首页 > 最新文献

Headache最新文献

英文 中文
Routine migraine screening as a standard of care for Women's health: A position statement from the American Headache Society. 例行偏头痛筛查作为妇女健康护理的标准:美国头痛协会的立场声明。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-10 DOI: 10.1111/head.70023
Todd J Schwedt, Amaal J Starling, Jessica Ailani, Andrew D Hershey, Hope L O'Brien, Elizabeth Seng, Adam S Sprouse-Blum, Scott B Turner, Richard B Lipton

Objectives: The aim of this work was to develop an American Headache Society position statement addressing diagnostic screening for migraine among girls and women.

Background: Despite its high prevalence and substantial negative impacts, migraine is underdiagnosed and undertreated. Diagnostic screening for migraine enables more patients to receive timely, appropriate, and effective management.

Methods: Development of this position statement followed the rules established by the American Headache Society Guidelines Committee. The published literature was reviewed to determine if migraine meets criteria for when disease screening is justified, to guide recommendations for screening tools, and to determine subpopulation(s) for which migraine screening is indicated. After author consensus was reached, the position statement was reviewed and approved by the American Headache Society Board of Directors.

Results: Migraine fulfills established criteria for conditions in which screening is appropriate since it is highly prevalent, results in significant morbidity, and exerts substantial economic and social costs. Migraine incidence and prevalence are exceptionally high among girls and women during adolescence and through menopause. Furthermore, there are valid and reliable diagnostic screening methods (e.g., ID Migraine) and effective treatments that reduce migraine symptoms and disease impact.

Conclusion: Yearly diagnostic screening for migraine should be included as part of women's preventive healthcare services, particularly from adolescence to menopause.

目的:这项工作的目的是制定美国头痛协会的立场声明,解决女孩和妇女偏头痛的诊断筛查。背景:尽管偏头痛的高患病率和巨大的负面影响,但它的诊断和治疗不足。偏头痛的诊断筛查使更多的患者得到及时、适当和有效的治疗。方法:根据美国头痛协会指南委员会制定的规则制定本立场声明。回顾已发表的文献,以确定偏头痛是否符合疾病筛查的标准,指导筛查工具的推荐,并确定偏头痛筛查的亚人群。在作者达成共识后,立场声明由美国头痛协会董事会审查并批准。结果:偏头痛符合既定条件,筛查是适当的,因为它是高度普遍的,导致显著的发病率,并产生巨大的经济和社会成本。在青春期和绝经期的女孩和妇女中,偏头痛的发病率和流行率特别高。此外,有有效和可靠的诊断筛选方法(例如,ID偏头痛)和有效的治疗方法可以减少偏头痛症状和疾病影响。结论:偏头痛的年度诊断筛查应作为妇女预防性保健服务的一部分,特别是从青春期到更年期。
{"title":"Routine migraine screening as a standard of care for Women's health: A position statement from the American Headache Society.","authors":"Todd J Schwedt, Amaal J Starling, Jessica Ailani, Andrew D Hershey, Hope L O'Brien, Elizabeth Seng, Adam S Sprouse-Blum, Scott B Turner, Richard B Lipton","doi":"10.1111/head.70023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this work was to develop an American Headache Society position statement addressing diagnostic screening for migraine among girls and women.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite its high prevalence and substantial negative impacts, migraine is underdiagnosed and undertreated. Diagnostic screening for migraine enables more patients to receive timely, appropriate, and effective management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Development of this position statement followed the rules established by the American Headache Society Guidelines Committee. The published literature was reviewed to determine if migraine meets criteria for when disease screening is justified, to guide recommendations for screening tools, and to determine subpopulation(s) for which migraine screening is indicated. After author consensus was reached, the position statement was reviewed and approved by the American Headache Society Board of Directors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Migraine fulfills established criteria for conditions in which screening is appropriate since it is highly prevalent, results in significant morbidity, and exerts substantial economic and social costs. Migraine incidence and prevalence are exceptionally high among girls and women during adolescence and through menopause. Furthermore, there are valid and reliable diagnostic screening methods (e.g., ID Migraine) and effective treatments that reduce migraine symptoms and disease impact.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Yearly diagnostic screening for migraine should be included as part of women's preventive healthcare services, particularly from adolescence to menopause.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145721140","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Treatment of abdominal migraine in an 8-year-old child with calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist: A case report. 降钙素基因相关肽受体拮抗剂治疗8岁儿童腹部偏头痛1例。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-10 DOI: 10.1111/head.70017
Yunzhu Tang, Chunyan Lu, Yao Zhou, Shuxia Qian
{"title":"Treatment of abdominal migraine in an 8-year-old child with calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist: A case report.","authors":"Yunzhu Tang, Chunyan Lu, Yao Zhou, Shuxia Qian","doi":"10.1111/head.70017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70017","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145714108","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Case report: Treatment of temporomandibular joint disorder pain with V3 nerve block procedure. 病例报告:V3神经阻滞术治疗颞下颌关节紊乱性疼痛。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-04 DOI: 10.1111/head.70013
Dean Zeldich, Nadav Calderon, Itay Goor-Aryeh, Gabriel Ricardo Lichtenstein

A 38-year-old woman with temporomandibular joint dysfunction (TMJD) and chronic migraine presented with refractory TMJD-related pain. Conservative treatments and prior injections provided only short-term relief. To achieve longer lasting pain reduction, an ultrasound-guided V3 nerve block was performed, targeting the mandibular nerve with a 4-mL injection of 1% lidocaine. The patient experienced immediate pain relief and sustained improvement. Encouraged by results on the right side, she underwent the same procedure on the left, achieving identical relief. Despite unchanged migraine frequency, TMJD pain resolution significantly enhanced her quality of life, demonstrating the efficacy of ultrasound-guided V3 nerve blocks.

38岁女性颞下颌关节功能障碍(TMJD)和慢性偏头痛提出难治性TMJD相关疼痛。保守治疗和先前的注射只能提供短期的缓解。为了实现更持久的疼痛减轻,超声引导V3神经阻滞,针对下颌神经注射4毫升1%利多卡因。患者的疼痛立即缓解并持续改善。受到右侧手术结果的鼓舞,她在左侧进行了同样的手术,取得了同样的缓解。尽管偏头痛频率不变,但TMJD疼痛缓解显著提高了她的生活质量,证明了超声引导V3神经阻滞的有效性。
{"title":"Case report: Treatment of temporomandibular joint disorder pain with V3 nerve block procedure.","authors":"Dean Zeldich, Nadav Calderon, Itay Goor-Aryeh, Gabriel Ricardo Lichtenstein","doi":"10.1111/head.70013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A 38-year-old woman with temporomandibular joint dysfunction (TMJD) and chronic migraine presented with refractory TMJD-related pain. Conservative treatments and prior injections provided only short-term relief. To achieve longer lasting pain reduction, an ultrasound-guided V3 nerve block was performed, targeting the mandibular nerve with a 4-mL injection of 1% lidocaine. The patient experienced immediate pain relief and sustained improvement. Encouraged by results on the right side, she underwent the same procedure on the left, achieving identical relief. Despite unchanged migraine frequency, TMJD pain resolution significantly enhanced her quality of life, demonstrating the efficacy of ultrasound-guided V3 nerve blocks.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145668212","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Headache after hemorrhagic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. 出血性中风后头痛:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-02 DOI: 10.1111/head.70008
Bradley Ong, Jad El Ahdab, Ahmet Günkan, Shervin Badihian, Neil Nero, Marina Vilardo, Lisa Wilson, Nicolas Thompson, Payal Patel Soni

Background/objective: Hemorrhagic stroke comprises about 20% of all strokes, with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) being the most common type. While post-stroke care often focuses on motor and functional recovery, post-stroke headaches remain underrecognized and understudied. This study aimed to summarize and pool the evidence on the prevalence and patterns of headaches after hemorrhagic stroke.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published from database inception to December 2024, identifying observational studies that investigated headaches after hemorrhagic stroke. Studies enrolling five or more adult patients were included. Meta-analyses were conducted to estimate pooled prevalence of overall, acute/subacute, persistent, and severe headaches. Acute/subacute headache was defined as onset within 3 months of stroke, while persistent headache as headache lasting more than 3 months. Severe headache was defined as either a ≥ 7/10 pain intensity or functional impairment.

Results: Twenty-four studies comprising 4688 patients (58.2% female; mean age 56.9) were included. The overall pooled headache prevalence of 46.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 36.3%-56.1%; 95% prediction interval [PI]: 4.3%-91.8%; I2 = 96.7%) following hemorrhagic stroke. Stratified analyses showed that the prevalence was 58.3% (95% CI: 44.4%-71.6%, I2 = 97.5%) in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and 36.1% (95% CI: 26.7%-46.0%, I2 = 93.9%) in those with ICH. Acute/subacute headache occurred in 55.9% (95% CI: 41.1%-70.1%; I2 = 97.6%), while persistent headache occurred in 36.7% (95% CI: 25.6%-48.5%, I2 = 93.1%). Severe headaches were reported in 42.7% (95% CI: 15.8%-72.1%; I2 = 98.0%) of patients with acute/subacute headache and 14.3% (95% CI: 10.4%-18.7%; I2 = 71.5%) with persistent headache. In both SAH and ICH, headaches frequently become chronic. No significant differences were observed by study design, geographic region, Human Development Index, or risk of bias.

Conclusion: Headache is a common but understudied condition that can manifest at or soon after a hemorrhagic stroke and can persist for years, potentially contributing to long-term morbidity. Standardized headache definitions and longitudinal assessments are needed to improve recognition and inform future clinical trials targeting this underappreciated source of post-stroke morbidity. Further research is essential to better understand the nature of these headaches, which will help shape treatment protocols and enhance patient care.

背景/目的:出血性中风约占所有中风的20%,其中脑出血(ICH)是最常见的类型。虽然中风后的护理通常侧重于运动和功能恢复,但中风后头痛仍未得到充分认识和研究。本研究旨在总结和汇集出血性中风后头痛的患病率和模式的证据。方法:我们对从数据库建立到2024年12月发表的研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,确定了调查出血性中风后头痛的观察性研究。纳入了5名或更多成年患者的研究。进行荟萃分析以估计总体、急性/亚急性、持续性和严重头痛的总患病率。急性/亚急性头痛定义为中风后3个月内发病,而持续性头痛定义为头痛持续3个月以上。重度头痛定义为疼痛强度≥7/10或功能障碍。结果:纳入24项研究,共4688例患者(58.2%为女性,平均年龄56.9岁)。出血性卒中后总头痛发生率为46.1%(95%可信区间[CI]: 36.3% ~ 56.1%; 95%预测区间[PI]: 4.3% ~ 91.8%; I2 = 96.7%)。分层分析显示,蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)患者的患病率为58.3% (95% CI: 44.4% ~ 71.6%, I2 = 97.5%), ICH患者的患病率为36.1% (95% CI: 26.7% ~ 46.0%, I2 = 93.9%)。急性/亚急性头痛发生率为55.9% (95% CI: 41.1% ~ 70.1%; I2 = 97.6%),持续性头痛发生率为36.7% (95% CI: 25.6% ~ 48.5%, I2 = 93.1%)。急性/亚急性头痛患者中重度头痛发生率为42.7% (95% CI: 15.8%-72.1%; I2 = 98.0%),持续性头痛患者为14.3% (95% CI: 10.4%-18.7%; I2 = 71.5%)。在SAH和ICH中,头痛经常变成慢性的。研究设计、地理区域、人类发展指数或偏倚风险均未观察到显著差异。结论:头痛是一种常见但研究不足的疾病,可在出血性中风时或不久后出现,并可持续数年,可能导致长期发病。需要标准化的头痛定义和纵向评估,以提高对这一未被充分认识的卒中后发病来源的认识,并为未来的临床试验提供信息。进一步的研究对于更好地了解这些头痛的性质至关重要,这将有助于制定治疗方案并加强患者护理。
{"title":"Headache after hemorrhagic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Bradley Ong, Jad El Ahdab, Ahmet Günkan, Shervin Badihian, Neil Nero, Marina Vilardo, Lisa Wilson, Nicolas Thompson, Payal Patel Soni","doi":"10.1111/head.70008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objective: </strong>Hemorrhagic stroke comprises about 20% of all strokes, with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) being the most common type. While post-stroke care often focuses on motor and functional recovery, post-stroke headaches remain underrecognized and understudied. This study aimed to summarize and pool the evidence on the prevalence and patterns of headaches after hemorrhagic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published from database inception to December 2024, identifying observational studies that investigated headaches after hemorrhagic stroke. Studies enrolling five or more adult patients were included. Meta-analyses were conducted to estimate pooled prevalence of overall, acute/subacute, persistent, and severe headaches. Acute/subacute headache was defined as onset within 3 months of stroke, while persistent headache as headache lasting more than 3 months. Severe headache was defined as either a ≥ 7/10 pain intensity or functional impairment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four studies comprising 4688 patients (58.2% female; mean age 56.9) were included. The overall pooled headache prevalence of 46.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 36.3%-56.1%; 95% prediction interval [PI]: 4.3%-91.8%; I<sup>2</sup> = 96.7%) following hemorrhagic stroke. Stratified analyses showed that the prevalence was 58.3% (95% CI: 44.4%-71.6%, I<sup>2</sup> = 97.5%) in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and 36.1% (95% CI: 26.7%-46.0%, I<sup>2</sup> = 93.9%) in those with ICH. Acute/subacute headache occurred in 55.9% (95% CI: 41.1%-70.1%; I<sup>2</sup> = 97.6%), while persistent headache occurred in 36.7% (95% CI: 25.6%-48.5%, I<sup>2</sup> = 93.1%). Severe headaches were reported in 42.7% (95% CI: 15.8%-72.1%; I<sup>2</sup> = 98.0%) of patients with acute/subacute headache and 14.3% (95% CI: 10.4%-18.7%; I<sup>2</sup> = 71.5%) with persistent headache. In both SAH and ICH, headaches frequently become chronic. No significant differences were observed by study design, geographic region, Human Development Index, or risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Headache is a common but understudied condition that can manifest at or soon after a hemorrhagic stroke and can persist for years, potentially contributing to long-term morbidity. Standardized headache definitions and longitudinal assessments are needed to improve recognition and inform future clinical trials targeting this underappreciated source of post-stroke morbidity. Further research is essential to better understand the nature of these headaches, which will help shape treatment protocols and enhance patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145660908","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A retrospective audit of the real-world safety and effectiveness profile of eptinezumab for treatment-resistant chronic migraine in Australia. 在澳大利亚对eptinezumab治疗难治性慢性偏头痛的安全性和有效性进行回顾性审计。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-02 DOI: 10.1111/head.70015
Lakshini Gunasekera, Shuli Cheng, Emma Foster, Shobi Sivathamboo, Terence O'Brien, Helmut Butzkueven, Jayashri Kulkarni, Elspeth Hutton

Objective: To describe the real-world safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of eptinezumab for chronic migraine prevention in Australia.

Background: Eptinezumab is a relatively new medication for treatment-resistant chronic migraine prevention. It was only introduced onto the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in August 2023, so there are limited real-world Australian data regarding its tolerability and effectiveness.

Methods: This is a single center retrospective audit of patients receiving eptinezumab for chronic migraine prevention between 1 September 2023 and 31 December 2024. Headache characteristics were compared at baseline and 3 months after eptinezumab administration. Primary outcomes were mean reductions in monthly headache days (MHD) and monthly migraine days (MMD). Secondary outcomes were mean monthly reductions in acute abortive medications, and adverse events.

Results: Of the 60 patients who received eptinezumab during the study period, a total of 54 patients with complete medical records and headache diaries were used in the statistical analysis. The majority were female (43/54, 80%) with mean age 41.7 years (SD 11.4). Three months after eptinezumab infusion, MMD reduced from 23.0 to 15.4 days (p value <0.001), and MHD reduced from 26.5 to 19.2 days (p value <0.001). Acute analgesic use decreased from 16.2 to 11.1 days (p value<0.001). The vast majority (94%, 51/54) had no immediate adverse events. Of 22 patients with 6-month post infusion data, mean MMD and MHD decreased to 11.0 (p < 0.001) and 17.8 days (p < 0.001), respectively, from baseline. Statistically significant reductions to both co-primary outcomes were achieved in those with pre-existing medication-overuse headache and those who had previously not responded to onabotulinumtoxinA, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab.

Conclusions: Our findings show that eptinezumab is a safe, well-tolerated migraine prophylactic that decreases monthly migraine and headache days in a small sample of Australian patients with treatment-resistant chronic migraine. Further prospective studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up data are needed to confirm findings of this study.

目的:描述eptinezumab在澳大利亚用于慢性偏头痛预防的实际安全性、耐受性和有效性。背景:Eptinezumab是一种相对较新的治疗难治性慢性偏头痛预防药物。它在2023年8月才被引入澳大利亚药品福利计划,因此关于其耐受性和有效性的真实澳大利亚数据有限。方法:这是对2023年9月1日至2024年12月31日期间接受eptinezumab治疗慢性偏头痛患者的单中心回顾性审计。在基线和给药后3个月比较头痛特征。主要结局是每月头痛天数(MHD)和每月偏头痛天数(MMD)的平均减少。次要结局是急性流产药物的月平均减少和不良事件。结果:在研究期间接受eptinezumab治疗的60例患者中,有完整病历和头痛日记的患者共54例用于统计分析。多数为女性(43/ 54,80 %),平均年龄41.7岁(SD 11.4)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,eptinezumab是一种安全的、耐受性良好的偏头痛预防药物,在一小部分澳大利亚治疗抵抗性慢性偏头痛患者中,它可以减少每月偏头痛和头痛天数。进一步的前瞻性研究需要更大的样本量和更长的随访数据来证实本研究的发现。
{"title":"A retrospective audit of the real-world safety and effectiveness profile of eptinezumab for treatment-resistant chronic migraine in Australia.","authors":"Lakshini Gunasekera, Shuli Cheng, Emma Foster, Shobi Sivathamboo, Terence O'Brien, Helmut Butzkueven, Jayashri Kulkarni, Elspeth Hutton","doi":"10.1111/head.70015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70015","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the real-world safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of eptinezumab for chronic migraine prevention in Australia.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Eptinezumab is a relatively new medication for treatment-resistant chronic migraine prevention. It was only introduced onto the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in August 2023, so there are limited real-world Australian data regarding its tolerability and effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single center retrospective audit of patients receiving eptinezumab for chronic migraine prevention between 1 September 2023 and 31 December 2024. Headache characteristics were compared at baseline and 3 months after eptinezumab administration. Primary outcomes were mean reductions in monthly headache days (MHD) and monthly migraine days (MMD). Secondary outcomes were mean monthly reductions in acute abortive medications, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 60 patients who received eptinezumab during the study period, a total of 54 patients with complete medical records and headache diaries were used in the statistical analysis. The majority were female (43/54, 80%) with mean age 41.7 years (SD 11.4). Three months after eptinezumab infusion, MMD reduced from 23.0 to 15.4 days (p value <0.001), and MHD reduced from 26.5 to 19.2 days (p value <0.001). Acute analgesic use decreased from 16.2 to 11.1 days (p value<0.001). The vast majority (94%, 51/54) had no immediate adverse events. Of 22 patients with 6-month post infusion data, mean MMD and MHD decreased to 11.0 (p < 0.001) and 17.8 days (p < 0.001), respectively, from baseline. Statistically significant reductions to both co-primary outcomes were achieved in those with pre-existing medication-overuse headache and those who had previously not responded to onabotulinumtoxinA, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings show that eptinezumab is a safe, well-tolerated migraine prophylactic that decreases monthly migraine and headache days in a small sample of Australian patients with treatment-resistant chronic migraine. Further prospective studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up data are needed to confirm findings of this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145660968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
2025 guideline update to acute treatment of migraine for adults in the emergency department: The American Headache Society evidence assessment of parenteral pharmacotherapies. 2025年急诊科成人偏头痛急性治疗指南更新:美国头痛学会对肠外药物治疗的证据评估
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1111/head.70016
Jennifer Robblee, Mia T Minen, Benjamin W Friedman, Miguel A Cortel-LeBlanc, Achelle Cortel-LeBlanc, Serena L Orr
<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To update the 2016 American Headache Society (AHS) guideline on parenteral pharmacologic therapies for the management of migraine attacks in the emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using the same methodology as the 2016 guideline. The original search strategy was repeated and expanded to include studies of nerve blocks and sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blocks. We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane, clinicaltrials.gov, and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform through February 10, 2025. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving adults diagnosed with migraine, treated in the ED with intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM), subcutaneous (SC), or nerve block (including SPG block) interventions. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full texts; a third reviewer resolved disagreements. Data were extracted using a standardized form and verified by a second reviewer. Risk of bias was assessed using the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) criteria. Where applicable, meta-analyses were performed. Efficacy was categorized as highly likely, likely, or possibly effective or ineffective. Clinical recommendations were developed using the AAN guideline development process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 26 new RCTs evaluating 20 injectable treatments. Of these, 12 were rated class I (low risk of bias), 9 class II, and 4 class III. Prochlorperazine IV, dexketoprofen IV, sumatriptan SC, and greater occipital nerve blocks (GONB) were considered highly likely to be effective based on multiple class I studies. Chlorpromazine IV, metoclopramide IV, eptinezumab IV, ketorolac IV, and supraorbital nerve blocks (SONB) were considered likely effective based on one class I or multiple class II studies. Hydromorphone IV, propofol IV, and paracetamol IV were considered likely ineffective based on class I or multiple class II studies. After review of the evidence and a consensus process, recommendations were made for each intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prochlorperazine IV and GONB must be offered to eligible adults presenting to the ED with a migraine attack for treatment of headache requiring parenteral therapy (level A - must offer) in those without contraindications, while hydromorphone IV must not be offered (level A - must not offer). Treatments that should be offered when appropriate (level B - should offer) include dexketoprofen IV, ketorolac IV, metoclopramide IV, sumatriptan SC, and SONB. Chlorpromazine IV, dexamethasone IV, and valproate IV may be offered (level C - may offer). Paracetamol IV may not be offered (level C - should not offer). Eptinezumab should be offered (level B) only for patients matching the clinical trial population but is rated level U - no recommendation for an ED-specific population. Additional evidence is needed
目的:更新2016年美国头痛学会(AHS)关于急诊科(ED)偏头痛发作管理的肠外药物治疗指南。方法:我们采用与2016年指南相同的方法进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。最初的搜索策略被重复并扩展到包括神经阻滞和蝶腭神经节(SPG)阻滞的研究。我们检索了截至2025年2月10日的Medline、Embase、Cochrane、clinicaltrials.gov和世界卫生组织(WHO)国际临床试验注册平台。符合条件的研究是随机对照试验(RCTs),涉及诊断为偏头痛的成年人,在ED中接受静脉注射(IV)、肌肉注射(IM)、皮下注射(SC)或神经阻滞(包括SPG阻滞)干预。两位审稿人独立筛选标题/摘要和全文;第三位审稿人解决了分歧。使用标准化表格提取数据,并由第二审稿人进行验证。偏倚风险采用美国神经病学学会(AAN)标准进行评估。在适用的情况下,进行了荟萃分析。功效分为极可能、可能、可能有效或无效。临床建议是根据AAN指南制定过程制定的。结果:搜索确定了26个新的随机对照试验,评估了20种注射治疗方法。其中,12个被评为I类(低偏倚风险),9个被评为II类,4个被评为III类。基于多项I类研究,丙氯哌嗪IV、右酮洛芬IV、舒马匹坦SC和更大枕骨神经阻滞(GONB)被认为很可能有效。氯丙嗪IV、甲氧氯普胺IV、依替单抗IV、酮罗拉酸IV和眶上神经阻滞(SONB)在一项I类或多项II类研究中被认为可能有效。基于I类或多个II类研究,氢吗啡酮IV、异丙酚IV和扑热息痛IV被认为可能无效。在对证据进行审查并达成共识后,对每项干预措施提出建议。结论:在没有禁忌症的情况下,有偏头痛发作的成年人必须给予丙氯拉嗪IV和GONB治疗,以治疗需要肠外治疗的头痛(a级必须提供),而不能给予氢吗啡酮IV (a级必须提供)。适当时应给予的治疗(B级-应给予)包括dexketoprofen IV, ketorolac IV, metoclopramide IV,舒马匹坦SC和SONB。氯丙嗪IV,地塞米松IV,丙戊酸IV可提供(C级-可提供)。对乙酰氨基酚IV不能提供(C级-不应该提供)。Eptinezumab仅适用于符合临床试验人群的患者(B级),但额定值为U级-不推荐用于ed特异性人群。咖啡因、格拉司琼、布洛芬、氯胺酮、利多卡因、生理盐水、异丙酚和SPG阻滞剂目前都被评为U级——不推荐。
{"title":"2025 guideline update to acute treatment of migraine for adults in the emergency department: The American Headache Society evidence assessment of parenteral pharmacotherapies.","authors":"Jennifer Robblee, Mia T Minen, Benjamin W Friedman, Miguel A Cortel-LeBlanc, Achelle Cortel-LeBlanc, Serena L Orr","doi":"10.1111/head.70016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70016","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To update the 2016 American Headache Society (AHS) guideline on parenteral pharmacologic therapies for the management of migraine attacks in the emergency department (ED).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using the same methodology as the 2016 guideline. The original search strategy was repeated and expanded to include studies of nerve blocks and sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blocks. We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane, clinicaltrials.gov, and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform through February 10, 2025. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving adults diagnosed with migraine, treated in the ED with intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM), subcutaneous (SC), or nerve block (including SPG block) interventions. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full texts; a third reviewer resolved disagreements. Data were extracted using a standardized form and verified by a second reviewer. Risk of bias was assessed using the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) criteria. Where applicable, meta-analyses were performed. Efficacy was categorized as highly likely, likely, or possibly effective or ineffective. Clinical recommendations were developed using the AAN guideline development process.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;The search identified 26 new RCTs evaluating 20 injectable treatments. Of these, 12 were rated class I (low risk of bias), 9 class II, and 4 class III. Prochlorperazine IV, dexketoprofen IV, sumatriptan SC, and greater occipital nerve blocks (GONB) were considered highly likely to be effective based on multiple class I studies. Chlorpromazine IV, metoclopramide IV, eptinezumab IV, ketorolac IV, and supraorbital nerve blocks (SONB) were considered likely effective based on one class I or multiple class II studies. Hydromorphone IV, propofol IV, and paracetamol IV were considered likely ineffective based on class I or multiple class II studies. After review of the evidence and a consensus process, recommendations were made for each intervention.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;Prochlorperazine IV and GONB must be offered to eligible adults presenting to the ED with a migraine attack for treatment of headache requiring parenteral therapy (level A - must offer) in those without contraindications, while hydromorphone IV must not be offered (level A - must not offer). Treatments that should be offered when appropriate (level B - should offer) include dexketoprofen IV, ketorolac IV, metoclopramide IV, sumatriptan SC, and SONB. Chlorpromazine IV, dexamethasone IV, and valproate IV may be offered (level C - may offer). Paracetamol IV may not be offered (level C - should not offer). Eptinezumab should be offered (level B) only for patients matching the clinical trial population but is rated level U - no recommendation for an ED-specific population. Additional evidence is needed","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145648363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
False nonresponders to anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies: A real-world analysis beyond migraine frequency reduction. 抗降钙素基因相关肽单克隆抗体的假无反应:一项真实世界的分析,超出偏头痛频率减少。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-28 DOI: 10.1111/head.70012
Albert Muñoz-Vendrell, Sergio Campoy-Díaz, Patricia Díaz-Corta, Lidia Termens, Jaume Campdelacreu, Joan Prat, Jordi Sanahuja, Mariano Huerta-Villanueva
<p><strong>Objectives/background: </strong>Reimbursement criteria for anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) typically rely on predefined reductions in monthly migraine days (MMD). However, this approach may fail to capture the full spectrum of treatment benefits, potentially leading to premature discontinuation in patients experiencing meaningful improvements in other parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective observational cohort study of prospectively collected data from a multicenter headache unit (Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge and Hospital de Viladecans, Barcelona, Spain) between December 2019 and September 2024. We included patients with migraine who initiated anti-CGRP MAbs and who, at 6 months, would not meet institutional reimbursement criteria for response (≥50% reduction in MMD or ≥30% reduction in MMD with ≥1-point Headache Impact Test-6 improvement) but nonetheless continued treatment ("false nonresponders"). As a comparison group, we included patients who discontinued treatment within the first 6 months due to lack of efficacy ("true nonresponders"). Outcome measures included headache frequency, disability, analgesic use, and overall treatment perception, assessed via headache diaries and patient-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 415 patients initiating MAbs, 106 were classified as false nonresponders. By month 6, 91.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 84.5-96.0) demonstrated improvements in at least one assessed outcome. Some of the most frequent benefits were Migraine Disability Assessment Score improvement (60.2%, 95% CI = 49.5-70.2), Patient Global Impression of Change score ≥ 5 (54.5%, 95% CI = 44.2-64.6), Headache Impact Test-6 reduction (44.1%, 95% CI = 34.3-54.3), medication-overuse headache resolution (46.4%, 95% CI = 33.0-60.3), chronic to episodic migraine conversion (41.2%, 95% CI = 27.6-55.9), and a reduction in ≥50% of severe intensity days (29.3%, 95% CI = 19.4-41.0). Additionally, 82 patients continued treatment until 12 months, when 18.3% (95% CI = 10.6-28.4) of those eventually met reimbursement criteria, underscoring the potential for late response. In contrast, 76 patients were classified as true nonresponders for discontinuing treatment within the first 6 months; among the 38 who reached the month 6 evaluation, only 65.8% (95% CI = 48.6-80.4) demonstrated improvement in at least one parameter. Compared to false nonresponders, they had a more severe baseline profile, including higher frequency and intensity, greater disability and analgesic use, poorer quality of life, higher depression rates, and more frequent prior onabotulinumtoxinA use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A substantial proportion of patients with migraine classified as nonresponders to anti-CGRP MAbs at 6 months show measurable improvements beyond frequency reduction. These "false nonresponders" may benefit from continued treatment, highlighting the need for a
目的/背景:抗降钙素基因相关肽(CGRP)单克隆抗体(mab)的报销标准通常依赖于预先确定的每月偏头痛天数(MMD)的减少。然而,这种方法可能无法获得全部治疗益处,可能导致在其他参数有意义改善的患者过早停药。方法:这是一项回顾性观察队列研究,前瞻性收集了2019年12月至2024年9月期间来自西班牙巴塞罗那多中心头痛部门(Bellvitge大学医院和Viladecans医院)的数据。我们纳入了开始抗cgrp单克隆抗体治疗的偏头痛患者,这些患者在6个月时不符合机构对缓解的报销标准(烟雾病减少≥50%或烟雾病减少≥30%,头痛影响测试-6改善≥1点),但仍继续治疗(“假无反应”)。作为对照组,我们纳入了在前6个月内因缺乏疗效而停止治疗的患者(“真正无反应”)。结果测量包括头痛频率、残疾、止痛药使用和总体治疗感觉,通过头痛日记和患者报告的结果进行评估。结果:在415例启动单克隆抗体的患者中,106例被归类为假无反应。到第6个月,91.5%(95%置信区间[CI] = 84.5-96.0)的患者在至少一项评估结果中表现出改善。一些最常见的益处是偏头痛残疾评估评分改善(60.2%,95% CI = 49.5-70.2),患者总体变化印象评分≥5 (54.5%,95% CI = 44.2-64.6),头痛影响测试-6减少(44.1%,95% CI = 34.3-54.3),药物过度使用头痛缓解(46.4%,95% CI = 33.0-60.3),慢性偏头痛转化为发作性偏头痛(41.2%,95% CI = 27.6-55.9),以及严重强度天数减少≥50% (29.3%,95% CI = 19.4-41.0)。此外,82名患者持续治疗至12个月,其中18.3% (95% CI = 10.6-28.4)的患者最终达到了报销标准,强调了延迟反应的可能性。相比之下,76名患者在前6个月内停止治疗,被归类为真正无反应;在38名达到第6个月评估的患者中,只有65.8% (95% CI = 48.6-80.4)至少有一个参数得到改善。与假无反应者相比,他们有更严重的基线特征,包括更高的频率和强度,更大的残疾和止痛药使用,更差的生活质量,更高的抑郁率,更频繁的先前使用肉毒杆菌毒素。结论:相当大比例的偏头痛患者在6个月时对抗cgrp单克隆抗体无反应,除了频率降低外,还显示出可测量的改善。这些“假无反应”可能从持续治疗中受益,强调需要更全面的评估,包括强度、止痛药使用、残疾和生活质量,以防止过早停止潜在有效的治疗。相反,基线情况较差且早期改善有限的患者可能被适当地确定为真正的无反应,证明早期停止治疗是合理的。
{"title":"False nonresponders to anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies: A real-world analysis beyond migraine frequency reduction.","authors":"Albert Muñoz-Vendrell, Sergio Campoy-Díaz, Patricia Díaz-Corta, Lidia Termens, Jaume Campdelacreu, Joan Prat, Jordi Sanahuja, Mariano Huerta-Villanueva","doi":"10.1111/head.70012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70012","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objectives/background: &lt;/strong&gt;Reimbursement criteria for anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) typically rely on predefined reductions in monthly migraine days (MMD). However, this approach may fail to capture the full spectrum of treatment benefits, potentially leading to premature discontinuation in patients experiencing meaningful improvements in other parameters.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;This was a retrospective observational cohort study of prospectively collected data from a multicenter headache unit (Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge and Hospital de Viladecans, Barcelona, Spain) between December 2019 and September 2024. We included patients with migraine who initiated anti-CGRP MAbs and who, at 6 months, would not meet institutional reimbursement criteria for response (≥50% reduction in MMD or ≥30% reduction in MMD with ≥1-point Headache Impact Test-6 improvement) but nonetheless continued treatment (\"false nonresponders\"). As a comparison group, we included patients who discontinued treatment within the first 6 months due to lack of efficacy (\"true nonresponders\"). Outcome measures included headache frequency, disability, analgesic use, and overall treatment perception, assessed via headache diaries and patient-reported outcomes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Of 415 patients initiating MAbs, 106 were classified as false nonresponders. By month 6, 91.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 84.5-96.0) demonstrated improvements in at least one assessed outcome. Some of the most frequent benefits were Migraine Disability Assessment Score improvement (60.2%, 95% CI = 49.5-70.2), Patient Global Impression of Change score ≥ 5 (54.5%, 95% CI = 44.2-64.6), Headache Impact Test-6 reduction (44.1%, 95% CI = 34.3-54.3), medication-overuse headache resolution (46.4%, 95% CI = 33.0-60.3), chronic to episodic migraine conversion (41.2%, 95% CI = 27.6-55.9), and a reduction in ≥50% of severe intensity days (29.3%, 95% CI = 19.4-41.0). Additionally, 82 patients continued treatment until 12 months, when 18.3% (95% CI = 10.6-28.4) of those eventually met reimbursement criteria, underscoring the potential for late response. In contrast, 76 patients were classified as true nonresponders for discontinuing treatment within the first 6 months; among the 38 who reached the month 6 evaluation, only 65.8% (95% CI = 48.6-80.4) demonstrated improvement in at least one parameter. Compared to false nonresponders, they had a more severe baseline profile, including higher frequency and intensity, greater disability and analgesic use, poorer quality of life, higher depression rates, and more frequent prior onabotulinumtoxinA use.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion: &lt;/strong&gt;A substantial proportion of patients with migraine classified as nonresponders to anti-CGRP MAbs at 6 months show measurable improvements beyond frequency reduction. These \"false nonresponders\" may benefit from continued treatment, highlighting the need for a ","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145632600","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The role of stress in the comorbidity of migraine and other chronic primary pain. 压力在偏头痛和其他慢性原发性疼痛合并症中的作用。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-26 DOI: 10.1111/head.70004
Shi-Jie Zhao, Ting-Ting Wang, Qi Zhang, Simon Akerman, Dong-Yuan Cao

Background: Chronic migraine is one of the most common causes of headache, belonging to the chronic primary pain (CPP) classification, along with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS), temporomandibular disorders (TMD), and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), based on the International Classification of Diseases-11. The comorbidity between these pain disorders is commonly seen in the clinic. Stress directly and indirectly affects the pathophysiological mechanisms related to migraine and plays an important role in the co-occurrence and development of migraine, FMS, TMD, and IBS.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed and Web of Science databases, using combined keywords: stress, migraine, comorbidity, fibromyalgia syndrome, temporomandibular disorders, irritable bowel syndrome, pathological mechanisms, animal models, and treatment strategies, while emphasizing high impact studies. Literature was screened based on relevance, scientific rigor, and evidence level, prioritizing studies on stress-related comorbidity mechanisms, models, or treatments. Exclusion criteria included single case reports, non-full-text conference abstracts, non-English articles, low-relevance studies, low-quality methodologies, and general opinions (except authoritative consensus/guidelines).

Results: Clinical and preclinical studies support that potential stress-related mechanisms underlie these comorbidities, including dysfunction of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, dysregulation of autonomic nervous system, and central sensitization. We highlight the development and application of preclinical stress-induced comorbid models as crucial tools for investigating these shared mechanisms. Stress targeted interventions have potential in managing these conditions, but mechanisms and efficacy stability remain to be clarified.

Conclusion: Stress may be a key driver of migraine and CPP comorbidities. Stress induced preclinical models support mechanism exploration, and stress-targeted therapies hold promise for improving patient prognosis. Future research should deepen mechanistic studies and optimize models/therapies to enhance clinical care.

背景:慢性偏头痛是头痛最常见的原因之一,根据国际疾病分类-11,与纤维肌痛综合征(FMS)、颞下颌紊乱(TMD)和肠易激综合征(IBS)一起属于慢性原发性疼痛(CPP)分类。这些疼痛障碍的合并症在临床上很常见。应激直接或间接影响偏头痛相关的病理生理机制,在偏头痛、FMS、TMD和IBS共发生发展中起重要作用。方法:系统检索PubMed和Web of Science数据库,结合关键词:压力、偏头痛、合并症、纤维肌痛综合征、颞下颌紊乱、肠易激综合征、病理机制、动物模型和治疗策略,同时强调高影响研究。根据相关性、科学严谨性和证据水平筛选文献,优先考虑与压力相关的合并症机制、模型或治疗方法。排除标准包括单个病例报告、非全文会议摘要、非英文文章、低相关性研究、低质量方法和一般意见(权威共识/指南除外)。结果:临床和临床前研究支持潜在的应激相关机制是这些合并症的基础,包括下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴功能障碍、自主神经系统失调和中枢致敏。我们强调临床前应激诱导共病模型的发展和应用,作为研究这些共同机制的关键工具。针对压力的干预措施在管理这些疾病方面具有潜力,但机制和疗效稳定性仍有待阐明。结论:压力可能是偏头痛和CPP合并症的关键驱动因素。应激诱导的临床前模型支持机制探索,应激靶向治疗有望改善患者预后。未来的研究应深化机制研究,优化模型/治疗方法,以提高临床护理水平。
{"title":"The role of stress in the comorbidity of migraine and other chronic primary pain.","authors":"Shi-Jie Zhao, Ting-Ting Wang, Qi Zhang, Simon Akerman, Dong-Yuan Cao","doi":"10.1111/head.70004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic migraine is one of the most common causes of headache, belonging to the chronic primary pain (CPP) classification, along with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS), temporomandibular disorders (TMD), and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), based on the International Classification of Diseases-11. The comorbidity between these pain disorders is commonly seen in the clinic. Stress directly and indirectly affects the pathophysiological mechanisms related to migraine and plays an important role in the co-occurrence and development of migraine, FMS, TMD, and IBS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed and Web of Science databases, using combined keywords: stress, migraine, comorbidity, fibromyalgia syndrome, temporomandibular disorders, irritable bowel syndrome, pathological mechanisms, animal models, and treatment strategies, while emphasizing high impact studies. Literature was screened based on relevance, scientific rigor, and evidence level, prioritizing studies on stress-related comorbidity mechanisms, models, or treatments. Exclusion criteria included single case reports, non-full-text conference abstracts, non-English articles, low-relevance studies, low-quality methodologies, and general opinions (except authoritative consensus/guidelines).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinical and preclinical studies support that potential stress-related mechanisms underlie these comorbidities, including dysfunction of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, dysregulation of autonomic nervous system, and central sensitization. We highlight the development and application of preclinical stress-induced comorbid models as crucial tools for investigating these shared mechanisms. Stress targeted interventions have potential in managing these conditions, but mechanisms and efficacy stability remain to be clarified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stress may be a key driver of migraine and CPP comorbidities. Stress induced preclinical models support mechanism exploration, and stress-targeted therapies hold promise for improving patient prognosis. Future research should deepen mechanistic studies and optimize models/therapies to enhance clinical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145632625","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Engagement and predictors of use of a smartphone app for migraine self-management: A secondary analysis of the EMMA trial. 参与和使用智能手机应用程序偏头痛自我管理的预测:对EMMA试验的二次分析。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-25 DOI: 10.1111/head.70009
Stefanie Lysk, Daniel Pach, Tatjana Tissen-Diabaté, Simon Scholler, Claudia M Witt

Objective: The objective of this secondary analysis was to examine engagement with a mobile app for migraine self-management and to identify predictors of migraine app usage.

Background: Migraine self-monitoring and behavioral strategies are central components in migraine self-management, but patient adherence often remains a challenge. Recently, migraine apps have shown promise in enabling more frequent and continuous headache tracking and supporting self-management by integrating behavioral strategies; however, data on patient engagement with these digital interventions are still scarce.

Methods: This secondary analysis of the EMMA trial used the full dataset of the intervention group, which received a migraine app for 24 weeks, and examined app engagement and factors associated with frequent app usage. Outcomes were frequency of app engagement, intensity of app engagement, and time of usage. Potential associated factors included demographics, migraine history, burden of disease, headache management self-efficacy, and first-week app use. Descriptive analyses summarized engagement patterns for the overall app, the diary, and self-management modules. Kaplan-Meier survival curves illustrated usage over time. Univariable linear regression models explored associations between patient characteristics and first-week app usage as predictors of total app usage.

Results: Of the 238 patients, 161 (67.7%) were still actively using the app after 24 weeks. Total active usage days ranged from 1 to 168, with a mean (SD) of 129.7 (52.5) days, corresponding to usage on approximately 77% of days. Among all app modules, the headache and trigger diaries had the highest usage frequencies, with means (SDs) of 110.6 (49.7) and 118.1 (60.9) days, respectively. Engagement with the behavioral self-management modules was lower overall, with faster drop-off rates. Among the behavioral self-management modules, the training module showed the highest usage, with a mean (SD) of 26.2 (33.9) documented training days. Linear regression analyses showed that older age and higher app usage during the first week were associated with more frequent app usage.

Conclusions: This secondary analysis demonstrated high engagement with the headache and trigger diary modules of a migraine app over 6 months. These findings support the potential of smartphone apps to improve adherence to headache self-monitoring. However, engagement with the behavioral self-management modules was lower than intended, highlighting the persistent challenge of promoting adherence to behavioral migraine interventions.

Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00024174.

目的:这一次要分析的目的是检查偏头痛自我管理的移动应用程序的参与情况,并确定偏头痛应用程序使用的预测因素。背景:偏头痛自我监测和行为策略是偏头痛自我管理的核心组成部分,但患者的依从性往往仍然是一个挑战。最近,偏头痛应用程序显示出希望,可以更频繁和持续地跟踪头痛,并通过整合行为策略支持自我管理;然而,关于患者参与这些数字干预的数据仍然很少。方法:对EMMA试验的二次分析使用了干预组的完整数据集,干预组接受了24周的偏头痛应用程序,并检查了应用程序的参与度和与频繁使用应用程序相关的因素。结果是应用参与频率、应用参与强度和使用时间。潜在的相关因素包括人口统计学、偏头痛史、疾病负担、头痛管理自我效能和第一周应用程序使用情况。描述性分析总结了整个应用程序、日记和自我管理模块的用户粘性模式。Kaplan-Meier生存曲线说明了随时间的使用情况。单变量线性回归模型探讨了患者特征与第一周应用程序使用情况之间的关系,作为应用程序总使用情况的预测因子。结果:238例患者中,有161例(67.7%)在24周后仍在积极使用该应用程序。总活跃使用天数从1到168天不等,平均(SD)为129.7(52.5)天,相当于大约77%的天数的使用。在所有app模块中,头痛日记和触发日记的使用频率最高,平均(sd)分别为110.6(49.7)天和118.1(60.9)天。总体而言,行为自我管理模块的参与度较低,退出率更快。在行为自我管理模块中,训练模块的使用率最高,平均(SD)为26.2(33.9)。线性回归分析显示,年龄越大,第一周的应用使用率越高,使用应用的频率越高。结论:这一次要分析表明,在6个月的时间里,偏头痛应用程序的头痛和触发日记模块具有很高的参与度。这些发现支持了智能手机应用程序在提高头痛自我监测依从性方面的潜力。然而,行为自我管理模块的参与度低于预期,突出了促进坚持行为偏头痛干预的持续挑战。试验注册:德国临床试验注册:DRKS00024174。
{"title":"Engagement and predictors of use of a smartphone app for migraine self-management: A secondary analysis of the EMMA trial.","authors":"Stefanie Lysk, Daniel Pach, Tatjana Tissen-Diabaté, Simon Scholler, Claudia M Witt","doi":"10.1111/head.70009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this secondary analysis was to examine engagement with a mobile app for migraine self-management and to identify predictors of migraine app usage.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Migraine self-monitoring and behavioral strategies are central components in migraine self-management, but patient adherence often remains a challenge. Recently, migraine apps have shown promise in enabling more frequent and continuous headache tracking and supporting self-management by integrating behavioral strategies; however, data on patient engagement with these digital interventions are still scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This secondary analysis of the EMMA trial used the full dataset of the intervention group, which received a migraine app for 24 weeks, and examined app engagement and factors associated with frequent app usage. Outcomes were frequency of app engagement, intensity of app engagement, and time of usage. Potential associated factors included demographics, migraine history, burden of disease, headache management self-efficacy, and first-week app use. Descriptive analyses summarized engagement patterns for the overall app, the diary, and self-management modules. Kaplan-Meier survival curves illustrated usage over time. Univariable linear regression models explored associations between patient characteristics and first-week app usage as predictors of total app usage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 238 patients, 161 (67.7%) were still actively using the app after 24 weeks. Total active usage days ranged from 1 to 168, with a mean (SD) of 129.7 (52.5) days, corresponding to usage on approximately 77% of days. Among all app modules, the headache and trigger diaries had the highest usage frequencies, with means (SDs) of 110.6 (49.7) and 118.1 (60.9) days, respectively. Engagement with the behavioral self-management modules was lower overall, with faster drop-off rates. Among the behavioral self-management modules, the training module showed the highest usage, with a mean (SD) of 26.2 (33.9) documented training days. Linear regression analyses showed that older age and higher app usage during the first week were associated with more frequent app usage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This secondary analysis demonstrated high engagement with the headache and trigger diary modules of a migraine app over 6 months. These findings support the potential of smartphone apps to improve adherence to headache self-monitoring. However, engagement with the behavioral self-management modules was lower than intended, highlighting the persistent challenge of promoting adherence to behavioral migraine interventions.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00024174.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145603860","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The effect of vestibular rehabilitation in the management of vestibular migraine in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. 前庭康复在成人前庭偏头痛治疗中的作用:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-25 DOI: 10.1111/head.70002
Jad El Ahdab, Marina Vilardo, Bradley Ong, Nicolas R Thompson, Neil Nero, Ahmet Günkan, Neil Cherian, Julia Bucklan

Background: Vestibular migraine (VM) is a common migraine subtype characterized by recurrent vestibular symptoms. Despite its prevalence, evidence-based treatment guidelines are lacking. Vestibular rehabilitation (VR) has been proven effective in many vestibular disorders, but its role in managing VM has not been well established. This systematic review aimed to summarize and pool the evidence on the effectiveness of VR for VM using standardized outcome measures, primarily focusing on patient-reported dizziness-related quality-of-life assessments.

Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus from inception to March 2025 for studies evaluating self-reported and physical outcome measures of VR in patients with VM. Meta-analysis of mean change in Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) scores was performed. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool for the randomized controlled trials and the ROBINS-I tool for observational studies.

Results: Seven studies comprising 413 patients (mean age, 45.4; 76% female) with VM treated with VR were included. The effect of vestibular rehabilitation on DHI scores showed a pooled mean difference of -29.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], -40.2 to -18.3), more than the clinically important difference of 18 points. Although, our meta-analysis had high heterogeneity (Cochran's Q p value <0.001, I2 = 94.7%).

Conclusion: VR demonstrated a reduction in DHI scores, meeting the clinically significant difference of 18 indicating clinical improvement. However, the considerable heterogeneity limits the generalizability of these results and highlights the need for further standardized randomized controlled trials with subgroup analyses to better determine the specific benefits and optimal protocols of VR in managing VM.

背景:前庭偏头痛(VM)是一种常见的偏头痛亚型,其特征是反复出现前庭症状。尽管它很普遍,但缺乏循证治疗指南。前庭康复(VR)已被证明对许多前庭疾病有效,但其在治疗VM中的作用尚未得到很好的确定。本系统综述旨在总结和汇总使用标准化结果测量的VR治疗VM有效性的证据,主要关注患者报告的与眩晕相关的生活质量评估。方法:我们系统地检索了MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane Library和Scopus从成立到2025年3月的研究,以评估VM患者的VR自我报告和物理结果测量。对头晕障碍量表(DHI)评分的平均变化进行meta分析。随机对照试验使用Cochrane RoB 2工具评估偏倚风险,观察性研究使用robins - 1工具评估偏倚风险。结果:纳入了7项研究,包括413例接受VR治疗的VM患者(平均年龄45.4岁,76%为女性)。前庭康复对DHI评分的影响,合并平均差异为-29.3分(95%可信区间[CI], -40.2 ~ -18.3分),大于临床重要差异18分。然而,我们的meta分析具有很高的异质性(Cochran’s Q p值2 = 94.7%)。结论:VR可降低DHI评分,达到18分的临床显著差异,表明临床改善。然而,相当大的异质性限制了这些结果的普遍性,并强调需要进一步标准化的随机对照试验和亚组分析,以更好地确定VR治疗VM的具体益处和最佳方案。
{"title":"The effect of vestibular rehabilitation in the management of vestibular migraine in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Jad El Ahdab, Marina Vilardo, Bradley Ong, Nicolas R Thompson, Neil Nero, Ahmet Günkan, Neil Cherian, Julia Bucklan","doi":"10.1111/head.70002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vestibular migraine (VM) is a common migraine subtype characterized by recurrent vestibular symptoms. Despite its prevalence, evidence-based treatment guidelines are lacking. Vestibular rehabilitation (VR) has been proven effective in many vestibular disorders, but its role in managing VM has not been well established. This systematic review aimed to summarize and pool the evidence on the effectiveness of VR for VM using standardized outcome measures, primarily focusing on patient-reported dizziness-related quality-of-life assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus from inception to March 2025 for studies evaluating self-reported and physical outcome measures of VR in patients with VM. Meta-analysis of mean change in Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) scores was performed. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool for the randomized controlled trials and the ROBINS-I tool for observational studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies comprising 413 patients (mean age, 45.4; 76% female) with VM treated with VR were included. The effect of vestibular rehabilitation on DHI scores showed a pooled mean difference of -29.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], -40.2 to -18.3), more than the clinically important difference of 18 points. Although, our meta-analysis had high heterogeneity (Cochran's Q p value <0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 94.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VR demonstrated a reduction in DHI scores, meeting the clinically significant difference of 18 indicating clinical improvement. However, the considerable heterogeneity limits the generalizability of these results and highlights the need for further standardized randomized controlled trials with subgroup analyses to better determine the specific benefits and optimal protocols of VR in managing VM.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145603490","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Headache
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1