Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-13DOI: 10.1111/head.15083
Willemijn C Naber, Paulien J van Tilborg, Roemer B Brandt, Julia J Jansen, Leopoldine A Wilbrink, Wim M Mulleners, Erkan Kurt, Willemijn Leen, Frank J P M Huygen, Denise Bijlenga, Rolf Fronczek
Objective: Cluster headache (CH) significantly impacts patients' quality of life (QoL). We aim to validate the Cluster Headache Quality of Life scale (CHQ) for measuring QoL changes in patients with CH.
Methods: In this multicenter, prospective, longitudinal psychometric validation study, participants, all with chronic CH (CCH), completed the CHQ at a 3-monthly interval alongside headache diaries and general QoL questionnaires (36-item Short Form [SF-36], Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS], and EuroQol 5 Dimensions [EQ-5D]). CHQ's ability to measure changes was validated in three steps following COSMIN guidelines: (1) convergent validity, (2) responsiveness, and (3) interpretability. Baseline scores were used for step 1; change scores for steps 2 and 3 (Δ baseline-follow-up). Twelve correlation hypotheses were formulated and tested for steps 1 and 2. Validity was rated by % rejected hypotheses (high: ≤25%, moderate: 26%-50%, poor: ≥50%). Data were collected in the Netherlands (Leiden, Nijmegen, Heerlen) between 9 December 2021 and 18 November 2024.
Results: For step 1, 117 participants were included (n = 70 for SF-36/HADS analyses, n = 42 for EQ-5D analyses) and 82 were included for steps 2 and 3 (n = 48 for SF-36/HADS analyses, n = 29 for EQ-5D analyses). At baseline, overall QoL was poor (CHQ: 60.9 ± 23.1, SF-36: 46.7 ± 19.9) and worse in participants with more intense and frequent CH attacks (>CHQ scores: β = 2.92 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91 to 4.93), p = 0.005; β = 0.27 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.53), p = 0.033). Convergent and responsiveness validity was high (≤25% hypotheses rejected). CHQ baseline scores correlated strongly with the HADS, SF-36, and EQ-5D (ρ = 0.68, ρ = -0.60, ρ = -0.52), but weakly with attack frequency (ρ = 0.27). Change scores correlated strongly with HADS and SF-36 (ρ = 0.51, ρ = -0.56) and moderately with EQ-5D (ρ = -0.38). Step 3 indicated ≤ -3.5 points change as clinically relevant improvement and ≥7.5 points as deterioration.
Conclusion: The CHQ has a high validity to measure change in QoL. CH attack frequency influences QoL, but QoL is more strongly correlated with mental health and activity restrictions than attack frequency. Implementing the CHQ may improve understanding of disease burden, enabling more targeted treatment strategies and thus improving overall disease management.
{"title":"Quality of life changes in cluster headache: Convergent validity, responsiveness, and interpretability of the Cluster Headache Quality of Life scale as a patient-reported outcome measure.","authors":"Willemijn C Naber, Paulien J van Tilborg, Roemer B Brandt, Julia J Jansen, Leopoldine A Wilbrink, Wim M Mulleners, Erkan Kurt, Willemijn Leen, Frank J P M Huygen, Denise Bijlenga, Rolf Fronczek","doi":"10.1111/head.15083","DOIUrl":"10.1111/head.15083","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cluster headache (CH) significantly impacts patients' quality of life (QoL). We aim to validate the Cluster Headache Quality of Life scale (CHQ) for measuring QoL changes in patients with CH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter, prospective, longitudinal psychometric validation study, participants, all with chronic CH (CCH), completed the CHQ at a 3-monthly interval alongside headache diaries and general QoL questionnaires (36-item Short Form [SF-36], Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS], and EuroQol 5 Dimensions [EQ-5D]). CHQ's ability to measure changes was validated in three steps following COSMIN guidelines: (1) convergent validity, (2) responsiveness, and (3) interpretability. Baseline scores were used for step 1; change scores for steps 2 and 3 (Δ baseline-follow-up). Twelve correlation hypotheses were formulated and tested for steps 1 and 2. Validity was rated by % rejected hypotheses (high: ≤25%, moderate: 26%-50%, poor: ≥50%). Data were collected in the Netherlands (Leiden, Nijmegen, Heerlen) between 9 December 2021 and 18 November 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For step 1, 117 participants were included (n = 70 for SF-36/HADS analyses, n = 42 for EQ-5D analyses) and 82 were included for steps 2 and 3 (n = 48 for SF-36/HADS analyses, n = 29 for EQ-5D analyses). At baseline, overall QoL was poor (CHQ: 60.9 ± 23.1, SF-36: 46.7 ± 19.9) and worse in participants with more intense and frequent CH attacks (>CHQ scores: β = 2.92 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91 to 4.93), p = 0.005; β = 0.27 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.53), p = 0.033). Convergent and responsiveness validity was high (≤25% hypotheses rejected). CHQ baseline scores correlated strongly with the HADS, SF-36, and EQ-5D (ρ = 0.68, ρ = -0.60, ρ = -0.52), but weakly with attack frequency (ρ = 0.27). Change scores correlated strongly with HADS and SF-36 (ρ = 0.51, ρ = -0.56) and moderately with EQ-5D (ρ = -0.38). Step 3 indicated ≤ -3.5 points change as clinically relevant improvement and ≥7.5 points as deterioration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CHQ has a high validity to measure change in QoL. CH attack frequency influences QoL, but QoL is more strongly correlated with mental health and activity restrictions than attack frequency. Implementing the CHQ may improve understanding of disease burden, enabling more targeted treatment strategies and thus improving overall disease management.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":"213-229"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12849543/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145503489","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-10-21DOI: 10.1111/head.15058
Margaret Slavin, Cara L Frankenfeld
{"title":"Headache, nutrition, and developmental origins of health and disease.","authors":"Margaret Slavin, Cara L Frankenfeld","doi":"10.1111/head.15058","DOIUrl":"10.1111/head.15058","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":"15-16"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145336602","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-10-24DOI: 10.1111/head.15072
Marcin Straburzyński, Sima Bahn, Arne May
Objective: The aim of this case series is to describe a clinical phenotype of midfacial pain and suggest its potential as a candidate for future iterations of headache and facial pain classifications.
Background: Patients with facial pain that is located in the middle part of the face often consult otorhinolaryngologic, neurologic, or pain specialists. In the past, a diagnosis of midfacial pain was suggested if other causes were excluded.
Methods: This case series is based on a retrospective analysis of patients consulted in two headache and facial pain centers. The patients were selected if the pain was located in the zygomatic, infraorbital, or nasal region, and rhinosinusitis and other primary or secondary facial pain syndromes were excluded during a comprehensive diagnostic process.
Results: Twelve patients in the 18-74 years age group (median, 40.5 years; interquartile range [IQR], 18.3; 4 of 12 [33%] patients were women), from two tertiary headache and facial pain centers in Warsaw and Hamburg were included in the case series based on consultations conducted between January 1, 2024, and December 31, 2024. Patients reported 20-30 (median, 30; IQR, 2.8; mean = 28.1; standard deviation, 3.2) monthly facial pain days of mostly moderate intensity (range from 1 to 9; median, 5; IQR, 2.125; mean = 5.2; SD, 1.9) on Numeric Rating Scale. Pain was described as dull, pressing, or tension-like and was bilateral in 10 of 12 (83%) patients. Seven of 12 (58%) patients described pain occurring simultaneously in regions innervated by the first (nasal region) and second branch (infraorbital) of the trigeminal nerve.
Conclusions: This study provides preliminary evidence for a distinct phenotype of idiopathic midfacial pain that is not caused by rhinosinusitis, stomatognathic disorders, or facial manifestations of primary headaches. Our data call for prospective studies on this type of idiopathic facial pain for future International Classification of Headache Disorders and International Classification of Orofacial Pain editions.
{"title":"Phenotype of midfacial pain in 12 new cases-A multidisciplinary idiopathic facial pain syndrome.","authors":"Marcin Straburzyński, Sima Bahn, Arne May","doi":"10.1111/head.15072","DOIUrl":"10.1111/head.15072","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this case series is to describe a clinical phenotype of midfacial pain and suggest its potential as a candidate for future iterations of headache and facial pain classifications.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with facial pain that is located in the middle part of the face often consult otorhinolaryngologic, neurologic, or pain specialists. In the past, a diagnosis of midfacial pain was suggested if other causes were excluded.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This case series is based on a retrospective analysis of patients consulted in two headache and facial pain centers. The patients were selected if the pain was located in the zygomatic, infraorbital, or nasal region, and rhinosinusitis and other primary or secondary facial pain syndromes were excluded during a comprehensive diagnostic process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve patients in the 18-74 years age group (median, 40.5 years; interquartile range [IQR], 18.3; 4 of 12 [33%] patients were women), from two tertiary headache and facial pain centers in Warsaw and Hamburg were included in the case series based on consultations conducted between January 1, 2024, and December 31, 2024. Patients reported 20-30 (median, 30; IQR, 2.8; mean = 28.1; standard deviation, 3.2) monthly facial pain days of mostly moderate intensity (range from 1 to 9; median, 5; IQR, 2.125; mean = 5.2; SD, 1.9) on Numeric Rating Scale. Pain was described as dull, pressing, or tension-like and was bilateral in 10 of 12 (83%) patients. Seven of 12 (58%) patients described pain occurring simultaneously in regions innervated by the first (nasal region) and second branch (infraorbital) of the trigeminal nerve.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides preliminary evidence for a distinct phenotype of idiopathic midfacial pain that is not caused by rhinosinusitis, stomatognathic disorders, or facial manifestations of primary headaches. Our data call for prospective studies on this type of idiopathic facial pain for future International Classification of Headache Disorders and International Classification of Orofacial Pain editions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":"230-238"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145354594","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-10-14DOI: 10.1111/head.15070
Daniel C Ogrezeanu, Rodrigo Núñez-Cortés, Joaquín Salazar-Méndez, Iván Cuyul-Vásquez, Rubén López-Bueno, Francisco José Ferrer-Sargues, Lars Louis Andersen, Joaquín Calatayud, Luis Suso-Martí
Background: Evidence suggests that exercise has clinically relevant benefits for migraine, but an optimal prescription standard remains undefined. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of aerobic exercise on migraine intensity and frequency through a dose-response meta-analysis.
Methods: A data search was performed in PubMed, PEDro, Google Scholar, and EBSCO from inception to September 1, 2024. Randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies of aerobic exercise in patients with a clinical diagnosis of migraine were included. The outcome measures were pain intensity and migraine frequency. The dose-response relationship was evaluated using a dose-response meta-analysis.
Results: Fifteen studies (253 participants) were included. Meta-analysis showed a statistically significant decrease in pain intensity between pre and post intervention (standardized mean differences [SMD], -1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.72 to -0.47). The spline model showed a U-shape statistically significant association (χ2 = 112.03, df = 2, p < 0.001) between total minutes of aerobic exercise and reduction in pain intensity. A minimum dose of 200 min was required for moderate effects, with a maximum effect at 900 min (SMD, -2.4; 95% CI, -2.85 to -1.95). Meta-analysis showed a statistically significant decrease in migraine frequency between pre and post intervention (SMD, -0.79; 95% CI, -1.1 to -0.47). The spline model showed a U-shape statistically significant association (χ2 = 86.41, dl = 2, p < 0.001) between total minutes of aerobic exercise and reduction in migraine frequency. A minimum dose of 300 total minutes of aerobic exercise program duration was required to obtain a moderate effect in reducing migraine frequency, with a maximum effect at 950 min (SMD, -1.55; 95% CI, -1.87 to -1.22).
Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that aerobic exercise may be effective in reducing both pain intensity and migraine frequency in people with migraine. The greatest observed effect on both variables was observed at a cumulative dose of approximately 900-950 total minutes of aerobic exercise during the program, and higher doses may not present additional benefits. These findings support a preliminary recommendation of 3 weekly 30-min sessions over 10-11 weeks, to be confirmed in future high-quality trials.
{"title":"How much aerobic exercise is needed to reduce migraine? A dose-response meta-analysis of pain intensity and frequency.","authors":"Daniel C Ogrezeanu, Rodrigo Núñez-Cortés, Joaquín Salazar-Méndez, Iván Cuyul-Vásquez, Rubén López-Bueno, Francisco José Ferrer-Sargues, Lars Louis Andersen, Joaquín Calatayud, Luis Suso-Martí","doi":"10.1111/head.15070","DOIUrl":"10.1111/head.15070","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence suggests that exercise has clinically relevant benefits for migraine, but an optimal prescription standard remains undefined. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of aerobic exercise on migraine intensity and frequency through a dose-response meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A data search was performed in PubMed, PEDro, Google Scholar, and EBSCO from inception to September 1, 2024. Randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies of aerobic exercise in patients with a clinical diagnosis of migraine were included. The outcome measures were pain intensity and migraine frequency. The dose-response relationship was evaluated using a dose-response meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen studies (253 participants) were included. Meta-analysis showed a statistically significant decrease in pain intensity between pre and post intervention (standardized mean differences [SMD], -1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.72 to -0.47). The spline model showed a U-shape statistically significant association (χ<sup>2</sup> = 112.03, df = 2, p < 0.001) between total minutes of aerobic exercise and reduction in pain intensity. A minimum dose of 200 min was required for moderate effects, with a maximum effect at 900 min (SMD, -2.4; 95% CI, -2.85 to -1.95). Meta-analysis showed a statistically significant decrease in migraine frequency between pre and post intervention (SMD, -0.79; 95% CI, -1.1 to -0.47). The spline model showed a U-shape statistically significant association (χ<sup>2</sup> = 86.41, dl = 2, p < 0.001) between total minutes of aerobic exercise and reduction in migraine frequency. A minimum dose of 300 total minutes of aerobic exercise program duration was required to obtain a moderate effect in reducing migraine frequency, with a maximum effect at 950 min (SMD, -1.55; 95% CI, -1.87 to -1.22).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis suggests that aerobic exercise may be effective in reducing both pain intensity and migraine frequency in people with migraine. The greatest observed effect on both variables was observed at a cumulative dose of approximately 900-950 total minutes of aerobic exercise during the program, and higher doses may not present additional benefits. These findings support a preliminary recommendation of 3 weekly 30-min sessions over 10-11 weeks, to be confirmed in future high-quality trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":"40-52"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145286098","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-28DOI: 10.1111/head.70012
Albert Muñoz-Vendrell, Sergio Campoy-Díaz, Patricia Díaz-Corta, Lidia Termens, Jaume Campdelacreu, Joan Prat, Jordi Sanahuja, Mariano Huerta-Villanueva
<p><strong>Objectives/background: </strong>Reimbursement criteria for anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) typically rely on predefined reductions in monthly migraine days (MMD). However, this approach may fail to capture the full spectrum of treatment benefits, potentially leading to premature discontinuation in patients experiencing meaningful improvements in other parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective observational cohort study of prospectively collected data from a multicenter headache unit (Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge and Hospital de Viladecans, Barcelona, Spain) between December 2019 and September 2024. We included patients with migraine who initiated anti-CGRP MAbs and who, at 6 months, would not meet institutional reimbursement criteria for response (≥50% reduction in MMD or ≥30% reduction in MMD with ≥1-point Headache Impact Test-6 improvement) but nonetheless continued treatment ("false nonresponders"). As a comparison group, we included patients who discontinued treatment within the first 6 months due to lack of efficacy ("true nonresponders"). Outcome measures included headache frequency, disability, analgesic use, and overall treatment perception, assessed via headache diaries and patient-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 415 patients initiating MAbs, 106 were classified as false nonresponders. By month 6, 91.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 84.5-96.0) demonstrated improvements in at least one assessed outcome. Some of the most frequent benefits were Migraine Disability Assessment Score improvement (60.2%, 95% CI = 49.5-70.2), Patient Global Impression of Change score ≥ 5 (54.5%, 95% CI = 44.2-64.6), Headache Impact Test-6 reduction (44.1%, 95% CI = 34.3-54.3), medication-overuse headache resolution (46.4%, 95% CI = 33.0-60.3), chronic to episodic migraine conversion (41.2%, 95% CI = 27.6-55.9), and a reduction in ≥50% of severe intensity days (29.3%, 95% CI = 19.4-41.0). Additionally, 82 patients continued treatment until 12 months, when 18.3% (95% CI = 10.6-28.4) of those eventually met reimbursement criteria, underscoring the potential for late response. In contrast, 76 patients were classified as true nonresponders for discontinuing treatment within the first 6 months; among the 38 who reached the month 6 evaluation, only 65.8% (95% CI = 48.6-80.4) demonstrated improvement in at least one parameter. Compared to false nonresponders, they had a more severe baseline profile, including higher frequency and intensity, greater disability and analgesic use, poorer quality of life, higher depression rates, and more frequent prior onabotulinumtoxinA use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A substantial proportion of patients with migraine classified as nonresponders to anti-CGRP MAbs at 6 months show measurable improvements beyond frequency reduction. These "false nonresponders" may benefit from continued treatment, highlighting the need for a
目的/背景:抗降钙素基因相关肽(CGRP)单克隆抗体(mab)的报销标准通常依赖于预先确定的每月偏头痛天数(MMD)的减少。然而,这种方法可能无法获得全部治疗益处,可能导致在其他参数有意义改善的患者过早停药。方法:这是一项回顾性观察队列研究,前瞻性收集了2019年12月至2024年9月期间来自西班牙巴塞罗那多中心头痛部门(Bellvitge大学医院和Viladecans医院)的数据。我们纳入了开始抗cgrp单克隆抗体治疗的偏头痛患者,这些患者在6个月时不符合机构对缓解的报销标准(烟雾病减少≥50%或烟雾病减少≥30%,头痛影响测试-6改善≥1点),但仍继续治疗(“假无反应”)。作为对照组,我们纳入了在前6个月内因缺乏疗效而停止治疗的患者(“真正无反应”)。结果测量包括头痛频率、残疾、止痛药使用和总体治疗感觉,通过头痛日记和患者报告的结果进行评估。结果:在415例启动单克隆抗体的患者中,106例被归类为假无反应。到第6个月,91.5%(95%置信区间[CI] = 84.5-96.0)的患者在至少一项评估结果中表现出改善。一些最常见的益处是偏头痛残疾评估评分改善(60.2%,95% CI = 49.5-70.2),患者总体变化印象评分≥5 (54.5%,95% CI = 44.2-64.6),头痛影响测试-6减少(44.1%,95% CI = 34.3-54.3),药物过度使用头痛缓解(46.4%,95% CI = 33.0-60.3),慢性偏头痛转化为发作性偏头痛(41.2%,95% CI = 27.6-55.9),以及严重强度天数减少≥50% (29.3%,95% CI = 19.4-41.0)。此外,82名患者持续治疗至12个月,其中18.3% (95% CI = 10.6-28.4)的患者最终达到了报销标准,强调了延迟反应的可能性。相比之下,76名患者在前6个月内停止治疗,被归类为真正无反应;在38名达到第6个月评估的患者中,只有65.8% (95% CI = 48.6-80.4)至少有一个参数得到改善。与假无反应者相比,他们有更严重的基线特征,包括更高的频率和强度,更大的残疾和止痛药使用,更差的生活质量,更高的抑郁率,更频繁的先前使用肉毒杆菌毒素。结论:相当大比例的偏头痛患者在6个月时对抗cgrp单克隆抗体无反应,除了频率降低外,还显示出可测量的改善。这些“假无反应”可能从持续治疗中受益,强调需要更全面的评估,包括强度、止痛药使用、残疾和生活质量,以防止过早停止潜在有效的治疗。相反,基线情况较差且早期改善有限的患者可能被适当地确定为真正的无反应,证明早期停止治疗是合理的。
{"title":"False nonresponders to anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies: A real-world analysis beyond migraine frequency reduction.","authors":"Albert Muñoz-Vendrell, Sergio Campoy-Díaz, Patricia Díaz-Corta, Lidia Termens, Jaume Campdelacreu, Joan Prat, Jordi Sanahuja, Mariano Huerta-Villanueva","doi":"10.1111/head.70012","DOIUrl":"10.1111/head.70012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives/background: </strong>Reimbursement criteria for anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) typically rely on predefined reductions in monthly migraine days (MMD). However, this approach may fail to capture the full spectrum of treatment benefits, potentially leading to premature discontinuation in patients experiencing meaningful improvements in other parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective observational cohort study of prospectively collected data from a multicenter headache unit (Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge and Hospital de Viladecans, Barcelona, Spain) between December 2019 and September 2024. We included patients with migraine who initiated anti-CGRP MAbs and who, at 6 months, would not meet institutional reimbursement criteria for response (≥50% reduction in MMD or ≥30% reduction in MMD with ≥1-point Headache Impact Test-6 improvement) but nonetheless continued treatment (\"false nonresponders\"). As a comparison group, we included patients who discontinued treatment within the first 6 months due to lack of efficacy (\"true nonresponders\"). Outcome measures included headache frequency, disability, analgesic use, and overall treatment perception, assessed via headache diaries and patient-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 415 patients initiating MAbs, 106 were classified as false nonresponders. By month 6, 91.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 84.5-96.0) demonstrated improvements in at least one assessed outcome. Some of the most frequent benefits were Migraine Disability Assessment Score improvement (60.2%, 95% CI = 49.5-70.2), Patient Global Impression of Change score ≥ 5 (54.5%, 95% CI = 44.2-64.6), Headache Impact Test-6 reduction (44.1%, 95% CI = 34.3-54.3), medication-overuse headache resolution (46.4%, 95% CI = 33.0-60.3), chronic to episodic migraine conversion (41.2%, 95% CI = 27.6-55.9), and a reduction in ≥50% of severe intensity days (29.3%, 95% CI = 19.4-41.0). Additionally, 82 patients continued treatment until 12 months, when 18.3% (95% CI = 10.6-28.4) of those eventually met reimbursement criteria, underscoring the potential for late response. In contrast, 76 patients were classified as true nonresponders for discontinuing treatment within the first 6 months; among the 38 who reached the month 6 evaluation, only 65.8% (95% CI = 48.6-80.4) demonstrated improvement in at least one parameter. Compared to false nonresponders, they had a more severe baseline profile, including higher frequency and intensity, greater disability and analgesic use, poorer quality of life, higher depression rates, and more frequent prior onabotulinumtoxinA use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A substantial proportion of patients with migraine classified as nonresponders to anti-CGRP MAbs at 6 months show measurable improvements beyond frequency reduction. These \"false nonresponders\" may benefit from continued treatment, highlighting the need for a ","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":"172-182"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12849535/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145632600","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-02DOI: 10.1111/head.70008
Bradley Ong, Jad El Ahdab, Ahmet Günkan, Shervin Badihian, Neil Nero, Marina Vilardo, Lisa Wilson, Nicolas Thompson, Payal Patel Soni
Background/objective: Hemorrhagic stroke comprises about 20% of all strokes, with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) being the most common type. While post-stroke care often focuses on motor and functional recovery, post-stroke headaches remain underrecognized and understudied. This study aimed to summarize and pool the evidence on the prevalence and patterns of headaches after hemorrhagic stroke.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published from database inception to December 2024, identifying observational studies that investigated headaches after hemorrhagic stroke. Studies enrolling five or more adult patients were included. Meta-analyses were conducted to estimate pooled prevalence of overall, acute/subacute, persistent, and severe headaches. Acute/subacute headache was defined as onset within 3 months of stroke, while persistent headache as headache lasting more than 3 months. Severe headache was defined as either a ≥ 7/10 pain intensity or functional impairment.
Results: Twenty-four studies comprising 4688 patients (58.2% female; mean age 56.9) were included. The overall pooled headache prevalence of 46.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 36.3%-56.1%; 95% prediction interval [PI]: 4.3%-91.8%; I2 = 96.7%) following hemorrhagic stroke. Stratified analyses showed that the prevalence was 58.3% (95% CI: 44.4%-71.6%, I2 = 97.5%) in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and 36.1% (95% CI: 26.7%-46.0%, I2 = 93.9%) in those with ICH. Acute/subacute headache occurred in 55.9% (95% CI: 41.1%-70.1%; I2 = 97.6%), while persistent headache occurred in 36.7% (95% CI: 25.6%-48.5%, I2 = 93.1%). Severe headaches were reported in 42.7% (95% CI: 15.8%-72.1%; I2 = 98.0%) of patients with acute/subacute headache and 14.3% (95% CI: 10.4%-18.7%; I2 = 71.5%) with persistent headache. In both SAH and ICH, headaches frequently become chronic. No significant differences were observed by study design, geographic region, Human Development Index, or risk of bias.
Conclusion: Headache is a common but understudied condition that can manifest at or soon after a hemorrhagic stroke and can persist for years, potentially contributing to long-term morbidity. Standardized headache definitions and longitudinal assessments are needed to improve recognition and inform future clinical trials targeting this underappreciated source of post-stroke morbidity. Further research is essential to better understand the nature of these headaches, which will help shape treatment protocols and enhance patient care.
{"title":"Headache after hemorrhagic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Bradley Ong, Jad El Ahdab, Ahmet Günkan, Shervin Badihian, Neil Nero, Marina Vilardo, Lisa Wilson, Nicolas Thompson, Payal Patel Soni","doi":"10.1111/head.70008","DOIUrl":"10.1111/head.70008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objective: </strong>Hemorrhagic stroke comprises about 20% of all strokes, with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) being the most common type. While post-stroke care often focuses on motor and functional recovery, post-stroke headaches remain underrecognized and understudied. This study aimed to summarize and pool the evidence on the prevalence and patterns of headaches after hemorrhagic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published from database inception to December 2024, identifying observational studies that investigated headaches after hemorrhagic stroke. Studies enrolling five or more adult patients were included. Meta-analyses were conducted to estimate pooled prevalence of overall, acute/subacute, persistent, and severe headaches. Acute/subacute headache was defined as onset within 3 months of stroke, while persistent headache as headache lasting more than 3 months. Severe headache was defined as either a ≥ 7/10 pain intensity or functional impairment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four studies comprising 4688 patients (58.2% female; mean age 56.9) were included. The overall pooled headache prevalence of 46.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 36.3%-56.1%; 95% prediction interval [PI]: 4.3%-91.8%; I<sup>2</sup> = 96.7%) following hemorrhagic stroke. Stratified analyses showed that the prevalence was 58.3% (95% CI: 44.4%-71.6%, I<sup>2</sup> = 97.5%) in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and 36.1% (95% CI: 26.7%-46.0%, I<sup>2</sup> = 93.9%) in those with ICH. Acute/subacute headache occurred in 55.9% (95% CI: 41.1%-70.1%; I<sup>2</sup> = 97.6%), while persistent headache occurred in 36.7% (95% CI: 25.6%-48.5%, I<sup>2</sup> = 93.1%). Severe headaches were reported in 42.7% (95% CI: 15.8%-72.1%; I<sup>2</sup> = 98.0%) of patients with acute/subacute headache and 14.3% (95% CI: 10.4%-18.7%; I<sup>2</sup> = 71.5%) with persistent headache. In both SAH and ICH, headaches frequently become chronic. No significant differences were observed by study design, geographic region, Human Development Index, or risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Headache is a common but understudied condition that can manifest at or soon after a hemorrhagic stroke and can persist for years, potentially contributing to long-term morbidity. Standardized headache definitions and longitudinal assessments are needed to improve recognition and inform future clinical trials targeting this underappreciated source of post-stroke morbidity. Further research is essential to better understand the nature of these headaches, which will help shape treatment protocols and enhance patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":"155-171"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145660908","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alicia Alpuente, Victor J Gallardo, Laila Asskour, Edoardo Caronna, Marta Torres-Ferrus, Patricia Pozo-Rosich
{"title":"Response to: Calcitonin gene-related peptide and headache: Comparison of two commonly used assay kits highlights the perils of measuring neuropeptides with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.","authors":"Alicia Alpuente, Victor J Gallardo, Laila Asskour, Edoardo Caronna, Marta Torres-Ferrus, Patricia Pozo-Rosich","doi":"10.1111/head.70019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70019","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":"66 1","pages":"21-23"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146062535","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-10-24DOI: 10.1111/head.15074
Chay Ngee Lim, Gary Mo, Rajinder Bhardwaj, Craig M Comisar, Beth L Emerson, Kyle T Matschke, Ogert Fisniku, Richard Bertz, Robert Croop, Jing Liu
<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of a weight-adjusted dose of rimegepant orally disintegrating tablet (ODT) in children (aged ≥6 to <12 years) with a history of migraine.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Rimegepant 75 mg ODT is approved for acute treatment of migraine (with or without aura) and preventive treatment of episodic migraine in adults. Studies of rimegepant in pediatric populations have not been conducted to date.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this phase 1 open-label study, a single dose of rimegepant ODT was administered, based on body weight, to children aged ≥6 to <12 years. Children with body weight ≥15 kg to ≤30 kg received 25 mg (group 1; n = 7), children >30 kg to ≤50 kg received 50 mg (2 × 25 mg; group 2; n = 9), and children >50 kg received 75 mg (group 3; n = 5). Blood samples were collected pre-dose and 0.5, 1.25, 3.5, and 18 h post-dose and then analyzed using a validated bioanalytical assay. Rimegepant PK parameters, including area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to infinity (AUC<sub>inf</sub>), AUC from time zero to 24 h after dosing, maximum plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>), and time to C<sub>max</sub> were estimated using a population PK approach in which pediatric PK data from this study were used to update a previous rimegepant population PK model developed with adult data. A safety follow-up phone call was conducted 4 days after dosing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty participants with ≥1 post-dose PK sample were included in PK analyses. All 21 participants treated were analyzed for safety. A majority of the study population was White (67%) and female (57%), had a median (range) age of 9.0 (6 to 11) years, and a mean (standard deviation) body weight of 37.7 (12.3) kg. Geometric mean estimates of C<sub>max</sub> and AUC<sub>inf</sub> ranged from 615.9 to 811.1 ng/mL and 1987.8 to 4244.9 ng*h/mL, respectively, across weight groups. Rimegepant exposures, particularly AUC<sub>inf</sub> values, were lower in the two lower-weight groups (groups 1 and 2) than in the higher-weight group (group 3). Median time to C<sub>max</sub> was 1 to 1.5 h across weight/dose groups. Three (14%) participants (all in group 3) had ≥1 adverse event; all were mild in severity. No clinically relevant findings regarding laboratory tests, vital signs, electrocardiograms, physical examinations, local tolerability assessments, or the Sheehan-Suicidality Tracking Scale were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A single weight-adjusted dose of rimegepant ODT demonstrated a favorable safety profile in children aged ≥6 to <12 years with a history of migraine. Exposures in children >50 kg receiving 75 mg rimegepant were similar to observed exposures in adults receiving 75 mg. However, exposures in children >30 kg to ≤50 kg receiving 50 mg rimegepant and in children ≥15 kg to ≤30 kg receiving 25 mg rimegepant were lower than exposures in
{"title":"A phase 1, multicenter, open-label study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of a single dose of rimegepant in children (aged ≥6 to <12 years) with a history of migraine.","authors":"Chay Ngee Lim, Gary Mo, Rajinder Bhardwaj, Craig M Comisar, Beth L Emerson, Kyle T Matschke, Ogert Fisniku, Richard Bertz, Robert Croop, Jing Liu","doi":"10.1111/head.15074","DOIUrl":"10.1111/head.15074","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of a weight-adjusted dose of rimegepant orally disintegrating tablet (ODT) in children (aged ≥6 to <12 years) with a history of migraine.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Rimegepant 75 mg ODT is approved for acute treatment of migraine (with or without aura) and preventive treatment of episodic migraine in adults. Studies of rimegepant in pediatric populations have not been conducted to date.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this phase 1 open-label study, a single dose of rimegepant ODT was administered, based on body weight, to children aged ≥6 to <12 years. Children with body weight ≥15 kg to ≤30 kg received 25 mg (group 1; n = 7), children >30 kg to ≤50 kg received 50 mg (2 × 25 mg; group 2; n = 9), and children >50 kg received 75 mg (group 3; n = 5). Blood samples were collected pre-dose and 0.5, 1.25, 3.5, and 18 h post-dose and then analyzed using a validated bioanalytical assay. Rimegepant PK parameters, including area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to infinity (AUC<sub>inf</sub>), AUC from time zero to 24 h after dosing, maximum plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>), and time to C<sub>max</sub> were estimated using a population PK approach in which pediatric PK data from this study were used to update a previous rimegepant population PK model developed with adult data. A safety follow-up phone call was conducted 4 days after dosing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty participants with ≥1 post-dose PK sample were included in PK analyses. All 21 participants treated were analyzed for safety. A majority of the study population was White (67%) and female (57%), had a median (range) age of 9.0 (6 to 11) years, and a mean (standard deviation) body weight of 37.7 (12.3) kg. Geometric mean estimates of C<sub>max</sub> and AUC<sub>inf</sub> ranged from 615.9 to 811.1 ng/mL and 1987.8 to 4244.9 ng*h/mL, respectively, across weight groups. Rimegepant exposures, particularly AUC<sub>inf</sub> values, were lower in the two lower-weight groups (groups 1 and 2) than in the higher-weight group (group 3). Median time to C<sub>max</sub> was 1 to 1.5 h across weight/dose groups. Three (14%) participants (all in group 3) had ≥1 adverse event; all were mild in severity. No clinically relevant findings regarding laboratory tests, vital signs, electrocardiograms, physical examinations, local tolerability assessments, or the Sheehan-Suicidality Tracking Scale were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A single weight-adjusted dose of rimegepant ODT demonstrated a favorable safety profile in children aged ≥6 to <12 years with a history of migraine. Exposures in children >50 kg receiving 75 mg rimegepant were similar to observed exposures in adults receiving 75 mg. However, exposures in children >30 kg to ≤50 kg receiving 50 mg rimegepant and in children ≥15 kg to ≤30 kg receiving 25 mg rimegepant were lower than exposures in ","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":"202-212"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12849519/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145354430","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: To investigate the relationship between prenatal nutrition and the development of painful temporomandibular disorders (p-TMD) and headaches in offspring during young adulthood.
Background: p-TMD are a common source of chronic orofacial pain and are often comorbid with headaches. Dietary quality may influence chronic musculoskeletal pain, but its role on the development of p-TMD and headache is less known.
Methods: The study was conducted as a prospective longitudinal cohort study. Survey data from the Danish National Birth Cohort (DNBC) were analyzed. Data included prenatal nutritional information assessed using a healthy eating index (HEI) derived from a food frequency questionnaire collected between 1996 and 2002 and offspring's p-TMD and headache status at age 18-23 years, assessed in 2021. HEI was categorized into quartile levels of dietary quality. A total of 10,382 individuals had complete data on both exposure and outcome.
Results: No statistically significant association was found between prenatal HEI and offspring's p-TMD status. Offspring of mothers with higher HEI scores were significantly less likely to report one or fewer headaches per month in young adulthood (adjusted OR [aOR] = 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-0.96, p = 0.006). Specific pre-natal dietary domains associated with reduced headache risk included red meat scores (aOR = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99, p = 0.006) and saturated fatty acids (aOR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-0.99, p = 0.039).
Conclusion: Offspring of mothers with higher HEI scores, that is, healthier dietary choices during pregnancy, had significantly lower odds of reporting headaches but not p-TMD in young adulthood. Lower maternal intake of saturated fatty acids and red meat were associated with decreased odds of reporting headaches later in life.
目的:探讨产前营养与子代成年后患疼痛性颞下颌障碍(p-TMD)及头痛的关系。背景:p-TMD是慢性口面部疼痛的常见来源,通常与头痛合并症。饮食质量可能影响慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛,但其在p-TMD和头痛发展中的作用尚不清楚。方法:采用前瞻性纵向队列研究。对丹麦国家出生队列(DNBC)的调查数据进行分析。数据包括使用健康饮食指数(HEI)评估产前营养信息,该指数来自1996年至2002年收集的食物频率问卷,以及2021年评估的18-23岁子女的p-TMD和头痛状况。HEI被划分为饮食质量的四分位数水平。总共有10382人有关于暴露和结果的完整数据。结果:产前HEI与子代p-TMD状态无统计学意义相关。HEI评分较高的母亲的后代在青年期每月报告一次或更少头痛的可能性显著降低(调整后比值[aOR] = 0.84; 95%可信区间[CI], 0.73-0.96, p = 0.006)。与降低头痛风险相关的特定产前饮食领域包括红肉评分(aOR = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99, p = 0.006)和饱和脂肪酸评分(aOR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-0.99, p = 0.039)。结论:HEI评分较高的母亲,即在怀孕期间选择更健康的饮食,其后代在成年后报告头痛的几率显著降低,但p-TMD的几率则显著降低。母亲摄入较少的饱和脂肪酸和红肉与晚年报告头痛的几率降低有关。
{"title":"Pre-natal nutrition as risk factor for painful temporomandibular disorders and headaches in young adults.","authors":"Cristina Rocha Exposto, Mojdeh Mansoori, Bodil Hammer Bech, Anne Ahrendt Bjerregaard, Sjurdur Frodi Olsen, Lene Baad-Hansen","doi":"10.1111/head.15030","DOIUrl":"10.1111/head.15030","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the relationship between prenatal nutrition and the development of painful temporomandibular disorders (p-TMD) and headaches in offspring during young adulthood.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>p-TMD are a common source of chronic orofacial pain and are often comorbid with headaches. Dietary quality may influence chronic musculoskeletal pain, but its role on the development of p-TMD and headache is less known.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted as a prospective longitudinal cohort study. Survey data from the Danish National Birth Cohort (DNBC) were analyzed. Data included prenatal nutritional information assessed using a healthy eating index (HEI) derived from a food frequency questionnaire collected between 1996 and 2002 and offspring's p-TMD and headache status at age 18-23 years, assessed in 2021. HEI was categorized into quartile levels of dietary quality. A total of 10,382 individuals had complete data on both exposure and outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant association was found between prenatal HEI and offspring's p-TMD status. Offspring of mothers with higher HEI scores were significantly less likely to report one or fewer headaches per month in young adulthood (adjusted OR [aOR] = 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-0.96, p = 0.006). Specific pre-natal dietary domains associated with reduced headache risk included red meat scores (aOR = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99, p = 0.006) and saturated fatty acids (aOR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-0.99, p = 0.039).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Offspring of mothers with higher HEI scores, that is, healthier dietary choices during pregnancy, had significantly lower odds of reporting headaches but not p-TMD in young adulthood. Lower maternal intake of saturated fatty acids and red meat were associated with decreased odds of reporting headaches later in life.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":"29-39"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12849538/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144882801","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}