Todd J Schwedt, Amaal J Starling, Jessica Ailani, Andrew D Hershey, Hope L O'Brien, Elizabeth Seng, Adam S Sprouse-Blum, Scott B Turner, Richard B Lipton
Objectives: The aim of this work was to develop an American Headache Society position statement addressing diagnostic screening for migraine among girls and women.
Background: Despite its high prevalence and substantial negative impacts, migraine is underdiagnosed and undertreated. Diagnostic screening for migraine enables more patients to receive timely, appropriate, and effective management.
Methods: Development of this position statement followed the rules established by the American Headache Society Guidelines Committee. The published literature was reviewed to determine if migraine meets criteria for when disease screening is justified, to guide recommendations for screening tools, and to determine subpopulation(s) for which migraine screening is indicated. After author consensus was reached, the position statement was reviewed and approved by the American Headache Society Board of Directors.
Results: Migraine fulfills established criteria for conditions in which screening is appropriate since it is highly prevalent, results in significant morbidity, and exerts substantial economic and social costs. Migraine incidence and prevalence are exceptionally high among girls and women during adolescence and through menopause. Furthermore, there are valid and reliable diagnostic screening methods (e.g., ID Migraine) and effective treatments that reduce migraine symptoms and disease impact.
Conclusion: Yearly diagnostic screening for migraine should be included as part of women's preventive healthcare services, particularly from adolescence to menopause.
{"title":"Routine migraine screening as a standard of care for Women's health: A position statement from the American Headache Society.","authors":"Todd J Schwedt, Amaal J Starling, Jessica Ailani, Andrew D Hershey, Hope L O'Brien, Elizabeth Seng, Adam S Sprouse-Blum, Scott B Turner, Richard B Lipton","doi":"10.1111/head.70023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this work was to develop an American Headache Society position statement addressing diagnostic screening for migraine among girls and women.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite its high prevalence and substantial negative impacts, migraine is underdiagnosed and undertreated. Diagnostic screening for migraine enables more patients to receive timely, appropriate, and effective management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Development of this position statement followed the rules established by the American Headache Society Guidelines Committee. The published literature was reviewed to determine if migraine meets criteria for when disease screening is justified, to guide recommendations for screening tools, and to determine subpopulation(s) for which migraine screening is indicated. After author consensus was reached, the position statement was reviewed and approved by the American Headache Society Board of Directors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Migraine fulfills established criteria for conditions in which screening is appropriate since it is highly prevalent, results in significant morbidity, and exerts substantial economic and social costs. Migraine incidence and prevalence are exceptionally high among girls and women during adolescence and through menopause. Furthermore, there are valid and reliable diagnostic screening methods (e.g., ID Migraine) and effective treatments that reduce migraine symptoms and disease impact.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Yearly diagnostic screening for migraine should be included as part of women's preventive healthcare services, particularly from adolescence to menopause.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145721140","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Treatment of abdominal migraine in an 8-year-old child with calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist: A case report.","authors":"Yunzhu Tang, Chunyan Lu, Yao Zhou, Shuxia Qian","doi":"10.1111/head.70017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70017","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145714108","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Dean Zeldich, Nadav Calderon, Itay Goor-Aryeh, Gabriel Ricardo Lichtenstein
A 38-year-old woman with temporomandibular joint dysfunction (TMJD) and chronic migraine presented with refractory TMJD-related pain. Conservative treatments and prior injections provided only short-term relief. To achieve longer lasting pain reduction, an ultrasound-guided V3 nerve block was performed, targeting the mandibular nerve with a 4-mL injection of 1% lidocaine. The patient experienced immediate pain relief and sustained improvement. Encouraged by results on the right side, she underwent the same procedure on the left, achieving identical relief. Despite unchanged migraine frequency, TMJD pain resolution significantly enhanced her quality of life, demonstrating the efficacy of ultrasound-guided V3 nerve blocks.
{"title":"Case report: Treatment of temporomandibular joint disorder pain with V3 nerve block procedure.","authors":"Dean Zeldich, Nadav Calderon, Itay Goor-Aryeh, Gabriel Ricardo Lichtenstein","doi":"10.1111/head.70013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A 38-year-old woman with temporomandibular joint dysfunction (TMJD) and chronic migraine presented with refractory TMJD-related pain. Conservative treatments and prior injections provided only short-term relief. To achieve longer lasting pain reduction, an ultrasound-guided V3 nerve block was performed, targeting the mandibular nerve with a 4-mL injection of 1% lidocaine. The patient experienced immediate pain relief and sustained improvement. Encouraged by results on the right side, she underwent the same procedure on the left, achieving identical relief. Despite unchanged migraine frequency, TMJD pain resolution significantly enhanced her quality of life, demonstrating the efficacy of ultrasound-guided V3 nerve blocks.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145668212","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bradley Ong, Jad El Ahdab, Ahmet Günkan, Shervin Badihian, Neil Nero, Marina Vilardo, Lisa Wilson, Nicolas Thompson, Payal Patel Soni
Background/objective: Hemorrhagic stroke comprises about 20% of all strokes, with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) being the most common type. While post-stroke care often focuses on motor and functional recovery, post-stroke headaches remain underrecognized and understudied. This study aimed to summarize and pool the evidence on the prevalence and patterns of headaches after hemorrhagic stroke.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published from database inception to December 2024, identifying observational studies that investigated headaches after hemorrhagic stroke. Studies enrolling five or more adult patients were included. Meta-analyses were conducted to estimate pooled prevalence of overall, acute/subacute, persistent, and severe headaches. Acute/subacute headache was defined as onset within 3 months of stroke, while persistent headache as headache lasting more than 3 months. Severe headache was defined as either a ≥ 7/10 pain intensity or functional impairment.
Results: Twenty-four studies comprising 4688 patients (58.2% female; mean age 56.9) were included. The overall pooled headache prevalence of 46.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 36.3%-56.1%; 95% prediction interval [PI]: 4.3%-91.8%; I2 = 96.7%) following hemorrhagic stroke. Stratified analyses showed that the prevalence was 58.3% (95% CI: 44.4%-71.6%, I2 = 97.5%) in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and 36.1% (95% CI: 26.7%-46.0%, I2 = 93.9%) in those with ICH. Acute/subacute headache occurred in 55.9% (95% CI: 41.1%-70.1%; I2 = 97.6%), while persistent headache occurred in 36.7% (95% CI: 25.6%-48.5%, I2 = 93.1%). Severe headaches were reported in 42.7% (95% CI: 15.8%-72.1%; I2 = 98.0%) of patients with acute/subacute headache and 14.3% (95% CI: 10.4%-18.7%; I2 = 71.5%) with persistent headache. In both SAH and ICH, headaches frequently become chronic. No significant differences were observed by study design, geographic region, Human Development Index, or risk of bias.
Conclusion: Headache is a common but understudied condition that can manifest at or soon after a hemorrhagic stroke and can persist for years, potentially contributing to long-term morbidity. Standardized headache definitions and longitudinal assessments are needed to improve recognition and inform future clinical trials targeting this underappreciated source of post-stroke morbidity. Further research is essential to better understand the nature of these headaches, which will help shape treatment protocols and enhance patient care.
{"title":"Headache after hemorrhagic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Bradley Ong, Jad El Ahdab, Ahmet Günkan, Shervin Badihian, Neil Nero, Marina Vilardo, Lisa Wilson, Nicolas Thompson, Payal Patel Soni","doi":"10.1111/head.70008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objective: </strong>Hemorrhagic stroke comprises about 20% of all strokes, with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) being the most common type. While post-stroke care often focuses on motor and functional recovery, post-stroke headaches remain underrecognized and understudied. This study aimed to summarize and pool the evidence on the prevalence and patterns of headaches after hemorrhagic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published from database inception to December 2024, identifying observational studies that investigated headaches after hemorrhagic stroke. Studies enrolling five or more adult patients were included. Meta-analyses were conducted to estimate pooled prevalence of overall, acute/subacute, persistent, and severe headaches. Acute/subacute headache was defined as onset within 3 months of stroke, while persistent headache as headache lasting more than 3 months. Severe headache was defined as either a ≥ 7/10 pain intensity or functional impairment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four studies comprising 4688 patients (58.2% female; mean age 56.9) were included. The overall pooled headache prevalence of 46.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 36.3%-56.1%; 95% prediction interval [PI]: 4.3%-91.8%; I<sup>2</sup> = 96.7%) following hemorrhagic stroke. Stratified analyses showed that the prevalence was 58.3% (95% CI: 44.4%-71.6%, I<sup>2</sup> = 97.5%) in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and 36.1% (95% CI: 26.7%-46.0%, I<sup>2</sup> = 93.9%) in those with ICH. Acute/subacute headache occurred in 55.9% (95% CI: 41.1%-70.1%; I<sup>2</sup> = 97.6%), while persistent headache occurred in 36.7% (95% CI: 25.6%-48.5%, I<sup>2</sup> = 93.1%). Severe headaches were reported in 42.7% (95% CI: 15.8%-72.1%; I<sup>2</sup> = 98.0%) of patients with acute/subacute headache and 14.3% (95% CI: 10.4%-18.7%; I<sup>2</sup> = 71.5%) with persistent headache. In both SAH and ICH, headaches frequently become chronic. No significant differences were observed by study design, geographic region, Human Development Index, or risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Headache is a common but understudied condition that can manifest at or soon after a hemorrhagic stroke and can persist for years, potentially contributing to long-term morbidity. Standardized headache definitions and longitudinal assessments are needed to improve recognition and inform future clinical trials targeting this underappreciated source of post-stroke morbidity. Further research is essential to better understand the nature of these headaches, which will help shape treatment protocols and enhance patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145660908","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lakshini Gunasekera, Shuli Cheng, Emma Foster, Shobi Sivathamboo, Terence O'Brien, Helmut Butzkueven, Jayashri Kulkarni, Elspeth Hutton
Objective: To describe the real-world safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of eptinezumab for chronic migraine prevention in Australia.
Background: Eptinezumab is a relatively new medication for treatment-resistant chronic migraine prevention. It was only introduced onto the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in August 2023, so there are limited real-world Australian data regarding its tolerability and effectiveness.
Methods: This is a single center retrospective audit of patients receiving eptinezumab for chronic migraine prevention between 1 September 2023 and 31 December 2024. Headache characteristics were compared at baseline and 3 months after eptinezumab administration. Primary outcomes were mean reductions in monthly headache days (MHD) and monthly migraine days (MMD). Secondary outcomes were mean monthly reductions in acute abortive medications, and adverse events.
Results: Of the 60 patients who received eptinezumab during the study period, a total of 54 patients with complete medical records and headache diaries were used in the statistical analysis. The majority were female (43/54, 80%) with mean age 41.7 years (SD 11.4). Three months after eptinezumab infusion, MMD reduced from 23.0 to 15.4 days (p value <0.001), and MHD reduced from 26.5 to 19.2 days (p value <0.001). Acute analgesic use decreased from 16.2 to 11.1 days (p value<0.001). The vast majority (94%, 51/54) had no immediate adverse events. Of 22 patients with 6-month post infusion data, mean MMD and MHD decreased to 11.0 (p < 0.001) and 17.8 days (p < 0.001), respectively, from baseline. Statistically significant reductions to both co-primary outcomes were achieved in those with pre-existing medication-overuse headache and those who had previously not responded to onabotulinumtoxinA, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab.
Conclusions: Our findings show that eptinezumab is a safe, well-tolerated migraine prophylactic that decreases monthly migraine and headache days in a small sample of Australian patients with treatment-resistant chronic migraine. Further prospective studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up data are needed to confirm findings of this study.
{"title":"A retrospective audit of the real-world safety and effectiveness profile of eptinezumab for treatment-resistant chronic migraine in Australia.","authors":"Lakshini Gunasekera, Shuli Cheng, Emma Foster, Shobi Sivathamboo, Terence O'Brien, Helmut Butzkueven, Jayashri Kulkarni, Elspeth Hutton","doi":"10.1111/head.70015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70015","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the real-world safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of eptinezumab for chronic migraine prevention in Australia.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Eptinezumab is a relatively new medication for treatment-resistant chronic migraine prevention. It was only introduced onto the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in August 2023, so there are limited real-world Australian data regarding its tolerability and effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single center retrospective audit of patients receiving eptinezumab for chronic migraine prevention between 1 September 2023 and 31 December 2024. Headache characteristics were compared at baseline and 3 months after eptinezumab administration. Primary outcomes were mean reductions in monthly headache days (MHD) and monthly migraine days (MMD). Secondary outcomes were mean monthly reductions in acute abortive medications, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 60 patients who received eptinezumab during the study period, a total of 54 patients with complete medical records and headache diaries were used in the statistical analysis. The majority were female (43/54, 80%) with mean age 41.7 years (SD 11.4). Three months after eptinezumab infusion, MMD reduced from 23.0 to 15.4 days (p value <0.001), and MHD reduced from 26.5 to 19.2 days (p value <0.001). Acute analgesic use decreased from 16.2 to 11.1 days (p value<0.001). The vast majority (94%, 51/54) had no immediate adverse events. Of 22 patients with 6-month post infusion data, mean MMD and MHD decreased to 11.0 (p < 0.001) and 17.8 days (p < 0.001), respectively, from baseline. Statistically significant reductions to both co-primary outcomes were achieved in those with pre-existing medication-overuse headache and those who had previously not responded to onabotulinumtoxinA, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings show that eptinezumab is a safe, well-tolerated migraine prophylactic that decreases monthly migraine and headache days in a small sample of Australian patients with treatment-resistant chronic migraine. Further prospective studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up data are needed to confirm findings of this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145660968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jennifer Robblee, Mia T Minen, Benjamin W Friedman, Miguel A Cortel-LeBlanc, Achelle Cortel-LeBlanc, Serena L Orr
<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To update the 2016 American Headache Society (AHS) guideline on parenteral pharmacologic therapies for the management of migraine attacks in the emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using the same methodology as the 2016 guideline. The original search strategy was repeated and expanded to include studies of nerve blocks and sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blocks. We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane, clinicaltrials.gov, and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform through February 10, 2025. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving adults diagnosed with migraine, treated in the ED with intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM), subcutaneous (SC), or nerve block (including SPG block) interventions. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full texts; a third reviewer resolved disagreements. Data were extracted using a standardized form and verified by a second reviewer. Risk of bias was assessed using the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) criteria. Where applicable, meta-analyses were performed. Efficacy was categorized as highly likely, likely, or possibly effective or ineffective. Clinical recommendations were developed using the AAN guideline development process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 26 new RCTs evaluating 20 injectable treatments. Of these, 12 were rated class I (low risk of bias), 9 class II, and 4 class III. Prochlorperazine IV, dexketoprofen IV, sumatriptan SC, and greater occipital nerve blocks (GONB) were considered highly likely to be effective based on multiple class I studies. Chlorpromazine IV, metoclopramide IV, eptinezumab IV, ketorolac IV, and supraorbital nerve blocks (SONB) were considered likely effective based on one class I or multiple class II studies. Hydromorphone IV, propofol IV, and paracetamol IV were considered likely ineffective based on class I or multiple class II studies. After review of the evidence and a consensus process, recommendations were made for each intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prochlorperazine IV and GONB must be offered to eligible adults presenting to the ED with a migraine attack for treatment of headache requiring parenteral therapy (level A - must offer) in those without contraindications, while hydromorphone IV must not be offered (level A - must not offer). Treatments that should be offered when appropriate (level B - should offer) include dexketoprofen IV, ketorolac IV, metoclopramide IV, sumatriptan SC, and SONB. Chlorpromazine IV, dexamethasone IV, and valproate IV may be offered (level C - may offer). Paracetamol IV may not be offered (level C - should not offer). Eptinezumab should be offered (level B) only for patients matching the clinical trial population but is rated level U - no recommendation for an ED-specific population. Additional evidence is needed
目的:更新2016年美国头痛学会(AHS)关于急诊科(ED)偏头痛发作管理的肠外药物治疗指南。方法:我们采用与2016年指南相同的方法进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。最初的搜索策略被重复并扩展到包括神经阻滞和蝶腭神经节(SPG)阻滞的研究。我们检索了截至2025年2月10日的Medline、Embase、Cochrane、clinicaltrials.gov和世界卫生组织(WHO)国际临床试验注册平台。符合条件的研究是随机对照试验(RCTs),涉及诊断为偏头痛的成年人,在ED中接受静脉注射(IV)、肌肉注射(IM)、皮下注射(SC)或神经阻滞(包括SPG阻滞)干预。两位审稿人独立筛选标题/摘要和全文;第三位审稿人解决了分歧。使用标准化表格提取数据,并由第二审稿人进行验证。偏倚风险采用美国神经病学学会(AAN)标准进行评估。在适用的情况下,进行了荟萃分析。功效分为极可能、可能、可能有效或无效。临床建议是根据AAN指南制定过程制定的。结果:搜索确定了26个新的随机对照试验,评估了20种注射治疗方法。其中,12个被评为I类(低偏倚风险),9个被评为II类,4个被评为III类。基于多项I类研究,丙氯哌嗪IV、右酮洛芬IV、舒马匹坦SC和更大枕骨神经阻滞(GONB)被认为很可能有效。氯丙嗪IV、甲氧氯普胺IV、依替单抗IV、酮罗拉酸IV和眶上神经阻滞(SONB)在一项I类或多项II类研究中被认为可能有效。基于I类或多个II类研究,氢吗啡酮IV、异丙酚IV和扑热息痛IV被认为可能无效。在对证据进行审查并达成共识后,对每项干预措施提出建议。结论:在没有禁忌症的情况下,有偏头痛发作的成年人必须给予丙氯拉嗪IV和GONB治疗,以治疗需要肠外治疗的头痛(a级必须提供),而不能给予氢吗啡酮IV (a级必须提供)。适当时应给予的治疗(B级-应给予)包括dexketoprofen IV, ketorolac IV, metoclopramide IV,舒马匹坦SC和SONB。氯丙嗪IV,地塞米松IV,丙戊酸IV可提供(C级-可提供)。对乙酰氨基酚IV不能提供(C级-不应该提供)。Eptinezumab仅适用于符合临床试验人群的患者(B级),但额定值为U级-不推荐用于ed特异性人群。咖啡因、格拉司琼、布洛芬、氯胺酮、利多卡因、生理盐水、异丙酚和SPG阻滞剂目前都被评为U级——不推荐。
{"title":"2025 guideline update to acute treatment of migraine for adults in the emergency department: The American Headache Society evidence assessment of parenteral pharmacotherapies.","authors":"Jennifer Robblee, Mia T Minen, Benjamin W Friedman, Miguel A Cortel-LeBlanc, Achelle Cortel-LeBlanc, Serena L Orr","doi":"10.1111/head.70016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70016","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To update the 2016 American Headache Society (AHS) guideline on parenteral pharmacologic therapies for the management of migraine attacks in the emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using the same methodology as the 2016 guideline. The original search strategy was repeated and expanded to include studies of nerve blocks and sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blocks. We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane, clinicaltrials.gov, and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform through February 10, 2025. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving adults diagnosed with migraine, treated in the ED with intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM), subcutaneous (SC), or nerve block (including SPG block) interventions. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full texts; a third reviewer resolved disagreements. Data were extracted using a standardized form and verified by a second reviewer. Risk of bias was assessed using the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) criteria. Where applicable, meta-analyses were performed. Efficacy was categorized as highly likely, likely, or possibly effective or ineffective. Clinical recommendations were developed using the AAN guideline development process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 26 new RCTs evaluating 20 injectable treatments. Of these, 12 were rated class I (low risk of bias), 9 class II, and 4 class III. Prochlorperazine IV, dexketoprofen IV, sumatriptan SC, and greater occipital nerve blocks (GONB) were considered highly likely to be effective based on multiple class I studies. Chlorpromazine IV, metoclopramide IV, eptinezumab IV, ketorolac IV, and supraorbital nerve blocks (SONB) were considered likely effective based on one class I or multiple class II studies. Hydromorphone IV, propofol IV, and paracetamol IV were considered likely ineffective based on class I or multiple class II studies. After review of the evidence and a consensus process, recommendations were made for each intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prochlorperazine IV and GONB must be offered to eligible adults presenting to the ED with a migraine attack for treatment of headache requiring parenteral therapy (level A - must offer) in those without contraindications, while hydromorphone IV must not be offered (level A - must not offer). Treatments that should be offered when appropriate (level B - should offer) include dexketoprofen IV, ketorolac IV, metoclopramide IV, sumatriptan SC, and SONB. Chlorpromazine IV, dexamethasone IV, and valproate IV may be offered (level C - may offer). Paracetamol IV may not be offered (level C - should not offer). Eptinezumab should be offered (level B) only for patients matching the clinical trial population but is rated level U - no recommendation for an ED-specific population. Additional evidence is needed","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145648363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Albert Muñoz-Vendrell, Sergio Campoy-Díaz, Patricia Díaz-Corta, Lidia Termens, Jaume Campdelacreu, Joan Prat, Jordi Sanahuja, Mariano Huerta-Villanueva
<p><strong>Objectives/background: </strong>Reimbursement criteria for anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) typically rely on predefined reductions in monthly migraine days (MMD). However, this approach may fail to capture the full spectrum of treatment benefits, potentially leading to premature discontinuation in patients experiencing meaningful improvements in other parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective observational cohort study of prospectively collected data from a multicenter headache unit (Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge and Hospital de Viladecans, Barcelona, Spain) between December 2019 and September 2024. We included patients with migraine who initiated anti-CGRP MAbs and who, at 6 months, would not meet institutional reimbursement criteria for response (≥50% reduction in MMD or ≥30% reduction in MMD with ≥1-point Headache Impact Test-6 improvement) but nonetheless continued treatment ("false nonresponders"). As a comparison group, we included patients who discontinued treatment within the first 6 months due to lack of efficacy ("true nonresponders"). Outcome measures included headache frequency, disability, analgesic use, and overall treatment perception, assessed via headache diaries and patient-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 415 patients initiating MAbs, 106 were classified as false nonresponders. By month 6, 91.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 84.5-96.0) demonstrated improvements in at least one assessed outcome. Some of the most frequent benefits were Migraine Disability Assessment Score improvement (60.2%, 95% CI = 49.5-70.2), Patient Global Impression of Change score ≥ 5 (54.5%, 95% CI = 44.2-64.6), Headache Impact Test-6 reduction (44.1%, 95% CI = 34.3-54.3), medication-overuse headache resolution (46.4%, 95% CI = 33.0-60.3), chronic to episodic migraine conversion (41.2%, 95% CI = 27.6-55.9), and a reduction in ≥50% of severe intensity days (29.3%, 95% CI = 19.4-41.0). Additionally, 82 patients continued treatment until 12 months, when 18.3% (95% CI = 10.6-28.4) of those eventually met reimbursement criteria, underscoring the potential for late response. In contrast, 76 patients were classified as true nonresponders for discontinuing treatment within the first 6 months; among the 38 who reached the month 6 evaluation, only 65.8% (95% CI = 48.6-80.4) demonstrated improvement in at least one parameter. Compared to false nonresponders, they had a more severe baseline profile, including higher frequency and intensity, greater disability and analgesic use, poorer quality of life, higher depression rates, and more frequent prior onabotulinumtoxinA use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A substantial proportion of patients with migraine classified as nonresponders to anti-CGRP MAbs at 6 months show measurable improvements beyond frequency reduction. These "false nonresponders" may benefit from continued treatment, highlighting the need for a
目的/背景:抗降钙素基因相关肽(CGRP)单克隆抗体(mab)的报销标准通常依赖于预先确定的每月偏头痛天数(MMD)的减少。然而,这种方法可能无法获得全部治疗益处,可能导致在其他参数有意义改善的患者过早停药。方法:这是一项回顾性观察队列研究,前瞻性收集了2019年12月至2024年9月期间来自西班牙巴塞罗那多中心头痛部门(Bellvitge大学医院和Viladecans医院)的数据。我们纳入了开始抗cgrp单克隆抗体治疗的偏头痛患者,这些患者在6个月时不符合机构对缓解的报销标准(烟雾病减少≥50%或烟雾病减少≥30%,头痛影响测试-6改善≥1点),但仍继续治疗(“假无反应”)。作为对照组,我们纳入了在前6个月内因缺乏疗效而停止治疗的患者(“真正无反应”)。结果测量包括头痛频率、残疾、止痛药使用和总体治疗感觉,通过头痛日记和患者报告的结果进行评估。结果:在415例启动单克隆抗体的患者中,106例被归类为假无反应。到第6个月,91.5%(95%置信区间[CI] = 84.5-96.0)的患者在至少一项评估结果中表现出改善。一些最常见的益处是偏头痛残疾评估评分改善(60.2%,95% CI = 49.5-70.2),患者总体变化印象评分≥5 (54.5%,95% CI = 44.2-64.6),头痛影响测试-6减少(44.1%,95% CI = 34.3-54.3),药物过度使用头痛缓解(46.4%,95% CI = 33.0-60.3),慢性偏头痛转化为发作性偏头痛(41.2%,95% CI = 27.6-55.9),以及严重强度天数减少≥50% (29.3%,95% CI = 19.4-41.0)。此外,82名患者持续治疗至12个月,其中18.3% (95% CI = 10.6-28.4)的患者最终达到了报销标准,强调了延迟反应的可能性。相比之下,76名患者在前6个月内停止治疗,被归类为真正无反应;在38名达到第6个月评估的患者中,只有65.8% (95% CI = 48.6-80.4)至少有一个参数得到改善。与假无反应者相比,他们有更严重的基线特征,包括更高的频率和强度,更大的残疾和止痛药使用,更差的生活质量,更高的抑郁率,更频繁的先前使用肉毒杆菌毒素。结论:相当大比例的偏头痛患者在6个月时对抗cgrp单克隆抗体无反应,除了频率降低外,还显示出可测量的改善。这些“假无反应”可能从持续治疗中受益,强调需要更全面的评估,包括强度、止痛药使用、残疾和生活质量,以防止过早停止潜在有效的治疗。相反,基线情况较差且早期改善有限的患者可能被适当地确定为真正的无反应,证明早期停止治疗是合理的。
{"title":"False nonresponders to anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies: A real-world analysis beyond migraine frequency reduction.","authors":"Albert Muñoz-Vendrell, Sergio Campoy-Díaz, Patricia Díaz-Corta, Lidia Termens, Jaume Campdelacreu, Joan Prat, Jordi Sanahuja, Mariano Huerta-Villanueva","doi":"10.1111/head.70012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives/background: </strong>Reimbursement criteria for anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) typically rely on predefined reductions in monthly migraine days (MMD). However, this approach may fail to capture the full spectrum of treatment benefits, potentially leading to premature discontinuation in patients experiencing meaningful improvements in other parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective observational cohort study of prospectively collected data from a multicenter headache unit (Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge and Hospital de Viladecans, Barcelona, Spain) between December 2019 and September 2024. We included patients with migraine who initiated anti-CGRP MAbs and who, at 6 months, would not meet institutional reimbursement criteria for response (≥50% reduction in MMD or ≥30% reduction in MMD with ≥1-point Headache Impact Test-6 improvement) but nonetheless continued treatment (\"false nonresponders\"). As a comparison group, we included patients who discontinued treatment within the first 6 months due to lack of efficacy (\"true nonresponders\"). Outcome measures included headache frequency, disability, analgesic use, and overall treatment perception, assessed via headache diaries and patient-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 415 patients initiating MAbs, 106 were classified as false nonresponders. By month 6, 91.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 84.5-96.0) demonstrated improvements in at least one assessed outcome. Some of the most frequent benefits were Migraine Disability Assessment Score improvement (60.2%, 95% CI = 49.5-70.2), Patient Global Impression of Change score ≥ 5 (54.5%, 95% CI = 44.2-64.6), Headache Impact Test-6 reduction (44.1%, 95% CI = 34.3-54.3), medication-overuse headache resolution (46.4%, 95% CI = 33.0-60.3), chronic to episodic migraine conversion (41.2%, 95% CI = 27.6-55.9), and a reduction in ≥50% of severe intensity days (29.3%, 95% CI = 19.4-41.0). Additionally, 82 patients continued treatment until 12 months, when 18.3% (95% CI = 10.6-28.4) of those eventually met reimbursement criteria, underscoring the potential for late response. In contrast, 76 patients were classified as true nonresponders for discontinuing treatment within the first 6 months; among the 38 who reached the month 6 evaluation, only 65.8% (95% CI = 48.6-80.4) demonstrated improvement in at least one parameter. Compared to false nonresponders, they had a more severe baseline profile, including higher frequency and intensity, greater disability and analgesic use, poorer quality of life, higher depression rates, and more frequent prior onabotulinumtoxinA use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A substantial proportion of patients with migraine classified as nonresponders to anti-CGRP MAbs at 6 months show measurable improvements beyond frequency reduction. These \"false nonresponders\" may benefit from continued treatment, highlighting the need for a ","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145632600","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Shi-Jie Zhao, Ting-Ting Wang, Qi Zhang, Simon Akerman, Dong-Yuan Cao
Background: Chronic migraine is one of the most common causes of headache, belonging to the chronic primary pain (CPP) classification, along with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS), temporomandibular disorders (TMD), and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), based on the International Classification of Diseases-11. The comorbidity between these pain disorders is commonly seen in the clinic. Stress directly and indirectly affects the pathophysiological mechanisms related to migraine and plays an important role in the co-occurrence and development of migraine, FMS, TMD, and IBS.
Methods: We systematically searched PubMed and Web of Science databases, using combined keywords: stress, migraine, comorbidity, fibromyalgia syndrome, temporomandibular disorders, irritable bowel syndrome, pathological mechanisms, animal models, and treatment strategies, while emphasizing high impact studies. Literature was screened based on relevance, scientific rigor, and evidence level, prioritizing studies on stress-related comorbidity mechanisms, models, or treatments. Exclusion criteria included single case reports, non-full-text conference abstracts, non-English articles, low-relevance studies, low-quality methodologies, and general opinions (except authoritative consensus/guidelines).
Results: Clinical and preclinical studies support that potential stress-related mechanisms underlie these comorbidities, including dysfunction of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, dysregulation of autonomic nervous system, and central sensitization. We highlight the development and application of preclinical stress-induced comorbid models as crucial tools for investigating these shared mechanisms. Stress targeted interventions have potential in managing these conditions, but mechanisms and efficacy stability remain to be clarified.
Conclusion: Stress may be a key driver of migraine and CPP comorbidities. Stress induced preclinical models support mechanism exploration, and stress-targeted therapies hold promise for improving patient prognosis. Future research should deepen mechanistic studies and optimize models/therapies to enhance clinical care.
背景:慢性偏头痛是头痛最常见的原因之一,根据国际疾病分类-11,与纤维肌痛综合征(FMS)、颞下颌紊乱(TMD)和肠易激综合征(IBS)一起属于慢性原发性疼痛(CPP)分类。这些疼痛障碍的合并症在临床上很常见。应激直接或间接影响偏头痛相关的病理生理机制,在偏头痛、FMS、TMD和IBS共发生发展中起重要作用。方法:系统检索PubMed和Web of Science数据库,结合关键词:压力、偏头痛、合并症、纤维肌痛综合征、颞下颌紊乱、肠易激综合征、病理机制、动物模型和治疗策略,同时强调高影响研究。根据相关性、科学严谨性和证据水平筛选文献,优先考虑与压力相关的合并症机制、模型或治疗方法。排除标准包括单个病例报告、非全文会议摘要、非英文文章、低相关性研究、低质量方法和一般意见(权威共识/指南除外)。结果:临床和临床前研究支持潜在的应激相关机制是这些合并症的基础,包括下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴功能障碍、自主神经系统失调和中枢致敏。我们强调临床前应激诱导共病模型的发展和应用,作为研究这些共同机制的关键工具。针对压力的干预措施在管理这些疾病方面具有潜力,但机制和疗效稳定性仍有待阐明。结论:压力可能是偏头痛和CPP合并症的关键驱动因素。应激诱导的临床前模型支持机制探索,应激靶向治疗有望改善患者预后。未来的研究应深化机制研究,优化模型/治疗方法,以提高临床护理水平。
{"title":"The role of stress in the comorbidity of migraine and other chronic primary pain.","authors":"Shi-Jie Zhao, Ting-Ting Wang, Qi Zhang, Simon Akerman, Dong-Yuan Cao","doi":"10.1111/head.70004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic migraine is one of the most common causes of headache, belonging to the chronic primary pain (CPP) classification, along with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS), temporomandibular disorders (TMD), and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), based on the International Classification of Diseases-11. The comorbidity between these pain disorders is commonly seen in the clinic. Stress directly and indirectly affects the pathophysiological mechanisms related to migraine and plays an important role in the co-occurrence and development of migraine, FMS, TMD, and IBS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed and Web of Science databases, using combined keywords: stress, migraine, comorbidity, fibromyalgia syndrome, temporomandibular disorders, irritable bowel syndrome, pathological mechanisms, animal models, and treatment strategies, while emphasizing high impact studies. Literature was screened based on relevance, scientific rigor, and evidence level, prioritizing studies on stress-related comorbidity mechanisms, models, or treatments. Exclusion criteria included single case reports, non-full-text conference abstracts, non-English articles, low-relevance studies, low-quality methodologies, and general opinions (except authoritative consensus/guidelines).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinical and preclinical studies support that potential stress-related mechanisms underlie these comorbidities, including dysfunction of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, dysregulation of autonomic nervous system, and central sensitization. We highlight the development and application of preclinical stress-induced comorbid models as crucial tools for investigating these shared mechanisms. Stress targeted interventions have potential in managing these conditions, but mechanisms and efficacy stability remain to be clarified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stress may be a key driver of migraine and CPP comorbidities. Stress induced preclinical models support mechanism exploration, and stress-targeted therapies hold promise for improving patient prognosis. Future research should deepen mechanistic studies and optimize models/therapies to enhance clinical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145632625","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Stefanie Lysk, Daniel Pach, Tatjana Tissen-Diabaté, Simon Scholler, Claudia M Witt
Objective: The objective of this secondary analysis was to examine engagement with a mobile app for migraine self-management and to identify predictors of migraine app usage.
Background: Migraine self-monitoring and behavioral strategies are central components in migraine self-management, but patient adherence often remains a challenge. Recently, migraine apps have shown promise in enabling more frequent and continuous headache tracking and supporting self-management by integrating behavioral strategies; however, data on patient engagement with these digital interventions are still scarce.
Methods: This secondary analysis of the EMMA trial used the full dataset of the intervention group, which received a migraine app for 24 weeks, and examined app engagement and factors associated with frequent app usage. Outcomes were frequency of app engagement, intensity of app engagement, and time of usage. Potential associated factors included demographics, migraine history, burden of disease, headache management self-efficacy, and first-week app use. Descriptive analyses summarized engagement patterns for the overall app, the diary, and self-management modules. Kaplan-Meier survival curves illustrated usage over time. Univariable linear regression models explored associations between patient characteristics and first-week app usage as predictors of total app usage.
Results: Of the 238 patients, 161 (67.7%) were still actively using the app after 24 weeks. Total active usage days ranged from 1 to 168, with a mean (SD) of 129.7 (52.5) days, corresponding to usage on approximately 77% of days. Among all app modules, the headache and trigger diaries had the highest usage frequencies, with means (SDs) of 110.6 (49.7) and 118.1 (60.9) days, respectively. Engagement with the behavioral self-management modules was lower overall, with faster drop-off rates. Among the behavioral self-management modules, the training module showed the highest usage, with a mean (SD) of 26.2 (33.9) documented training days. Linear regression analyses showed that older age and higher app usage during the first week were associated with more frequent app usage.
Conclusions: This secondary analysis demonstrated high engagement with the headache and trigger diary modules of a migraine app over 6 months. These findings support the potential of smartphone apps to improve adherence to headache self-monitoring. However, engagement with the behavioral self-management modules was lower than intended, highlighting the persistent challenge of promoting adherence to behavioral migraine interventions.
Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00024174.
{"title":"Engagement and predictors of use of a smartphone app for migraine self-management: A secondary analysis of the EMMA trial.","authors":"Stefanie Lysk, Daniel Pach, Tatjana Tissen-Diabaté, Simon Scholler, Claudia M Witt","doi":"10.1111/head.70009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this secondary analysis was to examine engagement with a mobile app for migraine self-management and to identify predictors of migraine app usage.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Migraine self-monitoring and behavioral strategies are central components in migraine self-management, but patient adherence often remains a challenge. Recently, migraine apps have shown promise in enabling more frequent and continuous headache tracking and supporting self-management by integrating behavioral strategies; however, data on patient engagement with these digital interventions are still scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This secondary analysis of the EMMA trial used the full dataset of the intervention group, which received a migraine app for 24 weeks, and examined app engagement and factors associated with frequent app usage. Outcomes were frequency of app engagement, intensity of app engagement, and time of usage. Potential associated factors included demographics, migraine history, burden of disease, headache management self-efficacy, and first-week app use. Descriptive analyses summarized engagement patterns for the overall app, the diary, and self-management modules. Kaplan-Meier survival curves illustrated usage over time. Univariable linear regression models explored associations between patient characteristics and first-week app usage as predictors of total app usage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 238 patients, 161 (67.7%) were still actively using the app after 24 weeks. Total active usage days ranged from 1 to 168, with a mean (SD) of 129.7 (52.5) days, corresponding to usage on approximately 77% of days. Among all app modules, the headache and trigger diaries had the highest usage frequencies, with means (SDs) of 110.6 (49.7) and 118.1 (60.9) days, respectively. Engagement with the behavioral self-management modules was lower overall, with faster drop-off rates. Among the behavioral self-management modules, the training module showed the highest usage, with a mean (SD) of 26.2 (33.9) documented training days. Linear regression analyses showed that older age and higher app usage during the first week were associated with more frequent app usage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This secondary analysis demonstrated high engagement with the headache and trigger diary modules of a migraine app over 6 months. These findings support the potential of smartphone apps to improve adherence to headache self-monitoring. However, engagement with the behavioral self-management modules was lower than intended, highlighting the persistent challenge of promoting adherence to behavioral migraine interventions.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00024174.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145603860","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jad El Ahdab, Marina Vilardo, Bradley Ong, Nicolas R Thompson, Neil Nero, Ahmet Günkan, Neil Cherian, Julia Bucklan
Background: Vestibular migraine (VM) is a common migraine subtype characterized by recurrent vestibular symptoms. Despite its prevalence, evidence-based treatment guidelines are lacking. Vestibular rehabilitation (VR) has been proven effective in many vestibular disorders, but its role in managing VM has not been well established. This systematic review aimed to summarize and pool the evidence on the effectiveness of VR for VM using standardized outcome measures, primarily focusing on patient-reported dizziness-related quality-of-life assessments.
Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus from inception to March 2025 for studies evaluating self-reported and physical outcome measures of VR in patients with VM. Meta-analysis of mean change in Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) scores was performed. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool for the randomized controlled trials and the ROBINS-I tool for observational studies.
Results: Seven studies comprising 413 patients (mean age, 45.4; 76% female) with VM treated with VR were included. The effect of vestibular rehabilitation on DHI scores showed a pooled mean difference of -29.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], -40.2 to -18.3), more than the clinically important difference of 18 points. Although, our meta-analysis had high heterogeneity (Cochran's Q p value <0.001, I2 = 94.7%).
Conclusion: VR demonstrated a reduction in DHI scores, meeting the clinically significant difference of 18 indicating clinical improvement. However, the considerable heterogeneity limits the generalizability of these results and highlights the need for further standardized randomized controlled trials with subgroup analyses to better determine the specific benefits and optimal protocols of VR in managing VM.
{"title":"The effect of vestibular rehabilitation in the management of vestibular migraine in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Jad El Ahdab, Marina Vilardo, Bradley Ong, Nicolas R Thompson, Neil Nero, Ahmet Günkan, Neil Cherian, Julia Bucklan","doi":"10.1111/head.70002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vestibular migraine (VM) is a common migraine subtype characterized by recurrent vestibular symptoms. Despite its prevalence, evidence-based treatment guidelines are lacking. Vestibular rehabilitation (VR) has been proven effective in many vestibular disorders, but its role in managing VM has not been well established. This systematic review aimed to summarize and pool the evidence on the effectiveness of VR for VM using standardized outcome measures, primarily focusing on patient-reported dizziness-related quality-of-life assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus from inception to March 2025 for studies evaluating self-reported and physical outcome measures of VR in patients with VM. Meta-analysis of mean change in Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) scores was performed. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool for the randomized controlled trials and the ROBINS-I tool for observational studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies comprising 413 patients (mean age, 45.4; 76% female) with VM treated with VR were included. The effect of vestibular rehabilitation on DHI scores showed a pooled mean difference of -29.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], -40.2 to -18.3), more than the clinically important difference of 18 points. Although, our meta-analysis had high heterogeneity (Cochran's Q p value <0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 94.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VR demonstrated a reduction in DHI scores, meeting the clinically significant difference of 18 indicating clinical improvement. However, the considerable heterogeneity limits the generalizability of these results and highlights the need for further standardized randomized controlled trials with subgroup analyses to better determine the specific benefits and optimal protocols of VR in managing VM.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145603490","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}