positive correlation was found between the cerebrospinal fluid pressure and ADC values of the left and right superior and left inferior longitudinal fasciculus, genu of the corpus callosum, and right optic radiation (&lt;jats:italic&gt;r&lt;/jats:italic&gt; = 0.43, &lt;jats:italic&gt;p&lt;/jats:italic","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142199088","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Occipital condyle syndrome due to small-cell lung carcinoma: A case report. 小细胞肺癌导致的枕骨髁综合征:病例报告。
IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI: 10.1111/head.14833
Satoshi Yamashita, Toru Kinouchi, Tomoyuki Otsu, Makoto Tsumura, Akihiko Taira, Masaki Tomura, Yuri Mizuno, Naoki Akamatsu, Hiroyuki Murai

Skull base metastases, including those from small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC), can present with various syndromes depending on the site of involvement, such as orbital syndrome, parasellar syndrome, middle fossa syndrome, jugular foramen syndrome, and occipital condyle syndrome (OCS). One such example is OCS, which consists of unilateral occipital headache accompanied with ipsilateral hypoglossal palsy. This case report describes a 51-year-old man initially diagnosed with OCS, which led to the discovery of systemic bone metastases from SCLC. Magnetic resonance imaging showed lesions in the occipital condyle and hypoglossal canal, while positron emission tomography-computed tomography identified a lung mass and widespread metastases. SCLC is highly aggressive and metastatic, with the bone being a common site of spread. In this case, the OCS preceded the diagnosis of the underlying malignancy. Prompt diagnosis and treatment are crucial, as patients with OCS often have advanced disease. This case highlights the importance of considering SCLC as a potential etiology for OCS, given the propensity for bone metastases. Early recognition and evaluation of OCS is essential to initiate appropriate management.

颅底转移瘤,包括小细胞肺癌(SCLC)的颅底转移瘤,根据受累部位的不同,可表现出不同的综合征,如眼眶综合征、腮腺综合征、中窝综合征、颈静脉孔综合征和枕髁综合征(OCS)。OCS 就是其中之一,它包括单侧枕部头痛并伴有同侧舌下神经麻痹。本病例报告描述了一名 51 岁男子最初被诊断为 OCS,随后发现了 SCLC 全身骨转移。磁共振成像显示枕骨髁和舌下管有病变,而正电子发射计算机断层扫描则发现了肺部肿块和广泛的转移灶。SCLC具有高度侵袭性和转移性,骨骼是常见的扩散部位。在本病例中,OCS先于潜在恶性肿瘤的诊断。及时诊断和治疗至关重要,因为OCS患者通常已是晚期。鉴于骨转移的倾向,本病例强调了将 SCLC 作为 OCS 潜在病因的重要性。早期识别和评估OCS对启动适当的治疗至关重要。
{"title":"Occipital condyle syndrome due to small-cell lung carcinoma: A case report.","authors":"Satoshi Yamashita, Toru Kinouchi, Tomoyuki Otsu, Makoto Tsumura, Akihiko Taira, Masaki Tomura, Yuri Mizuno, Naoki Akamatsu, Hiroyuki Murai","doi":"10.1111/head.14833","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14833","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Skull base metastases, including those from small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC), can present with various syndromes depending on the site of involvement, such as orbital syndrome, parasellar syndrome, middle fossa syndrome, jugular foramen syndrome, and occipital condyle syndrome (OCS). One such example is OCS, which consists of unilateral occipital headache accompanied with ipsilateral hypoglossal palsy. This case report describes a 51-year-old man initially diagnosed with OCS, which led to the discovery of systemic bone metastases from SCLC. Magnetic resonance imaging showed lesions in the occipital condyle and hypoglossal canal, while positron emission tomography-computed tomography identified a lung mass and widespread metastases. SCLC is highly aggressive and metastatic, with the bone being a common site of spread. In this case, the OCS preceded the diagnosis of the underlying malignancy. Prompt diagnosis and treatment are crucial, as patients with OCS often have advanced disease. This case highlights the importance of considering SCLC as a potential etiology for OCS, given the propensity for bone metastases. Early recognition and evaluation of OCS is essential to initiate appropriate management.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142153711","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Changes in use of acute and preventive medications for migraine after erenumab initiation over 12 months: A United States retrospective cohort study. 开始使用艾伦单抗 12 个月后偏头痛急性和预防性药物使用的变化:一项美国回顾性队列研究。
IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI: 10.1111/head.14820
Jasjit K Multani, Robert Urman, Andrew S Park, Karminder Gill, Fiston Vuvu, Kainan Sun, Leah B Patel, Karen M Stockl, Kevin Hawkins, Christopher Rhyne, Mark E Bensink

Objective: To assess changes in real-world use of acute and preventive medications for migraine over a 12-month follow-up period in the United States following initiation of the anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway monoclonal antibody (mAb) erenumab.

Background: Early assessments of real-world use of acute and preventive medications for migraine after initiation of erenumab have been limited to 6 months of follow-up.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study used data from the IQVIA open-source longitudinal prescription (LRx) and medical (Dx) claims databases. Adult patients with an initial claim (index date) for erenumab between May 2018 and April 2020 were identified.

Results: Among 201,176 patients who met inclusion criteria, the mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 47.5 (13.8) years and 85.6% (n = 172,153) were female. Most patients used one or more acute (88.4%; n = 177,795) and one or more traditional preventive (86.1%; n = 173,225) medications during the 12-month pre-index period. Adherence to erenumab (proportion of days covered [PDC] ≥0.80) was 40.2% (n = 80,927) with an overall mean (SD) PDC of 0.60 (0.34). Among all patients, 70.0% (n = 140,809) discontinued erenumab. After accounting for 24.7% (n = 49,720) of patients who restarted erenumab, discontinuation without reinitiation was observed in 45.3% (n = 91,089) of total patients. Switching to a different anti-CGRP pathway mAb was observed in 13.1% (n = 26,446) of total patients. Among 177,795 patients with pre-index use of one or more acute migraine medication class, 86.5% (n = 153,788) had post-index use of the same class, and 56.7% (87,134/153,788) of them discontinued one or more class of acute medication in the 12-month follow-up period. Similarly, among 173,225 patients with pre-index use of one or more traditional migraine preventive medication class, 67.7% (n = 117,274) had post-index use of the same class, and 46.7% (54,790/117,274) of them discontinued one or more class of traditional preventive medication in the 12-month follow-up period.

Conclusions: In this long-term study, we observed the discontinuation of both acute and preventive medications for migraine post-erenumab initiation.

目的:目的:评估在美国开始使用抗降钙素基因相关肽(CGRP)通路单克隆抗体(mAb)艾伦单抗后的12个月随访期内,偏头痛急性期和预防性药物实际使用情况的变化:背景:对开始使用艾伦单抗后偏头痛急性和预防性药物实际使用情况的早期评估仅限于6个月的随访:这项回顾性队列研究使用的数据来自IQVIA开源纵向处方(LRx)和医疗(Dx)索赔数据库。确定了 2018 年 5 月至 2020 年 4 月期间首次报销(索引日期)艾伦单抗的成人患者:在符合纳入标准的 201,176 名患者中,平均(标准差 [SD])年龄为 47.5 (13.8)岁,85.6%(n = 172,153 人)为女性。大多数患者在指数发布前的 12 个月内使用过一种或多种急性药物(88.4%;n = 177,795 例)和一种或多种传统预防药物(86.1%;n = 173,225 例)。依仑单抗的依从性(覆盖天数比例 [PDC] ≥0.80)为 40.2%(n = 80,927),总体平均(标清)PDC 为 0.60 (0.34)。在所有患者中,70.0%(n = 140,809)的患者停用了艾伦单抗。在重新开始使用艾伦单抗的患者中,有24.7%(n = 49,720)的患者停用了艾伦单抗,在所有患者中,有45.3%(n = 91,089)的患者没有重新开始使用艾伦单抗。在所有患者中,13.1%(n = 26446)的患者转用了不同的抗 CGRP 通路 mAb。在177,795名索引前使用过一种或多种急性偏头痛药物的患者中,86.5%(n = 153,788)在索引后使用过同类药物,其中56.7%(87,134/153,788)的患者在12个月的随访期间停用了一种或多种急性药物。同样,在173,225名指数前使用过一种或多种传统偏头痛预防药物的患者中,67.7%(n = 117,274)在指数后使用过同一类药物,其中46.7%(54,790/117,274)在12个月的随访期间停用了一种或多种传统预防药物:在这项长期研究中,我们观察到在开始使用艾伦单抗治疗偏头痛后,急性和预防性药物均有停用。
{"title":"Changes in use of acute and preventive medications for migraine after erenumab initiation over 12 months: A United States retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Jasjit K Multani, Robert Urman, Andrew S Park, Karminder Gill, Fiston Vuvu, Kainan Sun, Leah B Patel, Karen M Stockl, Kevin Hawkins, Christopher Rhyne, Mark E Bensink","doi":"10.1111/head.14820","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14820","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess changes in real-world use of acute and preventive medications for migraine over a 12-month follow-up period in the United States following initiation of the anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway monoclonal antibody (mAb) erenumab.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Early assessments of real-world use of acute and preventive medications for migraine after initiation of erenumab have been limited to 6 months of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used data from the IQVIA open-source longitudinal prescription (LRx) and medical (Dx) claims databases. Adult patients with an initial claim (index date) for erenumab between May 2018 and April 2020 were identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 201,176 patients who met inclusion criteria, the mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 47.5 (13.8) years and 85.6% (n = 172,153) were female. Most patients used one or more acute (88.4%; n = 177,795) and one or more traditional preventive (86.1%; n = 173,225) medications during the 12-month pre-index period. Adherence to erenumab (proportion of days covered [PDC] ≥0.80) was 40.2% (n = 80,927) with an overall mean (SD) PDC of 0.60 (0.34). Among all patients, 70.0% (n = 140,809) discontinued erenumab. After accounting for 24.7% (n = 49,720) of patients who restarted erenumab, discontinuation without reinitiation was observed in 45.3% (n = 91,089) of total patients. Switching to a different anti-CGRP pathway mAb was observed in 13.1% (n = 26,446) of total patients. Among 177,795 patients with pre-index use of one or more acute migraine medication class, 86.5% (n = 153,788) had post-index use of the same class, and 56.7% (87,134/153,788) of them discontinued one or more class of acute medication in the 12-month follow-up period. Similarly, among 173,225 patients with pre-index use of one or more traditional migraine preventive medication class, 67.7% (n = 117,274) had post-index use of the same class, and 46.7% (54,790/117,274) of them discontinued one or more class of traditional preventive medication in the 12-month follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this long-term study, we observed the discontinuation of both acute and preventive medications for migraine post-erenumab initiation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142153708","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Headache diagnosis and treatment: A pilot knowledge and needs assessment among physical therapists. 头痛的诊断和治疗:物理治疗师知识和需求试点评估。
IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI: 10.1111/head.14801
Mia T Minen, Christopher Whetten, Danielle Messier, Sheena Mehta, Anne Williamson, Allison Verhaak, Brian Grosberg

Objective: The objective of this pilot study was to assess physical therapists' (PTs) knowledge and needs regarding headache diagnosis and management.

Background: While there is significant research on physical therapy and cervicogenic headache, studies suggest that migraine is often under-recognized, misdiagnosed, and inadequately treated across society despite its high prevalence and burden. Because migraine commonly includes concurrent neck pain and/or vestibular symptoms, patients with migraine may present to PTs for treatment. Very little is known about PTs' headache and migraine education, knowledge, and clinical practices.

Methods: A team of headache specialists and PTs adapted a previously used headache knowledge and needs assessment survey to help ascertain PTs' knowledge and needs regarding headache treatment. The cross-sectional survey was distributed online via Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) to PTs within a large healthcare system in Connecticut.

Results: An estimated 50.5% (101/200) of PTs invited to complete the survey did so. Only 37.6% (38/101) of respondents reported receiving any formal headache or migraine education in their professional training, leading to knowledge gaps in differentiating and responding to headache subtypes. Only 45.5% (46/101) were able to identify that migraine is characterized by greater pain intensity than tension-type headache, and 22.8% (23/101) reported not knowing the duration of untreated migraine. When asked about the aspects of care they believe their patients with headache would like to see improved, PTs reported education around prevention and appropriate medication use (61/100 [61.0%]), provider awareness of the degree of disability associated with migraine (51/100 [51.0%]), and diagnostics (47/100 [47.0%]).

Conclusion: This sample of PTs from one healthcare system demonstrates knowledge gaps and variations in clinical practice for managing their patients with headache. Future research on integrating additional opportunities for headache education for physical therapists, including evidence-based behavioral therapies, is needed to ascertain whether it is likely to improve patient care.

目的: 本试验性研究的目的是评估物理治疗师(PTs)对头痛诊断和管理的知识和需求:本试验性研究旨在评估物理治疗师(PTs)在头痛诊断和管理方面的知识和需求:背景:尽管有关物理治疗和颈源性头痛的研究很多,但研究表明,尽管偏头痛的发病率和负担很高,但社会上对偏头痛的认识不足、误诊和治疗不当的情况却时有发生。由于偏头痛通常会并发颈部疼痛和/或前庭症状,因此偏头痛患者可能会向理疗师寻求治疗。人们对康复治疗师的头痛和偏头痛教育、知识和临床实践知之甚少:一个由头痛专家和康复治疗师组成的团队对之前使用过的头痛知识和需求评估调查进行了改编,以帮助确定康复治疗师在头痛治疗方面的知识和需求。该横断面调查通过研究电子数据采集(REDCap)向康涅狄格州一个大型医疗保健系统内的PT医生在线发放:据估计,50.5%(101/200)受邀完成了调查。只有37.6%(38/101)的受访者表示在专业培训中接受过任何正规的头痛或偏头痛教育,这导致他们在区分和应对头痛亚型方面存在知识差距。只有45.5%(46/101)的受访者能够明确偏头痛的疼痛强度高于紧张型头痛,22.8%(23/101)的受访者表示不知道偏头痛未经治疗的持续时间。当被问及他们认为头痛患者希望在哪些方面得到更好的护理时,康复治疗师表示,他们希望在预防和合理用药方面得到教育(61/100 [61.0%]),医疗服务提供者对偏头痛相关残疾程度的认识(51/100 [51.0%]),以及诊断(47/100 [47.0%]):来自一个医疗系统的护理人员样本表明,他们在管理头痛患者的临床实践中存在知识差距和差异。未来需要对物理治疗师头痛教育的其他机会(包括循证行为疗法)进行整合研究,以确定其是否有可能改善患者护理。
{"title":"Headache diagnosis and treatment: A pilot knowledge and needs assessment among physical therapists.","authors":"Mia T Minen, Christopher Whetten, Danielle Messier, Sheena Mehta, Anne Williamson, Allison Verhaak, Brian Grosberg","doi":"10.1111/head.14801","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14801","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this pilot study was to assess physical therapists' (PTs) knowledge and needs regarding headache diagnosis and management.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>While there is significant research on physical therapy and cervicogenic headache, studies suggest that migraine is often under-recognized, misdiagnosed, and inadequately treated across society despite its high prevalence and burden. Because migraine commonly includes concurrent neck pain and/or vestibular symptoms, patients with migraine may present to PTs for treatment. Very little is known about PTs' headache and migraine education, knowledge, and clinical practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A team of headache specialists and PTs adapted a previously used headache knowledge and needs assessment survey to help ascertain PTs' knowledge and needs regarding headache treatment. The cross-sectional survey was distributed online via Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) to PTs within a large healthcare system in Connecticut.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An estimated 50.5% (101/200) of PTs invited to complete the survey did so. Only 37.6% (38/101) of respondents reported receiving any formal headache or migraine education in their professional training, leading to knowledge gaps in differentiating and responding to headache subtypes. Only 45.5% (46/101) were able to identify that migraine is characterized by greater pain intensity than tension-type headache, and 22.8% (23/101) reported not knowing the duration of untreated migraine. When asked about the aspects of care they believe their patients with headache would like to see improved, PTs reported education around prevention and appropriate medication use (61/100 [61.0%]), provider awareness of the degree of disability associated with migraine (51/100 [51.0%]), and diagnostics (47/100 [47.0%]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This sample of PTs from one healthcare system demonstrates knowledge gaps and variations in clinical practice for managing their patients with headache. Future research on integrating additional opportunities for headache education for physical therapists, including evidence-based behavioral therapies, is needed to ascertain whether it is likely to improve patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142125511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Headache
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1